[Bug 208208] Review Request: MegaMek - a portable, network-enabled BattleTech engine

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: MegaMek - a portable, network-enabled BattleTech engine


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208208


overholt at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |overholt at redhat.com




------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com  2006-09-28 20:06 EST -------
I'll take this one.

A few questions:

- can we change the jar commands to not have -v flags?  Or did you want them to
have this?
- can/should any of the included zip/jars be split out into separate packages? 
I'm thinking about tinyXML here; is it developed by the MegaMek developers?
- collections.jar has the com.sun namespace but this is from GNU Classpath, right?
- this is all redistributable, right?  nist.gov and Oster<something>.com stuff?

And I know this isn't package review territory, but do we expect this to
actually work?  On my rawhide-ish (probably two or three days ago) system, it
starts up and then appears to hang.  I'll attach a screenshot.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.