From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 00:35:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 20:35:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230449] Review Request: hostapd - User space daemon for access point In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704010035.l310Z14b022499@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hostapd - User space daemon for access point https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230449 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-03-31 20:34 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/hostapd-FE/hostapd.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/hostapd-FE/hostapd-0.6-0.5.20070325.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Description: User space daemon for access point This new version still uses mac80211 tarball from intel because ieee80211_common.h hostapd_ioctl.h aren't avaible from the kernel-headers or kernel-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 05:03:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 01:03:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233423] Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704010503.l3153PFh026489@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233423 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-01 01:03 EST ------- Thank you!! Request for CVS admin: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-mecab Short Description: Python binding for MeCab Owners: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Branches: devel FC-6 FC-5 InitialCC: (nobody) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 05:26:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 01:26:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233424] Review Request: perl-mecab - Perl binding for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704010526.l315Qjkf027210@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-mecab - Perl binding for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233424 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-01 01:26 EST ------- Needswork: - MUSTFIX: No License, no copyright inside of the source tarball. Spec file claims to be BSD/LGPL/GPL, but their no indication inside of the sources for this claim, and their website is unreadable to me (seemingly written in Japanese). - MUSTFIX: Specfile contains: %{!?python_sitearch: ...} I fail to understand why a perl module's spec would want python_sitearch - MUSTFIX: Package doesn't acknowledge RPM_OPT_FLAGS ExtUtils::MakeMaker Makefiles don't use CXXFLAGS, they use OPTIMIZE => %{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor OPTIMIZE="${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}" - MUSTFIX: Package explictly links against -lstdc++ This is a bug in mecap-config libstdc++ is an internal implementation detail of g++ which must not be explictily used. - SHOULDFIX: %check ||: The ||: in check is an anachronism to cater ancient versions of rpm and should not be used. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 05:40:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 01:40:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233423] Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704010540.l315et8e027558@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233423 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review- ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-01 01:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Looks fine now, approved! Hmm, I don't see any applicable license, copyright not even any mention of an author. IMO, it's illegal to ship this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 05:52:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 01:52:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233423] Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704010552.l315qJ4w027797@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233423 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-01 01:52 EST ------- For license: The license is actually the same as the main part of mecab (upstream declares), and this binding is simply gerenated automatically by using swig. So there is no problem. Anyway I asked upstream to include License document explicitly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 05:52:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 01:52:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233424] Review Request: perl-mecab - Perl binding for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704010552.l315qbDv027814@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-mecab - Perl binding for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233424 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-01 01:52 EST ------- For license, see 233423 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 05:55:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 01:55:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233423] Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704010555.l315tKsD027882@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233423 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-01 01:55 EST ------- And.. please understand currently I am _very_ careful for license... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 06:12:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 02:12:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233423] Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704010612.l316C9Kw028149@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233423 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-01 02:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > For license: > > The license is actually the same as the main part of mecab > (upstream declares), and this binding is simply gerenated > automatically by using swig. So there is no problem. There are SEVEREST probles: You are packaging unlicensed, uncopyrighted sources. To formulate it into a devil's advocate argument: You are shipping unowned sources, you or upstream probably have stolen somewhere, very likely from Microsoft or SCO - Now prove this claim wrong! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 06:21:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 02:21:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233423] Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704010621.l316LGje028259@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233423 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-01 02:21 EST ------- Please don't speek in so aggressive word... You may use English as your first or second language, however, I am not and I cannot understand what you want to say by "devil's advocate argument"... for me the word seems _very_ aggressive to me and I hear it as if you are criticizing my personality..... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 06:22:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 02:22:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233782] Review Request: vegastrike - 3D OpenGL spaceflight simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704010622.l316MIwY028279@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vegastrike - 3D OpenGL spaceflight simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233782 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-01 02:22 EST ------- Yes, it seems so, could you be so kind to add that yourself (I'll fix ir eventually) and continue with the review. I think there might be more issues that need fixing and I don't want to go through a zillion iterations, I would rather have a complete list of issues and fix them all at once. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 06:31:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 02:31:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233423] Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704010631.l316VPbi028387@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233423 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-01 02:31 EST ------- Ralf, I don't see the big problem here ?? I do see a small problem though: Mamoru, I seem to have missed the fact (my bad) that you have included a modified tarbal in the SRPM, with license files added. Don't do that! Please provide a new version with the original tarbal and include a README.fedora pointing to the license docs in /usr/share/doc/mecab-0.95, those should always be present since python-mecab Requires mecab. Ralf Mamoru is very carefull about licenses AFAIK, for one of the mecab-XXXX dictionaries I reviewed he explicitly asked Spot if the license was ok. Also the main mecab is under the BSD/GPL/LGPL, and the main mecab docs refer to this package as if its an integral part (for as far as I can read japanese) , add to that the this is distributed from the same website as the main package, has the same author (which is listed in the original tarbal) , and is indeed all autogenerated with swig, and I don't see any real problem. We have more packages where the website says this is GPL, but they forgot to add any license to the tarbal, there we always request upstream to fix it and in the mean time ship it as is. So I agree that the adding off licenses by Mamoru is bad, but that doesn't amke this whole package bad. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 06:38:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 02:38:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233423] Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704010638.l316cdqT028472@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233423 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-01 02:38 EST ------- Hans, Well, I didn't modify tarball. So the tarball in srpm does not contain License documents. Currently I copy the license documents from the main part of mecab --------------------------------------------- # LICENSE for doc in COPYING BSD GPL LGPL ; do %{__install} -cpm 644 %{_datadir}/doc/mecab-%{version}/$doc . done --------------------------------------------- You prefer to simply add License.Fedora which says "license documents are included in main mecab rpm"? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 06:42:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 02:42:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233423] Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704010642.l316gaU0028540@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233423 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-01 02:42 EST ------- NOTE: It seems that my account on my university seems to have expired today.... and sadly, today is Sunday. So while I can upload a modified spec file as attached, I cannot upload the whole srpm until I have my account again fixed.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 06:52:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 02:52:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233423] Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704010652.l316qBpL028665@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233423 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-01 02:52 EST ------- p.s. (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #6) > > Looks fine now, approved! > Hmm, I don't see any applicable license, copyright not even any mention of an > author. > You didn't look very good then the README clearly states the author. (In reply to comment #14) > Hans, > > Well, I didn't modify tarball. So the tarball in srpm does > not contain License documents. Currently I copy the license > documents from the main part of mecab > --------------------------------------------- > # LICENSE > for doc in COPYING BSD GPL LGPL ; do > %{__install} -cpm 644 %{_datadir}/doc/mecab-%{version}/$doc . > done > --------------------------------------------- > Ah that explains, when I reviewed this I didn't notice. Now I understand, I was already puzzled how I could have missed a modified tarbal as I always check for that. Yes please add a License.fedora instead, thats more acurate / honest. I'm still waiting to hear from Ralf on this though, if my arguments are not enough to convince him that this package is OK license-wise, we will need to ask someone with more "powers" to make a judgement on this, for example Spot. (In reply to comment #15) > NOTE: > > It seems that my account on my university seems to have expired today.... > and sadly, today is Sunday. So while I can upload a modified > spec file as attached, I cannot upload the whole srpm until > I have my account again fixed.... Once the license issue is cleared, you can just attach the modified specfile and License.fedora . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 06:56:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 02:56:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233424] Review Request: perl-mecab - Perl binding for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704010656.l316udBJ028756@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-mecab - Perl binding for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233424 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-01 02:56 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=151372) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=151372&action=view) 0.95-3 spec file 0.95-3: Well, I cannot upload the whole srpm until I have my account on my university fixed... > Needswork: > > - MUSTFIX: No License, no copyright inside of the source tarball. See bug 233423 > - MUSTFIX: Specfile contains: %{!?python_sitearch: ...} Just because I forgot to remove this... > - MUSTFIX: Package doesn't acknowledge RPM_OPT_FLAGS Fixed > - MUSTFIX: Package explictly links against -lstdc++ > This is a bug in mecab-config Fixed in mecab-0.95-2 > - SHOULDFIX: %check ||: > The ||: in check is an anachronism to cater ancient versions of > rpm and should not be used. Well, I usually do this (because one of my computer still uses rpm-4.0.4), however I removed this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 07:58:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 03:58:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233426] Review Request: ruby-mecab - Ruby binding for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704010758.l317wOGr031425@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-mecab - Ruby binding for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233426 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-01 03:58 EST ------- MUST: ===== * rpmlint output is: * Package and spec file named appropriately * Packaged according to packaging guidelines 0 License ok, but not included! * spec file is legible and in Am. English. * Source matches upstream * Compiles and builds on devel x86_64 * BR: ok * No locales * No shared libraries * Not relocatable * Package owns / or requires all dirs * No duplicate files & Permissions * %clean & macro usage OK * Contains code only * %doc does not affect runtime, and isn't large enough to warrent a sub package * no -devel package needed * no .desktop file required Should Fix ========== * Remove the unused rubyver %define Must FIX ======== * Wait for the license issue surrounding python-mecab to be solved, and solve it the same way for ruby-mecab -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 07:59:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 03:59:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233423] Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704010759.l317x5T2031484@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233423 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-01 03:59 EST ------- Upstream replied to me that they will include license explicitly from next version 10 minutes ago. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 08:03:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 04:03:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233423] Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704010803.l3183vVs032102@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233423 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-01 04:03 EST ------- Okay, thats good! Let me guess the reply is in japanese? If you can get upstream to send you a mail in English stating that mecab-python / ruby / perl / java are under the same license as mecab itself. Then that would end all doubts surrounding the licensing and we can move forward. Once you have that mail include that mail in a License.fedora, and refer the reader to the main mecab License files in that same License.fedora document. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 08:04:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 04:04:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233426] Review Request: ruby-mecab - Ruby binding for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704010804.l31847sZ032101@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-mecab - Ruby binding for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233426 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-01 04:03 EST ------- Thank you for reply. In reply to comment #4) > Should Fix > ========== > * Remove the unused rubyver %define This is used in ---------------------------------------- Requires: ruby(abi) = %{rubyver} ---------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 08:05:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 04:05:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233426] Review Request: ruby-mecab - Ruby binding for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704010805.l3185ooa032383@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-mecab - Ruby binding for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233426 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-01 04:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Thank you for reply. > > In reply to comment #4) > > Should Fix > > ========== > > * Remove the unused rubyver %define > This is used in > ---------------------------------------- > Requires: ruby(abi) = %{rubyver} > ---------------------------------------- Oops, missed that, thats fine then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 08:20:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 04:20:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234436] Review Request: glchess - GlChess, a 3d Chess game using OpenGL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704010820.l318K0oF000882@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glchess - GlChess, a 3d Chess game using OpenGL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234436 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 09:20:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 05:20:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234563] Review Request: tecnoballz - A Breakout like game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704010920.l319KqWU002051@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tecnoballz - A Breakout like game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234563 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-01 05:20 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=151379) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=151379&action=view) PATCH: drop sgid rights ASAP As promised, and to answer you're question no. with highscores there are 2 options, which both take modfication / programming in this case: 1) Use shared highscores and drop sgid asap 2) Use per user highscores in $HOME -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 09:28:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 05:28:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234568] Review Request: perl-AutoClass - Automatically define classes and objects for Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704010928.l319SJ5m002484@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-AutoClass - Automatically define classes and objects for Perl Alias: perl-AutoClass https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234568 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-01 05:28 EST ------- picking up for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 09:28:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 05:28:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234573] Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704010928.l319Sjdk002525@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology Alias: perl-bioperl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234573 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-01 05:28 EST ------- picking up for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 09:37:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 05:37:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225066] Review Request: gedit-plugins - Collections of plugins for gedit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704010937.l319bPkX003064@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gedit-plugins - Collections of plugins for gedit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225066 ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com 2007-04-01 05:37 EST ------- I've updated the spec file to the latest version of gedit-plugins, so now it build just fine on rawhide. I also applied the patch that you submitted, and removed the old entries in the changelog, because the package has never been available for FC6. Is this ok? Both spec and srpm files are available here: ftp://open-gnss.org/pub/fedora/gedit-plugins/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 09:42:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 05:42:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229490] Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704010942.l319gcGP003426@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229490 ------- Additional Comments From maxime.carron at fedoraproject.org 2007-04-01 05:42 EST ------- Here is the srpm without any tag (%vendor, %dist, ...) in the .rpmmacros SRPM : http://carron.maxime.free.fr/fedora/rpms/pypar2-1.3-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 10:39:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 06:39:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225066] Review Request: gedit-plugins - Collections of plugins for gedit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704011039.l31AdYeP004417@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gedit-plugins - Collections of plugins for gedit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225066 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-04-01 06:39 EST ------- "Session Saver" plugin gives: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/gedit-2/plugins/sessionsaver/__init__.py", line 141, in deactivate window.get_data(self.WINDOW_DATA_KEY).deactivate() File "/usr/lib/gedit-2/plugins/sessionsaver/__init__.py", line 122, in deactivate manager = self._window.get_ui_manager() AttributeError: 'SessionSaverWindowHelper' object has no attribute '_window' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 10:43:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 06:43:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225066] Review Request: gedit-plugins - Collections of plugins for gedit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704011043.l31AhESL004486@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gedit-plugins - Collections of plugins for gedit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225066 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-04-01 06:43 EST ------- File > Saved sessions > Manage saved sessions Close button doesn't work File > Saved sessions > Save current session Save button does something, but doesn't close the dialog Restoring saved sessions creates corrupted windows. Conclusively, the Session Saver plugin seems unstable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 10:44:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 06:44:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225066] Review Request: gedit-plugins - Collections of plugins for gedit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704011044.l31AiL4R004557@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gedit-plugins - Collections of plugins for gedit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225066 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-04-01 06:44 EST ------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/gedit-2/plugins/sessionsaver/dialogs.py", line 39, in on_session_changed self.row_changed(self.on_get_path(piter), piter) TypeError: iter should be a GtkTreeIter Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/gedit-2/plugins/sessionsaver/dialogs.py", line 39, in on_session_changed self.row_changed(self.on_get_path(piter), piter) TypeError: iter should be a GtkTreeIter Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/gedit-2/plugins/sessionsaver/dialogs.py", line 150, in on_response self.plugin.sessions.save() File "/usr/lib/gedit-2/plugins/sessionsaver/store.py", line 124, in save os.path.makedirs(dirname) AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'makedirs' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 10:46:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 06:46:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225066] Review Request: gedit-plugins - Collections of plugins for gedit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704011046.l31AkYsl004629@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gedit-plugins - Collections of plugins for gedit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225066 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-04-01 06:46 EST ------- "Character Map" plugin Does it work? Unlike the colour picker, it does not show up anywhere. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 11:08:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 07:08:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225066] Review Request: gedit-plugins - Collections of plugins for gedit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704011108.l31B87eE005134@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gedit-plugins - Collections of plugins for gedit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225066 ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com 2007-04-01 07:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > "Character Map" plugin > Does it work? > Unlike the colour picker, it does not show up anywhere. It is available on the sidebar. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 11:29:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 07:29:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225066] Review Request: gedit-plugins - Collections of plugins for gedit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704011129.l31BTl7A005503@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gedit-plugins - Collections of plugins for gedit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225066 ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com 2007-04-01 07:29 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=151384) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=151384&action=view) gedit-plugins spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 11:43:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 07:43:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225066] Review Request: gedit-plugins - Collections of plugins for gedit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704011143.l31BhKjr005854@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gedit-plugins - Collections of plugins for gedit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225066 ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com 2007-04-01 07:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/lib/gedit-2/plugins/sessionsaver/dialogs.py", line 39, in > on_session_changed > self.row_changed(self.on_get_path(piter), piter) > TypeError: iter should be a GtkTreeIter > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/lib/gedit-2/plugins/sessionsaver/dialogs.py", line 39, in > on_session_changed > self.row_changed(self.on_get_path(piter), piter) > TypeError: iter should be a GtkTreeIter > > > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/lib/gedit-2/plugins/sessionsaver/dialogs.py", line 150, in on_response > self.plugin.sessions.save() > File "/usr/lib/gedit-2/plugins/sessionsaver/store.py", line 124, in save > os.path.makedirs(dirname) > AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'makedirs' > This has been fixed in the attached spec file. The bug will reported upstream once *.gnome.org gets back on line. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 13:06:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 09:06:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234749] New: Review Request: arm-linux-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at arm-linux Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234749 Summary: Review Request: arm-linux-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at arm-linux Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/arm-linux-binutils.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/arm-linux-binutils-2.17.50.0.12-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: This is a Cross Compiling version of GNU binutils, which can be used to assemble and link binaries for the arm-linux platform, instead of for the native %{_arch} platform. -- Notice to reviewers, I've removed the info / manpages and the PO files as these conflict with the native binutils. I think that this means that this package should have a "Requires: bintuils" to make sure the native binutils are always installed, especially for the PO files, I haven't done this yet as I'm not sure, but I think such a Requires should be added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 13:07:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 09:07:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234750] New: Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234750 Summary: Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/avr-binutils.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/avr-binutils-2.17.50.0.12-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: This is a Cross Compiling version of GNU binutils, which can be used to assemble and link binaries for the avr platform, instead of for the native %{_arch} platform. -- Notice to reviewers, I've removed the info / manpages and the PO files as these conflict with the native binutils. I think that this means that this package should have a "Requires: bintuils" to make sure the native binutils are always installed, especially for the PO files, I haven't done this yet as I'm not sure, but I think such a Requires should be added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 13:08:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 09:08:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234749] Review Request: arm-linux-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at arm-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704011308.l31D8qT0009444@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-linux-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at arm-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234749 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-01 09:08 EST ------- Note this package is identical to the avr-binutils package except for the %define target. For avr-binutils review see: bug 234750 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 13:09:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 09:09:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234750] Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704011309.l31D9GRh009484@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234750 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-01 09:09 EST ------- Note this package is identical to the arm-linux-binutils package except for the %define target. For avr-binutils review see: bug 234749 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 13:10:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 09:10:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234563] Review Request: tecnoballz - A Breakout like game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704011310.l31DAgoG009606@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tecnoballz - A Breakout like game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234563 ------- Additional Comments From musuruan at gmail.com 2007-04-01 09:10 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.webalice.it/musuruan/RPMS/reviews/tecnoballz.spec SRPM URL: http://www.webalice.it/musuruan/RPMS/reviews/tecnoballz-0.91-3.src.rpm Changelog - added a patch by Hans de Goede to drop setgid privileges when not needed - changed icon cache scriptles to be compliant with updated guidelines - changed vendor to fedora in desktop-file-install -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 13:19:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 09:19:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234753] New: Review Request: accerciser - An interactive Python accessibility explorer for the GNOME desktop Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234753 Summary: Review Request: accerciser - An interactive Python accessibility explorer for the GNOME desktop Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: splinux25 at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/accerciser/accerciser.spec SRPM URL: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/accerciser/accerciser-0.1.0-1.src.rpm Description: Accerciser is an interactive Python accessibility explorer for the GNOME desktop. It uses AT-SPI to inspect and control widgets, allowing you to check if an application is providing correct information to assistive technologies and automated test frameworks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 14:09:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 10:09:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234750] Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704011409.l31E9urv011246@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234750 trond.danielsen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |trond.danielsen at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 14:10:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 10:10:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234750] Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704011410.l31EAbYZ011283@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234750 ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com 2007-04-01 10:10 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=151389) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=151389&action=view) Review report -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 14:15:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 10:15:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234750] Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704011415.l31EFQUu011395@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234750 trond.danielsen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 14:16:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 10:16:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234750] Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704011416.l31EGMku011427@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234750 ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com 2007-04-01 10:16 EST ------- This looks good to me. I've gone through the entire Review Guidelines, and cannot find anything that should be a problem. I have tested building the package in mock on both rawhide-i386 and fc6-x86_64, and there were no problems. The complete review report is available in comment #2 If there are no other objections I will set the fedora-review flag to +. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 15:56:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 11:56:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233004] Review Request: xmlrpc3 - Java XML-RPC implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704011556.l31FuDv9014255@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlrpc3 - Java XML-RPC implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233004 overholt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-04-01 11:56 EST ------- This is available in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 15:56:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 11:56:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232710] Review Request: eclipse-sdk-nls - Eclipse language packs for eclipse-sdk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704011556.l31FuZxF014338@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-sdk-nls - Eclipse language packs for eclipse-sdk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232710 overholt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 15:56:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 11:56:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232725] Review Request: eclipse-mylar - A task-focused UI for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704011556.l31FuZSj014325@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-mylar - A task-focused UI for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232725 Bug 232725 depends on bug 233004, which changed state. Bug 233004 Summary: Review Request: xmlrpc3 - Java XML-RPC implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233004 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 16:08:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 12:08:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234573] Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704011608.l31G8k3Q014632@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology Alias: perl-bioperl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234573 ron at ron.dk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ron at ron.dk ------- Additional Comments From ron at ron.dk 2007-04-01 12:08 EST ------- This is really great! I'm looking forward to see bioperl in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 16:58:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 12:58:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234031] Review Request: eclipse-pydev - an Eclipse plugin for working with Python. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704011658.l31GwVOd015780@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-pydev - an Eclipse plugin for working with Python. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234031 ------- Additional Comments From tla at rasmil.dk 2007-04-01 12:58 EST ------- I did a test build of the SRPM, if failed, after installing Jython*, the the build went fine, maybe Jython should be a build requirement. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 17:42:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 13:42:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234750] Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704011742.l31HgSmk017247@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234750 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-01 13:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > This looks good to me. I've gone through the entire Review Guidelines, and > cannot find anything that should be a problem. I have tested building the > package in mock on both rawhide-i386 and fc6-x86_64, and there were no problems. > > The complete review report is available in comment #2 > > If there are no other objections I will set the fedora-review flag to +. VETO - Allow this package a couple of days for further checking. MUSTFIX without having checked details yet. * --disable-nls nls can't be enabled unless the version is identical to Fedora's. * --target-prefix Superfluous -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 17:55:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 13:55:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234750] Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704011755.l31HtBZ8017608@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234750 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-01 13:55 EST ------- I have no(In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > This looks good to me. I've gone through the entire Review Guidelines, and > > cannot find anything that should be a problem. I have tested building the > > package in mock on both rawhide-i386 and fc6-x86_64, and there were no problems. > > > > The complete review report is available in comment #2 > > > > If there are no other objections I will set the fedora-review flag to +. > > VETO - Allow this package a couple of days for further checking. > > MUSTFIX without having checked details yet. > > * --disable-nls > nls can't be enabled unless the version is identical to Fedora's. > Actually currently the version is identical to Fedora's (for Fedora 7), but can you explain this a bit more, what is nls, and what do we loose by disabling it? Also why must the version be identical to Fedora in order to be able to enable this? > * --target-prefix > Superfluous > Nope, I thought so too, but %configure does something which makes this necessary (probably passing -bindir). Last remark to both you and Trond, what do you think about my initial question: --- Notice to reviewers, I've removed the info / manpages and the PO files as these conflict with the native binutils. I think that this means that this package should have a "Requires: bintuils" to make sure the native binutils are always installed, especially for the PO files, I haven't done this yet as I'm not sure, but I think such a Requires should be added. --- So should this require the native binutils for the PO files (which are btw an other reason to try and keep the native and our version in sync.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 18:02:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 14:02:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234750] Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704011802.l31I22xm017815@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234750 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-01 14:02 EST ------- Further remarks: * The upstream for binutils sources is ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/binutils/ http://www.gnu.org/software/binutils/ You are packaging H.J.Lu's linux fork of the linux-binutils. IMO, you are badly advised to package them for non-linux targets. * BuildRequires: libtools Superfluous. * BuildRequires: flex and bison Likely to be superfluous - Nominally, building binutils does NOT requires them, except that there exist some broken versions of binutils which (due to bugs) do. I haven't checked what applies to this version. * This is not correct: .. %{name} does not include any documentation (info / manpages) because these would conflict with the native binutils. Please see the docs for the native binutils, so instead of "man %{target}-as" use "man as". For additional docs also see: %{_docdir}/binutils-%{version} .. You can ship all section 1 man-pages, they do not conflict. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 18:07:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 14:07:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234750] Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704011807.l31I7h00017992@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234750 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-01 14:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > I have no(In reply to comment #4) > > (In reply to comment #3) > > > * --disable-nls > > nls can't be enabled unless the version is identical to Fedora's. > > > > Actually currently the version is identical to Fedora's (for Fedora 7), > but can you explain this a bit more, what is nls, and what do we loose by > disabling it? This is a random match - IMO, actually a fault, because you are using the wrong binutils-sources for this target. > Also why must the version be identical to Fedora in order to be able to > enable this? At run-time gettext applies "sprintf-format string" lookups. At the very moment the format strings inside of an application will mismatch with that of the installed locale/ files (e.g. because format strings have been added/removed), you'll be facing address violations / memory leaks. These typically show as sporatic/hardly reproducable run-time errors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 18:15:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 14:15:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234750] Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704011815.l31IFBOm018267@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234750 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-01 14:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Further remarks: > > * The upstream for binutils sources is > ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/binutils/ > http://www.gnu.org/software/binutils/ > > You are packaging H.J.Lu's linux fork of the linux-binutils. IMO, you are badly > advised to package them for non-linux targets. > Ok, this is what Fedora uses as a base so i started there, but I believe you, so I will use the official 2.17 for the next iteration. I will also add the advised --disable-nls configure flag. Side note, what is wise for arm-linux, the Fedora version or the GNU one? > * This is not correct: > .. > %{name} does not include any documentation (info / manpages) because these > would conflict with the native binutils. Please see the docs for the native > binutils, so instead of "man %{target}-as" use "man as". For additional docs > also see: %{_docdir}/binutils-%{version} > .. > > You can ship all section 1 man-pages, they do not conflict. > True, I will fix this. Open questions: 1 If we use a different version as native, then some translated strings may be changed, leading to them not being translated. I guess the differences are small, so that we can live with this, but I would like to hear what others think. 2 In order for translations to work at all (and to have the info pages) the native binutils must be installed, so I'm tending towarda adding "Requires: binutils" to the specfile, but again I would like to hear what others think. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 18:19:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 14:19:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234750] Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704011819.l31IJ3LH018376@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234750 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-01 14:19 EST ------- In reply to comment #5) > > * --target-prefix > > Superfluous > > > > Nope, I thought so too, but %configure does something which makes > this necessary (probably passing -bindir). ATM, I am short on time, so just a short note without having tried to check details: You observation probably is the result of one of two bugs in rpm: - redhat-rpm-config kills config.sub/config.guess and replaces them with ancient versions. This is inappropriate for binutils, gcc etc. because they ship with much newer versions, esp. for those targettting embedded systems, which often ship customized versions. - %configure overrides --host, --build ... This is wrong for cross-compilation. The work-around to both issues is not to use %configure, but to directly use configure with all "--*dir" options explicitly passed directly [adding jwilson, because this bug is one of those I repeatedly had complained about] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 18:28:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 14:28:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234445] Review Request: mod_auth_shadow - An Apache module for authentication using /etc/shadow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704011828.l31IShb7018687@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_auth_shadow - An Apache module for authentication using /etc/shadow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234445 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-04-01 14:28 EST ------- Good: + Tar ball matches with upstream. + License ok. Bad: - Package contains no verbatin text of the license (Please contact upstream to include it in the next release) - Debuginfo package contains no sources. Please increase release number when upload a new release of your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 18:44:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 14:44:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234368] Review Request: gnome-games-extra-data - themes for gnome-games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704011844.l31Iirxh019133@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-games-extra-data - themes for gnome-games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234368 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-04-01 14:44 EST ------- Good: + Naming ok. + Tar ball metaches with upstream. + rpmlint quite on source package. + Local build works fine. + Rpmlint quite on binary package. + Local install and uninstall works fine. + License ok. + Package contains verbatin copy of the license text. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 18:46:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 14:46:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234750] Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704011846.l31IkP0G019180@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234750 ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at fedoraproject.org 2007-04-01 14:46 EST ------- First of all: Sorry for my initial and to early report. Thanks to Ralf for finding all the errors that I missed. (In reply to comment #8) > Open questions: > 1 If we use a different version as native, then some translated strings may be > changed, leading to them not being translated. I guess the differences are > small, so that we can live with this, but I would like to hear what others > think. As Ralf mentioned, this might lead to sporadic errors at run-time, which is something that should be avoided. The gain in the added translation does not justify this potential problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 19:09:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 15:09:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234721] Review Request: sakura - A terminal emulator based on GTK+ and VTE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704011909.l31J9uxM019818@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sakura - A terminal emulator based on GTK+ and VTE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234721 ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at fedoraproject.org 2007-04-01 15:09 EST ------- Two small issues: [trondd at localhost ~]$ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/sakura-* E: sakura non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/pixmaps/terminal-tango.png 0555 E: sakura non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/sakura 0555 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 19:13:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 15:13:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234750] Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704011913.l31JDLi4019893@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234750 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-01 15:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > First of all: Sorry for my initial and to early report. Thanks to Ralf for > finding all the errors that I missed. > > (In reply to comment #8) > > Open questions: > > 1 If we use a different version as native, then some translated strings may be > > changed, leading to them not being translated. I guess the differences are > > small, so that we can live with this, but I would like to hear what others > > think. > > As Ralf mentioned, this might lead to sporadic errors at run-time, which is > something that should be avoided. The gain in the added translation does not > justify this potential problem. Ah I see now, /me stupid, --disable-nls disables the use of translations, yes thats an excellent solution, thanks Ralf! Working on a new version now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 19:48:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 15:48:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234563] Review Request: tecnoballz - A Breakout like game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704011948.l31JmEXX021444@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tecnoballz - A Breakout like game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234563 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-01 15:48 EST ------- Erm, you messed up the %postun script (you lost the "touch"), once thats fixed I'm ready to approve this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 19:56:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 15:56:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234750] Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704011956.l31Juvgb021828@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234750 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-01 15:56 EST ------- okay, I've made a new version with the following changes: * Sun Apr 1 2007 Hans de Goede 2.17-1 - Revert to GNU 2.17 release as using GNU releases are better for non linux targets - Add --disable-nls, to disable translations, so that we don't use the native PO files, as using the PO files of the (different version) native binutils, can lead to all kinda problems when translating formatstrings. - Don't use %%configure but DIY, to avoid unwanted side effects of %%configure Go get it here: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/avr-binutils.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/avr-binutils-2.17-1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 20:06:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 16:06:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234563] Review Request: tecnoballz - A Breakout like game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704012006.l31K6sBx022186@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tecnoballz - A Breakout like game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234563 ------- Additional Comments From musuruan at gmail.com 2007-04-01 16:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Erm, you messed up the %postun script (you lost the "touch"), once thats fixed > I'm ready to approve this. Sorry for that. Spec URL: http://www.webalice.it/musuruan/RPMS/reviews/tecnoballz.spec SRPM URL: http://www.webalice.it/musuruan/RPMS/reviews/tecnoballz-0.91-4.src.rpm Changelog: - corrected silly error in the %%postun script -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 20:13:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 16:13:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234031] Review Request: eclipse-pydev - an Eclipse plugin for working with Python. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704012013.l31KDlhP022409@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-pydev - an Eclipse plugin for working with Python. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234031 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-04-01 16:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > I did a test build of the SRPM, if failed, after installing Jython*, the the > build went fine, maybe Jython should be a build requirement. You're correct. Igor, can we add jython as a BR? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 20:54:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 16:54:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225691] Merge Review: dhcp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704012054.l31KsWJe023388@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: dhcp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225691 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From dcantrell at redhat.com 2007-04-01 16:54 EST ------- The last big change I wanted to make to the dhcp package was to reorganize the patches by feature/bugfix. I've done that. Each patch is documented in the %prep section as to what it changes. I plan to work on getting as many of these upstream as possible, but releases of ISC dhcp are so infrequent, that it may prove pointless. The previous package maintainer had notes of sending patches upstream that were even accepted, but haven't shown up in a release...and that's 2 years later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 21:19:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 17:19:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225797] Merge Review: gimp-data-extras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704012119.l31LJCv1024032@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gimp-data-extras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225797 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 22:06:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 18:06:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175623] Review Request: yaz - Z39.50/SRW/SRU programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704012206.l31M6NZp025463@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yaz - Z39.50/SRW/SRU programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175623 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium mricon at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mricon at gmail.com 2007-04-01 18:06 EST ------- Please create EPEL branches: Branches: EL-4, EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 22:07:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 18:07:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229533] Review Request: perl-Template-GD - GD plugin(s) for the Template Toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704012207.l31M7j3p025503@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Template-GD - GD plugin(s) for the Template Toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229533 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-01 18:07 EST ------- New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Template-GD-2.66-2.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Template-GD.spec Fixes the above issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 22:13:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 18:13:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232434] Review Request: FileZilla 3 - fast FTP and SFTP client with a lot of features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704012213.l31MDo99025639@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FileZilla 3 - fast FTP and SFTP client with a lot of features https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232434 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-04-01 18:13 EST ------- SRPMS: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/7/testing/filezilla/filezilla-3.0.0-0.1.beta7.kwizart.fc7.src.rpm SPEC: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/7/testing/filezilla/filezilla.spec Summary: FTP client and server with lots of useful features and an intuitive interface mock build are in the same directory Same TODO list apply from above... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 23:02:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 19:02:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225693] Merge Review: dialog In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704012302.l31N2arc026904@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: dialog https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225693 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium dickey at radix.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dickey at radix.net ------- Additional Comments From dickey at radix.net 2007-04-01 19:02 EST ------- dialog-1.0-20060221 is the upstream version. "the header files include a lot of ./configure conditionals." yes - they depend on dlg_config.h which is part of the package. During install, the symbols are prefixed to avoid collision with other packages. Some are not needed for applications linking to libdialog, but were used to configure and build the library. All of the header conditionals are required for portability. If you disagree, file a suitable bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 23:03:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 19:03:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234784] New: Review Request: perl-Email-Date - Find and format date headers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234784 Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Date - Find and format date headers Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Email-Date.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Email-Date-1.102-1.src.rpm Description: RFC 2822 defines the "Date:" header. It declares the header a required part of an email message. The syntax for date headers is clearly laid out. Stil, even a perfectly planned world has storms. The truth is, many programs get it wrong. Very wrong. Or, they don't include a "Date:" header at all. This often forces you to look elsewhere for the date, and hoping to find something. For this reason, the tedious process of looking for a valid date has been encapsulated in this software. Further, the process of creating RFC compliant date strings is also found in this software. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 23:04:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 19:04:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228298] Review Request: python-louie - Dispatches signals between Python objects in a wide variety of contexts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704012304.l31N4VLg026967@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-louie - Dispatches signals between Python objects in a wide variety of contexts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228298 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-04-01 19:04 EST ------- that right but, the fact is that you have a doc file mentioned the kind of license that the package own and other one which point a external location to get the license text. So, it's not forbbiden to add as sourcex the license text and mention why. some pakckages has been already accepted like that in waitting upstream add it in the next release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 23:05:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 19:05:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234785] New: Review Request: perl-Email-Simple-Creator - Email::Simple constructor for starting anew Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234785 Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Simple-Creator - Email::Simple constructor for starting anew Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Email-Simple-Creator.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Email-Simple-Creator-1.420-1.src.rpm Description: This software provides a constructor to Email::Simple for creating messages from scratch. Note: BuildRequires: perl-Email-Date (bugzilla 234784) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 23:06:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 19:06:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234785] Review Request: perl-Email-Simple-Creator - Email::Simple constructor for starting anew In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704012306.l31N6SIV027015@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Simple-Creator - Email::Simple constructor for starting anew https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234785 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |234784 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 23:06:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 19:06:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234784] Review Request: perl-Email-Date - Find and format date headers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704012306.l31N6TsR027023@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Date - Find and format date headers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234784 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |234785 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 23:10:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 19:10:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234786] New: Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Creator - Email::MIME constructor for starting anew Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234786 Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Creator - Email::MIME constructor for starting anew Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Email-MIME-Creator.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Email-MIME-Creator-1.452-1.src.rpm Description: This module provides an Email::MIME constructor. Note: BuildRequires: perl-Email-Simple-Creator (234785) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 23:10:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 19:10:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234785] Review Request: perl-Email-Simple-Creator - Email::Simple constructor for starting anew In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704012310.l31NAhLD027167@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Simple-Creator - Email::Simple constructor for starting anew https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234785 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |234786 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 23:10:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 19:10:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234786] Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Creator - Email::MIME constructor for starting anew In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704012310.l31NAhjp027159@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Creator - Email::MIME constructor for starting anew https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234786 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |234785 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 23:12:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 19:12:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234787] New: Review Request: perl-Email-Reply - Reply to an email message Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234787 Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Reply - Reply to an email message Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Email-Reply.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Email-Reply-1.201-1.src.rpm Description: This package provides a simple way to reply to email messages. Note: BuildRequires: perl-Email-MIME-Creator (234786) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 23:12:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 19:12:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234787] Review Request: perl-Email-Reply - Reply to an email message In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704012312.l31NCj9i027219@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Reply - Reply to an email message https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234787 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |234786 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 23:12:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 19:12:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234786] Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Creator - Email::MIME constructor for starting anew In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704012312.l31NCuhp027229@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Creator - Email::MIME constructor for starting anew https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234786 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |234787 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 23:14:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 19:14:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234788] New: Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Attachment-Stripper - Strip the attachments from a mail message Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234788 Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Attachment-Stripper - Strip the attachments from a mail message Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Email-MIME-Attachment-Stripper.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Email-MIME-Attachment-Stripper-1.313-1.src.rpm Description: Given a Email::MIME object, detach all attachments from the message. These are then available separately. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 23:18:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 19:18:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234789] New: Review Request: perl-Return-Value - Polymorphic Return Values Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234789 Summary: Review Request: perl-Return-Value - Polymorphic Return Values Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Return-Value.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Return-Value-1.302-1.src.rpm Description: This module provides polymorphic return values with a simple API that should get you what you're looking for in each context a return value is used in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 23:21:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 19:21:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234790] New: Review Request: perl-Email-Abstract - Unified interface to mail representations Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234790 Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Abstract - Unified interface to mail representations Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Email-Abstract.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Email-Abstract-2.132-1.src.rpm Description: "Email::Abstract" provides module writers with the ability to write representation-independent mail handling code. For instance, in the cases of "Mail::Thread" or "Mail::ListDetector", a key part of the code involves reading the headers from a mail object. Where previously one would either have to specify the mail class required, or to build a new object from scratch, "Email::Abstract" can be used to perform certain simple operations on an object regardless of its underlying representation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 23:22:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 19:22:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234790] Review Request: perl-Email-Abstract - Unified interface to mail representations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704012322.l31NMf2C027531@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Abstract - Unified interface to mail representations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234790 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |234784 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 23:22:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 19:22:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234784] Review Request: perl-Email-Date - Find and format date headers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704012322.l31NMeU4027523@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Date - Find and format date headers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234784 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |234790 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 23:23:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 19:23:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234787] Review Request: perl-Email-Reply - Reply to an email message In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704012323.l31NNI8B027577@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Reply - Reply to an email message https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234787 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |234790 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 23:23:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 19:23:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234790] Review Request: perl-Email-Abstract - Unified interface to mail representations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704012323.l31NNSuf027588@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Abstract - Unified interface to mail representations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234790 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |234787 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 23:24:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 19:24:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234787] Review Request: perl-Email-Reply - Reply to an email message In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704012324.l31NO726027612@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Reply - Reply to an email message https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234787 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-01 19:24 EST ------- ...and BR: perl-Email-Abstract (234790) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 23:26:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 19:26:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234791] New: Review Request: perl-Email-Send - Module for sending email Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234791 Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Send - Module for sending email Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Email-Send.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Email-Send-2.185-1.src.rpm Description: This module provides a very simple, very clean, very specific interface to multiple Email mailers. The goal of this software is to be small and simple, easy to use, and easy to extend. Note: BuildRequires: perl-Email-Abstract (234790), perl-Return-Value (234789) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 23:27:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 19:27:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234789] Review Request: perl-Return-Value - Polymorphic Return Values In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704012327.l31NRNHC027688@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Return-Value - Polymorphic Return Values https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234789 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |234791 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 23:27:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 19:27:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234791] Review Request: perl-Email-Send - Module for sending email In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704012327.l31NRMf6027680@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Send - Module for sending email https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234791 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |234789, 234790 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 1 23:27:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 19:27:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234790] Review Request: perl-Email-Abstract - Unified interface to mail representations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704012327.l31NRXJX027698@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Abstract - Unified interface to mail representations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234790 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |234791 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 00:53:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 20:53:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226135] Merge Review: memtest86+ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704020053.l320rKPU029239@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: memtest86+ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226135 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-04-01 20:53 EST ------- No. Merge Review is only a qualify improvement sweep. You can install memtest86+ after install, or you can use it from the initial menu when booting the installer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 00:59:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 20:59:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 212974] Review Request: aspell-ar - Word list/dictionaries for Arabic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704020059.l320xYPg029744@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-ar - Word list/dictionaries for Arabic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212974 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 01:01:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 21:01:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228299] Review Request: python-metar - Coded METAR weather reports parser for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704020101.l3211GUQ029922@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-metar - Coded METAR weather reports parser for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228299 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 01:06:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 21:06:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232342] Review Request: mcs - A configuration file abstraction library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704020106.l32166Xr030181@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mcs - A configuration file abstraction library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232342 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 01:09:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 21:09:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233423] Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704020109.l32195GQ030252@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233423 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs?, fedora-review- |fedora-cvs+, fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 01:09:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 21:09:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233695] Review Request: Pyclutter - Python modules that allow you to use the Clutter toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704020109.l3219VOB030308@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Pyclutter - Python modules that allow you to use the Clutter toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233695 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 01:10:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 21:10:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234121] Review Request: PyOpenGL - Python bindings for OpenGL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704020110.l321Axrf030455@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyOpenGL - Python bindings for OpenGL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234121 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 01:17:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 21:17:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234122] Review Request: pygtkglext - Python bindings for GtkGLExt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704020117.l321HvH3030761@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pygtkglext - Python bindings for GtkGLExt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234122 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 01:19:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 21:19:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234484] Review Request: dtc - device tree compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704020119.l321JqBD030839@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dtc - device tree compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234484 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 02:43:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 22:43:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233695] Review Request: Pyclutter - Python modules that allow you to use the Clutter toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704020243.l322hac5001300@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Pyclutter - Python modules that allow you to use the Clutter toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233695 allisson at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From allisson at gmail.com 2007-04-01 22:43 EST ------- Build ok: http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/30870-pyclutter-0.2.0-5.fc7/ http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-6-extras/30871-pyclutter-0.2.0-5.fc6/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 03:21:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 23:21:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234031] Review Request: eclipse-pydev - an Eclipse plugin for working with Python. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704020321.l323Lopk003352@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-pydev - an Eclipse plugin for working with Python. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234031 ------- Additional Comments From ifoox at redhat.com 2007-04-01 23:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Now that we've got Mylar in Fedora, it'd be great to package up the Pydev Mylar > integration. I just noticed that it had this here: > > http://pydev.sourceforge.net/ Agreed, this will be a good next step. But it should be separately packaged, like they do it upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 03:36:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 23:36:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234031] Review Request: eclipse-pydev - an Eclipse plugin for working with Python. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704020336.l323aZtd003829@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-pydev - an Eclipse plugin for working with Python. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234031 ------- Additional Comments From ifoox at redhat.com 2007-04-01 23:36 EST ------- New files: (people.redhat.com doesn't seem to respond right now, so I'm uploading these files elsewhere and will move them together with the other ones once it's back) http://www.igorfoox.com/misc/fedora/eclipse-pydev-1.3.1-2.src.rpm http://www.igorfoox.com/misc/fedora/eclipse-pydev.spec (In reply to comment #6) > Lines beginning with an X need to be fixed. They're all minor - thanks! :) > > MUST: > * package is named appropriately > * it is legal for Fedora to distribute this > * license field matches the actual license. > * license is open source-compatible. > - I really wish they packed the license text in their VCS. Can you please > ask them to do so? I won't hold up the review on it but it would be great > if it was more prominent than just in their "new in 0.9.8.4" section of > their website. I will ask them to include the license. > * specfile name matches %{name} > X verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do) > - I can't duplicate the md5sum of the tarball, but the contents match except > for some timestamps of the generation time > - can we get some comments for the patches? they could also be re-numbered > if you feel like it :) Done. > - should we file the references to 0.9.7.1 issue upstream? I've brought this up before, this seems to be their preferred way of doing things, strange as it is. > * summary and description fine > X correct buildroot > - should be: > %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) Done. > ? %{?dist} isn't used ... should it be? I see no reason why it shouldn't be. Done. > X license text included in package and marked with %doc > - upstream doesn't include license text outside of feature.xml and I don't > want to mark that as %doc; we're okay here > * package meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) > * rpmlint on SRPM (see earlier bug comments) > * changelog format fine > * Packager tag not used > * Vendor tag not used > * Distribution tag not used > * License used and not Copyright > * Summary tag does not end in a period > * if possible, replace PreReq with Requires(pre) and/or Requires(post) > X specfile is legible > - there is an extraneous '#' in the comment about how to generate the tarball > - the instructions for generating the tarball should have an updated VCS tag > (I know it says "substitute the correct version number" but get rid of that > comment and fix the actual tag) > - speaking of the tarball-generating instructions, can we clean them up a > bit? Let's drop the "following the Eclipse Releng process" bit Simplified the whole comment and put the appropriate tag. > - remove pkg_summary and eclipse_name and just type them in directly Done. > * package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86 > X BuildRequires are proper > - why don't we just have BR: eclipse-pde? You're right, that would be better. Done. > X make sure lines are <= 80 characters > - can we split the commons-codec symlinking line? > - also, the lines with symlinking in %install are too long I've split them up, although some are still slightly over 80 chars. > * specfile written in American English > * no -doc sub-package necessary > * no libraries > * no rpath > * no config files > * not a GUI app > * no -devel sub-package necessary > * macros used appropriately and consistently > * no %makeinstall > * install section must begin with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot} > * no locale data > * no cp usage so no need to worry about -p > * split Requires(pre,post) into two separate lines > * package not relocatable > * package contains code > * package owns all directories and files > * no %files duplicates > * file permissions fine > ? %defattrs present > - should there be another '-' after the 'root,root'? I'm not sure, some other specs I've looked at have four components, some have 3. So I've added it, since it seems that's what most do. > * %clean present > * %doc files do not affect runtime > * not a web app > * verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs > $ rpm -q --requires -p eclipse-pydev-1.3.1-1.i386.rpm > /usr/bin/rebuild-gcj-db > /usr/bin/rebuild-gcj-db > commons-codec >= 1.3 > eclipse-platform > java-1.5.0-gcj >= 1.5.0 > java-1.5.0-gcj >= 1.5.0 > junit >= 3.8.1 > jython >= 2.2 > libc.so.6 > libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) > libdl.so.2 > libgcc_s.so.1 > libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) > libgcj_bc.so.1 > libm.so.6 > libpthread.so.0 > librt.so.1 > libz.so.1 > python > rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 > rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 > rtld(GNU_HASH) > > $ rpm -q --provides -p eclipse-pydev-1.3.1-1.i386.rpm > ast.jar.so > core.jar.so > parser.jar.so > pydev-debug.jar.so > pydev-jython.jar.so > pydev.jar.so > refactoring.jar.so > eclipse-pydev = 1:1.3.1-1 > > * run rpmlint on the binary RPMs > - see previous bug comments > > SHOULD: > X package should include license text in the package and mark it with %doc > * package should build on i386 > ? package should build in mock > - I haven't tried, but I don't think it'll be a problem (In reply to comment #7) > I did a test build of the SRPM, if failed, after installing Jython*, the the > build went fine, maybe Jython should be a build requirement. You're right, added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 03:49:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 23:49:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234568] Review Request: perl-AutoClass - Automatically define classes and objects for Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704020349.l323nofp004164@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-AutoClass - Automatically define classes and objects for Perl Alias: perl-AutoClass https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234568 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-01 23:49 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 5f04fa29d6cd01b4d1b707ed79edb8e6 autoclass_v1_01.tgz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/AutoArgsTest.........ok t/AutoClassTest........Subroutine testPackage6::first redefined at (eval 29) line 4. Subroutine testPackage6::last redefined at (eval 30) line 4. Subroutine testPackage6::friends redefined at (eval 31) line 4. Subroutine testPackage6::sex redefined at (eval 32) line 4. Subroutine testPackage6::has_default redefined at (eval 33) line 4. Subroutine testPackage6::gender redefined at (eval 34) line 2. Subroutine testPackage6::FIRST redefined at (eval 35) line 1. Subroutine testPackage6::LAST redefined at (eval 36) line 1. Subroutine testPackage6::FRIENDS redefined at (eval 37) line 1. Subroutine testPackage6::SEX redefined at (eval 38) line 1. Subroutine testPackage6::HAS_DEFAULT redefined at (eval 39) line 1. ok t/classvarTest.........ok t/defaultTest..........# Tests for handling of defaults with synonyms. Parent only # Tests for handling of defaults with synonyms. Parent and Child ok t/nullify..............ok t/override.............ok t/RootTest.............ok t/synonym..............ok t/testCase.............# test setting attributes from defaults # test setting attributes from arguments ok t/testInconsistent.....ok t/testNoAutoClass......ok t/testNoUseParent......ok t/testSynonyms2........ok t/testUseOutOfOrder....ok All tests successful. Files=14, Tests=362, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.88 cusr + 0.17 csys = 1.05 CPU) + Provides: perl(Class::AutoClass) = 1.0 perl(Class::AutoClass::Args) perl(Class::AutoClass::Root) = 1.0 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 05:06:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 01:06:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234789] Review Request: perl-Return-Value - Polymorphic Return Values In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704020506.l3256eIT007414@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Return-Value - Polymorphic Return Values https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234789 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-02 01:06 EST ------- Two minor issues: 1. # rpmbuild ... ... + /usr/bin/perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor WARNING: LICENSE is not a known parameter. ... => This is a minor bug inside of Makefile.PL Removing the line containing "LICENSE" would remove this warning. 2. ... t/perl-critic.....skipped all skipped: define PERL_TEST_CRITIC to run these tests ... I'd recommend to change make test into make test PERL_TEST_CRITIC=1 and to BR: perl(Test::Perl::Critic) Nevertheless, I am approving this package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 05:15:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 01:15:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234563] Review Request: tecnoballz - A Breakout like game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704020515.l325FLHT008235@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tecnoballz - A Breakout like game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234563 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-02 01:15 EST ------- MUST: ===== * rpmlint output is: E: tecnoballz non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/tecnoballz 02755 This is "normal" for this package and can be ignored * Package and spec file named appropriately * Packaged according to packaging guidelines * License ok * spec file is legible and in Am. English. * Source matches upstream * Compiles and builds on devel x86_64 * BR: ok * No locales * No shared libraries * Not relocatable * Package owns / or requires all dirs 0 No duplicate files & Permissions * %clean & macro usage OK * Contains code and permissable content * %doc does not affect runtime, and isn't large enough to warrent a sub package * no -devel package needed * .desktop file as required and properly installed Approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 05:26:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 01:26:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233423] Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704020526.l325QJx8009413@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233423 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wtogami at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-02 01:26 EST ------- Warren, What does the setting of fedora-review to + by you mean, does that mean that you are happy with the given license explanation and the package as reviewed initially can be imported? or ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 05:33:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 01:33:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234788] Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Attachment-Stripper - Strip the attachments from a mail message In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704020533.l325XfxO009856@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Attachment-Stripper - Strip the attachments from a mail message https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234788 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-02 01:33 EST ------- Same issue as with perl-Return-Value + /usr/bin/perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor WARNING: LICENSE is not a known parameter. => Minor bug inside of Makefile.PL Removing the line containing "LICENSE" would remove this warning. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 06:10:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 02:10:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234788] Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Attachment-Stripper - Strip the attachments from a mail message In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704020610.l326A8KE010896@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Attachment-Stripper - Strip the attachments from a mail message https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234788 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-02 02:10 EST ------- Ralf, sorry but is above Review comment OK for perl packages review? Though its not clear about what should be included in Review, I will also be happy with one word review APPROVED for perl packages :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 06:12:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 02:12:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234790] Review Request: perl-Email-Abstract - Unified interface to mail representations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704020612.l326CNKh010991@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Abstract - Unified interface to mail representations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234790 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-02 02:12 EST ------- NEEDSWORK: + /usr/bin/perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor WARNING: LICENSE is not a known parameter. Checking if your kit is complete... Looks good Warning: prerequisite Module::Pluggable 1.5 not found. 'LICENSE' is not a known MakeMaker parameter name. Writing Makefile for Email::Abstract ... PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/abs-object......NOK 1 # Failed test 'use Email::Abstract;' # in t/abs-object.t at line 15. # Tried to use 'Email::Abstract'. # Error: Can't locate Module/Pluggable.pm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 06:18:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 02:18:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234569] Review Request: perl-AcePerl - Perl module for interfacing with ACE bioinformatics databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704020618.l326I12H011202@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-AcePerl - Perl module for interfacing with ACE bioinformatics databases Alias: perl-AcePerl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234569 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-02 02:17 EST ------- The only working URL I got is http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/Ace/AcePerl-1.91.tar.gz Can you please update that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 06:19:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 02:19:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234569] Review Request: perl-AcePerl - Perl module for interfacing with ACE bioinformatics databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704020619.l326JdU9011247@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-AcePerl - Perl module for interfacing with ACE bioinformatics databases Alias: perl-AcePerl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234569 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-02 02:19 EST ------- Not getting whats missing that made make test to fail PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/basic.......Waiting for remote acedb regression database to start up. This may take a few minutes. Couldn't establish connection to database. Aborting tests. dubious Test returned status 22 (wstat 5632, 0x1600) DIED. FAILED tests 2-10 Failed 9/10 tests, 10.00% okay t/object......Couldn't establish connection to database. Aborting tests. dubious Test returned status 22 (wstat 5632, 0x1600) DIED. FAILED tests 2-36 Failed 35/36 tests, 2.78% okay t/sequence....Couldn't establish connection to database. Aborting tests. dubious Test returned status 22 (wstat 5632, 0x1600) DIED. FAILED tests 2-54 Failed 53/54 tests, 1.85% okay t/update......Couldn't establish connection to database. Aborting tests. dubious Test returned status 22 (wstat 5632, 0x1600) DIED. FAILED tests 2-17 Failed 16/17 tests, 5.88% okay Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t/basic.t 22 5632 10 17 170.00% 2-10 t/object.t 22 5632 36 69 191.67% 2-36 t/sequence.t 22 5632 54 105 194.44% 2-54 t/update.t 22 5632 17 31 182.35% 2-17 Failed 4/4 test scripts, 0.00% okay. 113/117 subtests failed, 3.42% okay. make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 22 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.77875 (%check) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 06:55:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 02:55:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234121] Review Request: PyOpenGL - Python bindings for OpenGL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704020655.l326tdP1012410@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyOpenGL - Python bindings for OpenGL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234121 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-02 02:55 EST ------- Many thanks for the review! Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 06:55:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 02:55:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234122] Review Request: pygtkglext - Python bindings for GtkGLExt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704020655.l326tvEW012456@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pygtkglext - Python bindings for GtkGLExt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234122 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-02 02:55 EST ------- Many thanks for the review! Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 07:04:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 03:04:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233423] Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704020704.l3274r21012783@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233423 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-02 03:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > I don't see the big problem here ?? I do see a SHOWSTOPPER: This package IS NOT PROPERLY LICENSED - Period. As such it CAN NOT be shipped as part of Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 07:10:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 03:10:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234788] Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Attachment-Stripper - Strip the attachments from a mail message In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704020710.l327AHkM013130@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Attachment-Stripper - Strip the attachments from a mail message https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234788 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-02 03:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Ralf, > sorry but is above Review comment OK for perl packages review? Though its > not clear about what should be included in Review, I will also be happy with one > word review APPROVED for perl packages :) Parag, what is this you don't like about this? You find this too brief? Are you seriously thinking, I didn't check more? Pardon, you are wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 07:11:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 03:11:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233848] Review Request: perl-SVG-Graph - Visualize your data in Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704020711.l327BSA9013207@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SVG-Graph - Visualize your data in Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) format Alias: perl-SVG-Graph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233848 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2007-04-02 03:11 EST ------- Contacted upstream and Allen Day confirmed that perl-SVG-Graph is released under the Artistic license (see e-mail below). I will ask him to add the license to the CPAN webpage and add it inside the tarball, and ask him to roll a new tarball, if possible. From: "Allen Day" Subject: Re: License terms for perl-SVG-Graph? To: "Alex Lancaster" Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 00:47:21 -0700 Reply-To: allenday at ucla.edu Hi Alex, My oversight. It's released under the Artistic License. -Allen On 3/26/07, Alex Lancaster wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Dear Allen and Chris, > > I am trying to package your Perl package SVG-Graph as part of the > Fedora Linux distribution (it is also required as a dependency for > bioperl), see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/233848 for this discussion. > In order to distribute the package, however, we need to clarify the > license, currently the only mention is the following: > > COPYRIGHT AND LICENCE > > Copyright (C) 2002-2003 Allen Day , > Chris To > > However, that only states the copyright owners (yourselves), but > doesn't state the license distribution terms. Could you clarify your > intentions with respect to the license? Usually most CPAN Perl > modules are distributed under the same terms as Perl, that is can be > distributed under the terms of either "Artistic" or the GNU GPL > license. > > If so, could you please include state so *explicitly* in your package, > or otherwise indicate to me that the package can be distributed under > a suitable open source license, see: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-76294f12c6b481792eb00\ 1ba9763d95e2792e825 > > for a list of acceptable licenses. > > Best regards, > Alex Lancaster -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 07:17:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 03:17:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225797] Merge Review: gimp-data-extras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704020717.l327HcQc013594@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gimp-data-extras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225797 ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2007-04-02 03:17 EST ------- Due to the unclear licensing, the package isn't included in current Rawhide/test versions. Adrian told me and upstream that his contributions are public domain (or GPL if preferred) and what he knew about the origins of the other stuff. So far, upstream hasn't reacted. In that case I'd leave the package out for now, if upstream comes to a conclusion, we can include it at a later point. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 07:33:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 03:33:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234454] Review Request: perl-PostScript - PostScript Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704020733.l327XQvI014426@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-PostScript - PostScript Perl module Alias: perl-PostScript https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234454 alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2007-04-02 03:33 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-PostScript Short Description: Perl package that generates PostScript files. Owners: alexl at users.sourceforge.net Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 07:34:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 03:34:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234568] Review Request: perl-AutoClass - Automatically define classes and objects for Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704020734.l327Yqql014540@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-AutoClass - Automatically define classes and objects for Perl Alias: perl-AutoClass https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234568 alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2007-04-02 03:34 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-AutoClass Short Description: Automatically define classes and objects for Perl Owners: alexl at users.sourceforge.net Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 07:43:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 03:43:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221906] Review Request: gmediaserver - UPnP compatible media server for the GNU system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704020743.l327h2sm015284@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gmediaserver - UPnP compatible media server for the GNU system Alias: gmediaserver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221906 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-02 03:43 EST ------- Sorry, I've been awfully busy and haven't been able to finish this review. It will still be a couple of day yet. I did a quick look over the spec file and things look much better. There was a couple of things that stood out. 1) "%patch0 -p0 -b .mypatch" - when I said ".mypatch" I meant to personalize it. I suspect in your case it would be something like "%patch0 -p0 -b .infofix". I see you took me literally. 2) The %preun and %postun are using two different styles of testing $1. This makes it hard to read. Suggest that you adopt the style of %preun. You are also mixing different styles of redirection. This makes it a little hard to follow, but it not a blocker. 3) rpmlint will always complain with the userdel/groupdel in the scriptlets. Let me check and see what the current recommended way to handle this is. A lot of people suggest leaving the user on the system once it's created. Since it's going to own the media, we must be careful that reinstallation get the same id or there will be a problem. This might be a candidate for static uid, but let me check. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 07:54:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 03:54:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231590] Review Request: aspell-te - Telugu Dictionary for Aspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704020754.l327sbPE016231@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-te - Telugu Dictionary for Aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231590 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium aalam at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From aalam at redhat.com 2007-04-02 03:54 EST ------- following package is available -------- aspell-te.i386 0.01-1.fc7 extras-development -------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 08:17:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 04:17:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 212974] Review Request: aspell-ar - Word list/dictionaries for Arabic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704020817.l328HZe3018509@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-ar - Word list/dictionaries for Arabic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212974 danken at cs.technion.ac.il changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 08:49:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 04:49:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226542] Merge Review: words In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704020849.l328nKoq020945@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: words https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226542 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From kzak at redhat.com 2007-04-02 04:49 EST ------- > * Version field is quite arbitrary (3.0) instead of matching upstream. The upstream doesn't use any versioning. > * Separate license file into a different "Source" file. Also explain in the > file that the license info in the file readme.txt is deprecated. Good point. Thanks. Fixed. Please, review the package (words-3.0-12.fc7). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 09:09:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 05:09:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234031] Review Request: eclipse-pydev - an Eclipse plugin for working with Python. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704020909.l3299S0M022749@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-pydev - an Eclipse plugin for working with Python. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234031 paskalis at di.uoa.gr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paskalis at di.uoa.gr ------- Additional Comments From paskalis at di.uoa.gr 2007-04-02 05:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > > ? %defattrs present > > - should there be another '-' after the 'root,root'? > > I'm not sure, some other specs I've looked at have four components, some have 3. > So I've added it, since it seems that's what most do. It seems to not really matter. See http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm-snapshot/s1-rpm-inside-files-list-directives.html#S3-RPM-INSIDE-FLIST-DEFATTR-DIRECTIVE Also, it is redundant in rpm >= 4.4, but still required for older RHEL versions. http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2007-February/msg00171.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 09:09:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 05:09:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231674] Review Request: libmimedir - Library to parse MIME Directory Profile In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704020909.l3299RkJ022741@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmimedir - Library to parse MIME Directory Profile https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231674 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2007-04-02 05:09 EST ------- * Mon Apr 02 2007 Aurelien Bompard 0.4-2 - make a -static package http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/synce/libmimedir-0.4-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 09:10:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 05:10:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231679] Review Request: synce-serial - Serial connection support for Pocket PC devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704020910.l329AMiw022869@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-serial - Serial connection support for Pocket PC devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231679 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2007-04-02 05:10 EST ------- * Mon Apr 02 2007 Aurelien Bompard 0.9.1-2 - fix typo in description - make udev rules %%config(noreplace) http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/synce/synce-serial-0.9.1-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 09:29:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 05:29:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234812] New: Review Request: tcpreplay - Replay captured network traffic Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234812 Summary: Review Request: tcpreplay - Replay captured network traffic Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bojan at rexursive.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://ftp.rexursive.com/pub/tcpreplay/tcpreplay.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.rexursive.com/pub/tcpreplay/tcpreplay-2.3.5-1.src.rpm Description: Tcpreplay is a tool to replay captured network traffic. Currently, tcpreplay supports pcap (tcpdump) and snoop capture formats. Also included, is tcpprep a tool to pre-process capture files to allow increased performance under certain conditions as well as capinfo which provides basic information about capture files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 09:37:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 05:37:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234569] Review Request: perl-Ace - Perl module for interfacing with ACE bioinformatics databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704020937.l329b3Kg025045@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Ace - Perl module for interfacing with ACE bioinformatics databases Alias: perl-AcePerl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234569 alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: perl-AcePerl|Review Request: perl-Ace - |- Perl module for |Perl module for interfacing |interfacing with ACE |with ACE bioinformatics |bioinformatics databases |databases ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2007-04-02 05:37 EST ------- Updated spec file: Disable tests because they require network access at build-time. Relabel package as perl-Ace for consistency with provides as perl(Ace) Spec URL: http://allele5.biol.berkeley.edu/~alex/fedora/perl-Ace.spec SRPM URL: http://allele5.biol.berkeley.edu/~alex/fedora/perl-Ace-1.91-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 09:46:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 05:46:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234814] New: Review Request: perl-HTML-Encoding - Determine the encoding of HTML/XML/XHTML documents Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234814 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-Encoding - Determine the encoding of HTML/XML/XHTML documents Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ville.skytta at iki.fi QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com http://cachalot.mine.nu/6/SRPMS/perl-HTML-Encoding.spec http://cachalot.mine.nu/6/SRPMS/perl-HTML-Encoding-0.52-0.5.cmn6.src.rpm HTML::Encoding helps to determine the encoding of HTML and XML/XHTML documents. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 09:48:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 05:48:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234571] Review Request: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene - Regular expression-based Perl Parser for NCBI Entrez Gene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704020948.l329mBjU026101@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene - Regular expression-based Perl Parser for NCBI Entrez Gene Alias: Bio-ASN1-Entrez https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234571 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-02 05:48 EST ------- So its upstream mistake to tar Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.09 as Bio-ASN1-EntreZGene-1.091.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 09:50:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 05:50:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234571] Review Request: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene - Regular expression-based Perl Parser for NCBI Entrez Gene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704020950.l329onrO026208@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene - Regular expression-based Perl Parser for NCBI Entrez Gene Alias: Bio-ASN1-Entrez https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234571 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-02 05:50 EST ------- Sorry Chris for picking this for review as I want to review perl-bioperl I need this to be reviewed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 09:51:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 05:51:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234571] Review Request: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene - Regular expression-based Perl Parser for NCBI Entrez Gene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704020951.l329pcKb026251@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene - Regular expression-based Perl Parser for NCBI Entrez Gene Alias: Bio-ASN1-Entrez https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234571 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-02 05:51 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url fabb888e03435007e08050def1aed0ac Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091.tgz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test disabled for circular BR on perl-bioperl + Provides: perl(Bio::ASN1::EntrezGene) = 1.09 perl(Bio::ASN1::EntrezGene::Indexer) = 1.09 perl(Bio::ASN1::Sequence) = 1.09 perl(Bio::ASN1::Sequence::Indexer) = 1.09 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 09:52:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 05:52:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234571] Review Request: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene - Regular expression-based Perl Parser for NCBI Entrez Gene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704020952.l329qW5U026294@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene - Regular expression-based Perl Parser for NCBI Entrez Gene Alias: Bio-ASN1-Entrez https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234571 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2007-04-02 05:52 EST ------- 1. As noted by Parag, upstream made a mistake. 2. I added examples subdirectory. Spec URL: http://allele5.biol.berkeley.edu/~alex/fedora/perl-perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene.spec SRPM URL: http://allele5.biol.berkeley.edu/~alex/fedora/perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 09:16:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 05:16:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233848] Review Request: perl-SVG-Graph - Visualize your data in Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704020916.l329G7ws023399@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SVG-Graph - Visualize your data in Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) format Alias: perl-SVG-Graph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233848 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-02 05:16 EST ------- I think it will be good to see license file in tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 09:57:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 05:57:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234571] Review Request: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene - Regular expression-based Perl Parser for NCBI Entrez Gene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704020957.l329v630026464@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene - Regular expression-based Perl Parser for NCBI Entrez Gene Alias: Bio-ASN1-Entrez https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234571 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-02 05:56 EST ------- thanks for adding examples directory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 10:04:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 06:04:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234569] Review Request: perl-Ace - Perl module for interfacing with ACE bioinformatics databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021004.l32A47FS027006@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Ace - Perl module for interfacing with ACE bioinformatics databases Alias: perl-AcePerl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234569 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-02 06:03 EST ------- Can you also add here examples directory? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 10:04:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 06:04:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234571] Review Request: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene - Regular expression-based Perl Parser for NCBI Entrez Gene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021004.l32A4E0e027037@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene - Regular expression-based Perl Parser for NCBI Entrez Gene Alias: Bio-ASN1-Entrez https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234571 alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2007-04-02 06:04 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene Short Description: Regular expression-based Perl Parser for NCBI Entrez Gene Owners: alexl at users.sourceforge.net Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 10:06:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 06:06:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234571] Review Request: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene - Regular expression-based Perl Parser for NCBI Entrez Gene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021006.l32A6gkN027166@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene - Regular expression-based Perl Parser for NCBI Entrez Gene Alias: Bio-ASN1-Entrez https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234571 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-02 06:06 EST ------- Just had a look at new SRPM and it looks OK to me. Re-Approving new package perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 10:34:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 06:34:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234812] Review Request: tcpreplay - Replay captured network traffic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021034.l32AYSNn028088@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcpreplay - Replay captured network traffic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234812 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-04-02 06:34 EST ------- modified BR line for epel4: BuildRequires: libnet-devel >= 1.1, libpcap,tcpdump Sucessfully built in mock, seems to run OK. Played a 30 secs capture file without problems, no further checks done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 10:38:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 06:38:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234569] Review Request: perl-Ace - Perl module for interfacing with ACE bioinformatics databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021038.l32AcwRm028296@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Ace - Perl module for interfacing with ACE bioinformatics databases Alias: perl-AcePerl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234569 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2007-04-02 06:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Can you also add here examples directory? Done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 10:41:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 06:41:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234569] Review Request: perl-Ace - Perl module for interfacing with ACE bioinformatics databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021041.l32Af4in028368@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Ace - Perl module for interfacing with ACE bioinformatics databases Alias: perl-AcePerl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234569 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-02 06:41 EST ------- thanks and here come its review Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url f473592d51f016ca4fe8efcf049e8b94 AcePerl-1.91.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test disabled. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test disabled. + Provides: perl(Ace) = 1.91 perl(Ace::Browser::AceSubs) = 1.21 perl(Ace::Browser::GeneSubs) perl(Ace::Browser::SearchSubs) = 1.30 perl(Ace::Browser::SiteDefs) perl(Ace::Browser::TreeSubs) perl(Ace::Graphics::Fk) perl(Ace::Graphics::Glyph) perl(Ace::Graphics::Glyph::anchored_arrow) perl(Ace::Graphics::Glyph::arrow) perl(Ace::Graphics::Glyph::box) perl(Ace::Graphics::Glyph::crossbox) perl(Ace::Graphics::Glyph::dot) perl(Ace::Graphics::Glyph::ex) perl(Ace::Graphics::Glyph::graded_segments) perl(Ace::Graphics::Glyph::group) perl(Ace::Graphics::Glyph::line) perl(Ace::Graphics::Glyph::primers) perl(Ace::Graphics::Glyph::segments) perl(Ace::Graphics::Glyph::span) perl(Ace::Graphics::Glyph::toomany) perl(Ace::Graphics::Glyph::transcript) perl(Ace::Graphics::Glyph::triangle) perl(Ace::Graphics::GlyphFactory) perl(Ace::Graphics::Panel) perl(Ace::Graphics::Track) perl(Ace::Iterator) = 1.51 perl(Ace::Local) = 1.05 perl(Ace::Model) = 1.51 perl(Ace::Object) = 1.66 perl(Ace::Object::Wormbase) perl(Ace::Sequence) = 1.51 perl(Ace::Sequence::Feature) perl(Ace::Sequence::FeatureList) perl(Ace::Sequence::GappedAlignment) = 1.20 perl(Ace::Sequence::Gene) perl(Ace::Sequence::Homol) perl(Ace::Sequence::Multi) perl(Ace::Sequence::Transcript) perl(Ace::SocketServer) = 1.01 perl(GFF::Filehandle) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 10:44:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 06:44:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234569] Review Request: perl-Ace - Perl module for interfacing with ACE bioinformatics databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021044.l32AiwvS028534@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Ace - Perl module for interfacing with ACE bioinformatics databases Alias: perl-AcePerl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234569 alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2007-04-02 06:44 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Ace Short Description: Perl module for interfacing with ACE bioinformatics databases Owners: alexl at users.sourceforge.net Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 11:16:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 07:16:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234569] Review Request: perl-Ace - Perl module for interfacing with ACE bioinformatics databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021116.l32BGaCj029475@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Ace - Perl module for interfacing with ACE bioinformatics databases Alias: perl-AcePerl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234569 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 11:36:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 07:36:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234573] Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021136.l32BahHT030194@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology Alias: perl-bioperl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234573 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-02 07:36 EST ------- This review blocked by now package perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 11:38:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 07:38:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226322] Merge Review: psmisc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021138.l32BcCqP030258@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: psmisc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226322 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium kzak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 11:51:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 07:51:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234573] Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021151.l32Bp9cE031134@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology Alias: perl-bioperl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234573 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-02 07:51 EST ------- As mock build gave me Error: Missing Dependency: perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq) is needed by package perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene But I really confused when i checked cpan, I found that missing depencecy is actually part of this(perl-bioperl) package then why its reported as its needed by perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene? I am referring to http://search.cpan.org/~mingyiliu/Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091/lib/Bio/ASN1/EntrezGene.pm#PREREQUISITE Need some help But for time being not blocking CVS request already made for perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 12:28:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 08:28:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234445] Review Request: mod_auth_shadow - An Apache module for authentication using /etc/shadow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021228.l32CSICP000576@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_auth_shadow - An Apache module for authentication using /etc/shadow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234445 ------- Additional Comments From fedora-packaging at dw-perspective.org.uk 2007-04-02 08:28 EST ------- New versions, which I believe satisfy both mentioned requirements: Spec URL: http://david.dw-perspective.org.uk/tmp/mod_auth_shadow.spec SRPM URL: http://david.dw-perspective.org.uk/tmp/mod_auth_shadow-2.1-2.src.rpm I've included a copy of the GPL to satisfy the GPL's own requirements, and I've contacted upstream to ask them to include it themselves in future releases. The debuginfo was a mistake - somehow I'd not updated the uploaded src.rpm which had fixed this. I've bumped the version to make sure that doesn't happen this time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 12:31:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 08:31:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175623] Review Request: yaz - Z39.50/SRW/SRU programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021231.l32CVUcN000783@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yaz - Z39.50/SRW/SRU programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175623 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-04-02 08:31 EST ------- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 12:34:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 08:34:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234445] Review Request: mod_auth_shadow - An Apache module for authentication using /etc/shadow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021234.l32CYNR1000943@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_auth_shadow - An Apache module for authentication using /etc/shadow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234445 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-04-02 08:34 EST ------- David, you should not include the license by yourself. Please see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines, under MUST: - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 12:39:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 08:39:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190066] Review Request: php-pear-Mail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021239.l32CdcHa001215@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190066 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-04-02 08:39 EST ------- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 12:43:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 08:43:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234445] Review Request: mod_auth_shadow - An Apache module for authentication using /etc/shadow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021243.l32ChNCQ001456@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_auth_shadow - An Apache module for authentication using /etc/shadow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234445 ------- Additional Comments From fedora-packaging at dw-perspective.org.uk 2007-04-02 08:43 EST ------- Spec URL: http://david.dw-perspective.org.uk/tmp/mod_auth_shadow.spec SRPM URL: http://david.dw-perspective.org.uk/tmp/mod_auth_shadow-2.1-3.src.rpm Thanks wolfshant. New versions. I disagree with those guidelines, as the GPL itself requires that the GPL be included in the distribution. It seems to me that Fedora can't redistribute without fulfilling those terms. Upstream isn't bound by those terms as it's the copyright holder, but we are, so we ought to include a copy of the GPL. So I think Tom Callaway has got that wrong. But, I don't make the rules, so the new SRPM I've uploaded does it the suggested way... I assume that Fedora legal knows what it's doing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 12:48:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 08:48:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190156] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021248.l32CmU7o001768@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190156 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-04-02 08:48 EST ------- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 12:52:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 08:52:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190956] Review Request: php-pear-Auth-SASL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021252.l32CqDM8002101@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth-SASL Alias: php-pear-Auth-SASL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190956 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-04-02 08:51 EST ------- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 12:52:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 08:52:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234454] Review Request: perl-PostScript - PostScript Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021252.l32Cqqnu002165@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-PostScript - PostScript Perl module Alias: perl-PostScript https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234454 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 13:00:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 09:00:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190957] Review Request: php-pear-Net-Socket In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021300.l32D0Bqp002801@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Socket Alias: php-pear-Net-Socket https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190957 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-04-02 08:59 EST ------- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 13:04:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 09:04:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190958] Review Request: php-pear-Net-SMTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021304.l32D4BLj003186@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-SMTP Alias: php-pear-Net-SMTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190958 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-04-02 09:03 EST ------- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 13:08:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 09:08:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192583] Review Request: php-pear-XML-Parser - XML parsing class based on PHP's bundled expat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021308.l32D8CEU003712@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-XML-Parser - XML parsing class based on PHP's bundled expat Alias: php-pear-XML-Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192583 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-04-02 09:08 EST ------- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 13:09:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 09:09:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234031] Review Request: eclipse-pydev - an Eclipse plugin for working with Python. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021309.l32D96Fw003954@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-pydev - an Eclipse plugin for working with Python. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234031 ------- Additional Comments From ifoox at redhat.com 2007-04-02 09:09 EST ------- OK, so in my opinion we might as well leave the extra '-' in there since it does no harm. Andrew? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 13:12:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 09:12:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206037] Review Request: php-pear-Console-Table - Class that makes it easy to build console style tables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021312.l32DC8Df004579@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Console-Table - Class that makes it easy to build console style tables Alias: pear-Console-Table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206037 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-04-02 09:11 EST ------- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 13:15:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 09:15:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208453] Review Request: php-pear-Console-Getargs - Command-line arguments and parameters parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021315.l32DFooX005234@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Console-Getargs - Command-line arguments and parameters parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208453 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-04-02 09:15 EST ------- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 13:20:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 09:20:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234568] Review Request: perl-AutoClass - Automatically define classes and objects for Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021320.l32DK3ii005902@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-AutoClass - Automatically define classes and objects for Perl Alias: perl-AutoClass https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234568 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-04-02 09:19 EST ------- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 13:20:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 09:20:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234031] Review Request: eclipse-pydev - an Eclipse plugin for working with Python. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021320.l32DKnFK006016@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-pydev - an Eclipse plugin for working with Python. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234031 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-04-02 09:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > OK, so in my opinion we might as well leave the extra '-' in there since it does > no harm. Andrew? Yeah, let's leave it. I'll finish the rest of the review ASAP. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 13:23:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 09:23:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234031] Review Request: eclipse-pydev - an Eclipse plugin for working with Python. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021323.l32DNOcQ006470@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-pydev - an Eclipse plugin for working with Python. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234031 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-04-02 09:23 EST ------- Bah, I completely forgot to put this in the review: X Remove ExclusiveArch Sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 13:24:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 09:24:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234569] Review Request: perl-Ace - Perl module for interfacing with ACE bioinformatics databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021324.l32DOBg6006618@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Ace - Perl module for interfacing with ACE bioinformatics databases Alias: perl-AcePerl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234569 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-04-02 09:23 EST ------- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 13:28:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 09:28:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234571] Review Request: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene - Regular expression-based Perl Parser for NCBI Entrez Gene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021328.l32DSxln007270@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene - Regular expression-based Perl Parser for NCBI Entrez Gene Alias: Bio-ASN1-Entrez https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234571 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-04-02 09:28 EST ------- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 13:33:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 09:33:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234826] New: Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234826 Summary: Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabrice at bellet.info QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com CC: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Spec URL: http://fr2.rpmfind.net/pub/bellet/review/FlightGear.spec SRPM URL: http://fr2.rpmfind.net/pub/bellet/review/FlightGear-0.9.10-2.fc6.src.rpm Description: The Flight Gear project is working to create a sophisticated flight simulator framework for the development and pursuit of interesting flight simulator ideas. Now that SimGear is in Fedora, games using this library can be submitted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 13:44:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 09:44:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 166008] Review Request: uw-imap - UW Server daemons for IMAP and POP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021344.l32DiLp3009351@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uw-imap - UW Server daemons for IMAP and POP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166008 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-04-02 09:44 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: uw-imap Updated Fedora Cc: jorton at redhat.com +comaintainer -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 14:06:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 10:06:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234830] New: Review Request: audacious-show - XChat plugin for audacious Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234830 Summary: Review Request: audacious-show - XChat plugin for audacious Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rpm at greysector.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/audacious-show.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/audacious-show-1.2.0-1.src.rpm Description: XChat plugin to control audacious and to show whatever you're currently playing to others. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 14:06:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 10:06:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233423] Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021406.l32E6UTZ011347@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233423 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-04-02 10:06 EST ------- Hmm, I didnt intentionally set fedora-review+. That was a mistake on my part. It seems to me that Ralf is just being a hard ass like usual. But it is reasonable to wait until after upstream makes a new release that has explicit licenses before building this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 14:09:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 10:09:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234831] New: Review Request: fgfs-base - FlightGear base scenery and data files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234831 Summary: Review Request: fgfs-base - FlightGear base scenery and data files Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabrice at bellet.info QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com CC: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Spec URL: http://fr2.rpmfind.net/pub/bellet/review/fgfs-base.spec SRPM URL: http://fr2.rpmfind.net/pub/bellet/review/fgfs-base-0.9.10-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: This package contains the base scenery and aircrafts data files for FlightGear This package is noarch, it is big because it contains all the available aircrafts data. It also provides a base Scenery : the area of San Francisco airport. The spec file has an empty %prep section, because the tarball doesn't provide a Makefile, as all the data from the tarball is supposed to land in the same destination data directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 14:18:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 10:18:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221906] Review Request: gmediaserver - UPnP compatible media server for the GNU system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021418.l32EIau0012536@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gmediaserver - UPnP compatible media server for the GNU system Alias: gmediaserver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221906 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2007-04-02 10:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > 3) rpmlint will always complain with the userdel/groupdel in the scriptlets. > Let me check and see what the current recommended way to handle this is. A lot > of people suggest leaving the user on the system once it's created. Since it's > going to own the media, we must be careful that reinstallation get the same id > or there will be a problem. This might be a candidate for static uid, but let > me check. If the package's own user/group will be used for media files that will be left on the system if the package is removed, it's certainly best not to delete the user/group at all. If the package is subsequently reinstalled, useradd/groupadd will fail but it doesn't matter because the user/group will already be there with the correct uid/gid respectively (just be sure that the useradd/groupadd commands don't produce spurious error messages or cause the scriptlets to fail in this situation). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 14:23:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 10:23:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234835] New: Review Request: fgfs-Atlas - Flightgear map tools Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234835 Summary: Review Request: fgfs-Atlas - Flightgear map tools Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabrice at bellet.info QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com CC: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Spec URL: http://fr2.rpmfind.net/pub/bellet/review/fgfs-Atlas.spec SRPM URL: http://fr2.rpmfind.net/pub/bellet/review/fgfs-Atlas-0.3.1-2.fc6.src.rpm Description: Atlas aims to produce and display high quality charts of the world for users of FlightGear, an open source flight simulator. This is achieved through two main parts: The map creator (simply called Map) and the Atlas viewer This package needs the scenery files from FlightGear to generate maps as a set of images. The project on sourceforge is named "Atlas", which conflicts with another Fedora package, so the modification of the package name. I also pre-generated a set of images around the default San Francisco airport in the FlightGear base scenery, so the Atlas program is directly useable, and can be used to track a flight, when starting from the default location in FlightGear. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 14:34:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 10:34:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234789] Review Request: perl-Return-Value - Polymorphic Return Values In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021434.l32EYIN8013615@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Return-Value - Polymorphic Return Values https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234789 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-02 10:34 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Return-Value Short Description: Polymorphic Return Values Owners: tcallawa at redhat.com Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 14:41:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 10:41:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234788] Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Attachment-Stripper - Strip the attachments from a mail message In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021441.l32EfObe014299@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Attachment-Stripper - Strip the attachments from a mail message https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234788 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-02 10:41 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Email-MIME-Attachment-Stripper Short Description: Strip the attachments from a mail message Owners: tcallawa at redhat.com Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 14:42:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 10:42:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234031] Review Request: eclipse-pydev - an Eclipse plugin for working with Python. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021442.l32Eg4c0014354@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-pydev - an Eclipse plugin for working with Python. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234031 ------- Additional Comments From ifoox at redhat.com 2007-04-02 10:41 EST ------- New files: http://people.redhat.com/ifoox/extras/eclipse-pydev-1.3.1-3.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/ifoox/extras/eclipse-pydev.spec Removed ExclusiveArch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 14:43:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 10:43:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234667] Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021443.l32Eh1VT014418@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234667 ------- Additional Comments From acme at redhat.com 2007-04-02 10:42 EST ------- new SRPM: http://oops.ghostprotocols.net:81/acme/dwarves/rpm/SRPMS/dwarves-0-17.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 15:28:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 11:28:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234445] Review Request: mod_auth_shadow - An Apache module for authentication using /etc/shadow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021528.l32FSnqY019884@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_auth_shadow - An Apache module for authentication using /etc/shadow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234445 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+, needinfo? ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-04-02 11:28 EST ------- God: + Naming semms ok + License ok. + Local build works ok. + Binary package ok. + Debuginfo package ok. + Mock build works fine. + Local install and uninstall works fine. + Start of httpd with installed package works fine. Bad: - Package conains no verbatin copy of the license (Please contact upstream for including it in the next release) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 15:37:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 11:37:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234445] Review Request: mod_auth_shadow - An Apache module for authentication using /etc/shadow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021537.l32Fbcfd020549@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_auth_shadow - An Apache module for authentication using /etc/shadow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234445 fedora-packaging at dw-perspective.org.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo? |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From fedora-packaging at dw-perspective.org.uk 2007-04-02 11:37 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mod_auth_shadow Short Description: An Apache module for authentication using /etc/shadow Owners: fedora-packaging at dw-perspective.org.uk Branches: FC-5 FC-6 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 15:45:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 11:45:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226387] Merge Review: samba In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021545.l32FjLHJ021217@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: samba https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226387 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2007-04-02 11:45 EST ------- Against 3.0.24-10: - What about "auth" macro? Why the explicit or implicit "Requires: pam >= ..." could not be enough? - Certainly "samba" subpackage must require "samba-common". For the current rpm program, "Requires(pre): something" implies an ordinary "Requires: something" too, but to be more robast, add explicit "Requires: samba-common = ...." anyway, notwithstanding of "...(pre)" existence. - Whether "samba-doc" actually requires "samba-common"? - Replace "/usr/lib", "/usr/lib*" just to %{_libdir} - Changelog section still has "macros" (since 21 May 2001 and to EOF) - It seems to be more useful to move "docs/registry" from "-docs" to the main subpackage. - All the docs/manpages contain non-ascii non-UTF8 symbols. Moreover, it looks not like a "national symbol in author's name", it could be some formatting mess. Do "iconv -f UTF-8 < nmbd.8" for example. - Init scripts: there is no need to check for /etc/rc.d/init.d/finctions existence. (f.e. httpd and vsftpd do not such an extra check). - winbind.init: /var/lock/subsys name should match the initscript name, i.e. should be "/var/lock/subsys/winbind", not ".../winbindd" (rmplint complains about it). Since "/var/cache/samba" is no more used, maybe create a symlink to /var/lib/samba? Perhaps this way (old and new places are playing together) the migration procedure could be simplified... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 15:53:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 11:53:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234789] Review Request: perl-Return-Value - Polymorphic Return Values In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021553.l32FrA9o022131@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Return-Value - Polymorphic Return Values Alias: perl-Return-Value https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234789 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-Return-Value -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 16:19:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 12:19:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234031] Review Request: eclipse-pydev - an Eclipse plugin for working with Python. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021619.l32GJrc6024137@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-pydev - an Eclipse plugin for working with Python. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234031 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-04-02 12:19 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=151442) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=151442&action=view) patch - mainly whitespace Here's a patch that fixes some whitespace and line length issues. If it can be applied, we're all set to go except for: - plugins/org.python.pydev.jython_1.3.1/Lib. Where does the content of this directory come from? Is it necessary? If so, can we symlink it? - plugins/org.python.pydev_1.3.1/PySrc. What is the content of this directory? If we want to ship it or if it's necessary, I think it should either have a clear source and license trail or be a separate package. - plugins/org.python.pydev.jython_1.3.1/jysrc. Same questions as above. - plugins/org.python.pydev.debug_1.3.1/pysrc. Same. Thanks, Igor - sorry for the legal annoyances, I wish we had caught them earlier. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 16:23:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 12:23:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234814] Review Request: perl-HTML-Encoding - Determine the encoding of HTML/XML/XHTML documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021623.l32GNtVD024503@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-Encoding - Determine the encoding of HTML/XML/XHTML documents Alias: perl-HTML-Encoding https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234814 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Alias| |perl-HTML-Encoding Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 16:25:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 12:25:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234122] Review Request: pygtkglext - Python bindings for GtkGLExt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021625.l32GPRFY024706@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pygtkglext - Python bindings for GtkGLExt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234122 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-02 12:25 EST ------- (Actually closing) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 16:27:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 12:27:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234814] Review Request: perl-HTML-Encoding - Determine the encoding of HTML/XML/XHTML documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021627.l32GR1Bj024917@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-Encoding - Determine the encoding of HTML/XML/XHTML documents Alias: perl-HTML-Encoding https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234814 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-02 12:27 EST ------- Please ensure release is bumped to 1 before building :) Aside from that, looks ready... + source files match upstream: ee31564305ffdaf24d99f26588f8eb9f HTML-Encoding-0.52.tar.gz ee31564305ffdaf24d99f26588f8eb9f ../HTML-Encoding-0.52.tar.gz + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. O specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license field matches the actual license. + license is open source-compatible; license text not included upstream. + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. + %clean is present. + package installs properly O no debuginfo package -- noarch + rpmlint is silent. + final provides and requires are sane: ** perl-HTML-Encoding-0.52-0.5.fc6.noarch.rpm == rpmlint == provides perl(HTML::Encoding) = 0.52 perl-HTML-Encoding = 0.52-0.5.fc6 == requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Encode) perl(HTML::Parser) perl(HTTP::Headers::Util) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) + %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=1, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.04 cusr + 0.02 csys = 0.06 CPU) + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets present. + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. + no headers. + no pkgconfig files. + no libtool .la droppings. + not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 16:27:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 12:27:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234814] Review Request: perl-HTML-Encoding - Determine the encoding of HTML/XML/XHTML documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021627.l32GRQaq024958@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-Encoding - Determine the encoding of HTML/XML/XHTML documents Alias: perl-HTML-Encoding https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234814 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 16:29:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 12:29:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234790] Review Request: perl-Email-Abstract - Unified interface to mail representations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021629.l32GTogR025180@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Abstract - Unified interface to mail representations Alias: perl-Email-Abstract https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234790 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-Email-Abstract -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 16:30:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 12:30:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234835] Review Request: fgfs-Atlas - Flightgear map tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021630.l32GURMd025221@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fgfs-Atlas - Flightgear map tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234835 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |Jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-04-02 12:30 EST ------- Good: + Naming ok. + Local build works fine. + Rpmlint is quite on source rpm. + Rpmlint is quite on binary rpm. + Rpmlint ok on debuginfo package. Bad: - Naming ok. - Duplicate BRs Duplicate BuildRequires: plib-devel (by SimGear-devel), libjpeg-devel (by SimGear-devel) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 16:31:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 12:31:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228894] Review Request: rpcbind - converts RPC program numbers into universal addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021631.l32GVAbM025397@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpcbind - converts RPC program numbers into universal addresses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228894 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |234855 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 16:49:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 12:49:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234445] Review Request: mod_auth_shadow - An Apache module for authentication using /etc/shadow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021649.l32Gn2Df026963@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_auth_shadow - An Apache module for authentication using /etc/shadow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234445 ------- Additional Comments From fedora-packaging at dw-perspective.org.uk 2007-04-02 12:48 EST ------- Upstream has released a new release which includes the license file: Spec URL: http://david.dw-perspective.org.uk/tmp/mod_auth_shadow.spec SRPM URL: http://david.dw-perspective.org.uk/tmp/mod_auth_shadow-2.2-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 16:55:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 12:55:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234814] Review Request: perl-HTML-Encoding - Determine the encoding of HTML/XML/XHTML documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021655.l32GtsaA027456@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-Encoding - Determine the encoding of HTML/XML/XHTML documents Alias: perl-HTML-Encoding https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234814 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-04-02 12:55 EST ------- Thanks. Sure, will bump to 1%{?dist} before building. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-HTML-Encoding Short Description: Determine the encoding of HTML/XML/XHTML documents Owners: ville.skytta at iki.fi Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 16:58:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 12:58:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234857] New: Review Request: perl-Geography-Countries - 2-letter, 3-letter, and numerical codes for countries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234857 Summary: Review Request: perl-Geography-Countries - 2-letter, 3- letter, and numerical codes for countries Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Geography-Countries.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Geography-Countries-1.4-1.src.rpm Description: This module maps country names, and their 2-letter, 3-letter and numerical codes, as defined by the ISO-3166 maintenance agency, and defined by the UNSD. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 17:00:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 13:00:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234784] Review Request: perl-Email-Date - Find and format date headers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021700.l32H01kc027665@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Date - Find and format date headers Alias: perl-Email-Date https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234784 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-Email-Date -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 17:00:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 13:00:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234858] New: Review Request: perl-User-Identity - Maintains info about a physical person Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234858 Summary: Review Request: perl-User-Identity - Maintains info about a physical person Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-User-Identity.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-User-Identity-0.91-1.src.rpm Description: A modules designed to store and maintain a set of informational objects which are related to one user. Note: BuildRequires: perl-Geography-Countries (234587) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 17:00:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 13:00:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234858] Review Request: perl-User-Identity - Maintains info about a physical person In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021700.l32H0gHc027734@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-User-Identity - Maintains info about a physical person https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234858 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |234587 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 17:01:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 13:01:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234787] Review Request: perl-Email-Reply - Reply to an email message In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021701.l32H1pLW027881@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Reply - Reply to an email message Alias: perl-Email-Reply https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234787 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-Email-Reply -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 17:02:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 13:02:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234859] New: Review Request: perl-Object-Realize-Later - Delayed creation of objects Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234859 Summary: Review Request: perl-Object-Realize-Later - Delayed creation of objects Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Object-Realize-Later.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Object-Realize-Later-0.16-1.src.rpm Description: This module helps you implementing delay loading of object-data. While creating a stub-object, Object::Realize::Later simulates you got the real data. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 17:02:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 13:02:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234791] Review Request: perl-Email-Send - Module for sending email In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021702.l32H2gMH027933@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Send - Module for sending email Alias: perl-Email-Send https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234791 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-Email-Send -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 17:03:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 13:03:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234860] New: Review Request: perl-Mail-IMAPClient - An IMAP Client API Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234860 Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-IMAPClient - An IMAP Client API Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Mail-IMAPClient.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Mail-IMAPClient-2.2.9-1.src.rpm Description: This module provides perl routines that simplify a sockets connection to and an IMAP conversation with an IMAP server. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 17:04:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 13:04:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234861] New: Review Request: perl-Mail-Transport-Dbx - Parse Outlook Express mailboxe Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234861 Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Transport-Dbx - Parse Outlook Express mailboxe Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Mail-Transport-Dbx.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Mail-Transport-Dbx-0.07-1.src.rpm Description: Mail::Transport::Dbx is a wrapper around libdbx to read Outlook Express mailboxes (more commonly known as .dbx files). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 17:06:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 13:06:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234862] New: Review Request: perl-Mail-Box - Manage a mailbox, a folder with messages Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234862 Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Box - Manage a mailbox, a folder with messages Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Mail-Box.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Mail-Box-2.070-1.src.rpm Description: The Mail::Box folder is a modern mail-folder manager -- at least at the moment of this writing ;) It is written to replace Mail::Folder, although its interface is different. Note: BuildRequires: perl-Mail-Transport-Dbx [234861], perl-Mail-IMAPClient [234860], perl-Object-Realize-Later [234859], perl-User-Identity [234858] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 17:07:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 13:07:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234860] Review Request: perl-Mail-IMAPClient - An IMAP Client API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021707.l32H7T1Y028434@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-IMAPClient - An IMAP Client API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234860 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |234862 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 17:07:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 13:07:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234861] Review Request: perl-Mail-Transport-Dbx - Parse Outlook Express mailboxe In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021707.l32H7Vp3028443@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Transport-Dbx - Parse Outlook Express mailboxe https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234861 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |234862 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 17:07:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 13:07:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234862] Review Request: perl-Mail-Box - Manage a mailbox, a folder with messages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021707.l32H7S9C028424@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Box - Manage a mailbox, a folder with messages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234862 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |234858, 234859, 234860, | |234861 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 17:07:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 13:07:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234859] Review Request: perl-Object-Realize-Later - Delayed creation of objects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021707.l32H7VN8028460@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Object-Realize-Later - Delayed creation of objects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234859 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |234862 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 17:07:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 13:07:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234858] Review Request: perl-User-Identity - Maintains info about a physical person In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021707.l32H7rk7028538@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-User-Identity - Maintains info about a physical person https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234858 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |234862 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 17:08:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 13:08:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234436] Review Request: glchess - GlChess, a 3d Chess game using OpenGL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021708.l32H8bRj028689@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glchess - GlChess, a 3d Chess game using OpenGL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234436 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-02 13:08 EST ------- ( I would appreciate it if you would wait my review for about 2-3 days.... ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 17:09:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 13:09:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222087] Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021709.l32H942Z028756@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222087 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-02 13:09 EST ------- ( I would appreciate it if you would wait my review for 2-3 days... ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 17:09:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 13:09:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234863] New: Review Request: perl-Mail-Box-Parser-C - Parsing folders for MailBox with C routines Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234863 Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Box-Parser-C - Parsing folders for MailBox with C routines Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Mail-Box-Parser-C.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Mail-Box-Parser-C-3.006-1.src.rpm Description: This module enables faster folder parsing by using compiled C routines. Note: BuildRequires: perl-Mail-Box (234862) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 17:09:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 13:09:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234863] Review Request: perl-Mail-Box-Parser-C - Parsing folders for MailBox with C routines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021709.l32H9gWF028794@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Box-Parser-C - Parsing folders for MailBox with C routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234863 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |234862 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 17:09:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 13:09:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234862] Review Request: perl-Mail-Box - Manage a mailbox, a folder with messages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021709.l32H9r2k028816@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Box - Manage a mailbox, a folder with messages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234862 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |234863 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 17:11:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 13:11:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234790] Review Request: perl-Email-Abstract - Unified interface to mail representations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021711.l32HB0n2028960@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Abstract - Unified interface to mail representations Alias: perl-Email-Abstract https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234790 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |234862 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 17:11:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 13:11:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234862] Review Request: perl-Mail-Box - Manage a mailbox, a folder with messages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021711.l32HB2vR028981@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Box - Manage a mailbox, a folder with messages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234862 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |234790 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 17:12:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 13:12:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234790] Review Request: perl-Email-Abstract - Unified interface to mail representations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021712.l32HCmVO029192@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Abstract - Unified interface to mail representations Alias: perl-Email-Abstract https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234790 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-02 13:12 EST ------- New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Email-Abstract-2.132-2.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Email-Abstract.spec Fixed the NEEDSWORK items, but I noticed another missing BuildRequires. Which dragged in another tree of perl packages. perl-Mail-Box is the top of that tree (234862). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 17:16:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 13:16:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234858] Review Request: perl-User-Identity - Maintains info about a physical person In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021716.l32HGnt2029886@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-User-Identity - Maintains info about a physical person Alias: perl-User-Identity https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234858 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Alias| |perl-User-Identity ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-02 13:16 EST ------- Sanity check: should this bug really be blocked by bug 234587: "VFS: Busy inodes at umount on NFSv4 filesystem"? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 17:17:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 13:17:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234862] Review Request: perl-Mail-Box - Manage a mailbox, a folder with messages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021717.l32HHOOf030057@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Box - Manage a mailbox, a folder with messages Alias: perl-Mail-Box https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234862 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-Mail-Box -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 17:23:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 13:23:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234858] Review Request: perl-User-Identity - Maintains info about a physical person In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021723.l32HN35Y031120@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-User-Identity - Maintains info about a physical person Alias: perl-User-Identity https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234858 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|234587 |234857 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-02 13:23 EST ------- Not really. Thanks for the catch. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 17:23:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 13:23:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234857] Review Request: perl-Geography-Countries - 2-letter, 3-letter, and numerical codes for countries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021723.l32HNdeK031275@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Geography-Countries - 2-letter, 3-letter, and numerical codes for countries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234857 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |234858 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 17:24:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 13:24:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234857] Review Request: perl-Geography-Countries - 2-letter, 3-letter, and numerical codes for countries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021724.l32HOe3s031426@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Geography-Countries - 2-letter, 3-letter, and numerical codes for countries Alias: Geography-Countries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234857 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Alias| |Geography-Countries Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 17:28:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 13:28:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234857] Review Request: perl-Geography-Countries - 2-letter, 3-letter, and numerical codes for countries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021728.l32HSOT2031785@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Geography-Countries - 2-letter, 3-letter, and numerical codes for countries Alias: Geography-Countries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234857 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-02 13:28 EST ------- + source files match upstream: 693426ab59ce3d51fcd48dfe3b402107 Geography-Countries-1.4.tar.gz 693426ab59ce3d51fcd48dfe3b402107 ../Geography-Countries-1.4.tar.gz + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license field matches the actual license. + license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. + %clean is present. + package installs properly O no debuginfo package -- noarch + rpmlint is silent. + final provides and requires are sane: ** perl-Geography-Countries-1.4-1.fc6.noarch.rpm == rpmlint == provides perl(Geography::Countries) perl-Geography-Countries = 1.4-1.fc6 == requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Exporter) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(vars) + %check is present and all tests pass + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets present. + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. + no headers. + no pkgconfig files. + no libtool .la droppings. + not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 17:28:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 13:28:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned CJK bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021728.l32HSten031838@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned CJK bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 fangqq at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fangqq at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 17:29:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 13:29:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234857] Review Request: perl-Geography-Countries - 2-letter, 3-letter, and numerical codes for countries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021729.l32HT3P6031862@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Geography-Countries - 2-letter, 3-letter, and numerical codes for countries Alias: Geography-Countries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234857 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 17:30:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 13:30:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned CJK bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021730.l32HUH4i032009@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned CJK bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 ------- Additional Comments From fangqq at gmail.com 2007-04-02 13:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20) > Well, while I suppose many packages use my way, > I posted to Fedora packaging committee anyway. heard of anything back from them? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 17:33:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 13:33:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234857] Review Request: perl-Geography-Countries - 2-letter, 3-letter, and numerical codes for countries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021733.l32HXaMT032398@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Geography-Countries - 2-letter, 3-letter, and numerical codes for countries Alias: Geography-Countries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234857 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-02 13:33 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Geography-Countries Short Description: 2-letter, 3-letter, and numerical codes for countries Owners: tcallawa at redhat.com Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 17:36:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 13:36:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233142] Review Request: asc - Advanced Strategic Command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021736.l32HaxsH032659@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asc - Advanced Strategic Command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233142 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-04-02 13:36 EST ------- Building on FC-6: ../../edmisc.cpp:4564: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See for instructions. The bug is not reproducible, so it is likely a hardware or OS problem. make[4]: *** [edmisc.o] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/asc-1.16.4.0/source/unix/mapeditor' make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/asc-1.16.4.0/source/unix' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/asc-1.16.4.0/source' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/asc-1.16.4.0' make: *** [all] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.57624 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.57624 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 18:04:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 14:04:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 224254] Review Request: bos - Real-time strategy game using the Stratagus game engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021804.l32I4N4j002533@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bos - Real-time strategy game using the Stratagus game engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224254 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-02 14:04 EST ------- Peter, are you still interested in this? IOW ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 18:06:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 14:06:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 224254] Review Request: bos - Real-time strategy game using the Stratagus game engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021806.l32I6ZH9002794@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bos - Real-time strategy game using the Stratagus game engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224254 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-02 14:06 EST ------- Forget my last 2 comments please, I just saw in comment 7 that you already packaged 2.3, duh! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 18:29:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 14:29:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234882] New: Review Request: libident - New LibIdent C library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234882 Summary: Review Request: libident - New LibIdent C library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: andreas at bawue.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/libident/libident.spec SRPM URL: http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/libident/libident-0.30-1.src.rpm Description: LibIdent is a small C library for interfacing with RFC 1413 Identification protocol servers, which are used for identifying users. LibIdent supports both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses transparently. It is meant to be used by daemons to try to authenticate users using the Ident protocol. For this to work, users need to have an Ident server running on the system from which they are connected. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 18:36:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 14:36:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233142] Review Request: asc - Advanced Strategic Command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021836.l32Ia8ps006238@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asc - Advanced Strategic Command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233142 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-04-02 14:35 EST ------- Second attempt. ../../objecttype.cpp:933: warning: unused variable 'copycount' g++: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus) Please submit a full bug report. See for instructions. make[4]: *** [objecttype.o] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/asc-1.16.4.0/source/tools/linux' make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/asc-1.16.4.0/source/tools' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/asc-1.16.4.0/source' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/asc-1.16.4.0' make: *** [all] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.21812 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.21812 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 19:07:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 15:07:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233142] Review Request: asc - Advanced Strategic Command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021907.l32J7slE009286@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asc - Advanced Strategic Command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233142 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-04-02 15:07 EST ------- Vanilla source builds fine.. . .trying the rpm sans patch. . . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 19:13:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 15:13:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234368] Review Request: gnome-games-extra-data - themes for gnome-games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021913.l32JDkEv009876@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-games-extra-data - themes for gnome-games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234368 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-04-02 15:13 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gnome-games-extra-data Short Description: The gnome-games-extra-data package includes additional data and themes for the games in the gnome-games package. Owners: mclasen at redhat.com Branches: FC-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 19:14:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 15:14:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021914.l32JEVho010026@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2 Alias: perl-RPM2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-04-02 15:14 EST ------- Yeah, i don't see it either - did I miss a step here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 19:20:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 15:20:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021920.l32JKwn8010959@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2 Alias: perl-RPM2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 19:23:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 15:23:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233142] Review Request: asc - Advanced Strategic Command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021923.l32JNfm4011460@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asc - Advanced Strategic Command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233142 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-04-02 15:23 EST ------- Nah, that's worse. What's going on? I assume it's a problem in the sed scripts, but my sed-foo is only a tiny blossom. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 19:25:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 15:25:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234368] Review Request: gnome-games-extra-data - themes for gnome-games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021925.l32JPq6H011799@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-games-extra-data - themes for gnome-games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234368 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 19:27:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 15:27:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234831] Review Request: fgfs-base - FlightGear base scenery and data files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021927.l32JRORV012114@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fgfs-base - FlightGear base scenery and data files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234831 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |Jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-04-02 15:27 EST ------- good: + Naming is ok * Tar ball matches with upstream. + License is ok + Local build works fine. + Binary packagea are ok. Bad: - Pakcage contains no docs. - Pakcage contrains no verbatin copy of the license -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 19:36:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 15:36:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234882] Review Request: libident - New LibIdent C library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021936.l32JaLap012776@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libident - New LibIdent C library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234882 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |Jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-04-02 15:36 EST ------- Good: + Naming is ok. + Tar ball matches with upstream. + License ok. + Package contains verbatin copy of the license. + rpmlint quite on source rpm. + Local build works fine. + Rpmlint quite on binary package ? Rpmlint quite on debuginfo package Bad: - you should create a package called libident which contains a shared library. Providing only a static library vaiolate the packaging rules. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 19:39:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 15:39:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233142] Review Request: asc - Advanced Strategic Command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021939.l32Jdjem013160@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asc - Advanced Strategic Command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233142 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-02 15:39 EST ------- Erm, I don't want to be negative, but gcc segfaulting instead of giving an error, and especially that happening twice with different source files, is an (serious) indication of RAM / CPU problems. Are you running devel / Fedora 7? Maybe there is an actual bug in gcc there, try upgrading. But chances are you're hardware is not 100% I know it may seem to be working fine, both lamost nothing hits / stresses the hardware as much as gcc, it could for example also be a cooling problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 19:44:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 15:44:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234835] Review Request: fgfs-Atlas - Flightgear map tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021944.l32Jiucd013908@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fgfs-Atlas - Flightgear map tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234835 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-02 15:44 EST ------- Jochen, can you sponsor? Because Fabrice needs a sponsor. If not I can sponsor him, and as an exception to the normal sponsor procedure I would be very happy to see you do the review, as I'm _really_ busy with all kinda Fedora / Linux stuff ATM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 19:45:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 15:45:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234882] Review Request: libident - New LibIdent C library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021945.l32JjBEm013969@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libident - New LibIdent C library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234882 ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2007-04-02 15:45 EST ------- Well, this might be a bit problematic, as libident has code currently to provide a shared libary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 19:45:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 15:45:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234831] Review Request: fgfs-base - FlightGear base scenery and data files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021945.l32JjRYS014011@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fgfs-base - FlightGear base scenery and data files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234831 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 19:46:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 15:46:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234826] Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021946.l32Jk9oH014171@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234826 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 19:52:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 15:52:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234882] Review Request: libident - New LibIdent C library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021952.l32Jq86k015090@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libident - New LibIdent C library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234882 ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2007-04-02 15:52 EST ------- Ahh, just to clarify: The problem is not creating a shared library for libident. This can be done probably with something like gcc -shared -Wl,-soname,libident -o libident.so *.o. The problem is more that all the tools I've seen which use libident are expecting this to be a static lib. So we're in a similar situation as with libnet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 19:52:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 15:52:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233142] Review Request: asc - Advanced Strategic Command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704021952.l32Jqxxx015242@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asc - Advanced Strategic Command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233142 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-04-02 15:52 EST ------- I'll try it on a different box. I've been building on this box for awhile, no major issues so far. I'll see what happens. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 20:17:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 16:17:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208678] Review Request: SimGear - Simulation library components In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704022017.l32KHAwB017670@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SimGear - Simulation library components https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208678 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-02 16:17 EST ------- SimGear is in the repo now (and has been successfully tested with FlightGear), closing. For those interested FlightGear's review is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234826 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234831 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234835 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 20:17:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 16:17:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208679] Review Request: vamos - Automotive simulation framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704022017.l32KHYE5017737@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vamos - Automotive simulation framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208679 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Bug 208679 depends on bug 208678, which changed state. Bug 208678 Summary: Review Request: SimGear - Simulation library components https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208678 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 20:17:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 16:17:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234882] Review Request: libident - New LibIdent C library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704022017.l32KHjeJ017757@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libident - New LibIdent C library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234882 ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2007-04-02 16:17 EST ------- Mhm, Seems like my testcase ngircd works with the shared library as well. Must have been updated in the last months then. I uploaded a new spec which created a shared library. Please take a look. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 20:18:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 16:18:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234079] Review Request: kicker-compiz - Pager applet for kicker to make it work with compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704022018.l32KIVqE017875@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kicker-compiz - Pager applet for kicker to make it work with compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234079 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gauret at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2007-04-02 16:18 EST ------- Quick notes, because I can't get it to work so I won't review it just yet : * Please use this URL in the Source tag : http://kde-apps.org/CONTENT/content-files/46021-kicker-compiz-3.5.4.tar.gz * mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 14) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 20:27:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 16:27:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 224254] Review Request: bos - Real-time strategy game using the Stratagus game engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704022027.l32KRUq8019444@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bos - Real-time strategy game using the Stratagus game engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224254 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-04-02 16:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > Forget my last 2 comments please, I just saw in comment 7 that you already > packaged 2.3, duh! Actually I still can't make it work with default stratagus. Things looks like we should focus on packaging previous release first instead of making patch-fest with unclear results with the latest one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 20:33:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 16:33:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 224254] Review Request: bos - Real-time strategy game using the Stratagus game engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704022033.l32KXPeU020680@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bos - Real-time strategy game using the Stratagus game engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224254 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-02 16:33 EST ------- Why don't you just use the included stratagus? They forked stratagus as they wanted to make some changes there, so the new boswars is not designed to work with the plain stratagus. I think its necessary (and OK) to also package the included stratagus version together with the data. Much like tremulous which is a modified quake engine comes with its own copy, which also is packaged as par of the tremulous package, even though the code is 95-99% quake. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 20:36:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 16:36:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221906] Review Request: gmediaserver - UPnP compatible media server for the GNU system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704022036.l32KashW021439@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gmediaserver - UPnP compatible media server for the GNU system Alias: gmediaserver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221906 ------- Additional Comments From karlikt at gmail.com 2007-04-02 16:36 EST ------- Well...IMO there are some ways resolve this problem: 1. Do not change it, the owner of /srv/gmediaserver will be changing all time when the package user will be having other uid/gid and the files are often 644, so the program can read it. I think it is safe, because if the directory will not be deleted unless it is empty. 2. Delete from spec: "%postun if [ $1 = 0 ]; then /usr/sbin/userdel gmediaserver &>/dev/null || : /usr/sbin/groupdel gmediaserver &>/dev/null || : fi". It can be good idea, but I think the packages which does not remove users make a mess. If the all servers do not remove it, after some "testing" instalations (different packages) in system will be a lot of needless users. On the other hand there is not a problem with owner of log-file (in gmediaserver) and it is very safe for the media files. 3. The static uid/gid solve all problems, but I really do not know if the make static uid/gid is good idea if there are another solution. I made the spec more clearly, but I make next release when I will know what I should do with the gmediaserver-package-user. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 20:46:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 16:46:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234835] Review Request: fgfs-Atlas - Flightgear map tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704022046.l32KkuYm023136@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fgfs-Atlas - Flightgear map tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234835 ------- Additional Comments From fabrice at bellet.info 2007-04-02 16:46 EST ------- I removed the duplicate BuildRequires. Should I rename the package to something better ? There's already an "atlas" (lowercase A) package in Fedora, for http://math-atlas.sourceforge.net/ so I think we should avoid the name "Atlas" alone. Alternative name can be FlightGear-Atlas that clearly shows the relation with the FlightGear project. I chose fgfs-Atlas, because the upstream big all-in-one data tarball of FlightGear is called fgfs-base (BZ#234831), and Atlas primarily works with the scenery files of this tarball. New SPEC: http://fr2.rpmfind.net/pub/bellet/review/fgfs-Atlas.spec New SRPM: http://fr2.rpmfind.net/pub/bellet/review/fgfs-Atlas-0.3.1-3.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 21:13:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 17:13:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233388] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-CalendarButton - Gtk2::Ex::CalendarButton Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704022113.l32LDUEY025691@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-CalendarButton - Gtk2::Ex::CalendarButton Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233388 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-02 17:13 EST ------- BR perl is optional. What with the recent (well, ongoing, really) perl/perl-devel split I'm starting to be a touch more pedantic w.r.t. perl BR's. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 21:18:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 17:18:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205319] Review Request: perl-Params-Coerce - Allows your classes to do coercion of parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704022118.l32LILhp026081@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Params-Coerce - Allows your classes to do coercion of parameters Alias: perl-Params-Coerce https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205319 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-Params-Coerce -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 21:20:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 17:20:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234926] New: Review Request: ngircd - Next Generation IRC Daemon Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234926 Summary: Review Request: ngircd - Next Generation IRC Daemon Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: andreas at bawue.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/ngircd/ngircd.spec SRPM URL: http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/ngircd/ngircd-0.10.1-2.src.rpm Description: ngIRCd is a free open source daemon for Internet Relay Chat (IRC), developed under the GNU General Public License (GPL). It's written from scratch and is not based upon the original IRCd like many others. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 21:21:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 17:21:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234926] Review Request: ngircd - Next Generation IRC Daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704022121.l32LLip9026402@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ngircd - Next Generation IRC Daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234926 andreas at bawue.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |234882 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 21:21:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 17:21:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234882] Review Request: libident - New LibIdent C library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704022121.l32LLk9R026418@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libident - New LibIdent C library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234882 andreas at bawue.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |234926 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 21:27:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 17:27:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234926] Review Request: ngircd - Next Generation IRC Daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704022127.l32LR8sY026976@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ngircd - Next Generation IRC Daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234926 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-04-02 17:26 EST ------- Is this possibly a duplicate of: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228955 ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 21:30:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 17:30:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234368] Review Request: gnome-games-extra-data - themes for gnome-games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704022130.l32LUAaV027211@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-games-extra-data - themes for gnome-games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234368 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-04-02 17:29 EST ------- Built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 21:40:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 17:40:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234926] Review Request: ngircd - Next Generation IRC Daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704022140.l32LePkv028058@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ngircd - Next Generation IRC Daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234926 ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2007-04-02 17:40 EST ------- Uhh, right. I missed that one. Okay, it's a dupe. I'll talk with Sean about it. His package doesn't look as polished though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 21:42:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 17:42:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228955] Review Request: ngircd - A lightweight daemon for the Internet Relay Chat (IRC) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704022142.l32LgeOZ028227@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ngircd - A lightweight daemon for the Internet Relay Chat (IRC) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228955 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2007-04-02 17:42 EST ------- I overlooked this review request when adding #234926 for the same package. Sean, are you still interested in ngircd or should I submit my version of the package? #234926 is somewhat more integrated with the system then your version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 21:49:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 17:49:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234812] Review Request: tcpreplay - Replay captured network traffic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704022149.l32Lncpf028860@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcpreplay - Replay captured network traffic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234812 ------- Additional Comments From bojan at rexursive.com 2007-04-02 17:49 EST ------- See if this fares any better: ftp://ftp.rexursive.com/pub/tcpreplay/tcpreplay.spec ftp://ftp.rexursive.com/pub/tcpreplay/tcpreplay-2.3.5-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 21:59:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 17:59:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228955] Review Request: ngircd - A lightweight daemon for the Internet Relay Chat (IRC) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704022159.l32LxqpK029847@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ngircd - A lightweight daemon for the Internet Relay Chat (IRC) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228955 jafo-redhat at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From jafo-redhat at tummy.com 2007-04-02 17:59 EST ------- Have at it, Andreas. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 22:08:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 18:08:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228955] Review Request: ngircd - A lightweight daemon for the Internet Relay Chat (IRC) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704022208.l32M8SfQ030621@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ngircd - A lightweight daemon for the Internet Relay Chat (IRC) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228955 andreas at bawue.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2007-04-02 18:08 EST ------- Thanks sean. Closing this one here as a duplicate then. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 234926 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 22:08:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 18:08:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234926] Review Request: ngircd - Next Generation IRC Daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704022208.l32M8eNc030661@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ngircd - Next Generation IRC Daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234926 andreas at bawue.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jafo-redhat at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2007-04-02 18:08 EST ------- *** Bug 228955 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 22:52:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 18:52:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234569] Review Request: perl-Ace - Perl module for interfacing with ACE bioinformatics databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704022252.l32MqwsF000668@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Ace - Perl module for interfacing with ACE bioinformatics databases Alias: perl-AcePerl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234569 alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2007-04-02 18:52 EST ------- Builds fine in all branches. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 22:52:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 18:52:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234573] Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704022252.l32Mqxtc000680@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology Alias: perl-bioperl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234573 Bug 234573 depends on bug 234569, which changed state. Bug 234569 Summary: Review Request: perl-Ace - Perl module for interfacing with ACE bioinformatics databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234569 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 22:55:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 18:55:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234568] Review Request: perl-AutoClass - Automatically define classes and objects for Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704022255.l32MtdUM000874@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-AutoClass - Automatically define classes and objects for Perl Alias: perl-AutoClass https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234568 alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2007-04-02 18:55 EST ------- Builds in all branches. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 22:55:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 18:55:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234573] Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704022255.l32Mto9O000892@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology Alias: perl-bioperl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234573 Bug 234573 depends on bug 234568, which changed state. Bug 234568 Summary: Review Request: perl-AutoClass - Automatically define classes and objects for Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234568 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 23:01:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 19:01:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234571] Review Request: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene - Regular expression-based Perl Parser for NCBI Entrez Gene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704022301.l32N1XfN001193@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene - Regular expression-based Perl Parser for NCBI Entrez Gene Alias: Bio-ASN1-Entrez https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234571 alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2007-04-02 19:01 EST ------- Builds fine in all branches. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 23:01:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 19:01:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234573] Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704022301.l32N1YA7001210@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology Alias: perl-bioperl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234573 Bug 234573 depends on bug 234571, which changed state. Bug 234571 Summary: Review Request: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene - Regular expression-based Perl Parser for NCBI Entrez Gene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234571 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 23:03:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 19:03:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234454] Review Request: perl-PostScript - PostScript Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704022303.l32N30bY001302@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-PostScript - PostScript Perl module Alias: perl-PostScript https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234454 alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2007-04-02 19:02 EST ------- Builds in all branches. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 23:03:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 19:03:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234573] Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704022303.l32N31iE001314@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology Alias: perl-bioperl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234573 Bug 234573 depends on bug 234454, which changed state. Bug 234454 Summary: Review Request: perl-PostScript - PostScript Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234454 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 23:06:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 19:06:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234831] Review Request: fgfs-base - FlightGear base scenery and data files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704022306.l32N6opL001474@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fgfs-base - FlightGear base scenery and data files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234831 ------- Additional Comments From fabrice at bellet.info 2007-04-02 19:06 EST ------- ok. I moved doc files and COPYING to the docdir. New SPEC : http://fr2.rpmfind.net/pub/bellet/review/fgfs-base.spec New SRPM : http://fr2.rpmfind.net/pub/bellet/review/fgfs-base-0.9.10-2.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 23:16:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 19:16:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234939] New: Review Request: perl-Affix-Infix2Postfix - Perl extension for converting from infix notation to postfix notation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234939 Summary: Review Request: perl-Affix-Infix2Postfix - Perl extension for converting from infix notation to postfix notation Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Affix-Infix2Postfix/perl-Affix-Infix2Postfix.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Affix-Infix2Postfix-0.03-1.src.rpm Description: Infix2Postfix as the name suggests converts from infix to postfix notation. The reason why someone would like to do this is that postfix notation is generally much easier to do in computers. For example take an expression like: a+b+c*d. For us humans it's pretty easy to do that calculation. But it's actually much better for computers to get a string of operations such as: a b + c d * +, where the variable names mean put variable on stack. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 23:18:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 19:18:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234940] New: Review Request: perl-Image-Math-Constrain - Scaling math used in image size constraining (such as thumbnails) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234940 Summary: Review Request: perl-Image-Math-Constrain - Scaling math used in image size constraining (such as thumbnails) Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Image-Math-Constrain/perl-Image-Math-Constrain.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Image-Math-Constrain-1.01-1.src.rpm Description: There are a number of different modules and systems that constrain image sizes, such as thumbnailing. Every one of these independantly implement the same logic. That is, given a width and/or height constraint, they check to see if the image is bigger than the constraint, and if so scale the image down proportionally so that it fits within the constraints. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 23:21:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 19:21:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234939] Review Request: perl-Affix-Infix2Postfix - Perl extension for converting from infix notation to postfix notation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704022321.l32NLc8d002398@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Affix-Infix2Postfix - Perl extension for converting from infix notation to postfix notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234939 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |234934 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 23:21:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 19:21:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234940] Review Request: perl-Image-Math-Constrain - Scaling math used in image size constraining (such as thumbnails) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704022321.l32NLSet002376@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Image-Math-Constrain - Scaling math used in image size constraining (such as thumbnails) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234940 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |234934 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 23:24:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 19:24:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned CJK bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704022324.l32NOJIN002516@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned CJK bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-04-02 19:24 EST ------- https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2007-March/msg00128.html Basically the conclusion was that it should go into the version field as Tasaka-san suggested. So either "0.8.0_6" or "0.8.0.6". It would really be better though if the "upstream release number" could go away since it just causes problems for packagers. (In reply to comment #21) > oh, yes, if the release number start from 1, then, the version-release number > in %changelog will not match the package's number. They have to match. :) > perhaps the way you suggested is better. Well, I would put it more strongly, you cannot use the "upstream release number" directly in the Fedora release field. It could be embedded there if you do not wish to include it in the version field. See also . Qianqian, as the submitter you cannot assign a Package Review to yourself. Tasaka-san, do you want to take it? Otherwise I can do it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 23:44:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 19:44:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234860] Review Request: perl-Mail-IMAPClient - An IMAP Client API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704022344.l32NiX7K003507@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-IMAPClient - An IMAP Client API Alias: perl-Mail-IMAPClient https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234860 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-Mail-IMAPClient -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 00:03:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 20:03:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233844] Review Request: perl-Convert-Binary-C - Binary data conversion using C types In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704030003.l3303Gt1004586@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Convert-Binary-C - Binary data conversion using C types Alias: perl-Convert-Bin-C https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233844 alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2007-04-02 20:03 EST ------- Problem was use of parallel make, which package doesn't support. This is now fixed in CVS by the following change: and now packages build fine in all arch and branches. * Mon Apr 02 2007 Alex Lancaster 0.67-4 - Remove '%{?_smp_mflags}', package does not support parallel make. Closing bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 00:03:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 20:03:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234573] Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704030003.l3303HWD004598@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology Alias: perl-bioperl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234573 Bug 234573 depends on bug 233844, which changed state. Bug 233844 Summary: Review Request: perl-Convert-Binary-C - Binary data conversion using C types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233844 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 00:31:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 20:31:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 166008] Review Request: uw-imap - UW Server daemons for IMAP and POP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704030031.l330Vtma008091@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uw-imap - UW Server daemons for IMAP and POP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166008 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org ------- Additional Comments From jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org 2007-04-02 20:31 EST ------- Comaintainers need to be in the Owners field for the pkg.acl stuff to work. Do you really want to add Joe as a Comaintainer? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 00:33:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 20:33:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234789] Review Request: perl-Return-Value - Polymorphic Return Values In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704030033.l330XiwM008341@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Return-Value - Polymorphic Return Values Alias: perl-Return-Value https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234789 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 00:38:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 20:38:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234788] Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Attachment-Stripper - Strip the attachments from a mail message In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704030038.l330cQnI008894@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Attachment-Stripper - Strip the attachments from a mail message https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234788 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 00:42:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 20:42:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234445] Review Request: mod_auth_shadow - An Apache module for authentication using /etc/shadow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704030042.l330gFtt009599@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_auth_shadow - An Apache module for authentication using /etc/shadow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234445 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 00:44:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 20:44:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234814] Review Request: perl-HTML-Encoding - Determine the encoding of HTML/XML/XHTML documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704030044.l330it8U010083@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-Encoding - Determine the encoding of HTML/XML/XHTML documents Alias: perl-HTML-Encoding https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234814 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 00:48:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 20:48:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234857] Review Request: perl-Geography-Countries - 2-letter, 3-letter, and numerical codes for countries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704030048.l330mcK3010517@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Geography-Countries - 2-letter, 3-letter, and numerical codes for countries Alias: Geography-Countries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234857 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 02:39:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 22:39:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned CJK bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704030239.l332dMF2016759@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned CJK bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 fangqq at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|fangqq at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org ------- Additional Comments From fangqq at gmail.com 2007-04-02 22:39 EST ------- thanks Jens after reading the links you posted, I think 0.8.0-1 is the appropriate version-release tag for this package. the new spec and srpm files can be viewed and downloaded here http://wenq.org/eindex.cgi?wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec http://wenq.org/release/08src/wqy-bitmap-fonts-0.8.0-1.src.rpm the changes of the spec file( http://wenq.org/eindex.cgi?action=browse&diff=1&id=wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec&revision=6&diffrevision=5) include 1. used 1 as release number 2. updated release tags in %changelog 3. removed the changelog items for 0.7.0 and ealier, combined changelog items for 0.7.9 (as upstream beta) and 0.8.0 as the new 0.8.0-1 tag how do these changes look to you? by the way, I put my email address in the assignee just for fulfill my curiosities when I played around. now I will restore it to nobody at fedoraproject.org until any of you take the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 02:44:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 22:44:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned CJK bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704030244.l332ihgV017205@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned CJK bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 ------- Additional Comments From fangqq at gmail.com 2007-04-02 22:44 EST ------- a second read of the package naming rules reminds me that the upstream tarball name wqy-bitmapfont is recommended name for the package, Jens, do you suggest me rolling back the package name as well? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 04:01:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 00:01:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234573] Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704030401.l3341BMm023899@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology Alias: perl-bioperl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234573 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2007-04-03 00:00 EST ------- The problem is a circular BuildRequires on perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene package. I have removed this in this update: * Mon Apr 02 2007 Alex Lancaster 1.5.2_102-3 - Remove BuildRequires: perl(Bio::ASN1::EntrezGene), creates a circular dependency, the dependency is still found at install-time. Spec URL: http://allele5.biol.berkeley.edu/~alex/fedora/perl-bioperl.spec SRPM URL: http://allele5.biol.berkeley.edu/~alex/fedora/perl-bioperl-1.5.2_102-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 04:16:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 00:16:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234573] Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704030416.l334GqZQ025204@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology Alias: perl-bioperl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234573 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2007-04-03 00:16 EST ------- As an aside, there is currently a discussion on the bioperl-l list about where bioperl should live, on Fedora or in a third-party repository like http://biopackages.net/. See the thread at: http://lists.open-bio.org/pipermail/bioperl-l/2007-March/thread.html#25279 One of the issue is in addition to this base bioperl package residing here, there is bioperl-run which has interfaces to a number of non-free packages such as Clustal which couldn't be packaged in Fedora. Possibilities are: 1. Host the bioperl - the interfaces to non-free packages on Fedora and package the non-free interfaces on biopackages.net 2. Host all bioperl-* packages on biopackages.net I lean towards 1), but splitting up a single tarball across distributions can be rather messy. Ideas welcome. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 04:18:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 00:18:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234573] Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704030418.l334IEG5025351@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology Alias: perl-bioperl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234573 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2007-04-03 00:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > > 1. Host the bioperl - the interfaces to non-free packages on Fedora Should read: Host all of bioperl minus the interfaces to non-free packages on Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 05:46:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 01:46:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234563] Review Request: tecnoballz - A Breakout like game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704030546.l335kb7a028963@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tecnoballz - A Breakout like game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234563 musuruan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From musuruan at gmail.com 2007-04-03 01:46 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tecnoballz Short Description: A Breakout like game Owners: musuruan at gmail.com Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: musuruan at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 06:51:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 02:51:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234445] Review Request: mod_auth_shadow - An Apache module for authentication using /etc/shadow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704030651.l336pelk031999@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_auth_shadow - An Apache module for authentication using /etc/shadow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234445 fedora-packaging at dw-perspective.org.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora-packaging at dw-perspective.org.uk 2007-04-03 02:51 EST ------- OK, in CVS and built for devel now. Thanks to everyone who helped. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 07:01:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 03:01:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233423] Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704030701.l337184k032316@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233423 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-03 03:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #21) > Hmm, I didnt intentionally set fedora-review+. That was a mistake on my part. > > It seems to me that Ralf is just being a hard ass like usual. Watch your language, Togami - There might be a language barrier hitting, but are you really name-calling me as an "arse"? > But it is > reasonable to wait until after upstream makes a new release that has explicit > licenses before building this package. There is no doubt that this package violates: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-76294f12c6b481792eb001ba9763d95e2792e825 because it doesn't contain any licence/copyright notice nor any indication that Fedora is legimitated to ship this package. We have seen packages banned for far less. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 07:19:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 03:19:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234573] Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704030719.l337JEt9000559@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology Alias: perl-bioperl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234573 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-03 03:19 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=151548) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=151548&action=view) Failed mock build's build.log Attaching Mock build.log for your reference for further changes for make test and is removing perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene as BR is OK? Its giving warning in build.log now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 07:30:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 03:30:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234573] Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704030730.l337U4qp001060@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology Alias: perl-bioperl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234573 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2007-04-03 03:30 EST ------- It looks like many, if not, most, tests require network access, so we may have to disable all of them. It's OK to remove perl-Bio-ASN-EntrezGene, as it's the only workaround that will allow it to be installed (this is what upstream does anyway). It is added back as an auto-generated Requires for install-time, so it's OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 09:08:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 05:08:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223943] Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME - point, click, debug! In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704030908.l3398LpD009336@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME - point, click, debug! Alias: nemiver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223943 giallu at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |giallu at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2007-04-03 05:08 EST ------- Ok, since I am probably going to be a user of this, I'll try to review the package. Please note this is my first official review, so anyone watching over my shoulders will be really welcome... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 09:17:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 05:17:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234563] Review Request: tecnoballz - A Breakout like game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704030917.l339HEvW010117@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tecnoballz - A Breakout like game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234563 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-03 05:17 EST ------- Andrea, I missed this during review, but please change the summary from: "A Breakout like game" to "A Brick Busting game" before importing as breakout is a trademark. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 09:33:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 05:33:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234814] Review Request: perl-HTML-Encoding - Determine the encoding of HTML/XML/XHTML documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704030933.l339X6DL011397@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-Encoding - Determine the encoding of HTML/XML/XHTML documents Alias: perl-HTML-Encoding https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234814 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-04-03 05:33 EST ------- Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 09:36:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 05:36:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234031] Review Request: eclipse-pydev - an Eclipse plugin for working with Python. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704030936.l339aaDn011687@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-pydev - an Eclipse plugin for working with Python. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234031 ------- Additional Comments From tla at rasmil.dk 2007-04-03 05:36 EST ------- eclipse-pydev-1.3.1-3.src.rpm b build fine in mock (development / i386) But it look like eclipse-jdt is needed as a requirement. $ rpm -qa | grep "eclipse" eclipse-subclipse-1.1.9-2.fc7 eclipse-pydev-1.3.1-3.fc7 eclipse-rcp-3.2.2-7.fc7 eclipse-ecj-3.2.2-7.fc7 eclipse-platform-3.2.2-7.fc7 Pydev is not working. $ rpm -qa | grep "eclipse" eclipse-subclipse-1.1.9-2.fc7 eclipse-pydev-1.3.1-3.fc7 eclipse-rcp-3.2.2-7.fc7 eclipse-jdt-3.2.2-7.fc7 eclipse-ecj-3.2.2-7.fc7 eclipse-platform-3.2.2-7.fc7 Pydev is working now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 09:38:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 05:38:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234563] Review Request: tecnoballz - A Breakout like game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704030938.l339c8MT011856@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tecnoballz - A Breakout like game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234563 ------- Additional Comments From musuruan at gmail.com 2007-04-03 05:38 EST ------- Hans, I will as you requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 09:39:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 05:39:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234331] Review Request: linuxdcpp - Direct Connect client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704030939.l339dKZI011957@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linuxdcpp - Direct Connect client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234331 ------- Additional Comments From mgarski at post.pl 2007-04-03 05:39 EST ------- I have asked LinuxDC++ developer when they plan to make a release: https://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/linuxdcpp-developers/2007-March/000443.html Why there haven't benn official release, because "the only thing holding back a release is the incomplete i18n support", besides "I've been packaging linuxdcpp without any major issue for months now in debian". Have this convinced you to review? :) Or should I wait until official release? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 09:48:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 05:48:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234573] Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704030948.l339mB7r012594@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology Alias: perl-bioperl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234573 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2007-04-03 05:47 EST ------- * Tue Apr 03 2007 Alex Lancaster 1.5.2_102-4 - Disable tests because many of them require network access, add _with_check macro so they can be enabled during testing. Spec URL: http://allele5.biol.berkeley.edu/~alex/fedora/perl-bioperl.spec SRPM URL: http://allele5.biol.berkeley.edu/~alex/fedora/perl-bioperl-1.5.2_102-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 10:16:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 06:16:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234573] Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031016.l33AGR7k014057@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology Alias: perl-bioperl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234573 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-03 06:16 EST ------- Starting Review Like to Note here first that build.log gave Checking prerequisites... Install [a]ll optional external modules, [n]one, or choose [i]nteractively? [n] * Optional prerequisite Bio::ASN1::EntrezGene is not installed (wanted for parsing entrezgene, used by Bio::SeqIO::entrezgene) ERRORS/WARNINGS FOUND IN PREREQUISITES. You may wish to install the versions of the modules indicated above before proceeding with this installation * Could not connect to test database Checking features: BioDBSeqFeature_mysql....disabled BioDBGFF.................enabled BioDBSeqFeature_BDB......enabled which seems not problematic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 10:24:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 06:24:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234573] Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031024.l33AOKqS014331@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology Alias: perl-bioperl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234573 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2007-04-03 06:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > ERRORS/WARNINGS FOUND IN PREREQUISITES. You may wish to install the versions > of the modules indicated above before proceeding with this installation > > * Could not connect to test database > Checking features: > BioDBSeqFeature_mysql....disabled > BioDBGFF.................enabled > BioDBSeqFeature_BDB......enabled > > which seems not problematic. Yep, it's just a warning, it must be ignored because of the circular build dependency. New SRPM URL: http://allele5.biol.berkeley.edu/~alex/fedora/perl-bioperl-1.5.2_102-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 10:36:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 06:36:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234573] Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031036.l33AaYQx014838@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology Alias: perl-bioperl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234573 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-03 06:36 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 71f22246979ee5d6e19d547319962eea bioperl-1.5.2_102.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test disabled. + Provides: perl(Bio::Align::AlignI) perl(Bio::Align::DNAStatistics) perl(Bio::Align::PairwiseStatistics) perl(Bio::Align::ProteinStatistics) perl(Bio::Align::StatisticsI) perl(Bio::Align::Utilities) perl(Bio::AlignIO) perl(Bio::AlignIO::bl2seq) perl(Bio::AlignIO::clustalw) perl(Bio::AlignIO::emboss) perl(Bio::AlignIO::fasta) perl(Bio::AlignIO::largemultifasta) perl(Bio::AlignIO::maf) perl(Bio::AlignIO::mase) perl(Bio::AlignIO::mega) perl(Bio::AlignIO::meme) perl(Bio::AlignIO::metafasta) perl(Bio::AlignIO::msf) perl(Bio::AlignIO::nexus) perl(Bio::AlignIO::pfam) perl(Bio::AlignIO::phylip) perl(Bio::AlignIO::po) perl(Bio::AlignIO::prodom) perl(Bio::AlignIO::psi) perl(Bio::AlignIO::selex) perl(Bio::AlignIO::stockholm) perl(Bio::AnalysisI) perl(Bio::AnalysisI::JobI) perl(Bio::AnalysisParserI) perl(Bio::AnalysisResultI) perl(Bio::AnnotatableI) perl(Bio::Annotation::AnnotationFactory) perl(Bio::Annotation::Collection) perl(Bio::Annotation::Comment) perl(Bio::Annotation::DBLink) perl(Bio::Annotation::OntologyTerm) perl(Bio::Annotation::Reference) perl(Bio::Annotation::SimpleValue) perl(Bio::Annotation::StructuredValue) perl(Bio::Annotation::Target) perl(Bio::Annotation::TypeManager) perl(Bio::AnnotationCollectionI) perl(Bio::AnnotationI) perl(Bio::Assembly::Contig) perl(Bio::Assembly::ContigAnalysis) perl(Bio::Assembly::IO) perl(Bio::Assembly::IO::ace) perl(Bio::Assembly::IO::phrap) perl(Bio::Assembly::Scaffold) perl(Bio::Assembly::ScaffoldI) perl(Bio::Assembly::Singlet) perl(Bio::Biblio) perl(Bio::Biblio::Article) perl(Bio::Biblio::BiblioBase) perl(Bio::Biblio::Book) perl(Bio::Biblio::BookArticle) perl(Bio::Biblio::IO) perl(Bio::Biblio::IO::medline2ref) perl(Bio::Biblio::IO::medlinexml) perl(Bio::Biblio::IO::pubmed2ref) perl(Bio::Biblio::IO::pubmedxml) perl(Bio::Biblio::Journal) perl(Bio::Biblio::JournalArticle) perl(Bio::Biblio::MedlineArticle) perl(Bio::Biblio::MedlineBook) perl(Bio::Biblio::MedlineBookArticle) perl(Bio::Biblio::MedlineJournal) perl(Bio::Biblio::MedlineJournalArticle) perl(Bio::Biblio::Organisation) perl(Bio::Biblio::Patent) perl(Bio::Biblio::Person) perl(Bio::Biblio::Proceeding) perl(Bio::Biblio::Provider) perl(Bio::Biblio::PubmedArticle) perl(Bio::Biblio::PubmedBookArticle) perl(Bio::Biblio::PubmedJournalArticle) perl(Bio::Biblio::Ref) perl(Bio::Biblio::Service) perl(Bio::Biblio::TechReport) perl(Bio::Biblio::Thesis) perl(Bio::Biblio::WebResource) perl(Bio::Cluster::ClusterFactory) perl(Bio::Cluster::FamilyI) perl(Bio::Cluster::SequenceFamily) perl(Bio::Cluster::UniGene) perl(Bio::Cluster::UniGeneI) perl(Bio::ClusterI) perl(Bio::ClusterIO) perl(Bio::ClusterIO::dbsnp) perl(Bio::ClusterIO::unigene) perl(Bio::CodonUsage::IO) perl(Bio::CodonUsage::Table) perl(Bio::ConfigData) perl(Bio::Coordinate::Chain) perl(Bio::Coordinate::Collection) perl(Bio::Coordinate::ExtrapolatingPair) perl(Bio::Coordinate::GeneMapper) perl(Bio::Coordinate::Graph) perl(Bio::Coordinate::MapperI) perl(Bio::Coordinate::Pair) perl(Bio::Coordinate::Result) perl(Bio::Coordinate::Result::Gap) perl(Bio::Coordinate::Result::Match) perl(Bio::Coordinate::ResultI) perl(Bio::Coordinate::Utils) perl(Bio::DB::Ace) perl(Bio::DB::Biblio::biofetch) perl(Bio::DB::Biblio::eutils) perl(Bio::DB::Biblio::pdf) perl(Bio::DB::Biblio::soap) perl(Bio::DB::BiblioI) perl(Bio::DB::BioFetch) perl(Bio::DB::CUTG) perl(Bio::DB::DBFetch) perl(Bio::DB::EMBL) perl(Bio::DB::EUtilities) perl(Bio::DB::EUtilities::Cookie) perl(Bio::DB::EUtilities::ElinkData) perl(Bio::DB::EUtilities::efetch) perl(Bio::DB::EUtilities::egquery) perl(Bio::DB::EUtilities::einfo) perl(Bio::DB::EUtilities::elink) perl(Bio::DB::EUtilities::epost) perl(Bio::DB::EUtilities::esearch) perl(Bio::DB::EUtilities::esummary) perl(Bio::DB::EntrezGene) perl(Bio::DB::Expression) perl(Bio::DB::Expression::geo) perl(Bio::DB::Failover) perl(Bio::DB::Fasta) perl(Bio::DB::Fasta::Stream) perl(Bio::DB::FileCache) perl(Bio::DB::Flat) perl(Bio::DB::Flat::BDB) perl(Bio::DB::Flat::BDB::embl) perl(Bio::DB::Flat::BDB::fasta) perl(Bio::DB::Flat::BDB::genbank) perl(Bio::DB::Flat::BDB::swiss) perl(Bio::DB::Flat::BDB::swissprot) perl(Bio::DB::Flat::BinarySearch) perl(Bio::DB::GDB) perl(Bio::DB::GFF) perl(Bio::DB::GFF::Adaptor::ace) perl(Bio::DB::GFF::Adaptor::berkeleydb) perl(Bio::DB::GFF::Adaptor::berkeleydb::iterator) perl(Bio::DB::GFF::Adaptor::biofetch) perl(Bio::DB::GFF::Adaptor::biofetch_oracle) perl(Bio::DB::GFF::Adaptor::dbi) perl(Bio::DB::GFF::Adaptor::dbi::caching_handle) perl(Bio::DB::GFF::Adaptor::dbi::faux_dbh) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 10:40:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 06:40:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234862] Review Request: perl-Mail-Box - Manage a mailbox, a folder with messages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031040.l33Aew79014947@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Box - Manage a mailbox, a folder with messages Alias: perl-Mail-Box https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234862 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-03 06:40 EST ------- any reason for not adding doc directory to %doc? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 10:45:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 06:45:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234488] Review Request: yum-presto - Yum plugin to download deltarpms rather than full rpms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031045.l33AjZ0U015108@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yum-presto - Yum plugin to download deltarpms rather than full rpms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234488 tla at rasmil.dk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tla at rasmil.dk Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tla at rasmil.dk 2007-04-03 06:45 EST ------- rpmlint Output: [tim at naboo ~]$ rpmlint yum-presto-0.3.3-1.noarch.rpm E: yum-presto only-non-binary-in-usr-lib [tim at naboo ~]$ rpmlint yum-presto-0.3.3-1.src.rpm W: yum-presto macro-in-%changelog _datadir - Change %{_datadir} to %%{_datadir} in Chagelog entry W: yum-presto no-%build-section - Not a blocker, but a empty %build section coulf be added to silence rpmlint -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 10:48:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 06:48:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234488] Review Request: yum-presto - Yum plugin to download deltarpms rather than full rpms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031048.l33AmLYC015169@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yum-presto - Yum plugin to download deltarpms rather than full rpms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234488 ------- Additional Comments From tla at rasmil.dk 2007-04-03 06:48 EST ------- MUST: * package is named appropriately * it is legal for Fedora to distribute this * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * specfile name matches %{name} * verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do) * summary and description fine * correct buildroot * %{?dist} is used * license text included in package and marked with %doc * package meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) X changelog format fine (see earlier bug comments) * Packager tag not used * Vendor tag not used * Distribution tag not used * License used and not Copyright * Summary tag does not end in a period * if possible, replace PreReq with Requires(pre) and/or Requires( * Source match upstream $ md5sum yum-presto-0.3.3.tar.bz2 fd1984365bdbe61aca8114ab47eccefa yum-presto-0.3.3.tar.bz2 $ md5sum rpmbuild/SOURCES/yum-presto-0.3.3.tar.bz2 fd1984365bdbe61aca8114ab47eccefa rpmbuild/SOURCES/yum-presto-0.3.3.tar.bz2 * specfile is legible * package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86 * BuildRequires are proper * make sure lines are <= 80 characters * specfile written in American English * no -doc sub-package necessary * no libraries * no rpath * config files uses %config(noreplace) * not a GUI app * no -devel sub-package necessary * macros used appropriately and consistently * no %makeinstall * install section must begin with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot} * no locale data * no cp usage so no need to worry about -p * split Requires(pre,post) into two separate lines * package not relocatable * package contains code * package owns all directories and files * no %files duplicates * file permissions fine ? %defattrs present - should it be %defattr(-, root, root, -) * %clean present * %doc files do not affect runtime * not a web app * verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs $ rpm -q --requires -p rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/yum-presto-0.3.3-1.noarch.rpm config(yum-presto) = 0.3.3-1 deltarpm >= 3.4 python >= 2.4 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 yum >= 3.0 $ rpm -q --provides -p rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/yum-presto-0.3.3-1.noarch.rpm config(yum-presto) = 0.3.3-1 yum-presto = 0.3.3-1 * run rpmlint on the binary RPMs - see previous bug comments SHOULD: * package should include license text in the package and mark it with %doc * package should build on i386 ? package should build in mock - I haven't tried, but I don't think it'll be a problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 10:52:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 06:52:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234571] Review Request: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene - Regular expression-based Perl Parser for NCBI Entrez Gene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031052.l33AqplQ015301@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene - Regular expression-based Perl Parser for NCBI Entrez Gene Alias: Bio-ASN1-Entrez https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234571 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-04-03 06:52 EST ------- Can you please test new packages only in "devel" and build them for the stable branches some time later? This one has unresolved dependencies (for FC-5, FC-6 and devel). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 10:54:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 06:54:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234488] Review Request: yum-presto - Yum plugin to download deltarpms rather than full rpms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031054.l33AsGJr015361@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yum-presto - Yum plugin to download deltarpms rather than full rpms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234488 ------- Additional Comments From tla at rasmil.dk 2007-04-03 06:54 EST ------- SUMMARY: E: yum-presto only-non-binary-in-usr-lib This is fine because yum plugins is stored in /usr/lib/yum-plugins. W: yum-presto macro-in-%changelog _datadir Change %{_datadir} to %%{_datadir} in Changelog entry use %defattr(-, root, root, -) Fix these issues and i will approve it, i'm not a sponsor, so we need somebody to sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 10:55:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 06:55:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223943] Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME - point, click, debug! In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031055.l33AtSbG015407@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME - point, click, debug! Alias: nemiver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223943 ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2007-04-03 06:55 EST ------- Here is the review: MUST ITEMS: + Package name is valid + spec file name match base package name + spec file is written in American English + spec file is legible (very!) + Sources matches upstream (289d46e97c125b95fdc5de9dd9736d7c nemiver-0.3.0.tar.bz2) + License is acceptable (GPL) + License is included in the package + Package builds (in mock) for FC6 i386 + BuildRequires list looks sane + Macros are consistently used + Use %find_lang macro for locale files + use ldconfig for installed .so files + package is not relocatable + headers and .so files correctly packaged in -devel + -devel correctly Requires base package + .la files excluded from package + .desktop file present and correctly installed rpmlint output: /var/lib/mock/fedora-6-i386-core/result/nemiver-0.3.0-6.fc6.i386.rpm W: nemiver non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/nemiver-workbench.schemas W: nemiver non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/nemiver-dbgperspective.schemas This are usually to be ignored (and probably rpmlint should as well...) /var/lib/mock/fedora-6-i386-core/result/nemiver-0.3.0-6.fc6.src.rpm W: nemiver mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 167, tab: line 1) line 167 is in the changelog section, so I think we can ignore this Just a couple questions: is the "touch" trick for forcing the icon cache update the usual/preferred/best way to do that? are you going to remove COPYING from the -devel subpackage as suggested in comment #2? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 10:59:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 06:59:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234573] Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031059.l33AxQbU015551@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology Alias: perl-bioperl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234573 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-04-03 06:59 EST ------- In reply to comment 4: > As mock build gave me > Error: Missing Dependency: perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq) > is needed by package perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene It is broken in the needsign queue, too, as extras-repoclosure also detects this. I've blacklisted the builds for now (FC-5, FC-6, development). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 11:07:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 07:07:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234573] Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031107.l33B7k41016019@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology Alias: perl-bioperl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234573 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2007-04-03 07:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > In reply to comment 4: > > > As mock build gave me > > Error: Missing Dependency: perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq) > > is needed by package perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene > > It is broken in the needsign queue, too, as extras-repoclosure > also detects this. I've blacklisted the builds for now (FC-5, > FC-6, development). These packages depend on each other, so once this package is built, perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene will have it's dependency satisfied. It no longer needs perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene at build-time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 11:10:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 07:10:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234862] Review Request: perl-Mail-Box - Manage a mailbox, a folder with messages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031110.l33BAGWF016174@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Box - Manage a mailbox, a folder with messages Alias: perl-Mail-Box https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234862 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-03 07:10 EST ------- oops I mean s/doc/examples -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 11:11:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 07:11:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234860] Review Request: perl-Mail-IMAPClient - An IMAP Client API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031111.l33BBeLG016250@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-IMAPClient - An IMAP Client API Alias: perl-Mail-IMAPClient https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234860 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-03 07:11 EST ------- Found no %doc with inclusion of docs and examples directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 11:10:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 07:10:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234860] Review Request: perl-Mail-IMAPClient - An IMAP Client API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031110.l33BAeUH016198@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-IMAPClient - An IMAP Client API Alias: perl-Mail-IMAPClient https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234860 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 11:13:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 07:13:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234573] Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031113.l33BD4Av016353@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology Alias: perl-bioperl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234573 alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2007-04-03 07:13 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-bioperl Short Description: A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology Owners: alexl at users.sourceforge.net Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: This directory exists in CVS as an orphaned package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 11:30:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 07:30:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234573] Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031130.l33BUvgT017183@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology Alias: perl-bioperl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234573 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-04-03 07:30 EST ------- What provides 'perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq)'? Comment 13 doesn't list it. But the module is part of bioperl. So what's wrong in the dependencies? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 11:42:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 07:42:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233142] Review Request: asc - Advanced Strategic Command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031142.l33BgBij017690@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asc - Advanced Strategic Command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233142 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-04-03 07:41 EST ------- Ah, that worked. Crud, now I have to build a new dev box. Oh well. Anyway, it builds, rpmlint is clean. TBC. . . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 11:42:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 07:42:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234573] Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031142.l33BgpEq017773@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology Alias: perl-bioperl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234573 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-03 07:42 EST ------- The dependencies are like this ===> rpm -q --requires perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene | grep Bio perl(Bio::ASN1::EntrezGene) perl(Bio::ASN1::Sequence) perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq) rpm -q --provides perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene perl(Bio::ASN1::EntrezGene) = 1.09 perl(Bio::ASN1::EntrezGene::Indexer) = 1.09 perl(Bio::ASN1::Sequence) = 1.09 perl(Bio::ASN1::Sequence::Indexer) = 1.09 perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene = 1.091-2 rpm -q --requires perl-bioperl | grep Bio::ASN1 perl(Bio::ASN1::EntrezGene) rpm -q --provides perl-bioperl | grep Abstract perl(Bio::Index::Abstract) perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 11:45:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 07:45:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234573] Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031145.l33BjHFY018056@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology Alias: perl-bioperl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234573 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-04-03 07:45 EST ------- Okay, then your list in comment 13 is truncated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 12:03:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 08:03:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234573] Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031203.l33C3rj6019423@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology Alias: perl-bioperl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234573 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2007-04-03 08:03 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=151551) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=151551&action=view) Complete provides list Yes, I've attached the full list the result of: rpm -q --provides perl-bioperl > /tmp/bioperl-provides -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 12:12:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 08:12:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 166008] Review Request: uw-imap - UW Server daemons for IMAP and POP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031212.l33CCGa2019996@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uw-imap - UW Server daemons for IMAP and POP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166008 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-04-03 08:11 EST ------- (Please set fedora-cvs flag to '?' again with the clarification. Thanks.