[Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2006-09-29 08:18 EST -------
(In reply to comment #20)
> (In reply to comment #19)
> >    /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/piklab/common ../doc/common
> >    - Well, this warning itself is no problem, however, the problem
> >      is that this symlink is broken.
> >      Perhaps this should point to ../common  .
> 
> No. KDE recently changed /usr/share/doc/HTML/$LANG/common 
> in /usr/share/doc/HTML/$LANG/docs/common.

Well, then what package owns /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/docs/common
_NOW_ ? I use rawhide, and the newest rawhide kdelibs-3.5.4-6.fc6
owns /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common, however, my system doesn't have
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/docs/common directory.

So my opinition is:
* If some package actually owns /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/docs/common,
  this package should require the package (I am now trying to search
  for it by yum, however for some reason I don't know yum is very
  slow for now!!)
* If no package owns the directory _NOW_, 
   /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/piklab/common should point to ../common
  as before till some package gets to own /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/docs/common.
  
> > 3. Other things I have noticed:
> >    - Well, 
> > 
> > /etc/security/console.perms.d/pickit1.perms
> > /etc/security/console.perms.d/pickit2.perms
> > 
> >      These two files are same. Acutally spec file says:
> > %{__install} -pm 644 %{SOURCE3} \
> >    %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/security/console.perms.d/pickit1.perms
> > %{__install} -pm 644 %{SOURCE3} \
> >    %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/security/console.perms.d/pickit2.perms
> > 
> No, this is an error, the second should be %{SOURCE4}

Okay. Just fix as it should be.

> 
> >    Also, while this is not documented, the files under
> >    /etc/security/console.perms.d/ seem to have the names like
> >    <number>-<specific name>.perms (like 50-default.perms).
> 
> I don't know how to choose a number.
> This configuration is taken from http://piklab.sourceforge.net/support.php
> section "for distributions using udev and PAM.

This is not documented and you don't have to add the number if
you don't want to.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.