[Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108





------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com  2006-09-28 02:59 EST -------
Peter,
   you confused me. I rechecked for .so files and found that 
 rpm -ql gutenprint | grep so
/usr/lib/gutenprint/5.0.0/modules/color-traditional.so
/usr/lib/gutenprint/5.0.0/modules/print-canon.so
/usr/lib/gutenprint/5.0.0/modules/print-escp2.so
/usr/lib/gutenprint/5.0.0/modules/print-lexmark.so
/usr/lib/gutenprint/5.0.0/modules/print-olympus.so
/usr/lib/gutenprint/5.0.0/modules/print-pcl.so
/usr/lib/gutenprint/5.0.0/modules/print-ps.so
/usr/lib/gutenprint/5.0.0/modules/print-raw.so
/usr/lib/libgutenprint.so.2
/usr/lib/libgutenprint.so.2.0.0
/usr/lib/libgutenprintui.so.1
/usr/lib/libgutenprintui.so.1.0.0
/usr/lib/libgutenprintui2.so.1
/usr/lib/libgutenprintui2.so.1.0.0

AND
 rpm -ql gutenprint-devel | grep so
/usr/lib/libgutenprint.so
/usr/lib/libgutenprintui.so
/usr/lib/libgutenprintui2.so

This clearly shows that packaging for gutenpeint is corret. isn't it?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.