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 12:19:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 08:19:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225784] Merge Review: gdbm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031219.l33CJEKZ020547@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gdbm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225784 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Bug 225784 depends on bug 223688, which changed state. Bug 223688 Summary: gdbm: non-failsafe install-info use in scriptlets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223688 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 12:22:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 08:22:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031222.l33CM81J020777@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2 Alias: perl-RPM2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-04-03 08:22 EST ------- Sorry, seems I forgot to make the cvs module. Should be there now, please try again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 12:23:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 08:23:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233142] Review Request: asc - Advanced Strategic Command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031223.l33CNimi020950@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asc - Advanced Strategic Command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233142 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-04-03 08:23 EST ------- Named accoring to naming Guidelines. Spec name good. Meets PackagingGuidelines. License is good. Spec is legible American English. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 12:41:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 08:41:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234563] Review Request: tecnoballz - A Breakout like game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031241.l33Cf8fS022544@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tecnoballz - A Breakout like game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234563 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-04-03 08:40 EST ------- cvs request done with changed description. BTW no need to put the owner also in InitialCC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 12:52:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 08:52:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234750] Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031252.l33Cqf6H023841@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234750 ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at fedoraproject.org 2007-04-03 08:52 EST ------- I tried removing flex and bison from BuildRequirements, and the package still builds in mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 12:57:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 08:57:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233142] Review Request: asc - Advanced Strategic Command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031257.l33Cv7Di024407@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asc - Advanced Strategic Command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233142 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-04-03 08:56 EST ------- Source MD5 matches. Builds on 1386. BRs are OK. Locales N/A. No ldconfig needed. Not relocatable. Ownership OK. No dupes. Perms OK. Clean present. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 13:03:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 09:03:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234750] Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031303.l33D369e025287@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234750 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-03 09:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > I tried removing flex and bison from BuildRequirements, and the package still > builds in mock. Yes, I know, but I left them in deliberately, because as Ralf said, sometimes having them present is needed to work around certain bugs. And the ./configure script does check for them. Also they are not that bug. So all things concidered I would rather leave them in. I think that covers all mentioned issues, can this package be approved now then? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 13:04:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 09:04:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233142] Review Request: asc - Advanced Strategic Command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031304.l33D4hLF025533@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asc - Advanced Strategic Command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233142 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-04-03 09:04 EST ------- Macro use OK. Code, not content. No large docs. No runtime doc deps. No header or static files. No libraries. No .pc files. Desktop file is good, handled properly. All MUSTS good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 13:10:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 09:10:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234721] Review Request: sakura - A terminal emulator based on GTK+ and VTE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031310.l33DAQ2D026417@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sakura - A terminal emulator based on GTK+ and VTE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234721 ------- Additional Comments From splinux25 at gmail.com 2007-04-03 09:10 EST ------- Fixed with a new rpm Spec URL: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/sakura/sakura.spec SRPM URL: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/sakura/sakura-1.1.4-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 13:16:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 09:16:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031316.l33DGpWt027245@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at fedoraproject.org 2007-04-03 09:16 EST ------- Now I know why it fails on x86_64. I did not spot this configure warning at first: - - - - checking for tclConfig.sh... Can't find Tcl configuration script "tclConfig.sh" Reverting to non-Tcl compilation checking for X... libraries /usr/lib64, headers checking for gethostbyname... yes checking for connect... yes - - - - The real problem is that the makefile in netgen/lib does not check if install path exists before attempting to copy the file, but adding --with-tcl=%{_libdir} to %configure solves the problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 13:20:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 09:20:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234573] Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031320.l33DKJtQ027589@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology Alias: perl-bioperl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234573 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-04-03 09:20 EST ------- I think the Summary can be shortened to "Perl tools for computational molecular biology". CVS ownership added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 13:24:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 09:24:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234573] Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031324.l33DO97t028008@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology Alias: perl-bioperl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234573 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-04-03 09:24 EST ------- Alex, you may need to be careful with the old FC-5 and FC-6 branches since they still contain the previous packaging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 13:43:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 09:43:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234488] Review Request: yum-presto - Yum plugin to download deltarpms rather than full rpms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031343.l33DhTGL029612@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yum-presto - Yum plugin to download deltarpms rather than full rpms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234488 ------- Additional Comments From jdieter at gmail.com 2007-04-03 09:43 EST ------- New release: 0.3.4-1 Spec URL: http://www.lesbg.com/jdieter/presto/yum-presto.spec SRPM URL: http://www.lesbg.com/jdieter/presto/yum-presto-0.3.4-1.src.rpm This fixes all the mistakes you pointed out, Tim (including the %build one). Thanks much for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 13:44:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 09:44:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226164] Merge Review: mtr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031344.l33Dim8D029757@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mtr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226164 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|mmaslano at redhat.com |dan at danny.cz Flag|needinfo? | ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2007-04-03 09:44 EST ------- The bug has to be reassigned to you, when it's approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 13:47:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 09:47:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226402] Merge Review: SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031347.l33DlZiv030004@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226402 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|RAWHIDE | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-03 09:47 EST ------- Thomas, Thanks for fixing most open SDL bugs and for fixing/answering most of my questions. As stated however, my initial list of questions wasn't a full review yet, so bug isn't resolved yet, reopening. And then now the full review: MUST: ===== 0 rpmlint output is: W: SDL-devel summary-ended-with-dot Files needed to develop Simple DirectMedia Layer applications. W: SDL rpm-buildroot-usage %prep rm -rf %{buildroot} W: SDL macro-in-%changelog build * Package and spec file named appropriately * Packaged according to packaging guidelines * License ok * spec file is legible and in Am. English. * Source matches upstream * Compiles and builds on devel x86_64 * BR: ok * No locales * ldconfig run for shared libraries * Not relocatable 0 Package owns / or requires all dirs * No duplicate files & Permissions * %clean & macro usage OK * Contains code only * %doc does not affect runtime, and isn't large enough to warrent a sub package * -devel package as needed * no .desktop file required Should Fix ========== * remove this line: "CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" CXXFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" \", this is Superfluous, as %configure already does this itself * remove "README-SDL.txt COPYING CREDITS BUGS" from %files devel's %doc, they are already included in the main %doc, which is required by -devel * bug 234823 bug 208212 Must Fix ======== * From rpmlint: * Drop the . at the end of the -devel package summary * Drop "rm -rf %{buildroot}" from %prep (already done at the begin of %install) * change %build in %changelog to %%build * Drop the static library from -devel * Add "Requires: pkgcconfig" to -devel subpackage for proper ownership of the /usr/%{_lib}/pkgconfig directory * Add "Requires: automake" to -devel subpackage for proper ownership of the /usr/share/aclocal directory As said before all in all a pretty good package! and once the above fixes have been applied its "perfect" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 13:53:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 09:53:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233142] Review Request: asc - Advanced Strategic Command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031353.l33DrMO9030549@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asc - Advanced Strategic Command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233142 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-04-03 09:53 EST ------- Builds in mock. SHOULDS look fine. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 13:55:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 09:55:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232160] Review Request: ruby-gnome2 - A ruby binding of libgnome/libgnomeui-2.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031355.l33DtYki030778@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-gnome2 - A ruby binding of libgnome/libgnomeui-2.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232160 ------- Additional Comments From allisson at gmail.com 2007-04-03 09:55 EST ------- Update package: Spec URL: http://fedora.allisson.eti.br/ruby-gnome2/ruby-gnome2.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.allisson.eti.br/ruby-gnome2/ruby-gnome2-0.16.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 13:57:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 09:57:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234750] Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031357.l33DvXCY031102@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234750 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-03 09:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > (In reply to comment #13) > > I tried removing flex and bison from BuildRequirements, and the package still > > builds in mock. > > Yes, I know, but I left them in deliberately, because as Ralf said, sometimes > having them present is needed to work around certain bugs. I recommend to remove them from BuildRequires, because this inside of a build-system assures building to use the pre-build sources and prevents an arbitrary bison/byacc/flex to interfere. I'd even go a step further and to BuildConflicts: bison flex byacc > And the ./configure > script does check for them. Also they are not that bug. So all things > concidered I would rather leave them in. Well you know about esp. flex's "fame"? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 14:00:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 10:00:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234835] Review Request: fgfs-Atlas - Flightgear map tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031400.l33E0udR031436@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fgfs-Atlas - Flightgear map tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234835 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-04-03 10:00 EST ------- On my mind flygear-atlas sound better. But then you should rename your other package in flygear-base. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 14:20:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 10:20:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234750] Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031420.l33EKGBK001040@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234750 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-03 10:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #14) > > And the ./configure > > script does check for them. Also they are not that bug. So all things > > concidered I would rather leave them in. > Well you know about esp. flex's "fame"? No I don't but I trust your experience with cross compiler setups (mine is very limited) so I'll take your word for it. Are there any other problems with the second revision I posted other then that those BR's should be removed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 14:21:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 10:21:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233142] Review Request: asc - Advanced Strategic Command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031421.l33ELj7p001177@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asc - Advanced Strategic Command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233142 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-03 10:21 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: acs Short Description: Advanced Strategic Command Owners: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Branches: FC-6 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 14:22:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 10:22:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233142] Review Request: asc - Advanced Strategic Command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031422.l33EMowk001283@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asc - Advanced Strategic Command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233142 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-03 10:22 EST ------- OOPS make that: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: asc Short Description: Advanced Strategic Command Owners: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Branches: FC-6 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 14:24:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 10:24:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234835] Review Request: fgfs-Atlas - Flightgear map tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031424.l33EOK98001439@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fgfs-Atlas - Flightgear map tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234835 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-03 10:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > On my mind flygear-atlas sound better. But then you should rename your other > package in flygear-base. Notice that fgfs-base ic actually called fgfs-base by upstream, so that should not be renamed. As for a name for this. I think that fgfs-atlas, following the base package isn't such a bad idea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 14:25:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 10:25:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234882] Review Request: libident - New LibIdent C library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031425.l33EPHAd001535@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libident - New LibIdent C library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234882 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-04-03 10:25 EST ------- Good: + Local build works fine. Bad: - in.libidenttestd seems to be staticly linked agains libident - Please upload a full source rpm for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 14:26:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 10:26:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234750] Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031426.l33EQhNX001670@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234750 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-03 10:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > (In reply to comment #15) > > (In reply to comment #14) > Are there any other problems with the > second revision I posted other then that those BR's should be removed? Sorry, but I haven't had any chance to look into it yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 14:29:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 10:29:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226402] Merge Review: SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031429.l33ETD47001981@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226402 twoerner at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(j.w.r.degoede at hhs. | |nl) ------- Additional Comments From twoerner at redhat.com 2007-04-03 10:29 EST ------- Why is dropping the static library a must? bug 208212 has already been fixed in package SDL-1.2.11-1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 14:37:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 10:37:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 166008] Review Request: uw-imap - UW Server daemons for IMAP and POP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031437.l33EbMcC002787@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uw-imap - UW Server daemons for IMAP and POP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166008 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-04-03 10:37 EST ------- OK, one more try: Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: uw-imap Updated Fedora Owners:rdieter at math.unl.edu,jorton at redhat.com +comaintainer jorton -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 15:27:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 11:27:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226402] Merge Review: SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031527.l33FRoeJ008201@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226402 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(j.w.r.degoede at hhs.| |nl) | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-03 11:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Why is dropping the static library a must? > The line between Must and Should is thin, anything is debatable. In general there are little good reasons to keep a static library around. Do you want to keep it around and if so, why? > bug 208212 has already been fixed in package SDL-1.2.11-1. Okay, then maybe it should be closed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 15:32:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 11:32:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226270] Merge Review: perl-Net-DNS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031532.l33FWW1M008552@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Net-DNS Alias: perl-Net-DNS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226270 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Alias| |perl-Net-DNS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 15:32:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 11:32:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226267] Merge Review: perl-LDAP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031532.l33FWd2n008575@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-LDAP Alias: perl-LDAP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226267 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Alias| |perl-LDAP -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 15:36:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 11:36:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 214266] Review Request: perl-Moose-Policy - Moose-mounted police In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031536.l33FajiS009012@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Moose-Policy - Moose-mounted police Alias: perl-Moose-Policy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214266 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-Moose-Policy -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 15:58:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 11:58:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234835] Review Request: fgfs-Atlas - Flightgear map tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031558.l33FwSPU010919@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fgfs-Atlas - Flightgear map tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234835 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag|fedora-review? |needinfo?, fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-04-03 11:58 EST ------- good: + Naming ok. + Tar ball matches with upstream. + License ok. + Package contains verbain copy of the license text *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 16:09:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 12:09:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234831] Review Request: fgfs-base - FlightGear base scenery and data files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031609.l33G9Q4p011965@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fgfs-base - FlightGear base scenery and data files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234831 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-04-03 12:09 EST ------- Good: + Package contains verbatin copy of the license text. *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 16:15:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 12:15:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226138] Merge Review: metacity In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031615.l33GF783012614@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: metacity https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226138 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Bug 226138 depends on bug 203547, which changed state. Bug 203547 Summary: split a metacity-devel package + missing dependency https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203547 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 16:15:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 12:15:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200249] Review Request: cvs2svn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031615.l33GFrRM012787@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cvs2svn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200249 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium mricon at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mricon at gmail.com 2007-04-03 12:15 EST ------- Please create EPEL branches: Branches: EL-4, EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 16:22:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 12:22:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173388] Review Request: mod_evasive - Denial of Service evasion module for Apache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031622.l33GMXWo013274@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_evasive - Denial of Service evasion module for Apache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173388 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium mricon at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mricon at gmail.com 2007-04-03 12:22 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mod_evasive Short Description: Denial of Service evasion module for Apache Owners: icon at fedoraproject.org Branches: FC-6, EL-4, EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 16:26:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 12:26:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226267] Merge Review: perl-LDAP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031626.l33GQ9PC013632@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-LDAP Alias: perl-LDAP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226267 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-04-03 12:26 EST ------- Good: + Tar ball matches with upstream. + Rpmlint ok for source package. + Local build works fine. Bad: - Rpmlint complaint binary rpm: rpmlint perl-LDAP-0.34-1.noarch.rpm E: perl-LDAP useless-explicit-provides perl(Net::LDAP::Filter) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 16:31:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 12:31:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226138] Merge Review: metacity In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031631.l33GVNpC013964@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: metacity https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226138 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-04-03 12:31 EST ------- Bad: - Local build failed: + cd metacity-2.18.0 + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + rm -rf /var/tmp/metacity-2.18.0-1-root-s4504kr + CPPFLAGS=' -I/var/tmp/metacity-2.18.0-1-root-s4504kr/usr/include' + export CPPFLAGS + autoreconf src/Makefile.am: required file `./compile' not found autoreconf: automake failed with exit status: 1 Fehler: Fehler-Status beim Beenden von /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.46901 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 16:47:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 12:47:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221906] Review Request: gmediaserver - UPnP compatible media server for the GNU system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031647.l33GlKDA015520@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gmediaserver - UPnP compatible media server for the GNU system Alias: gmediaserver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221906 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2007-04-03 12:47 EST ------- In the absence of option 3 (static UID/GID), I think option 2 (not removing the user/group) is much better. It may be "messy" in terms of leaving accounts on systems but IMHO this is not as "messy" as leaving unowned files on those systems (which would happen if the user/group were deleted). There is actually a pseudo-static UID/GID mechanism available in Fedora (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageUserCreation) but use of it is contentious to say the least and the possibility of expanding the static uid/gid range beyond the current 0-100 was favourably received when the latest flamewar on this subject erupted recently (see http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-March/msg00647.html and the "discussion" on fedora-maintainers linked from there). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 16:49:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 12:49:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228299] Review Request: python-metar - Coded METAR weather reports parser for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031649.l33Gnf4E015986@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-metar - Coded METAR weather reports parser for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228299 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 16:49:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 12:49:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031649.l33Gnqgl016029@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598 Bug 233598 depends on bug 228299, which changed state. Bug 228299 Summary: Review Request: python-metar - Coded METAR weather reports parser for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228299 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 16:59:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 12:59:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226270] Merge Review: perl-Net-DNS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031659.l33Gx80n017260@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Net-DNS Alias: perl-Net-DNS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226270 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-04-03 12:59 EST ------- Good: + Rpmlint quite on source rpm + Tar ball matches with upstream. + License ok. + Local build works fine. + Rpmlint quite for binary package + Rpmlint quite for debuginfo package. Bad: - Wrong Buildroot: uildRoot should be %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#BuildRoot) - Perl must not be included as an BR. BuildRequires: perl should not be included (wiki: Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions) - Package contains no verbatin copy of the license text. - Mock build failed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 17:00:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 13:00:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226270] Merge Review: perl-Net-DNS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031700.l33H0Flr017385@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Net-DNS Alias: perl-Net-DNS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226270 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-04-03 13:00 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=151589) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=151589&action=view) log of failed mock build -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 17:08:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 13:08:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226270] Merge Review: perl-Net-DNS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031708.l33H80JJ017871@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Net-DNS Alias: perl-Net-DNS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226270 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2007-04-03 13:07 EST ------- Can you post the root.log as well? I'm curious as to how the buildreq perl-Net-IP was satisfied since the absence of this module is what caused the build to fail. (the perl-Net-IP buildreq should really be perl(Net::IP) of course) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 17:35:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 13:35:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228298] Review Request: python-louie - Dispatches signals between Python objects in a wide variety of contexts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031735.l33HZBit020334@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-louie - Dispatches signals between Python objects in a wide variety of contexts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228298 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-04-03 13:35 EST ------- > So, it's not forbbiden to add as sourcex the license text and mention why. Nor is it "forbidden" to not add a source file for the BSD license. I don't want to sound too pessimistic, but upstream seems mostly dead by looking at their website. Also, could you please remember to ASSIGN the bug to yourself when the review is in progress? This would avoid me forgetting these reviews since they appear as "NEW" in my bugzilla front page. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 17:41:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 13:41:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234488] Review Request: yum-presto - Yum plugin to download deltarpms rather than full rpms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031741.l33HfVD7020832@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yum-presto - Yum plugin to download deltarpms rather than full rpms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234488 ------- Additional Comments From tla at rasmil.dk 2007-04-03 13:41 EST ------- The spec link is wrong, it point to 0.3.3 spec file, not the 0.3.4 one $ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/yum-presto-0.3.4-1.fc7.noarch.rpm E: yum-presto only-non-binary-in-usr-lib $ rpmlint Download/yum-presto-0.3.4-1.src.rpm silent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 17:46:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 13:46:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225923] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-collections In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031746.l33HkxPv021265@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-collections https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225923 ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-04-03 13:46 EST ------- With the new srpm, rpmlint on the tomcat5 subpackage gives: W: jakarta-commons-collections-tomcat5 summary-not-capitalized jakarta-commons-collections dependency for Tomcat5 Please fix this. Also, the Summary on the main package is just the package name, please fix that as well. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 17:55:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 13:55:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234488] Review Request: yum-presto - Yum plugin to download deltarpms rather than full rpms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031755.l33Ht3HD022075@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yum-presto - Yum plugin to download deltarpms rather than full rpms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234488 tla at rasmil.dk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tla at rasmil.dk 2007-04-03 13:54 EST ------- The spec file in the SRPM is ok. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 18:03:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 14:03:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234488] Review Request: yum-presto - Yum plugin to download deltarpms rather than full rpms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031803.l33I3XPE022849@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yum-presto - Yum plugin to download deltarpms rather than full rpms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234488 ------- Additional Comments From jdieter at gmail.com 2007-04-03 14:03 EST ------- Thanks! The spec file has been changed on the server, but it may take a refresh to come through. Is there anything I should be doing to get a sponsor's attention, or should I just wait patiently? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 18:09:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 14:09:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234488] Review Request: yum-presto - Yum plugin to download deltarpms rather than full rpms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031809.l33I9Xno023866@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yum-presto - Yum plugin to download deltarpms rather than full rpms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234488 ------- Additional Comments From tla at rasmil.dk 2007-04-03 14:09 EST ------- You should just wait for a sponsor to pop up. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 18:15:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 14:15:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234488] Review Request: yum-presto - Yum plugin to download deltarpms rather than full rpms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031815.l33IF3H9024486@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yum-presto - Yum plugin to download deltarpms rather than full rpms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234488 ------- Additional Comments From jdieter at gmail.com 2007-04-03 14:14 EST ------- Sweet! Thanks for the review! I'll just wait and hope someone pops up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 18:26:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 14:26:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231911] Review Request: jomolhari-fonts - Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031826.l33IQMHZ026308@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jomolhari-fonts - Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231911 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From cfynn at gmx.net 2007-04-03 14:26 EST ------- Perhaps I was being a little too modest... The Jomolhari font also supports all the most frequently occurring combinations used for transliterating Sanskrit and other foreign words into Tibetan. The font has already been used to typeset over 22 volumes of traditional Tibetan texts containing many mantras - and it has be tested with all the combinations occurring in a substantial Sanskrit-Tibetan dictionary. I am slowly adding several thousand more combinations - but these are infrequently occurring and for most purposes unnecessary. To get some idea of the coverage see: - though this is not comprehensive. - Chris - Chris -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 18:29:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 14:29:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234882] Review Request: libident - New LibIdent C library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031829.l33ITU1r026653@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libident - New LibIdent C library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234882 ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2007-04-03 14:29 EST ------- Mhm. I must have missed the static linking against in.libidenttestd. Fixed. And please do take a look into the directory . You'll find not only the spec but all SRPMS and the extracted contents as well... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 19:32:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 15:32:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228298] Review Request: python-louie - Dispatches signals between Python objects in a wide variety of contexts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031932.l33JWPDl001035@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-louie - Dispatches signals between Python objects in a wide variety of contexts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228298 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-04-03 15:32 EST ------- It seem that when the fedora-reviwe flags set to +, the ASSIGN statu is removed. cause it was already assign since the beginning of the full review. > I don't want to sound too pessimistic, but upstream seems mostly dead by > looking > at their website. well, i will ask throuth the ML if in these condition the license text can be added by the maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 19:38:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 15:38:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226135] Merge Review: memtest86+ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031938.l33JcqMh001717@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: memtest86+ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226135 ------- Additional Comments From david.r.bentley at btinternet.com 2007-04-03 15:38 EST ------- In F7 test 3 you need to press ESC then ENTER to get to the boot promt (no cursor)then either F1 - F5 to get the various text help screens and on typing the usual memtest86 you get could not find kernel image: memtest86 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 19:41:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 15:41:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234835] Review Request: fgfs-Atlas - Flightgear map tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031941.l33JfCMS002011@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fgfs-Atlas - Flightgear map tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234835 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo? | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-03 15:41 EST ------- Jochen, you haven't answered my question yet, can (and will) you sponsor Fabrice, or shall I? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 19:43:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 15:43:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234563] Review Request: tecnoballz - A Breakout like game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704031943.l33JhLbx002253@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tecnoballz - A Breakout like game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234563 musuruan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From musuruan at gmail.com 2007-04-03 15:43 EST ------- Built successfully. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 19:49:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 15:49:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235111] New: Review Request: mina - A Multipurpose Infrastructure for Network Applications Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235111 Summary: Review Request: mina - A Multipurpose Infrastructure for Network Applications Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nsantos at redhat.com ReportedBy: nsantos at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/nsantos/fc7/mina.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/nsantos/fc7/mina-1.0.0-2jpp.src.rpm Description: A Multipurpose Infrastructure for Network Applications -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 19:54:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 15:54:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235113] New: Review Request: slf4j - Simple Logging Facade for Java Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235113 Summary: Review Request: slf4j - Simple Logging Facade for Java Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nsantos at redhat.com ReportedBy: nsantos at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/nsantos/fc7/slf4j.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/nsantos/fc7/slf4j-1.0-0.rc5.1jpp.src.rpm Description: Simple Logging Facade for Java -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 19:57:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 15:57:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235115] New: Review Request: tl-netty2 - Event based network application framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235115 Summary: Review Request: tl-netty2 - Event based network application framework Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nsantos at redhat.com ReportedBy: nsantos at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/nsantos/fc7/tl-netty2.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/nsantos/fc7/tl-netty2-1.9.2-1jpp.src.rpm Description: Event based network application framework -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 20:03:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 16:03:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235117] New: Review Request: servletapi4 - Java servlet and JSP implementation classes Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235117 Summary: Review Request: servletapi4 - Java servlet and JSP implementation classes Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nsantos at redhat.com ReportedBy: nsantos at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/nsantos/fc7/servletapi4.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/nsantos/fc7/servletapi4-4.0.4-4jpp.src.rpm Description: Java servlet and JSP implementation classes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 20:10:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 16:10:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225923] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-collections In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704032010.l33KAqBi005426@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-collections https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225923 ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-04-03 16:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > With the new srpm, rpmlint on the tomcat5 subpackage gives: > W: jakarta-commons-collections-tomcat5 summary-not-capitalized > jakarta-commons-collections dependency for Tomcat5 > Please fix this. Fixed > Also, the Summary on the main package is just the package name, please fix that > as well. Fixed Updated srpm: https://mwringe.108.redhat.com/files/documents/175/324/jakarta-commons-collections-3.1-9jpp.1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 20:15:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 16:15:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235121] New: Review Request: backport-util-concurrent - Backport of java.util.concurrent API, introduced in Java 5.0 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235121 Summary: Review Request: backport-util-concurrent - Backport of java.util.concurrent API, introduced in Java 5.0 Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nsantos at redhat.com ReportedBy: nsantos at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/nsantos/fc7/backport-util-concurrent.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/nsantos/fc7/backport-util-concurrent-2.1-1jpp.src.rpm Description: Backport of java.util.concurrent API, introduced in Java 5.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 20:37:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 16:37:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223943] Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME - point, click, debug! In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704032037.l33KbQNq008959@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME - point, click, debug! Alias: nemiver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223943 giallu at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 21:28:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 17:28:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235136] New: Review Request: lostirc - Simple IRC client for X11 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235136 Summary: Review Request: lostirc - Simple IRC client for X11 Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: splinux25 at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/lostirc/lostirc.spec SRPM URL: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/lostirc/lostirc-0.4.6-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Lostirc is a simple, yet very useful IRC-client. It has features such as tab-autocompletion, multiple server support, automatic joining of servers/channels and DCC sending which should cover the needs of most people. The client is 100% keyboard-controllable, and uses the gtkmm GUI library -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 22:06:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 18:06:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225923] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-collections In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704032206.l33M6dMr017481@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-collections https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225923 pcheung at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-04-03 18:06 EST ------- Running rpmlint on the final binary rpms gives: W: jakarta-commons-collections non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java E: jakarta-commons-collections-debuginfo description-line-too-long This package provides debug information for package jakarta-commons-collections. W: jakarta-commons-collections-javadoc non-standard-group Development/Documentation W: jakarta-commons-collections-testframework non-standard-group Development/Testing W: jakarta-commons-collections-testframework no-documentation W: jakarta-commons-collections-testframework filename-too-long-for-joliet jakarta-commons-collections-testframework-3.1-9jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm W: jakarta-commons-collections-testframework-javadoc non-standard-group Development/Documentation W: jakarta-commons-collections-testframework-javadoc filename-too-long-for-joliet jakarta-commons-collections-testframework-javadoc-3.1-9jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm W: jakarta-commons-collections-tomcat5 non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 23:02:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 19:02:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235113] Review Request: slf4j - Simple Logging Facade for Java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704032302.l33N2oZY021152@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slf4j - Simple Logging Facade for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235113 nsantos at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From nsantos at redhat.com 2007-04-03 19:02 EST ------- Updated specfile and SRPM: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/nsantos/fc7/slf4j.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/nsantos/fc7/slf4j-1.0-0.rc5.1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 23:38:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 19:38:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235117] Review Request: servletapi4 - Java servlet and JSP implementation classes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704032338.l33NciLD022939@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: servletapi4 - Java servlet and JSP implementation classes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235117 nsantos at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From nsantos at redhat.com 2007-04-03 19:38 EST ------- Updated specfile and srpm: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/nsantos/fc7/servletapi4.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/nsantos/fc7/servletapi4-4.0.4-1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 23:39:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 19:39:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned CJK bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704032339.l33NdVtF022982@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned CJK bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-04-03 19:39 EST ------- Ok, thanks for the updated package. I can sponsor you. If you have not already done so, please read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join to understand the process of becoming a Fedora Contributor better. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 3 23:46:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 19:46:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231911] Review Request: jomolhari-fonts - Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704032346.l33Nk8Uq023320@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jomolhari-fonts - Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231911 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |petersen at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 01:07:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 21:07:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231911] Review Request: jomolhari-fonts - Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704040107.l3417bZC027971@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jomolhari-fonts - Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231911 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://www.thdl.org/tools/fo | |nts/tibfonts.php?l=uva200607 | |171100 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-04-03 21:07 EST ------- Thanks, Chris. Is this any better: "Jomolhari is an TrueType OpenType Bhutanese style font for Dzongkha and Tibetan text. It is based on Bhutanese manuscript examples, supports the Unicode and the Chinese encoding for Tibetan. The font supports the standard combinations used in most texts." Do you want to improve it more? Should "combinations" be referring to Sankrit? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 01:23:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 21:23:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229154] Review Request: konwert - Converter of character encodings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704040123.l341NsUm029218@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: konwert - Converter of character encodings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229154 daniil.ivanov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(daniil.ivanov at gmai| |l.com) | ------- Additional Comments From daniil.ivanov at gmail.com 2007-04-03 21:23 EST ------- Hi, something like this? http://users.jyu.fi/~divanov/devel/konwert-1.8-10.src.rpm http://users.jyu.fi/~divanov/devel/konwert.spec Thanks, Daniil. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 01:30:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 21:30:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229154] Review Request: konwert - Converter of character encodings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704040130.l341UbKu029596@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: konwert - Converter of character encodings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229154 ------- Additional Comments From daniil.ivanov at gmail.com 2007-04-03 21:30 EST ------- Hi, http://users.jyu.fi/~divanov/devel/konwert-1.8-10.fc7.src.rpm http://users.jyu.fi/~divanov/devel/build.log Thanks, Daniil. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 02:58:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 22:58:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231911] Review Request: jomolhari-fonts - Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704040258.l342wWZN002719@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jomolhari-fonts - Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231911 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-04-03 22:58 EST ------- Marcin, perhaps the package should be named "Jomolhari-fonts", ie with a capital like the .zip file? Personally I prefer lowercase package names, but according to Packaging/NamingGuidelines the package name should follow the upstream name. Again there is the problem of the upstream version: the .zip file is versioned "alpha003" and the .ttf filename "alpha003-060520". The latest version mentioned in the font is "alpha 0.003a". Anyway in the circumstances I think your choice of "0.003" is probably the best one. I suggest shortening the Summary in the spec file to just: Summary: Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha should it be "Dzongkha and Tibetan"? Overall the package looks fine to me. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 03:19:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 23:19:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231911] Review Request: jomolhari-fonts - Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704040319.l343JUai004402@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jomolhari-fonts - Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231911 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-04-03 23:19 EST ------- Just noticed there seems to be a newer version at . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 03:20:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 23:20:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231911] Review Request: jomolhari-fonts - Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704040320.l343KO84004492@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jomolhari-fonts - Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231911 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL|http://www.thdl.org/tools/fo|http://www.btinternet.com/~c |nts/tibfonts.php?l=uva200607|.fynn/tibetan/fonts/jomolhar |171100 |i.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 03:30:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 23:30:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned CJK bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704040330.l343Up6O005182@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned CJK bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-04-03 23:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #25) > a second read of the package naming rules reminds me that the upstream tarball > name wqy-bitmapfont is recommended name for the package, Jens, do you suggest me > rolling back the package name as well? That is true, but font packages may be an exception since they are usually named with "-fonts" in Fedora and also more than one font file is included. :) So I think wqy-bitmap-fonts is ok. Using the "-fonts" suffix makes font packages easier to find. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 03:31:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 23:31:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned CJK bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704040331.l343VRRk005247@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned CJK bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |petersen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 03:43:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 23:43:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned CJK bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704040343.l343hIRu006113@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned CJK bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-04-03 23:43 EST ------- The rpmlint output on srpm gives: W: wqy-bitmap-fonts mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 65) and on the rpm: W: wqy-bitmap-fonts non-conffile-in-etc /etc/fonts/conf.d/85-wqy-bitmapsong.conf E: wqy-bitmap-fonts no-prereq-on chkfontpath E: wqy-bitmap-fonts no-prereq-on chkfontpath You need to use "Requires(post):" and "Requires(postun):" for the latter two. See also . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 03:44:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 23:44:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned CJK bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704040344.l343iMAO006207@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned CJK bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-04-03 23:44 EST ------- Also since this is a bitmap font there is no need to use fontconfig AFAIK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 04:50:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 00:50:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234488] Review Request: yum-presto - Yum plugin to download deltarpms rather than full rpms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704040450.l344o3Mm011148@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yum-presto - Yum plugin to download deltarpms rather than full rpms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234488 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-04-04 00:50 EST ------- Hey Jonathan. I'd be happy to sponsor you. Thanks for the nice review here Tim. I do see a build failure on x86_64 however... Processing files: yum-presto-0.3.4-1.fc7 error: File not found by glob: /var/tmp/yum-presto-0.3.4-1.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/yum-plugins/presto.py* Looks like: %{_libdir}/yum-plugins/presto.py* needs to be: /usr/lib/yum-plugins/presto.py* Can you make that change? I have a x86_64 test box if you need one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 04:51:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 00:51:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231758] Review Request: perl-Workflow - Simple, flexible system to implement workflows In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704040451.l344pi5Y011258@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Workflow - Simple, flexible system to implement workflows Alias: perl-Workflow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231758 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-04 00:51 EST ------- I think you should add perl(Data::UUID) and SPOPS as make test showed me t/persister_spops..................skipped all skipped: SPOPS not installed t/persister_uuid...................skipped all skipped: Data::UUID not installed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 05:32:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 01:32:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234488] Review Request: yum-presto - Yum plugin to download deltarpms rather than full rpms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704040532.l345Wplu014452@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yum-presto - Yum plugin to download deltarpms rather than full rpms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234488 ------- Additional Comments From tla at rasmil.dk 2007-04-04 01:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > Hey Jonathan. I'd be happy to sponsor you. > > Thanks for the nice review here Tim. > > I do see a build failure on x86_64 however... > > Processing files: yum-presto-0.3.4-1.fc7 > error: File not found by glob: > /var/tmp/yum-presto-0.3.4-1.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/yum-plugins/presto.py* > > Looks like: > %{_libdir}/yum-plugins/presto.py* > > needs to be: > > /usr/lib/yum-plugins/presto.py* > > Can you make that change? I have a x86_64 test box if you need one. > It's right, it need to be '/usr/lib/yum-plugins/presto.py*', because yum look for plugins in /usr/lib/yum-plugins/ for all archs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 07:41:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 03:41:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226138] Merge Review: metacity In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704040741.l347fC1l022542@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: metacity https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226138 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-04-04 03:41 EST ------- * a remark the gettext_package, metacity_version and metacity_filename don't seem to be usefull to me, %{name}, %{version} and %{name}-%{version} would seem more natural to me * -I$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_includedir} seems wrong to me. Why is it there? CPPFLAGS="$CPPFLAGS -I$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_includedir}" * Why run autoreconf? * on the make line, CPPFLAGS="$CPPFLAGS" LIBS="$LIBS" seems unuseful to me, while %{?_smp_mflags} is missing (it worked in my tests) * The pkgconfig Requires is unuseful in main package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 08:17:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 04:17:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228298] Review Request: python-louie - Dispatches signals between Python objects in a wide variety of contexts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704040817.l348HqsD026533@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-louie - Dispatches signals between Python objects in a wide variety of contexts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228298 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-04-04 04:17 EST ------- > well, i will ask throuth the ML if in these condition the license text can be > added by the maintainer. Of course it *can*, but I would just prefer to avoid it because : - The sources clearly state that they are BSD licensed, with an external pointer - The BSD license doesn't *require* you to ship a copy of the license So I'd just like to not bother and ship yet-another-copy-of-the-BSD license, since it is not needed to comply with the packaging guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 09:58:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 05:58:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235113] Review Request: slf4j - Simple Logging Facade for Java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704040958.l349wTOT003178@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slf4j - Simple Logging Facade for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235113 asimon at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |asimon at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From asimon at redhat.com 2007-04-04 05:58 EST ------- slf4j-1.0-0.rc5.1jpp.src.rpm Legend: OK: passes criteria NO: fails criteria (errors included between "--" markers) NA: non applicable ??: unable to verify MUST: OK - package is named appropriately ?? * match upstream tarball or project name ?? * try to match previous incarnations in other distributions/packagers for consistency ---> I am not sure about those 2 points as the latest available version is 1.3.0 (see http://www.slf4j.org/dist/) NO * specfile should be %{name}.spec ---> it is named: slf4j.spec but it should be slf4j-1.0-0.rc5.1jpp.spec OK - non-numeric characters should only be used in Release (ie. cvs or something) OK - for non-numerics (pre-release, CVS snapshots, etc.), see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#PackageRelease OK - if case sensitivity is requested by upstream or you feel it should be not just lowercase, do so; otherwise, use all lower case for the name OK - is it legal for Fedora to distribute this? ?? * OSI-approved OK - not a kernel module OK - not shareware ?? * is it covered by patents? OK - it *probably* shouldn't be an emulator OK - no binary firmware OK - license field matches the actual license. OK - license is open source-compatible. OK - use acronyms for licences where common ?? * verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do) - if upstream doesn't release source drops, put *clear* instructions on how to generate the the source drop; ie. # svn export blah/tag blah # tar cjf blah-version-src.tar.bz2 blah OK - skim the summary and description for typos, etc. NO * correct buildroot should be: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) --> it is /slf4j-1.0-rc5/lib/ NA * if %{?dist} is used, it should be in that form (note the ? and % locations) NO * license text included in package and marked with %doc --> included but not marked with %doc: OK * keep old changelog entries; use judgement when removing (too old? useless?) NO * packages meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) --> The rpm contains unwanted directories and files: /.svn/, /test/, /TODO.txt, /src/.svn etc with .svn directories NO * rpmlint on .srpm gives no output - justify warnings if you think they shouldn't be there --> Cannot install source packages. No packages were given for installation. OK - changelog should be in one of these formats: * Fri Jun 23 2006 Jesse Keating - 0.6-4 - And fix the link syntax. * Fri Jun 23 2006 Jesse Keating 0.6-4 - And fix the link syntax. * Fri Jun 23 2006 Jesse Keating - 0.6-4 - And fix the link syntax. OK * Packager tag should not be used OK * Vendor tag should not be used OK * use License and not Copyright OK * Summary tag should not end in a period NA * if possible, replace PreReq with Requires(pre) and/or Requires(post) NO * specfile is legible - this is largely subjective; use your judgement --> Those fields must be changed Name: %{name} Version: %{version} Release: %{release}.1%{?dist} ?? * package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86 ?? * BuildRequires are proper - builds in mock will flush out problems here - the following packages don't need to be listed in BuildRequires: bash bzip2 coreutils cpio diffutils fedora-release (and/or redhat-release) gcc gcc-c++ gzip make patch perl redhat-rpm-config rpm-build sed tar unzip which OK - summary should be a short and concise description of the package OK - description expands upon summary (don't include installation instructions) OK - make sure lines are <= 80 characters OK - specfile written in American English OK - make a -doc sub-package if necessary - see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-9bbfa57478f0460c6160947a6bf795249488182b NA - packages including libraries should exclude static libraries if possible OK - don't use rpath NA * config files should usually be marked with %config(noreplace) NA * GUI apps should contain .desktop files NA * should the package contain a -devel sub-package? ?? * use macros appropriately and consistently - ie. %{buildroot} and %{optflags} vs. $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and $RPM_OPT_FLAGS OK * don't use %makeinstall NA * locale data handling correct (find_lang) - if translations included, add BR: gettext and use %find_lang %{name} at the end of %install ?? * consider using cp -p to preserve timestamps NA * split Requires(pre,post) into two separate lines OK * package should probably not be relocatable OK * package contains code - see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#CodeVsContent - in general, there should be no offensive content OK * package should own all directories and files OK * there should be no %files duplicates ?? * file permissions should be okay; %defattrs should be present ?? * %clean should be present NA * %doc files should not affect runtime NA * if it is a web apps, it should be in /usr/share/%{name} and *not* /var/www ?? * verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs ?? * run rpmlint on the binary RPMs SHOULD: NO * package should include license text in the package and mark it with %doc --> included but not marked with %doc: ?? * package should build on i386 ?? * package should build in mock -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 10:22:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 06:22:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235117] Review Request: servletapi4 - Java servlet and JSP implementation classes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041022.l34AM9dY004580@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: servletapi4 - Java servlet and JSP implementation classes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235117 asimon at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |asimon at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From asimon at redhat.com 2007-04-04 06:22 EST ------- servletapi4-4.0.4-4jpp.src.rpm Legend: OK: passes criteria NO: fails criteria (errors included between "--" markers) NA: non applicable ??: unable to verify MUST: OK - package is named appropriately OK - match upstream tarball or project name OK - try to match previous incarnations in other distributions/packagers for consistency NO * specfile should be %{name}.spec ---> it is named: servletapi4.spec but it should be servletapi4-4.0.4-4jpp.spec OK - non-numeric characters should only be used in Release (ie. cvs or something) OK - for non-numerics (pre-release, CVS snapshots, etc.), see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#PackageRelease OK - if case sensitivity is requested by upstream or you feel it should be not just lowercase, do so; otherwise, use all lower case for the name OK - is it legal for Fedora to distribute this? ?? * OSI-approved OK - not a kernel module OK - not shareware ?? * is it covered by patents? OK - it *probably* shouldn't be an emulator OK - no binary firmware OK - license field matches the actual license. OK - license is open source-compatible. OK - use acronyms for licences where common ?? * verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do) - if upstream doesn't release source drops, put *clear* instructions on how to generate the the source drop; ie. # svn export blah/tag blah # tar cjf blah-version-src.tar.bz2 blah OK - skim the summary and description for typos, etc. NO * correct buildroot should be: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) --> it is /jakarta-servletapi-4-src/ NA * if %{?dist} is used, it should be in that form (note the ? and % locations) NO * license text included in package and marked with %doc --> included but not marked with %doc: OK * keep old changelog entries; use judgement when removing (too old? useless?) NO * packages meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) --> The rpm does not contain /lib (not sure this is normal) NO * rpmlint on .srpm gives no output - justify warnings if you think they shouldn't be there --> Cannot install source packages. No packages were given for installation. OK - changelog should be in one of these formats: * Fri Jun 23 2006 Jesse Keating - 0.6-4 - And fix the link syntax. * Fri Jun 23 2006 Jesse Keating 0.6-4 - And fix the link syntax. * Fri Jun 23 2006 Jesse Keating - 0.6-4 - And fix the link syntax. OK * Packager tag should not be used OK * Vendor tag should not be used OK * use License and not Copyright OK * Summary tag should not end in a period NA * if possible, replace PreReq with Requires(pre) and/or Requires(post) NO * specfile is legible - this is largely subjective; use your judgement --> Those fields must be changed Name: %{name} Version: %{version} Release: %{release}.1%{?dist} ?? * package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86 ?? * BuildRequires are proper - builds in mock will flush out problems here - the following packages don't need to be listed in BuildRequires: bash bzip2 coreutils cpio diffutils fedora-release (and/or redhat-release) gcc gcc-c++ gzip make patch perl redhat-rpm-config rpm-build sed tar unzip which OK - summary should be a short and concise description of the package OK - description expands upon summary (don't include installation instructions) OK - make sure lines are <= 80 characters OK - specfile written in American English OK - make a -doc sub-package if necessary - see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-9bbfa57478f0460c6160947a6bf795249488182b NA - packages including libraries should exclude static libraries if possible OK - don't use rpath NA * config files should usually be marked with %config(noreplace) NA * GUI apps should contain .desktop files NA * should the package contain a -devel sub-package? ?? * use macros appropriately and consistently - ie. %{buildroot} and %{optflags} vs. $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and $RPM_OPT_FLAGS OK * don't use %makeinstall NA * locale data handling correct (find_lang) - if translations included, add BR: gettext and use %find_lang %{name} at the end of %install ?? * consider using cp -p to preserve timestamps NA * split Requires(pre,post) into two separate lines OK * package should probably not be relocatable OK * package contains code - see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#CodeVsContent - in general, there should be no offensive content OK * package should own all directories and files OK * there should be no %files duplicates ?? * file permissions should be okay; %defattrs should be present ?? * %clean should be present NA * %doc files should not affect runtime NA * if it is a web apps, it should be in /usr/share/%{name} and *not* /var/www ?? * verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs ?? * run rpmlint on the binary RPMs SHOULD: NO * package should include license text in the package and mark it with %doc --> included but not marked with %doc: ?? * package should build on i386 ?? * package should build in mock -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 10:58:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 06:58:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225266] Merge Review: aspell-en In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041058.l34Aw51R006096@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: aspell-en https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225266 ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-04-04 06:58 EST ------- Thanks Parag for your excellent work. There should be used Conflicts flag instead of Obsoletes (see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Conflicts). The fixed version is aspell-en-6.0-6.fc7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 11:50:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 07:50:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225278] Merge Review: aspell-nl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041150.l34Boab3009103@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: aspell-nl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225278 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-04 07:50 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). - rpmlint is NOT silent for SRPM and RPM. W: aspell-nl incoherent-version-in-changelog -51:0.1e-4 51:0.1e-4.fc7 You can do this at next release also. But following messages are ignorable E: aspell-nl no-binary E: aspell-nl only-non-binary-in-usr-lib E: aspell-nl configure-without-libdir-spec + SPEC file contains explanation about above warnings. + source files match upstream. c9b63f9e0f754cc593d4c6233c2d5730 dutch_0.1e.orig.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Dose owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Requires: aspell >= 12:0.60 + Provides: aspell-nl = 51:0.1e-4.fc7 + Not a GUI APP. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 12:09:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 08:09:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225266] Merge Review: aspell-en In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041209.l34C9H1I010336@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: aspell-en https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225266 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-04 08:09 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). - rpmlint is NOT silent for SRPM and RPM. E: aspell-en obsolete-not-provided aspell-en-gb The obsoleted package must also be provided to allow clean upgrade paths and not to break dependencies. E: aspell-en obsolete-not-provided aspell-en-ca The obsoleted package must also be provided to allow clean upgrade paths and not to break dependencies. The above are OK and already set to show warning instead Error in rpmlint CVS. Also following messages are ignorable E: aspell-en no-binary E: aspell-en only-non-binary-in-usr-lib E: aspell-en configure-without-libdir-spec + SPEC file contains explanation about above warnings. + source files match upstream. 16449e0a266e1ecc526b2f3cd39d4bc2 aspell6-en-6.0-0.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Dose owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Requires: aspell >= 12:0.60 + Provides: aspell-en = 50:6.0-7.fc7 + Not a GUI APP. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 12:10:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 08:10:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225266] Merge Review: aspell-en In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041210.l34CAAeP010392@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: aspell-en https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225266 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-04 08:10 EST ------- Forgot to mention new SPEC contains Obsoletes and not Conflicts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 12:11:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 08:11:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186452] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041211.l34CBA6Q010466@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186452 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-04-04 08:11 EST ------- * Thu Mar 29 2007 Gilboa Davara 1.0-0.19.beta2 - Spec file clean-up. http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/kdebluetooth-1.0-0.19.beta2..src.rpm http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/kdebluetooth.spec I'm currently installing F7T3. Once I'm done, I'll rebuild the bluez package with the proposed pin-helper patch. If all goes well, I'll submit the patch to the bluez maintainer. - Gilboa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 12:20:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 08:20:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186452] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041220.l34CKkw8010851@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186452 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|scop at fedoraproject.org |nobody at fedoraproject.org OtherBugsDependingO|201449 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-04-04 08:20 EST ------- The package in comment 38 seems to have discarded all changes made in the package in comment 29 - I don't have time or interest at the moment to go through all of them again so assigning to nobody@ for someone else to take over. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 12:23:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 08:23:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216353] Review Request: vdr-text2skin - OSD skin plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041223.l34CNrrE011193@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-text2skin - OSD skin plugin for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216353 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 12:23:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 08:23:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216355] Review Request: vdr-skins - Collection of OSD skins for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041223.l34CNwCd011211@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-skins - Collection of OSD skins for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216355 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 12:25:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 08:25:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216355] Review Request: vdr-skins - Collection of OSD skins for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041225.l34CPJ4h011294@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-skins - Collection of OSD skins for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216355 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 12:25:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 08:25:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216353] Review Request: vdr-text2skin - OSD skin plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041225.l34CPdFP011336@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-text2skin - OSD skin plugin for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216353 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 12:28:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 08:28:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186452] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041228.l34CSQSV011465@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186452 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 12:40:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 08:40:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186452] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041240.l34CeWcc012223@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186452 gilboad at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |gilboad at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-04-04 08:40 EST ------- 1. My mistake. I got mixed up by the different versions of kdebluetooth. 2. Mistake or not, posting rude comments have no business here. 3. Taking over the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 12:40:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 08:40:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235189] New: Review Request: nautilus-python - Python bindings for Nautilus Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235189 Summary: Review Request: nautilus-python - Python bindings for Nautilus Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: trond.danielsen at fedoraproject.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://open-gnss.org/pub/fedora/nautilus-python/nautilus-python.spec SRPM URL: ftp://open-gnss.org/pub/fedora/nautilus-python/nautilus-python-0.4.3-1.src.rpm Description: Python bindings for Nautilus. - Builds in mock on rawhide i386 and fc6 x86_64. - Output from rpmlint: [trondd at localhost i386]$ rpmlint nautilus-python-* W: nautilus-python-devel no-documentation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 12:45:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 08:45:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235191] New: Review Request: postr - Flickr uploader Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235191 Summary: Review Request: postr - Flickr uploader Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: trond.danielsen at fedoraproject.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://open-gnss.org/pub/fedora/postr/postr.spec SRPM URL: ftp://open-gnss.org/pub/fedora/postr/postr-0.5-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Postr is a tool for uploading pictures to Flickr. Its both a standalone application and a plugin for Nautilus. - Builds in mock on rawhide i386 and fc6 x86_64 - Rpmlint output: [trondd at localhost noarch]$ rpmlint postr-0.5-1.fc7.noarch.rpm E: postr only-non-binary-in-usr-lib Python modules are installed in /usr/lib/nautilus, but they are not executable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 12:47:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 08:47:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235191] Review Request: postr - Flickr uploader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041247.l34ClXYG012744@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postr - Flickr uploader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235191 trond.danielsen at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at fedoraproject.org 2007-04-04 08:47 EST ------- Notice that there is still no icon for this package, but the author has requested one[1], so hopefully an icon will be available shortly. If anyone can recommend a temporary icon, I would be grateful. [1] http://www.burtonini.com/blog/computers/postr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 12:49:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 08:49:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235191] Review Request: postr - Flickr uploader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041249.l34Cn4wX012895@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postr - Flickr uploader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235191 trond.danielsen at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |235189 ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at fedoraproject.org 2007-04-04 08:49 EST ------- Postr depends on nautilus-python. A package has been submitted, but is awaiting review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235189 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 12:49:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 08:49:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235189] Review Request: nautilus-python - Python bindings for Nautilus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041249.l34Cn4WU012910@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nautilus-python - Python bindings for Nautilus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235189 trond.danielsen at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |235191 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 12:54:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 08:54:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186452] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041254.l34CsjZK013397@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186452 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-04-04 08:54 EST ------- If you're referring to comment 39, calm down, it was not meant to be rude at all, just stating the fact and letting go of the review so others who may have more time to look into this know it's time for them to chime in. Anyway, looks like it resulted in the desired outcome and there's a new reviewer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 13:11:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 09:11:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235191] Review Request: postr - Flickr uploader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041311.l34DBc4V015300@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postr - Flickr uploader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235191 trond.danielsen at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 13:14:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 09:14:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226533] Merge Review: vsftpd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041314.l34DETgb015623@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: vsftpd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226533 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium mbarabas at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 13:15:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 09:15:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235191] Review Request: postr - Flickr uploader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041315.l34DFviG015799@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postr - Flickr uploader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235191 trond.danielsen at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|Reopened | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 13:20:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 09:20:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186452] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041320.l34DKDax016170@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186452 gilboad at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-04-04 09:20 EST ------- OK. Here's the problem. Package went through way-too-many-hands I got completely mixed up by the history of it. I cannot review the package... simply because I'm trying to get it submitted and reviewed. (Read: I followed the un-orphaning procedure and assigned the bug to myself - forgetting that the package is yet-to-be-submitted). In short, unless someone has any objections, I'll close this bug, open a new one (with clean[er] history) and post a review-request. - Gilboa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 13:26:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 09:26:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186452] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041326.l34DQcwt016514@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186452 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2007-04-04 09:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #42) > In short, unless someone has any objections, I'll close this bug, open a new > one (with clean[er] history) and post a review-request. Please clone the current bug, to keep at least the Cc list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 13:30:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 09:30:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186452] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041330.l34DU1Qb016794@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186452 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-04-04 09:29 EST ------- We'll do. Again, my apologies for the noise. (I'll just mark the "old" bug as a duplicate of the new bug) - Gilboa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 13:33:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 09:33:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231911] Review Request: jomolhari-fonts - Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041333.l34DX81Z016985@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jomolhari-fonts - Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231911 ------- Additional Comments From mgarski at post.pl 2007-04-04 09:32 EST ------- Jens IMHO package name only refer to name not to the case sensitivity of name, just look at Packaging/NamingGuidelines -> Case Sensitivity. As I would also prefer lowercase name so leave it as is. Can I keep the old Summary, it will be consistent with the TMU package where the font name is included in Summary? Chris and Jens, which URL are you suggesting to use: http://www.btinternet.com/~c.fynn/tibetan/fonts/jomolhari.html or http://www.thdl.org/tools/fonts/tibfonts.php?l=uva200607171100 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 13:58:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 09:58:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226489] Merge Review: tftp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041358.l34Dwa6p019082@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: tftp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226489 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium mbarabas at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 14:19:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 10:19:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] New: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gilboad at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/kdebluetooth.spec SRPM URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/kdebluetooth-1.0-0.20.beta2.src.rpm Description: The KDE Bluetooth Framework is a set of tools built on top of Linux' Bluetooth (Bluez) stack. The goal is to provide easy access to the most common Bluetooth profiles and to make data exchange with Bluetooth enabled devices as straightforward as possible. --- The original [1] review was orphaned by the submitter (Rex Dieter) and the reviewer (Ville Skytt?) and when I tried to pick it up, I somehow managed to butch everything up. (Oh well) As a result, I decided to open a new, clean review request. - Gilboa [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186452 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 14:19:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 10:19:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186452] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041419.l34EJrkS021164@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186452 gilboad at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-04-04 10:19 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 235203 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 14:20:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 10:20:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041420.l34EKdKK021289@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 gilboad at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-04-04 10:20 EST ------- *** Bug 186452 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 14:26:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 10:26:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225907] Merge Review: iptraf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041426.l34EQtLQ021730@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: iptraf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225907 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(dan at danny.cz) ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2007-04-04 10:26 EST ------- W: iptraf hidden-file-or-dir It's side effect of making images in Documentation. I can't remove it without *.gif pictures. It must stay here. I added logrotate file. Also other problems were fixed in iptraf-3.0.0-6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 14:27:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 10:27:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041427.l34ERVlL021822@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-04-04 10:27 EST ------- Open issues: - pin-helper no longer supported. Use the debian old-pin-helper patch to re-enable pin-helper support in bluez. If all works well, push it upstream. - SELinux. According to the original submitter, kdepin is FUBAR in enforce mode. - FC6/pin-helper support? - Gilboa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 14:30:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 10:30:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234750] Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041430.l34EUuw2022130@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234750 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-04 10:30 EST ------- * MUSTFIX: Useless man-pages /usr/share/man/man1/avr-dlltool.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/avr-nlmconv.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/avr-windres.1.gz These are Win tools, not being useful nor built for embedded avr-targets. binutils installing them is a bug in binutils-2.17.* * RECOMMENDATIONS: - You are exporting CFLAGS: export CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" ./configure ... This doesn't do any harm in this particular case (binutils is an ordinary, native-only package), but will be harmful when a package applies cross-compilation (e.g. when building GCC). I recommend to pass CFLAGS on the configure command-line instead, i.e. CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" ./configure ... This hard-codes CFLAGS into generated files and avoids conflicts between different CFLAGS between Makefiles and environment. - I'd recommend to build this package inside of an avr-binutils-... directory instead of "binutils-..." (apply %setup magic) - I'd recommend to build binutils "VPATH style" instead of "in-source-tree style". Though this is not required by building binutils, it much less error-prone than in-source-tree-builts (and required when building GCC) In my specs I do all these steps this way: %prep %setup -q -c -T -n %{name}-%{version} %setup -q -D -T -n %{name}-%{version} -a0 %build mkdir -p build cd build CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" ../binutils-%{version}/configure .... cd .. Finally: As you already know, I dislike a toolchains using an architecture (avr) as their target, because this doesn't make much sense and actually is wrong if wanting to be pedantic. But I don't want to insist on this, in this particular case, because the avr always had been "special" and probably doesn't have a long enough history (Other targets with a longer history have learnt their leasons: i386-elf, m68k-elf, m68k-coff, arm-eabi) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 14:34:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 10:34:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225633] Merge Review: bzip2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041434.l34EYELt022272@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bzip2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225633 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium varekova at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo? | ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-04-04 10:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #22) > (In reply to comment #18) > > (In reply to comment #15) > > > > * the original soname don't follow the usual convention of a soname > > > number with an integer, but I am not certain that it is right to > > > modify it in fedora. It should better be changed upstream. What is > > > the reasoning behind this change? > > It is the upstream resolution so fedora should accept it > > But it is not what is done in fedora! the soname is changed in the > bzip2-1.0.4-saneso.patch patch, and I question that change. > I'm sorry, I have not understand your previous comment so my reply was confused. So I'm not sure what are you asking about. The version which is in fedora now is right - if there will be any change then there would be necessary to rebuild all dependencies. I'm not sure why was this change done (it was about 6 years ago), but it is ok. This problem should not be a subject of review. > Otherwise > * there is no need of -p when installing generated binaries, like > libbz2.a, bzip2-shared... And the static lib should be 0644. I personally > like to have the -mxxx option even when it isn't stricly needed, so > what I would have done is: > > install -m644 libbz2.a $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir} > install -m755 libbz2.so.%{version} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir} > install -m755 bzip2-shared $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/bzip2 > install -m755 bzip2recover bzgrep bzdiff bzmore $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/ > > The only mandatory item here is to have -m644 on the libbz2.a install > call. Thanks. Fixed in bzip2-1.0.4-10.fc7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 14:37:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 10:37:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225633] Merge Review: bzip2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041437.l34Eb032022588@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bzip2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225633 ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-04-04 10:36 EST ------- Ruben, could you please look at bzip2-1.0.4-10.fc7 and approved this review request or if you see any reason why you wdon't want to aproved it here. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 14:53:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 10:53:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234488] Review Request: yum-presto - Yum plugin to download deltarpms rather than full rpms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041453.l34ErjMh024018@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yum-presto - Yum plugin to download deltarpms rather than full rpms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234488 ------- Additional Comments From jdieter at gmail.com 2007-04-04 10:53 EST ------- Thanks for pointing that out! I really should have tested this on my wife's x86_64 system. A note though: I haven't mirrored FC6 x86_64 updates or extras yet, so you won't get any deltarpms through it yet. New release: 0.3.5-1 Spec URL: http://www.lesbg.com/jdieter/presto/yum-presto.spec SRPM URL: http://www.lesbg.com/jdieter/presto/yum-presto-0.3.5-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 15:16:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 11:16:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041516.l34FGbKQ025580@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|bugs.michael at gmx.net | ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-04-04 11:16 EST ------- Why have I been added to Cc? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 15:18:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 11:18:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234858] Review Request: perl-User-Identity - Maintains info about a physical person In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041518.l34FIa6V025753@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-User-Identity - Maintains info about a physical person Alias: perl-User-Identity https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234858 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 15:19:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 11:19:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234858] Review Request: perl-User-Identity - Maintains info about a physical person In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041519.l34FJIkT025790@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-User-Identity - Maintains info about a physical person Alias: perl-User-Identity https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234858 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-04 11:19 EST ------- + source files match upstream: d5929be62a99b90f60b07062ab86a2ec User-Identity-0.91.tar.gz d5929be62a99b90f60b07062ab86a2ec ../User-Identity-0.91.tar.gz + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license field matches the actual license. + license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. + %clean is present. + package installs properly + no debuginfo package -- noarch + rpmlint is silent. + final provides and requires are sane: ** perl-User-Identity-0.91-1.fc6.noarch.rpm == rpmlint == provides perl(Mail::Identity) = 0.91 perl(User::Identity) = 0.91 perl(User::Identity::Archive) = 0.91 perl(User::Identity::Archive::Plain) = 0.91 perl(User::Identity::Collection) = 0.91 perl(User::Identity::Collection::Emails) = 0.91 perl(User::Identity::Collection::Locations) = 0.91 perl(User::Identity::Collection::Systems) = 0.91 perl(User::Identity::Collection::Users) = 0.91 perl(User::Identity::Item) = 0.91 perl(User::Identity::Location) = 0.91 perl(User::Identity::System) = 0.91 perl-User-Identity = 0.91-1.fc6 == requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(List::Util) perl(Mail::Identity) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(User::Identity) perl(User::Identity::Location) perl(User::Identity::System) perl(base) perl(overload) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) + %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=114, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.19 cusr + 0.06 csys = 0.25 CPU) + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets present. + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. + no headers. + no pkgconfig files. + no libtool .la droppings. + not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 15:19:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 11:19:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234858] Review Request: perl-User-Identity - Maintains info about a physical person In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041519.l34FJq4L025830@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-User-Identity - Maintains info about a physical person Alias: perl-User-Identity https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234858 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 15:26:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 11:26:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225653] Merge Review: concurrent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041526.l34FQeqJ026368@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: concurrent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225653 ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-04-04 11:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > * is it legal for Fedora to distribute this? > > - OSI-approved > > - not a kernel module > > - not shareware > > - is it covered by patents? > > - it *probably* shouldn't be an emulator > > - no binary firmware > > X I don't know if we can just distribute this. The project claims to be in the > > public domain but sections of it are covered by a Technology License from Sun > > Microsystems Inc. > > (http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/dl/classes/EDU/oswego/cs/dl/util/sun-u.c.license.pdf) > > > This is OK as Public Domain, please see > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2007-March/msg00142.html Right, I know public domain is acceptable, but is this project really public domain if it has that clause in there? > > * license field matches the actual license. > > X the license field does not mention the Technology License > As noted in the message on the mailing list > > > > * license is open source-compatible. > > - use acronyms for licences where common > > X I don't know if the Technology License is open source-compatible > > > Same as above. > > * license text included in package and marked with %doc > > X The source does not include a specific license file, but it does mention the > > terms of the license in the intro.html file included. This file has a broken > > link to the Sun Technology license which should be patched. > > > No license file as it is Public Domain, and I fixed the link in intro.html > > > * rpmlint on .srpm gives no output > > rpmlint concurrent-1.3.4-5jpp.1.fc7.src.rpm > > W: concurrent non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java > > W: concurrent strange-permission concurrent.tar.gz 0660 > > W: concurrent strange-permission concurrent-1.3.4.build.xml 0660 > > W: concurrent strange-permission concurrent.spec 0640 > > > > X please fix these permission issues > Fixed. > > > X package fails in mock. > > I will continue the review once the package can be built properly and the > > licensing issues are resolved. > > > > Error in mock build: > > cp: cannot stat `intro.html': No such file or directory > Fixed. > > Updated spec and srpm at the same location. Thanks > Rest of review since the package now builds: * BuildRequires are proper - builds in mock will flush out problems here OK, build fine in mock - the following packages don't need to be listed in BuildRequires: bash bzip2 coreutils cpio diffutils fedora-release (and/or redhat-release) gcc gcc-c++ gzip make patch perl redhat-rpm-config rpm-build sed tar unzip which OK * summary should be a short and concise description of the package OK * description expands upon summary (don't include installation instructions) X Do we want to be advertising for that book? * make sure description lines are <= 80 characters OK * specfile written in American English OK * make a -doc sub-package if necessary OK, contains a javadoc subpackage * use macros appropriately and consistently - ie. %{buildroot} and %{optflags} vs. $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and $RPM_OPT_FLAGS OK * install section must begin with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot} OK * consider using cp -p to preserve timestamps X missing a -p on the first cp in %prep * split Requires(pre,post) into two separate lines OK * package contains code - see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#CodeVsContent - in general, there should be no offensive content OK * package should own all directories and files OK * there should be no %files duplicates OK * file permissions should be okay; %defattrs should be present OK * %clean should be present OK * %doc files should not affect runtime * if it is a web apps, it should be in /usr/share/%{name} and *not* /var/www * verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs rpm -qp --provides concurrent-1.3.4-5jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm concurrent-1.3.4.jar.so()(64bit) concurrent = 0:1.3.4-5jpp.1.fc7 rpm -qp --requires concurrent-1.3.4-5jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm /bin/sh /bin/sh java-gcj-compat java-gcj-compat libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgcj_bc.so.1()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) librt.so.1()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) rpm -qp --provides concurrent-javadoc-1.3.4-5jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm concurrent-javadoc = 0:1.3.4-5jpp.1.fc7 rpm -qp --requires concurrent-javadoc-1.3.4-5jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm /bin/ln /bin/rm /bin/rm X it should not need a requires on these * run rpmlint on the binary RPMs rpmlint concurrent-1.3.4-5jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm W: concurrent non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java rpmlint concurrent-javadoc-1.3.4-5jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm W: concurrent-javadoc non-standard-group Development/Documentation rpmlint concurrent-debuginfo-1.3.4-5jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm OK, the group warnings can be ignored SHOULD: * package should include license text in the package and mark it with %doc * package should build on i386 OK * package should build in mock OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 15:31:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 11:31:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235211] New: Review Request: stgit - git patch maintainer (ala Quilt) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235211 Summary: Review Request: stgit - git patch maintainer (ala Quilt) Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: williams at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/williams/stgit/stgit.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/williams/stgit/stgit-0.12.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: StGIT is a Python application providing similar functionality to Quilt (i.e. pushing/popping patches to/from a stack) on top of GIT. These operations are performed using GIT commands and the patches are stored as GIT commit objects, allowing easy merging of the StGIT patches into other repositories using standard GIT functionality. StGIT is licensed under the GNU General Public License. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 15:36:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 11:36:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235211] Review Request: stgit - git patch maintainer (ala Quilt) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041536.l34Faq6P027452@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stgit - git patch maintainer (ala Quilt) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235211 ------- Additional Comments From jbowes at redhat.com 2007-04-04 11:36 EST ------- fwiw, I've got a review request open for stgit already at bz 227946 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 15:42:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 11:42:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225922] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-codec In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041542.l34FgbLX028333@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-codec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225922 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium mwringe at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pcheung at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 15:42:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 11:42:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225934] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-modeler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041542.l34FglU0028380@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-modeler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225934 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium mwringe at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pcheung at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 15:47:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 11:47:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235211] Review Request: stgit - git patch maintainer (ala Quilt) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041547.l34FlFQZ029160@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stgit - git patch maintainer (ala Quilt) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235211 williams at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From williams at redhat.com 2007-04-04 11:47 EST ------- Argh, sorry, didn't mean to duplicate requests. I'll see about closing this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 15:50:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 11:50:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232160] Review Request: ruby-gnome2 - A ruby binding of libgnome/libgnomeui-2.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041550.l34FoxDB029412@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-gnome2 - A ruby binding of libgnome/libgnomeui-2.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232160 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-04 11:50 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=151671) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=151671&action=view) mock build log of ruby-gnome2-0.16.0-2 on FC-devel i386 Well, for -2: This time mockbuild is no problem on FC-devel i386. * License - Please check license. For me it seems that this package is licensed under LGPL. * Gecko engine dependency - Well, for rpath issue, version direction is also required for Requires. i.e. --------------------------------------------- BuildRequires: firefox-devel = 2.0.0.3 Requires: firefox = 2.0.0.3 --------------------------------------------- for example. * Requires - Well, check the Requires tree and remove redundant Requires. EXAMPLE: (this is only a example. please check others!!) For now ruby-gnome2 has: --------------------------------------------- Requires: ruby(glib2) = %{version}-%{release} Requires: ruby(gtk2) = %{version}-%{release} Requires: ruby(gnomecanvas2) = %{version}-%{release} --------------------------------------------- However, /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/gnome2.rb contains only --------------------------------------------- 1 require 'gnomecanvas2' 2 require 'gnome2.so' --------------------------------------------- for require and thus Requires for ruby(glib2), rubly(gtk2) should not be needed Perhaps other packages also have to be checked. ANOTHER EXAMPLE For now ruby-gtk2 contains --------------------------------------------- BuildRequires: ruby ruby-devel gtk2-devel pango-devel cairo-devel ruby-cairo-devel --------------------------------------------- However * ruby-devel should be required by ruby-cairo-devel * cairo-devel should be required by ruby-cairo-devel * pango-devel is required by gtk2-devel So, "ruby-devel pango-devel cairo-devel" is redundant for BuildRequires. - And some questionable Requires is found. EXAMPLE: In ruby-atk-devel, it seems that Requires for ruby-devel is written twice. (Well, what I wrote is only examples and perhaps some other fixes are also needed) * prep/build stage --------------------------------------------- ruby extconf.rb --------------------------------------------- - IMO this is similar with general configure and this should be moved to %build stage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 15:51:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 11:51:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235117] Review Request: servletapi4 - Java servlet and JSP implementation classes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041551.l34Fp1j2029433@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: servletapi4 - Java servlet and JSP implementation classes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235117 nsantos at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nsantos at redhat.com |asimon at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From nsantos at redhat.com 2007-04-04 11:50 EST ------- > NO * specfile should be %{name}.spec ---> it is named: servletapi4.spec but it should be servletapi4-4.0.4-4jpp.spec This is OK, %name refers just to the package name. No version/release should be included in the specfile name. > ?? * OSI-approved It's an Apache license, so it's OK. > ?? * is it covered by patents? Distributed under Apache license, no explicit references to patents, so to the best of our knowledge it's OK. > ?? * verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches > do) To verify source/patches, follow instructions to obtain source and package it, then run "md5sum" against the resulting tarfile, and compare to the tarfile included in the srpm, they should match. FWIW, md5sum on the tarfile in the srpm is: 91a4aeec8409a427c6a3b6d50924c15d jakarta-servletapi-4-src.tar.gz > NO * correct buildroot should be: > %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) --> it is /jakarta-servletapi-4-src/ This is OK, buildroot in specfile is (see line 54): BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) > NA * if %{?dist} is used dist is being used (see line 41): Release: %{release}%{?dist} > NO * license text included in package and marked with %doc --> included but not marked with %doc: It's marked with %doc, see line 111: %doc LICENSE README.txt > NO * packages meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) --> The rpm does not contain /lib (not sure this is normal) It's OK. > NO * rpmlint on .srpm gives no output --> Cannot install source packages. srpm doesn't need to be installed, just run rpmlint on it directly: $ rpmlint servletapi4-4.0.4-1.fc7.src.rpm W: servletapi4 non-standard-group Internet/WWW/Dynamic Content W: servletapi4 unversioned-explicit-obsoletes servlet4 W: servletapi4 unversioned-explicit-obsoletes servlet23 W: servletapi4 unversioned-explicit-provides servlet W: servletapi4 unversioned-explicit-provides servlet4 W: servletapi4 unversioned-explicit-provides servlet23 These warnings are OK (other packages were approved with similar warnings). > NO * specfile is legible --> Those fields must be changed > Name: %{name} > Version: %{version} > Release: %{release}.1%{?dist} Using the macros allows for name/version/release to be referred to later in the specfile. > ?? * package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86 > ?? * BuildRequires are proper You'll have to setup mock and try to build the package there, to verify that it builds. > ?? * use macros appropriately and consistently Usage is consistent to other packages that have been approved. > ?? * consider using cp -p to preserve timestamps It's used e.g. in line 98: cp -pr build/docs/api/* $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadocdir}/%{name} > ?? * file permissions should be okay; %defattrs should be present defattrs present (see lines 110, 115): %defattr(-,root,root) > ?? * %clean should be present Present (see lines 78/79): %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT > ?? * verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs > ?? * run rpmlint on the binary RPMs > ?? * package should build on i386 > ?? * package should build in mock See comment above about setting up mock. FWIW, here's the provides, requires, and rpmlint for the binary rpm: $ rpm -qp servletapi4-4.0.4-1.fc7.noarch.rpm --provides servlet servlet23 servlet4 servletapi4 = 0:4.0.4-1.fc7 $ rpm -qp servletapi4-4.0.4-1.fc7.noarch.rpm --requires /bin/sh /bin/sh /usr/sbin/update-alternatives /usr/sbin/update-alternatives rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 $ rpmlint servletapi4-4.0.4-1.fc7.noarch.rpm W: servletapi4 non-standard-group Internet/WWW/Dynamic Content -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 15:52:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 11:52:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235211] Review Request: stgit - git patch maintainer (ala Quilt) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041552.l34FqfDB029629@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stgit - git patch maintainer (ala Quilt) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235211 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-04 11:52 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 227946 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 15:52:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 11:52:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227946] Review Request: stgit - StGIT provides similar functionality to Quilt on top of GIT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041552.l34FqgjN029643@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stgit - StGIT provides similar functionality to Quilt on top of GIT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227946 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp CC| |williams at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-04 11:52 EST ------- *** Bug 235211 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 15:52:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 11:52:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227946] Review Request: stgit - StGIT provides similar functionality to Quilt on top of GIT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041552.l34FqckK029615@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stgit - StGIT provides similar functionality to Quilt on top of GIT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227946 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 16:17:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 12:17:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235113] Review Request: slf4j - Simple Logging Facade for Java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041617.l34GHYw0031944@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slf4j - Simple Logging Facade for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235113 nsantos at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nsantos at redhat.com |asimon at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From nsantos at redhat.com 2007-04-04 12:17 EST ------- > ?? * match upstream tarball or project name > ?? * try to match previous incarnations in other distributions/packagers for > consistency ---> I am not sure about those 2 points as the latest available version is 1.3.0 It's OK, we're repackaging from the jpackage project (see http://mirrors.dotsrc.org/jpackage/1.7/generic/free/repodata/repoview/slf4j-0-1.0-0.rc5.1jpp.html ). Agreed it's not the latest version/release, but it's the release needed to satisfy dependencies. > NO * specfile should be %{name}.spec ---> it is named: slf4j.spec but it should be slf4j-1.0-0.rc5.1jpp.spec This is OK, %name refers just to the package name. No version/release should be included in the specfile name. > ?? * OSI-approved It's an X11 license, so it's OK (GPL compatible). See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html#GPLCompatibleLicenses > ?? * is it covered by patents? Distributed under X11 license, no explicit references to patents, so to the best of our knowledge it's OK. > ?? * verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches > do) To verify source/patches, follow instructions to obtain source and package it, then run "md5sum" against the resulting tarfile, and compare to the tarfile included in the srpm, they should match. FWIW, md5sum on the tarfile in the srpm is in the specfile: # md5sum: f34e95130cc3ae28095f31961427197d slf4j-1.0-rc5.tar.gz > NO * correct buildroot should be: > %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) --> it is /slf4j-1.0-rc5/lib/ This is OK, buildroot in specfile is (see line 51): BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) > NA * if %{?dist} is used dist is being used (see line 41): Release: %{release}.1%{?dist} > NO * license text included in package and marked with %doc --> included but not marked with %doc: It's marked with %doc, see line 132: %doc LICENSE.txt > NO * packages meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) --> The rpm contains unwanted directories and files: /.svn/, /test/, /TODO.txt, /src/.svn etc with .svn directories Those are either included upstream (TODO.txt, /test) or are a result of grabbing the source from svn. They do not violate the FHS, so should be OK. > NO * rpmlint on .srpm gives no output --> Cannot install source packages. srpm doesn't need to be installed, just run rpmlint on it directly: $ rpmlint slf4j-1.0-0.rc5.1.fc7.src.rpm W: slf4j non-standard-group System/Logging W: slf4j invalid-license X11 License Warnings are OK (see license info above) > NO * specfile is legible --> Those fields must be changed > Name: %{name} > Version: %{version} > Release: %{release}.1%{?dist} Using the macros allows for name/version/release to be referred to later in the specfile. And the definitions are grouped at the top of the specfile for clarity. > ?? * package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86 > ?? * BuildRequires are proper You'll have to setup mock and try to build the package there, to verify that it builds. > ?? * use macros appropriately and consistently Usage is consistent to other packages that have been approved. > ?? * consider using cp -p to preserve timestamps It's used e.g. in line 127: cp -pr docs/api/* $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadocdir}/%{name}-%{version}/ > ?? * file permissions should be okay; %defattrs should be present defattrs present (see lines 131, 136): %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) > ?? * %clean should be present Present (see lines 77/78): %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT > ?? * verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs > ?? * run rpmlint on the binary RPMs > ?? * package should build on i386 > ?? * package should build in mock See comment above about setting up mock. FWIW, here's the provides, requires, and rpmlint for the binary rpm: $ rpm -qp slf4j-1.0-0.rc5.1.noarch.rpm --provides slf4j = 0:1.0-0.rc5.1 $ rpm -qp slf4j-1.0-0.rc5.1.noarch.rpm --requires rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 $ rpmlint slf4j-1.0-0.rc5.1.noarch.rpm W: slf4j non-standard-group System/Logging W: slf4j invalid-license X11 License -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 16:40:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 12:40:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234488] Review Request: yum-presto - Yum plugin to download deltarpms rather than full rpms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041640.l34Geuu0001262@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yum-presto - Yum plugin to download deltarpms rather than full rpms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234488 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-04-04 12:40 EST ------- Yeah, that looks good now here on x86_64... Are you looking for mirror space/BW for the x86_64 rpms? Or just haven't had time to generate them yet? Feel free to drop me an email about mirror space, I might be able to scare some up depending on what you need. Please continue the process from: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#head-a601c13b0950a89568deafa65f505b4b58ee869b Feel free to email me if you have any questions or problems, or find me on irc: nirik on #fedora-devel on irc.freenode.net. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 16:54:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 12:54:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234436] Review Request: glchess - GlChess, a 3d Chess game using OpenGL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041654.l34GsbpW002466@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glchess - GlChess, a 3d Chess game using OpenGL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234436 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-04 12:54 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=151678) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=151678&action=view) mock build log of glchess-1.0.4-1 on FC-devel i386 Well, for 1.0.4-1: * BuildRequires - mockbuild failed. At least desktop-file-utils is missing for BuildRequires. * Executable permissions/shebang -------------------------------------------- # make rpmlint happy chmod +x $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{python_sitelib}/%{name}/scene/opengl/png.py \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{python_sitelib}/%{name}/gtkui/__init__.py -------------------------------------------- - IMO the resolution should be opposite. * GConf files -------------------------------------------- %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/gconf/schemas/glchess.schemas -------------------------------------------- - Well, while I cannot find any wiki packages, however I am sure that GConf schemas files under /etc/gconf/schemas is generally _not_ regarded as config file and should not marked as %config (even if rpmlint complains about it). * Some python related dependency - Well, would you check the following import sentence? * import Image (from opengl/texture.py: Perhaps python-imaging It seems that "Packages" link from http://glchess.sourceforge.net/ requires it) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 17:08:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 13:08:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235234] New: Review Request: aoetools - ATA over Ethernet Tools Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235234 Summary: Review Request: aoetools - ATA over Ethernet Tools Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jima at beer.tclug.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://beer.tclug.org/fedora-extras/aoetools/aoetools.spec SRPM URL: http://beer.tclug.org/fedora-extras/aoetools/aoetools-14-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: The aoetools are programs that assist in using ATA over Ethernet on systems with version 2.6 Linux kernels. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 17:15:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 13:15:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235236] New: Review Request: vblade - Virtual EtherDrive (R) blade daemon Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235236 Summary: Review Request: vblade - Virtual EtherDrive (R) blade daemon Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jima at beer.tclug.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://beer.tclug.org/fedora-extras/vblade/vblade.spec SRPM URL: http://beer.tclug.org/fedora-extras/vblade/vblade-14-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: The vblade is the virtual EtherDrive (R) blade, a program that makes a seekable file available over an ethernet local area network (LAN) via the ATA over Ethernet (AoE) protocol. The seekable file is typically a block device like /dev/md0 but even regular files will work. When vblade exports the block storage over AoE it becomes a storage target. Another host on the same LAN can access the storage if it has a compatible aoe kernel driver. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 17:55:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 13:55:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234488] Review Request: yum-presto - Yum plugin to download deltarpms rather than full rpms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041755.l34Ht98L008015@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yum-presto - Yum plugin to download deltarpms rather than full rpms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234488 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-04-04 13:55 EST ------- NOTE: (Just in case if it wasn't obvious or clear) When/if imported into Extras, the default config(s) must not point to repos/servers outside of the (usual) fedoraproject infrastructure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 18:02:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 14:02:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235249] New: Review Request: vdrift-data-minimal - VDrift minimal data set Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235249 Summary: Review Request: vdrift-data-minimal - VDrift minimal data set Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: limb at jcomserv.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/extras/vdrift/vdrift-data-minimal.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/extras/vdrfit/vdrift-data-minimal-20070323-1.src.rpm Description: VDrift minimal data set. See also https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 18:03:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 14:03:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041803.l34I3chE009701@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |che666 at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-04-04 14:03 EST ------- Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/extras/vdrift/vdrift.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/extras/vdrift/vdrift-20070323-2.src.rpm Split out vdrift-data-minimal. Review BZ here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235249 Adding che666 at gmail.com, still needs work on path correction/scons. Working on full data set RPM. Will submit for review once my bandwidth improves on 4/13/07. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 18:04:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 14:04:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234488] Review Request: yum-presto - Yum plugin to download deltarpms rather than full rpms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041804.l34I4KuB009810@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yum-presto - Yum plugin to download deltarpms rather than full rpms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234488 ------- Additional Comments From jdieter at gmail.com 2007-04-04 14:04 EST ------- Thank you for pointing that out. I hadn't thought about it, but I guess it should have been obvious to me. When/if we get presto into extras, I don't think we'll point it at any repositories. Rather, it will be up to the repository owners (or the user) to add the deltaurl line to their .repo files. Thanks for the heads up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 18:08:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 14:08:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234488] Review Request: yum-presto - Yum plugin to download deltarpms rather than full rpms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041808.l34I8nQ5010627@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yum-presto - Yum plugin to download deltarpms rather than full rpms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234488 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-04-04 14:08 EST ------- Totally agreed. Jonathan: Can you make sure the version you check in has a commented presto.conf? ie, so it doesn't enable anything by default and the user must enable it, or wait until it's enabled in their repo files? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 18:24:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 14:24:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234488] Review Request: yum-presto - Yum plugin to download deltarpms rather than full rpms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041824.l34IOH4o012631@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yum-presto - Yum plugin to download deltarpms rather than full rpms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234488 ------- Additional Comments From jdieter at gmail.com 2007-04-04 14:24 EST ------- It shouldn't be hard to comment the conf file. The plugin will be enabled, but there won't be any presto repositories in the conf file (as there are now). If there aren't any presto repositories in the conf file and none in the user's .repo files, then it's just as if the plugin is disabled. I had never originally planned on having the conf file contain repository information at all. It just turned out to be an easy feature to add and one that was invaluable during testing. I'm hoping that, as interest in yum-presto grows, Fedora Infrastructure will start hosting deltarpms and modify their .repo files accordingly (the deltaurl option will be ignored by yum if yum-presto isn't installed). So, to reiterate, the conf file will not point to *any* repositories. If there's anything else you would like me to do with this, let me know. Jonathan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 19:18:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 15:18:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225653] Merge Review: concurrent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041918.l34JIP06018210@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: concurrent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225653 ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-04-04 15:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) ... > > > > > This is OK as Public Domain, please see > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2007-March/msg00142.html > Right, I know public domain is acceptable, but is this project really public > domain if it has that clause in there? I've listed the Sun License and a link to the pdf in the original mail, and it was described as Public Domain, feel free to further discuss that in that discussion thread if you see fit. ... > X Do we want to be advertising for that book? Good catch, got rid of it. ... > * consider using cp -p to preserve timestamps > X missing a -p on the first cp in %prep Fixed. > rpm -qp --requires concurrent-javadoc-1.3.4-5jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm > /bin/ln > /bin/rm > /bin/rm > > X it should not need a requires on these Fixed. New spec file and srpm uploaded at the same location. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 19:36:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 15:36:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704041936.l34Ja2b7019767@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2 Alias: perl-RPM2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(petersen at redhat.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-04-04 15:35 EST ------- Hrm - checking out the module works for me now (cvs co perl-RPM2), but importing it fails: """ [rnorwood at solitude fedora-extras]$ common/cvs-import.sh /tmp/perl-RPM2-0.67-1.src.rpm Checking out module: 'perl-RPM2' connect to address 10.8.34.151 port 544: Connection refused cvs [checkout aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if any) ERROR: "perl-RPM2" module does not exist in cvs. [rnorwood at solitude fedora-extras]$ echo $CVSROOT :ext:rnorwood at cvs.fedora.redhat.com:/cvs/extras [rnorwood at solitude fedora-extras]$ echo $CVS_RSH ssh """ Any ideas? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 20:49:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 16:49:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235293] New: Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235293 Summary: Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rmeggins at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://directory.fedoraproject.org/sources/adminutil.spec SRPM URL: http://directory.fedoraproject.org/sources/adminutil-1.1.0-1.src.rpm Description: adminutil is used to administer Fedora Directory Server, usually in conjunction with the admin server. It is broken into two libraries - libadminutil contains the basic functionality, and libadmsslutil contains SSL versions and wrappers around the basic functions. The PSET functions allow applications to store their preferences and configuration parameters in LDAP, without having to know anything about LDAP. The configuration is cached in a local file, allowing applications to function even if the LDAP server is down. The other code is typically used by CGI programs used for directory server management, containing GET/POST processing code as well as resource handling (ICU ures API). Source tarball: http://directory.fedoraproject.org/sources/adminutil-1.1.0.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 21:10:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 17:10:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225633] Merge Review: bzip2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704042110.l34LAe7V027241@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bzip2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225633 ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|varekova at redhat.com |ruben at rubenkerkhof.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2007-04-04 17:10 EST ------- Hi Ivana, I went throught all the comments above, and I don't see any further blockers, so bzip2-1.0.4-10.fc7 is approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 21:15:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 17:15:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198816] Review Request: gfs-utils - global file system userland utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704042115.l34LFgq2027586@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-utils - global file system userland utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198816 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |201449 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2007-04-04 17:15 EST ------- Sorry, I'll have to close this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 21:18:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 17:18:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 209511] Review Request: gnbd - global network block device In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704042118.l34LIUsb027672@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnbd - global network block device https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209511 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |201449 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2007-04-04 17:18 EST ------- Sorry, I'll have to close this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 21:59:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 17:59:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234857] Review Request: perl-Geography-Countries - 2-letter, 3-letter, and numerical codes for countries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704042159.l34LxFgj030432@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Geography-Countries - 2-letter, 3-letter, and numerical codes for countries Alias: Geography-Countries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234857 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-04 17:59 EST ------- Built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 21:59:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 17:59:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234858] Review Request: perl-User-Identity - Maintains info about a physical person In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704042159.l34LxQZX030450@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-User-Identity - Maintains info about a physical person Alias: perl-User-Identity https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234858 Bug 234858 depends on bug 234857, which changed state. Bug 234857 Summary: Review Request: perl-Geography-Countries - 2-letter, 3-letter, and numerical codes for countries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234857 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 22:02:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 18:02:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234858] Review Request: perl-User-Identity - Maintains info about a physical person In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704042202.l34M2eSO030779@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-User-Identity - Maintains info about a physical person Alias: perl-User-Identity https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234858 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-04 18:02 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-User-Identity Short Description: Maintains info about a physical person Owners: tcallawa at redhat.com Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 22:12:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 18:12:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234788] Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Attachment-Stripper - Strip the attachments from a mail message In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704042212.l34MCHp1031535@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Attachment-Stripper - Strip the attachments from a mail message https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234788 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-04 18:12 EST ------- Built. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 22:20:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 18:20:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225939] Merge Review: java-1.4.2-gcj-compat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704042220.l34MKG9i032071@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: java-1.4.2-gcj-compat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225939 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium fitzsim at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2007-04-04 18:20 EST ------- java-1.4.2-gcj-compat has been removed for Fedora 7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 22:21:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 18:21:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225802] Merge Review: gjdoc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704042221.l34ML1fc032112@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gjdoc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225802 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium fitzsim at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2007-04-04 18:21 EST ------- gjdoc has been removed for Fedora 7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 22:22:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 18:22:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225944] Merge Review: jessie In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704042222.l34MM50Y032195@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jessie https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225944 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium fitzsim at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fitzsim at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2007-04-04 18:22 EST ------- jessie has been removed for Fedora 7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 22:22:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 18:22:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225944] Merge Review: jessie In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704042222.l34MMNZT032213@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jessie https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225944 fitzsim at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 22:23:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 18:23:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225633] Merge Review: bzip2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704042223.l34MNTXd032275@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bzip2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225633 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-04-04 18:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #23) > The version which is in fedora now is right - if there will be any change then > there would be necessary to rebuild all dependencies. I'm not sure why was this > change done (it was about 6 years ago), but it is ok. > This problem should not be a subject of review. Indeed it should. The reverse is right. Letting pass that item without discussing it wouldn't be right. This is not a hard blocker, indeed. It is much too late to change it, indeed, if it has to be changed it should be changed right after fedora 7 is released. Also it could be decided not to change it, but use the upstream soname versionning if there is a new soname. Still this issue is not clear to me. Do you have an idea about what would be best (use libbz2.so.1 as soname or libbz2.so.1.0)? It seems right to me not to change the soname, but this issue should be settled down now such that it is easy to do the right thing when the soname is changed upstream, and a comment should be added in the spec to explain everything and give guidance for the future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 22:23:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 18:23:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225927] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-discovery In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704042223.l34MNhPq032311@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-discovery https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225927 ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-04-04 18:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Please fix items marked by X: > MUST: > * package is named appropriately > - match upstream tarball or project name > - try to match previous incarnations in other distributions/packagers for > consistency > - specfile should be %{name}.spec > - non-numeric characters should only be used in Release (ie. cvs or > something) > - for non-numerics (pre-release, CVS snapshots, etc.), see > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#PackageRelease > - if case sensitivity is requested by upstream or you feel it should be > not just lowercase, do so; otherwise, use all lower case for the name > * is it legal for Fedora to distribute this? > - OSI-approved > - not a kernel module > - not shareware > - is it covered by patents? > - it *probably* shouldn't be an emulator > - no binary firmware > * license field matches the actual license. > * license is open source-compatible. > - use acronyms for licences where common > * specfile name matches %{name} > * verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do) > - if upstream doesn't release source drops, put *clear* instructions on > how to generate the the source drop; ie. > # svn export blah/tag blah > # tar cjf blah-version-src.tar.bz2 blah > * skim the summary and description for typos, etc. > * correct buildroot > - should be: > %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) > * if %{?dist} is used, it should be in that form (note the ? and % > locations) > X license text included in package and marked with %doc Fixed > - should the README.txt, RELEASE-NOTES.txt be marked as %doc as well? > * keep old changelog entries; use judgement when removing (too old? > useless?) > * packages meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) > * rpmlint on .srpm gives no output > - W: jakarta-commons-discovery non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java - > this is OK > * changelog are OK > * Packager tag should not be used > * Vendor tag should not be used > * Distribution tag should not be used > * use License and not Copyright > * Summary tag should not end in a period > * if possible, replace PreReq with Requires(pre) and/or Requires(post) > * specfile is legible > - this is largely subjective; use your judgement > * package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86 > * BuildRequires are proper > - builds in mock will flush out problems here > - the following packages don't need to be listed in BuildRequires: > bash > bzip2 > coreutils > cpio > diffutils > fedora-release (and/or redhat-release) > gcc > gcc-c++ > gzip > make > patch > perl > redhat-rpm-config > rpm-build > sed > tar > unzip > which > * summary should be a short and concise description of the package > * description expands upon summary (don't include installation > instructions) > * make sure lines are <= 80 characters > * specfile written in American English > * make a -doc sub-package if necessary > - see > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-9bbfa57478f0460c6160947a6bf795249488182b > * packages including libraries should exclude static libraries if possible > * don't use rpath > * config files should usually be marked with %config(noreplace) > * GUI apps should contain .desktop files > * should the package contain a -devel sub-package? > * use macros appropriately and consistently > - ie. %{buildroot} and %{optflags} vs. $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and $RPM_OPT_FLAGS > * don't use %makeinstall > * locale data handling correct (find_lang) > - if translations included, add BR: gettext and use %find_lang %{name} at the > end of %install > * consider using cp -p to preserve timestamps > * split Requires(pre,post) into two separate lines > * package should probably not be relocatable > * package contains code > - see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#CodeVsContent > - in general, there should be no offensive content > * package should own all directories and files > * there should be no %files duplicates > * file permissions should be okay; %defattrs should be present > * %clean should be present > * %doc files should not affect runtime > * if it is a web apps, it should be in /usr/share/%{name} and *not* /var/www > * verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs > will do this when this can be built in mock > * run rpmlint on the binary RPMs > will do this when this can be built in mock > > SHOULD: > * package should include license text in the package and mark it with %doc > * package should build on i386 > * package should build in mock > It doesn't build in mock currently: > javadoc: > [mkdir] Created dir: /builddir/build/BUILD/commons-discovery-0.4-src/dist > [mkdir] Created dir: /builddir/build/BUILD/commons-discovery-0.4-src/dist/docs > [mkdir] Created dir: > /builddir/build/BUILD/commons-discovery-0.4-src/dist/docs/api > [javadoc] Generating Javadoc > [javadoc] Javadoc execution > [javadoc] Unknown option: - > [javadoc] Parsing > /builddir/build/BUILD/commons-discovery-0.4-src/src/java/org/apache/commons/discovery/ResourceNameIterator.java > .... > [javadoc] 1 error. > > and when copying the files over, it fails with: > + mkdir -p > /var/tmp/jakarta-commons-discovery-0.4-2jpp.1.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/javadoc/jakarta-commons-discovery-0.4 > + cp -pr 'dist/docs/api/*' > /var/tmp/jakarta-commons-discovery-0.4-2jpp.1.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/javadoc/jakarta-commons-discovery-0.4 > cp: cannot stat `dist/docs/api/*': No such file or directory > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.1025 (%install) > > > RPM build errors: > Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.1025 (%install) > srpm that will actually build properly: https://mwringe.108.redhat.com/files/documents/175/335/jakarta-commons-discovery-0.4-2jpp.1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 22:24:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 18:24:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225845] Merge Review: gnu-crypto In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704042224.l34MO82L032338@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnu-crypto https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225845 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium fitzsim at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fitzsim at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2007-04-04 18:24 EST ------- gnu-crypto has been removed for Fedora 7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 22:29:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 18:29:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226149] Merge Review: mockobjects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704042229.l34MTZ7s032566@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mockobjects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226149 fitzsim at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fitzsim at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 22:30:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 18:30:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226149] Merge Review: mockobjects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704042230.l34MUVY6032641@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mockobjects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226149 fitzsim at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2007-04-04 18:30 EST ------- mockobjects has been removed for Fedora 7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 22:31:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 18:31:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227086] Review Request: mockobjects-0.09-16jpp - Java MockObjects package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704042231.l34MVXbP032735@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mockobjects-0.09-16jpp - Java MockObjects package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227086 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium fitzsim at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fitzsim at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2007-04-04 18:31 EST ------- mockobjects has been removed for Fedora 7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 22:36:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 18:36:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225653] Merge Review: concurrent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704042236.l34Ma4bh000424@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: concurrent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225653 mwringe at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-04-04 18:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > ... > > > > > > > This is OK as Public Domain, please see > > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2007-March/msg00142.html > > Right, I know public domain is acceptable, but is this project really public > > domain if it has that clause in there? > > I've listed the Sun License and a link to the pdf in the original mail, and it > was described as Public Domain, feel free to further discuss that in that > discussion thread if you see fit. Ok, its seems to be ok https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2007-April/msg00014.html Everything looks good APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 22:38:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 18:38:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234789] Review Request: perl-Return-Value - Polymorphic Return Values In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704042238.l34McjTY000582@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Return-Value - Polymorphic Return Values Alias: perl-Return-Value https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234789 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-04 18:38 EST ------- Built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 22:38:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 18:38:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234791] Review Request: perl-Email-Send - Module for sending email In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704042238.l34MckPW000590@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Send - Module for sending email Alias: perl-Email-Send https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234791 Bug 234791 depends on bug 234789, which changed state. Bug 234789 Summary: Review Request: perl-Return-Value - Polymorphic Return Values https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234789 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 22:52:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 18:52:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225931] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-lang In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704042252.l34MqqE7001247@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-lang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225931 mwringe at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-04-04 18:52 EST ------- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 22:53:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 18:53:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234860] Review Request: perl-Mail-IMAPClient - An IMAP Client API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704042253.l34MrfcT001324@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-IMAPClient - An IMAP Client API Alias: perl-Mail-IMAPClient https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234860 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-04 18:53 EST ------- New Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Mail-IMAPClient.spec New SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Mail-IMAPClient-2.2.9-2.src.rpm Added missing docs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 22:56:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 18:56:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234862] Review Request: perl-Mail-Box - Manage a mailbox, a folder with messages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704042256.l34MutvW001464@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Box - Manage a mailbox, a folder with messages Alias: perl-Mail-Box https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234862 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-04 18:56 EST ------- New Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Mail-Box.spec New SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Mail-Box-2.070-2.src.rpm Added examples/ to %doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 23:22:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 19:22:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234667] Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704042322.l34NM6MT002753@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234667 ------- Additional Comments From acme at redhat.com 2007-04-04 19:22 EST ------- New Release: SRPM: http://oops.ghostprotocols.net:81/acme/dwarves/rpm/SRPMS/dwarves-0-18.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 4 23:39:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 19:39:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232160] Review Request: ruby-gnome2 - A ruby binding of libgnome/libgnomeui-2.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704042339.l34Nd3gY003227@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-gnome2 - A ruby binding of libgnome/libgnomeui-2.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232160 ------- Additional Comments From stefmanos at gmail.com 2007-04-04 19:38 EST ------- is there a problem with the site you posted the srpm? because i can't download it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 00:05:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 20:05:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704050005.l35057S7004122@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2 Alias: perl-RPM2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(petersen at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-04-04 20:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #35) > connect to address 10.8.34.151 port 544: Connection refused > cvs [checkout aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if any) That doesn't look right. Sorry but could you try again and if you still have problems please ask on #fedora-admin or cvsadmin-members at fedoraproject org. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 00:10:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 20:10:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225653] Merge Review: concurrent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704050010.l350App8004348@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: concurrent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225653 ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-04-04 20:10 EST ------- Package built in brew. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 00:12:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 20:12:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231911] Review Request: jomolhari-fonts - Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704050012.l350C034004397@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jomolhari-fonts - Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231911 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-04-04 20:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Jens IMHO package name only refer to name not to the case sensitivity of name, > just look at Packaging/NamingGuidelines -> Case Sensitivity. As I would also > prefer lowercase name so leave it as is. Ok, fine, works for me. :) > Can I keep the old Summary, it will be consistent with the TMU package where the font name is included in Summary? Well it is up to you really. Personally I don't see so much point in repeating the package name in the summary, but it is ok if you prefer to keep it. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 00:28:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 20:28:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225931] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-lang In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704050028.l350S5Ug004864@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-lang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225931 ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-04-04 20:27 EST ------- Package built in brew. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 01:06:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 21:06:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225610] Merge Review: bcel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704050106.l3516NCk005844@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bcel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225610 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium pcheung at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mwringe at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-04-04 21:06 EST ------- Updated spec file and srpm at: https://pcheung.108.redhat.com/files/documents/174/284/bcel.spec https://pcheung.108.redhat.com/files/documents/174/283/bcel-5.1-10jpp.1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 02:01:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 22:01:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231911] Review Request: jomolhari-fonts - Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704050201.l3521Asb007567@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jomolhari-fonts - Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231911 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(cfynn at gmx.net) ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-04-04 22:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Chris and Jens, which URL are you suggesting to use: > http://www.btinternet.com/~c.fynn/tibetan/fonts/jomolhari.html > or > http://www.thdl.org/tools/fonts/tibfonts.php?l=uva200607171100 Chris, any comments? Probably doesn't matter too much, though Chris webpage seems more up to date. Has the license in 0.003c changed to OFL? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 02:38:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 22:38:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228301] Review Request: python-nevow - Web application construction kit written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704050238.l352cuiN010929@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-nevow - Web application construction kit written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228301 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 02:41:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 22:41:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228301] Review Request: python-nevow - Web application construction kit written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704050241.l352f3bp011095@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-nevow - Web application construction kit written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228301 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 02:44:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 22:44:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231911] Review Request: jomolhari-fonts - Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704050244.l352iuH9011301@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jomolhari-fonts - Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231911 cfynn at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(cfynn at gmx.net) | ------- Additional Comments From cfynn at gmx.net 2007-04-04 22:44 EST ------- Either URL is OK - the THDL site currently takes a while to get updated as they are reorganizing everything. 0.003c was changed to OFL as this seems to work better for fonts. - Chris -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 03:01:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 23:01:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187621] Review Request: blam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704050301.l3531tRw012399@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187621 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-04-04 23:01 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: blam New Branches: FC-6 I'd like to continue with Blam! on FC-6 also and would appreciate a branching for it. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 03:40:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 23:40:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225607] Merge Review: axis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704050340.l353e50Z014465@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: axis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225607 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium pcheung at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mwringe at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-04-04 23:40 EST ------- Updated spec file and srpm at: https://pcheung.108.redhat.com/files/documents/174/362/axis.spec https://pcheung.108.redhat.com/files/documents/174/361/axis-1.2.1-2jpp.7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 03:52:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 23:52:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225922] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-codec In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704050352.l353qcq1015066@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-codec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225922 ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-04-04 23:52 EST ------- MUST: * package is named appropriately - match upstream tarball or project name - try to match previous incarnations in other distributions/packagers for consistency - specfile should be %{name}.spec - non-numeric characters should only be used in Release (ie. cvs or something) - for non-numerics (pre-release, CVS snapshots, etc.), see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#PackageRelease - if case sensitivity is requested by upstream or you feel it should be not just lowercase, do so; otherwise, use all lower case for the name * is it legal for Fedora to distribute this? - OSI-approved - not a kernel module - not shareware - is it covered by patents? - it *probably* shouldn't be an emulator - no binary firmware * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. - use acronyms for licences where common * specfile name matches %{name} X verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do) - md5sum do not match with upstream tar ball * skim the summary and description for typos, etc. * correct buildroot - should be: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) * if %{?dist} is used, it should be in that form (note the ? and % locations) * license text included in package and marked with %doc * keep old changelog entries; use judgement when removing (too old? useless?) * packages meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) * rpmlint on .srpm gives no output - W: jakarta-commons-codec non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java - this is OK * changelog should be in one of these formats: * Fri Jun 23 2006 Jesse Keating - 0.6-4 - And fix the link syntax. * Fri Jun 23 2006 Jesse Keating 0.6-4 - And fix the link syntax. * Fri Jun 23 2006 Jesse Keating - 0.6-4 - And fix the link syntax. * Packager tag should not be used * Vendor tag should not be used * Distribution tag should not be used * use License and not Copyright * Summary tag should not end in a period * if possible, replace PreReq with Requires(pre) and/or Requires(post) X specfile is legible - Are these still needed: Requires(post): /bin/rm /bin/ln, Requires(postun): /bin/rm? * package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86 * BuildRequires are proper - builds in mock will flush out problems here - the following packages don't need to be listed in BuildRequires: bash bzip2 coreutils cpio diffutils fedora-release (and/or redhat-release) gcc gcc-c++ gzip make patch perl redhat-rpm-config rpm-build sed tar unzip which X summary should be a short and concise description of the package Summary is just the name of the package * description expands upon summary (don't include installation instructions) * make sure lines are <= 80 characters * specfile written in American English * make a -doc sub-package if necessary - see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-9bbfa57478f0460c6160947a6bf795249488182b * packages including libraries should exclude static libraries if possible * don't use rpath * config files should usually be marked with %config(noreplace) * GUI apps should contain .desktop files * should the package contain a -devel sub-package? * use macros appropriately and consistently - ie. %{buildroot} and %{optflags} vs. $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and $RPM_OPT_FLAGS * don't use %makeinstall * install section must begin with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot} * locale data handling correct (find_lang) - if translations included, add BR: gettext and use %find_lang %{name} at the end of %install * consider using cp -p to preserve timestamps * split Requires(pre,post) into two separate lines * package should probably not be relocatable * package contains code - see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#CodeVsContent - in general, there should be no offensive content * package should own all directories and files * there should be no %files duplicates * file permissions should be okay; %defattrs should be present * %clean should be present * %doc files should not affect runtime * if it is a web apps, it should be in /usr/share/%{name} and *not* /var/www * verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs will do this after the spec file is fixed * run rpmlint on the binary RPMs rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/jakarta-commons-codec-*rpm W: jakarta-commons-codec non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java W: jakarta-commons-codec non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java W: jakarta-commons-codec-javadoc non-standard-group Development/Documentation SHOULD: * package should include license text in the package and mark it with %doc * package should build on i386 * package should build in mock -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 04:05:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 00:05:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234488] Review Request: yum-presto - Yum plugin to download deltarpms rather than full rpms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704050405.l3545397015840@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yum-presto - Yum plugin to download deltarpms rather than full rpms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234488 jdieter at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jdieter at gmail.com 2007-04-05 00:04 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: yum-presto Short Description: Deltarpm plugin for yum Owners: jdieter at gmail.com Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 04:10:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 00:10:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234860] Review Request: perl-Mail-IMAPClient - An IMAP Client API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704050410.l354AjCx016188@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-IMAPClient - An IMAP Client API Alias: perl-Mail-IMAPClient https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234860 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-05 00:10 EST ------- Add following lines to SPEC to silent rpmlint Warning spurious-executable-perm and Errors invalid-dependency and wrong-script-interpreter. find examples -type f -exec chmod -x {} 2>/dev/null ';' find examples -type f -exec sed -i 's#/usr/local/bin/perl#/usr/bin/perl#' {} 2>/dev/null ';' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 04:21:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 00:21:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234861] Review Request: perl-Mail-Transport-Dbx - Parse Outlook Express mailboxe In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704050421.l354LCS3016807@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Transport-Dbx - Parse Outlook Express mailboxe https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234861 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 04:22:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 00:22:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234488] Review Request: yum-presto - Yum plugin to download deltarpms rather than full rpms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704050422.l354MpVX016927@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yum-presto - Yum plugin to download deltarpms rather than full rpms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234488 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wtogami at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-04-05 00:22 EST ------- CVS is approved, please wait about 10 minutes before checking in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 04:23:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 00:23:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234861] Review Request: perl-Mail-Transport-Dbx - Parse Outlook Express mailboxe In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704050423.l354NMnv016984@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Transport-Dbx - Parse Outlook Express mailboxe https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234861 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-05 00:23 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 4dcf5346a67c0a7f861cb2bb51a7d14e Mail-Transport-Dbx-0.07.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/0_pod.............skipped all skipped: Test::Pod not installed t/0_pod_coverage....skipped all skipped: Test::Pod::Coverage not installed t/1.................ok t/2.................ok t/3.................ok t/fixed.............ok All tests successful, 2 tests skipped. Files=6, Tests=58, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.12 cusr + 0.03 csys = 0.15 CPU) + Provides: Dbx.so perl(Mail::Transport::Dbx) = 0.07 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 04:28:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 00:28:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234859] Review Request: perl-Object-Realize-Later - Delayed creation of objects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704050428.l354S4RV017076@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Object-Realize-Later - Delayed creation of objects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234859 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 04:29:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 00:29:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234859] Review Request: perl-Object-Realize-Later - Delayed creation of objects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704050429.l354TUiU017112@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Object-Realize-Later - Delayed creation of objects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234859 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-05 00:29 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url c6e124d52305c1f6c7f08aeaf6bd82d4 Object-Realize-Later-0.16.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/10isa.........ok t/20can.........ok t/30realize.....ok t/40autoload....ok t/41autoload....ok t/50again.......ok t/60module......ok All tests successful. Files=7, Tests=109, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.24 cusr + 0.07 csys = 0.31 CPU) + Provides: perl(Object::Realize::Later) = 0.16 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 04:53:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 00:53:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234861] Review Request: perl-Mail-Transport-Dbx - Parse Outlook Express mailboxe In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704050453.l354rVCb017742@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Transport-Dbx - Parse Outlook Express mailboxe https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234861 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-05 00:53 EST ------- Missing: BR: perl(Test::Pod) BR: perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 05:14:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 01:14:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234861] Review Request: perl-Mail-Transport-Dbx - Parse Outlook Express mailboxe In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704050514.l355EJWk018340@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Transport-Dbx - Parse Outlook Express mailboxe https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234861 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-05 01:14 EST ------- Ralf, I am really confused on make test issues. Can you please give me guidelines for future perl-* packages review about if I got something skipped in make test then whether I should ask submitter to add those as BRs ot it can be made as optional? Really wonder about perl packages that make will not require or asks those BRs but make tests asks about that. PS. Would like to say "Parag is not a Good Perl Programmer though he knows introductory perl programming." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 05:44:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 01:44:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234862] Review Request: perl-Mail-Box - Manage a mailbox, a folder with messages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704050544.l355iTDY019653@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Box - Manage a mailbox, a folder with messages Alias: perl-Mail-Box https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234862 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-05 01:44 EST ------- Before I go for review, Let me give here what build.log gave me * **** Installing MailBox * * First, I will check the sanity of all required modules... sometimes * they do not load, for instance if you have installed a new release * of Perl without upgrading the libraries. Scalar::Util version 1.18 is ok (required is 1.13) File::Remove version 0.33 is ok (required is 0.2) IO::Scalar version 2.110 is ok (required is 0) Object::Realize::Later version 0.16 is ok (required is 0.14) File::Spec version 3.12 is ok (required is 0.7) Time::Zone version 2.22 is ok (required is 0) User::Identity version 0.91 is ok (required is 0.9) Digest::HMAC_MD5 version 1.01 is ok (required is 0) Mail::Address version 1.74 is ok (required is 0) Errno version 1.0901 is ok (required is 0) Test::Harness version 2.56 is outdated; requires 2.62 URI version 1.35 is ok (required is 1.23) MIME::Types version 1.17 is ok (required is 1.004) Date::Parse version 2.27 is ok (required is 0) Test::More version 0.62 is ok (required is 0.47) MIME::Base64 version 3.07 is ok (required is 0) Sys::Hostname version 1.11 is ok (required is 0) * Now, let me ask you whether you want some optional modules to be * installed as well. You can always install these modules later, by * hand, without a need to re-install MailBox. * **** Optional Mail::Box::Parser::C is not installed Use: Speeds-up reading mail folders, though most time is consumed by Perl's administration of the processed data. WARN This module contains XS code, so you need a C compiler. Do you want to install Mail::Box::Parser::C? yes/no/all [n] **** Found optional Encode version 2.12 (at least 1.86 required) **** Found optional Mail::Transport::Dbx version 0.07 (at least 0.04 required) **** Found optional Mail::SpamAssassin version 3.002000 (at least 2.00 required) **** Found optional Mail::IMAPClient version 2.2.9 (at least 2.2.8 required) **** Found optional Mail::Internet version 1.74 (at least 1.0 required) **** Found optional MIME::Entity version 5.420 (at least 3.0 required) **** Found optional HTML::TreeBuilder version 3.21 (at least 3.13 required) **** Found optional Time::HiRes version 1.86 (at least 1.51 required) **** Found optional HTML::FormatText version 2.04 (at least 2.01 required) Do you want to run the (large set of) tests? yes/no [yes] **** Writing Makefile Checking if your kit is complete... Looks good Warning: prerequisite Test::Harness 2.62 not found. We have 2.56. Writing Makefile for Mail::Box **** Done yes: standard output: Broken pipe yes: write error Now I have 2 questions:- 1)Saw all optional dependencies got installed successfully except Mail::Box::Parser::C Is that OK or its missing BR? 2)Warning: prerequisite Test::Harness 2.62 not found. We have 2.56. Did some search for Test::Harness and found its part of perl package but not able to get more information on its versions 2.62/2.56. Also I found because of this make test is disables. Want to know reason to disable them? %check # We can't do this, perl(Test::Harness) is too old. :/ # make test -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 06:06:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 02:06:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234861] Review Request: perl-Mail-Transport-Dbx - Parse Outlook Express mailboxe In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704050606.l3566iNV020546@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Transport-Dbx - Parse Outlook Express mailboxe https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234861 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-05 02:06 EST ------- Parag, I don't understand what you don't understand: Your log shows this: t/0_pod.............skipped all skipped: Test::Pod not installed t/0_pod_coverage....skipped all skipped: Test::Pod::Coverage not installed This means, the tests have not been fully excercised, because some optional modules were missing when building. Note: These modules are optional. So far, it has been our policy to "test to the maximum, when possible" (In practice, inside of the buildsys, i.e. everything but network access or some cases of database access) I.e. to let the testsuite excercise these checks, you'd have to BR: these tests' infrastructure. > Really wonder about perl packages that make will > not require or asks those BRs but make tests asks about that. I don't fully understand what you are trying to say, the principle of most perl modules' testsuites (and most testsuites in general), is to run "non-interactive, non-supervised" and only warn about those cases when something is missing. I.e. if you want larger test coverage but some "minimal tests", you'll have to configure a testsuite and your system in advance to running it. In case of a perl module, these BR: ... means to "taylor the system for the testsuite" in advance to running a testsuite. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 06:16:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 02:16:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234861] Review Request: perl-Mail-Transport-Dbx - Parse Outlook Express mailboxe In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704050616.l356GW1e020937@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Transport-Dbx - Parse Outlook Express mailboxe https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234861 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-05 02:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Parag, I don't understand what you don't understand: > > Your log shows this: > > t/0_pod.............skipped > all skipped: Test::Pod not installed > t/0_pod_coverage....skipped > all skipped: Test::Pod::Coverage not installed > > This means, the tests have not been fully excercised, because some optional > modules were missing when building. > > Note: These modules are optional. So after we create SPEC for any new perl package, we need to run "make test" to its maximum to check for whether we are missing any optional modules for this package or not and if we are missing anything then add those required packages as BR to SPEC. > > So far, it has been our policy to "test to the maximum, when possible" (In > practice, inside of the buildsys, i.e. everything but network access or some > cases of database access) > > I.e. to let the testsuite excercise these checks, you'd have to BR: these tests' > infrastructure. Ok. So this is main thing I should remember for reviewing now any perl-* packages. > > > Really wonder about perl packages that make will > > not require or asks those BRs but make tests asks about that. > I don't fully understand what you are trying to say, the principle of most perl > modules' testsuites (and most testsuites in general), is to run > "non-interactive, non-supervised" and only warn about those cases when something > is missing. > > I.e. if you want larger test coverage but some "minimal tests", you'll have to > configure a testsuite and your system in advance to running it. In case of a > perl module, these BR: ... means to "taylor the system for the testsuite" in > advance to running a testsuite. What my basic question is towards perl-* packages/its packaging is that in most of normal packages that uses gcc compilation uses ./configure and from there also we can know if we are missing to add any packages as BRs. But I am not able to find same for perl packages. Instead I saw "make test" is the only one way to satisfy package's all requires Build time dependencies. Now I got that. thanks for your reply. Tom, Either you can submit a new package to review again or you can add those BRs at a time of package importing in CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 07:15:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 03:15:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225066] Review Request: gedit-plugins - Collections of plugins for gedit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704050715.l357FsiT023162@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gedit-plugins - Collections of plugins for gedit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225066 ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at fedoraproject.org 2007-04-05 03:15 EST ------- I think most of the issues you mentioned have been addressed. Do you have any other comment? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 07:21:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 03:21:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234861] Review Request: perl-Mail-Transport-Dbx - Parse Outlook Express mailboxe In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704050721.l357LPjp023441@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Transport-Dbx - Parse Outlook Express mailboxe https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234861 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-05 03:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > What my basic question is towards perl-* packages/its packaging is that in > most of normal packages that uses gcc compilation uses ./configure These are configuration-time options (If "found" then "activate/build-in a feature") > and from > there also we can know if we are missing to add any packages as BRs. But I am > not able to find same for perl packages. Instead I saw "make test" is the only > one way to satisfy package's all requires Build time dependencies. ... and these are run-time options (run-time of the test-suites) The former rarely exist for perl-packages (Nevertheless, they occasionally they exist), while the latter also occasionally exist for "ordinary packages" (but most packages don't ship a testsuite) The problems actually are: * rpm doesn't destinguish between both situations. * Most packages do not properly destinguish between both cases. In practice, packagers have to resort to a "compromise that works", which in most cases will be "activate a testsuite only if it doesn't pull in additional configuration-time deps". In most cases, such as most perl-packages, "activating the testsuite" will not have negative impacts on package deps, but that's an item to be carefully watched for. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 07:35:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 03:35:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226904] Review Request: qmpdclient - MPD client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704050735.l357Z4Lb023890@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qmpdclient - MPD client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226904 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium trond.danielsen at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |trond.danielsen at fedoraprojec | |t.org ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at fedoraproject.org 2007-04-05 03:35 EST ------- Are these warnings a problem? [trondd at localhost i386]$ rpmlint -v qmpdclient-* I: qmpdclient checking I: qmpdclient-debuginfo checking W: qmpdclient-debuginfo hidden-file-or-dir /usr/src/debug/qmpdclient-1.0.7/.res W: qmpdclient-debuginfo hidden-file-or-dir /usr/src/debug/qmpdclient-1.0.7/.res W: qmpdclient-debuginfo hidden-file-or-dir /usr/src/debug/qmpdclient-1.0.7/.ui W: qmpdclient-debuginfo hidden-file-or-dir /usr/src/debug/qmpdclient-1.0.7/.ui W: qmpdclient-debuginfo hidden-file-or-dir /usr/src/debug/qmpdclient-1.0.7/.moc W: qmpdclient-debuginfo hidden-file-or-dir /usr/src/debug/qmpdclient-1.0.7/.moc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 07:38:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 03:38:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225849] Merge Review: gnuplot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704050738.l357cSxw024073@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnuplot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225849 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium varekova at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(pertusus at free.fr) ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-04-05 03:38 EST ------- Patrice what preciesly are the problems you need to change before you proved this review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 07:55:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 03:55:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704050755.l357tFbp025463@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-05 03:55 EST ------- Brian, would you expect that I check the rpms submitted by Jules comment 74? Or will you check Brian's rpms and modify them somewhat? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 07:57:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 03:57:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223657] Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704050757.l357v7r0025646@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223657 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-05 03:56 EST ------- Again ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 07:59:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 03:59:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227309] Review Request: seom - Desktop video capture and playback utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704050759.l357xchV025838@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seom - Desktop video capture and playback utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227309 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-05 03:59 EST ------- ( I certainly remember I am reviewing this bug. When new package is ready, please upload and I will check it ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 08:01:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 04:01:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229250] Review Request: koji - Build system tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704050801.l3581p7Q026038@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: koji - Build system tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229250 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-05 04:01 EST ------- As now koji-1.0-1 is in public, can you close this bug as NEXTRELEASE? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 08:04:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 04:04:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223592] Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704050804.l3584OBN026658@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223592 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(dgoodwin at dangerous | |lyinc.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-05 04:04 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 08:05:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 04:05:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222964] Review Request: dayplanner - A simple time management program. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704050805.l3585eOl026789@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dayplanner - A simple time management program. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222964 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-05 04:05 EST ------- Again ping? I will close this bug in a week unless any response is made on this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 08:06:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 04:06:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220393] Review Request: synopsis - Source-code Introspection Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704050806.l3586WEr026898@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synopsis - Source-code Introspection Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220393 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_DEV |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(seefeld at sympatico. | |ca) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-05 04:06 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 08:08:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 04:08:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 209468] Review Request: Sjitter - Another network performance tool... In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704050808.l3588Iwa027117@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sjitter - Another network performance tool... Alias: sjitter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209468 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |201449 nThis| | Flag|needinfo?(nicolashennion at gma|fedora-review- |il.com) | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-05 04:08 EST ------- Closing as WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 08:08:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 04:08:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225983] Merge Review: less In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704050808.l3588gfV027192@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: less https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225983 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium varekova at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(ed at eh3.com) ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-04-05 04:08 EST ------- Ed, could you please look at less-394-9.fc7 and approved this review request or if you see any reason why you wdon't want to aproved it here. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 08:25:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 04:25:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226113] Merge Review: lynx In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704050825.l358PAso028485@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: lynx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226113 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium varekova at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(rnorwood at redhat.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-04-05 04:25 EST ------- Robin, could you please look at less and approved this review request or if you see any reason why you wdon't want to aproved it here. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 09:08:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 05:08:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704050908.l3598hsg032259@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2007-04-05 05:08 EST ------- It would be easier to maintain for all parties, I think, if we could modify my build process so that the resulting e-b spec file is good enough for approval instead of maintaining Brian's spec outside of my source tree. But it is about making it as easy as possible for Brian to maintain e-b in Fedora, not about making it easy for me. So I'll just go with whatever Brian says ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 09:11:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 05:11:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226232] Merge Review: passwd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704050911.l359B9Bm032489@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: passwd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226232 tmraz at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From tmraz at redhat.com 2007-04-05 05:10 EST ------- Dist tag added. Buildroot changed to the standard value (passwd-0.74-3.fc7). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 09:20:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 05:20:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226904] Review Request: qmpdclient - MPD client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704050920.l359KD7o000763@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qmpdclient - MPD client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226904 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-04-05 05:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Are these warnings a problem? > I don't think so. They all are connected with debuginfo subpackage and I have no influence on it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 10:00:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 06:00:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231911] Review Request: jomolhari-fonts - Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051000.l35A0485003556@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jomolhari-fonts - Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231911 ------- Additional Comments From mgarski at post.pl 2007-04-05 05:59 EST ------- rpmlint recognise only SIL Open Font License as valid license tag, OFL is reported as unknown. Can I leave the short form? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 10:27:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 06:27:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225293] Merge Review: authconfig In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051027.l35AROGu004808@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: authconfig https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225293 ------- Additional Comments From tmraz at redhat.com 2007-04-05 06:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > authconfig > W: authconfig no-url-tag > -> add tag Fixed although the project doesn't have any real web pages. > W: authconfig symlink-should-be-relative /usr/sbin/authconfig-tui > /usr/share/authconfig/authconfig-tui.py > W: authconfig symlink-should-be-relative /usr/sbin/authconfig > /usr/share/authconfig/authconfig.py > -> possible problems with absolute symlinks The symlink points to completely unrelated subtree -> should stay absolute. > W: authconfig read-error /etc/pam.d/system-auth-ac [Errno 2] No such file or > directory: '/tmp/authconfig-5.3.13-2.fc7.i386.rpm.10386//etc/pam.d/system-auth-ac' Bug in rpmlint. > authconfig-gtk > W: authconfig-gtk no-url-tag > W: authconfig-gtk no-documentation > W: authconfig-gtk symlink-should-be-relative > /usr/sbin/system-config-authentication /usr/share/authconfig/authconfig-gtk.py > W: authconfig-gtk no-dependency-on usermode It depends on it indirectly through authconfig base package. > W: authconfig-gtk symlink-should-be-relative /usr/sbin/authconfig-gtk > /usr/share/authconfig/authconfig-gtk.py > W: authconfig-gtk no-dependency-on usermode > > Wrong buildroot path. Fixed. > %defattr(-,root,root) replace with %defattr(-,root,root,-) Fixed. (authconfig-5.3.13-3.fc7) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 11:04:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 07:04:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226224] Merge Review: pam_ccreds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051104.l35B4mEE006073@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pam_ccreds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226224 ------- Additional Comments From tmraz at redhat.com 2007-04-05 07:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > W: pam_ccreds no-url-tag Fixed. > E: pam_ccreds binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/sbin/ccreds_validate > ['/lib/security'] > E: pam_ccreds binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/sbin/cc_dump ['/lib/security'] > E: pam_ccreds binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/sbin/cc_test ['/lib/security'] > -> replace rpath if possible No, the rpath is correct because the binaries have to link to the pam_ccreds.so module directly. > E: pam_ccreds setuid-binary /usr/sbin/ccreds_validate root 04755 > E: pam_ccreds non-standard-executable-perm /usr/sbin/ccreds_validate 04755 > -> I think they are needed for functionality of pam_ccred Yes. > W: pam_ccreds buildprereq-use automake db4-devel openssl-devel pam-devel > -> Use plain BuildRequires instead. Fixed. > Missing dist tag. Added. > Missing post, pre part with ldconfig for shared library. There is only pam module, no regular shared library -> no need for ldconfig. > Requires should include version, which is needed for install/build > %{name} >= %{version}-%{release} It should build fine with versions which are not years old I don't think explicit versions are required. (pam_ccreds-4-2.fc7) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 11:18:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 07:18:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207805] Review Request: skey - An S/Key implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051118.l35BIQKj006514@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: skey - An S/Key implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207805 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium pb at bieringer.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pb at bieringer.de ------- Additional Comments From pb at bieringer.de 2007-04-05 07:18 EST ------- Probably related, how about adding at least OPIE support? There are packages available for Debian, PLD and SuSE but I didn't found one for Fedora/RedHat systems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 11:44:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 07:44:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226669] Merge Review: zip In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051144.l35BiqNY007419@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: zip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226669 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium mgarski at post.pl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mgarski at post.pl ------- Additional Comments From mgarski at post.pl 2007-04-05 07:44 EST ------- * What's the reasons not updating to 2.32? * I'm not sure but probably zcrypt29.zip can br droped. As it states in crypt.c (from 2.31 and 2.32): The main encryption/decryption source code for Info-Zip software was originally written in Europe. To the best of our knowledge, it can be freely distributed in both source and object forms from any country, including the USA under License Exception TSU of the U.S. Export Administration Regulations (section 740.13(e)) of 6 June 2002. Prior to January 2000, re-export from the US was a violation of US law. Enc/dec in 2.3{2,1} are newer then in zrypt29.zip * Drop BUGS, as in 2.32 we can read: "This file is likely out of date 17 May 2006" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 11:58:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 07:58:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225849] Merge Review: gnuplot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051158.l35BwZTG008240@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnuplot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225849 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(pertusus at free.fr) | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-04-05 07:58 EST ------- I think that the font directories are important for the integration in fedora. The docs are not a blocker, but I gave all the informations needed to implement it. Do you want a patch for that? Otherwise at the moment I don't have any time to devote to merge reviews (it is also for other reviews I am involved in), so somebody else should take the review, or you'll have to wait (notice that I never formally took the review, because I knew that I could be taken by 'real life' tasks). A side note is that the comments I made in the gd merge review are in fact useful for the new gnuplot png driver, and also to avoid bogus dependencies in gnuplot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 11:58:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 07:58:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225786] Merge Review: gd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051158.l35BwjVo008270@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225786 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 12:48:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 08:48:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226130] Merge Review: man-pages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051248.l35CmHfB010321@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: man-pages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226130 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-04-05 08:48 EST ------- This directory should be owned by filesystem - it is not part of aman-pages package. So I filled separate bug against this problem (235356). Is there any other problem which you want to fix in man-pages-2.43-10.fc7? If there is no problem and you agree that the package fulfill the review requirements, please could you approved it. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 13:28:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 09:28:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234862] Review Request: perl-Mail-Box - Manage a mailbox, a folder with messages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051328.l35DSxtF014365@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Box - Manage a mailbox, a folder with messages Alias: perl-Mail-Box https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234862 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-05 09:28 EST ------- 1)Saw all optional dependencies got installed successfully except Mail::Box::Parser::C Is that OK or its missing BR? A) Mail::Box::Parser::C depends on Mail::Box, not the other way around. I packaged it up too, but it can't be a BR of perl-Mail-Box. 2)Warning: prerequisite Test::Harness 2.62 not found. We have 2.56. Did some search for Test::Harness and found its part of perl package but not able to get more information on its versions 2.62/2.56. Also I found because of this make test is disables. Want to know reason to disable them? A) Test::Harness is part of core perl. Its too old for this package's tests. make test explodes because of it, but the perl bits work fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 13:47:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 09:47:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226320] Merge Review: psacct In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051347.l35DlaPS015288@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: psacct https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226320 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium varekova at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(varekova at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-04-05 09:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > SRC > W: psacct no-url-tag - there is no upstream > W: psacct strange-permission psacct.init 0775 - this could not be changed > W: psacct prereq-use /sbin/chkconfig /sbin/install-info - fixed > W: psacct conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/account/pacct > E: psacct non-readable /var/account/pacct 0600 - this is not a problem > W: psacct dangerous-command-in-%post mv - this is not a problem > Replace buildroot. - fixed > Replace macro %{makeinstall}, if you can. - fixed > Defattr has 4 parametres. - fixed > mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT{/sbin,%{_bindir},%{_mandir},%{_sbindir}} > Isn't $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/sbin the same as $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_sbindir} ? - no %{_sbindir} should be /usr/sbin directory The fixed version is psacct-6.3.2-44.fc7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 14:11:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 10:11:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235370] New: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql - PostgreSQL driver for MDB2 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235370 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql - PostgreSQL driver for MDB2 Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dhollis at davehollis.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.davehollis.com/packages/php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql.spec SRPM URL: http://www.davehollis.com/packages/php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql-1.4.0-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: This package provides a PostgreSQL driver for the MDB2 database abstraction library. This is my first submitted package so I am seeking a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 14:11:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 10:11:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235370] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql - PostgreSQL driver for MDB2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051411.l35EBhIX016910@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql - PostgreSQL driver for MDB2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235370 dhollis at davehollis.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 14:35:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 10:35:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235376] New: Review Request: ocsinventory-ipdiscover - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235376 Summary: Review Request: ocsinventory-ipdiscover - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: Fedora at FamilleCollet.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/ocsinventory-ipdiscover.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/ocsinventory-ipdiscover-1.01-1.fc7.src.rpm Mock Log: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/ocsinventory-ipdiscover-build.log Description: Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation is an application designed to help a network or system administrator keep track of computer configuration and software installed on the network. It also allows deploying softwares, commands or files on Windows and Linux client computers. ocsinventory-ipdiscover provide the ipiscover command used by client agent for Linux. ----------------- ocsinventory-client is already available in the Extras. This is a split, need to : ocsinventory-client become "noarch" (perl only) ocsinventory-ipdiscover is needed by new agent (Unix Unified Agent) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 14:37:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 10:37:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235376] Review Request: ocsinventory-ipdiscover - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051437.l35EbGpb018937@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocsinventory-ipdiscover - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235376 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2007-04-05 10:37 EST ------- Patrice, as you've done the review of ocsinventory-client, can you have a look to this one ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 14:48:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 10:48:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051448.l35EmRV6020792@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2 Alias: perl-RPM2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-04-05 10:48 EST ------- Ok, I figured out what was breaking. The odd error message threw me off...I added a -t to the cvs command in the cvs_import.sh script: -> Starting server: /usr/kerberos/bin/krsh -l rnorwood cvs.fedora.redhat.com cvs server It's using krsh probably because I use krsh for my RH CVS checkout - my ~/.bashrc was setting CVS_RSH to it because of some changed I'd made recently. Works now, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 14:52:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 10:52:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235380] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235380 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dwmw2 at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://david.woodhou.se/petitboot/libtwin.spec SRPM URL: http://david.woodhou.se/petitboot/libtwin-0.0.2-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: With embedded systems gaining high resolution displays and powerful cpus, the desire for sophisticated graphical user interfaces can be realized in even the smallest of systems. While the cpupower available for a given power budget has increased dramatically, these tiny systems remain severely memory constrained. This unique environment presents interesting challenges in graphical system design and implementation. To explore this particular space, a new window system, Twin, has been developed. Using ideas from modern window systems in larger environments, Twin offers overlapping translucent windows, anti-aliased graphics and scalable fonts in a total memory budget of 100KB. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 14:52:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 10:52:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235381] New: Review Request: libtwin - Tiny Window System Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235381 Summary: Review Request: libtwin - Tiny Window System Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dwmw2 at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://david.woodhou.se/petitboot/libtwin.spec SRPM URL: http://david.woodhou.se/petitboot/libtwin-0.0.2-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: With embedded systems gaining high resolution displays and powerful cpus, the desire for sophisticated graphical user interfaces can be realized in even the smallest of systems. While the cpupower available for a given power budget has increased dramatically, these tiny systems remain severely memory constrained. This unique environment presents interesting challenges in graphical system design and implementation. To explore this particular space, a new window system, Twin, has been developed. Using ideas from modern window systems in larger environments, Twin offers overlapping translucent windows, anti-aliased graphics and scalable fonts in a total memory budget of 100KB. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 14:53:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 10:53:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235376] Review Request: ocsinventory-ipdiscover - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051453.l35ErVVZ021802@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocsinventory-ipdiscover - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235376 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-04-05 10:53 EST ------- I don't have much time to devote to reviewing these days, but given the nature of the package I'll try to do the review by the end of the week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 14:53:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 10:53:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235380] Review Request:
- In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051453.l35ErNlY021770@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235380 dwmw2 at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- - |summary here> Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2 at redhat.com 2007-04-05 10:53 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 235381 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 14:53:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 10:53:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235381] Review Request: libtwin - Tiny Window System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051453.l35ErYIM021824@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtwin - Tiny Window System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235381 ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2 at redhat.com 2007-04-05 10:53 EST ------- *** Bug 235380 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 14:59:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 10:59:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229250] Review Request: koji - Build system tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051459.l35ExPLu022918@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: koji - Build system tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229250 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2007-04-05 10:59 EST ------- Whoops, forgot about this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 15:26:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 11:26:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051526.l35FQJar025978@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2 Alias: perl-RPM2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-04-05 11:26 EST ------- Ok, ran builds for FC-5 and FC-6. We'll see how they go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 15:37:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 11:37:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225984] Merge Review: lftp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051537.l35Fb2Cj027123@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: lftp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225984 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2007-04-05 11:37 EST ------- From https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-cvs-commits/2007-April/msg00189.html : +%post +/sbin/chkconfig --add lftp +/sbin/ldconfig + +%postun +if [ "$1" = 0 ]; then +/sbin/chkconfig --del lftp +/sbin/ldconfig +fi +exit 0 + Why the call the to /sbin/chkconfig ? There are no servers in the lftp packagew? Cut-paste error? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 15:54:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 11:54:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225284] Merge Review: aspell-sr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051554.l35FsiZW028967@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: aspell-sr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225284 vlk at lcpe.uni-sofia.bg changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vlk at lcpe.uni-sofia.bg ------- Additional Comments From vlk at lcpe.uni-sofia.bg 2007-04-05 11:54 EST ------- There is the same problem in RHEL5: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Server/en/os/SRPMS/aspell-sr-0.02-1.2.1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 16:01:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 12:01:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225783] Merge Review: gdb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051601.l35G1aUa030032@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gdb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225783 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium skasal at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |skasal at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 16:05:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 12:05:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225927] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-discovery In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051605.l35G5WD4030705@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-discovery https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225927 ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-04-05 12:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > .. > > X license text included in package and marked with %doc > Fixed > > - should the README.txt, RELEASE-NOTES.txt be marked as %doc as well? > > * keep old changelog entries; use judgement when removing (too old? > > useless?) The README file just explain how the manifest file is used during building, this is something that shouldn't be included in the %doc section. I don't see a RELEASE-NOTES.txt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 16:11:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 12:11:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225254] Merge Review: apr-util In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051611.l35GBIaY031532@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: apr-util https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225254 jorton at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED ------- Additional Comments From jorton at redhat.com 2007-04-05 12:11 EST ------- Thanks for the review! Please see 1.2.8-7 in CVS/Raw Hide soon. > 1. Build root is not one of the recommended options The buildroot used does meet the mandatory requirements. > 2. It is recommended to use %{?dist} in Release: This is not mandatory. > 3. There is an outstanding bug for apr-util, but it may not apply to > Fedora. Not relevant to review process. > 4. Conflicts: should not be used. Perhaps Requires: subversion >= > 0.20.1-2 instead? Removed, as suggested. > 5 rpmlint output > > W: apr-util invalid-license Apache Software License 2.0 No standard for License tags exists yet. > E: apr-util use-of-RPM_SOURCE_DIR This is not prohibited by packaging guidelines, see f-m@ flamewar. > W: apr-util-devel no-documentation All expected. > 6. Build Requires > doxygen is in BuildRequires but it does not seem to be used in the Removed. > 7. .la files exist and must be removed The .la file is part of the defined build interface for this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 16:13:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 12:13:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051613.l35GDLTb031820@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2 Alias: perl-RPM2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-04-05 12:13 EST ------- ok, looks like they both built successfully. Finally done with this bug. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 16:15:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 12:15:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225927] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-discovery In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051615.l35GF3Ek032052@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-discovery https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225927 ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-04-05 12:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > (In reply to comment #2) > > > .. > > > X license text included in package and marked with %doc > > Fixed > > > - should the README.txt, RELEASE-NOTES.txt be marked as %doc as well? > > > * keep old changelog entries; use judgement when removing (too old? > > > useless?) > > The README file just explain how the manifest file is used during building, this > is something that shouldn't be included in the %doc section. > > I don't see a RELEASE-NOTES.txt Oops, I see that now. I have updated the srpm in the same location -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 16:15:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 12:15:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235409] New: Review Request:petitboot - graphical kexec-based bootloader Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235409 Summary: Review Request:petitboot - graphical kexec-based bootloader Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dwmw2 at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://david.woodhou.se/petitboot/petitboot.spec SRPM URL: http://david.woodhou.se/petitboot/petitboot-0.0.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Petitboot is a graphical bootloader for the PlayStation 3. It's based on the existing kboot project, plus the twin windowing system for the GUI. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 16:16:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 12:16:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225253] Merge Review: apr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051616.l35GGW2A032156@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: apr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225253 jorton at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED ------- Additional Comments From jorton at redhat.com 2007-04-05 12:16 EST ------- Thanks for the review! Please see apr-1.2.8-6 in CVS/Raw Hide. > 1. Build root should be one of the recommended build roots: The buildroot used meets the mandatory requirements. > 2. The %{?dist} tag should be used in Release: This is not mandatory. > 3. BuildPrereq should not be used, use BuildRequires instead Fixed. > 4. Conflicts: is used and should not be. Perhaps change Conflicts: to The Conflicts was correct but really no longer necessary; dropped as suggested. > 5. There are outstanding bugs for apr please address them. This is not relevant to the packaging review process. > 6. In %configure it should not be necessary to set CC and CXX. If the > are required to be set, use %{__cc} and %{__cxx} instead of gcc and > g++ This is a left-over from some old build/libtool issue; dropped. > 7. Source0: should be the upstream source location. Possibly, Fixed. > 8. .a files should be in a separate %{name}-static package or removed. Removed. > 9. rpmlint output Fixed. > 10. missed a .la file in apr-devel. This should be removed This is part of the build interface and cannot be removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 16:24:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 12:24:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226052] Merge Review: libunwind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051624.l35GOF5u001036@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libunwind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226052 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium jan.kratochvil at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|jjohnstn at redhat.com |jan.kratochvil at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 16:36:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 12:36:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226113] Merge Review: lynx In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051636.l35Ga66G011461@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: lynx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226113 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review?, |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(rnorwood at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-04-05 12:35 EST ------- Oh, sorry Ivana - everything looks fine now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 16:53:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 12:53:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235376] Review Request: ocsinventory-ipdiscover - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051653.l35GrIYM018046@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocsinventory-ipdiscover - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235376 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-04-05 12:53 EST ------- Please note that according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts one should use downloads.sourceforge.net instead of an arbitrarily chosen mirror, so a better source url would be: Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/ocsinventory/%{tarname}.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 16:54:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 12:54:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235417] New: Review Request: zzuf - Transparent application input fuzzer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235417 Summary: Review Request: zzuf - Transparent application input fuzzer Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ville.skytta at iki.fi QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com http://cachalot.mine.nu/6/SRPMS/zzuf.spec http://cachalot.mine.nu/6/SRPMS/zzuf-0.8.1-0.1.cmn6.src.rpm zzuf is a transparent application input fuzzer. It works by intercepting file operations and changing random bits in the program's input. zzuf's behaviour is deterministic, making it easy to reproduce bugs. rpmlint says WTFPL is an invalid license, but it's wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 17:04:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 13:04:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226267] Merge Review: perl-LDAP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051704.l35H46px019310@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-LDAP Alias: perl-LDAP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226267 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |Jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-04-05 13:03 EST ------- Ok - filtering out the provides for perl(Net::LDAP::Filter) in the usual way. (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 17:24:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 13:24:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234717] Review Request: python-spambayes - Bayesian anti-spam filter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051724.l35HOTDc021394@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-spambayes - Bayesian anti-spam filter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234717 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-04-05 13:24 EST ------- Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/python-spambayes.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/python-spambayes-1.0.4-2.src.rpm %changelog * Thu Apr 05 2007 Christopher Stone 1.0.4-2 - %%exclude pyo and pyc files from %%{_bindir} - Add scriptlet to remove shebangs Okay, added some stuff to remove the rpmlint warnings. Still need to test this out to make sure everything still works. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 17:27:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 13:27:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234717] Review Request: python-spambayes - Bayesian anti-spam filter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051727.l35HRRCw021713@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-spambayes - Bayesian anti-spam filter Alias: spambayes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234717 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |spambayes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 18:09:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 14:09:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235381] Review Request: libtwin - Tiny Window System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051809.l35I9rRO028053@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtwin - Tiny Window System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235381 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 18:10:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 14:10:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235381] Review Request: libtwin - Tiny Window System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051810.l35IAVpQ028143@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtwin - Tiny Window System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235381 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 18:10:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 14:10:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226270] Merge Review: perl-Net-DNS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051810.l35IAfCB028163@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Net-DNS Alias: perl-Net-DNS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226270 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |Jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-04-05 14:10 EST ------- o Fixed the buildroot ------ This string is in the README: """ All rights reserved. This program is free software; you may redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as Perl itself. """ Which is sufficient for perl packages - the text of the license doesn't have to be included unless it is included in the source tarball. ------- o I can't reproduce the build failure you show maybe the root.log that Paul requests in comment #3 will help. o Fixed the BuildRequires - removed 'perl', and changed the others to the perl(Module::Name) format. ------- 0.59-2.fc7 should fix these issues - if the mock build failure is geniune, we can look at the root.log and maybe figure out what's up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 18:22:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 14:22:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235381] Review Request: libtwin - Tiny Window System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051822.l35IMwV5029322@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtwin - Tiny Window System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235381 ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2 at redhat.com 2007-04-05 14:22 EST ------- Spec URL: http://david.woodhou.se/petitboot/libtwin.spec SRPM URL: http://david.woodhou.se/petitboot/libtwin-0.0.2-2.fc7.src.rpm * Thu Apr 5 2007 David Woodhouse 0.0.2-2 - Fix non-HAVE_ALTIVEC build -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 18:32:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 14:32:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235381] Review Request: libtwin - Tiny Window System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051832.l35IWncp030239@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtwin - Tiny Window System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235381 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org 2007-04-05 14:32 EST ------- Good must items: - rpmlint runs clean - meets naming guidelines - spec file matches base name - meets packaging guidelines - license field matches actual license - license %doc - plain english, legible - source matches upstream - builds - dependencies in BuildRequires - runs ldconfig - no duplicate files - proper file permissions - proper macro use - contains appropriate %clean - all the devel package things are handled correctly - contains no .la files APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 18:38:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 14:38:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234717] Review Request: python-spambayes - Bayesian anti-spam filter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051838.l35Ic5qM030719@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-spambayes - Bayesian anti-spam filter Alias: spambayes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234717 trond.danielsen at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |trond.danielsen at fedoraprojec | |t.org ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at fedoraproject.org 2007-04-05 14:38 EST ------- During byte compiling I get errors like this: ----- File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/spambayes/Corpus.py", line 81 SyntaxError: ('from __future__ imports must occur at the beginning of the file', ('/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/spambayes /Corpus.py', 81, None, None)) ----- It might not be a problem, but I fixed it by removing the line that tries to import __future__ since it is no longer needed. I added this line to the %prep section: ----- # Fixes warnings during byte compiling. sed -i "s/from __future__ import generators//" spambayes/*.py ----- I've tested it and it builds in mock on rawhide i386. I've also tested building it on fc6 x86_64. No problems so far. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 18:42:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 14:42:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235409] Review Request:petitboot - graphical kexec-based bootloader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051842.l35IgOqr031029@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:petitboot - graphical kexec-based bootloader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235409 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 18:44:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 14:44:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225653] Merge Review: concurrent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051844.l35IirkU031309@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: concurrent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225653 mwringe at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 18:45:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 14:45:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225924] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051845.l35Ij5Nt031335@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225924 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium mwringe at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 18:45:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 14:45:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225930] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-httpclient In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051845.l35IjLx0031363@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-httpclient https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225930 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium mwringe at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 18:45:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 14:45:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225931] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-lang In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051845.l35IjYQq031382@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-lang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225931 mwringe at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 18:46:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 14:46:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232719] maven2-2.0.4-10jpp.3 - Java project management and project comprehension tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051846.l35IkQEG031450@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: maven2-2.0.4-10jpp.3 - Java project management and project comprehension tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232719 mwringe at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 18:47:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 14:47:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233004] Review Request: xmlrpc3 - Java XML-RPC implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051847.l35Il88O031533@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlrpc3 - Java XML-RPC implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233004 Bug 233004 depends on bug 232719, which changed state. Bug 232719 Summary: maven2-2.0.4-10jpp.3 - Java project management and project comprehension tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232719 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 19:04:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 15:04:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235409] Review Request:petitboot - graphical kexec-based bootloader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051904.l35J48nu000642@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:petitboot - graphical kexec-based bootloader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235409 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org 2007-04-05 15:03 EST ------- Good must items: - rpmlint runs clean - meets naming guidelines - spec file matches base name - meets packaging guidelines - license field matches actual license - plain english, legible - source matches upstream - builds - dependencies in BuildRequires - no duplicate files - proper file permissions - proper macro use - contains appropriate %clean - no devel package - contains no .la files The license in the spec file is correct, however there are very few files that actually have a license header in them and a copy of the GPL is not included. I've emailed upstream myself about this so it can be fixed in future versions. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 19:06:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 15:06:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234307] Review Request: tuxpuck - Airhockey with a twist In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051906.l35J6jeZ001013@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tuxpuck - Airhockey with a twist https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234307 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 19:50:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 15:50:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226101] Merge Review: lm_sensors In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051950.l35JoAoR005340@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: lm_sensors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226101 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-05 15:50 EST ------- Some intial comments, taken from a bug I've filed against lm_sensors long ago: 2 small packaging issues: 1) lm_sensors-devel ships a static lib, afaik shipping static libs is concidered deprecated and should no longer be done unless there is a specific reason (like initrd needing it) 2) /usr/share/man/man3/libsensors.3.gz must be in lm_sensors-devel not in lm_sensors -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 19:50:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 15:50:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226101] Merge Review: lm_sensors In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051950.l35JowRP005436@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: lm_sensors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226101 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-05 15:50 EST ------- *** Bug 197864 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 19:51:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 15:51:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223592] Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051951.l35JpQVH005489@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223592 dgoodwin at dangerouslyinc.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(dgoodwin at dangerous| |lyinc.com) | ------- Additional Comments From dgoodwin at dangerouslyinc.com 2007-04-05 15:51 EST ------- Will upgrade to Fedora 7 soon and attempt to get the rpm building properly without the elementtree dependency. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 19:54:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 15:54:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235409] Review Request:petitboot - graphical kexec-based bootloader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051954.l35JsO5Y005925@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:petitboot - graphical kexec-based bootloader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235409 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org 2007-04-05 15:54 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: petitboot Short Description: Graphical Bootloader Owners: dwmw2 at redhat.com Branches: InitialCC: jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 19:55:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 15:55:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235381] Review Request: libtwin - Tiny Window System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704051955.l35Jts2P006189@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtwin - Tiny Window System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235381 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org 2007-04-05 15:55 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libtwin Short Description: Tiny Window System Owners: dwmw2 at redhat.com Branches: InitialCC: jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 20:06:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 16:06:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235409] Review Request:petitboot - graphical kexec-based bootloader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704052006.l35K65Uv007304@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:petitboot - graphical kexec-based bootloader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235409 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org 2007-04-05 16:06 EST ------- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 20:07:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 16:07:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235381] Review Request: libtwin - Tiny Window System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704052007.l35K77SA007451@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtwin - Tiny Window System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235381 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org 2007-04-05 16:06 EST ------- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 20:27:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 16:27:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234717] Review Request: python-spambayes - Bayesian anti-spam filter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704052027.l35KRHmq009080@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-spambayes - Bayesian anti-spam filter Alias: spambayes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234717 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-04-05 16:27 EST ------- Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/python-spambayes.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/python-spambayes-1.0.4-3.src.rpm %changelog * Thu Apr 05 2007 Christopher Stone 1.0.4-3 - Add patch to fix python2.5 errors -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 20:43:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 16:43:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225607] Merge Review: axis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704052043.l35Kh2Eg010307@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: axis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225607 ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-04-05 16:43 EST ------- links point to an empty file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 20:43:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 16:43:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225610] Merge Review: bcel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704052043.l35KhQdg010346@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bcel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225610 ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-04-05 16:43 EST ------- links point to an empty file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 21:00:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 17:00:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225607] Merge Review: axis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704052100.l35L0nuR011363@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: axis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225607 ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-04-05 17:00 EST ------- sorry... don't know what went wrong with the upload, fixed now, please try again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 21:01:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 17:01:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225610] Merge Review: bcel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704052101.l35L1FMm011395@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bcel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225610 ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-04-05 17:01 EST ------- sorry... don't know what went wrong with the upload, fixed now, please try again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 21:03:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 17:03:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225984] Merge Review: lftp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704052103.l35L3Akw011596@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: lftp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225984 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2007-04-05 17:03 EST ------- Error message produced by the previous script during a yum update transaction (rawhide at 2007-04-05): ... Finished Transaction Test Transaction Test Succeeded Running Transaction ... Updating : lftp ####################### [ 3/10] error reading information on service lftp: No such file or directory Updating : yum-updatesd ####################### [ 4/10] ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 21:20:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 17:20:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235456] New: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-advmultiselect - Element for HTML_QuickForm that emulate a multi-select Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235456 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-advmultiselect - Element for HTML_QuickForm that emulate a multi-select Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sebastien.prudhomme at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.espritdesims.info/fedora/php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-advmultiselect.spec SRPM URL: http://www.espritdesims.info/fedora/php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-advmultiselect-1.3.1-1.src.rpm Description: The HTML_QuickForm_advmultiselect package adds an element to the HTML_QuickForm package that is two select boxes next to each other emulating a multi-select. This is my first package submitted to Fedora Extras. I'm planning to build a package for Oreon (http://www.oreon-project.org/index.php?lang=en). This PEAR package is needed by Oreon, so please review it so that it can be included in Fedora Extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 22:31:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 18:31:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225984] Merge Review: lftp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704052231.l35MVHYx016186@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: lftp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225984 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |terjeros at phys.ntnu.no ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2007-04-05 18:31 EST ------- > Running Transaction > ... > Updating : lftp ####################### [ 3/10] > error reading information on service lftp: No such file or directory > Updating : yum-updatesd ####################### [ 4/10] Yeah , coming from the calls to chkconfig in scripts. BTW: i guess automake and autoconf should be removed as buildreq? More strange things: (rpath issue?): # ldd /usr/lib/lftp/3.5.10/proto-file.so |grep ncur libncurses.so.5 => /lib/libncurses.so.5 (0x00fad000) # /usr/lib/lftp/3.5.10/proto-http.so /usr/lib/lftp/3.5.10/proto-http.so: error while loading shared libraries: /usr/lib/libncurses.so.5: file too short All lftp libs should be linked against libncurses in /lib, however because of rpath libncurses in /usr/lib is used by some libs: proto-sftp.so, proto-ftp.so, proto-fish.so liblftp-network.so proto-http.so Please read: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-a1dfb5f46bf4098841e31a75d833e6e1b3e72544 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 5 23:39:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 19:39:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235471] New: Review Request: perl-PDF-API2 - Perl module for creation and modification of PDF files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235471 Summary: Review Request: perl-PDF-API2 - Perl module for creation and modification of PDF files Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bjohnson at symetrix.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/fedora/perl-PDF-API2.spec SRPM URL: http://symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/fedora/perl-PDF-API2-0.59.002-1.src.rpm Description: A Perl Module Chain to faciliate the Creation and Modification of High-Quality "Portable Document Format (aka. PDF)" Files. In particular when you review this package, please pay attention to: 1) Licenses - multiple licenses 2) Patents - patent statements regarding PDF technology 3) Fonts - inclusion of fonts in package 4) Win32.pm - I removed these to not trigger additional dependencies Please let me know if I'm doing anything wrong here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 00:04:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 20:04:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234031] Review Request: eclipse-pydev - an Eclipse plugin for working with Python. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704060004.l3604Ium022200@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-pydev - an Eclipse plugin for working with Python. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234031 ------- Additional Comments From ifoox at redhat.com 2007-04-05 20:03 EST ------- Andrew, I'll look into the legalities of these files right now. Tim, you may be right that JDT is required. What was the error you were getting without it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 01:43:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 21:43:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229098] Review Request: openjpeg - JPEG 2000 codec library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704060143.l361hpGi025326@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openjpeg - JPEG 2000 codec library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229098 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-04-05 21:43 EST ------- Well, any answers from upstream about license ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 02:14:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 22:14:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228301] Review Request: python-nevow - Web application construction kit written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704060214.l362ENwF026093@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-nevow - Web application construction kit written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228301 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-04-05 22:14 EST ------- Well, OK - Mock Build on FC-6 and FC-Devel (i386) OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License is MIT OK - License text is included in package. OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 4c744ea416b36dc9067b67e18c5707b5 Nevow-0.9.0.tar.gz OK - Package has correct buildroot. OK - BuildRequires isn't redundant. ?? - %prep stage SHOULD be quiet by setting -q option. OK - %build and %install stages is correct and work. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Changelog section is correct. -------------------------------------- - rpmlint output isn't silent: ------------------------------------- * From .rpm file: W: python-nevow wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/python-nevow-0.9.0/examples/blogengine/styles/typo.css W: python-nevow wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/python-nevow-0.9.0/examples/blogengine/styles/form.css E: python-nevow zero-length /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/nevow/test/test_package/Foo/Baz/Quux.js E: python-nevow non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/nevow/test/test_object.js 0644 W: python-nevow wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/python-nevow-0.9.0/examples/postit/styles/typo.css W: python-nevow wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/python-nevow-0.9.0/examples/postit/postit.html E: python-nevow zero-length /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/nevow/test/test_package/Foo/Bar.js W: python-nevow wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/python-nevow-0.9.0/examples/postit/atom.xml W: python-nevow wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/python-nevow-0.9.0/examples/postit/styles/postit.css E: python-nevow zero-length /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/nevow/empty.js W: python-nevow wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/python-nevow-0.9.0/examples/blogengine/atom.xml W: python-nevow wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/python-nevow-0.9.0/examples/blogengine/styles/site.css W: python-nevow doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-nevow-0.9.0/examples/i18n/update-l10n /bin/sh * From .srpm file : E: python-nevow unknown-key GPG#e42d547b W: python-nevow setup-not-quiet SHOULD be fix -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 04:50:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 00:50:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229533] Review Request: perl-Template-GD - GD plugin(s) for the Template Toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704060450.l364o3FR001934@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Template-GD - GD plugin(s) for the Template Toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229533 ------- Additional Comments From antonio at apache.org 2007-04-06 00:49 EST ------- bugzilla package in fedora extras repository should reqires this package too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 05:34:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 01:34:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231911] Review Request: jomolhari-fonts - Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704060534.l365Y7nS003510@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jomolhari-fonts - Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231911 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-04-06 01:33 EST ------- I think "SIL Open Font License" is fine. :) The gentium-fonts package uses that too. http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/index_html#Fonts Wondering if we ought to include a helloworld shellscript or something to fulfil the requirements of bundling some software according to the FSF page. The gentium-fonts package doesn't apparently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 05:44:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 01:44:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231911] Review Request: jomolhari-fonts - Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704060544.l365iuQR003846@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jomolhari-fonts - Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231911 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-04-06 01:44 EST ------- > http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/index_html#Fonts > Wondering if we ought to include a helloworld shellscript or something > to fulfil the requirements of bundling some software according to the FSF page. http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsi&item_id=OFL-FAQ_web (question 1.4) Nevermind, seems I was worrying too much again. