[Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250





------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr  2006-09-29 04:42 EST -------
(In reply to comment #16)
> (In reply to comment #15)
> > (In reply to comment #14)
> > > The problem is to know if I have to add this BR or if this BR is missing 
in 
> > a 
> > > package from which pikloop depends.
> > 
> > piklab of course :-)
> 
> Well, configure requests the existence of -lcurses.
> in FC5, this is in ncurses, which are installed by minimal buildroot.
> However, in FC6, libcurses.so is moved to ncurses-devel.
> 
> So you have to add ncurses-devel to BuildRequires and the problem
> for rebuilding is resolved.
> 
> I have not yet reviewed this fully, however,
> * rpmlint complaints about long summary. It says that summary should
>   have no longer than 79 characters.

I really don't understand, my rpmlint don't complaints!
I'll fix...

> * Please add "ncurses-devel" to BuildRequiers (this should be no problem
>   for FC5, too).

Before doing this change, I'm waiting one hour or two for an answer to my 
question on Extras list.

> * Perhaps /etc/security/consoles.perms.d/ should be
>   /etc/security/console.perms.d/ ? (the latter is owned by pam)

Oups, you're right, it's a typo.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.