[Bug 208116] Review Request: oorexx - Open Object Rexx

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: oorexx - Open Object Rexx


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208116


Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |Jochen at herr-schmitt.de
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de  2006-09-26 14:21 EST -------
Good:

+ Rpmlint of source RPM ok.
+ Local build works fine.
+ Rpmlint of binaries RPK ok.
+ Source in RPM matched with upstream.
+ Local execution of a simple text script works.
+ Mock build works fine.
+ Package contains license (CPLv1) in verbatin form.

Bad:
- rpmlint of install oorexx-libs produced a lot of Warning like:
rpmlint oorexx-libs
W: oorexx-libs undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/librxsock.so.3.0.1
RexxDeregisterFunction
W: oorexx-libs undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/librxsock.so.3.0.1
RexxVariablePool
W: oorexx-libs undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/librxsock.so.3.0.1
RexxRegisterFunctionDll
W: oorexx-libs undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/librexxapi.so.3.0.1 TheNilObject
W: oorexx-libs undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/librexxapi.so.3.0.1 RexxTerminated
W: oorexx-libs undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/librexxapi.so.3.0.1
ProcessLocalActs
W: oorexx-libs undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/librexxapi.so.3.0.1
_Z12ApiRexxStartlP9_RXSTRINGPcS0_S1_lP10_RXSYSEXITPsS0_
W: oorexx-libs undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/librexxapi.so.3.0.1 dlerror
...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.