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 06:23:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 02:23:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173388] Review Request: mod_evasive - Denial of Service evasion module for Apache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704060623.l366NdAP005011@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_evasive - Denial of Service evasion module for Apache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173388 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-04-06 02:23 EST ------- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 06:32:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 02:32:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233142] Review Request: asc - Advanced Strategic Command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704060632.l366W6Df005226@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asc - Advanced Strategic Command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233142 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-04-06 02:31 EST ------- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 06:35:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 02:35:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226232] Merge Review: passwd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704060635.l366Zdj4005303@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: passwd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226232 mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 06:35:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 02:35:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234858] Review Request: perl-User-Identity - Maintains info about a physical person In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704060635.l366ZqOk005340@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-User-Identity - Maintains info about a physical person Alias: perl-User-Identity https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234858 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-04-06 02:35 EST ------- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 06:38:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 02:38:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225293] Merge Review: authconfig In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704060638.l366cEcn005382@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: authconfig https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225293 mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 06:38:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 02:38:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226224] Merge Review: pam_ccreds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704060638.l366chvO005420@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pam_ccreds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226224 mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 06:42:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 02:42:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187621] Review Request: blam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704060642.l366gnpg005561@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187621 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-04-06 02:42 EST ------- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 06:48:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 02:48:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200249] Review Request: cvs2svn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704060648.l366macS005869@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cvs2svn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200249 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-04-06 02:48 EST ------- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 06:54:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 02:54:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226130] Merge Review: man-pages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704060654.l366sXlu006189@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: man-pages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226130 mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|varekova at redhat.com |mmaslano at redhat.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 06:55:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 02:55:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226118] Merge Review: mailx In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704060655.l366tF2m006226@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mailx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226118 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2007-04-06 02:55 EST ------- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 07:11:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 03:11:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234436] Review Request: glchess - GlChess, a 3d Chess game using OpenGL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704060711.l367BB2Q006783@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glchess - GlChess, a 3d Chess game using OpenGL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234436 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-06 03:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Created an attachment (id=151678) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=151678&action=view) [edit] > mock build log of glchess-1.0.4-1 on FC-devel i386 > > Well, for 1.0.4-1: > > * BuildRequires > - mockbuild failed. At least desktop-file-utils is missing > for BuildRequires. > Fixed > * Executable permissions/shebang > -------------------------------------------- > # make rpmlint happy > chmod +x $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{python_sitelib}/%{name}/scene/opengl/png.py \ > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{python_sitelib}/%{name}/gtkui/__init__.py > -------------------------------------------- > - IMO the resolution should be opposite. > Fixed for one of the 2 files, the other can be executed stand alone > * GConf files > -------------------------------------------- > %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/gconf/schemas/glchess.schemas > -------------------------------------------- > - Well, while I cannot find any wiki packages, however I am > sure that GConf schemas files under /etc/gconf/schemas is > generally _not_ regarded as config file and should not > marked as %config (even if rpmlint complains about it). > Fixed > * Some python related dependency > - Well, would you check the following import sentence? > * import Image (from opengl/texture.py: Perhaps python-imaging > It seems that "Packages" link from http://glchess.sourceforge.net/ > requires it) python-imaging is not required, it will fallback to an alternative png loading routine if python-imageging is not installed, and all the included textures are png, so that will work fine: try: self.__loadPIL(fileName) except ImportError: self.__loadPNG(fileName) New version here: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/glchess.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/glchess-1.0.4-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 07:27:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 03:27:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226320] Merge Review: psacct In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704060727.l367RmIY007372@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: psacct https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226320 mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmaslano at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 07:52:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 03:52:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234031] Review Request: eclipse-pydev - an Eclipse plugin for working with Python. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704060752.l367quKt009105@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-pydev - an Eclipse plugin for working with Python. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234031 ------- Additional Comments From tla at rasmil.dk 2007-04-06 03:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > Tim, you may be right that JDT is required. What was the error you were getting > without it? I dont get any visible errors, it is just not working, there is no PyDev entry in Windows -> Preferences. In The About -> Plugin details i only see 2 org.python.pydev plugins (ast & online help) the other org.python.pydev is missing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 08:11:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 04:11:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235471] Review Request: perl-PDF-API2 - Perl module for creation and modification of PDF files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704060811.l368B2hP011162@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-PDF-API2 - Perl module for creation and modification of PDF files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235471 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-06 04:10 EST ------- Spec URL: http://symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/fedora/perl-PDF-API2.spec SRPM URL: http://symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/fedora/perl-PDF-API2-0.59.002-2.src.rpm * Fri Apr 06 2007 Bernard Johnson - 0.59.002-2 - moving resource to docs was a mistake, fix it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 08:38:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 04:38:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226113] Merge Review: lynx In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704060838.l368cTnd014556@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: lynx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226113 ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-04-06 04:38 EST ------- Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 08:44:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 04:44:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233848] Review Request: perl-SVG-Graph - Visualize your data in Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704060844.l368i6qr015009@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SVG-Graph - Visualize your data in Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) format Alias: perl-SVG-Graph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233848 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2007-04-06 04:44 EST ------- Can you please do an initial review pending updating of tarball because this is currently blocking the build of bug #234573. Upstream is taking a while to do the update, but we *do* know that it is under the Artistic license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 08:45:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 04:45:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233848] Review Request: perl-SVG-Graph - Visualize your data in Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704060845.l368jV2x015137@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SVG-Graph - Visualize your data in Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) format Alias: perl-SVG-Graph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233848 alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|234573 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 08:45:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 04:45:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234573] Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704060845.l368jXj9015152@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology Alias: perl-bioperl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234573 alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|233848 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 08:45:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 04:45:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233848] Review Request: perl-SVG-Graph - Visualize your data in Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704060845.l368jvkZ015203@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SVG-Graph - Visualize your data in Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) format Alias: perl-SVG-Graph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233848 alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |234573 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 08:46:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 04:46:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234573] Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704060846.l368k817015231@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology Alias: perl-bioperl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234573 alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |233848 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 08:48:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 04:48:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233142] Review Request: asc - Advanced Strategic Command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704060848.l368mQWG015503@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asc - Advanced Strategic Command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233142 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-06 04:48 EST ------- Thanks for the review! Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 08:48:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 04:48:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233139] Review Request: SDLmm - C++ interface for the popular SDL library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704060848.l368mbLd015533@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SDLmm - C++ interface for the popular SDL library Alias: SDLmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233139 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 08:53:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 04:53:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234835] Review Request: fgfs-Atlas - Flightgear map tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704060853.l368rAus015948@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fgfs-Atlas - Flightgear map tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234835 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-06 04:52 EST ------- Jochen, Will you also review FlightGear itself? Also you still haven't answered my question yet, can (and will) you sponsor Fabrice, or shall I? Fabrice do you want to import these 2 now, or do you want to wait till FlightGear itself is also reviewed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 09:02:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 05:02:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225066] Review Request: gedit-plugins - Collections of plugins for gedit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704060902.l36927bS016621@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gedit-plugins - Collections of plugins for gedit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225066 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-04-06 05:02 EST ------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/gedit-2/plugins/sessionsaver/dialogs.py", line 35, in on_session_added self.row_inserted(self.on_get_path(piter), piter) TypeError: iter should be a GtkTreeIter ** (gedit:12835): CRITICAL **: gedit_commands_load_uris: assertion `(uris != NULL) && (uris->data != NULL)' failed "Manage saved sessions..." still opens very damaged windows here, and hence I still think the plugin ought to be excluded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 09:02:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 05:02:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234750] Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704060902.l3692QLK016654@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234750 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-06 05:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > In my specs I do all these steps this way: > %prep > %setup -q -c -T -n %{name}-%{version} > %setup -q -D -T -n %{name}-%{version} -a0 > Erm why not just: %prep %setup -q -c That has exactly the same effect. > Finally: As you already know, I dislike a toolchains using an architecture (avr) > as their target I know, but as long as almost the whole world does it like this I'm not planning on changing this. All other Must's and Should's fixed, new version here: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/avr-binutils.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/avr-binutils-2.17-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 09:23:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 05:23:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234750] Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704060923.l369NMlb018310@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234750 ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at fedoraproject.org 2007-04-06 05:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > (In reply to comment #18) > > Finally: As you already know, I dislike a toolchains using an architecture (avr) > > as their target > > I know, but as long as almost the whole world does it like this I'm not planning > on changing this. Even though I in principle agree with Ralf, I think it is to much trouble to try to convince the rest of the world. As everybody else uses only avr as target, I think it justifies the exception. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 09:47:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 05:47:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226671] Merge Review: zlib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704060947.l369l3Ku019855@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: zlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226671 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium varekova at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo? | ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-04-06 05:46 EST ------- Patrice, could you please look at the last version zlib-1.2.3-10.fc7 and approved this review request or if you see any reason why you don't want to aproved it here. But at first I want to reply to your comments: * adding autotools is the most clear solution and there is no problem with it * zutil.h is removed * timestamps are kept * the description is easy to get/find/grab it is not a part of zlib package and upstream don't want to add it so I think it is not necessary to add it too Thanks for your comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 11:47:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 07:47:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226671] Merge Review: zlib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061147.l36BlDJS024668@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: zlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226671 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-04-06 07:47 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=151869) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=151869&action=view) spec file that incorporates all my comments I removed the autotools patch in this spec. I think that such change is for upstream, not in a fedora package. Moreover this is not similar with upstream since the tests are removed. I cleaned the build such that the package is built in the build section and also used more rpm macros. and I added the manual, in my opinion this is a must - don't use the autotools, instead revert to the previous build procedure - ship the manual to have a description of the API - build the libraries in the %%build section rpmlint output is explained in comments in the spec E: zlib configure-without-libdir-spec W: zlib make-check-outside-check-section make check E: zlib configure-without-libdir-spec W: zlib make-check-outside-check-section make check Feel free to modify it again (for example if you like the build but not the manual). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 11:55:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 07:55:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226671] Merge Review: zlib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061155.l36Btpid025129@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: zlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226671 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-04-06 07:55 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=151870) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=151870&action=view) keep header and man page timestamps -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 11:59:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 07:59:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225861] Merge Review: grub In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061159.l36Bx9rC025337@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: grub https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225861 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2007-04-06 07:59 EST ------- Just noticed: $ LC_ALL=C rpm -qf /boot/grub/* file /boot/grub/device.map is not owned by any package file /boot/grub/e2fs_stage1_5 is not owned by any package file /boot/grub/fat_stage1_5 is not owned by any package file /boot/grub/ffs_stage1_5 is not owned by any package file /boot/grub/grub.conf is not owned by any package file /boot/grub/iso9660_stage1_5 is not owned by any package file /boot/grub/jfs_stage1_5 is not owned by any package file /boot/grub/menu.lst is not owned by any package file /boot/grub/minix_stage1_5 is not owned by any package file /boot/grub/reiserfs_stage1_5 is not owned by any package fedora-logos-6.0.97-2.fc7 file /boot/grub/stage1 is not owned by any package file /boot/grub/stage2 is not owned by any package file /boot/grub/ufs2_stage1_5 is not owned by any package file /boot/grub/vstafs_stage1_5 is not owned by any package file /boot/grub/xfs_stage1_5 is not owned by any package I'd say all those unowned files should be ghost-owned by grub. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 12:01:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 08:01:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235501] New: Review Request: jsdoc - Produces javadoc-style documentation from JavaScript sourcefiles Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235501 Summary: Review Request: jsdoc - Produces javadoc-style documentation from JavaScript sourcefiles Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mcepl at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/progs/rpms/jsdoc.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/progs/rpms/jsdoc-1.10.2-1.src.rpm Description: A script that produces javadoc-style documentation from well-formed JavaScript sourcefiles. At the moment, this means it supports sourcefiles where all functions are mapped to a class using prototype-based inheritance. Anonymous function definitions (e.g. Circle.prototype.getRadius = function(){ ...} ) are supported. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 12:12:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 08:12:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233848] Review Request: perl-SVG-Graph - Visualize your data in Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061212.l36CCxj9025818@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SVG-Graph - Visualize your data in Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) format Alias: perl-SVG-Graph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233848 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2007-04-06 08:12 EST ------- * Fri Apr 06 2007 Alex Lancaster 0.01-2 - Updated license. - Add BR: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) Spec URL: http://allele5.biol.berkeley.edu/~alex/fedora/perl-SVG-Graph.spec SRPM URL: http://allele5.biol.berkeley.edu/~alex/fedora/perl-SVG-Graph-0.01-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 12:16:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 08:16:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234835] Review Request: fgfs-Atlas - Flightgear map tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061216.l36CGq2M025910@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fgfs-Atlas - Flightgear map tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234835 ------- Additional Comments From fabrice at bellet.info 2007-04-06 08:16 EST ------- Hans, Yes, I can import fgfs-base and fgfs-Atlas now, and build them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 12:37:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 08:37:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194279] Review Request: kdeartwork: Extra KDE artwork (themes, sound themes, ...) for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061237.l36Cb1dU026500@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeartwork: Extra KDE artwork (themes, sound themes, ...) for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194279 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-04-06 08:36 EST ------- marked approved, per comment #24. please update in cvs (I don't have access yet, poo), and then you can close this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 12:37:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 08:37:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227241] Review Request: kde-settings - Config files for kde In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061237.l36CbaZw026536@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kde-settings - Config files for kde https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227241 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-04-06 08:37 EST ------- Chitlesh, ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 12:38:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 08:38:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225960] Merge Review: kdbg In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061238.l36CcFE6026580@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: kdbg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225960 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 12:38:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 08:38:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200236] Review Request: kdeaddons: K Desktop Environment - Plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061238.l36CcsVc026630@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeaddons: K Desktop Environment - Plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200236 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Keywords|Reopened | Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 12:39:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 08:39:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194374] Review Request: kdegames: K Desktop Environment - Games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061239.l36CdFdG026650@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdegames: K Desktop Environment - Games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194374 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 12:39:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 08:39:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194278] Review Request: kdeadmin: Administrative tools for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061239.l36CdGNw026664@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeadmin: Administrative tools for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194278 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Keywords|Reopened | Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-04-06 08:39 EST ------- closing per comment #7 (no need to wait for merge) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 12:39:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 08:39:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225961] Merge Review: kdebase In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061239.l36CdxsT026732@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: kdebase https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225961 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 12:40:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 08:40:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194280] Review Request: kdebindings: KDE/DCOP bindings to non-C++ languages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061240.l36CehHP026769@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebindings: KDE/DCOP bindings to non-C++ languages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194280 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-04-06 08:40 EST ------- than, can you update cvs? then you can close this ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 12:41:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 08:41:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194373] Review Request: kdeedu: Educational/Edutainment applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061241.l36Cf5Xx026808@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeedu: Educational/Edutainment applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194373 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 12:42:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 08:42:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194374] Review Request: kdegames: K Desktop Environment - Games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061242.l36CgITe026902@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdegames: K Desktop Environment - Games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194374 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE CC| |than at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|163779 | nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-04-06 08:42 EST ------- approved per comment #19, closing->rawhide per comment #21 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 12:42:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 08:42:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195485] Review Request: kdegraphics: K Desktop Environment - Graphics Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061242.l36Cgjc8026961@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdegraphics: K Desktop Environment - Graphics Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195485 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |than at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-04-06 08:42 EST ------- than, please update cvs, and then you can close this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 12:42:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 08:42:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200236] Review Request: kdeaddons: K Desktop Environment - Plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061242.l36Cgr2H026997@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeaddons: K Desktop Environment - Plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200236 Bug 200236 depends on bug 194374, which changed state. Bug 194374 Summary: Review Request: kdegames: K Desktop Environment - Games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194374 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 12:43:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 08:43:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225963] Merge Review: kdelibs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061243.l36Ch5Tu027010@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: kdelibs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225963 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Keywords|Reopened | Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 12:43:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 08:43:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225964] Merge Review: kdemultimedia In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061243.l36ChJnF027036@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: kdemultimedia https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225964 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 12:43:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 08:43:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195486] Review Request: kdenetwork: K Desktop Environment - Network Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061243.l36ChqRI027070@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdenetwork: K Desktop Environment - Network Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195486 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-04-06 08:43 EST ------- than, please update cvs, then you can close this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 12:44:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 08:44:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225965] Merge Review: kdepim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061244.l36CiUN8027108@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: kdepim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225965 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 12:51:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 08:51:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235501] Review Request: jsdoc - Produces javadoc-style documentation from JavaScript sourcefiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061251.l36CpXX7027598@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jsdoc - Produces javadoc-style documentation from JavaScript sourcefiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235501 ------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com 2007-04-06 08:51 EST ------- Currently there is a known problem with this package -- missing license. I am trying to get upstream to make some changes in that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 13:33:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 09:33:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234721] Review Request: sakura - A terminal emulator based on GTK+ and VTE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061333.l36DXjBq030245@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sakura - A terminal emulator based on GTK+ and VTE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234721 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lxtnow at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 13:43:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 09:43:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226671] Merge Review: zlib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061343.l36Dhv80030581@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: zlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226671 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-04-06 09:43 EST ------- I think that the spec I proposed in Comment #10 is right, but if you really want to use the autotools and think my proposal is not right, I could also accept an autotool based package -- although I think it is not right. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 14:48:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 10:48:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234721] Review Request: sakura - A terminal emulator based on GTK+ and VTE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061448.l36EmXsK001743@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sakura - A terminal emulator based on GTK+ and VTE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234721 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-04-06 10:48 EST ------- Well, You should add flags INSTALL="install -p" to your make install to keep timestamp on files, such as doc files, *.png files (which is included including in this package). ------ .desktop file ------ ** category: Application and X-fedora is deprecated and SHOULD be remove. can be fix by adding "-remove-category=" option ** .desktop file : no correct permission -> 0664 [SmootherFrOgZ at Helzeilerd ~]$ ll rpmbuild/SOURCES/sakura.desktop -rw-rw-r-- 1 SmootherFrOg lxtnow 271 Apr 6 09:47 rpmbuild/SOURCES/sakura.desktop can be fix by adding -mode 0644 option from desktop-file-install. ** scriptlets: %post update-desktop-database &> /dev/null ||: %postun update-desktop-database &> /dev/null ||: The use of above is only require when the desktop entry have a mime type key. and isn't the case. This scriptlet can be remove. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 15:32:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 11:32:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235376] Review Request: ocsinventory-ipdiscover - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061532.l36FWapQ006519@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocsinventory-ipdiscover - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235376 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2007-04-06 11:32 EST ------- Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/ocsinventory-ipdiscover.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/ocsinventory-ipdiscover-1.01-2.fc7.src.rpm * Fri Apr 06 2007 Remi Collet 1.01-2 - change source URL - add ocsinventory-ipdiscover.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 15:34:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 11:34:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234436] Review Request: glchess - GlChess, a 3d Chess game using OpenGL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061534.l36FYUk7006598@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glchess - GlChess, a 3d Chess game using OpenGL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234436 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-06 11:33 EST ------- Okay. --------------------------------------------- This package (glchess) is APPROVED by me. --------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 15:37:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 11:37:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061537.l36FbuLv006797@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2007-04-06 11:37 EST ------- I haven't had a chance to look at your updated spec Jules, but my experience with other packages is that using a generic spec file from the tarball usually doesn't work in the long run. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 15:40:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 11:40:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222087] Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061540.l36FeN9c007006@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222087 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-06 11:40 EST ------- Well, this is svn version, right? I suppose svn version does not have configure, etc... So please * write in the spec file how you created this tarball as a comment like ------------------------------------------------ # The svn version tarball is created by the following command # $ svn ......... # $ tar ......... ------------------------------------------------ so that I can reproduce the tarball which you used. * write from autoreconf, .... in %prep stage and add appropriate BuildRequires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 15:46:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 11:46:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061546.l36Fkkvq007445@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208034 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-06 11:46 EST ------- Well, I still think that * having config.h installed in -devel package * #ifdef judgment for HAVE_NUMPY HAVE_NUMARRAY etc... being included in header files are wrong as said in comment 40. IMO you should remove unnecessary header files and remove confusing ifdef judgment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 15:50:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 11:50:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061550.l36Fontj007688@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-06 11:50 EST ------- Well, then should I wait until you upload a new spec/srpm, Brian? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 16:04:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 12:04:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226406] Merge Review: selinux-policy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061604.l36G4Lsi008540@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: selinux-policy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226406 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-04-06 12:04 EST ------- selinux-policy-targeted outputs a bunch of stuff to the console during an upgrade, this is an example output: /sbin/restorecon reset /etc/cron.daily/000-delay.cron context system_u:object_r:etc_t:s0->system_u:object_r:bin_t:s0 If this is important it should be sent to syslog with the logger command, otherwise it should be surpressed. I don't know if there is a guideline to prevent spurious output to the console during upgrades, but there should be. There is nothing more annoying than a package outputting a ton of stuff to your console. One really bad side effect is that you can no longer scroll back to see which config files were backed up, and you have to run updatedb just to find the .rpmnew/.rpmsave files again because some package spewed out a bunch of text preventing you from just simply scrolling up to find out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 16:09:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 12:09:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061609.l36G9Mfo009159@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2007-04-06 12:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #78) > Well, then should I wait until you upload a new spec/srpm, > Brian? Probably. after a quick look at Jules spec there's a few things that should probably be changed (Unnecessary requires, use %doc, etc). Of course, I've got to get some new web-space to upload to, since I shutdown my webserver over the holidays. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 16:19:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 12:19:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234721] Review Request: sakura - A terminal emulator based on GTK+ and VTE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061619.l36GJMbZ010545@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sakura - A terminal emulator based on GTK+ and VTE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234721 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-06 12:19 EST ------- Some notes: * Timestamps - Well, while the method 'INSTALL="%{__install} -p"' normally works for makefile.in generated by GNU autotools, for the types of makefiles which were created by developer by his own way (like this package), it is very rare that this method still works (and actually for this package it does not work). For the latter case, the packager has to check what are actually done on install stage and fix some files appropriately. Normally the package has to change the command like "cp" or "install" appropriately (see the lines 119-148 of mobs.mk). * Cflags - And for makefiles generated by GNU autotools, fedora specific compilation flags are normally passed correctly by %configure macro (please check what %configure actually does), however, again for the types of makefiles created by the developer's own way, passing cflags has to be done with a special care Actually ------------------------------------------ %build ./0 --prefix=/usr make %{?_smp_mflags} ------------------------------------------ does not use fedora specific compilation flags (%optflags or $RPM_BUILD_FLAGS). You have to use this flags _somehow_ * Desktop file - Be careful on the each item on desktop file (e.g. is the path for icon used correct? in the first place, does the path have to be specified by full path?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 16:28:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 12:28:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222087] Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061628.l36GSvFI011905@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222087 ------- Additional Comments From sdl.web at gmail.com 2007-04-06 12:28 EST ------- Done! SRPM: http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~sl392/fedora/SRPMs/pcmanx-gtk2-0.3.5-7.20070406svn.leof6.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~sl392/fedora/SRPMs/pcmanx-gtk2.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 16:29:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 12:29:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234721] Review Request: sakura - A terminal emulator based on GTK+ and VTE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061629.l36GT3iO011920@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sakura - A terminal emulator based on GTK+ and VTE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234721 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-06 12:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > $RPM_BUILD_FLAGS). $RPM_OPT_FLAGS, sorry -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 16:56:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 12:56:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223943] Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME - point, click, debug! In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061656.l36GuHKS015084@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME - point, click, debug! Alias: nemiver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223943 ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2007-04-06 12:56 EST ------- ping. I am going to approve this as soon as you can provide some info about my remarks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 17:25:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 13:25:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223943] Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME - point, click, debug! In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061725.l36HP2HK018817@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME - point, click, debug! Alias: nemiver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223943 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-04-06 13:24 EST ------- Pong :) Hi, Gianluca and Thanks for the review! >(In reply to comment #33) > Just a couple questions: > is the "touch" trick for forcing the icon cache update the > usual/preferred/best way to do that? It is, according to the Packaging/ScriptletSnippets page on the wiki. > are you going to remove COPYING from the -devel subpackage as suggested in > comment #2? No. I'm of the opinon that such license texts should be included in development subpackages to make the license explicitly clear (and not have to backreference that of the original SRPM's main package). I know of no guideline for or against thish, though; and it seems more sensible to me tokeep it in there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 17:35:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 13:35:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061735.l36HZrxO020311@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2007-04-06 13:34 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=151889) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=151889&action=view) Updated spec file Here's an updated spec file. No major change, though I did remove the license that was in the header, since it's not really necessary IMO. Jules, if you have a problem with that please tell me, and I can put it back in. Once I score some webspace, I'll post the srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 17:37:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 13:37:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061737.l36Hb45X020477@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #151889|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2007-04-06 13:37 EST ------- (From update of attachment 151889) Argh! wrong spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 17:40:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 13:40:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061740.l36Hep0x020870@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2007-04-06 13:40 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=151890) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=151890&action=view) Update spec file. Here's an updated spec file. No major change, though I did remove the license that was in the header, since it's not really necessary IMO. Jules, if you have a problem with that please tell me, and I can put it back in. Once I score some webspace, I'll post the srpm. Note: This is targeted for the devel branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 17:51:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 13:51:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222087] Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061751.l36HpOQi022091@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222087 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-06 13:51 EST ------- Well, actually on rawhide automake is 1.10 and some other fixes are needed for rawhide. For me, the following works ------------------------------------------------ %prep %setup -q -n %{name} for f in `ls -d %{_datadir}/automake-1.* | sort -g -k 2 -t .` ; do automakever=`echo $f | sed -e 's|%{_datadir}/automake-||'` done eval %{__sed} -i.orig -e \'s\|-1\\\.9\|-$automakever\|\' autogen.sh %{__sed} -i -e 's|set -x|set -e -x|' autogen.sh touch config.rpath ./autogen.sh #autoreconf -fi ------------------------------------------------ Please check if the above also works for you. And.. I have not checked other things yet... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 18:06:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 14:06:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174289] LibHdate is a small C, C++ library for Hebrew calendar and dates, holidays, and reading sequence. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061806.l36I6jNv023958@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: LibHdate is a small C,C++ library for Hebrew calendar and dates, holidays, and reading sequence. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174289 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-06 14:06 EST ------- Well, again ping? Normally, when no response is received from packager for one month, the bug is closed as WONTFIX or so.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 18:07:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 14:07:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199905] Review Request: gotmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061807.l36I7eqV024050@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gotmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199905 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-06 14:07 EST ------- Again what is the status of this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 18:12:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 14:12:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232815] Review Request: libnetfilter_queue - Netfilter queue userspace library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061812.l36ICScT024563@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnetfilter_queue - Netfilter queue userspace library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232815 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium i at stingr.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 18:28:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 14:28:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235456] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-advmultiselect - Element for HTML_QuickForm that emulate a multi-select In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061828.l36IS2GK026415@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-advmultiselect - Element for HTML_QuickForm that emulate a multi-select https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235456 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chris.stone at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-04-06 14:27 EST ------- Hi, if this is your first package you should block FE-NEEDSPONSER as shown to be important and hilighted here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#head-a7a95bc9083826b65ccdd4d0f201ea6e59426590 I can sponser you, but I prefer to sponser people who can log onto the #fedora-devel channel on IRC for easier communication. A good way to start is to review some packages, for example: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222575 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 18:29:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 14:29:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235526] New: Review Request: python-xattr - Extended attributes library wrapper for Python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235526 Summary: Review Request: python-xattr - Extended attributes library wrapper for Python Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mszpak at wp.pl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/rpms/python-xattr/python-xattr.spec SRPM URL: http://timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/rpms/python-xattr/python-xattr-0.2.1-1.src.rpm Description: Python extension module wrapper for libattr. It allows to query, list, add and remove extended attributes from files and directories. It's a recommended runtime dependency for rdiff-backup (already in Fedora Extras). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 18:29:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 14:29:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235527] New: Review Request: python-libacl - POSIX.1e ACLs library wrapper for python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235527 Summary: Review Request: python-libacl - POSIX.1e ACLs library wrapper for python Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mszpak at wp.pl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/rpms/python-libacl/python-libacl.spec SRPM URL: http://timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/rpms/python-libacl/python-libacl-0.2.1-2.src.rpm Description: Python extension module for POSIX ACLs. It allows to query, list, add and remove ACLs from files and directories. It's a recommended runtime dependency for rdiff-backup (already in Fedora Extras). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 18:32:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 14:32:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235370] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql - PostgreSQL driver for MDB2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061832.l36IWuWN026978@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql - PostgreSQL driver for MDB2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235370 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chris.stone at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-04-06 14:32 EST ------- I can sponser you, however I prefer users who can log into #fedora-devel on IRC for easier communication. You can start by reviewing some packages, for example: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232165 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 18:37:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 14:37:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235527] Review Request: python-libacl - POSIX.1e ACLs library wrapper for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061837.l36IbIu4027476@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-libacl - POSIX.1e ACLs library wrapper for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235527 mszpak at wp.pl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |163776 ------- Additional Comments From mszpak at wp.pl 2007-04-06 14:37 EST ------- Added FE-NEW dependency. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 18:37:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 14:37:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235526] Review Request: python-xattr - Extended attributes library wrapper for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061837.l36IbSeS027508@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-xattr - Extended attributes library wrapper for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235526 mszpak at wp.pl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |163776 ------- Additional Comments From mszpak at wp.pl 2007-04-06 14:36 EST ------- Added FE-NEW dependency. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 18:51:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 14:51:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232816] Review Request: libnetfilter_log - Netfilter logging userspace library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061851.l36IpBsv029062@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnetfilter_log - Netfilter logging userspace library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232816 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From i at stingr.net 2007-04-06 14:50 EST ------- Jochen, can you say something here so I'd push this further? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 18:56:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 14:56:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234835] Review Request: fgfs-Atlas - Flightgear map tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061856.l36IuTXF029701@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fgfs-Atlas - Flightgear map tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234835 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-06 14:55 EST ------- okay, I'll sponsor you then. Go request cvs-extras group membership in the account system, then I can sponsor you. Once sponsored, configure your system for CVS access as described on the wiki and then import and build them. Jochen, that still leaves the question open of reviewing FlightGear itself, any chance you could do that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 19:02:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 15:02:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234436] Review Request: glchess - GlChess, a 3d Chess game using OpenGL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061902.l36J2U5G030461@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glchess - GlChess, a 3d Chess game using OpenGL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234436 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-06 15:01 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: glchess Short Description: 3d Chess game using OpenGL Owners: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: Notice this package is intended for FC-6 only in devel this has been integrated into gnome-games, still I would like to release this for FC-6 as there have been several specific packaging requests for this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 19:33:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 15:33:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231911] Review Request: jomolhari-fonts - Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061933.l36JXUXS001854@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jomolhari-fonts - Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231911 ------- Additional Comments From mgarski at post.pl 2007-04-06 15:33 EST ------- Spec URL: http://manta.univ.gda.pl/~mgarski/fe/jomolhari-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://manta.univ.gda.pl/~mgarski/fe/jomolhari-fonts-0.003-3.src.rpm - Update to 0.003c - Change license from GPL to OFL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 19:39:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 15:39:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235456] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-advmultiselect - Element for HTML_QuickForm that emulate a multi-select In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061939.l36JddYZ002831@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-advmultiselect - Element for HTML_QuickForm that emulate a multi-select https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235456 sebastien.prudhomme at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 19:48:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 15:48:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234031] Review Request: eclipse-pydev - an Eclipse plugin for working with Python. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704061948.l36JmVlZ004173@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-pydev - an Eclipse plugin for working with Python. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234031 ------- Additional Comments From ifoox at redhat.com 2007-04-06 15:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > I dont get any visible errors, it is just not working, there is no PyDev entry > in Windows -> Preferences. > In The About -> Plugin details i only see 2 org.python.pydev plugins (ast & > online help) the other org.python.pydev is missing. Thanks, I'll include a requires for JDT in the next revision. (In reply to comment #16) > > - plugins/org.python.pydev.jython_1.3.1/Lib. Where does the content of this > directory come from? Is it necessary? If so, can we symlink it? > > - plugins/org.python.pydev_1.3.1/PySrc. What is the content of this directory? > If we want to ship it or if it's necessary, I think it should either have a > clear source and license trail or be a separate package. This is some auxiliary scripts that are used for running tests I believe. Some of the files here come from outside python packages, see full reply bellow. > - plugins/org.python.pydev.jython_1.3.1/jysrc. Same questions as above. This is pydev's files, and they are jython scripts used to control pydev. > > - plugins/org.python.pydev.debug_1.3.1/pysrc. Same. These seem to be pydev's own scripts. Here's Fabio's reply about the origin of these files: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=cfb578b20704060345n677f8a26u5e87bbc3a4a20c8%40mail.gmail.com What do you think is the appropriate thing to do with these? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 20:10:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 16:10:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235527] Review Request: python-libacl - POSIX.1e ACLs library wrapper for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704062010.l36KA9Dp006274@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-libacl - POSIX.1e ACLs library wrapper for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235527 ------- Additional Comments From mszpak at wp.pl 2007-04-06 16:09 EST ------- A path to the source package should be: http://heanet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/pylibacl-%{version}.tar.bz2 I don't want to bump release number only because of that, so I will fix it together with other changes suggested in a review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 20:13:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 16:13:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234488] Review Request: yum-presto - Yum plugin to download deltarpms rather than full rpms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704062013.l36KDAWq006502@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yum-presto - Yum plugin to download deltarpms rather than full rpms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234488 jdieter at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |0.3.8-1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 20:49:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 16:49:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229098] Review Request: openjpeg - JPEG 2000 codec library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704062049.l36Knx8x008083@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openjpeg - JPEG 2000 codec library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229098 ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2007-04-06 16:49 EST ------- I finally managed to catch upstream's attention. :) The license is in svn now and a new release should be coming soonish, with the license and some of the optimizations me and others have been working on... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 20:59:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 16:59:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235417] Review Request: zzuf - Transparent application input fuzzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704062059.l36KxDul008428@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zzuf - Transparent application input fuzzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235417 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bjohnson at symetrix.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 21:22:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 17:22:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235417] Review Request: zzuf - Transparent application input fuzzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704062122.l36LMp13009072@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zzuf - Transparent application input fuzzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235417 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-06 17:22 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Rpmlint output: Agreed, rpmlint is wrong. W: zzuf invalid-license WTFPL W: zzuf invalid-license WTFPL W: zzuf-debuginfo invalid-license WTFPL [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is written in American English. [x] Spec file for the package is legible. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : 1970dcf4f77251bea843b0f6ae19231c MD5SUM upstream package: 1970dcf4f77251bea843b0f6ae19231c [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: FC-6/i386 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: Arches excluded: Why: [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. Not required since this is a LD_PRELOAD package [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: FC-6/i386 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: FC-6/i386 [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] Latest version is packaged. === Issues === 1. === Final Notes === 1. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 21:29:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 17:29:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221906] Review Request: gmediaserver - UPnP compatible media server for the GNU system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704062129.l36LTFeh009293@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gmediaserver - UPnP compatible media server for the GNU system Alias: gmediaserver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221906 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-06 17:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > In the absence of option 3 (static UID/GID), I think option 2 (not removing the > user/group) is much better. It may be "messy" in terms of leaving accounts on > systems but IMHO this is not as "messy" as leaving unowned files on those > systems (which would happen if the user/group were deleted). > There is actually a pseudo-static UID/GID mechanism available in Fedora > (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageUserCreation) but use of it is contentious I agree with Paul here. This is messy, but ATM there is not a good way to handle this except with fedora-usermgmt as noted above. However, I would not recommend fedora-usermgmt (although I use it on my packages) until the controversy regarding it's use is ironed out. So for now, let's go with the persistent user/group. (In reply to comment #14) > Well...IMO there are some ways resolve this problem: > 1. Do not change it, the owner of /srv/gmediaserver will be changing all time > when the package user will be having other uid/gid and the files are often 644, > so the program can read it. I think it is safe, because if the directory will > not be deleted unless it is empty. But there will be potentially unowned files depending on how the media server is used. You're lucky in the regard that the media server doesn't actually have to manage the files, only read them - otherwise it would be more sticky. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 21:41:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 17:41:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232548] Review Request: gnome-yum - Graphical program for easier use the YUM install program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704062141.l36LfeqX009967@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-yum - Graphical program for easier use the YUM install program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232548 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bjohnson at symetrix.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-06 17:41 EST ------- Looks like you are sponsored now, so I'll provide a review. Let's get this fixed first: checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes checking for GNOME... no + make make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 21:58:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 17:58:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223943] Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME - point, click, debug! In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704062158.l36Lw0Eu010643@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME - point, click, debug! Alias: nemiver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223943 giallu at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2007-04-06 17:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #35) > >(In reply to comment #33) > > Just a couple questions: > > is the "touch" trick for forcing the icon cache update the > > usual/preferred/best way to do that? > > It is, according to the Packaging/ScriptletSnippets page on the wiki. Ok. seems I missed it until now... > > > are you going to remove COPYING from the -devel subpackage as suggested in > > comment #2? > No. I'm of the opinon that such license texts should be included in development > subpackages to make the license explicitly clear (and not have to backreference > that of the original SRPM's main package). I know of no guideline for or against > thish, though; and it seems more sensible to me tokeep it in there. > I have no strong opinion against this either (though I did not notice other packages doing the same). In the lack of an official guideline about this and given there was more than enough time for further comments the package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 22:11:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 18:11:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233802] Review Request: python-xlib - Fully functional X client library for Python programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704062211.l36MB6II011147@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-xlib - Fully functional X client library for Python programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233802 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-04-06 18:11 EST ------- Updated for the summary text change suggestion http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/python-xlib/python-xlib-0.13-2.fc7.src.rpm http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/python-xlib/python-xlib.spec So uhm, Rex, anytime you want to start that official review that would be great. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 22:11:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 18:11:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235417] Review Request: zzuf - Transparent application input fuzzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704062211.l36MBV2c011184@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zzuf - Transparent application input fuzzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235417 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-04-06 18:11 EST ------- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: zzuf Short Description: Transparent application input fuzzer Owners: ville.skytta at iki.fi Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 22:59:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 18:59:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233848] Review Request: perl-SVG-Graph - Visualize your data in Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704062259.l36MxBDB012294@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SVG-Graph - Visualize your data in Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) format Alias: perl-SVG-Graph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233848 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2007-04-06 18:59 EST ------- * Fri Apr 06 2007 Alex Lancaster 0.01-3 - Added e-mail confirmation for license in package. Spec URL: http://allele5.biol.berkeley.edu/~alex/fedora/perl-SVG-Graph.spec SRPM URL: http://allele5.biol.berkeley.edu/~alex/fedora/perl-SVG-Graph-0.01-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 6 23:05:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 19:05:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235376] Review Request: ocsinventory-ipdiscover - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704062305.l36N5NqM012525@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocsinventory-ipdiscover - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235376 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-04-06 19:05 EST ------- GOOD - rpmlint checks do not return anything - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPL ) OK, matches source; upstream did not include the full license, but the only existing doc (a README) mentions that the license is GPL and points to the URL - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream, sha1sum 06acb6c071040d2ae6d3c26109e526afba660835 OCSNG_LINUX_AGENT_1.01.tar.gz - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all files and directories that it creates; does not take ownership of foreign files and directories - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - not a GUI, so no need for .desktop file - no static content. no libtool / pkgconfig files SHOULD - compiles and builds in mock/devel/x86_64 - there are no translations available, but %description is also in French - no scriptlets - the program does start and seems to run without problems. I cannot do full tests because I do not have the other needed programs (the agents). If someone else could test this, please give us a hand. Unless someone steps in pointing to problems that I have not spotted, Wednesday I will approve this package (I think it's a good idea to wait till after Easter). Meanwhile, Remi, please think of a method to preserve the timestamp of the README file. Using perl to remove the CR/LF line endings affects it. Maybe using "touch -r" before and after modifying the file ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 01:33:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 21:33:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704070133.l371XJZL015493@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command Alias: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-06 21:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #97) > * when I do > export CFLAGS="%{optflags} -DDEBUG" > just before %configure in %build, there is a compile error > in util.c, so I cannot test a build with -DDEBUG. This is now fixed in the upstream, and I've included the -DDEBUG in the src.rpm for now until we get this worked out. > * the libraries aren't linked against any libraries, > so there are a lot of undefined non weak symbols with > rpmlint run on the installed rpm. I'll attach a patch. > > After applying the patch I get > W: ntop unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libntop-3.3.so > > ... > > I checked some of those symbols, they were in admin.c, > or main.c and admin.c and main.c are only in ntop. This > should really be reported upstream, this is weird.... Upstream claims to have fixed this. My rpmlint does now show any problems, but it never did on the other builds either. Can you check and see if this clears it up for you? * Fri Apr 06 2007 Bernard Johnson - 3.3-0.12.20070407cvs - update to 20070407cvs - compile with -DDEBUG for now to check for problems - rework ntop-am.patch with recent changes - patch to remove gdVersionGuessValue from plugin - repatch with shrext patch Spec URL: http://symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/fedora/ntop.spec SRPM URL: http://symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/fedora/ntop-3.3-0.12.20070407cvs.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 02:35:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 22:35:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223943] Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME - point, click, debug! In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704070235.l372ZFHb017985@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME - point, click, debug! Alias: nemiver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223943 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-04-06 22:35 EST ------- Great; thanks for your review & comments! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: nemiver Short Description: A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME - point, click, debug! Owners: peter at thecodergeek.com Branches: FC-6 devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 02:48:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 22:48:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233602] Review Request: pykdeextentions - A collection of python packages to support KDE applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704070248.l372mwWa018768@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pykdeextentions - A collection of python packages to support KDE applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233602 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-04-06 22:48 EST ------- Spec URL: http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/pykdeextensions.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 03:38:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 23:38:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234750] Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704070338.l373c4dm021494@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234750 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-06 23:37 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > (In reply to comment #18) > > In my specs I do all these steps this way: > > %prep > > %setup -q -c -T -n %{name}-%{version} > > %setup -q -D -T -n %{name}-%{version} -a0 > > > > Erm why not just: > %prep > %setup -q -c > > That has exactly the same effect. Yes, but only if a package has exactly one source-tarball. When a package has several source-tarballs (like my gcc-specs), my construct is more flexible (I generate the specs) > > Finally: As you already know, I dislike a toolchains using an architecture (avr) > > as their target > > I know, but as long as almost the whole world does it like this I'm > not planning on changing this. Well, ... who is this whole world you are referring to? Any GNU toolchain developer will tell you that using an architecture as target is not a clever decision. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 04:00:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 00:00:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225783] Merge Review: gdb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704070400.l3740pcP023026@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gdb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225783 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-07 00:00 EST ------- This package will need a lot of love ;) Some obious issues: 1. When running configure ... checking for libexpat... no configure: WARNING: expat is missing or unusable; some features may be disabled. => Missing BR: libexpat-devel 2. %makeinstall %makeinstall should not be used if a package supports make DESTDIR=.. install Old gdb didn't, but modern ones do (AFAICT, gdb-6.6 does). 3. The way, the infos are being installed. I don't see much wrong with the way you are doing it, but ... I'd recommend to convert this to the way most packages handle it nowadays. 4. Prereq: info This construct is being frowned upon. It should be replaced with Requires(pre): /sbin/install-info Requires(post): /sbin/install-info 5. running the tests should be put into a separate %check section. 6. The rationale for the "version-reporting paragraph" escapes me. I recommend to remove it. 7. Package doesn't honor RPM_OPT_FLAGS: gdb-6.3-warnings-20050317.patch:+-Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE" When running the testsuite: ... Running ../../../gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/auxv.exp ... WARNING: can't generate a core file - core tests suppressed - check ulimit -c => You probably should set ulimit -c unlimited before running the tests ... Running ../../../gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/prelink.exp ... sh: prelink: command not found I was running rpmbuild as ordinary user, who didn't have /usr/sbin in $PATH Finally: Running the testsuite hangs when building this package on FC6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 04:36:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 00:36:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235550] New: Review Request: mysql-gui-tools - Graphical Tools for mysql Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235550 Summary: Review Request: mysql-gui-tools - Graphical Tools for mysql Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dennis at ausil.us QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ausil.us/packages/mysql-gui-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://ausil.us/packages/mysql-gui-tools-5.0-1.fc7.r11.src.rpm Description: MySQL Administrator enables developers and DBAs to easily perform all the command line operations visually including configuring servers, administering users, and dynamically monitoring database health. Other common administrative tasks such as monitoring replication status, backup and restore, and viewing logs can also be performed through the MySQL Administrator graphical console. This package replaces my existing mysql-administrator and mysql-query-browser packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 05:24:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 01:24:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234750] Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704070524.l375Ogm2024855@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234750 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-07 01:24 EST ------- MUSTFIX: Using mkdir is not safe against "rpmbuild --short-circuit": # rpmbuild -bb avr-binutils.spec # rpmbuild --short-circuit -bc avr-binutils.spec Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.5345 ... + mkdir build mkdir: cannot create directory `build': File exists error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.5345 (%build) Replace the "mkdir build" with "mkdir -p build". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 06:13:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 02:13:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235376] Review Request: ocsinventory-ipdiscover - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704070613.l376Dt0e025761@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocsinventory-ipdiscover - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235376 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2007-04-07 02:13 EST ------- Thank's for the review Mock log devel/x86_64 : http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/ocsinventory-ipdiscover-build2.log The patch used has been send upstream and is commited to the CVS. I've add your proposal for README in the spec file (no release bump) About the test, ocsinventory-client (with ipdiscover) is available in the Extras for a while : no bug filed. And i used it in a production environment (FC 3-6, RHEL 2-4) ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 07:12:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 03:12:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234750] Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704070712.l377C3H0026671@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234750 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-07 03:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #22) > MUSTFIX: > > Using mkdir is not safe against "rpmbuild --short-circuit": > > Replace the "mkdir build" with "mkdir -p build". Fixed, new version here: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/avr-binutils.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/avr-binutils-2.17-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 07:26:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 03:26:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234750] Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704070726.l377Q7rn027054@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234750 ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at fedoraproject.org 2007-04-07 03:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #21) > (In reply to comment #19) > > I know, but as long as almost the whole world does it like this I'm > > not planning on changing this. > Well, ... who is this whole world you are referring to? The whole world is everybody else who distributes compilers for the AVR; the biggest one being WinAVR, but also every one *nix distribution that I know of. > Any GNU toolchain developer will tell you that using an architecture as target > is not a clever decision. Silly suggestion: Could we compile avr-binutils with the correct target, and then add additional symlinks with the names that most people would expect? That way we gradually educate people while remaining backward compatible with existing project. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 07:50:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 03:50:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235555] New: Review Request: transset - Simple program to toggle Translucency property Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235555 Summary: Review Request: transset - Simple program to toggle Translucency property Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lemenkov at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://lemenkov.googlepages.com/transset.spec SRPM URL: http://lemenkov.googlepages.com/transset-20040120-1.src.rpm Description: Simple program to toggle Translucency property. This is a little handy tool. I want to mention that I forced to use "cvs co" instead of unpacking source-archives 'cause project actually never released as tarball. Maybe it would be better to download all 4 files and put it into tarball by myself? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 07:52:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 03:52:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235555] Review Request: transset - Simple program to toggle Translucency property In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704070752.l377qOtG028271@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: transset - Simple program to toggle Translucency property https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235555 lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 08:13:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 04:13:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235555] Review Request: transset - Simple program to toggle Translucency property In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704070813.l378DSuX030235@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: transset - Simple program to toggle Translucency property https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235555 lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 08:15:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 04:15:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235555] Review Request: transset - Simple program to toggle Translucency property In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704070815.l378FbpL030331@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: transset - Simple program to toggle Translucency property https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235555 lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 13:36:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 09:36:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235573] New: Review Request: websec - Web page monitoring software with highlighting Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235573 Summary: Review Request: websec - Web page monitoring software with highlighting Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at leemhuis.info QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.leemhuis.info/files/fedorarpms/SPECS.fdr/websec.spec SRPM URL: http://www.leemhuis.info/files/fedorarpms/SRPMS.fdr/websec-1.9.0-1.src.rpm Description: Web Secretary is a web page change monitoring software. It will detect changes based on content analysis, making sure that it's not just HTML that changed, but actual content. You can tell it what to ignore in the page (hit counters and such), and it can mail you the document with the changes highlighted or load the highlighted page in a browser. Notes for the reviewer: * not using dist on purpose -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 13:58:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 09:58:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222575] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-ElementGrid - Meta-element which holds any other element in a grid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704071358.l37DwwnQ010776@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-ElementGrid - Meta-element which holds any other element in a grid Alias: pear-ElementGrid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222575 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From sebastien.prudhomme at gmail.com 2007-04-07 09:58 EST ------- + rpmlint output (none) + right package name (follows PEAR package naming scheme) + build for noarch + spec file name = %{name}.spec + package version = tarball version + uses 1%{?dist} release + web site url checked: http://pear.php.net/package/HTML_QuickForm_ElementGrid + source file url checked + LGPG license ? missing license file + requires: php-pear(PEAR) - requires: php >= 4.3.0 (not sure for this as php-pear requires php yet but Wiki page says a PEAR package MUST requires it) + requires: php-pear(HTML_QuickForm) >= 3.2.5 (as written in PEAR XML package description) + requires: php-pear(HTML_Table) >= 1.7.5 (as written in PEAR XML package description) + provides: php-pear(HTML_QuickForm_ElementGrid) = %{version} + uses '%setup -q -c' as suggested in PEAR additional hints + uses PEAR macros + uses recommended scriptlets for registering and unregistering the module + written in english (not my native language so i hope all is OK) + md5 of source file same as the one of the source file on the official web site + build and installed without problem on fc6 + sample elementGrid.php tested successfully + no duplicate files + uses %defattr(-,root,root,-) + doesn't own %{pear_phpdir}/HTML/QuickForm directory ? group should be Development/Libraries not Development/Languages + buildroot %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 14:08:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 10:08:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199905] Review Request: gotmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704071408.l37E83Un011036@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gotmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199905 james at lovedthanlost.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(james at lovedthanlos| |t.net) | ------- Additional Comments From james at lovedthanlost.net 2007-04-07 10:07 EST ------- As far as I can concerned it's ready for submission. The only issue is a permissions one that I can't replicate nor can anyone suggest a fix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 15:12:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 11:12:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234436] Review Request: glchess - GlChess, a 3d Chess game using OpenGL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704071512.l37FCr2N012631@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glchess - GlChess, a 3d Chess game using OpenGL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234436 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 15:23:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 11:23:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235417] Review Request: zzuf - Transparent application input fuzzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704071523.l37FN04T012876@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zzuf - Transparent application input fuzzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235417 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 15:24:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 11:24:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223943] Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME - point, click, debug! In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704071524.l37FOm7j012960@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME - point, click, debug! Alias: nemiver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223943 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 15:28:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 11:28:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235376] Review Request: ocsinventory-ipdiscover - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704071528.l37FSZAx013056@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocsinventory-ipdiscover - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235376 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-04-07 11:28 EST ------- Thanks Manuel for looking at that. Upon reading the spec I didn't found anything wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 15:34:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 11:34:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222087] Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704071534.l37FYPn6013192@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222087 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-07 11:34 EST ------- Well, for 7.svn20070406 * numbering - Usually for svn tarball, the revision number is used (at the time I checked svn version, the revision number was 336), while for cvs tarball, the date is used for tarball number. * autotool - Well, as noted above, currently * rawhide is automake 1.10 * automake 1.10 fails without config.rpath So the modification I wrote above was needed for rawhide. * Documentation - Please check if the following documents are needed. -------------------------------------------------- README -------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 15:58:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 11:58:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234835] Review Request: fgfs-Atlas - Flightgear map tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704071558.l37Fw09V013793@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fgfs-Atlas - Flightgear map tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234835 fabrice at bellet.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From fabrice at bellet.info 2007-04-07 11:57 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fgfs-Atlas Short Description: Flightgear map tools Owners: fabrice at bellet.info Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 16:01:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 12:01:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234831] Review Request: fgfs-base - FlightGear base scenery and data files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704071601.l37G1eWv013916@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fgfs-base - FlightGear base scenery and data files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234831 fabrice at bellet.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From fabrice at bellet.info 2007-04-07 12:01 EST ------- Thanks Jochen! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fgfs-base Short Description: FlightGear base scenery and data files Owners: fabrice at bellet.info Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 16:03:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 12:03:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221884] Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704071603.l37G3Qr2014023@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221884 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-07 12:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Just thought I'd let you know I haven't disappeared off the face of the earth. Andy, Can you post a status at least once a month? Otherwise, we should probably just close this and reopen once you have time to work on it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 16:11:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 12:11:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235471] Review Request: perl-PDF-API2 - Perl module for creation and modification of PDF files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704071611.l37GBjgh014283@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-PDF-API2 - Perl module for creation and modification of PDF files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235471 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |235587 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 16:26:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 12:26:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235555] Review Request: transset - Simple program to toggle Translucency property In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704071626.l37GQ5sk014559@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: transset - Simple program to toggle Translucency property https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235555 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-04-07 12:26 EST ------- Hey Peter. You shouldn't set the review flag here. That will be set by a reviewer once they are reviewing your package, see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageReviewProcess CVS sources are ok...See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 16:29:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 12:29:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233848] Review Request: perl-SVG-Graph - Visualize your data in Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704071629.l37GTWkc014613@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SVG-Graph - Visualize your data in Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) format Alias: perl-SVG-Graph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233848 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 16:32:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 12:32:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235550] Review Request: mysql-gui-tools - Graphical Tools for mysql In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704071632.l37GWUoT014678@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-gui-tools - Graphical Tools for mysql https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235550 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-04-07 12:32 EST ------- I would be happy to review this package. The versioning here is odd. Is "r11" a post release update? A pre-release for the next version, or just the standard way they increment releases? Perhaps that should be 5.0r11-1.%{?dist} ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 16:32:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 12:32:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235376] Review Request: ocsinventory-ipdiscover - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704071632.l37GWgFv014701@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocsinventory-ipdiscover - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235376 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-04-07 12:32 EST ------- I've noticed your patch in the first place. I think that the buffer you allocate is way too large when compared to the 50 chars needed for storing a netmask+the text of the error message. However it definitely does not break anything, so I did not comment over it. Since Patrice did not notice anything wrong either (btw, thank you for verifying ), the package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 16:34:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 12:34:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234826] Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704071634.l37GY7IO014737@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234826 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bjohnson at symetrix.com BugsThisDependsOn| |234831 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-07 12:34 EST ------- What is: Requires: fgfs-base = %{version} Sed is preferred: dos2unix docs-mini/AptNavFAQ.FlightGear.html >From build.log: Automake version: ./configure: line 13604: automake: command not found -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 16:34:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 12:34:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234831] Review Request: fgfs-base - FlightGear base scenery and data files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704071634.l37GYd1s014768@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fgfs-base - FlightGear base scenery and data files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234831 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |234826 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 16:35:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 12:35:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235588] New: Review Request: escape - an extensible puzzle game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235588 Summary: Review Request: escape - an extensible puzzle game Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: adam at spicenitz.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.spicenitz.org/fedora/escape.spec SRPM URL: http://www.spicenitz.org/fedora/escape-200704070-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Escape is a tile-based puzzle game in the style of "Adventures of Lolo" or "Chip's Challenge." Unlike either of those games, Escape doesn't rely at all on reflexes--it's all about your brain. Although Escape comes with hundreds of levels, the game places an emphasis on the composition of new puzzles. Thus Escape has a built-in level editor and facilities for automatically sharing puzzles with other players. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 16:36:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 12:36:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234826] Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704071636.l37GaCBD014837@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234826 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-07 12:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > What is: > Requires: fgfs-base = %{version} Ignore that comment, I found it and set a dependency bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 16:36:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 12:36:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235589] New: Review Request: escape-data - data for the escape package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235589 Summary: Review Request: escape-data - data for the escape package Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: adam at spicenitz.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.spicenitz.org/fedora/escape-data.spec SRPM URL: http://www.spicenitz.org/fedora/escape-data-200704070-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: This is the noarch data files for Escape. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 16:42:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 12:42:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704071642.l37GglEw015015@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-07 12:42 EST ------- Well, again I review this package (evolution-brutus) For 1.1.25.3-2 * Source0 - By the way, where is 1.1.25.3 tarball? * compilation flags - Why are fedora specific compilation flags passed _twice_ ? ----------------------------------------------------------- make[3]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/evolution-brutus-1.1.25.3/idl_output' /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I/usr/include/orbit-2.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/builddir/build/BUILD/evolution-brutus-1.1.25.3/idl_output -DORBIT2=1 -pthread -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/gnome-keyring-1 -I/usr/include/orbit-2.0 -I/usr/include/libIDL-2.0 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Wpointer-arith -Wno-sign-compare -Werror -Werror-implicit-function-declaration -Wundef -Wpointer-arith -Wbad-function-cast -Wcast-align -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wnested-externs -std=gnu89 -D_REENTRANT -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -DG_LOG_DOMAIN=\"libBrutusSTUBS\" -DORBIT2=1 -pthread -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/gnome-keyring-1 -I/usr/include/orbit-2.0 -I/usr/include/libIDL-2.0 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Wpointer-arith -Wno-sign-compare -Werror -Werror-implicit-function-declaration -Wundef -Wpointer-arith -Wbad-function-cast -Wcast-align -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wnested-externs -std=gnu89 -D_REENTRANT -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -MT IDistList-common.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/IDistList-common.Tpo -c -o IDistList-common.lo IDistList-common.c mkdir .libs ----------------------------------------------------------- * pkgconfig .pc file - Well why are the seemingly-extra include options ----------------------------------------------------------- -I/usr/include/orbit-2.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 ----------------------------------------------------------- in Cflags in .pc files needed, although ORBit-2.0 (therefore glib-2.0 and is required by .pc files? ----------------------------------------------------------- For upstream: * Documentation - Why are the following documents empty? AUTHORS ChangeLog NEWS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 16:48:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 12:48:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233848] Review Request: perl-SVG-Graph - Visualize your data in Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704071648.l37Gm85c015134@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SVG-Graph - Visualize your data in Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) format Alias: perl-SVG-Graph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233848 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-07 12:48 EST ------- The package appears to be missing a BR on perl(Statistics::Descriptive). Also, there appears to be an examples directory (eg/), why not include it in %doc? :) (Note to keep rpmlint quiet you'll need to remove the exec bit from the examples.) Make the two above changes and I'll approve. + source files match upstream: 3fbf3ae9aa6ea33fd548e63dd926ee2b SVG-Graph-0.01.tar.gz 3fbf3ae9aa6ea33fd548e63dd926ee2b ../SVG-Graph-0.01.tar.gz + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license field matches the actual license. + license is open source-compatible. (Artistic) License text not included upstream. + latest version is being packaged. X BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. + %clean is present. + package installs properly + no debuginfo package -- noarch + rpmlint is silent. + final provides and requires are sane: ** perl-SVG-Graph-0.01-3.fc6.noarch.rpm == rpmlint == provides perl(SVG::Graph) = 0.01 perl(SVG::Graph::Data) perl(SVG::Graph::Data::Datum) perl(SVG::Graph::Data::Node) perl(SVG::Graph::Data::Tree) perl(SVG::Graph::File) perl(SVG::Graph::Frame) perl(SVG::Graph::Glyph) perl(SVG::Graph::Glyph::axis) perl(SVG::Graph::Glyph::bar) perl(SVG::Graph::Glyph::barflex) perl(SVG::Graph::Glyph::bezier) perl(SVG::Graph::Glyph::bubble) perl(SVG::Graph::Glyph::heatmap) perl(SVG::Graph::Glyph::line) perl(SVG::Graph::Glyph::pictogram) perl(SVG::Graph::Glyph::scatter) perl(SVG::Graph::Glyph::tree) perl(SVG::Graph::Glyph::wedge) perl(SVG::Graph::Group) perl-SVG-Graph = 0.01-3.fc6 == requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(Math::Spline) perl(SVG) perl(SVG::Graph::Data::Node) perl(SVG::Graph::Frame) perl(Statistics::Descriptive) perl(Tree::DAG_Node) perl(base) perl(constant) perl(strict) + %check is present and all tests pass (though not without a lot of noise): All tests successful. Files=7, Tests=69, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.66 cusr + 0.19 csys = 0.85 CPU) + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets present. + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. + no headers. + no pkgconfig files. + no libtool .la droppings. + not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 16:51:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 12:51:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235417] Review Request: zzuf - Transparent application input fuzzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704071651.l37Gp0ZV015187@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zzuf - Transparent application input fuzzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235417 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-04-07 12:50 EST ------- Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 16:52:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 12:52:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199905] Review Request: gotmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704071652.l37Gqmaa015243@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gotmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199905 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-04-07 12:52 EST ------- The URL of the spec (Comment #18) directs me to an add for a book. I doubt that this is the correct/intended behavior. I cannot retrieve the src.rpm either: [wolfy at wolfy2 tmp]$ wget http://www.hardening-linux.com/gotmail/gotmail-0.8.9-2.src.rpm --19:50:09-- http://www.hardening-linux.com/gotmail/gotmail-0.8.9-2.src.rpm => `gotmail-0.8.9-2.src.rpm' Resolving www.hardening-linux.com... 64.202.166.216 Connecting to www.hardening-linux.com|64.202.166.216|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found 19:50:09 ERROR 404: Not Found. [wolfy at wolfy2 tmp]$ wget http://www.hardening-linux.com/gotmail/gotmail-0.8.9-1.src.rpm --19:50:12-- http://www.hardening-linux.com/gotmail/gotmail-0.8.9-1.src.rpm => `gotmail-0.8.9-1.src.rpm' Resolving www.hardening-linux.com... 64.202.166.216 Connecting to www.hardening-linux.com|64.202.166.216|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found 19:50:13 ERROR 404: Not Found. James, could you please repost the correct URLs ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 16:59:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 12:59:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235376] Review Request: ocsinventory-ipdiscover - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704071659.l37GxBuE015430@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocsinventory-ipdiscover - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235376 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2007-04-07 12:58 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ocsinventory-ipdiscover Short Description: Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client Owners: Fedora at FamilleCollet.com Branches: devel FC-6 FC-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 17:13:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 13:13:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235573] Review Request: websec - Web page monitoring software with highlighting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704071713.l37HDmhp015836@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: websec - Web page monitoring software with highlighting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235573 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ville.skytta at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-04-07 13:13 EST ------- - Even though the dep on smtpdaemon probably pulls in the needed thing, it sounds incorrect; websec just needs a sendmail executable, not a SMTP daemon -> change dependency to "MTA" or "/usr/sbin/sendmail"? - %define debug_package stuff + comment can be removed, this is a noarch package. - s/mozilla/xdg-open/ in the example url.list? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 17:28:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 13:28:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235293] Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704071728.l37HSWX0016792@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration Alias: adminutil https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235293 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-04-07 13:28 EST ------- missing BuildRequires: cyrus-sasl-devel Shared Objects are not versioned. with correct BuildRequires builds in mock. rpmlint is quiet -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 17:31:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 13:31:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235550] Review Request: mysql-gui-tools - Graphical Tools for mysql In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704071731.l37HVQnb016940@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-gui-tools - Graphical Tools for mysql https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235550 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-04-07 13:31 EST ------- the versioning im really not sure of. MySQL started it with the pre-releases then continued it after saying the the 5.0 series is stable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 17:55:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 13:55:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235573] Review Request: websec - Web page monitoring software with highlighting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704071755.l37HtqDA017551@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: websec - Web page monitoring software with highlighting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235573 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2007-04-07 13:55 EST ------- Thanks for the review Ville. (In reply to comment #1) > - Even though the dep on smtpdaemon probably pulls in the needed thing, it > sounds incorrect; websec just needs a sendmail executable, not a SMTP daemon -> > change dependency to "MTA" or "/usr/sbin/sendmail"? Changed (there are some packages in Fedora that seem to do it like this, but I'm not sure if they need a daemon or just /usr/sbin/sendmail) > - %define debug_package stuff + comment can be removed, this is a noarch package. Note to myself: make noarch packages noarch first, before looking at the size of the debuginfo package ;-) > - s/mozilla/xdg-open/ in the example url.list? Hmmm; I've thought about it a bit, but I think more people know what "mozilla" is and does than what "xdg-open" does (which is not installed on any of my Fedora machines...) = Updated package = Spec URL: http://www.leemhuis.info/files/fedorarpms/SPECS.fdr/websec.spec SRPM URL: http://www.leemhuis.info/files/fedorarpms/SRPMS.fdr/websec-1.9.0-2.src.rpm DIFF URL: http://www.leemhuis.info/files/fedorarpms/DIFFS.fdr/websec.diff -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 18:02:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 14:02:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235573] Review Request: websec - Web page monitoring software with highlighting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704071802.l37I2aQW017696@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: websec - Web page monitoring software with highlighting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235573 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-04-07 14:02 EST ------- Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 18:18:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 14:18:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235573] Review Request: websec - Web page monitoring software with highlighting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704071818.l37IITXi018111@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: websec - Web page monitoring software with highlighting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235573 fedora at leemhuis.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2007-04-07 14:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Approved. Thanks Ville New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: websec Short Description: Web Secretary - Web page monitoring software with highlighting Owners: fedora at leemhuis.info Branches: FC-5 FC-6 EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 18:26:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 14:26:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226407] Merge Review: sendmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704071826.l37IQ4ep018286@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sendmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226407 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-04-07 14:25 EST ------- Should add "Provides: MTA"; other packages that provide a MTA do that as well (exim, postfix, ssmtp, esmtp (bug filed, pending)) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 19:17:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 15:17:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229533] Review Request: perl-Template-GD - GD plugin(s) for the Template Toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704071917.l37JHgpq019569@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Template-GD - GD plugin(s) for the Template Toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229533 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2007-04-07 15:17 EST ------- APPROVED MD5SUMS: 45d84b9a9f2d10e89aa4826ee6f219b0 perl-Template-GD-2.66-2.src.rpm 223844df6c603a3fd3b4cc9daad30b5d perl-Template-GD.spec 9052bef9bd799e143990e67422c14b81 Template-GD-2.66.tar.gz Sources: * Template-GD-2.66.tar.gz: MD5 digest verified against CPAN copy. Good: * URL and Source url are valid. * License verified (README file) * Requirements and build requirements are sane * perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_xxx) contruct present * perl vendor libs present * File permissions are sane -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 19:54:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 15:54:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235550] Review Request: mysql-gui-tools - Graphical Tools for mysql In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704071954.l37JsGEB021143@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-gui-tools - Graphical Tools for mysql https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235550 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-04-07 15:54 EST ------- See below - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPL) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 063fda21a80f1b1a3e96231433b3f24b mysql-gui-tools-5.0r11.tar.gz 063fda21a80f1b1a3e96231433b3f24b mysql-gui-tools-5.0r11.tar.gz.1 See below - BuildRequires correct OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file See below - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. See below - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. See below - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: See below - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs See below - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. Should address the naming (as mentioned above). I think 5.0r11-1.%{dist} might be correct here. Is the next version likely 5.0r12? or ? 2. There are some packages that are included here within the source. Should try and use the existing packages for them instead of using the bundled versions? in mysql-query-browser there is a full copy of gtksourceview (which is already available in fedora). in mysql-gui-common/library/generic-runtime/ there is a full copy of 'newt' (which is already available in fedora). 3. The Source url doesn't seem to work here. Looks like you might need to pick one of the mirrors, ie: http://dev.mysql.com/get/Downloads/MySQLGUITools/mysql-gui-tools-5.0r11.tar.gz/from/http://mysql.orst.edu/ 4. Does there need to be a dependency on mysql? Or could this be installed/run on a client machine with no mysql installed to talk to a server on another machine? I guess it's linked to the client at least. 5. Will the java support work with the gcj setup in fedora? If so, might be worth enabling. 6. Didn't build under mock here, I had to add: BuildRequires: libgnomeprint22-devel This looks to be in the gtksourceview build, so if thats removed it might not be needed. 7. Do the other packages need anything from the -common package? Currently there are no subpackage dependencies at all (ie, any of them could be installed alone) is that correct? I would think the others would need to depend on -common at least for directory ownership issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 19:59:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 15:59:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222575] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-ElementGrid - Meta-element which holds any other element in a grid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704071959.l37JxEEa021406@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-ElementGrid - Meta-element which holds any other element in a grid Alias: pear-ElementGrid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222575 ------- Additional Comments From sebastien.prudhomme at gmail.com 2007-04-07 15:59 EST ------- + build with mock (fc6 i386) - a new version is released (0.1.0) since a few days -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 20:01:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 16:01:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221769] Review Request: libcgi - CGI easy as C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704072001.l37K1YQ9021570@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcgi - CGI easy as C https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221769 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2007-04-07 16:01 EST ------- Any change of getting this package approved if I don't build the static sub-package by default? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 20:06:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 16:06:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231758] Review Request: perl-Workflow - Simple, flexible system to implement workflows In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704072006.l37K6p8e021678@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Workflow - Simple, flexible system to implement workflows Alias: perl-Workflow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231758 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-07 16:06 EST ------- Added perl(Data::UUID) and perl(SPOPS) as BRs; however, perl(SPOPS) is commented out as it isn't in Fedora yet, and depends on perl(Class::Fields) whose tests fail. If Class-Fields cleans itself up and perl(SPOPS) makes it into Fedora, I'll uncomment it... SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Workflow-0.26-2.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Workflow.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 20:13:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 16:13:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223943] Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME - point, click, debug! In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704072013.l37KDqYb021905@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME - point, click, debug! Alias: nemiver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223943 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-04-07 16:13 EST ------- Thanks for the branching, Josh. Built successfully for devel; comps entry done too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 20:29:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 16:29:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185262] Review Request: kchmviewer - CHM viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704072029.l37KTp8D022623@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kchmviewer - CHM viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185262 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-04-07 16:29 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: kchmviewer Updated Fedora Owners: pertusus[ AT ]free.fr, jpo[ AT ]di.uminho.pt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 20:34:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 16:34:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234826] Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704072034.l37KY7ij022724@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234826 ------- Additional Comments From fabrice at bellet.info 2007-04-07 16:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Sed is preferred: > dos2unix docs-mini/AptNavFAQ.FlightGear.html ok. fixed (and also in the fgfs-base package) > From build.log: > Automake version: ./configure: line 13604: automake: command not found This one is an upstream problem. automake is called at the end of the configure script, and is just used to display summary information (automake version). configure should not use automake. I added a patch to fix this, and will report upstream if you agree. Should I also patch configure.ac, even if this is not required for a clean build ? If yes, some care must be taken with files modification date, as the Makefile expects configure to be newer than configure.ac to start compiling. New SPEC : http://fr2.rpmfind.net/pub/bellet/review/FlightGear.spec New SRPM : http://fr2.rpmfind.net/pub/bellet/review/FlightGear-0.9.10-3.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 20:36:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 16:36:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226407] Merge Review: sendmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704072036.l37KaZMO022806@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sendmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226407 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-04-07 16:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > * all of the alternatives-managed files should be "provided" by sendmail. Is it really sure? What is the point of providing the man pages? > %{_mandir}/man1/mailq.1.gz > %{_mandir}/man1/newaliases.1.gz > %{_mandir}/man5/aliases.5.gz > %{_mandir}/man8/sendmail.8.gz > -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 20:50:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 16:50:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235234] Review Request: aoetools - ATA over Ethernet Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704072050.l37Kot4R023129@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aoetools - ATA over Ethernet Tools Alias: aoetools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235234 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Alias| |aoetools Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-07 16:50 EST ------- One note before I post the actual review -- it looks like the Makefile doesn't honor the Fedora compiler flags -- I suspect something like this would resolve that: %build make %{?_smp_mflags} CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 21:45:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 17:45:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235234] Review Request: aoetools - ATA over Ethernet Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704072145.l37LjPwG024262@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aoetools - ATA over Ethernet Tools Alias: aoetools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235234 ------- Additional Comments From jima at beer.tclug.org 2007-04-07 17:45 EST ------- Thanks for picking this up. Just kicked off a test build with your suggestion, I'll see what the build.log looks like. I readily acknowledge that I'm not too good at compiler flags, so I appreciate the pointer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 21:57:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 17:57:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235501] Review Request: jsdoc - Produces javadoc-style documentation from JavaScript sourcefiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704072157.l37LvOTO024544@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jsdoc - Produces javadoc-style documentation from JavaScript sourcefiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235501 ------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com 2007-04-07 17:57 EST ------- The license issue resolved -- it is GPL. Updated SRPM URL: http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/progs/rpms/jsdoc-1.10.2-2.src.rpm (of course, URL of the .spec file is the same) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 21:57:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 17:57:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235234] Review Request: aoetools - ATA over Ethernet Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704072157.l37Lvksx024563@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aoetools - ATA over Ethernet Tools Alias: aoetools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235234 ------- Additional Comments From jima at beer.tclug.org 2007-04-07 17:57 EST ------- Yep, looks way better. The highlights from the build.log diff: -+ make -j2 -cc -Wall -O -g -o aoeping.o -c aoeping.c ++ make -j2 'CFLAGS=-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic' +cc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -o aoeping.o -c aoeping.c -cc -Wall -O -g -o linux.o -c linux.c -cc -Wall -O -g -o aoeping aoeping.o linux.o +cc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -o linux.o -c linux.c +cc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -o aoeping aoeping.o linux.o You get the idea. Fairly obvious, but here are the new spec/SRPM: http://beer.tclug.org/fedora-extras/aoetools/aoetools.spec http://beer.tclug.org/fedora-extras/aoetools/aoetools-14-2.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 22:13:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 18:13:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235236] Review Request: vblade - Virtual EtherDrive (R) blade daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704072213.l37MDaXx024877@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vblade - Virtual EtherDrive (R) blade daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235236 ------- Additional Comments From jima at beer.tclug.org 2007-04-07 18:13 EST ------- As cweyl found in this package's sibling review (aoetools, BZ#235234), the Fedora compiler flags weren't being honored, so I've released the following update: http://beer.tclug.org/fedora-extras/vblade/vblade.spec http://beer.tclug.org/fedora-extras/vblade/vblade-14-2.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 22:29:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 18:29:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704072229.l37MTmS9025269@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command Alias: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-04-07 18:29 EST ------- I have a segfault. In the backtrace I remove personal information and replace it with xx.xx... or xx:xx... Added a new hash_hostTraffic entry [00:07:CB:0B:30:E6///4][idx=3019] DEBUG: free(85b86f0) @ util.c:2755 Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread -1314272368 (LWP 29298)] 0x01007f4b in strlen () from /lib/libc.so.6 (gdb) bt #0 0x01007f4b in strlen () from /lib/libc.so.6 #1 0x00fd9732 in _IO_vfprintf_internal (s=0xb1a984cc, format=0x27117c "(%s/%s/%s) -> (%s/%s/%s) routed by [idx=%d/%s/%s/%s]", ap=) at vfprintf.c:1560 #2 0x0107df01 in ___vsnprintf_chk ( s=0xb1a99648 "(00:0F:1F:xx:xx:96/82.67.xx.xx/xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) -> (/82.67.xx.xx/82.67.xx.xx) routed by [idx=149712984//freebox sa:xx:xx:xx/", maxlen=1024, flags=1, slen=1024, format=0x27117c "(%s/%s/%s) -> (%s/%s/%s) routed by [idx=%d/%s/%s/%s]", args=0xb1a99ba0 "??\b??\b??b??\b??b??bXp?bjp?b?p?b\001") at vsnprintf_chk.c:65 #3 0x0025c40c in traceEvent (eventTraceLevel=3, file=0x271862 "pbuf.c", line=611, format=0x27117c "(%s/%s/%s) -> (%s/%s/%s) routed by [idx=%d/%s/%s/%s]") at util.c:2722 #4 0x0023d49f in processIpPkt (bp=0xb1a9a2ae "E?, h=0xb1a9c320, length=106, ether_src=0xb1a9a224 "", ether_dst=0xb1a9a21e "", actualDeviceId=0, vlanId=65535) at pbuf.c:611 #5 0x0024344e in processPacket (_deviceId=0x0, h=0xb1a9c320, p=0xb1a9a2a0 "") at pbuf.c:3665 #6 0x00247083 in queuePacket (_deviceId=0x0, h=0xb1a9c320, p=0x85191ea "") at pbuf.c:2446 #7 0x009ee4e7 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libpcap.so.0.9 #8 0x009ee957 in pcap_dispatch () from /usr/lib/libpcap.so.0.9 #9 0x002392de in pcapDispatch (_i=0x0) at ntop.c:106 #10 0x002032db in start_thread (arg=0xb1a9cb90) at pthread_create.c:296 #11 0x0106a0fe in clone () from /lib/libc.so.6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 22:34:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 18:34:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704072234.l37MYNJd025361@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command Alias: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-04-07 18:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #99) > > I checked some of those symbols, they were in admin.c, > > or main.c and admin.c and main.c are only in ntop. This > > should really be reported upstream, this is weird.... > > Upstream claims to have fixed this. > > My rpmlint does now show any problems, but it never did on the other builds > either. Can you check and see if this clears it up for you? It clears many of the undefined-non-weak-symbol, but not all. There are still symbols from admin.c and main.c needed in the shared libs. To get those warnings, you must run rpmlint against an installed package, like rpmlint ntop And it is similar than running ldd -r /usr/lib/libntopreport-3.3.so (for undefined symbols) and ldd -r -u /usr/lib/libntopreport-3.3.so (for Unused direct dependencies, and undefined symbols) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 22:38:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 18:38:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233848] Review Request: perl-SVG-Graph - Visualize your data in Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704072238.l37MchfR025487@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SVG-Graph - Visualize your data in Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) format Alias: perl-SVG-Graph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233848 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2007-04-07 18:38 EST ------- * Sat Apr 07 2007 Alex Lancaster 0.01-4 - Add BR: perl(Statistics::Descriptive). - Add "eg" subdirectory as documentation. Spec URL: http://allele5.biol.berkeley.edu/~alex/fedora/perl-SVG-Graph.spec SRPM URL: http://allele5.biol.berkeley.edu/~alex/fedora/perl-SVG-Graph-0.01-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 22:57:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 18:57:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235588] Review Request: escape - an extensible puzzle game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704072257.l37MvWio025813@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: escape - an extensible puzzle game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235588 adam at spicenitz.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |235589 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From adam at spicenitz.org 2007-04-07 18:57 EST ------- This is mutually dependent on escape-data, also pending review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 22:57:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 18:57:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235589] Review Request: escape-data - data for the escape package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704072257.l37MvhUb025824@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: escape-data - data for the escape package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235589 adam at spicenitz.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |235588 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 23:05:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 19:05:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233848] Review Request: perl-SVG-Graph - Visualize your data in Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704072305.l37N5BDi025960@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SVG-Graph - Visualize your data in Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) format Alias: perl-SVG-Graph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233848 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2007-04-07 19:04 EST ------- * Sat Apr 07 2007 Alex Lancaster 0.01-5 - Add BR: perl(SVG), perl(Tree::DAG_Node) and versions Spec URL: http://allele5.biol.berkeley.edu/~alex/fedora/perl-SVG-Graph.spec SRPM URL: http://allele5.biol.berkeley.edu/~alex/fedora/perl-SVG-Graph-0.01-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 23:48:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 19:48:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199905] Review Request: gotmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704072348.l37NmSi0026648@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gotmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199905 ------- Additional Comments From james at lovedthanlost.net 2007-04-07 19:48 EST ------- http://dl.sf.net/gotmail/gotmail-0.8.9-1.tar.bz2 or http://easynews.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/gotmail/gotmail-0.8.9-1.tar.bz2 If you read the comment thread you can see that I incorrectly moved the source and have since corrected that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 23:53:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 19:53:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229490] Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704072353.l37Nr0Dn026701@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229490 ------- Additional Comments From maxime.carron at fedoraproject.org 2007-04-07 19:52 EST ------- up! What do i do now? What about the question in comment #25. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 7 23:58:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 19:58:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233848] Review Request: perl-SVG-Graph - Visualize your data in Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704072358.l37Nw043026767@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SVG-Graph - Visualize your data in Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) format Alias: perl-SVG-Graph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233848 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2007-04-07 19:57 EST ------- One last BuildRequires error picked up by mock build: * Sat Apr 07 2007 Alex Lancaster 0.01-6 - Fixes BR for perl(Tree::DAG_Node) Spec URL: http://allele5.biol.berkeley.edu/~alex/fedora/perl-SVG-Graph.spec SRPM URL: http://allele5.biol.berkeley.edu/~alex/fedora/perl-SVG-Graph-0.01-6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 00:10:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 20:10:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232873] Review Request: compat-guichan05 - compatibility libraries for guichan In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704080010.l380AjRL027035@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-guichan05 - compatibility libraries for guichan https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232873 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2007-04-07 20:10 EST ------- This makes sense as well, and I guess it would minimize the chance of breaking other packages. I'll have to upgrade the non-compat guichan package with the -release fix before I can submit a build for this one in order to avoid filename conflicts. Updated package without the -release %{version} fix: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/compat-guichan05.spec http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/compat-guichan05-0.5.0-3.src.rpm rpmlint now complains: compat-guichan05-devel dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/guichan-0.5/libguichan_sdl.so ../libguichan_sdl.so.0.0.0 ...but these files are provided in the base package on which -devel requires, so I don't think it's a real problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 00:20:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 20:20:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned CJK bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704080020.l380K3Nt027190@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned CJK bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 ------- Additional Comments From fangqq at gmail.com 2007-04-07 20:19 EST ------- hi Jens thank you for your sponsorship. I am following the instructions on the "Join" page, and got to the point "Install the Build-System Client Tools". My account is FangQ, I added cvsextras group, and I may need you to approve my subscription. by the way, I have three computers running different linux distros (FC6, CentOS4.4 and Ubuntu6.10). Does the Plaque system only work for FC? or can be any system running Python? I set up the .plague-client.cfg file and when I run "plague-client list_builders", it showed some error msgs, I am not sure if this is because I am not an approved user or the system problem. For the font, the provided fontconfig file allows the synergy of this bitmap font with other existing vector fonts at specific font sizes, which is a highly desired feature and make web page display very pleasing. I prefer to keep this feature by adding the fontconfig dependence (the X-Core font system still use this font in the old way). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 01:04:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 21:04:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned CJK bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704080104.l3814qs3028138@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned CJK bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 ------- Additional Comments From fangqq at gmail.com 2007-04-07 21:04 EST ------- the spec and srpm files are updated. changes of the spec file are listed here: http://wenq.org/eindex.cgi?action=history&id=wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec download url: http://wenq.org/eindex.cgi?wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec http://wenq.org/release/08src/wqy-bitmap-fonts-0.8.0-1.src.rpm this time I used rpmlint and removed all error/warning messages :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 01:10:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 21:10:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199905] Review Request: gotmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704080110.l381Ax1x028243@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gotmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199905 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-04-07 21:10 EST ------- I appologize for not being more clear. It is customary for a reporter to help the potential reviewers by providing the URLs for the spec and for the source rpm under review. I was unable to locate/download either of these. Also, James, please note that a source rpm is _mandatory_ as it has to be made public in the fedora repositories. You could even store it at sf.net if you need to, alongside with the tar.bz2. I suggest replacing http://dl.sf.net with http://downloads.sourceforge.net. It has been proved to be more reliable. After running rpmbuild -ta over the tar.bz2, rpmlint is not happy about the resulting src.rpm: W: gotmail strange-permission gotmail.spec 0600 W: gotmail setup-not-quiet W: gotmail mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 30) First one was already discussed above; second one can be silenced by adding -q to %setup; last one is triggered by usage of spaces in the first lines of the spec, but tabs in the second to fifth lines of make install. It would be nice to fix all these. Since the wiki recommends preserving time stamps, I suggest keeping the timestamp of the man page, especially since the %make step does nothing but concat (and gzip) together the manual page and the AUTHORS file. A simple "touch -r" before and after running make will fix this. Also, using INSTALL="install -p" would probably preserve the timestamp of the gotmail perl script (which does not happen now). As an additional suggestion, it would be nice to remove the extra end of lines from the end of the man page before doing the cat and add comas to the end of each line in AUTHORS, as this will improve the aspect of the final man page. With the current way of generating the page, under the 'Authors" section we get an explanation about who wrote the manual, two empty lines and after that a very long list of names without any separators between them, without an obvious link to the previous paragraph (except of the title of the section ) and without a verb. Despite a sponsor being required, here is a pre-review, in order to push things a bit forward. Please mind that my hotmail account was canceled a couple of years ago for not using it no-idea-for-how long and I have no plans to create another one, so we will need a tester to validate that the script really works and that the Requires: are correct. According to the docs included, curl is the only separate package required. All other requirements seem to be picked by rpm at build time. However I think that this aspect should be tested, too. GOOD - rpmlint checks : see above for source rpm; no output for the binary rpm - package meets naming guidelines; However the first comments refer to Epoch=1; as far as I can see, this has disappeared from this version and I am perfectly happy so, but is Epoch=0 really intended, given comments #14 to #16? - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPL ) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream (see above comments about the src.rpm not being supplied), sha1sum: adae68b51f8866eef5670f9f257d34675315d307 gotmail-0.8.9-1.tar.bz2 - the package actually bundles a Perl script included as such in the final rpm, so no compiling involved; the make step only creates a man page - no locales - not relocatable - owns all files/directories that it creates, does not take ownership of foreign files/dirs - no duplicate files - permissions ok (modulo the spec file!) - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - not a GUI, so no need for .desktop file - no static, .pc, .la files - no scriptlets needed SHOULD - builds in mock/devel/x86_64 - does not segfault when run without any arguments and a valid config file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 02:14:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 22:14:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199905] Review Request: gotmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704080214.l382E3rK028981@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gotmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199905 ------- Additional Comments From james at lovedthanlost.net 2007-04-07 22:13 EST ------- The src.rpm is in Sourceforge as is the spec file. Sorry I should have made that clearer myself. Try here: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/gotmail/gotmail-0.8.9-4.src.rpm http://downloads.sourceforge.net/gotmail/gotmail.spec All of the changes you've mentioned above have been made. I believe I have fixed the permissions problem also. Where to from here? Thanks for your feedback. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 05:35:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 01:35:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229154] Review Request: konwert - Converter of character encodings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704080535.l385ZqWH032486@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: konwert - Converter of character encodings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229154 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-08 01:35 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=151926) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=151926&action=view) -11 spec file (some fixes added) Well, as this is a NEEDSPONSOR ticket, I do a full review for this package. For -10: * Timestamps - Well, actually 'INSTALL="install -p"' in %install stage does nothing, as all files installed in "INSTALL" macro are modified beforhand during the build stage. However, there are many files under %{_datadir}/%{name}, of which the timestamps should be kept as they are not modified during build stage. This should be done by modifying Makefile directly. * Lang file - All _documentation_ other than in English should be marked as %%lang(...). The spec file attached should fix all the issues I mentioned above. Please this the attached. If you agree with my spec file, I can say okay for this package. Then: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora Extras package review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed&namedcmd=mtasaka-review-noone NOTE: FE-NEW blockers are now not complete. Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 05:38:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 01:38:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227946] Review Request: stgit - StGIT provides similar functionality to Quilt on top of GIT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704080538.l385cIAh032587@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stgit - StGIT provides similar functionality to Quilt on top of GIT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227946 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |williams at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-04 11:52 EST ------- *** Bug 235211 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-08 01:38 EST ------- I will review this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 05:51:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 01:51:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225253] Merge Review: apr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704080551.l385pR3I000395@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: apr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225253 ------- Additional Comments From jeremy at hinegardner.org 2007-04-08 01:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) Thanks for the changes. Everything looks good to except for (10) > > > 10. missed a .la file in apr-devel. This should be removed > > This is part of the build interface and cannot be removed. Accoding to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. Accordingly I cannot give final approval until this is addressed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 05:55:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 01:55:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225254] Merge Review: apr-util In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704080555.l385teMZ000485@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: apr-util https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225254 ------- Additional Comments From jeremy at hinegardner.org 2007-04-08 01:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) Thanks for the changes. Everything is good except for (7) > > E: apr-util use-of-RPM_SOURCE_DIR > > This is not prohibited by packaging guidelines, see f-m@ flamewar. Understood, since the spec does not write to RPM_SOURCE_DIR then it is ok. > > 7. .la files exist and must be removed > > The .la file is part of the defined build interface for this package. According to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. Accordingly I cannot give final approval until this is addressed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 06:00:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 02:00:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232873] Review Request: compat-guichan05 - compatibility libraries for guichan In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704080600.l3860iK2000556@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-guichan05 - compatibility libraries for guichan https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232873 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-08 02:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > This makes sense as well, and I guess it would minimize the chance of breaking > other packages. I'll have to upgrade the non-compat guichan package with the > -release fix before I can submit a build for this one in order to avoid filename > conflicts. > Correct. MUST: ===== * rpmlint output is: E: compat-guichan05 obsolete-not-provided guichan E: compat-guichan05-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib W: compat-guichan05-devel dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/guichan-0.5/libguichan_sdl.so ../libguichan_sdl.so.0.0.0 W: compat-guichan05-devel dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/guichan-0.5/libguichan.so ../libguichan.so.0.0.0 W: compat-guichan05-devel dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/guichan-0.5/libguichan_allegro.so ../libguichan_allegro.so.0.0.0 W: compat-guichan05-devel dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/guichan-0.5/libguichan_glut.so ../libguichan_glut.so.0.0.0 W: compat-guichan05-devel dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/guichan-0.5/libguichan_opengl.so ../libguichan_opengl.so.0.0.0 These can all be ignored * Package and spec file named appropriately * Packaged according to packaging guidelines * License ok * spec file is legible and in Am. English. * Source matches upstream * Compiles and builds on devel x86_64 * BR: ok * No locales * ldconfig correctly run for shared libraries * Not relocatable * Package owns / or requires all dirs * No duplicate files & Permissions * %clean & macro usage OK * Contains code only * %doc does not affect runtime, and isn't large enough to warrent a sub package * -devel package as needed * no .desktop file required Could fix ========= * Why instead off: %dir %{_libdir}/guichan-0.5 %{_libdir}/guichan-0.5/libguichan.so %{_libdir}/guichan-0.5/libguichan_allegro.so %{_libdir}/guichan-0.5/libguichan_glut.so %{_libdir}/guichan-0.5/libguichan_opengl.so %{_libdir}/guichan-0.5/libguichan_sdl.so not just write: %{_libdir}/guichan-0.5 ? this would also be consistent with how you handle the .h files Approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 06:09:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 02:09:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234436] Review Request: glchess - GlChess, a 3d Chess game using OpenGL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704080609.l3869r30000744@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glchess - GlChess, a 3d Chess game using OpenGL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234436 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-08 02:09 EST ------- Hans, if you have some time (if you are busy, it is okay) I would appreciate it if you put some comments about #ifdef macro in header files for the HippoDraw review request (bug 208034) I am currently reviewing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 06:43:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 02:43:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704080643.l386haIG001184@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208034 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-08 02:43 EST ------- Mamoru asked me to look at the #ifdef stuff, but while doing so I also stumbled over this: (In reply to comment #14) > * %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/hippoApp.png > Installing image files under %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor needs > icon cache updating (check: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ) > Using capitals in icon file names is not allowed according to the freedesktop.org icon naming standard, please choose and use an all lowercase name. (In reply to comment #26) > * Desktop file > -------------------------------------------------- > Categories=Science;DataVisualization; > -------------------------------------------------- > - Category "DataVisualization" is not valid (please check comment 25) > - Category "Science" is valid, so this can be left as is. > However, currenly no HippoDraw entry appear in my GNOME menu. > Please check: > /etc/xdg/menus/applications.menu > and add a category which can be found in the menu file above > so that HippoDraw entry can appear on GNOME menu. > Yes that might work, but the correct way todo this is to write desktop files which follow the spec. According to the spec there are 2 kinda categories: Main categories and Additional categories. For the Categories filed in a desktop file you should select one Main Category and as many additional as propriate, see: http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html I'll get back to the #ifdef stuff later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 06:44:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 02:44:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234436] Review Request: glchess - GlChess, a 3d Chess game using OpenGL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704080644.l386i6Dj001212@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glchess - GlChess, a 3d Chess game using OpenGL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234436 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-08 02:44 EST ------- Thanks for the review! Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 07:08:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 03:08:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226407] Merge Review: sendmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704080708.l3878Bps001568@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sendmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226407 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2007-04-08 03:08 EST ------- Providing the manpages means that 'rpm -qf /usr/share/man/man1/mailq.1.gz' etc. will return a meaningful result. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 07:28:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 03:28:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227946] Review Request: stgit - StGIT provides similar functionality to Quilt on top of GIT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704080728.l387SwkT002004@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stgit - StGIT provides similar functionality to Quilt on top of GIT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227946 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-08 03:28 EST ------- Well, for 0.12-1.fc7: * executable permission vs shebang ------------------------------------------ stgbashpromt.sh is a contributed file that is meant to be sourced, so the missing shebang shouldn't be a problem. ------------------------------------------ - Your explanation means that this shell script should not have executable permission. * Source0 - It seems 0.12.1 is released so please update. I will recheck this when you update source tarball to the newest. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 08:30:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 04:30:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704080830.l388Ufe4002050@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208034 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-08 04:30 EST ------- About the header files, #ifdef HAVE_XXXX and including config.h Header files document / publish interfaces. The first thing todo is to make a divide between internal interfaces (iow interfaces between parts of HippoDraw) and external interfaces. Then you should only install external interfaces, iow interfaces meant to be used by other party apps / libraries into /usr/include. Then where-ever possible the header files installed into /usr/include should not contain any #ifdef HAVE_XXX code, if they do, maybe the contain a mix between internal and external interfaces. If that is the case try to split the header file. Having #ifdef HAVE_XXXX macros in public header files is bad, as that means that different compilations of the same version of HippoDraw may be ABI incompatible, which should be avoided if at all possible. Last when the number of #ifdef HAVE_XXX lines in public header files is reduced the a minimum, change them to #ifdef HIPPODRAW_WITH_XXX, and create a hippodraw_conf.h with only the #ifdef HIPPODRAW_WITH_XXX defines in it, and include that from the header files who need the #ifdef HIPPODRAW_WITH_XXX defines. This last step is necessary because we don't want a generic filename like config.h in the headerfile-name space, nor a header file with very generic and often conflicting defines like HAVE_XXX. What happens when an app uses 2 libraries with config.h, which config.h gets included? And if they both get included, because not -Ixxx is used, but #include , then what if one defines HAVE_FOO 0 and the other as HAVE_FOO 1, as they were build with different BR's? To avoid such a mess in general autoheader files should not be installed, and thus public headers should not depend on them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 09:06:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 05:06:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226407] Merge Review: sendmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704080906.l38963P0004474@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sendmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226407 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-04-08 05:05 EST ------- Uhm. For me a meaningfull result would be that that file isn't provided by any package. A file provide is useful if other packages may depend on it (like %_sbindir/sendmail), but in my opinion it would be better if the package didn't own the alternative symlinks when possible. Not to mention that, for other reduced functionality MTA like esmtp those man pages and the binaries are in the alternate system, even when they don't do anything, so I think it is even more wrong to provide them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 09:57:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 05:57:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225253] Merge Review: apr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704080957.l389vG69007176@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: apr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225253 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-04-08 05:57 EST ------- Jeremy, you're wrong. There ARE cases, where you NEED a .la file (e.g. neon, ImageMagick just to name a few, to avoid breakings of e.g. rpm or convert). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 09:57:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 05:57:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225254] Merge Review: apr-util In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704080957.l389vdse007197@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: apr-util https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225254 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-04-08 05:57 EST ------- Jeremy, you're wrong. There ARE cases, where you NEED a .la file (e.g. neon, ImageMagick just to name a few, to avoid breakings of e.g. rpm or convert). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 09:59:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 05:59:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225253] Merge Review: apr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704080959.l389xrdV007241@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: apr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225253 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-04-08 05:59 EST ------- And if Joe says .la is needed, we IMHO really should trust him (he maintains neon package and knows how to handle .la files, because rpm depends on neon and you can't simply drop the .la file there, too). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 10:00:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 06:00:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225254] Merge Review: apr-util In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704081000.l38A09Cj007269@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: apr-util https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225254 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-04-08 05:59 EST ------- And if Joe says .la is needed, we IMHO really should trust him (he maintains neon package and knows how to handle .la files, because rpm depends on neon and you can't simply drop the .la file there, too). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 10:21:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 06:21:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235456] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-advmultiselect - Element for HTML_QuickForm that emulate a multi-select In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704081021.l38AL30l007687@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-advmultiselect - Element for HTML_QuickForm that emulate a multi-select https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235456 ------- Additional Comments From sebastien.prudhomme at gmail.com 2007-04-08 06:21 EST ------- New SRPM (build with mock): http://www.espritdesims.info/fedora/php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-advmultiselect-1.3.1-2.fc6.src.rpm Spec file now based on default template provided with rpmdevtools -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 11:08:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 07:08:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225691] Merge Review: dhcp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704081108.l38B81s6008301@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: dhcp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225691 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-04-08 07:07 EST ------- Good job. It is right for the patches now. I have a remark on the release-by-ifup patch, maybe it would be better not to hardcode /var in /var/run/..., but allow to override /var with something like localstatedir. Even if ISC releases are infrequent, it is better to have those patches submitted upstream. Also if upstream release are infrequent, you may want to coordinate with other big distros for non-fedora specific patches. Now more on the packaging itself: Issues: W: dhcp strange-permission linux.dbus-example 0775 W: dhcp strange-permission dhcpd-conf-to-ldap 0775 W: dhcp strange-permission linux 0775 This should be fixed if possible. If it is really the case, you can fix the following W: dhcp mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 11, tab: line 324) W: dhcp wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/dhcp-3.0.5/contrib/ms2isc/readme.txt W: dhcp wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/dhcp-3.0.5/contrib/ms2isc/Registry.perlmodule W: dhcp wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/dhcp-3.0.5/contrib/ms2isc/ms2isc.pl This may be fixed by sed -i -e 's/\r//' .... W: dhclient summary-ended-with-dot Provides the dhclient ISC DHCP client daemon and dhclient-script . Just remove the dot W: dhcp-devel spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man3/omshell.3.gz W: dhcp-devel spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man3/dhcpctl.3.gz W: dhcp-devel spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man3/omapi.3.gz You can fix this like how you do for other man pages. W: libdhcp4client-devel no-dependency-on libdhcp4client I guess this should be fixed E: dhclient obsolete-not-provided dhcpcd Certainly the Provides could be the next version after obsoletion Suggestions: * use wildcards for man patches to catch no compression and other compression modes, like %attr(0644,root,root) %{_mandir}/man1/omshell.1* * In the patch name, don't use %{version}, but instead hardcode the current version when the patch was added, it serves an historical purpose like that. * prefix Source files with simple names with dhcp- to disambiguate from other files in the SOURCE dir (in my opinion this is relevant for README.ldap linux.dbus-example linux Makefile.dist). * your scriptlets seem right to me but I suggest using the standard scriptlets, if only for consistency http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets?action=show&redirect=ScriptletSnippets#head-97754e2c646616c5f6222f0cfc6923c60765133e Pros of the standard scriptlets may be - using paths for /sbin/service and in the corresponding requires makes it more robust with regard with package rename/split/merge... - exit 0 is not very pretty Not a big deal anyway. * I think that messing with files in %prep when it is not to fix issues with upstream bad packaging (like CVS dirs, executable source files) is not right, therefore I think that # Ensure we don't pick up Perl as a dependency from the scripts and modules # in the contrib directory (we copy this to /usr/share/doc in the final # package). %{__chmod} -x contrib/3.0b1-lease-convert %{__chmod} -x contrib/dhcpd-conf-to-ldap %{__cp} -p contrib/ms2isc/Registry.pm contrib/ms2isc/Registry.perlmodule %{__rm} -f contrib/ms2isc/Registry.pm should be in %install. Moreover I don't like to modify the original dirs when it is only to cope with fedora specific stuff. You may not find it right, but I would have done: rm -rf __fedora_contrib mkdir __fedora_contrib cp -a contrib __fedora_contrib %{__chmod} -x __fedora_contrib/contrib/3.0b1-lease-convert %{__chmod} -x __fedora_contrib/contrib/dhcpd-conf-to-ldap %{__cp} -p __fedora_contrib/contrib/ms2isc/Registry.pm contrib/ms2isc/Registry.perlmodule %{__rm} -f __fedora_contrib/contrib/ms2isc/Registry.pm (as a side note the cp followed by a rm should better be a mv in my opinion). And then in %doc, use %doc __fedora_contrib/contrib * Unless I am wrong rpm spec variables substitution happens before anything else so the following is simpler and works too: %{__sed} 's/@DHCP_VERSION@/%{version}/' < %SOURCE5 > libdhcp4client.pc I don't comment on the rpmlint warning and errors that are ignorable in my opinion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 11:23:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 07:23:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225907] Merge Review: iptraf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704081123.l38BNT4U008590@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: iptraf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225907 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|mmaslano at redhat.com |dan at danny.cz Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2007-04-08 07:23 EST ------- Looks good now, APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 11:25:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 07:25:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235526] Review Request: python-xattr - Extended attributes library wrapper for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704081125.l38BPAV9008651@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-xattr - Extended attributes library wrapper for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235526 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|163776 | OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 11:25:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 07:25:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235527] Review Request: python-libacl - POSIX.1e ACLs library wrapper for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704081125.l38BPJ46008671@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-libacl - POSIX.1e ACLs library wrapper for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235527 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|163776 | OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 11:39:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 07:39:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704081139.l38BdvfF008936@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208034 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-08 07:39 EST ------- Thank you for a good explanation, Hans. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 12:04:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 08:04:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228186] Review Request: gsm - Shared libraries for GSM speech compressor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704081204.l38C4r7t009958@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gsm - Shared libraries for GSM speech compressor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228186 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-04-08 08:04 EST ------- "sox" in Core is built --with-gsm and contains a copy of gsm "linphone" in Extras contains a copy of gsm-1.0.10 [...] @ John: * Files in gsm-devel are not writable by owner. chmod u+w needed * Static library should be deleted from -devel, summary and description. * The patch is out-of-date and needs an update. It creates libgsm.so.1.0.10 but this is libgsm.so.1.0.12. Suggest you add a %check section that makes sure this doesn't happen for future patch-levels. --- gsm.spec.orig 2007-02-11 04:46:37.000000000 +0100 +++ gsm.spec 2007-04-08 14:06:13.000000000 +0200 @@ -45,6 +45,9 @@ %{__ln_s} -f toast %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/untoast %{__ln_s} -f toast %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/tcat +%check +[ -f %{_libdir}/libgsm.so.%{version} ] + %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig * The %install section uses a few hardcoded paths that should be replaced with macros. * %mandir in %files section is %doc automatically. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 12:08:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 08:08:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234826] Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704081208.l38C8LFH010073@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234826 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gauret at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2007-04-08 08:08 EST ------- By the way, there's a typo in the %build section : it's not "%{?smp_mflags}", it's "%{?_smp_mflags}". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 12:21:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 08:21:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228186] Review Request: gsm - Shared libraries for GSM speech compressor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704081221.l38CL1Qw010324@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gsm - Shared libraries for GSM speech compressor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228186 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|182235 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-04-08 08:20 EST ------- Removing from FE-Legal tracker since this code is in the distribution multiple times. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 13:25:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 09:25:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199905] Review Request: gotmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704081325.l38DPrjc013011@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gotmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199905 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-04-08 09:25 EST ------- Thank you for your efforts, James, but there still are some problems: The spec from comment #36 says release 4 but the last Changelog entry is for release 3. This is again the same type of error as seen by comment #4. Please also note that it would be wise for the changelog entry to reflect the actual changes. Generic descriptions ("changes to spec for fedora extras") are completely useless to someone who wishes to know if a specific release should be used/updated etc. In my opinions explanations like "Modify makefile to preserve timestamps", "Modify the list of authors in order to obtain a better man page" would have been more appropiate. rpmlint on the src.rpm from comment #36 still complains about permissions: W: gotmail strange-permission gotmail.spec 0600 W: gotmail strange-permission gotmail-0.8.9.tar.bz2 0600 I wonder hou you missed these, since I assume that you do verify the src.rpm using rpmlint before uploading it to sf.net. Maybe your version of rpmlint is not uptodate ? Best option would be to use the one from FE, or even the one in cvs because it has some small patches which have not been included in the released version. The time preserving problem is not fixed either, as you can see from a list of the files included in the generated rpm: [wolfy at wolfy64 result]$ rpm -qlv -p gotmail-0.8.9-4.noarch.rpm|grep Apr -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 46409 Apr 8 15:42 /usr/bin/gotmail drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Apr 8 15:42 /usr/share/doc/gotmail-0.8.9 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 24580 Apr 8 05:00 /usr/share/doc/gotmail-0.8.9/ChangeLog -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 346 Apr 8 05:00 /usr/share/doc/gotmail-0.8.9/NEWS -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1682 Apr 8 05:00 /usr/share/doc/gotmail-0.8.9/PRESSRELEASE -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3271 Apr 8 15:42 /usr/share/man/man1/gotmail.1.gz [wolfy at wolfy64 result]$ date Sun Apr 8 15:44:38 EEST 2007 One can notice that the application itself, as well as the man page have the current time (15:42), not the one from packaging the tar.bz2 (5:00) Given the fact that you seem to be the upstream maintainer, I strongly suggest to decide what modifications to perform via the tar.bz2 (which would be seen by anyone downloading the source from sf.net) and what you can/should do via the spec file. It is indeed a big plus to have the spec inside the tar, but at least until you have a correct spec, fiddling with the tar will confuse those users who retrieve the file directly from sf.net and see newer files with the same version. For instance the AUTHORS file could have remained as it was and adjust it in %make (using sed or a perl one liner), just before doing the cat which gives the final man. And anyway, if you want to have all authors listed in the man page, why not just add the content of AUTHORS to the gotmail.man file (before packing the tar) so that they can be seen by anyone who retrieves the source tar.bz2 ? Or, as an alternative, why do you modify the man page, and not just include both the man and the AUTHORS files just as they are (and are seen by whoever chooses to grab the tar and not the rpm) ? BTW, mind that Paul Cannon is listed twice in the modified man page because he is present both in gotmail.man and in the long list of authors. And leaving modesty apart, maybe your name should be listed too, as you seem to be the current maintainer. Anyway, these two are just cosmetic, feel free to ignore. WRT your question in comment #37, please see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 13:38:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 09:38:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216353] Review Request: vdr-text2skin - OSD skin plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704081338.l38DcqsP013257@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-text2skin - OSD skin plugin for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216353 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-04-08 09:38 EST ------- http://cachalot.mine.nu/6/SRPMS/vdr-text2skin.spec http://cachalot.mine.nu/6/SRPMS/vdr-text2skin-1.1-18.20051217cvs.cmn6.src.rpm - Grab potential XML parse buffer overflow fix from upstream CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 13:46:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 09:46:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234826] Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704081346.l38DkSRs013412@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234826 ------- Additional Comments From fabrice at bellet.info 2007-04-08 09:46 EST ------- Thanks for the typo Aurelien. I tried a parallel build, but the compilation failed. So until parallel build is fixed upstream, it is probably better IMO to disable it in the spec file. New SPEC: http://fr2.rpmfind.net/pub/bellet/review/FlightGear.spec New SRPM: http://fr2.rpmfind.net/pub/bellet/review/FlightGear-0.9.10-4.fc6.src.rpm I also fixed some duplicate BuildRequires in this new build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 15:15:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 11:15:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234835] Review Request: fgfs-Atlas - Flightgear map tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704081515.l38FF5PP015305@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fgfs-Atlas - Flightgear map tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234835 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 15:16:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 11:16:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234831] Review Request: fgfs-base - FlightGear base scenery and data files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704081516.l38FGqc1015345@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fgfs-base - FlightGear base scenery and data files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234831 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 15:20:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 11:20:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235376] Review Request: ocsinventory-ipdiscover - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704081520.l38FKTvH015450@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocsinventory-ipdiscover - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235376 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 15:23:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 11:23:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235573] Review Request: websec - Web page monitoring software with highlighting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704081523.l38FNn0C015568@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: websec - Web page monitoring software with highlighting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235573 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 15:26:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 11:26:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185262] Review Request: kchmviewer - CHM viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704081526.l38FQSLu015646@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kchmviewer - CHM viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185262 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 15:51:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 11:51:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192436] Review Request: xorg-x11-server-Xgl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704081551.l38Fp8tk016125@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-server-Xgl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192436 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium steven at silverorange.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |steven at silverorange.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 17:16:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 13:16:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233848] Review Request: perl-SVG-Graph - Visualize your data in Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704081716.l38HGwkA018583@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SVG-Graph - Visualize your data in Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) format Alias: perl-SVG-Graph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233848 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-08 13:16 EST ------- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 17:33:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 13:33:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235234] Review Request: aoetools - ATA over Ethernet Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704081733.l38HX5ht019384@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aoetools - ATA over Ethernet Tools Alias: aoetools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235234 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-08 13:33 EST ------- There is a devnodes.txt that's included with the distribution that you may also want to stick in %doc + source files match upstream: 592f9f031796b4f0b90166a8cd5f9e30 aoetools-14.tar.gz 592f9f031796b4f0b90166a8cd5f9e30 ../aoetools-14.tar.gz package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license field matches the actual license. + license is open source-compatible. (GPL) License text included in package. + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. + %clean is present. + package installs properly + debuginfo package looks complete. + rpmlint is silent. + final provides and requires are sane: ** aoetools-14-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm == rpmlint == provides aoetools = 14-1.fc6 == requires /bin/bash /bin/sh libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) ** aoetools-debuginfo-14-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm == rpmlint == provides aoetools-debuginfo = 14-1.fc6 == requires O %check is not present -- no tests defined, however + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets present. + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. + no headers. + no pkgconfig files. + no libtool .la droppings. + not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 17:34:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 13:34:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234826] Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704081734.l38HY1kA019437@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234826 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-08 13:33 EST ------- Removing needsponsor blocker as Fabrice has been sponsored now. Bernard / Aurelien, feel free to review this (hint hint). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 17:33:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 13:33:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235234] Review Request: aoetools - ATA over Ethernet Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704081733.l38HXqgJ019426@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aoetools - ATA over Ethernet Tools Alias: aoetools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235234 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 17:46:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 13:46:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234717] Review Request: python-spambayes - Bayesian anti-spam filter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704081746.l38HkXSN019759@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-spambayes - Bayesian anti-spam filter Alias: spambayes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234717 ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at fedoraproject.org 2007-04-08 13:46 EST ------- The package looks good to me, but I cannot assign the package to my self. Shouldn't the package block FE_NEW? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 17:51:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 13:51:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235636] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235636 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: musuruan at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.webalice.it/musuruan/RPMS/reviews/pipepanic.spec SRPM URL: http://www.webalice.it/musuruan/RPMS/reviews/pipepanic-0.1.3-1.src.rpm Description: Pipepanic is a pipe connecting game using libSDL that is playable on Linux PCs and the Sharp Zaurus. Connect as many different shaped pipes together as possible within the time given. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 17:51:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 13:51:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230802] Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704081751.l38HprkK019881@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks Alias: perl-Callback https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230802 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Alias| |perl-Callback ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-08 13:51 EST ------- While cpanspec does an excellent job creating a base specfile, it still needs some tweaks: * the license tag should be corrected * due to the impending perl/perl-devel split, you should buildrequires perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 17:52:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 13:52:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235636] Review Request: pipepanic - A pipe connecting game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704081752.l38HqXvu019906@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pipepanic - A pipe connecting game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235636 musuruan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 17:54:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 13:54:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235456] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-advmultiselect - Element for HTML_QuickForm that emulate a multi-select In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704081754.l38Hse7t019962@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-advmultiselect - Element for HTML_QuickForm that emulate a multi-select https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235456 ------- Additional Comments From sebastien.prudhomme at gmail.com 2007-04-08 13:54 EST ------- New SRPM: http://www.espritdesims.info/fedora/php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-advmultiselect-1.3.1-3.src.rpm Some suggestions by people of #fedora-devel-fr IRC channel (thanks guys!) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 18:00:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 14:00:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235236] Review Request: vblade - Virtual EtherDrive (R) blade daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704081800.l38I0qTf020073@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vblade - Virtual EtherDrive (R) blade daemon Alias: vblade https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235236 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Alias| |vblade Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-08 14:00 EST ------- Ok, as a storage geek in a previous (and maybe future) life, I'm finding this pretty cool :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 18:17:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 14:17:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235236] Review Request: vblade - Virtual EtherDrive (R) blade daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704081817.l38IH193020422@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vblade - Virtual EtherDrive (R) blade daemon Alias: vblade https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235236 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 18:16:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 14:16:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235236] Review Request: vblade - Virtual EtherDrive (R) blade daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704081816.l38IGw6V020405@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vblade - Virtual EtherDrive (R) blade daemon Alias: vblade https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235236 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-08 14:16 EST ------- There is a contrib directory -- but as it's a source patch, it's probably not something to stick in %doc. Not that it is, I'm just saying. :) + source files match upstream: c5c7ed7b859d6d74575dd9facd82e2a1 vblade-14.tgz c5c7ed7b859d6d74575dd9facd82e2a1 rpms/vblade/vblade-14.tgz + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license field matches the actual license. + license is open source-compatible. (GPL) License text included. + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate (as tweaked :) ) + %clean is present. + package installs properly + debuginfo package looks complete. + rpmlint is silent. + final provides and requires are sane: ** vblade-14-2.fc6.x86_64.rpm == rpmlint == provides config(vblade) = 14-2.fc6 vblade = 14-2.fc6 == requires /bin/sh /sbin/chkconfig /sbin/service config(vblade) = 14-2.fc6 libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) ** vblade-debuginfo-14-2.fc6.x86_64.rpm == rpmlint == provides vblade-debuginfo = 14-2.fc6 == requires O no %check -- but no tests either. + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + scriptlets look sane. + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. + no headers. + no pkgconfig files. + no libtool .la droppings. + not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 18:39:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 14:39:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201502] Review Request: php-pear-PhpDocumentor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704081839.l38Id7ED021042@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PhpDocumentor Alias: phpDocumentor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201502 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-08 14:39 EST ------- Setting fedora-review => + You should be able to toggle 'fedora-cvs' to ? and import/branch now :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 18:39:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 14:39:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235637] New: Review Request: smstools - Send and receive short messages through GSM modems Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235637 Summary: Review Request: smstools - Send and receive short messages through GSM modems Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: andreas at bawue.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/smstools/smstools.spec SRPM URL: http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/smstools/smstools-3.0.6-1.src.rpm Description: The SMS Server Tools are made to send and receive short messages through GSM modems. It supports easy file interfaces and it can run external programs for automatic actions. rpmlint is showing several warnings and errors: rpmlint /home/andreas/fedora/redhat/RPMS/i386/smstools-3.0.6-1.i386.rpm W: smstools conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/logrotate.d/smstools E: smstools non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/sms/failed 0750 E: smstools non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/sms/checked 0750 E: smstools non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/sms/outgoing 0750 E: smstools non-readable /etc/smsd.conf 0600 E: smstools non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/sms/sent 0750 E: smstools non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/sms/incoming 0750 E: smstools non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/sms 0750 These errors should be ignored as the access restrictions are used to prevent unauthorized access to the spool-dirs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 19:31:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 15:31:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235637] Review Request: smstools - Send and receive short messages through GSM modems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704081931.l38JVUVL022592@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smstools - Send and receive short messages through GSM modems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235637 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-04-08 15:31 EST ------- Initial review, full one later (+ assignment to myself, in the meanwhile, others feel free to chime in) if I can get this to work with hardware I have around: (In reply to comment #0) > These errors should be ignored as the access restrictions are used to prevent > unauthorized access to the spool-dirs. * Um, "conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/logrotate.d/smstools" doesn't quite fall into this category, should be fixed. * Build fails if _smp_mflags is unset, a fix is not to use the toplevel Makefile but to do explicit "make -C src ..." * Init script (and logrotate file) would be better called "smsd", as that's what it starts. * Init script exit code on usage error is not LSB compliant, should be 2. See /usr/share/rpmdevtools/template.init for other related cleanup and action alias suggestions. * smsd.conf contains very environment and hardware dependent settings, perhaps it would be a better idea to ship a very dummy one containing just a comment or two about where to find examples and further info, and preferably make the service startup fail with a descriptive message (see eg. the vdr package). The currently installed one is not an appropriate default IMO, two GSM modems hardcoded to specific serial ports with hardcoded init AT commands etc. * Many docs and examples (and even the default config) contain hardcoded /usr/local paths, should be fixed to reflect actual installed locations. * Would be better to run as a dedicated low privileged user than root, doesn't look like that would be hard to implement. Device permissions would be the hardest part, IMO a quick doc about setting them for the devices in use would be good enough. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 20:05:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 16:05:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232873] Review Request: compat-guichan05 - compatibility libraries for guichan In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704082005.l38K5f8i024054@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-guichan05 - compatibility libraries for guichan https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232873 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2007-04-08 16:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Could fix > ========= > * Why instead off: > %dir %{_libdir}/guichan-0.5 > %{_libdir}/guichan-0.5/libguichan.so > %{_libdir}/guichan-0.5/libguichan_allegro.so > %{_libdir}/guichan-0.5/libguichan_glut.so > %{_libdir}/guichan-0.5/libguichan_opengl.so > %{_libdir}/guichan-0.5/libguichan_sdl.so > not just write: > %{_libdir}/guichan-0.5 > ? this would also be consistent with how you handle the .h files The set of libraries that guichan provides may (and has) vary from release to release depending on the whims of upstream. Listing each library explicitly makes it easier to detect when the list of libraries changes, so that I can check any dependencies for breakage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 20:05:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 16:05:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232873] Review Request: compat-guichan05 - compatibility libraries for guichan In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704082005.l38K5wh7024084@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-guichan05 - compatibility libraries for guichan https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232873 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2007-04-08 16:05 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: compat-guichan05 Short Description: compatibility libraries for older guichan versions Owners: wart at kobold.org Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 20:16:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 16:16:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234831] Review Request: fgfs-base - FlightGear base scenery and data files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704082016.l38KGH12024462@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fgfs-base - FlightGear base scenery and data files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234831 fabrice at bellet.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fabrice at bellet.info 2007-04-08 16:16 EST ------- fgfs-base has been successfully build. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 20:16:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 16:16:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234826] Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704082016.l38KGIAG024478@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234826 Bug 234826 depends on bug 234831, which changed state. Bug 234831 Summary: Review Request: fgfs-base - FlightGear base scenery and data files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234831 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 20:20:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 16:20:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234835] Review Request: fgfs-Atlas - Flightgear map tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704082020.l38KKd8w024625@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fgfs-Atlas - Flightgear map tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234835 fabrice at bellet.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fabrice at bellet.info 2007-04-08 16:20 EST ------- fgfs-Atlas has been successfully build. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 20:21:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 16:21:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232873] Review Request: compat-guichan05 - compatibility libraries for guichan In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704082021.l38KL5qD024673@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-guichan05 - compatibility libraries for guichan https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232873 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 20:38:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 16:38:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235234] Review Request: aoetools - ATA over Ethernet Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704082038.l38KcQrC025018@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aoetools - ATA over Ethernet Tools Alias: aoetools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235234 jima at beer.tclug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora_requires_release_note | |?, fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jima at beer.tclug.org 2007-04-08 16:38 EST ------- Thanks for the review! Requesting CVS Admin attention to get the module created. Also, maybe we should mention the AoE userspace support in the release notes? No idea. Flagging it, someone smarter than me can make that determination. I'll include the devnotes.txt in the copy I upload. Thanks again! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 20:40:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 16:40:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235236] Review Request: vblade - Virtual EtherDrive (R) blade daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704082040.l38Ke6gI025111@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vblade - Virtual EtherDrive (R) blade daemon Alias: vblade https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235236 jima at beer.tclug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora_requires_release_note | |?, fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jima at beer.tclug.org 2007-04-08 16:39 EST ------- Did someone get the license plate of that reviewer? Came outta nowhere... Thanks for the speedy review. Flagging CVS and release notes (again, having this in Fedora might be worth noting). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 20:42:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 16:42:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235234] Review Request: aoetools - ATA over Ethernet Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704082042.l38Kg57K025170@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aoetools - ATA over Ethernet Tools Alias: aoetools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235234 ------- Additional Comments From jima at beer.tclug.org 2007-04-08 16:42 EST ------- Oops, I'm supposed to use this here template, huh? New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: aoetools Short Description: ATA over Ethernet Tools Owners: jima at beer.tclug.org Branches: FC-5, FC-6, devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 20:43:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 16:43:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235236] Review Request: vblade - Virtual EtherDrive (R) blade daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704082043.l38Khb51025240@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vblade - Virtual EtherDrive (R) blade daemon Alias: vblade https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235236 ------- Additional Comments From jima at beer.tclug.org 2007-04-08 16:43 EST ------- The template might help, sorry: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: vblade Short Description: Virtual EtherDrive (R) blade daemon Owners: jima at beer.tclug.org Branches: FC-5, FC-6, devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 21:00:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 17:00:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225622] Merge Review: boost In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704082100.l38L0wUL025614@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: boost https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225622 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-04-08 17:00 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=151940) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=151940&action=view) spec file diff implementing merge review proposals -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 21:01:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 17:01:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235637] Review Request: smstools - Send and receive short messages through GSM modems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704082101.l38L1OTM025646@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smstools - Send and receive short messages through GSM modems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235637 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-04-08 17:01 EST ------- * file /usr/bin/sendsms from install of smstools-3.0.6-1 conflicts with file from package gnokii-0.6.14-2.fc6 * On startup: Starting smsd: /usr/sbin/smsd: invalid option -- b * Init script's $OPTIONS value, possibly other configurable definitions should be moved to a /etc/sysconfig/smsd snippet * /usr/bin/sendsms tries to write to /var/spool/sms/outgoing which doesn't work as a normal user due to dir permissions * There are user/group smsd.conf parameters that cause dropping of privileges to those, but appears the privs are dropped before opening the device so it's not that useful (just reading the code, untested) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 21:04:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 17:04:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225622] Merge Review: boost In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704082104.l38L4DZi025697@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: boost https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225622 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-04-08 17:04 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=151941) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=151941&action=view) remove compile flags, some optionally, and soname -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 21:08:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 17:08:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225622] Merge Review: boost In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704082108.l38L8bop025802@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: boost https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225622 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-04-08 17:08 EST ------- My patch replaces boost-gcc-tools.patch and boost-cxxflags-debug.patch. I think that it could be submitted upstream. Otherwise among the changes in the spec, I renamed devel-static to static-devel to shut up rpmlint. I readded Obsoletes, they are right. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 8 22:31:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 18:31:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233848] Review Request: perl-SVG-Graph - Visualize your data in Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704082231.l38MVdeU027526@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SVG-Graph - Visualize your data in Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) format Alias: perl-SVG-Graph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233848 alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2007-04-08 18:31 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-SVG-Graph Short Description: Visualize data in Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) format Owners: alexl at users.sourceforge.net Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 00:36:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 20:36:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225253] Merge Review: apr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704090036.l390aqrR030855@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: apr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225253 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-04-08 20:36 EST ------- Re: comment #7, Joe, could you clarify/justify that with a few more details? I can understand keeping the .la files around for static linking, and if that is the case, they should be packaged in -static along with the static libs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 01:38:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 21:38:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229826] Review Request: Chmsee - a GTK2 CHM viewer based on chmlib and gecko In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704090138.l391cCbw031947@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Chmsee - a GTK2 CHM viewer based on chmlib and gecko https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229826 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From bbbush.yuan at gmail.com 2007-04-08 21:38 EST ------- Now test2 is out. It now uses pkg-config to configure firefox-gtkmozembed include and libs path. Since on fedora, firefox-gtkmozembed.pc doesn't contain -R/usr/lib/firefox-2.0.0.3/ so RPATH is not used when linking chmsee. Since /usr/lib/firefox-2.0.0.3/ is not in ldconfig path, the compiled chmsee binary cannot run without setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH. run "ldd /usr/bin/chmsee" will output [yuan at mstar ~]$ ldd /usr/bin/chmsee |grep "not found" libgtkembedmoz.so => not found libxpcom.so => not found libxpcom_core.so => not found It is suggested to make a wrapper "chmsee" to call the binary (rename it chmsee.bin or so), then in the wrapper we can search for firefox install directory to avoid rebuild everytime firefox has an update. I think it may introduce security issue if anyone make another wrapper to load different libgtkmozembed.so. Any opinion? I can see the same thing on FE package lifera, but they use fixed LD_LIBRARY_PATH (that is, they need to rebuild when firefox has an update). Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 01:46:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 21:46:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221884] Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704090146.l391kS2R032154@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221884 ------- Additional Comments From andy at andrewprice.me.uk 2007-04-08 21:46 EST ------- Sorry this took so long. I've been doing a lot of refactoring and stability work on pybackpack recently. No shiny new features or big performance fixes I'm afraid, mostly reworking the code to make it easier to maintain. But nonetheless I've made a new release (0.5.0): Spec, SRPM and RPM: http://andrewprice.me.uk/projects/pybackpack/download/pybackpack.spec http://andrewprice.me.uk/projects/pybackpack/download/pybackpack-0.5.0-1.src.rpm http://andrewprice.me.uk/projects/pybackpack/download/pybackpack-0.5.0-1.noarch.rpm You may not see much difference between the previous version and this version on the surface but development should start to pick up momentum now that the codebase is starting to become sane. I'm going to be crazy busy with university stuff until the middle of June but I'll try to keep the bug fixes coming and keep you posted at least once a month. Thanks again for your time. I appreciate the feedback even if the package is still far from Fedora-worthy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 02:43:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 22:43:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233946] Review Request: secondlife - The Second Life client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704090243.l392h5Yb001735@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: secondlife - The Second Life client Alias: secondlife https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233946 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |secondlife -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 02:43:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 22:43:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229098] Review Request: openjpeg - JPEG 2000 codec library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704090243.l392hnWC001819@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openjpeg - JPEG 2000 codec library Alias: openjpeg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229098 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |openjpeg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 02:44:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 22:44:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231809] Review Request: xmlrpc-epi - An implementation of the xmlrpc protocol in C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704090244.l392iHwd001843@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlrpc-epi - An implementation of the xmlrpc protocol in C Alias: xmlrpc-epi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231809 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |xmlrpc-epi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 02:58:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 22:58:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234812] Review Request: tcpreplay - Replay captured network traffic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704090258.l392wWZ5002236@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcpreplay - Replay captured network traffic Alias: tcpreplay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234812 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |tcpreplay -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 04:05:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 00:05:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221769] Review Request: libcgi - CGI easy as C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704090405.l3945Hvs003894@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcgi - CGI easy as C https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221769 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-09 00:05 EST ------- Sorry but would like to go by way written in comment4. Moreover you can ask approval for same to include -static in Fedora on Fedora-maintainers list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 04:06:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 00:06:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225284] Merge Review: aspell-sr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704090406.l3946Ddm003940@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: aspell-sr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225284 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-09 00:06 EST ------- what problem?? Can you specify what problem you found? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 04:10:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 00:10:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231758] Review Request: perl-Workflow - Simple, flexible system to implement workflows In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704090410.l394ADE8004048@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Workflow - Simple, flexible system to implement workflows Alias: perl-Workflow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231758 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-09 00:10 EST ------- Is perl-Class-Fields and perl(SPOPS) is in Fedora or its submitted for review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 04:42:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 00:42:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234862] Review Request: perl-Mail-Box - Manage a mailbox, a folder with messages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704090442.l394gnAt004760@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Box - Manage a mailbox, a folder with messages Alias: perl-Mail-Box https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234862 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-09 00:42 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url f6b0da296a582e06880f93f166f57bb7 Mail-Box-2.070.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test disabled because of Test::Harness + Provides: perl(Mail::Box) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Box::Collection) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Box::Dbx) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Box::Dbx::Message) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Box::Dir) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Box::Dir::Message) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Box::FastScalar) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Box::File) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Box::File::Message) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Box::IMAP4) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Box::IMAP4::Head) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Box::IMAP4::Message) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Box::Identity) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Box::Locker) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Box::Locker::DotLock) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Box::Locker::Flock) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Box::Locker::Multi) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Box::Locker::Mutt) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Box::Locker::NFS) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Box::Locker::POSIX) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Box::MH) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Box::MH::Index) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Box::MH::Labels) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Box::MH::Message) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Box::Maildir) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Box::Maildir::Message) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Box::Manage::User) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Box::Manager) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Box::Mbox) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Box::Mbox::Message) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Box::Message) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Box::Message::Destructed) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Box::Net) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Box::Net::Message) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Box::POP3) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Box::POP3::Message) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Box::Parser) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Box::Parser::Perl) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Box::Search) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Box::Search::Grep) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Box::Search::SpamAssassin) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Box::Thread::Manager) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Box::Thread::Node) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Box::Tie) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Box::Tie::ARRAY) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Box::Tie::HASH) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::Body) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::Body::Construct) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::Body::Delayed) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::Body::File) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::Body::Lines) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::Body::Multipart) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::Body::Nested) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::Body::String) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::Construct) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::Construct::Bounce) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::Construct::Build) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::Construct::Forward) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::Construct::Read) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::Construct::Rebuild) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::Construct::Reply) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::Construct::Text) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::Convert) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::Convert::Html) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::Convert::HtmlFormatPS) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::Convert::HtmlFormatText) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::Convert::MailInternet) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::Convert::MimeEntity) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::Convert::TextAutoformat) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::Dummy) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::Field) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::Field::AddrGroup) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::Field::Address) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::Field::Addresses) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::Field::Attribute) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::Field::Fast) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::Field::Flex) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::Field::Full) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::Field::Structured) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::Field::URIs) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::Field::Unstructured) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::Head) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::Head::Complete) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::Head::Delayed) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::Head::FieldGroup) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::Head::ListGroup) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::Head::Partial) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::Head::ResentGroup) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::Head::SpamGroup) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::Head::Subset) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::Part) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::Replace::MailHeader) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::Replace::MailInternet) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::TransferEnc) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::TransferEnc::Base64) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::TransferEnc::Binary) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::TransferEnc::EightBit) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::TransferEnc::QuotedPrint) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::TransferEnc::SevenBit) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Message::Wrapper::SpamAssassin) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Reporter) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Server) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Server::IMAP4) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Server::IMAP4::Fetch) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Server::IMAP4::List) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Server::IMAP4::Search) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Transport) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Transport::Exim) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Transport::IMAP4) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Transport::Mailx) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Transport::POP3) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Transport::Qmail) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Transport::Receive) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Transport::SMTP) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Transport::Send) = 2.070 perl(Mail::Transport::Sendmail) = 2.070 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 08:46:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 04:46:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229826] Review Request: Chmsee - a GTK2 CHM viewer based on chmlib and gecko In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704090846.l398kCZK015404@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Chmsee - a GTK2 CHM viewer based on chmlib and gecko https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229826 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-04-09 04:46 EST ------- Seems like the bug is in firefox-gtkmozembed.pc? then it should be fixed there. I'd say use LD_LIBRARY_PATH in the interim or wait for the issue to be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 08:59:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 04:59:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229826] Review Request: Chmsee - a GTK2 CHM viewer based on chmlib and gecko In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704090859.l398xRRh016412@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Chmsee - a GTK2 CHM viewer based on chmlib and gecko https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229826 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-09 04:59 EST ------- The software which uses gecko engine usually sets rpath on the binary to be installed by itself. So IMO introducing rpath to chmsee is a reasonable solution. And every time firefox is updated, the software which uses gecho engine always has to be rebuilded anyway because gecho engine usually becomes incompatible -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 09:19:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 05:19:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229826] Review Request: Chmsee - a GTK2 CHM viewer based on chmlib and gecko In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704090919.l399JGN7018046@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Chmsee - a GTK2 CHM viewer based on chmlib and gecko https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229826 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-04-09 05:19 EST ------- Liferea not just sets LD_LIBRARY_PATH, it also hardcodes the Firefox home dir into the binary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 10:15:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 06:15:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235573] Review Request: websec - Web page monitoring software with highlighting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091015.l39AFiBb021373@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: websec - Web page monitoring software with highlighting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235573 fedora at leemhuis.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 10:45:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 06:45:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235456] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-advmultiselect - Element for HTML_QuickForm that emulate a multi-select In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091045.l39AjWGx022278@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-advmultiselect - Element for HTML_QuickForm that emulate a multi-select https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235456 ------- Additional Comments From sebastien.prudhomme at gmail.com 2007-04-09 06:45 EST ------- New SRPM: http://www.espritdesims.info/fedora/php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-advmultiselect-1.3.1-4.src.rpm Some rpmlint errors fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 10:48:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 06:48:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235234] Review Request: aoetools - ATA over Ethernet Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091048.l39AmOOX022353@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aoetools - ATA over Ethernet Tools Alias: aoetools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235234 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 10:50:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 06:50:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235236] Review Request: vblade - Virtual EtherDrive (R) blade daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091050.l39AocBG022456@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vblade - Virtual EtherDrive (R) blade daemon Alias: vblade https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235236 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 10:54:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 06:54:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233848] Review Request: perl-SVG-Graph - Visualize your data in Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091054.l39Askrf022609@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SVG-Graph - Visualize your data in Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) format Alias: perl-SVG-Graph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233848 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 10:55:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 06:55:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235660] New: Review Request: Thunderbird 2 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235660 Summary: Review Request: Thunderbird 2 Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: daace at gmx.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Mozilla Thunderbird 2 is now at RC-state Are the any chances to have it in Fedora 7? FTP-URI is http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/thunderbird/nightly/2.0.0.0-candidates/rc1/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 11:04:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 07:04:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235660] Review Request: Thunderbird 2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091104.l39B4J0r023095@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Thunderbird 2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235660 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Package Review |thunderbird CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | ------- Additional Comments From jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org 2007-04-09 07:04 EST ------- No. This isn't a review request either. If you'd like to file an RFE against Thunderbird, please just use a regular bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 11:56:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 07:56:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225253] Merge Review: apr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091156.l39Bu1Jf025260@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: apr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225253 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-04-09 07:55 EST ------- I noticed the # Trim exported dependencies section, but it only touched *.la files and *-config, but not *.pc, this patch effectively does that for the included pkgconfig file (which can/should be upstreamed): --- apr-1.2.8/apr.pc.in.private 2007-04-09 06:50:37.000000000 -0500 +++ apr-1.2.8/apr.pc.in 2007-04-09 06:52:21.000000000 -0500 @@ -8,5 +8,6 @@ Name: APR Description: The Apache Portable Runtime library Version: @APR_DOTTED_VERSION@ -Libs: -L${libdir} -l at APR_LIBNAME@ @EXTRA_LIBS@ +Libs: -L${libdir} -l at APR_LIBNAME@ +Libs.private: @EXTRA_LIBS@ Cflags: ${CPPFLAGS} @EXTRA_CFLAGS@ -I${includedir} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 12:08:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 08:08:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225254] Merge Review: apr-util In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091208.l39C8W8v025634@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: apr-util https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225254 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-04-09 08:08 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=151985) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=151985&action=view) move static-only libs to Libs.private section similar to pkgconfig patch provided for apr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 12:22:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 08:22:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235550] Review Request: mysql-gui-tools - Graphical Tools for mysql In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091222.l39CMiUR025973@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-gui-tools - Graphical Tools for mysql https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235550 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-04-09 08:22 EST ------- ive renamed mysql is confusing here and it seems they use the rxx to increment releases. mysql use a modified gtksourceview and it wont build against whats in Fedora . newt is not used. there are some additional tools that use them but my efforts to port them to use lua 5.1 allowed things to build but fail horribly at runtime. my calls for help have fallen on deaf ears so for now im only packaging what works. this newer version fixes many bugs in the current releases. I cant point the sourceurl at one of the mirrors or the package fails horribly not knowing what the source package is java is used in mysql-migration-tool but it also requires lua. mysql has also said that they wont support the current alpha release of mysql-workbench. they are re-writing it to use cairo instead of lua. Theses additional tools will be added latter as they work. i did enable java and it builds in mock on fc6 and f7 these tools can be run remotely and access SRPM: http://ausil.us/packages/mysql-gui-tools-5.0r11-2.al3.src.rpm SPEC: http://ausil.us/packages/mysql-gui-tools.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 13:01:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 09:01:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226189] Merge Review: neon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091301.l39D1Ydf027892@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: neon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226189 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-04-09 09:01 EST ------- *.pc patch forthcoming to move static lib deps to Libs.private (similar to recent patches for apr/apr-util) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 13:05:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 09:05:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232816] Review Request: libnetfilter_log - Netfilter logging userspace library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091305.l39D5WED028332@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnetfilter_log - Netfilter logging userspace library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232816 i at stingr.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 13:06:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 09:06:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226189] Merge Review: neon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091306.l39D6pk0028451@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: neon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226189 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-04-09 09:06 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=151989) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=151989&action=view) neon.pc: move static-only libs to Libs.private section -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 13:38:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 09:38:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226407] Merge Review: sendmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091338.l39DcIrK030959@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sendmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226407 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2007-04-09 09:38 EST ------- I think that if it's OK to provide %_sbindir/sendmail then it should be OK to provide the alternatives-based files too for consistency. Whilst there may well be other packages with dependencies on %_sbindir/sendmail, which isn't going to apply in the cases of manpages, the provides for the manpages cou;d still be useful for someone using say repoquery to find a manpage for a file so as to discover the file format etc. However, I don't see this as a blocker either way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 13:49:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 09:49:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229533] Review Request: perl-Template-GD - GD plugin(s) for the Template Toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091349.l39DnNT2031544@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Template-GD - GD plugin(s) for the Template Toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229533 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-09 09:49 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Template-GD Short Description: GD plugin(s) for the Template Toolkit Owners: tcallawa at redhat.com Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 13:50:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 09:50:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232160] Review Request: ruby-gnome2 - A ruby binding of libgnome/libgnomeui-2.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091350.l39DoA5V031611@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-gnome2 - A ruby binding of libgnome/libgnomeui-2.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232160 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-09 09:50 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 13:59:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 09:59:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234861] Review Request: perl-Mail-Transport-Dbx - Parse Outlook Express mailboxe In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091359.l39Dxf5b032120@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Transport-Dbx - Parse Outlook Express mailboxe https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234861 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-09 09:59 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Mail-Transport-Dbx Short Description: Parse Outlook Express mailboxes Owners: tcallawa at redhat.com Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 14:00:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 10:00:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234862] Review Request: perl-Mail-Box - Manage a mailbox, a folder with messages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091400.l39E0Oua032166@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Box - Manage a mailbox, a folder with messages Alias: perl-Mail-Box https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234862 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-09 10:00 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Mail-Box Short Description: Manage a mailbox, a folder with messages Owners: tcallawa at redhat.com Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 14:05:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 10:05:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234858] Review Request: perl-User-Identity - Maintains info about a physical person In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091405.l39E5k7r032561@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-User-Identity - Maintains info about a physical person Alias: perl-User-Identity https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234858 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-09 10:05 EST ------- Built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 14:05:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 10:05:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234862] Review Request: perl-Mail-Box - Manage a mailbox, a folder with messages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091405.l39E5vmV032582@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Box - Manage a mailbox, a folder with messages Alias: perl-Mail-Box https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234862 Bug 234862 depends on bug 234858, which changed state. Bug 234858 Summary: Review Request: perl-User-Identity - Maintains info about a physical person https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234858 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 14:09:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 10:09:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234860] Review Request: perl-Mail-IMAPClient - An IMAP Client API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091409.l39E96lb000343@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-IMAPClient - An IMAP Client API Alias: perl-Mail-IMAPClient https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234860 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-09 10:08 EST ------- New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Net-Domain-TLD-1.65-1.fc7.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Net-Domain-TLD.spec Handles rpmlint warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 14:14:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 10:14:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234859] Review Request: perl-Object-Realize-Later - Delayed creation of objects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091414.l39EE82u000649@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Object-Realize-Later - Delayed creation of objects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234859 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-09 10:14 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Object-Realize-Later Short Description: Delayed creation of objects Owners: tcallawa at redhat.com Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 14:15:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 10:15:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230806] Review Request: tasks - To-do list In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091415.l39EFWa4000754@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tasks - To-do list https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230806 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 14:21:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 10:21:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232160] Review Request: ruby-gnome2 - A ruby binding of libgnome/libgnomeui-2.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091421.l39ELYZh001122@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-gnome2 - A ruby binding of libgnome/libgnomeui-2.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232160 ------- Additional Comments From allisson at gmail.com 2007-04-09 10:21 EST ------- Update package: Spec URL: http://fedora.allisson.eti.br/ruby-gnome2/ruby-gnome2.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.allisson.eti.br/ruby-gnome2/ruby-gnome2-0.16.0-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 14:25:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 10:25:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229533] Review Request: perl-Template-GD - GD plugin(s) for the Template Toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091425.l39EPx1X001559@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Template-GD - GD plugin(s) for the Template Toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229533 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 14:27:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 10:27:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234859] Review Request: perl-Object-Realize-Later - Delayed creation of objects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091427.l39ERXKO001745@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Object-Realize-Later - Delayed creation of objects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234859 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 14:29:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 10:29:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234861] Review Request: perl-Mail-Transport-Dbx - Parse Outlook Express mailboxe In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091429.l39ET7l4001897@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Transport-Dbx - Parse Outlook Express mailboxe https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234861 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 14:30:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 10:30:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234862] Review Request: perl-Mail-Box - Manage a mailbox, a folder with messages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091430.l39EUJrU001983@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Box - Manage a mailbox, a folder with messages Alias: perl-Mail-Box https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234862 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 14:45:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 10:45:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235672] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235672 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: eugene_beast at mail.ru QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://217.117.89.14/zope3/zope3.spec SRPM URL: http://217.117.89.14/zope3/zope3-3.3.1-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: Zope 3 web application server framework Zope 3 is a redesign of Zope 2 and improves the Zope development experience through the use of a "component architecture". For the time being, Fedora Extras already has a Zope 2 package. I've tried to make this `zope3' package to be 100% stackable with the existing `zope' package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 14:48:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 10:48:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231758] Review Request: perl-Workflow - Simple, flexible system to implement workflows In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091448.l39EmXKS003424@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Workflow - Simple, flexible system to implement workflows Alias: perl-Workflow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231758 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-09 10:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Is perl-Class-Fields and perl(SPOPS) is in Fedora or its submitted for review? Neither are. perl-SPOPS would depend on perl-Class-Fields, and perl-Class-Fields fails its own tests currently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 14:54:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 10:54:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091454.l39EsKwA003806@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-09 10:54 EST ------- Does someone know what is happening on PerceptualDiff review request (bug 223657)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 14:59:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 10:59:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225927] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-discovery In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091459.l39Exrpb004372@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-discovery https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225927 ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-04-09 10:59 EST ------- * verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs: [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 brew]$ rpm -qp --provides /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/jakarta-commons-discovery-0.4-2jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm jakarta-commons-discovery-0.4.jar.so()(64bit) jakarta-commons-discovery = 1:0.4-2jpp.1.fc7 [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 brew]$ rpm -qp --requires /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/jakarta-commons-discovery-0.4-2jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm /bin/sh /bin/sh jakarta-commons-logging >= 0:1.0.4 java-gcj-compat java-gcj-compat libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgcj_bc.so.1()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) librt.so.1()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 brew]$ rpm -qp --provides /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/jakarta-commons-discovery-debuginfo-0.4-2jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm jakarta-commons-discovery-0.4.jar.so.debug()(64bit) jakarta-commons-discovery-debuginfo = 1:0.4-2jpp.1.fc7 [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 brew]$ rpm -qp --requires /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/jakarta-commons-discovery-debuginfo-0.4-2jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 brew]$ rpm -qp --provides /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/jakarta-commons-discovery-javadoc-0.4-2jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm jakarta-commons-discovery-javadoc = 1:0.4-2jpp.1.fc7 [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 brew]$ rpm -qp --requires /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/jakarta-commons-discovery-javadoc-0.4-2jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm /bin/ln /bin/rm /bin/rm rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 * run rpmlint on the binary RPMs: [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 brew]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/jakarta-commons-discovery*rpm W: jakarta-commons-discovery non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java W: jakarta-commons-discovery-javadoc non-standard-group Development/Documentation These are OK All looks good. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 15:00:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 11:00:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233850] Review Request: freepops - POP3 interface to webmails In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091500.l39F0QQ9004469@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freepops - POP3 interface to webmails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233850 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-09 11:00 EST ------- Well, for 0.4-2: * Timestamps - Please keep timestamps on files which are not created or modified during build stage as much as possible (for this package, png/svg/xml files). The following method works for this package. --------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="%{__install} -p" --------------------------------------------------- * Duplicate entry - mockbuild says: --------------------------------------------------- + /bin/mkdir -p /var/tmp/tasks-0.4-2.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/doc/tasks-0.4 + cp -pr AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING NEWS README /var/tmp/tasks-0.4-2.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/doc/tasks-0.4 + exit 0 warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/tasks/tasks-ui.xml Requires(interp): /bin/sh /bin/sh Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 --------------------------------------------------- Note: the entry --------------------------------------------------- %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) foo/ --------------------------------------------------- (where foo is a directory) means the directory foo/ itself and all the files/directories/etc under foo/, while --------------------------------------------------- %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %dir foo/ --------------------------------------------------- means the directory foo/ only. Well, ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora Extras package review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed&namedcmd=mtasaka-review-noone NOTE: FE-NEW blockers are now not complete. Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 15:00:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 11:00:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235234] Review Request: aoetools - ATA over Ethernet Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091500.l39F0ZY4004487@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aoetools - ATA over Ethernet Tools Alias: aoetools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235234 jima at beer.tclug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jima at beer.tclug.org 2007-04-09 11:00 EST ------- Oops. Turns out there was a new release (15) four days after my original R&D, but two days before I submitted this review request. Only minor bugfixes, which had the net result of eliminating one of my patches and reducing the other. I'm pushing the updated version as 15-1. In other news, 15-1 builds successfully in the official buildsys, so I'm closing this review out. Thanks again, Chris! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 15:01:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 11:01:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225927] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-discovery In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091501.l39F1BV3004585@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-discovery https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225927 pcheung at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-04-09 11:01 EST ------- Marking fedora-review flag accordingly -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 15:01:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 11:01:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233850] Review Request: freepops - POP3 interface to webmails In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091501.l39F1SDa004616@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freepops - POP3 interface to webmails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233850 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-09 11:01 EST ------- Well, very sorry... Please ignore my last comment... It was addressed for another review request..... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 15:02:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 11:02:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230806] Review Request: tasks - To-do list In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091502.l39F23bf004678@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tasks - To-do list https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230806 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-09 11:01 EST ------- Well, for 0.4-2: * Timestamps - Please keep timestamps on files which are not created or modified during build stage as much as possible (for this package, png/svg/xml files). The following method works for this package. --------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="%{__install} -p" --------------------------------------------------- * Duplicate entry - mockbuild says: --------------------------------------------------- + /bin/mkdir -p /var/tmp/tasks-0.4-2.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/doc/tasks-0.4 + cp -pr AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING NEWS README /var/tmp/tasks-0.4-2.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/doc/tasks-0.4 + exit 0 warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/tasks/tasks-ui.xml Requires(interp): /bin/sh /bin/sh Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 --------------------------------------------------- Note: the entry --------------------------------------------------- %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) foo/ --------------------------------------------------- (where foo is a directory) means the directory foo/ itself and all the files/directories/etc under foo/, while --------------------------------------------------- %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %dir foo/ --------------------------------------------------- means the directory foo/ only. Well, ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora Extras package review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed&namedcmd=mtasaka-review-noone NOTE: FE-NEW blockers are now not complete. Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 15:07:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 11:07:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232160] Review Request: ruby-gnome2 - A ruby binding of libgnome/libgnomeui-2.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091507.l39F70bc005312@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-gnome2 - A ruby binding of libgnome/libgnomeui-2.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232160 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-09 11:06 EST ------- Before checking ruby-gnome again: E: ruby-gdkpixbuf2 devel-dependency ruby-cairo-devel E: ruby-pango devel-dependency ruby-cairo-devel E: ruby-poppler devel-dependency ruby-cairo-devel E: ruby-rsvg devel-dependency ruby-cairo-devel Would you fix these error first and resubmit? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 15:08:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 11:08:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233850] Review Request: freepops - POP3 interface to webmails In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091508.l39F8jWS005445@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freepops - POP3 interface to webmails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233850 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-09 11:08 EST ------- Anyway I will review this (again please ignore my comment #3) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 15:13:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 11:13:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091513.l39FDOKr005911@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-04-09 11:13 EST ------- I suppose him to be away from a fedora machine, as i understood... I will take a look to the review this week... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 15:13:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 11:13:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235672] Review Request: zope3 - Zope 3 web application server framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091513.l39FDkjd005962@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zope3 - Zope 3 web application server framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235672 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- |framework -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 15:25:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 11:25:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235236] Review Request: vblade - Virtual EtherDrive (R) blade daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091525.l39FPROd006912@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vblade - Virtual EtherDrive (R) blade daemon Alias: vblade https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235236 jima at beer.tclug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jima at beer.tclug.org 2007-04-09 11:25 EST ------- vblade-14-2 built in devel just fine; closing this review out. Thanks again! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 15:27:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 11:27:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229533] Review Request: perl-Template-GD - GD plugin(s) for the Template Toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091527.l39FRrIK007097@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Template-GD - GD plugin(s) for the Template Toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229533 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-09 11:27 EST ------- Built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 15:36:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 11:36:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235236] Review Request: vblade - Virtual EtherDrive (R) blade daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091536.l39FarGw008043@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vblade - Virtual EtherDrive (R) blade daemon Alias: vblade https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235236 jima at beer.tclug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | ------- Additional Comments From jima at beer.tclug.org 2007-04-09 11:36 EST ------- Oops, Firefox caching seemed to reset fedora?cvs to ?; unsetting. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 15:37:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 11:37:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235234] Review Request: aoetools - ATA over Ethernet Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091537.l39Fbw3Z008139@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aoetools - ATA over Ethernet Tools Alias: aoetools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235234 jima at beer.tclug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | ------- Additional Comments From jima at beer.tclug.org 2007-04-09 11:37 EST ------- Oops, Firefox caching seemed to reset fedora?cvs to ?; unsetting. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 15:39:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 11:39:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234859] Review Request: perl-Object-Realize-Later - Delayed creation of objects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091539.l39FdTNd008244@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Object-Realize-Later - Delayed creation of objects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234859 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-09 11:39 EST ------- Built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 15:39:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 11:39:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234862] Review Request: perl-Mail-Box - Manage a mailbox, a folder with messages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091539.l39FdUku008256@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Box - Manage a mailbox, a folder with messages Alias: perl-Mail-Box https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234862 Bug 234862 depends on bug 234859, which changed state. Bug 234859 Summary: Review Request: perl-Object-Realize-Later - Delayed creation of objects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234859 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 15:40:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 11:40:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235679] New: Review Request: weechat - Portable, fast, light and extensible IRC client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235679 Summary: Review Request: weechat - Portable, fast, light and extensible IRC client Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: i at stingr.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://palevo.sgu.ru/mockbuild/6/SPECS/weechat.spec SRPM URL: http://palevo.sgu.ru/mockbuild/6/SRPMS/weechat-0.2.4-2.fc6.src.rpm Description: WeeChat (Wee Enhanced Environment for Chat) is a portable, fast, light and extensible IRC client. Everything can be done with a keyboard. It is customizable and extensible with scripts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 15:47:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 11:47:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091547.l39FlFcw009072@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 trond.danielsen at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|trond.danielsen at fedoraprojec|trond.danielsen at gmail.com |t.org | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 15:47:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 11:47:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228960] Review Request: java-1.5.0-gcj - JPackage compatibility layer for GCJ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091547.l39FlrfI009147@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.5.0-gcj - JPackage compatibility layer for GCJ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228960 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|rdieter at math.unl.edu | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 15:48:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 11:48:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233850] Review Request: freepops - POP3 interface to webmails In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091548.l39FmnZD009291@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freepops - POP3 interface to webmails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233850 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-09 11:48 EST ------- Umm... 4 months has passed since I was reviewing bug 208113 and I have completely forgotton my previous review.... Well, this is a first review of this bug. While perhaps I have not checked this package fully, I think some cleanup is needed before I can do so. For 0.2.0-4: Z. First.. * Unneeded comment - Please remove all unneeded comments.... These comments make it harder to read spec file easily. A. Description section * Source0 - Please specify the URL where we can get tarball at Source0 * Redundant BuildRequires - The following BRs are not needed because they are included in the minimal buildroot environment. ------------------------------------------------- sed ------------------------------------------------- * Pre/post stage requires for service installation - Service installation requires some %Requires(post) and so on. Please check the "Services" section of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets B. Build stage * Parallel make - Please enable parallel make support when it is possible. When it is not possible, write a note as a comment. * Fedora specific compilation flags - are not passed. --------------------------------------------------- building luay echo " building dep for luay.c" building dep for luay.c gcc -I. -I/builddir/build/BUILD/freepops-0.2.0/modules/include -O2 -g3 -Wall -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/builddir/build/BUILD/freepops-0.2.0 -I. -I/builddir/build/BUILD/freepops-0.2.0/modules/include -MM luay.c > .luay.d; ---------------------------------------------------- - where fedora specific compilation flags (can be checked by "rpm --eval %optflags" are ---------------------------------------------------- -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables ---------------------------------------------------- and this must be used. C. Install stage * Timestamps - Keep timestamps on the files which are not created or modified during build stage. ---------------------------------------------------- install -m755 %{SOURCE1} ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_initrddir}/freepopsd install -m644 %{SOURCE2} ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/freepopsd ---------------------------------------------------- Please use "install -p". D. File entry * Directory ownership - The following directories are not owned by any packages. ---------------------------------------------------- %{_datadir}/freepops/ %{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/ %{_libdir}/freepops/ ---------------------------------------------------- Note: the entry --------------------------------------------------- %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) foo/ --------------------------------------------------- (where foo is a directory) means the directory foo/ itself and all the files/directories/etc under foo/, while --------------------------------------------------- %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %dir foo/ --------------------------------------------------- means the directory foo/ only. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 16:20:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 12:20:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230738] Review Request - jwm - Very light window manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091620.l39GKAUW011540@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request - jwm - Very light window manager Alias: jwm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230738 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-09 12:19 EST ------- What is the status of this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 17:10:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 13:10:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235694] New: Review Request: s3270 - Scripted 3270 Emulator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235694 Summary: Review Request: s3270 - Scripted 3270 Emulator Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bpeck at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/bpeck/s3270/s3270.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/bpeck/s3270/s3270-3.3.5-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Complete IBM 3278/3279 emulation, TN3270E support, structured fields, color xterm emulation, highly configurable -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 17:15:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 13:15:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234861] Review Request: perl-Mail-Transport-Dbx - Parse Outlook Express mailboxe In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091715.l39HFIhn015661@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Transport-Dbx - Parse Outlook Express mailboxe https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234861 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-09 13:15 EST ------- Built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 17:15:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 13:15:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234862] Review Request: perl-Mail-Box - Manage a mailbox, a folder with messages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091715.l39HFJFk015674@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Box - Manage a mailbox, a folder with messages Alias: perl-Mail-Box https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234862 Bug 234862 depends on bug 234861, which changed state. Bug 234861 Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Transport-Dbx - Parse Outlook Express mailboxe https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234861 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 17:26:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 13:26:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232160] Review Request: ruby-gnome2 - A ruby binding of libgnome/libgnomeui-2.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091726.l39HQ91Y016600@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-gnome2 - A ruby binding of libgnome/libgnomeui-2.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232160 ------- Additional Comments From allisson at gmail.com 2007-04-09 13:26 EST ------- Update package: Spec URL: http://fedora.allisson.eti.br/ruby-gnome2/ruby-gnome2.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.allisson.eti.br/ruby-gnome2/ruby-gnome2-0.16.0-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 19:00:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 15:00:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235111] Review Request: mina - A Multipurpose Infrastructure for Network Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091900.l39J0s2G024990@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mina - A Multipurpose Infrastructure for Network Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235111 nsantos at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nsantos at redhat.com |asimon at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From nsantos at redhat.com 2007-04-09 15:00 EST ------- Updated specfile and SRPM: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/nsantos/fc7/mina.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/nsantos/fc7/mina-1.0.0-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 19:01:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 15:01:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235111] Review Request: mina - A Multipurpose Infrastructure for Network Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091901.l39J1Mwt025053@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mina - A Multipurpose Infrastructure for Network Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235111 nsantos at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 19:38:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 15:38:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704091938.l39JcjpH029126@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208034 ------- Additional Comments From paul_kunz at slac.stanford.edu 2007-04-09 15:38 EST ------- Thanks Hans, for sharing your suggestions. I understand what you mean by config.h being installed, I've been bitten by other libraries that do that. For example WCSLIB. The fixes will take more than a few days. I've already started working on it. Thanks again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 20:09:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 16:09:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232160] Review Request: ruby-gnome2 - A ruby binding of libgnome/libgnomeui-2.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704092009.l39K9p6j000638@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-gnome2 - A ruby binding of libgnome/libgnomeui-2.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232160 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-09 16:09 EST ------- Well, for -4: * Requires - Still some cleanup seems needed. Well, there are 26 subpackages and examining proper dependency is a bit hard work. I appreciate your good work. Then: ( = means okay, * means some fixes needed ). * ruby-gnome2 - Requires: ruby(glib2) seems unneeded. = ruby-atk = ruby-atk-devel = ruby-gconf2 * ruby-gdkpixbuf2 - ruby-cairo dependency should be ruby(cairo) = ruby-glib2 = ruby-glib2-devel = ruby-gnomecanvas2 = ruby-gnomeprint2 = ruby-gnomeprintui2 * ruby-gnomevfs - Why does this provide ruby(glib2)? Perhaps Requires: ruby(glib2) = %{version}-%{release}? = ruby-gtk2 * ruby-gtk2-devel - gdk-pixbuf-devel is gtk 1.0 version and should not be needed. ? ruby-gtkglext - What provides "require 'opengl'" in /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/gtkglext.rb ? IMO it is http://ruby-opengl.rubyforge.org/ . If you can submit the review request of this (ruby-opengl) soon, would you submit? If not, leave as it is for now. * ruby-gtkhtm2 - This should be ruby-gtkhtml2 = ruby-gtkmozembed = ruby-gtksourceview = ruby-libart2 = ruby-libart2-devel = ruby-libglade2 = ruby-applet2 * ruby-pango - ruby-cairo dependency should be ruby(cairo) * ruby-pango-devel - ruby-cairo-devel seems required. * ruby-poppler - ruby-cairo dependency should be ruby(cairo) (-) ruby(glib2) dependency is redundant because ruby(gtk2) requires ruby(glib2). * ruby-rsvg - ruby-cairo dependency should be ruby(cairo) (-) ruby(glib2) dependency is redundant because ruby(gdkpixbuf2) requires ruby(glib2) = ruby-vte -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 20:16:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 16:16:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235555] Review Request: transset - Simple program to toggle Translucency property In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704092016.l39KG47H001087@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: transset - Simple program to toggle Translucency property https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235555 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-04-09 16:16 EST ------- Updated spec according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL http://lemenkov.googlepages.com/transset.spec http://lemenkov.googlepages.com/transset-20040120-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 20:19:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 16:19:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704092019.l39KJ6Ef001400@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-04-09 16:19 EST ------- The patch attached to this bug would be nice to include, makes using OBEX file transfers easier to use with various Nokia devices (from the SDP service view, select "Nokia OBEX PC Suite Services" instead of "OBEX File Transfer"; the former works but the latter does nothing for me): http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129594 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 20:19:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 16:19:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235731] New: Review Request: openbsd-malloc - Alternative malloc() implementation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235731 Summary: Review Request: openbsd-malloc - Alternative malloc() implementation Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lemenkov at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://lemenkov.googlepages.com/openbsd-malloc.spec SRPM URL: http://lemenkov.googlepages.com/openbsd-malloc-0-1.src.rpm Description: This package contains experimental alternative to glibc implementation of malloc() which is prone to heap fragmentation due to use of deprecated brk() syscall; one might find it useful to reduce e.g. Firefox memory consumption (though reportedly won't work with e.g. Emacs). Use openbsd-malloc some-program to run some-program this way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 20:21:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 16:21:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233802] Review Request: python-xlib - Fully functional X client library for Python programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704092021.l39KLowY001639@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-xlib - Fully functional X client library for Python programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233802 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rdieter at math.unl.edu Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-04-09 16:21 EST ------- plate... full... but... eating as ... fast as I can... alright, I'm ready for a review now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 20:22:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 16:22:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235637] Review Request: smstools - Send and receive short messages through GSM modems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704092022.l39KMRvK001705@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smstools - Send and receive short messages through GSM modems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235637 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ville.skytta at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-04-09 16:22 EST ------- Turns out I can only send messages with hardware at hand, receiving is not supported with it. Assigning to myself anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 20:33:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 16:33:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233802] Review Request: python-xlib - Fully functional X client library for Python programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704092033.l39KXtN5002690@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-xlib - Fully functional X client library for Python programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233802 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-04-09 16:33 EST ------- sorry for the delay, this one's simple enough, and looks good. Wow, I don't recall ever actually witnesseing a 100% clean (w/o warnings) rpmlint on a package under review before either. neat. My only possible suggestion would be to split the ~660K-ish docs into a separate package (-doc), to ease the runtime weight of python-xlibs. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 20:34:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 16:34:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704092034.l39KY5GD002716@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-04-09 16:34 EST ------- OK. I'll add it to the next build. Short update: kdebluetooth builds just fine FC6 but fails miserably on -devel. (xmms-devel problem). As a result, I've yet to test the kdepin/bluez-utils patch. - Gilboa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 20:49:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 16:49:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235731] Review Request: openbsd-malloc - Alternative malloc() implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704092049.l39Kni9o004606@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openbsd-malloc - Alternative malloc() implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235731 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |peter at thecodergeek.com ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-04-09 16:49 EST ------- Please ensure that your build honors the RPM build flags by adding %{optflags} (or $RPM_OPT_FLAGS) to the gcc invocation: %build gcc -shared -fPIC %{optflags} %{SOURCE0} -o malloc.so -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 21:05:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 17:05:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232160] Review Request: ruby-gnome2 - A ruby binding of libgnome/libgnomeui-2.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704092105.l39L5Ewm006226@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-gnome2 - A ruby binding of libgnome/libgnomeui-2.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232160 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-09 17:05 EST ------- Sorry, I also have overlooked something. * ruby-gtk2-devel - rbgobject.h means that this requires ruby(glib2-devel) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 21:07:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 17:07:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235741] New: Review Request: hippo-canvas - Crossplatform canvas using cairo Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235741 Summary: Review Request: hippo-canvas - Crossplatform canvas using cairo Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: walters at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://download.mugshot.org/extras/canvas/source/hippo-canvas.spec SRPM URL: http://download.mugshot.org/extras/canvas/source/hippo-canvas-0.2.13-2.src.rpm Description: This library will be necessary for eventual packaging of the "bigboard" Mugshot sidebar. Likely in the future we will change the Mugshot package to depend on this as well. I mostly just tweaked a spec file originally written by John Palmieri. This is not my first RPM, though I do not currently maintain any Fedora packages; thus this will be my first in the new system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 21:17:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 17:17:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201077] gfs-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704092117.l39LH9bI007082@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gfs-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201077 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From katzj at redhat.com 2007-04-09 17:16 EST ------- Did this ever get built? Is it going to get built? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 21:25:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 17:25:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704092125.l39LP3er008071@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 trond.danielsen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|trond.danielsen at gmail.com |trond.danielsen at fedoraprojec | |t.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 21:39:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 17:39:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704092139.l39LdLRV009027@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-04-09 17:39 EST ------- BTW, making XMMS support build-time optional (default disabled) and/or splitting kbemusedsrv into a subpackage could be worth considering. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 21:39:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 17:39:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225984] Merge Review: lftp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704092139.l39LdYPU009074@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: lftp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225984 ------- Additional Comments From katzj at redhat.com 2007-04-09 17:39 EST ------- Also, there really shouldn't be a -devel subpackage for lftp. It does not provide an API for external things to use. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 21:45:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 17:45:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225691] Merge Review: dhcp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704092145.l39LjXmS010148@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: dhcp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225691 ------- Additional Comments From dcantrell at redhat.com 2007-04-09 17:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > Good job. It is right for the patches now. > > I have a remark on the release-by-ifup patch, maybe it would > be better not to hardcode /var in /var/run/..., but allow to > override /var with something like localstatedir. /var/run is documented in the LFS as the location for these files. There should be no reason that we need rpmbuild to provide that information at build time. Technically, I should be using /var/run/dhclient, but that's a patch for after Fedora 7. > Even if ISC releases are infrequent, it is better to have those patches > submitted upstream. Also if upstream release are infrequent, you may want > to coordinate with other big distros for non-fedora specific patches. Agreed, but I was just wanting to point out that you will likely always see a large patch set for dhcp, unfortunately. They accepted things from us 2 years ago and we have yet to see them in a new release of dhcp. However, having it accepted upstream is still an indication of at least some level of communication with the upstream developers. I am working on submitting patches we have upstream. Collaboration with other distributors is something I'd like to get to, but it's a bit disjoint at the moment. Something I'd like to improve, but I need to approach it carefully. > Now more on the packaging itself: > > Issues: > W: dhcp strange-permission linux.dbus-example 0775 > W: dhcp strange-permission dhcpd-conf-to-ldap 0775 > W: dhcp strange-permission linux 0775 > This should be fixed if possible. Done. > If it is really the case, you can fix the following > W: dhcp mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 11, tab: line 324) I'm not seeing this. > W: dhcp wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding > /usr/share/doc/dhcp-3.0.5/contrib/ms2isc/readme.txt > W: dhcp wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding > /usr/share/doc/dhcp-3.0.5/contrib/ms2isc/Registry.perlmodule > W: dhcp wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding > /usr/share/doc/dhcp-3.0.5/contrib/ms2isc/ms2isc.pl > This may be fixed by > sed -i -e 's/\r//' .... Done. > W: dhclient summary-ended-with-dot Provides the dhclient ISC DHCP client daemon > and dhclient-script . > Just remove the dot Done. > W: dhcp-devel spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man3/omshell.3.gz > W: dhcp-devel spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man3/dhcpctl.3.gz > W: dhcp-devel spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man3/omapi.3.gz > You can fix this like how you do for other man pages. Done. > W: libdhcp4client-devel no-dependency-on libdhcp4client > I guess this should be fixed Done. > E: dhclient obsolete-not-provided dhcpcd > Certainly the Provides could be the next version after obsoletion IMHO, all mention of dhcpcd should be removed from the spec file anyway. That package hasn't been around for many years. > Suggestions: > * use wildcards for man patches to catch no compression and other > compression modes, like > %attr(0644,root,root) %{_mandir}/man1/omshell.1* I don't like that. I prefer to explicitly list the files I'm including, that way I have no surprises when it comes time to rebase the package on a new release. > * In the patch name, don't use %{version}, but instead hardcode the > current version when the patch was added, it serves an historical > purpose like that. Done. > * prefix Source files with simple names with dhcp- to disambiguate > from other files in the SOURCE dir (in my opinion this is relevant for > README.ldap linux.dbus-example linux Makefile.dist). I don't like that. I prefer to keep the source file names exactly as they will appear in the source tree. No munging. > * your scriptlets seem right to me but I suggest using the standard > scriptlets, if only for consistency > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets?action=show&redirect=ScriptletSnippets#head-97754e2c646616c5f6222f0cfc6923c60765133e > > Pros of the standard scriptlets may be > - using paths for /sbin/service and in the corresponding requires makes > it more robust with regard with package rename/split/merge... Changed the scriptlets to match the packaging guidelines. > - exit 0 is not very pretty Not that it matters, but why is it not pretty? It's pointless since the shell is already doing that, but why is it not pretty? > * I think that messing with files in %prep when it is not to fix > issues with upstream bad packaging (like CVS dirs, executable source > files) is not right, therefore I think that > # Ensure we don't pick up Perl as a dependency from the scripts and modules > # in the contrib directory (we copy this to /usr/share/doc in the final > # package). > %{__chmod} -x contrib/3.0b1-lease-convert > %{__chmod} -x contrib/dhcpd-conf-to-ldap > %{__cp} -p contrib/ms2isc/Registry.pm contrib/ms2isc/Registry.perlmodule > %{__rm} -f contrib/ms2isc/Registry.pm > should be in %install. I'm not a big fan of this approach. I prefer the %prep section to be all things necessary to prepare the source tree for compilation and installation. > Moreover I don't like to modify the original dirs when it is only to > cope with fedora specific stuff. You may not find it right, but I > would have done: > > rm -rf __fedora_contrib > mkdir __fedora_contrib > cp -a contrib __fedora_contrib > %{__chmod} -x __fedora_contrib/contrib/3.0b1-lease-convert > %{__chmod} -x __fedora_contrib/contrib/dhcpd-conf-to-ldap > %{__cp} -p __fedora_contrib/contrib/ms2isc/Registry.pm > contrib/ms2isc/Registry.perlmodule > %{__rm} -f __fedora_contrib/contrib/ms2isc/Registry.pm > > (as a side note the cp followed by a rm should better be a mv in > my opinion). Changed. > And then in %doc, use > %doc __fedora_contrib/contrib Done. > * Unless I am wrong rpm spec variables substitution happens > before anything else so the following is simpler and works too: > %{__sed} 's/@DHCP_VERSION@/%{version}/' < %SOURCE5 > libdhcp4client.pc Done. Now, I've committed these changes to CVS, but have not built a new set of packages yet. I already rebuilt dhcp today to fix a dhclient problem. I want that to land in rawhide before pushing a new dhcp out. So expect a rebuild of dhcp tomorrow to include these spec changes. For now you can look at it in CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 21:50:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 17:50:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201077] gfs-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704092150.l39LotXs011093@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gfs-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201077 ------- Additional Comments From cfeist at redhat.com 2007-04-09 17:50 EST ------- I'll try to track down what the current status is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 23:39:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 19:39:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235763] New: Review Request: windowlab - Small and Simple Amiga-like Window Manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235763 Summary: Review Request: windowlab - Small and Simple Amiga-like Window Manager Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dev at nigelj.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/windowlab.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/windowlab-1.34-1.src.rpm Description: WindowLab is a Window Manager for the X Window System. Features include click-to-focus and a simple menu/taskbar combination. WindowLab is incredibly fast and small. rpmlint on src.rpm and built rpm files are clean. I believe I have got the correct Build-Requires, sadly I don't have a mock enviroment to test with at the moment (I hope to change that soon). It is also compliant with changes made to the Packaging Guidelines announced today. n.b> The chmod a-x trick is to keep rpmlint etc happy by not having executable documentation, but technically the whole source should be extracted without executable permissions, my attempt at this failed, so I'd appreciate if someone could shed some light on to it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 23:52:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 19:52:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 219769] Package request: yamipod, gpixpod (ipod music and photo managers) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704092352.l39NqMJd018056@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package request: yamipod, gpixpod (ipod music and photo managers) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219769 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium sg266 at cornell.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 9 23:59:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 19:59:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235764] New: Review Request: perl-CGI-Ex - CGI utility suite - makes powerful application writing fun and easy Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235764 Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Ex - CGI utility suite - makes powerful application writing fun and easy Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/CGI-Ex/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-CGI-Ex-2.09-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-CGI-Ex.spec Description: CGI::Ex provides a suite of utilities to make writing CGI scripts more enjoyable. Although they can all be used separately, the main functionality of each of the modules is best represented in the CGI::Ex::App module. CGI::Ex::App takes CGI application building to the next step. CGI::Ex::App is not quite a framework (which normally includes pre-built html) instead CGI::Ex::App is an extended application flow that dramatically reduces CGI build time in most cases. It does so using as little magic as possible. See CGI::Ex::App. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 00:00:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 20:00:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235764] Review Request: perl-CGI-Ex - CGI utility suite - makes powerful application writing fun and easy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704100000.l3A00552018350@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Ex - CGI utility suite - makes powerful application writing fun and easy Alias: perl-CGI-Ex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235764 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-CGI-Ex -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 00:26:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 20:26:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235765] New: Review Request: perl-CGI-Ajax - Perl-specific system for writing Asynchronous web applications Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235765 Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Ajax - Perl-specific system for writing Asynchronous web applications Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/CGI-Ajax/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-CGI-Ajax-0.701-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-CGI-Ajax.spec Description: CGI::Ajax is an object-oriented module that provides a unique mechanism for using perl code asynchronously from javascript- enhanced HTML pages. CGI::Ajax unburdens the user from having to write extensive javascript, except for associating an exported method with a document-defined event (such as onClick, onKeyUp, etc). CGI::Ajax also mixes well with HTML containing more complex javascript. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 00:27:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 20:27:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235765] Review Request: perl-CGI-Ajax - Perl-specific system for writing Asynchronous web applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704100027.l3A0RBCW019093@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Ajax - Perl-specific system for writing Asynchronous web applications Alias: perl-CGI-Ajax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235765 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-CGI-Ajax -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 02:08:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 22:08:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231911] Review Request: jomolhari-fonts - Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704100208.l3A284GI022475@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jomolhari-fonts - Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231911 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-04-09 22:07 EST ------- Here is the review Good: + rpmlint outputs are clean + package name follows standard font package naming + spec file name follows package name + meets packaging guidelines + SIL OFL 1.0 is a recognised FOSS license + license file is included + spec file is legible and in English + md5sum matches upstream 0d03b98a7184a966815b85e7556e8bcb jomolhari-alpha003c.zip + package builds fine on fc6 i386 + no build deps + no translations + no libs + owns its directories + files list is good + clean section + consistent macro usage + package contains a free truetype font + no large documentation + no runtime %doc files + cleans buildroot before installing + package tested to work on upstream testpage Needs attention: - need to add "Requires(post)" and "Requires(postun)" for fontconfig (needed in tibetan-machine-uni-fonts too and gentium-fonts...) Otherwise the package is fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 02:19:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 22:19:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232160] Review Request: ruby-gnome2 - A ruby binding of libgnome/libgnomeui-2.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704100219.l3A2JK4l023128@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-gnome2 - A ruby binding of libgnome/libgnomeui-2.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232160 ------- Additional Comments From allisson at gmail.com 2007-04-09 22:19 EST ------- Update package: Spec URL: http://fedora.allisson.eti.br/ruby-gnome2/ruby-gnome2.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.allisson.eti.br/ruby-gnome2/ruby-gnome2-0.16.0-5.src.rpm I'm not submit review for ruby-opengl now because is rubygem only, perhaps later ;] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 02:43:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 22:43:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned CJK bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704100243.l3A2hfYW024899@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned CJK bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-04-09 22:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #30) > thank you for your sponsorship. My account is FangQ, I added cvsextras group, > and I may need you to approve my subscription. Yes, I see your request. Let me activate it when this review is complete. :) > Does the Plague system only work for FC? I have only used it on Fedora. I would expect it to work with EL4 too, but I don't know if packages for it are available anymore (ie fc3 packages). > when I run "plague-client list_builders", it showed some error msgs, I am > not sure if this is because I am not an approved user or the system problem. It works for me right now, so it may be because you're not a full contributor yet. What error do you see? BTW soon the Fedora buildsys will change to use koji in place of plague. > For the font, the provided fontconfig file allows the synergy of this bitmap > font with other existing vector fonts at specific font sizes, which is a highly > desired feature and make web page display very pleasing. I prefer to keep this > feature by adding the fontconfig dependence (the X-Core font system still use > this font in the old way). Ok, I think I was mistaken - you are right to keep it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 02:51:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 22:51:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned CJK bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704100251.l3A2pauA025462@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned CJK bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-04-09 22:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #31) > http://wenq.org/eindex.cgi?wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec It would be nice if this just displayed the .spec text file. Do you have an url for that? > http://wenq.org/release/08src/wqy-bitmap-fonts-0.8.0-1.src.rpm Please bump the release number when you make a new package to help the review. > this time I used rpmlint and removed all error/warning messages :) Good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 04:00:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 00:00:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235550] Review Request: mysql-gui-tools - Graphical Tools for mysql In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704100400.l3A40HkD029929@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-gui-tools - Graphical Tools for mysql https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235550 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-04-10 00:00 EST ------- 1. ok. 2. ok, but you now have "gtksourceview-devel, newt-devel" in BuildRequires. If it's using the internal one, those should be removed? 3. ok. ANoying that they seem to have an even more borken mirror system than sourceforge does. ;( 4. It looks like your comment was cut off there... do you need the "Requires: mysql >= 4.0" ? 5. ok. Glad that it works, although if they don't want to support it, perhaps it shouldn't be enabled? Up to you I guess. 6. ok. 7. ok. Looks good on the other packages depending on the -common package now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 04:45:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 00:45:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235731] Review Request: openbsd-malloc - Alternative malloc() implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704100445.l3A4jub5032213@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openbsd-malloc - Alternative malloc() implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235731 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-04-10 00:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Please ensure that your build honors the RPM build flags by adding %{optflags} > (or $RPM_OPT_FLAGS) to the gcc invocation: > > %build > gcc -shared -fPIC %{optflags} %{SOURCE0} -o malloc.so Done. http://lemenkov.googlepages.com/openbsd-malloc.spec http://lemenkov.googlepages.com/openbsd-malloc-0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 05:05:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 01:05:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235555] Review Request: transset - Simple program to toggle Translucency property In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704100505.l3A55OLA032655@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: transset - Simple program to toggle Translucency property https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235555 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-04-10 01:05 EST ------- Typo in cvs command fixed. http://lemenkov.googlepages.com/transset.spec http://lemenkov.googlepages.com/transset-20040120-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 05:18:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 01:18:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235763] Review Request: windowlab - Small and Simple Amiga-like Window Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704100518.l3A5I1Jr000744@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: windowlab - Small and Simple Amiga-like Window Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235763 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776, 177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 05:30:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 01:30:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235780] New: Review Request: perl-Class-Prototyped - Fast prototype-based OO programming in Perl Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235780 Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Prototyped - Fast prototype- based OO programming in Perl Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Class-Prototyped/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Class-Prototyped-1.10-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Class-Prototyped.spec Description: This package provides for efficient and simple prototype-based programming in Perl. You can provide different subroutines for each object, and also have objects inherit their behavior and state from another object. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 05:31:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 01:31:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235780] Review Request: perl-Class-Prototyped - Fast prototype-based OO programming in Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704100531.l3A5Ve4x001696@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Prototyped - Fast prototype-based OO programming in Perl Alias: Class-Prototyped https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235780 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |Class-Prototyped -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 05:50:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 01:50:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235783] New: Review Request: perl-GraphViz - Interface to the GraphViz graphing tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235783 Summary: Review Request: perl-GraphViz - Interface to the GraphViz graphing tool Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/GraphViz/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-GraphViz-2.02-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-GraphViz.spec Description: This module provides an interface to layout and image generation of directed and undirected graphs in a variety of formats (PostScript, PNG, etc.) using the "dot", "neato", "twopi", "circo" and "fdp" programs from the GraphViz project (http://www.graphviz.org/ or http://www.research.att.com/sw/tools/graphviz/). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 05:51:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 01:51:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235783] Review Request: perl-GraphViz - Interface to the GraphViz graphing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704100551.l3A5pXeT002486@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GraphViz - Interface to the GraphViz graphing tool Alias: perl-GraphViz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235783 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |235780 nThis| | Alias| |perl-GraphViz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 05:51:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 01:51:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235780] Review Request: perl-Class-Prototyped - Fast prototype-based OO programming in Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704100551.l3A5piRS002498@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Prototyped - Fast prototype-based OO programming in Perl Alias: Class-Prototyped https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235780 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |235783 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 06:01:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 02:01:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235790] New: Review Request: perl-CGI-Prototype - Create a CGI application by subclassing Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235790 Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Prototype - Create a CGI application by subclassing Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/CGI-Prototype/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-CGI-Prototype-0.9053-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-CGI-Prototype.spec Description: The core of every CGI application seems to be roughly the same: * Analyze the incoming parameters, cookies, and URLs to determine the state of the application (let's call this "dispatch"). * Based on the current state, analyze the incoming parameters to respond to any form submitted ("respond"). * From there, decide what response page should be generated, and produce it ("render"). CGI::Prototype creates a "Class::Prototyped" engine for doing all this, with the right amount of callback hooks to customize the process. Because I'm biased toward Template Toolkit for rendering HTML, I've also integrated that as my rendering engine of choice. And, being a fan of clean MVC designs, the classes become the controllers, and the templates become the views, with clean separation of responsibilities, and "CGI::Prototype" a sort of "archetypal" controller. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 06:02:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 02:02:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235780] Review Request: perl-Class-Prototyped - Fast prototype-based OO programming in Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704100602.l3A624Yd002824@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Prototyped - Fast prototype-based OO programming in Perl Alias: Class-Prototyped https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235780 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |235790 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 06:03:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 02:03:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235790] Review Request: perl-CGI-Prototype - Create a CGI application by subclassing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704100603.l3A63HjH002914@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Prototype - Create a CGI application by subclassing Alias: perl-CGI-Prototype https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235790 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-CGI-Prototype -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 06:28:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 02:28:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228450] Review Request: zhcon - A Fast Console CJK System Using FrameBuffer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704100628.l3A6St1W003668@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zhcon - A Fast Console CJK System Using FrameBuffer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228450 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-04-10 02:28 EST ------- Discussion about the setuid issue: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-security-list/2007-April/msg00004.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 06:31:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 02:31:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235802] New: Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235802 Summary: Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rayvd at bludgeon.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.bludgeon.org/~rayvd/rpms/remind/remind.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bludgeon.org/~rayvd/rpms/remind/remind-03.00.24-1.src.rpm Description: This is the remind program which is a very powerful scheduling program (different purpose than cron). I've created this package with the intent of making it part of EPEL. It is my first package however, so if it can or should be included in Fedora Extras or elsewhere, that would be fine as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 06:44:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 02:44:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228450] Review Request: zhcon - A Fast Console CJK System Using FrameBuffer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704100644.l3A6i7VL004154@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zhcon - A Fast Console CJK System Using FrameBuffer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228450 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-04-10 02:44 EST ------- A bit late now but I suggest replacing "CJK" with "Chinese". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 06:55:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 02:55:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned CJK bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704100655.l3A6tgu4004602@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned CJK bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-04-10 02:55 EST ------- I have not tried yet, but is the font better suited to Chinese than Japanese and Korean? Perhaps it would be better to replace "CJK" with "Chinese"? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 07:09:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 03:09:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235804] New: Review Request: ocamlSDL - OCaml bindings for SDL Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235804 Summary: Review Request: ocamlSDL - OCaml bindings for SDL Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dev at nigelj.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/ocamlSDL.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/ocamlSDL-0.7.2-1.src.rpm Description: Runtime (and development) libraries to allow programs written in OCaml to write to SDL (Simple DirectMedia Layer) interfaces. rpmlint: ocamlSDL-0.7.2-1.rpm: W: ocamlSDL ocaml-naming-policy-not-applied /usr/lib/ocaml/stublibs/dllsdlstub.so (I don't know if an exception can be made here, I can't find much on the problem) ocamlSDL-devel-0.7.2-1.rpm: W: ocamlSDL-devel no-documentation W: ocamlSDL-devel ocaml-naming-policy-not-applied /usr/lib/ocaml/sdl/sdlwm.cmi (1: docs are in the main package, which is strictly depended on, 2: Ditto about exception) ocamlSDL-0.7.2-1.src.rpm: Clean I believe the files are in the right place etc etc, but I have one note: One package which depends on this (which I'm putting in for Package Review later today), depends on this for building, but not for use, I'm worried that the libraries are somehow been configured statically, not sure if it's a problem with this package or the other package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 07:10:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 03:10:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235804] Review Request: ocamlSDL - OCaml bindings for SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704100710.l3A7AdfG005358@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocamlSDL - OCaml bindings for SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235804 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776, 177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 07:17:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 03:17:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235805] New: Review Request: camlimages - OCaml image processing library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235805 Summary: Review Request: camlimages - OCaml image processing library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dev at nigelj.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/camlimages.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/camlimages-2.2.0-1.src.rpm Description: CamlImages is an image processing library for Objective CAML, which provides: basic functions for image processing and loading/saving various image file formats (hence providing a translation facility from format to format) an interface with the Caml graphics library allows to display images in the Graphics module screen and to mix them with Caml drawings In addition, the library can handle huge images that cannot be (or can hardly be) stored into the main memory (the library then automatically creates swap files and escapes them to reduce the memory usage). rpmlint: camlimages-2.2.0-1.i386.rpm: W: camlimages ocaml-naming-policy-not-applied /usr/lib/ocaml/camlimages/dllci_jpeg.so (I don't know if an exception can be made here, I can't find much on the problem) camlimages-devel-2.2.0-1.i386.rpm: W: camlimages-devel no-documentation W: camlimages-devel ocaml-naming-policy-not-applied /usr/lib/ocaml/camlimages/Makefile.config (1: docs are in the main package, which is strictly depended on, 2: Ditto about exception) camlimages-2.2.0-1.src.rpm: Clean Like with ocamlSDL (235804) I believe the files are in the right place etc etc, but I have one note: One package which depends on this (which I'm putting in for Package Review later today), depends on this for building, but not for use, I'm worried that the libraries are somehow been configured statically, not sure if it's a problem with this package or the other package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 07:18:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 03:18:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235805] Review Request: camlimages - OCaml image processing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704100718.l3A7I3DT005934@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: camlimages - OCaml image processing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235805 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776, 177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 09:13:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 05:13:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225622] Merge Review: boost In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704100913.l3A9DTwu016498@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: boost https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225622 ------- Additional Comments From bkoz at redhat.com 2007-04-10 05:13 EST ------- Thanks Patrice. #11 looks good for me. As far as devel-static vs. static-devel vs. static, I don't see any other packages using static-devel. Do you? If not, why not? Is this something that should be asked on fedora-devel? #12 detail why you're doing the inlining and optimization changes. In addition, as long as you're doing this, you might as well do %optflags changes too. best, benjamin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 09:38:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 05:38:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199905] Review Request: gotmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704100938.l3A9cRp6018653@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gotmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199905 ------- Additional Comments From james at lovedthanlost.net 2007-04-10 05:38 EST ------- Thanks for your feedback Wolfgang - much appreciated. I've rebuilt my development box and downloaded a more recent rpmlint. I now see the errors you've identified. I cannot, however, work out what the problem is: 1. All commands I can see use -p to preserve permissions. 2. umask is set to 022 3. Permissions of the spec file are 0644. I cannot see where the spec file is getting the 0600 permissions from. Do you have any other ideas? I have fixed the other issues: 1. Timestamps should now be preserved. 2. AUTHORS file has been merged into the man file. 3. I even added myself to it. :) Given the other changes I will increment the version and upload new packages shortly but I wanted to fix the permissions issue first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 09:49:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 05:49:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233850] Review Request: freepops - POP3 interface to webmails In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704100949.l3A9nORI019769@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freepops - POP3 interface to webmails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233850 ------- Additional Comments From francesco at francesco-laurita.info 2007-04-10 05:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Z. First.. > * Unneeded comment > - Please remove all unneeded comments.... These comments done! > A. Description section > * Source0 > - Please specify the URL where we can get tarball at Source0 done > * Redundant BuildRequires done > * Pre/post stage requires for service installation > - Service installation requires some %Requires(post) and so on. Done by adding Requires(post): /sbin/chkconfig Requires(preun): /sbin/chkconfig Requires(preun): /sbin/service > B. Build stage > * Parallel make By adding %{?_smp_mflags} after make it not works. I'm not sure if parallel make isn't supported or it's just a my mistake > * Fedora specific compilation flags > - are not passed. fixed > C. Install stage > * Timestamps > - Keep timestamps on the files which are not created or modified done > D. File entry > * Directory ownership fixed Spec URL: http://francesco-laurita.info/files/fedora/freepops.spec SRPM URL: http://francesco-laurita.info/files/fedora/freepops-0.2.2-1.src.rpm Cya!!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 10:09:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 06:09:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234860] Review Request: perl-Mail-IMAPClient - An IMAP Client API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101009.l3AA9LE0021139@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-IMAPClient - An IMAP Client API Alias: perl-Mail-IMAPClient https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234860 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-10 06:09 EST ------- Can you submit a new package that handles rpmlint warnings for this review ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 10:13:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 06:13:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226396] Merge Review: scim-pinyin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101013.l3AADSGL021285@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: scim-pinyin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226396 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|panemade at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 10:15:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 06:15:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225773] Merge Review: f-spot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101015.l3AAFJnx021370@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: f-spot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225773 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|panemade at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 10:15:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 06:15:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225767] Merge Review: fonts-korean In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101015.l3AAFK68021374@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-korean https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225767 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|panemade at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 10:16:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 06:16:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225759] Merge Review: fontconfig In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101016.l3AAG2QQ021429@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fontconfig https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225759 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|panemade at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 10:17:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 06:17:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225762] Merge Review: fonts-hebrew In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101017.l3AAHPKm021483@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-hebrew https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225762 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|panemade at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-10 06:17 EST ------- looks this package is orphaned ??? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 10:17:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 06:17:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225761] Merge Review: fonts-chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101017.l3AAHs0x021511@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225761 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|panemade at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-10 06:17 EST ------- No response from maintainer yet ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 10:19:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 06:19:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199905] Review Request: gotmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101019.l3AAJKnY021612@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gotmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199905 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-04-10 06:19 EST ------- Upload the new tar and I'll take another look. If I were you, I would use INSTALL="%{__install} -p" (mind the quotes, you are not using them). They never hurt and sometimes quoting is .. heh.. needed. Like now, if I am not wrong: without them, the "-p" is not passed to "install" but to "make". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 10:19:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 06:19:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225893] Merge Review: hwdata In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101019.l3AAJMWd021638@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: hwdata https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225893 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|panemade at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-10 06:19 EST ------- No response from maintainer -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 10:20:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 06:20:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226389] Merge Review: sane-frontends In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101020.l3AAKc2V021723@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sane-frontends https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226389 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|panemade at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-10 06:20 EST ------- No Response from maintainer -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 10:22:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 06:22:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226658] Merge Review: xsane In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101022.l3AAMlID021800@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xsane https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226658 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|panemade at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-10 06:22 EST ------- No response from maintainer -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 10:24:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 06:24:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225765] Merge Review: fonts-japanese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101024.l3AAOrUg021893@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-japanese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225765 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-10 06:24 EST ------- Do we got any conclusions here to solve conffile-without-noreplace-flag problem? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 10:32:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 06:32:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176582] Review Request: freedt -- Reimplementation of Dan Bernstein's daemontools under the GNU GPL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101032.l3AAWICp022178@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freedt -- Reimplementation of Dan Bernstein's daemontools under the GNU GPL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176582 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 11:12:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 07:12:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235815] New: Review Request: freetennis - Tennis simulation game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235815 Summary: Review Request: freetennis - Tennis simulation game Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dev at nigelj.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/freetennis.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/freetennis-0.4.8-1.src.rpm Description: Free Tennis is a free software tennis simulation game. The game can be played against an A.I. or human-vs-human via LAN or internet. rpmlint is clean on all rpms (incl src). Potential problems that I'm aware of that may/may not need fixing: 1. As noted in both blockers to this, the game has a buildrequires on -devel packages, but after build does not require library files, I am not sure if I have done something in error, (i.e. the libraries are been statically built), or this is how ocaml treat libraries etc, I've noted that the Debian freetennis package does not require ocamlSDL or camlimages 2. I'm a bit worried if I went a bit OTT on the directory ownership. 3. README and LICENSE are duplicated in both the main package and -data, this is because -data may be used in another package, and it may be possible to provide a seperate datafile, using the same directory format. 4. I think the summaries need a touch up before importing into Fedora, but I have time because this can be even uploaded (due to the blocking Reviews). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 11:13:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 07:13:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235815] Review Request: freetennis - Tennis simulation game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101113.l3ABDrUv024030@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetennis - Tennis simulation game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235815 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |235804, 235805 OtherBugsDependingO| |163776, 177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 11:13:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 07:13:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235804] Review Request: ocamlSDL - OCaml bindings for SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101113.l3ABDtp0024044@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocamlSDL - OCaml bindings for SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235804 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |235815 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 11:14:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 07:14:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235805] Review Request: camlimages - OCaml image processing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101114.l3ABE6DH024069@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: camlimages - OCaml image processing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235805 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |235815 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 11:26:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 07:26:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231911] Review Request: jomolhari-fonts - Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101126.l3ABQkKO024850@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jomolhari-fonts - Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231911 ------- Additional Comments From mgarski at post.pl 2007-04-10 07:26 EST ------- I'm not sure if it's necessary to add this requirements. First in post and postun there is test for fc-cache availability before executing it "if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]", second in core and extras very few packages has this req. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 11:29:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 07:29:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225893] Merge Review: hwdata In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101129.l3ABTuJZ025032@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: hwdata https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225893 ------- Additional Comments From karsten at redhat.com 2007-04-10 07:29 EST ------- I've built hwdata-0.200-1 with updated pci.ids and use macros now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 11:30:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 07:30:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225622] Merge Review: boost In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101130.l3ABUv8q025094@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: boost https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225622 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-04-10 07:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > Thanks Patrice. > > #11 looks good for me. > > As far as devel-static vs. static-devel vs. static, I don't see any other > packages using static-devel. Do you? If not, why not? Is this something that > should be asked on fedora-devel? The guideline regarding static libs going in a separate package is relatively new. I agree it is a good idea to have a separate package for the static libraries. I personally don't care whether it is named -static, -static-devel, -devel-static and the guidelines leave this detail to the packager. I choosed -static-devel to silent rpmlint. > #12 detail why you're doing the inlining and optimization changes. In addition, > as long as you're doing this, you might as well do %optflags changes too. I am not doing an inlining and optimization change, I am allowing the user building boost to remove completely the and flags. Is there an other way? Regarding the optflags, it would be bad to hardcode them in a patch, they change depending on the platform, release, and so on and so forth. I pass them through export GXX="%__cxx $RPM_OPT_FLAGS" I couldn't find a way to pass them with since, unless I'm wrong, only allows to pass them one by one. And I also set no no to avoid any and flags to be set, such that they don't overwrite what is set in the optflags (and this is allowed by the patch in comment #12). As a side note I had quite a hard time with bjam. It lacks a bit of documentation and examples. I couldn't understand how to pass the python linking flags that would allow to solve the underlinking issue, as explained in comment #5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 11:52:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 07:52:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228301] Review Request: python-nevow - Web application construction kit written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101152.l3ABqsnW026735@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-nevow - Web application construction kit written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228301 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-04-10 07:52 EST ------- You seem to have reviewed the 0.9.0 package, while a 0.9.18-1 package has been available for weeks now... I'll fix the EOL encoding issues, but the empty js files will certainly stay... those are just examples after all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 11:54:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 07:54:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225010] Review Request: glob2 - An innovative RTS game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101154.l3ABsw3p027006@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glob2 - An innovative RTS game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225010 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dev at nigelj.com ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-04-10 07:54 EST ------- As someone just sticking their nose in, (I pretty much made a spec file and was about to submit it for review (as a first review) and happened to stumble on this bug), I've noticed that the -data package does not seem to take ownership of dirs (use %dir ). Also, the Glob2 dev team released a .22 version (it appears that maps were accidently omitted, you may need to pack them in as a seperate tarball - I was advised this is okay in the case of genuine omissions). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 11:57:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 07:57:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232160] Review Request: ruby-gnome2 - A ruby binding of libgnome/libgnomeui-2.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101157.l3ABviqV027247@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-gnome2 - A ruby binding of libgnome/libgnomeui-2.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232160 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-10 07:57 EST ------- Okay. * Requires/BuildRequires now fixed * Actually -5 successfully enables ruby support for kazehakase (which I currently maintain) ------------------------------------------------------ This package (ruby-gnome2) is APPOVED by me. ------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 12:02:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 08:02:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235550] Review Request: mysql-gui-tools - Graphical Tools for mysql In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101202.l3AC2bTi027538@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-gui-tools - Graphical Tools for mysql https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235550 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-04-10 08:02 EST ------- SRPM: http://ausil.us/packages/mysql-gui-tools-5.0r11-3.src.rpm SPEC: http://ausil.us/packages/mysql-gui-tools.spec 2. removed the unused BR's 4. its extra as mysql-administrator and mysql-query-browser both link to mysql. 5. when i can get the java bits working i will enable the extra sub packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 12:09:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 08:09:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228301] Review Request: python-nevow - Web application construction kit written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101209.l3AC9AUc027891@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-nevow - Web application construction kit written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228301 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-04-10 08:08 EST ------- http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/python-nevow/python-nevow-0.9.18-2.src.rpm * Tue Apr 10 2007 Matthias Saou 0.9.18-2 - Fix some end-of-line encodings and executable bits in the docs. * Fri Mar 23 2007 Matthias Saou 0.9.18-1 - Update to 0.9.18. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 12:10:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 08:10:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232160] Review Request: ruby-gnome2 - A ruby binding of libgnome/libgnomeui-2.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101210.l3ACARs3027996@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-gnome2 - A ruby binding of libgnome/libgnomeui-2.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232160 allisson at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From allisson at gmail.com 2007-04-10 08:10 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ruby-gnome2 Short Description: ruby bindings for the GNOME-2.x Owners: allisson at gmail.com Branches: FC-6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 12:17:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 08:17:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235825] New: Review Request: kftpgrabber - Graphical FTP client for KDE Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235825 Summary: Review Request: kftpgrabber - Graphical FTP client for KDE Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: johan at x-tnd.be QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/kftpgrabber/kftpgrabber-0.8.0-1.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/kftpgrabber/kftpgrabber.spec Description: KFTPgrabber is a graphical FTP client for the K Desktop Environment. It implements many features required for usable FTP interaction. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 12:39:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 08:39:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199905] Review Request: gotmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101239.l3ACdKxX029707@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gotmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199905 ------- Additional Comments From james at lovedthanlost.net 2007-04-10 08:39 EST ------- Tried that without success. New version uploaded here: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=96810&package_id=103482&release_id=500052 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 12:47:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 08:47:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225622] Merge Review: boost In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101247.l3AClxJQ030518@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: boost https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225622 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-04-10 08:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > 1) why not use boost-jam for install? > > It provides no advantage when we are doing staged builds, and also doesn't work > with prefix. In addition, it doesn't get the permissions correct. I'm not quite > sure why the permissions are incorrect in rpmlint considering they are > explicitly set by install to be the correct values. Any hacking by others in > this area would be appreciated. I added a comment in my spec patch summarizing your point. > 2) soname > > What upstream boost does with soname is dubious IMHO. In particular, boost libs > should not change SONAMES based on gcc versions if gcc versions are compat. Ie, > gcc-3.4, gcc-4.0, gcc-4.1 are compat. If using upstream boost versioning, they > are not. > > In general, there is no ABI checking in upstream boost. Fedora does not have > this luxury. > > Mostly, they leave this as a decision for vendors, one of whom is Fedora. The > plan WRT Fedora is to provide some guidance for people using older boosts that > are not ABI-compat with current boost. Thus the soname bump. I don't understand exactly what you are meaning. With the current patcheset, and without changing soname, the soname version used is the boost version. This seems to be right, if you are saying that "Fedora does not have the luxury to check the boost ABI change", since it means that the soname has to be changed for every boost release. In that case the library name could be like libboost_python.so.1.33.1 the soname would be libboost_python.so.1.33.1 and there would be a so link in devel libboost_python.so pointing to libboost_python.so.1.33.1 You may also be saying the reverse, namely that you check the ABI compatibility and you don't break ABI for each release, that's why you need a soname version that don't use the boost version, but instead an integer you bump only when there has been an ABI change. Is is the case? (As a side note, even without boost-base.patch applied the gcc version isn't hardcoded in the soname. The soname is like: libboost_python-gcc-1_33_1.so.1.33.1 (or libboost_python-gcc-1_33_1.so.2 with 2 and my patch or, I guess, the previous patch).) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 13:12:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 09:12:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101312.l3ADCEuV000303@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2007-04-10 09:12 EST ------- Just back from easter holidays. I'll have had a rather busy catching up day today so I'll look at the review findings tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 13:29:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 09:29:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234860] Review Request: perl-Mail-IMAPClient - An IMAP Client API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101329.l3ADTFPg001965@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-IMAPClient - An IMAP Client API Alias: perl-Mail-IMAPClient https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234860 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-10 09:29 EST ------- Heh. It helps if I link to the right package: New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Mail-IMAPClient-2.2.9-3.fc7.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Mail-IMAPClient.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 13:51:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 09:51:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234573] Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101351.l3ADpKuG003745@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology Alias: perl-bioperl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234573 Bug 234573 depends on bug 233848, which changed state. Bug 233848 Summary: Review Request: perl-SVG-Graph - Visualize your data in Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233848 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 13:51:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 09:51:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233848] Review Request: perl-SVG-Graph - Visualize your data in Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101351.l3ADpIWt003731@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SVG-Graph - Visualize your data in Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) format Alias: perl-SVG-Graph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233848 alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2007-04-10 09:51 EST ------- Builds fine in devel and FC-6. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 14:07:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 10:07:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199905] Review Request: gotmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101407.l3AE70IN005447@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gotmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199905 james at lovedthanlost.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #137980|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From james at lovedthanlost.net 2007-04-10 10:06 EST ------- (From update of attachment 137980) Spec file obsoleted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 14:08:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 10:08:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199905] Review Request: gotmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101408.l3AE88rm005551@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gotmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199905 ------- Additional Comments From james at lovedthanlost.net 2007-04-10 10:07 EST ------- The problem has been fixed. The spec file and src rpm located at: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=96810&package_id=103482&release_id=500052 Now build and rpmlint without error. Thanks to all for their help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 14:17:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 10:17:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226267] Merge Review: perl-LDAP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101417.l3AEHKAS006297@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-LDAP Alias: perl-LDAP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226267 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-04-10 10:17 EST ------- oops - turns out when I actually looked at it that the problem with the provides was that there is a versioned "Provides: perl(Net::LDAP::Filter) = 15", and and unversioned "Provides: perl(Net::LDAP::Filter)". So, the filter had to be changed to only filter out the 'unversioned' one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 14:46:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 10:46:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199905] Review Request: gotmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101446.l3AEkP0K009513@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gotmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199905 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-04-10 10:46 EST ------- This time it is plain wrong. You try to set gotmail as user, which is certain to fail everywhere since that user does not exist: rpmlint of gotmail: W: gotmail incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.9.0-0 1:0.9.0-0 -> this comes from the Epoch=1; the full version (e-v-r) should be included in the %changelog entries E: gotmail non-standard-uid /usr/share/doc/gotmail-0.9.0/COPYING gotmail E: gotmail non-standard-gid /usr/share/doc/gotmail-0.9.0/COPYING gotmail E: gotmail non-standard-uid /usr/share/man/man1/gotmail.1.gz gotmail E: gotmail non-standard-gid /usr/share/man/man1/gotmail.1.gz gotmail E: gotmail non-standard-uid /usr/share/doc/gotmail-0.9.0/ChangeLog gotmail E: gotmail non-standard-gid /usr/share/doc/gotmail-0.9.0/ChangeLog gotmail E: gotmail non-standard-uid /usr/bin/gotmail gotmail E: gotmail non-standard-gid /usr/bin/gotmail gotmail E: gotmail non-standard-uid /usr/share/doc/gotmail-0.9.0/README gotmail E: gotmail non-standard-gid /usr/share/doc/gotmail-0.9.0/README gotmail E: gotmail non-standard-uid /usr/share/doc/gotmail-0.9.0/sample.gotmailrc gotmail E: gotmail non-standard-gid /usr/share/doc/gotmail-0.9.0/sample.gotmailrc gotmail E: gotmail non-standard-uid /usr/share/doc/gotmail-0.9.0 gotmail E: gotmail non-standard-gid /usr/share/doc/gotmail-0.9.0 gotmail E: gotmail non-standard-uid /usr/share/doc/gotmail-0.9.0/gotmail4evolution gotmail E: gotmail non-standard-gid /usr/share/doc/gotmail-0.9.0/gotmail4evolution gotmail Pretty please, stop trying to work around packaging bugs and read a bit about preserving the modes. The umask=022 is not needed, the (-,root,root,-) was fine... All you have to do is - work as an regular user (not root) - ensure umask is 022 - chmod all files which have to be included to 0644 (minus the executable which should be 0755, of course) - create a tarball where all the included stuff is chmod-ed as above - rpmbuild -bs (or -bt) using the correctly created spec (or tarball) By the way, if you remove the exec bit from gotmail4evolution you'll avoid later warnings from rpmlint (this script -- which is a %doc -- because it has the executable bit set, will pull bash as a dependency; generally it is considered bad habit to have %doc bring in deps; in this particular case I would accept this, because bash is present already on any fedora system but as I said this is a very bad habit that you should avoid) [*] Also, please increase the release each time you modify something and (in the future) start counting the release from 1. [*] this problem seems to be fixed in the package listed at comment #43 but I am not sure at this point that you actually intendted it or it was just an unwanted side effect of the other modifications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 15:05:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 11:05:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235115] Review Request: tl-netty2 - Event based network application framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101505.l3AF5IBS012006@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tl-netty2 - Event based network application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235115 nsantos at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nsantos at redhat.com |asimon at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 15:06:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 11:06:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235121] Review Request: backport-util-concurrent - Backport of java.util.concurrent API, introduced in Java 5.0 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101506.l3AF6RlI012105@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: backport-util-concurrent - Backport of java.util.concurrent API, introduced in Java 5.0 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235121 nsantos at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nsantos at redhat.com |asimon at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 15:12:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 11:12:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199905] Review Request: gotmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101512.l3AFCpOn012673@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gotmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199905 ------- Additional Comments From james at lovedthanlost.net 2007-04-10 11:12 EST ------- Okay - my apologies - that's entirely my fault. I inherited the packing system and I should just have dumped it and started again rather than learn someone else's method. I've: 1. Reverted back to (-,root,root,-) 2. Removed the umask 3. Incremented the spec file to 1 (I will start counting from 1 next time also) 4. Ensured the Makefile will chmod the files 5. Removed the x from the gotmail4evolution script 6. Fixed the epoch tupple error The rpm now builds and installs without error - at least for me. The new files have been uploaded and you can see the -1 rpms and the spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 15:43:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 11:43:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221906] Review Request: gmediaserver - UPnP compatible media server for the GNU system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101543.l3AFh77p017383@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gmediaserver - UPnP compatible media server for the GNU system Alias: gmediaserver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221906 ------- Additional Comments From karlikt at gmail.com 2007-04-10 11:42 EST ------- "So for now, let's go with the persistent user/group." I really do not understand it. Should I use "fedora-usermgmt" with uid? If yes, which number can I use as uid/gid? I am testing fedora-useradd, but I do not uderstand how it works. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 15:47:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 11:47:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225607] Merge Review: axis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101547.l3AFlHZe017786@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: axis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225607 ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-04-10 11:47 EST ------- MUST: * package is named appropriately - match upstream tarball or project name - try to match previous incarnations in other distributions/packagers for consistency - specfile should be %{name}.spec - non-numeric characters should only be used in Release (ie. cvs or something) - for non-numerics (pre-release, CVS snapshots, etc.), see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#PackageRelease - if case sensitivity is requested by upstream or you feel it should be not just lowercase, do so; otherwise, use all lower case for the name OK * is it legal for Fedora to distribute this? - OSI-approved - not a kernel module - not shareware - is it covered by patents? - it *probably* shouldn't be an emulator - no binary firmware OK * license field matches the actual license. OK * license is open source-compatible. - use acronyms for licences where common OK * specfile name matches %{name} OK * verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do) - if upstream doesn't release source drops, put *clear* instructions on how to generate the the source drop; ie. # svn export blah/tag blah # tar cjf blah-version-src.tar.bz2 blah X md5sums do not match * skim the summary and description for typos, etc. OK * correct buildroot - should be: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) OK * if %{?dist} is used, it should be in that form (note the ? and % locations) OK * license text included in package and marked with %doc OK * keep old changelog entries; use judgement when removing (too old? useless?) OK * packages meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) OK * rpmlint on .srpm gives no output rpmlint axis-1.2.1-2jpp.7.src.rpm W: axis non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java OK, the group warning can be ignored * changelog should be in a proper formats: OK * Packager tag should not be used OK * Vendor tag should not be used OK * Distribution tag should not be used OK * use License and not Copyright OK * Summary tag should not end in a period OK * if possible, replace PreReq with Requires(pre) and/or Requires(post) OK * specfile is legible OK * package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86 * BuildRequires are proper - builds in mock will flush out problems here OK - the following packages don't need to be listed in BuildRequires: bash bzip2 coreutils cpio diffutils fedora-release (and/or redhat-release) gcc gcc-c++ gzip make patch perl redhat-rpm-config rpm-build sed tar unzip which OK * summary should be a short and concise description of the package OK * description expands upon summary (don't include installation instructions) OK * make sure description lines are <= 80 characters OK * specfile written in American English OK * make a -doc sub-package if necessary OK, it contains javadoc and a manual sub-package * packages including libraries should exclude static libraries if possible * don't use rpath * config files should usually be marked with %config(noreplace) * GUI apps should contain .desktop files * should the package contain a -devel sub-package? * use macros appropriately and consistently - ie. %{buildroot} and %{optflags} vs. $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and $RPM_OPT_FLAGS OK * don't use %makeinstall OK * install section must begin with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot} OK * locale data handling correct (find_lang) - if translations included, add BR: gettext and use %find_lang %{name} at the end of %install * consider using cp -p to preserve timestamps OK * split Requires(pre,post) into two separate lines OK * package should probably not be relocatable * package contains code - see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#CodeVsContent - in general, there should be no offensive content OK * package should own all directories and files OK * there should be no %files duplicates * file permissions should be okay; %defattrs should be present OK * %clean should be present OK * %doc files should not affect runtime * if it is a web apps, it should be in /usr/share/%{name} and *not* /var/www * verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs * run rpmlint on the binary RPMs rpmlint axis-1.2.1-2jpp.7.fc7.x86_64.rpm W: axis non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java OK, group warnings can be ignored rpmlint axis-javadoc-1.2.1-2jpp.7.fc7.x86_64.rpm W: axis-javadoc non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java W: axis-javadoc symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/javadoc/axis /usr/share/javadoc/axis-1.2.1 X please fix the symlink issue rpmlint axis-manual-1.2.1-2jpp.7.fc7.x86_64.rpm W: axis-manual non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java W: axis-manual dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/axis-manual-1.2.1/apiDocs /usr/share/javadoc/axis W: axis-manual symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/axis-manual-1.2.1/apiDocs /usr/share/javadoc/axis X please fix the symlink issues rpmlint axis-debuginfo-1.2.1-2jpp.7.fc7.x86_64.rpm OK SHOULD: * package should include license text in the package and mark it with %doc OK * package should build on i386 OK * package should build in mock OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 16:14:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 12:14:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101614.l3AGEDjq021390@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-10 12:14 EST ------- Chitlesh, if you want to take over the maintainship and when Alain agrees, take a procedure according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 16:18:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 12:18:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225850] Merge Review: gnutls In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101618.l3AGIDN0021641@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnutls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225850 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Bug 225850 depends on bug 223694, which changed state. Bug 223694 Summary: gnutls: non-failsafe install-info use in scriptlets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223694 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 16:36:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 12:36:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233850] Review Request: freepops - POP3 interface to webmails In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101636.l3AGa2F8024744@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freepops - POP3 interface to webmails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233850 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-10 12:35 EST ------- Well, for -2: * Documention update - Update documents which uses /var/lib/freepops/. This fedora rpms use /usr/share/freepops. One example is doc/freepops-updater-dialog.1 . * Directory/file ownership - Well, as I noted above, while --------------------------------------- %files %dir foo/ --------------------------------------- means the directory foo/ only, whey you write --------------------------------------- foo/ --------------------------------------- it means the directory foo/ and all files/directories under foo/. So. --------------------------------------- %{_libdir}/freepops/ --------------------------------------- contains %{_libdir}/freepops/updater_fltk.so and this file is installed into main and -updater rpms. Also, %{_sysconfdir}/freepops/config.lua is listed twice. * Souce0 - Well, what I meant by "specify Source0 URL" is that you should write --------------------------------------- URL: http://www.freepops.org Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/freepops/freepops-%{name}.tar.gz --------------------------------------- * Local copy of libraries - Check "Duplication of system libraries" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines . Here what is the problem is that this package (freepops) has a tarball of other libraries in it and use them, which must be avoided. You have to - first submit a review request of the libraries this package uses (luafilesystem, luacurl, luaexpat...) seperately - add patches to freepops so that freepops uses the _external_ libraries you submitted seperately. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 17:19:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 13:19:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199905] Review Request: gotmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101719.l3AHJ2qp030211@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gotmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199905 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-04-10 13:18 EST ------- Excellent, James, all problems but one seem to be fixed now. There is one issue which must be fixed before having the package accepted: Source gotmail-0.9.0.tar.bz2 is different from upstream Given the fact that you are the upstream maintainer, the large number of changes which have occured during these last days and the fact that all files are hosted on SF servers, it might be that not all the servers have synced with the new version (see? that's why it's a good idea to not touch the tarball and to increment the release when you do...). Just to be sure, please verify that the tar.bz2 included in the src.rpm and the standalone one are identical. The other issue that might be discussed is that, given the script's ability to forward the messages to SA and procmail, it might be a good idea to Require: these two. Because these two are "soft requires", I for one am happy with it such as it is now, leaving the option to install or not the other two packages to the user. So: from my point of view and assuming the script works as advertised (I assume it does since the perl script has not been modified in 3 months, but as I said I don't have a hotmail account and I have no intent to create one), the package is ready for approval. You now have to convince a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 17:34:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 13:34:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225610] Merge Review: bcel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101734.l3AHYDl9032210@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bcel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225610 ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-04-10 13:34 EST ------- MUST: * package is named appropriately - match upstream tarball or project name - try to match previous incarnations in other distributions/packagers for consistency - specfile should be %{name}.spec - non-numeric characters should only be used in Release (ie. cvs or something) - for non-numerics (pre-release, CVS snapshots, etc.), see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#PackageRelease - if case sensitivity is requested by upstream or you feel it should be not just lowercase, do so; otherwise, use all lower case for the name OK * is it legal for Fedora to distribute this? - OSI-approved - not a kernel module - not shareware - is it covered by patents? - it *probably* shouldn't be an emulator - no binary firmware OK * license field matches the actual license. OK * license is open source-compatible. - use acronyms for licences where common OK * specfile name matches %{name} OK * verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do) - if upstream doesn't release source drops, put *clear* instructions on how to generate the the source drop; ie. # svn export blah/tag blah # tar cjf blah-version-src.tar.bz2 blah OK * skim the summary and description for typos, etc. OK * correct buildroot - should be: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) OK * if %{?dist} is used, it should be in that form (note the ? and % locations) OK * license text included in package and marked with %doc OK * keep old changelog entries; use judgement when removing (too old? useless?) OK * packages meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) OK * rpmlint on .srpm gives no output rpmlint bcel-5.1-10jpp.1.src.rpm W: bcel non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java OK, the group warning can be ignored * changelog should be in proper format: OK * Packager tag should not be used OK * Vendor tag should not be used OK * Distribution tag should not be used OK * use License and not Copyright OK * Summary tag should not end in a period OK * if possible, replace PreReq with Requires(pre) and/or Requires(post) OK * specfile is legible OK * package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86 OK * BuildRequires are proper - builds in mock will flush out problems here OK - the following packages don't need to be listed in BuildRequires: bash bzip2 coreutils cpio diffutils fedora-release (and/or redhat-release) gcc gcc-c++ gzip make patch perl redhat-rpm-config rpm-build sed tar unzip which OK * summary should be a short and concise description of the package OK * description expands upon summary (don't include installation instructions) OK * make sure description lines are <= 80 characters OK * specfile written in American English OK * make a -doc sub-package if necessary OK, contains a manual and javadoc subpackages * packages including libraries should exclude static libraries if possible * don't use rpath * config files should usually be marked with %config(noreplace) * GUI apps should contain .desktop files * should the package contain a -devel sub-package? * use macros appropriately and consistently - ie. %{buildroot} and %{optflags} vs. $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and $RPM_OPT_FLAGS OK * don't use %makeinstall OK * install section must begin with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot} OK * locale data handling correct (find_lang) - if translations included, add BR: gettext and use %find_lang %{name} at the end of %install * consider using cp -p to preserve timestamps X one cp missing -p in %build (line 186) * split Requires(pre,post) into two separate lines OK * package should probably not be relocatable * package contains code - see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#CodeVsContent - in general, there should be no offensive content OK * package should own all directories and files OK * there should be no %files duplicates OK * file permissions should be okay; %defattrs should be present OK * %clean should be present OK * %doc files should not affect runtime * if it is a web apps, it should be in /usr/share/%{name} and *not* /var/www * verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs * run rpmlint on the binary RPMs rpmlint bcel-5.1-10jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm W: bcel non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java OK, group warnings can be ignored rpmlint bcel-demo-5.1-10jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm W: bcel-demo non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java W: bcel-demo no-documentation X should there be any documentation for this? rpmlint bcel-javadoc-5.1-10jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm W: bcel-javadoc non-standard-group Development/Documentation OK rpmlint bcel-manual-5.1-10jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm W: bcel-manual non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java OK rpmlint bcel-debuginfo-5.1-10jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm OK SHOULD: * package should include license text in the package and mark it with %doc OK * package should build on i386 OK * package should build in mock OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 17:41:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 13:41:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235895] New: Review Request: perl-Text-Aspell - spell check interface for perl Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235895 Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Aspell - spell check interface for perl Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: Jerry.James at usu.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.cs.usu.edu/~jerry/Projects/RPMS/perl-Text-Aspell/perl-Text-Aspell.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cs.usu.edu/~jerry/Projects/RPMS/perl-Text-Aspell/perl-Text-Aspell-0.07-1.src.rpm Description: This module provides a Perl interface to the GNU Aspell library. This module is to meet the need of looking up many words, one at a time, in a single session, such as spell-checking a document in memory. I need this package to enable the spell-checking facility in moodle. Rpmlint produces no output on either the binary or the source RPM. There is no distinct license file, but the man page describes the licensing terms. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 18:02:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:02:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225610] Merge Review: bcel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101802.l3AI2bQn002464@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bcel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225610 ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-04-10 14:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > * consider using cp -p to preserve timestamps > X one cp missing -p in %build (line 186) Fixed > rpmlint bcel-demo-5.1-10jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm > W: bcel-demo non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java > W: bcel-demo no-documentation > X should there be any documentation for this? There's a README in examples/Mini, so I marked that with %doc New spec file and srpm at the same location. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 18:11:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:11:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225795] Merge Review: ghostscript In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101811.l3AIBP7x003390@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ghostscript https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225795 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 18:12:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:12:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225795] Merge Review: ghostscript In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101812.l3AIClwc003548@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ghostscript https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225795 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-04-10 14:12 EST ------- BTW version 8.56 already released but we still got pretty old v8.15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 18:13:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:13:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232160] Review Request: ruby-gnome2 - A ruby binding of libgnome/libgnomeui-2.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101813.l3AIDFVv003637@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-gnome2 - A ruby binding of libgnome/libgnomeui-2.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232160 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 18:21:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:21:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232792] Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101821.l3AILbPM004966@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232792 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 18:26:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:26:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221906] Review Request: gmediaserver - UPnP compatible media server for the GNU system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101826.l3AIQMQL005722@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gmediaserver - UPnP compatible media server for the GNU system Alias: gmediaserver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221906 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-10 14:26 EST ------- I mean you can add the user/group dynamically, then never remove it. That will assure that it uses the same uid/gid. None of these solutions are ideal, but the current state of affairs doesn't offer much better until Fesco and/or FPC makes some decisions on this matter. Using fedora-usermgmt will not necessarily buy you anything in this case unless you are also using the static id registry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 18:55:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:55:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225957] Merge Review: k3b In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101855.l3AItJTJ008447@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: k3b https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225957 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-04-10 14:55 EST ------- Harald, per comment #5, could you add the Obsoletes k3b-extras at least for now (even before the BR's and Provides) so that we can have a clean upgrade path and remove k3b-extras from the repos? After the merge, you can do the rest. Sound ok? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 19:05:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 15:05:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225922] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-codec In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101905.l3AJ53Qt009435@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-codec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225922 ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-04-10 15:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) >... > X verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do) > - md5sum do not match with upstream tar ball OK, this should be fixed now > ... > * if possible, replace PreReq with Requires(pre) and/or Requires(post) > X specfile is legible > - Are these still needed: Requires(post): /bin/rm /bin/ln, Requires(postun): > /bin/rm? Removed >... > X summary should be a short and concise description of the package > Summary is just the name of the package Fixed New srpm here: https://mwringe.108.redhat.com/files/documents/175/337/jakarta-commons-codec-1.3-8jpp.1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 19:16:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 15:16:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235550] Review Request: mysql-gui-tools - Graphical Tools for mysql In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101916.l3AJGR1k010999@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-gui-tools - Graphical Tools for mysql https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235550 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-04-10 15:16 EST ------- ok. I don't see any further blockers here... this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this review request once the package has been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 19:31:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 15:31:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225950] Merge Review: jpackage-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101931.l3AJVcgm012637@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jpackage-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225950 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium fitzsim at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fitzsim at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 19:40:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 15:40:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235763] Review Request: windowlab - Small and Simple Amiga-like Window Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101940.l3AJebEt014192@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: windowlab - Small and Simple Amiga-like Window Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235763 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-04-10 15:40 EST ------- I cannot sponsor you so just a few notes: * windowlab-1.34-pathfixes.patch looks useless - you'd better to redefine $XROOT variable in Makefile from /usr/X11R6 to /usr - it resolves some other issues. * change %files section to something like: %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %dir %{_sysconfdir}/X11/windowlab/ %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/X11/windowlab/windowlab.menurc %{_bindir}/windowlab %{_mandir}/man1/windowlab.1x.gz %{_datadir}/xsessions/windowlab.desktop %doc CHANGELOG README TODO LICENCE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 19:44:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 15:44:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235550] Review Request: mysql-gui-tools - Graphical Tools for mysql In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101944.l3AJiOUY014899@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-gui-tools - Graphical Tools for mysql https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235550 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-04-10 15:44 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mysql-gui-tools Short Description: GUI tools to manage mysql Databases Owners: dennis at ausil.us Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 19:45:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 15:45:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235804] Review Request: ocamlSDL - OCaml bindings for SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101945.l3AJjtrg015277@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocamlSDL - OCaml bindings for SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235804 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-04-10 15:45 EST ------- Little note - looks like excessive BuildRequires: I didn't check it but looks like if you BR SDL_ttf-devel, SDL_mixer-devel and SDL_image-devel then BR SDL-devel is implies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 19:49:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 15:49:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101949.l3AJn9Tj015725@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: TeXLive 2007|Review Request: texlive- |- the TeX formatting system,|texmf - Architecture |noarch part |independent parts of the TeX | |formatting system AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rdieter at math.unl.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-04-10 15:49 EST ------- I can get started on these. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 19:50:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 15:50:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230738] Review Request - jwm - Very light window manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101950.l3AJofF8015958@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request - jwm - Very light window manager Alias: jwm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230738 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-04-10 15:50 EST ------- Robert, could you, please, update according to the above suggestions? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 19:51:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 15:51:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229182] Review Request: texlive-texmf-errata - Errata for texlive-texmf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101951.l3AJp976016108@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf-errata - Errata for texlive-texmf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229182 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: TeXLive 2007|Review Request: texlive- |- errata for the noarch part|texmf-errata - Errata for |of the TeX formatting system|texlive-texmf AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rdieter at math.unl.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-04-10 15:50 EST ------- I can get started on these, and please submit review for texlive (binaries, if you haven't already, I didn't check... yet). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 19:51:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 15:51:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229182] Review Request: texlive-texmf-errata - Errata for texlive-texmf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101951.l3AJpjq4016228@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf-errata - Errata for texlive-texmf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229182 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |229180 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 19:51:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 15:51:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704101951.l3AJpkYd016249@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |229182 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 20:12:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 16:12:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235550] Review Request: mysql-gui-tools - Graphical Tools for mysql In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704102012.l3AKCYWl018674@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-gui-tools - Graphical Tools for mysql https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235550 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-04-10 16:12 EST ------- builds requested thanks for the review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 20:13:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 16:13:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221906] Review Request: gmediaserver - UPnP compatible media server for the GNU system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704102013.l3AKDqr9018807@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gmediaserver - UPnP compatible media server for the GNU system Alias: gmediaserver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221906 ------- Additional Comments From karlikt at gmail.com 2007-04-10 16:13 EST ------- Well...I hope that there is finish release: http://karlik.nonlogic.org/gmediaserv/gmediaserver.spec http://karlik.nonlogic.org/gmediaserv/gmediaserver-0.12.0-6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 20:14:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 16:14:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233946] Review Request: secondlife - The Second Life client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704102014.l3AKElrM018893@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: secondlife - The Second Life client Alias: secondlife https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233946 ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2007-04-10 16:14 EST ------- Okay, someone pointed out the license on an included font is probably not acceptable for Fedora: http://jira.secondlife.com/browse/VWR-408 It has a no modification clause and a funky commercial distribution clause. How should we handle this? We might be able to convince upstream to change the license, otherwise we have to patch slviewer to just use DejaVu Sans Mono or something. Wonder how hard it would be to just get it to use xft... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 20:24:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 16:24:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235925] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wjhns174 at hardakers.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/dnssec-tools/dnssec-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/dnssec-tools/dnssec-tools-1.1.1-1.src.rpm Description: The goal of the DNSSEC-Tools project is to create a set of tools, patches, applications, wrappers, extensions, and plugins that will help ease the deployment of DNSSEC-related technologies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 20:24:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 16:24:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225746] Merge Review: fedora-release In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704102024.l3AKOAOV019873@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fedora-release https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225746 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2007-04-10 16:24 EST ------- Any update on this, would like to close this out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 20:30:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 16:30:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235925] Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704102030.l3AKUOHf020660@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925 wjhns174 at hardakers.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- |signed DNS zones -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 20:34:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 16:34:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235925] Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704102034.l3AKYetU021456@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925 wjhns174 at hardakers.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-04-10 16:34 EST ------- This is a first-time-package and I need a sponsor as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 20:53:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 16:53:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235929] New: Review Request: postgresql-odbcng - PostgreSQL ODBCng driver Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235929 Summary: Review Request: postgresql-odbcng - PostgreSQL ODBCng driver Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: devrim at commandprompt.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/postgresql-odbcng/postgresql-odbcng.spec SRPM URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/postgresql-odbcng/postgresql-odbcng-0.90.101-1.src.rpm Description: ODBCng is a written from scratch ODBC driver for PostgreSQL 8.x. ODBCng is a wire-level ODBC driver meaning that we do not require libpq or any PostgreSQL libraries be installed to function. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 21:18:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 17:18:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232873] Review Request: compat-guichan05 - compatibility libraries for guichan In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704102118.l3ALIGPd026801@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-guichan05 - compatibility libraries for guichan https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232873 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2007-04-10 17:18 EST ------- Imported and built on -devel. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 21:23:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 17:23:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221675] Review Request: zd1211-firmware - Firmware for wireless devices based on zd1211 chipset In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704102123.l3ALNmHX027579@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zd1211-firmware - Firmware for wireless devices based on zd1211 chipset https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221675 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-10 17:23 EST ------- If this firmware is truly under the GPL, we should be able to get source for it, not just a hex dump. If the upstream is not providing this, then they're in violation of the GPL. Have we tried to ask upstream for the source? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 21:26:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 17:26:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221675] Review Request: zd1211-firmware - Firmware for wireless devices based on zd1211 chipset In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704102126.l3ALQ5gW027757@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zd1211-firmware - Firmware for wireless devices based on zd1211 chipset https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221675 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-04-10 17:25 EST ------- That would then imply that the qlogic driver in the kernel is in violation of the GPL, and we can't distribute that.... not sure we want to go down that road. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 21:27:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 17:27:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231911] Review Request: jomolhari-fonts - Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704102127.l3ALRHAv027829@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jomolhari-fonts - Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231911 ------- Additional Comments From mgarski at post.pl 2007-04-10 17:27 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: jomolhari-fonts Short Description: Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha Owners: mgarski at post.pl Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 21:29:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 17:29:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231911] Review Request: jomolhari-fonts - Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704102129.l3ALTNvs027911@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jomolhari-fonts - Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231911 mgarski at post.pl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 21:39:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 17:39:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199905] Review Request: gotmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704102139.l3ALdHZg028483@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gotmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199905 james at lovedthanlost.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO ------- Additional Comments From james at lovedthanlost.net 2007-04-10 17:39 EST ------- There is a delay with sync between mirrors on SF. But I can verify that they are identical as I have been uploading the new tar.bz2 files whenever the RPMs have changed. It may take a little time to distribute all the new files - this is one of the drawbacks of SF. As both procmail and SA are optional for Gotmail I'd prefer to leave them as is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 21:41:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 17:41:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704102141.l3ALf4dP028641@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-04-10 17:40 EST ------- Alain, could I take over ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 21:45:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 17:45:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221675] Review Request: zd1211-firmware - Firmware for wireless devices based on zd1211 chipset In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704102145.l3ALjo8j028990@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zd1211-firmware - Firmware for wireless devices based on zd1211 chipset https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221675 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-04-10 17:45 EST ------- That's exactly what i've said on irc to #zd1211 (about possible GPL violation) If a real open source GPL firmware can be obtened, this may be requested to Atheros http://www.atheros.com/news/ZyDAS.html For now The "GPL" licence of this package seems a problem. But can we use "Redistributable, no modification permitted" instead? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 21:47:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 17:47:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228894] Review Request: rpcbind - converts RPC program numbers into universal addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704102147.l3ALl702029109@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpcbind - converts RPC program numbers into universal addresses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228894 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE OtherBugsDependingO|163779 |188268 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2007-04-10 17:47 EST ------- rpcbind was built for rawhide, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 21:49:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 17:49:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221675] Review Request: zd1211-firmware - Firmware for wireless devices based on zd1211 chipset In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704102149.l3ALnK1X029344@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zd1211-firmware - Firmware for wireless devices based on zd1211 chipset https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221675 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-04-10 17:49 EST ------- *Atheros*? Ok, that will never happen. :) GPL is the license put on the code,in entirety. The question is whether the hex dump is the preferred form of modification. You certainly are allowed to modify the hex code and redistribute it, so the 'Redistrubtable, no modification permitted' does not apply. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 21:49:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 17:49:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201730] Review Request: MemProf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704102149.l3ALnO5C029376@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MemProf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201730 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |INSUFFICIENT_DATA Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED OtherBugsDependingO|188267 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2007-04-10 17:49 EST ------- i'm closing this for now. Re-request later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 21:53:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 17:53:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235804] Review Request: ocamlSDL - OCaml bindings for SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704102153.l3ALr8PC029624@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocamlSDL - OCaml bindings for SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235804 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-04-10 17:53 EST ------- Yeah, thats true, I *thought* it was removed, but obviously not, I think I've found some other missing BRs tough, so I'm going to check them out and hopefully put up a -2 srpm soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 22:10:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 18:10:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221675] Review Request: zd1211-firmware - Firmware for wireless devices based on zd1211 chipset In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704102210.l3AMAoVP030516@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zd1211-firmware - Firmware for wireless devices based on zd1211 chipset https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221675 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-04-10 18:10 EST ------- Well, I can send them a mail with hope to get some clarification from them... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 22:23:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 18:23:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221675] Review Request: zd1211-firmware - Firmware for wireless devices based on zd1211 chipset In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704102223.l3AMNB8t031041@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zd1211-firmware - Firmware for wireless devices based on zd1211 chipset https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221675 ------- Additional Comments From ericm24x7 at gmail.com 2007-04-10 18:23 EST ------- My understanding is that the firmware was already approved for redistribution under the previous ownership (Zydas). Usually the contract agreement under previous ownership remain legally binding and enforceable unless the new ownership (Atheros in this case) specifically revoke the previous agreement in writing. Of course it would have been nice if the agreement specifically prohibit revocation of current agreement upon change of ownership. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 22:24:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 18:24:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225795] Merge Review: ghostscript In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704102224.l3AMO08S031100@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ghostscript https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225795 ------- Additional Comments From twaugh at redhat.com 2007-04-10 18:23 EST ------- No, we are shipping ESP Ghostscript which is at 8.15.4. The GPL Ghostscript branch has several drivers missing compared to ESP Ghostscript. The upstream merge is not yet complete. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 22:30:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 18:30:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned CJK bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704102230.l3AMU1Ev031441@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned CJK bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 ------- Additional Comments From fangqq at gmail.com 2007-04-10 18:29 EST ------- hi Jens Chinese/Japanese/Korean share a large number of ideographic glyphs (called Hanzi/Kanji/Hanja). There Hanzi were organized as CJK Unified Ideographics (U+4E00-9FA5), CJK Unified Ideographics Extension A and Extension B by Unicode Consortium and endorsed by all governments. The WenQuanYi bitmap font 0.8 include all CJK Unified Ideographics glyphs (20902 x 4 sizes), with much improved glyph shape compared to any existing open CJK font. Beside these unified CJK characters, we also provide Hangul(thousands) and Hiragana/Katakana(less than 100) glyphs in this font. Although we are not expert in these JK-specific glyphs, but they look as good as those I have seen in the commercial fonts, IMHO. So, I prefer to stay with CJK in the title. At the same time, with more people start using our font, I also hope more Japanese and Korean people to get involved in the glyph optimization. Our wiki is open to all people and the submitted glyph will be automatically compiled into nightly-build fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 22:34:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 18:34:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned CJK bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704102234.l3AMYC5q031749@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned CJK bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 ------- Additional Comments From fangqq at gmail.com 2007-04-10 18:34 EST ------- the link for the spec file: http://wenq.org/release/08src/wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec or http://wenq.org/eindex.cgi?id=wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec&raw=1&action=browse (you need to remove 
 and
) I will increase the release number next time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 22:41:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 18:41:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235804] Review Request: ocamlSDL - OCaml bindings for SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704102241.l3AMfqEd032329@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocamlSDL - OCaml bindings for SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235804 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-04-10 18:41 EST ------- Spec URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/ocamlSDL.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/ocamlSDL-0.7.2-2.src.rpm Removed SDL-devel, added ocaml -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 22:44:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 18:44:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235805] Review Request: camlimages - OCaml image processing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704102244.l3AMiHXD032582@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: camlimages - OCaml image processing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235805 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-04-10 18:44 EST ------- Spec URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/camlimages.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/camlimages-2.2.0-2.src.rpm Simple dependency update, now -2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 22:47:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 18:47:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235763] Review Request: windowlab - Small and Simple Amiga-like Window Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704102247.l3AMl5Wa032727@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: windowlab - Small and Simple Amiga-like Window Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235763 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-04-10 18:47 EST ------- Spec URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/windowlab.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/windowlab-1.34-2.src.rpm -2, updated %files per recommendation, also changed the patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 23:04:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 19:04:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235825] Review Request: kftpgrabber - Graphical FTP client for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704102304.l3AN4nbq001300@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kftpgrabber - Graphical FTP client for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235825 ------- Additional Comments From johan at x-tnd.be 2007-04-10 19:04 EST ------- Sorry for the inversion in the links :) QT was not sourced The icon didn't appears under gnome nor xfce It seems a libs package was needed New version is available : Spec URL: http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/kftpgrabber/kftpgrabber.spec SRPM URL: http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/kftpgrabber/kftpgrabber-0.8.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 23:15:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 19:15:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199905] Review Request: gotmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704102315.l3ANFll0001832@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gotmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199905 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-04-10 19:15 EST ------- My thoughts exactly. I suggest hunting for a sponsor :) The ball is in your yard. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 23:32:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 19:32:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 212003] Review Request: mugshot - Companion software for mugshot.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704102332.l3ANW63O002441@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mugshot - Companion software for mugshot.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212003 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2007-04-10 19:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #25) > Can we get FC-5 and EL-5 branches added as well? Thanks I think there was a mugshot rpm update a few days ago. When will this show up in rawhide? Thanks, AG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 10 23:35:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 19:35:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221675] Review Request: zd1211-firmware - Firmware for wireless devices based on zd1211 chipset In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704102335.l3ANZVV3002608@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zd1211-firmware - Firmware for wireless devices based on zd1211 chipset https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221675 ------- Additional Comments From ericm24x7 at gmail.com 2007-04-10 19:35 EST ------- Here is a response from the primary developer Uli Kunitz of the re-written zd1211 driver under GPL: The vendor driver has been distributed alternatively under the GPL version 2 in source code, which contains header files with the firmware in large C arrays. I have created a derived work of the vendor driver published also under the GPL version 2. The source code contains the headers of the vendor driver. The program itself creates the firmware files. Look for zd1211rw_fw_*.tar.bz2 under http://deine-taler.de/zd1211/snapshots/. Look at the file README. IANAL, so I cannot answer the question under which conditions the distribution of the firmware files would be covered under the GPL. > [1] Requirements: > > > > 1. The files are non-executable (note: this means that the files > > cannot run on their own, not that they are just chmod -x) > > 2. The files are not libraries. > > 3. The files are standalone, not embedded in executable or library code. > > 4. Explicit permission is given by the owner to freely redistribute > > without restrictions (this permission must be included, in > > "writing", with the files in the packaging) > > 5. The files must be necessary for the functionality of open source > > code being included in Fedora. Requirements 1, 2, 3, and 5 are fulfilled by the binary files. Daniel Drake (dsd-at-gentoo-dot-org) handled the relationship to the vendor, so he might be able to help with requirement 4. Uli Kunitz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 00:05:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 20:05:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231911] Review Request: jomolhari-fonts - Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110005.l3B058eG003882@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jomolhari-fonts - Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231911 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-04-10 20:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > I'm not sure if it's necessary to add this requirements. First in post and > postun there is test for fc-cache availability before executing it "if [ -x > %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]" True. > second in core and extras very few packages has this req. Perhaps it is a "Red Hat thing": in my machine at least of the installed fonts: 20 requires fontconfig 14 do not require it (majority of those are not truetype fonts though) APPROVED :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 00:24:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 20:24:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228301] Review Request: python-nevow - Web application construction kit written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110024.l3B0ON4o004750@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-nevow - Web application construction kit written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228301 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-04-10 20:24 EST ------- Sorry for the late, indeed, i will check it out ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 00:29:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 20:29:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221675] Review Request: zd1211-firmware - Firmware for wireless devices based on zd1211 chipset In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110029.l3B0Tpbk004947@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zd1211-firmware - Firmware for wireless devices based on zd1211 chipset https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221675 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-04-10 20:29 EST ------- Regarding the packaging, the previous issues raised: description - FIXED -devel removed - FIXED installation of zd1211b - FIXED I am of the opinion that the license is 'good enough' - it provides the source for the firmware in the only form available for modification. Hence, I'm inclined to APPROVE this. Spot? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 00:31:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 20:31:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234721] Review Request: sakura - A terminal emulator based on GTK+ and VTE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110031.l3B0VjWo005056@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sakura - A terminal emulator based on GTK+ and VTE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234721 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-04-10 20:31 EST ------- ping ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 00:32:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 20:32:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225761] Merge Review: fonts-chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110032.l3B0WM0w005082@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225761 ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2007-04-10 20:32 EST ------- Hi Parag, are you talking about me? - Caius -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 00:33:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 20:33:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225767] Merge Review: fonts-korean In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110033.l3B0XIPh005121@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-korean https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225767 ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2007-04-10 20:33 EST ------- Hi Parag, what could I help here? Please feel free to let me know. - Caius. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 00:57:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 20:57:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232160] Review Request: ruby-gnome2 - A ruby binding of libgnome/libgnomeui-2.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110057.l3B0vR0t006211@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-gnome2 - A ruby binding of libgnome/libgnomeui-2.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232160 allisson at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From allisson at gmail.com 2007-04-10 20:57 EST ------- Thanks Mamoru and Stephanos, The ruby-gnome2 "big one" is gone. http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/31359-ruby-gnome2-0.16.0-5.fc7/ http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-6-extras/31360-ruby-gnome2-0.16.0-5.fc6/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 01:18:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 21:18:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232160] Review Request: ruby-gnome2 - A ruby binding of libgnome/libgnomeui-2.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110118.l3B1IHSG007116@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-gnome2 - A ruby binding of libgnome/libgnomeui-2.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232160 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-10 21:18 EST ------- Actually -5 enabled ruby-gtk2 support for kazehakase http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/31363-kazehakase-0.4.5-2.fc7/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 01:27:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 21:27:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235954] New: Review Request: perl-Test-use-ok - Alternative to Test::More::use_ok Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235954 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-use-ok - Alternative to Test::More::use_ok Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-use-ok/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Test-use-ok-0.02-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Test-use-ok.spec Description: According to the Test::More documentation, it is recommended to run use_ok() inside a BEGIN block, so functions are exported at compile-time and prototypes are properly honored. However, people often either forget to add "BEGIN", or mistakenly group "use_ok" with other tests in a single "BEGIN" block, which can create subtle differences in execution order. With this module, simply change all "use_ok" in test scripts to "use ok", and they will be executed at "BEGIN" time. The explicit space after "use" makes it clear that this is a single compile-time action. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 01:28:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 21:28:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235954] Review Request: perl-Test-use-ok - Alternative to Test::More::use_ok In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110128.l3B1S6B8007554@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-use-ok - Alternative to Test::More::use_ok Alias: perl-Test-use-ok https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235954 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-Test-use-ok -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 02:51:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 22:51:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235960] New: Review Request: perl-Data-Visitor - Visitor style traversal of Perl data structures Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235960 Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Visitor - Visitor style traversal of Perl data structures Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Data-Visitor/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Data-Visitor-0.05-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Data-Visitor.spec Description: This module is a simple visitor implementation for Perl values. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 02:51:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 22:51:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235954] Review Request: perl-Test-use-ok - Alternative to Test::More::use_ok In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110251.l3B2pkG3011693@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-use-ok - Alternative to Test::More::use_ok Alias: perl-Test-use-ok https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235954 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |235960 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 02:52:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 22:52:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235960] Review Request: perl-Data-Visitor - Visitor style traversal of Perl data structures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110252.l3B2qbOh011754@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Visitor - Visitor style traversal of Perl data structures Alias: perl-Data-Visitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235960 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-Data-Visitor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 03:12:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:12:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232018] Review Request: perl-YAML-Syck - Fast, lightweight YAML loader and dumper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110312.l3B3Cj0p013112@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-YAML-Syck - Fast, lightweight YAML loader and dumper Alias: perl-YAML-Syck https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232018 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Alias| |perl-YAML-Syck ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-10 23:12 EST ------- 0.84 is out :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 03:16:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:16:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235962] New: Review Request: perl-Config-Any - Load configuration from different file formats, transparently Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235962 Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Any - Load configuration from different file formats, transparently Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Config-Any/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Config-Any-0.07-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Config-Any.spec Description: Config::Any provides a facility for Perl applications and libraries to load configuration data from multiple different file formats. It supports XML, YAML, JSON, Apache-style configuration, Windows INI files, and even Perl code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 03:17:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:17:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232036] Review Request: perl-YAML-Tiny - Read/Write YAML files with as little code as possible In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110317.l3B3HBfJ013502@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-YAML-Tiny - Read/Write YAML files with as little code as possible https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232036 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-10 23:17 EST ------- APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 03:17:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:17:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235962] Review Request: perl-Config-Any - Load configuration from different file formats, transparently In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110317.l3B3HUvn013530@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Any - Load configuration from different file formats, transparently Alias: perl-Config-Any https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235962 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |232018 Alias| |perl-Config-Any -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 03:17:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:17:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232018] Review Request: perl-YAML-Syck - Fast, lightweight YAML loader and dumper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110317.l3B3HhQj013558@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-YAML-Syck - Fast, lightweight YAML loader and dumper Alias: perl-YAML-Syck https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232018 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |235962 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 03:18:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:18:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225258] Merge Review: aspell-bg In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110318.l3B3IOun013596@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: aspell-bg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225258 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-10 23:18 EST ------- As build is available now, therefor CLOSING this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 03:21:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:21:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235954] Review Request: perl-Test-use-ok - Alternative to Test::More::use_ok In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110321.l3B3LSpQ013926@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-use-ok - Alternative to Test::More::use_ok Alias: perl-Test-use-ok https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235954 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-10 23:21 EST ------- Missing: BR: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) BR: perl(Test::More) BR: perl(Test::Harness) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 03:21:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:21:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225259] Merge Review: aspell-br In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110321.l3B3LW7u013939@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: aspell-br https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225259 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-10 23:21 EST ------- As build is available now, therefore CLOSING this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 03:21:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:21:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225260] Merge Review: aspell-ca In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110321.l3B3LkvB013967@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: aspell-ca https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225260 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-10 23:21 EST ------- As build is available now, therefore CLOSING this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 03:23:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:23:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225261] Merge Review: aspell-cs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110323.l3B3NRSJ014114@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: aspell-cs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225261 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-10 23:23 EST ------- As build is available now, therefore CLOSING this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 03:23:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:23:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225262] Merge Review: aspell-cy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110323.l3B3NjsY014163@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: aspell-cy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225262 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-10 23:23 EST ------- As build is available now, therefore CLOSING this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 03:24:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:24:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225263] Merge Review: aspell-da In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110324.l3B3O2XS014203@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: aspell-da https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225263 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-10 23:24 EST ------- As build is available now, therefore CLOSING this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 03:24:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:24:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225264] Merge Review: aspell-de In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110324.l3B3OLaj014234@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: aspell-de https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225264 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-10 23:24 EST ------- As build is available now, therefore CLOSING this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 03:24:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:24:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225265] Merge Review: aspell-el In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110324.l3B3Oafl014265@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: aspell-el https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225265 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-10 23:24 EST ------- As build is available now, therefore CLOSING this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 03:26:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:26:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225267] Merge Review: aspell-es In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110326.l3B3QX4r014419@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: aspell-es https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225267 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-10 23:26 EST ------- As build is available now, therefore CLOSING this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 03:26:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:26:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225269] Merge Review: aspell-fo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110326.l3B3QhRa014446@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: aspell-fo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225269 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-10 23:26 EST ------- As build is available now, therefore CLOSING this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 03:26:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:26:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225270] Merge Review: aspell-fr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110326.l3B3Qwpx014496@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: aspell-fr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225270 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-10 23:26 EST ------- As build is available now, therefore CLOSING this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 03:27:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:27:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225271] Merge Review: aspell-ga In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110327.l3B3RN3p014551@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: aspell-ga https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225271 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-10 23:27 EST ------- As build is available now, therefore CLOSING this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 03:27:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:27:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225272] Merge Review: aspell-gd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110327.l3B3RYd8014575@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: aspell-gd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225272 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-10 23:27 EST ------- As build is available now, therefore CLOSING this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 03:27:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:27:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225273] Merge Review: aspell-gl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110327.l3B3Rtm5014682@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: aspell-gl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225273 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-10 23:27 EST ------- As build is available now, therefore CLOSING this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 03:28:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:28:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225274] Merge Review: aspell-hr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110328.l3B3SLcX014760@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: aspell-hr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225274 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-10 23:28 EST ------- As build is available now, therefore CLOSING this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 03:28:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:28:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235954] Review Request: perl-Test-use-ok - Alternative to Test::More::use_ok In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110328.l3B3SVJA014779@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-use-ok - Alternative to Test::More::use_ok Alias: perl-Test-use-ok https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235954 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-10 23:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Missing: > > BR: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) > BR: perl(Test::More) > BR: perl(Test::Harness) So updated (thanks for the catch). Are we at the point now where we should expect to list all module dependencies, including code? (e.g., not just ExtUtils::MakeMaker). SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Test-use-ok-0.02-2.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Test-use-ok.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 03:28:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:28:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225275] Merge Review: aspell-id In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110328.l3B3SXN5014788@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: aspell-id https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225275 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-10 23:28 EST ------- As build is available now, therefore CLOSING this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 03:28:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:28:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225276] Merge Review: aspell-is In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110328.l3B3Slex014811@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: aspell-is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225276 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-10 23:28 EST ------- As build is available now, therefore CLOSING this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 03:29:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:29:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225277] Merge Review: aspell-it In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110329.l3B3T0J6014831@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: aspell-it https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225277 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-10 23:28 EST ------- As build is available now, therefore CLOSING this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 03:29:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:29:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225278] Merge Review: aspell-nl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110329.l3B3TMEu014861@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: aspell-nl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225278 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-10 23:29 EST ------- As build is available now, therefore CLOSING this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 03:30:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:30:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235954] Review Request: perl-Test-use-ok - Alternative to Test::More::use_ok In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110330.l3B3UBls015033@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-use-ok - Alternative to Test::More::use_ok Alias: perl-Test-use-ok https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235954 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-10 23:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > expect to list all module dependencies, including code? (e.g., not just err, s/code/core/. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 03:31:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:31:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225280] Merge Review: aspell-pl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110331.l3B3VIof015133@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: aspell-pl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225280 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-10 23:31 EST ------- As build is available now, therefore CLOSING this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 03:31:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:31:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225281] Merge Review: aspell-pt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110331.l3B3VPae015149@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: aspell-pt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225281 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-10 23:31 EST ------- As build is available now, therefore CLOSING this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 03:31:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:31:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225282] Merge Review: aspell-ru In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110331.l3B3VdnZ015183@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: aspell-ru https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225282 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-10 23:31 EST ------- As build is available now, therefore CLOSING this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 03:32:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:32:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225283] Merge Review: aspell-sl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110332.l3B3WF2w015237@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: aspell-sl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225283 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-10 23:32 EST ------- As build is available now, therefore CLOSING this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 03:32:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:32:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225284] Merge Review: aspell-sr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110332.l3B3WUA7015266@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: aspell-sr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225284 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-10 23:32 EST ------- As build is available now, therefore CLOSING this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 03:32:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:32:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225285] Merge Review: aspell-sv In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110332.l3B3WiMt015291@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: aspell-sv https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225285 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-10 23:32 EST ------- As build is available now, therefore CLOSING this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 03:37:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:37:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225266] Merge Review: aspell-en In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110337.l3B3bOwH015541@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: aspell-en https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225266 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-10 23:37 EST ------- As build is available now, therefore CLOSING this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 03:37:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:37:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225279] Merge Review: aspell-no In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110337.l3B3bYAj015558@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: aspell-no https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225279 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-10 23:37 EST ------- As build is available now, therefore CLOSING this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 03:44:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:44:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235954] Review Request: perl-Test-use-ok - Alternative to Test::More::use_ok In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110344.l3B3ieJG016077@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-use-ok - Alternative to Test::More::use_ok Alias: perl-Test-use-ok https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235954 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-10 23:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Missing: > > > > BR: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) > > BR: perl(Test::More) > > BR: perl(Test::Harness) > > So updated (thanks for the catch). Are we at the point now where we should > expect to list all module dependencies, including code? (e.g., not just > ExtUtils::MakeMaker). Well, the list above is the result of testing the latest perl packaging (as discussed on perl-devel-list@), which has several modules formerly contained in "perl" split out. I don't know about RH's plans nor whether or when we're going to see this split perl package in Fedora. A side-effect of this split-out is building perl-modules having to explictly BR: those "now/soon to be split-out" modules formerly having been in "perl" they actually use when building. In most cases this is "ExtUtils::MakeMaker", but ins some cases, it is more - This package is one of those case. More generally: Blindly adding "BR: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)" isn't the solution. One has to track down these modules individually. Fortunately, most package bomb out with build-failures pretty hard in a buildsystems carrying the "split perl" package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 03:50:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:50:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234860] Review Request: perl-Mail-IMAPClient - An IMAP Client API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110350.l3B3o363016521@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-IMAPClient - An IMAP Client API Alias: perl-Mail-IMAPClient https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234860 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-10 23:50 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 21c1901d55a2d57f73840cad478c665d Mail-IMAPClient-2.2.9.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test is successful. + Provides: perl(Mail::IMAPClient) perl(Mail::IMAPClient::BodyStructure) perl(Mail::IMAPClient::BodyStructure::Address) perl(Mail::IMAPClient::BodyStructure::Envelope) perl(Mail::IMAPClient::BodyStructure::Parse) perl(Mail::IMAPClient::BodyStructure::Part) perl(Mail::IMAPClient::MessageSet) perl(Mail::IMAPClient::Thread) perl(Parse::RecDescent::Mail::IMAPClient::BodyStructure::Parse) perl(Parse::RecDescent::Mail::IMAPClient::Thread) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 04:05:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 00:05:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235962] Review Request: perl-Config-Any - Load configuration from different file formats, transparently In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110405.l3B45amN017713@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Any - Load configuration from different file formats, transparently Alias: perl-Config-Any https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235962 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-11 00:05 EST ------- I found in build.log + make test t/01-use..........ok t/10-branches.....ok t/20-parse........ok 27/54 skipped: various reasons t/50-general......ok 2/2 skipped: Couldn't Load Config::General plugin t/51-ini..........ok 9/9 skipped: various reasons t/52-json.........ok t/53-perl.........ok t/54-xml..........ok 2/2 skipped: Couldn't Load XML plugin t/55-yaml.........ok t/61-features.....ok 10/10 skipped: File loading backend for INI not found t/pod-coverage....ok t/pod.............ok All tests successful, 50 subtests skipped. Files=12, Tests=112, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.75 cusr + 0.17 csys = 0.92 CPU) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 04:06:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 00:06:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235962] Review Request: perl-Config-Any - Load configuration from different file formats, transparently In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110406.l3B46T9D017782@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Any - Load configuration from different file formats, transparently Alias: perl-Config-Any https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235962 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-11 00:06 EST ------- Do this package need to add XML plugin as well as Config::General plugin? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 04:14:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 00:14:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226395] Merge Review: scim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110414.l3B4EFtf018286@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: scim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226395 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-11 00:14 EST ------- Can this review be closed now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 04:42:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 00:42:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233802] Review Request: python-xlib - Fully functional X client library for Python programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110442.l3B4ggRD019398@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-xlib - Fully functional X client library for Python programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233802 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-04-11 00:42 EST ------- Okay I spun a new version with a separate doc subpackage if you have a second please take a quick look at the binaries in http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/python-xlib/devel/ -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 04:46:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 00:46:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233802] Review Request: python-xlib - Fully functional X client library for Python programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110446.l3B4kUdX019517@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-xlib - Fully functional X client library for Python programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233802 jspaleta at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-04-11 00:46 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-xlib Short Description: X client library for Python Owners: jspaleta at gmail.com Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 05:14:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 01:14:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235962] Review Request: perl-Config-Any - Load configuration from different file formats, transparently In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110514.l3B5E83l020216@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Any - Load configuration from different file formats, transparently Alias: perl-Config-Any https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235962 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-11 01:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Do this package need to add XML plugin as well as Config::General plugin? Yes. Updated: SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Config-Any-0.07-2.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Config-Any.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 05:48:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 01:48:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235962] Review Request: perl-Config-Any - Load configuration from different file formats, transparently In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110548.l3B5mbmY021915@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Any - Load configuration from different file formats, transparently Alias: perl-Config-Any https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235962 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-11 01:48 EST ------- I saw following is missing BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) Is that intentional? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 06:01:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 02:01:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235731] Review Request: openbsd-malloc - Alternative malloc() implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110601.l3B618CO022458@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openbsd-malloc - Alternative malloc() implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235731 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-04-11 02:00 EST ------- New version: http://lemenkov.googlepages.com/openbsd-malloc.spec http://lemenkov.googlepages.com/openbsd-malloc-0-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 06:08:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 02:08:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235962] Review Request: perl-Config-Any - Load configuration from different file formats, transparently In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110608.l3B68avL022779@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Any - Load configuration from different file formats, transparently Alias: perl-Config-Any https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235962 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-11 02:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > I saw following is missing > BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) > Is that intentional? That is correct -- this module actually uses Module::Build instead of ExtUtils::MakeMaker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 06:31:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 02:31:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235962] Review Request: perl-Config-Any - Load configuration from different file formats, transparently In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110631.l3B6VXQg023988@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Any - Load configuration from different file formats, transparently Alias: perl-Config-Any https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235962 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-11 02:31 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url f4233adfa8abb621be7a68f172be000a Config-Any-0.07.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test t/01-use..........ok t/10-branches.....ok t/20-parse........ok t/50-general......ok t/51-ini..........ok t/52-json.........ok t/53-perl.........ok t/54-xml..........ok t/55-yaml.........ok t/61-features.....ok t/pod-coverage....ok t/pod.............ok All tests successful. Files=12, Tests=112, 2 wallclock secs ( 1.04 cusr + 0.19 csys = 1.23 CPU) + Provides: perl(Config::Any) = 0.07 perl(Config::Any::General) perl(Config::Any::INI) perl(Config::Any::JSON) perl(Config::Any::Perl) perl(Config::Any::XML) perl(Config::Any::YAML) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 06:34:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 02:34:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235731] Review Request: openbsd-malloc - Alternative malloc() implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110634.l3B6YAdm024147@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openbsd-malloc - Alternative malloc() implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235731 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-11 02:34 EST ------- Some remarks: 1. MUSTFIX: This spec doesn't apply $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. It compiles and places its files directly into */BUILD. One way to approach this: %setup -c -T 2. Is there an agreement with the glibc developers upon using the name libmalloc.*? To me, this name appears as too general. 3. http://mr.himki.net/index-alloc.html is in a Cyrillan written language (Russian?). An English version would be helpful, because except of the source code there doesn't seem to be any other documentation. 4. The source file seems to be intended to be used as a preloaded module: >From the source code: * Compilation: gcc -shared -fPIC -O2 OpenBSD_malloc_Linux.c -o malloc.so * Launching: LD_PRELOAD=/path/to/malloc.so firefox I am not sure if packaging it as a library is a wise decision. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 07:58:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 03:58:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225957] Merge Review: k3b In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110758.l3B7wwav029740@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: k3b https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225957 ------- Additional Comments From harald at redhat.com 2007-04-11 03:58 EST ------- > After the merge, you can do the rest. Sound ok? No :) Need your experience and help :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 08:32:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 04:32:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226395] Merge Review: scim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110832.l3B8WadY000351@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: scim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226395 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 08:39:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 04:39:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235989] New: Review Request: python-biopython - Python tools for computational molecular biology Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235989 Summary: Review Request: python-biopython - Python tools for computational molecular biology Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: alexl at users.sourceforge.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://allele5.biol.berkeley.edu/~alex/fedora/python-biopython.spec SRPM URL: http://allele5.biol.berkeley.edu/~alex/fedora/python-biopython-1.43-1.src.rpm Description: A set of freely available Python tools for computational molecular biology. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 08:51:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 04:51:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235989] Review Request: python-biopython - Python tools for computational molecular biology In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110851.l3B8p4uJ001920@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-biopython - Python tools for computational molecular biology https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235989 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2007-04-11 04:51 EST ------- License is non-standard "Biopython License Agreement" which rpmlint doesn't like but is more or less an MIT-style license: http://biopython.org/DIST/LICENSE Biopython License Agreement Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its documentation with or without modifications and for any purpose and without fee is hereby granted, provided that any copyright notices appear in all copies and that both those copyright notices and this permission notice appear in supporting documentation, and that the names of the contributors or copyright holders not be used in advertising or publicity pertaining to distribution of the software without specific prior permission. THE CONTRIBUTORS AND COPYRIGHT HOLDERS OF THIS SOFTWARE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES WITH REGARD TO THIS SOFTWARE, INCLUDING ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS, IN NO EVENT SHALL THE CONTRIBUTORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, INDIRECT OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM LOSS OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 09:05:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 05:05:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235113] Review Request: slf4j - Simple Logging Facade for Java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110905.l3B95gL1002992@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slf4j - Simple Logging Facade for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235113 asimon at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|asimon at redhat.com |nsantos at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From asimon at redhat.com 2007-04-11 05:05 EST ------- OK * match upstream tarball or project name OK * try to match previous incarnations in other distributions/packagers for consistency ---> I agree with your comment OK * specfile should be %{name}.spec ---> I agree with your comment OK * OSI-approved ---> I agree with your comment OK * is it covered by patents? ---> under X11 license OK * verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches > do) ---> md5sum matches OK * correct buildroot should be: OK * if %{?dist} is used OK * license text included in package and marked with %doc OK * packages meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) ---> Could be nice to get rid of those unwanted directories and files: /.svn/, /test/, /TODO.txt, /src/.svn etc with .svn directories OK * rpmlint on .srpm gives no output OK * specfile is legible OK * package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86 OK * BuildRequires are proper ---> 8 warning though OK * use macros appropriately and consistently OK * consider using cp -p to preserve timestamps OK * file permissions should be okay; %defattrs should be present OK * %clean should be present OK * verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs OK * run rpmlint on the binary RPMs OK * package should build on i386 OK * package should build in mock -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 09:14:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 05:14:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235113] Review Request: slf4j - Simple Logging Facade for Java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704110914.l3B9Er6C003672@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slf4j - Simple Logging Facade for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235113 ------- Additional Comments From asimon at redhat.com 2007-04-11 05:14 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=152258) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=152258&action=view) guild log This is the build log for reference -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 10:15:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 06:15:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225839] Merge Review: gnome-terminal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111015.l3BAFRjN007629@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-terminal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225839 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-04-11 06:15 EST ------- > Unused patches are not removed from cvs. Irrelevant for a package review. > And /usr/share/gnome/help/, which package should owns this directory? There has been discussion about doing a filesystem-desktop or filesystem-gnome package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 10:16:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 06:16:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225765] Merge Review: fonts-japanese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111016.l3BAGOFS007678@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-japanese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225765 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2007-04-11 06:16 EST ------- all the files under /etc/ghostscript has been moved to /usr/share/ghostscript/conf.d in 0.20061016-5.fc7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 10:29:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 06:29:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221027] Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111029.l3BAT8Ml008156@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221027 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk |nobody at fedoraproject.org BugsThisDependsOn|221184 | OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | Flag|needinfo?(paul at all-the- | |johnsons.co.uk) | ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-04-11 06:28 EST ------- following comment #24, I'm removing Paul Johnson from the reviewer list. Feel free to tqke over the reviewer :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 10:29:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 06:29:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221184] Review Request: libundo - Undo/redo information managing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111029.l3BATpYR008198@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libundo - Undo/redo information managing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221184 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|221027 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 10:33:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 06:33:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221027] Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111033.l3BAXnFJ008344@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221027 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 10:45:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 06:45:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229490] Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111045.l3BAjlFK008915@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229490 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-04-11 06:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #21) > desktop-file-install --vendor "" \ > --add-category Utilities \ > [...] It should be "Utility" instead of "Utilities". If not, during the build you will have: /var/tmp/pypar2-1.3-3.fc7-root-chitlesh/usr/share/applications/pypar2.desktop: warning: Categories values must be one of "AudioVideo", "Audio", "Video", "Development", "Education", "Game", "Graphics", "Network", "Office", "Settings", "System", "Utility", "Building", "Debugger", "IDE", "GUIDesigner", "Profiling", "RevisionControl", "Translation", "Calendar", "ContactManagement", "Database", "Dictionary", "Chart", "Email", "Finance", "FlowChart", "PDA", "ProjectManagement", "Presentation", "Spreadsheet", "WordProcessor", "2DGraphics", "VectorGraphics", "RasterGraphics", "3DGraphics", "Scanning", "OCR", "Photography", "Viewer", "DesktopSettings", "HardwareSettings", "PackageManager", "Dialup", "InstantMessaging", "IRCClient", "FileTransfer", "HamRadio", "News", "P2P", "RemoteAccess", "Telephony", "WebBrowser", "WebDevelopment", "Midi", "Mixer", "Sequencer", "Tuner", "TV", "AudioVideoEditing", "Player", "Recorder", "DiscBurning", "ActionGame", "AdventureGame", "ArcadeGame", "BoardGame", "BlocksGame", "CardGame", "KidsGame", "LogicGame", "RolePlaying", "Simulation", "SportsGame", "StrategyGame", "Art", "Construction", "Music", "Languages", "Science", "Astronomy", "Biology", "Chemistry", "Geology", "Math", "MedicalSoftware", "Physics", "Amusement", "Archiving", "Electronics", "Emulator", "Engineering", "FileManager", "TerminalEmulator", "Filesystem", "Monitor", "Security", "Accessibility", "Calculator", "Clock", "TextEditor", "Core", "KDE", "GNOME", "GTK", "Qt", "Motif", "Java", "ConsoleOnly", "Screensaver", "TrayIcon", "Applet", "Shell" (found "Utilities") -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 10:49:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 06:49:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226387] Merge Review: samba In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111049.l3BAnKRE009125@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: samba https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226387 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2007-04-11 06:49 EST ------- Shouldn't /etc/samba/smb.conf be a marked as %config(noreplace) or at least %config? At the moment smb.conf gets overridden on every update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 11:13:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 07:13:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226048] Merge Review: libtheora In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111113.l3BBD9iI010252@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libtheora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226048 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-04-11 07:13 EST ------- All the Bads and Maybes seem to be fixed in the current rawhide package, except for the version. The only way to fix it that I can see would be to add an epoch, since rpm considers 1.0alpha > 1.0. Is this worth an epoch ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 11:14:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 07:14:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226056] Merge Review: libvorbis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111114.l3BBEBmD010309@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libvorbis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226056 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-04-11 07:14 EST ------- Brian, anything left here ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 11:18:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 07:18:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111118.l3BBIASb010639@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-04-11 07:18 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/RPMS/netgen.spec SRPM http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/RPMS/netgen-1.3.7-5.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 11:18:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 07:18:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226387] Merge Review: samba In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111118.l3BBISsf010673@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: samba https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226387 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2007-04-11 07:18 EST ------- For comment #23 : Where you have seen it exactly? I see "%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/samba/smb.conf" anywhere... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 11:38:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 07:38:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225957] Merge Review: k3b In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111138.l3BBc7iU011744@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: k3b https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225957 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-04-11 07:38 EST ------- OK, let me rephrase... After the merge, if you don't mind, I can help co-maintain k3b, and then *we* can do the rest. Sound better? :) Regardless, we'd like to get the Obsoletes in place asap (ie, in time for f7t4). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 11:38:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 07:38:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226134] Merge Review: mdadm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111138.l3BBcAjP011770@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mdadm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226134 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(dledford at redhat.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-04-11 07:38 EST ------- Quick pre-review of release 2.6.1-2.fc7 * RPM name is OK * Source mdadm-2.6.1.tgz is the same as upstream * This is the latest version * Builds fine in mock * License GPL, is OK Needs work: * BuildRoot should be %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) (wiki: Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot) * Missing SMP flags. If it doesn't build with it, please add a comment (wiki: Packaging/Guidelines#parallelmake) * Spec file: there is a "/sbin" in make install which should be replaced with RPM macros (%_sbindir) (wiki: Packaging/Guidelines#macros) * The BuildRoot must be cleaned at the beginning of %install * make install (static ?) -- compiles stuff but does not use rpm_opt_flags; why is it not compiled in %build ? * Timestamps are not preserved for man pages, mdadm.conf-example and init.d/mdmonitor (you should probably use install -p) * Missing dependancies on chkconfig and service for %post / %preun / %postun * mdadm service is enabled by default in /etc/rc.d/init.d/mdmonitor. Fedora policy recommends services to be off by default and allow the admin to enable them at will * Most of the ANNOUNCE files could be dropped. The useful information is available in the Changelog file * In %Changelog, the line with 2.5.0-6 (which should have been 1.5.0-6) contains an unescaped macro (%postun) * Should require /usr/sbin/sendmail or maybe MTA, not smtpdaemon. See also DSendmail="/usr/sbin/sendmail -t" in the Makefile -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 11:44:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 07:44:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111144.l3BBiwQ1012296@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 ------- Additional Comments From mefoster at gmail.com 2007-04-11 07:44 EST ------- I've done a bit more testing and uploaded new versions. Changes: - ice-arch: removed 1.5-ism (assert) from included Java class - ice-dotnet: added "BuildArch: noarch" - ice-java: added "BuildArch: noarch" and "BuildRequires: ant-nodeps" Specs are in the same place as before. Here are the new SRPMS: http://www6.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/~foster/extras/ice/ice-3.2.0-2.src.rpm http://www6.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/~foster/extras/ice/ice-java-3.2.0-2.src.rpm http://www6.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/~foster/extras/ice/ice-dotnet-3.2.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 11:49:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 07:49:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned CJK bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111149.l3BBnIIW012701@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned CJK bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-04-11 07:49 EST ------- > So, I prefer to stay with CJK in the title. At the same time, with more people > start using our font, I also hope more Japanese and Korean people to get > involved in the glyph optimization. Our wiki is open to all people and the > submitted glyph will be automatically compiled into nightly-build fonts. Ok. Well the "CJK" wording is a smaller detail, I just thought it might be safer to call it a Chinese font with support for Japanese and Korean. I lived in Japan for 12 years until last year and have yet to see a unified CJK font - there are usually considerable differences between Chinese Hanzi and Japanese Kanji glyphs but perhaps I will be pleasantly surprised. In the long term if it were really possible to make a unified font it would make CJK support much easier. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 11:51:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 07:51:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233802] Review Request: python-xlib - Fully functional X client library for Python programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111151.l3BBp1uD012885@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-xlib - Fully functional X client library for Python programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233802 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-04-11 07:50 EST ------- Looks good, except you prolly don't want/need %doc README COPYING in *both* packages (just the main one). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 12:08:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 08:08:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111208.l3BC8UXp013890@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-04-11 08:08 EST ------- Little notes: Change something in %files-section from /usr/bin/dumpdb /usr/bin/transformdb /usr/bin/glacier2router /usr/bin/icebox /usr/bin/iceboxadmin /usr/bin/icecpp /usr/bin/icepatch2calc /usr/bin/icepatch2client /usr/bin/icepatch2server /usr/bin/icestormadmin /usr/bin/slice2docbook /usr/bin/slice2html /usr/bin/icegridadmin /usr/bin/icegridnode /usr/bin/icegridregistry /usr/bin/iceca /usr/bin/ImportKey.class to %{_bindir}/dumpdb %{_bindir}/transformdb %{_bindir}/glacier2router %{_bindir}/icebox %{_bindir}/iceboxadmin %{_bindir}/icecpp %{_bindir}/icepatch2calc %{_bindir}/icepatch2client %{_bindir}/icepatch2server %{_bindir}/icestormadmin %{_bindir}/slice2docbook %{_bindir}/slice2html %{_bindir}/icegridadmin %{_bindir}/icegridnode %{_bindir}/icegridregistry %{_bindir}/iceca %{_bindir}/ImportKey.class and /etc/init.d/icegridregistry /etc/init.d/icegridnode /etc/init.d/glacier2router %config(noreplace) /etc/icegridregistry.conf %config(noreplace) /etc/icegridnode.conf %config(noreplace) /etc/glacier2router.conf to %{_sysconfdir}/init.d/icegridregistry %{_sysconfdir}/init.d/icegridnode %{_sysconfdir}/init.d/glacier2router %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/icegridregistry.conf %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/icegridnode.conf %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/glacier2router.conf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 12:14:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 08:14:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111214.l3BCEXAm014195@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250 ------- Additional Comments From alain.portal at free.fr 2007-04-11 08:14 EST ------- What have I to do? I can't access to the link http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure I get a 502 error -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 12:34:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 08:34:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111234.l3BCYPFv015389@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-11 08:34 EST ------- I can see the URL correctly. Still can't you access, Alain? If still you cannot, please answer the following questions. * Would you want to be a co-maintainer? * Would you want to be in a CC-list? * Or would you want to make your name completely removed from piklab owner list? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 12:41:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 08:41:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226196] Merge Review: perl-Newt (was: newt-perl) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111241.l3BCfQk5015774@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Newt (was: newt-perl) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226196 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium jorton at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de ------- Additional Comments From jorton at redhat.com 2007-04-11 08:41 EST ------- *** Bug 216610 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 12:45:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 08:45:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111245.l3BCjHFa016028@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250 ------- Additional Comments From alain.portal at free.fr 2007-04-11 08:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #30) > I can see the URL correctly. Still can't you access, Alain? Still have problem for all the site. > If still you cannot, please answer the following questions. > > * Would you want to be a co-maintainer? > * Would you want to be in a CC-list? > * Or would you want to make your name completely removed from > piklab owner list? After a discussion with Chitlesh, he become co-. maintainer -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 12:46:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 08:46:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111246.l3BCkTv8016142@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: wqy-bitmap- |Review Request: wqy-bitmap- |fonts - a fine-tuned CJK |fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese |bitmap font |bitmap font ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-04-11 08:46 EST ------- Ok I tested the font now in gedit. While it looks nice I can't honestly say that the font is suitable for native Japanese. The kana (hiragana and katakana) look fine, (though I noticed some misalignment between some hiragana and other glyphs at 10 and 11pt), but the kanji do standout in eyes of Japanese i am afraid. (I can attach some screenshots if you are interested to see some examples.:) A few more comments: - Is there any particular reason for using a subdir (wenquanyi/wqy-bitmapfont) for the fonts? Do you expect other fonts in wenquanyi/ in the future? - You don't really need to include all the upstream changelog details in spec file at least not for the initial package. Usually starting with something like: %changelog *Sun Feb 18 2007 Qianqian Fang 0.8.0-1 - initial packaging for Fedora (#230560) would be sufficient. - I see wqy-bitmapfont-pcf-0.8.1-7.tar.gz was released upstream, after wqy-bitmapfont-pcf-0.8.0-6.tar.gz, how about changing the upstream version numbering scheme? Eg why not just number the next release wqy-bitmapfont-pcf-0.8.2.tar.gz say? :) - AFAICT the md5sum of the tarball in the srpm and the one on sourceforge are different. The package tarball must be identical to the upstream released tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 12:53:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 08:53:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225957] Merge Review: k3b In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111253.l3BCrcmd016840@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: k3b https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225957 ------- Additional Comments From harald at redhat.com 2007-04-11 08:53 EST ------- k3b-1.0-1.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 12:54:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 08:54:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111254.l3BCscKC016957@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-04-11 08:54 EST ------- Sorry, one other point about the sponsorship process, since Contributors are able to review and approve other submitted packages it would help to show your understanding of the review process if you can do a so-called "pre-review" of another package currently awaiting review. When doing a pre-review one should state that it is a pre-review but make useful comments along the Fedora Review Guidelines. If you can add a link to such a pre-review here that would be very helpful. Feel free to ask me offline if you need more details. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 13:05:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 09:05:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111305.l3BD5iwf018063@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-04-11 09:05 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: piklab Updated Fedora Owners: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au, alain.portal at free.fr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 13:07:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 09:07:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222589] Review Request: dolphin - A file manager for KDE focusing on usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111307.l3BD7a84018310@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dolphin - A file manager for KDE focusing on usability https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222589 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-04-11 09:07 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: piklab Updated Fedora Owners: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au, johan at x-tnd.be -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 13:08:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 09:08:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222589] Review Request: dolphin - A file manager for KDE focusing on usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111308.l3BD8tIe018549@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dolphin - A file manager for KDE focusing on usability https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222589 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-04-11 09:08 EST ------- please discard comment #6 Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: dolphin Updated Fedora Owners: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au, johan at x-tnd.be -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 13:10:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 09:10:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111310.l3BDAc0S018826@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 Bug 190189 depends on bug 214193, which changed state. Bug 214193 Summary: sip-4.6 (and PyQt-3.17.1) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214193 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|RAWHIDE | Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 13:23:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 09:23:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226387] Merge Review: samba In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111323.l3BDN1Cv020107@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: samba https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226387 ssorce at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From ssorce at redhat.com 2007-04-11 09:22 EST ------- The file is replaced only if it was never touched at all IIRC. It _IS_ marked as %config(noreplace) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 13:41:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 09:41:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226387] Merge Review: samba In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111341.l3BDfQgI021563@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: samba https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226387 dmitry at butskoy.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|RAWHIDE | ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2007-04-11 09:41 EST ------- Simo, this ticket was not about comment #23 only... ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 13:46:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 09:46:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229321] Review Request: pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111346.l3BDkl47021929@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229321 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 13:58:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 09:58:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 170303] Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111358.l3BDwHxg022738@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170303 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 14:01:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:01:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229321] Review Request: pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111401.l3BE1t5F023074@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229321 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-04-11 10:01 EST ------- At first glance, you need to add BuildRequires: libpqxx-devel. Also, once built, rpmlint complains about a lack of docs in -devel, but is otherwise clean. TBC. . . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 14:12:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:12:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225783] Merge Review: gdb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111412.l3BECw8b024068@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gdb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225783 ------- Additional Comments From jan.kratochvil at redhat.com 2007-04-11 10:12 EST ------- Thanks for the review. As I still wait on one review listing here the preliminary changelog entry going to be committed soon. 1.+2.+3.+4.+5.+6.+7.+ulimit+prelink: All implemented. 6. It is useful but there are now stored all the installed packages versions in the logs from mock. Your note about build hang on FC6 is not reproducible - WORKSFORME. If you target rebuilds in mock, it may be a DUPLICATE of the still pending Bug 221351. * Wed Apr 11 2007 Jan Kratochvil - 6.6-9 - Package review, analysed by Ralf Corsepius (BZ 225783). - Fix prelink(8) testcase for non-root $PATH missing `/usr/sbin' (BZ 225783). - Fix debugging GDB itself - the compiled in source files paths (BZ 225783). - Fix XML support - the build was missing `expat-devel'. - Updated `info' spec file support. - Building now with the standard Fedora code protections - _FORTIFY_SOURCE=2. - Use multiple CPUs for the build (%{?_smp_mflags}). - Separate testsuite run to its %check section. - Fix (remove) non-ASCII spec file characters. - Remove system tools versions dumping - already present in mock build logs. - BuildRequires now `libunwind-devel' instead of the former `libunwind'. - Use the runtime variant of `libunwind-ARCH.so.7' rather than the `.so' one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 14:14:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:14:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225783] Merge Review: gdb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111414.l3BEE7sC024228@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gdb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225783 jan.kratochvil at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jan.kratochvil at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 14:17:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:17:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234860] Review Request: perl-Mail-IMAPClient - An IMAP Client API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111417.l3BEHcoL024741@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-IMAPClient - An IMAP Client API Alias: perl-Mail-IMAPClient https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234860 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-11 10:17 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Mail-IMAPClient Short Description: An IMAP Client API Owners: tcallawa at redhat.com Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 14:35:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:35:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233597] Review Request: pigment - Media Center Toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111435.l3BEZjfk026503@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pigment - Media Center Toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233597 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 14:41:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:41:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225522] Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111441.l3BEfXNi027318@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225522 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 14:42:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:42:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235636] Review Request: pipepanic - A pipe connecting game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111442.l3BEgK4d027384@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pipepanic - A pipe connecting game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235636 ------- Additional Comments From adam at spicenitz.org 2007-04-11 10:42 EST ------- Hi, I'd be happy to review this if you help me out and review a game for me: Escape: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235588 Data for Escape: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235589 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 14:48:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:48:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221027] Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111448.l3BEmJEc028098@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221027 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-11 10:48 EST ------- Well, actually I have not read the previous discussion in this bug, so some of them I write below may be already addressed previously... For 1.5.1.5-4: A. Spec file description * SourceURL - Please check http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL * Dependency for main package - Usually dependency for main package should be release number specific. * Conditional dependency -------------------------------------------------------- # Use of --enable-final: The gsl version 1.6 has a bug which may cause problems. -------------------------------------------------------- - While I don't know what --enable-final does, however rawhide gsl is gsl-1.8-3.fc7. Please check if this feature can be enabled. By the way, configure checkes gsl version....... -------------------------------------------------------- gsl : yes gsl-devel : yes gsl >= 1.4 : yes gsl >= 1.6 : yes gsl >= 1.7 : yes -------------------------------------------------------- B. File entry * French documentation files - While you split br, de, ... language documentation files into seperate subpackages, why don't you split French documents? * Doc rpms dependency - Currently, this is corrupted. Also for _installed_ rpms, I get the following rpmlint. -------------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ rpmlint LabPlot-doc-it W: LabPlot-doc-it dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/it/LabPlot/small_pics ../../en/LabPlot/small_pics [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ rpm -qa | grep LabPlot | sort LabPlot-1.5.1.5-4.fc7 LabPlot-devel-1.5.1.5-4.fc7 LabPlot-doc-it-1.5.1.5-4.fc7 -------------------------------------------------------- B. rpmlint * Attached (currently only 3 rpms above are installed). Summary: - There are many files withWindows style end-of-line encoding. NOTE: there are no complaint about this on main package, however allmost all files under /usr/share/apps/LabPlot/colormaps in main package also have Windows-like end-of-file encodings so they should be fixed. - Symlinks are corrupted (see above) - For undefined-non-weak-symbol: * First of all, what is the use of -devel package? There are no header files in -devel package, so generally other applications has no way to know how to link against libLabPlot.so or libLabPlotcephes.so. Is this -devel package really useful? * If the libraries libLabPlot.so or libLabPlotcephes.so are supposed to be linked from other packages, then these undefined-non-weak-symbols are the BLOCKER for this review request because leaving these symbols leads linkage for these libraries to failure. C. File check * Non-UTF8 documentation - Some of the documents installed are not encoded in UTF-8. -------------------------------------------------------- /usr/share/doc/LabPlot-1.5.1.5/BUGS: ISO-8859 English text /usr/share/doc/LabPlot-1.5.1.5/ChangeLog: ISO-8859 Java program text /usr/share/doc/LabPlot-1.5.1.5/TODO: ISO-8859 English text /usr/share/doc/LabPlot-1.5.1.5/WISHLIST: ISO-8859 English text -------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 14:49:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:49:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221027] Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111449.l3BEnpli028175@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221027 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-11 10:49 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=152278) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=152278&action=view) rpmlint log for LabPlot 1.5.1.5-4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 14:52:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:52:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235962] Review Request: perl-Config-Any - Load configuration from different file formats, transparently In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111452.l3BEqPTm028458@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Any - Load configuration from different file formats, transparently Alias: perl-Config-Any https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235962 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-11 10:52 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Config-Any Short Description: Load configuration from different file formats, transparently Owners: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Branches: FC-5, FC-6, devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 14:52:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:52:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235962] Review Request: perl-Config-Any - Load configuration from different file formats, transparently In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111452.l3BEqbRN028522@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Any - Load configuration from different file formats, transparently Alias: perl-Config-Any https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235962 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 14:56:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:56:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225610] Merge Review: bcel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111456.l3BEubii028968@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bcel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225610 ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-04-11 10:56 EST ------- * The examples/Mini README probably shouldn't be marked as a %doc as it makes more sense to just leave it in the Mini directory. * The demo package probably shouldn't install things to %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version} but to %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/demo * It seems strange that the demo package doesn't have any documentation describing what the classes do and how to build them. But I guess the sources don't have this information either * The build file for the demo package is the build.xml for the whole project. Perhaps this should be included in the demo package (or maybe a subset that would only build the demos?) * The manual subpackage just has the license file in there, there should be more to the manual than this. maybe the manual only gets built if using maven? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 14:57:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:57:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229321] Review Request: pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111457.l3BEvxDk029132@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229321 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2007-04-11 10:57 EST ------- Hello, (In reply to comment #5) > At first glance, you need to add BuildRequires: libpqxx-devel. AFAICS pgpool-II does not depend on libpqxx-devel. Are you sure about that? > Also, once built, rpmlint complains about a lack of docs in -devel, but is > otherwise clean. Thanks a lot for this review. Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 14:59:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:59:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229321] Review Request: pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111459.l3BExlS4029397@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229321 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-04-11 10:59 EST ------- It build with it, and not without it, on FC6. I'm testing a mock build without it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 15:05:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 11:05:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221027] Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111505.l3BF55Aw030001@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221027 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-11 11:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #21) > the supplied liborigin from LabPlot is no more built, but however it calls for > liborigin.la. > > liborigin.la isn't supplied by the liborigin that recently got approved. > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223598 IMO you should apply a patch against LabPlot to use system-wide liborigin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 15:08:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 11:08:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 212003] Review Request: mugshot - Companion software for mugshot.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111508.l3BF8gEk030438@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mugshot - Companion software for mugshot.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212003 ------- Additional Comments From otaylor at redhat.com 2007-04-11 11:08 EST ------- Right now, mugshot is excluded from being propagated to the Fedora extras yum repository. This was done so that we could do testing before users got upgraded to a new version of the client, and also coordinate client and server pushes to happen at the same time. But in retrospect, it's probably more confusing than it's worth, so we'll likely request that this exclusion be removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 15:11:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 11:11:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226387] Merge Review: samba In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111511.l3BFB8wV030807@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: samba https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226387 ------- Additional Comments From ssorce at redhat.com 2007-04-11 11:11 EST ------- ops! :) Do you still have open questions about the current package? Maybe we can open a new bug with any missing piece? We are going to move to 3.0.25 btw. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 15:16:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 11:16:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226387] Merge Review: samba In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111516.l3BFGhTB031361@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: samba https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226387 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2007-04-11 11:16 EST ------- > Maybe we can open a new bug with any missing piece? AFAIK the review ticket should be unique for all package's lifetime... > We are going to move to 3.0.25 btw. I know. Comment #22 seems still actual... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 15:29:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 11:29:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226048] Merge Review: libtheora In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111529.l3BFT82A000865@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libtheora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226048 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-04-11 11:29 EST ------- Introducing an Epoch should be delayed as long as it makes sense. The next upstream version might for example be "1.1" instead of "1.0" which would mean an Epoch introduced today would have had only negative effects. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 15:30:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 11:30:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226134] Merge Review: mdadm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111530.l3BFUfs0001101@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mdadm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226134 dledford at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(dledford at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From dledford at redhat.com 2007-04-11 11:30 EST ------- BuildRoot fixed Missing SMP flags fixed /sbin != %{_sbindir}, and this package *really* needs to be in /sbin, not /usr/sbin Cleaning of buildroot done The make during build was due to building things out of order and the Makefile was rebuilding mdadm because the object files were newer than the mdadm binary. Make mdadm the last thing to be built during %build solves the issue. Timestamps for man pages and mdmonitor fixed, for all the others they are done as part of the %doc macro, so if that gets them wrong then there's not much to do (although viewing the output shows %doc is using -p, so I suspect their timestamps are actually correct). Dependencies done. mdadm is a reasonable exception to the default off policy. It exits immediately if there is nothing for it to monitor, and if there is something for it to monitor, it's responsible for notifying the admin of failure events in their hardware that might compromise their raid subsystem integrity. Announce files dropped. Changelog fixed As for sendmail, don't all the various MTA alternatives that provide smtpdaemon also provide a sendmail compatibility link via alternatives? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 16:25:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:25:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226134] Merge Review: mdadm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111625.l3BGPUaX008758@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mdadm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226134 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-04-11 12:25 EST ------- WRT smtpdaemon: please read this thread https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-April/msg00377.html The problem is not that all MTA alternatives that provide smtpdaemon also provide a sendmail compatibility link but that mdadm really needs JUST that compatibility link. We could say that by mere coincidence some packages which provide /usr/sbin/sendmail also provide smtpdaemon. In my case, I have added "Provides: smtpdaemon" to ssmtp ONLY to satisfy mdadm and mailx who do not really need it [*] /sbin: You are right, I apologize. I was thinking that %{_sbindir}= /sbin Full review coming soon. First glance almost everything seems OK. [*] Once this review is done I'll file bugs against all other versions of mdadm (RHEL 3/4/5, FC5/6) to have Requires:smtpdaemon replaced. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 16:40:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:40:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229321] Review Request: pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111640.l3BGeVG2010024@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229321 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-04-11 12:40 EST ------- Mock confirms the need for that BR. Otherwise mock build happily, and the resulting RPMS have only the -devel doc warning, otherwise clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 16:46:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:46:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229321] Review Request: pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111646.l3BGkBoA010739@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229321 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-04-11 12:46 EST ------- Needs naming guidelines. Good spec name. Meets Packaging Guidelines, AFAICS. License is OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 17:01:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 13:01:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222994] Review Request: koverartist - Create CD/DVD covers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111701.l3BH1qF0011817@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: koverartist - Create CD/DVD covers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222994 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rdieter at math.unl.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 17:11:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 13:11:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229321] Review Request: pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111711.l3BHBIhq012481@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229321 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-04-11 13:11 EST ------- Spec is American English, and legible. ISSUE: md5sum from upstream adf88e4b7eb7f3347740a6b54aa09e92 pgpool-II-1.0.2.tar.gz md5sum from SRPM 4abe109bfc3c78d441a9533365ccccd7 /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/pgpool-II-1.0.2.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 17:17:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 13:17:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226056] Merge Review: libvorbis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111717.l3BHHeSn013062@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libvorbis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226056 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2007-04-11 13:17 EST ------- Nope, you changes look fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 17:28:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 13:28:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222994] Review Request: koverartist - Create CD/DVD covers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111728.l3BHSPtM014103@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: koverartist - Create CD/DVD covers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222994 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-04-11 13:28 EST ------- 1. MUST add/use scriptlets for icons: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-7103f6c38d1b5735e8477bdd569ad73ea2c49bda 2. MUST add scriptlets for mimetypes http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-de6770dd9867fcd085a73a4700f6bcd0d10294ef 3. SHOULD omit # Set correct entry for "DocPath" in desktop-file workaround. It's a workaround for a harmless rpmlint/desktop-file-install warning 4. (imo) SHOULD set/revert Group: Applications/Multimedia (Group isn't really used anywhere, so it's not a big deal) 5. SHOULD use desktop-file-install --vendor "" \ --dir %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/kde I'll kick off a mock build, and if it builds/runs ok, then fix at least the MUST items, and I'll APPROVE this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 17:28:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 13:28:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236041] New: Review Request: libx86 - libx86 library from X Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236041 Summary: Review Request: libx86 - libx86 library from X Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pjones at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pjones/libx86.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pjones/libx86-0.99-2.src.rpm Description: libx86 is used by X and vbetool and some other things, and right now they're all using their own copies. ergo, here's a package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 17:29:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 13:29:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236041] Review Request: libx86 - libx86 library from X In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111729.l3BHTdIc014230@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libx86 - libx86 library from X https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236041 pjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Core Component|Package Review |Package Review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 17:32:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 13:32:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236041] Review Request: libx86 - libx86 library from X In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111732.l3BHWAdc014485@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libx86 - libx86 library from X https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236041 pjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jkeating at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 17:42:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 13:42:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222994] Review Request: koverartist - Create CD/DVD covers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111742.l3BHguMX015559@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: koverartist - Create CD/DVD covers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222994 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-04-11 13:42 EST ------- mock build succeeded, and runs ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 17:48:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 13:48:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233850] Review Request: freepops - POP3 interface to webmails In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111748.l3BHmKe9016051@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freepops - POP3 interface to webmails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233850 ------- Additional Comments From francesco at francesco-laurita.info 2007-04-11 13:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > > You have to > - first submit a review request of the libraries this package uses > (luafilesystem, luacurl, luaexpat...) seperately > - add patches to freepops so that freepops uses the _external_ libraries > you submitted seperately. > I'm working on it. I'll keep u informed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 17:51:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 13:51:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236041] Review Request: libx86 - libx86 library from X In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111751.l3BHpnsn016343@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libx86 - libx86 library from X https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236041 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(pjones at redhat.com) ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2007-04-11 13:51 EST ------- Cosmetic, but any reason for BuildPreReq instead of just BuildReq? Also lame, but since our RPM can't do it itself yet, buildroot value MUST be below %{_tmppath}/ and MUST contain at least %{name}, %{version} and %{release}. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-b4fdd45fa76cbf54c885ef0836361319ab962473 Source tag should be a URL to the upstream tarball if possible: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL (somewhat cosmetic, but helpful too) Another cosmetic thing, summary isn't capitalized, but since the first word is the name of the software, and that name is 'libx86' this is ignorable. Package currently doesn't build for rawhide x86_64. The build on i386 had a couple interesting rpmlint issues: E: libx86 shlib-with-non-pic-code /usr/lib/libx86.so.1 shlib-with-non-pic-code : The listed shared libraries contain object code that was compiled without -fPIC. All object code in shared libraries should be recompiled separately from the static libraries with the -fPIC option. Another common mistake that causes this problem is linking with ``gcc -Wl,-shared'' instead of ``gcc -shared''. W: libx86-devel spurious-executable-perm /usr/include/libx86.h No reason why that should be executable, but it's just a warning. x86_64 build issue: make LIBRARY=static static make[1]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/libx86-0.99' cc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -c -o x86-common.o x86-common.c x86-common.c: In function 'get_int_seg': x86-common.c:193: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size x86-common.c: In function 'get_int_off': x86-common.c:200: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size cc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -c -o lrmi.o lrmi.c lrmi.c:83: error: field 'vm' has incomplete type Cascade from there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 17:57:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 13:57:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223657] Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111757.l3BHv3eV016817@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223657 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(cgtobi at gmail.com) | ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-04-11 13:57 EST ------- SRPMS: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/PerceptualDiff/PerceptualDiff-1.0.1-1.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm SPEC: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/PerceptualDiff/PerceptualDiff.spec Summary: An image comparison utility I took the Review Request for this package as proposed to Tobias (he's away from a Fedora workstation). Sorry for the delay... Update to 1.0.1 Allow x86_64 Fix RPATHs rpmlint is silent mock build in progress for devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 18:02:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 14:02:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229321] Review Request: pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111802.l3BI2pmt017569@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229321 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-04-11 14:02 EST ------- Builds locally and in mock on x86. BRs, see above. No locales to handle. ldconfig correct. Not relocatable. Explicitly creates no directories. ISSUE: %{_mandir}/man8/* will own all man8 man pages. Must be narrowed down. No dupes, perms ok. %clean correct. Macros OK. Code, not content. Docs are reasonably sized and non-critical at runtime. Dev/static handling correct, no .la. No pkgconfig.pc. Devel requires base, versioned. Not a GUI app. %install begins correctly. ALL filenames UTF8. All MUSTS are OK except for the BR, md5sum, and man8 ownership. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 18:43:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 14:43:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225522] Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111843.l3BIhBuJ023185@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225522 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-04-11 14:43 EST ------- FYI: Cinepaint 0.22 released. http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=75029&package_id=76680&release_id=492079 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 18:47:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 14:47:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222994] Review Request: koverartist - Create CD/DVD covers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111847.l3BIlkLx023823@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: koverartist - Create CD/DVD covers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222994 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2007-04-11 14:47 EST ------- Fixed 1,2,3 To 4: Applications/Publishing is also used in kover. So I've taken it from there (maybe it should be changed in both) To 5: See comment #5 and comment #6 Spec URL: http://www.deadbabylon.de/fedora/extras/koverartist/koverartist.spec SRPM URL: http://www.deadbabylon.de/fedora/extras/koverartist/koverartist-0.5-6.fc6.src.rpm Changelog: - run gtk-update-icon-cache on post and postun - run update-desktop-database on post and postun - added BR: desktop-file-utils -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 19:07:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 15:07:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225522] Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111907.l3BJ75Ku025035@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225522 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-04-11 15:06 EST ------- Yes - I'm currently working on it I would like to work also on oyranos first, but i have not much success for now... I will update review soon... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 19:10:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 15:10:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225691] Merge Review: dhcp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111910.l3BJARg1025410@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: dhcp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225691 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|dcantrell at redhat.com |pertusus at free.fr Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-04-11 15:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > /var/run is documented in the LFS as the location for these files. There should > be no reason that we need rpmbuild to provide that information at build time. > > Technically, I should be using /var/run/dhclient, but that's a patch for after > Fedora 7. I think that even if it is specified in the FHS, it is nice to let a user rebuilding the package be able to specify completely its install macros. Moreover if it is a patch that should be submitted upstream it is even more important to be able to specify another location at build time. Not a blocker for the review in any case. > > Issues: > > W: dhcp strange-permission linux.dbus-example 0775 > > W: dhcp strange-permission dhcpd-conf-to-ldap 0775 > > W: dhcp strange-permission linux 0775 > > This should be fixed if possible. > > Done. No, it is not fixed, because it is the perms in the src.rpm, but I think it cannot be fixed (because it is in cvs already). > > If it is really the case, you can fix the following > > W: dhcp mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 11, tab: line 324) > > I'm not seeing this. In fact it is line 654 now, in the changelog: - fix bug 176615: fix DDNS update when Windows-NT client sends host-name with trailing nul ^^^^^^^^ > IMHO, all mention of dhcpcd should be removed from the spec file anyway. That > package hasn't been around for many years. I think it is nice to keep Obsoletes/Provides for more than many years, when they are properly versionned. Still not a blocker, though. > > - exit 0 is not very pretty > > Not that it matters, but why is it not pretty? It's pointless since the shell > is already doing that, but why is it not pretty? It is not pointless, it is certainly there to for an exit code of 0 even if the preceding command had an exit code different from 0. I say it is not pretty because in my opinion it is better to avoid having an exit code of 1 in the first place. Let's do a reduced formal review: * rpmlint output ignorable (or not blocking) W: dhcp invalid-license ISC W: dhcp strange-permission linux.dbus-example 0775 W: dhcp strange-permission dhcpd-conf-to-ldap 0775 W: dhcp strange-permission linux 0775 E: dhcp configure-without-libdir-spec W: dhcp mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 11, tab: line 654) W: dhcp invalid-license ISC E: dhcp zero-length /var/lib/dhcpd/dhcpd.leases W: dhclient invalid-license ISC W: dhcp-devel invalid-license ISC W: libdhcp4client invalid-license ISC W: libdhcp4client no-documentation W: libdhcp4client-devel invalid-license ISC W: libdhcp4client-devel no-documentation W: dhcp-debuginfo invalid-license ISC * source match upstream, but source timestamp different. this should be fixed next time (by using spectoo -g, wget -N or the like). -rw-rw-r-- 1 dumas dumas 876591 nov 7 16:28 dhcp-3.0.5.tar.gz -rw-rw-r-- 1 dumas dumas 876591 nov 6 00:01 dhcp-3.0.5.tar.gz-orig ce5d30d4645e4eab1f54561b487d1ec7 dhcp-3.0.5.tar.gz * follow guidelines * specfile very legible and well commented * scriptlets right * %files section right Minor: according to the newest guideline, the *.a should be in a distinct package, named, for example dhcp-static-devel or the like, with Requires: %{name}-devel = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release} APPROVED Reassigning to me since it should be assigned to reviewer. Michael, you can reassign to you since you did the first review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 19:13:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 15:13:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221027] Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111913.l3BJDJgi025662@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221027 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-11 15:13 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=152314) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=152314&action=view) LabPlot.spec with some fixes added LabPlot.spec with - Use system liborigin library - Shut up undefined non-weak symbols - Fix end-of-line encodings of [Mm]ap file - Change the encoding of a part of documents - Require doc for doc-?? subpackage NOTE that not all of the issues I pointed out are fixed. Please check the spec file attached, and _modify_ it. Now rpmlint for binary rpms are ---------------------------------------------- W: LabPlot incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.5.1.5-4 1.5.1.5-4.2.fc7 W: LabPlot-devel no-documentation W: LabPlot-doc file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/LabPlot-doc-1.5.1.5/examples/qwt.lpl.gz W: LabPlot-doc file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/LabPlot-doc-1.5.1.5/examples/rydberg.lpl.gz W: LabPlot-doc file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/LabPlot-doc-1.5.1.5/examples/fit.lpl.gz W: LabPlot-doc file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/LabPlot-doc-1.5.1.5/examples/analysis.lpl.gz W: LabPlot-doc file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/LabPlot-doc-1.5.1.5/examples/axeslabel.lpl.gz W: LabPlot-doc-br dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/br/LabPlot/small_pics ../../en/LabPlot/small_pics W: LabPlot-doc-de dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/de/LabPlot/small_pics ../../en/LabPlot/small_pics W: LabPlot-doc-it dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/it/LabPlot/small_pics ../../en/LabPlot/small_pics W: LabPlot-doc-nl dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/nl/LabPlot/small_pics ../../en/LabPlot/small_pics W: LabPlot-doc-pl dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/pl/LabPlot/small_pics ../../en/LabPlot/small_pics W: LabPlot-doc-sv dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/sv/LabPlot/small_pics ../../en/LabPlot/small_pics -------------------------------------------------- For installed: -------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost i386]$ rpmlint LabPlot W: LabPlot incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.5.1.5-4 1.5.1.5-4.2.fc7 W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 /usr/lib/libgslcblas.so.0 W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 /usr/lib/liblcms.so.1 W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62 W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1 W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 /usr/lib/libXext.so.6 W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 /usr/lib/libSM.so.6 W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 /usr/lib/libICE.so.6 W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 /usr/lib/libXt.so.6 W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 /usr/lib/libbz2.so.1 W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 /lib/libz.so.1 W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 /usr/lib/libWand.so.10 W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 /lib/libpthread.so.0 W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 /usr/lib/libGL.so.1 W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 /usr/lib/libGLU.so.1 [tasaka1 at localhost i386]$ rpmlint LabPlot-devel W: LabPlot-devel no-documentation [tasaka1 at localhost i386]$ rpmlint LabPlot-doc-it [tasaka1 at localhost i386]$ rpmlint LabPlot-doc W: LabPlot-doc file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/LabPlot-doc-1.5.1.5/examples/qwt.lpl.gz W: LabPlot-doc file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/LabPlot-doc-1.5.1.5/examples/rydberg.lpl.gz W: LabPlot-doc file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/LabPlot-doc-1.5.1.5/examples/fit.lpl.gz W: LabPlot-doc file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/LabPlot-doc-1.5.1.5/examples/analysis.lpl.gz W: LabPlot-doc file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/LabPlot-doc-1.5.1.5/examples/axeslabel.lpl.gz ----------------------------------------------- ldd says: [tasaka1 at localhost i386]$ ldd -r /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so | grep liborigin liborigin.so.0 => /usr/lib/liborigin.so.0 (0x0098b000) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 19:14:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 15:14:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228186] Review Request: gsm - Shared libraries for GSM speech compressor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111914.l3BJExDE025807@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gsm - Shared libraries for GSM speech compressor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228186 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-04-11 15:14 EST ------- John, please update ypur spec according to the latest proposals. Take a look at Mattias's one here: http://ftp.freshrpms.net/pub/freshrpms/fedora/linux/6/gsm/gsm-1.0.12-1.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 19:16:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 15:16:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228186] Review Request: gsm - Shared libraries for GSM speech compressor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111916.l3BJG9DG025938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gsm - Shared libraries for GSM speech compressor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228186 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-04-11 15:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Take a look at Mattias's one here: Oops! s/Mattias/Matthias/g -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 19:25:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 15:25:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225522] Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111925.l3BJPmj0027074@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225522 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |236067 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 19:43:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 15:43:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221906] Review Request: gmediaserver - UPnP compatible media server for the GNU system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111943.l3BJhlgB028768@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gmediaserver - UPnP compatible media server for the GNU system Alias: gmediaserver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221906 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-11 15:43 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Rpmlint output: E: gmediaserver non-standard-uid /srv/gmediaserver gmediaserver E: gmediaserver non-standard-gid /srv/gmediaserver gmediaserver E: gmediaserver non-standard-uid /var/log/gmediaserver/gmediaserver.log gmediaserver E: gmediaserver non-standard-gid /var/log/gmediaserver/gmediaserver.log gmediaserver E: gmediaserver non-standard-uid /var/log/gmediaserver gmediaserver E: gmediaserver non-standard-gid /var/log/gmediaserver gmediaserver These are acceptable as the package will own the log and media directories. [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is written in American English. [x] Spec file for the package is legible. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : 7f99a9b2e32c41acf7e71eb0bc0840e9 MD5SUM upstream package: 7f99a9b2e32c41acf7e71eb0bc0840e9 [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: FC6/i386 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: Arches excluded: Why: [!] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. Build is not picking up the uuid libraries. These are not the ossp-uuid libraries that you added to the BR, but the e2fsprogs uuid libraries. Please remove uuid-devel from the BR and add e2pfsprogs-devel. BR also does not contain pkgconfig which is required for the uuid detection. [x] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: FC6/i386 [-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [?] Package functions as described. Unable to test as I don't have any upnp devices. [x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [x] File based requires are sane. [x] Latest version is packaged. === Issues === 1. Package source file timestamp does not match upstream. Consider downloading with "wget -N". 2. Missing/incorrect BR noted above. 3. init file line wraps on line 4-5, please pick a better break point 4. init file / LSB info requires $syslog - not needed since it does not use syslog === Final Notes === 1. I was only able to start/stop program and verify that it did run. I don't have a upnp media device to test with. I also noted that there was no information sent to the log files. If this seems to be a problem, please look into it. Go ahead and fix this up and I'll approve the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 19:53:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 15:53:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230806] Review Request: tasks - To-do list In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704111953.l3BJrc6d029884@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tasks - To-do list https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230806 ------- Additional Comments From dyoung at mesd.k12.or.us 2007-04-11 15:53 EST ------- Spec URL: http://files.mesd.k12.or.us/~dyoung/tasks/tasks.spec SRPM URL: http://files.mesd.k12.or.us/~dyoung/tasks/tasks-0.4-3.fc6.src.rpm - Preserve timestamps on install - Fix /usr/share/tasks/tasks-ui.xml files listing twice - Patch Help -> About -> License to fix name Thanks for the feedback. I'll continue to polish this one, am looking at some other candidates to package, and will try to do some pre-review on other packages. The license typo I patched out has been fixed in upstream SVN, but not yet released. I'll drop the patch when that happens. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 20:11:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:11:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225691] Merge Review: dhcp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704112011.l3BKB34o031453@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: dhcp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225691 ------- Additional Comments From dcantrell at redhat.com 2007-04-11 16:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > (In reply to comment #18) > > > /var/run is documented in the LFS as the location for these files. There should > > be no reason that we need rpmbuild to provide that information at build time. > > > > Technically, I should be using /var/run/dhclient, but that's a patch for after > > Fedora 7. > > I think that even if it is specified in the FHS, it is nice to > let a user rebuilding the package be able to specify completely > its install macros. > > Moreover if it is a patch that should be submitted upstream it is > even more important to be able to specify another location > at build time. Not a blocker for the review in any case. I'll look in to this post-F7. > > > Issues: > > > W: dhcp strange-permission linux.dbus-example 0775 > > > W: dhcp strange-permission dhcpd-conf-to-ldap 0775 > > > W: dhcp strange-permission linux 0775 > > > This should be fixed if possible. > > > > Done. > > No, it is not fixed, because it is the perms in the src.rpm, > but I think it cannot be fixed (because it is in cvs already). I removed them and re-added them to CVS with 0644 permissions. > > > If it is really the case, you can fix the following > > > W: dhcp mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 11, tab: line 324) > > > > I'm not seeing this. > > In fact it is line 654 now, in the changelog: > - fix bug 176615: fix DDNS update when Windows-NT client sends > host-name with trailing nul > ^^^^^^^^ I fixed up line 654 and a few other lines with tabs that shouldn't have had them (previous maintainer). > > IMHO, all mention of dhcpcd should be removed from the spec file anyway. That > > package hasn't been around for many years. > > I think it is nice to keep Obsoletes/Provides for more than many > years, when they are properly versionned. Still not a blocker, though. An Obsoletes is fine. But what are you suggesting for a Provides line? > > > - exit 0 is not very pretty > > > > Not that it matters, but why is it not pretty? It's pointless since the shell > > is already doing that, but why is it not pretty? > > It is not pointless, it is certainly there to for an exit code > of 0 even if the preceding command had an exit code different from > 0. I say it is not pretty because in my opinion it is better to > avoid having an exit code of 1 in the first place. Right, exit 0 forces a clean exit of the scriptlet which meant a failure of the preceeding operation doesn't matter. Using 'exit 0' is common practice for this, but we're really just splitting hairs here because we're both advocating the same thing...avoid exiting with a value other than 0. What's there now accomplishes that as did what was there before. > * source match upstream, but source timestamp different. > this should be fixed next time (by using spectoo -g, wget > -N or the like). > -rw-rw-r-- 1 dumas dumas 876591 nov 7 16:28 dhcp-3.0.5.tar.gz > -rw-rw-r-- 1 dumas dumas 876591 nov 6 00:01 dhcp-3.0.5.tar.gz-orig > > ce5d30d4645e4eab1f54561b487d1ec7 dhcp-3.0.5.tar.gz I can't fix that. The archive is the build system's lookaside cache and since the checksum isn't changing, I can't override it. If it really is a *big* deal, I can look in to getting it removed and reupload it to the lookaside cache. > Minor: > according to the newest guideline, the *.a should be in > a distinct package, named, for example > dhcp-static-devel or the like, with > Requires: %{name}-devel = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release} Done. Created dhcp-devel-static and libdhcp4client-devel-static. > APPROVED Hooray. > Reassigning to me since it should be assigned to reviewer. > Michael, you can reassign to you since you did the first review. I think you should stay as the reviewer for this package. You seem to have done a bulk of the reviewing. Also, I still have other reviews that no one has touched (225690, 225692, 225853, 226230, and 226337 :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 20:25:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:25:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227244] Review Request: gfa-0.4.1 - GTK+ fast address book In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704112025.l3BKPbok032567@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfa-0.4.1 - GTK+ fast address book https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227244 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-04-11 16:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > A quick comment: > * sourceURL > - For source0, please check > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL > * http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets > - This desktop file does not contain mimetype and > update-desktop-database is not needed. These 2 issues haven't been addressed yet. Damien, please proceed as necessary ASAP and close this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 20:56:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:56:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221675] Review Request: zd1211-firmware - Firmware for wireless devices based on zd1211 chipset In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704112056.l3BKuSxI002299@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zd1211-firmware - Firmware for wireless devices based on zd1211 chipset https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221675 ------- Additional Comments From ericm24x7 at gmail.com 2007-04-11 16:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > Please give me feedback! > RPM: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/zd1211-firmware/zd1211-firmware-1.3-3.kwizart.fc6.noarch.rpm I tested the above link on the latest FC7 development build (4.11.07). Installs and works perfectly! Can you submit it to FC7 repo, so it can easily be downloaded and install. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 21:15:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 17:15:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225691] Merge Review: dhcp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704112115.l3BLFC2T003670@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: dhcp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225691 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-04-11 17:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20) > An Obsoletes is fine. But what are you suggesting for a Provides line? Maybe Obsoletes: dhcpcd <= 1.3.22pl1-7 Provides: dhcpcd = 1.3.22pl1-8 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines?highlight=%28Obsolete%29#head-3cfc1ea19d28975faad9d56f70a6ae55661d3c3d > I can't fix that. The archive is the build system's lookaside cache and since > the checksum isn't changing, I can't override it. If it really is a *big* deal, > I can look in to getting it removed and reupload it to the lookaside cache. Not a big deal at all, I said to do that for the next time. > Also, I still have other reviews that no one has touched (225690, 225692, > 225853, 226230, and 226337 :) :) I don't have time to devote to more Merge reviews currently, but later, who knows. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 21:40:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 17:40:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225522] Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704112140.l3BLe3lD005773@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225522 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-04-11 17:39 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/cinepaint/cinepaint.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/cinepaint/cinepaint-0.22.0-1.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Description: CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images The lcms requirement is 1.16 so it can be build only in devel for now (requested to build lcms >= 1.16 for FC-6 also) oyranos is a little harder to build (1.7 is out this month) I will try to improve and submit a "work in progress" review... icc_examin is bundled within (0.43) we may need to bundle as separate package but lonely sources cannot be found later than 0.41 ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 21:42:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 17:42:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236091] New: Review Request: dolphin - A file manager for KDE focusing on usability Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236091 Summary: Review Request: dolphin - A file manager for KDE focusing on usability Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: johan at x-tnd.be QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/dolphin/dolphin.spec SRPM URL: http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/dolphin/dolphin-0.8.2-1.src.rpm Description: Dolphin focuses on being only a file manager. This approach allows to optimize the user interface for the task of file management. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 22:00:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:00:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236091] Review Request: dolphin - A file manager for KDE focusing on usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704112200.l3BM0Ox6007395@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dolphin - A file manager for KDE focusing on usability https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236091 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-04-11 18:00 EST ------- I think there was a misunderstanding Johan. On irc, I met file a RFE bug against dolphin (which is already in Fedora repositories), not to file a duplicate review request :) BTW: there is a request for you to be the co-maintainer already :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 22:05:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:05:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704112205.l3BM5YJL007898@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2007-04-11 18:05 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=152325) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=152325&action=view) fix for vdrift scons files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 22:23:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:23:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704112223.l3BMNYxW009283@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2007-04-11 18:23 EST ------- build: CC="gcc" CXX="g++" CXXFLAGS="%{optflags}" scons destdir=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT bin=/bin datadir=/share/%{name}/data prefix=/usr use_binreloc=0 install: install -d %{buildroot}%{_bindir} CC="gcc" CXX="g++" CXXFLAGS="%{optflags}" scons install destdir=%{buildroot} bin=/bin datadir=/share/%{name}/data prefix=/usr use_binreloc=0 mv %{buildroot}/usr/share/games/vdrift/bin/vdrift %{buildroot}%{_bindir} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 22:28:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:28:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227063] Review Request: jakarta-commons-cli-1.0-7jpp - Jakarta Commons CLI, a Command Line Interface for Java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704112228.l3BMSrLZ009504@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jakarta-commons-cli-1.0-7jpp - Jakarta Commons CLI, a Command Line Interface for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227063 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-11 18:28 EST ------- Please close as RESOLVE -> NOTABUG if there is going to be no more activity on this request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 22:30:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:30:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235802] Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704112230.l3BMUnIp009585@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235802 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dev at nigelj.com ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-04-11 18:30 EST ------- Hey, I'm willing to do a prereview (I'm awaiting a sponsor myself for my first pac kages). Items that need looking at (Pasted directly from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines) - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. :You should consider adding COPYRIGHT and README (basedir) to %doc - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. :/usr/share/man/man1/tkremind.1.gz is in both %{name} and %{name}-gui, you might want to reconsider the pattern your using to match man files. SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. :I can't test with mock sorry Hopefully someone that can do an official review will be able to approve the package! p.s. If this is your first package, then you'll need to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/SponsorProcess -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 22:34:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:34:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232797] Review Request: tasks - A simple to do list application that uses libecal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704112234.l3BMYFBK009855@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tasks - A simple to do list application that uses libecal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232797 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-11 18:34 EST ------- Setting FE-NEEDSPONSOR blocker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 22:46:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:46:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220630] Review Request: qpidc - C++ implementation of AMQP messaging spec from Apache Qpid. Upstream for Red Hat Messaging. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704112246.l3BMkcAu010692@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qpidc - C++ implementation of AMQP messaging spec from Apache Qpid. Upstream for Red Hat Messaging. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220630 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-11 18:46 EST ------- Pardon the bugzilla spam. This package appears to have been approved, imported, and built. If that is the case, please close this bug RESOLVE -> NEXTRELEASE as documented in the package review process: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageReviewProcess?#head-df921556b35438a4c78b4b6a790151ea568e8f9e -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 22:47:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:47:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227082] Review Request: maven-scm-1.0-0.b3.2jpp - Basic API for lightweight logging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704112247.l3BMlBa3010767@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maven-scm-1.0-0.b3.2jpp - Basic API for lightweight logging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227082 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-11 18:46 EST ------- Pardon the bugzilla spam. This package appears to have been approved, imported, and built. If that is the case, please close this bug RESOLVE -> NEXTRELEASE as documented in the package review process: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageReviewProcess?#head-df921556b35438a4c78b4b6a790151ea568e8f9e -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 22:47:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:47:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233519] Review Request: amqp - grammar for amqp wire format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704112247.l3BMlNq5010800@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: amqp - grammar for amqp wire format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233519 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-11 18:47 EST ------- Pardon the bugzilla spam. This package appears to have been approved, imported, and built. If that is the case, please close this bug RESOLVE -> NEXTRELEASE as documented in the package review process: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageReviewProcess?#head-df921556b35438a4c78b4b6a790151ea568e8f9e -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 22:47:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:47:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227105] Review Request: plexus-runtime-builder-1.0-0.a9.2jpp - Plexus Component Descriptor Creator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704112247.l3BMljRk010827@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: plexus-runtime-builder-1.0-0.a9.2jpp - Plexus Component Descriptor Creator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227105 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-11 18:47 EST ------- Pardon the bugzilla spam. This package appears to have been approved, imported, and built. If that is the case, please close this bug RESOLVE -> NEXTRELEASE as documented in the package review process: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageReviewProcess?#head-df921556b35438a4c78b4b6a790151ea568e8f9e -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 22:47:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:47:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227084] Review Request: maven-surefire-1.5.3-2jpp - Surefire is a test framework project. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704112247.l3BMlkgI010844@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maven-surefire-1.5.3-2jpp - Surefire is a test framework project. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227084 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-11 18:47 EST ------- Pardon the bugzilla spam. This package appears to have been approved, imported, and built. If that is the case, please close this bug RESOLVE -> NEXTRELEASE as documented in the package review process: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageReviewProcess?#head-df921556b35438a4c78b4b6a790151ea568e8f9e -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 22:48:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:48:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227108] Review Request: plexus-xmlrpc-1.0-0.b4.3jpp - Plexus XML RPC Component In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704112248.l3BMm9F4010880@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: plexus-xmlrpc-1.0-0.b4.3jpp - Plexus XML RPC Component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227108 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-11 18:47 EST ------- Pardon the bugzilla spam. This package appears to have been approved, imported, and built. If that is the case, please close this bug RESOLVE -> NEXTRELEASE as documented in the package review process: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageReviewProcess?#head-df921556b35438a4c78b4b6a790151ea568e8f9e -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 22:48:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:48:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227119] Review Request: ws-jaxme-0.5.1-1jpp - Open source implementation of JAXB In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704112248.l3BMmKD3010911@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ws-jaxme-0.5.1-1jpp - Open source implementation of JAXB https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227119 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-11 18:48 EST ------- Pardon the bugzilla spam. This package appears to have been approved, imported, and built. If that is the case, please close this bug RESOLVE -> NEXTRELEASE as documented in the package review process: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageReviewProcess?#head-df921556b35438a4c78b4b6a790151ea568e8f9e -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 22:48:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:48:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227083] Review Request: maven-shared-1.0-4jpp - Maven Shared Components In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704112248.l3BMmWSc010938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maven-shared-1.0-4jpp - Maven Shared Components https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227083 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-11 18:48 EST ------- Pardon the bugzilla spam. This package appears to have been approved, imported, and built. If that is the case, please close this bug RESOLVE -> NEXTRELEASE as documented in the package review process: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageReviewProcess?#head-df921556b35438a4c78b4b6a790151ea568e8f9e -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 22:48:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:48:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227127] Review Request: xpp3-1.1.3.4-1.o.2jpp - XML Pull Parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704112248.l3BMmsUk010989@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpp3-1.1.3.4-1.o.2jpp - XML Pull Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227127 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-11 18:48 EST ------- Pardon the bugzilla spam. This package appears to have been approved, imported, and built. If that is the case, please close this bug RESOLVE -> NEXTRELEASE as documented in the package review process: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageReviewProcess?#head-df921556b35438a4c78b4b6a790151ea568e8f9e -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 22:49:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:49:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227095] Review Request: plexus-appserver-1.0-0.a5.3jpp - Plexus Application Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704112249.l3BMn6ds011026@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: plexus-appserver-1.0-0.a5.3jpp - Plexus Application Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227095 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-11 18:48 EST ------- Pardon the bugzilla spam. This package appears to have been approved, imported, and built. If that is the case, please close this bug RESOLVE -> NEXTRELEASE as documented in the package review process: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageReviewProcess?#head-df921556b35438a4c78b4b6a790151ea568e8f9e -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 22:49:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:49:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227081] Review Request: maven-jxr-1.0-2jpp - Maven JXR is a source cross referencing tool. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704112249.l3BMn8jR011042@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maven-jxr-1.0-2jpp - Maven JXR is a source cross referencing tool. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227081 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-11 18:49 EST ------- Pardon the bugzilla spam. This package appears to have been approved, imported, and built. If that is the case, please close this bug RESOLVE -> NEXTRELEASE as documented in the package review process: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageReviewProcess?#head-df921556b35438a4c78b4b6a790151ea568e8f9e -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 22:49:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:49:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227094] Review Request: plexus-ant-factory-1.0-0.a1.2jpp - Plexus Component Creator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704112249.l3BMnADn011059@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: plexus-ant-factory-1.0-0.a1.2jpp - Plexus Component Creator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227094 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-11 18:49 EST ------- Pardon the bugzilla spam. This package appears to have been approved, imported, and built. If that is the case, please close this bug RESOLVE -> NEXTRELEASE as documented in the package review process: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageReviewProcess?#head-df921556b35438a4c78b4b6a790151ea568e8f9e -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 22:49:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:49:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227104] Review Request: plexus-maven-plugin-1.2-2jpp - Plexus Maven plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704112249.l3BMnLu2011109@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: plexus-maven-plugin-1.2-2jpp - Plexus Maven plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227104 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-11 18:49 EST ------- Pardon the bugzilla spam. This package appears to have been approved, imported, and built. If that is the case, please close this bug RESOLVE -> NEXTRELEASE as documented in the package review process: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageReviewProcess?#head-df921556b35438a4c78b4b6a790151ea568e8f9e -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 22:49:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:49:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227126] Review Request: xpp2-2.1.10-6jpp - XML Pull Parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704112249.l3BMnNcI011125@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpp2-2.1.10-6jpp - XML Pull Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227126 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-11 18:49 EST ------- Pardon the bugzilla spam. This package appears to have been approved, imported, and built. If that is the case, please close this bug RESOLVE -> NEXTRELEASE as documented in the package review process: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageReviewProcess?#head-df921556b35438a4c78b4b6a790151ea568e8f9e -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 22:49:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:49:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227098] Review Request: plexus-bsh-factory-1.0-0.a7s.2jpp - Plexus Component Creator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704112249.l3BMnZMm011152@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: plexus-bsh-factory-1.0-0.a7s.2jpp - Plexus Component Creator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227098 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-11 18:49 EST ------- Pardon the bugzilla spam. This package appears to have been approved, imported, and built. If that is the case, please close this bug RESOLVE -> NEXTRELEASE as documented in the package review process: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageReviewProcess?#head-df921556b35438a4c78b4b6a790151ea568e8f9e -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 22:49:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:49:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227080] Review Request: maven-doxia-1.0-0.a7.3jpp - Doxia is a content generation framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704112249.l3BMna8J011168@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maven-doxia-1.0-0.a7.3jpp - Doxia is a content generation framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227080 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-11 18:49 EST ------- Pardon the bugzilla spam. This package appears to have been approved, imported, and built. If that is the case, please close this bug RESOLVE -> NEXTRELEASE as documented in the package review process: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageReviewProcess?#head-df921556b35438a4c78b4b6a790151ea568e8f9e -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 22:58:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:58:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235802] Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704112258.l3BMwSX1011607@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235802 ------- Additional Comments From rayvd at bludgeon.org 2007-04-11 18:58 EST ------- Thanks for the feedback. I have built this package under mock successfully and will take a look at the other items you mentioned. Hopefully someone will be willing to sponsor me. :-) Have a few other packages I'd like to create down the road. One thing that wasn't super clear to me was how to tag this as an EPEL package. I guess it can be both, but there wasn't a way to choose a "New" component under EPEL (or I missed it). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 23:08:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 19:08:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226904] Review Request: qmpdclient - MPD client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704112308.l3BN83ML011981@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qmpdclient - MPD client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226904 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-11 19:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Are these warnings a problem? > > > > I don't think so. They all are connected with debuginfo subpackage and I have no > influence on it Install the -debuginfo package and take a look at the files in that directory. I'm pretty sure you'll find that it's preprocessed code from the compile, which I'm assuming that you'll need for the -debuginfo packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 23:23:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 19:23:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225839] Merge Review: gnome-terminal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704112323.l3BNNw6Z012629@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-terminal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225839 ------- Additional Comments From besfahbo at redhat.com 2007-04-11 19:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > two little problems: > > $ rpmlint gnome-terminal-2.17.91-3.src.rpm > W: gnome-terminal mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 68, tab: line 71) > > Unused patches are not removed from cvs. Both fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 23:25:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 19:25:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217100] Fn hotkey combinations do not function on Panasonic Toughbook CF-51 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704112325.l3BNPgIf012771@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Fn hotkey combinations do not function on Panasonic Toughbook CF-51 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217100 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-11 19:25 EST ------- This request was miscategorized. I moved the request to the Fedora Wishlist http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WishList where some developer may pick it up. Closing this bug as NOTABUG as it is not a package review bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 23:26:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 19:26:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225759] Merge Review: fontconfig In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704112326.l3BNQuHr012819@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fontconfig https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225759 ------- Additional Comments From besfahbo at redhat.com 2007-04-11 19:26 EST ------- 1) as I said, I don't want %config(noreplace). 2) what's the point in patching changelog entries? Please attach a patch addressing this issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 11 23:38:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 19:38:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225635] Merge Review: cairo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704112338.l3BNcR3j013244@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: cairo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225635 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From besfahbo at redhat.com 2007-04-11 19:38 EST ------- Mostly fixed. Remaining issues are: $ rpmlint cairo-devel-1.3.12-1.i386.rpm W: cairo-devel no-documentation (The HTML files provided in the package are definitely documentation and should be marked as such.) MUST: owning directories The -devel subpackage installs files in /usr/share/gtk-doc/html without owning the directory or depending on anything that owns it. MUST: packaging guidelines * make should use %{?_smp_mflags} flag. None of the few packages I looked at (pango, gtk+) does any of them, so I'm not sure about to do them in the right way. For one thing, we pass --disable-gtk-doc to configure, so requiring gtk-doc doesn't make much sense. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 00:38:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 20:38:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235802] Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704120038.l3C0cULI018628@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235802 rayvd at bludgeon.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 00:58:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 20:58:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704120058.l3C0wMlH020582@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From wilmer at fedoraproject.org 2007-04-11 20:58 EST ------- ^sponser^sponsor :D -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 01:38:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 21:38:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226534] Merge Review: vte In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704120138.l3C1cklr024806@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: vte https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226534 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From besfahbo at redhat.com 2007-04-11 21:38 EST ------- No, freetype is included in Requires.private only. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 01:56:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 21:56:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235804] Review Request: ocamlSDL - OCaml bindings for SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704120156.l3C1ut6q026465@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocamlSDL - OCaml bindings for SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235804 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-04-11 21:56 EST ------- I've done some more research into the issue with static linking etc etc, and found out it is the case, I'd like to put this review on hold until I'm at least sponsored (and can post on fedora-maintainers to get some more information on the problem and possible solutions). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 01:57:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 21:57:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235805] Review Request: camlimages - OCaml image processing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704120157.l3C1vkin026586@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: camlimages - OCaml image processing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235805 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-04-11 21:57 EST ------- As per my comment on 235804... I've done some more research into the issue with static linking etc etc, and found out it is the case, I'd like to put this review on hold until I'm at least sponsored (and can post on fedora-maintainers to get some more information on the problem and possible solutions). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 02:39:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 22:39:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225783] Merge Review: gdb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704120239.l3C2dAvT030332@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gdb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225783 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-11 22:38 EST ------- Any updated *.spec or src.rpm available? http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gdb/ still is at *-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 03:59:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 23:59:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223657] Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704120359.l3C3xLVk002951@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223657 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-11 23:59 EST ------- I would not approve any package which is using chrpath. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 05:26:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 01:26:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229321] Review Request: pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704120526.l3C5QFsk005900@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229321 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2007-04-12 01:26 EST ------- Thanks for the review. I still cannot see libpgxx-devel issue. I don't have it on my box, but I can build pgpool-II. Also I'm pretty sure that there is nothing in the code that is dependent on libpqxx... Other than this... I am really not sure about how md5 problem appeared. I fixed that now. Also, fixed the man ownership. Spec URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/pgpool-II/pgpool-II.spec SRPM URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/pgpool-II/postgresql-pgpool-II-1.0.2-2.src.rpm Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 05:54:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 01:54:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236158] New: Review Request: wise2 - Bioinformatics tools for comparison of biopolymers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236158 Summary: Review Request: wise2 - Bioinformatics tools for comparison of biopolymers Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: alexl at users.sourceforge.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://allele5.biol.berkeley.edu/~alex/fedora/wise2.spec SRPM URL: http://allele5.biol.berkeley.edu/~alex/fedora/wise2-2.2.0-1.src.rpm Description: Wise2 is a package focused on comparisons of biopolymers, commonly DNA sequence and protein sequence. A strength of Wise2 is the comparison of DNA sequence at the level of its protein translation. This comparison allows the simultaneous prediction of gene structure with homology based alignment. Parts of the code are licensed under a BSD-style license, the rest is under the GPL making the aggregate work GPL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 06:19:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 02:19:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229321] Review Request: pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704120619.l3C6Jo5I008202@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229321 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-12 02:19 EST ------- Several issues: 1. Missing BR's: ... checking for PQexecPrepared in -lpq... no configure: error: libpq is not installed or libpq is old error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.37113 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.37113 (%build) => MISSING: BR: postgresql-devel 2. Package supports --disable-static => append --disable-static to %configure 3. All of the manual installs in %install are superfluous: @@ -52,11 +53,6 @@ make DESTDIR=%{buildroot} install mv %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/pgpool.conf.sample %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/pgpool.conf mv %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/pcp.conf.sample %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/pcp.conf -install -m 644 pgpool.8 %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man8/ -install -m 644 -p pcp/pcp.h %{buildroot}%{_includedir}/ -install -m 755 pcp/.libs/libpcp.so.0.* %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/ -cp -a pcp/.libs/libpcp.so.0 %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/ -install -m 644 -p pool_type.h %{buildroot}%{_includedir}/ # nuke libtool archive and static lib rm -f %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/libpcp.{a,la} 4. Very serious compiler warnings: if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DDEFAULT_CONFIGDIR=\"/etc\" -I. -I. -I. -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -D_GNU_SOURCE -I /usr/include/pgsql -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -MT pool_process_query.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/pool_process_query.Tpo" -c -o pool_process_query.o pool_process_query.c; \ then mv -f ".deps/pool_process_query.Tpo" ".deps/pool_process_query.Po"; else rm -f ".deps/pool_process_query.Tpo"; exit 1; fi pool_process_query.c: In function 'process_reporting': pool_process_query.c:2453: warning: call to __builtin___strncpy_chk will always overflow destination buffer pool_process_query.c:2578: warning: call to __builtin___snprintf_chk will always overflow destination buffer pool_process_query.c:2580: warning: call to __builtin___snprintf_chk will always overflow destination buffer pool_process_query.c:2583: warning: call to __builtin___snprintf_chk will always overflow destination buffer pool_process_query.c:2585: warning: call to __builtin___snprintf_chk will always overflow destination buffer pool_process_query.c:2588: warning: call to __builtin___snprintf_chk will always overflow destination buffer pool_process_query.c:2590: warning: call to __builtin___snprintf_chk will always overflow destination buffer pool_process_query.c:2593: warning: call to __builtin___snprintf_chk will always overflow destination buffer pool_process_query.c:2595: warning: call to __builtin___snprintf_chk will always overflow destination buffer -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 06:35:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 02:35:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229321] Review Request: pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704120635.l3C6Z7PE008936@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229321 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-12 02:34 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=152359) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=152359&action=view) patch to fix 4. from comment #13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 06:37:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 02:37:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229321] Review Request: pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704120637.l3C6bqm1009173@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229321 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-12 02:37 EST ------- Why does this BZ depend on 229322 and 229323? /me thinks these blockers are reversed. Probably this BZ should block 229322 and 229323 - Please correct them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 06:53:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 02:53:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236162] New: Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236162 Summary: Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jasperhartline at adelphia.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://autopsy.podzone.org/~autopsy/kadischi.spec SRPM URL: http://autopsy.podzone.org/~autopsy/kadischi-3.4-7.20070412cvs.src.rpm Description: Kadischi is a LiveCD generation tool for Fedora Core systems. A Live ISO9660 compliant image file made with Kadischi can be written to a CD or DVD and run without any prior installation of Fedora Core. I am a new packager and require a sponser. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 07:07:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 03:07:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236158] Review Request: wise2 - Bioinformatics tools for comparison of biopolymers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704120707.l3C77ZPV011333@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wise2 - Bioinformatics tools for comparison of biopolymers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236158 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-12 03:07 EST ------- + make CC=gcc all (cd base ; make CC="gcc" CFLAGS="-c -O " libwisebase.a ) make[1]: Entering directory `/users/packman/src/rpms/BUILD/wise2.2.0/src/base' gcc -c -O wiseconfig.c gcc -c -O wisestring.c => package doesn't honour RPM_OPT_FLAGS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 07:55:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 03:55:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229321] Review Request: pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704120755.l3C7tXKD015848@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229321 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2007-04-12 03:55 EST ------- Hi, (In reply to comment #13) > 1. Missing BR's: > ... > => MISSING: BR: postgresql-devel :-) I thought I fixed this already. Anyway, thanks. > 2. Package supports --disable-static > => append --disable-static to %configure Done. > 3. All of the manual installs in %install are superfluous: Ok, removed. Thanks. > 4. Very serious compiler warnings: Submitted your patch to upstream. I'll apply that patch tomorrow, unless someone objects. Also added that patch to spec file. Thanks again. Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 07:56:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 03:56:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229321] Review Request: pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704120756.l3C7uXpL015970@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229321 devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|229322, 229323 | OtherBugsDependingO| |229322, 229323 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 07:56:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 03:56:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229323] Review Request: PgpoolAdmin - web-based pgpool administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704120756.l3C7uuC9016035@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PgpoolAdmin - web-based pgpool administration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229323 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |229321 OtherBugsDependingO|229321 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 07:56:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 03:56:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229322] Review Request: pgpool-ha : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704120756.l3C7uxFk016057@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool-ha : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229322 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |229321 OtherBugsDependingO|229321 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 08:56:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 04:56:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236158] Review Request: wise2 - Bioinformatics tools for comparison of biopolymers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704120856.l3C8ujjN023062@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wise2 - Bioinformatics tools for comparison of biopolymers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236158 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2007-04-12 04:56 EST ------- * Mon Apr 12 2007 Alex Lancaster 2.2.0-2 - Pass $RPM_OPT_FLAGS to compiler as per suggestion from Ralf Corsepius. Spec URL: http://allele5.biol.berkeley.edu/~alex/fedora/wise2.spec SRPM URL: http://allele5.biol.berkeley.edu/~alex/fedora/wise2-2.2.0-2.src.rpm + make CC=gcc 'CFLAGS=-c -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables' all (cd base ; make CC="gcc" CFLAGS="-c -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables" libwisebase.a ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 08:58:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 04:58:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236091] Review Request: dolphin - A file manager for KDE focusing on usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704120858.l3C8wfQf023263@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dolphin - A file manager for KDE focusing on usability https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236091 ------- Additional Comments From johan at x-tnd.be 2007-04-12 04:58 EST ------- Sorry for that Chitlesh, I'm not yet very familiar with posting new things on the buzilla :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 10:05:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 06:05:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225984] Merge Review: lftp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704121005.l3CA5wZk029860@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: lftp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225984 ------- Additional Comments From karsten at redhat.com 2007-04-12 06:05 EST ------- I'd like to repeat comment #9: lftp provides no libraries in the standard paths and doesn't add a new path in /etc/ld.so.conf.d. Therefore ldconfig in post/postun isn't required lftp isn't a daemon, running chkconfig in post/postun isn't required. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 10:29:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 06:29:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704121029.l3CATElg031063@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 Bug 190189 depends on bug 214193, which changed state. Bug 214193 Summary: sip-4.6 (and PyQt-3.17.1) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214193 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 11:30:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 07:30:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223657] Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704121130.l3CBUKs6002158@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223657 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-04-12 07:30 EST ------- Well the other way to do this is to patch libtool i'm not sure that will work. (no libtool used) I can also report this to upstream ( i will try to contact them...) Since this is documented that way in the Fedora packaging guidelines, i would recommnand that you raise this objection to the packaging guidelines commity. This package seems to work fine, tested in mock from FC-5 to devel on x86_64... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 11:34:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 07:34:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236177] New: Review Request: perl-NetAddr-IP - Manages IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and subnets Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236177 Summary: Review Request: perl-NetAddr-IP - Manages IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and subnets Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: andreas at bawue.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://helena.bawue.de/~ixs/perl-NetAddr-IP/perl-NetAddr-IP.spec SRPM URL: http://helena.bawue.de/~ixs/perl-NetAddr-IP/perl-NetAddr-IP-4.004-1.src.rpm Description: This module provides an object-oriented abstraction on top of IP addresses or IP subnets, that allows for easy manipulations. Version 4.xx of NetAdder::IP will will work older versions of Perl and does not use Math::BigInt as in previous versions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 11:40:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 07:40:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225839] Merge Review: gnome-terminal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704121140.l3CBeY15002743@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-terminal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225839 reza at farsiweb.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|reza at farsiweb.info |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From reza at farsiweb.info 2007-04-12 07:40 EST ------- rpmlint output of source package: W: gnome-terminal mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 91, tab: line 68) (cvs revision: 1.78) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 12:18:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 08:18:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229321] Review Request: pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704121218.l3CCIH0u005618@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229321 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-04-12 08:18 EST ------- Wow, that'll teach me to sleep. :) Thanks, good catches, Ralf. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 12:27:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 08:27:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704121227.l3CCRXFD006142@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-04-12 08:27 EST ------- Rudolf, these are very helpful, but the scons install fails due to lack of data, as that's being package separately. We either need to manually install the files created with scons in the build step, or somehow trick scons into not checking for data. I'd prefer the latter, but I can do the former if it's non-trivial. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 12:39:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 08:39:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195486] Review Request: kdenetwork: K Desktop Environment - Network Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704121239.l3CCdv82006807@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdenetwork: K Desktop Environment - Network Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195486 than at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From than at redhat.com 2007-04-12 08:39 EST ------- it's now in CVS. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 13:29:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 09:29:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222994] Review Request: koverartist - Create CD/DVD covers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704121329.l3CDTnHd011732@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: koverartist - Create CD/DVD covers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222994 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-04-12 09:29 EST ------- > To 4: (maybe it should be changed in both) imo, yes, shouldn't be in that comps group either, but that's just me. > To 5: See comment #5 and comment #6 not a valid justification. imo, --vendor=fedora should only be used if we(fedora) are generating our own .desktop file (which isn't the case here). These aren't a blocker tho, I'll leave the final decisions up to you. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 13:32:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 09:32:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236162] Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704121332.l3CDW4PE011854@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236162 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-04-12 09:32 EST ------- kadishi is already in Fedora (Extras). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 13:35:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 09:35:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236162] Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704121335.l3CDZu24012150@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236162 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NOTABUG | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-04-12 09:35 EST ------- Hrm, now I'm confused, kadischi is listed in owners.list Fedora Extras|kadischi|An application for Fedora-based LiveCD generation| cgoorah at yahoo.com.au|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| but I can't do a cvs checkout: $ cvs co kadischi cvs server: cannot find module `kadischi' - ignored cvs [checkout aborted]: cannot expand modules So, I'll re-open this (pending a better explanation, other than my being clueless). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 13:43:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 09:43:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236162] Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704121343.l3CDhNuu012736@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236162 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-04-12 09:43 EST ------- According to fedora-extras-comments Jasper made several commits to /cvs/devel/kadischi which brings up the question how can this require a sponsor (I thought CVS access was a sign of been already sponsored). But yeah, /cvs/devel/kadischi seems to be where it's located at the moment. (And I think I might be going crazy at the same time) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 13:52:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 09:52:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704121352.l3CDqLCc013483@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2007-04-12 09:52 EST ------- OK, all of the above has been fixed in my tree except for the last review point. Should I keep ChangeLog, AUTHORS and NEWS updated too? I've been keeping the ChangeLog entries in the spec updated so it seems rather as duplicated work to edit the top-level ChangeLog and NEWS files as well... Anyway, I'm currently yum upgrading my rawhide installation and with 233 packages to go it will take a while before I can build the RPMs. I'll post the updated files tomorrow when yum should be done - knock on wood :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 14:27:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 10:27:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704121427.l3CER1NV017087@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|199430 | OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-04-12 10:27 EST ------- %changelog * Wed Apr 11 2007 Rex Dieter 4.2-1 - PyQt4-4.2 Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/PyQt4.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/PyQt4-4.2-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 14:56:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 10:56:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226407] Merge Review: sendmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704121456.l3CEumXZ021062@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sendmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226407 twoerner at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(twoerner at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From twoerner at redhat.com 2007-04-12 10:56 EST ------- > E: sendmail hardcoded-library-path in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/lib/libmilter.a > => false positive, the %install script is removing the library incorrectly > => installed there by the upstream build script This is wrong, because /usr/lib/libmilter.a gets removed for a 64 bit build, because /usr/lib/libmilter.a has to be 32 bit here, but sendmail installs the 64 bit build. symlinks is not usable, because it would create realtive links outside of the buildroot. %{_localstatedir} ist not /var it is %{_prefix}/var, ergo /usr/var. /etc/aliases is not part of the sendmail package. ===> Please have a look at sendmail-8.14.1-1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 15:14:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 11:14:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226407] Merge Review: sendmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704121514.l3CFEXvP022908@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sendmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226407 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2007-04-12 11:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > > E: sendmail hardcoded-library-path in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/lib/libmilter.a > > => false positive, the %install script is removing the library incorrectly > > => installed there by the upstream build script > This is wrong, because /usr/lib/libmilter.a gets removed for a 64 bit build, > because /usr/lib/libmilter.a has to be 32 bit here, but sendmail installs the 64 > bit build. OK, but that's what I meant; the upstream installer puts it in /usr/lib and the spec puts it in /usr/lib64, so the upstream-installed one needs to be removed on x86_64. > symlinks is not usable, because it would create realtive links outside of the > buildroot. Are you sure? I tried the patch from Comment #8 before posting it and it looked to be doing the right thing to me. > %{_localstatedir} ist not /var it is %{_prefix}/var, ergo /usr/var. $ rpm --eval '%{_localstatedir}' /var > /etc/aliases is not part of the sendmail package. It should be if the package is supposed to work with %{old_setup} = yes (obviously not for current Fedora versions but for people trying to rebuild for older distros). I don't think %{old_setup} should be supported half-heartedly - either let it work properly or remove it altogether. > ===> Please have a look at sendmail-8.14.1-1. Where can I find that? It's not in my just-updated cvs checkout. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 15:14:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 11:14:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223657] Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704121514.l3CFEebm022931@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223657 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-12 11:14 EST ------- Well, for 1.0.1-1: * cmake special issue - Please make the build process _VERBOSE_ . Currently only the messages like ----------------------------------------- [ 20%] Building CXX object CMakeFiles/perceptualdiff.dir/PerceptualDiff.o ----------------------------------------- are shown and I cannot check if the compilation is done properly (however, for 1.0.1-1 I can say that the compilation process is wrong because mockbuild log says: ----------------------------------------- extracting debug info from /var/tmp/PerceptualDiff-1.0.1-1.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/bin/perceptualdiff 0 blocks ----------------------------------------- You can check: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/cmake Here you cannot use /etc/rpm/macros.cmake but you can borrow some trick from that page. * macro - Please use macro (%{_sysconfdir}, %{_prefix}, ...) * rpath - Well, for me chrpath seems unneeded as actually the created Makefile does not set rpath, you can refer to the URL above also for handling rpath. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 15:20:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 11:20:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233519] Review Request: amqp - grammar for amqp wire format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704121520.l3CFKYFQ023732@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: amqp - grammar for amqp wire format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233519 nsantos at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 15:21:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 11:21:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227044] Review Request: checkstyle-4.1-3jpp - Java source code checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704121521.l3CFLcJS023826@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: checkstyle-4.1-3jpp - Java source code checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227044 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium nsantos at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 15:23:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 11:23:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227127] Review Request: xpp3-1.1.3.4-1.o.2jpp - XML Pull Parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704121523.l3CFNAwP024200@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpp3-1.1.3.4-1.o.2jpp - XML Pull Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227127 nsantos at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 15:23:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 11:23:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227126] Review Request: xpp2-2.1.10-6jpp - XML Pull Parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704121523.l3CFNTsX024278@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpp2-2.1.10-6jpp - XML Pull Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227126 nsantos at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 15:24:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 11:24:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227125] Review Request: xom-1.0-3jpp - XML Pull Parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704121524.l3CFO5Uw024347@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xom-1.0-3jpp - XML Pull Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227125 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium nsantos at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 15:24:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 11:24:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227123] Review Request: xmldb-api-0.1-0.20041010.3jpp - XML:DB API for Java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704121524.l3CFO6YL024360@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmldb-api-0.1-0.20041010.3jpp - XML:DB API for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227123 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium nsantos at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 15:24:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 11:24:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227069] Review Request: jaxen-bootstrap-1.1-0.b7.3jpp - A convenience package for build of dom4j In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704121524.l3CFOIaL024450@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jaxen-bootstrap-1.1-0.b7.3jpp - A convenience package for build of dom4j https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227069 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Bug 227069 depends on bug 227125, which changed state. Bug 227125 Summary: Review Request: xom-1.0-3jpp - XML Pull Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227125 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 15:24:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 11:24:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227119] Review Request: ws-jaxme-0.5.1-1jpp - Open source implementation of JAXB In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704121524.l3CFOElg024416@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ws-jaxme-0.5.1-1jpp - Open source implementation of JAXB https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227119 nsantos at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 15:24:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 11:24:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227112] Review Request: relaxngDatatype-1.0-3jpp - RELAX NG Datatype API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704121524.l3CFOVjN024560@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: relaxngDatatype-1.0-3jpp - RELAX NG Datatype API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227112 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium nsantos at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 15:24:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 11:24:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227075] Review Request: jtidy-1.0-0.20000804r7dev.6jpp - HTML syntax checker and pretty printer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704121524.l3CFOqSp024614@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jtidy-1.0-0.20000804r7dev.6jpp - HTML syntax checker and pretty printer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227075 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium nsantos at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 15:25:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 11:25:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227057] Review Request: gnu-regexp-1.1.4-10jpp - Java NFA regular expression engine implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704121525.l3CFP2dU024650@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnu-regexp-1.1.4-10jpp - Java NFA regular expression engine implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227057 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium nsantos at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 15:25:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 11:25:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227059] Review Request: httpunit-1.6.2-1jpp - Automated web site testing toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704121525.l3CFPLt1024764@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: httpunit-1.6.2-1jpp - Automated web site testing toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227059 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Bug 227059 depends on bug 227075, which changed state. Bug 227075 Summary: Review Request: jtidy-1.0-0.20000804r7dev.6jpp - HTML syntax checker and pretty printer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227075 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 15:25:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 11:25:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227050] Review Request: dtdparser-1.21-3jpp - A Java DTD Parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704121525.l3CFPOas024789@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dtdparser-1.21-3jpp - A Java DTD Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227050 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium nsantos at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 15:25:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 11:25:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227049] Review Request: dom4j-1.6.1-2jpp - DOM4J In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704121525.l3CFPnnh024955@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dom4j-1.6.1-2jpp - DOM4J https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227049 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium nsantos at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 15:25:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 11:25:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227047] Review Request: classworlds-1.1-0.a2.2jpp - Classworlds Classloader Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704121525.l3CFPrBZ024975@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: classworlds-1.1-0.a2.2jpp - Classworlds Classloader Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227047 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium nsantos at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 15:29:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 11:29:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226407] Merge Review: sendmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704121529.l3CFTX9c025624@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sendmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226407 ------- Additional Comments From twoerner at redhat.com 2007-04-12 11:29 EST ------- OK, agree now with _localstatedir: /usr/lib/rpm/macros: %_localstatedir %{_prefix}/var /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/macros: %_localstatedir /var I am always looking at /usr/lib/rpm/macros instead of /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/macros ... The old_setup switch is gone, also update support for sendmail < 8.12.0 with the corresponding triggers and post script tweaks. sendmail-8.14.1-1.1 is in rawhide with additional prereq replacements. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 15:48:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 11:48:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704121548.l3CFmT1P028286@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-12 11:48 EST ------- Well, IMO these files are generally not empty. You can see gdm, for example. * At least, AUTHORS is generally not empty. * And ChangeLog or NEWS is generally not empty. (In reply to comment #85) > I've been keeping the > ChangeLog entries in the spec updated so... Well, what is listed in %changelog in spec file is that the changelog for spec file. ChangeLog (or NEWS) is meant to show what changed on the evolution-brutus itself (i.e. some additional feature added, some deprecated feature removed etc...) so this is different from spec file %changelog -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 16:13:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 12:13:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226134] Merge Review: mdadm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704121613.l3CGD09W030839@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mdadm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226134 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-04-12 12:12 EST ------- rpmlint checks: [wolfy at wolfy64 mdadm]$ rpmlint mdadm-2.6.1-3.fc7.src.rpm W: mdadm summary-not-capitalized mdadm controls Linux md devices (software RAID arrays) -> ignorable W: mdadm strange-permission mdmonitor.init 0755 -> including the file as 644 and setting it via install -p at 0755 would probably make rpmlint happier. not a big deal anyway W: mdadm unversioned-explicit-obsoletes mdctl W: mdadm unversioned-explicit-obsoletes raidtools -> As far as I have understood, these tools are gone for good, so this could be OK If very very sure that none of these will ever come back, it's OK, but most probably a versioning measure should be put in place W: mdadm mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 7) -> cosmetic, please fix before uploading to CVS [wolfy at wolfy64 mdadm]$ rpmlint mdadm-2.6.1-3.fc7.x86_64.rpm W: mdadm summary-not-capitalized mdadm controls Linux md devices (software RAID arrays) ->ignorable E: mdadm obsolete-not-provided mdctl E: mdadm obsolete-not-provided raidtools -> see above E: mdadm non-standard-dir-perm /var/run/mdadm 0700 -> security measure? W: mdadm service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/mdmonitor -> ignorable per comment #2 W: mdadm incoherent-init-script-name mdmonitor -> given my mdadm/mdmonitor change. ignorable GOOD - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines [*] - license (GPL ) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream, sha1sum c0f523853a9c816986c24c699fa80b2c02336f3d mdadm/devel/mdadm-2.6.1.tgz - no locales - not relocatable - owns all files/directories that it creates, does not take ownership of foreign files/dirs - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for separate package for docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - not a GUI, so no need for .desktop file - no .pc, .la files - sciptlets are sane, including removal of previously existing but no longer needed mdmpd - final provides are sane: [wolfy at wolfy64]$ rpm -q --provides mdadm mdadm = 2.6.1-3.fc7 - final requires are mostly sane: [wolfy at wolfy64]$ rpm -q --requires mdadm|sort -u /bin/bash /bin/sh libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.3)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) /sbin/chkconfig /sbin/service smtpdaemon [*] There is one static compiled binary but it is needed so this should be considered an exception to normal policy of a separate -static package. SHOULD - builds in mock/devel/x86_64 - works as advertised Recommended fixes: a) timestamp is not preserved for /usr/share/doc/mdadm-2.6.1/mdadm.conf-example: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2180 Apr 11 19:16 one can see that this is the build time, not the file time in the tar ( -rw-r--r-- 1 wolfy wolfy 2194 Jun 20 2006) The difference comes from mdadm-1.5.0-email.patch; I suggest "touch -r" using one of the other doc files as reference b) %defattr(-,root,root,-) instead of %defattr(-,root,root) Only remaining issue is the "smtpdaemon" Requires which definitely should be replaced either by the virtual provide MTA or (better yet) by "/usr/sbin/sendmail" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 16:14:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 12:14:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226134] Merge Review: mdadm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704121614.l3CGEKgY030964@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mdadm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226134 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(dledford at redhat.co | |m) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 16:21:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 12:21:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226134] Merge Review: mdadm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704121621.l3CGLNp2031387@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mdadm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226134 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-04-12 12:21 EST ------- sorry for typo, "given my mdadm/mdmonitor change" should have been "given by ... " -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 16:58:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 12:58:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222994] Review Request: koverartist - Create CD/DVD covers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704121658.l3CGwDZZ002435@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: koverartist - Create CD/DVD covers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222994 fedora at deadbabylon.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2007-04-12 12:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > imo, --vendor=fedora should only be used if > we(fedora) are generating our own .desktop file (which isn't the case here). Haven't thought about it this way. I will change it to --vendor "". > APPROVED. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 16:59:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 12:59:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222994] Review Request: koverartist - Create CD/DVD covers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704121659.l3CGxMYb002547@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: koverartist - Create CD/DVD covers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222994 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2007-04-12 12:59 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: koverartist Short Description: Create CD/DVD covers Owners: fedora at deadbabylon.de Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 17:04:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 13:04:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235588] Review Request: escape - an extensible puzzle game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704121704.l3CH4ibv003079@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: escape - an extensible puzzle game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235588 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 17:04:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 13:04:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235589] Review Request: escape-data - data for the escape package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704121704.l3CH4irB003080@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: escape-data - data for the escape package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235589 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 17:27:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 13:27:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235588] Review Request: escape - an extensible puzzle game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704121727.l3CHRiIw005704@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: escape - an extensible puzzle game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235588 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-04-12 13:27 EST ------- Wiki is down, but this is an initial list of issues: escape owns all of %{bindir}. Should only own what it puts there. Remove X-Fedora category Icon-cache is not updated on install and remove, see the wiki when it's back up. Source0 should include the full download URL. Builds in mock, though. I'll peek at -data. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 17:37:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 13:37:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235589] Review Request: escape-data - data for the escape package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704121737.l3CHbwTo006782@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: escape-data - data for the escape package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235589 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-04-12 13:37 EST ------- Wiki is down, but this is an initial list of issues: Source0 should include the full download URL. Builds in mock. Both packages are pretty small, and data is smaller than the main package. They're also from the same source tarball. I see no real advantage in not making them one package. Thoughts? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 18:11:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 14:11:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236162] Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704121811.l3CIBTGi010387@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236162 ------- Additional Comments From jasperhartline at adelphia.net 2007-04-12 14:11 EST ------- The root purpose for me creating this review request is because I am the primary upstream Kadischi maintainer and developer. I am looking to gain control of the bugs files under Kadischi since cgoorah Chitlesh Goorah has abandoned the project. Here is my message to the accounts at fedoraproject.org and a response from Jesse Keating: On Wednesday 11 April 2007 21:55:50 Jasper Hartline wrote: > > I am curious how to go about becoming the assignee for bugs filed under > > component "Kadischi" > > in the http://bugzilla.redhat.com Bugzilla system. Chitlesh Goorah > > (cgoorah) has abandoned the project > > and bugs are not being taken care of. > > > > Just as a reference I am the primary developer/maintainer for Kadischi > > at this time. > > If I could get some guidance on this issue that would be helpful. You'd have to take over the packaging of it for Fedora Extras. The bugzilla entry is for the package in Extras, not necessarily the upstream of kadischi. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora I will notify Jesse Keating of this bugzilla review request and see what he says, I assumed this was the proper process. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 18:16:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 14:16:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234812] Review Request: tcpreplay - Replay captured network traffic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704121816.l3CIGLwg010839@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcpreplay - Replay captured network traffic Alias: tcpreplay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234812 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bjohnson at symetrix.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 18:33:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 14:33:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236162] Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704121833.l3CIXv6u012493@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236162 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-04-12 14:33 EST ------- This is the proper process, yes, for new packages, no worries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 18:40:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 14:40:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704121840.l3CIeliS013097@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2007-04-12 14:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #85) > Should I keep ChangeLog, AUTHORS and NEWS updated too? I've been keeping the > ChangeLog entries in the spec updated so it seems rather as duplicated work to > edit the top-level ChangeLog and NEWS files as well... None of these are blockers, and it's entirely up to upstream if they want to use them or not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 19:35:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 15:35:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234812] Review Request: tcpreplay - Replay captured network traffic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704121935.l3CJZ8Vs019260@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcpreplay - Replay captured network traffic Alias: tcpreplay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234812 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-12 15:34 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Rpmlint output: [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: BSD [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is written in American English. [x] Spec file for the package is legible. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : fff1c5a382bc869caabfb20f4b3b3dad MD5SUM upstream package: fff1c5a382bc869caabfb20f4b3b3dad [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: FC6/i386 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: Arches excluded: Why: [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [x] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: FC6/i386 [-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [x] File based requires are sane. [-] Latest version is packaged. === Issues === 1. Please consider to change the install lines in your patch to use install -p to preserve timestamps. Or you could 2. Please change "%doc Docs" to "%doc Docs/*" so that there is not an extraneous single Docs directory in the %doc directory. 3. Not sure why you did a file base requires on /sbin/tcpdump rather than a package name. 4. CFLAGS are not being used in the compile. This is a blocker. 5. Do not include Docs/INSTALL, Docs/WARNINGS. You might also consider only including one format for the same information as far as Docs/*. === Final Notes === 1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 19:39:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 15:39:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236177] Review Request: perl-NetAddr-IP - Manages IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and subnets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704121939.l3CJdhMv019683@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-NetAddr-IP - Manages IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and subnets Alias: perl-NetAddr-IP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236177 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Alias| |perl-NetAddr-IP ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-12 15:39 EST ------- Missing br's on: Test::More Test::Pod Pod::Coverage There's an rfc included under docs/... Why not add it to %doc? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 19:52:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 15:52:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704121952.l3CJqCLL021315@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 19:52:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 15:52:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222589] Review Request: dolphin - A file manager for KDE focusing on usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704121952.l3CJqI2T021345@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dolphin - A file manager for KDE focusing on usability https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222589 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 19:55:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 15:55:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222994] Review Request: koverartist - Create CD/DVD covers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704121955.l3CJtFNw021807@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: koverartist - Create CD/DVD covers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222994 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 20:01:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 16:01:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220630] Review Request: qpidc - C++ implementation of AMQP messaging spec from Apache Qpid. Upstream for Red Hat Messaging. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704122001.l3CK1Kp3022531@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qpidc - C++ implementation of AMQP messaging spec from Apache Qpid. Upstream for Red Hat Messaging. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220630 nsantos at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 20:13:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 16:13:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225783] Merge Review: gdb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704122013.l3CKDOKL024327@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gdb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225783 ------- Additional Comments From jan.kratochvil at redhat.com 2007-04-12 16:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gdb/ > still is at *-8 as I wrote in Comment 2 I could not commit it so far, wait a moment, please. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 20:37:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 16:37:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225691] Merge Review: dhcp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704122037.l3CKbVFn027087@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: dhcp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225691 ------- Additional Comments From dcantrell at redhat.com 2007-04-12 16:37 EST ------- OK, I've made all the necessary changes. Is this review approved now? If so, can the bug be closed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 20:48:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 16:48:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235741] Review Request: hippo-canvas - Crossplatform canvas using cairo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704122048.l3CKmjlh029429@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hippo-canvas - Crossplatform canvas using cairo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235741 walters at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 20:56:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 16:56:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236287] New: Review Request: python-genshi - Toolkit for stream-based generation of output for the web Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236287 Summary: Review Request: python-genshi - Toolkit for stream-based generation of output for the web Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jeff at ocjtech.us QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/development/SRPMS/python-genshi-0.3.6-1.fc7.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/development/SRPMS/python-genshi-0.3.6-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Genshi is a Python library that provides an integrated set of components for parsing, generating, and processing HTML, XML or other textual content for output generation on the web. The major feature is a template language, which is heavily inspired by Kid. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 21:00:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 17:00:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234812] Review Request: tcpreplay - Replay captured network traffic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704122100.l3CL0MHF031719@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcpreplay - Replay captured network traffic Alias: tcpreplay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234812 ------- Additional Comments From bojan at rexursive.com 2007-04-12 17:00 EST ------- Thank you very much for picking this up. I will work on the open issues and report back. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 21:09:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 17:09:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222994] Review Request: koverartist - Create CD/DVD covers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704122109.l3CL9ktY000412@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: koverartist - Create CD/DVD covers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222994 fedora at deadbabylon.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 21:31:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 17:31:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225691] Merge Review: dhcp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704122131.l3CLVefb003526@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: dhcp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225691 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-04-12 17:31 EST ------- It is approved. I have set the fedora-review flag to +. I don't know what should be done next (well I know for normal review requests but for merge review I don't know). Maybe nothing needs to be done since things are already in CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 22:04:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 18:04:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236297] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236297 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: paul at xelerance.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/xoo/xoo.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/xoo/xoo-0.7-1.src.rpm Description: Xoo is a graphical wrapper around xnest Xoo is a graphical wrapper around xnest. You can make Xnest look like a particular device's display and set up buttons on that device. This is being used by the Openmoko project, see: http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Getting_Openmoko_working_on_host_with_Xoo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 12 22:05:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 18:05:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236297] Review Request: xoo - Xoo is a graphical wrapper around xnest. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704122205.l3CM5E9A007209@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xoo - Xoo is a graphical wrapper around xnest. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236297 paul at xelerance.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- |around xnest. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 13 00:08:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 20:08:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704130008.l3D08U9A012256@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-12 20:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #87) > (In reply to comment #85) > None of these are blockers, and it's entirely up to > upstream if they want to use > them or not. So I wrote as "For upstream". Still check my comment 83. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 13 02:09:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 22:09:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234860] Review Request: perl-Mail-IMAPClient - An IMAP Client API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704130209.l3D29uZs018063@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-IMAPClient - An IMAP Client API Alias: perl-Mail-IMAPClient https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234860 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 13 02:12:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 22:12:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235962] Review Request: perl-Config-Any - Load configuration from different file formats, transparently In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704130212.l3D2CQ2h018219@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Any - Load configuration from different file formats, transparently Alias: perl-Config-Any https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235962 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 13 02:19:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 22:19:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231911] Review Request: jomolhari-fonts - Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704130219.l3D2JYPs018843@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jomolhari-fonts - Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231911 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 13 05:39:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 01:39:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235376] Review Request: ocsinventory-ipdiscover - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704130539.l3D5dGmj000582@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocsinventory-ipdiscover - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235376 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 13 05:51:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 01:51:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233597] Review Request: pigment - Media Center Toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704130551.l3D5pe4c001150@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pigment - Media Center Toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233597 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-04-13 01:51 EST ------- Is this under active review along with elisa? If not i can start working on reviewing these now. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 13 07:38:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 03:38:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234711] Review Request: desktop-drapes - A wallpaper manager application for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704130738.l3D7chm8005447@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: desktop-drapes - A wallpaper manager application for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234711 jspaleta at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jspaleta at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-04-13 03:38 EST ------- Here are the list of blocker review issues as I see it. I have provided an updated specfile as an attachment to this report which I believe address each of the issues below. If you have an issue with any of the suggested changes, please let me know. Review items that need to be addressed: - Change the name to drapes to match upstream tarball and packaging ... Fixed in updated spec - Need BuildRequires: perl-XML-Parser to build under mock against development tree ... Fixed in updated spec - Directory ownership issues: Package should require hicolor-icon-theme for /usr/share/icons/hicolor/*/apps/ ownership Package should require yelp for /usr/share/gnome/help/ ownership Package should require libbonobo for /usr/lib/bonobo/servers/ ownership Package should own /usr/share/omf/drapes/ and /usr/share/gnome/help/drapes/ and /usr/lib/drapes/ ... Fixed in updated spec - Minor Scriptlet changes to bring the package inline with http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ... Fixed in updated spec Details concerning scriptlets: + GConf scriptlets and requires look good according to ScriptletSnippets - scrollkeeper scriptlet updated for to best practises from ScriptletSnippets ... updated spec file contains suggested changes. - update-desktop-database scriptlets technically not needed, since desktop file does not reference a MimeType. ... removed in the updates specfile. Non-blocker item: - Close button on the About dialog doesn't work. ... This is not a blocker, but should be filed with upstream developer. Items which pass review: + rpmlint not clean, but messages appear to be bogus pmlint messages from binary with comments inline: E: desktop-drapes no-binary I'm not sure what this means. This looks bogus to me. The /usr/bin/drapes file is a bash script which shells out to mono. I don't see a problem here. E: desktop-drapes only-non-binary-in-usr-lib I think this is also bogus, the file location /usr/lib/drapes/drapes.exe appears to be consistent with other mono application packaging such as tomboy. W: desktop-drapes non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/drapes.schemas clearly a bogus warning + Specfile name matches name field. Note that both should probably change to just 'drapes' + URL and SOURCE0 tags look good + md5sum of included source matches with upstream source 3ae3b1489f33a3e3b6ccaa3dd8782622 drapes-0.5.1.tar.gz + GPL License tag matches actual license as listed in source COPYING file. COPYING file is included in docs section appropriately + specfile is in legible english-ese + no need for ldconfig no shared libraries + locales seem to be handled correctly + files section looks good ( after correction for directory ownership ) + permissions look good + clean section looks good + install section looks good + no need for doc subpackage + no need for devel subpackage + docs section does not include runtime necessary files + desktop file is included and appears to be installed correctly (Suggestion, add fedora as vendor-id.. this is included in updated spec) + build process appears to be using the rpm build environment compiler options correctly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 13 07:40:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 03:40:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234711] Review Request: desktop-drapes - A wallpaper manager application for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704130740.l3D7eVFD005564@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: desktop-drapes - A wallpaper manager application for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234711 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-04-13 03:40 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=152519) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=152519&action=view) Updated drapes specfile which includes all suggested fixes for review This specfile includes all suggested review blocker fixes. Most importantly this includes a name change from desktop-drapes to drapes to bring it inline with upstream packaging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 13 09:18:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 05:18:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233597] Review Request: pigment - Media Center Toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704130918.l3D9IcpN014572@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pigment - Media Center Toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233597 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-04-13 05:18 EST ------- Status is not ASSIGNED yet, so I guess you could review :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 13 09:59:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 05:59:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222964] Review Request: dayplanner - A simple time management program. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704130959.l3D9xYfO017302@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dayplanner - A simple time management program. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222964 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841 |201449 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-13 05:59 EST ------- Closing for now. If you want to try this software, feel free to reopen this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 13 10:00:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 06:00:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222964] Review Request: dayplanner - A simple time management program. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704131000.l3DA0PN2017417@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dayplanner - A simple time management program. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222964 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX Flag|needinfo?(johnny.d at freesurf.| |ch) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 13 10:05:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 06:05:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210823] Review Request: wxsvg - wxSVG is C++ library to create, manipulate and render SVG files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704131005.l3DA5Scp017669@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wxsvg - wxSVG is C++ library to create, manipulate and render SVG files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210823 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(mola.mp at gmail.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-13 06:05 EST ------- What is the status of this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 13 10:06:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 06:06:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235588] Review Request: escape - an extensible puzzle game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704131006.l3DA6TgI017731@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: escape - an extensible puzzle game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235588 ------- Additional Comments From musuruan at gmail.com 2007-04-13 06:06 EST ------- You should also add hicolor-icon-theme to Requires. This is an empty package owning the /usr/share/icons/hicolor dir hierarchy, sortoff like the filesystem package but then for icons. Note that all packages which have an icon should Require this to ensure proper icon dir ownership. Version is wrong. Please read: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines?action=show#head-cfd71146dbb6f00cec9fe3623ea619f843394837 BTW, why do you use a snapshot version (CVS checkout) instead of a stable release? There may be good reasons, but I'd like to know :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 13 11:23:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 07:23:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235588] Review Request: escape - an extensible puzzle game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704131123.l3DBNo3T020351@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: escape - an extensible puzzle game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235588 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-04-13 07:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > BTW, why do you use a snapshot version (CVS checkout) instead of a stable > release? There may be good reasons, but I'd like to know :) > +1. Would probably also make the URL issue go away more easily. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 13 11:41:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 07:41:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221027] Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704131141.l3DBfVnD021057@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221027 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-04-13 07:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #26) > * Conditional dependency > -------------------------------------------------------- > # Use of --enable-final: The gsl version 1.6 has a bug which may cause problems. > -------------------------------------------------------- > - While I don't know what --enable-final does, however rawhide > gsl is gsl-1.8-3.fc7. Please check if this feature can be enabled. > > By the way, configure checkes gsl version....... > -------------------------------------------------------- > gsl : yes > gsl-devel : yes > gsl >= 1.4 : yes > gsl >= 1.6 : yes > gsl >= 1.7 : yes > -------------------------------------------------------- It is still broken. (In reply to comment #29) > [tasaka1 at localhost i386]$ rpmlint LabPlot > W: LabPlot incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.5.1.5-4 1.5.1.5-4.2.fc7 > W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 > /usr/lib/libgslcblas.so.0 > W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 > /usr/lib/liblcms.so.1 > W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 > /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 > W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 > /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62 > W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 > /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1 > W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 > /usr/lib/libXext.so.6 > W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 > /usr/lib/libSM.so.6 > W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 > /usr/lib/libICE.so.6 > W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 > /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 > W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 > /usr/lib/libXt.so.6 > W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 > /usr/lib/libbz2.so.1 > W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 > /lib/libz.so.1 > W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 > /usr/lib/libWand.so.10 > W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 > /lib/libpthread.so.0 > W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 > /usr/lib/libGL.so.1 > W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 > /usr/lib/libGLU.so.1 It can be ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 13 11:50:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 07:50:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221027] Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704131150.l3DBovSs021899@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221027 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-13 07:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #30) > > (In reply to comment #29) > > [tasaka1 at localhost i386]$ rpmlint LabPlot > > W: LabPlot incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.5.1.5-4 1.5.1.5-4.2.fc7 > > W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 > > /usr/lib/libgslcblas.so.0 > > W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 > > /usr/lib/liblcms.so.1 > > W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 > > /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 > > W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 > > /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62 > > W: LabPlot unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libLabPlot.so.1.5.1 > > /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1 > > It can be ignored. Yes. Anyway, please check my spec file and fix it. Especially, * it seems for me that -devel package is not useful because -devel package does not contain any header files * I don't understand why you don't split -fr documents -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 13 11:59:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 07:59:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221027] Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704131159.l3DBx8a5022615@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221027 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-04-13 07:58 EST ------- Updated Spec URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/LabPlot/LabPlot.spec SRPM URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/LabPlot/LabPlot-1.5.1.5-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 13 12:00:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 08:00:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221027] Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704131200.l3DC0mFV022730@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221027 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-04-13 08:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #31) > * I don't understand why you don't split -fr documents I've done it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 13 12:20:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 08:20:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231911] Review Request: jomolhari-fonts - Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704131220.l3DCK5tg023893@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jomolhari-fonts - Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231911 mgarski at post.pl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mgarski at post.pl 2007-04-13 08:20 EST ------- Imported and builded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 13 12:53:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 08:53:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233802] Review Request: python-xlib - Fully functional X client library for Python programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704131253.l3DCroPU026280@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-xlib - Fully functional X client library for Python programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233802 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 13 13:20:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 09:20:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223592] Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704131320.l3DDKbV3031163@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223592 ------- Additional Comments From dgoodwin at dangerouslyinc.com 2007-04-13 09:20 EST ------- http://dangerouslyinc.com/files/wuja/wuja.spec http://dangerouslyinc.com/files/wuja/wuja-0.0.6-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 13 13:48:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 09:48:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225253] Merge Review: apr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704131348.l3DDmN9e000538@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: apr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225253 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-04-13 09:48 EST ------- Re: comment #11 Regardless, if you want to keep static libs/.la files, they should to be in *-static pkgs: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-82d97fc4a3421310f4e2971180e4165965b65662 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/StaticLinkage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 13 14:00:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 10:00:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226189] Merge Review: neon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704131400.l3DE0WRX001292@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: neon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226189 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|RAWHIDE | Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-04-13 10:00 EST ------- Here's a few more items that should be addressed in merge review: 1. neon's static libs (and .la's) file should be packaged separately: into a -static or -devel-static package: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-82d97fc4a3421310f4e2971180e4165965b65662 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/StaticLinkage This will be mildly painful, but to do this right, we'll have to sort through the whole stack of dependent libs/packages and do those too. 2. libneon.la (currently in neon-devel) contains references to -lgssapi_krb5 -lkrb5 but it doesn't include: the (sub) package owning libneon.la MUST include: Requires: krb5-devel Eventually, when/if krb5-static exists, neon-static needs Requires: krb5-static -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 13 14:03:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 10:03:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236366] New: Review Request: clutter-gtk - basic GTK clutter widget Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236366 Summary: Review Request: clutter-gtk - basic GTK clutter widget Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: allisson at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://fedora.allisson.eti.br/clutter-gtk/clutter-gtk.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.allisson.eti.br/clutter-gtk/clutter-gtk-0.1.0-1.src.rpm Description: This allows clutter to be embedded in GTK applications. We hope with further work in the future clutter-gtk will also allow the reverse, namely embedding GTK in Clutter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 13 15:21:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 11:21:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226189] Merge Review: neon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704131521.l3DFLgNa009921@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: neon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226189 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-04-13 11:21 EST ------- Just a note that the static library guideline wasn't there when I originally reviewed this package, so this bit about splitting them (and the .la file) out from the main package is new. Still, I'm not sure what the value of putting the .la file in a separate package is if the main package will just require it in order for "neon-config --la-file" to be meaningful. Unless, of course, it's OK for neon-config output to point to a nonexistant file in the case that the -static package is not installed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 13 15:22:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 11:22:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223592] Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704131522.l3DFMDt8009968@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223592 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-13 11:22 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=152547) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=152547&action=view) mock build log of wuja-0.0.6-3 on FC-devel i386 wuja-0.0.6-3 won't be rebuilt on FC-devel i386. Please check BuildRequires (at least python-devel seems required as BR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 13 15:27:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 11:27:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221027] Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704131527.l3DFRluw010502@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221027 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-13 11:27 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=152548) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=152548&action=view) mock build log of LabPlot-1.5.1.5-5 on FC-devel i386 mockbuild fails on FC-devel i386 (at least due to non-checked existing files). I just tried to rebuild -5, however: * Are the .so symlink needed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 13 15:29:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 11:29:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226189] Merge Review: neon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704131529.l3DFTBZ3010646@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: neon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226189 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-04-13 11:29 EST ------- Re: neon-config --la-file Prolly patch --- neon-config.static 2006-07-12 12:13:28.000000000 -0500 +++ neon-config 2007-04-13 10:27:56.000000000 -0500 @@ -82,7 +82,9 @@ ;; --la-file) + if test -f ${libdir}/libneon.la ; then echo ${libdir}/libneon.la + fi ;; --support) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 13 15:49:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 11:49:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226189] Merge Review: neon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704131549.l3DFnRZG012781@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: neon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226189 ------- Additional Comments From jorton at redhat.com 2007-04-13 11:49 EST ------- Rex: thanks for the .pc patch, looks great (neon 0.26.x does similar already). But breaking the --la-file output is simply not acceptable. I'm not sure it is worth the hassle of going through creating all those -static packages. We could just drop the libneon.a, strip the dep_libs line from the .la file to prevent deps leaks, break the upstream RPM build, and be done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 13 16:31:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 12:31:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226189] Merge Review: neon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704131631.l3DGVZh2016442@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: neon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226189 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-04-13 12:31 EST ------- > break the upstream RPM build, and be done. you sure? Having the ability to have a static rpm seems desirable (but you're right, the extra effort may not be worth the pain). > breaking the --la-file output is simply not acceptable. why? really, who uses it? what depends on it? couldn't/shouldn't those be fixed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 13 17:11:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 13:11:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226407] Merge Review: sendmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704131711.l3DHBc58019093@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sendmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226407 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2007-04-13 13:11 EST ------- rpmlint output, ignoring things explained away in Comment #2. W: sendmail unversioned-explicit-provides MTA => I'm not convinced about the merits of "Provides: MTA" vs. "Provides: smtpdaemon", and the discussion on fedora-devel-list didn't seem to lead to any particular conclusion. It's harmless enough though so I'm not going to quibble about it. E: sendmail hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/sendmail => This comes from "Provides: /usr/lib/sendmail", is intentional and required for backwards compatibility (OK). W: sendmail unversioned-explicit-provides %{_sysconfdir}/pam.d/smtp W: sendmail unversioned-explicit-provides %{_mandir}/man8/sendmail.8.gz == Provides for alternatives-based files (OK). W: sendmail mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 232) => Should use either spaces or tabs consistently, not a mixture of the two. E: sendmail non-standard-executable-perm /usr/sbin/makemap 0555 => Permission should be 0755 to enable debuginfo extraction. E: sendmail non-readable /etc/aliases.db 0640 => This has appeared because the original package explicitly used %attr(0644... for this file. Harmless because (a) the file is %ghosted and (b) the permissions will be 0640 on the installed system anyway if the file is created properly. E: sendmail executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/sendmail => Marking initscripts as %config is a contentious subject. I'm against it on the basis that configurability should be encapsulated in /etc/sysconfig/sendmail etc. but I can see the merits of the argument the other way too. Do you have a strong opinion on this or is this just an inheritance from older packaging? E: sendmail non-standard-executable-perm /usr/sbin/smrsh 0555 => Permission should be 0755 to enable debuginfo extraction. E: sendmail postin-without-chkconfig /etc/rc.d/init.d/sendmail => /sbin/chkconfig --add sendmail was removed from %post along with the stuff for upgrading from old versions, needs to be reinstated. Other comments: FFR_UNSAFE_SASL still present in sasl2 config - why? Why is the not-included mysql support stuff still in the spec? Any thoughts on my suggestion for the %post script near the end of Comment #9? Finally, the line containing "MSPQOWN=${nameuser}" in the spec has a trailing space on it. Please remove it, it's been annoying me for ages ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 13 18:09:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 14:09:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225792] Merge Review: gfs2-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704131809.l3DI9TRO023213@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gfs2-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225792 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium nstraz at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |josef at toxicpanda.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 13 18:19:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 14:19:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222372] Review Request: tilda - a quake like drop down terminal for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704131819.l3DIJU1N024123@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tilda - a quake like drop down terminal for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222372 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium josef at toxicpanda.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From josef at toxicpanda.com 2007-04-13 14:19 EST ------- Hmm I never closed this. Its been committed to CVS and released. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 13 19:48:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:48:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234860] Review Request: perl-Mail-IMAPClient - An IMAP Client API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704131948.l3DJmVLE031902@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-IMAPClient - An IMAP Client API Alias: perl-Mail-IMAPClient https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234860 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-13 15:48 EST ------- Built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 13 19:48:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:48:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234862] Review Request: perl-Mail-Box - Manage a mailbox, a folder with messages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704131948.l3DJmgEP031935@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Box - Manage a mailbox, a folder with messages Alias: perl-Mail-Box https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234862 Bug 234862 depends on bug 234860, which changed state. Bug 234860 Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-IMAPClient - An IMAP Client API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234860 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 13 19:52:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:52:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236422] New: Review Request: clutter-gst - ClutterMedia interface to GStreamer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236422 Summary: Review Request: clutter-gst - ClutterMedia interface to GStreamer Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: allisson at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://fedora.allisson.eti.br/clutter-gst/clutter-gst.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.allisson.eti.br/clutter-gst/clutter-gst-0.1.1-1.src.rpm Description: This package contains a video texture actor and an audio player object for use with clutter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 13 19:57:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:57:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234862] Review Request: perl-Mail-Box - Manage a mailbox, a folder with messages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704131957.l3DJvOmp000415@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Box - Manage a mailbox, a folder with messages Alias: perl-Mail-Box https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234862 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-13 15:57 EST ------- Built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 13 19:57:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:57:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234863] Review Request: perl-Mail-Box-Parser-C - Parsing folders for MailBox with C routines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704131957.l3DJvPnB000423@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Box-Parser-C - Parsing folders for MailBox with C routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234863 Bug 234863 depends on bug 234862, which changed state. Bug 234862 Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Box - Manage a mailbox, a folder with messages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234862 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 13 19:57:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:57:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234790] Review Request: perl-Email-Abstract - Unified interface to mail representations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704131957.l3DJvQOq000431@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Abstract - Unified interface to mail representations Alias: perl-Email-Abstract https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234790 Bug 234790 depends on bug 234862, which changed state. Bug 234862 Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Box - Manage a mailbox, a folder with messages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234862 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 13 20:51:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 16:51:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225610] Merge Review: bcel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704132051.l3DKp5Lr004606@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bcel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225610 ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-04-13 16:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > * The examples/Mini README probably shouldn't be marked as a %doc as it makes > more sense to just leave it in the Mini directory. Done > * The demo package probably shouldn't install things to > %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version} but to %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/demo Fixed > * It seems strange that the demo package doesn't have any documentation > describing what the classes do and how to build them. But I guess the sources > don't have this information either Yeah, the upstream sources don't have any documentation either. > * The build file for the demo package is the build.xml for the whole project. > Perhaps this should be included in the demo package (or maybe a subset that > would only build the demos?) I've made the main package a Requires: for the demo package > * The manual subpackage just has the license file in there, there should be more > to the manual than this. maybe the manual only gets built if using maven? The docs/* stuff are built but doesn't get included in the package, I copied the LICENCE.txt to %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}, so that the docs/* stays in the package. New spec file and srpm at the same location. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 13 22:04:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 18:04:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225607] Merge Review: axis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704132204.l3DM4OG1008862@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: axis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225607 ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-04-13 18:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > - if upstream doesn't release source drops, put *clear* instructions on > how to generate the the source drop; ie. > # svn export blah/tag blah > # tar cjf blah-version-src.tar.bz2 blah > X md5sums do not match Fixed > rpmlint axis-javadoc-1.2.1-2jpp.7.fc7.x86_64.rpm > W: axis-javadoc non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java > W: axis-javadoc symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/javadoc/axis > /usr/share/javadoc/axis-1.2.1 > X please fix the symlink issue I don't think the symlink can be made relative since there is macro in there. > > rpmlint axis-manual-1.2.1-2jpp.7.fc7.x86_64.rpm > W: axis-manual non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java > W: axis-manual dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/axis-manual-1.2.1/apiDocs > /usr/share/javadoc/axis > W: axis-manual symlink-should-be-relative > /usr/share/doc/axis-manual-1.2.1/apiDocs /usr/share/javadoc/axis > X please fix the symlink issues > The symlink is needed to avoid duplicate files. This symlink also includes a macro. Updated spec file and srpm at the same location. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 13 22:06:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 18:06:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235589] Review Request: escape-data - data for the escape package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704132206.l3DM6ut1008986@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: escape-data - data for the escape package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235589 adam at spicenitz.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From adam at spicenitz.org 2007-04-13 18:06 EST ------- Yeah, I'll kill this bug and just have the one package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 13 22:17:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 18:17:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223486] Review Request: happy - Haskell parser generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704132217.l3DMHWQe009322@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: happy - Haskell parser generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223486 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2007-04-13 18:17 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: happy Short Description: Haskell parser generator Owners: bos at serpentine.com Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: petersen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 13 22:52:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 18:52:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235802] Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704132252.l3DMql0V011260@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235802 ------- Additional Comments From dyoung at mesd.k12.or.us 2007-04-13 18:52 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=152596) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=152596&action=view) Patch to not strip binaries I'm seeking a sponsor also, so consider this just pre-review comments. The binaries are being stripped, leaving an empty debuginfo package. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Debuginfo for details. My patch to src/Makefile.in is attached. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 13 22:56:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 18:56:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230806] Review Request: tasks - To-do list In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704132256.l3DMuQMY011581@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tasks - To-do list https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230806 ------- Additional Comments From dyoung at mesd.k12.or.us 2007-04-13 18:56 EST ------- Pre-review notes on remind: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235802 Proposed patch to stop stripping binaries, generate non-empty debuginfo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 13 23:23:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 19:23:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235588] Review Request: escape - an extensible puzzle game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704132323.l3DNN2Fg012414@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: escape - an extensible puzzle game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235588 ------- Additional Comments From adam at spicenitz.org 2007-04-13 19:23 EST ------- New release: http://www.spicenitz.org/fedora/escape-200704130-1.fc7.src.rpm http://www.spicenitz.org/fedora/escape.spec - Merge -data package into this - Install icon into correct place and update the icon cache - Use upstream tarball, created by upstream at my request - Remove X-Fedora category -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 13 23:31:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 19:31:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226048] Merge Review: libtheora In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704132331.l3DNVsaR012694@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libtheora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226048 michel.salim at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2007-04-13 19:31 EST ------- I guess we'll have to wait until a stable version is out (hopefully it won't be called 1.0). Closing this bug, since in this case it's a review of an existing package and there's no owner set -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 13 23:50:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 19:50:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230806] Review Request: tasks - To-do list In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704132350.l3DNo043013292@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tasks - To-do list https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230806 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-13 19:49 EST ------- Well, * tasks-0.4-3 is okay * I have not checked remind (bug 235802) in detail, however your patch is actually needed. ------------------------------------------------- This package (tasks) is APPROVED by me. ------------------------------------------------- I will sponsor you. Please follow according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 14 00:58:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 20:58:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226230] Merge Review: parted In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704140058.l3E0w46O015342@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: parted https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226230 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(dcantrell at redhat.c | |om) ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-04-13 20:58 EST ------- Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [!] Rpmlint output: #rpmlint parted-1.8.6-4.src.rpm W: parted no-url-tag rpmlint ~/reports/parted/parted-1.8.6-4.fc7.x86_64.rpm W: parted no-url-tag --> an URL tag should be provided [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type:GPL [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is written in American English. [x] Spec file for the package is legible. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM : eef9d788f13f4ed461f97051eb0543ffd40830b7 parted-1.8.6.tar.bz2 [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [-] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Pack aging Guidelines. [!] Duplicate BR: automake (by libtool), libsepol-devel (by libselinux-devel) [x] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [!] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [!] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [x] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on:Devel/x86_64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on:devel/x86_64, devel/i386 [x] Package functions as described. [x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [x] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [x] File based requires are sane. [x] Latest version is packaged. === Issues === 1. Summary ends with dot. As far as I remember (rpmlint does not say anything, and it is latest version) it was preffered to not end sumaries with dot. Not a big deal. 2. parted-devel should require pkconfig. MUSTFIX 3. there is a texinfo file (doc/parted-pt_BR) which might be shipped but is not. 4. %files has a duplicate line: %{_libdir}/libparted-*.so.* is included twice. MUSTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 14 01:00:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 21:00:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226230] Merge Review: parted In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704140100.l3E10waW015457@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: parted https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226230 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-04-13 21:00 EST ------- Sorry, should have been [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 14 04:43:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 00:43:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230806] Review Request: tasks - To-do list In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704140443.l3E4hNra025813@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tasks - To-do list https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230806 ------- Additional Comments From dyoung at mesd.k12.or.us 2007-04-14 00:43 EST ------- Thank you for the review and sponsorship. I've applied for my account and will notify you when I'm in the cvsextras and fedorabugs groups. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 14 04:51:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 00:51:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235588] Review Request: escape - an extensible puzzle game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704140451.l3E4pS7q025944@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: escape - an extensible puzzle game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235588 ------- Additional Comments From adam at spicenitz.org 2007-04-14 00:51 EST ------- Backup location if spicenitz.org is down: http://www.andrew.cmu.edu/user/agoode/fedora/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 14 07:14:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 03:14:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704140714.l3E7Ehps029413@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium david at lovesunix.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |david at lovesunix.net ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2007-04-14 03:14 EST ------- Looking at the SVN branch for SLED10 SP1 bugfixes the version they are at currently is 0.9.8. http://svn.gnome.org/viewcvs/gnome-main-menu/branches/SLED10-SP1/ I compiled this branch on Fedora as I enjoyed using it while I was testing SLED10 SP1, currently there are a few problems. 1) It doesn't display the Applications context 2) The status field for harddrive displays 0mb of 0mb 3) It has issues with translations, long strings get cut off Outside of that this works rather well out of the box. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 14 08:12:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 04:12:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704140812.l3E8CfNn000414@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 thelusiv at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |thelusiv at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From thelusiv at gmail.com 2007-04-14 04:12 EST ------- To make scons install work without data, simply comment out the line SConscript('data/SConscript') in the file SConstruct. Should I add a SCons option to install no data to make packaging easier? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 14 08:46:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 04:46:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704140846.l3E8kJGF002483@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From thelusiv at gmail.com 2007-04-14 04:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > Created an attachment (id=152325) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=152325&action=view) [edit] > fix for vdrift scons files > I've checked this into VDrift SVN... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 14 08:50:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 04:50:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235249] Review Request: vdrift-data-minimal - VDrift minimal data set In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704140850.l3E8oX22002876@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdrift-data-minimal - VDrift minimal data set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235249 thelusiv at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |thelusiv at gmail.com, | |che666 at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From thelusiv at gmail.com 2007-04-14 04:50 EST ------- Will there be a full data set as well? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 14 09:17:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 05:17:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704140917.l3E9HPg0004812@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From thelusiv at gmail.com 2007-04-14 05:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > To make scons install work without data, simply comment out the line > > SConscript('data/SConscript') To clarify, you should comment out lines 355 and 356 in SConstruct. By the way, reading through the delimma about packaging above, it seems it would be handy to have a way for SCons to only install the data unique to the full data package. Also, it might make more sense to call the RPMs "vdrift", "vdrift-required-data", and "vdrift-extra-data", or something along those lines, instead of just full or minimal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 14 09:29:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 05:29:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704140929.l3E9TB9X005503@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From thelusiv at gmail.com 2007-04-14 05:29 EST ------- One more thing...in at least the build section you should probably add "release=1" as another option to scons. Jon, this might give you a tiny bit more info on our SCons system: http://wiki.vdrift.net/index.php/Using_SCons If you have any questions about the page let me know, the info that's there is very basic but should give you a starting point... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 14 10:38:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 06:38:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222087] Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704141038.l3EAcRBJ007611@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222087 ------- Additional Comments From sdl.web at gmail.com 2007-04-14 06:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #29) > Well, for 7.svn20070406 > > * numbering > - Usually for svn tarball, the revision number is used > (at the time I checked svn version, the revision number > was 336), while for cvs tarball, the date is used for > tarball number. Done. > * autotool > - Well, as noted above, currently > * rawhide is automake 1.10 > * automake 1.10 fails without config.rpath > So the modification I wrote above was needed for > rawhide. Yes, it also builds on Fedora 6. > * Documentation > - Please check if the following documents are needed. > -------------------------------------------------- > README > -------------------------------------------------- I wonder what's the reason not to include README. http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~sl392/fedora/SRPMs/pcmanx-gtk2.spec http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~sl392/fedora/SRPMs/pcmanx-gtk2-0.3.5-8.336svn.leof6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 14 11:22:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 07:22:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222087] Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704141122.l3EBMGF6008735@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222087 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-14 07:22 EST ------- Well, before checking srpm on comment 30: (In reply to comment #30) > (In reply to comment #29) > > * Documentation > > - Please check if the following documents are needed. > > -------------------------------------------------- > > README > > -------------------------------------------------- > > I wonder what's the reason not to include README. The reason I have a question for README is that this README file only explains the options of configure, so this is similar with what is usually written in INSTALL file and IMO this is needed for people who want to install this by themselves and not needed for people using rpm. How do you think? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 14 12:12:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 08:12:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222087] Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704141212.l3ECC3OI010083@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222087 ------- Additional Comments From sdl.web at gmail.com 2007-04-14 08:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #31) > > I wonder what's the reason not to include README. > > The reason I have a question for README is that > this README file only explains the options of configure, > so this is similar with what is usually written in INSTALL > file and IMO this is needed for people who want to install > this by themselves and not needed for people using rpm. > > How do you think? I agree with you. Maybe we should ask upstream to rename the file. What do you think? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 14 12:17:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 08:17:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704141217.l3ECHRm2010210@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2007-04-14 08:17 EST ------- if you want lower case names theelusive then i do suggest to also name the tarballs lower case in the next iteration. it will make things somewhat more trivial. otherwise you will end up with the upper/lower case mix like above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 14 12:19:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 08:19:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222087] Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704141219.l3ECJVBO010253@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222087 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-14 08:19 EST ------- IMO while there is actually INSTALL file, the content of README file is also suitable to belong to INSTALL file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 14 12:23:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 08:23:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223486] Review Request: happy - Haskell parser generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704141223.l3ECNwp7010373@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: happy - Haskell parser generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223486 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-04-14 08:23 EST ------- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 14 13:32:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 09:32:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704141332.l3EDW12j013566@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2007-04-14 09:31 EST ------- I've just uploaded the updated files. These should, knock on wood, fix all review points. Get them here: http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Rawhide/SPECS/evolution-brutus.spec http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Rawhide/SRPMS/evolution-brutus-1.1.25.9-1.fc7.src.rpm http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Rawhide/RPMS/i386/evolution-brutus-devel-1.1.25.9-1.fc7.i386.rpm http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Rawhide/RPMS/i386/evolution-brutus-debuginfo-1.1.25.9-1.fc7.i386.rpm http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Rawhide/RPMS/i386/evolution-brutus-1.1.25.9-1.fc7.i386.rpm http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Rawhide/SOURCES/evolution-brutus-1.1.25.9.tar.gz Thanks, jules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 14 14:21:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 10:21:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233946] Review Request: secondlife - The Second Life client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704141421.l3EELFUU015055@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: secondlife - The Second Life client Alias: secondlife https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233946 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2007-04-14 10:21 EST ------- Please contact upstream with a clear recommendation to relicense the font or use a open font instead mentioning that this is a requirement for this package to be in Fedora. If upstream doesn't want to change this, patch it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 14 14:45:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 10:45:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233946] Review Request: secondlife - The Second Life client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704141445.l3EEjOqP015928@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: secondlife - The Second Life client Alias: secondlife https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233946 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2007-04-14 10:45 EST ------- error: Failed build dependencies: openjpeg-devel is needed by secondlife-1.13.4.8-0.1.20070321a.x86_64 xmlrpc-epi-devel is needed by secondlife-1.13.4.8-0.1.20070321a.x86_64 [nbecker at nbecker ~]$ sudo smart install openjpeg-devel xmlrpc-epi-devel [...] error: 'openjpeg-devel' matches no packages. Suggestions: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 14 15:08:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 11:08:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223592] Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704141508.l3EF80Il016822@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223592 ------- Additional Comments From dgoodwin at dangerouslyinc.com 2007-04-14 11:07 EST ------- Sorry for the confusion, still trying to get the hang of building rpms. http://dangerouslyinc.com/files/wuja/wuja.spec http://dangerouslyinc.com/files/wuja/wuja-0.0.6-4.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 14 16:24:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 12:24:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223592] Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704141624.l3EGOISx019163@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223592 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-14 12:24 EST ------- Well, while I don't know if I am doing the right way to use this, I just typed on the terminal and gets the following traceback. [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ wuja Unable to locate logging configuration in the following locations: /home/tasaka1/.wuja/logging.conf /home/tasaka1/logging.conf GTK Accessibility Module initialized /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/wuja/application.py:35: DeprecationWarning: the module egg.trayicon is deprecated; equivalent functionality can now be found in pygtk 2.10 from egg import trayicon Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/wuja", line 13, in from wuja.application import WujaApplication File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/wuja/application.py", line 38, in from wuja.notifier import Notifier File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/wuja/notifier.py", line 31, in from wuja.feed import FeedOpenError File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/wuja/feed.py", line 29, in from elementtree import ElementTree ImportError: No module named elementtree -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 14 16:26:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 12:26:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225718] Merge Review: eel2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704141626.l3EGQC2q019271@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: eel2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225718 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium dakingun at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dakingun at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-04-14 12:26 EST ------- GOOD: * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group and License tags properly in place * Locales handled correctly * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * Package builds OK in Mock. * Source matches upstream md5sum: dd06a56773af79e4292e63c6bcca9449 eel-2.18.0.1.tar.bz2 NEEDSWORK: * Source url not given in the spec * eel2-devel should not own %{_libdir}/pkgconfig, the -devel %files section should have /usr/lib/pkgconfig/eel-2.0.pc instead * rpmlint warnings: $ rpmlint eel2-2.18.0.1-3.fc7.src.rpm W: eel2 mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 17, tab: line 16) $ rpmlint eel2-2.18.0.1-3.fc7.x86_64.rpm W: eel2 spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/eel2-2.18.0.1/COPYING $ rpmlint eel2-devel-2.18.0.1-3.fc7.x86_64.rpm W: eel2-devel no-documentation (can be ignored!) Minor nit: $RPM_OPT_FLAGS already includes a '-g' option -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 14 17:00:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 13:00:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228969] Review Request: wxGlade - A wxWidgets/wxPython/wxPerl GUI designer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704141700.l3EH0wEL020030@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wxGlade - A wxWidgets/wxPython/wxPerl GUI designer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228969 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From bbbush.yuan at gmail.com 2007-04-14 13:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > updated: > SPEC : ftp://ftp.fedora.cn/pub/fedora-cn/in-review/wxglade.spec > SRPM : ftp://ftp.fedora.cn/pub/fedora-cn/in-review/wxglade-0.4.1-3.fc6.src.rpm > == formal review == The latest version is wxGlade-0.5. The package name, as well as spec file name should be "wxGlade" instead of "wxglade". Or, have you contacted the authors? In the launcher script, \$@ should be quoted with double quote. Mixed tabs and spaces in spec file. Why using "Prefix:". desktop-file-install --vendor fedora instead of "" Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 14 17:04:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 13:04:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225721] Merge Review: ekiga In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704141704.l3EH4BeA020119@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ekiga https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225721 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium dakingun at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dakingun at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-04-14 13:03 EST ------- GOOD: * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Source, Group and License tags properly in place * Locales handled correctly * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * Package builds OK in Mock. * Source matches upstream md5sum: ec43c03ad942f87fb1d5cbcec5153b64 ekiga-2.0.7.tar.gz NEEDSWORK: * rpmlint have the following complaints $ rpmlint ekiga-2.0.7-2.fc7.src.rpm W: ekiga prereq-use scrollkeeper W: ekiga unversioned-explicit-obsoletes gnomemeeting W: ekiga macro-in-%changelog post $ rpmlint ekiga-2.0.7-2.fc7.x86_64.rpm W: ekiga incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.0.7-1 2.0.7-2.fc7 E: ekiga obsolete-not-provided gnomemeeting W: ekiga non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/ekiga.schemas W: ekiga one-line-command-in-%postun scrollkeeper-update There are also warnings as below in the build log; Processing files: ekiga-2.0.7-2.fc7 warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/omf/ekiga/ekiga-C.omf warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/omf/ekiga/ekiga-bg.omf warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/omf/ekiga/ekiga-de.omf warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/omf/ekiga/ekiga-es.omf warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/omf/ekiga/ekiga-fr.omf warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/omf/ekiga/ekiga-pt_BR.omf warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/omf/ekiga/ekiga-sv.omf warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/omf/ekiga/ekiga-uk.omf It is sufficient to just have %{_datadir}/omf/ekiga without %{_datadir}/omf/ekiga/*.omf in the files manifest BTW: There's a 2.0.9 release on the source ftp. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 14 17:18:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 13:18:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221769] Review Request: libcgi - CGI easy as C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704141718.l3EHILCV020572@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcgi - CGI easy as C https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221769 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2007-04-14 13:18 EST ------- ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/libcgi.spec ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/libcgi-1.0-3.src.rpm Changelog: No longer builds the static subpackage by default. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 14 17:23:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 13:23:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222087] Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704141723.l3EHNZWp020851@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222087 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-14 13:23 EST ------- Well, apart from README file, this package is okay. For now, just remove README file. ---------------------------------------------------- This package (pcmanx-gtk2) is APPROVED by me. ---------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 14 17:25:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 13:25:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225730] Merge Review: eog In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704141725.l3EHPx10021035@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: eog https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225730 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium dakingun at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dakingun at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 14 17:30:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 13:30:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225730] Merge Review: eog In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704141730.l3EHUqk5021248@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: eog https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225730 dakingun at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-04-14 13:30 EST ------- GOOD: * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group and License tags properly in place * Locales handled correctly * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * No file duplicates * Package builds OK in Mock. * Source matches upstream md5sum: 32f4cd4cd3108522eccf0b8fd85c8bbd eog-2.18.0.1.tar.bz2 rpmlint warnings (no so serious); $ rpmlint eog-2.18.0.1-2.fc7.src.rpm W: eog mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 16, tab: line 78) $ rpmlint eog-2.18.0.1-2.fc7.x86_64.rpm W: eog non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/eog.schemas APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 14 19:44:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 15:44:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704141944.l3EJi6cb025139@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From thelusiv at gmail.com 2007-04-14 15:44 EST ------- I'm not so concerned about case, but I thought that most package were named after the "short name" of the application anyway. Also our tarballs are named in lowercase, only the .package files have uppercase names. Is this what you're talking about? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 14 19:45:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 15:45:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222087] Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704141945.l3EJjcCA025232@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222087 ------- Additional Comments From sdl.web at gmail.com 2007-04-14 15:45 EST ------- So what to do next? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 14 20:27:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 16:27:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704142027.l3EKRgLI026690@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From thelusiv at gmail.com 2007-04-14 16:27 EST ------- Also, can't believe I forgot about this. There's no need at all for that patch to import CC/CXX/CXXFLAGS. I added options to do just this long ago, just for this purpose. Just add these options to scons during build: scons os_cc=1 os_cxx=1 os_cxxflags=1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 14 20:46:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 16:46:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222475] Review Request: sofia-sip - Sofia SIP User-Agent library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704142046.l3EKk3Kx027624@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sofia-sip - Sofia SIP User-Agent library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222475 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-04-14 16:46 EST ------- Spec URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/sofia-sip-1.12.5-4.work6.fc6.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/sofia-sip-1.12.5-4.work6.fc6.src.rpm I believe that the build failures should have a workaround now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 14 21:55:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 17:55:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704142155.l3ELtU9G029472@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2007-04-14 17:55 EST ------- last time i looked though those paths were hardcoded and that means that ccache / distcc wont be used :) which cc /usr/lib/ccache/cc sorry if it just looks in PATH now, could be. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 14 22:25:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 18:25:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704142225.l3EMPTgV030311@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From thelusiv at gmail.com 2007-04-14 18:25 EST ------- There are no hard-coded paths. You will still have to put "CC=gcc CXX=g++ CXXFLAGS=..." before running scons for them to apply the desired effect. These options do the same thing your patch did: #----------------------# # OS compiler settings # #----------------------# if env['os_cc']: env.Replace(CC = os.environ['CC']) if env['os_cxx']: env.Replace(CXX = os.environ['CXX']) if env['os_cxxflags']: env.Append(CXXFLAGS = os.environ['CXXFLAGS']) http://svn.vdrift.net/viewvc.py/trunk/SConstruct?view=markup -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 14 23:05:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 19:05:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218599] Review Request: klibido - NNTP (Usenet) file grabber for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704142305.l3EN5imC031236@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: klibido - NNTP (Usenet) file grabber for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218599 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium johan at x-tnd.be changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |johan at x-tnd.be ------- Additional Comments From johan at x-tnd.be 2007-04-14 19:05 EST ------- This server does not respond :/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 14 23:18:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 19:18:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205891] Review Request: rpl - Intelligent recursive search/replace utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704142318.l3ENIrYA031566@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpl - Intelligent recursive search/replace utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205891 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium rpm at timj.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2007-04-14 19:18 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: rpl New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 14 23:23:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 19:23:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207174] Review Request: whatmask - Convert between different netmask types and show information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704142323.l3ENNqjl031659@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: whatmask - Convert between different netmask types and show information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207174 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium rpm at timj.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2007-04-14 19:23 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: whatmask New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 01:10:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 21:10:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236486] New: Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236486 Summary: Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kuznetsovaval at yahoo.ca QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/profugus SRPM URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/profugus Description: The software does the automatic live migration of the Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU load or scheduled maintenance. The software will be running as a daemon on the master system and read CPU load from both systems. It will read the CPU load on the remote machine using ssh. For the first run the software will copy magic cookie to the remote machine, and it'll not ask the user password for the next time. Based on CPU load of systems the software will pick virtual machine(s) to migrate to the save system. The software is written in Python. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 01:15:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 21:15:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236486] Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704150115.l3F1FJCS001534@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236486 ------- Additional Comments From kuznetsovaval at yahoo.ca 2007-04-14 21:15 EST ------- This my first package and I need a sponsor. Thanks, Anton -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 01:36:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 21:36:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236486] Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704150136.l3F1aKdL001866@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236486 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-04-14 21:36 EST ------- Here are a couple of errors I have spotted at the first glance - BuildRoot is wrong, please see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-b4fdd45fa76cbf54c885ef0836361319ab962473 - you should use "cp -p" or better yet "install -p" in order to preserve the timestamps of the files - you should not use "ln -s " in order to install the start/stop script; instead you should just install the script in it's final location (/etc/init.d) and allow the admins to use chkconfig to activate/deactivate it; please also make sure that it is not enabled by default. Given the current shape of the "profugus" file, it looks like it needs a couple of lines to make it chkconfig-aware - you should include in the package the text of the license used for the program (GPL) and also include it as %doc in the binary rpm Please provide direct links to the spec and src.rpm if possible, not the general link to the project page. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 01:46:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 21:46:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222087] Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704150146.l3F1kMVM002067@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222087 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-14 21:46 EST ------- Please follow: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/NewPackageProcess -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 02:20:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 22:20:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226062] Merge Review: libX11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704150220.l3F2KNKH002905@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libX11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226062 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From retsil at zipworld.com.au 2007-04-14 22:20 EST ------- Application of the libX11-cve-2007-1667.patch appears to be causing problems with some propietary software. Users are halting their YUM updates until the problem is fixed. http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.lang.idl-pvwave/browse_thread/thread/5cf3f528590e3aa0/e52f0b3a878073a0#e52f0b3a878073a0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 05:03:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 01:03:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 209112] Review Request: gspca - v4l2 kernel module driver for webcams In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704150503.l3F53Dvv005699@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gspca - v4l2 kernel module driver for webcams https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209112 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-15 01:03 EST ------- Time to CLOSE this Package Review instead of seeing it as "Awaiting-for-review" again and again every time Package Status wiki page updated. I agree its huge work of maintaining kmod packages in Fedora as kernel releases are very often and kmod packages need to be released for each releases. After waiting/struggling long here even after getting approval from FESCO, nobody like to review this package. Though I am sure that many peoples are using gspca drivers but no one like to see this in Fedora. Therefore CLOSING this package review. Thanks to those who commented here and to FESCO for approving this kmod package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 05:15:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 01:15:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 209112] Review Request: gspca - v4l2 kernel module driver for webcams In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704150515.l3F5FMLN005977@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gspca - v4l2 kernel module driver for webcams https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209112 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-15 01:15 EST ------- Dunno How to CLOSE this bug (I mean which resolution to use?) Kindly CLOSE this Review without marking it as DEAD-Review Please. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 05:15:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 01:15:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 209113] Review Request: gspca - This is kmod-common package for gspca-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704150515.l3F5FngI006001@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gspca - This is kmod-common package for gspca-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209113 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-15 01:15 EST ------- Time to CLOSE this Package Review instead of seeing it as "Awaiting-for-review" again and again every time Package Status wiki page updated. I agree its huge work of maintaining kmod packages in Fedora as kernel releases are very often and kmod packages need to be released for each releases. After waiting/struggling long here even after getting approval from FESCO, nobody like to review this package. Though I am sure that many peoples are using gspca drivers but no one like to see this in Fedora. Therefore CLOSING this package review. Thanks to those who commented here and to FESCO for approving this kmod package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 05:24:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 01:24:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233802] Review Request: python-xlib - Fully functional X client library for Python programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704150524.l3F5OTdJ006415@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-xlib - Fully functional X client library for Python programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233802 jspaleta at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 05:25:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 01:25:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233597] Review Request: pigment - Media Center Toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704150525.l3F5PjZx006489@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pigment - Media Center Toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233597 jspaleta at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jspaleta at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-04-15 01:25 EST ------- uhm lxtnow at gmail.com took assignment for this and the elisa ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 05:43:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 01:43:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233597] Review Request: pigment - Media Center Toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704150543.l3F5hh2v006945@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pigment - Media Center Toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233597 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-04-15 01:43 EST ------- Okay first thing to note the SOURCE0 is wrong it now needs to be http://elisa.fluendo.com/static/download/pigment/pigment-0.1.4.tar.gz looks like they've re-organized. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 05:47:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 01:47:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221769] Review Request: libcgi - CGI easy as C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704150547.l3F5l9B2007004@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcgi - CGI easy as C https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221769 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-15 01:46 EST ------- To me, these files are named too general and are likely to conflict with future packages: /usr/include/cgi.h /usr/include/session.h Please move them into a subdirectory of %{_includedir} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 05:49:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 01:49:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236488] New: Review Request: aimject - AIM packet injection tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236488 Summary: Review Request: aimject - AIM packet injection tool Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: livinded at deadbytes.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com I'm still looking for a sponsor so that I may become a contributor though this isn't my first package. Spec URL: http://deadbytes.net/packages/fedora/specs/aimject/aimject.spec SRPM URL: Message-ID: <200704150555.l3F5t3L7007163@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aimject - AIM packet injection tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236488 livinded at deadbytes.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 06:01:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 02:01:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233597] Review Request: pigment - Media Center Toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704150601.l3F61E5o007277@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pigment - Media Center Toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233597 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-04-15 02:01 EST ------- I think we'll need to a legal review for pigment and elisa. The actual license is GPL with an additional licensing exception for fluendo non-gpl plugins. While I personally don't have a problem with that, it's still not strictly GPL and I think we need a legal review of the additional licensing terms. Matthias, do you have any comments before I set the review failure and block on FE-LEGAL? -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 06:03:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 02:03:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233946] Review Request: secondlife - The Second Life client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704150603.l3F63pK4007335@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: secondlife - The Second Life client Alias: secondlife https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233946 ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2007-04-15 02:03 EST ------- Yes, you need those two libraries, which are also submitted by me and are under review. Check the bug deps. :) I did up a patch to use DejaVu instead of the included fonts. Font metrics are a bit off but it works. Also an update to 1.14.0.1. My net connection is down which is hampering my testing and upload... (Borrowing the neighbor's wireless on my laptop ATM...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 06:12:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 02:12:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227946] Review Request: stgit - StGIT provides similar functionality to Quilt on top of GIT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704150612.l3F6C6G3007483@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stgit - StGIT provides similar functionality to Quilt on top of GIT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227946 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(jbowes at redhat.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-15 02:11 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 06:16:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 02:16:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174290] HDate-applet is an applet to show the hebrew date (calendar) using the libhdate library and the gnome-2.0 graphics library. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704150616.l3F6GSaD007559@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: HDate-applet is an applet to show the hebrew date (calendar) using the libhdate library and the gnome-2.0 graphics library. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174290 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(kaplanlior at gmail.c | |om) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-15 02:16 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 06:18:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 02:18:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233597] Review Request: pigment - Media Center Toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704150618.l3F6I4QL007592@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pigment - Media Center Toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233597 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-15 02:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > I think we'll need to a legal review for pigment and elisa. > The actual license is GPL with an additional licensing exception for fluendo > non-gpl plugins. While I personally don't have a problem with that, it's still > not strictly GPL and I think we need a legal review of the additional licensing > terms. IMO, this is just a case of "GPL with exceptions". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 06:40:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 02:40:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233597] Review Request: pigment - Media Center Toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704150640.l3F6e0lf007899@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pigment - Media Center Toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233597 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-04-15 02:39 EST ------- Okay here's the run down of the rest of the technical review blockers. - pigment-devel needs to require gtk-doc for directory ownership of /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/ - need to exclude /usr/lib/pigment-0.1/gstreamer/libpgmrendersink.la - need to exclude /usr/lib/pigment-0.1/libpgmrendergl1.la - fix the SOURCE and URL tags to use elisa.fluendo.com instead of www.fluendo.com Additional non-blocking suggestion: remove glib2-devel BuildRequires as its pulled in by gtk2-devel rpmlint returns clean on my locally rpmbuild --rebuild built development binaries One question: does pigment count as a python addon, and if so does the python naming scheme require python-pigment for the package name? -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 06:44:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 02:44:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233597] Review Request: pigment - Media Center Toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704150644.l3F6iEj8007997@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pigment - Media Center Toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233597 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-04-15 02:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > IMO, this is just a case of "GPL with exceptions". Doesn't each unique exceptional clause demand a review? While I'm personally fine with the fluendo plugin exception, I'd like to avoid a problem later on after this is published. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 08:59:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 04:59:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228969] Review Request: wxGlade - A wxWidgets/wxPython/wxPerl GUI designer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704150859.l3F8xFFY008691@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wxGlade - A wxWidgets/wxPython/wxPerl GUI designer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228969 ------- Additional Comments From hellwolf.misty at gmail.com 2007-04-15 04:59 EST ------- Updated ftp://ftp.fedora.cn/pub/fedora-cn/in-review/wxGlade.spec ftp://ftp.fedora.cn/pub/fedora-cn/in-review/wxGlade-0.5-1.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 09:13:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 05:13:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236491] New: Review Request: ruby-romkan - Romaji <-> Kana conversion library for Ruby Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236491 Summary: Review Request: ruby-romkan - Romaji <-> Kana conversion library for Ruby Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/ruby-romkan.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/ruby-romkan-0.4-1.fc7.src.rpm Mock build log on FC-devel i386: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/LOGS/MOCK-ruby-romkan.log Description: Ruby/Romkan is a Romaji <-> Kana conversion library for Ruby. It can convert a Japanese Romaji string to a Japanese Kana string or vice versa. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 09:16:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 05:16:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236492] New: Review Request: ruby-bsearch - Binary search library for Ruby Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236492 Summary: Review Request: ruby-bsearch - Binary search library for Ruby Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/ruby-bsearch.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/ruby-bsearch-1.5-1.fc7.src.rpm Mock build log on FC-devel i386: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/LOGS/MOCK-ruby-bsearch.log Description: Ruby/Bsearch is a binary search library for Ruby. It can search the FIRST or LAST occurrence in an array with a condition given by a block. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 09:18:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 05:18:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236493] New: Review Request: migemo - Japanese incremental search tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236493 Summary: Review Request: migemo - Japanese incremental search tool Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/migemo.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/migemo-0.40-8.fc7.src.rpm Mock build log on FC-devel i386: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/LOGS/MOCK-migemo.log Description: Ruby/Migemo is a tool for Japanese incremental search. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 09:19:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 05:19:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236493] Review Request: migemo - Japanese incremental search tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704150919.l3F9JEYk010287@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: migemo - Japanese incremental search tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236493 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |236491, 236492 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 09:19:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 05:19:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236492] Review Request: ruby-bsearch - Binary search library for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704150919.l3F9JFU3010299@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-bsearch - Binary search library for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236492 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |236493 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 09:19:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 05:19:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236491] Review Request: ruby-romkan - Romaji <-> Kana conversion library for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704150919.l3F9JQfJ010325@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-romkan - Romaji <-> Kana conversion library for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236491 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |236493 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 09:32:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 05:32:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228969] Review Request: wxGlade - A wxWidgets/wxPython/wxPerl GUI designer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704150932.l3F9WOxD011024@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wxGlade - A wxWidgets/wxPython/wxPerl GUI designer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228969 ------- Additional Comments From bbbush.yuan at gmail.com 2007-04-15 05:32 EST ------- "\$@" is not fixed. in %prep, %setup should not use -n param in %install, the "install" command should taken care about directory permission and preserve file time stamp. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 09:46:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 05:46:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236492] Review Request: ruby-bsearch - Binary search library for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704150946.l3F9kPYZ011787@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-bsearch - Binary search library for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236492 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dev at nigelj.com ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-04-15 05:46 EST ------- Prereview as I'm still awaiting a sponsor: [build at ip-50 SPECS]$ rpmbuild -ba ruby-bsearch.spec sh: ruby: command not found sh: ruby: command not found sh: ruby: command not found error: Failed build dependencies: ruby is needed by ruby-bsearch-1.5-1.noarch [build at ip-50 SPECS]$ From: %{!?ruby_sitelib: %define ruby_sitelib %(ruby -rrbconfig -e "puts Config::CONFIG['sitelibdir']")} Other than that, rpmlint clean, and matches policy requirements (from my knowledge). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 09:55:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 05:55:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236492] Review Request: ruby-bsearch - Binary search library for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704150955.l3F9tVQW012157@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-bsearch - Binary search library for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236492 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-04-15 05:55 EST ------- Sorry, one more mistake: [build at ip-50 SPECS]$ rpm -qlp ../RPMS/noarch/ruby-bsearch-1.5-1.noarch.rpm /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/bsearch.rb /usr/share/doc/ruby-bsearch-1.5 /usr/share/doc/ruby-bsearch-1.5/ChangeLog /usr/share/doc/ruby-bsearch-1.5/bsearch.en.rd /usr/share/doc/ruby-bsearch-1.5/bsearch.ja.rd /usr/share/doc/ruby-bsearch-1.5/bsearch.png [build at ip-50 SPECS]$ grep License ruby-bsearch.spec License: GPL >From ReviewGuidelines: SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. Also, according to bsearch.rb, it is licensed under ruby's license, which looking at /usr/share/doc/ruby-1.8.5.35/COPYING is GPL plus a custom one. Might be better to reference as Ruby(GPL)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 10:04:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 06:04:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236492] Review Request: ruby-bsearch - Binary search library for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704151004.l3FA4jlT012411@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-bsearch - Binary search library for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236492 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-15 06:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Prereview as I'm still awaiting a sponsor: > > [build at ip-50 SPECS]$ rpmbuild -ba ruby-bsearch.spec > sh: ruby: command not found > sh: ruby: command not found > sh: ruby: command not found > error: Failed build dependencies: > ruby is needed by ruby-bsearch-1.5-1.noarch ruby is in BuildRequires. (In reply to comment #2) > From ReviewGuidelines: > SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate > file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. Check bsearch.en.rd > Also, according to bsearch.rb, it is licensed under ruby's license, which > looking at /usr/share/doc/ruby-1.8.5.35/COPYING is GPL plus a custom one. Might > be better to reference as Ruby(GPL)? I don't know the Ruby(GPL) license tag. ruby uses "Ruby License/GPL", and actually this is a simple dual license and referring to the license as GPL is not a problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 10:14:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 06:14:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228969] Review Request: wxGlade - A wxWidgets/wxPython/wxPerl GUI designer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704151014.l3FAEoCH012632@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wxGlade - A wxWidgets/wxPython/wxPerl GUI designer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228969 ------- Additional Comments From hellwolf.misty at gmail.com 2007-04-15 06:14 EST ------- Updated : ftp://ftp.fedora.cn/pub/fedora-cn/in-review/wxGlade-0.5-2.fc6.src.rpm ftp://ftp.fedora.cn/pub/fedora-cn/in-review/wxGlade.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 10:27:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 06:27:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228969] Review Request: wxGlade - A wxWidgets/wxPython/wxPerl GUI designer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704151027.l3FARfES012821@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wxGlade - A wxWidgets/wxPython/wxPerl GUI designer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228969 ------- Additional Comments From bbbush.yuan at gmail.com 2007-04-15 06:27 EST ------- Approved. Well, the fedora-review flag has long been set to '+'. Who did that? Please request to add a CVS module on your own. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 10:28:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 06:28:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236492] Review Request: ruby-bsearch - Binary search library for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704151028.l3FASu7m012854@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-bsearch - Binary search library for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236492 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-04-15 06:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Prereview as I'm still awaiting a sponsor: > > > > [build at ip-50 SPECS]$ rpmbuild -ba ruby-bsearch.spec > > sh: ruby: command not found > > sh: ruby: command not found > > sh: ruby: command not found > > error: Failed build dependencies: > > ruby is needed by ruby-bsearch-1.5-1.noarch > ruby is in BuildRequires. True, but this happens before build requires are processed, but I've noticed that it happens no matter where the line is in the specfile. I'd approve if I could. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 10:31:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 06:31:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228969] Review Request: wxGlade - A wxWidgets/wxPython/wxPerl GUI designer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704151031.l3FAV8X9012909@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wxGlade - A wxWidgets/wxPython/wxPerl GUI designer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228969 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-04-15 06:31 EST ------- Comment: You did, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_activity.cgi?id=228969 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 10:40:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 06:40:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236492] Review Request: ruby-bsearch - Binary search library for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704151040.l3FAeHq5013105@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-bsearch - Binary search library for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236492 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-15 06:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > (In reply to comment #1) > > > Prereview as I'm still awaiting a sponsor: > > > > > > [build at ip-50 SPECS]$ rpmbuild -ba ruby-bsearch.spec > > > sh: ruby: command not found > > > sh: ruby: command not found > > > sh: ruby: command not found > > > error: Failed build dependencies: > > > ruby is needed by ruby-bsearch-1.5-1.noarch > > ruby is in BuildRequires. > > True, but this happens before build requires are processed, but I've noticed > that it happens no matter where the line is in the specfile. Yes, ruby_sitelib cannot be defined before build requires are processed, however ruby_sitelib is not used at this stage and this is not a problem. Check what happens on mock build log. this situation is not unusual. > I'd approve if I could. What do you mean? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 10:47:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 06:47:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236492] Review Request: ruby-bsearch - Binary search library for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704151047.l3FAlmPq013273@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-bsearch - Binary search library for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236492 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-04-15 06:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > I'd approve if I could. > What do you mean? > I was refering to the fact that if I was in a position to do an actual review (and approve new packages), I'd approve it, but as I'm unsponsored I can't. Sorry if I put it in a confusing way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 10:55:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 06:55:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235804] Review Request: ocamlSDL - OCaml bindings for SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704151055.l3FAtvuw013412@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocamlSDL - OCaml bindings for SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235804 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 11:08:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 07:08:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228969] Review Request: wxGlade - A wxWidgets/wxPython/wxPerl GUI designer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704151108.l3FB8bjQ013747@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wxGlade - A wxWidgets/wxPython/wxPerl GUI designer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228969 ------- Additional Comments From hellwolf.misty at gmail.com 2007-04-15 07:08 EST ------- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ seems down currently. And I forget(but never remembered) the next step :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 11:33:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 07:33:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228969] Review Request: wxGlade - A wxWidgets/wxPython/wxPerl GUI designer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704151133.l3FBXIAn014143@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wxGlade - A wxWidgets/wxPython/wxPerl GUI designer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228969 hellwolf.misty at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From hellwolf.misty at gmail.com 2007-04-15 07:33 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: wxGlade Short Description: A wxWidgets/wxPython/wxPerl GUI designer Owners: hellwolf.misty at gmail.com Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: bbbush.yuan at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 11:43:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 07:43:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228969] Review Request: wxGlade - A wxWidgets/wxPython/wxPerl GUI designer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704151143.l3FBhtlx014482@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wxGlade - A wxWidgets/wxPython/wxPerl GUI designer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228969 bbbush.yuan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bbbush.yuan at gmail.com 2007-04-15 07:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > Comment: > > You did, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_activity.cgi?id=228969 Thanks. Maybe a mistake. Confirmed, approved. Hellwolf, please continue to set fedora-cvs flag and request for cvs modules. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 11:53:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 07:53:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228969] Review Request: wxGlade - A wxWidgets/wxPython/wxPerl GUI designer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704151153.l3FBrWqN014935@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wxGlade - A wxWidgets/wxPython/wxPerl GUI designer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228969 hellwolf.misty at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 11:56:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 07:56:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228969] Review Request: wxGlade - A wxWidgets/wxPython/wxPerl GUI designer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704151156.l3FBuWpk015100@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wxGlade - A wxWidgets/wxPython/wxPerl GUI designer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228969 hellwolf.misty at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+, fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 12:00:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 08:00:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236486] Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704151200.l3FC0gJM015253@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236486 ------- Additional Comments From kuznetsovaval at yahoo.ca 2007-04-15 08:00 EST ------- I fixed my spec file and I have a question regarding chkconfig. Do I need to include in documentation that in order to run profugus as service they need to use chkconfig? Anton -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 12:21:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 08:21:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235804] Review Request: ocamlSDL - OCaml bindings for SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704151221.l3FCL1af015768@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocamlSDL - OCaml bindings for SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235804 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-15 08:20 EST ------- Sorry, however, for some reasons, I switch back to nobody at fedoraproject.org..... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 12:21:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 08:21:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235804] Review Request: ocamlSDL - OCaml bindings for SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704151221.l3FCLesD015809@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocamlSDL - OCaml bindings for SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235804 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 12:34:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 08:34:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233754] Review Request: marble - A KDE Desktop Globe In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704151234.l3FCYaiU016156@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: marble - A KDE Desktop Globe https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233754 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 12:56:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 08:56:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233754] Review Request: marble - A KDE Desktop Globe In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704151256.l3FCupvX017273@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: marble - A KDE Desktop Globe https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233754 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-04-15 08:56 EST ------- I'll be update to 0.3.1 soon in a few minutes. Thanks Mamoru for the review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 13:19:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 09:19:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233754] Review Request: marble - A KDE Desktop Globe In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704151319.l3FDJeLX018689@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: marble - A KDE Desktop Globe https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233754 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-04-15 09:19 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/marble/marble.spec SRPM URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/marble/marble-0.3.1-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 13:53:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 09:53:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233754] Review Request: marble - A KDE Desktop Globe In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704151353.l3FDrt8u019519@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: marble - A KDE Desktop Globe https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233754 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-15 09:53 EST ------- BTW: Chitlesh, I would appreciate it if you would review my migemo-related review requests bug 236491, bug 236492, and bug 236493 . They are very small packages, noarch and perhaps the reviews are easy... Packaging guidelines for ruby can be found on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 15:42:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 11:42:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236504] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236504 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: aconway at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rhm.et.redhat.com/download/rhm.spec SRPM URL: http://rhm.et.redhat.com/download/rhm-0.1-1.src.rpm Description: Red Hat Messaging - Red Hat extensions to Qpid messaging system. This package contains extensions to the Qpid messaging system (http://cwiki.apache.org/qpid) This release contains a persistent message store extension using Berkley DB. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 15:44:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 11:44:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236504] Review Request: rhm - Red Hat Messaging extensions to qpid. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704151544.l3FFiOf8022357@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rhm - Red Hat Messaging extensions to qpid. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236504 aconway at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- |qpid. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 16:01:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 12:01:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704151601.l3FG12wA022784@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-15 12:01 EST ------- Well, again, would you modify before I review spec/srpm if you want, Brian? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 16:04:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 12:04:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226407] Merge Review: sendmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704151604.l3FG4m8B022899@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sendmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226407 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-04-15 12:04 EST ------- The directory /usr/share/doc/sendmail-8.14.1 is no longer owned! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 16:55:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 12:55:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233754] Review Request: marble - A KDE Desktop Globe In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704151655.l3FGt0lr024052@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: marble - A KDE Desktop Globe https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233754 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-15 12:54 EST ------- Well, for 0.3.1-1: * BuildRequires - At least, cmake, desktop-file-utils are missing. * cmake log verboseness - And when I try local rpmbuild, the build log leaves only unuseful messages like: --------------------------------------------------- [ 1%] Generating ui_placemarkinfodialog.h [ 3%] Generating katlastoolbox.moc [ 4%] Generating katlascontrol.moc [ 6%] Generating katlasview.moc [ 7%] Generating katlasviewinputhandler.moc [ 9%] Generating searchlistview.moc --------------------------------------------------- We cannot judge from this log whether compilation is done properly (and actually in this case it was wrong because the log says as folloing). --------------------------------------------------- + /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh /home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/BUILD/marble extracting debug info from /home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/INSTROOT/marble-0.3.1-1.fc6_LC-root-tasaka1/usr/bin/marble 0 blocks --------------------------------------------------- Usually the verbose log can be gained by using "make VERBOSE=1" for cmake. Please check: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/cmake * Fedora specific compilation flags - As said above, fedora specific compilation flags are not passed. When I use "make VERBOSE=1", the log says: --------------------------------------------------- /usr/bin/cmake -E cmake_progress_report /home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/BUILD/marble/CMakeFiles 2 [ 39%] [ 41%] Building CXX object src/CMakeFiles/marble.dir/katlascontrol.o /usr/bin/c++ -I/home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/BUILD/marble/src -DQT_SHARED -O2 -msse -o src/CMakeFiles/marble.dir/katlascontrol.o -c /home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/BUILD/marble/src/katlascontrol.cpp --------------------------------------------------- Using CXXFLAGS seems good * macros - Please use macros when possible. /usr/bin/qmake-qt4 should be %{_bindir}/qmake-qt4 ? -msse - As the above log says, -msse seems to be used anyway. ? Home page - Wiki ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marble_(KDE) ) refers to http://edu.kde.org/marble/ for the home page. ? Timestamps - Well, there are many files which are installed from tarball without any modification (many png, svg, PNT files), so keeping timestamps on these files is _strongly_ recommended. However, cmake uses its original installation mechanism and I don't know how I can make cmake keep timestamps... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 16:55:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 12:55:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233754] Review Request: marble - A KDE Desktop Globe In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704151655.l3FGtJOH024075@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: marble - A KDE Desktop Globe https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233754 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 18:18:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 14:18:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221769] Review Request: libcgi - CGI easy as C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704151818.l3FIIkTT026487@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcgi - CGI easy as C https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221769 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|panemade at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-15 14:18 EST ------- sorry for leaving this review as I got busy with some other work now and this review may take more time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 18:28:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 14:28:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200941] Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704151828.l3FISt5n026734@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200941 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|panemade at gmail.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 18:31:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 14:31:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220931] Review Request: ZoneMinder - Linux CCTV package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704151831.l3FIVecD026824@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ZoneMinder - Linux CCTV package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220931 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|panemade at gmail.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 18:40:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 14:40:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216517] Review Request: gnome-valgrind-session - Run an entire GNOME session under valgrind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704151840.l3FIe6WS027032@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-valgrind-session - Run an entire GNOME session under valgrind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216517 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|panemade at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org CC|panemade at gmail.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 18:47:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 14:47:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206707] Review Request: acerhk-kmod - Acer Hotkey driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704151847.l3FIlJF5027191@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: acerhk-kmod - Acer Hotkey driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206707 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|panemade at gmail.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 18:53:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 14:53:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216734] Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704151853.l3FIrF3o027341@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216734 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|panemade at gmail.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 19:27:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 15:27:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231809] Review Request: xmlrpc-epi - An implementation of the xmlrpc protocol in C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704151927.l3FJRUTT028463@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlrpc-epi - An implementation of the xmlrpc protocol in C Alias: xmlrpc-epi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231809 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2007-04-15 15:27 EST ------- Conflicts with xmlrpc-c-devel? Installing packages (4): xmlrpc-epi-0.51-2 at x86_64 xmlrpc-epi-devel-0.51-2 at x86_64 xmlrpc-epi-debuginfo-0.51-2 at x86_64 xmlrpc-epi-examples-0.51-2 at x86_64 206.9kB of package files are needed. 730.5kB will be used. Confirm changes? (Y/n): y Committing transaction... error: file /usr/lib64/libxmlrpc.so from install of xmlrpc-epi-devel-0.51-2 conflicts with file from package xmlrpc-c-devel-1.06.11-2.fc6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 20:14:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 16:14:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233946] Review Request: secondlife - The Second Life client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704152014.l3FKEjYm030042@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: secondlife - The Second Life client Alias: secondlife https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233946 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2007-04-15 16:14 EST ------- Attempted to build on x86_64 (fc6): [...] + install -D -p -m 755 indra/newview/secondlife-x86_64-bin-globalsyms /var/tmp/rpm/secondlife-1.13.4.8-0.1.20070321a-root-nbecker/usr/bin/secondlife install: cannot stat `indra/newview/secondlife-x86_64-bin-globalsyms': No such file or directory error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm/rpm-tmp.2087 (%install) RP -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 20:39:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 16:39:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236486] Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704152039.l3FKdbfN031106@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236486 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-04-15 16:39 EST ------- You know what say about documentation, being like sex. If it's good, it is very good; if it's bad, it's better than nothing. Any decent admin will notice the presence of the start/stop script, but there would be no harm in pointing it out in the docs. Please also make sure to fix the link to Source0, it should respect http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#head-e27982f18a3bfd26b5b6ecbee113d2d8f3f006f2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 20:42:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 16:42:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206707] Review Request: acerhk-kmod - Acer Hotkey driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704152042.l3FKgYwA031180@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: acerhk-kmod - Acer Hotkey driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206707 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rpm at greysector.net ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-04-15 16:42 EST ------- FWIW here's my spec pair. Feel free to use/merge it. It's been tested working on my i686 laptop. http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/acerhk-kmod.spec http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/acerhk.spec SRPMS are in the same directory. Also, there's a new version available at http://www.cakey.de/acerhk/ . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 21:43:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 17:43:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227500] Review Request: svnkit - Pure Java Subversion client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704152143.l3FLhlkE032529@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: svnkit - Pure Java Subversion client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227500 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From robert at marcanoonline.com 2007-04-15 17:43 EST ------- sorry for the long delay, i was only updating critical updates of my packages recently... Updated package http://www.marcanoonline.com/downloads/fedora/package_submissions/svnkit/svnkit.spec http://www.marcanoonline.com/downloads/fedora/package_submissions/svnkit/svnkit-1.1.2-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 15 23:11:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 19:11:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235895] Review Request: perl-Text-Aspell - spell check interface for perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704152311.l3FNB6vn002230@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Aspell - spell check interface for perl Alias: perl-Text-Aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235895 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Alias| |perl-Text-Aspell ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-15 19:11 EST ------- A couple comments -- *the canonical way to indicate requirements against perl modules is to cite the perl module itself, rather than the package (e.g. perl(Test::Pod) vs perl-Test-Pod) *due to the impending-maybe-sometime-who-knows perl/devel split, there are a couple deps that have to be listed as explicit BR's: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker), perl(Test::More) * typically, the license is written as "GPL or Artistic", rathern than "Artistic or GPL" (don't ask me -- just convention, really) *Requires(check) is neat, but doesn't work correctly. BuildRequires(check) just might (or just plain BuildRequires). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 00:57:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 20:57:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236521] New: Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236521 Summary: Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dakingun at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/nspluginwrapper/nspluginwrapper.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/nspluginwrapper/nspluginwrapper-0.9.91.4-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: nspluginwrapper makes it possible to use Mozilla/Firefox compatible plugins compiled for %{target_arch} into Mozilla for another architecture, e.g. x86_64 NB: If approved, this package will need a special handling to copy the 32-bit builds into the respective arch's 64-bit tree, for it to function properly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 01:23:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 21:23:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234812] Review Request: tcpreplay - Replay captured network traffic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704160123.l3G1NF7n005470@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcpreplay - Replay captured network traffic Alias: tcpreplay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234812 ------- Additional Comments From bojan at rexursive.com 2007-04-15 21:23 EST ------- > 3. Not sure why you did a file base requires on /sbin/tcpdump rather than a package name. This software actually places the absolute path to tcpdump binary into one its binaries. So, I was thinking it's better to put an absolute pathname in there, just in case the maintainers of tcpdump decide to move the binary to another location. Maybe a bit too paranoid... I'll address the other questions and issues a bit later on. Just bit too busy with work stuff right now. :-( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 02:04:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 22:04:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234812] Review Request: tcpreplay - Replay captured network traffic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704160204.l3G24tXF006484@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcpreplay - Replay captured network traffic Alias: tcpreplay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234812 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-15 22:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > This software actually places the absolute path to tcpdump binary into one its > binaries. So, I was thinking it's better to put an absolute pathname in there, > just in case the maintainers of tcpdump decide to move the binary to another > location. Maybe a bit too paranoid... It's unlikely that it would happen, but I guess that's a safety measure. I'm fine with that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 03:58:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 23:58:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225356] fonts-thai In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704160358.l3G3w9Yi009674@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: fonts-thai https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225356 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|panemade at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-15 23:57 EST ------- No response from submitter so leaving this review as it looks dead to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 04:02:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 00:02:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208398] Review Request: luvcview - Webcam Viewer Application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704160402.l3G42dTg009937@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: luvcview - Webcam Viewer Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208398 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-16 00:02 EST ------- CLOSING this Package Review as no one seems to like this package to be included in Fedora. Kindly Don't Mark this Review as DEAD-Review. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 04:03:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 00:03:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 209112] Review Request: gspca - v4l2 kernel module driver for webcams In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704160403.l3G43mf6010005@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gspca - v4l2 kernel module driver for webcams https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209112 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-16 00:03 EST ------- I think Its CANTFIX. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 04:03:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 00:03:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 209113] Review Request: gspca - This is kmod-common package for gspca-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704160403.l3G43xoR010024@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gspca - This is kmod-common package for gspca-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209113 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-16 00:03 EST ------- Kindly CLOSE this Review without marking it as DEAD-Review Please. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 04:04:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 00:04:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 209112] Review Request: gspca - v4l2 kernel module driver for webcams In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704160404.l3G44Ach010045@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gspca - v4l2 kernel module driver for webcams https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209112 Bug 209112 depends on bug 209113, which changed state. Bug 209113 Summary: Review Request: gspca - This is kmod-common package for gspca-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209113 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |CANTFIX Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 04:06:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 00:06:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 209113] Review Request: gspca - This is kmod-common package for gspca-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704160406.l3G46Pck010139@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gspca - This is kmod-common package for gspca-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209113 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-16 00:06 EST ------- Let me close with CANTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 04:08:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 00:08:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232018] Review Request: perl-YAML-Syck - Fast, lightweight YAML loader and dumper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704160408.l3G484BW010175@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-YAML-Syck - Fast, lightweight YAML loader and dumper Alias: perl-YAML-Syck https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232018 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-16 00:07 EST ------- ping is this built? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 04:29:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 00:29:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205891] Review Request: rpl - Intelligent recursive search/replace utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704160429.l3G4Tv4D010782@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpl - Intelligent recursive search/replace utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205891 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 04:31:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 00:31:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228969] Review Request: wxGlade - A wxWidgets/wxPython/wxPerl GUI designer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704160431.l3G4VRap010832@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wxGlade - A wxWidgets/wxPython/wxPerl GUI designer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228969 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 05:26:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 01:26:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222087] Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704160526.l3G5Q7N2012845@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222087 ------- Additional Comments From sdl.web at gmail.com 2007-04-16 01:25 EST ------- I should have mentioned this earlier. I was stuck at step 8. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure (I am preparing for exams thus might be a little slow in reply). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 05:37:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 01:37:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222087] Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704160537.l3G5bMmr013339@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222087 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-16 01:37 EST ------- Please follow "New Packages" process of the URL you referred to. That is: * Write *in this bug* new package CVS request as a comment according to the new package request template. * Set the fedora-cvs flag of this bug to ? * And wait until cvs admin switches fedora-cvs flag to + -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 07:05:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 03:05:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236492] Review Request: ruby-bsearch - Binary search library for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704160705.l3G75FOD016346@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-bsearch - Binary search library for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236492 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 07:05:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 03:05:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236491] Review Request: ruby-romkan - Romaji <-> Kana conversion library for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704160705.l3G75GGT016358@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-romkan - Romaji <-> Kana conversion library for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236491 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-04-16 03:05 EST ------- The package looks good. I'll take the reviewer. However rpmlint spits: chitlesh(SPECS) [2]$rpmlint /home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/SRPMS/ruby-romkan-0.4-1.src.rpm W: ruby-romkan strange-permission ruby-romkan.spec 0600 W: ruby-romkan strange-permission ruby-romkan-0.4.tar.gz 0600 W: ruby-romkan mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 5, tab: line 1) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 07:12:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 03:12:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236491] Review Request: ruby-romkan - Romaji <-> Kana conversion library for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704160712.l3G7CLYS016794@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-romkan - Romaji <-> Kana conversion library for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236491 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-04-16 03:12 EST ------- MUST Items: - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed (GPL) with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license Ruby(GPL). - MUST: The spec file is written in American English. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least i386. - MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires. - MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable - MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: There are no Large documentation files - MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: mock builds succcessfully in i386. - SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. - SHOULD: No scriptlets were used, those scriptlets must be sane. - SHOULD: No subpackages present. APPROVED! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 07:14:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 03:14:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236491] Review Request: ruby-romkan - Romaji <-> Kana conversion library for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704160714.l3G7EJgl016894@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-romkan - Romaji <-> Kana conversion library for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236491 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-04-16 03:14 EST ------- Please fix the rpmlint issues as said in Comment #2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 07:15:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 03:15:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236492] Review Request: ruby-bsearch - Binary search library for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704160715.l3G7Fbr8017010@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-bsearch - Binary search library for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236492 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 07:18:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 03:18:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218599] Review Request: klibido - NNTP (Usenet) file grabber for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704160718.l3G7I4oi017209@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: klibido - NNTP (Usenet) file grabber for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218599 ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2007-04-16 03:18 EST ------- Indeed. It's been awhile since I've checked it... will fix and update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 07:18:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 03:18:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236492] Review Request: ruby-bsearch - Binary search library for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704160718.l3G7IWD9017268@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-bsearch - Binary search library for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236492 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-04-16 03:18 EST ------- MUST Items: - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed (GPL) with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license Ruby(GPL). - MUST: The spec file is written in American English. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least i386. - MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires. - MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable - MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: There are no Large documentation files - MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: mock builds succcessfully in i386. - SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. - SHOULD: No scriptlets were used, those scriptlets must be sane. - SHOULD: No subpackages present. APPROVED! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 07:49:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 03:49:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236491] Review Request: ruby-romkan - Romaji <-> Kana conversion library for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704160749.l3G7nFEV019340@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-romkan - Romaji <-> Kana conversion library for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236491 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-16 03:49 EST ------- Thank you! (In reply to comment #1) > However rpmlint spits: > chitlesh(SPECS) > [2]$rpmlint /home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/SRPMS/ruby-romkan-0.4-1.src.rpm > W: ruby-romkan strange-permission ruby-romkan.spec 0600 > W: ruby-romkan strange-permission ruby-romkan-0.4.tar.gz 0600 > W: ruby-romkan mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 5, tab: line 1) Ah.. I uploaded the spec/srpm at the time I didn't fix these... http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/ruby-romkan.spec http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/ruby-romkan-0.4-2.fc7.src.rpm Request for CVS admin: -------------------------------------------------------------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ruby-romkan Short Description: Romaji <-> Kana conversion library for Ruby Owners: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Branches: devel FC-6 FC-5 InitialCC: (nobody) --------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 07:50:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 03:50:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236492] Review Request: ruby-bsearch - Binary search library for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704160750.l3G7oiH5019484@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-bsearch - Binary search library for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236492 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-16 03:50 EST ------- Thank you! Request for CVS admin: ------------------------------------------------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ruby-bsearch Short Description: Binary search library for Ruby Owners: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Branches: devel FC-6 FC-5 InitialCC: (nobody) -------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 07:56:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 03:56:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704160756.l3G7uMkC020059@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-04-16 03:56 EST ------- OK. XMMS problem solved. I've managed to get kdebluetooth and patched [1] bluez-utils talking together (or actually pairing) without breaking bluez-gnome. (using kbluepin) I'll upload a new SRPM later today. - Gilboa [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236531 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 08:19:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 04:19:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235765] Review Request: perl-CGI-Ajax - Perl-specific system for writing Asynchronous web applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704160819.l3G8Jk46022711@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Ajax - Perl-specific system for writing Asynchronous web applications Alias: perl-CGI-Ajax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235765 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bjohnson at symetrix.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 08:31:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 04:31:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235765] Review Request: perl-CGI-Ajax - Perl-specific system for writing Asynchronous web applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704160831.l3G8VIux023602@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Ajax - Perl-specific system for writing Asynchronous web applications Alias: perl-CGI-Ajax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235765 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-16 04:31 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Rpmlint output: None [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL or Artistic [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is written in American English. [x] Spec file for the package is legible. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : e4922d9ea9e45c68387d3682a7adbacf MD5SUM upstream package: e4922d9ea9e45c68387d3682a7adbacf [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: Arches excluded: Why: [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [-] Latest version is packaged. === Issues === 1. === Final Notes === 1. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 08:48:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 04:48:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230394] Review Request: mysql++ - C++ wrapper for the MySQL C API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704160848.l3G8mWlx025194@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql++ - C++ wrapper for the MySQL C API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230394 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2007-04-16 04:48 EST ------- Work with upstream done. This new version includes a lot of changes - soname support - new documentation layout - upstream specfile near the same than this one Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/mysql++.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/mysql++-2.2.2-1.fc7.src.rpm Mock Log: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/mysql++-build.log Mock log is devel/x86_64. Ready for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 08:52:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 04:52:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234790] Review Request: perl-Email-Abstract - Unified interface to mail representations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704160852.l3G8qpvw025630@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Abstract - Unified interface to mail representations Alias: perl-Email-Abstract https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234790 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bjohnson at symetrix.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 09:06:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 05:06:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234790] Review Request: perl-Email-Abstract - Unified interface to mail representations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704160906.l3G96bt8026846@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Abstract - Unified interface to mail representations Alias: perl-Email-Abstract https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234790 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-16 05:06 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Rpmlint output: None [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL or Artistic [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is written in American English. [x] Spec file for the package is legible. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : 0eeaf43f08a9f931d7189c473ed8fc4b MD5SUM upstream package: 0eeaf43f08a9f931d7189c473ed8fc4b [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: Arches excluded: Why: [!] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [-] Latest version is packaged. === Issues === 1. For complete test coverage, the following BRs need to be added: perl(Email::MIME) perl(Test::Pod) perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) === Final Notes === 1. Please fix the missing BRs and I'll approve the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 09:13:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 05:13:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236537] New: Review Request: gpsbabel - A tool to convert between various formats used by GPS devices Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236537 Summary: Review Request: gpsbabel - A tool to convert between various formats used by GPS devices Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: roozbeh at farsiweb.info QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://guava.farsiweb.info/~roozbeh/gpsbabel.spec SRPM URL: http://guava.farsiweb.info/~roozbeh/gpsbabel-1.3.3-1.src.rpm Description: Converts GPS waypoint, route, and track data from one format type to another. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 09:15:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 05:15:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218599] Review Request: klibido - NNTP (Usenet) file grabber for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704160915.l3G9FNg8027662@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: klibido - NNTP (Usenet) file grabber for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218599 ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2007-04-16 05:15 EST ------- Sigh. Free hosting - can't live with it, can't live without it. ;-) The server seems to be working now, although it's a bit unstable as of late. Also, I've updated the SRPM: Spec URL: http://www.snoekie.com/rpm/klibido.spec SRPM URL: http://www.snoekie.com/rpm/klibido-0.2.5-5.src.rpm Changes: - Create a 48x48 icon - Added BuildRequires: ImageMagick -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 09:27:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 05:27:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233597] Review Request: pigment - Media Center Toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704160927.l3G9Rh4S028777@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pigment - Media Center Toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233597 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-04-16 05:27 EST ------- Updated packages here, which fix all problems reported : Spec URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/pigment/pigment.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/pigment/pigment-0.1.4-2.src.rpm (not the glib2-devel BR, since I prefer keeping it in this particular case) About the license, I also think it's fine, but feel free to ask on the mailing-list or even get FE-LEGAL to confirm if you think it's required. About the name... indeed, pigment should maybe be considered like a python package. I didn't really think about it, and since it's not just a python module, but also a system library (libpgmrender.so) and a gstreamer plugin (libpgmrendersink.so), it might be best to not rename it "python-pigment". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 09:28:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 05:28:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226407] Merge Review: sendmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704160928.l3G9SjtF028905@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sendmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226407 ------- Additional Comments From twoerner at redhat.com 2007-04-16 05:28 EST ------- All done in package sendmail-8.14.1-2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 09:34:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 05:34:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236539] New: Review Request: perl-Math-Vec - Perl Math::Vec module Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236539 Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-Vec - Perl Math::Vec module Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: roozbeh at farsiweb.info QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://guava.farsiweb.info/~roozbeh/perl-Math-Vec.spec SRPM URL: http://guava.farsiweb.info/~roozbeh/perl-Math-Vec-0.04-1.src.rpm Description: Perl package for Math::Vec support. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 10:03:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 06:03:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229182] Review Request: texlive-texmf-errata - Errata for texlive-texmf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161003.l3GA3CCb031762@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf-errata - Errata for texlive-texmf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229182 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2007-04-16 06:03 EST ------- Hi Jindrich, While I understand your separate packaging of errata follows upstream, I think that packaging errata in this way for Fedora needs some discussion. This is a totally different packaging paradigm - as far as I'm aware there's no precedent for issuing errata packages rather than updated packages. A far better alternative IMO is to have finer grained subpackaging of the texlive texmf tree, such that updates don't replace the whole thing. That of course has other major advantages, such as allowing smaller tex installs. Also, to have *two* system managed texmf trees searched is a big change, and something else that system admins have to think about when they add their own local texmf trees. Put more bluntly, while I understand the convenience from a packagers point of view, this seems like a really ugly way to package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 10:04:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 06:04:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222087] Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161004.l3GA4jE8031911@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222087 sdl.web at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From sdl.web at gmail.com 2007-04-16 06:04 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pcmanx-gtk2 Short Description: Telnet client designed for BBS browsing Owners: sdl.web at gmail.com Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: sdl.web at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 10:06:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 06:06:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234826] Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161006.l3GA6sQ6032090@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234826 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bjohnson at symetrix.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 10:33:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 06:33:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234826] Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161033.l3GAX6oq000919@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234826 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-16 06:33 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Rpmlint output: None [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is written in American English. [x] Spec file for the package is legible. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : f4b89c9cafc18d56beab77a04f1ebdce MD5SUM upstream package: f4b89c9cafc18d56beab77a04f1ebdce [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: Arches excluded: Why: [?] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [!] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] Latest version is packaged. === Issues === 1. Possible missing BR, from build.log: "checking for library containing hid_init... no" "checking for X... no" 2. Host listed in Source0 URL appears to be down. Please verify if this is still a valid download link. 3. Please clean up %doc entries that are related to building, installation, or other operating systems. 4. Please change "%patch0 -p1" to "%patch0 -p1 -b .no-automake-in-configure" 5. What is the reason to add -fPIC to $RPM_OPT_FLAGS? If this is truly needed, it must be documented. 6. Please change "%defattr(-, root, root, 0755)" to "%defattr(-, root, root, -) and if needed, fix install section to set correct permissions. 7. Must include a .desktop file (please see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop) === Final Notes === 1. Minor cleanups, then we'll call it good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 10:42:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 06:42:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236537] Review Request: gpsbabel - A tool to convert between various formats used by GPS devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161042.l3GAga42001239@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gpsbabel - A tool to convert between various formats used by GPS devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236537 sander at hoentjen.eu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sander at hoentjen.eu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 10:46:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 06:46:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229182] Review Request: texlive-texmf-errata - Errata for texlive-texmf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161046.l3GAk3rQ001362@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf-errata - Errata for texlive-texmf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229182 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-04-16 06:45 EST ------- It seems like the separate texmf-errata package loses its main point as soon as the deltarpm based updating system starts to work properly. The question is how to fine grain packaging of the the texmf tree for TeXLive and if it does even make sense if we take the diff updating scheme into account. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 10:46:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 06:46:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233597] Review Request: pigment - Media Center Toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161046.l3GAkNVM001385@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pigment - Media Center Toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233597 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-04-16 06:46 EST ------- Spec URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/pigment/pigment.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/pigment/pigment-0.1.5-1.src.rpm * Mon Apr 16 2007 Matthias Saou 0.1.5-1 - Update to 0.1.5. - Get rid of the /usr/lib64 RPATH on 64bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 11:01:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 07:01:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161101.l3GB1aSR002179@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-04-16 07:01 EST ------- Spec URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/elisa/elisa.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/elisa/elisa-0.1.5-1.src.rpm * Mon Apr 16 2007 Matthias Saou 0.1.5-1 - Update to 0.1.5. - Disable gst requirements which aren't part of Fedora (oops!). - Patch out the hash-bang python from scripts not meant to be executed. - Rip out the root user test condition to installing the desktop entry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 11:32:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 07:32:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228298] Review Request: python-louie - Dispatches signals between Python objects in a wide variety of contexts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161132.l3GBWh5d003572@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-louie - Dispatches signals between Python objects in a wide variety of contexts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228298 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-04-16 07:32 EST ------- Ping? The package should be able to be accepted in its current form, unless I'm missing something... please confirm ASAP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 11:34:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 07:34:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228301] Review Request: python-nevow - Web application construction kit written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161134.l3GBY2YY003679@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-nevow - Web application construction kit written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228301 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-04-16 07:33 EST ------- Ping? Please review the 0.9.18 packages ASAP, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 11:35:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 07:35:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228969] Review Request: wxGlade - A wxWidgets/wxPython/wxPerl GUI designer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161135.l3GBZIDd003814@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wxGlade - A wxWidgets/wxPython/wxPerl GUI designer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228969 hellwolf.misty at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 12:12:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 08:12:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236537] Review Request: gpsbabel - A tool to convert between various formats used by GPS devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161212.l3GCCIMD005988@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gpsbabel - A tool to convert between various formats used by GPS devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236537 sander at hoentjen.eu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From sander at hoentjen.eu 2007-04-16 08:12 EST ------- Good: - rpmlint checks return nothing - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license ( GPL ) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file Suggestion: You can include gpsbabel-sample.ini in the %doc section, to provide an example for people to use, but this is up to you. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 12:14:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 08:14:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236537] Review Request: gpsbabel - A tool to convert between various formats used by GPS devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161214.l3GCETCi006111@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gpsbabel - A tool to convert between various formats used by GPS devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236537 sander at hoentjen.eu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|sander at hoentjen.eu |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 12:29:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 08:29:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235763] Review Request: windowlab - Small and Simple Amiga-like Window Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161229.l3GCTUvJ007064@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: windowlab - Small and Simple Amiga-like Window Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235763 alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alexl at users.sourceforge.net ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2007-04-16 08:29 EST ------- I also can't sponsor, but I'll make some notes rather than a formal review: 1) Builds cleanly in mock 2) rpmlint is silent on RPM and SRPM 3) Package doesn't respect RPM_OPT_FLAGS, see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-8b14098227aebff1cf6188939e9d0877295ac448 + make gcc -g -O2 -Wall -W -DSHAPE -DDEF_MENURC="\"/etc/X11/windowlab/windowlab.menurc\"" -I/usr/include -c main.c -o m ain.o gcc -g -O2 -Wall -W -DSHAPE -DDEF_MENURC="\"/etc/X11/windowlab/windowlab.menurc\"" -I/usr/include -c events.c -o events.o -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 12:33:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 08:33:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225299] Merge Review: automake15 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161233.l3GCXcx0007232@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: automake15 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225299 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium karsten at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(nobody at fedoraproje| |ct.org) | ------- Additional Comments From karsten at redhat.com 2007-04-16 08:33 EST ------- I've added your changes in -22 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 12:38:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 08:38:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225300] Merge Review: automake16 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161238.l3GCcxjx007415@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: automake16 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225300 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From karsten at redhat.com 2007-04-16 08:38 EST ------- the Obsolete: is required as we shipped automake-1.6.3 in older releases and automake16 needs to replace that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 12:39:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 08:39:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225301] Merge Review: automake17 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161239.l3GCdiKa007456@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: automake17 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225301 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium karsten at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(rc040203 at freenet.d|needinfo?(nobody at fedoraproje |e) |ct.org) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 12:55:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 08:55:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225977] Merge Review: ksh In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161255.l3GCt2EH008591@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ksh https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225977 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium karsten at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tsmetana at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 13:06:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 09:06:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236537] Review Request: gpsbabel - A tool to convert between various formats used by GPS devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161306.l3GD61iN009772@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gpsbabel - A tool to convert between various formats used by GPS devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236537 roozbeh at farsiweb.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From roozbeh at farsiweb.info 2007-04-16 09:05 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gpsbabel Short Description: A tool to convert between various formats used by GPS devices Owners: roozbeh at farsiweb.info Branches: FC-5 FC-6 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 13:28:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 09:28:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161328.l3GDSHlL012177@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2007-04-16 09:28 EST ------- I'm currently preparing new packages for 5.0.3, I stumbled over the following: [ 97%] Building CXX object Wrapping/Java/CMakeFiles/VTKJavaExecutable.dir/VTKJava.o Linking CXX executable ../../bin/VTKJavaExecutable /usr/lib64/lib-gnu-java-awt-peer-gtk.so.7: undefined reference to `_Jv_CheckCast' /usr/lib64/lib-gnu-java-awt-peer-gtk.so.7: undefined reference to `_Jv_JNI_PopSystemFrame' /usr/lib64/lib-gnu-java-awt-peer-gtk.so.7: undefined reference to `_Jv_MonitorEnter' /usr/lib64/lib-gnu-java-awt-peer-gtk.so.7: undefined reference to `_Jv_byteClass' /usr/lib64/lib-gnu-java-awt-peer-gtk.so.7: undefined reference to `_Jv_InitClass' /usr/lib64/lib-gnu-java-awt-peer-gtk.so.7: undefined reference to `_Jv_GetJNIEnvNewFrame' /usr/lib64/lib-gnu-java-awt-peer-gtk.so.7: undefined reference to `__gcj_personality_v0' /usr/lib64/lib-gnu-java-awt-peer-gtk.so.7: undefined reference to `_Jv_NewPrimArray' /usr/lib64/lib-gnu-java-awt-peer-gtk.so.7: undefined reference to `_Jv_divI' /usr/lib64/lib-gnu-java-awt-peer-gtk.so.7: undefined reference to `_Jv_CheckArrayStore' /usr/lib64/lib-gnu-java-awt-peer-gtk.so.7: undefined reference to `_Jv_LookupJNIMethod' /usr/lib64/lib-gnu-java-awt-peer-gtk.so.7: undefined reference to `_Jv_LookupInterfaceMethodIdx' /usr/lib64/lib-gnu-java-awt-peer-gtk.so.7: undefined reference to `_Jv_charClass' /usr/lib64/lib-gnu-java-awt-peer-gtk.so.7: undefined reference to `java::lang::Math::floor(double)' /usr/lib64/lib-gnu-java-awt-peer-gtk.so.7: undefined reference to `_Jv_intClass' /usr/lib64/lib-gnu-java-awt-peer-gtk.so.7: undefined reference to `_Jv_ThrowBadArrayIndex' /usr/lib64/lib-gnu-java-awt-peer-gtk.so.7: undefined reference to `vtable for java::lang::Class' /usr/lib64/lib-gnu-java-awt-peer-gtk.so.7: undefined reference to `_Jv_IsInstanceOf' /usr/lib64/lib-gnu-java-awt-peer-gtk.so.7: undefined reference to `_Jv_doubleClass' /usr/lib64/lib-gnu-java-awt-peer-gtk.so.7: undefined reference to `_Jv_AllocObject' /usr/lib64/lib-gnu-java-awt-peer-gtk.so.7: undefined reference to `_Jv_AllocObjectNoFinalizer' /usr/lib64/lib-gnu-java-awt-peer-gtk.so.7: undefined reference to `_Jv_ThrowNullPointerException' /usr/lib64/lib-gnu-java-awt-peer-gtk.so.7: undefined reference to `_Jv_Throw' /usr/lib64/lib-gnu-java-awt-peer-gtk.so.7: undefined reference to `_Jv_UnwrapJNIweakReference' /usr/lib64/lib-gnu-java-awt-peer-gtk.so.7: undefined reference to `_Jv_ThrowNoSuchFieldError' /usr/lib64/lib-gnu-java-awt-peer-gtk.so.7: undefined reference to `_Jv_floatClass' /usr/lib64/lib-gnu-java-awt-peer-gtk.so.7: undefined reference to `_Jv_MonitorExit' /usr/lib64/lib-gnu-java-awt-peer-gtk.so.7: undefined reference to `_Jv_ResolvePoolEntry' /usr/lib64/lib-gnu-java-awt-peer-gtk.so.7: undefined reference to `_Jv_NewObjectArray' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status (of course it has to be at 97% and not 3% ;) That's on FC5, so I guess for FC5 I'll just turn off the java sub-package. On further note: Upon request the vtk developers split the mpeg sources out of the main tarball and verified that there are no patent issues with any algorithms in vtk (see also comment #34), so the review will be able to proceed w/o patent troubling. I also merged in most changes of Orion in comment #36. OK, so all that is left is finishing the builds, verifiying it still works, and post new URLs. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 13:30:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 09:30:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189088] Review Request: knemo Network monitor applet. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161330.l3GDUQbS012405@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: knemo Network monitor applet. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium faucamp at csir.co.za changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |faucamp at csir.co.za Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2007-04-16 09:30 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: knemo Updated Fedora Owners: faucamp at csir.co.za Hugo Cisneiros (the previous maintainer of this package) is AWOL. As per this discussion on the f-e-l, I will be maintaining this package from now on: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2007-March/msg00025.html An email was also sent by Hans de Goede (j. w. r. degoede hhs (dot) nl) to cvsadmins at fedoraproject.org on 2007-03-02 with the final list of Hugo's packages' new owners; I can forward this if necessary. Please change owners.list and the ACLs to reflect this change? Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 13:37:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 09:37:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234790] Review Request: perl-Email-Abstract - Unified interface to mail representations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161337.l3GDbbcn013125@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Abstract - Unified interface to mail representations Alias: perl-Email-Abstract https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234790 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-16 09:37 EST ------- New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Email-Abstract-2.132-3.fc7.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Email-Abstract.spec Adds the missing BRs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 14:03:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 10:03:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226501] Merge Review: traceroute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161403.l3GE38gj015274@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: traceroute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226501 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium mbacovsk at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|mbacovsk at redhat.com |dmitry at butskoy.name ------- Additional Comments From mbacovsk at redhat.com 2007-04-16 10:03 EST ------- Reviews should be assigned to reviewer so just reassigning... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 14:08:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 10:08:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225922] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-codec In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161408.l3GE8Y7e015755@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-codec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225922 ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-04-16 10:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > >... > > X verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do) > > - md5sum do not match with upstream tar ball > OK, this should be fixed now With the svn export, the source from the svn checkout and the tar ball is different: Only in ../CODEC_1_3/: build.properties.sample Only in ../CODEC_1_3/: build.xml Only in ../CODEC_1_3/: checkstyle.xml Only in src/: conf Only in ../CODEC_1_3/: .cvsignore Only in ../CODEC_1_3/: default.properties Only in src/: java Only in ../CODEC_1_3/: LICENSE-header.txt Only in ../CODEC_1_3/: LICENSE.txt Only in ../CODEC_1_3/: maven.xml Only in src/: media Only in ../CODEC_1_3/: NOTICE.txt Only in ../CODEC_1_3/: project.properties Only in ../CODEC_1_3/: project.xml Only in ../CODEC_1_3/: PROPOSAL.html Only in ../CODEC_1_3/: RELEASE-NOTES-1.0-dev.txt Only in ../CODEC_1_3/: RELEASE-NOTES-1.1.txt Only in ../CODEC_1_3/: RELEASE-NOTES-1.2.txt Only in ../CODEC_1_3/: RELEASE-NOTES.txt Only in ../CODEC_1_3/: RELEASE-PLAN Only in ../CODEC_1_3/: src Only in src/: test Only in ../CODEC_1_3/: TODO Only in ../CODEC_1_3/: xdocs Do you need a tag when doing the svn export? (seems like it's currently checking out from the head?) > > > ... > > * if possible, replace PreReq with Requires(pre) and/or Requires(post) > > X specfile is legible > > - Are these still needed: Requires(post): /bin/rm /bin/ln, Requires(postun): > > /bin/rm? > Removed > Great! > >... > > X summary should be a short and concise description of the package > > Summary is just the name of the package > Fixed Thanks. > > New srpm here: > https://mwringe.108.redhat.com/files/documents/175/337/jakarta-commons-codec-1.3-8jpp.1.src.rpm > -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 14:22:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 10:22:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225934] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-modeler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161422.l3GEMQBh017199@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-modeler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225934 ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-04-16 10:22 EST ------- Please fix items marked by X: MUST: * package is named appropriately - match upstream tarball or project name - try to match previous incarnations in other distributions/packagers for consistency - specfile should be %{name}.spec - non-numeric characters should only be used in Release (ie. cvs or something) - for non-numerics (pre-release, CVS snapshots, etc.), see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#PackageRelease - if case sensitivity is requested by upstream or you feel it should be not just lowercase, do so; otherwise, use all lower case for the name * is it legal for Fedora to distribute this? - OSI-approved - not a kernel module - not shareware - is it covered by patents? - it *probably* shouldn't be an emulator - no binary firmware * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. - use acronyms for licences where common * specfile name matches %{name} X verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do) - if upstream doesn't release source drops, put *clear* instructions on how to generate the the source drop; ie. - Please provide instructions/URL for Source0 * skim the summary and description for typos, etc. X correct buildroot - should be: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) - Please fix buildroot * if %{?dist} is used, it should be in that form (note the ? and % locations) * license text included in package and marked with %doc * keep old changelog entries; use judgement when removing (too old? useless?) * packages meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) * rpmlint on .srpm gives no output - W: jakarta-commons-modeler non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java This is OK * changelog should be in one of these formats: * Fri Jun 23 2006 Jesse Keating - 0.6-4 - And fix the link syntax. * Fri Jun 23 2006 Jesse Keating 0.6-4 - And fix the link syntax. * Fri Jun 23 2006 Jesse Keating - 0.6-4 - And fix the link syntax. * Packager tag should not be used * Vendor tag should not be used * Distribution tag should not be used * use License and not Copyright * Summary tag should not end in a period * if possible, replace PreReq with Requires(pre) and/or Requires(post) * specfile is legible - seems ok, except for the items marked above. * package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86 * BuildRequires are proper - builds in mock will flush out problems here - the following packages don't need to be listed in BuildRequires: bash bzip2 coreutils cpio diffutils fedora-release (and/or redhat-release) gcc gcc-c++ gzip make patch perl redhat-rpm-config rpm-build sed tar unzip which X summary should be a short and concise description of the package - Summary is only the name of the package - Description references to 'preceding section' without including that section in there. * description expands upon summary (don't include installation instructions) * make sure lines are <= 80 characters * specfile written in American English * make a -doc sub-package if necessary - see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-9bbfa57478f0460c6160947a6bf795249488182b * packages including libraries should exclude static libraries if possible * don't use rpath * config files should usually be marked with %config(noreplace) * GUI apps should contain .desktop files * should the package contain a -devel sub-package? * use macros appropriately and consistently - ie. %{buildroot} and %{optflags} vs. $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and $RPM_OPT_FLAGS * don't use %makeinstall * install section must begin with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot} * locale data handling correct (find_lang) - if translations included, add BR: gettext and use %find_lang %{name} at the end of %install * consider using cp -p to preserve timestamps * split Requires(pre,post) into two separate lines * package should probably not be relocatable * package contains code - see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#CodeVsContent - in general, there should be no offensive content * package should own all directories and files * there should be no %files duplicates * file permissions should be okay; %defattrs should be present * %clean should be present * %doc files should not affect runtime * if it is a web apps, it should be in /usr/share/%{name} and *not* /var/www * verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs will do this when the above is fixed * run rpmlint on the binary RPMs will do this when the above is fixed SHOULD: * package should include license text in the package and mark it with %doc * package should build on i386 * package should build in mock will do this when the above is fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 14:22:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 10:22:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235249] Review Request: vdrift-data-minimal - VDrift minimal data set In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161422.l3GEMW55017215@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdrift-data-minimal - VDrift minimal data set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235249 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-04-16 10:22 EST ------- Indeed. I will be submitting a BZ soon, I was just waiting on my bandwidth to be upgraded, which it now has. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 14:25:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 10:25:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225607] Merge Review: axis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161425.l3GEPWhX017639@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: axis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225607 mwringe at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-04-16 10:25 EST ------- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 14:32:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 10:32:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 224365] Review Request: cdrkit - cdrtools replacement In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161432.l3GEWI2u018350@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cdrkit - cdrtools replacement https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224365 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Core |Fedora Extras Component|Package Review |Package Review ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-04-16 10:32 EST ------- Perhaps the reviewers like to comment on bug 236194, since currently, cdrkit in Extras (!) conflicts with Core packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 14:40:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 10:40:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225610] Merge Review: bcel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161440.l3GEeKw3019269@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bcel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225610 ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-04-16 10:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > * The examples/Mini README probably shouldn't be marked as a %doc as it makes > > more sense to just leave it in the Mini directory. > Done > > * The demo package probably shouldn't install things to > > %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version} but to %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/demo > Fixed > > * It seems strange that the demo package doesn't have any documentation > > describing what the classes do and how to build them. But I guess the sources > > don't have this information either > Yeah, the upstream sources don't have any documentation either. > > * The build file for the demo package is the build.xml for the whole project. > > Perhaps this should be included in the demo package (or maybe a subset that > > would only build the demos?) > I've made the main package a Requires: for the demo package Yes, but the main pacakage doesn't include the build.xml (and shouldn't). The problem is that build scripts for the demos are in the main build.xml. So without the build.xml there is no way to know how to build and run the demos. But the build.xml also contains how to build the main package, so just including the build.xml as is will probably not be the best idea. I would suggest either creating a new demo build.xml file (it looks to just be a simple copy and paste from the original build.xml) or to remove the demo subpackage (it doesn't make sense to include a demo package that is just source files without documentation or build scripts). > > * The manual subpackage just has the license file in there, there should be more > > to the manual than this. maybe the manual only gets built if using maven? > The docs/* stuff are built but doesn't get included in the package, I copied the > LICENCE.txt to %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}, so that the docs/* stays in the > package. > > > New spec file and srpm at the same location. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 14:52:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 10:52:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 224365] Review Request: cdrkit - cdrtools replacement In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161452.l3GEq2AX020826@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cdrkit - cdrtools replacement https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224365 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-04-16 10:51 EST ------- I discussed this with releng people before approving the review; cdrkit was supposed by to be removed from core when this package was built. Of course, I have no control over what actually happens in core So, what kind of comment were you fishing for here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 14:55:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 10:55:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229321] Review Request: pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161455.l3GEtasD021401@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229321 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-04-16 10:55 EST ------- Is there an updated spec/SRPM addressing the above yet? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 15:00:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 11:00:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225922] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-codec In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161500.l3GF0v2s022089@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-codec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225922 ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-04-16 11:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > (In reply to comment #2) > > >... > > > X verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do) > > > - md5sum do not match with upstream tar ball > > OK, this should be fixed now > With the svn export, the source from the svn checkout and the tar ball is different: > Only in ../CODEC_1_3/: build.properties.sample > Only in ../CODEC_1_3/: build.xml > Only in ../CODEC_1_3/: checkstyle.xml > Only in src/: conf > Only in ../CODEC_1_3/: .cvsignore > Only in ../CODEC_1_3/: default.properties > Only in src/: java > Only in ../CODEC_1_3/: LICENSE-header.txt > Only in ../CODEC_1_3/: LICENSE.txt > Only in ../CODEC_1_3/: maven.xml > Only in src/: media > Only in ../CODEC_1_3/: NOTICE.txt > Only in ../CODEC_1_3/: project.properties > Only in ../CODEC_1_3/: project.xml > Only in ../CODEC_1_3/: PROPOSAL.html > Only in ../CODEC_1_3/: RELEASE-NOTES-1.0-dev.txt > Only in ../CODEC_1_3/: RELEASE-NOTES-1.1.txt > Only in ../CODEC_1_3/: RELEASE-NOTES-1.2.txt > Only in ../CODEC_1_3/: RELEASE-NOTES.txt > Only in ../CODEC_1_3/: RELEASE-PLAN > Only in ../CODEC_1_3/: src > Only in src/: test > Only in ../CODEC_1_3/: TODO > Only in ../CODEC_1_3/: xdocs > > Do you need a tag when doing the svn export? (seems like it's currently checking > out from the head?) Can you please explain to me what you are doing? I can see those files in the tar contained in the srpm. > > > > > > ... > > > * if possible, replace PreReq with Requires(pre) and/or Requires(post) > > > X specfile is legible > > > - Are these still needed: Requires(post): /bin/rm /bin/ln, Requires(postun): > > > /bin/rm? > > Removed > > > Great! > > >... > > > X summary should be a short and concise description of the package > > > Summary is just the name of the package > > Fixed > Thanks. > > > > New srpm here: > > > https://mwringe.108.redhat.com/files/documents/175/337/jakarta-commons-codec-1.3-8jpp.1.src.rpm > > > > -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 15:13:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 11:13:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235765] Review Request: perl-CGI-Ajax - Perl-specific system for writing Asynchronous web applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161513.l3GFDCNd023101@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Ajax - Perl-specific system for writing Asynchronous web applications Alias: perl-CGI-Ajax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235765 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 15:13:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 11:13:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235765] Review Request: perl-CGI-Ajax - Perl-specific system for writing Asynchronous web applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161513.l3GFD8gK023077@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Ajax - Perl-specific system for writing Asynchronous web applications Alias: perl-CGI-Ajax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235765 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-16 11:12 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-CGI-Ajax Short Description: Perl-specific system for writing Asynchronous web applications Owners: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Branches: FC-5, FC-6, devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 15:19:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 11:19:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234790] Review Request: perl-Email-Abstract - Unified interface to mail representations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161519.l3GFJOb9024196@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Abstract - Unified interface to mail representations Alias: perl-Email-Abstract https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234790 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-16 11:19 EST ------- Don't get sloppy at this point. Space separated or comma separated - pick one, but not both :) ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 15:21:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 11:21:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227063] Review Request: jakarta-commons-cli-1.0-7jpp - Jakarta Commons CLI, a Command Line Interface for Java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161521.l3GFLIqL024417@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jakarta-commons-cli-1.0-7jpp - Jakarta Commons CLI, a Command Line Interface for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227063 pcheung at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-04-16 11:21 EST ------- Closing bug report -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 15:24:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 11:24:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225934] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-modeler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161524.l3GFOULr024747@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-modeler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225934 ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-04-16 11:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > X verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do) > - if upstream doesn't release source drops, put *clear* instructions on > how to generate the the source drop; ie. > - Please provide instructions/URL for Source0 Fixed > * skim the summary and description for typos, etc. > X correct buildroot > - should be: > %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) > - Please fix buildroot Fixed > X summary should be a short and concise description of the package > - Summary is only the name of the package > - Description references to 'preceding section' without including that section > in there. Fixed Updated srpm: https://mwringe.108.redhat.com/files/documents/175/341/jakarta-commons-modeler-2.0-3jpp.1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 15:26:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 11:26:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161526.l3GFQQq6024919@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-04-16 11:26 EST ------- I applied changes from #17, #18 and #21. Build breaks. . . Checking for C header file libintl.h... yes KeyError: 'CC': File "SConstruct", line 291: env.Replace(CC = os.environ['CC']) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/UserDict.py", line 17: def __getitem__(self, key): return self.data[key] error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.67321 (%build) Do I need latest SVN for this? I'm not sure I've got the full gist of what changes I need to make beyond these. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 15:28:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 11:28:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225922] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-codec In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161528.l3GFSOFI025130@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-codec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225922 pcheung at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-04-16 11:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) ... > Can you please explain to me what you are doing? I can see those files in the > tar contained in the srpm. > Sorry... I must have diff'd against the wrong dir, the src tar ball looks fine. * verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 review]$ rpm -qp --provides /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/jakarta-commons-codec-1.3-8jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm commons-codec = 0:1.3-8jpp.1.fc7 jakarta-commons-codec-1.3.jar.so()(64bit) jakarta-commons-codec = 0:1.3-8jpp.1.fc7 [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 review]$ rpm -qp --requires /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/jakarta-commons-codec-1.3-8jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm /bin/sh /bin/sh java-gcj-compat java-gcj-compat libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgcj_bc.so.1()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) librt.so.1()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 review]$ rpm -qp --provides /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/jakarta-commons-codec-debuginfo-1.3-8jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm jakarta-commons-codec-1.3.jar.so.debug()(64bit) jakarta-commons-codec-debuginfo = 0:1.3-8jpp.1.fc7 [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 review]$ rpm -qp --requires /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/jakarta-commons-codec-debuginfo-1.3-8jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 review]$ rpm -qp --provides /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/jakarta-commons-codec-javadoc-1.3-8jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm jakarta-commons-codec-javadoc = 0:1.3-8jpp.1.fc7 [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 review]$ rpm -qp --requires /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/jakarta-commons-codec-javadoc-1.3-8jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm java-javadoc rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 * run rpmlint on the binary RPMs [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 review]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/jakarta-commons-codec-1.3-8jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm W: jakarta-commons-codec non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 review]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/jakarta-commons-codec-debuginfo-1.3-8jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 review]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/jakarta-commons-codec-javadoc-1.3-8jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm W: jakarta-commons-codec-javadoc non-standard-group Development/Documentation These are OK. Everything looks good. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 15:29:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 11:29:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225607] Merge Review: axis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161529.l3GFTFgW025219@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: axis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225607 ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-04-16 11:29 EST ------- Package built in brew. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 15:30:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 11:30:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226526] Merge Review: vim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161530.l3GFUpgB025398@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: vim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226526 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium karsten at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(nobody at fedoraproje| |ct.org) | ------- Additional Comments From karsten at redhat.com 2007-04-16 11:30 EST ------- ok, I'm now down to just a few warnings. Most of them are like this one: vim-common file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/ru.KOI8-R/man1/vimdiff.1.gz This file isn't intented to be UTF8, it's KOI8-R encoded. vim-enhanced and vim-X11 report dangling symlinks, but this becomes a normal symlink when the required vim-common is installed. vim -minimal has no documentation, I'd like to keep it this way. Maybe I'll add the license, but nothing more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 15:36:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 11:36:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226155] Merge Review: mod_perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161536.l3GFapDR026129@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mod_perl Alias: mod_perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226155 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu BugsThisDependsOn| |228429 Alias| |mod_perl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 15:39:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 11:39:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234826] Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161539.l3GFdgWu026370@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234826 ------- Additional Comments From fabrice at bellet.info 2007-04-16 11:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) Thanks for the review Bernard, > === Issues === > 1. Possible missing BR, from build.log: > "checking for library containing hid_init... no" hid_init() from libusbhid is specific to freebsd (from configure.ac): dnl add joystick support libraries dnl search for FreeBSD library AC_SEARCH_LIBS(hid_init, usbhid) joystick_LIBS="$LIBS" LIBS="" so IMO, it's safe to ignore this unsatisfied check (joystick interface should be handled by plib IIRC) > "checking for X... no" Checking for X (in fact looking for XIntrisic.h from libXt-devel) comes from the AC_PATH_XTRA macro, that defines X_DISPLAY_MISSING in src/Include/config.h. This macro is used nowhere in the source code and in the included headers. My conclusion is that adding libXt-devel to the buildroot has no consequence on the build result. > 2. Host listed in Source0 URL appears to be down. Please verify if this is > still a valid download link. yes, I confirm that ftp.flightgear.org is currently unreachable. This is probably a transcient problem, as it appears on http://www.flightgear.org/mirrors.html#ftp at the first row and its dns name indicates that its probably the primary/master mirror. > 3. Please clean up %doc entries that are related to building, installation, or > other operating systems. done. > 4. Please change "%patch0 -p1" to "%patch0 -p1 -b .no-automake-in-configure" done. > 5. What is the reason to add -fPIC to $RPM_OPT_FLAGS? If this is truly needed, > it must be documented. This option is not needed, it's a mistake. I removed it from the spec file. > 6. Please change "%defattr(-, root, root, 0755)" to "%defattr(-, root, root, -) > and if needed, fix install section to set correct permissions. done > 7. Must include a .desktop file (please see > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop) Done. I added a .desktop file, but I didn't find a suitable icon, neither in the source tarball, nor in the fgfs-base package. Is it acceptable to ship a desktop file without icon ? New SPEC: http://fr2.rpmfind.net/pub/bellet/review/FlightGear.spec New SRPM: http://fr2.rpmfind.net/pub/bellet/review/FlightGear-0.9.10-5.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 15:41:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 11:41:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234863] Review Request: perl-Mail-Box-Parser-C - Parsing folders for MailBox with C routines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161541.l3GFfNiU026671@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Box-Parser-C - Parsing folders for MailBox with C routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234863 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bjohnson at symetrix.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 15:42:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 11:42:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234939] Review Request: perl-Affix-Infix2Postfix - Perl extension for converting from infix notation to postfix notation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161542.l3GFgGWK026788@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Affix-Infix2Postfix - Perl extension for converting from infix notation to postfix notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234939 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bjohnson at symetrix.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 15:42:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 11:42:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235588] Review Request: escape - an extensible puzzle game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161542.l3GFgQee026797@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: escape - an extensible puzzle game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235588 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-04-16 11:42 EST ------- Ok, let's see. rpmlint -i clean, except for debuginfo, which complains that several source files are marked executable. Might want to submit to upstream, but not a showstopper IMHO: W: escape-debuginfo spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/escape-src/dirt.h W: escape-debuginfo spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/escape-src/sound.h E: escape-debuginfo script-without-shebang /usr/src/debug/escape-src/dirt.cpp E: escape-debuginfo script-without-shebang /usr/src/debug/escape-src/sound.cpp W: escape-debuginfo spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/escape-src/progress.h W: escape-debuginfo spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/escape-src/sound_enum.h E: escape-debuginfo script-without-shebang /usr/src/debug/escape-src/progress.cpp Good package/spec names. Meets packaging guidelines. License OK. Spec is legible American English. [limb at fawkes fedora]$ md5sum escape-src-200704130.tar.bz2 07263976a54607792dbbe4bc442f0735 escape-src-200704130.tar.bz2 [limb at fawkes fedora]$ md5sum /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/escape-src-200704130.tar.bz2 1764ef8aad634e6f71c5533fc7eafe21 /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/escape-src-200704130.tar.bz2 ISSUE: MD5 mismatch. Put the tarball from upstream straight in the SRPM, no modification. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 15:43:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 11:43:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222087] Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161543.l3GFhVXu026916@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222087 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-04-16 11:43 EST ------- Please don't put matching addresses as owner and intialCC. done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 15:49:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 11:49:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235765] Review Request: perl-CGI-Ajax - Perl-specific system for writing Asynchronous web applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161549.l3GFnfjq027510@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Ajax - Perl-specific system for writing Asynchronous web applications Alias: perl-CGI-Ajax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235765 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 15:51:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 11:51:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234863] Review Request: perl-Mail-Box-Parser-C - Parsing folders for MailBox with C routines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161551.l3GFpXM7027795@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Box-Parser-C - Parsing folders for MailBox with C routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234863 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-16 11:51 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Rpmlint output: None [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{xame}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL or Artistic [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is written in American English. [x] Spec file for the package is legible. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : 3dfb3e2729597ae33114250cbce1b884 MD5SUM upstream package: 3dfb3e2729597ae33114250cbce1b884 [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: Arches excluded: Why: [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [-] Latest version is packaged. === Issues === 1. === Final Notes === 1. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 16:05:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 12:05:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235588] Review Request: escape - an extensible puzzle game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161605.l3GG5Z3d029003@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: escape - an extensible puzzle game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235588 ------- Additional Comments From musuruan at gmail.com 2007-04-16 12:05 EST ------- If I may add, even if I'm not the reviewer, the version is wrong. Using the release or snapshot date as the version is going to cause you trouble when version x.y will be released. E.g. 200704130 > 1.0. If a stable release is not yet planned upstream, and therefore it is not possibile to identify this as a prerelease of a planned release, I would suggest to use 0.0 as version and 0.release.200704130pre as the release. For a complete overview, please read from the following link onwards. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines?action=show&redirect=PackageNamingGuidelines#head-18aa467fc6925455e44be682fd336667a17e8933 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 16:07:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 12:07:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235765] Review Request: perl-CGI-Ajax - Perl-specific system for writing Asynchronous web applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161607.l3GG7jYG029263@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Ajax - Perl-specific system for writing Asynchronous web applications Alias: perl-CGI-Ajax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235765 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-16 12:07 EST ------- Imported and building for all branches. Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 16:09:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 12:09:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235588] Review Request: escape - an extensible puzzle game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161609.l3GG9qWS029511@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: escape - an extensible puzzle game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235588 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-04-16 12:09 EST ------- Good point. What are upstream's plans? If they never plan on a sane versioning system 2007x would work, but even so I agree with Andrea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 16:10:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 12:10:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234939] Review Request: perl-Affix-Infix2Postfix - Perl extension for converting from infix notation to postfix notation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161610.l3GGAQ1M029562@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Affix-Infix2Postfix - Perl extension for converting from infix notation to postfix notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234939 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-16 12:10 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Rpmlint output: None [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL or Artistic [-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is written in American English. [x] Spec file for the package is legible. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : 93cde6953a95a52a08cbfde1260c3436 MD5SUM upstream package: 93cde6953a95a52a08cbfde1260c3436 [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: Fedora / i386 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: Arches excluded: Why: [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [-] Latest version is packaged. === Issues === 1. === Final Notes === 1. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 16:11:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 12:11:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235962] Review Request: perl-Config-Any - Load configuration from different file formats, transparently In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161611.l3GGBrh3029649@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Any - Load configuration from different file formats, transparently Alias: perl-Config-Any https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235962 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-16 12:11 EST ------- Approved and branched, just waiting on perl-YAML-Syck to import and build this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 16:55:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 12:55:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235588] Review Request: escape - an extensible puzzle game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161655.l3GGtXnw032725@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: escape - an extensible puzzle game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235588 ------- Additional Comments From adam at spicenitz.org 2007-04-16 12:55 EST ------- I'll have to look into the MD5 mismatch thing later tonight. Something weird has happened. As for the version, upstream has no plans to move from date-based version number. So for now the version number is correct. If upstream changes its scheme, that's what epoch is for. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 17:07:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 13:07:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229417] Review Request: qpidpy - qpid's python implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161707.l3GH7NB6001339@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qpidpy - qpid's python implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229417 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From rafaels at redhat.com 2007-04-16 13:07 EST ------- Updated packages are here: http://people.redhat.com/rafaels/srpms/python-qpid-0.1-1.fc7.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/rafaels/specs/python-qpid.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 17:09:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 13:09:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229418] Review Request: qpidrb - qpid's ruby implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161709.l3GH9Mqn001729@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qpidrb - qpid's ruby implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229418 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From rafaels at redhat.com 2007-04-16 13:09 EST ------- Updated packages are here: http://people.redhat.com/rafaels/srpms/ruby-qpid-0.1-1.fc7.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/rafaels/specs/ruby-qpid.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 17:17:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 13:17:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226407] Merge Review: sendmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161717.l3GHH0lr002810@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sendmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226407 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2007-04-16 13:16 EST ------- rpmlint looks OK now apart from: W: sendmail mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 868, tab: line 2) some very minor cosmetic changes to the changelog can fix this The provides for "MTA" and smtpdaemon are well before the rest of the provides in the spec; it'd be good if they were all together. Requires(postun) doesn't need to include chkconfig Requires: openssl (with_tls, with_sasl, with_ldap) is redundant; autodetected library dependencies will pull in the correct package if sendmail is built against openssl. Similarly, Requires: openldap is redundant. %description doc says that "papers are provided in PostScript(TM) and troff formats" but it's now a PDF. The "touch" and initial "chmod" parts of "create db files" in %install are redundant because the files were created in the immediately preceding part of the spec, and with the correct permissions. Installation of %{maildir}/Makefile would be better grouped with the installation of the other files in %{maildir} above "create db files" rather than grouped with the initscript installation. Still no comment on using /etc/mail/Makefile for map rebuilds in %post? %attr(0755,root,root) for %{_initrddir}/sendmail in $files is redundant as those are the attributes it would have by default. So, mainly those are cosmetic changes and in general I'm happy with this. Any more comments from anyone else before I approve this one? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 17:48:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 13:48:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226407] Merge Review: sendmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161748.l3GHm9YU006657@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sendmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226407 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-04-16 13:47 EST ------- Because sendmail it basically the reference for all MTAs, I'd kindly ask you to take a look at the thread started by Ville Skytt?: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-April/msg00377.html I have no objections at all for sendmail providing any or all of the three capabilities mentioned in that thread (/usr/sbin/sendmail, MTA, smtpdaemon), but maybe with this occasion we could define some sort of standard, defining the exact meaning of each capability. With that definitions at hand we could then file bugs and hopefully fix mdadm (see also https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226134), mailx and any other programs acting as MTA or having MTA requirements. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 17:53:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 13:53:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235895] Review Request: perl-Text-Aspell - spell check interface for perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161753.l3GHrnYX007201@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Aspell - spell check interface for perl Alias: perl-Text-Aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235895 ------- Additional Comments From Jerry.James at usu.edu 2007-04-16 13:53 EST ------- Thanks for the review, Chris. I'll note that the perl package itself says its license is "Artistic or GPL", so that's where I got it. No big deal, though. I changed it to the order you indicated. I've changed the BuildRequires to reflect your other comments. The new URLs are: Spec URL: http://www.cs.usu.edu/~jerry/Projects/RPMS/perl-Text-Aspell/perl-Text-Aspell.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cs.usu.edu/~jerry/Projects/RPMS/perl-Text-Aspell/perl-Text-Aspell-0.07-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 17:53:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 13:53:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161753.l3GHrplP007223@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From thelusiv at gmail.com 2007-04-16 13:53 EST ------- Did you remember to run scons with the environment variables before it, as che suggested? Like: CC="gcc" CXX="g++" CXXFLAGS="%{optflags}" scons os_cc=1 os_cxx=1 os_cxxflags=1 destdir=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT bin=/bin datadir=/share/%{name}/data prefix=/usr use_binreloc=0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 17:56:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 13:56:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229417] Review Request: qpidpy - qpid's python implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161756.l3GHuuUB007609@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qpidpy - qpid's python implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229417 nsantos at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From nsantos at redhat.com 2007-04-16 13:56 EST ------- I've reviewed the updated package and I believe that it complies with all Fedora packaging guidelines, including Python-specific guidelines: python-qpid-0.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Legend: OK: passes criteria NO: fails criteria (errors included between "--" markers) NA: non applicable ??: unable to verify MUST: OK * package is named appropriately OK - match upstream tarball or project name OK - try to match previous incarnations in other distributions/packagers for consistency OK - specfile should be %{name}.spec NA - non-numeric characters should only be used in Release (ie. cvs or something) NA - for non-numerics (pre-release, CVS snapshots, etc.), see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#PackageRelease NA - if case sensitivity is requested by upstream or you feel it should be not just lowercase, do so; otherwise, use all lower case for the name OK * is it legal for Fedora to distribute this? OK - OSI-approved OK - not a kernel module OK - not shareware OK - is it covered by patents? OK - it *probably* shouldn't be an emulator OK - no binary firmware OK * license field matches the actual license. OK * license is open source-compatible. OK - use acronyms for licences where common OK * specfile name matches %{name} OK * verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do) OK * skim the summary and description for typos, etc. OK * correct buildroot OK * if %{?dist} is used, it should be in that form (note the ? and % locations) OK * license text included in package and marked with %doc OK * keep old changelog entries; use judgement when removing (too old? useless?) OK * packages meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) OK * rpmlint on .srpm gives no output - justify warnings if you think they shouldn't be there -- $ rpmlint python-qpid-0.1-1.fc7.src.rpm W: python-qpid non-standard-group Development/Python (this warning is ok, based on other approved packages) -- OK * changelog should be in one of these formats: OK * Packager tag should not be used OK * Vendor tag should not be used OK * use License and not Copyright OK * Summary tag should not end in a period NA * if possible, replace PreReq with Requires(pre) and/or Requires(post) OK * specfile is legible OK * package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86 OK * BuildRequires are proper OK * summary should be a short and concise description of the package OK * description expands upon summary (don't include installation instructions) OK * make sure lines are <= 80 characters OK * specfile written in American English NA * make a -doc sub-package if necessary NA * packages including libraries should exclude static libraries if possible OK * don't use rpath NA * config files should usually be marked with %config(noreplace) NA * GUI apps should contain .desktop files NA * should the package contain a -devel sub-package? OK * use macros appropriately and consistently OK * don't use %makeinstall NA * locale data handling correct (find_lang) NA * consider using cp -p to preserve timestamps NA * split Requires(pre,post) into two separate lines OK * package should probably not be relocatable OK * package contains code OK * package should own all directories and files OK * there should be no %files duplicates OK * file permissions should be okay; %defattrs should be present OK * %clean should be present OK * %doc files should not affect runtime NA * if it is a web apps, it should be in /usr/share/%{name} and *not* /var/www OK * verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs -- $ rpm -qp /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/noarch/python-qpid-0.1-1.noarch.rpm --provides python-qpid = 0.1-1 $ rpm -qp /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/noarch/python-qpid-0.1-1.noarch.rpm --requires amqp python python(abi) = 2.4 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 -- SHOULD: OK * package should include license text in the package and mark it with %doc OK * package should build on i386 OK * package should build in mock Python-specific guidelines: OK * naming: python- OK * define python_sitelib at the top of your specfile OK * During %install, or when listing %files, you can use the %{python_sitelib} macro to specify the path OK * Byte Compiled Files: If you are only going to build for Fedora Core >= 4 and RHEL >= 5, rpm has a script that will create the files for you. All you have to do is remember to include the files in your spec file I'm marking this as APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 17:59:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 13:59:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225610] Merge Review: bcel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161759.l3GHxKPe007992@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bcel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225610 mwringe at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-04-16 13:59 EST ------- I don't think the demo package missing a doc should really be a blocker, but this really needs to be added at some point (please add a TODO in the spec file). APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 18:02:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:02:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229418] Review Request: ruby-qpid - qpid's ruby implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161802.l3GI21Ad008198@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-qpid - qpid's ruby implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229418 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: qpidrb - |Review Request: ruby-qpid - |qpid's ruby implementation |qpid's ruby implementation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 18:02:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:02:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229417] Review Request: python-qpid - qpid's python implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161802.l3GI2CX0008240@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-qpid - qpid's python implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229417 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: qpidpy - |Review Request: python-qpid |qpid's python implementation|- qpid's python | |implementation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 18:09:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:09:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236491] Review Request: ruby-romkan - Romaji <-> Kana conversion library for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161809.l3GI9vMn009239@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-romkan - Romaji <-> Kana conversion library for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236491 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 18:11:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:11:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236492] Review Request: ruby-bsearch - Binary search library for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161811.l3GIBdDN009469@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-bsearch - Binary search library for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236492 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 18:17:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:17:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161817.l3GIHn2q010023@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-04-16 14:17 EST ------- I misunderstood, I thought os_cc=1. . .was to replace CC="gcc". . ., not complement. That corrected, the build gets a lot farther. :) Then dies here: scons: done reading SConscript files. scons: Building targets ... guilists_to_cppfile_builder(["po/guilists.cpp"], []) [] scons: *** Source `data/settings/options.config' not found, needed by target `po/optionslist.cpp'. Stop. scons: building terminated because of errors. Patch to comment out part of po/optionslist.cpp, or. . .? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 18:20:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:20:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229418] Review Request: ruby-qpid - qpid's ruby implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161820.l3GIK9M4010217@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-qpid - qpid's ruby implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229418 nsantos at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From nsantos at redhat.com 2007-04-16 14:19 EST ------- I've reviewed the updated package and I believe it complies with all guidelines, generic and ruby-specific: ruby-qpid-0.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Legend: OK: passes criteria NO: fails criteria (errors included between "--" markers) NA: non applicable ??: unable to verify MUST: OK * package is named appropriately OK - match upstream tarball or project name OK - try to match previous incarnations in other distributions/packagers for consistency OK - specfile should be %{name}.spec NA - non-numeric characters should only be used in Release (ie. cvs or something) NA - for non-numerics (pre-release, CVS snapshots, etc.), see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#PackageRelease NA - if case sensitivity is requested by upstream or you feel it should be not just lowercase, do so; otherwise, use all lower case for the name OK * is it legal for Fedora to distribute this? OK - OSI-approved OK - not a kernel module OK - not shareware OK - is it covered by patents? OK - it *probably* shouldn't be an emulator OK - no binary firmware OK * license field matches the actual license. OK * license is open source-compatible. OK - use acronyms for licences where common OK * specfile name matches %{name} OK * verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do) OK * skim the summary and description for typos, etc. OK * correct buildroot OK * if %{?dist} is used, it should be in that form (note the ? and % locations) OK * license text included in package and marked with %doc OK * keep old changelog entries; use judgement when removing (too old? useless?) OK * packages meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) OK * rpmlint on .srpm gives no output - justify warnings if you think they shouldn't be there -- $ rpmlint ruby-qpid-0.1-1.fc7.src.rpm W: ruby-qpid non-standard-group Development/Ruby (this warning is ok, based on previously approved packages) -- OK * changelog should be in one of these formats: OK * Packager tag should not be used OK * Vendor tag should not be used OK * use License and not Copyright OK * Summary tag should not end in a period NA * if possible, replace PreReq with Requires(pre) and/or Requires(post) OK * specfile is legible OK * package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86 OK * BuildRequires are proper OK * summary should be a short and concise description of the package OK * description expands upon summary (don't include installation instructions) OK * make sure lines are <= 80 characters OK * specfile written in American English NA * make a -doc sub-package if necessary NA * packages including libraries should exclude static libraries if possible OK * don't use rpath NA * config files should usually be marked with %config(noreplace) NA * GUI apps should contain .desktop files NA * should the package contain a -devel sub-package? OK * use macros appropriately and consistently OK * don't use %makeinstall NA * locale data handling correct (find_lang) NA * consider using cp -p to preserve timestamps NA * split Requires(pre,post) into two separate lines OK * package should probably not be relocatable OK * package contains code OK * package should own all directories and files OK * there should be no %files duplicates OK * file permissions should be okay; %defattrs should be present OK * %clean should be present OK * %doc files should not affect runtime NA * if it is a web apps, it should be in /usr/share/%{name} and *not* /var/www OK * verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs -- $ rpm -qp /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/noarch/ruby-qpid-0.1-1.noarch.rpm --requires amqp rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 ruby ruby(abi) = 1.8 $ rpm -qp /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/noarch/ruby-qpid-0.1-1.noarch.rpm --provides ruby(qpid) = 0.1 ruby-qpid = 0.1-1 -- OK * run rpmlint on the binary RPMs -- $ rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/noarch/ruby-qpid-0.1-1.noarch.rpm W: ruby-qpid non-standard-group Development/Ruby (this warning is ok, based on previously approved packages) -- SHOULD: OK * package should include license text in the package and mark it with %doc OK * package should build on i386 OK * package should build in mock Additional ruby-specific guidelines: OK * package must indicate the Ruby ABI version it depends: -- Requires: ruby Requires: ruby(abi) = 1.8 -- OK * name of a ruby extension/library package must be of the form ruby-UPSTREAM -- ruby-qpid -- OK * a ruby extension/library package must indicate what it provides with a Provides: ruby(LIBRARY) = VERSION declaration in the spec file. -- Provides: ruby(qpid) = %{version} -- OK * Pure Ruby packages must be built as noarch packages. -- BuildArch: noarch -- OK * The Ruby library files in a pure Ruby package must be placed into Config::CONFIG["sitelibdir"] -- %{!?ruby_sitelib: %define ruby_sitelib %(ruby -rrbconfig -e 'puts Config::CONFIG["sitelibdir"]')} (...) install -dm 755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{ruby_sitelib}/qpid install -pm 644 qpid/*.rb $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{ruby_sitelib}/qpid -- I'm marking this as APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 18:24:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:24:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236537] Review Request: gpsbabel - A tool to convert between various formats used by GPS devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161824.l3GIO3cx010422@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gpsbabel - A tool to convert between various formats used by GPS devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236537 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 18:24:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:24:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229418] Review Request: ruby-qpid - qpid's ruby implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161824.l3GIOQsJ010458@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-qpid - qpid's ruby implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229418 nsantos at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From nsantos at redhat.com 2007-04-16 14:24 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ruby-qpid Short Description: Ruby language client for AMQP Owners: rafaels at redhat.com,nsantos at redhat.com Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 18:25:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:25:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229417] Review Request: python-qpid - qpid's python implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161825.l3GIP9JS010523@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-qpid - qpid's python implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229417 nsantos at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From nsantos at redhat.com 2007-04-16 14:25 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-qpid Short Description: Python language client for AMQP Owners: rafaels at redhat.com,nsantos at redhat.com Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 18:27:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:27:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161827.l3GIRnxW010713@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From thelusiv at gmail.com 2007-04-16 14:27 EST ------- Since our translations are extremely limited and not being included in the package anyway, just turn them off at build time, by adding the "NLS=0" option to the scons argument list. This should probably cover it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 18:32:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:32:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222087] Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161832.l3GIWJDH010965@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222087 ------- Additional Comments From sdl.web at gmail.com 2007-04-16 14:32 EST ------- Build requested for all branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 18:37:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:37:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225938] Merge Review: jakarta-taglibs-standard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161837.l3GIbeXh011422@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-taglibs-standard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225938 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium mwringe at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pcheung at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 18:37:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:37:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226326] Merge Review: puretls In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161837.l3GIbxFW011481@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: puretls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226326 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium mwringe at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pcheung at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 18:46:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:46:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225934] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-modeler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161846.l3GIkoH4012272@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-modeler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225934 pcheung at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-04-16 14:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > X verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do) > > - if upstream doesn't release source drops, put *clear* instructions on > > how to generate the the source drop; ie. > > - Please provide instructions/URL for Source0 > Fixed Great, md5sum match. > > * skim the summary and description for typos, etc. > > X correct buildroot > > - should be: > > %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) > > - Please fix buildroot > Fixed Thanks. > > > X summary should be a short and concise description of the package > > - Summary is only the name of the package > > - Description references to 'preceding section' without including that section > > in there. > Fixed > Thanks. > Updated srpm: > https://mwringe.108.redhat.com/files/documents/175/341/jakarta-commons-modeler-2.0-3jpp.1.src.rpm * verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 review]$ rpm -qp --provides /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/jakarta-commons-modeler-2.0-3jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm commons-modeler = 0:2.0-3jpp.1.fc7 jakarta-commons-modeler-2.0.jar.so()(64bit) jakarta-commons-modeler = 0:2.0-3jpp.1.fc7 [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 review]$ rpm -qp --requires /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/jakarta-commons-modeler-2.0-3jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm /bin/sh /bin/sh jakarta-commons-beanutils >= 0:1.3 jakarta-commons-collections >= 0:2.0 jakarta-commons-digester >= 0:1.2 jakarta-commons-logging >= 0:1.0 java-gcj-compat java-gcj-compat jaxp_parser_impl jaxp_transform_impl jmxri libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgcj_bc.so.1()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) librt.so.1()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) xml-commons-apis [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 review]$ rpm -qp --provides /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/jakarta-commons-modeler-debuginfo-2.0-3jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm jakarta-commons-modeler-2.0.jar.so.debug()(64bit) jakarta-commons-modeler-debuginfo = 0:2.0-3jpp.1.fc7 [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 review]$ rpm -qp --requires /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/jakarta-commons-modeler-debuginfo-2.0-3jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 review]$ rpm -qp --provides /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/jakarta-commons-modeler-javadoc-2.0-3jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm jakarta-commons-modeler-javadoc = 0:2.0-3jpp.1.fc7 [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 review]$ rpm -qp --requires /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/jakarta-commons-modeler-javadoc-2.0-3jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 * run rpmlint on the binary RPMs [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 review]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/jakarta-commons-modeler-2.0-3jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm W: jakarta-commons-modeler non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 review]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/jakarta-commons-modeler-debuginfo-2.0-3jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 review]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/jakarta-commons-modeler-javadoc-2.0-3jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm W: jakarta-commons-modeler-javadoc non-standard-group Development/Documentation These are OK. Everything looks good. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 18:55:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:55:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225610] Merge Review: bcel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161855.l3GItU3o012707@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bcel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225610 ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-04-16 14:55 EST ------- TODO added in the spec file. Package built in brew. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 19:01:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 15:01:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161901.l3GJ1sx2013217@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From thelusiv at gmail.com 2007-04-16 15:01 EST ------- Er, well I guess they *were* being included before, but they are very limited as I said. We only have a Belgian translation and it hasn't been updated in a while so it's incomplete anyway...just turn it off. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 19:24:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 15:24:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704161924.l3GJOQB5015993@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-04-16 15:24 EST ------- Ah. That worked much better: Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/extras/vdrift/vdrift.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/extras/vdrift/vdrift-20070323-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 20:20:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 16:20:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234826] Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704162020.l3GKKak0021235@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234826 ------- Additional Comments From fabrice at bellet.info 2007-04-16 16:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > 2. Host listed in Source0 URL appears to be down. Please verify if this is > still a valid download link. ftp.flightgear.org is back online, and the link is okay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 20:47:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 16:47:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225925] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-dbcp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704162047.l3GKlflJ023605@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-dbcp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225925 ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-04-16 16:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Good: > + Naming seems ok. > + Package contains license text. > + Mock build works fine. > > > Bad: > - Source0 contains not a full qualified URL Fixed > - Bad Buildroot > BuildRoot should be %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) Fixed > (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#BuildRoot) > New srpm here: https://mwringe.108.redhat.com/files/documents/175/323/jakarta-commons-dbcp-1.2.1-10jpp.1.fc7.src.rpm (sorry for the delay, I kindof lost track of this one) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 20:58:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 16:58:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225935] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-pool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704162058.l3GKwujI024260@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-pool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225935 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-04-16 16:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > ... > X specfile is legible > - should the NOTICE.txt and RELEASE-NOTES.txt be marked as %doc? > - why did epoch get back to 0? > * package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86 Added the NOTICE.txt and RELEASE-NOTES.txt as %doc As for the epoch question, I do not believe the epoch was actually bumped, I believe it was added by mistake in the changelog and nobody has noticed it. Updated srpm here: https://mwringe.108.redhat.com/files/documents/175/327/jakarta-commons-pool-1.3-9jpp.1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 21:17:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 17:17:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225938] Merge Review: jakarta-taglibs-standard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704162117.l3GLHeXX026165@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-taglibs-standard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225938 ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-04-16 17:17 EST ------- Please fix items marked by X: MUST: * package is named appropriately - match upstream tarball or project name - try to match previous incarnations in other distributions/packagers for consistency - specfile should be %{name}.spec - non-numeric characters should only be used in Release (ie. cvs or something) - for non-numerics (pre-release, CVS snapshots, etc.), see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#PackageRelease - if case sensitivity is requested by upstream or you feel it should be not just lowercase, do so; otherwise, use all lower case for the name * is it legal for Fedora to distribute this? - OSI-approved - not a kernel module - not shareware - is it covered by patents? - it *probably* shouldn't be an emulator - no binary firmware * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. - use acronyms for licences where common * specfile name matches %{name} X verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do) - if upstream doesn't release source drops, put *clear* instructions on how to generate the the source drop; ie. # svn export blah/tag blah # tar cjf blah-version-src.tar.bz2 blah I can only find 1.1.2 src tar ball on the mentioned site for Source0 * skim the summary and description for typos, etc. - description says 'This directory contains releases for the 1.1.x ...', should it be 'This package .... for the 1.1.1 ...'? X correct buildroot - should be: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) Please fix buildroot * if %{?dist} is used, it should be in that form (note the ? and % locations) * license text included in package and marked with %doc * keep old changelog entries; use judgement when removing (too old? useless?) * packages meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) * rpmlint on .srpm gives no output W: jakarta-taglibs-standard non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java This is OK * changelog should be in one of these formats: * Fri Jun 23 2006 Jesse Keating - 0.6-4 - And fix the link syntax. * Fri Jun 23 2006 Jesse Keating 0.6-4 - And fix the link syntax. * Fri Jun 23 2006 Jesse Keating - 0.6-4 - And fix the link syntax. * Packager tag should not be used * Vendor tag should not be used * Distribution tag should not be used * use License and not Copyright * Summary tag should not end in a period * if possible, replace PreReq with Requires(pre) and/or Requires(post) X specfile is legible - what is the difference between jversion and version? (since both is 1.1.1, do we need both?) * package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86 * BuildRequires are proper - builds in mock will flush out problems here - the following packages don't need to be listed in BuildRequires: bash bzip2 coreutils cpio diffutils fedora-release (and/or redhat-release) gcc gcc-c++ gzip make patch perl redhat-rpm-config rpm-build sed tar unzip which * summary should be a short and concise description of the package * description expands upon summary (don't include installation instructions) * make sure lines are <= 80 characters * specfile written in American English * make a -doc sub-package if necessary - see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-9bbfa57478f0460c6160947a6bf795249488182b * packages including libraries should exclude static libraries if possible * don't use rpath * config files should usually be marked with %config(noreplace) * GUI apps should contain .desktop files * should the package contain a -devel sub-package? * use macros appropriately and consistently - ie. %{buildroot} and %{optflags} vs. $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and $RPM_OPT_FLAGS * don't use %makeinstall * install section must begin with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot} * locale data handling correct (find_lang) - if translations included, add BR: gettext and use %find_lang %{name} at the end of %install * consider using cp -p to preserve timestamps * split Requires(pre,post) into two separate lines * package should probably not be relocatable * package contains code - see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#CodeVsContent - in general, there should be no offensive content * package should own all directories and files * there should be no %files duplicates * file permissions should be okay; %defattrs should be present * %clean should be present * %doc files should not affect runtime * if it is a web apps, it should be in /usr/share/%{name} and *not* /var/www * verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 review]$ rpm -pq --provides /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/jakarta-taglibs-standard-1.1.1-8jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm jakarta-taglibs-core-1.1.1.jar.so()(64bit) jakarta-taglibs-standard-1.1.1.jar.so()(64bit) jakarta-taglibs-standard = 0:1.1.1-8jpp.1.fc7 [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 review]$ rpm -pq --requires /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/jakarta-taglibs-standard-1.1.1-8jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm /bin/sh /bin/sh java-gcj-compat java-gcj-compat libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgcj_bc.so.1()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) librt.so.1()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) servletapi5 >= 0:5.0.16 tomcat5-jsp-2.0-api >= 0:5.0.16 xalan-j2 >= 2.6.0 [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 review]$ rpm -pq --provides /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/jakarta-taglibs-standard-debuginfo-1.1.1-8jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm jakarta-taglibs-core-1.1.1.jar.so.debug()(64bit) jakarta-taglibs-standard-1.1.1.jar.so.debug()(64bit) jakarta-taglibs-standard-debuginfo = 0:1.1.1-8jpp.1.fc7 [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 review]$ rpm -pq --requires /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/jakarta-taglibs-standard-debuginfo-1.1.1-8jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 review]$ rpm -pq --provides /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/jakarta-taglibs-standard-javadoc-1.1.1-8jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm jakarta-taglibs-standard-javadoc = 0:1.1.1-8jpp.1.fc7 [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 review]$ rpm -pq --requires /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/jakarta-taglibs-standard-javadoc-1.1.1-8jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 * run rpmlint on the binary RPMs [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 review]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/jakarta-taglibs-standard-1.1.1-8jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm W: jakarta-taglibs-standard non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 review]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/jakarta-taglibs-standard-debuginfo-1.1.1-8jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 review]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/jakarta-taglibs-standard-javadoc-1.1.1-8jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm W: jakarta-taglibs-standard-javadoc non-standard-group Development/DocumentationThe group warnings are OK. SHOULD: * package should include license text in the package and mark it with %doc * package should build on i386 * package should build in mock -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 21:39:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 17:39:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225935] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-pool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704162139.l3GLdl4G028082@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-pool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225935 ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-04-16 17:39 EST ------- Changes look good, just 2 more questions: Are the Requrires(post[un]): /bin/rm,/bin/ln still needed? Is there any doc for the tomcat5 subpackage? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 22:02:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 18:02:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704162202.l3GM2McQ030825@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2007-04-16 18:02 EST ------- Hi Axel, I'll be glad to continue with this review as soon as you post an update. I've been using the SRPM posted in comment #20 and it works nicely for me on a few different (i386 and x86_64) machines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 22:05:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 18:05:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236642] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236642 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jonathansteffan at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://files.damaestro.us/revisor/revisor.spec SRPM URL: http://files.damaestro.us/revisor/revisor-2.0.1-2.fc7.src.rpm Description: Fedora "Spin" Graphical User Interface -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 22:06:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 18:06:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236642] Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704162206.l3GM6IGo031550@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236642 jonathansteffan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 22:11:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 18:11:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236642] Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704162211.l3GMB8Ra032223@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236642 kanarip at kanarip.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kanarip at kanarip.com ------- Additional Comments From kanarip at kanarip.com 2007-04-16 18:10 EST ------- Adding myself to CC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 22:11:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 18:11:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222087] Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704162211.l3GMBKQC032270@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222087 ------- Additional Comments From sdl.web at gmail.com 2007-04-16 18:11 EST ------- Failed on FC-5: Build logs may be found at http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-5-extras/31608-pcmanx-gtk2-0.3.5-9.336svn.fc5/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 22:25:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 18:25:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225938] Merge Review: jakarta-taglibs-standard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704162225.l3GMP4Rg001239@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-taglibs-standard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225938 ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-04-16 18:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > X verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do) > - if upstream doesn't release source drops, put *clear* instructions on > how to generate the the source drop; ie. > # svn export blah/tag blah > # tar cjf blah-version-src.tar.bz2 blah > I can only find 1.1.2 src tar ball on the mentioned site for Source0 Fixed. This is due to apache having one location for the lastest packages and another for older packages (archives). I have switched the link to point to the archives section as this pacakges is no longer the most current. > X correct buildroot > - should be: > %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) > Please fix buildroot Fixed > X specfile is legible > - what is the difference between jversion and version? (since both is 1.1.1, do > we need both?) good point, I have no idea why jversion is in there. It has been removed. Updated srpm can be found here: https://mwringe.108.redhat.com/files/documents/175/344/jakarta-taglibs-standard-1.1.1-8jpp.1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 22:36:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 18:36:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225935] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-pool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704162236.l3GMaS3i001895@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-pool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225935 ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-04-16 18:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Changes look good, just 2 more questions: > Are the Requrires(post[un]): /bin/rm,/bin/ln still needed? They shouldn't be in there, I have removed it > Is there any doc for the tomcat5 subpackage? No, the -tomcat5 package is specifically created for tomcat5, there is no documentation for it, and nothing should be using this rpm except for tomcat5 itself. Tomcat5 used to create a jar from pool, collections and dbcp, requiring each of these project's sources to be included in the tomcat5 srpm. This has been changed so that each of the projects now create the bits for tomcat5 on their own. Updated srpm: https://mwringe.108.redhat.com/files/documents/175/327/jakarta-commons-pool-1.3-9jpp.1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 23:12:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 19:12:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236652] New: Review Request: pidgin - gaim renamed Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236652 Summary: Review Request: pidgin - gaim renamed Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wtogami at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com gaim is being renamed to pidgin. This is just a tracking ticket so history knows where this package came from. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 23:13:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 19:13:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236652] Review Request: pidgin - gaim renamed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704162313.l3GND7de004218@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin - gaim renamed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236652 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wtogami at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+, fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-04-16 19:12 EST ------- APPROVED (rename) importing into CVS... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 23:39:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 19:39:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236486] Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704162339.l3GNdB1Y005903@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236486 ------- Additional Comments From kuznetsovaval at yahoo.ca 2007-04-16 19:39 EST ------- I fixed all problems in spec file: - now i use install -p - fixed bulidroot - fixed daemon script, it now works with chkconfig - included %doc Links: SRPM Url:http://downloads.sourceforge.net/profugus/profugus-0.1-3.x86_64.rpm Spec URL:http://downloads.sourceforge.net/profugus/profugus.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 16 23:47:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 19:47:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236486] Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704162347.l3GNld0I006161@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236486 ------- Additional Comments From kuznetsovaval at yahoo.ca 2007-04-16 19:47 EST ------- Sorry, i put the wrong link for the source. Here are new links SRPM Url: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/profugus/profugus-0.1-3.src.rpm Spec Url: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/profugus/profugus.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 00:05:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 20:05:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222087] Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704170005.l3H054As006857@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222087 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-16 20:05 EST ------- Build log says that compilar failed to find libdbus-glib.so . Fix this by adding: BuildRequires: dbus-devel on FC-5 (on higher branches this is not needed). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 00:18:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 20:18:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226134] Merge Review: mdadm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704170018.l3H0IcM1007310@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mdadm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226134 dledford at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(dledford at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From dledford at redhat.com 2007-04-16 20:18 EST ------- W: mdadm unversioned-explicit-obsoletes mdctl W: mdadm unversioned-explicit-obsoletes raidtools -> As far as I have understood, these tools are gone for good, so this could be OK If very very sure that none of these will ever come back, it's OK, but most probably a versioning measure should be put in place These are most definitely gone forever. The ioctls that the raidtools use are being phased out of the kernel entirely, and mdctl was basically the first version of mdadm and the name was changed later. However, just in the last month I had to do a new update to raidtools for a bug fix for a commercial package that depended on raidtools, so I'm leary of hard coding the values since they *might* change on something like an older RHEL but we still want them to be obsoleted on upgrade to later RHEL or Fedora. Tab/spaces fixed. Changed summary and description so they start capitalized. In regards to /var/run/mdadm (I didn't make the change and don't fully know why it was necessary), here's the changelog: * Fri Jul 30 2004 Dan Walsh 1.5.0-11 - Create a directory /var/run/mdadm to contain mdadm.pid - This cleans up SELinux problem I'm guessing that the permissions on the dir are to avoid possible cross context contamination since mdadm has it's own context in SELinux policy. As for the mdadm.conf-example timestamp, you're right that it's because of the email patch. But, that then raises the question of whether or not the timestamp should be preserved since the file no longer matches the original tarball file. The patch was originally done because the default install of mdadm copied the mdadm.conf-example to /etc and we wanted a working MAILADDR. However, now a days, Anaconda custom writes the mdadm.conf on install, so we don't even package an /etc/mdadm.conf file in the rpm. As a result, it's safe to drop the email patch entirely, so we will no longer be modifying the file, and the timestamp should come out correct now. [*] There is one static compiled binary but it is needed so this should be considered an exception to normal policy of a separate -static package. Actually, there are two: mdadm.static and mdassemble.static (we don't even include the shared version of mdassemble). However, these are both intended for use by mkinitrd to create initrd images and therefore *need* to be static, so I do think they both warrant the exception status. I changed the permission on the repo copy of the init script. It was already being installed with -m 0755 in the %install, the odd permissions were just a relic. Changed Requires: smptdaemon to /usr/sbin/sendmail New build currently in process. 2.6.1-4.fc7 is the tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 00:20:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 20:20:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234812] Review Request: tcpreplay - Replay captured network traffic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704170020.l3H0KAlg007362@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcpreplay - Replay captured network traffic Alias: tcpreplay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234812 ------- Additional Comments From bojan at rexursive.com 2007-04-16 20:20 EST ------- Revised spec and source RPM now available: ftp://ftp.rexursive.com/pub/tcpreplay/tcpreplay.spec ftp://ftp.rexursive.com/pub/tcpreplay/tcpreplay-2.3.5-3.src.rpm The issues addressed: > 1. Please consider to change the install lines in your patch to use install -p to preserve timestamps. Done. > 2. Please change "%doc Docs" to "%doc Docs/*" so that there is not an extraneous single Docs directory in the %doc directory. Done. > 4. CFLAGS are not being used in the compile. This is a blocker. Done. Now setting CFLAGS to RPM_OPT_FLAGS in Makefile explicitly. > 5. Do not include Docs/INSTALL, Docs/WARNINGS. You might also consider only including one format for the same information as far as Docs/*. Done. I only included text and HTML versions (the latter is included because there is an image HTML docs include, which text files cannot point to). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 01:12:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 21:12:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236492] Review Request: ruby-bsearch - Binary search library for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704170112.l3H1CSEe009327@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-bsearch - Binary search library for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236492 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-16 21:12 EST ------- Rebuilt for all branches, closing. Thank you for reviewing and approving this package!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 01:12:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 21:12:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236491] Review Request: ruby-romkan - Romaji <-> Kana conversion library for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704170112.l3H1CUiY009335@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-romkan - Romaji <-> Kana conversion library for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236491 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-16 21:12 EST ------- Rebuilt for all branches, closing. Thank you for reviewing and approving this package!! P.S. I would appreciate it if you would review the last one, migemo itself (bug 236493). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 01:12:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 21:12:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236493] Review Request: migemo - Japanese incremental search tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704170112.l3H1CeIL009360@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: migemo - Japanese incremental search tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236493 Bug 236493 depends on bug 236491, which changed state. Bug 236491 Summary: Review Request: ruby-romkan - Romaji <-> Kana conversion library for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236491 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 236493 depends on bug 236492, which changed state. Bug 236492 Summary: Review Request: ruby-bsearch - Binary search library for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236492 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 01:32:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 21:32:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236504] Review Request: rhm - Red Hat Messaging extensions to qpid. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704170132.l3H1WOLe010061@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rhm - Red Hat Messaging extensions to qpid. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236504 nsantos at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nsantos at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From nsantos at redhat.com 2007-04-16 21:32 EST ------- rhm-0.1-1.src.rpm Legend: OK: passes criteria NO: fails criteria (errors included between "--" markers) NA: non applicable ??: unable to verify MUST: OK * package is named appropriately OK - match upstream tarball or project name OK - try to match previous incarnations in other distributions/packagers for consistency OK - specfile should be %{name}.spec NA - non-numeric characters should only be used in Release (ie. cvs or something) NA - for non-numerics (pre-release, CVS snapshots, etc.), see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#PackageRelease NA - if case sensitivity is requested by upstream or you feel it should be not just lowercase, do so; otherwise, use all lower case for the name OK * is it legal for Fedora to distribute this? OK - OSI-approved OK - not a kernel module OK - not shareware OK - is it covered by patents? OK - it *probably* shouldn't be an emulator OK - no binary firmware OK * license field matches the actual license. OK * license is open source-compatible. OK - use acronyms for licences where common OK * specfile name matches %{name} OK * verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do) OK * skim the summary and description for typos, etc. OK * correct buildroot OK * if %{?dist} is used, it should be in that form (note the ? and % locations) OK * license text included in package and marked with %doc OK * keep old changelog entries; use judgement when removing (too old? useless?) OK * packages meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) OK * rpmlint on .srpm gives no output OK * changelog should be in one of these formats: OK * Packager tag should not be used OK * Vendor tag should not be used OK * use License and not Copyright OK * Summary tag should not end in a period OK * if possible, replace PreReq with Requires(pre) and/or Requires(post) OK * specfile is legible OK * package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86 OK * BuildRequires are proper OK * summary should be a short and concise description of the package OK * description expands upon summary (don't include installation instructions) OK * make sure lines are <= 80 characters OK * specfile written in American English NA * make a -doc sub-package if necessary NA * packages including libraries should exclude static libraries if possible OK * don't use rpath NA * config files should usually be marked with %config(noreplace) NA * GUI apps should contain .desktop files OK * should the package contain a -devel sub-package? OK * use macros appropriately and consistently OK * don't use %makeinstall NA * locale data handling correct (find_lang) NA * consider using cp -p to preserve timestamps OK * split Requires(pre,post) into two separate lines OK * package should probably not be relocatable OK * package contains code OK * package should own all directories and files OK * there should be no %files duplicates OK * file permissions should be okay; %defattrs should be present OK * %clean should be present OK * %doc files should not affect runtime NA * if it is a web apps, it should be in /usr/share/%{name} and *not* /var/www OK * verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs -- [nsantos at qpid-test pkg]$ rpm -qp /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/x86_64/rhm-0.1-1.x86_64.rpm --provides libbdbstore.so.0()(64bit) rhm = 0.1-1 [nsantos at qpid-test pkg]$ rpm -qp /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/x86_64/rhm-0.1-1.x86_64.rpm --requires /sbin/ldconfig /sbin/ldconfig /sbin/service /sbin/service db4 libapr-1.so.0()(64bit) libbdbstore.so.0()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) libcrypt.so.1()(64bit) libdb_cxx-4.3.so()(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libqpidbroker.so.0()(64bit) librt.so.1()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) libuuid.so.1()(64bit) qpidd rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) -- OK * run rpmlint on the binary RPMs -- [nsantos at qpid-test pkg]$ rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/x86_64/rhm-0.1-1.x86_64.rpm [nsantos at qpid-test pkg]$ rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/x86_64/rhm-debuginfo-0.1-1.x86_64.rpm [nsantos at qpid-test pkg]$ -- SHOULD: OK * package should include license text in the package and mark it with %doc OK * package should build on i386 OK * package should build in mock Marking as APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 01:34:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 21:34:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236504] Review Request: rhm - Red Hat Messaging extensions to qpid. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704170134.l3H1YMmJ010167@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rhm - Red Hat Messaging extensions to qpid. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236504 nsantos at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From nsantos at redhat.com 2007-04-16 21:34 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rhm Short Description: Red Hat extensions to the Qpid messaging system Owners: aconway at redhat.com,nsantos at redhat.com Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 01:36:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 21:36:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230806] Review Request: tasks - To-do list In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704170136.l3H1aDZ8010219@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tasks - To-do list https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230806 dyoung at mesd.k12.or.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From dyoung at mesd.k12.or.us 2007-04-16 21:35 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tasks Short Description: To-do list Owners: dyoung at mesd.k12.or.us Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 02:40:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 22:40:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235588] Review Request: escape - an extensible puzzle game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704170240.l3H2eD8a013816@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: escape - an extensible puzzle game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235588 ------- Additional Comments From adam at spicenitz.org 2007-04-16 22:40 EST ------- http://www.spicenitz.org/fedora/escape-200704130-2.fc7.src.rpm http://www.spicenitz.org/fedora/escape.spec - Fix permissions in debuginfo package - Generate SRPM with source matching upstream MD5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 02:56:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 22:56:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229417] Review Request: python-qpid - qpid's python implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704170256.l3H2uGfg014602@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-qpid - qpid's python implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229417 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 02:58:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 22:58:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229418] Review Request: ruby-qpid - qpid's ruby implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704170258.l3H2wLhE014725@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-qpid - qpid's ruby implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229418 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 03:00:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 23:00:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234812] Review Request: tcpreplay - Replay captured network traffic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704170300.l3H30KBC014862@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcpreplay - Replay captured network traffic Alias: tcpreplay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234812 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-16 22:59 EST ------- ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ pending removal of /usr/share/doc/tcpreplay-2.3.5/Makefile (unless there is a reason to keep it) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 03:00:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 23:00:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236504] Review Request: rhm - Red Hat Messaging extensions to qpid. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704170300.l3H30fZx014895@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rhm - Red Hat Messaging extensions to qpid. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236504 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 03:02:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 23:02:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230806] Review Request: tasks - To-do list In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704170302.l3H32RB8014997@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tasks - To-do list https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230806 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 03:05:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 23:05:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189088] Review Request: knemo Network monitor applet. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704170305.l3H35D7o015163@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: knemo Network monitor applet. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 03:06:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 23:06:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207174] Review Request: whatmask - Convert between different netmask types and show information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704170306.l3H36FAE015239@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: whatmask - Convert between different netmask types and show information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207174 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 03:06:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 23:06:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235895] Review Request: perl-Text-Aspell - spell check interface for perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704170306.l3H36XpM015262@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Aspell - spell check interface for perl Alias: perl-Text-Aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235895 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-16 23:06 EST ------- Have you posted them yet? :) I seem to be getting a 404 on that srpm... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 03:07:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 23:07:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230806] Review Request: tasks - To-do list In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704170307.l3H37TCK015314@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tasks - To-do list https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230806 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-16 23:07 EST ------- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR. I am sponsoring) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 03:18:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 23:18:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234812] Review Request: tcpreplay - Replay captured network traffic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704170318.l3H3IEFj015919@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcpreplay - Replay captured network traffic Alias: tcpreplay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234812 ------- Additional Comments From bojan at rexursive.com 2007-04-16 23:18 EST ------- > pending removal of /usr/share/doc/tcpreplay-2.3.5/Makefile OOPS! Apologies, completely missed that. Corrected files are here, just for reference: ftp://ftp.rexursive.com/pub/tcpreplay/tcpreplay.spec ftp://ftp.rexursive.com/pub/tcpreplay/tcpreplay-2.3.5-4.src.rpm Thanks for reviewing! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 03:27:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 23:27:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234812] Review Request: tcpreplay - Replay captured network traffic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704170327.l3H3RNRU016497@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcpreplay - Replay captured network traffic Alias: tcpreplay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234812 bojan at rexursive.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 03:30:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 23:30:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234812] Review Request: tcpreplay - Replay captured network traffic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704170330.l3H3UdeO016691@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcpreplay - Replay captured network traffic Alias: tcpreplay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234812 bojan at rexursive.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | ------- Additional Comments From bojan at rexursive.com 2007-04-16 23:30 EST ------- OOPS? Flag with no comment... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 03:33:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 23:33:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226326] Merge Review: puretls In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704170333.l3H3XdDm016867@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: puretls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226326 ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-04-16 23:33 EST ------- Please fix item(s) mared by X: MUST: * package is named appropriately - match upstream tarball or project name - try to match previous incarnations in other distributions/packagers for consistency - specfile should be %{name}.spec - non-numeric characters should only be used in Release (ie. cvs or something) - for non-numerics (pre-release, CVS snapshots, etc.), see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#PackageRelease - if case sensitivity is requested by upstream or you feel it should be not just lowercase, do so; otherwise, use all lower case for the name * is it legal for Fedora to distribute this? - OSI-approved - not a kernel module - not shareware - is it covered by patents? - it *probably* shouldn't be an emulator - no binary firmware * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. - use acronyms for licences where common * specfile name matches %{name} X verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do) Please specify URL/instructions for the Source0 src tar ball. X skim the summary and description for typos, etc. Do we need to mention the company in the description? * correct buildroot - should be: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) * if %{?dist} is used, it should be in that form (note the ? and % locations) * license text included in package and marked with %doc * keep old changelog entries; use judgement when removing (too old? useless?) * packages meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) * rpmlint on .srpm gives no output [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 ~]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/puretls-0.9-0.b5.5jpp.1.fc7.src.rpm W: puretls non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java This is OK * changelog should be in one of these formats: * Fri Jun 23 2006 Jesse Keating - 0.6-4 - And fix the link syntax. * Fri Jun 23 2006 Jesse Keating 0.6-4 - And fix the link syntax. * Fri Jun 23 2006 Jesse Keating - 0.6-4 - And fix the link syntax. * Packager tag should not be used * Vendor tag should not be used * Distribution tag should not be used * use License and not Copyright * Summary tag should not end in a period * if possible, replace PreReq with Requires(pre) and/or Requires(post) X specfile is legible - Please get rid of the section - Isn't the pre-release tag 0.1.%{beta}.5jpp.1%{?dist}? (note the .1 after 0) * package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86 * BuildRequires are proper - builds in mock will flush out problems here - the following packages don't need to be listed in BuildRequires: bash bzip2 coreutils cpio diffutils fedora-release (and/or redhat-release) gcc gcc-c++ gzip make patch perl redhat-rpm-config rpm-build sed tar unzip which * summary should be a short and concise description of the package * description expands upon summary (don't include installation instructions) * make sure lines are <= 80 characters * specfile written in American English * make a -doc sub-package if necessary - see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-9bbfa57478f0460c6160947a6bf795249488182b * packages including libraries should exclude static libraries if possible * don't use rpath * config files should usually be marked with %config(noreplace) * GUI apps should contain .desktop files * should the package contain a -devel sub-package? * use macros appropriately and consistently - ie. %{buildroot} and %{optflags} vs. $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and $RPM_OPT_FLAGS * don't use %makeinstall * install section must begin with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot} * locale data handling correct (find_lang) - if translations included, add BR: gettext and use %find_lang %{name} at the end of %install X consider using cp -p to preserve timestamps please use cp -p on line 139 * split Requires(pre,post) into two separate lines * package should probably not be relocatable * package contains code - see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#CodeVsContent - in general, there should be no offensive content * package should own all directories and files * there should be no %files duplicates * file permissions should be okay; %defattrs should be present * %clean should be present * %doc files should not affect runtime * if it is a web apps, it should be in /usr/share/%{name} and *not* /var/www * verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 ~]$ rpm -qp --provides /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/puretls-0.9-0.b5.5jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm puretls1.4-0.9.b5.jar.so()(64bit) puretls = 0.9-0.b5.5jpp.1.fc7 [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 ~]$ rpm -qp --requires /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/puretls-0.9-0.b5.5jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm /bin/sh /bin/sh cryptix cryptix-asn1 java-gcj-compat java-gcj-compat libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgcj_bc.so.1()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) librt.so.1()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 ~]$ rpm -qp --provides /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/puretls-debuginfo-0.9-0.b5.5jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm puretls-demo.jar.so.debug()(64bit) puretls1.4-0.9.b5.jar.so.debug()(64bit) puretls-debuginfo = 0.9-0.b5.5jpp.1.fc7 [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 ~]$ rpm -qp --requires /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/puretls-debuginfo-0.9-0.b5.5jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 ~]$ rpm -qp --provides /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/puretls-demo-0.9-0.b5.5jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm puretls-demo.jar.so()(64bit) puretls-demo = 0.9-0.b5.5jpp.1.fc7 [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 ~]$ rpm -qp --requires /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/puretls-demo-0.9-0.b5.5jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm /bin/sh /bin/sh /usr/bin/perl java-gcj-compat java-gcj-compat libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgcj_bc.so.1()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) librt.so.1()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) perl(getopts.pl) puretls rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 ~]$ rpm -qp --provides /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/puretls-javadoc-0.9-0.b5.5jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm puretls-javadoc = 0.9-0.b5.5jpp.1.fc7 [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 ~]$ rpm -qp --requires /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/puretls-javadoc-0.9-0.b5.5jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 X run rpmlint on the binary RPMs [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 ~]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/puretls-0.9-0.b5.5jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm W: puretls non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 ~]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/puretls-debuginfo-0.9-0.b5.5jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 ~]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/puretls-demo-0.9-0.b5.5jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm W: puretls-demo non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java W: puretls-demo no-documentation [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 ~]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/puretls-javadoc-0.9-0.b5.5jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm W: puretls-javadoc non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java The groups ones are OK, does the demo subpackage has any doc? SHOULD: * package should include license text in the package and mark it with %doc * package should build on i386 * package should build in mock -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 03:47:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 23:47:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225938] Merge Review: jakarta-taglibs-standard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704170347.l3H3lmID017716@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-taglibs-standard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225938 ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-04-16 23:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > > X verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do) > > - if upstream doesn't release source drops, put *clear* instructions on > > how to generate the the source drop; ie. > > # svn export blah/tag blah > > # tar cjf blah-version-src.tar.bz2 blah > > I can only find 1.1.2 src tar ball on the mentioned site for Source0 > Fixed. This is due to apache having one location for the lastest packages and > another for older packages (archives). I have switched the link to point to the > archives section as this pacakges is no longer the most current. md5sum now matches. > > > X correct buildroot > > - should be: > > %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) > > Please fix buildroot > Fixed Great! > > > X specfile is legible > > - what is the difference between jversion and version? (since both is 1.1.1, do > > we need both?) > good point, I have no idea why jversion is in there. It has been removed. > Thanks. Please get rid of the section tag. Forgot to mark an X besides this: * skim the summary and description for typos, etc. - description says 'This directory contains releases for the 1.1.x ...', should it be 'This package .... for the 1.1.1 ...'? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 03:58:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 23:58:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234826] Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704170358.l3H3wFt3018251@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234826 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-16 23:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > > 7. Must include a .desktop file (please see > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop) > > Done. I added a .desktop file, but I didn't find a suitable icon, neither in the > source tarball, nor in the fgfs-base package. Is it acceptable to ship a > desktop file without icon ? It's VERY preferable to have the icon in place. Please take a look at this: http://mail.flightgear.org/pipermail/flightgear-devel/2005-September/039106.html http://jrbabcock.home.comcast.net/flightgear/icons/index.html Contact the author of this artwork and see if he will release it under a license that allows you to use it (and include that license as well). You also need to add this: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets?highlight=%28scriptlets%29#head-de6770dd9867fcd085a73a4700f6bcd0d10294ef and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets?highlight=%28scriptlets%29#head-7103f6c38d1b5735e8477bdd569ad73ea2c49bda -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 04:01:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 00:01:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235989] Review Request: python-biopython - Python tools for computational molecular biology In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704170401.l3H41ENM018419@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-biopython - Python tools for computational molecular biology https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235989 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 04:06:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 00:06:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225935] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-pool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704170406.l3H46e0j018649@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-pool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225935 pcheung at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-04-17 00:06 EST ------- Everything looks good. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 04:14:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 00:14:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235989] Review Request: python-biopython - Python tools for computational molecular biology In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704170414.l3H4E9mV019088@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-biopython - Python tools for computational molecular biology https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235989 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-17 00:14 EST ------- I think you can use Source url as http://biopython.org/DIST/biopython-%{version}.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 04:34:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 00:34:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233597] Review Request: pigment - Media Center Toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704170434.l3H4YLkF020222@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pigment - Media Center Toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233597 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-04-17 00:34 EST ------- Good catch on the rpath Things look pretty good, just looking over the build log of 0.1.5-1 on x86 and i still see multiple references to -rpath. Are these a problem as well? -rpath /usr/lib -rpath /usr/lib/pigment-0.1/gstreamer -rpath /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 04:53:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 00:53:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234812] Review Request: tcpreplay - Replay captured network traffic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704170453.l3H4rA3E021582@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcpreplay - Replay captured network traffic Alias: tcpreplay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234812 bojan at rexursive.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bojan at rexursive.com 2007-04-17 00:52 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tcpreplay Short Description: Replay captured network traffic Owners: bojan at rexursive.com Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 05:00:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 01:00:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235989] Review Request: python-biopython - Python tools for computational molecular biology In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704170500.l3H50qUf021946@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-biopython - Python tools for computational molecular biology https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235989 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2007-04-17 01:00 EST ------- * Mon Apr 16 2007 Alex Lancaster 1.43-2 - Fix Source0 URL as per suggestion from Parag AN on #235989. Spec URL: http://allele5.biol.berkeley.edu/~alex/fedora/python-biopython.spec SRPM URL: http://allele5.biol.berkeley.edu/~alex/fedora/python-biopython-1.43-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 05:04:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 01:04:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235989] Review Request: python-biopython - Python tools for computational molecular biology In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704170504.l3H543a9022030@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-biopython - Python tools for computational molecular biology https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235989 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-17 01:04 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). - rpmlint is NOT silent for SRPM and for RPM. reports invalid license but I saw its similar to MIT style license. So I don't think we should have any objections to this license. + source files match upstream url 3c275b321bb1db7d8bda764913aaedcd biopython-1.43.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Provides: DNAUtils.so _CKDTree.so cMarkovModel.so cdistance.so clistfns.so cluster.so cmathfns.so cnexus.so cpairwise2.so cstringfns.so trie.so + Requires: MySQL-python libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) libm.so.6 libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libpthread.so.0 libpython2.5.so.1.0 libstdc++.so.6 libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4) mx python(abi) = 2.5 python-numeric python-psycopg python-reportlab rtld(GNU_HASH) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 05:08:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 01:08:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235989] Review Request: python-biopython - Python tools for computational molecular biology In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704170508.l3H58CMn022167@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-biopython - Python tools for computational molecular biology https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235989 alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2007-04-17 01:08 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-biopython Short Description: A set of freely available Python tools for computational molecular biology. Owners: alexl at users.sourceforge.net Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 05:20:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 01:20:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235989] Review Request: python-biopython - Python tools for computational molecular biology In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704170520.l3H5KwAm022669@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-biopython - Python tools for computational molecular biology https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235989 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2007-04-17 01:20 EST ------- Better short description is below: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-biopython Short Description: Python tools for computational molecular biology Owners: alexl at users.sourceforge.net Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 05:49:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 01:49:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225765] Merge Review: fonts-japanese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704170549.l3H5nSIF023926@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-japanese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225765 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2007-04-17 01:49 EST ------- updated fonts-japanese-0.20061016-6.fc7 is available btw. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 07:27:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 03:27:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225765] Merge Review: fonts-japanese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704170727.l3H7RlUu027536@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-japanese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225765 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-17 03:27 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). - rpmlint is NOT silent for SRPM. W: fonts-japanese rpm-buildroot-usage %build %configure --disable-bold --disable-italic --with-fontdir=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{bmpfontdir} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be touched during %build or %prep stage, as it will break short circuiting. ===> the above is OK for this package as its only installing font files. + rpmlint is silent for RPM. + source files match upstream. e8a452c07cd5d1d31d3a6f32c2b74265 jisksp14.bdf.gz d0d24d605ee62833234b711d6766e16c jisksp16-1990.bdf.gz c59fc33f4319a291c1f3f7d58d896b9c k14-oldkanji.tar.gz e0a103ceeffe0aa1c5670458f47452b3 kaname_k12_bdf.tar.gz 065920714d022cfd225feb6d80b03238 knm_new.tar.gz a97a99acbee54976407dec828d03850c mplus_bitmap_fonts-2.2.4.tar.gz e0e1d3b139159a2af09bc9867c9a654b warabi12-0.19a.tar.gz 19ff56e6de82e8f9a02c9cebf5af0cdc Kappa20-0.396.tar.bz2 b312f77829011547b19fc16956dc6f12 sazanami-20061016.tar.bz2 38ce9221d128383a3f9f50eb641da424 shinonome-0.9.11-src.tar.bz2 b3900ebac6dd1044423bef5e23d653dc imamura-jisx0213.tgz a412bc6920d29be2689b3c3192bcdbd2 marumoji.tgz c6b7771e4f00e310fe807b3245fd316e vine-fonttools-0.1.tgz fa5981d270f432d36818329c8878ba6e xfonts_jp.tgz 77d997789026b1829bb4a33f65a0ce78 jiskan16-1990.bdf.Z c9fd21064b4ad6f1af0bcdb40a4222ee jiskano16-1997.bdf.Z + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + Used Fonts Scriptlet. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Provides: fonts-ja = 8.0-16 jisksp14 = 0.1-16 jisksp16-1990 = 0.1-16 kappa20 = 0.3-15 knm_new = 1.1-16 ttfonts-ja = 1.2-37 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 07:37:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 03:37:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226399] Merge Review: scim-tables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704170737.l3H7b6gK027985@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: scim-tables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226399 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-17 03:37 EST ------- rpm -qf /usr/share/scim/tables/ scim-tables-additional-0.5.7-2.1.fc7 scim-tables-amharic-0.5.7-2.1.fc7 scim-tables-arabic-0.5.7-2.1.fc7 scim-tables-chinese-0.5.7-2.1.fc7 scim-tables-nepali-0.5.7-2.1.fc7 scim-tables-russian-0.5.7-2.1.fc7 scim-tables-thai-0.5.7-2.1.fc7 scim-tables-vietnamese-0.5.7-2.1.fc7 why a single directory is owned by multiple rpms? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 07:49:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 03:49:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226399] Merge Review: scim-tables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704170749.l3H7nlQw029040@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: scim-tables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226399 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-17 03:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > rpm -qf /usr/share/scim/tables/ > scim-tables-additional-0.5.7-2.1.fc7 > scim-tables-amharic-0.5.7-2.1.fc7 > scim-tables-arabic-0.5.7-2.1.fc7 > scim-tables-chinese-0.5.7-2.1.fc7 > scim-tables-nepali-0.5.7-2.1.fc7 > scim-tables-russian-0.5.7-2.1.fc7 > scim-tables-thai-0.5.7-2.1.fc7 > scim-tables-vietnamese-0.5.7-2.1.fc7 > > why a single directory is owned by multiple rpms? Well, as all scim-table- requires scim-table, the directory /usr/share/scim/tables/ should be owned by scim-table. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 07:52:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 03:52:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222087] Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704170752.l3H7qVf0029324@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222087 ------- Additional Comments From sdl.web at gmail.com 2007-04-17 03:52 EST ------- Still error http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-5-extras/31651-pcmanx-gtk2-0.3.5-10.336svn.fc5/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 07:57:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 03:57:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226134] Merge Review: mdadm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704170757.l3H7vx4k029848@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mdadm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226134 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag|fedora-review? |needinfo?(dledford at redhat.co | |m), fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-04-17 03:57 EST ------- All problems fixed, explanations are logical. Package is APPROVED. Thank you, Doug, for changing the Provides. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 08:02:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 04:02:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222087] Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704170802.l3H82Fc9030438@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222087 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-17 04:02 EST ------- Yes, I saw. Now I am checking what is occuring by mockbuild. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 08:13:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 04:13:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195485] Review Request: kdegraphics: K Desktop Environment - Graphics Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704170813.l3H8DLOO031819@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdegraphics: K Desktop Environment - Graphics Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195485 than at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From than at redhat.com 2007-04-17 04:13 EST ------- it's now fixed in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 09:13:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 05:13:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226399] Merge Review: scim-tables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704170913.l3H9DKDd003731@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: scim-tables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226399 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-04-17 05:13 EST ------- my bad - fixing in cvs and 1.5.7-3.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 10:03:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 06:03:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222087] Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171003.l3HA3Eke007349@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222087 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-17 06:03 EST ------- Seems to be bug of libnotify-0.3. Header files seem to be unsafe for C++. On >= FC-6, libnotify is 0.4. Perhaps disabling libnotify support on FC-5 is the best for now. BTW: If you change the release number to -10, then you have to increase release number also on FC-devel and FC-6. Please make it sure that version-release number is always higher on higher branches. If you want to fix only on lower branches, you can tag release number as 9%{?dist}.1, for example. Check "Minor release bumps for old branches" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 10:10:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 06:10:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236642] Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171010.l3HAAIDp007692@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236642 kanarip at kanarip.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 10:17:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 06:17:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236162] Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171017.l3HAHhQ0008094@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236162 jasperhartline at adelphia.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 10:55:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 06:55:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235763] Review Request: windowlab - Small and Simple Amiga-like Window Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171055.l3HAtNnR009663@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: windowlab - Small and Simple Amiga-like Window Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235763 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-04-17 06:55 EST ------- Spec URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/windowlab.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/windowlab-1.34-3.src.rpm I spoke with Alex on IRC regarding his mock build (while he did it). It was then I discovered an issue with the debuginfo package, both have been fixed (the latter via another patch, depending on upstream's stance the patch may be merged, but I'd like to keep it seperate for now) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 11:41:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 07:41:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235588] Review Request: escape - an extensible puzzle game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171141.l3HBfsd9011927@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: escape - an extensible puzzle game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235588 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-04-17 07:41 EST ------- MD5 matches. Still some -debug perm issues. W: escape-debuginfo spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/escape-src/dirt.h W: escape-debuginfo spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/escape-src/sound.h W: escape-debuginfo spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/escape-src/progress.h W: escape-debuginfo spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/escape-src/sound_enum.h -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 12:44:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 08:44:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226364] Merge Review: redhat-menus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171244.l3HCi3lI015237@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: redhat-menus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226364 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Bug 226364 depends on bug 222905, which changed state. Bug 222905 Summary: should own %{_datadir}/desktop-directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222905 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 13:10:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 09:10:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226134] Merge Review: mdadm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171310.l3HDAGTe018099@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mdadm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226134 dledford at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(dledford at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From dledford at redhat.com 2007-04-17 09:10 EST ------- Thank you for reviewing. I'll go ahead and build this same package for FC5/FC6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 13:19:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 09:19:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171319.l3HDJi3j019022@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|rdieter at math.unl.edu | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 13:36:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 09:36:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225305] Merge Review: avalon-framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171336.l3HDaGaR020550@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: avalon-framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225305 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-04-17 09:36 EST ------- Package built into brew. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 14:03:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 10:03:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234863] Review Request: perl-Mail-Box-Parser-C - Parsing folders for MailBox with C routines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171403.l3HE30wi022442@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Box-Parser-C - Parsing folders for MailBox with C routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234863 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-17 10:02 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Mail-Box-Parser-C Short Description: Parsing folders for MailBox with C routines Owners: tcallawa at redhat.com Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 14:03:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 10:03:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234863] Review Request: perl-Mail-Box-Parser-C - Parsing folders for MailBox with C routines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171403.l3HE3SsK022475@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Box-Parser-C - Parsing folders for MailBox with C routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234863 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 14:04:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 10:04:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225938] Merge Review: jakarta-taglibs-standard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171404.l3HE4PKO022551@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-taglibs-standard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225938 ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-04-17 10:04 EST ------- -got rid of section tag -fixed up the description Updated File: https://mwringe.108.redhat.com/files/documents/175/344/jakarta-taglibs-standard-1.1.1-8jpp.1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 14:04:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 10:04:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234790] Review Request: perl-Email-Abstract - Unified interface to mail representations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171404.l3HE4xsQ022585@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Abstract - Unified interface to mail representations Alias: perl-Email-Abstract https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234790 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-17 10:04 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Email-Abstract Short Description: Unified interface to mail representations Owners: tcallawa at redhat.com Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 14:05:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 10:05:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234790] Review Request: perl-Email-Abstract - Unified interface to mail representations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171405.l3HE5I2e022624@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Abstract - Unified interface to mail representations Alias: perl-Email-Abstract https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234790 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 14:21:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 10:21:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225938] Merge Review: jakarta-taglibs-standard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171421.l3HELQPZ023780@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-taglibs-standard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225938 pcheung at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-04-17 10:21 EST ------- APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 14:25:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 10:25:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234940] Review Request: perl-Image-Math-Constrain - Scaling math used in image size constraining (such as thumbnails) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171425.l3HEPFhL024206@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Image-Math-Constrain - Scaling math used in image size constraining (such as thumbnails) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234940 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bjohnson at symetrix.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 14:33:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 10:33:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234940] Review Request: perl-Image-Math-Constrain - Scaling math used in image size constraining (such as thumbnails) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171433.l3HEXqAk025496@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Image-Math-Constrain - Scaling math used in image size constraining (such as thumbnails) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234940 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-17 10:33 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Rpmlint output: None [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL or Artistic [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is written in American English. [x] Spec file for the package is legible. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : 92980c42977b0dfe9dba715d405313b0 MD5SUM upstream package: 92980c42977b0dfe9dba715d405313b0 [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: Arches excluded: Why: [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] Latest version is packaged. === Issues === 1. === Final Notes === 1. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 14:37:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 10:37:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228301] Review Request: python-nevow - Web application construction kit written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171437.l3HEbMO3026027@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-nevow - Web application construction kit written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228301 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-04-17 10:37 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Ping? Please review the 0.9.18 packages ASAP, thanks. checked out. sorry for the late. the updated srpm is silent, but not the rpm, it seems still have wrong-line-ending. you can fix these with sed ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 14:40:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 10:40:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228301] Review Request: python-nevow - Web application construction kit written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171440.l3HEecHc026617@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-nevow - Web application construction kit written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228301 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-04-17 10:40 EST ------- > I'll fix the EOL encoding issues, but the empty js files will certainly stay... > those are just examples after all. yep, this error can be ignored from rpmlint. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 14:49:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 10:49:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228298] Review Request: python-louie - Dispatches signals between Python objects in a wide variety of contexts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171449.l3HEncFn028400@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-louie - Dispatches signals between Python objects in a wide variety of contexts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228298 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-04-17 10:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > Ping? The package should be able to be accepted in its current form, unless I'm > missing something... please confirm ASAP. As you said, it can be accepted, this form is acceptable. --------- APPROUVED --------- you can now request CVSsync -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 14:53:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 10:53:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229098] Review Request: openjpeg - JPEG 2000 codec library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171453.l3HErt5H029241@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openjpeg - JPEG 2000 codec library Alias: openjpeg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229098 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-04-17 10:53 EST ------- ping ? Any news about new release ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 14:55:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 10:55:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231774] Review Request: perl-DBIx-POS - Define a dictionary of SQL statements in a POD dialect (POS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171455.l3HEtqcT029722@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-POS - Define a dictionary of SQL statements in a POD dialect (POS) Alias: perl-DBIx-POS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231774 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bjohnson at symetrix.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 14:57:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 10:57:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234573] Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171457.l3HEv3On030008@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology Alias: perl-bioperl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234573 alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2007-04-17 10:57 EST ------- Builds and installs in devel. Closing bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 14:57:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 10:57:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223657] Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171457.l3HEvLsr030070@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223657 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-04-17 10:57 EST ------- SRPMS: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/PerceptualDiff/PerceptualDiff-1.0.1-3.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm SPEC: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/PerceptualDiff/PerceptualDiff.spec Summary: An image comparison utility It remains the issue with debug info: extracting debug info from buildroot/usr/bin/perceptualdiff 0 blocks I don't know how to solve this... !? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 14:57:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 10:57:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229418] Review Request: ruby-qpid - qpid's ruby implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171457.l3HEvoWx030171@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-qpid - qpid's ruby implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229418 nsantos at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 14:57:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 10:57:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229417] Review Request: python-qpid - qpid's python implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171457.l3HEvqkJ030189@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-qpid - qpid's python implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229417 nsantos at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 15:04:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 11:04:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229154] Review Request: konwert - Converter of character encodings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171504.l3HF4k4G031462@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: konwert - Converter of character encodings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229154 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lxtnow at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-04-17 11:04 EST ------- this bug should be assigned and approuved by a sponsor, removed myself from assignee block. Daniil, do you have a updated srpm fix from Mamoru review ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 15:06:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 11:06:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226387] Merge Review: samba In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171506.l3HF6Em9031614@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: samba https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226387 dmitry at butskoy.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #151207|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2007-04-17 11:06 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=152814) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=152814&action=view) some of proposed changes to the .spec file according to the comment #22 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 15:06:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 11:06:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234721] Review Request: sakura - A terminal emulator based on GTK+ and VTE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171506.l3HF6t8h031731@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sakura - A terminal emulator based on GTK+ and VTE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234721 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-04-17 11:06 EST ------- re: ping ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 15:10:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 11:10:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231774] Review Request: perl-DBIx-POS - Define a dictionary of SQL statements in a POD dialect (POS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171510.l3HFAN6f032141@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-POS - Define a dictionary of SQL statements in a POD dialect (POS) Alias: perl-DBIx-POS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231774 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-17 11:10 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Rpmlint output: None [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL or Artistic / Artistic [-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [-] Spec file is written in American English. [-] Spec file for the package is legible. [-] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : ecd44d600628a0c3031628c9cc0e7706 MD5SUM upstream package: ecd44d600628a0c3031628c9cc0e7706 [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [-] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: Arches excluded: Why: [!] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [-] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] Latest version is packaged. === Issues === 1. Missing BR perl(YAML). 2. There are two licenses that apply to this module. The first is "GPL or Artistic" but the second is only "Artistic". I think you need to change your license tag to be just "Artistic". === Final Notes === 1. Give that a clean up and I'll approve the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 15:10:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 11:10:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223657] Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171510.l3HFAV4t032162@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223657 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-17 11:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #23) > It remains the issue with debug info: > extracting debug info from buildroot/usr/bin/perceptualdiff > 0 blocks > I don't know how to solve this... !? This is a symptom of the package not acknowledging RPM_OPT_FLAGS. Checking the log proves this: ... /usr/bin/c++ -o CMakeFiles/perceptualdiff.dir/LPyramid.o -c /users/packman/src/rpms/BUILD/PerceptualDiff-1.0.1/LPyramid.cpp ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 15:12:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 11:12:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231011] Review Request: cowpatty - Audit Wpa pre-shared keys In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171512.l3HFC8GJ032444@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cowpatty - Audit Wpa pre-shared keys https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231011 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-04-17 11:12 EST ------- kwizrat: ping ? Till: ping ? kwizart, can you check till's package to propose something or are you agree to make a full review of updated till's package ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 15:13:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 11:13:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231011] Review Request: cowpatty - Audit Wpa pre-shared keys In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171513.l3HFDnli032743@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cowpatty - Audit Wpa pre-shared keys https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231011 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-04-17 11:13 EST ------- s/are you/do you -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 15:17:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 11:17:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226387] Merge Review: samba In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171517.l3HFHaZH000764@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: samba https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226387 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2007-04-17 11:17 EST ------- Still pending remarks: - Does "/usr/lib* instead of %{_libdir}" hack still needed for the latest upstream versions? - docs/manpages contain non-ascii non-UTF8 symbols (yet not checked out for 3.0.25 :) ). Non-UTF8 is deprecated now. (BTW, run f.e. "man smbd" and see the man's warning in the first 3 lines). - Init scripts: /etc/rc.d/init.d/finctions existance is checked "hardly", whereas /etc/sysconfig/network is not... Since the init scripts are separate sources for Fedora, it can be fixed easily. - winbind.init: /var/lock/subsys name should match the initscript name, i.e. should be "/var/lock/subsys/winbind", not ".../winbindd" (rmplint complains about it). Since "/var/cache/samba" is no more used, maybe create a symlink to /var/lib/samba? (at least "for compatibility reasons" :) ) Perhaps this way (old and new places are playing together) the migration procedure could be simplified... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 15:18:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 11:18:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231011] Review Request: cowpatty - Audit Wpa pre-shared keys In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171518.l3HFI41s000826@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cowpatty - Audit Wpa pre-shared keys https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231011 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-04-17 11:17 EST ------- As state by Till, this package isn't very usefull! aircrack-ng seems better... I will let Till decide weither to continue the review with the spec of him or close the bug ... Sorry for the late answear... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 15:18:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 11:18:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229154] Review Request: konwert - Converter of character encodings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171518.l3HFIW0Z000902@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: konwert - Converter of character encodings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229154 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |needinfo?(daniil.ivanov at gmai | |l.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 15:31:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 11:31:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223657] Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171531.l3HFVLfG002225@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223657 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-17 11:31 EST ------- I have not checked -3 yet, however perhaps CFLAGS or CXXFLAGS should be exported before cmake is called. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 15:36:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 11:36:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231315] Review Request: fcgi - fastcgi development kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171536.l3HFaDjl002481@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fcgi - fastcgi development kit Alias: fcgi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231315 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-17 11:36 EST ------- W: fcgi no-documentation W: fcgi strange-permission fcgi-autogen.sh 0775 W: fcgi patch-not-applied Patch1: fcgi-2.4.0-configure.in.patch W: fcgi patch-not-applied Patch2: fcgi-2.4.0-Makefile.am-CPPFLAGS.patch W: fcgi-debuginfo spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fcgi-2.4.0/include/fcgios.h W: fcgi-debuginfo spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fcgi-2.4.0/libfcgi/os_unix.c W: fcgi-devel no-documentation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 15:38:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 11:38:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223657] Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171538.l3HFcM3W002664@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223657 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-04-17 11:38 EST ------- Then i suppose i need to patch CMakeLists.txt with: #flags SET(LINK_FLAGS ) #ADD CFLAGS AND LDFLAGS TO TARGET SET_TARGET_PROPERTIES(${TARGET} PROPERTIES COMPILE_FLAGS "${DEBUG_FLAGS}") SET_TARGET_PROPERTIES(${TARGET} PROPERTIES LINK_FLAGS "${LINK_FLAGS}") I will try to look further... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 15:46:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 11:46:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231859] Review Request: scratchpad - Spatial text editor for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171546.l3HFkUN0003175@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scratchpad - Spatial text editor for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231859 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bjohnson at symetrix.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 15:54:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 11:54:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235895] Review Request: perl-Text-Aspell - spell check interface for perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171554.l3HFsqv0004111@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Aspell - spell check interface for perl Alias: perl-Text-Aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235895 ------- Additional Comments From Jerry.James at usu.edu 2007-04-17 11:54 EST ------- Oops. Me and my fumble fingers. The SRPM now has the name I posted earlier. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 15:56:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 11:56:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225929] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-fileupload In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171556.l3HFuE4R004248@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-fileupload https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225929 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium pcheung at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mwringe at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-04-17 11:56 EST ------- Update spec file and srpm at: https://pcheung.108.redhat.com/files/documents/174/365/jakarta-commons-fileupload.spec https://pcheung.108.redhat.com/files/documents/174/364/jakarta-commons-fileupload-1.0-6jpp.2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 16:03:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 12:03:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235895] Review Request: perl-Text-Aspell - spell check interface for perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171603.l3HG36no004957@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Aspell - spell check interface for perl Alias: perl-Text-Aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235895 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-17 12:02 EST ------- Mondays, bah :) I'll take a look at it later on today, unless anyone else gets to it first... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 16:04:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 12:04:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223657] Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171604.l3HG4tmd005157@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223657 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-04-17 12:04 EST ------- SRPMS: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/PerceptualDiff/PerceptualDiff-1.0.1-4.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm SPEC: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/PerceptualDiff/PerceptualDiff.spec Summary: An image comparison utility Ok i've got 49 blocks for debug info! This look better! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 16:47:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 12:47:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231859] Review Request: scratchpad - Spatial text editor for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171647.l3HGl3B1008153@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scratchpad - Spatial text editor for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231859 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-17 12:47 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Rpmlint output: None [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is written in American English. [x] Spec file for the package is legible. [!] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : 12ec467f5670150a79964c00f593157c MD5SUM upstream package: can't be verified [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: Arches excluded: Why: [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [x] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [!] Package functions as described. [x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] Latest version is packaged. === Issues === 1. %doc - include News file. 2. libguniqueapp is included and used for the build. I would recommend submitting another package for just libguniqueapp and have this package require that and build against it. 3. Starting the application from the gnome menu just gives a popup window that says "This would create a new project oriented window, but this feature is not yet implemented. Please use Scratchpad from your file manager or terminal to open a document directly instead." 4. Running from a terminal give the same message and this in the console: $ scratchpad (:5696): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_style_detach: assertion `style->attach_count > 0' failed 5. Missing: Requires(post): desktop-file-utils Requires(postun): desktop-file-utils 6. Source0 is an invalid URL. Unable to verify Source0 integrity. === Final Notes === 1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 16:48:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 12:48:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234790] Review Request: perl-Email-Abstract - Unified interface to mail representations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171648.l3HGmW0O008244@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Abstract - Unified interface to mail representations Alias: perl-Email-Abstract https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234790 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 16:52:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 12:52:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234812] Review Request: tcpreplay - Replay captured network traffic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171652.l3HGqpgZ008490@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcpreplay - Replay captured network traffic Alias: tcpreplay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234812 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 16:57:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 12:57:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234863] Review Request: perl-Mail-Box-Parser-C - Parsing folders for MailBox with C routines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171657.l3HGvvgg008726@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Box-Parser-C - Parsing folders for MailBox with C routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234863 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 16:59:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 12:59:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235989] Review Request: python-biopython - Python tools for computational molecular biology In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171659.l3HGx6O2008776@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-biopython - Python tools for computational molecular biology https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235989 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 17:09:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 13:09:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223657] Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171709.l3HH99Gq009406@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223657 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-17 13:08 EST ------- Almost okay. * Question: - Well, CXXFLAGS is exported before cmake is called. Then do we have to pass CXXFLAGS as a option of cmake? (Also CFLAGS and etc) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 17:21:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 13:21:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230394] Review Request: mysql++ - C++ wrapper for the MySQL C API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171721.l3HHLrd7010334@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql++ - C++ wrapper for the MySQL C API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230394 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2007-04-17 13:21 EST ------- Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/mysql++.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/mysql++-2.2.3-1.fc7.src.rpm Mock Log: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/mysql++-build.log %changelog * Tue Apr 17 2007 Remi Collet 2.2.3-1 - update to 2.2.3, - del doc patch - change BuildRoot - add Requires mysql-devel for mysql++-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 17:23:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 13:23:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236652] Review Request: pidgin - gaim renamed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171723.l3HHNlIn010587@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin - gaim renamed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236652 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 17:27:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 13:27:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223657] Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171727.l3HHRrE2011091@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223657 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-04-17 13:27 EST ------- SRPMS: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/PerceptualDiff/PerceptualDiff-1.0.1-5.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm SPEC: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/PerceptualDiff/PerceptualDiff.spec Summary: An image comparison utility Ok that wasn't necessary indeed... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 17:29:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 13:29:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236792] New: Review Request: redhat-artwork-kde - KDE portions temporarily split out of redhat-artwork (236633) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236792 Summary: Review Request: redhat-artwork-kde - KDE portions temporarily split out of redhat-artwork (236633) Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kevin.kofler at chello.at QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f7/redhat-artwork-kde.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f7/redhat-artwork-kde-5.0.12-4.src.rpm Description: Since the KDE and KDM themes had to be temporarily disabled in redhat-artwork (see Bug 236633), this package serves as a stopgap solution to provide them. This package is for Fedora 7 only, FC <=6 don't need it, Fedora >=8 hopefully won't need it either. There are 2 rpmlint warnings, one from the SRPM: W: redhat-artwork-kde strange-permission post-install-fixup.sh 0755 I don't see what's strange in that permission, it's a script which is packaged as a source. But as it's currently empty anyway (just #!/bin/sh), I can remove it. (It was taken straight from the original redhat-artwork package.) And one from the binary RPM: W: redhat-artwork-kde dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/apps/kdm/themes/FedoraFlyingHigh/background.jpg ../../../../gdm/themes/FedoraFlyingHigh/background.jpg That file is in redhat-artwork, which this package Requires. Again, I can change this, but this was an intentional optimization to save space in redhat-artwork, and it shouldn't hurt because redhat-artwork-kde Requires: redhat-artwork anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 17:29:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 13:29:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236792] Review Request: redhat-artwork-kde - KDE portions temporarily split out of redhat-artwork (236633) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171729.l3HHTnnC011262@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redhat-artwork-kde - KDE portions temporarily split out of redhat-artwork (236633) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236792 kevin.kofler at chello.at changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 17:31:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 13:31:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236792] Review Request: redhat-artwork-kde - KDE portions temporarily split out of redhat-artwork (236633) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171731.l3HHV6iN011346@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redhat-artwork-kde - KDE portions temporarily split out of redhat-artwork (236633) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236792 kevin.kofler at chello.at changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rdieter at math.unl.edu ------- Additional Comments From kevin.kofler at chello.at 2007-04-17 13:31 EST ------- Assigning to Rex Dieter as discussed on IRC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 17:48:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 13:48:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236792] Review Request: redhat-artwork-kde - KDE portions temporarily split out of redhat-artwork (236633) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171748.l3HHm83e012843@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redhat-artwork-kde - KDE portions temporarily split out of redhat-artwork (236633) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236792 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 17:58:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 13:58:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236798] New: Review Request: ballz - Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236798 Summary: Review Request: ballz - Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: SRPM URL: Description: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 18:00:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 14:00:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236798] Review Request: ballz - Platform game with some puzzle elements In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171800.l3HI0jZa013771@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ballz - Platform game with some puzzle elements https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236798 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: ballz - |Review Request: ballz - | |Platform game with some | |puzzle elements ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-17 14:00 EST ------- Oops, enter didn't do what I wanted it too. Fixup: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ballz.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ballz-1.0-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Ballz is a platformer with some puzzle elements. You take control of a ball which is genetically modified by the British secret service. Your mission is to rescue captured British soldiers from a prison in Iran. The game was written in 72 hours for the TINS competition, a competition similar to Speedhack. The name TINS is an recursive acronym for ?TINS is not Speedhack?. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 18:05:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 14:05:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225010] Review Request: glob2 - An innovative RTS game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171805.l3HI562v014052@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glob2 - An innovative RTS game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225010 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-17 14:04 EST ------- Rafal, if you can create and upload an updated version, then maybe we can exchange reviews? I myself also have several game packages awaiting review: * asc-music - Background music for the game asc - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233256 - requires asc * vegastrike - 3D OpenGL spaceflight simulator - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233782 * vegastrike-data - Data files for Vega Strike - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233783 * ballz - Platform game with some puzzle elements - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236798 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 18:05:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 14:05:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226326] Merge Review: puretls In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171805.l3HI5Kqi014089@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: puretls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226326 ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-04-17 14:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > > X verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do) > Please specify URL/instructions for the Source0 src tar ball. > X skim the summary and description for typos, etc. > Do we need to mention the company in the description? Fixed, having the company information in there doesn't really give anything to the description. > * if possible, replace PreReq with Requires(pre) and/or Requires(post) > X specfile is legible > - Please get rid of the section > - Isn't the pre-release tag 0.1.%{beta}.5jpp.1%{?dist}? (note the .1 after 0) Oh, good catch, this has been fixed > X consider using cp -p to preserve timestamps > please use cp -p on line 139 Done > X run rpmlint on the binary RPMs > [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 ~]$ rpmlint > /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/puretls-0.9-0.b5.5jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm > W: puretls non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java > [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 ~]$ rpmlint > /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/puretls-debuginfo-0.9-0.b5.5jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm > [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 ~]$ rpmlint > /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/puretls-demo-0.9-0.b5.5jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm > W: puretls-demo non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java > W: puretls-demo no-documentation > [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 ~]$ rpmlint > /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/puretls-javadoc-0.9-0.b5.5jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm > W: puretls-javadoc non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java > The groups ones are OK, does the demo subpackage has any doc? The demo package depends on the main package which contains all the licensing doc information. The actual docs for how to use the demo package is in the INSTALL file (which for obvious reasons should not be included). I have created a new README file from INSTALL that explains how to use the demo. New SRPM: https://mwringe.108.redhat.com/files/documents/175/346/puretls-0.9-0.1.b5.5jpp.1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 18:06:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 14:06:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235588] Review Request: escape - an extensible puzzle game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171806.l3HI63Ws014166@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: escape - an extensible puzzle game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235588 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-17 14:05 EST ------- Jon, you should set the fedora review flag to ? when doing a review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 18:06:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 14:06:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235636] Review Request: pipepanic - A pipe connecting game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171806.l3HI6cPx014222@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pipepanic - A pipe connecting game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235636 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-17 14:06 EST ------- Andrea, the same goes for me, I would be happy to exchange a review for a review of any of these: * asc-music - Background music for the game asc - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233256 - requires asc * vegastrike - 3D OpenGL spaceflight simulator - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233782 * vegastrike-data - Data files for Vega Strike - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233783 * ballz - Platform game with some puzzle elements - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236798 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 18:07:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 14:07:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 224254] Review Request: bos - Real-time strategy game using the Stratagus game engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171807.l3HI7C9E014262@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bos - Real-time strategy game using the Stratagus game engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224254 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-17 14:07 EST ------- Peter, are you still interested in this? Maybe we can exchange reviews? I myself also have several game packages awaiting review: * asc-music - Background music for the game asc - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233256 - requires asc * vegastrike - 3D OpenGL spaceflight simulator - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233782 * vegastrike-data - Data files for Vega Strike - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233783 * ballz - Platform game with some puzzle elements - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236798 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 18:07:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 14:07:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223657] Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171807.l3HI7Iop014288@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223657 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-17 14:07 EST ------- Okay. ---------------------------------------------- This package (PerceptualDiff) is APPROVED by me ---------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 18:19:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 14:19:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235588] Review Request: escape - an extensible puzzle game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171819.l3HIJ0tE015252@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: escape - an extensible puzzle game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235588 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-04-17 14:18 EST ------- Whoops. Thanks. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 18:19:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 14:19:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229321] Review Request: pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171819.l3HIJmYh015423@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229321 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-04-17 14:19 EST ------- Forgot to set flag. . . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 18:33:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 14:33:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229321] Review Request: pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171833.l3HIXoOl016587@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229321 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2007-04-17 14:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > Is there an updated spec/SRPM addressing the above yet? Spec file: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/pgpool-II/postgresql-pgpool-II.spec SRPM: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/pgpool-II/postgresql-pgpool-II-1.0.2-4.src.rpm Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 18:38:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 14:38:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223657] Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171838.l3HIctA9017325@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223657 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-04-17 14:38 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: PerceptualDiff Short Description: An image comparison utility Owners: kwizart at gmail.com Branches: FC-5 FC-6 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 19:00:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 15:00:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230275] Review Request: varnish - High-performance HTTP accelerator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171900.l3HJ07f9019243@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: varnish - High-performance HTTP accelerator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230275 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From ingvar at linpro.no 2007-04-17 14:59 EST ------- The short story: New version of the specfile: http://users.linpro.no/ingvar/varnish/fedora-extras-commit/varnish.spec New source rpm: http://users.linpro.no/ingvar/varnish/fedora-extras-commit/varnish-1.0.3-5.src.rpm The details: * Kevin Fenzi > 1. You might want to use the %{?dist} tag. OK, added the dist tag in Relase > 2. You should not strip the binaries and libraries... > that makes the rpm debuginfo > package empty. Remove the 'strip -p' lines in install. > rpmlint says: > E: varnish-debuginfo empty-debuginfo-package Ah, I had a %debug_package %{nil} in my .rpmmacros, som I didn't catch this one with rpmlint. Fixed. > 3. Don't use $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot}. OK, fixed. > 4. You might use for the Source0 url something like: > http://downloads.sourceforge.net/varnish/varnish-%{version}.tar.gz > Not a blocker, but nice to not point to a specific mirror. OK, fixed. > 5. You shouldn't need to specify Buildroot for each of the > subpackages. It should pick that up from the top. I think the > comment above was about "BuildRequires", not "Buildroot". Also, no > need for another URL tag for the subpackages. OK, fixed > 6. Do you need to ship static libs? They are discouraged in Fedora > for a variety of reasons. Do you know anything that links to just > the static libs? Or can we remove them for now and readd a -static > subpackage later if someone requests? Yep, removed. > 7. Subpackages shouldn't also need to duplicate all the doc files: > %doc INSTALL LICENSE README ChangeLog redhat/README.redhat OK, added only the LICENCE file to avoid the "no documentation" warning from rpmlint. > Perhaps they should just be in the main package since the others require it? Yep, that sounds reasonable > Also, no need to include the INSTALL file, since people reading here will be > installing via the rpm. ;) That is not necessarily true. The INSTALL file may contain information which could inspire users to compile a version of varnish on their own. Which is not a bad thing. I kept the INSTALL file. > 8. Does the description in the main package need to have all the > links and copyright info? It's just a dump of the README, so no problem in trimming it down a bit. > 9. Should remove the > /sbin/chkconfig --list varnish > in %post. rpms shouldn't have any output when installing. Also > missing some requires for the init script handling, suggest: > > Requires(post): /sbin/chkconfig > Requires(preun): /sbin/chkconfig > Requires(preun): /sbin/service OK, fixed as proposed. > 10. You need to own the /etc/varnish directory... > %dir %{_sysconfdir}/varnish/ OK, fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 19:30:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 15:30:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226326] Merge Review: puretls In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171930.l3HJUwaJ024033@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: puretls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226326 ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-04-17 15:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > > > X verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do) > > Please specify URL/instructions for the Source0 src tar ball. md5sum matches with upstream. > > X skim the summary and description for typos, etc. > > Do we need to mention the company in the description? > Fixed, having the company information in there doesn't really give anything to > the description. > OK. > > * if possible, replace PreReq with Requires(pre) and/or Requires(post) > > X specfile is legible > > - Please get rid of the section > > - Isn't the pre-release tag 0.1.%{beta}.5jpp.1%{?dist}? (note the .1 after 0) > Oh, good catch, this has been fixed Great! > > X consider using cp -p to preserve timestamps > > please use cp -p on line 139 > Done > > > X run rpmlint on the binary RPMs > > [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 ~]$ rpmlint > > > /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/puretls-0.9-0.b5.5jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm > > W: puretls non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java > > [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 ~]$ rpmlint > > > /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/puretls-debuginfo-0.9-0.b5.5jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm > > [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 ~]$ rpmlint > > > /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/puretls-demo-0.9-0.b5.5jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm > > W: puretls-demo non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java > > W: puretls-demo no-documentation > > [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 ~]$ rpmlint > > > /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/puretls-javadoc-0.9-0.b5.5jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm > > W: puretls-javadoc non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java > > The groups ones are OK, does the demo subpackage has any doc? > The demo package depends on the main package which contains all the licensing > doc information. The actual docs for how to use the demo package is in the > INSTALL file (which for obvious reasons should not be included). I have created > a new README file from INSTALL that explains how to use the demo. Please mark it as %doc. > > > New SRPM: > https://mwringe.108.redhat.com/files/documents/175/346/puretls-0.9-0.1.b5.5jpp.1.src.rpm [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 review]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/puretls-0.9-0.1.b5.5jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm W: puretls non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java W: puretls incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.9-0.b5.5jpp.1 0.9-0.1.b5.5jpp.1.fc7 Please fix the incoherent version in changelog warning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 19:40:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 15:40:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236816] New: hal-info review Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236816 Summary: hal-info review Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: mclasen at redhat.com ReportedBy: davidz at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package- review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com,rstrode at redhat.com As stated in bug 230707 we should split hal-info. Please see http://people.redhat.com/davidz/hal-info/ rpmlint output $ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/hal-info-20070402-1.noarch.rpm W: hal-info no-documentation W: hal-info invalid-license AFL/GPL both of these warnings can be waived I think. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 19:46:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 15:46:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226326] Merge Review: puretls In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171946.l3HJk6gH025972@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: puretls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226326 ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-04-17 15:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > (In reply to comment #2) > > > > > > X verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do) > > > Please specify URL/instructions for the Source0 src tar ball. > md5sum matches with upstream. > > > X skim the summary and description for typos, etc. > > > Do we need to mention the company in the description? > > Fixed, having the company information in there doesn't really give anything to > > the description. > > > OK. > > > * if possible, replace PreReq with Requires(pre) and/or Requires(post) > > > X specfile is legible > > > - Please get rid of the section > > > - Isn't the pre-release tag 0.1.%{beta}.5jpp.1%{?dist}? (note the .1 after 0) > > Oh, good catch, this has been fixed > Great! > > > X consider using cp -p to preserve timestamps > > > please use cp -p on line 139 > > Done > > > > > X run rpmlint on the binary RPMs > > > [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 ~]$ rpmlint > > > > > > /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/puretls-0.9-0.b5.5jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm > > > W: puretls non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java > > > [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 ~]$ rpmlint > > > > > > /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/puretls-debuginfo-0.9-0.b5.5jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm > > > [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 ~]$ rpmlint > > > > > > /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/puretls-demo-0.9-0.b5.5jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm > > > W: puretls-demo non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java > > > W: puretls-demo no-documentation > > > [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 ~]$ rpmlint > > > > > > /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/puretls-javadoc-0.9-0.b5.5jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm > > > W: puretls-javadoc non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java > > > The groups ones are OK, does the demo subpackage has any doc? > > The demo package depends on the main package which contains all the licensing > > doc information. The actual docs for how to use the demo package is in the > > INSTALL file (which for obvious reasons should not be included). I have created > > a new README file from INSTALL that explains how to use the demo. > Please mark it as %doc. done > > > > New SRPM: > > > https://mwringe.108.redhat.com/files/documents/175/346/puretls-0.9-0.1.b5.5jpp.1.src.rpm > > [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 review]$ rpmlint > /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/puretls-0.9-0.1.b5.5jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm > W: puretls non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java > W: puretls incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.9-0.b5.5jpp.1 0.9-0.1.b5.5jpp.1.fc7 > > Please fix the incoherent version in changelog warning. Fixed New srpm: https://mwringe.108.redhat.com/files/documents/175/346/puretls-0.9-0.1.b5.5jpp.1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 19:55:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 15:55:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236816] hal-info review In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704171955.l3HJtge8026803@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: hal-info review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236816 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-04-17 15:55 EST ------- - rpmlint output looks ok, those two warnings are waivable - package name is tarball name, ok - The version is a bit unusual, but thats the upstream versioning convention, so ok, I guess - spec file name is ok - packaging guidelines appear to be followed - license is ok To be continued... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 20:07:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 16:07:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226326] Merge Review: puretls In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704172007.l3HK77i1028306@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: puretls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226326 pcheung at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-04-17 16:07 EST ------- APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 20:08:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 16:08:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234790] Review Request: perl-Email-Abstract - Unified interface to mail representations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704172008.l3HK82VA028408@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Abstract - Unified interface to mail representations Alias: perl-Email-Abstract https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234790 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-17 16:08 EST ------- Built (and comma separated on commit), thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 20:08:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 16:08:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234784] Review Request: perl-Email-Date - Find and format date headers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704172008.l3HK84HL028437@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Date - Find and format date headers Alias: perl-Email-Date https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234784 Bug 234784 depends on bug 234790, which changed state. Bug 234790 Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Abstract - Unified interface to mail representations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234790 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 20:08:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 16:08:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234791] Review Request: perl-Email-Send - Module for sending email In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704172008.l3HK83r3028428@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Send - Module for sending email Alias: perl-Email-Send https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234791 Bug 234791 depends on bug 234790, which changed state. Bug 234790 Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Abstract - Unified interface to mail representations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234790 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 20:08:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 16:08:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234787] Review Request: perl-Email-Reply - Reply to an email message In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704172008.l3HK8Faa028471@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Reply - Reply to an email message Alias: perl-Email-Reply https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234787 Bug 234787 depends on bug 234790, which changed state. Bug 234790 Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Abstract - Unified interface to mail representations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234790 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 20:12:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 16:12:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226565] Merge Review: xmlrpc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704172012.l3HKCxiA028894@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xmlrpc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226565 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium mwringe at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mwringe at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-04-17 16:12 EST ------- updated srpm: https://mwringe.108.redhat.com/files/documents/175/348/xmlrpc-2.0.1-3jpp.3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 20:19:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 16:19:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234863] Review Request: perl-Mail-Box-Parser-C - Parsing folders for MailBox with C routines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704172019.l3HKJPST029441@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Box-Parser-C - Parsing folders for MailBox with C routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234863 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-17 16:19 EST ------- Built, thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 20:44:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 16:44:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231011] Review Request: cowpatty - Audit Wpa pre-shared keys In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704172044.l3HKiPTk032209@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cowpatty - Audit Wpa pre-shared keys https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231011 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-04-17 16:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > As state by Till, this package isn't very usefull! aircrack-ng seems better... > I will let Till decide weither to continue the review with the spec of him > or close the bug ... I never used cowpatty, because after I compiled it, I read the statement from the author, that it is not very useful. Currently, the only interesting (unique) feature of cowpatty, is that there are some precalculated hashes for wpa, that cannot be used aircrack-ng, yet. So if you have the time to test it, check how well these hashes http://www.renderlab.net/projects/WPA-tables/ work. If this works fine and the support is not included in aircrack-ng, yet (ticket: http://trac.aircrack-ng.org/ticket/23), then imho fedora would benefit from cowpatty. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 21:11:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 17:11:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226526] Merge Review: vim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704172111.l3HLBNm4001978@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: vim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226526 ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2007-04-17 17:11 EST ------- Hi Karsten, > ok, I'm now down to just a few warnings. > Most of them are like this one: > vim-common file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/ru.KOI8-R/man1/vimdiff.1.gz > This file isn't intented to be UTF8, it's KOI8-R encoded. That makes sense :-) > vim-enhanced and vim-X11 report dangling symlinks, but this becomes a normal > symlink when the required vim-common is installed. OK > vim -minimal has no documentation, I'd like to keep it this way. Maybe I'll add > the license, but nothing more. The License file would be nice. Just two small things: - vim-X11 BuildRequires libSM-devel, but that one is already required by libXt-devel - Requires: /usr/bin/desktop-file-install on line 305, replace /usr/bin with %{_bindir} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 21:18:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 17:18:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236504] Review Request: rhm - Red Hat Messaging extensions to qpid. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704172118.l3HLIu2N003086@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rhm - Red Hat Messaging extensions to qpid. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236504 nsantos at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 21:28:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 17:28:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236816] hal-info review In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704172128.l3HLSbkf004522@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: hal-info review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236816 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-04-17 17:28 EST ------- mustfix: - COPYING must be added as %doc - %install must rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT nice to have: - add AUTHORS, NEWS, ChangeLog to %doc - use recommended BuildRoot -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 21:54:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 17:54:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226276] Merge Review: perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704172154.l3HLscc5006628@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226276 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-04-17 17:54 EST ------- Looking at 5.8.8-16 in CVS, although not required in the strictest sense, I don't think it would be a bad idea to add a manual "Requires: perl(Test::Harness)" to perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker. That dependency is not automatically found by rpmbuild (see test_harness() in ExtUtils/Command/MM.pm), but is a feature that is indirectly used by a lot of module packages - with "make test", ExtUtils::MakeMaker runs t/*.t tests using Test::Harness which is prominently documented in the ExtUtils::MakeMaker man page. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 22:20:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 18:20:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236816] hal-info review In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704172220.l3HMKr9n007704@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: hal-info review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236816 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-04-17 18:20 EST ------- builds fine in mock -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 22:27:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 18:27:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231315] Review Request: fcgi - fastcgi development kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704172227.l3HMRX2X008126@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fcgi - fastcgi development kit Alias: fcgi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231315 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-04-17 18:27 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www-users.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de/~tmaas/fedora/fcgi.spec SRPM URL: http://www-users.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de/~tmaas/fedora/repo/fcgi-2.4.0-2.src.rpm $ rpmlint fcgi-2.4.0-2.src.rpm W: fcgi strange-permission fcgi-autogen.sh 0775 this is because of my build setup where everything in SOURCES must be group-writable. This will change, when I import the package to Fedora SCM. W: fcgi patch-not-applied Patch1: fcgi-2.4.0-configure.in.patch W: fcgi patch-not-applied Patch2: fcgi-2.4.0-Makefile.am-CPPFLAGS.patch As described in the .spec file, these patches are used to generate the source tarball. Because autoconf should (must?) not be run within rpmbuild, they cannot be applied within the build. changelog: - add some documentation - add mkdir ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} to %%install - install man-pages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 22:43:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 18:43:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704172243.l3HMhNYi008966@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 math02084 at math.aegean.gr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |math02084 at math.aegean.gr ------- Additional Comments From math02084 at math.aegean.gr 2007-04-17 18:43 EST ------- Any solution for the texlive binaries compilation error (statically freetype linking) ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 22:50:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 18:50:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234812] Review Request: tcpreplay - Replay captured network traffic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704172250.l3HMo4cQ009473@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcpreplay - Replay captured network traffic Alias: tcpreplay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234812 bojan at rexursive.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From bojan at rexursive.com 2007-04-17 18:50 EST ------- Thanks everyone involved for their help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 23:06:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 19:06:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234826] Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704172306.l3HN6jQn011659@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234826 ------- Additional Comments From fabrice at bellet.info 2007-04-17 19:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #8) > > > 7. Must include a .desktop file (please see > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop) > > > > Done. I added a .desktop file, but I didn't find a suitable icon, neither in the > > source tarball, nor in the fgfs-base package. Is it acceptable to ship a > > desktop file without icon ? > > It's VERY preferable to have the icon in place. Please take a look at this: > http://mail.flightgear.org/pipermail/flightgear-devel/2005-September/039106.html > http://jrbabcock.home.comcast.net/flightgear/icons/index.html > > Contact the author of this artwork and see if he will release it under a license > that allows you to use it (and include that license as well). Nice find. I contacted him, and he kindly provides the icons under the GPL license, and updated his web page accordingly. I added the icon to the desktop file, and included all available sizes. > > You also need to add this: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets?highlight=%28scriptlets%29#head-de6770dd9867fcd085a73a4700f6bcd0d10294ef done. > and > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets?highlight=%28scriptlets%29#head-7103f6c38d1b5735e8477bdd569ad73ea2c49bda done. New SPEC: http://fr2.rpmfind.net/pub/bellet/review/FlightGear.spec New SRPM: http://fr2.rpmfind.net/pub/bellet/review/FlightGear-0.9.10-6.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 23:08:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 19:08:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235588] Review Request: escape - an extensible puzzle game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704172308.l3HN8J6L012019@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: escape - an extensible puzzle game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235588 ------- Additional Comments From adam at spicenitz.org 2007-04-17 19:08 EST ------- New version: http://www.spicenitz.org/fedora/escape.spec http://www.spicenitz.org/fedora/escape-200704130-3.fc7.src.rpm Changes: - REALLY fix spurious-executable-perm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 23:29:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 19:29:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236849] New: Review Request: lcdpro - LCDproc displays real-time system information on a 20x4 backlit LCD Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236849 Summary: Review Request: lcdpro - LCDproc displays real-time system information on a 20x4 backlit LCD Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/lcdpro/lcdproc.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/lcdpro/lcdproc-0.5.1-1.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Description: LCDproc displays real-time system information on a 20x4 backlit LCD There is still a need to tweak init scripts W: lcdproc no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/LCDd W: lcdproc service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/LCDd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 17 23:41:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 19:41:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226399] Merge Review: scim-tables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704172341.l3HNfFpg013924@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: scim-tables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226399 ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2007-04-17 19:41 EST ------- Please feel free to let me know if there are any assistance required. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 00:32:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 20:32:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236854] New: Review Request: python-kaa-base - The Kaa Media is a set of python modules related to media Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236854 Summary: Review Request: python-kaa-base - The Kaa Media is a set of python modules related to media Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/python-kaa/python-kaa-base.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/python-kaa/python-kaa-base-0.1.2-1.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Description: The Kaa Media is a set of python modules related to media Some other package to come, it may also need pylirc. (and pygtk2 ?!) How to check all required python packages ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 00:36:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 20:36:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236816] hal-info review In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704180036.l3I0a8g9017093@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: hal-info review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236816 ------- Additional Comments From davidz at redhat.com 2007-04-17 20:35 EST ------- Fixed but mustfix and nice-to-have items mentioned in comment 2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 00:40:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 20:40:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236816] hal-info review In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704180040.l3I0eCEr017489@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: hal-info review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236816 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-04-17 20:39 EST ------- good to go then. approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 00:57:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 20:57:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234826] Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704180057.l3I0v6Jo018668@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234826 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-17 20:56 EST ------- ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 01:07:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 21:07:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225810] Merge Review: gnome-applets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704180107.l3I17o54019029@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-applets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225810 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 01:08:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 21:08:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236856] New: Review Request: brlcad - BRL-CAD is a powerful constructive solid geometry modeler Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236856 Summary: Review Request: brlcad - BRL-CAD is a powerful constructive solid geometry modeler Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/brlcad/brlcad.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/brlcad/brlcad-7.10.0-1.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Description: BRL-CAD is a powerful constructive solid geometry modeler This is the "workin progress version" i use for brlcad! Currently it do not build because of some *** buffer overflow detected *** See: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/brlcad/build.log It also requires tcl/tk 0.8.5 unless it build with the internal version... TODO:for BR tkimg (1.3 is needed, it suppose to take svn snapshoot) openNURBS (0.4.0 wip) Make it build with system libs current status: not building -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 01:09:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 21:09:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236856] Review Request: brlcad - BRL-CAD is a powerful constructive solid geometry modeler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704180109.l3I19o1e019159@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brlcad - BRL-CAD is a powerful constructive solid geometry modeler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236856 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |160441 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 01:37:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 21:37:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230275] Review Request: varnish - High-performance HTTP accelerator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704180137.l3I1bVN7020343@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: varnish - High-performance HTTP accelerator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230275 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-04-17 21:37 EST ------- 1. ok, looks good. 2. ok. looks good. 3. ok. looks good. 4. ok. looks good. 5. ok. looks good. 6. ok on static libs, but did you really want to disable the dynamic libs as well? Does anything known link against the varnish dynamic libs? Is there a reason to not ship them? 7. ok. looks good. You shouldn't need the LICENSE in all the subpackages, but it's not a blocker if you want to do so. The rpmlint warning about no docs can be ignored for devel subpackages. If you really want to ship the INSTALL thats fine I would think. 8. ok. looks good. 9. ok. looks good. 10. ok. looks good. So the only final question I see here is if the devel package should be shipped or not. It's only the static libs that are reccomended against, not the dynamic ones. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 01:51:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 21:51:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230394] Review Request: mysql++ - C++ wrapper for the MySQL C API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704180151.l3I1pMR4020834@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql++ - C++ wrapper for the MySQL C API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230394 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lxtnow at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 01:58:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 21:58:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236816] hal-info review In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704180158.l3I1w9QC021277@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: hal-info review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236816 davidz at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Fixed In Version| |20070402-1 ------- Additional Comments From davidz at redhat.com 2007-04-17 21:57 EST ------- Thanks for the review. I've got Fedora releng to add'n'tag this for Fedora 7 so closing this bug. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 02:30:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 22:30:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235527] Review Request: python-libacl - POSIX.1e ACLs library wrapper for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704180230.l3I2U0hQ023333@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-libacl - POSIX.1e ACLs library wrapper for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235527 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-04-17 22:29 EST ------- I'd be happy to review this package. Look for a full review in a bit here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 02:37:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 22:37:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225983] Merge Review: less In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704180237.l3I2bMJ9023757@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: less https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225983 ed at eh3.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review?, |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(ed at eh3.com) | ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2007-04-17 22:37 EST ------- My apologies for taking so long to get back to this! All issues are fixed in less-394-9.fc7. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 02:44:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 22:44:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235527] Review Request: python-libacl - POSIX.1e ACLs library wrapper for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704180244.l3I2iH4g024386@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-libacl - POSIX.1e ACLs library wrapper for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235527 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-04-17 22:44 EST ------- See below - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPL) OK - License field in spec matches See below - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 5c06b62ca4ee453042c9fa3f28aa56e8 pylibacl-0.2.1.tar.bz2 5c06b62ca4ee453042c9fa3f28aa56e8 pylibacl-0.2.1.tar.bz2.1 OK - BuildRequires correct See below - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. Is the name right here? According to the guidelines if the upstream has 'py' in it you can just use that name: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-8756a3bce652c376d7ba3908461b638784b6952d so perhaps pylibacl would be acceptable instead of python-libacl? 2. Upstream doesn't seem to active, but you might ask if they can include a copy of the GPL with the package. Not a blocker. 3. The Source URL should probibly be: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/pylibacl/pylibacl-%{version}.tar.bz2 4. Do you need the %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) or does a normal %defattr(-,root,root,-) Install files with the correct permissions? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 02:53:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 22:53:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233236] Review Request: epel-release EPEL repository configuration and setup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704180253.l3I2rtOa025014@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: epel-release EPEL repository configuration and setup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233236 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-04-17 22:53 EST ------- This package appears to be in now... can we close this review request? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 03:14:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 23:14:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235526] Review Request: python-xattr - Extended attributes library wrapper for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704180314.l3I3EPWO026166@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-xattr - Extended attributes library wrapper for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235526 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-04-17 23:14 EST ------- See below - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPL) OK - License field in spec matches See below - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: c2c28332bbeefc2cf0627ecb4c10c9b0 pyxattr-0.2.1.tar.gz c2c28332bbeefc2cf0627ecb4c10c9b0 pyxattr-0.2.1.tar.gz.1 OK - BuildRequires correct See below - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. Is the name right here? According to the guidelines if the upstream has 'py' in it you can just use that name: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-8756a3bce652c376d7ba3908461b638784b6952d so perhaps pyxattr would be acceptable instead of python-xattr? 2. Upstream doesn't seem to active, but you might ask if they can include a copy of the GPL with the package. Not a blocker. 3. The Source URL should probibly be: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/pyxattr/pyxattr-%{version}.tar.gz 4. Do you need the %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) or does a normal %defattr(-,root,root,-) Install files with the correct permissions? 5. What is the #Packager removed due to FE requirements comment about? (This also applies to the pylibacl too) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 03:20:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 23:20:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235895] Review Request: perl-Text-Aspell - spell check interface for perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704180320.l3I3KeF8026569@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Aspell - spell check interface for perl Alias: perl-Text-Aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235895 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 03:21:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 23:21:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235895] Review Request: perl-Text-Aspell - spell check interface for perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704180321.l3I3L6Jk026618@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Aspell - spell check interface for perl Alias: perl-Text-Aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235895 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-17 23:21 EST ------- I question the explicit dependency on the aspell package, as the resulting binary rpm has a versioned library dependency aspell provides. However, it does not appear to be a blocker. + source files match upstream: a456444cb3320634e218426273227cb4 Text-Aspell-0.07.tar.gz a456444cb3320634e218426273227cb4 ../Text-Aspell-0.07.tar.gz + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license field matches the actual license. + license is open source-compatible. (GPL or Artistic) License text not included upstream. + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. + %clean is present. + package installs properly + debuginfo package looks complete. + rpmlint is silent. O final provides and requires are sane: ** perl-Text-Aspell-0.07-2.fc6.x86_64.rpm == rpmlint == provides Aspell.so()(64bit) perl(Text::Aspell) = 0.07 perl-Text-Aspell = 0.07-2.fc6 == requires aspell >= 0.50.1 libaspell.so.15()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(DynaLoader) perl(vars) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) ** perl-Text-Aspell-debuginfo-0.07-2.fc6.x86_64.rpm == rpmlint == provides Aspell.so.debug()(64bit) perl-Text-Aspell-debuginfo = 0.07-2.fc6 == requires + %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=19, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.19 cusr + 0.06 csys = 0.25 CPU) + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets present. + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. + no headers. + no pkgconfig files. + no libtool .la droppings. + not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 03:22:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 23:22:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235895] Review Request: perl-Text-Aspell - spell check interface for perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704180322.l3I3M5nv026695@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Aspell - spell check interface for perl Alias: perl-Text-Aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235895 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 03:28:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 23:28:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231774] Review Request: perl-DBIx-POS - Define a dictionary of SQL statements in a POD dialect (POS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704180328.l3I3SEcD027012@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-POS - Define a dictionary of SQL statements in a POD dialect (POS) Alias: perl-DBIx-POS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231774 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-17 23:28 EST ------- SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-DBIx-POS-0.03-2.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-DBIx-POS.spec (In reply to comment #1) > === Issues === > 1. Missing BR perl(YAML). Fixed, at above links :) > 2. There are two licenses that apply to this module. The first is "GPL or > Artistic" but the second is only "Artistic". I think you need to change your > license tag to be just "Artistic". Well, this module (as most of the perl world) is indeed dual-licensed. While the module itself is a touch misleading when it comes to this, one is the GPL, the other is Artistic... Hence the license tag GPL or Artistic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 03:31:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 23:31:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234326] Review Request: bandsaw - A syslog monitoring program for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704180331.l3I3VEhY027184@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bandsaw - A syslog monitoring program for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234326 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bjohnson at symetrix.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-17 23:31 EST ------- Doesn't mock build. checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no checking for gconftool-2... /usr/bin/gconftool-2 Using config source xml:merged:/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults for schema installation Using $(sysconfdir)/gconf/schemas as install directory for schema files checking for scrollkeeper-config... no configure: error: Couldn't find scrollkeeper-config. Please install the scrollkeeper package: http://scrollkeeper.sourceforge.net error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.60534 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.60534 (%build) Error building package from bandsaw-0.3.0-1.fc6.src.rpm, See build log ending done Also, I noticed that you don't have a call to update-desktop-database in %post and %postun. Please see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets?highlight=%28scriptlets%29#head-de6770dd9867fcd085a73a4700f6bcd0d10294ef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 03:38:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 23:38:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231774] Review Request: perl-DBIx-POS - Define a dictionary of SQL statements in a POD dialect (POS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704180338.l3I3cqWX027640@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-POS - Define a dictionary of SQL statements in a POD dialect (POS) Alias: perl-DBIx-POS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231774 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-17 23:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Well, this module (as most of the perl world) is indeed dual-licensed. While > the module itself is a touch misleading when it comes to this, one is the GPL, > the other is Artistic... Hence the license tag GPL or Artistic. I want to make sure we are talking about the same thing. I'm speaking specifically of these lines in the README: The instance routine is from Andy Wardley's Class::Singleton, and carries the following copyright and license. Copyright (C) 1998 Canon Research Centre Europe Ltd. All Rights Reserved. This module is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the term of the Perl Artistic License. If you set the license tag to "GPL or Artistic" it is misleading in that the entire package is not "GPL or Artistic", however, it can be entirely licensed as "Artistic". But if in your opinion you have the right info in the tag, I'm willing to go with that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 04:15:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 00:15:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223657] Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704180415.l3I4F9v3030031@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223657 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 04:48:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 00:48:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226276] Merge Review: perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704180448.l3I4mLmf030966@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226276 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-18 00:48 EST ------- MUSTFIX: The *-16 in CVS still suffers from the "broken epoch" bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 04:55:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 00:55:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225783] Merge Review: gdb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704180455.l3I4tZa9031238@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gdb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225783 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-18 00:55 EST ------- Ping? Still no fixed spec nor src.rpm available. If this was a community Review Request, I'd now start a one week timer after which I'd close this PR as FAILED due to submitter disinterest/non-cooperativeness. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 05:11:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 01:11:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223486] Review Request: happy - Haskell parser generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704180511.l3I5BOQH031942@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: happy - Haskell parser generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223486 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2007-04-18 01:11 EST ------- In devel now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 05:11:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 01:11:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223490] Review Request: alex - The lexer generator for Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704180511.l3I5BamE031970@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alex - The lexer generator for Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223490 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Bug 223490 depends on bug 223486, which changed state. Bug 223486 Summary: Review Request: happy - Haskell parser generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223486 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 05:16:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 01:16:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229728] Review Request: polyml - Poly/ML compiler and runtime system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704180516.l3I5GFnc032101@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polyml - Poly/ML compiler and runtime system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229728 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bos at serpentine.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 05:36:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 01:36:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229728] Review Request: polyml - Poly/ML compiler and runtime system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704180536.l3I5aCLh000793@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polyml - Poly/ML compiler and runtime system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229728 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2007-04-18 01:36 EST ------- Here is my review. MUST: + rpmlint looks acceptable. W: polyml devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libpolyml.so W: polyml devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libpolymain.a W: polyml-libs no-documentation + Meets packaging guidelines. + Name of spec file is OK. + License is OK (LGPL). + License file content matches license. + License file is in both source package and %doc. + Spec file is in English. + Spec file is legible. + md5sums match. + Builds on x86_64. + BuildRequires looks OK. + Locales not an issue, since not used. + ldconfig is run correctly for -libs package. + Not relocatable. + Directory ownership OK. + No duplicate file names. + File permissions look OK. + %clean is present. + Macro use is consistent. + Package contents are permissible. + Docs are in -doc package. + Docs don't affect runtime. + Headers are in -devel package. + No libtool turds. + No incorrect directory ownership. + %install cleans buildroot. + File names are UTF-8. Don't follow MUST guidelines, but acceptable since this is a compiler: ? Static library is not in -static package. ? The symlink %{_libdir}/libpolyml.so in the main package refers to libpolyml.so.0.0.0 in the -libs package. Accordingly, package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 06:23:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 02:23:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230275] Review Request: varnish - High-performance HTTP accelerator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704180623.l3I6NgZM001961@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: varnish - High-performance HTTP accelerator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230275 ------- Additional Comments From ingvar at linpro.no 2007-04-18 02:23 EST ------- * Kevin Fenzi > 6. ok on static libs, but did you really want to disable the dynamic > libs as well? Does anything known link against the varnish dynamic libs? > Is there a reason to not ship them? The dynamic libraries are there allright. I just removed the ".so" symlinks that points to them. These symlinks are usually part of the -devel package in redhat-based systems, it I have understood correctly. Varnish itself links to the main-versioned symlink. $ ls -l /usr/lib64/*varnish*so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 22 feb 28 14:17 /usr/lib64/libvarnishapi.so -> libvarnishapi.so.0.0.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 feb 28 14:17 /usr/lib64/libvarnish.so -> libvarnish.so.0.0.0 $ ldd /usr/sbin/varnishd | grep usr | cut -d '(' -f 1 libvarnish.so.0 => /usr/lib64/libvarnish.so.0 libvcl.so.0 => /usr/lib64/libvcl.so.0 So for varnish itself, the .so symlinks are not necessary, though they might be valuable if anybody want to develop things on top of varnish later. Thus, they might belong in a future -devel package. > 7. ok. looks good. You shouldn't need the LICENSE in all the > subpackages, but it's not a blocker if you want to do so. The > rpmlint warning about no docs can be ignored for devel subpackages. I get this warm fuzzy feeling when I get no errors or warnings, you see. Also note that "all the subpackages" at the moment counts one :-) > If you really want to ship the INSTALL thats fine I would think. Good > So the only final question I see here is if the devel package should > be shipped or not. Well, I don't know of anyone using varnish technology for anything but varnish, so for an initial release, I'd say it's not necessary. A devel package should perhaps include some header files and some hacking starting point docs too. If we can push it for later, I'll ask some of the developers for this. Ingvar -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 06:54:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 02:54:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233597] Review Request: pigment - Media Center Toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704180654.l3I6sJTG002915@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pigment - Media Center Toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233597 jspaleta at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|lxtnow at gmail.com |jspaleta at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-04-18 02:54 EST ------- okay those -rpath calls are false alarms, running a local build on x86 with check-rpaths doesn't abort. 0.1.5 APPROVED Looks good. I'm going to take assignment of this as the reviewer and flag it as approved. From the discussion on maintainers-list its pretty clear that this GPL exception falls into normal allowed license practices. + All build dependencies listed in BuildRequires, + Packages do not contain any .la libtool archives. + The package named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. contains shared library as well as python bindings... not strictly a python addon. + MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. + The package is licensed with GPL with special exception + License field in the package spec is GPL. + The sources used to build the package match the upstream source, http://elisa.fluendo.com/static/download/pigment/pigment-0.1.5.tar.gz md5sum d39000c031e35d5a5835343161ce4bf8 matches included source + rpmlint appears to return cleanly + The spec file name must match the base package %{name} + includes the text of the license(s) in %doc. + The spec file is in english-ese. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The package must successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on x86 developement using mock + no locales to worry about + ldconfig in %post and %postun. + package not relocatable + owns all directories that it creates. + no duplicate files in the %files listing. + Permissions on files set properly. + %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + consistent use of macros + The package contains code, or permissable content. + no doc subpackage. gtk-docs are placed in the -devel package + %doc items do not affect runtime + Header files are in a -devel package. + no statics + -devel package correctly 'Requires: pkgconfig' + library files that end in .so (without suffix) are in a -devel package. + devel packages requires the base package using a fully versioned dependency + No GUI apps + Doesn't duplicate directory or file ownership afaict + beginning of %install has rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 07:53:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 03:53:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236877] New: Review Request: perl-bioperl-run - Perl interface to various bioinformatics applications Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236877 Summary: Review Request: perl-bioperl-run - Perl interface to various bioinformatics applications Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: alexl at users.sourceforge.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://allele5.biol.berkeley.edu/~alex/fedora/perl-bioperl-run.spec SRPM URL: http://allele5.biol.berkeley.edu/~alex/fedora/perl-bioperl-run-1.5.2_100-1.src.rpm Description: Bioperl-run contain modules that provide a Perl interface to various bioinformatics applications. This allows various applications to be used with common Bioperl objects. There is no LICENSE file in the top-level directory, but each .pm file contains either: "You may distribute this module under the same terms as perl itself" "This module is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as Perl itself." which makes the license=GPL or Artistic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 08:25:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 04:25:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236642] Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704180825.l3I8PYv5009813@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236642 jspaleta at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jspaleta at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-04-18 04:25 EST ------- Okay initial review comments. Attached you will find an updated specfile which fixes some simple problems in the specfile and the important rpmlint error message concerning consolehelper symlink. Fixes in updated specfile: - remove makeinstall macro - add usermode and pam requires - make symlink to consolehelper relative path instead of absolute path - removed desktop-update-database scriptlets and associated deps Refer to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets One thing I can't easily fix is the SOURCE0 tag. Please refer to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL and follow the directions for Using Revision Control to add the appropriate comment blog which gives the necessary instructions to rebuild the source tarball locally. The goal is to provide the steps necessary for me to rebuild the tarball so that I can do the appropriate md5sum check for the tarball you have included. Please regenerate a new spec and srpm with these corrections and I should be able to run through the full formal review. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 08:27:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 04:27:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236642] Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704180827.l3I8Rcl6010059@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236642 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-04-18 04:27 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=152880) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=152880&action=view) Updated Spec with review inspired corrections This is an updated spec which includes corrections found during submission review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 08:33:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 04:33:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234826] Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704180833.l3I8XT4p010521@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234826 fabrice at bellet.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From fabrice at bellet.info 2007-04-18 04:33 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: FlightGear Short Description: The FlightGear Flight Simulator Owners: fabrice at bellet.info Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 09:20:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 05:20:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236877] Review Request: perl-bioperl-run - Perl interface to various bioinformatics applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704180920.l3I9KcDF013853@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-bioperl-run - Perl interface to various bioinformatics applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236877 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 09:21:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 05:21:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236877] Review Request: perl-bioperl-run - Perl interface to various bioinformatics applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704180921.l3I9LrC8013955@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-bioperl-run - Perl interface to various bioinformatics applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236877 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-18 05:21 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 0f3fb1589062e857aaf7d5523c18f5ba bioperl-run-1.5.2_100.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs nothing. +Provides: perl(Bio::Factory::EMBOSS) perl(Bio::Installer::Clustalw) perl(Bio::Installer::EMBOSS) perl(Bio::Installer::Generic) perl(Bio::Installer::Muscle) perl(Bio::Installer::PAML) perl(Bio::Installer::Probcons) perl(Bio::Installer::TCoffee) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::AbstractRunner) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Alignment::Amap) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Alignment::Blat) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Alignment::Clustalw) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Alignment::DBA) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Alignment::Exonerate) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Alignment::Kalign) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Alignment::Lagan) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Alignment::MAFFT) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Alignment::Muscle) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Alignment::Probalign) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Alignment::Probcons) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Alignment::Sim4) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Alignment::StandAloneFasta) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Alignment::TCoffee) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Analysis) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Analysis::Job) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Analysis::Job::soap) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Analysis::Utils) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Analysis::soap) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::AnalysisFactory) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::AnalysisFactory::Pise) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::AnalysisFactory::soap) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Cap3) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Coil) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::EMBOSSApplication) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::EMBOSSacd) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Eponine) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::FootPrinter) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Genewise) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Genscan) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Hmmer) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::JavaRunner) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Mdust) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Phrap) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Phylo::Forester::SDI) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Phylo::LVB) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Phylo::Molphy::ProtML) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Phylo::PAML::Baseml) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Phylo::PAML::Codeml) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Phylo::PAML::Evolver) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Phylo::PAML::Yn00) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Phylo::Phylip::Base) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Phylo::Phylip::Consense) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Phylo::Phylip::DrawGram) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Phylo::Phylip::DrawTree) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Phylo::Phylip::Neighbor) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Phylo::Phylip::PhylipConf) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Phylo::Phylip::ProtDist) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Phylo::Phylip::ProtPars) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Phylo::Phylip::SeqBoot) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::CSR) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::Puzzle) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::abiview) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::addquart) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::align2model) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::alistat) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::antigenic) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::assp) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::backtranseq) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::bambe) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::banana) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::bionj) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::biosed) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::bl2seq) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::blast2) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::blimps) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::blimps_block) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::blimps_matrix) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::boxshade) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::btwisted) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::cai) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::cap) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::cds) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::chaos) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::charge) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::checktrans) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::chips) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::cirdna) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::clique) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::clustalw) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::clustalw_convert) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::codcmp) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::coderet) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::codnocod) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::codontree) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::codonw) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::comalign) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::combat) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::compseq) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::con_filter) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::confmat) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::cons) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::consense) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::consensus) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::cpgplot) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::cpgreport) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::cusp) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::cutseq) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::dan) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::dca) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::decorate) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::degapseq) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::descseq) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::dialign2) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::diffseq) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::digest) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::distmat) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::distquart) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::dnadist) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::dnapars) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::dollop) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::domainer) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::dotmatcher) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::dotpath) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::dottup) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::drawgram) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::drawpyr) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::drawtree) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::dreg) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::druid) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::dsc) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::dssp) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::einverted) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::emma) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::emowse) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::environ) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::eprimer3) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::equicktandem) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::est2genome) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::etandem) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::extractfeat) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::extractseq) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::fasta) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::fastdnaml) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::fastrna) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::filtersites) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::findkm) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::fitch) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::fmtseq) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::freak) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::fuzznuc) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::fuzzpro) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::fuzztran) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::gb2xml) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::geecee) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::genscan) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::getblock) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::getorf) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::gff2ps) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::gibbs) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::gibbs_scan) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::golden) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::grailclnt) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::gruppi) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::helixturnhelix) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::hmmalign) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::hmmbuild) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::hmmcalibrate) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::hmmconvert) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::hmmemit) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::hmmer2sam) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::hmmfetch) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::hmmpfam) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::hmmscore) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::hmmsearch) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::hmoment) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::homology) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::html4blast) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::iep) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::infoalign) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::infoseq) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::interface) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::isochore) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::kitsch) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::lassap) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::lindna) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::listor) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::loadseq) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::lvb) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::makehist) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::map) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::marscan) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::maskfeat) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::maskseq) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::matcher) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::megamerger) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::melting) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::merger) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::mfold) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::mix) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::modelfromalign) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::most) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::mreps) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::msa) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::msbar) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::mspcrunch) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::mview_alig) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::mview_blast) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::mwfilter) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::needle) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::neighbor) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::newcpgreport) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::newcpgseek) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::newseq) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::njdist) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::nnssp) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::notseq) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::nrscope) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::nthseq) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::octanol) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::oddcomp) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::palindrome) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::pam) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::parciquart) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::pars) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::pasteseq) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::patmatdb) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::patmatmotifs) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::patser) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::pdbsearch) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::pepcoil) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::pepinfo) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::pepnet) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::pepstats) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::pepwheel) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::pepwindow) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::pepwindowall) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::pestfind) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::pftools) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::phiblast) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::phyml) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::pima) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::plotcon) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::plotorf) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::plsearch) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::polydot) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::pratt) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::predator) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::preg) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::prettyalign) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::prettyplot) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::prettyseq) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::primersearch) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::primo) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::prodom) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::profit) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::prophecy) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::prophet) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::prose) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::prot_nucml) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::protal2dna) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::protdist) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::protpars) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::pscan) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::psiblast) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::psort2) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::pyramids) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::pyreval) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::qstar) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::quicktree) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::readnexus) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::readseq) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::recoder) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::redata) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::remap) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::repeats) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::restover) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::restrict) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::revseq) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::rnadistance) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::rnaeval) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::rnafold) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::rnaga) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::rnaheat) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::rnainverse) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::rnapdist) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::rnasubopt) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::sam2hmmer) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::sampleseqs) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::saps) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::satellites) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::scan_for_matches) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::scope) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::scopparse) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::seqboot) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::seqgen) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::seqmatchall) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::seqsblast) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::seqstat) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::showalign) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::showfeat) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::showorf) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::showseq) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::shuffleseq) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::sigcleave) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::siggen) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::sigscan) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::silent) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::sirna) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::splitter) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::sreformat) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::stretcher) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::stride) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::stssearch) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::supermatcher) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::syco) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::tacg) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::tfscan) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::tipdate) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::tmap) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::toppred) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::tranalign) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::transeq) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::treealign) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::trimest) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::trimseq) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::trnascan) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::twofeat) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::unroot) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::vectorstrip) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::water) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::weighbor) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::whichdb) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::wise2) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::wobble) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::wordcount) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::wordmatch) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::wublast2) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::xblast) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseApplication::xpound) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseJob) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseJobParser) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::PiseWorkflow) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Primate) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Primer3) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Prints) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Profile) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Promoterwise) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Pseudowise) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::RepeatMasker) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Seg) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Signalp) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Tmhmm) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::TribeMCL) perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Vista) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 09:26:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 05:26:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236877] Review Request: perl-bioperl-run - Perl interface to various bioinformatics applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704180926.l3I9Q2Dt014290@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-bioperl-run - Perl interface to various bioinformatics applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236877 alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2007-04-18 05:25 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-bioperl-run Short Description: Perl interface to various bioinformatics applications Owners: alexl at users.sourceforge.net Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 09:29:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 05:29:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704180929.l3I9Tka8014506@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 ------- Additional Comments From mefoster at gmail.com 2007-04-18 05:29 EST ------- Some more modifications, now that I'm actually trying to use these packages myself. :) Changes for ice-java: - Put files into Java shared directory (/usr/share/java) - Optionally build IceGrid GUI (depends on jgoodies) - Optionally use java5 Changes for ice-arch: - Use RPM macros instead of /etc and /usr/bin (Thanks to Peter Lemenkov) - Suggestions from ZeroC forum (http://zeroc.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3095): - Use Python site-packages directory - Create "iceuser" user - Split /etc/init.d services into a separate sub-package - Follow guidelines from Fedora wiki about packaging Ruby - Use Ruby site-arch directory - Depend on ruby(abi) - Make sure to compile all Java files with -source 1.4 -target 1.4 The new spec files are in the same place. Here are the new SRPMS: http://www6.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/~foster/extras/ice/ice-3.2.0-3.src.rpm http://www6.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/~foster/extras/ice/ice-java-3.2.0-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 09:41:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 05:41:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235989] Review Request: python-biopython - Python tools for computational molecular biology In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704180941.l3I9fvxE015261@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-biopython - Python tools for computational molecular biology https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235989 alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2007-04-18 05:41 EST ------- Builds in devel and FC-6. Closing bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 09:43:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 05:43:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228298] Review Request: python-louie - Dispatches signals between Python objects in a wide variety of contexts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704180943.l3I9hXLm015406@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-louie - Dispatches signals between Python objects in a wide variety of contexts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228298 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-04-18 05:43 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-louie Short Description: Dispatches signals between Python objects in a wide variety of contexts Owners: matthias at rpmforge.net Branches: devel FC-6 FC-5 EL-5 EL-4 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 09:44:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 05:44:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233597] Review Request: pigment - Media Center Toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704180944.l3I9itv1015541@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pigment - Media Center Toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233597 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-04-18 05:44 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pigment Short Description: Media Center Toolkit Owners: matthias at rpmforge.net Branches: devel FC-6 EL-5 (only the most current branches as Elisa won't make much sense on old releases) InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 09:50:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 05:50:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228301] Review Request: python-nevow - Web application construction kit written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704180950.l3I9oD2w015933@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-nevow - Web application construction kit written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228301 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-04-18 05:50 EST ------- I'm not seeing any more EOL encoding issues. Are you sure you reviewed the 0.9.18-2 package and not the 0.9.18-1 one? Could you copy/paste your rpmlint output so that I know for which files it is? All I get is this : E: python-nevow zero-length /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/nevow/test/test_package/Foo/Baz/Quux.js E: python-nevow zero-length /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/nevow/test/test_package/Foo/Bar.js Which are both harmless, and removing those files could only mean breaking some tests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 09:53:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 05:53:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233455] Review Request: autodir - Creates user directories on demand In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704180953.l3I9ruQC016205@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autodir - Creates user directories on demand https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233455 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-04-18 05:53 EST ------- Spec URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/autodir/autodir.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/autodir/autodir-0.99.9-1.src.rpm * Wed Apr 18 2007 Matthias Saou 0.99.9-1 - Update to 0.99.9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 10:11:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 06:11:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236642] Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704181011.l3IABgI9017490@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236642 ------- Additional Comments From kanarip at kanarip.com 2007-04-18 06:11 EST ------- Thank you for taking the time to review our package. Updated Source RPM: http://revisor.fedoraunity.org/releases/revisor-2.0/revisor-2.0.1-3.fc7.src.rpm Updated Spec file: http://revisor.fedoraunity.org/releases/revisor-2.0/revisor.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 10:31:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 06:31:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704181031.l3IAV451018153@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556 ------- Additional Comments From karsten at redhat.com 2007-04-18 06:30 EST ------- What's the status of this package ? I'd really like to see it in Fedora as soon as possible. It seems to be quite stable on 32bit but needs some work on 64bit. More public exposure/testing would probably help a lot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 10:31:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 06:31:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236856] Review Request: brlcad - BRL-CAD is a powerful constructive solid geometry modeler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704181031.l3IAV4aK018161@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brlcad - BRL-CAD is a powerful constructive solid geometry modeler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236856 lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-04-18 06:30 EST ------- > BuildRequires: xorg-x11-server-Xorg > BuildRequires: xorg-x11-server-Xdmx Does it really requires X-server for compiling? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 10:45:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 06:45:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228186] Review Request: gsm - Shared libraries for GSM speech compressor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704181045.l3IAjkoM018737@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gsm - Shared libraries for GSM speech compressor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228186 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-04-18 06:45 EST ------- "ladspa-swh-plugins" in Extras contains a copy of gsm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 11:47:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 07:47:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233236] Review Request: epel-release EPEL repository configuration and setup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704181147.l3IBle5R021943@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: epel-release EPEL repository configuration and setup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233236 mastahnke at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 11:59:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 07:59:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228301] Review Request: python-nevow - Web application construction kit written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704181159.l3IBxbYR023031@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-nevow - Web application construction kit written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228301 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-04-18 07:59 EST ------- Sorry, my rpmlint was broken, it gave me the same errors on both packages. Things fixed now. ---------- OK - rpmlint is silent from SRPM file. OK - rpmlint from RPM file: E: python-nevow zero-length /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/nevow/test/test_package/Foo/Baz/Quux.js E: python-nevow zero-length /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/nevow/test/test_package/Foo/Bar.js These are not a blocker and can be ignored. ----------- APPROUVED ----------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 12:01:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 08:01:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228303] Review Request: python-tag - Python bindings for TagLib to read and write music files tags In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704181201.l3IC1WrX023166@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-tag - Python bindings for TagLib to read and write music files tags https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228303 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-04-18 08:01 EST ------- Starting review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 12:02:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 08:02:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229321] Review Request: pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704181202.l3IC2Hnx023212@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229321 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-04-18 08:02 EST ------- BRs, MD5 and man8 issues fixed. Ralf's issues have been addressed. APPROVED. I'll start looking at 229322. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 12:09:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 08:09:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229321] Review Request :postgresql-pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704181209.l3IC9pCd023577@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request :postgresql-pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229321 devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: pgpool-II : |Review Request :postgresql- |Connection |pgpool-II : Connection |pooling/replication server |pooling/replication server |for PostgreSQL |for PostgreSQL Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2007-04-18 08:09 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pgpool-II Short Description: Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL Owners: devrim at CommandPrompt.com Branches: FC-5 FC-6 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: devrim at CommandPrompt.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 12:31:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 08:31:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223657] Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704181231.l3ICVNqL024588@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223657 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 12:42:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 08:42:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228301] Review Request: python-nevow - Web application construction kit written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704181242.l3ICgdRZ025155@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-nevow - Web application construction kit written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228301 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-04-18 08:42 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-nevow Short Description: Web application construction kit written in Python Owners: matthias at rpmforge.net Branches: devel FC-6 FC-5 EL-5 EL-4 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 12:56:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 08:56:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235588] Review Request: escape - an extensible puzzle game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704181256.l3ICuLqn026283@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: escape - an extensible puzzle game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235588 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-04-18 08:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > > - REALLY fix spurious-executable-perm > Confirmed. :) Builds on FC6 1386. BRs are good. No shared libs. Not relocatable. ISSUE: Ownership is OK, except for the .desktop line. It should own it's own desktop file, not all of them (*.desktop). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 13:04:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 09:04:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229322] Review Request: pgpool-ha : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704181304.l3ID4xLG027291@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool-ha : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229322 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 13:28:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 09:28:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229322] Review Request: pgpool-ha : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704181328.l3IDSCdV029657@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool-ha : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229322 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-04-18 09:27 EST ------- ISSUES: BuildRequires = heartbeat-devel Build error: usr/bin/install -c -m 755 pgpool /usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/heartbeat/ /usr/bin/install: cannot create regular file `/usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/heartbeat/pgpool': Permission denied make: *** [install] Error 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.4563 (%install) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.4563 (%install) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 13:44:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 09:44:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229322] Review Request: pgpool-ha : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704181344.l3IDi0B7031015@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool-ha : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229322 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2007-04-18 09:43 EST ------- Hi, New spec file: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/pgpool-II/postgresql-pgpool-ha.spec New SRPM: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/pgpool-II/postgresql-pgpool-ha-1.0.0-3.src.rpm I also removed Vendor tag, and added postgresql-pgpool-II as buildrequires. Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 13:54:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 09:54:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229322] Review Request: pgpool-ha : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704181354.l3IDsjXw031869@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool-ha : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229322 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-04-18 09:54 EST ------- Same build error. I have the BRs installed. It's trying to install pgpool to my actual /usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/heartbeat/, not the one in BuildRoot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 14:04:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 10:04:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226387] Merge Review: samba In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704181404.l3IE48vB032565@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: samba https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226387 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2007-04-18 10:04 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=152907) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=152907&action=view) proposed changes for winbind.init script some cosmetic changes (useful for {smb|nmb}.init too), plus rename subsys name to be matched with initscript name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 14:23:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 10:23:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232018] Review Request: perl-YAML-Syck - Fast, lightweight YAML loader and dumper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704181423.l3IENbFx001409@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-YAML-Syck - Fast, lightweight YAML loader and dumper Alias: perl-YAML-Syck https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232018 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-04-18 10:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > ping is this built? Not yet. I'm working on catching up this week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 14:24:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 10:24:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233256] Review Request: asc-music - Background music for the game asc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704181424.l3IEOAYp001489@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asc-music - Background music for the game asc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233256 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium musuruan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |musuruan at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 14:39:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 10:39:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 224365] Review Request: cdrkit - cdrtools replacement In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704181439.l3IEdHEa002696@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cdrkit - cdrtools replacement https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224365 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-04-18 10:38 EST ------- Everything like what has been posted to fab list and the other ticket. ;) Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 14:49:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 10:49:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228186] Review Request: gsm - Shared libraries for GSM speech compressor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704181449.l3IEnJfL003416@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gsm - Shared libraries for GSM speech compressor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228186 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-04-18 10:49 EST ------- xine-lib >= 1.1.5 in Extras contains one too. (I looked into changing it to use system libgsm, but some gsm's private things are being used so it doesn't look like a no-brainer.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 15:18:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 11:18:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226553] Merge Review: xdoclet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704181518.l3IFIxbn006276@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xdoclet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226553 mwringe at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pcheung at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 15:19:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 11:19:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226555] Merge Review: xerces-j2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704181519.l3IFJLYE006362@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xerces-j2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226555 mwringe at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pcheung at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 15:20:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 11:20:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226565] Merge Review: xmlrpc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704181520.l3IFKC4F006486@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xmlrpc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226565 mwringe at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pcheung at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 15:29:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 11:29:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234882] Review Request: libident - New LibIdent C library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704181529.l3IFTsuT007621@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libident - New LibIdent C library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234882 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-04-18 11:29 EST ------- Bad: - libident-tools subpackage should contains Requires: %{name} = %{version}.%{release} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 15:50:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 11:50:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225925] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-dbcp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704181550.l3IFoqvW009266@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-dbcp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225925 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-04-18 11:50 EST ------- Good: + Tar ball matches with upstream. bad: - Duplicated BRs Duplicate BuildRequires: xml-commons-apis (by ant), jpackage-utils (by ant) - Mock build fails This may take a while setup 0:jakarta-commons-pool-1.3-5jpp.1.x86_64 0:xml-commons-apis-1.3.02-0.b2.7jpp.10.x86_64 0:junit-3.8.2-3jpp.1.x86_64 No Package Found for jakarta-commons-pool-tomcat5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 16:05:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:05:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229728] Review Request: polyml - Poly/ML compiler and runtime system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704181605.l3IG5WHM010055@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polyml - Poly/ML compiler and runtime system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229728 gemi at bluewin.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2007-04-18 12:05 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: polyml Short Description: Poly/ML compiler and runtime system Owners: gemi at bluewin.ch Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: gemi at bluewin.ch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 16:16:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:16:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704181616.l3IGG5oG010772@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-04-18 12:16 EST ------- I can do another round of testing tonight with ppc32 and x86_64 rawhide. I don't have a handy i386/rawhide machine around right now. If someone out there could do some testing with i386/rawhide that would be great. The packaging itself is good to approve now, but I hate to have something in that doesn't work. ;( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 17:58:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 13:58:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704181758.l3IHwxtS017570@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From alain.portal at free.fr 2007-04-18 13:58 EST ------- Chitlesh, I added a patch for fr.po, commited the files, tag the branch, but I can't build from home. Please, could you do? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 18:35:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:35:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704181835.l3IIZWoX020730@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From thelusiv at gmail.com 2007-04-18 14:35 EST ------- One possible suggestion: mouse driving was broken in the Linux source release. We've since fixed it, it's very simple, just replace mouse.cpp with the one in SVN here: http://svn.vdrift.net/viewvc.py/trunk/src/mouse.cpp?revision=1638 Besides that, what's the status on this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 18:45:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:45:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236854] Review Request: python-kaa-base - The Kaa Media - base package for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704181845.l3IIjBAa022022@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-kaa-base - The Kaa Media - base package for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236854 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: python-kaa- |Review Request: python-kaa- |base - The Kaa Media is a |base - The Kaa Media - base |set of python modules |package for python |related to media | ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-04-18 14:45 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/python-kaa/python-kaa-base.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/python-kaa/python-kaa-base-0.1.3-1.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Description: The Kaa Media - base package for python Update to today release 1.3 fix removed shebang and sourced scripts perms -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 18:46:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:46:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236976] New: Review Request: python-kaa-imlib2 - The Kaa Media - imlib2 binding for python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236976 Summary: Review Request: python-kaa-imlib2 - The Kaa Media - imlib2 binding for python Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/python-kaa/python-kaa-imlib2.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/python-kaa/python-kaa-imlib2-0.2.1-1.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Description: The Kaa Media - imlib2 binding for python -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 18:48:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:48:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236977] New: Review Request: python-kaa-metadata - The Kaa Media - metadata binding for python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236977 Summary: Review Request: python-kaa-metadata - The Kaa Media - metadata binding for python Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/python-kaa/python-kaa-metadata.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/python-kaa/python-kaa-metadata-0.6.1-1.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Description: The Kaa Media - metadata binding for python -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 18:54:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:54:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221675] Review Request: zd1211-firmware - Firmware for wireless devices based on zd1211 chipset In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704181854.l3IIsAPA022622@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zd1211-firmware - Firmware for wireless devices based on zd1211 chipset https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221675 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-18 14:54 EST ------- Yeah. I don't like their choice of license, but it meets the Fedora criteria. A good lawyer could probably force them to deliver true source on this, but I'm not going to hold this up on that battle. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 18:56:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:56:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221675] Review Request: zd1211-firmware - Firmware for wireless devices based on zd1211 chipset In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704181856.l3IIuOF0022924@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zd1211-firmware - Firmware for wireless devices based on zd1211 chipset https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221675 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-04-18 14:56 EST ------- OK then. Approving. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 19:02:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:02:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230275] Review Request: varnish - High-performance HTTP accelerator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704181902.l3IJ2qL1023406@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: varnish - High-performance HTTP accelerator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230275 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-04-18 15:02 EST ------- >I get this warm fuzzy feeling when I get no errors or warnings, you >see. Also note that "all the subpackages" at the moment counts one :-) indeed. :) >Well, I don't know of anyone using varnish technology for anything but >varnish, so for an initial release, I'd say it's not necessary. A >devel package should perhaps include some header files and some >hacking starting point docs too. If we can push it for later, I'll ask >some of the developers for this. ok. Yeah, if you could talk to upstream about making a more fully featured devel package before shipping it, that would be great. I see no further blockers, so this package is APPROVED, and I would be happy to sponsor you. You can continue the process from: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#head-a601c13b0950a89568deafa65f505b4b58ee869b -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 19:07:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:07:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221675] Review Request: zd1211-firmware - Firmware for wireless devices based on zd1211 chipset In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704181907.l3IJ7evf023825@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zd1211-firmware - Firmware for wireless devices based on zd1211 chipset https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221675 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-04-18 15:07 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: zd1211-firmware Short Description: Firmware for wireless devices based on zd1211 chipset Owners: kwizart at gmail.com Branches: FC-5 FC-6 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 19:12:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:12:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221675] Review Request: zd1211-firmware - Firmware for wireless devices based on zd1211 chipset In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704181912.l3IJCCd0024236@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zd1211-firmware - Firmware for wireless devices based on zd1211 chipset https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221675 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-04-18 15:11 EST ------- Note - for *non*-modifyable firmware, we can't really have branches for earlier releases. This one should be OK, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 19:12:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:12:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234031] Review Request: eclipse-pydev - an Eclipse plugin for working with Python. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704181912.l3IJCIBK024258@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-pydev - an Eclipse plugin for working with Python. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234031 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium overholt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-04-18 15:12 EST ------- Sorry for taking so long to look at this. I've CC'd spot (and emailed him some of the back story) to get his take on the situation. (In reply to comment #20) > (In reply to comment #16) > > > > - plugins/org.python.pydev.jython_1.3.1/Lib. Where does the content of this > > directory come from? Is it necessary? If so, can we symlink it? Fabio says (copied from [1]): "All beneath org.python.pydev.jython/Lib come from jython 2.1. I just extracted it and bundled it in pydev (the jython guys probably have taken some of them from python). I don't think it's really safe to change those files, as it could break some things... that internal jython distribution is actually only used for jython scripting inside of pydev, but those scripts would have to be re-checked if an upgrade is done (I'd rather only do that update once jython 2.2 is stable)." So is it okay for us to include this separate copy? Jython's BSD and PyDev is EPL. What's python? If it's okay to include them from Fedora's standpoint (with the plan to symlink once jython 2.2 goes final) and from a legal POV, I'm okay with keeping them. > > - plugins/org.python.pydev_1.3.1/PySrc. What is the content of this directory? "The files from org.python.pydev/PySrc/ThirdParty are either from Bycicle repair man or ctypes (they are distributed in pydev, and executed under a separate shell)." We don't seem to have bicycle repairman or ctypes in Fedora. If the bits of those projects are necessary for non-testing purposes, can we include them for now and try to package those projects or do we need to package those projects first? > This is some auxiliary scripts that are used for running tests I believe. How much can we remove that's not testing-related? > > - plugins/org.python.pydev.jython_1.3.1/jysrc. Same questions as above. > > This is pydev's files, and they are jython scripts used to control pydev. Okay, great. > > - plugins/org.python.pydev.debug_1.3.1/pysrc. Same. > These seem to be pydev's own scripts. Okay, great. [1] http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=cfb578b20704060345n677f8a26u5e87bbc3a4a20c8%40mail.gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 19:17:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:17:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221675] Review Request: zd1211-firmware - Firmware for wireless devices based on zd1211 chipset In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704181917.l3IJHoL4024828@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zd1211-firmware - Firmware for wireless devices based on zd1211 chipset https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221675 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-04-18 15:17 EST ------- Noted. This note is important for Ralink's ones. If it is possible to have them in FC7?! I think it will be fine to add zd1211-firmware to the FC-7 collection if possible ? So that zd1211 devices can work "out of the box" and livecd team would be interested also... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 19:24:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:24:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704181924.l3IJObrI025572@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-04-18 15:24 EST ------- Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/extras/vdrift/vdrift.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/extras/vdrift/vdrift-20070323-4.src.rpm Patched. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 19:28:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:28:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221675] Review Request: zd1211-firmware - Firmware for wireless devices based on zd1211 chipset In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704181928.l3IJSET9026190@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zd1211-firmware - Firmware for wireless devices based on zd1211 chipset https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221675 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-04-18 15:28 EST ------- Since zd1211-firmware is GPL, it's ok for F7, FC6, FC5. ralink is non-GPL, so it's only OK for F7 and later (due to the EULA terms.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 19:56:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:56:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235527] Review Request: python-libacl - POSIX.1e ACLs library wrapper for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704181956.l3IJuSIk029451@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-libacl - POSIX.1e ACLs library wrapper for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235527 ------- Additional Comments From mszpak at wp.pl 2007-04-18 15:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > 1. Is the name right here? According to the guidelines if the upstream has > 'py' in it you can just use that name: (...) > so perhaps pylibacl would be acceptable instead of python-libacl? You are right. I missed a line about an exception. > 2. Upstream doesn't seem to active, but you might ask if they can include > a copy of the GPL with the package. Not a blocker. Ok, I will. > 3. The Source URL should probibly be: > http://downloads.sourceforge.net/pylibacl/pylibacl-%{version}.tar.bz2 Changed. > 4. Do you need the > %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) > or does a normal > %defattr(-,root,root,-) > Install files with the correct permissions? I like to define it explicitly, to make sure that strange mask in a system doesn't make a problem (like shared files available only by root). New links: http://timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/rpms/pylibacl/pylibacl.spec http://timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/rpms/pylibacl/pylibacl-0.2.1-4.src.rpm Thanks for your reviews -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 19:57:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:57:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235526] Review Request: python-xattr - Extended attributes library wrapper for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704181957.l3IJvJxc029613@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-xattr - Extended attributes library wrapper for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235526 ------- Additional Comments From mszpak at wp.pl 2007-04-18 15:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > 1. Is the name right here? According to the guidelines if the upstream has > 'py' in it you can just use that name: (...) > so perhaps pyxattr would be acceptable instead of python-xattr? You are right. I missed a line about an exception. > 2. Upstream doesn't seem to active, but you might ask if they can include > a copy of the GPL with the package. Not a blocker. Ok, I will. > 3. The Source URL should probibly be: > http://downloads.sourceforge.net/pyxattr/pyxattr-%{version}.tar.gz Changed. > 5. What is the > #Packager removed due to FE requirements > comment about? (This also applies to the pylibacl too) This spec file was originally made by Dag Wieers. I make a note that removed packager tag due to FE requirements not because I tried to descrease role of Dag in a package creation process. New links: http://timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/rpms/pyxattr/pyxattr.spec http://timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/rpms/pyxattr/pyxattr-0.2.1-2.src.rpm Thanks for your reviews -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 20:01:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 16:01:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226407] Merge Review: sendmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704182001.l3IK1SUH030038@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sendmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226407 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-04-18 16:01 EST ------- Warnung: Datei doppelt aufgelistet: /usr/share/sendmail-cf/README Warnung: Datei doppelt aufgelistet: /usr/share/sendmail-cf/sendmail.schema This means the files above are listed twice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 20:05:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 16:05:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226276] Merge Review: perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704182005.l3IK5tqG030458@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226276 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-04-18 16:05 EST ------- ok, added the Requires that Ville recommends in comment #22, and (I believe) fixed the epoch issue. The version is now 16.2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 20:11:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 16:11:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235527] Review Request: pylibacl - POSIX.1e ACLs library wrapper for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704182011.l3IKBPwr030937@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pylibacl - POSIX.1e ACLs library wrapper for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235527 mszpak at wp.pl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: python- |Review Request: pylibacl - |libacl - POSIX.1e ACLs |POSIX.1e ACLs library |library wrapper for python |wrapper for python ------- Additional Comments From mszpak at wp.pl 2007-04-18 16:11 EST ------- Changed package name in a bug summary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 20:11:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 16:11:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235526] Review Request: pyxattr - Extended attributes library wrapper for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704182011.l3IKBLjh030930@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyxattr - Extended attributes library wrapper for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235526 mszpak at wp.pl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: python-xattr|Review Request: pyxattr - |- Extended attributes |Extended attributes library |library wrapper for Python |wrapper for Python ------- Additional Comments From mszpak at wp.pl 2007-04-18 16:11 EST ------- Changed package name in a bug summary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 20:13:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 16:13:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236854] Review Request: python-kaa-base - The Kaa Media - base package for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704182013.l3IKDFQQ031036@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-kaa-base - The Kaa Media - base package for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236854 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |Jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-04-18 16:13 EST ------- Good: + Rpmlint quite for source rpm. + Local build works fine. + Rpmlint quited on binaries files. + License ok. + Package contains verbatin copy of the license. + Tar ball matches with upstream + Prpmlint quite on installed package + Local install and uninstall works fine. *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 20:25:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 16:25:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236976] Review Request: python-kaa-imlib2 - The Kaa Media - imlib2 binding for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704182025.l3IKP33d031784@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-kaa-imlib2 - The Kaa Media - imlib2 binding for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236976 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |Jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-04-18 16:25 EST ------- Good: + Naming seems ok. + Local build works fine. + Rpmlint quite on source rpm. + Rpmlint quite on binary rpm. + Rpmlint quite on Debuginfo rpm. + Rpmlint quite on installed package. + Local install and uninstall ok. + License ok. + Pakcage contains verbatin copy of the license. *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 20:32:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 16:32:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236854] Review Request: python-kaa-base - The Kaa Media - base package for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704182032.l3IKWcU0032401@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-kaa-base - The Kaa Media - base package for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236854 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-04-18 16:32 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-kaa-base Short Description: The Kaa Media - base package for python Owners: kwizart at gmail.com Branches: FC-6 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 20:33:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 16:33:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236977] Review Request: python-kaa-metadata - The Kaa Media - metadata binding for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704182033.l3IKXfgR032500@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-kaa-metadata - The Kaa Media - metadata binding for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236977 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |Jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-04-18 16:33 EST ------- Good: + Naming seems ok. + Tar ball matches with upstream. + Local build works fine. + Rpmlint quite on source package. + Rpmlint quite on binary package. + Rpmlint quite oh Debuginfo package. + Rpmlint quite on installed package. + License ok. + Package contains verbatin copy of the license text. * local install and uninstall works fine. *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 20:34:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 16:34:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236976] Review Request: python-kaa-imlib2 - The Kaa Media - imlib2 binding for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704182034.l3IKY6C5032540@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-kaa-imlib2 - The Kaa Media - imlib2 binding for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236976 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-04-18 16:34 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-kaa-imlib2 Short Description: The Kaa Media - imlib2 binding for python Owners: kwizart at gmail.com Branches: FC-6 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 20:36:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 16:36:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236977] Review Request: python-kaa-metadata - The Kaa Media - metadata binding for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704182036.l3IKaYNh000330@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-kaa-metadata - The Kaa Media - metadata binding for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236977 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-04-18 16:36 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-kaa-metadata Short Description: The Kaa Media - metadata binding for python Owners: kwizart at gmail.com Branches: FC-6 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 20:55:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 16:55:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234031] Review Request: eclipse-pydev - an Eclipse plugin for working with Python. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704182055.l3IKt68N001933@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-pydev - an Eclipse plugin for working with Python. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234031 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-18 16:55 EST ------- While this is a mess, all of the files seem to be ok: pydev: Eclipse jython: BSD python: PSF License ctypes: MIT bicycle repairman: BSD If possible to not duplicate ctypes/bicycle repairman, please don't. But if its unavoidable, its ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 21:16:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 17:16:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235764] Review Request: perl-CGI-Ex - CGI utility suite - makes powerful application writing fun and easy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704182116.l3ILGgvP003188@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Ex - CGI utility suite - makes powerful application writing fun and easy Alias: perl-CGI-Ex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235764 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bjohnson at symetrix.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 21:21:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 17:21:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229490] Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704182121.l3ILLJNK003486@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229490 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From maxime.carron at fedoraproject.org 2007-04-18 17:21 EST ------- How did you get this message? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 21:21:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 17:21:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235764] Review Request: perl-CGI-Ex - CGI utility suite - makes powerful application writing fun and easy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704182121.l3ILLfrf003539@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Ex - CGI utility suite - makes powerful application writing fun and easy Alias: perl-CGI-Ex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235764 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-18 17:21 EST ------- perl(Crypt::Blowfish) and perl(YAML) are needed for %check. I also see this message: t/3_conf_01_write...............ok 6/18 skipped: various reasons t/4_app_00_base.................ok t/5_dump_00_base................ok which probably indicates that something else is missing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 21:22:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 17:22:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235925] Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704182122.l3ILMWbl003631@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925 paul at xelerance.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul at xelerance.com ------- Additional Comments From paul at xelerance.com 2007-04-18 17:22 EST ------- I haven't taken on a person for sponsorship yet. I'll talk to Spot about it. But in any case, here is the review. Please let me know when all issues have been fixed and I'll do a new review. It fails to compile on 64bit: RPM build errors: File not found: /var/tmp/dnssec-tools-1.1.1-1-root-root/usr/lib64/debug/usr/bin/validate.debug File not found: /var/tmp/dnssec-tools-1.1.1-1-root-root/usr/lib64/debug/usr/lib64/libsres.so.3.0.0.debug File not found: /var/tmp/dnssec-tools-1.1.1-1-root-root/usr/lib64/debug/usr/lib64/libval-threads.so.3.0.0.debug These seem to get mistakenly installed in /var/tmp/dnssec-tools-1.1.1-1-root-root/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/ instead I am not sure why you are defining the debug package, since they are built automatically. When your debug package "cut" from the spec file, at the end I get: Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/dnssec-tools-1.1.1-1.src.rpm Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/x86_64/dnssec-tools-1.1.1-1.x86_64.rpm Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/x86_64/dnssec-tools-perlmods-1.1.1-1.x86_64.rpm Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/x86_64/dnssec-tools-libs-1.1.1-1.x86_64.rpm Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/x86_64/dnssec-tools-libs-devel-1.1.1-1.x86_64.rpm Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/x86_64/dnssec-tools-debuginfo-1.1.1-1.x86_64.rpm Second: perl(Net::DNS::SEC) is needed by dnssec-tools-1.1.1-1.x86_64 It depends ona non-existing package, so this package would have to be added first before Fedora can accept this package Apart from that: FIXME: rpmlint warnings: W: dnssec-tools incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.1-2 1.1.1-1 W: dnssec-tools-libs no-documentation OK: Package Naming Guidelines followed OK: spec file base name matches base package OK: Packaging Guidelines followed (isn't this a recursive loop anyways :) OK: Package complies to an opensource licence FIX: License states "BSD" but it also includes a requirement to include a disclaimer for the vendor SPARTA. So license should state "BSD-like" OK: %doc includes license file OK: package is in american english OK: spec file is readable. FIX: source field using local reference instead of full URL, eg: Source: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/SourceUrl#head-27442167fe28eb345470e8db56716d62b508978c OK: md5sum of source matches that of upstream OK: package compiles into binary rpms (but see note at start or review) OK: all buildrequires listed OK: no bad locale handling FIX: calling ldconfig in %post/%postun in subpackage that installs lib files does not call %post/%postun for sub package libs-devel, which installs files in _libdir. in other words, add: %post libs-devel -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun libs-devel -p /sbin/ldconfig OK: no relocatable FIX: package creates directories it does not own: /usr/include/validator add it to the %files section Same for /usr/share/dnssec-tools and /etc/dnssec and the perl dirs OK: no duplicate entries in %files OK: every subpackage/package contains %defattr OK: package contains %clean section and rm's buildroot OK: macros used consistently OK: contains contain code, or permissable content. OK: no large documentation files in package OK: %doc items contain no running dependancies OK: includes files are in devel package only OK: no static libs OK: no .pc files without pkconfig OK: .so$ files in devel package OK: devel package requires package (though you could rewrite it to: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} instead of using hardcoded name) OK: *.la files removed correctly OK: no .desktop file requires (no GUI is build) OK: package owns no dir other package owns already OK: install calls rm -rf buildroot OK: filenames are valid UTF-8 OK: scriptlets are sane OK: basic functinality tested and works -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 21:30:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 17:30:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233236] Review Request: epel-release EPEL repository configuration and setup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704182130.l3ILUIRa004228@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: epel-release EPEL repository configuration and setup Alias: epel-release https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233236 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |epel-release -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 21:32:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 17:32:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235783] Review Request: perl-GraphViz - Interface to the GraphViz graphing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704182132.l3ILWjjR004497@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GraphViz - Interface to the GraphViz graphing tool Alias: perl-GraphViz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235783 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bjohnson at symetrix.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 21:38:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 17:38:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229490] Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704182138.l3ILcoPU005147@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229490 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-04-18 17:38 EST ------- during rpmbuild -ba pypar2.spec on F7-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 21:43:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 17:43:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235783] Review Request: perl-GraphViz - Interface to the GraphViz graphing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704182143.l3ILhPaj005772@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GraphViz - Interface to the GraphViz graphing tool Alias: perl-GraphViz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235783 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-18 17:43 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Rpmlint output: None [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL or Artistic [-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is written in American English. [x] Spec file for the package is legible. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : bb89286643e01631d1b7b0179ef120d6 MD5SUM upstream package: bb89286643e01631d1b7b0179ef120d6 [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: Arches excluded: Why: [!] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] Latest version is packaged. === Issues === 1. Missing BR graphviz. 2. commented out perl(IPC::Run) should be removed. === Final Notes === 1. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ pending fixing missing BR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 21:48:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 17:48:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230394] Review Request: mysql++ - C++ wrapper for the MySQL C API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704182148.l3ILmEnC006359@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql++ - C++ wrapper for the MySQL C API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230394 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-04-18 17:48 EST ------- OK - Mock Build on FC-6 and FC-Devel (tested on i386 and i86_64 arch) OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro and subpackages usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License is LGPL OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec file is in American English OK - Spec files is legible. OK - Sources SHOULD match upstream md5sum: 2856acf395940aa02a27d2db1bfc0801 mysql++-2.2.3.tar.gz OK - Package has correct buildroot. OK - BuildRequires isn't redundant. OK - Sub-packages is proper. OK - %build and %install stages is correct and work. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages and Sub-packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package and Sub-packages has no duplicate files in %files section. OK - Package and Sub-packages don't own any directories other packages own. OK - Changelog section is correct. OK - rpmlint output are silent on RPMs (including sub-package) and SRPM files. Soname clearly fixed. OK - Should function as described. OK - Should package latest version ---------- APPROVED ---------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 21:52:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 17:52:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234791] Review Request: perl-Email-Send - Module for sending email In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704182152.l3ILqZGD006688@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Send - Module for sending email Alias: perl-Email-Send https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234791 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bjohnson at symetrix.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 21:55:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 17:55:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175898] Review Request: perl-Text-CSV_XS - Comma-separated values manipulation routines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704182155.l3ILtwZt007097@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-CSV_XS - Comma-separated values manipulation routines Alias: perl-Text-CSV_XS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175898 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-Text-CSV_XS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 21:59:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 17:59:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234791] Review Request: perl-Email-Send - Module for sending email In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704182159.l3ILxHOF007311@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Send - Module for sending email Alias: perl-Email-Send https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234791 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-18 17:59 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Rpmlint output: None [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL or Artistic [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is written in American English. [x] Spec file for the package is legible. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : d0640973bf0f01e5ad8fbd4c8b274005 MD5SUM upstream package: d0640973bf0f01e5ad8fbd4c8b274005 [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: Arches excluded: Why: [!] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] Latest version is packaged. === Issues === 1. Missing BR: perl(Test::Pod), perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) for full test coverage. === Final Notes === 1. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ pending fixing missing BR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 22:00:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 18:00:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234784] Review Request: perl-Email-Date - Find and format date headers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704182200.l3IM0ekL007375@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Date - Find and format date headers Alias: perl-Email-Date https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234784 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bjohnson at symetrix.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 22:01:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 18:01:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234784] Review Request: perl-Email-Date - Find and format date headers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704182201.l3IM1DU5007422@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Date - Find and format date headers Alias: perl-Email-Date https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234784 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-18 18:01 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Rpmlint output: None [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL or Artistic [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is written in American English. [x] Spec file for the package is legible. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : d0640973bf0f01e5ad8fbd4c8b274005 MD5SUM upstream package: d0640973bf0f01e5ad8fbd4c8b274005 [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: Arches excluded: Why: [!] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] Latest version is packaged. === Issues === 1. Missing BR: perl(Test::Pod), perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) for full test coverage. === Final Notes === 1. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ pending fixing missing BR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 22:02:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 18:02:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234791] Review Request: perl-Email-Send - Module for sending email In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704182202.l3IM28YH007459@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Send - Module for sending email Alias: perl-Email-Send https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234791 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-18 18:02 EST ------- Sorry, I typed the wrong review in here (this was for perl-Email-Date)... ignore this one. Proper review to follow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 22:07:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 18:07:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234784] Review Request: perl-Email-Date - Find and format date headers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704182207.l3IM7Sei007843@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Date - Find and format date headers Alias: perl-Email-Date https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234784 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-18 18:07 EST ------- You might want to fix this too, although it's not critical: + /usr/bin/perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor WARNING: LICENSE is not a known parameter. Checking if your kit is complete... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 22:24:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 18:24:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234791] Review Request: perl-Email-Send - Module for sending email In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704182224.l3IMOWv3009089@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Send - Module for sending email Alias: perl-Email-Send https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234791 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-18 18:24 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Rpmlint output: None [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL or Artistic [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is written in American English. [x] Spec file for the package is legible. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : 1f728eab1cf972c5bf4d9fa702397d75 MD5SUM upstream package: 1f728eab1cf972c5bf4d9fa702397d75 [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: Arches excluded: Why: [!] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] Latest version is packaged. === Issues === 1. WARNING: LICENSE is not a known parameter. (during build) 2. Missing BR: perl(Mail::Internet), perl(MIME::Entity), perl(Test::Pod), perl(Test::Pod::Coverage), /usr/sbin/sendmail === Final Notes === 1. Please resubmit with fixes listed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 23:27:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 19:27:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236287] Review Request: python-genshi - Toolkit for stream-based generation of output for the web In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704182327.l3INRJ8L017133@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-genshi - Toolkit for stream-based generation of output for the web https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236287 ------- Additional Comments From thomas at apestaart.org 2007-04-18 19:27 EST ------- I would be interested in reviewing. I notice 0.4.0 was released two days ago :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 23:56:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 19:56:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 170303] Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704182356.l3INuZQG019232@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170303 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From csilvers2000 at yahoo.com 2007-04-18 19:56 EST ------- Tom, sorry I didn't respond to your query last December. I thought I was set up to get email every time someone added to this bug report, but I don't, and I didn't see this until I logged in again just now. In any case, perftools-0.90 was just released -- http://code.google.com/p/google-perftools. I've tested it on every Redhat system from FC2-FC6, and it compiles on all of them and all tests pass. So I'm excited for you to take another look and see how things work now. There's a silly typo-bug that affects x86_64 systems. I plan to release perftools-0.91 today to fix that, but if you're testing on 32-bit systems you should feel free to download the 0.90 version even now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 00:04:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:04:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 170303] Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704190004.l3J04GJK019600@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170303 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-18 20:04 EST ------- Thanks for the update. :) I think this may be the oldest pending package in the Fedora queue. I'll wait for 0.91 (all of my immediately available test boxes are x86_64) to repackage and test. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 00:07:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:07:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704190007.l3J07Hcu019868@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 00:07:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:07:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235783] Review Request: perl-GraphViz - Interface to the GraphViz graphing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704190007.l3J07MkH019880@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GraphViz - Interface to the GraphViz graphing tool Alias: perl-GraphViz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235783 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-18 20:07 EST ------- Thanks for the review! I'll fix the BR post-import, pre-build (obviously) :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 00:08:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:08:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235783] Review Request: perl-GraphViz - Interface to the GraphViz graphing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704190008.l3J08EGo019981@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GraphViz - Interface to the GraphViz graphing tool Alias: perl-GraphViz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235783 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-18 20:08 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-GraphViz Short Description: Interface to the GraphViz graphing tool Owners: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Branches: FC-5, FC-6, devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 00:08:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:08:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235783] Review Request: perl-GraphViz - Interface to the GraphViz graphing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704190008.l3J08Q9k020017@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GraphViz - Interface to the GraphViz graphing tool Alias: perl-GraphViz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235783 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 00:11:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:11:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235925] Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704190011.l3J0BM1M020202@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-04-18 20:11 EST ------- Are you by chance using the SRPM available from the dnssec-tools website instead of the one in the comment field above from my submission? Because the one above does *not* build it's own debug package and is much cleaner than the one on the dnssec-tools website (eventually they should become the same, but they're not at the moment). I suspect you've actually grabbed the wrong one? Your other warnings also look like they're from the SRPM on the main dnssec-tools website as they've been corrected in the one at hardakers.net as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 00:14:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:14:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235925] Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704190014.l3J0EDlP020330@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-04-18 20:14 EST ------- Oh, one more comment: I'm not sure whether the dnssec-tools package has been fully tested on 64bit architectures. I believe it should be ok as that was taken into consideration during development, but... After installing, run "validate -s" to run a bunch of self-tests and see if they succeeds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 00:22:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:22:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235764] Review Request: perl-CGI-Ex - CGI utility suite - makes powerful application writing fun and easy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704190022.l3J0M1E3020663@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Ex - CGI utility suite - makes powerful application writing fun and easy Alias: perl-CGI-Ex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235764 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-18 20:21 EST ------- Yes indeedy -- among them, perl(JSON) and perl(Config::IniHash), which I'm packaging up now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 00:39:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:39:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235925] Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704190039.l3J0doDC021757@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-04-18 20:39 EST ------- New versions of the SRPM and spec file to fix some of the bugs that were not fixed by the original: Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/dnssec-tools/dnssec-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/dnssec-tools/dnssec-tools-1.1.1-2.src.rpm * Tue Apr 10 2007 Wes Hardaker - 1.1.1-2 - Pointed Source0 at the sourceforge server instead of a local file - Set License to BSD-like - Took ownership of %{_includedir}/validator -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 00:42:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:42:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237041] New: Review Request: perl-JSON - Parse and convert to JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237041 Summary: Review Request: perl-JSON - Parse and convert to JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/JSON/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-JSON-1.10-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-JSON.spec Description: This module converts between JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) and Perl data structure into each other. For JSON, See to http://www.crockford.com/JSON/. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 00:42:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:42:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235764] Review Request: perl-CGI-Ex - CGI utility suite - makes powerful application writing fun and easy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704190042.l3J0gEdt021951@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Ex - CGI utility suite - makes powerful application writing fun and easy Alias: perl-CGI-Ex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235764 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |237041 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 00:44:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:44:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237041] Review Request: perl-JSON - Parse and convert to JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704190044.l3J0i6rQ022113@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-JSON - Parse and convert to JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) Alias: perl-JSON https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237041 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-JSON -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 00:54:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:54:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 170303] Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704190054.l3J0sHff022752@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170303 ------- Additional Comments From csilvers2000 at yahoo.com 2007-04-18 20:54 EST ------- Yikes! I feel bad about how long things have taken. But I'm very happy with the result. perftools 0.91 is now up on http://code.google.com/p/google-perftools -- you should be all set to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 00:55:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:55:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 170303] Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704190055.l3J0tD8d022846@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170303 ------- Additional Comments From csilvers2000 at yahoo.com 2007-04-18 20:55 EST ------- btw, please be sure to read the INSTALL file, and perhaps the README as well, if you're building for x86_64 systems. There are a few known issues there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 00:56:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:56:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237043] New: Review Request: perl-Hash-Case - Base class for hashes with key-casing requirements Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237043 Summary: Review Request: perl-Hash-Case - Base class for hashes with key-casing requirements Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Hash-Case/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Hash-Case-1.003-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Hash-Case.spec Description: Hash::Case is the base class for various classes which tie special treatment for the casing of keys. Be aware of the differences in implementation: Lower and Upper are tied native hashes: these hashes have no need for hidden fields or other assisting data structured. A case Preserve hash will actually create three hashes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 00:57:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:57:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237043] Review Request: perl-Hash-Case - Base class for hashes with key-casing requirements In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704190057.l3J0vhcM022996@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Hash-Case - Base class for hashes with key-casing requirements Alias: perl-Hash-Case https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237043 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-Hash-Case -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 01:04:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 21:04:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237045] New: Review Request: perl-Hash-WithDefaults - Class for hashes with key-casing requirements supporting defaults Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237045 Summary: Review Request: perl-Hash-WithDefaults - Class for hashes with key-casing requirements supporting defaults Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Hash-WithDefaults/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Hash-WithDefaults-0.04-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Hash-WithDefaults.spec Description: This module implements hashes that support "defaults". That is you may specify several more hashes in which the data will be looked up in case it is not found in the current hash. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 01:09:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 21:09:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231586] Review Request: aspell-hi - Hindi Dictionary for Aspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704190109.l3J19hfH023726@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-hi - Hindi Dictionary for Aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231586 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium wwoods at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |221696 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 01:10:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 21:10:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237045] Review Request: perl-Hash-WithDefaults - Class for hashes with key-casing requirements supporting defaults In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704190110.l3J1AsXS023835@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Hash-WithDefaults - Class for hashes with key-casing requirements supporting defaults Alias: Hash-WithDefaults https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237045 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |Hash-WithDefaults -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 01:11:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 21:11:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231586] Review Request: aspell-hi - Hindi Dictionary for Aspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704190111.l3J1B5wd023852@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-hi - Hindi Dictionary for Aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231586 wwoods at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|221696 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 01:11:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 21:11:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237043] Review Request: perl-Hash-Case - Base class for hashes with key-casing requirements In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704190111.l3J1Bhw7023883@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Hash-Case - Base class for hashes with key-casing requirements Alias: perl-Hash-Case https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237043 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |237046 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 01:11:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 21:11:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237045] Review Request: perl-Hash-WithDefaults - Class for hashes with key-casing requirements supporting defaults In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704190111.l3J1BiTt023891@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Hash-WithDefaults - Class for hashes with key-casing requirements supporting defaults Alias: Hash-WithDefaults https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237045 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |237046 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 01:11:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 21:11:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237046] New: Review Request: perl-Config-IniHash - Perl extension for reading and writing INI files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237046 Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-IniHash - Perl extension for reading and writing INI files Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Config-IniHash/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Config-IniHash-2.8-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Config-IniHash.spec Description: This module reads and writes INI files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 01:11:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 21:11:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235764] Review Request: perl-CGI-Ex - CGI utility suite - makes powerful application writing fun and easy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704190111.l3J1BjLB023903@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Ex - CGI utility suite - makes powerful application writing fun and easy Alias: perl-CGI-Ex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235764 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |237046 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 01:12:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 21:12:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237046] Review Request: perl-Config-IniHash - Perl extension for reading and writing INI files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704190112.l3J1CTVY023936@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-IniHash - Perl extension for reading and writing INI files Alias: perl-Config-IniHash https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237046 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-Config-IniHash -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 01:35:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 21:35:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235588] Review Request: escape - an extensible puzzle game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704190135.l3J1ZXUP025402@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: escape - an extensible puzzle game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235588 ------- Additional Comments From adam at spicenitz.org 2007-04-18 21:35 EST ------- What's wrong with having something like this? %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc COPYING design.txt escape.txt README %{_bindir}/* %{_datadir}/%{name} %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/*.png %{_datadir}/applications/*.desktop The * doesn't mean I own everything, just the files that I installed to $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. This can be verified using rpm -ql escape. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 02:08:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 22:08:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228303] Review Request: python-tag - Python bindings for TagLib to read and write music files tags In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704190208.l3J28lpf026847@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-tag - Python bindings for TagLib to read and write music files tags https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228303 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-04-18 22:08 EST ------- OK - Mock : Built on FC6 en FC-Devel (i386 and x86_64) OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License field in spec matches OK - License is BSD (BSD_like) NO - License file is not included in package ----- The BSD license is only mentioned by PKG-INFO file which is not included in the package. ----- OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources SHOULD match upstream md5sum: c9de0b7b3819579b5f460b20c42e03c9 tagpy-0.91.tar.gz OK - Package has correct buildroot. OK - BuildRequires isn't redundant. OK - %build and %install stages is correct and work. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Changelog section is correct. OK - Should function as described. OK - Should package latest version ------------------------------------------------ Rpmlint output: ------------------------------------------------ * from srpm : quiet. * from rpm : W: python-tag spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python-tag-0.91/tagrename W: python-tag doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-tag-0.91/tagrename /usr/bin/env The files which are installed in %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} are exemples, as mentioned in the README file which's includes in the package. So, these errors are harmless and can be IGNORED. But, maybe you could change the default permission on it to make rpmlint cute :-). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 02:20:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 22:20:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 180743] Review Request: pdsh In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704190220.l3J2KvrM028070@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pdsh https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180743 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 03:10:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 23:10:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235527] Review Request: pylibacl - POSIX.1e ACLs library wrapper for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704190310.l3J3AQkj001508@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pylibacl - POSIX.1e ACLs library wrapper for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235527 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-04-18 23:10 EST ------- 1. ok. 2. ok. 3. ok. 4. I thought we explicitly wanted (-, root, root, -), but looking at the guilelines it just says that there must be a defattr section for each files section, so I guess thats ok. Note that the fedora package is always going to be built under a controlled setup and the umask shouldn't ever be a problem. I don't see the need for the: #Packager tag removed due to FE requirements #libacl is forced by RPM comments. Thats no blocker, but unless you need them perhaps remove them before import? I don't see any further blockers here, so this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this review request once this package has been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 03:14:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 23:14:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235526] Review Request: pyxattr - Extended attributes library wrapper for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704190314.l3J3EPb7001937@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyxattr - Extended attributes library wrapper for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235526 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-04-18 23:14 EST ------- 1. ok. 2. ok. 3. ok. 4. ok. 5. Ah, I see. Well, as long as you credit Dag in the changelog (ie, don't remove any of his changelog entries) I think thats giving sufficient credit. I see no further blockers here, so this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this review request once the package has been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 03:32:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 23:32:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704190332.l3J3WWOA004078@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 177841 | nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-04-18 23:32 EST ------- ok. I have done some testing here with the latest rawhide kernel and ecrypts-utils. - ppc32 works just fine. No oops. No issues. I can mount, read/write and unmount ok. - x86_64 works ok. There is a locking message when you first try and use the mount after mounting, but there is no ill effect. mount/read/write/umount all work ok. Here's the locking messages I see in dmesg: ============================================= [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] 2.6.20-1.3079.fc7 #1 --------------------------------------------- ls/23073 is trying to acquire lock: (&inode->i_mutex){--..}, at: [] mutex_lock+0x2a/0x2e but task is already holding lock: (&inode->i_mutex){--..}, at: [] mutex_lock+0x2a/0x2e other info that might help us debug this: 1 lock held by ls/23073: #0: (&inode->i_mutex){--..}, at: [] mutex_lock+0x2a/0x2e stack backtrace: Call Trace: [] __lock_acquire+0x151/0xbd1 [] :ecryptfs:ecryptfs_filldir+0x0/0x7d [] lock_acquire+0x4c/0x65 [] mutex_lock+0x2a/0x2e [] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xff/0x299 [] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x280/0x299 [] mutex_lock+0x2a/0x2e [] vfs_readdir+0x61/0xb1 [] filldir+0x0/0xc5 [] :ecryptfs:ecryptfs_readdir+0x6c/0xb2 [] filldir+0x0/0xc5 [] vfs_readdir+0x7c/0xb1 [] sys_getdents+0x7a/0xc4 [] system_call+0x7e/0x83 That looks like it's a cosmetic bug more than one that causes any real problems. So, since there are no more packaging issues, and things seem to work now, I will go ahead and APPROVE this package. Michael: You can continue the process at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#head-a601c13b0950a89568deafa65f505b4b58ee869b If you have any questions at all about the process, feel free to email me, or catch me on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-devel (nick: nirik). Oh, I see that -14 is out now. If you would like me to look over the updated package before you import it, I would be happy to do so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 03:41:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 23:41:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235925] Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704190341.l3J3fivh005028@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-04-18 23:41 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/dnssec-tools/dnssec-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/dnssec-tools/dnssec-tools-1.1.1-3.src.rpm * Wed Apr 18 2007 Wes Hardaker - 1.1.1-3 - Add patch to make Net::DNS::SEC optional - fix date in previous log This makes the Net::DNS::SEC module optional (needed only for certain functions). Ideally I would like to see that part of FE as well and I'll work on making that spec as well but it starts a long dependency chain of missing FE components (Crypto::OpenSSL::* for one). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 04:04:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 00:04:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235925] Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704190404.l3J44fic007611@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xelerance.com 2007-04-19 00:04 EST ------- I'll check this latest rpm. Yes, I know the problem of NET::DNS::SEC. That's why I haven't done it either, though I'm requiring it as well. Maybe we should divide the load and tackle them together? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 04:50:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 00:50:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230394] Review Request: mysql++ - C++ wrapper for the MySQL C API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704190450.l3J4oLva013271@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql++ - C++ wrapper for the MySQL C API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230394 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2007-04-19 00:50 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mysql++ Short Description: C++ wrapper for the MySQL C API Owners: Fedora at FamilleCollet.com Branches: devel FC-6 FC-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 04:50:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 00:50:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704190450.l3J4oOUv013288@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-19 00:50 EST ------- Jon, maybe we can exchange reviews? I myself also have several game packages awaiting review: * asc-music - Background music for the game asc - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233256 - requires asc * vegastrike - 3D OpenGL spaceflight simulator - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233782 * vegastrike-data - Data files for Vega Strike - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233783 * ballz - Platform game with some puzzle elements - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236798 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 05:54:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 01:54:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235925] Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704190554.l3J5sSw7021356@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xelerance.com 2007-04-19 01:54 EST ------- rpmlint found a few things. I still need to go over things manually.... W: dnssec-tools macro-in-%changelog _includedir W: dnssec-tools-libs no-documentation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 06:06:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 02:06:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236642] Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704190606.l3J66750022957@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236642 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-04-19 02:06 EST ------- You really really really need to do something about the SOURCE tag as mentioned in comment #2. Since the source tarball is being generated from a source control system (git in this case if im reading the revisor development webpages correctly) and its not available at an established static URL address as an identifiable 'release' then the spec file must contain a comment blog which details the actual steps that need to be taken to pull the appropriated tagged git entity and then repackage it as a tarball. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL has an example of how to do a comment block for a public svn server. You should do something similar for your git tree. I cannot initiate a formal review if I can't confirm that the md5sum of the tarball is as it should be. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 06:34:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 02:34:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235925] Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704190634.l3J6YNI6026788@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-04-19 02:34 EST ------- I'll take the macro out of the changelog (it was just documenting something) The no-documentation error can't go away because there is none! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 06:36:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 02:36:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237062] New: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Params-Validate - Extension of Params::Validate using Moose's types Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237062 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Params-Validate - Extension of Params::Validate using Moose's types Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/MooseX-Params-Validate/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-MooseX-Params-Validate-0.01-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-MooseX-Params-Validate.spec Description: This module fills a gap in Moose by adding method parameter validation to Moose. This is just one of many developing options, it should be considered the "official" one by any means though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 06:40:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 02:40:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235764] Review Request: perl-CGI-Ex - CGI utility suite - makes powerful application writing fun and easy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704190640.l3J6eg6N027581@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Ex - CGI utility suite - makes powerful application writing fun and easy Alias: perl-CGI-Ex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235764 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-19 02:40 EST ------- Additional BR's packaged and submitted; they're blocking this bug. I'll post the updated sources for this package after some needed sleep :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 06:45:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 02:45:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205306] Review Request: perl-SUPER - Control superclass method dispatch In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704190645.l3J6j1lJ028154@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SUPER - Control superclass method dispatch Alias: perl-SUPER https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205306 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-SUPER -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 06:45:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 02:45:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205314] Review Request: perl-Class-C3 - Pragma to use the C3 method resolution order algorithm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704190645.l3J6je5k028255@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-C3 - Pragma to use the C3 method resolution order algorithm Alias: perl-Class-C3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205314 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-Class-C3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 06:46:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 02:46:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205309] Review Request: perl-Algorithm-C3 - Module for merging hierarchies using the C3 algorithm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704190646.l3J6kGH3028324@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Algorithm-C3 - Module for merging hierarchies using the C3 algorithm Alias: perl-Algorithm-C3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205309 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-Algorithm-C3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 06:46:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 02:46:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235764] Review Request: perl-CGI-Ex - CGI utility suite - makes powerful application writing fun and easy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704190646.l3J6kxAu028419@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Ex - CGI utility suite - makes powerful application writing fun and easy Alias: perl-CGI-Ex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235764 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-19 02:46 EST ------- No big rush. I'm leaving town tomorrow and won't be back until Wednesday. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 06:58:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 02:58:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226276] Merge Review: perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704190658.l3J6wxha029799@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226276 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-19 02:58 EST ------- Robin: The rationale behind the "Provides: cpan" escapes me. Packages wanting to use perl(CPAN) should require "perl(CPAN)", packages wanting to use /usr/bin/cpan should directly depend on /usr/bin/cpan (which would be the only correct solution) or can "Requires: perl-CPAN". If your intention is to provide a "virtual cpan package", then it should be a versioned "Provides". I would not add "Provides: cpan". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 07:05:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 03:05:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237043] Review Request: perl-Hash-Case - Base class for hashes with key-casing requirements In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704190705.l3J75aup030607@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Hash-Case - Base class for hashes with key-casing requirements Alias: perl-Hash-Case https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237043 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-19 03:05 EST ------- Nothing much to say about it. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 07:07:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 03:07:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235925] Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704190707.l3J77NCn030813@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-04-19 03:07 EST ------- * Wed Apr 18 2007 Wes Hardaker - 1.1.1-4 - Fix changelog so it doesn't have a macro in the documentation - Added a dnsval.conf starting file. - Remove include subdir wildcard expansion since the entire directory is owned. Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/dnssec-tools/dnssec-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/dnssec-tools/dnssec-tools-1.1.1-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 08:00:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 04:00:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236642] Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704190800.l3J802DU006580@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236642 ------- Additional Comments From kanarip at kanarip.com 2007-04-19 03:59 EST ------- I'm sorry, obviously you are right. I didn't regenerate the .spec after editting the .spec.in. I've updated the .spec file on the location mentioned above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 08:12:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 04:12:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236642] Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704190812.l3J8C2tj009303@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236642 ------- Additional Comments From kanarip at kanarip.com 2007-04-19 04:11 EST ------- No I've not updated, for some reason it won't update. New location is http://revisor.fedoraunity.org/releases/revisor-2.0/revisor-2.0.1.spec Thank you Jef, for your patience ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 08:37:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 04:37:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704190837.l3J8bvl8013292@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-04-19 04:37 EST ------- Done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 09:47:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 05:47:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229490] Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704190947.l3J9lQ9I023016@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229490 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-19 05:47 EST ------- FYI pypar2 1.4 is out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 10:38:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 06:38:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236798] Review Request: ballz - Platform game with some puzzle elements In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191038.l3JAcejS029860@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ballz - Platform game with some puzzle elements https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236798 musuruan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |musuruan at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 11:17:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 07:17:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229490] Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191117.l3JBHxcK001239@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229490 ------- Additional Comments From maxime.carron at fedoraproject.org 2007-04-19 07:17 EST ------- Yep, i'm working on. I still have a problem. In reply to comment #29, i've changed Utilities in Utility, but there is something I don't understand. Shouldn't desktop-file-install --vendor "" \ --add-category Utility \ [...] modify the desktop file? Because since i don't use the patch (for the desktop file) ther is no entry in thefedora menu for pypar2. Do I need to use both patch and desktop-file-install options (--add-category and --remove-category)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 11:58:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 07:58:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235588] Review Request: escape - an extensible puzzle game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191158.l3JBwunH004552@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: escape - an extensible puzzle game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235588 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-04-19 07:58 EST ------- Oh, so it is. I didn't know that. Nevermind. :) No duplicate files. Permissions are ok. %clean present and correct. Macros OK. Code, not content. No huge docs. No runtime doc issues. No shared or static libs, or headers. No pkgconfig files. No devel package. No .la. .desktop file handled properly. No cross-ownership. %install starts right. Good filenames. All MUSTS met. Builds in mock of FC-6 i386. Runs as advertised. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 12:21:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 08:21:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220979] Review Request: tesseract - Raw OCR Engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191221.l3JCLS6s005780@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tesseract - Raw OCR Engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220979 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium mgarski at post.pl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mgarski at post.pl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 12:24:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 08:24:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229490] Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191224.l3JCOTdk006061@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229490 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-19 08:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #33) > Yep, i'm working on. > > Do I need to use both patch and desktop-file-install options > (--add-category and > --remove-category)? I just saw 1.4 desktop file and both --add-category Utility --remove-category Application seems needed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 12:38:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 08:38:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220979] Review Request: tesseract - Raw OCR Engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191238.l3JCcrJP006902@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tesseract - Raw OCR Engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220979 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-04-19 08:38 EST ------- Please take a look at tis link: http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=672344 They said that address of Tesseract OCR was changed to http://code.google.com/p/tesseract-ocr/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 13:42:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 09:42:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218599] Review Request: klibido - NNTP (Usenet) file grabber for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191342.l3JDgF66012516@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: klibido - NNTP (Usenet) file grabber for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218599 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2007-04-19 09:42 EST ------- Ok, the content has moved to a new host: Spec URL: http://fna.vel4.com/rpm/klibido.spec SRPM URL: http://fna.vel4.com/rpm/klibido-0.2.5-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 13:55:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 09:55:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191355.l3JDteqL013855@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-04-19 09:55 EST ------- That's great, but it looks like they all have reviewers assigned, though it looks like Andrea and Peter haven't done much in awhile. Have you looked at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Policy/StalledReviews? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 13:56:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 09:56:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233256] Review Request: asc-music - Background music for the game asc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191356.l3JDug1K013927@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asc-music - Background music for the game asc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233256 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From musuruan at gmail.com 2007-04-19 09:56 EST ------- - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines. OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License. SEE BELOW - License field in spec matches. SEE BELOW - License file included in package. SEE BELOW - Spec in American English. OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: N/A transcoded from original files - Package needs ExcludeArch. N/A - BuildRequires correct. OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang. N/A - Package is relocatable and has a reason to be. N/A - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Doc subpackage needed/used. N/A - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. N/A - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun. N/A - .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig. N/A - .so files in -devel subpackage. N/A - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}. N/A - .la files are removed. N/A - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file. N/A - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK fc6/i386 - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane: asc-music-1.0-1.noarch.rpm asc-music = 1.0-1 = asc SHOULD Items: - Should build in mock. OK fc6/i386 - Should build on all supported archs. OK package is noarch - Should function as described. OK - Should have sane scriptlets. N/A - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. NO, but OK - Should have dist tag. NO, but OK - Should package latest version. OK Issues: 1. Let's try to clear out under what license the audio files are released. I read the following on the upstream site: "ASC is distributed under the terms of the Gnu General Public License (the license Linux uses too), which basically means the game is free, the complete source code is available and you can do everything with it as long as it remains free." There is no indication on download section of what license is used for the audio files. The best would be to have such a statement from the author and include it in your source package. BTW, the debian package also state that this is GPL'ed, but again, without any further explaination. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 14:44:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:44:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226387] Merge Review: samba In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191444.l3JEiYWp018207@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: samba https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226387 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From ssorce at redhat.com 2007-04-19 10:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #30) > Still pending remarks: > > - Does "/usr/lib* instead of %{_libdir}" hack still needed for the latest > upstream versions? I am trying to change it to %{_libdir}, let's see what happens. > - docs/manpages contain non-ascii non-UTF8 symbols (yet not checked out for > 3.0.25 :) ). Non-UTF8 is deprecated now. > (BTW, run f.e. "man smbd" and see the man's warning in the first 3 lines). This is an upstream problem, trying to fix it there. > - Init scripts: /etc/rc.d/init.d/finctions existance is checked "hardly", > whereas /etc/sysconfig/network is not... Since the init scripts are separate > sources for Fedora, it can be fixed easily. Ok, fixind this. > - winbind.init: /var/lock/subsys name should match the initscript name, i.e. > should be "/var/lock/subsys/winbind", not ".../winbindd" (rmplint complains > about it). Sorry but I can change the subsystem file name in the lock dir or upgrades would fail to condrestart. Or I would have to check for both which is not pretty. But you made me see that we don't start winbindd if networking is set to no. With the winbindd offline mode, I think we may want to start it anyway. Thougths about this? > Since "/var/cache/samba" is no more used, maybe create a symlink to > /var/lib/samba? (at least "for compatibility reasons" :) ) Perhaps this way > (old and new places are playing together) the migration procedure could be > simplified... No, the migration would just break, as the script will find stuff in /var/cache/samba and in /var/lib/samba, it will move the stuff in /var/lib/samba to a backup and try to move /var/cache/samba to /var/lib/samba. But as we moved away that stuff to backup it, the script will fail finiding anything in /var/cache/samba and as result we just break new installtion by leaving them without files in the real /var/lib/samba Besides I want to see the absence of a /var/cache/samba directory as a mark we have upgraded. Simo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 14:45:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:45:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226387] Merge Review: samba In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191445.l3JEjRcx018353@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: samba https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226387 ssorce at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #152814|0 |1 is obsolete| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 14:46:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:46:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226387] Merge Review: samba In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191446.l3JEk5gQ018435@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: samba https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226387 ssorce at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #152907|0 |1 is obsolete| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 14:51:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:51:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235895] Review Request: perl-Text-Aspell - spell check interface for perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191451.l3JEpGV5018830@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Aspell - spell check interface for perl Alias: perl-Text-Aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235895 Jerry.James at usu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From Jerry.James at usu.edu 2007-04-19 10:51 EST ------- Thanks, Chris. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Text-Aspell Short Description: Perl interface to the GNU Aspell library Owners: Jerry.James at usu.edu Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 15:12:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:12:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237043] Review Request: perl-Hash-Case - Base class for hashes with key-casing requirements In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191512.l3JFCpsF020817@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Hash-Case - Base class for hashes with key-casing requirements Alias: perl-Hash-Case https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237043 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-19 11:12 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Hash-Case Short Description: Base class for hashes with key-casing requirements Owners: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Branches: FC-5, FC-6, devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 15:13:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:13:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237043] Review Request: perl-Hash-Case - Base class for hashes with key-casing requirements In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191513.l3JFD3Ai020844@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Hash-Case - Base class for hashes with key-casing requirements Alias: perl-Hash-Case https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237043 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 15:19:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:19:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226553] Merge Review: xdoclet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191519.l3JFJeVv021561@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xdoclet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226553 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-04-19 11:19 EST ------- Please fix item(s) mared by X: MUST: * package is named appropriately - match upstream tarball or project name - try to match previous incarnations in other distributions/packagers for consistency - specfile should be %{name}.spec - non-numeric characters should only be used in Release (ie. cvs or something) - for non-numerics (pre-release, CVS snapshots, etc.), see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#PackageRelease - if case sensitivity is requested by upstream or you feel it should be not just lowercase, do so; otherwise, use all lower case for the name * is it legal for Fedora to distribute this? - OSI-approved - not a kernel module - not shareware - is it covered by patents? - it *probably* shouldn't be an emulator - no binary firmware * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. - use acronyms for licences where common * specfile name matches %{name} * verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do) - if upstream doesn't release source drops, put *clear* instructions on how to generate the the source drop; ie. # svn export blah/tag blah # tar cjf blah-version-src.tar.bz2 blah * skim the summary and description for typos, etc. * correct buildroot - should be: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) * if %{?dist} is used, it should be in that form (note the ? and % locations) * keep old changelog entries; use judgement when removing (too old? useless?) * packages meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) * rpmlint on .srpm gives no output W: xdoclet non-standard-group Development/Framework This is OK * license text included in package and marked with %doc * changelog should be in one of these formats: * Fri Jun 23 2006 Jesse Keating - 0.6-4 - And fix the link syntax. * Fri Jun 23 2006 Jesse Keating 0.6-4 - And fix the link syntax. * Fri Jun 23 2006 Jesse Keating - 0.6-4 - And fix the link syntax. * Packager tag should not be used * Vendor tag should not be used * Distribution tag should not be used * use License and not Copyright * Summary tag should not end in a period * if possible, replace PreReq with Requires(pre) and/or Requires(post) X specfile is legible - please get rid of section tag * package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86 * BuildRequires are proper - builds in mock will flush out problems here - the following packages don't need to be listed in BuildRequires: bash bzip2 coreutils cpio diffutils fedora-release (and/or redhat-release) gcc gcc-c++ gzip make patch perl redhat-rpm-config rpm-build sed tar unzip which * summary should be a short and concise description of the package * description expands upon summary (don't include installation instructions) * make sure lines are <= 80 characters * specfile written in American English * make a -doc sub-package if necessary - see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-9bbfa57478f0460c6160947a6bf795249488182b * packages including libraries should exclude static libraries if possible * don't use rpath * config files should usually be marked with %config(noreplace) * GUI apps should contain .desktop files * should the package contain a -devel sub-package? * use macros appropriately and consistently - ie. %{buildroot} and %{optflags} vs. $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and $RPM_OPT_FLAGS * don't use %makeinstall * install section must begin with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot} * locale data handling correct (find_lang) - if translations included, add BR: gettext and use %find_lang %{name} at the end of %install * consider using cp -p to preserve timestamps * split Requires(pre,post) into two separate lines * package should probably not be relocatable * package contains code - see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#CodeVsContent - in general, there should be no offensive content * package should own all directories and files * there should be no %files duplicates * file permissions should be okay; %defattrs should be present * %clean should be present * %doc files should not affect runtime * if it is a web apps, it should be in /usr/share/%{name} and *not* /var/www * verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs will do this when I can build in mock * run rpmlint on the binary RPMs will do this when I can build in mock SHOULD: * package should include license text in the package and mark it with %doc * package should build on i386 X package should build in mock cant' build in mock: [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 pcheung]$ mock xdoclet-1.2.3-8jpp.1.src.rpm init clean prep This may take a while setup 0:xjavadoc-1.1-4jpp.2.x86_64 No Package Found for mockobjects 0:jakarta-commons-logging-1.0.4-6jpp.1.x86_64 0:log4j-1.2.13-3jpp.2.x86_64 0:jakarta-commons-collections-3.1-9jpp.1.fc7.x86_64 0:struts-1.2.9-4jpp.6.x86_64 0:javacc-4.0-3jpp.3.x86_64 0:ant-trax-1.6.5-4jpp.2.fc7.x86_64 0:java-1.5.0-gcj-devel-1.5.0.0-14.fc7.x86_64 0:ant-nodeps-1.6.5-4jpp.2.fc7.x86_64 0:java-1.5.0-gcj-devel-1.5.0.0-14.fc7.x86_64 0:jakarta-commons-net-1.4.1-2jpp.1.fc7.noarch 0:xml-commons-apis-1.3.03-0jpp.1.fc7.x86_64 0:jpackage-utils-1.7.3-1jpp.2.fc7.noarch 0:xalan-j2-2.7.0-6jpp.1.x86_64 0:velocity-1.4-6jpp.1.x86_64 0:jakarta-commons-lang-2.1-6jpp.1.fc7.x86_64 0:ant-1.6.5-4jpp.2.fc7.x86_64 0:bsf-2.3.0-11jpp.1.x86_64 0:jrefactory-2.8.9-6jpp.3.x86_64 0:junit-3.8.2-3jpp.1.fc7.x86_64 Cannot find build req mockobjects. Exiting. ending done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 15:28:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:28:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231774] Review Request: perl-DBIx-POS - Define a dictionary of SQL statements in a POD dialect (POS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191528.l3JFSvNY022704@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-POS - Define a dictionary of SQL statements in a POD dialect (POS) Alias: perl-DBIx-POS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231774 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-19 11:28 EST ------- Point well taken. That text is also in the source file (lib/DBIx/POS.pm) itself. The author intends to license this module under perl terms (dual GPL/Artistic) under the clear text of the licensing statement, and this module includes code copyrighted under a strictly Artistic license. This is a not derivative work, however, not a modification of the package Class::Singleton, so this appears to me to be kosher under the Artistic license. It is my assessment that this package (DBIx-POS) is properly licensed by the author under both the GPL and the Artistic license. This is just based on my reading of the Artistic license -- that is, that fragments of code licensed under the Artistic license may be reliscensed under the GPL (as would be the case if someone opted to use this package under the terms of the GPL). Comment is invited :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 15:47:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:47:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226555] Merge Review: xerces-j2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191547.l3JFlcYQ024465@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xerces-j2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226555 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-04-19 11:47 EST ------- Please fix item(s) mared by X: MUST: * package is named appropriately - match upstream tarball or project name - try to match previous incarnations in other distributions/packagers for consistency - specfile should be %{name}.spec - non-numeric characters should only be used in Release (ie. cvs or something) - for non-numerics (pre-release, CVS snapshots, etc.), see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#PackageRelease - if case sensitivity is requested by upstream or you feel it should be not just lowercase, do so; otherwise, use all lower case for the name * is it legal for Fedora to distribute this? - OSI-approved - not a kernel module - not shareware - is it covered by patents? - it *probably* shouldn't be an emulator - no binary firmware * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. - use acronyms for licences where common * specfile name matches %{name} X verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do) - Source0 doesn't exist * skim the summary and description for typos, etc. * correct buildroot - should be: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) * if %{?dist} is used, it should be in that form (note the ? and % locations) * license text included in package and marked with %doc * keep old changelog entries; use judgement when removing (too old? useless?) * packages meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) X rpmlint on .srpm gives no output W: xerces-j2 non-standard-group Text Processing/Markup/XML W: xerces-j2 unversioned-explicit-provides jaxp_parser_impl The group one is OK, please fix the unversioned-explicit-provides * changelog should be in one of these formats: * Fri Jun 23 2006 Jesse Keating - 0.6-4 - And fix the link syntax. * Fri Jun 23 2006 Jesse Keating 0.6-4 - And fix the link syntax. * Fri Jun 23 2006 Jesse Keating - 0.6-4 - And fix the link syntax. * Packager tag should not be used * Vendor tag should not be used * Distribution tag should not be used * use License and not Copyright * Summary tag should not end in a period * if possible, replace PreReq with Requires(pre) and/or Requires(post) X specfile is legible - please get rid of section tag - URL indicates 'Xerces has moved out of the XML project and is now a project in its own right.' , please update with the new URL - in this spec file, commands are usually just plain commands instead of macros except for %{__sed} * package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86 * BuildRequires are proper - builds in mock will flush out problems here - the following packages don't need to be listed in BuildRequires: bash bzip2 coreutils cpio diffutils fedora-release (and/or redhat-release) gcc gcc-c++ gzip make patch perl redhat-rpm-config rpm-build sed tar unzip which * summary should be a short and concise description of the package * description expands upon summary (don't include installation instructions) * make sure lines are <= 80 characters * specfile written in American English * make a -doc sub-package if necessary - see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-9bbfa57478f0460c6160947a6bf795249488182b * packages including libraries should exclude static libraries if possible * don't use rpath * config files should usually be marked with %config(noreplace) * GUI apps should contain .desktop files * should the package contain a -devel sub-package? * use macros appropriately and consistently - ie. %{buildroot} and %{optflags} vs. $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and $RPM_OPT_FLAGS * don't use %makeinstall * install section must begin with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot} * locale data handling correct (find_lang) - if translations included, add BR: gettext and use %find_lang %{name} at the end of %install X consider using cp -p to preserve timestamps - please use cp -p on lines 164, 248-253 * split Requires(pre,post) into two separate lines * package should probably not be relocatable * package contains code - see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#CodeVsContent - in general, there should be no offensive content * package should own all directories and files * there should be no %files duplicates * file permissions should be okay; %defattrs should be present * %clean should be present * %doc files should not affect runtime * if it is a web apps, it should be in /usr/share/%{name} and *not* /var/www * verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 pcheung]$ rpm -qp --provides /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xerces-j2-2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm jaxp_parser_impl xerces-j2-2.7.1.jar.so()(64bit) xerces-j2-dom3 = 0:2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7 xerces-j2 = 0:2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7 [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 pcheung]$ rpm -qp --requires /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xerces-j2-2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm /bin/sh /bin/sh /bin/sh /usr/sbin/update-alternatives /usr/sbin/update-alternatives java-gcj >= 1.5.0 java-gcj >= 1.5.0 jaxp_parser_impl jaxp_parser_impl libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgcj_bc.so.1()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) librt.so.1()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) xml-commons-apis >= 0:1.3 xml-commons-resolver >= 1.1 [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 pcheung]$ rpm -qp --provides /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xerces-j2-debuginfo-2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm xerces-j2-2.7.1.jar.so.debug()(64bit) xerces-j2-samples.jar.so.debug()(64bit) xerces-j2-debuginfo = 0:2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7 [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 pcheung]$ rpm -qp --requires /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xerces-j2-debuginfo-2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 pcheung]$ rpm -qp --provides /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xerces-j2-demo-2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm xerces-j2-samples.jar.so()(64bit) xerces-j2-demo = 0:2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7 [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 pcheung]$ rpm -qp --requires /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xerces-j2-demo-2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm /bin/sh /bin/sh libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgcj_bc.so.1()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) librt.so.1()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) xerces-j2 = 0:2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7 [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 pcheung]$ rpm -qp --provides /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xerces-j2-javadoc-apis-2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm xerces-j2-dom3-javadoc = 0:9jpp.1.fc7-2.7.1 xerces-j2-javadoc-apis = 0:2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7 [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 pcheung]$ rpm -qp --requires /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xerces-j2-javadoc-apis-2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 pcheung]$ rpm -qp --provides /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xerces-j2-javadoc-impl-2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm xerces-j2-javadoc-impl = 0:2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7 [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 pcheung]$ rpm -qp --requires /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xerces-j2-javadoc-impl-2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 pcheung]$ rpm -qp --provides /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xerces-j2-javadoc-other-2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm xerces-j2-javadoc-other = 0:2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7 [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 pcheung]$ rpm -qp --requires /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xerces-j2-javadoc-other-2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 pcheung]$ rpm -qp --provides /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xerces-j2-javadoc-xni-2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm xerces-j2-javadoc-xni = 0:2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7 [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 pcheung]$ rpm -qp --requires /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xerces-j2-javadoc-xni-2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 pcheung]$ rpm -qp --provides /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xerces-j2-scripts-2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm xerces-j2-scripts = 0:2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7 [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 pcheung]$ rpm -qp --requires /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xerces-j2-scripts-2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm jpackage-utils >= 0:1.6 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 xerces-j2 = 0:2.7.1-9jpp.1.fc7 X run rpmlint on the binary RPMs [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 pcheung]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xerces-j2-*x86*rpm W: xerces-j2 non-standard-group Text Processing/Markup/XML W: xerces-j2 dangling-symlink /usr/share/java/jaxp_parser_impl.jar /etc/alternatives W: xerces-j2 symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/java/jaxp_parser_impl.jar /etc/alternatives - Can these symlink warnings be fixed? W: xerces-j2-demo non-standard-group Development/Testing W: xerces-j2-demo no-documentation - Is there any doc for the -demo package? W: xerces-j2-javadoc-apis non-standard-group Development/Documentation W: xerces-j2-javadoc-impl non-standard-group Development/Documentation W: xerces-j2-javadoc-other non-standard-group Development/Documentation W: xerces-j2-javadoc-xni non-standard-group Development/Documentation W: xerces-j2-scripts non-standard-group Text Processing/Markup/XML W: xerces-j2-scripts no-documentation - Is there any doc for the -scripts package? SHOULD: * package should include license text in the package and mark it with %doc * package should build on i386 * package should build in mock -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 15:47:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:47:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174883] Review Request: distcc -- A free distributed C/C++ compiler system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191547.l3JFlwgk024527@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: distcc -- A free distributed C/C++ compiler system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174883 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2007-04-19 11:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #26) > 3) What does release_func accomplish? It obfusticates the fact that the release > tag violates policy. It should be a single integer followed by the release tag, > unless you're bumping an old tree in which case you can add a number after the > release tag. Actually, if %release_func is not defined, the default %release_func: %global release_func() %1%{?dist} seems to do the right thing. However, that macro is obfuscating. It should be removed from the spec file, and Release: should be: Release: 6%{?dist} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 16:03:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:03:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220706] Review Request: linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm - with wacomcpl tool, man page In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191603.l3JG3J6h025515@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm - with wacomcpl tool, man page https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220706 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium arozansk at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |arozansk at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 16:14:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:14:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231011] Review Request: cowpatty - Audit Wpa pre-shared keys In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191614.l3JGE2ia026342@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cowpatty - Audit Wpa pre-shared keys https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231011 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-04-19 12:13 EST ------- when running genpmk with cowpatty 4.0 : *** buffer overflow detected ***: genpmk terminated This seems not to be usable yet... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 16:21:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:21:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191621.l3JGLPQa026858@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2007-04-19 12:21 EST ------- it would probably make sense to prefix the release tag with 0.0.0. just incase at some point theres a switch to a regular versioning scheme. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 16:35:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:35:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237062] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Params-Validate - Extension of Params::Validate using Moose's types In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191635.l3JGZf6H028101@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Params-Validate - Extension of Params::Validate using Moose's types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237062 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |Jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-04-19 12:35 EST ------- Good: + Naming seems ok. + License ok. + Tar ball matches with upstream. + Local build works fine. + Rpmlint quite on source rpm. + Rpmlint quite on binary rpm. + Rpmlint quite on installed package. + Local install and uninstall works fine. *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 16:36:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:36:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191636.l3JGaYcq028186@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-04-19 12:36 EST ------- Release or Version? Would not 0.0.0.20070323-3 be better than 20070323-0.0.0.3? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 16:36:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:36:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226387] Merge Review: samba In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191636.l3JGauuL028231@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: samba https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226387 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2007-04-19 12:36 EST ------- > I can change the subsystem file name in the lock dir or upgrades would fail to condrestart. > Or I would have to check for both which is not pretty. Since /var/cache/samba is already moved, does subsys renaming look like just an addition for this process?.. Anyway, if you decided to cleanup samba, don't stop at the half of the way. Let's do all the hard changes at once! BTW, it seems that you can just rename lock files somewhere in the samba-common %post script, because all condrestarts will be invoked later. > But you made me see that we don't start winbindd if networking is set to no. > With the winbindd offline mode, I think we may want to start it anyway. If "winbind offline mode" is designed not for temporary network absence only, then maybe yes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 16:39:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:39:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237062] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Params-Validate - Extension of Params::Validate using Moose's types In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191639.l3JGdkXC028498@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Params-Validate - Extension of Params::Validate using Moose's types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237062 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-19 12:39 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-MooseX-Params-Validate Short Description: Extension of Params::Validate using Moose's types Owners: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Branches: FC-5, FC-6, devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 16:39:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:39:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237062] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Params-Validate - Extension of Params::Validate using Moose's types In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191639.l3JGdv1A028534@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Params-Validate - Extension of Params::Validate using Moose's types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237062 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 16:57:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:57:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236287] Review Request: python-genshi - Toolkit for stream-based generation of output for the web In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191657.l3JGvbA1029754@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-genshi - Toolkit for stream-based generation of output for the web https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236287 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-04-19 12:57 EST ------- Spec URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/python-genshi-0.4-1.fc6.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/python-genshi-0.4-1.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 16:59:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:59:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235925] Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191659.l3JGx2DE029804@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925 paul at xelerance.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 17:16:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:16:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235741] Review Request: hippo-canvas - Crossplatform canvas using cairo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191716.l3JHGNWV031772@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hippo-canvas - Crossplatform canvas using cairo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235741 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-04-19 13:16 EST ------- The spec file looks fine in general, just a few minor comments: A full source url is generally preferred, if you have one. I wondered about the fact that the -devel package does not install a .pc file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 17:21:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:21:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228303] Review Request: python-tag - Python bindings for TagLib to read and write music files tags In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191721.l3JHLUPX032568@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-tag - Python bindings for TagLib to read and write music files tags https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228303 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-04-19 13:21 EST ------- Well, for an example script to be executable isn't much of a problem, especially when it doesn't add an extra requirement like here. I prefer not removing its executable bit, especially since it doesn't have a .py extension, thus it would be hard to identify and run. As for the license, maybe it being set to both "BSD-Style" and "BSD License" in the PKG-INFO file without being included in the sources is a problem, but I don't think so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 17:21:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:21:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191721.l3JHLhBP032634@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 17:33:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:33:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221675] Review Request: zd1211-firmware - Firmware for wireless devices based on zd1211 chipset In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191733.l3JHXxH3001559@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zd1211-firmware - Firmware for wireless devices based on zd1211 chipset https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221675 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 17:36:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:36:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228298] Review Request: python-louie - Dispatches signals between Python objects in a wide variety of contexts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191736.l3JHaQhv001983@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-louie - Dispatches signals between Python objects in a wide variety of contexts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228298 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 17:37:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:37:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228301] Review Request: python-nevow - Web application construction kit written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191737.l3JHbVEO002203@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-nevow - Web application construction kit written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228301 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 17:37:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:37:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226565] Merge Review: xmlrpc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191737.l3JHbZeK002220@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xmlrpc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226565 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-04-19 13:37 EST ------- Please fix item(s) mared by X: MUST: * package is named appropriately - match upstream tarball or project name - try to match previous incarnations in other distributions/packagers for consistency - specfile should be %{name}.spec - non-numeric characters should only be used in Release (ie. cvs or something) - for non-numerics (pre-release, CVS snapshots, etc.), see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#PackageRelease - if case sensitivity is requested by upstream or you feel it should be not just lowercase, do so; otherwise, use all lower case for the name * is it legal for Fedora to distribute this? - OSI-approved - not a kernel module - not shareware - is it covered by patents? - it *probably* shouldn't be an emulator - no binary firmware * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. - use acronyms for licences where common * specfile name matches %{name} X verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do) - Source0 doesn't exist * skim the summary and description for typos, etc. * correct buildroot - should be: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) X if %{?dist} is used, it should be in that form (note the ? and % locations) - Please fix Release tag by adding %{?dist} * license text included in package and marked with %doc * keep old changelog entries; use judgement when removing (too old? useless?) * packages meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) * rpmlint on .srpm gives no output - W: xmlrpc non-standard-group Development/Java - this is OK * changelog should be in one of these formats: * Fri Jun 23 2006 Jesse Keating - 0.6-4 - And fix the link syntax. * Fri Jun 23 2006 Jesse Keating 0.6-4 - And fix the link syntax. * Fri Jun 23 2006 Jesse Keating - 0.6-4 - And fix the link syntax. * Packager tag should not be used * Vendor tag should not be used * Distribution tag should not be used * use License and not Copyright * Summary tag should not end in a period * if possible, replace PreReq with Requires(pre) and/or Requires(post) * specfile is legible * package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86 * BuildRequires are proper - builds in mock will flush out problems here - the following packages don't need to be listed in BuildRequires: bash bzip2 coreutils cpio diffutils fedora-release (and/or redhat-release) gcc gcc-c++ gzip make patch perl redhat-rpm-config rpm-build sed tar unzip which * summary should be a short and concise description of the package * description expands upon summary (don't include installation instructions) * make sure lines are <= 80 characters * specfile written in American English * make a -doc sub-package if necessary - see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-9bbfa57478f0460c6160947a6bf795249488182b * packages including libraries should exclude static libraries if possible * don't use rpath * config files should usually be marked with %config(noreplace) * GUI apps should contain .desktop files * should the package contain a -devel sub-package? * use macros appropriately and consistently - ie. %{buildroot} and %{optflags} vs. $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and $RPM_OPT_FLAGS * don't use %makeinstall * install section must begin with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot} * locale data handling correct (find_lang) - if translations included, add BR: gettext and use %find_lang %{name} at the end of %install * consider using cp -p to preserve timestamps * split Requires(pre,post) into two separate lines * package should probably not be relocatable * package contains code - see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#CodeVsContent - in general, there should be no offensive content * package should own all directories and files * there should be no %files duplicates * file permissions should be okay; %defattrs should be present * %clean should be present * %doc files should not affect runtime * if it is a web apps, it should be in /usr/share/%{name} and *not* /var/www * verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 pcheung]$ rpm -qp --provides /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xmlrpc-2.0.1-3jpp.3.x86_64.rpm xmlrpc-applet-2.0.1.jar.so()(64bit) xmlrpc = 0:2.0.1-3jpp.3 [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 pcheung]$ rpm -qp --requires /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xmlrpc-2.0.1-3jpp.3.x86_64.rpm /bin/sh /bin/sh jakarta-commons-codec >= 1.3 jakarta-commons-httpclient java-gcj-compat java-gcj-compat jpackage-utils >= 0:1.6 jsse junit libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgcj_bc.so.1()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) librt.so.1()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) servletapi5 [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 pcheung]$ rpm -qp --provides /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xmlrpc-debuginfo-2.0.1-3jpp.3.x86_64.rpm xmlrpc-applet-2.0.1.jar.so.debug()(64bit) xmlrpc-debuginfo = 0:2.0.1-3jpp.3 [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 pcheung]$ rpm -qp --requires /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xmlrpc-debuginfo-2.0.1-3jpp.3.x86_64.rpm rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 pcheung]$ rpm -qp --provides /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xmlrpc-javadoc-2.0.1-3jpp.3.x86_64.rpm xmlrpc-javadoc = 0:2.0.1-3jpp.3 [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 pcheung]$ rpm -qp --requires /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xmlrpc-javadoc-2.0.1-3jpp.3.x86_64.rpm rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 * run rpmlint on the binary RPMs [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 pcheung]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xmlrpc-*x86*rpm W: xmlrpc non-standard-group Development/Java W: xmlrpc-javadoc non-standard-group Development/Java These are OK SHOULD: * package should include license text in the package and mark it with %doc * package should build on i386 * package should build in mock -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 17:40:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:40:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229321] Review Request :postgresql-pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191740.l3JHefu2002576@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request :postgresql-pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229321 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 17:42:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:42:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229728] Review Request: polyml - Poly/ML compiler and runtime system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191742.l3JHgBbf002686@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polyml - Poly/ML compiler and runtime system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229728 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 17:58:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:58:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230394] Review Request: mysql++ - C++ wrapper for the MySQL C API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191758.l3JHwNK7003938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql++ - C++ wrapper for the MySQL C API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230394 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 17:59:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:59:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236537] Review Request: gpsbabel - A tool to convert between various formats used by GPS devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191759.l3JHxps2004047@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gpsbabel - A tool to convert between various formats used by GPS devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236537 roozbeh at farsiweb.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From roozbeh at farsiweb.info 2007-04-19 13:59 EST ------- Built in devel, FC-5, FC-6, and EL-5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 18:01:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 14:01:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234826] Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191801.l3JI1J9Q004211@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234826 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 18:05:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 14:05:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235783] Review Request: perl-GraphViz - Interface to the GraphViz graphing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191805.l3JI5FGT004537@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GraphViz - Interface to the GraphViz graphing tool Alias: perl-GraphViz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235783 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 18:08:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 14:08:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235895] Review Request: perl-Text-Aspell - spell check interface for perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191808.l3JI88ZL004855@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Aspell - spell check interface for perl Alias: perl-Text-Aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235895 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 18:11:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 14:11:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236854] Review Request: python-kaa-base - The Kaa Media - base package for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191811.l3JIBB4W005234@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-kaa-base - The Kaa Media - base package for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236854 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 18:16:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 14:16:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236877] Review Request: perl-bioperl-run - Perl interface to various bioinformatics applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191816.l3JIGbfR005648@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-bioperl-run - Perl interface to various bioinformatics applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236877 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 18:18:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 14:18:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236976] Review Request: python-kaa-imlib2 - The Kaa Media - imlib2 binding for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191818.l3JIIJ4t005867@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-kaa-imlib2 - The Kaa Media - imlib2 binding for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236976 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 18:20:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 14:20:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236977] Review Request: python-kaa-metadata - The Kaa Media - metadata binding for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191820.l3JIKAYg005948@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-kaa-metadata - The Kaa Media - metadata binding for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236977 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 18:24:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 14:24:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237043] Review Request: perl-Hash-Case - Base class for hashes with key-casing requirements In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191824.l3JIOkSu006302@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Hash-Case - Base class for hashes with key-casing requirements Alias: perl-Hash-Case https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237043 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 18:24:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 14:24:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229321] Review Request :postgresql-pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191824.l3JIOrRO006317@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request :postgresql-pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229321 devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2007-04-19 14:24 EST ------- Opps, fixing package name: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: postgresql-pgpool-II Short Description: Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL Owners: devrim at CommandPrompt.com Branches: FC-5 FC-6 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: devrim at CommandPrompt.com Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 18:26:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 14:26:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237062] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Params-Validate - Extension of Params::Validate using Moose's types In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191826.l3JIQqVn006534@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Params-Validate - Extension of Params::Validate using Moose's types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237062 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 18:52:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 14:52:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226230] Merge Review: parted In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191852.l3JIqhoH009156@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: parted https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226230 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium dcantrell at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(dcantrell at redhat.c| |om) | ------- Additional Comments From dcantrell at redhat.com 2007-04-19 14:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > [!] Rpmlint output: > #rpmlint parted-1.8.6-4.src.rpm > W: parted no-url-tag > rpmlint ~/reports/parted/parted-1.8.6-4.fc7.x86_64.rpm > W: parted no-url-tag > --> an URL tag should be provided Fixed. > [!] Duplicate BR: automake (by libtool), libsepol-devel (by libselinux-devel) Fixed. > [!] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. Fixed. > [!] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. Fixed. > 1. Summary ends with dot. As far as I remember (rpmlint does not say anything, > and it is latest version) it was preffered to not end sumaries with dot. Not a > big deal. Fixed. > 2. parted-devel should require pkconfig. MUSTFIX Fixed. > 3. there is a texinfo file (doc/parted-pt_BR) which might be shipped but is not. Don't think this file is correct anymore, so that's why it isn't installed. Will check on that. > 4. %files has a duplicate line: %{_libdir}/libparted-*.so.* is included twice. > MUSTFIX Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 19:00:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:00:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237062] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Params-Validate - Extension of Params::Validate using Moose's types In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191900.l3JJ0ndW009586@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Params-Validate - Extension of Params::Validate using Moose's types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237062 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 19:01:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:01:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235783] Review Request: perl-GraphViz - Interface to the GraphViz graphing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191901.l3JJ1WgE009643@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GraphViz - Interface to the GraphViz graphing tool Alias: perl-GraphViz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235783 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 19:01:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:01:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235780] Review Request: perl-Class-Prototyped - Fast prototype-based OO programming in Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191901.l3JJ1XIl009653@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Prototyped - Fast prototype-based OO programming in Perl Alias: Class-Prototyped https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235780 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium Bug 235780 depends on bug 235783, which changed state. Bug 235783 Summary: Review Request: perl-GraphViz - Interface to the GraphViz graphing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235783 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 19:02:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:02:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237043] Review Request: perl-Hash-Case - Base class for hashes with key-casing requirements In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191902.l3JJ2cpM009714@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Hash-Case - Base class for hashes with key-casing requirements Alias: perl-Hash-Case https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237043 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-19 15:02 EST ------- Thanks for the review, Ralf! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 19:02:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:02:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237046] Review Request: perl-Config-IniHash - Perl extension for reading and writing INI files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191902.l3JJ2n41009743@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-IniHash - Perl extension for reading and writing INI files Alias: perl-Config-IniHash https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237046 Bug 237046 depends on bug 237043, which changed state. Bug 237043 Summary: Review Request: perl-Hash-Case - Base class for hashes with key-casing requirements https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237043 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 19:16:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:16:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191916.l3JJGpDj010824@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556 ------- Additional Comments From mhalcrow at us.ibm.com 2007-04-19 15:16 EST ------- Kevin Fenzi (kevin at tummy.com) wrote: > Oh, I see that -14 is out now. If you would like me to look over the > updated package before you import it, I would be happy to do so. I added a PAM module that can be used to automatically insert the user's key (based on his login passphrase) into his keyring at login. This can be used to perform automatic eCryptfs mounts. Updated spec: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/ecryptfs/ecryptfs-utils.spec New source RPM package (version 15): http://downloads.sourceforge.net/ecryptfs/ecryptfs-utils-15-0.src.rpm Thanks, Mike -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 19:28:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:28:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201077] gfs-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191928.l3JJSlPR012124@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gfs-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201077 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium cfeist at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From cfeist at redhat.com 2007-04-19 15:28 EST ------- It looks like for now we'll be putting this package in an external repo for users. If we want to include this in the future we'll re-open this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 19:34:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:34:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236854] Review Request: python-kaa-base - The Kaa Media - base package for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191934.l3JJYaGg012593@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-kaa-base - The Kaa Media - base package for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236854 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 19:59:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:59:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226276] Merge Review: perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704191959.l3JJxRsq014872@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226276 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-04-19 15:59 EST ------- x86_64 build of 16.2 fails, looks like a %{_prefix}/lib vs %{_libdir} mixup: RPM build errors: File not found: /var/tmp/perl-5.8.8-16.2.cmn6-root-machbuild/usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/ExtUtils/Embed.pm File not found: /var/tmp/perl-5.8.8-16.2.cmn6-root-machbuild/usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/ExtUtils/Command File not found: /var/tmp/perl-5.8.8-16.2.cmn6-root-machbuild/usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/ExtUtils/Install.pm File not found: /var/tmp/perl-5.8.8-16.2.cmn6-root-machbuild/usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/ExtUtils/Installed.pm File not found: /var/tmp/perl-5.8.8-16.2.cmn6-root-machbuild/usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/ExtUtils/Liblist File not found: /var/tmp/perl-5.8.8-16.2.cmn6-root-machbuild/usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/ExtUtils/Liblist.pm File not found: /var/tmp/perl-5.8.8-16.2.cmn6-root-machbuild/usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/ExtUtils/MakeMaker File not found: /var/tmp/perl-5.8.8-16.2.cmn6-root-machbuild/usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/ExtUtils/MakeMaker.pm File not found: /var/tmp/perl-5.8.8-16.2.cmn6-root-machbuild/usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/ExtUtils/MANIFEST.SKIP File not found by glob: /var/tmp/perl-5.8.8-16.2.cmn6-root-machbuild/usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/ExtUtils/MM*.pm File not found: /var/tmp/perl-5.8.8-16.2.cmn6-root-machbuild/usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/ExtUtils/MY.pm File not found: /var/tmp/perl-5.8.8-16.2.cmn6-root-machbuild/usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/ExtUtils/Manifest.pm File not found: /var/tmp/perl-5.8.8-16.2.cmn6-root-machbuild/usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/ExtUtils/Mkbootstrap.pm File not found: /var/tmp/perl-5.8.8-16.2.cmn6-root-machbuild/usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/ExtUtils/Mksymlists.pm File not found: /var/tmp/perl-5.8.8-16.2.cmn6-root-machbuild/usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/ExtUtils/NOTES File not found: /var/tmp/perl-5.8.8-16.2.cmn6-root-machbuild/usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/ExtUtils/Packlist.pm File not found: /var/tmp/perl-5.8.8-16.2.cmn6-root-machbuild/usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/ExtUtils/PATCHING File not found: /var/tmp/perl-5.8.8-16.2.cmn6-root-machbuild/usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/ExtUtils/testlib.pm File not found by glob: /var/tmp/perl-5.8.8-16.2.cmn6-root-machbuild/usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/Test/Harness* File not found by glob: /var/tmp/perl-5.8.8-16.2.cmn6-root-machbuild/usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/Test/More* File not found by glob: /var/tmp/perl-5.8.8-16.2.cmn6-root-machbuild/usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/Test/Builder* File not found by glob: /var/tmp/perl-5.8.8-16.2.cmn6-root-machbuild/usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/Test/Simple* File not found by glob: /var/tmp/perl-5.8.8-16.2.cmn6-root-machbuild/usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/Test/Tutorial* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 20:06:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 16:06:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237170] New: Review Request: repoman - Tool for configuring yum(8) settings and repositories Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237170 Summary: Review Request: repoman - Tool for configuring yum(8) settings and repositories Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dcantrell at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.boston.burdell.org/repoman/RPMS/source/repoman.spec SRPM URL: http://www.boston.burdell.org/repoman/RPMS/source/repoman-0.7-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: repoman is a graphical application for configuring yum(8) settings, enabling and disabling repositories, and configuring yum(8) plug-ins. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 20:36:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 16:36:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221906] Review Request: gmediaserver - UPnP compatible media server for the GNU system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704192036.l3JKaQHY018101@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gmediaserver - UPnP compatible media server for the GNU system Alias: gmediaserver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221906 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From karlikt at gmail.com 2007-04-19 16:36 EST ------- I am sorry, I was very bussy last time, so I can not fix/update package. (In reply to comment #20) > [!] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are > listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. > Build is not picking up the uuid libraries. These are not the ossp-uuid > libraries that you added to the BR, but the e2fsprogs uuid libraries. Please > remove uuid-devel from the BR and add e2pfsprogs-devel. BR also does not > contain pkgconfig which is required for the uuid detection. I wrote BRs based on configure. Now it is fixed. > 1. Package source file timestamp does not match upstream. Consider downloading > with "wget -N". Update sources (download by wget -cN ....) > 2. Missing/incorrect BR noted above. Fixed > 3. init file line wraps on line 4-5, please pick a better break point I set break point in description between sentences. > 4. init file / LSB info requires $syslog - not needed since it does not use syslog Deleted http://karlik.nonlogic.org/gmediaserv/gmediaserver.spec http://karlik.nonlogic.org/gmediaserv/gmediaserver-0.12.0-7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 20:41:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 16:41:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205314] Review Request: perl-Class-C3 - Pragma to use the C3 method resolution order algorithm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704192041.l3JKfEhf018598@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-C3 - Pragma to use the C3 method resolution order algorithm Alias: perl-Class-C3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205314 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-19 16:41 EST ------- Please branch for EL-4, EL-5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 20:41:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 16:41:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205309] Review Request: perl-Algorithm-C3 - Module for merging hierarchies using the C3 algorithm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704192041.l3JKf7vu018569@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Algorithm-C3 - Module for merging hierarchies using the C3 algorithm Alias: perl-Algorithm-C3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205309 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-19 16:41 EST ------- Please branch for EL-4, EL-5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 20:42:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 16:42:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226230] Merge Review: parted In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704192042.l3JKgev5018766@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: parted https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226230 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+, | |needinfo?(dcantrell at redhat.c | |om) ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-04-19 16:42 EST ------- All problems seem fixed in release 5, package APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 20:43:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 16:43:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205306] Review Request: perl-SUPER - Control superclass method dispatch In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704192043.l3JKh21g018856@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SUPER - Control superclass method dispatch Alias: perl-SUPER https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205306 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-19 16:42 EST ------- Please branch for EL-4, EL-5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 20:43:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 16:43:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205304] Review Request: perl-Sub-Identify - Retrieve names of code references In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704192043.l3JKhTpK018960@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Identify - Retrieve names of code references Alias: perl-Sub-Identify https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205304 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-19 16:43 EST ------- Please branch for EL-4, EL-5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 20:44:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 16:44:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205318] Review Request: perl-Class-MOP - Class::MOP Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704192044.l3JKiu83019093@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-MOP - Class::MOP Perl module Alias: perl-Class-MOP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205318 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-19 16:44 EST ------- Please branch for EL-4, EL-5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 22:16:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 18:16:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205060] Review Request: perl-Sub-Name - Name -- or rename -- a sub In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704192216.l3JMGbZu028093@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Name - Name -- or rename -- a sub Alias: perl-Sub-Name https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205060 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-19 18:16 EST ------- Please branch for EL-4, EL-5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 22:16:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 18:16:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205060] Review Request: perl-Sub-Name - Name -- or rename -- a sub In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704192216.l3JMGeC1028107@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Name - Name -- or rename -- a sub Alias: perl-Sub-Name https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205060 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-19 18:16 EST ------- Please branch for EL-4, EL-5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 22:17:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 18:17:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205060] Review Request: perl-Sub-Name - Name -- or rename -- a sub In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704192217.l3JMH2BX028185@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Name - Name -- or rename -- a sub Alias: perl-Sub-Name https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205060 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 22:18:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 18:18:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205319] Review Request: perl-Params-Coerce - Allows your classes to do coercion of parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704192218.l3JMIlxX028335@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Params-Coerce - Allows your classes to do coercion of parameters Alias: perl-Params-Coerce https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205319 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-19 18:18 EST ------- Please branch for EL-4, EL-5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 22:44:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 18:44:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201494] Review Request: perl-Smart-Comments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704192244.l3JMiT4Y030309@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Smart-Comments Alias: perl-Smart-Comments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201494 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-19 18:44 EST ------- Please branch for EL-4, EL-5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 19 23:34:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 19:34:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227946] Review Request: stgit - StGIT provides similar functionality to Quilt on top of GIT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704192334.l3JNYH8x000380@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stgit - StGIT provides similar functionality to Quilt on top of GIT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227946 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium jbowes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(jbowes at redhat.com)| ------- Additional Comments From jbowes at redhat.com 2007-04-19 19:34 EST ------- Updated files: Spec URL: http://jbowes.dangerouslyinc.com/tmp/stgit.spec SRPM URL: http://jbowes.dangerouslyinc.com/tmp/stgit-0.12.1-1.src.rpm Sorry for the delay. I've updated to the new version, and chmod -x'd the shell script after install. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 00:13:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 20:13:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704200013.l3K0DLXX001989@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2007-04-19 20:13 EST ------- yeah exactly. to prefix means to put it beforehand :) so i completly agree with you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 00:56:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 20:56:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235588] Review Request: escape - an extensible puzzle game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704200056.l3K0us6Z004177@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: escape - an extensible puzzle game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235588 adam at spicenitz.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From adam at spicenitz.org 2007-04-19 20:56 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: escape Short Description: an extensible puzzle game Owners: adam at spicenitz.org Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 02:58:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 22:58:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231774] Review Request: perl-DBIx-POS - Define a dictionary of SQL statements in a POD dialect (POS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704200258.l3K2wYmP011208@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-POS - Define a dictionary of SQL statements in a POD dialect (POS) Alias: perl-DBIx-POS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231774 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-19 22:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > that is, that fragments of code licensed under the Artistic license may be > reliscensed under the GPL (as would be the case if someone opted to use this > package under the terms of the GPL). This is where I don't quite follow you. What part of the Artistic license allows this? And why would you consider the portion under the Artistic license a "fragment"? Note: I think we both understand that this is not a blocker on the package itself because mixing these two licenses is certainly compatible. It's just a matter of getting the tag to reflect the realistic licensing of the package as a whole. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 03:27:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 23:27:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221906] Review Request: gmediaserver - UPnP compatible media server for the GNU system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704200327.l3K3R1rC013105@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gmediaserver - UPnP compatible media server for the GNU system Alias: gmediaserver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221906 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-19 23:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #21) > I wrote BRs based on configure. Now it is fixed. Yeah, it took me a while to figure out why configure wasn't picking it up. Most everything is fixed at this point, so this package is ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ One last thing that I notice that you probably want to fix before your first build: all the scriptlet lines should end with "|| :" otherwise spurious errors on any of the commands will cause scriptlet errors and package install/upgrade/uninstall failures. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 04:34:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 00:34:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231774] Review Request: perl-DBIx-POS - Define a dictionary of SQL statements in a POD dialect (POS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704200434.l3K4YZED017792@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-POS - Define a dictionary of SQL statements in a POD dialect (POS) Alias: perl-DBIx-POS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231774 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-20 00:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > that is, that fragments of code licensed under the Artistic license may be > > reliscensed under the GPL (as would be the case if someone opted to use this > > package under the terms of the GPL). > > This is where I don't quite follow you. What part of the Artistic license > allows this? And why would you consider the portion under the Artistic > license a "fragment"? That's a good question. The Artistic license is very clear about what can and cannot be done with the package, both as provided ("Standard Version") and derivative works... If we treat D::P as a derivative work of C::S, then I think this usage falls under the scope of clause 3(a): " 3. You may otherwise modify your copy of this Package in any way, pro- vided that you insert a prominent notice in each changed file stat- ing how and when you changed that file, and provided that you do at least ONE of the following: "a) place your modifications in the Public Domain or otherwise make them Freely Available, such as by posting said modifications to Usenet or an equivalent medium, or placing the modifications on a major archive site such as uunet.uu.net, or by allowing the Copyright Holder to include your modifications in the Standard Version of the Package." Parts of C::S are aggregated (totally embedded, even) within D::P; and the author clearly states which parts, where they came from, and the original copyright. Furthermore, the author satisfied 3a by making such modifications freely available, etc. So, I'm certanly not a copyright lawyer, but that's my reading. > Note: I think we both understand that this is not a blocker on the package > itself because mixing these two licenses is certainly compatible. It's just a > matter of getting the tag to reflect the realistic licensing of the package as > a whole. Yep :) If we decide we can't go with the author's original dual-licensing as is, we can just term it Artistic and I'll take the matter upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 04:49:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 00:49:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704200449.l3K4n4NL018360@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-04-20 00:48 EST ------- I see in the build log: ... PAM directory: [/lib/security] ./configure: line 20473: gtk-config: command not found ./configure: line 20474: gtk-config: command not found ./configure: line 20475: gtk-config: command not found GTK not found Is there a missing BuildRequires: on gtk? (Not sure what it would be used for though). Also, the permissions don't look right on the pam module. It's mode 644, but should be 755? This results in it not appearing in the debuginfo since it's not executable. All the other pam modules appear to be 755... Other than that it looks good... ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 05:46:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 01:46:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237216] New: PUP future feature Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237216 Summary: PUP future feature Product: Fedora Core Version: test3 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: renier at gigaskills.co.za QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Description of problem: Would like to see more control of the package updater service. If one has a older copy of Fedora Core the list of updates available could be very long. Would like to change the default selection, so that one can check packages you wish to update rather than to have to uncheck all the packages that you do not want to have updated at that moment in time. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 06:35:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 02:35:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236642] Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704200635.l3K6Z9fW023657@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236642 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-04-20 02:34 EST ------- hmm im getting a name resolution failure for revisor.fedoraunity.org at the moment. Is the result of a problem on my end or is the machine down currently? -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 06:47:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 02:47:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236642] Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704200647.l3K6lY5A024191@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236642 ------- Additional Comments From jonathansteffan at gmail.com 2007-04-20 02:47 EST ------- Yeah, the VM has been moved to another host due to Bob needing to use the physical machine for another purpose (to replace a server having hardware issues for $work) and as a side effect the DNS servers are down at the moment. Minimally we are going to add my primary DNS server as a slave to help prevent this in the future but we are also evaluating just moving the plone instance to my dedicated zope server. Sorry Jef, it'll be back tomorrow I assume. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 06:59:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 02:59:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230394] Review Request: mysql++ - C++ wrapper for the MySQL C API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704200659.l3K6xF10024687@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql++ - C++ wrapper for the MySQL C API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230394 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 07:43:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 03:43:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227946] Review Request: stgit - StGIT provides similar functionality to Quilt on top of GIT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704200743.l3K7h4iS026866@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stgit - StGIT provides similar functionality to Quilt on top of GIT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227946 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-20 03:42 EST ------- Well, for 0.12.1-1: * Macros - Please use proper macros (especially for the directory starting from /usr... /usr/share should be %{_datadir} ) Other things are okay. ---------------------------------------------------------- This package (stgit) is APPROVED by me. ---------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 08:04:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 04:04:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227579] Review Request: spr - Statistical pattern recognition In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704200804.l3K84QNa029132@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spr - Statistical pattern recognition https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227579 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-20 04:04 EST ------- First, please update to the newest version. I will check it after that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 08:15:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 04:15:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235189] Review Request: nautilus-python - Python bindings for Nautilus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704200815.l3K8FNRo030194@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nautilus-python - Python bindings for Nautilus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235189 jspaleta at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jspaleta at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-04-20 04:15 EST ------- The Good + naming is good + specfile name matches base package name + Licensed as GPL and includes COPYING file accordingly + specfile written in english-ese and is legible + included source md5sum checks with upstream source as listed in SOURCE0 url f4bd5de3a9e01c80fc0a2ef7aeb64dd7 nautilus-python-0.4.3.tar.gz + builds on x86 fedora-development in mock + buildrequires look good + no locales + not relocatable + base package owns all directories it creates and directory ownership of parent directories is accounted for in package deps + permissions seem to be okay + clean section is okay + consistent use of macros + permissible code and content + items in doc are not runtime necessary + devel requires versioned base package + not a gui + does not obviously own files from another package + install section looks good + build.log shows its using the RPM_OPT_FLAGS The Bad - Must remove all .la files - devel subpackage needs to require pkgconfig due to directory ownership rules - Need to include appropriate ldconfig scriptlets for shared libraries The Suggestions ? Would it be better if the examples were placed in docs section of the devel package, instead of in the main package? The Corrections Attached you'll find an updated spec file that corrects the blocker items listed above. Please review it write back if you need to discuss anything. Once you resubmit updated spec and srpm urls that correct the blockers this should be approvable. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 08:17:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 04:17:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235189] Review Request: nautilus-python - Python bindings for Nautilus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704200817.l3K8HJ8u030342@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nautilus-python - Python bindings for Nautilus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235189 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-04-20 04:17 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=153113) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=153113&action=view) updated spec with review corrections included specfile with suggested review blocker corrections included. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 10:47:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 06:47:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205309] Review Request: perl-Algorithm-C3 - Module for merging hierarchies using the C3 algorithm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201047.l3KAlF96008197@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Algorithm-C3 - Module for merging hierarchies using the C3 algorithm Alias: perl-Algorithm-C3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205309 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 10:50:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 06:50:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205314] Review Request: perl-Class-C3 - Pragma to use the C3 method resolution order algorithm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201050.l3KAoMwd008458@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-C3 - Pragma to use the C3 method resolution order algorithm Alias: perl-Class-C3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205314 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 10:51:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 06:51:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228298] Review Request: python-louie - Dispatches signals between Python objects in a wide variety of contexts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201051.l3KAp64O008502@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-louie - Dispatches signals between Python objects in a wide variety of contexts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228298 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 10:51:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 06:51:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201051.l3KApHED008546@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598 Bug 233598 depends on bug 228298, which changed state. Bug 228298 Summary: Review Request: python-louie - Dispatches signals between Python objects in a wide variety of contexts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228298 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 10:53:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 06:53:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228301] Review Request: python-nevow - Web application construction kit written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201053.l3KArNxD008618@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-nevow - Web application construction kit written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228301 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 10:53:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 06:53:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201053.l3KArOZ1008636@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598 Bug 233598 depends on bug 228301, which changed state. Bug 228301 Summary: Review Request: python-nevow - Web application construction kit written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228301 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 10:54:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 06:54:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205306] Review Request: perl-SUPER - Control superclass method dispatch In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201054.l3KAs6ig008687@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SUPER - Control superclass method dispatch Alias: perl-SUPER https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205306 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 10:55:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 06:55:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205304] Review Request: perl-Sub-Identify - Retrieve names of code references In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201055.l3KAtaHD008752@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Identify - Retrieve names of code references Alias: perl-Sub-Identify https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205304 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 10:57:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 06:57:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233596] Review Request: coherence - Python framework to participate in digital living networks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201057.l3KAvv22008814@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coherence - Python framework to participate in digital living networks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233596 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-04-20 06:57 EST ------- Spec URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/coherence/coherence.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/coherence/coherence-0.2.1-1.src.rpm * Fri Apr 20 2007 Matthias Saou 0.2.1-1 - Update to 0.2.1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 10:58:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 06:58:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205318] Review Request: perl-Class-MOP - Class::MOP Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201058.l3KAwoQ8008849@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-MOP - Class::MOP Perl module Alias: perl-Class-MOP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205318 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 11:00:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 07:00:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205319] Review Request: perl-Params-Coerce - Allows your classes to do coercion of parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201100.l3KB0h8Q008924@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Params-Coerce - Allows your classes to do coercion of parameters Alias: perl-Params-Coerce https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205319 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 11:02:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 07:02:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201494] Review Request: perl-Smart-Comments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201102.l3KB2E6A009017@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Smart-Comments Alias: perl-Smart-Comments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201494 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 11:41:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 07:41:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233782] Review Request: vegastrike - 3D OpenGL spaceflight simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201141.l3KBfKON010339@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vegastrike - 3D OpenGL spaceflight simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233782 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-20 07:41 EST ------- Peter, any chance we could get some movement with this? If you don't have the time thats ok, but then please say so, then I can find another reviewer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 11:45:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 07:45:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234750] Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201145.l3KBjkrO010642@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234750 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From lennartkneppers at gmail.com 2007-04-20 07:45 EST ------- Whats the status on this one? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 11:53:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 07:53:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201153.l3KBrW7X011092@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-20 07:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #33) > That's great, but it looks like they all have reviewers assigned, though it > looks like Andrea and Peter haven't done much in awhile. Jon, I've added a comment to bug 233782, asking Peter if he has time for this and if not, if he would be okay with someone else reviewing it. I'm currently a bit too busy todo 100% volunteer reviews I'm afraid, otherwise I would love todo this as I think vdrift is a great game to get into Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 12:08:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 08:08:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233256] Review Request: asc-music - Background music for the game asc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201208.l3KC8Zxs011799@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asc-music - Background music for the game asc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233256 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-20 08:08 EST ------- AFAIK the music is an integral part of ASC, its just distributed separately from the source so that people don't have a huge download each new release. Since its in integral part, its under the same license. "Proof" of it being in integral part is tihs ./configure message when building the asc package: configure: WARNING: The following music files could not be found: data/music/frontiers.mp3 data/music/time_to_strike.mp3 data/music/machine_wars.mp3 . The music files are not distributed together with the source code because of their size. ASC can run without the music files being present, this message is just to inform you about the existence of the music. Notice how they give the size as the only reason for the separate distribution, they don't say anything about it being under a different license. --- If this is not good enough I can mail upstream to ask. I'm afraid google is of no use in locating the composer of the music himself. (I already tried to find his contact info before submitting this for review). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 13:22:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 09:22:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232792] Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201322.l3KDM31g016087@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232792 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 14:16:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 10:16:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226337] Merge Review: pyparted In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201416.l3KEG74W019904@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pyparted https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226337 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(dcantrell at redhat.c | |om) ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-04-20 10:15 EST ------- I am planning on reviewing this one, but I have a few questions/suggestions, before doing an official full review: - rpmlint has a couple of complaints on the src.rpm: W: pyparted no-url-tag W: pyparted mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 4, tab: line 27) The "no-url-tag" is of course propagated to the binary rpms, too. Maybe you could fix those? - I notice CFLAGS is explicitely set : export CFLAGS="-fPIC -O2 -g2" If there is a good reason to override the default compiler options (including the -fortify and so on), please be as kind as to explain it. - SMP flags are not used; if their usage breaks compilation, please state that in the spec, otherwise please use them - The theory says that %makeinstall should be avoided, if possible. I assume it is a must in this case? If so, could you please add a comment in the spec, to make it clear ? - I suggest adding AUTHORS and Changelog to the list of files, so that we know who to bug in case of trouble :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 14:22:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 10:22:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232792] Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201422.l3KEMbLO020326@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232792 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-20 10:22 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=153185) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=153185&action=view) rpmlint log for 4.10.1-2 (with gdal-config issue modified) Well, actually I don't know about PHP at all!! So I don't know how to use this... However as this is heavily related with grass, gdal.. so I will review this. For 4.10.1-2: * Mock build failure/gdal-config related issue - First of all, -2 won't be rebuilt. ------------------------------------------------------- /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lodbcinst collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [shp2img] Error 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.41559 (%build) ------------------------------------------------------- (Well, the previous line is so long, so I will attach a full mock build log) This is because `$GDAL_CONFIG --dep-libs` in configure adds unnecessary linkages. Applying a patch for configure to remove the above seems good. For sed usage, ------------------------------------------------------- %{__sed} -i.libs -e 's|`\$GDAL_CONFIG --dep-libs`||' configure ------------------------------------------------------- * License - Well, while most files are licensed under MIT, one file is licensed under BSD. ------------------------------------------------------- strptime.c ------------------------------------------------------- Currently I do not disagree with writing "BSD" for the license of this. Then after the fix above is applied.. * rpmlint - attached. Summary: * Fix improper permissions. Next for spec file: A. Description entry - Well, while there is a php releated subpackage which requires php, does main package also require php? Please explain because currently I don't know how to use this at all. - Do perl/python subpackage have no dependency for main package? - Requires: python/Requires: perl are redundant. - Current Fedora packaging policy requires that BuildRoot includes release number (according to the section "BuildRoot tag" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines ) - By the way, there seems to be java/ruby binding. Would you try to enable this? B. Prep/Build/Install stage - not a big problem, however fedora compilation flags is passed twice for main and python subdirectory build (not a blocker) - If this support parallel make, then please use. Otherwise add some comments in spec file. C. Scripts - While no shared libraries are installed by main package, why does main package call ldconfig? D. File entry - README.CONFIGURE is for people who want to build this software by themselves and so this is not needed for fedora rpm. - Vera related fonts under tests/ should not be installed because these fonts are provides system-wide by bitstream-vera-fonts - (I say this although I know *very little* about httpd) Please consider to move files under /var/www to %{_datadir} Check: the section "Web Applications" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines - It seems that mapscript/php3/README should be added as %doc to php subpackage. - On my system %{_libdir}/php4/ is not owned by any package. Please check if this directory is correct. - %{perl_vendorarch}/auto/mapscript/ is not owned by any package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 14:24:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 10:24:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232792] Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201424.l3KEOANc020403@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232792 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-20 10:24 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=153186) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=153186&action=view) mock build log of mapserver 4.10.1-2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 14:26:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 10:26:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232792] Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201426.l3KEQAPI020525@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232792 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-20 10:25 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=153187) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=153187&action=view) mock build log of mapserver 4.10.1-2 with gdal-config issue fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 14:27:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 10:27:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232792] Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201427.l3KERFHq020650@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232792 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 14:47:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 10:47:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230275] Review Request: varnish - High-performance HTTP accelerator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201447.l3KElHU7022485@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: varnish - High-performance HTTP accelerator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230275 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matthias at rpmforge.net ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-04-20 10:47 EST ------- For having packaged and used varnish, just a few comments : - The %lib_name doesn't seem very useful, and having used plain "libs" instead of "-n %{lib_name}" for the sub-package would make things clearer. Also, the "future" devel package would be named wrong since it would be "varnish-libs-devel". - Some brackets are used inconsistently ("%version-%{release}"). - A condrestart should probably be added in %postun, as it makes sense to restart varnishd after an update. - The .gz extensions in %files for the man pages are wrong, you should use something like "*.1*" instead, for people who rebuild with uncompressed or bzip2ed man pages. - You could spare a lot of "mkdir -p" by using "install -D". - The "--sbindir=/usr/sbin" on the %configure line is redundant. - The iteration for the UTF-8 conversion would be best done with a glob, i.e. "for i in bin/*/*.1", as it'll be less subject to break if any programs are added or removed. - I would personally add a comment above the "Requires: gcc" line to explain that varnish *really* needs a C compiler at runtime by design because of its VCL files. - The explicit requirements on "ncurses" should be removed, as it's wrong to have it (wouldn't allow for a compat-ncurses to work right). - The kernel requirement should probably be removed from the libs package, unless they are the ones requiring 2.6 specific features (but I think it's only the daemon). rpmlint's output is valuable, but having it empty unfortunately doesn't necessarily mean that the package is perfect! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 15:15:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:15:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225783] Merge Review: gdb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201515.l3KFFxex024043@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gdb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225783 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium skasal at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jan.kratochvil at redhat.com |rc040203 at freenet.de CC| |mcepl at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From skasal at redhat.com 2007-04-20 11:15 EST ------- A formalistic comment: this bug should be assigned to a reviewer (who must be != pkg owner), which would at the end guarantee that the pkg passed the review. So, if I understand the process correctly, Ralf should have assigned the bug to himself when posting comment #1. (Later on, Jan has assigned the bug to himself, which is a common mistake among RH developers coming from Fedora Core.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 15:19:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:19:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225691] Merge Review: dhcp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201519.l3KFJhXY024297@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: dhcp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225691 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-04-20 11:19 EST ------- One more comment, upon reading the guidelines, the static subpackage name should better be dhcp-static and libdhcp4client-static, but it is not a big deal. I attach a patch in case you want to change it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 15:21:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:21:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225691] Merge Review: dhcp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201521.l3KFL0J9024391@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: dhcp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225691 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-04-20 11:20 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=153188) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=153188&action=view) use -static instead of devel-static -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 15:28:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:28:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225622] Merge Review: boost In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201528.l3KFSjOQ025014@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: boost https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225622 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-04-20 11:28 EST ------- In fact the guidelines prefer -static, I'll update my patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 15:30:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:30:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225622] Merge Review: boost In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201530.l3KFUpvM025131@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: boost https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225622 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #151940|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-04-20 11:30 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=153190) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=153190&action=view) implement review remarks replace static-devel with static -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 15:31:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:31:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235764] Review Request: perl-CGI-Ex - CGI utility suite - makes powerful application writing fun and easy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201531.l3KFVone025188@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Ex - CGI utility suite - makes powerful application writing fun and easy Alias: perl-CGI-Ex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235764 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-20 11:31 EST ------- Now, with additional BR's :) Note a couple new deps: perl-JSON and perl-Config-IniHash SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-CGI-Ex-2.09-2.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-CGI-Ex.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 15:32:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:32:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225783] Merge Review: gdb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201532.l3KFWFj2025214@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gdb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225783 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-20 11:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > A formalistic comment: > So, if I understand the process correctly, Ralf should have assigned the bug to > himself when posting comment #1. I am not formally reviewing this package, I am just commenting. Jan has had his chances to make me review this package, but his non-colaboration has caused my interest in continuing this review to NULL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 15:32:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:32:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201532.l3KFWe22025265@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556 ------- Additional Comments From mhalcrow at us.ibm.com 2007-04-20 11:32 EST ------- Kevin Fenzi (kevin at tummy.com) wrote: > I see in the build log: > ... > PAM directory: [/lib/security] > ./configure: line 20473: gtk-config: command not found > ./configure: line 20474: gtk-config: command not found > ./configure: line 20475: gtk-config: command not found > GTK not found > > Is there a missing BuildRequires: on gtk? > (Not sure what it would be used for though). Not for this release. Someone put some work into a graphical eCryptfs mount management tool last summer, but it never got into a state that is worthy of inclusion into the utils package. So the check for gtk will be needed once the code is available, but for now, the ./configure warning can be ignored. > Also, the permissions don't look right on the pam module. It's mode > 644, but should be 755? This results in it not appearing in the > debuginfo since it's not executable. All the other pam modules > appear to be 755... It turns out that some distro's set the PAM permissions to 644 and others to 755. It looks like the only effect in Fedora is the inclusion in debuginfo. Version 15-1 changes the PAM module permission from 644 to 755. Spec file: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/ecryptfs/ecryptfs-utils.spec Source RPM: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/ecryptfs/ecryptfs-utils-15-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 15:43:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:43:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221906] Review Request: gmediaserver - UPnP compatible media server for the GNU system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201543.l3KFhm9N026394@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gmediaserver - UPnP compatible media server for the GNU system Alias: gmediaserver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221906 ------- Additional Comments From karlikt at gmail.com 2007-04-20 11:43 EST ------- Thanks for Your review (it taught me a lot of new things). Now, I can add fedora-cvs comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 15:47:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:47:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221906] Review Request: gmediaserver - UPnP compatible media server for the GNU system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201547.l3KFl3D5026622@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gmediaserver - UPnP compatible media server for the GNU system Alias: gmediaserver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221906 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-20 11:46 EST ------- Yes, you can find the information on how to request your packages CVS module creation here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure?action=show&redirect=CVSAdminProcedure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 15:49:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:49:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221906] Review Request: gmediaserver - UPnP compatible media server for the GNU system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201549.l3KFn7ZG026749@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gmediaserver - UPnP compatible media server for the GNU system Alias: gmediaserver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221906 karlikt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From karlikt at gmail.com 2007-04-20 11:48 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gmediaserver Short Description: UPnP compatible media server for the GNU system Owners: karlikt at gmail.com Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 16:03:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 12:03:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205062] Review Request: perl-Sub-Install - Install subroutines into packages easily In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201603.l3KG3AAq027675@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Install - Install subroutines into packages easily Alias: perl-Sub-Install https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205062 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-20 12:03 EST ------- Please branch for EL-4, EL-5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 16:07:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 12:07:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226474] Merge Review: systemtap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201607.l3KG7LUZ027908@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: systemtap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226474 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium dsmith at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dsmith at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 16:14:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 12:14:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226474] Merge Review: systemtap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201614.l3KGEJUo028256@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: systemtap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226474 ------- Additional Comments From dsmith at redhat.com 2007-04-20 12:14 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=153193) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=153193&action=view) rpmlint output on systemtap-0.5.13-1.fc6.i386.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 16:14:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 12:14:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225783] Merge Review: gdb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201614.l3KGEamM028285@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gdb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225783 skasal at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|rc040203 at freenet.de |nobody at fedoraproject.org ------- Additional Comments From skasal at redhat.com 2007-04-20 12:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > I am not formally reviewing this package, I am just commenting. OK, assigning it back to nobody, until a reviewer is found. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 16:17:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 12:17:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226474] Merge Review: systemtap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201617.l3KGHPHg028426@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: systemtap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226474 ------- Additional Comments From dsmith at redhat.com 2007-04-20 12:17 EST ------- There are no rpmlint warnings output on systemtap-runtime-0.5.13-1.fc6.i386.rpm. There are 3 classes of rpmlint warnings on systemtap-0.5.13-1.fc6.i386.rpm: - W: systemtap devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/systemtap/runtime/*.[ch] (48 instances) Since the systemtap package is basically a code generator/compiler, these warnings can be ignored. Those files could be put in a devel rpm, but the main rpm would always have to require the devel rpm, making the separation pointless. - W: systemtap spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/systemtap-0.5.13/examples/small_demos/* (13 instances) rpmlint doesn't like the fact that the systemtap package includes several demo scripts that are marked as executable. - W: systemtap doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/systemtap-0.5.13/examples/socktop /bin/bash (1 instance) rpmlint doesn't like the fact that the systemtap package includes one demo script that is a bash script. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 16:33:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 12:33:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234750] Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201633.l3KGX6hK029207@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234750 trond.danielsen at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #151389|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at fedoraproject.org 2007-04-20 12:33 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=153195) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=153195&action=view) Complete review As far as I can see this package is ok. Unless there are any additional comments I will mark it as approved later today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 16:48:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 12:48:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226337] Merge Review: pyparted In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201648.l3KGmFqZ029996@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pyparted https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226337 dcantrell at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(dcantrell at redhat.c| |om) | ------- Additional Comments From dcantrell at redhat.com 2007-04-20 12:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > I am planning on reviewing this one, but I have a few questions/suggestions, > before doing an official full review: > > - rpmlint has a couple of complaints on the src.rpm: > W: pyparted no-url-tag Fixed. > W: pyparted mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 4, tab: line 27) Fixed. > - I notice CFLAGS is explicitely set : > export CFLAGS="-fPIC -O2 -g2" > If there is a good reason to override the default compiler options (including > the -fortify and so on), please be as kind as to explain it. There is no good reason. Holdover from old old spec file. Removed. > - SMP flags are not used; if their usage breaks compilation, please state that > in the spec, otherwise please use them Fixed. > - The theory says that %makeinstall should be avoided, if possible. I assume it > is a must in this case? If so, could you please add a comment in the spec, to > make it clear ? Fixed. > - I suggest adding AUTHORS and Changelog to the list of files, so that we know > who to bug in case of trouble :) Fixed. Made a note in the AUTHORS file to use bugzilla.redhat.com to report bugs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 17:06:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 13:06:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225715] Merge Review: echo-icon-theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201706.l3KH64e3031064@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: echo-icon-theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225715 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-04-20 13:05 EST ------- Lets close this finally. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 17:16:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 13:16:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229728] Review Request: polyml - Poly/ML compiler and runtime system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201716.l3KHGsQ6031669@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polyml - Poly/ML compiler and runtime system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229728 gemi at bluewin.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2007-04-20 13:16 EST ------- Built on FC6 and devel for i386, x86_64 and ppc. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 17:47:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 13:47:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205062] Review Request: perl-Sub-Install - Install subroutines into packages easily In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201747.l3KHlqEC001713@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Install - Install subroutines into packages easily Alias: perl-Sub-Install https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205062 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 17:49:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 13:49:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225807] Merge Review: glib-java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201749.l3KHnpBE001820@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: glib-java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225807 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium skasal at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|medium |urgent ------- Additional Comments From skasal at redhat.com 2007-04-20 13:49 EST ------- All fixed, sorry for the delay. And similar bugs found in my other packages fixed, too. Could you please look at this again? (And to the other 6 java-gnome pkgs and to grep, if you have spare time...) Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 17:50:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 13:50:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225857] Merge Review: grep In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201750.l3KHoiJV001886@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: grep https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225857 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium skasal at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|medium |urgent ------- Additional Comments From skasal at redhat.com 2007-04-20 13:50 EST ------- I apologize for the huge delay. Fixed. I hope I have not missed something. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 18:00:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 14:00:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230806] Review Request: tasks - To-do list In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201800.l3KI0qkI002721@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tasks - To-do list https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230806 dyoung at mesd.k12.or.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From dyoung at mesd.k12.or.us 2007-04-20 14:00 EST ------- Sent 0.4-4 to builders. Built successfully; they are now in needsign state. Closing with NEXTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 18:05:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 14:05:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230806] Review Request: tasks - To-do list In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201805.l3KI5VwU003083@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tasks - To-do list https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230806 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-20 14:05 EST ------- Seems good. If you have something again, feel free to let me know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 18:12:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 14:12:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232792] Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201812.l3KIC1jv003523@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232792 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-20 14:11 EST ------- One more comment: Why do you exclude %{python_sitearch}/mapscript.py? ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 18:16:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 14:16:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234031] Review Request: eclipse-pydev - an Eclipse plugin for working with Python. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201816.l3KIGOFU003786@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-pydev - an Eclipse plugin for working with Python. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234031 overholt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-04-20 14:16 EST ------- Thanks, Tom. Igor: if we can't symlink any more than we already do, let's go ahead with this for now. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 18:19:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 14:19:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234031] Review Request: eclipse-pydev - an Eclipse plugin for working with Python. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201819.l3KIJqh7003923@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-pydev - an Eclipse plugin for working with Python. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234031 overholt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-04-20 14:19 EST ------- Igor's going away for the weekend so he asked me to request the CVS module for him. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: eclipse-pydev Short Description: An Eclipse plugin for working with Python as well as Jython code. Owners: ifoox at redhat.com Branches: InitialCC: overholt at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 18:25:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 14:25:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225691] Merge Review: dhcp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201825.l3KIPJHO004273@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: dhcp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225691 ------- Additional Comments From dcantrell at redhat.com 2007-04-20 14:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #24) > One more comment, upon reading the guidelines, the static subpackage > name should better be dhcp-static and libdhcp4client-static, but > it is not a big deal. I attach a patch in case you want to change > it. Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 18:45:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 14:45:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235527] Review Request: pylibacl - POSIX.1e ACLs library wrapper for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201845.l3KIjTO7005518@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pylibacl - POSIX.1e ACLs library wrapper for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235527 mszpak at wp.pl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mszpak at wp.pl 2007-04-20 14:45 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pylibacl Short Description: POSIX.1e ACLs library wrapper for python Owners: mszpak at wp.pl Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 18:45:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 14:45:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235526] Review Request: pyxattr - Extended attributes library wrapper for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201845.l3KIjw4T005587@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyxattr - Extended attributes library wrapper for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235526 mszpak at wp.pl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mszpak at wp.pl 2007-04-20 14:45 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pyxattr Short Description: Extended attributes library wrapper for Python Owners: mszpak at wp.pl Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 19:00:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 15:00:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237311] New: Review Request: ArgoUML - UML Modelling Tool - FOSS Java App Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237311 Summary: Review Request: ArgoUML - UML Modelling Tool - FOSS Java App Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: keith at karsites.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://argouml.tigris.org/ SRPM URL: it's a java package Description: An Open Source UML Modeling Tool ArgoUML Features ArgoUML provides the following features. Each feature is described briefly below. * All 9 UML 1.4 Diagrams supported * Platform Independent: Java 1.4+ * Click and Go! with Java Web Start * Standard UML 1.4 Metamodel * XMI Support * Export Diagrams as GIF, PNG, PS, EPS, PGML and SVG * Available in ten languages - EN, EN-GB, DE, ES, IT, RU, FR, NB, PT, ZH * Advanced diagram editing and Zoom * OCL Support * Forward Engineering * Reverse Engineering / Jar/class file Import * Cognitive Support o Reflection-in-action + Design Critics + Corrective Automations (partially implemented) + "To Do" List + User model (partially implemented) o Opportunistic Design + "To Do" List + Checklists o Comprehension and Problem Solving + Explorer Perspectives + Multiple, Overlapping Views Install with Java Web Start The ArgoUML website provides easy installation with Java Web Start. Runs on any platform with Java1.4 or Java5 ArgoUML is written entirely in Java and uses the Java Foundation Classes. This allows ArgoUML to run on virtually any platform. Standard UML Metamodel ArgoUML is compliant with the OMG Standard for UML 1.4. The core model repository is an implementation of the Java Metadata Interface (JMI) which directly supports MOF and uses the machine readable version of the UML 1.4 specification provided by the OMG. UML Diagram Support ArgoUML uses GEF, the UCI Graph Editing Framework to edit UML diagrams. The following diagram types are supported: * Class diagram * Statechart diagram * Activity diagram * Use Case diagram * Collaboration diagram * Deployment diagram (includes Object and Component diagram in one) * Sequence diagram NB: I have downloaded and installed the Java application. It works very well, and is very intuitive to use. Please take a look at it. I cannot get the print function to work, to print out UML diagrams under FC6 KDE & CUPS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 19:06:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 15:06:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201906.l3KJ6KuQ007284@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-04-20 15:06 EST ------- >Not for this release. Someone put some work into a graphical eCryptfs >mount management tool last summer, but it never got into a state that >is worthy of inclusion into the utils package. So the check for gtk >will be needed once the code is available, but for now, the >./configure warning can be ignored. ok. Makes sense. >It turns out that some distro's set the PAM permissions to 644 and >others to 755. It looks like the only effect in Fedora is the >inclusion in debuginfo. > >Version 15-1 changes the PAM module permission from 644 to 755. Humm. I don't see that change in the -1 version. Only the changelog and the version are changed. Can you doublecheck the version you updated? In any case you can fix that before you check it in... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 19:10:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 15:10:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230275] Review Request: varnish - High-performance HTTP accelerator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201910.l3KJArBH007856@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: varnish - High-performance HTTP accelerator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230275 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-04-20 15:10 EST ------- Ingvar: Can you address the items from Comment #10? >rpmlint's output is valuable, but having it empty unfortunately doesn't >necessarily mean that the package is perfect! Very true. :) I think some of the suggestions are minor/cosmetic, but they all make sense to me. Thanks for the input Matthias! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 19:26:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 15:26:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201926.l3KJQ7bu008845@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556 ------- Additional Comments From mhalcrow at us.ibm.com 2007-04-20 15:25 EST ------- Kevin Fenzi (kevin at tummy.com) wrote: > I don't see that change in the -1 version. The permission change was actually done in src/pam_ecryptfs/Makefile.am in the source tarball. I'm working on getting through some red tape to create my Fedora account. Hopefully I'll be able to get the package in by next week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 19:29:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 15:29:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233782] Review Request: vegastrike - 3D OpenGL spaceflight simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201929.l3KJT7NB009024@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vegastrike - 3D OpenGL spaceflight simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233782 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-04-20 15:29 EST ------- I'm incredibly sorry; I completely forgot about these review. (I am SUCH A FART! >.<) Thanks for the reminder; I'll get to doing these tomorrow morning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 19:34:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 15:34:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237216] PUP future feature In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201934.l3KJYCtL009456@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: PUP future feature https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237216 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Package Review |pirut AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |katzj at redhat.com QAContact|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org | CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 19:34:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 15:34:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233256] Review Request: asc-music - Background music for the game asc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201934.l3KJYV3O009484@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asc-music - Background music for the game asc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233256 musuruan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From musuruan at gmail.com 2007-04-20 15:34 EST ------- It is good enough for me. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 19:38:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 15:38:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233256] Review Request: asc-music - Background music for the game asc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201938.l3KJcE7q009763@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asc-music - Background music for the game asc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233256 musuruan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 19:41:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 15:41:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236798] Review Request: ballz - Platform game with some puzzle elements In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704201941.l3KJfO5H009998@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ballz - Platform game with some puzzle elements https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236798 musuruan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From musuruan at gmail.com 2007-04-20 15:41 EST ------- - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines. OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License: BSD - License field in spec matches. OK - License file included in package. OK - Spec in American English. OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream. OK md5sum: 1a98a0a87985f2425d2fde5715be50ed - Package needs ExcludeArch. N/A - BuildRequires correct. OK. - Spec handles locales/find_lang. N/A - Package is relocatable and has a reason to be. N/A - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Doc subpackage needed/used. N/A - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. N/A - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun. N/A - .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig. N/A - .so files in -devel subpackage. N/A - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}. N/A - .la files are removed. N/A - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file. OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK fc6/i386 - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane: /bin/sh /bin/sh hicolor-icon-theme libaldmb-0.9.3.so liballeg.so.4.2 libdumb-0.9.3.so libguichan-0.6.1.so libguichan_allegro-0.6.1.so rtld(GNU_HASH) SHOULD Items: - Should build in mock. OK fc6/i386 - Should function as described. OK - Should have sane scriptlets. OK - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. N/A - Should have dist tag. OK - Should package latest version. OK Issues: 1. Not a blocker, but on the PC I used for the review, the viewport was not centered at fullscreen. BTW, why did you patched the sources to use fullscreen instead of the default window mode? APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 20:32:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:32:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237330] New: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for AES support -- SPONSOR NEEDED Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237330 Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for AES support -- SPONSOR NEEDED Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wjhns174 at hardakers.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES.spec Description: A Perl wrapper around OpenSSL's AES library I'm currently not a sponsored member, though so I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 20:33:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:33:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237331] New: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for Random Number support -- SPONSOR NEEDED Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237331 Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for Random Number support -- SPONSOR NEEDED Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wjhns174 at hardakers.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random.spec Description: A Perl wrapper around OpenSSL's Random number generation library. (I don't currently have a sponsor, although there are other packages I've submitted as well tagged as needing a sponsor as well). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 20:34:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:34:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237332] New: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for big numbers support -- SPONSOR NEEDED Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237332 Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for big numbers support -- SPONSOR NEEDED Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wjhns174 at hardakers.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum.spec Description: A Perl wrapper around OpenSSL's big-number support. (I don't currently have a sponsor, although there are other packages I've submitted as well tagged as needing a sponsor as well). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 20:35:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:35:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237333] New: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for DSA support -- SPONSOR NEEDED Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237333 Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for DSA support -- SPONSOR NEEDED Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wjhns174 at hardakers.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA.spec Description: A Perl wrapper around OpenSSL's DSA cryptography library. (I don't currently have a sponsor, although there are other packages I've submitted as well tagged as needing a sponsor as well). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 20:35:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:35:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237334] New: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for RSA support -- SPONSOR NEEDED Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237334 Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for RSA support -- SPONSOR NEEDED Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wjhns174 at hardakers.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA.spec Description: A Perl wrapper around OpenSSL's RSA cryptography library. (I don't currently have a sponsor, although there are other packages I've submitted as well tagged as needing a sponsor as well). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 20:36:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:36:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237335] New: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for PKCS10 support -- SPONSOR NEEDED Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237335 Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for PKCS10 support -- SPONSOR NEEDED Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wjhns174 at hardakers.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10.spec Description: A Perl wrapper around OpenSSL's PKCS10 library. (I don't currently have a sponsor, although there are other packages I've submitted as well tagged as needing a sponsor as well). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 20:37:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:37:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237336] New: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for X509 support -- SPONSOR NEEDED Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237336 Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for X509 support -- SPONSOR NEEDED Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wjhns174 at hardakers.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509.spec Description: A Perl wrapper around OpenSSL's X509 library. (I don't currently have a sponsor, although there are other packages I've submitted as well tagged as needing a sponsor as well). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 20:39:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:39:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237337] New: perl-Digest-SHA -- Perl support for SHA digests -- SPONSOR NEEDED Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237337 Summary: perl-Digest-SHA -- Perl support for SHA digests -- SPONSOR NEEDED Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wjhns174 at hardakers.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 20:40:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:40:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237337] perl-Digest-SHA -- Perl support for SHA digests -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704202040.l3KKec3m015139@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Digest-SHA -- Perl support for SHA digests -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237337 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-04-20 16:40 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Digest-SHA.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Digest-SHA.spec Description: Digest::SHA is a complete implementation of the NIST Secure Hash Stan- dard. It gives Perl programmers a convenient way to calculate SHA-1, SHA-224, SHA-256, SHA-384, and SHA-512 message digests. The module can handle all types of input, including partial-byte data. (I don't currently have a sponsor, although there are other packages I've submitted as well tagged as needing a sponsor as well). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 20:42:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:42:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237338] New: Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-SEC -- Perl support for DNSSEC -- SPONSOR NEEDED Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237338 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-SEC -- Perl support for DNSSEC -- SPONSOR NEEDED Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wjhns174 at hardakers.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Net-DNS-SEC.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Net-DNS-SEC.spec Description: The Net::DNS::SEC modules provide perl with the ability to check and resolve secure DNS data (DNSSEC). (I don't currently have a sponsor, although there are other packages I've submitted as well tagged as needing a sponsor as well). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 20:45:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:45:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237334] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for RSA support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704202045.l3KKjUIb015668@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for RSA support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237334 wjhns174 at hardakers.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |237331 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 20:45:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:45:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237331] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for Random Number support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704202045.l3KKjVO3015690@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for Random Number support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237331 wjhns174 at hardakers.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |237334 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 20:48:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:48:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235895] Review Request: perl-Text-Aspell - spell check interface for perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704202048.l3KKmcbq016021@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Aspell - spell check interface for perl Alias: perl-Text-Aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235895 Jerry.James at usu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 20:49:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:49:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237338] Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-SEC -- Perl support for DNSSEC -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704202049.l3KKnN7s016100@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-SEC -- Perl support for DNSSEC -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237338 wjhns174 at hardakers.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |237332, 237333, 237334, | |237337 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 20:49:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:49:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237333] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for DSA support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704202049.l3KKnYk9016121@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for DSA support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237333 wjhns174 at hardakers.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |237338 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 20:49:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:49:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237334] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for RSA support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704202049.l3KKnjbd016155@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for RSA support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237334 wjhns174 at hardakers.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |237338 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 20:49:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:49:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237337] perl-Digest-SHA -- Perl support for SHA digests -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704202049.l3KKnkxj016167@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Digest-SHA -- Perl support for SHA digests -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237337 wjhns174 at hardakers.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |237338 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 20:49:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:49:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237332] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for big numbers support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704202049.l3KKnv8X016193@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for big numbers support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237332 wjhns174 at hardakers.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |237338 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 20:52:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:52:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237330] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for AES support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704202052.l3KKq2D3016370@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for AES support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237330 wjhns174 at hardakers.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 20:52:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:52:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237331] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for Random Number support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704202052.l3KKqRjN016428@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for Random Number support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237331 wjhns174 at hardakers.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 20:52:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:52:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237332] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for big numbers support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704202052.l3KKqa8o016445@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for big numbers support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237332 wjhns174 at hardakers.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 20:52:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:52:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237333] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for DSA support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704202052.l3KKqvnu016495@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for DSA support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237333 wjhns174 at hardakers.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 20:53:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:53:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237334] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for RSA support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704202053.l3KKrBBJ016528@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for RSA support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237334 wjhns174 at hardakers.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 20:53:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:53:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237335] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for PKCS10 support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704202053.l3KKrCrE016542@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for PKCS10 support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237335 wjhns174 at hardakers.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 20:53:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:53:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237336] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for X509 support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704202053.l3KKrTVq016586@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for X509 support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237336 wjhns174 at hardakers.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 20:53:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:53:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237337] perl-Digest-SHA -- Perl support for SHA digests -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704202053.l3KKrfAZ016616@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Digest-SHA -- Perl support for SHA digests -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237337 wjhns174 at hardakers.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 20:54:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:54:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237338] Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-SEC -- Perl support for DNSSEC -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704202054.l3KKs0MU016643@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-SEC -- Perl support for DNSSEC -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237338 wjhns174 at hardakers.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 21:24:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 17:24:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237340] New: Review Request: python-BeautifulSoup - HTML/XML parser for quick-turnaround applications like screen-scraping Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237340 Summary: Review Request: python-BeautifulSoup - HTML/XML parser for quick-turnaround applications like screen-scraping Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/python-kaa/python-BeautifulSoup.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/python-kaa/python-BeautifulSoup-3.0.4-1.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Description: HTML/XML parser for quick-turnaround applications like screen-scraping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 21:50:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 17:50:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237344] New: Review Request: supervisor - System for Allowing the Control of Process State on UNIX Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237344 Summary: Review Request: supervisor - System for Allowing the Control of Process State on UNIX Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmcgrath at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/supervisor/supervisor.spec SRPM: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/supervisor/supervisor-2.1-1fc6.src.rpm Description: The supervisor is a client/server system that allows its users to control a number of processes on UNIX-like operating systems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 22:04:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 18:04:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237344] Review Request: supervisor - System for Allowing the Control of Process State on UNIX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704202204.l3KM45YI019911@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: supervisor - System for Allowing the Control of Process State on UNIX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237344 toshio at tiki-lounge.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |toshio at tiki-lounge.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 22:20:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 18:20:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225857] Merge Review: grep In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704202220.l3KMK6Vx020794@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: grep https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225857 ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2007-04-20 18:20 EST ------- I don't see any further blockers, so this package is approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 22:25:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 18:25:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225656] Merge Review: cpio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704202225.l3KMP2UB021074@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: cpio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225656 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|pvrabec at redhat.com |ruben at rubenkerkhof.com Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2007-04-20 18:24 EST ------- Sorry that it took me so long. I don't see any further blockers so this package is approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 22:25:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 18:25:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704202225.l3KMPQO4021134@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-04-20 18:25 EST ------- In reply to comment #49: Ah, I looked and didn't see an increment in the release or change in the md5sum, but perhaps it was cached. It's best to increase release for any changes (no matter how minor) so people know it was changed. Please let me know if I can assist any with the fedora account/red tape... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 22:32:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 18:32:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225671] Merge Review: curl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704202232.l3KMWT5L021478@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: curl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225671 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 22:32:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 18:32:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237344] Review Request: supervisor - System for Allowing the Control of Process State on UNIX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704202232.l3KMWMN2021456@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: supervisor - System for Allowing the Control of Process State on UNIX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237344 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2007-04-20 18:32 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=153225) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=153225&action=view) Spec patch with two changes Initial spec file patch with two changes: 1) Use python_sitelib to get the directory to install the files. This works on multilib machines like x86_64. 2) Rename the init script from supervisor to supervisord (I renamed this in Source1 as well which means you'll want to rename the actual file.) This makes the lock file and the init script match which makes rpmlint happy. I'm not cetain that it's necessary but http://www.mail-archive.com/cooker at linux-mandrake.com/msg18193.html indicates that SysVinit may need the names to match in order to properly decide whether to start services when changing runlevel. Full review to follow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 22:36:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 18:36:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226539] Merge Review: which In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704202236.l3KMavEk021594@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: which https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226539 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo? ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2007-04-20 18:36 EST ------- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 23:16:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 19:16:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237352] New: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Getopt - Moose role for processing command line options Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237352 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Getopt - Moose role for processing command line options Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/MooseX-Getopt/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-MooseX-Getopt-0.02-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-MooseX-Getopt.spec Description: This is a Moose role which provides an alternate constructor for creating objects using parameters passed in from the command line. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 23:17:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 19:17:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237352] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Getopt - Moose role for processing command line options In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704202317.l3KNHfrN022974@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Getopt - Moose role for processing command line options Alias: perl-MooseX-Getopt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237352 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-MooseX-Getopt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 23:36:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 19:36:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229322] Review Request: pgpool-ha : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704202336.l3KNaF5g023691@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool-ha : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229322 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-04-20 19:36 EST ------- 1. the date of the newest entry in %changelog is obviously wrong, since it was modified 2007-04-18, not Oct 10 2006 2. I fail to understand why is the same file included twice (see install -m 755 pgpool %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/ha.d/resource.d/heartbeat/pgpool install -m 755 pgpool %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/ocf/resource.d/heartbeat/) You could symlink it if you really need it twice 3. Installing files under %{_libdir} prevents the package from being noarch 4. I did not actually test because postgresql-pgpool-II has not yet been pushed, but from looking at the spec I'd say that the %build step should include a make, while %install should include a "make install". In the current version of the spec, the actual build seems to take place in %install. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 23:52:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 19:52:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237354] New: Review Request: python-meld3 - An HTML/XML templating system for Python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237354 Summary: Review Request: python-meld3 - An HTML/XML templating system for Python Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmcgrath at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/meld3/python-meld3.spec SRPM: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/meld3/python-meld3-0.6-1fc6.src.rpm Description: meld3 is an HTML/XML templating system for Python 2.3+ which keeps template markup and dynamic rendering logic separate from one another. See http://www.entrian.com/PyMeld for a treatise on the benefits of this pattern. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 20 23:54:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 19:54:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237355] New: Review Request: kflickr - an easy to use photo uploader for flickr written for KDE. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237355 Summary: Review Request: kflickr - an easy to use photo uploader for flickr written for KDE. Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mastahnke at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.stahnkage.com/rpms/kflickr.spec SRPM URL: http://www.stahnkage.com/rpms/kflickr-0.8-1.src.rpm Description: kflickr is an easy to use photo uploader for flickr written for KDE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 21 00:03:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 20:03:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237344] Review Request: supervisor - System for Allowing the Control of Process State on UNIX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704210003.l3L03jk6024373@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: supervisor - System for Allowing the Control of Process State on UNIX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237344 mmcgrath at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |237354 ------- Additional Comments From mmcgrath at redhat.com 2007-04-20 20:03 EST ------- updated Spec: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/supervisor/supervisor.spec SRPM: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/supervisor/supervisor-2.1-2fc6.src.rpm This is now being blocked by: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/237354 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 21 00:03:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 20:03:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237354] Review Request: python-meld3 - An HTML/XML templating system for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704210003.l3L03u1e024384@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-meld3 - An HTML/XML templating system for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237354 mmcgrath at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |237344 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 21 00:10:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 20:10:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237354] Review Request: python-meld3 - An HTML/XML templating system for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704210010.l3L0AUG6024534@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-meld3 - An HTML/XML templating system for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237354 toshio at tiki-lounge.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |toshio at tiki-lounge.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 21 01:36:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 21:36:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227579] Review Request: spr - Statistical pattern recognition In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704210136.l3L1al7O026635@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spr - Statistical pattern recognition https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227579 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2007-04-20 21:36 EST ------- Here is the latest version: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/spr.spec http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/spr-05.01.00-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 21 04:13:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 00:13:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225783] Merge Review: gdb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704210413.l3L4DeOU001093@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gdb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225783 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-21 00:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > OK, assigning it back to nobody, until a reviewer is found. I really hate having to say this, but I am wondering what kind of clue-stick it takes to hit @RH's with until they finally understand how reviews are supposed to work: You will not be able to find any, because this package's sources are not available. RH's cvs still is at *-8, and nobody did provide an URL where the current *.src.rpm can be downloaded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 21 07:32:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 03:32:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704210732.l3L7WuKF004835@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com 2007-04-21 03:32 EST ------- Nope, still does not work on x86_64. Any particular reason why you write: %configure \ --with-tcl=%{_prefix}/lib$SUF \ --with-tk=%{_prefix}/lib$SUF \ --with-tcllibs=%{_prefix}/lib$SUF \ --with-tklibs=%{_prefix}/lib$SUF instead of just: %configure --with-tcl=%{_libdir} --with-tk=%{_libdir} I've tested it on both i386 and x86_64, and it works fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 21 08:19:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 04:19:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236877] Review Request: perl-bioperl-run - Perl interface to various bioinformatics applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704210819.l3L8JblK008094@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-bioperl-run - Perl interface to various bioinformatics applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236877 alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2007-04-21 04:19 EST ------- Built and pushed to repo. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 21 09:07:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 05:07:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235189] Review Request: nautilus-python - Python bindings for Nautilus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704210907.l3L97p5E010729@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nautilus-python - Python bindings for Nautilus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235189 ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com 2007-04-21 05:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > The Suggestions > ? Would it be better if the examples were placed in docs section of the devel > package, instead of in the main package? That is a good idea. I have added it to the spec file. > The Corrections > Attached you'll find an updated spec file that corrects the blocker items > listed above. Please review it write back if you need to discuss anything. Once > you resubmit updated spec and srpm urls that correct the blockers this should be > approvable. New versions of the source rpm and spec file can be found here: ftp://open-gnss.org/pub/fedora/nautilus-python -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 21 10:42:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 06:42:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200937] Review Request: FreqTweak, realtime audio spectral manipulation (& Jack client) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704211042.l3LAgBLC013727@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FreqTweak, realtime audio spectral manipulation (& Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200937 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(nando at ccrma.stanfo| |rd.edu) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 21 12:04:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 08:04:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236798] Review Request: ballz - Platform game with some puzzle elements In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704211204.l3LC4Cix016001@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ballz - Platform game with some puzzle elements https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236798 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-21 08:04 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ballz Short Description: Platform game with some puzzle elements Owners: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Branches: FC-6 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 21 12:05:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 08:05:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233256] Review Request: asc-music - Background music for the game asc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704211205.l3LC5TrJ016040@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asc-music - Background music for the game asc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233256 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-21 08:05 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: asc-music Short Description: Background music for the game asc Owners: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 21 13:02:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 09:02:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226562] Merge Review: xkeyboard-config In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704211302.l3LD238t017962@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xkeyboard-config https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226562 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium mgarski at post.pl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mgarski at post.pl ------- Additional Comments From mgarski at post.pl 2007-04-21 09:02 EST ------- It would be good to add URL: http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software_2fXKeyboardConfig and update to 0.9 (bug 237369). Of course this is not a review :) Just my comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 21 13:54:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 09:54:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237373] New: Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237373 Summary: Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kmatsui at t3.rim.or.jp QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/mcpp/mcpp-2.6.3-2.spec?download SRPM URL: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/mcpp/mcpp-2.6.3-2.src.rpm?download Description: MCPP is an alternative C/C++ preprocessor with the highest conformance, implementated by Kiyoshi Matsui. It supports multiple standards: K&R, ISO C90, ISO C99, and ISO C++98. MCPP is especially useful for debugging the source program which use complicated macros and also useful for checking portability of the source. Though mcpp could be built as a replacement of GCC's resident proprocessor or as a subroutine called from some other main program, this package installs only a stand-alone program named 'mcpp' which behaves independent from GCC. This is my first rpm package, and I am seeking a sponsor to be reviewed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 21 16:30:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 12:30:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222597] Review Request: php-pear-Crypt-CHAP - Class to generate CHAP packets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704211630.l3LGUhox023695@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Crypt-CHAP - Class to generate CHAP packets Alias: pear-Crypt-CHAP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222597 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-04-21 12:30 EST ------- Branch Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pear-Crypt-CHAP Short Description: Class to generate CHAP packets Owners: chris.stone at gmail.com Branches: EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 21 16:31:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 12:31:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222597] Review Request: php-pear-Crypt-CHAP - Class to generate CHAP packets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704211631.l3LGVBIZ023716@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Crypt-CHAP - Class to generate CHAP packets Alias: pear-Crypt-CHAP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222597 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 21 17:01:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 13:01:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237379] New: Review Request: ruby-amazon - Ruby interface to Amazon Web Services Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237379 Summary: Review Request: ruby-amazon - Ruby interface to Amazon Web Services Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/ruby-amazon.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/ruby-amazon-0.9.2-1.fc7.src.rpm Mock build log on FC-devel i386: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/LOGS/MOCK-ruby-amazon.log Description: Ruby/Amazon is a Ruby interface to Amazon Web Services. Information on the Amazon Web Services can be found at: http://www.amazon.com/gp/browse.html?node=3435361 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 21 17:03:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 13:03:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237380] New: Review Request: ruby-gettext-package - Localization Library and Tools for Ruby Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237380 Summary: Review Request: ruby-gettext-package - Localization Library and Tools for Ruby Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/ruby-gettext-package.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/ruby-gettext-package-1.9.0-1.fc7.src.rpm Mock build log on FC-devel i386: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/LOGS/MOCK-ruby-gettext-package.log Description: Ruby-GetText-Package is a Localization(L10n) Library and Tools which is modeled after GNU gettext package. The library converts the messages to localized messages properly using client-side locale information. And the tools for developers support to create, use, and modify localized message files (message catalogs) easily. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 21 17:05:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 13:05:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237381] New: Review Request: ruby-zoom - Ruby binding to ZOOM Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237381 Summary: Review Request: ruby-zoom - Ruby binding to ZOOM Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/ruby-zoom.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/ruby-zoom-0.2.2-1.fc7.src.rpm Mock build log on FC-devel i386: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/LOGS/MOCK-ruby-zoom.log Description: Ruby/ZOOM provides a Ruby binding to the Z39.50 Object-Orientation Model (ZOOM), an abstract object-oriented programming interface to a subset of the services specified by the Z39.50 standard, also known as the international standard ISO 23950. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 21 17:07:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 13:07:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237382] New: Review Request: alexandria - Book collection manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237382 Summary: Review Request: alexandria - Book collection manager Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/alexandria.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/alexandria-0.6.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Mock build log on FC-devel i386: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/LOGS/MOCK-alexandria.log Description: Alexandria is a GNOME application to help you manage your book collection. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 21 17:08:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 13:08:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237382] Review Request: alexandria - Book collection manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704211708.l3LH8L0Q024486@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alexandria - Book collection manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237382 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |237379, 237380, 237381 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 21 17:08:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 13:08:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237379] Review Request: ruby-amazon - Ruby interface to Amazon Web Services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704211708.l3LH8MYf024498@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-amazon - Ruby interface to Amazon Web Services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237379 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |237382 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 21 17:08:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 13:08:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237381] Review Request: ruby-zoom - Ruby binding to ZOOM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704211708.l3LH8Nro024511@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-zoom - Ruby binding to ZOOM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237381 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |237382 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 21 17:08:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 13:08:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237380] Review Request: ruby-gettext-package - Localization Library and Tools for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704211708.l3LH8OQI024524@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-gettext-package - Localization Library and Tools for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237380 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |237382 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 21 17:35:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 13:35:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197411] Review Request: php-pear-Date - Date and Time Zone Classes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704211735.l3LHZvRf025626@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Date - Date and Time Zone Classes Alias: php-pear-Date https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197411 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: php-pear- |Review Request: php-pear- |Date - PEAR: Date and Time |Date - Date and Time Zone |Zone Classes |Classes Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-04-21 13:35 EST ------- Branch Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pear-Date Short Description: Date and Time Zone Classes Owners: chris.stone at gmail.com Branches: EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 21 17:46:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 13:46:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210784] Review Request: php-pear-XML-Util - XML utility class In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704211746.l3LHkeQN025921@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-XML-Util - XML utility class Alias: pear-XML-Util https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210784 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-04-21 13:46 EST ------- Branch Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pear-XML-Util Short Description: XML utility class Owners: chris.stone at gmail.com Branches: EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 21 17:51:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 13:51:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210787] Review Request: php-pear-XML-Serializer - Swiss-army knife for reading and writing XML files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704211751.l3LHpBCQ026000@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-XML-Serializer - Swiss-army knife for reading and writing XML files Alias: pear-XML-Serializer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210787 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-04-21 13:50 EST ------- Branch Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pear-XML-Serializer Short Description: Swiss-army knife for reading and writing XML files Owners: chris.stone at gmail.com Branches: EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 21 17:54:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 13:54:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210788] Review Request: php-pear-Date-Holidays - Driver based class to calculate holidays In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704211754.l3LHs9nX026091@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Date-Holidays - Driver based class to calculate holidays Alias: pear-Date-Holidays https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210788 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-04-21 13:53 EST ------- Branch Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pear-Date-Holidays Short Description: Driver based class to calculate holidays Owners: chris.stone at gmail.com Branches: EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 21 21:13:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 17:13:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235588] Review Request: escape - an extensible puzzle game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704212113.l3LLDiRU032482@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: escape - an extensible puzzle game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235588 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 21 21:16:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 17:16:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221906] Review Request: gmediaserver - UPnP compatible media server for the GNU system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704212116.l3LLGBwK032556@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gmediaserver - UPnP compatible media server for the GNU system Alias: gmediaserver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221906 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 21 21:19:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 17:19:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234031] Review Request: eclipse-pydev - an Eclipse plugin for working with Python. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704212119.l3LLJiqv032615@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-pydev - an Eclipse plugin for working with Python. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234031 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 21 21:20:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 17:20:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235527] Review Request: pylibacl - POSIX.1e ACLs library wrapper for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704212120.l3LLKtA3032711@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pylibacl - POSIX.1e ACLs library wrapper for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235527 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 21 21:22:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 17:22:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235526] Review Request: pyxattr - Extended attributes library wrapper for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704212122.l3LLMnNM000339@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyxattr - Extended attributes library wrapper for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235526 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 21 21:25:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 17:25:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236798] Review Request: ballz - Platform game with some puzzle elements In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704212125.l3LLPhJN000480@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ballz - Platform game with some puzzle elements https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236798 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 21 21:26:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 17:26:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233256] Review Request: asc-music - Background music for the game asc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704212126.l3LLQlub000562@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asc-music - Background music for the game asc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233256 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 21 21:31:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 17:31:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197411] Review Request: php-pear-Date - Date and Time Zone Classes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704212131.l3LLV8wO000653@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Date - Date and Time Zone Classes Alias: php-pear-Date https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197411 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 21 21:32:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 17:32:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210784] Review Request: php-pear-XML-Util - XML utility class In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704212132.l3LLWlAK000688@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-XML-Util - XML utility class Alias: pear-XML-Util https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210784 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 21 21:35:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 17:35:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210788] Review Request: php-pear-Date-Holidays - Driver based class to calculate holidays In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704212135.l3LLZPOJ000740@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Date-Holidays - Driver based class to calculate holidays Alias: pear-Date-Holidays https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210788 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 21 21:37:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 17:37:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210787] Review Request: php-pear-XML-Serializer - Swiss-army knife for reading and writing XML files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704212137.l3LLbCdV000781@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-XML-Serializer - Swiss-army knife for reading and writing XML files Alias: pear-XML-Serializer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210787 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 21 22:22:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 18:22:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221906] Review Request: gmediaserver - UPnP compatible media server for the GNU system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704212222.l3LMMHZa002065@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gmediaserver - UPnP compatible media server for the GNU system Alias: gmediaserver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221906 karlikt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From karlikt at gmail.com 2007-04-21 18:22 EST ------- Built correct on buildsys, so I can close :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 21 22:24:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 18:24:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237379] Review Request: ruby-amazon - Ruby interface to Amazon Web Services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704212224.l3LMOUAe002149@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-amazon - Ruby interface to Amazon Web Services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237379 stefmanos at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |stefmanos at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From stefmanos at gmail.com 2007-04-21 18:24 EST ------- Be aware that including the rdocs brings an unwanted file conflict with a file provided ruby-ri (i.e. %{rdocpath}Fixnum/cdesc-Fixnum.yaml) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 21 22:49:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 18:49:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232548] Review Request: gnome-yum - Graphical program for easier use the YUM install program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704212249.l3LMnT9Y002608@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-yum - Graphical program for easier use the YUM install program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232548 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-21 18:49 EST ------- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 00:26:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 20:26:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237354] Review Request: python-meld3 - An HTML/XML templating system for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704220026.l3M0QG0T004189@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-meld3 - An HTML/XML templating system for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237354 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2007-04-21 20:26 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=153247) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=153247&action=view) Patch to build on x86_64 MD5Sum 778b2ac28cbdc3932774246791884973 python-meld3-0.6-1fc6.src.rpm Needswork: * Does not build on x86_64. Since the module includes a binary module, it ends up in sitearch (%{_libdir}/python2.?/site-packages, rather than /usr/lib). We can use the sitearch macro instead of the sitelib macro to find this. Patch for spec file attached. Should do: * meld3 doesn't contain a file with the license in it. Should email the author to add that in his next tarball. Good: * rpmlint output: W: python-meld3 invalid-license ZPL W: python-meld3 invalid-license ZPL W: python-meld3-debuginfo invalid-license ZPL ZPL is the Zope Public License, This is ignorable. * Package follows package naming guidelines. * Spec file named appropriately. * Package licensed under the Zope Public License v2 which is FSF approved. * Spec file is legible American English. * Source matches upstream. * All build requirements are listed. * No locale files. * Not a dynamic library. * Not relocatable. * Package owns all files nad directories it installs. * Package does not own files owned by other packages. * %files has a proper defattr line. * Consistent use of macros. * Code not content. With the attached patch, this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 00:27:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 20:27:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237354] Review Request: python-meld3 - An HTML/XML templating system for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704220027.l3M0RvkR004257@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-meld3 - An HTML/XML templating system for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237354 toshio at tiki-lounge.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 01:17:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 21:17:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237379] Review Request: ruby-amazon - Ruby interface to Amazon Web Services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704220117.l3M1HiKK005003@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-amazon - Ruby interface to Amazon Web Services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237379 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-21 21:17 EST ------- http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/ruby-amazon.spec http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/ruby-amazon-0.9.2-2.fc7.src.rpm ---------------------------------------- * Sun Apr 22 2007 Mamoru Tasaka - 0.9.2-2 - Don't provide rdoc files to aboid unwanted conflict with ri -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 02:33:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 22:33:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225668] Merge Review: cscope In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704220233.l3M2XEgV006021@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: cscope https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225668 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium nhorman at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nhorman at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 02:48:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 22:48:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704220248.l3M2mBvP006529@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium bbbush.yuan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bbbush.yuan at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 03:00:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 23:00:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230228] Review Request: perl-Crypt-PasswdMD5 - Provides interoperable MD5-based crypt() functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704220300.l3M30OY2006801@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-PasswdMD5 - Provides interoperable MD5-based crypt() functions Alias: perl-Crypt-PasswdMD5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230228 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Alias| |perl-Crypt-PasswdMD5 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-21 23:00 EST ------- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 03:13:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 23:13:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232623] Review Request: perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple - Perl Module for Generating HTML Calendars In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704220313.l3M3Der6007034@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple - Perl Module for Generating HTML Calendars https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232623 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 03:14:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 23:14:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232623] Review Request: perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple - Perl Module for Generating HTML Calendars In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704220314.l3M3ESI6007066@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple - Perl Module for Generating HTML Calendars https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232623 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-21 23:14 EST ------- Missing a BR on perl(Date::Calc). + source files match upstream: 2f9fcad2627890cc11ab5c3cd3c986cf HTML-CalendarMonthSimple-1.25.tar.gz 2f9fcad2627890cc11ab5c3cd3c986cf ../HTML-CalendarMonthSimple-1.25.tar.gz + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license field matches the actual license. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. (Entire license grant is in README & CalendarMonthSimple.pm) + latest version is being packaged. X BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. + %clean is present. + package installs properly O noarch -- no debuginfo package + rpmlint is silent. + final provides and requires are sane: ** perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple-1.25-1.fc6.noarch.rpm == rpmlint == provides perl(HTML::CalendarMonthSimple) perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple = 1.25-1.fc6 == requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Date::Calc) perl(strict) + %check is present and all tests pass + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets present. + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. + no headers. + no pkgconfig files. + no libtool .la droppings. + not a GUI app. Add perl(Date::Calc) -- post-import -- and the package is: APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 03:14:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 23:14:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232623] Review Request: perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple - Perl Module for Generating HTML Calendars In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704220314.l3M3EVBd007083@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple - Perl Module for Generating HTML Calendars https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232623 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 03:38:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 23:38:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704220338.l3M3c8pX007477@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 ------- Additional Comments From bbbush.yuan at gmail.com 2007-04-21 23:37 EST ------- Hi, Just FYI, we had a RPM SPEC for wqy bitmap song font at this URL: SPEC: ftp://ftp.fedora.cn/pub/fedora-cn/in-review/fonts-wenquanyi-song.spec SRPM: ftp://ftp.fedora.cn/pub/fedora-cn/in-review/fonts-wenquanyi-song-0.8.6-0.1.n20070405.fc7.src.rpm It is for nightly build, and contains a emacs setup file for FC-6 (In FC-7 it should not be used, #175599). It also contains a font alias file which I think should be useful. Here is my review: * bitmap fonts are always under "misc" directory. * I like the name fonts-wenquanyi-song-pcf and -ttf since I believe your font family will become huge in size & variants. * The font has BDF source so why not use that as Source0, and use bdftopcf to generate PCF on the fly. * Summary and %description could be localized * Requires(pre): /usr/bin/mkfontdir * Why conflicts? * Why provides? Why conflicts and provides are not match? * install -d -m755 on both %{fontdir} and %{fontconfdir} * %defattr(-, root, root, -) is nicer * %doc should not contain INSTALL* * %ghost %verify?? * Don't have to use [ -f .... ] && .... since you have already specified them in Requires * Keep old changelogs, and raise spec release number after each round of review/modification Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 03:55:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 23:55:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237344] Review Request: supervisor - System for Allowing the Control of Process State on UNIX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704220355.l3M3thi8007741@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: supervisor - System for Allowing the Control of Process State on UNIX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237344 toshio at tiki-lounge.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2007-04-21 23:55 EST ------- 3982619435d792d333dc6ed56abdcec0 supervisor-2.1-2fc6.src.rpm Needswork: * The package will need to BuildRequire: python-devel or it won't build on FC7. NonBlocker: * The license is a bit varied. It looks like ZPL/BSD covers it but perhaps a note to see the license file would be good: License: ZPL/BSD - see LICENSE.txt * Adding -p to the install commands in the spec file will preserve timestamps and may help to prevent generation of spurious .rpmnew files when the package is upgraded. Good: * rpmlint: E: supervisor non-standard-dir-perm /var/log/supervisor 0770 The log directory can be 0770 to protect the files written to it from being read by others. /var/log/messages and /var/log/httpd are examples of this precedent. W: supervisor invalid-license ZPL/BSD W: supervisor invalid-license ZPL/BSD Zope Public License and BSD is fine. W: supervisor strange-permission supervisord.init 0755 This is an init file so 0755 is fine. * Package is named according to the package naming guidelines. * Licenses are open source and the tag matches the actual license of the code. * License file is included in the package. * Spec file is readable. * No locales. * Not a shared library. * Package owns all its files and no others. * Package uses macros consistently. * Package contains code not content. * Builds on x86_64 for FC6. * Scriptlets follow the documented standards for packages including initscripts. * Runs with the python-meld3 from Bug #237354 and a small daemon. Fix the NEEDSWORK items when you import and this is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 04:08:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 00:08:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235234] Review Request: aoetools - ATA over Ethernet Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704220408.l3M48YeK007970@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aoetools - ATA over Ethernet Tools Alias: aoetools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235234 ------- Additional Comments From kwade at redhat.com 2007-04-22 00:08 EST ------- Note in FC7 release notes under "PackageNotes". Thanks for thinking of us. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 04:08:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 00:08:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235236] Review Request: vblade - Virtual EtherDrive (R) blade daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704220408.l3M48sdM008004@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vblade - Virtual EtherDrive (R) blade daemon Alias: vblade https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235236 ------- Additional Comments From kwade at redhat.com 2007-04-22 00:08 EST ------- Note in F7 release notes under "PackageNotes". Thanks for thinking of us. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 04:14:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 00:14:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237344] Review Request: supervisor - System for Allowing the Control of Process State on UNIX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704220414.l3M4EhI0008087@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: supervisor - System for Allowing the Control of Process State on UNIX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237344 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-22 00:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > * rpmlint: > E: supervisor non-standard-dir-perm /var/log/supervisor 0770 > > The log directory can be 0770 to protect the files written to it from being > read by others. /var/log/messages and /var/log/httpd are examples of this > precedent. I just watched your comment and have not looked into this package at all, however why should this log file be executable? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 04:27:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 00:27:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237344] Review Request: supervisor - System for Allowing the Control of Process State on UNIX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704220427.l3M4R8eP008226@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: supervisor - System for Allowing the Control of Process State on UNIX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237344 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2007-04-22 00:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > I just watched your comment and have not looked into > this package at all, however why should this log file > be executable? /var/log/supervisor is a directory rather than a file. That's why it's executable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 05:05:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 01:05:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237344] Review Request: supervisor - System for Allowing the Control of Process State on UNIX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704220505.l3M55m9U008634@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: supervisor - System for Allowing the Control of Process State on UNIX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237344 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-22 01:05 EST ------- Ah, then no problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 05:28:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 01:28:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216535] Review Request: mp3gain - Lossless MP3 volume adjustment tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704220528.l3M5Sngr009686@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mp3gain - Lossless MP3 volume adjustment tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216535 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 06:30:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 02:30:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704220630.l3M6UQXc010821@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(bdpepple at ameritech | |.net) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-22 02:30 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 06:31:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 02:31:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221027] Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704220631.l3M6VZ8K010871@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221027 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(cgoorah at yahoo.com. | |au) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-22 02:31 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 06:32:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 02:32:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222087] Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704220632.l3M6WQgB010915@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222087 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(sdl.web at gmail.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-22 02:32 EST ------- What is your plan for FC-5 branch? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 06:33:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 02:33:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233754] Review Request: marble - A KDE Desktop Globe In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704220633.l3M6XDHs010940@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: marble - A KDE Desktop Globe https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233754 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(cgoorah at yahoo.com. | |au) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-22 02:33 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 06:33:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 02:33:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704220633.l3M6XSqj010965@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208034 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(paul_kunz at slac.sta | |nford.edu) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-22 02:33 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 06:51:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 02:51:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227579] Review Request: spr - Statistical pattern recognition In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704220651.l3M6p3e8011179@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spr - Statistical pattern recognition https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227579 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 07:24:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 03:24:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227579] Review Request: spr - Statistical pattern recognition In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704220724.l3M7OHln012025@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spr - Statistical pattern recognition https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227579 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-22 03:24 EST ------- For 05.01.00-1: * rpmlint - attached Summary: - libSPR.so.0.0.0 contains undefined non-weak symbols. This is a BLOCKER for the rpm providing -devel subpackage because linkage against this library fais due to these symbols. * Timestamps - This package installs many text files (such as header files) which are not modified during build stage and keeping timestamps on these files are highly recommended. For this package, the following works. ----------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="%{__install} -c -p" ----------------------------------------------------- * header files location - Generally, if a package installs "many" header files, their header files should be hidden in the package specific directory to aboid namespace conflict. Would you consider to move all header files to under %{_includedir}/%{name}/ ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 07:26:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 03:26:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227190] Review Request: php-pear-Auth-OpenID - PHP OpenID In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704220726.l3M7QqYL012103@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth-OpenID - PHP OpenID https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227190 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |Fedora at FamilleCollet.com ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2007-04-22 03:26 EST ------- I'm quite disappointed by this package... BuildRequires should be php-pear >= 1:1.4.9-1.2 (older version doesn't provide the used macros) PHPUnit version 1.x is obsolete and replace in devel by PHPUnit 3 (which is not compatible). Empty build section should be provided (at least to avoid rpmlint warning, i know there is a bug if there is no %build, even if it only affect arch RPM). This package is not in default channel (pear.php.net) but in __uri one. Channels was discussed by packaging commitee but nothing approved. Uninstall command is : pear uninstall --nodeps --ignore-errors --register-only %{channel}/%{pear_name} With %{channel} defined to __uri And provides should probably be : php-pear(%{channel}/%{pear_name}) = %{version} Why are you moving %{pear_docdir}/%{pear_name}/doc to docdir and not all %{pear_docdir}/%{pear_name}/* ? And version 1.2.2 is available... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 07:27:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 03:27:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222087] Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704220727.l3M7RV2M012130@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222087 sdl.web at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(sdl.web at gmail.com)| ------- Additional Comments From sdl.web at gmail.com 2007-04-22 03:27 EST ------- Can rename the package back to 9%{?dist}.x? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 07:29:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 03:29:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227191] Review Request: php-pear-Services-Yadis - PHP Yadis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704220729.l3M7TFLe012154@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Services-Yadis - PHP Yadis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227191 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |Fedora at FamilleCollet.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 07:34:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 03:34:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222087] Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704220734.l3M7YPi8012269@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222087 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-22 03:34 EST ------- I have not tried that case, however you can just try. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 08:30:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 04:30:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227190] Review Request: php-pear-Auth-OpenID - PHP OpenID In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704220830.l3M8UE2X009992@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth-OpenID - PHP OpenID https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227190 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2007-04-22 04:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > I'm quite disappointed by this package... I'm very sorry about that, but I followed the packaging guidelines which provide explicit BuildRequires/Requires for pear packages. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/PHP?action=recall&rev=2 If you consider the guidelines wrong, then please raise that as a general issue on the packaging list, ranting on a specific package won't help. > Channels was discussed by packaging commitee but nothing approved. If nothing was approved/rejected, this means that the current guidelines still apply, and you should try to get the FPC to modify them if need be. > Empty build section should be provided (at least to avoid rpmlint warning, i > know there is a bug if there is no %build, even if it only affect arch RPM). Other than rpmlint not liking it there is no "bug". > PHPUnit version 1.x is obsolete and replace in devel by PHPUnit 3 (which is > not compatible) That's bad. So we need a PHPUnit 1.x compat :/ > And version 1.2.2 is available... Not when I submitted the package ;) Does 1.2.2 work with PHPUnit 3? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 09:27:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 05:27:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222087] Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704220927.l3M9R0Wl013016@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222087 ------- Additional Comments From sdl.web at gmail.com 2007-04-22 05:26 EST ------- Build succeeded in FC-5 http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-5-extras/32186-pcmanx-gtk2-0.3.5-9.336svn.fc5.1/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 09:31:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 05:31:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222087] Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704220931.l3M9VsgY013295@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222087 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-22 05:31 EST ------- Okay. Closing as NEXTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 11:10:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 07:10:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235802] Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704221110.l3MBAgrY015588@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235802 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-22 07:10 EST ------- Ray, would you update your spec/srpm? I will check then check yours. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 11:27:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 07:27:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233256] Review Request: asc-music - Background music for the game asc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704221127.l3MBRf97015916@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asc-music - Background music for the game asc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233256 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-22 07:27 EST ------- Thanks for the review! Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 11:28:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 07:28:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236798] Review Request: ballz - Platform game with some puzzle elements In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704221128.l3MBSTCj015938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ballz - Platform game with some puzzle elements https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236798 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-22 07:28 EST ------- Thanks for the review! Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 11:50:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 07:50:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234750] Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704221150.l3MBoW8Y016624@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234750 trond.danielsen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com 2007-04-22 07:50 EST ------- Looks good to me; approved by Trond Danielsen. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 12:28:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 08:28:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234750] Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704221228.l3MCSSAJ017677@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234750 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-22 08:28 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: avr-binutils Short Description: Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr Owners: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Branches: FC-6 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 12:48:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 08:48:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216355] Review Request: vdr-skins - Collection of OSD skins for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704221248.l3MCmNfh018109@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-skins - Collection of OSD skins for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216355 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2007-04-22 08:48 EST ------- - rpmlint checks return: E: vdr-skins non-standard-gid /etc/vdr/themes/[...].theme video E: vdr-skins non-standard-uid /etc/vdr/themes/[...].theme vdr W: vdr-skins dangerous-command-in-%trigger rm W: vdr-skins dangling-symlink /usr/share/vdr/text2skin/Enigma/FontMonoSpaced.ttf /usr/share/fonts/bitstream-vera/VeraMono.ttf W: vdr-skins incoherent-version-in-changelog 20061119-3 20061119-1 W: vdr-skins non-conffile-in-etc /etc/vdr/themes/[...].theme W: vdr-skins no-url-tag W: vdr-skins symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/vdr/text2skin/Enigma/FontMonoSpaced.ttf /usr/share/fonts/bitstream-vera/VeraMono.ttf - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source doesn't match upstream (see below) - package compiles on devel (x86_84) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file o Some parts under /etc should probably move into /usr/share. o Some URLs are broken like http://www.magoa.net/sttng-blue.theme and http://vdr.pfroen.de/download/DeepBlue-0.1.4.tar.gz. o Due to the latter the prepare script does not work till the end. o The ones that were created by the script had different md5sums (but maybe that's expected due to tar/bz2 timestamping, in that case: do we have some tarball comparison tool?). I could only verify EgalSimple-1.0-demo.tar.bz2 and SilverGreen-0.1.7.tar.bz2 [side note: why are the logos removed? Legal issues?] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 13:06:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 09:06:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216353] Review Request: vdr-text2skin - OSD skin plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704221306.l3MD6r1A019015@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-text2skin - OSD skin plugin for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216353 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2007-04-22 09:06 EST ------- - rpmlint checks return: W: vdr-text2skin dangerous-command-in-%pre cp - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file Everything looks OK including the dangerous cp, so review+ :) (AFAIU I'm not supposed to touch the assignee or status fields anymore, if I messed up, ping me) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 13:23:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 09:23:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237416] New: Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237416 Summary: Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban. Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: stransky at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/stransky/berusky/berusky.spec http://people.redhat.com/stransky/berusky/berusky-data.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/stransky/berusky/berusky-1.0-1.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/stransky/berusky/berusky-data-1.0-1.src.rpm Description: Berusky is a 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle named Sokoban. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 13:35:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 09:35:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234750] Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704221335.l3MDZG7F019566@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234750 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 13:49:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 09:49:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704221349.l3MDnCD4019834@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2007-04-22 09:49 EST ------- > I'll be glad to continue with this review as soon as you post an update. OK, here it comes. For the lazy one there are binary packages at ATrpms. Thanks to Paulo and Orion for several fixes. http://dl.atrpms.net/all/vtk-5.0.3-17.at.src.rpm http://dl.atrpms.net/all/vtk.spec Mon Apr 16 2007 Axel Thimm - 5.0.3-17 - Make java build conditional. - Add ldconfig %%post/%%postun for java/qt subpackages. * Sun Apr 15 2007 Axel Thimm - 5.0.3-16 - Remove %%ghosting pyc/pyo. * Wed Apr 04 2007 Paulo Roma - 5.0.3-15 - Update to 5.0.4. - Added support for qt4 plugin. * Wed Feb 7 2007 Orion Poplawski - 5.0.2-14 - Enable Java, Qt, GL2PS, OSMESA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 13:55:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 09:55:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704221355.l3MDtOPf020012@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2007-04-22 09:55 EST ------- BTW if you're reviewing this package, it may make sense to do so also for bug #199406, the respective data file with examples for vtk (it's a trivial review compared to this one). Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 13:55:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 09:55:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199406] Review Request: vtkdata - Example data file for VTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704221355.l3MDtbEf020056@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtkdata - Example data file for VTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199406 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2007-04-22 09:55 EST ------- http://dl.atrpms.net/all/vtkdata-5.0.3-6.at.src.rpm http://dl.atrpms.net/all/vtkdata.spec * Sun Apr 15 2007 Axel Thimm - 5.0.3-6 - Update to 5.0.3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 14:23:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 10:23:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237422] New: Review Request: bluedj - An online game centre Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237422 Summary: Review Request: bluedj - An online game centre Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bbbush.yuan at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://ftp.fedora.cn/pub/fedora-cn/in-review/bluedj.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.fedora.cn/pub/fedora-cn/in-review/bluedj-3.1.2-5.fc7.src.rpm Description: BlueDJ is an online game centre that is written with Qt. It runs on different platforms including handheld. The games are relaxing and easy. There are 14 games distributed with the platform. More games could be downloaded from server if available. To play games on this platform you must register to the network first. After that everything is easy to use: On the left panel there is the game list and server list. Click anyone to join in a server, then choose a seat and wait others ready to start. Most games would require 4 people, but you can also choose AI players for some games. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 14:54:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 10:54:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229154] Review Request: konwert - Converter of character encodings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704221454.l3MEsZ7f021516@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: konwert - Converter of character encodings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229154 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium daniil.ivanov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(daniil.ivanov at gmai| |l.com) | ------- Additional Comments From daniil.ivanov at gmail.com 2007-04-22 10:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #28) I agree with your changes. Also I agree with you that I don't have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 15:05:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 11:05:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704221505.l3MF58XD021808@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2007-04-22 11:05 EST ------- Hi Axel, I'm working through a review right now and I've run into a problem where it fails to build in mock for a "fedora-6-x86_64-core" buildroot. The reported error is: RPM build errors: File must begin with "/": %{python_sitearch}/vtk which seems very odd since the command python -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib(1)" returns "/usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages" which clearly has a leading "/". I'm not sure what's going on so any help or suggestions are appreciated. And I'll try it again with a "fedora-6-i386-core" buildroot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 15:11:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 11:11:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229154] Review Request: konwert - Converter of character encodings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704221511.l3MFBIWD021998@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: konwert - Converter of character encodings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229154 ------- Additional Comments From daniil.ivanov at gmail.com 2007-04-22 11:11 EST ------- http://users.jyu.fi/~divanov/devel/konwert-1.8-11.fc7.src.rpm http://users.jyu.fi/~divanov/devel/build.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 15:51:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 11:51:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237422] Review Request: bluedj - An online game centre In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704221551.l3MFpK7V022749@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluedj - An online game centre https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237422 bbbush.yuan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 16:00:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 12:00:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704221600.l3MG0FKf022931@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2007-04-22 12:00 EST ------- Hm, I have no idea. The package contains the guideline-required %{!?python_sitearch: %define python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib(1)")} line. This ensures that python_sitearch gets set to something, but your error message looks like it wasn't set at all, not even an invalid value. Perhaps try first w/o using mock? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 16:20:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 12:20:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237344] Review Request: supervisor - System for Allowing the Control of Process State on UNIX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704221620.l3MGKX50023454@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: supervisor - System for Allowing the Control of Process State on UNIX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237344 Bug 237344 depends on bug 237354, which changed state. Bug 237354 Summary: Review Request: python-meld3 - An HTML/XML templating system for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237354 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 16:20:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 12:20:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237354] Review Request: python-meld3 - An HTML/XML templating system for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704221620.l3MGKWMW023442@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-meld3 - An HTML/XML templating system for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237354 mmcgrath at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mmcgrath at redhat.com 2007-04-22 12:20 EST ------- Imported and building. Updates were made and upstream has been notified about license issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 16:34:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 12:34:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704221634.l3MGYjGA023777@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2007-04-22 12:34 EST ------- OK, I've now received the exact same error in mock with a "fedora-6-i386-core" and a "fedora-6-x86_64-core" build root. And, building outside mock gives exactly the same error, too. I agree that you have set exactly the same (byte-for-byte!) python_sitearch macro as is suggested in the guidelines. I can only conclude that the build process is either somehow either ignoring the macro or is un-defining it. Neither of which makes sense to me. Can someone (anyone?) please suggest a way to debug this problem? Its frustrating since the VTK builds are a little time-consuming. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 16:36:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 12:36:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229154] Review Request: konwert - Converter of character encodings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704221636.l3MGatIM023855@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: konwert - Converter of character encodings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229154 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-22 12:36 EST ------- Well, spec/srpm is okay (actually it is what I uploaded). Then: * would you do a "pre-review" of a review request you choose from the following? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed&namedcmd=mtasaka-review-noone * Or do you have a plan to submit another review request or do you already have another review request? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 16:40:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 12:40:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237344] Review Request: supervisor - System for Allowing the Control of Process State on UNIX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704221640.l3MGeHSJ023935@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: supervisor - System for Allowing the Control of Process State on UNIX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237344 mmcgrath at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mmcgrath at redhat.com 2007-04-22 12:40 EST ------- Added -p to installs and buildrequires python-devel. Is building for rawhide now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 18:39:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 14:39:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704221839.l3MId9mC026772@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-04-22 14:39 EST ------- %bcond_* are known to cause odd issues in some setups, reverting them to plain old %{?_with(out)_foo:bar} might be worth a try. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 18:57:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 14:57:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237381] Review Request: ruby-zoom - Ruby binding to ZOOM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704221857.l3MIveiN027267@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-zoom - Ruby binding to ZOOM Alias: ruby-zoom https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237381 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |ruby-zoom -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 18:58:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 14:58:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237379] Review Request: ruby-amazon - Ruby interface to Amazon Web Services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704221858.l3MIwKeb027297@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-amazon - Ruby interface to Amazon Web Services Alias: ruby-amazon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237379 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |ruby-amazon -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 18:58:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 14:58:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237380] Review Request: ruby-gettext-package - Localization Library and Tools for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704221858.l3MIwD1F027285@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-gettext-package - Localization Library and Tools for Ruby Alias: ruby-gettext-package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237380 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |ruby-gettext-package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 19:05:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 15:05:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227190] Review Request: php-pear-Auth-OpenID - PHP OpenID In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704221905.l3MJ57Gh027451@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth-OpenID - PHP OpenID https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227190 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chris.stone at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-04-22 15:05 EST ------- The guidelines need updating, thanks Axel for pointing this out. We definately need to get channel stuff in the guidelines, I did not think it important before because I didn't think we'd have any packages that used other channels. It appears I was wrong. I think any attempt at review on this package should probably wait until the pear version # and channel guidelines are in approved by the packaging comittee. In the meantime, Axel, can you please investigate the possibilities of modifying this to work with PHPUnit3? It may be that we will need a PHPUnit1-compat rpm or something, so we should see how difficult it is to either package a compat rpm or modify this rpm to work with PHPUnit3. All the other stuff seems like politics to me, I would recommend that you just use the php-pear template. It appears you did because of some comments I see in the spec, but I wouldn't bother removing stuff like %build or changing %buildroot. Thats just nonsense stuff and I'd rather focus on the more important issues. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 19:31:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 15:31:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225299] Merge Review: automake15 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704221931.l3MJVKre028376@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: automake15 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225299 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-04-22 15:31 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=153256) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=153256&action=view) complete patches of Makefile.in to avoir rerunning autoconf This patch allows not to run autoconf (and the autoconf call is commented out). As a side note it would be better to cal autoconf-2.13. But yet better not call anything... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 19:52:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 15:52:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236642] Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704221952.l3MJqxSl029107@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236642 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-04-22 15:52 EST ------- Okay, http://revisor.fedoraunity.org/releases/revisor-2.0/revisor-2.0.1.spec still isn't resolving correctly. that URL gets redirected to index.html for the fedoraunity site. Please provide an updated url for both the current srpm and spec. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 19:53:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 15:53:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216353] Review Request: vdr-text2skin - OSD skin plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704221953.l3MJrYkW029149@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-text2skin - OSD skin plugin for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216353 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-04-22 15:53 EST ------- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: vdr-text2skin Short Description: OSD skin plugin for VDR Owners: ville.skytta at iki.fi Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 19:59:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 15:59:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237311] Review Request: ArgoUML - UML Modelling Tool - FOSS Java App In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704221959.l3MJx7hC029339@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ArgoUML - UML Modelling Tool - FOSS Java App https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237311 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-04-22 15:59 EST ------- Looks like you forgot to provide links for your SPEC-file ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 20:12:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 16:12:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237311] Review Request: ArgoUML - UML Modelling Tool - FOSS Java App In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704222012.l3MKCNaA029665@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ArgoUML - UML Modelling Tool - FOSS Java App https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237311 ------- Additional Comments From keith at karsites.net 2007-04-22 16:12 EST ------- Sorry Lemenkov - I think I must have posted this in the wrong place. This is meant to be a request for Fedora to review the above package for inclusion in the next version of Fedora. I don't think it is included in FC6 right now. It seems alot more stable than Umbrello UML modeler is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 20:19:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 16:19:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235189] Review Request: nautilus-python - Python bindings for Nautilus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704222019.l3MKJl2Q029773@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nautilus-python - Python bindings for Nautilus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235189 jspaleta at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-04-22 16:19 EST ------- nautilus-python-0.4.3-3.fc7.src.rpm APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 20:20:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 16:20:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237416] Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704222020.l3MKKuTt029842@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237416 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |Jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-04-22 16:20 EST ------- Good: + Naming seems ok. + License seems ok. + Local build works ok. + Local install and unstall works fine. + Local start of the game works fine. + Package contains verbatin copy of the license. Bad: - Wrong build root BuildRoot should be %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#BuildRoot) - Missing SMP-Flags Missing SMP flags. If it doesn't build with it, please add a comment (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#parallelmake) - Source contains not an full qualified URL. - RPMlint complaints on binary package: E: berusky zero-length /usr/share/doc/berusky/NEWS E: berusky zero-length /usr/share/doc/berusky/ChangeLog W: berusky incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.1-2 1.0-1 - Docs should be in %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} - Mock build fails for berusky-1.0-1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/berusky-1.0/po' Making all in src make[2]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/berusky-1.0/src' if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -Wall -g -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -MT 2d_graph.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/2d_graph.Tpo" -c -o 2d_graph.o 2d_graph.cpp; \ then mv -f ".deps/2d_graph.Tpo" ".deps/2d_graph.Po"; else rm -f ".deps/2d_graph.Tpo"; exit 1; fi if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -Wall -g -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -MT animation.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/animation.Tpo" -c -o animation.o animation.cpp; \ then mv -f ".deps/animation.Tpo" ".deps/animation.Po"; else rm -f ".deps/animation.Tpo"; exit 1; fi In file included from animation.cpp:28: berusky.h:48:18: error: zlib.h: No such file or directory make[2]: *** [animation.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/berusky-1.0/src' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/berusky-1.0' make: *** [all] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.57262 (%build) I assume, that zlib-devel must be an BR in the source rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 20:31:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 16:31:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216355] Review Request: vdr-skins - Collection of OSD skins for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704222031.l3MKVfjZ030100@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-skins - Collection of OSD skins for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216355 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-04-22 16:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > o Some parts under /etc should probably move into /usr/share. Makes sense, although only the *.theme files remain in /etc/vdr/themes and that dir can't be changed without changing it in the main vdr package as well. Added to my TODO list for future vdr package revisions. > o Some URLs are broken like http://www.magoa.net/sttng-blue.theme and > http://vdr.pfroen.de/download/DeepBlue-0.1.4.tar.gz. > > o Due to the latter the prepare script does not work till the end. Yeah, I've been trying to ping upstreams of skins whose download URLs no longer work, but haven't got replies from all of them :( Archive.org appears to have a copy of sttng-blue.theme: http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.magoa.net/sttng-blue.theme So I guess that leaves us only DeepBlue-0.1.4.tar.gz MIA. Suggestions? I've had it in this package for ages, and IMHO upstream availablity/verification is not *that* critical because it's only data. If you feel more comfortable with dropping it for now, will do and reintroduce later if upstream reappears. > o The ones that were created by the script had different md5sums (but maybe > that's expected due to tar/bz2 timestamping, in that case: do we have some > tarball comparison tool?). I could only verify EgalSimple-1.0-demo.tar.bz2 > and SilverGreen-0.1.7.tar.bz2 bunzip2'ing and comparing the uncompressed tarballs could work. And rpmdev-diff might be useful as well. > [side note: why are the logos removed? Legal issues?] They are logos of various TV and radio channels, most of which are likely trademarked, and I haven't found any evidence that they'd be included in upstream tarballs with the trademark holders' consent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 21:03:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:03:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216355] Review Request: vdr-skins - Collection of OSD skins for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704222103.l3ML352O031545@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-skins - Collection of OSD skins for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216355 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2007-04-22 17:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > > o Some parts under /etc should probably move into /usr/share. > > Makes sense, although only the *.theme files remain in /etc/vdr/themes and > that dir can't be changed without changing it in the main vdr package as well. > Added to my TODO list for future vdr package revisions. Maybe just a symlink in /etc pointing to a /usr/share location? > I've had it in this package for ages, and IMHO upstream > availablity/verification is not *that* critical because it's only data. > If you feel more comfortable with dropping it for now, will do and > reintroduce later if upstream reappears. No, that's not a blocker, at least not for me, and I hope that the guidelines can be interpreted as such. Verification of sources is needed for novice errors and untrusted parties, I'd say in this case we can outrule both. :) I just wanted to mention these issues to keep them in mind, and to have this in the review in case someone digs this up in the future and thinks we didn't do a thorough job, after all I need to write something about whether the sources could be verified or not. I'd say, if you like move the non-config parts out of /etc leaving a symlink behind, but that's just a mild recommendation. I'll just go ahead and approve as is. :) BTW: Perhaps you want to remove the %{?dist} tag, as the package wouldn't change from release to release. But I don't know how to make the exact same package appear in FC5/FC6/F7 simultaneously w/ either plague or brew, so maybe you can't drop it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 21:07:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:07:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235189] Review Request: nautilus-python - Python bindings for Nautilus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704222107.l3ML7Z46031630@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nautilus-python - Python bindings for Nautilus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235189 trond.danielsen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com 2007-04-22 17:07 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: nautilus-python Short Description: Python bindings for Nautilus. Owners: trond.danielsen at gmail.com Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 21:31:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:31:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225300] Merge Review: automake16 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704222131.l3MLVODT032152@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: automake16 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225300 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-04-22 17:31 EST ------- Is it really true? It means that people having automake on a previous release won't have the latest automake. I am not sure that it is what we want. If it was possible to say to rpm to install automake16 and update to current automake version it would be even better, but that is not the case. In any case using a precise version is not right. What about if a use has 1.6.2 installed? He will get the latest, while with 1.6.3 it goes to automake16. Isn't that wrong? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 21:31:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:31:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216355] Review Request: vdr-skins - Collection of OSD skins for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704222131.l3MLVfAh032181@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-skins - Collection of OSD skins for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216355 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-04-22 17:31 EST ------- Thanks! I'll think about the /etc -> /usr/share change for a bit before the first build; however the symlink approach doesn't sound tempting as symlinks to dirs may cause various annoyances later. Maybe I'll just roll a new vdr package with the themes dir moved before the first build of this one. Looks like a bunch of not that large noarch packages have been accepted for disttagless copying between branches recently (such as various -firmware packages), so I suppose it's ok here as well, will drop the disttag. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: vdr-skins Short Description: Collection of OSD skins for VDR Owners: ville.skytta at iki.fi Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 21:34:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:34:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235588] Review Request: escape - an extensible puzzle game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704222134.l3MLYDX2032217@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: escape - an extensible puzzle game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235588 adam at spicenitz.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 21:34:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:34:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235589] Review Request: escape-data - data for the escape package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704222134.l3MLYOpa032234@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: escape-data - data for the escape package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235589 Bug 235589 depends on bug 235588, which changed state. Bug 235588 Summary: Review Request: escape - an extensible puzzle game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235588 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 21:58:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:58:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226526] Merge Review: vim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704222158.l3MLwndD032669@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: vim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226526 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-04-22 17:58 EST ------- Karsten, why are you shipping man pages in UTF-8 AND in ISO8859-X/KOI8-R. IMHO this doesn't make sense, UTF-8 should be enough and the stuff should put be in the man pages directory without any .CHARSET extension. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 22:07:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:07:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226526] Merge Review: vim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704222207.l3MM7Kdr000409@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: vim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226526 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-04-22 18:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Karsten, why are you shipping man pages in UTF-8 AND in ISO8859-X/KOI8-R. IMHO > this doesn't make sense, UTF-8 should be enough and the stuff should put be in > the man pages directory without any .CHARSET extension. It does make sense. For those who use a non UTF8 encoded locale. I don't know exactly how man select the man page based on the locale encoding, maybe it doesn't really work right, but if it is broken man should be fixed, not the man pages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 22:10:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:10:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237311] Review Request: ArgoUML - UML Modelling Tool - FOSS Java App In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704222210.l3MMAkAl000480@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ArgoUML - UML Modelling Tool - FOSS Java App https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237311 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-04-22 18:10 EST ------- Keith, if you want to package this application yourself and submit it for review, this is the right place but you have to provide URLs to the .spec and .src.rpm files that you would like to submit for examination. Please see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join and especially http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#head-a7a95bc9083826b65ccdd4d0f201ea6e59426590 If you just want to suggest adding this package to Fedora, then please see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WishList. In this case please close this bugzilla ticket ("resolve" it as "NOTABUG") -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 22:11:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:11:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226526] Merge Review: vim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704222211.l3MMBfZg000525@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: vim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226526 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-04-22 18:11 EST ------- Well...UTF-8 is the Fedora default charset, anything else is normally not likely seen. But finally, please put the UTF-8 to the man directory itself and not into .UTF-8 directory as UTF-8 is really the Fedora default charset. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 22:12:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:12:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226526] Merge Review: vim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704222212.l3MMCZ6c000570@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: vim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226526 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-04-22 18:12 EST ------- Nevertheless the abused directories have to be provided either by the man, man-pages or the filesystem package! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 22:33:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:33:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 224254] Review Request: bos - Real-time strategy game using the Stratagus game engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704222233.l3MMX3X9000957@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bos - Real-time strategy game using the Stratagus game engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224254 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jpmahowald at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2007-04-22 18:33 EST ------- It builds but does not run: Loading AI: passive.lua src/ai/script_ai.cpp:345: incorrect argument incorrect argument stack traceback: [C]: in function 'DefineAi' [string "/usr/share/boswars/scripts/ai.lua"]:43: in function 'RegisterAi' [string "/usr/share/boswars/scripts/ais/passive.lua"]:34: in main chunk [C]: in function 'Load' [string "/usr/share/boswars/scripts/ai.lua"]:101: in main chunk [C]: in function 'Load' [string "/usr/share/boswars/scripts/stratagus.lua"]:220: in main chunk I traced this down to stratagus vs. bundled boswars stratagus fork. In ai/script_ai.cpp, CclDefineAi function, stratagus from Fedora srpm checks for 4 arguments, the bundled boswars engine 3. Unless you want to patch the scripts and whatever else boswars does differently to match stratagus, this seems another vote for using included stratagus. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 22:33:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:33:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234721] Review Request: sakura - A terminal emulator based on GTK+ and VTE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704222233.l3MMXWfP000986@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sakura - A terminal emulator based on GTK+ and VTE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234721 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(splinux25 at gmail.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-04-22 18:33 EST ------- no answer from the reporter until now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 22:34:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:34:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234721] Review Request: sakura - A terminal emulator based on GTK+ and VTE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704222234.l3MMYkU0001022@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sakura - A terminal emulator based on GTK+ and VTE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234721 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(splinux25 at gmail.co| |m) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 22:35:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:35:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234721] Review Request: sakura - A terminal emulator based on GTK+ and VTE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704222235.l3MMZFUn001057@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sakura - A terminal emulator based on GTK+ and VTE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234721 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(lxtnow at gmail.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 22:39:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:39:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210785] Review Request: php-pear-XML-Beautifier - Class to format XML documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704222239.l3MMdSqh001132@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-XML-Beautifier - Class to format XML documents Alias: pear-XML-Beautifier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210785 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-04-22 18:39 EST ------- Branch Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pear-XML-Beautifier Short Description: Class to format XML documents Owners: chris.stone at gmail.com Branches: EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 22:40:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:40:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 212923] Review Request: php-pear-XML-RSS - RSS parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704222240.l3MMewNi001188@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-XML-RSS - RSS parser Alias: pear-XML-RSS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212923 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-04-22 18:40 EST ------- Branch Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pear-XML-RSS Short Description: RSS parser Owners: chris.stone at gmail.com Branches: EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 22:43:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:43:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197417] Review Request: php-pear-Validate - Validation Class for Various Data Types In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704222243.l3MMhaTt001262@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Validate - Validation Class for Various Data Types Alias: php-pear-Validate https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197417 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: php-pear- |Review Request: php-pear- |Validate - PEAR: Validation |Validate - Validation Class |class |for Various Data Types Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-04-22 18:43 EST ------- Branch Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pear-Validate Short Description: Validation Class for Various Data Types Owners: chris.stone at gmail.com Branches: EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 22:45:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:45:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197419] Review Request: php-pear-Validate-Finance-CreditCard - Validation class for Credit Cards In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704222245.l3MMjUn3001330@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Validate-Finance-CreditCard - Validation class for Credit Cards Alias: Validate-Finance-CC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197419 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: php-pear- |Review Request: php-pear- |Validate-Finance-CreditCard |Validate-Finance-CreditCard |- PEAR: Validation class for|- Validation class for |Credit Cards |Credit Cards Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-04-22 18:45 EST ------- Branch Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pear-Validate-Finance-CreditCard Short Description: Validation class for Credit Cards Owners: chris.stone at gmail.com Branches: EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 23:10:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 19:10:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228303] Review Request: python-tag - Python bindings for TagLib to read and write music files tags In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704222310.l3MNAhqs001789@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-tag - Python bindings for TagLib to read and write music files tags https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228303 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-04-22 19:10 EST ------- So do I... After talk about on #Fedora-devel channel, it seems that this package can't be acceptable like that and can be a blocker. I think you should bug upstream to include it explicitly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 23:13:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 19:13:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227579] Review Request: spr - Statistical pattern recognition In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704222313.l3MNDtsE001873@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spr - Statistical pattern recognition https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227579 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2007-04-22 19:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > For 05.01.00-1: > > * rpmlint - attached > Summary: > - libSPR.so.0.0.0 contains undefined non-weak symbols. Good catch. I always forget to run rpmlint on the installed packages. > * Timestamps Fixed. > * header files location > - Generally, if a package installs "many" header files, their > header files should be hidden in the package specific directory > to aboid namespace conflict. > Would you consider to move all header files to under > %{_includedir}/%{name}/ ? Good idea. I'll also suggest that upstream use this as a default. New packages: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/spr.spec http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/spr-05.01.00-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 23:23:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 19:23:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233782] Review Request: vegastrike - 3D OpenGL spaceflight simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704222323.l3MNNxeq002239@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vegastrike - 3D OpenGL spaceflight simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233782 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-04-22 19:23 EST ------- Hmm. Hans, I added "BuildRequires: freeglut-devel" to the spec file and rebuilt the SRPM, then ran that through mock; and it still fails with that above error. Is there another package that needs to be set as a dependency? Alternatively, freeglut is only at version 2.4 in Fedora Development, which makes this check currently fail. Can it be disabled? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 22 23:25:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 19:25:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704222325.l3MNPwRj002327@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2007-04-22 19:25 EST ------- Hi Ville, thank you for the warning about %bcond_* but the problem seems to lie elsewhere. I've tried the following builds: mock w/ fedora-6-i386-core mock w/ fedora-6-x86_64-core on two separate machines without mock on two different FC6 x86_64 system no-mock and removed all the %bcond_* bits from the spec file and all fail with the exact same indication that %{python_sitearch} is undefined when reaching the %files sections. And, just to be sure, I downloaded and built: http://people.atrpms.net/~athimm/fedorasubmit/vtk/vtk-5.0.2-13.at.src.rpm from comment #20 and it builds and works nicely for me. So something changed between the 5.0.2-13 and the 5.0.3-17 SRPMs that is causing this problem. Unfortunately, I'm out of free time for the weekend and will have to continue this review at a later date. Can someone please report whether this build works for them (particularly in mock!) and/or suggest what is causing this annoyance? All help is appreciated! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 01:14:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 21:14:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235763] Review Request: windowlab - Small and Simple Amiga-like Window Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704230114.l3N1Earp004816@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: windowlab - Small and Simple Amiga-like Window Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235763 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-04-22 21:14 EST ------- Hey Nigel. I will review this package and look at sponsoring you... I know you have 3 other submissions pending, but they are all waiting on guidelines, correct? Do you have any other packages to submit? Look for a review of this package in a bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 01:22:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 21:22:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227579] Review Request: spr - Statistical pattern recognition In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704230122.l3N1MBNW005015@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spr - Statistical pattern recognition https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227579 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-22 21:21 EST ------- One issue * Directory ownership - The directory %{_includedir}/%{name}/ is not owned by any package, which should be owned by -devel package. Other things are all okay ------------------------------------------------- This package (spr) is APPROVED by me ------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 01:36:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 21:36:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233783] Review Request: vegastrike-data - Data files for Vega Strike In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704230136.l3N1aQBH005592@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vegastrike-data - Data files for Vega Strike https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233783 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-04-22 21:36 EST ------- Here we go; sorry for the lateness of this review. == vegastrike-data 0.4.3-1 == ++ GOOD: * Naming and version/release are good - especially since it's a large data package that can be easily copied in the repository instead of rebuilt per distro. Spec file name is "%{name}.spec" as required. * Game engine/runtime and data packages are separate, with this data-only package being noarch. * License (GPL) is acceptable; and a copy of it is included in the installed documentation (%doc vega-license.txt). * Ownership and permissions of files/directories are sane with no duplicates in the %files listing; and the %defattr line is good. * %changelog section is good. * BuildRoot is properly defined, and cleaned both as the first step in %install and as the only step in %clean. * Dependency list (only the base vegastrike package) is OK. * Successfully builds into binary (noarch) RPMs on both Development and FC-6 (x86_64). * Non-ASCII files are encoded in UTF-8, as required. * Included documentation is good. * Macro and $RPM_* variable usage is consistent. * Package is not relocatable and contains no translations (so %find_lang stuff is not necessary). * Package source matches that of upstream. (The md5sum doesn't match; but a recursive diff between the source checkout as noted in the spec and the unpacked tarball included in your source RPM returns nothing different between the two.) * Files marked as %doc are not required at runtime. ++ BAD: (1) rpmlint complains about several empty files in the source and binary RPMs: I: vegastrike-data checking E: vegastrike-data zero-length /usr/share/vegastrike/units/weapons/weapons.blank E: vegastrike-data zero-length /usr/share/vegastrike/units/factions/factions.template E: vegastrike-data zero-length /usr/share/vegastrike/units/weapons/weapons.template E: vegastrike-data zero-length /usr/share/vegastrike/units/subunits/subunits.blank E: vegastrike-data zero-length /usr/share/vegastrike/units/subunits/subunits.template E: vegastrike-data zero-length /usr/share/vegastrike/units/factions/factions.blank These seem ignorable at first glance though - could you verify this please? (2) As-is, it seems to include its own locally-modified copy of various Python modules (modules/builtin/). A brief perusal of the diff between the included python modules and the system copies of them shows mostly variable renaming and similar generally-insignificant changes. (3) This contains a lot of ISO-8859 text files, as follows. These should be encoded in UTF-8. ./textures/sol2/sources.txt: ISO-8859 text ./accounts/test2.save: ISO-8859 text, with very long lines ./accounts/test1.save: ISO-8859 text, with very long lines ./accounts/default.save: ISO-8859 text, with very long lines ./universe/fgnames/purist.txt: ISO-8859 text ./universe/fgnames/forsaken.txt: ISO-8859 text ./universe/fgnames/LIHW.txt: ISO-8859 text ./universe/fgnames/confed.txt: ISO-8859 text ./universe/fgnames/highborn.txt: ISO-8859 text ./universe/fgnames/shaper.txt: ISO-8859 text ./universe/fgnames/cities.txt: ISO-8859 English text ./universe/fgnames/unadorned.txt: ISO-8859 text ./universe/fgnames/homeland-security.txt: ISO-8859 text ./universe/fgnames/ISO.txt: ISO-8859 text ./universe/fgnames/merchant.txt: ISO-8859 text ./universe/fgnames/andolian.txt: ISO-8859 text (4) The splash_holovid and splash_pacifier animations contain objectionable images (scantily-clad women in rather lude poses). These should probably be removed or replaced with more appropriate content. (5) You make executable every Python file in this which has a shebang. Is this really needed or can the shebang lines be removed instead? (The rest of the scriplets are otherwise sane.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 01:40:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 21:40:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235763] Review Request: windowlab - Small and Simple Amiga-like Window Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704230140.l3N1eX2a005685@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: windowlab - Small and Simple Amiga-like Window Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235763 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-04-22 21:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Hey Nigel. I will review this package and look at sponsoring you... > I know you have 3 other submissions pending, but they are all waiting on > guidelines, correct? Do you have any other packages to submit? Correct, Bug #235804, Bug #235805 & Bug #235815 are all held up by Ocaml's static linking, I'm still looking for workarounds on the issue, and considering asking FESCo at the next meeting to allow an exception (per guidelines). I'm planning on packaging a game CSP but that is held up by Bug #236517 (current scons version to too old to build some newer packages. I'm also still looking at other suitable packages, but once sponsored I'm going to spend some time to get the ocaml issues sorted with the other 3 packages. > > Look for a review of this package in a bit. Will do, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 01:51:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 21:51:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235763] Review Request: windowlab - Small and Simple Amiga-like Window Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704230151.l3N1pBrR006246@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: windowlab - Small and Simple Amiga-like Window Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235763 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-04-22 21:51 EST ------- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPL) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: d566b989f8e59b169f7affa462762c17 windowlab-1.34.tar d566b989f8e59b169f7affa462762c17 windowlab-1.34.tar.1 OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. rpmlint says: W: windowlab-debuginfo spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/windowlab-1.34/events.c W: windowlab-debuginfo spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/windowlab-1.34/taskbar.c W: windowlab-debuginfo spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/windowlab-1.34/menufile.c W: windowlab-debuginfo spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/windowlab-1.34/main.c W: windowlab-debuginfo spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/windowlab-1.34/windowlab.h W: windowlab-debuginfo spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/windowlab-1.34/manage.c W: windowlab-debuginfo spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/windowlab-1.34/new.c W: windowlab-debuginfo spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/windowlab-1.34/misc.c W: windowlab-debuginfo spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/windowlab-1.34/client.c This is pretty cosmetic, but you could 'chmod 644' those sources and/or just mention it to the upstream that they shouldn't have executable source files in their tar. I don't see any blockers here, so this package is APPROVED. I will be happy to sponsor you. You can continue the process from: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#head-a601c13b0950a89568deafa65f505b4b58ee869b Don't forget to close this review request once this package has been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 02:04:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 22:04:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230228] Review Request: perl-Crypt-PasswdMD5 - Provides interoperable MD5-based crypt() functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704230204.l3N24qHt006474@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-PasswdMD5 - Provides interoperable MD5-based crypt() functions Alias: perl-Crypt-PasswdMD5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230228 mmcgrath at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mmcgrath at redhat.com 2007-04-22 22:04 EST ------- Sorry, I forgot to close this bug. Its been imported and available for a while. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 02:31:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 22:31:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233783] Review Request: vegastrike-data - Data files for Vega Strike In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704230231.l3N2VU4V007081@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vegastrike-data - Data files for Vega Strike https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233783 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 02:46:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 22:46:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235763] Review Request: windowlab - Small and Simple Amiga-like Window Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704230246.l3N2kgEx007698@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: windowlab - Small and Simple Amiga-like Window Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235763 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-04-22 22:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > 1. rpmlint says: > > W: windowlab-debuginfo spurious-executable-perm > /usr/src/debug/windowlab-1.34/events.c [...] > > This is pretty cosmetic, but you could 'chmod 644' those sources and/or > just mention it to the upstream that they shouldn't have executable source files > in their tar. > Ahh I had that problem before with this package (the chmod trick before, forgot about debuginfo having the same problem, will fix when possible > I don't see any blockers here, so this package is APPROVED. > Thank You > I will be happy to sponsor you. > You can continue the process from: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#head-a601c13b0950a89568deafa65f505b4b58ee869b > Thank you again, I have applied for cvsextras/fedorabugs, also could you add me to the wiki editing group? > Don't forget to close this review request once this package has been imported > and built. > New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: windowlab Short Description: Small and Simple Amiga-like Window Manager Owners: dev at nigelj.com Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 02:49:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 22:49:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234721] Review Request: sakura - A terminal emulator based on GTK+ and VTE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704230249.l3N2nwqx007793@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sakura - A terminal emulator based on GTK+ and VTE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234721 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(lxtnow at gmail.com) |needinfo?(splinux25 at gmail.co | |m) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 03:19:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 23:19:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235763] Review Request: windowlab - Small and Simple Amiga-like Window Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704230319.l3N3JkFF008464@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: windowlab - Small and Simple Amiga-like Window Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235763 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 03:28:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 23:28:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704230328.l3N3Sc2u008670@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 ------- Additional Comments From fangqq at gmail.com 2007-04-22 23:28 EST ------- hi Jens and Yijun I have been working on some other stuff and met some problems when using the upstream pcf tar ball as source. I just figured out the problem and compiled the new srpm. you can find the new spec and srpm files at Spec URL: http://wenq.org/release/08src/wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://wenq.org/release/08src/wqy-bitmap-fonts-0.8.0-2.src.rpm diff: http://wenq.org/eindex.cgi?action=browse&diff=1&id=wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec&revision=9&diffrevision=7 to Jens: 1. We have been working on vector CJK fonts for two years, and we are expecting our first release this year. Because we developed our vector fonts in a quite general way, so, instead of generating a single font, you will find a families of fonts. To keep things simple and easy to manage, a separate project folder is highly desired, as /usr/share/fonts/dejavu* and /usr/share/fonts/bitstream* 2. the change log has been modified as you suggested 3. I updated Source to upstream 0.8.1-7, and use the exact file as source, so the md5sum should match now. to Yijun: I am glad to see you here, and thank you very much for help with the spec file. 1. I have seen /usr/share/fonts/bitmap-font folder in FC6, and also chinese/, zh_CN/, zh_TW/ folders, however, as in my reply to Jens, I felt it will be much more clear to keep wqy bitmap fonts under the wqy project folder. Debian xfonts-wqy maintainers put this font under misc, however, I have heard many complains such as X crashes when change settings for wqy fonts. It will be much safer to separate this font from others, because of the complex nature of this fonts (such as tricky fontconfig settings and accompanied fonts.alias file) 2. I saw you are using night-build GB18030 fonts as source. I do not recommend using the CVS version because of the following reasons: A. GB18030 fonts (including both CJK basic+CJK ext A glyphs) are for our next release (v1.0), which is still not publicly announced yet; all the documents, credits are not fully updated yet, font files are not fully tested and small number of wrong glyphs exist. B. version 1.0 is going to be 1/3 bigger than the 0.8.x version, I am thinking to use SFNT ttf as the format for the next release. In this case, the whole font file can be as small as 4M before compression. However, freetype seems not ready for SFNT ttf, please refer to the discussion to this issue at http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/fontconfig/2006-August/002365.html so, I have not decided which format to use. C. nightly-build files are overwritten everyday, I thought source referred to a downloadable link for the original file. a side note, the correct build method for nightly-build is "make wqyv1" or "make wqyv08" 3. I added install -d for both directories 4. %defattr I copied from other examples, is (-, root, root, -) a more commonly used attribute? 5. the only publicly available RPM for wqy font is the mandriva RPM "x11-font-wqy-bitmapfont", since it is a noarch RPM, so, I want to use conflict to block it. I am not sure if this is necessary. 6. for %ghost, I simply copied from fonts-japanese http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/fonts-japanese/fonts-japanese.spec?rev=1.25&view=markup 7. I think mkfontdir is in xorg-x11-font-utils, which is included in requires list sorry for the long reply. I am glad to hear back from both of you. thanks Qianqian -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 04:08:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 00:08:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237170] Review Request: repoman - Tool for configuring yum(8) settings and repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704230408.l3N48j0v009486@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: repoman - Tool for configuring yum(8) settings and repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237170 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-04-23 00:08 EST ------- Hey David. Here's a review. It looks like you also need a sponsor? OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License(GPL) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: aba4be5ea7da8cb0f751e1400d509acf repoman-0.7.tar.gz aba4be5ea7da8cb0f751e1400d509acf repoman-0.7.tar.gz.1 OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install See below - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. The source url doesn't seem quite right http://www.boston.burdell.org/repoman/src/repoman-0.7.tar.gz works. (ie, it needs a /src/ in there) 2. rpmlint says: a) W: repoman no-dependency-on usermode Should "Requires: usermode" since you have a link to consolehelper. b) W: repoman incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.7 0.7-1.fc7 Should have the Release on the versions in the changelog... ie, 0.7-1 c) W: repoman conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/pam.d/repoman W: repoman conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/security/console.apps/repoman Are users ever likely to modify those files? Should they be noreplace? 2. You shouldn't need to require desktop-file-utils anymore, also you might use the standardized scriptlet for updating the mime-type key. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-de6770dd9867fcd085a73a4700f6bcd0d10294ef 3. You should use desktop-file-install to install the .desktop file: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-254ddf07aae20a23ced8cecc219d8f73926e9755 4. Is there a reason for the (8) after yum in the summary and description? I find it distracting, and many people won't know what it means. Finally two items that are by no means blockers, but I thought I would mention: - Perhaps you could talk with the yum-presto maintainer and see if it would be possible/easy to add support for deltarpm repos when they appear? - I see that this application doesn't have an icon. Perhaps you could ask for someone on the art group to whip one up? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/DesignService -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 04:15:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 00:15:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218581] Review Request: mediawiki-openid - The OpenID extension for MediaWiki In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704230415.l3N4FmME009623@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-openid - The OpenID extension for MediaWiki https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218581 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dev at nigelj.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 05:59:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 01:59:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704230559.l3N5x7DZ012568@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 bbbush.yuan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ccheng at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From bbbush.yuan at gmail.com 2007-04-23 01:59 EST ------- It seems I have to explain my idea a bit longer. :) * bitmap fonts are always under "misc" directory. I totally agree that the /usr/share/fonts/wenquanyi/ directory is needed. What I mean is to use "misc" sub directory instead of %{name}. Well this issue is minor. * The font has BDF source so why not use that as Source0, and use bdftopcf to generate PCF on the fly. Why not? * Requires(pre): /usr/bin/mkfontdir I mean xorg-x11-font-utils may not exist in older release of fedora. I'm not familiar with X packages so could anyone confirm it? * Why conflicts? * Why provides? Why conflicts and provides don't not match? I forget where I read this, that when a package conflicts another, it should also provides that package to make the upgrade happens smoothly. Also use Provides intead of Conflicts is better I think. The package don't have explicitly Provides itself. * install -d -m755 on both %{fontdir} and %{fontconfdir} I mean -m755 is missing from your script. The newly added "install -d ...fontdir" is redundant. * %defattr(-, root, root, -) is nicer Yes, this is in the default template. (Do you use rpmdev-newspec and rpmlint?) * %doc should not contain INSTALL* Again I forget where I learned this. * Keep old changelogs I like old changelogs, especially for projects like WenQuanYi. :D Hope CCheng could have a look at this, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 06:01:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 02:01:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177747] Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704230601.l3N61n8p012682@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium bbbush.yuan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 06:14:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 02:14:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704230614.l3N6ED5Q013084@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-23 02:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #43) > Hi Axel, I'm working through a review right now and I've run into a problem > where it fails to build in mock for a "fedora-6-x86_64-core" buildroot. The > reported error is: > RPM build errors: > File must begin with "/": %{python_sitearch}/vtk > which seems very odd since the command (In reply to comment #45) > OK, I've now received the exact same error in mock with a "fedora-6-i386-core" > and a "fedora-6-x86_64-core" build root. Removing all macros which includes white space like: ----------------------------------------- %if %{with java} %if %{with qt4} ........ ----------------------------------------- seems okay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 07:39:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 03:39:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226399] Merge Review: scim-tables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704230739.l3N7dPEc015425@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: scim-tables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226399 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(panemade at gmail.com | |) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 07:44:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 03:44:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237373] Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704230744.l3N7iXZN015768@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237373 kmatsui at t3.rim.or.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 08:41:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 04:41:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236642] Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704230841.l3N8faRK022026@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236642 ------- Additional Comments From kanarip at kanarip.com 2007-04-23 04:41 EST ------- We're sorry for the inconvenience, backups were trashed. Files are up now; SPEC: http://revisor.fedoraunity.org/releases/revisor-2.0/revisor-2.0.1.spec SRPM: http://revisor.fedoraunity.org/releases/revisor-2.0/revisor-2.0.1-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 09:08:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 05:08:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226399] Merge Review: scim-tables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704230908.l3N983kt023583@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: scim-tables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226399 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review?, |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(panemade at gmail.com| |) | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-23 05:07 EST ------- oops sorry for taking time. Here comes a quick review. Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPMs. + source files match upstream. 58d7f7dd231d73ef179e072b3124ebac scim-tables-0.5.7.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text COPYING is included in package. + %doc is small so no need of -doc subpackage. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no static libraries. + no .pc files are present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Provides: table-imengine-setup.so table.so APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 09:13:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 05:13:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226337] Merge Review: pyparted In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704230913.l3N9DHmW023948@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pyparted https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226337 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-04-23 05:13 EST ------- I'd say something is still wrong. Here is a snap from the build log in mock: Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.37848 + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + cd pyparted-1.8.6 + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + /usr/bin/make gcc -O2 -Wall -g -I/usr/include/python2.5 -I. -fPIC -c -o partedmodule.o partedmodule.c gcc -O2 -Wall -g -I/usr/include/python2.5 -I. -fPIC -c -o pyconstraint.o pyconstraint.c gcc -O2 -Wall -g -I/usr/include/python2.5 -I. -fPIC -c -o pydevice.o pydevice.c gcc -O2 -Wall -g -I/usr/include/python2.5 -I. -fPIC -c -o pydisk.o pydisk.c gcc -O2 -Wall -g -I/usr/include/python2.5 -I. -fPIC -c -o pyexception.o pyexception.c gcc -O2 -Wall -g -I/usr/include/python2.5 -I. -fPIC -c -o pyfilesystem.o pyfilesystem.c gcc -O2 -Wall -g -I/usr/include/python2.5 -I. -fPIC -c -o pygeometry.o pygeometry.c make: pkg-config: Command not found gcc -O2 -Wall -g -I/usr/include/python2.5 -I. -fPIC -o partedmodule.so -shared partedmodule.o pyconstraint.o pydevice.o pydisk.o pyexception.o pyf ilesystem.o pygeometry.o + exit 0 It looks like standard compiler flags are not used. Could you please check ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 09:43:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 05:43:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234926] Review Request: ngircd - Next Generation IRC Daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704230943.l3N9ht2e025705@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ngircd - Next Generation IRC Daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234926 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dev at nigelj.com ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-04-23 05:43 EST ------- If no one else is interested in reviewing, I'll try to take a look tomorrow. (I notice libident is still waiting approval, so you'd have to fix that up first). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 10:06:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 06:06:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704231006.l3NA6m5O027438@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2007-04-23 06:06 EST ------- Please replace the %define in the definition of python_sitearch with a %global. I spent quite a few hours to debug this and it looks like a bug in rpm, see bug #237448. The reason why I was not seeing it it that python_sitearch was already defined for me. The consequence will be to get the FPC to change conditionalized %defines to %globals until rpm is fixed and until all supported releases contain this fix (so it may be that it will have to wait until F9+). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 10:15:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 06:15:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237373] Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704231015.l3NAFTqF027916@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237373 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 11:06:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 07:06:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236162] Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704231106.l3NB6L7L029800@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236162 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-04-23 07:06 EST ------- Ownership change was requested: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237402 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 11:10:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 07:10:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237373] Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704231110.l3NBAPVb030081@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237373 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-23 07:10 EST ------- Hello, Matsui-san: First please make yourself be familiar with the guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines Then: A. description section: * libdir - rpmlint shows: -------------------------------------------------------- E: mcpp configure-without-libdir-spec -------------------------------------------------------- For this package it seems okay, however please explain why not using libdir for ths configure is not a problem. Also consider to use %configure macro. * disttag - Using %{?dist} tag on Release number is prefered to make it easy to maintain a package over several branches Check: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag * SourceURL - Please refer to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL * Prefix - Do you intend to make this package relocatable? If so, please explain why you want. If not, setting Prefix is forbidden. B. setup/build/install stage: * macros - If you don't intend to make this relocatable, please use proper macros (%{_mandir} for /usr/share/man, %{_datadir} for /usr/share, ....) * parallel make - Support parallel make if possible. * Compilar flags - Fedora specific compilation flags are not honored. Mock build log says: ---------------------------------------------------------- make[2]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/mcpp-2.6.3/src' gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -g -O2 -c -o mcpp-main.o `test -f 'main.c' || echo './'`main.c ---------------------------------------------------------- while Fedora specific compilation flags are: ---------------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ rpm --eval %optflags -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables ---------------------------------------------------------- (on FC-devel i386) C Files entry * Documentation entry - Files/Directories under %{_docdir} (/usr/share/doc) are automatically marked as documentation * Locale specific documentation - Locale specific documents must be marked as %lang() (i.e. %lang(ja) %doc ..... , for example) * Encoding - doc-jp/mcpp-manual.html is encoded with EUC-JP, while Fedora default encoding is UTF-8. Please change (by iconv, for example). * Documentation The following documents are preferred to be included as a documentation. ---------------------------------------------------------- ChangeLog* ---------------------------------------------------------- D. clean section ---------------------------------------------------------- make DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT uninstall make distclean ---------------------------------------------------------- - Why do these required? E. test execution - These are some directory which "seem" to be used for %check section. If possible, add %check section and do some tests in the section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 11:16:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 07:16:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236162] Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704231116.l3NBGNiY030253@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236162 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-04-23 07:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #0) > I am a new packager and require a sponser. > Thanks. I'm sponsoring you Jasper. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 11:20:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 07:20:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236158] Review Request: wise2 - Bioinformatics tools for comparison of biopolymers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704231120.l3NBK1V7030353@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wise2 - Bioinformatics tools for comparison of biopolymers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236158 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 11:22:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 07:22:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236162] Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704231122.l3NBMMOF030511@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236162 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-04-23 07:22 EST ------- from now on there's no need to use %ghost for *.pyc *.pyo file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 11:24:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 07:24:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236158] Review Request: wise2 - Bioinformatics tools for comparison of biopolymers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704231124.l3NBOcbd030690@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wise2 - Bioinformatics tools for comparison of biopolymers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236158 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-23 07:24 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 0584240f77885e37528e99e64535ab60 wise2.2.0.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Provides: config(wise2) = 2.2.0-2.fc7 + Requires: config(wise2) = 2.2.0-2.fc7 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libm.so.6 libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) rtld(GNU_HASH) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 11:24:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 07:24:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237311] Review Request: ArgoUML - UML Modelling Tool - FOSS Java App In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704231124.l3NBOtrD030727@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ArgoUML - UML Modelling Tool - FOSS Java App https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237311 keith at karsites.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From keith at karsites.net 2007-04-23 07:24 EST ------- Thanks wolfy. I will close this ticket and post to the wishlist. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 11:33:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 07:33:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236158] Review Request: wise2 - Bioinformatics tools for comparison of biopolymers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704231133.l3NBXdnP031044@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wise2 - Bioinformatics tools for comparison of biopolymers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236158 alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2007-04-23 07:33 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: wise2 Short Description: Bioinformatics tools for comparison of biopolymers Owners: alexl at users.sourceforge.net Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 11:45:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 07:45:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704231145.l3NBjdFY031789@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-04-23 07:45 EST ------- Added the sdp patch. I doesn't seem to work. (I do see the PC suite, but once I try to click on it, the phone disconnects.) I'll investigate further. * Mon Apr 23 2007 Gilboa Davara 1-0-0.21.beta2 - Patch list clean-up. - Add Nokia obex detection patch. - Fix 64bit compile due to bad default in configure. (with_bluetooth_dir) - Missing BR: libtempter-devel. - Missing BT: libidn-devel. - Added: kbluepin wrapper - configure kbluepin as the old-style pin helper. Spec URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/kdebluetooth.spec SRPM URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/kdebluetooth-1.0-0.21.beta2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 11:48:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 07:48:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704231148.l3NBmBGQ031974@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-04-23 07:48 EST ------- Forgot to add. Tested on both rawhide x86_64 and i386. Old-style pinhelper requires a patched bluez-utils RPM. (Pending bluez-utils maintainer approval) - Gilboa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 11:56:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 07:56:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226155] Merge Review: mod_perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704231156.l3NBu0qT032579@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mod_perl Alias: mod_perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226155 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium Bug 226155 depends on bug 228429, which changed state. Bug 228429 Summary: mod_perl errantly provides perl(warnings) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228429 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 12:33:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 08:33:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225857] Merge Review: grep In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704231233.l3NCXeQs002021@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: grep https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225857 skasal at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From skasal at redhat.com 2007-04-23 08:33 EST ------- Thank you for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 12:41:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 08:41:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225718] Merge Review: eel2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704231241.l3NCfuL5002391@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: eel2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225718 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From alexl at redhat.com 2007-04-23 08:41 EST ------- Fixed in -5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 12:52:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 08:52:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225881] Merge Review: hardlink In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704231252.l3NCqxV7003508@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: hardlink https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225881 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-04-23 08:52 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 12:54:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 08:54:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236162] Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704231254.l3NCsYNe003648@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236162 ------- Additional Comments From jasperhartline at adelphia.net 2007-04-23 08:54 EST ------- The package doesn't seem to want to build with %ghost removed for *.pyc and *.pyo files, take a look: error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/share/kadischi/kadischi.pyc /usr/share/kadischi/kadischi.pyo /usr/share/kadischi/lib/functions.pyc /usr/share/kadischi/lib/functions.pyo /usr/share/kadischi/lib/shvar.pyc /usr/share/kadischi/lib/shvar.pyo /usr/share/kadischi/movefiles.pyc /usr/share/kadischi/movefiles.pyo /usr/share/kadischi/post_install_scripts/03fstab.pyc /usr/share/kadischi/post_install_scripts/03fstab.pyo /usr/share/kadischi/post_install_scripts/05fsclean.pyc /usr/share/kadischi/post_install_scripts/05fsclean.pyo /usr/share/kadischi/post_install_scripts/06sysconfig.pyc /usr/share/kadischi/post_install_scripts/06sysconfig.pyo RPM build errors: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/share/kadischi/kadischi.pyc /usr/share/kadischi/kadischi.pyo /usr/share/kadischi/lib/functions.pyc /usr/share/kadischi/lib/functions.pyo /usr/share/kadischi/lib/shvar.pyc /usr/share/kadischi/lib/shvar.pyo /usr/share/kadischi/movefiles.pyc /usr/share/kadischi/movefiles.pyo /usr/share/kadischi/post_install_scripts/03fstab.pyc /usr/share/kadischi/post_install_scripts/03fstab.pyo /usr/share/kadischi/post_install_scripts/05fsclean.pyc /usr/share/kadischi/post_install_scripts/05fsclean.pyo /usr/share/kadischi/post_install_scripts/06sysconfig.pyc /usr/share/kadischi/post_install_scripts/06sysconfig.pyo [autopsy at localhost ~]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 13:04:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 09:04:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226539] Merge Review: which In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704231304.l3ND4mSd004589@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: which https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226539 than at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|needinfo? | ------- Additional Comments From than at redhat.com 2007-04-23 09:04 EST ------- all above bugs are fixed in rawhide. thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 13:06:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 09:06:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236162] Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704231306.l3ND6c7p004817@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236162 ------- Additional Comments From jasperhartline at adelphia.net 2007-04-23 09:06 EST ------- Here is the new SRPM: http://autopsy.podzone.org/~autopsy/kadischi-3.5-2.20070423cvs.src.rpm Here is the new SPEC file: http://autopsy.podzone.org/~autopsy/kadischi.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 13:34:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 09:34:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225881] Merge Review: hardlink In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704231334.l3NDYEgo007097@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: hardlink https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225881 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|jnovy at redhat.com |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag|fedora-review-, |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(roozbeh at farsiweb.i| |nfo) | ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-04-23 09:34 EST ------- The theory says that Source0 should be a full (downloadable) URL. Given the fact that upstream is .. hugh.. you, I think that you could just add a comment with instructions on how to get (a specific version) from CVS. GOOD rpmlint checks: Source RPM: W: hardlink unversioned-explicit-obsoletes kernel-utils rpmlint of hardlink: W: hardlink obsolete-not-provided kernel-utils --> seems correct, the kernel-utils package has been replaced by a lot of other smaller packages which include all the utilities, one par package - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPL) OK, matches source - pec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all files that it creates; does not create any directories, does not take ownership of other files or directories - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file - no static, .la, .pc files SHOULD - builds fine in mock/devel/i386 and x86_64 - runs as advertised package is APPROVED but before importing please - fix timestamp preserving of man page (install -pm hardlink.1) - fix the %make step to take into account SMP flags (not that it would matter much for this small program, but the guidelines request it) - add to the package and include in the RPM as %doc the GPL license. It is mentioned in the C source, but it would be wise to also include it in full -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 13:36:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 09:36:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225881] Merge Review: hardlink In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704231336.l3NDa1m6007230@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: hardlink https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225881 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(jnovy at redhat.com) ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-04-23 09:35 EST ------- Jindrich, please do not assign the bug to you. The bug should be assigned to the reviewer, not to the packager. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 14:20:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:20:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225881] Merge Review: hardlink In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704231420.l3NEKinA009592@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: hardlink https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225881 jnovy at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(jnovy at redhat.com) | ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-04-23 10:20 EST ------- Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 14:57:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:57:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233754] Review Request: marble - A KDE Desktop Globe In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704231457.l3NEv6UI012609@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: marble - A KDE Desktop Globe https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233754 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(cgoorah at yahoo.com.| |au) | ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-04-23 10:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > ? Timestamps > - Well, there are many files which are installed from tarball without > any modification (many png, svg, PNT files), so keeping timestamps > on these files is _strongly_ recommended. > However, cmake uses its original installation mechanism and I don't > know how I can make cmake keep timestamps... I'm still looking how to do so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 15:05:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:05:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229490] Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704231505.l3NF5CeQ013320@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229490 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo? ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-04-23 11:04 EST ------- Maxime , Can you to 1.4 please so that we can continue with the review ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 15:11:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:11:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704231511.l3NFBVSn013911@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-04-23 11:11 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/RPMS/netgen.spec SRPM http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/RPMS/netgen-1.3.7-6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 15:57:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:57:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225807] Merge Review: glib-java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704231557.l3NFvbIp017860@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: glib-java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225807 mcepl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com 2007-04-23 11:57 EST ------- MUST Items: 1. rpmlint must be run on every package. OK, all runs are silent 2. The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines OK 3. The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec OK 4. The spec file must be written in American English. OK 5. The spec file for the package MUST be legible. Just a question about all java_pkg_* business -- is it necessary/required/needed? Probably yes (does it have anything to do with http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JavaFAQ or http://www.city-fan.org/tips/JpackageJava)? Doesn't hurt, just possibly silly; otherwise OK 6. Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines OK 7. Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} OK 8. The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK 9. The package must be licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the Packaging Guidelines OK 10. The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK 11. If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK 12. The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. OK 13. The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. OK 14. The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. OK 15. All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK 16. If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. OK 17. The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK 18. Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. OK 19. Non-relocatable? OK 20. A package must own all directories that it creates. OK 21. A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK 22. Permissions on files must be set properly. OK 23. Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. OK (API documentation is in -devel package) 24. If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK 25. Header files must be in a -devel package. OK 26. Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK (there are none) 27. Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). OK 28. If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. OK 29. In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK 30. Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. OK 31. Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. OK (no-GUI application, but library) 32. Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK SHOULD Items: 1. If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. OK (we have license) 2. The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK (we have none) 3. The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. OK (built in brew) 4. The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK (built in brew) 5. The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. Not done (will do with the following packages in the java-gnome toolchain, and if anything happens, will make a bug here). 6. If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. OK 7. Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK (there are no other subpackages than -devel) 8. The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. OK (in %{_libdir}/pkconfig/) 9. If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Please see File Dependencies in the Guidelines for further information. OK (no other dependencies) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 16:10:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 12:10:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225627] Merge Review: bsf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704231610.l3NGA69r019206@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bsf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225627 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium pcheung at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|pcheung at redhat.com |mwringe at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-04-23 12:09 EST ------- Updated spec file and srpm at: https://pcheung.108.redhat.com/files/documents/174/374/bsf.spec https://pcheung.108.redhat.com/files/documents/174/373/bsf-2.3.0-11jpp.2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 16:50:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 12:50:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236158] Review Request: wise2 - Bioinformatics tools for comparison of biopolymers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704231650.l3NGoL3E023451@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wise2 - Bioinformatics tools for comparison of biopolymers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236158 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 16:51:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 12:51:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235763] Review Request: windowlab - Small and Simple Amiga-like Window Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704231651.l3NGpoVb023707@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: windowlab - Small and Simple Amiga-like Window Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235763 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 16:53:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 12:53:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229321] Review Request :postgresql-pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704231653.l3NGrYVR024090@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request :postgresql-pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229321 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 16:58:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 12:58:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216355] Review Request: vdr-skins - Collection of OSD skins for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704231658.l3NGwgAm024683@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-skins - Collection of OSD skins for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216355 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 17:07:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:07:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216353] Review Request: vdr-text2skin - OSD skin plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704231707.l3NH7I6Q025602@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-text2skin - OSD skin plugin for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216353 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 17:25:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:25:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226337] Merge Review: pyparted In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704231725.l3NHPg0U027580@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pyparted https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226337 ------- Additional Comments From dcantrell at redhat.com 2007-04-23 13:25 EST ------- Should be fixed now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 17:38:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:38:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225248] Merge Review: ant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704231738.l3NHcY4B029057@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225248 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium pcheung at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mwringe at redhat.com CC| |pcheung at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-04-23 13:38 EST ------- New spec file and srpm at: https://pcheung.108.redhat.com/files/documents/174/375/ant.spec https://pcheung.108.redhat.com/files/documents/174/376/ant-1.6.5-4jpp.2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 17:50:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:50:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235189] Review Request: nautilus-python - Python bindings for Nautilus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704231750.l3NHonVr030421@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nautilus-python - Python bindings for Nautilus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235189 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 17:54:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:54:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197417] Review Request: php-pear-Validate - Validation Class for Various Data Types In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704231754.l3NHsaGw030706@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Validate - Validation Class for Various Data Types Alias: php-pear-Validate https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197417 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 17:57:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:57:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197419] Review Request: php-pear-Validate-Finance-CreditCard - Validation class for Credit Cards In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704231757.l3NHvDEr031004@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Validate-Finance-CreditCard - Validation class for Credit Cards Alias: Validate-Finance-CC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197419 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 18:01:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:01:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205060] Review Request: perl-Sub-Name - Name -- or rename -- a sub In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704231801.l3NI1Ptu031341@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Name - Name -- or rename -- a sub Alias: perl-Sub-Name https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205060 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 18:03:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:03:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210785] Review Request: php-pear-XML-Beautifier - Class to format XML documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704231803.l3NI3Aim031615@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-XML-Beautifier - Class to format XML documents Alias: pear-XML-Beautifier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210785 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 18:05:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:05:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 212923] Review Request: php-pear-XML-RSS - RSS parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704231805.l3NI59O1031791@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-XML-RSS - RSS parser Alias: pear-XML-RSS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212923 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 18:06:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:06:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222597] Review Request: php-pear-Crypt-CHAP - Class to generate CHAP packets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704231806.l3NI6EL2032014@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Crypt-CHAP - Class to generate CHAP packets Alias: pear-Crypt-CHAP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222597 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 18:19:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:19:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237170] Review Request: repoman - Tool for configuring yum(8) settings and repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704231819.l3NIJCVn032744@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: repoman - Tool for configuring yum(8) settings and repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237170 ------- Additional Comments From dcantrell at redhat.com 2007-04-23 14:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > It looks like you also need a sponsor? Yes. > 1. The source url doesn't seem quite right > http://www.boston.burdell.org/repoman/src/repoman-0.7.tar.gz > works. (ie, it needs a /src/ in there) Fixed. > 2. rpmlint says: > > a) W: repoman no-dependency-on usermode > > Should "Requires: usermode" since you have a link to consolehelper. Fixed. > b) W: repoman incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.7 0.7-1.fc7 > > Should have the Release on the versions in the changelog... > ie, 0.7-1 Fixed. > c) > W: repoman conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/pam.d/repoman > W: repoman conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/security/console.apps/repoman > > Are users ever likely to modify those files? Should they be noreplace? Most likely users will never have to modify those files. But, they are config files and we wouldn't go to the trouble of making them config files if we didn't want to give the users the option of changing them. I've added the noreplace attribute. > 2. You shouldn't need to require desktop-file-utils anymore, also you > might use the standardized scriptlet for updating the mime-type key. See: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-de6770dd9867fcd085a73a4700f6bcd0d10294ef Fixed. > 3. You should use desktop-file-install to install the .desktop file: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-254ddf07aae20a23ced8cecc219d8f73926e9755 Fixed, I think. Not sure if I'm using this correctly. > 4. Is there a reason for the (8) after yum in the summary and description? > I find it distracting, and many people won't know what it means. Only to indicate it's a command with a man page. Removed the (8). > Finally two items that are by no means blockers, but I thought I would mention: > > - Perhaps you could talk with the yum-presto maintainer and see if it would > be possible/easy to add support for deltarpm repos when they appear? Definitely something to look in to. Added it to the TODO list. > - I see that this application doesn't have an icon. Perhaps you could ask for > someone on the art group to whip one up? > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/DesignService Also added to the TODO list. I have put all of these changes together in repoman-0.8. Here is the new srpm and spec file: http://www.boston.burdell.org/repoman/RPMS/source/repoman-0.8-1.fc7.src.rpm http://www.boston.burdell.org/repoman/RPMS/source/repoman.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 19:06:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:06:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227241] Review Request: kde-settings - Config files for kde In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704231906.l3NJ6F2o005163@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kde-settings - Config files for kde Alias: kde-settings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227241 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chris.stone at gmail.com Alias| |kde-settings Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-04-23 15:06 EST ------- I'll make an attempt at reviewing this right now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 19:23:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:23:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216353] Review Request: vdr-text2skin - OSD skin plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704231923.l3NJNb34007362@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-text2skin - OSD skin plugin for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216353 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-04-23 15:23 EST ------- Imported and built for FC-6 and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 19:23:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:23:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216355] Review Request: vdr-skins - Collection of OSD skins for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704231923.l3NJNem2007395@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-skins - Collection of OSD skins for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216355 Bug 216355 depends on bug 216353, which changed state. Bug 216353 Summary: Review Request: vdr-text2skin - OSD skin plugin for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216353 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 19:30:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:30:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237416] Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704231930.l3NJUdS9008005@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237416 ------- Additional Comments From stransky at redhat.com 2007-04-23 15:30 EST ------- Should be fixed now, updated files are here: http://people.redhat.com/stransky/berusky/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 19:38:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:38:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237416] Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704231938.l3NJcR5Y008597@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237416 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-04-23 15:38 EST ------- Its look line, that you didn't upload the updated package for berusky. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 19:39:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:39:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225248] Merge Review: ant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704231939.l3NJdorV008725@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225248 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|mwringe at redhat.com |Jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-04-23 15:39 EST ------- Good: + Naming seems ok. + Tar ball matches with upstream. + Mock build works fine for FC6 and rawhide. Bad: - BR coreutils is not be included. - warning from rpmlint ant-manual: rpmlint of ant-manual: W: ant-manual dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/ant-manual-1.6.5/manual/api /usr/share/javadoc/ant-1.6.5 W: ant-manual symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/ant-manual-1.6.5/manual/api /usr/share/javadoc/ant-1.6.5 W: ant-manual file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/ant-manual-1.6.5/manual/tutorial-tasks-filesets-properties.zip - Errors/warnings on rpmlint ant: E: ant devel-dependency java-devel W: ant non-standard-group Development/Build Tools W: ant incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.6.5-4jpp.2 0:1.6.5-4jpp.2.fc6 W: ant obsolete-not-provided ant-optional W: ant obsolete-not-provided ant-optional-full E: ant useless-explicit-provides ant -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 19:48:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:48:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216355] Review Request: vdr-skins - Collection of OSD skins for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704231948.l3NJmRD9009757@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-skins - Collection of OSD skins for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216355 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-04-23 15:48 EST ------- Actually, in some situations VDR writes to the *.theme files, so I'll relocate them to /var/lib/vdr/themes instead of /usr/share. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 20:27:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:27:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227579] Review Request: spr - Statistical pattern recognition In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704232027.l3NKRX0g013454@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spr - Statistical pattern recognition https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227579 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2007-04-23 16:27 EST ------- Many thanks for the review! I'll fix the directory ownership in the -devel subpackage after importing the new package, but before the first build. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: spr Short Description: Statistical pattern recognition Owners: wart at kobold.org Branches: FC-6 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 20:28:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:28:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233782] Review Request: vegastrike - 3D OpenGL spaceflight simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704232028.l3NKSAkx013495@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vegastrike - 3D OpenGL spaceflight simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233782 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-23 16:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > Hmm. Hans, > > I added "BuildRequires: freeglut-devel" to the spec file and rebuilt the SRPM, > then ran that through mock; and it still fails with that above error. Is there > another package that needs to be set as a dependency? > Yes, a couple actually (my bad) here is a fixed version: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/vegastrike.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/vegastrike-0.4.3-2.fc7.src.rpm This new version also includes a patch to make it keep the python system dirs in its import path, so that the builtin dir can be removed from the data package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 20:30:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:30:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226190] Merge Review: netatalk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704232030.l3NKUEon013600@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: netatalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226190 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium mbarabas at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(mbarabas at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From mbarabas at redhat.com 2007-04-23 16:30 EST ------- Most of problems are fixed now in rawhide. Others will be resolved soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 20:41:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:41:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233783] Review Request: vegastrike-data - Data files for Vega Strike In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704232041.l3NKfGbo014586@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vegastrike-data - Data files for Vega Strike https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233783 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-23 16:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Here we go; sorry for the lateness of this review. > > ++ BAD: > (1) rpmlint complains about several empty files in the source and binary RPMs: > I: vegastrike-data checking > E: vegastrike-data zero-length /usr/share/vegastrike/units/weapons/weapons.blank > E: vegastrike-data zero-length > /usr/share/vegastrike/units/factions/factions.template > E: vegastrike-data zero-length /usr/share/vegastrike/units/weapons/weapons.template > E: vegastrike-data zero-length /usr/share/vegastrike/units/subunits/subunits.blank > E: vegastrike-data zero-length > /usr/share/vegastrike/units/subunits/subunits.template > E: vegastrike-data zero-length /usr/share/vegastrike/units/factions/factions.blank > > These seem ignorable at first glance though - could you verify this please? > Yes, I saw those warnings before submission myself too, but I've deliberately ignored them, as I think these empty files might still be needed / usefull. > (2) As-is, it seems to include its own locally-modified copy of various Python > modules (modules/builtin/). A brief perusal of the diff between the included > python modules and the system copies of them shows mostly variable renaming and > similar generally-insignificant changes. > Good catch, removed. > (3) This contains a lot of ISO-8859 text files, as follows. These should be > encoded in UTF-8. > ./textures/sol2/sources.txt: ISO-8859 text > ./accounts/test2.save: ISO-8859 text, with very long lines > ./accounts/test1.save: ISO-8859 text, with very long lines > ./accounts/default.save: ISO-8859 text, with very long lines > ./universe/fgnames/purist.txt: ISO-8859 text > ./universe/fgnames/forsaken.txt: ISO-8859 text > ./universe/fgnames/LIHW.txt: ISO-8859 text > ./universe/fgnames/confed.txt: ISO-8859 text > ./universe/fgnames/highborn.txt: ISO-8859 text > ./universe/fgnames/shaper.txt: ISO-8859 text > ./universe/fgnames/cities.txt: ISO-8859 English text > ./universe/fgnames/unadorned.txt: ISO-8859 text > ./universe/fgnames/homeland-security.txt: ISO-8859 text > ./universe/fgnames/ISO.txt: ISO-8859 text > ./universe/fgnames/merchant.txt: ISO-8859 text > ./universe/fgnames/andolian.txt: ISO-8859 text > Notice these are data files, not user docs, and I think the game might actually expect / depend on them being ISO-8859, so I've kept these as is. > (4) The splash_holovid and splash_pacifier animations contain objectionable > images (scantily-clad women in rather lude poses). These should probably be > removed or replaced with more appropriate content. > These are just 2 of a long list of in game fake advertisements, which are there to create a certain atmosphere. I personally find the ones about guns and joining the army / the ones promoting militarism much more offensive then the 2 you name. IOW this is pretty subjective. Removing any of them feels like applying censorship to me, and lets please not go there unless things are clearly illegal or really bad taste / inappropriate > (5) You make executable every Python file in this which has a shebang. Is this > really needed or can the shebang lines be removed instead? (The rest of the > scriplets are otherwise sane.) Most of these were in the builtin dir, the remaining 2 are really scripts meant to be executed stand alone, and thus should be executable. New version here: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/vegastrike-data.spec I only updated the specfile as the sources didn't change and it takes eons to upload it with my link. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 20:44:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:44:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234750] Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704232044.l3NKieET014997@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234750 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-23 16:44 EST ------- Trond, thanks for the review! Ralf, thanks for all the input! Imported and build, closing. I'll post avr-gcc for review soonish. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 21:18:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 17:18:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230275] Review Request: varnish - High-performance HTTP accelerator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704232118.l3NLICoU018400@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: varnish - High-performance HTTP accelerator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230275 ------- Additional Comments From ingvar at linpro.no 2007-04-23 17:18 EST ------- The short story: Updated specfile: http://users.linpro.no/ingvar/varnish/fedora-extras-commit/varnish.spec Updated source rpm: http://users.linpro.no/ingvar/varnish/fedora-extras-commit/varnish-1.0.3-6.src.rpm Details and comments: * Matthias Saou > - The %lib_name doesn't seem very useful, and having used plain > "libs" instead of "-n %{lib_name}" for the sub-package would make > things clearer. Also, the "future" devel package would be named > wrong since it would be "varnish-libs-devel". The macro has been hanging around since I experimented with names and an old mandrake-ish rpmlint. Agreed and fixed. > - Some brackets are used inconsistently ("%version-%{release}"). Ah, thanks. Fixed. > - A condrestart should probably be added in %postun, as it makes > sense to restart varnishd after an update. Yup, added. > - The .gz extensions in %files for the man pages are wrong, you should use > something like "*.1*" instead, for people who rebuild with uncompressed or > bzip2ed man pages. Fixed > - You could spare a lot of "mkdir -p" by using "install -D". Fixed > - The "--sbindir=/usr/sbin" on the %configure line is redundant. No, it's not. At least, not unless this has been fixed in upstream very, recently. In 1.0 it was needed. > - The iteration for the UTF-8 conversion would be best done with a > glob, i.e. "for i in bin/*/*.1", as it'll be less subject to break > if any programs are added or removed. ...and it became simpler and shorter too. Fixed. > - I would personally add a comment above the "Requires: gcc" line to > explain that varnish *really* needs a C compiler at runtime by > design because of its VCL files. Point. Fixed. > - The explicit requirements on "ncurses" should be removed, as it's wrong to > have it (wouldn't allow for a compat-ncurses to work right). Right. Removed, and let rpm find the correct deps by itself. > - The kernel requirement should probably be removed from the libs > package, unless they are the ones requiring 2.6 specific features > (but I think it's only the daemon). Yup, that's correct. Fixed. > rpmlint's output is valuable, but having it empty unfortunately doesn't > necessarily mean that the package is perfect! But of course. Thanks for the input. I also stole some of your init- and config file items :-) Ingvar -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 21:23:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 17:23:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237579] New: Review Request: cernlib-g77 - General purpose CERN library and associated binaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237579 Summary: Review Request: cernlib-g77 - General purpose CERN library and associated binaries Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pertusus at free.fr QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/cernlib-g77.spec SRPM URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/cernlib-g77-2006-6.fc7.src.rpm Description: This is a sort of compat package for the cernlib. Indeed in F7 the cernlib is compiled by gfortran, however gfortran compiled libraries are binary incompatible with g77 compiled libraries (and therefore have a different soname). Moreover gfortran is sort of new, so I think it is interesting to be able to use g77 and gfortran compiled binaries and libraries in parallel. The spec file is the cernlib specfile with the %bcond reversed in order to have g77 used instead of gfortran. To have cernlib and cernlib-g77 packages available from the same spec file, there is a use of a lot of conditionals, so the spec file isn't that legible, but in my opinion it is more maintainable like that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 21:24:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 17:24:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237579] Review Request: cernlib-g77 - General purpose CERN library and associated binaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704232124.l3NLOp13018981@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cernlib-g77 - General purpose CERN library and associated binaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237579 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jamatos at fc.up.pt ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-04-23 17:24 EST ------- Jose, since you did the cernlib review, could it be possible for you to review that one too? I'd like to have it in F7 if possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 21:52:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 17:52:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232018] Review Request: perl-YAML-Syck - Fast, lightweight YAML loader and dumper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704232152.l3NLqWCi021756@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-YAML-Syck - Fast, lightweight YAML loader and dumper Alias: perl-YAML-Syck https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232018 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ianburrell at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |237594 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 22:10:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:10:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226337] Merge Review: pyparted In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704232210.l3NMAAq6022976@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pyparted https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226337 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(dcantrell at redhat.c | |om) ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-04-23 18:10 EST ------- ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [!] Rpmlint output: Source RPM: E: pyparted no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install pyparted-debuginfo & pyparted: no output [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type:GPL [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is written in American English. See also note 2&3 below [x] Spec file for the package is legible. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: f431a4e84a7a5671c1ed653c99d25a89c9acbf8d pyparted-1.8.6.tar.bz2 [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on:devel/x86_64 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: Arches excluded: - Why: - [!] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. See below issue #3 [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [-] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [!] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. See below under issue #3 [x] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel, x86_64 and i386 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: devel, x86_64 and i386 [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [x] File based requires are sane. [x] Latest version is packaged. === Issues === 1. Please add back the "rm -fR buildroot" line in %install, looks like it was deleted by accident when editing the make line 2. The description tag says "it is used for manipulation partition tables". I am not a native English speaker, but to me it looks like a cat has eaten a word. I suggest "[...] used for manipulation of partition tables" or "[...] used for manipulating partition tables" 3. The Summary field says "python module for..." while the Desc field starts with "python modules for". How about sticking with either singular (module) or plural (modules) ? 4. The makefile mentions the need of pkg-config since version 1.8.3. However there is no .pc file and the spurious call to pkg-config (via LDFLAGS) leads to an error message in the build log. I suggest either using the already existing Makefile patch to remove the call to pkg-config or requiring pkg-config if the .pc will come back. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 23:12:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:12:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223592] Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704232312.l3NNCGvp025337@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223592 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 23:12:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:12:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192438] Review Request: fedora-xgl-settings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704232312.l3NNCcNe025384@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-xgl-settings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192438 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 23:13:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:13:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174288] Hspell-gui is a graphical front end to hspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704232313.l3NND0se025423@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Hspell-gui is a graphical front end to hspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174288 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 23:13:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:13:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: - In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704232313.l3NNDBa9025444@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 23:13:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:13:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235804] Review Request: ocamlSDL - OCaml bindings for SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704232313.l3NNDiNO025501@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocamlSDL - OCaml bindings for SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235804 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 23 23:13:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:13:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222374] Review Request: paprefs - Management tool for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704232313.l3NNDtpn025528@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: paprefs - Management tool for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222374 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 00:22:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:22:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196793] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2 - Database Abstraction Layer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704240022.l3O0MCJ9027208@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2 - Database Abstraction Layer Alias: php-pear-MDB2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196793 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: php-pear- |Review Request: php-pear- |MDB2 - PEAR: Database |MDB2 - Database Abstraction |Abstraction Layer |Layer Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-04-23 20:22 EST ------- Branch Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pear-MDB2 Short Description: Database Abstraction Layer Owners: chris.stone at gmail.com Branches: EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 00:24:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:24:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218225] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysql - MySQL MDB2 Driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704240024.l3O0OIt7027278@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysql - MySQL MDB2 Driver Alias: pear-MDB2-mysql https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218225 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-04-23 20:24 EST ------- Branch Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysql Short Description: MySQL MDB2 Driver Owners: chris.stone at gmail.com Branches: EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 00:27:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:27:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 212917] Review Request: php-pear-DB-DataObject - An SQL Builder, Object Interface to Database Tables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704240027.l3O0RCB1027367@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-DB-DataObject - An SQL Builder, Object Interface to Database Tables Alias: DB-DataObject https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212917 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-04-23 20:27 EST ------- Branch Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pear-DB-DataObject Short Description: An SQL Builder, Object Interface to Database Tables Owners: chris.stone at gmail.com Branches: EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 01:12:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:12:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233783] Review Request: vegastrike-data - Data files for Vega Strike In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704240112.l3O1CdeS028635@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vegastrike-data - Data files for Vega Strike https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233783 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-04-23 21:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Yes, I saw those warnings before submission myself too, but I've deliberately > ignored them, as I think these empty files might still be needed / usefull. That's OK, then. > > (2) As-is, it seems to include its own locally-modified copy of various Python > > modules (modules/builtin/). A brief perusal of the diff between the included > > python modules and the system copies of them shows mostly variable renaming and > > similar generally-insignificant changes. > > > > Good catch, removed. Thanks! :] > Notice these are data files, not user docs, and I think the game might actually > expect / depend on them being ISO-8859, so I've kept these as is. That's acceptable, then; though it should be brought to the attention of the upstream devs. UTF-8 is so much nicer than having to worry about codepages and stuff. ;) > These are just 2 of a long list of in game fake advertisements, which are there > to create a certain atmosphere. I personally find the ones about guns and > joining the army / the ones promoting militarism much more offensive then the 2 > you name. IOW this is pretty subjective. Removing any of them feels like > applying censorship to me, and lets please not go there unless things are > clearly illegal or really bad taste / inappropriate I agree. Someone from FESCo would need to make the final yea or nay, though if it came down to it. OK as-is. > Most of these were in the builtin dir, the remaining 2 are really scripts meant > to be executed stand alone, and thus should be executable. > Thanks for the clarification, then. With the fixes applied as you've mentioned, vegastrike-data 0.4.3-2 is APPROVED. > I only updated the specfile as the sources didn't change and it takes eons to > upload it with my link. Highly understandable - it takes eons to download it, even. ^_^ Though that's a problem with most large game-data packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 01:23:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:23:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230275] Review Request: varnish - High-performance HTTP accelerator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704240123.l3O1NAeU029224@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: varnish - High-performance HTTP accelerator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230275 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-04-23 21:23 EST ------- Those changes look mostly good, however: The condrestart, shouldn't: /sbin/service condrestart > /dev/null 2>/dev/null be: /sbin/service varnish condrestart > /dev/null 2>/dev/null and it shouldn't be in the -libs subpackage, but the main package? Other than that I see no issues... Matthias ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 01:30:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:30:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227579] Review Request: spr - Statistical pattern recognition In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704240130.l3O1UROM029435@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spr - Statistical pattern recognition https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227579 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 01:33:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:33:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196793] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2 - Database Abstraction Layer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704240133.l3O1XJuQ029579@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2 - Database Abstraction Layer Alias: php-pear-MDB2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196793 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 01:36:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:36:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218225] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysql - MySQL MDB2 Driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704240136.l3O1awvI029668@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysql - MySQL MDB2 Driver Alias: pear-MDB2-mysql https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218225 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 01:55:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:55:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 212917] Review Request: php-pear-DB-DataObject - An SQL Builder, Object Interface to Database Tables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704240155.l3O1tNpd030230@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-DB-DataObject - An SQL Builder, Object Interface to Database Tables Alias: DB-DataObject https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212917 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 02:22:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 22:22:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235471] Review Request: perl-PDF-API2 - Perl module for creation and modification of PDF files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704240222.l3O2MYb8031606@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-PDF-API2 - Perl module for creation and modification of PDF files Alias: perl-PDF-API2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235471 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Alias| |perl-PDF-API2 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-23 22:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #0) > In particular when you review this package, please pay attention to: > 1) Licenses - multiple licenses > 2) Patents - patent statements regarding PDF technology > 3) Fonts - inclusion of fonts in package > 4) Win32.pm - I removed these to not trigger additional dependencies > > Please let me know if I'm doing anything wrong here. It all sounds good, but when I read "patents" I get a little nervous. :) Can you elaboborate? Is there a particular part of the package we should review for this? (e.g. the fonts / PDF itself / etc) "Go read file FOO in the package" is a legit answer here... I'm just looking for a little guidance before beginning a review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 02:26:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 22:26:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225607] Merge Review: axis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704240226.l3O2Qr3g032024@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: axis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225607 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium mwringe at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 02:26:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 22:26:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225610] Merge Review: bcel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704240226.l3O2QlsI032013@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bcel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225610 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium mwringe at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 02:27:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 22:27:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225305] Merge Review: avalon-framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704240227.l3O2RB73032081@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: avalon-framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225305 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium mwringe at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 02:35:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 22:35:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226399] Merge Review: scim-tables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704240235.l3O2ZbaX032695@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: scim-tables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226399 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-04-23 22:35 EST ------- I would like to have a EPEL EL-4 branch for this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 03:20:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:20:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225929] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-fileupload In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704240320.l3O3KPH3003030@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-fileupload https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225929 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-04-23 23:20 EST ------- MUST: * package is named appropriately - match upstream tarball or project name - try to match previous incarnations in other distributions/packagers for consistency - specfile should be %{name}.spec - non-numeric characters should only be used in Release (ie. cvs or something) - for non-numerics (pre-release, CVS snapshots, etc.), see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#PackageRelease - if case sensitivity is requested by upstream or you feel it should be not just lowercase, do so; otherwise, use all lower case for the name OK * is it legal for Fedora to distribute this? - OSI-approved - not a kernel module - not shareware - is it covered by patents? - it *probably* shouldn't be an emulator - no binary firmware OK * license field matches the actual license. OK * license is open source-compatible. OK * specfile name matches %{name} OK * verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do) - if upstream doesn't release source drops, put *clear* instructions on how to generate the the source drop; ie. # svn export blah/tag blah # tar cjf blah-version-src.tar.bz2 blah OK, files match svn outputt * skim the summary and description for typos, etc. OK * correct buildroot - should be: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) OK * if %{?dist} is used, it should be in that form (note the ? and % locations) OK * license text included in package and marked with %doc OK * keep old changelog entries; use judgement when removing (too old? useless?) OK * packages meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) OK * rpmlint on .srpm gives no output rpmlint jakarta-commons-fileupload-1.0-6jpp.2.src.rpm W: jakarta-commons-fileupload non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java OK, group warnings can be ignored * changelog should be in a proper format: OK * Packager tag should not be used OK * Vendor tag should not be used OK * Distribution tag should not be used OK * use License and not Copyright OK * Summary tag should not end in a period OK * if possible, replace PreReq with Requires(pre) and/or Requires(post) OK * specfile is legible - this is largely subjective; use your judgement * package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86 OK * BuildRequires are proper - builds in mock will flush out problems here Have not tried in mock yet - the following packages don't need to be listed in BuildRequires: bash bzip2 coreutils cpio diffutils fedora-release (and/or redhat-release) gcc gcc-c++ gzip make patch perl redhat-rpm-config rpm-build sed tar unzip which OK * summary should be a short and concise description of the package X summary is basically just package name "Jakarta Commons Fileupload Package" * description expands upon summary (don't include installation instructions) OK * make sure description lines are <= 80 characters OK * specfile written in American English OK * make a -doc sub-package if necessary - see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-9bbfa57478f0460c6160947a6bf795249488182b OK * packages including libraries should exclude static libraries if possible OK * don't use rpath OK * config files should usually be marked with %config(noreplace) OK, no config files * GUI apps should contain .desktop files OK, not a gui app * should the package contain a -devel sub-package? OK, no -devel needed * use macros appropriately and consistently - ie. %{buildroot} and %{optflags} vs. $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and $RPM_OPT_FLAGS OK * don't use %makeinstall OK, doesn't use make * install section must begin with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot} OK * locale data handling correct (find_lang) - if translations included, add BR: gettext and use %find_lang %{name} at the end of %install OK, no locales * consider using cp -p to preserve timestamps OK * split Requires(pre,post) into two separate lines OK * package should probably not be relocatable OK * package contains code - see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#CodeVsContent - in general, there should be no offensive content OK * package should own all directories and files X package doesn't own /usr/share/java[doc], this package needs a requirement on jpackage-utils (owns those directories) * there should be no %files duplicates OK * file permissions should be okay; %defattrs should be present OK * %clean should be present OK * %doc files should not affect runtime * if it is a web apps, it should be in /usr/share/%{name} and *not* /var/www * verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs * run rpmlint on the binary RPMs rpmlint /home/matt/topdir/RPMS/i386/jakarta-commons-fileupload-1.0-6jpp.2.i386.rpm W: jakarta-commons-fileupload non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java W: jakarta-commons-fileupload unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/gcj/jakarta-commons-fileupload/jakarta-commons-fileupload-1.0.jar.so X please fix the unstripped-binary-or-object warning. rpmlint /home/matt/topdir/RPMS/i386/jakarta-commons-fileupload-javadoc-1.0-6jpp.2.i386.rpm W: jakarta-commons-fileupload-javadoc non-standard-group Development/Documentation OK, can ignore the group warning SHOULD: * package should include license text in the package and mark it with %doc OK * package should build on i386 OK * package should build in mock -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 03:25:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:25:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 170303] Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704240325.l3O3PJAl003444@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170303 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-23 23:25 EST ------- Alright, lets get this one off the queue. Here are new packages, I had to disable smp_mflags (it builds out of order on SMP), and patch out the use of rpath. But, it does pass all of its tests! New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/google-perftools-0.91-1.fc7.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/google-perftools.spec Dmitry, if you're no longer interested in reviewing this, I'd understand. Just lemme know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 03:42:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:42:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235471] Review Request: perl-PDF-API2 - Perl module for creation and modification of PDF files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704240342.l3O3gQG3004475@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-PDF-API2 - Perl module for creation and modification of PDF files Alias: perl-PDF-API2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235471 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-23 23:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > It all sounds good, but when I read "patents" I get a little nervous. :) Can you > elaboborate? Is there a particular part of the package we should review for > this? (e.g. the fonts / PDF itself / etc) > > "Go read file FOO in the package" is a legit answer here... I'm just looking > for a little guidance before beginning a review. "Go read file LICENSE in the package" :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 03:43:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:43:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225627] Merge Review: bsf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704240343.l3O3hMYi004551@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bsf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225627 ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-04-23 23:43 EST ------- MUST: * package is named appropriately - match upstream tarball or project name - try to match previous incarnations in other distributions/packagers for consistency - specfile should be %{name}.spec - non-numeric characters should only be used in Release (ie. cvs or something) - for non-numerics (pre-release, CVS snapshots, etc.), see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#PackageRelease - if case sensitivity is requested by upstream or you feel it should be not just lowercase, do so; otherwise, use all lower case for the name OK * is it legal for Fedora to distribute this? - OSI-approved - not a kernel module - not shareware - is it covered by patents? - it *probably* shouldn't be an emulator - no binary firmware OK * license field matches the actual license. OK * license is open source-compatible. OK * specfile name matches %{name} OK * verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do) - if upstream doesn't release source drops, put *clear* instructions on how to generate the the source drop; ie. # svn export blah/tag blah # tar cjf blah-version-src.tar.bz2 blah X link for Source0 is dead, and the version for the project does not exist on the project's webpage. * skim the summary and description for typos, etc. * correct buildroot - should be: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) OK * if %{?dist} is used, it should be in that form (note the ? and % locations) OK * license text included in package and marked with %doc X do not include the install or build instructions * keep old changelog entries; use judgement when removing (too old? useless?) OK * packages meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) OK * rpmlint on .srpm gives no output rpmlint bsf-2.3.0-11jpp.2.src.rpm W: bsf non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java OK, group warnings can be ignored * changelog should be in a proper format: OK * Packager tag should not be used OK * Vendor tag should not be used OK * Distribution tag should not be used OK * use License and not Copyright OK * Summary tag should not end in a period OK * if possible, replace PreReq with Requires(pre) and/or Requires(post) OK * specfile is legible - this is largely subjective; use your judgement * package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86 OK * BuildRequires are proper - builds in mock will flush out problems here Have not yet built in mock - the following packages don't need to be listed in BuildRequires: bash bzip2 coreutils cpio diffutils fedora-release (and/or redhat-release) gcc gcc-c++ gzip make patch perl redhat-rpm-config rpm-build sed tar unzip which OK * summary should be a short and concise description of the package OK * description expands upon summary (don't include installation instructions) OK * make sure description lines are <= 80 characters OK * specfile written in American English OK * make a -doc sub-package if necessary - see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-9bbfa57478f0460c6160947a6bf795249488182b OK * packages including libraries should exclude static libraries if possible * don't use rpath * config files should usually be marked with %config(noreplace) * GUI apps should contain .desktop files OK, not a gui app * should the package contain a -devel sub-package? OK, it shouldn't have one * use macros appropriately and consistently - ie. %{buildroot} and %{optflags} vs. $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and $RPM_OPT_FLAGS OK * don't use %makeinstall OK * install section must begin with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot} OK * locale data handling correct (find_lang) - if translations included, add BR: gettext and use %find_lang %{name} at the end of %install OK * consider using cp -p to preserve timestamps OK * split Requires(pre,post) into two separate lines OK * package should probably not be relocatable OK * package contains code - see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#CodeVsContent - in general, there should be no offensive content OK * package should own all directories and files X package needs to require jpackage-utils as this package owns /usr/share/java[doc] * there should be no %files duplicates X please get rid of the %ghost javadoc * file permissions should be okay; %defattrs should be present OK * %clean should be present OK * %doc files should not affect runtime * if it is a web apps, it should be in /usr/share/%{name} and *not* /var/www * verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs * run rpmlint on the binary RPMs rpmlint /home/matt/topdir/RPMS/i386/bsf-2.3.0-11jpp.2.i386.rpm W: bsf non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java W: bsf unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/gcj/bsf/bsf-2.3.0.jar.so rpmlint /home/matt/topdir/RPMS/i386/bsf-javadoc-2.3.0-11jpp.2.i386.rpm W: bsf-javadoc non-standard-group Development/Documentation OK, group warnings can be ignored SHOULD: * package should include license text in the package and mark it with %doc OK * package should build on i386 OK * package should build in mock -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 04:49:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:49:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233782] Review Request: vegastrike - 3D OpenGL spaceflight simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704240449.l3O4nEgj007675@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vegastrike - 3D OpenGL spaceflight simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233782 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 05:12:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 01:12:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231758] Review Request: perl-Workflow - Simple, flexible system to implement workflows In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704240512.l3O5CNjP008315@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Workflow - Simple, flexible system to implement workflows Alias: perl-Workflow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231758 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-24 01:12 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 05:24:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 01:24:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235763] Review Request: windowlab - Small and Simple Amiga-like Window Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704240524.l3O5Ogbg008846@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: windowlab - Small and Simple Amiga-like Window Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235763 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-04-24 01:24 EST ------- Built okay, closing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 05:50:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 01:50:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236158] Review Request: wise2 - Bioinformatics tools for comparison of biopolymers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704240550.l3O5oGf2009704@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wise2 - Bioinformatics tools for comparison of biopolymers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236158 alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2007-04-24 01:50 EST ------- Builds fine in all branches. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 05:55:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 01:55:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235471] Review Request: perl-PDF-API2 - Perl module for creation and modification of PDF files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704240555.l3O5tOCI009848@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-PDF-API2 - Perl module for creation and modification of PDF files Alias: perl-PDF-API2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235471 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-24 01:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > "Go read file LICENSE in the package" :) It's always this simple when I actually ask :) As to the fonts, they look perfectly fine. However, they may fall under the heading of "content", and thus need a FESCo ack... If someone with a better feel of this sections than the guidelines could post a comment here, I'd much appreciate it. Otherwise, I have a review all ready to post. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 06:22:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 02:22:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 170303] Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704240622.l3O6MjhJ010834@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170303 ------- Additional Comments From csilvers2000 at yahoo.com 2007-04-24 02:22 EST ------- Great news! } Here are new packages, I had to disable smp_mflags (it builds out of order on } SMP) Is this a bug on our end? If so, we'd be happy to try to fix it if you can describe the problem in a bit more detail. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 06:43:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 02:43:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233783] Review Request: vegastrike-data - Data files for Vega Strike In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704240643.l3O6h3Ic011480@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vegastrike-data - Data files for Vega Strike https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233783 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-24 02:42 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: vegastrike-data Short Description: Data files for Vega Strike Owners: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 07:45:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 03:45:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237416] Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704240745.l3O7jYja014630@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237416 ------- Additional Comments From stransky at redhat.com 2007-04-24 03:45 EST ------- Hm, all files are there (at http://people.redhat.com/stransky/berusky/): [ ] berusky-1.1-1.src.rpm 23-Apr-2007 15:28 402k RPM package file [ ] berusky-data-1.0-2.src.rpm 23-Apr-2007 15:28 932k RPM package file [ ] berusky-data.spec 23-Apr-2007 15:27 2k [ ] berusky.spec 23-Apr-2007 15:27 1k or do you mean the files at http://www.anakreon.cz/download/berusky/tar.gz/? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 08:46:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 04:46:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174290] HDate-applet is an applet to show the hebrew date (calendar) using the libhdate library and the gnome-2.0 graphics library. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704240846.l3O8k8oP019180@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: HDate-applet is an applet to show the hebrew date (calendar) using the libhdate library and the gnome-2.0 graphics library. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174290 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-24 04:45 EST ------- Again ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 08:47:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 04:47:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174289] LibHdate is a small C, C++ library for Hebrew calendar and dates, holidays, and reading sequence. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704240847.l3O8lCMA019281@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: LibHdate is a small C,C++ library for Hebrew calendar and dates, holidays, and reading sequence. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174289 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(kobi.zamir at gmail.c|needinfo?(kaplanlior at gmail.c |om) |om) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-24 04:46 EST ------- Again ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 08:48:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 04:48:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174286] hocr is a set of Hebrew character recognition utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704240848.l3O8mSeM019390@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: hocr is a set of Hebrew character recognition utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174286 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(kaplanlior at gmail.c | |om) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 09:13:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 05:13:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231758] Review Request: perl-Workflow - Simple, flexible system to implement workflows In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704240913.l3O9DsIO021230@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Workflow - Simple, flexible system to implement workflows Alias: perl-Workflow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231758 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-24 05:13 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url e9c25c357b0e2a62fa91493b818a538f Workflow-0.26.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test t/action...........................ok t/action_field.....................ok t/action_null......................ok t/base.............................ok t/condition........................ok t/condition_evaluate...............ok t/config...........................Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at t/config.t line 41. ok t/context..........................ok t/exception........................ok t/factory..........................ok t/factory_subclass.................ok t/history..........................ok t/persister_dbi....................Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/DBD/Mock.pm line 531. ok t/persister_dbi_extra_data.........ok t/persister_file...................ok t/persister_random_id..............ok t/persister_spops..................skipped all skipped: SPOPS not installed t/persister_uuid...................skipped all skipped: Data::UUID not installed t/state............................ok t/validator........................ok t/validator_has_required_field.....ok t/validator_in_enumerated_type.....ok t/validator_matches_date_format....ok t/workflow.........................Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/DBD/Mock.pm line 531. ok All tests successful, 2 tests skipped. Files=24, Tests=192, 10 wallclock secs ( 7.04 cusr + 0.79 csys = 7.83 CPU) + Provides: perl(Workflow) perl(Workflow::Action) perl(Workflow::Action::InputField) perl(Workflow::Action::Null) perl(Workflow::Base) perl(Workflow::Condition) perl(Workflow::Condition::Evaluate) perl(Workflow::Condition::HasUser) perl(Workflow::Config) perl(Workflow::Config::Perl) perl(Workflow::Config::XML) perl(Workflow::Context) perl(Workflow::Exception) perl(Workflow::Factory) perl(Workflow::History) perl(Workflow::Persister) perl(Workflow::Persister::DBI) perl(Workflow::Persister::DBI::AutoGeneratedId) perl(Workflow::Persister::DBI::ExtraData) perl(Workflow::Persister::DBI::SequenceId) perl(Workflow::Persister::File) perl(Workflow::Persister::RandomId) perl(Workflow::Persister::SPOPS) perl(Workflow::Persister::UUID) perl(Workflow::State) perl(Workflow::Validator) perl(Workflow::Validator::HasRequiredField) perl(Workflow::Validator::InEnumeratedType) perl(Workflow::Validator::MatchesDateFormat) + Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(DBI) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(Data::UUID) perl(DateTime) perl(DateTime::Format::Strptime) perl(Exception::Class) perl(File::Spec::Functions) perl(Log::Log4perl) perl(Safe) perl(Workflow) perl(Workflow::Action) perl(Workflow::Action::InputField) perl(Workflow::Condition) perl(Workflow::Condition::Evaluate) perl(Workflow::Config) perl(Workflow::Context) perl(Workflow::Exception) perl(Workflow::Factory) perl(Workflow::History) perl(Workflow::Persister) perl(Workflow::Persister::DBI::AutoGeneratedId) perl(Workflow::Persister::DBI::SequenceId) perl(Workflow::Persister::RandomId) perl(Workflow::State) perl(Workflow::Validator) perl(Workflow::Validator::HasRequiredField) perl(XML::Simple) perl(base) perl(constant) perl(strict) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 09:56:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 05:56:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226399] Merge Review: scim-tables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704240956.l3O9uwT3024397@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: scim-tables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226399 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-04-24 05:56 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: scim-tables New Branches: EL-4 Updated EPEL Owners: cchance at redhat.com,petersen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 10:03:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 06:03:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704241003.l3OA3SCU025042@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2007-04-24 06:03 EST ------- Brian, anything bad happened to you? Anything that I can help with?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 10:31:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 06:31:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174286] hocr is a set of Hebrew character recognition utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704241031.l3OAVeY9026373@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: hocr is a set of Hebrew character recognition utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174286 kaplanlior at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(kaplanlior at gmail.c| |om) | ------- Additional Comments From kaplanlior at gmail.com 2007-04-24 06:31 EST ------- I'm sorry for the delay, but it will take me more time to supply the spec file. If someone else is interested with packaging this - be my guest. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 10:31:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 06:31:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174289] LibHdate is a small C, C++ library for Hebrew calendar and dates, holidays, and reading sequence. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704241031.l3OAVgHc026395@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: LibHdate is a small C,C++ library for Hebrew calendar and dates, holidays, and reading sequence. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174289 kaplanlior at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(kaplanlior at gmail.c| |om) | ------- Additional Comments From kaplanlior at gmail.com 2007-04-24 06:31 EST ------- I'm sorry for the delay, but it will take me more time to supply the spec file. If someone else is interested with packaging this - be my guest. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 10:31:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 06:31:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174290] HDate-applet is an applet to show the hebrew date (calendar) using the libhdate library and the gnome-2.0 graphics library. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704241031.l3OAVkGM026420@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: HDate-applet is an applet to show the hebrew date (calendar) using the libhdate library and the gnome-2.0 graphics library. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174290 kaplanlior at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(kaplanlior at gmail.c| |om) | ------- Additional Comments From kaplanlior at gmail.com 2007-04-24 06:31 EST ------- I'm sorry for the delay, but it will take me more time to supply the spec file. If someone else is interested with packaging this - be my guest. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 11:12:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 07:12:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 170303] Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704241112.l3OBCY6i028026@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170303 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2007-04-24 07:12 EST ------- I'm still here... ;) All checks are OK under FC5 i386 ! Questions: It seems that libunwind is not strongly required. I've successfully built google-perftools under FC5/i386 without it at all. Since there is no libunwind in FC5 and FC6 distros, and since the trying to build it under FC5/i386 was failed (due to failed checks), maybe drop this BR, or at least use this BR for particular arch (64) only? Patching of both Makefile.am and Makefile.in files looks like not very good way, AFAIK in such a case we should patch *.am and run some autotools to update *.in Are there some more elegant ways for adding of libstacktrace to link stage? Maybe some unique change is possible (i.e. common LIBS, or something in Makefile.am and autoconf etc.)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 11:14:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 07:14:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 170303] Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704241114.l3OBEHo4028111@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170303 dmitry at butskoy.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 11:15:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 07:15:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 170303] Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704241115.l3OBFMi2028198@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170303 dmitry at butskoy.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #122826|0 |1 is obsolete| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 11:21:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 07:21:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229490] Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704241121.l3OBLfaI028578@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229490 maxime.carron at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo? | ------- Additional Comments From maxime.carron at fedoraproject.org 2007-04-24 07:21 EST ------- Yes, i'm on it. But i still have my problem : If i don't use patch, there isn't any menu entry for pypar2. I'll post my spec and srpm for version 1.4 with the problem tonight. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 11:45:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 07:45:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226389] Merge Review: sane-frontends In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704241145.l3OBjs59029847@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sane-frontends https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226389 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2007-04-24 07:45 EST ------- I'm currently building sane-frontends-1.0.14-3.fc7 which should fix the problems found by rpmlint, please check. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 11:53:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 07:53:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226658] Merge Review: xsane In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704241153.l3OBrriA030443@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xsane https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226658 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2007-04-24 07:53 EST ------- Sorry, I was a bit under water... I'm building xsane-0.994-3.fc7 right now which doesn't list the Application category for the desktop file anymore, please check. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 11:54:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 07:54:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225892] Merge Review: hwbrowser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704241154.l3OBst9w030568@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: hwbrowser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225892 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2007-04-24 07:54 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 12:01:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 08:01:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225892] Merge Review: hwbrowser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704241201.l3OC1PQj031078@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: hwbrowser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225892 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-24 08:01 EST ------- pong. sure let me check what mock gives me -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 12:06:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 08:06:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225892] Merge Review: hwbrowser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704241206.l3OC6wYs031378@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: hwbrowser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225892 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-24 08:06 EST ------- build.log showed me + desktop-file-install --vendor redhat --delete-original --dir /var/tmp/hwbrowser-0.31-1.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/applications /var/tmp/hwbrowser-0.31-1.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/applications/hwbrowser.desktop /var/tmp/hwbrowser-0.31-1.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/applications/redhat-hwbrowser.desktop: warning: boolean key "Terminal" has value "0", boolean values should be "false" or "true", although "0" and "1" are allowed in this field for backwards compatibility /var/tmp/hwbrowser-0.31-1.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/applications/redhat-hwbrowser.desktop: warning: The 'Application' category is not defined by the desktop entry specification. Please use one of "AudioVideo", "Audio", "Video", "Development", "Education", "Game", "Graphics", "Network", "Office", "Settings", "System", "Utility" instead ALSO rpmlint reported on SRPM W: hwbrowser macro-in-%changelog _datadir Macros are expanded in %changelog too, which can in unfortunate cases lead to the package not building at all, or other subtle unexpected conditions that affect the build. Even when that doesn't happen, the expansion results in possibly "rewriting history" on subsequent package revisions and generally odd entries eg. in source rpms, which is rarely wanted. Avoid use of macros in %changelog altogether, or use two '%'s to escape them, like '%%foo'. And on RPM W: hwbrowser incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.31 0.31-1.fc7 The last entry in %changelog contains a version identifier that is not coherent with the epoch:version-release tuple of the package. E: hwbrowser non-executable-script /usr/share/hwbrowser/DeviceList.py 0644 This text file contains a shebang or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks the executable bits and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the executable bits, otherwise remove the shebang or move the file elsewhere. Kindly correct those things and update the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 12:51:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 08:51:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225447] Review Request: php-magpierss - MagpieRSS is an RSS parser written in PHP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704241251.l3OCpGTX001582@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-magpierss - MagpieRSS is an RSS parser written in PHP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225447 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Bug 225447 depends on bug 225434, which changed state. Bug 225434 Summary: php include path should have /usr/share/php https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225434 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |ERRATA Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 13:07:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 09:07:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225892] Merge Review: hwbrowser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704241307.l3OD7eDd002994@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: hwbrowser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225892 ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2007-04-24 09:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > build.log showed me > + desktop-file-install --vendor redhat --delete-original --dir > /var/tmp/hwbrowser-0.31-1.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/applications > /var/tmp/hwbrowser-0.31-1.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/applications/hwbrowser.desktop > /var/tmp/hwbrowser-0.31-1.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/applications/redhat-hwbrowser.desktop: > warning: boolean key "Terminal" has value "0", boolean values should be "false" > or "true", although "0" and "1" are allowed in this field for backwards > compatibility fixed > /var/tmp/hwbrowser-0.31-1.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/applications/redhat-hwbrowser.desktop: > warning: The 'Application' category is not defined by the desktop entry > specification. Please use one of "AudioVideo", "Audio", "Video", "Development", > "Education", "Game", "Graphics", "Network", "Office", "Settings", "System", > "Utility" instead fixed > > ALSO > rpmlint reported on SRPM > W: hwbrowser macro-in-%changelog _datadir > Macros are expanded in %changelog too, which can in unfortunate cases lead > to the package not building at all, or other subtle unexpected conditions that > affect the build. Even when that doesn't happen, the expansion results in > possibly "rewriting history" on subsequent package revisions and generally > odd entries eg. in source rpms, which is rarely wanted. Avoid use of macros > in %changelog altogether, or use two '%'s to escape them, like '%%foo'. > fixed > And on RPM > W: hwbrowser incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.31 0.31-1.fc7 > The last entry in %changelog contains a version identifier that is not > coherent with the epoch:version-release tuple of the package. this will stay, as we're upstream for hwbrowser, thus releases will almost always be "1{?dist}" > > E: hwbrowser non-executable-script /usr/share/hwbrowser/DeviceList.py 0644 > This text file contains a shebang or is located in a path dedicated for > executables, but lacks the executable bits and cannot thus be executed. If > the file is meant to be an executable script, add the executable bits, > otherwise remove the shebang or move the file elsewhere. fixed > > Kindly correct those things and update the package. hwbrowser-0.32 is building right now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 13:09:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 09:09:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232792] Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704241309.l3OD9dXW003203@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232792 ------- Additional Comments From cbalint at redhat.com 2007-04-24 09:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Created an attachment (id=153185) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=153185&action=view) [edit] > rpmlint log for 4.10.1-2 (with gdal-config issue modified) > > Well, actually I don't know about PHP at all!! So I don't know > how to use this... > However as this is heavily related with grass, gdal.. so I will > review this. Well, this software package provedes both cgi-bin shell like interpreter and a nice php plugin, loaded and registered by apache server. Its easy we should have the .so registered in apach , thats all. this .so library exports for apache all necesary bindings, and provide a higher level programing functions in php specialized for GIS. > ------------------------------------------------------- > %{__sed} -i.libs -e 's|`\$GDAL_CONFIG --dep-libs`||' configure > ------------------------------------------------------- applied. > * License > - Well, while most files are licensed under MIT, one file is > licensed under BSD. > ------------------------------------------------------- > strptime.c > ------------------------------------------------------- erghh ... author fault, i should notify him. > Currently I do not disagree with writing "BSD" for the license > of this. > > Then after the fix above is applied.. > * rpmlint - attached. > Summary: > * Fix improper permissions. fixed all. > > Next for spec file: > A. Description entry > - Well, while there is a php releated subpackage which requires > php, does main package also require php? yes must require php, and especialy php-gd, it use some functions from php-gd > Please explain because currently I don't know how to use this > at all. well, this mapserver.so extension have some external reference to php-gd extension so its mandatory to have php-gd at all. I removed php since php-gd itself olso require php > - Do perl/python subpackage have no dependency for main package? no, its just a wrapper. > - Requires: python/Requires: perl are redundant. removed. > - Current Fedora packaging policy requires that BuildRoot includes > release number (according to the section "BuildRoot tag" of > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines ) updated. > - By the way, there seems to be java/ruby binding. Would you try > to enable this? ok i try, i notice down on my TODO. > > B. Prep/Build/Install stage > - not a big problem, however fedora compilation flags is passed > twice for main and python subdirectory build (not a blocker) > - If this support parallel make, then please use. Otherwise > add some comments in spec file. ouch, i will workaround put on my TODO as non-trivial. > C. Scripts > - While no shared libraries are installed by main package, why > does main package call ldconfig? removed. > D. File entry > - README.CONFIGURE is for people who want to build this software > by themselves and so this is not needed for fedora rpm. not included for now. > - Vera related fonts under tests/ should not be installed because > these fonts are provides system-wide by bitstream-vera-fonts not included for now. > - (I say this although I know *very little* about httpd) > Please consider to move files under /var/www to %{_datadir} update my TODO for now. > Check: the section "Web Applications" of > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines > - It seems that mapscript/php3/README should be added as %doc > to php subpackage. > - On my system %{_libdir}/php4/ is not owned by any package. If I own it than i break ownage for other php modules. I saw no other php modules olso own it, this is a place where all php modules go to be picked up by apache. Its owned _default_ by php-common ! > Please check if this directory is correct. > - %{perl_vendorarch}/auto/mapscript/ is not owned by any package. now its owned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 13:10:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 09:10:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232792] Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704241310.l3ODA4SI003245@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232792 ------- Additional Comments From cbalint at redhat.com 2007-04-24 09:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > One more comment: > Why do you exclude %{python_sitearch}/mapscript.py? ? done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 13:11:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 09:11:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232792] Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704241311.l3ODB2G2003341@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232792 ------- Additional Comments From cbalint at redhat.com 2007-04-24 09:11 EST ------- I got 3 TODO for now, i proceed into, hope within hours i solve those lefting issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 13:22:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 09:22:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225892] Merge Review: hwbrowser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704241322.l3ODMIkC004285@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: hwbrowser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225892 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-04-24 09:22 EST ------- WRT to changelog entry: just use 0.31-1 (or 0.32-1, etc) and you'll make rpmlint happy. Even if you are upstream, maybe you'll decide that a minor change is not worth a version bump but just a release bump. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 13:45:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 09:45:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225892] Merge Review: hwbrowser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704241345.l3ODjfAL005693@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: hwbrowser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225892 ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2007-04-24 09:45 EST ------- If you insist... I've added the release tag to the changelog entry in upstream CVS as a reminder, i.e. when there's a new version, rpmlint will be happy then (hopefully I won't forget it ;-). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 13:53:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 09:53:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235471] Review Request: perl-PDF-API2 - Perl module for creation and modification of PDF files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704241353.l3ODreqD006120@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-PDF-API2 - Perl module for creation and modification of PDF files Alias: perl-PDF-API2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235471 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-24 09:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > As to the fonts, they look perfectly fine. However, they may fall under the > heading of "content", and thus need a FESCo ack... If someone with a better > feel of this sections than the guidelines could post a comment here, I'd much > appreciate it. Since they are an integral (or are they?) part of the package, I wasn't so worried about whether they were OK or not, just if there was a better way to handle their inclusion. The package defaults to installing them with the perl package itself, but I was wondering if it should/could be broken up to install with regular fonts (I didn't try that). Opinions? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 13:59:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 09:59:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237416] Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704241359.l3ODxJJV006537@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237416 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-04-24 09:59 EST ------- I meant the files from comment #2 http://people.redhat.com/stransky/berusky/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 14:05:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:05:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237373] Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704241405.l3OE5jXL006941@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237373 ------- Additional Comments From kmatsui at t3.rim.or.jp 2007-04-24 10:05 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=153352) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=153352&action=view) mcpp-manual.html.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 14:07:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:07:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237373] Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704241407.l3OE7XAB007046@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237373 ------- Additional Comments From kmatsui at t3.rim.or.jp 2007-04-24 10:07 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=153353) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=153353&action=view) mcpp.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 14:10:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:10:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237416] Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704241410.l3OEAlYL007218@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237416 ------- Additional Comments From stransky at redhat.com 2007-04-24 10:10 EST ------- You're right. I've just updated the berusky-1.1-1.src.rpm and berusky.spec, there was an old spec file there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 14:11:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:11:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704241411.l3OEBhNU007285@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(bdpepple at ameritech| |.net) | ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2007-04-24 10:11 EST ------- Sorry, I was out of town this weekend. I'll have some time this afternoon to work on this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 14:13:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:13:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237373] Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704241413.l3OED1iq007411@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237373 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-24 10:12 EST ------- Please provide a new _full_ srpm so that everyone can check your new srpm easily... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 14:34:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:34:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237373] Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704241434.l3OEYBru009090@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237373 ------- Additional Comments From kmatsui at t3.rim.or.jp 2007-04-24 10:33 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=153354) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=153354&action=view) mcpp-2.6.3-3.src.rpm Hello Tasaka-san, Thank you very much for the thorough and kind review! I have rewritten the spec file and created a patch file. As for %check, current mcpp of compiler-independent-build has no automatic testing routine. Though mcpp has a series of automatic testing testcases, it is for GCC-specific-build of mcpp. I want to write a testing routine for mcpp of compiler-independent-build too, in the future version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 14:50:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:50:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232792] Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704241450.l3OEoQXB010621@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232792 ------- Additional Comments From cbalint at redhat.com 2007-04-24 10:50 EST ------- Spec URL: http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/mapserver.spec SRPM URL: http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/mapserver-4.10.1-3.src.rpm solved all blockers. ruby is not enabled becouse i wasnt able to build it, java is now enabled. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 14:52:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:52:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232792] Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704241452.l3OEqgAr010914@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232792 ------- Additional Comments From cbalint at redhat.com 2007-04-24 10:52 EST ------- http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/mapserver-4.10.1-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 14:54:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:54:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 170303] Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704241454.l3OEseZH011032@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170303 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-24 10:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #34) > Great news! > > } Here are new packages, I had to disable smp_mflags (it builds out of order on > } SMP) > > Is this a bug on our end? If so, we'd be happy to try to fix it if you can > describe the problem in a bit more detail. Yeah, this is a bug on your end (a minor one). Try building with make -j3 (doesn't need to be on an SMP system). On my end, the libraries don't finish building before the binaries try to link, and thus, it fails. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 14:56:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:56:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231758] Review Request: perl-Workflow - Simple, flexible system to implement workflows In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704241456.l3OEukGY011231@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Workflow - Simple, flexible system to implement workflows Alias: perl-Workflow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231758 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-24 10:56 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Workflow Short Description: Simple, flexible system to implement workflows Owners: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Branches: FC-5, FC-6, devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 14:56:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:56:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231758] Review Request: perl-Workflow - Simple, flexible system to implement workflows In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704241456.l3OEun8X011256@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Workflow - Simple, flexible system to implement workflows Alias: perl-Workflow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231758 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 14:57:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:57:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 170303] Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704241457.l3OEvk0s011347@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170303 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-24 10:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #35) > I'm still here... ;) > > All checks are OK under FC5 i386 ! > > > Questions: > > It seems that libunwind is not strongly required. It is on x86_64, and since it doesn't hurt us to have it everywhere, I made it a generic BuildRequires. > I've successfully built google-perftools under FC5/i386 without it at all. Since > there is no libunwind in FC5 and FC6 distros, and since the trying to build it > under FC5/i386 was failed (due to failed checks), maybe drop this BR, or at > least use this BR for particular arch (64) only? More likely, I'll just remove that BR for FC-5/6 and mark it i386 only for those dists. > Patching of both Makefile.am and Makefile.in files looks like not very good way, > AFAIK in such a case we should patch *.am and run some autotools to update *.in Ehh... I'm trying to avoid dragging in autotools. I patched both the .am and the .in so that it would be clean to anyone who did run autotools off the source. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 15:09:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:09:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237041] Review Request: perl-JSON - Parse and convert to JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704241509.l3OF96qA012250@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-JSON - Parse and convert to JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) Alias: perl-JSON https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237041 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-24 11:09 EST ------- Update to 1.11. SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-JSON-1.11-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-JSON.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 15:15:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:15:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237373] Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704241515.l3OFFVo3012891@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237373 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-24 11:15 EST ------- For -3: * Directory ownership - %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version} is not owned by any package and this package should own the directory. Well, then: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora Extras package review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed&namedcmd=mtasaka-review-noone NOTE: FE-NEW blockers are now not complete. Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 16:03:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:03:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 219889] Review Request: bootchart - a utility for profiling the boot process In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704241603.l3OG3he2017146@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bootchart - a utility for profiling the boot process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219889 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ajackson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ajackson at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-04-24 12:03 EST ------- If it does get abandoned, I'll be happy to pick it up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 16:31:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:31:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704241631.l3OGVCqd019467@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #151890|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2007-04-24 12:31 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=153359) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=153359&action=view) Updated spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 16:49:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:49:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232792] Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704241649.l3OGnou9020361@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232792 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-24 12:49 EST ------- For -3: * php module directory > > - On my system %{_libdir}/php4/ is not owned by any package. > If I own it than i break ownage for other php modules. > I saw no other php modules olso own it, this is a > place where all php modules go to be picked up by apache. > Its owned _default_ by php-common ! - Still I don't know why this is happening * In your opinion it is the bug of php side that %{_libdir}/php4 is not owned by any package? * And what does php"4" means? This "4" is of no relation with php version (currently 5.2.1)? * And as far as I saw some php modules rpms, php modules (which I think so) are installed under %{_libdir}/php/modules/, and this directory (%{_libdir}/php/modules) is owned by php-common. * perl .so module permission - Well, actually you fixed the permission by: ---------------------------------------------------------- %attr(0755,root,root) %{perl_vendorarch}/auto/mapscript/* ---------------------------------------------------------- However, this method leaves the following message which I don't know I can ignore: ---------------------------------------------------------- + /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-compress + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-static-archive /usr/bin/strip + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-comment-note /usr/bin/strip /usr/bin/objdump /usr/bin/strip: unable to copy file '/var/tmp/mapserver-4.10.1-3.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/mapscript/mapscript.so' reason: Permission denied + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-python-bytecompile + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-java-repack-jars ---------------------------------------------------------- To avoid this, it seems that the permission of mapscript.so must be changed to 0755 at the install stage, not by setting attr. * documentation ---------------------------------------------------------- %files %defattr(-,root,root) -%doc COMMITERS GD-COPYING HISTORY.TXT INSTALL -%doc MIGRATION_GUIDE.TXT README README.CONFIGURE +%doc COMMITERS GD-COPYING HISTORY.TXT +%doc INSTALL MIGRATION_GUIDE.TXT ---------------------------------------------------------- - While ReADME.CONFIGURE is not needed, IMO README should be left as documentation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 17:05:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:05:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232792] Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704241705.l3OH5NBt021692@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232792 ------- Additional Comments From cbalint at redhat.com 2007-04-24 13:05 EST ------- > * In your opinion it is the bug of php side that %{_libdir}/php4 > is not owned by any package? It _should be owned by: [cbalint at cbalint ~]$ rpm -qf /usr/lib64/php php-common-5.2.1-5 So i should _not_ own it ! > * And what does php"4" means? This "4" is of no relation with SHIIT.... Sorry, ok i should remove 4, and put all in /usr/lib64/php/modules/ Seems thigs changed since a while ... > php version (currently 5.2.1)? Ya right, sorry for confusion. > * And as far as I saw some php modules rpms, php modules (which > I think so) are installed under %{_libdir}/php/modules/, and this > directory (%{_libdir}/php/modules) is owned by php-common. correct ! > * perl .so module permission > - Well, actually you fixed the permission by: > ---------------------------------------------------------- > %attr(0755,root,root) %{perl_vendorarch}/auto/mapscript/* > ---------------------------------------------------------- > However, this method leaves the following message which > I don't know I can ignore: > ---------------------------------------------------------- > + /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot > + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-compress > + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-static-archive /usr/bin/strip > + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-comment-note /usr/bin/strip /usr/bin/objdump > /usr/bin/strip: unable to copy file > '/var/tmp/mapserver-4.10.1-3.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/mapscript/mapscript.so' > reason: Permission denied > + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-python-bytecompile > + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-java-repack-jars > ---------------------------------------------------------- > To avoid this, it seems that the permission of mapscript.so must > be changed to 0755 at the install stage, not by setting attr. > > * documentation > ---------------------------------------------------------- > %files > %defattr(-,root,root) > -%doc COMMITERS GD-COPYING HISTORY.TXT INSTALL > -%doc MIGRATION_GUIDE.TXT README README.CONFIGURE > +%doc COMMITERS GD-COPYING HISTORY.TXT > +%doc INSTALL MIGRATION_GUIDE.TXT > ---------------------------------------------------------- > - While ReADME.CONFIGURE is not needed, IMO README should be > left as documentation. Yay, i did stupid F6 instead of F5 at a point. Ok i fix all issues and upload things for tomorrow. (head out for now in a rush) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 18:00:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:00:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229490] Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704241800.l3OI0miQ025872@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229490 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-04-24 14:00 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=153377) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=153377&action=view) spec file Maxime, here is the spec file with my modifications. Have a look and bump a release for approval. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 18:06:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:06:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221027] Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704241806.l3OI6ACj026229@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221027 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(cgoorah at yahoo.com.| |au) | ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-04-24 14:06 EST ------- Updated Spec URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/LabPlot/LabPlot.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 18:12:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:12:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225929] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-fileupload In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704241812.l3OICaHx026641@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-fileupload https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225929 ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-04-24 14:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) ... > * summary should be a short and concise description of the package > X summary is basically just package name "Jakarta Commons Fileupload Package" Fixed ... > * package should own all directories and files > X package doesn't own /usr/share/java[doc], this package needs a requirement on > jpackage-utils (owns those directories) Added > * run rpmlint on the binary RPMs > > rpmlint /home/matt/topdir/RPMS/i386/jakarta-commons-fileupload-1.0-6jpp.2.i386.rpm > W: jakarta-commons-fileupload non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java > W: jakarta-commons-fileupload unstripped-binary-or-object > /usr/lib/gcj/jakarta-commons-fileupload/jakarta-commons-fileupload-1.0.jar.so > X please fix the unstripped-binary-or-object warning. > Hm... I don't get this warning, just the group one: [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 src]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/jakarta-commons-fileupload-1.0-6jpp.2.fc7.x86_64.rpm W: jakarta-commons-fileupload non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java Updated spec file and srpm at the same location. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 18:26:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:26:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704241826.l3OIQTHP027857@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-24 14:26 EST ------- Well, for 1.1.25.9-2: * Requires - For devel package, it seems that gpgme-devel, e2fsprogs-devel are not needed. Note: I usually check by: A: ------------------------------------------------------------------- $ LANG=C grep 'include ' `rpm -ql evolution-brutus-devel` | grep -v Binary | sed -e 's|^.*:||' | sed -e 's|^[ \t][ \t]*||' | sort | uniq ------------------------------------------------------------------- B: ------------------------------------------------------------------- $ rpm -ql evolution-brutus-devel | grep '/usr/lib/pkgconfig/.*.pc' | xargs cat | grep Requires ------------------------------------------------------------------- = License is okay for all 263 files * Removing documentation ------------------------------------------------------------------- # Don't bother to pack unnecessary docs. rm -f %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-devel-%{version}/INSTALL rm -f %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-devel-%{version}/building_from_source ------------------------------------------------------------------- - Just the following? ------------------------------------------------------------------- rm -rf %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-devel-%{version}/ ------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 18:41:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:41:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 166008] Review Request: uw-imap - UW Server daemons for IMAP and POP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704241841.l3OIfHVm028998@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uw-imap - UW Server daemons for IMAP and POP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166008 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-04-24 14:41 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: uw-imap New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 18:41:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:41:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221027] Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704241841.l3OIffd5029124@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221027 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-24 14:41 EST ------- Please change release number correctly... Also please also upload a new srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 18:57:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:57:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229490] Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704241857.l3OIvval030330@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229490 ------- Additional Comments From maxime.carron at fedoraproject.org 2007-04-24 14:57 EST ------- OK! All is right now. SPEC : http://carron.maxime.free.fr/fedora/rpms/pypar2.spec Read it online : http://carron.maxime.free.fr/fedora/rpms/pypar2-1.4-1.spec.html SRPM : http://carron.maxime.free.fr/fedora/rpms/pypar2-1.4-1.src.rpm Thanks a lot for your fixes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 19:08:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:08:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232792] Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704241908.l3OJ88Nd030824@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232792 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-04-24 15:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > > * In your opinion it is the bug of php side that %{_libdir}/php4 > > is not owned by any package? > > It _should be owned by: > [cbalint at cbalint ~]$ rpm -qf /usr/lib64/php > php-common-5.2.1-5 Note "php4" vs "php". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 19:21:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:21:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226276] Merge Review: perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704241921.l3OJLOjk031822@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226276 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-04-24 15:21 EST ------- The latest (5.8.8-16.3) fixes the issues described in comment #25 and comment #26: Now the perl-CPAN package Provides: cpan-, and the %{libdir} issues should be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 19:30:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:30:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704241930.l3OJUtfp032498@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2007-04-24 15:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #95) > Well, for 1.1.25.9-2: Any other blockers? Otherwise, your suggestions can be fixed when the package is imported into CVS since they're fairly minor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 19:56:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:56:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704241956.l3OJuBMW002349@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: - |Review Request: libtune - | |kernel tunables -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 20:13:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:13:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234791] Review Request: perl-Email-Send - Module for sending email In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704242013.l3OKDp8c004059@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Send - Module for sending email Alias: perl-Email-Send https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234791 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-24 16:13 EST ------- New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Email-Send.spec New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Email-Send-2.185-2.fc7.src.rpm Fixes WARNING: LICENSE and adds missing BR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 20:18:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:18:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234784] Review Request: perl-Email-Date - Find and format date headers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704242018.l3OKIixE004369@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Date - Find and format date headers Alias: perl-Email-Date https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234784 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-24 16:18 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Email-Date Short Description: Find and format date headers Owners: tcallawa at redhat.com Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 20:44:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:44:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235189] Review Request: nautilus-python - Python bindings for Nautilus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704242044.l3OKiucN006664@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nautilus-python - Python bindings for Nautilus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235189 trond.danielsen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com 2007-04-24 16:44 EST ------- Thank you for the review and the feedback! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 20:45:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:45:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235191] Review Request: postr - Flickr uploader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704242045.l3OKj7Ri006709@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postr - Flickr uploader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235191 Bug 235191 depends on bug 235189, which changed state. Bug 235189 Summary: Review Request: nautilus-python - Python bindings for Nautilus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235189 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 21:06:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:06:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237705] New: Review Request: xclip - Command line clipboard grabber Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237705 Summary: Review Request: xclip - Command line clipboard grabber Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/xclip.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/xclip-0.08-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: xclip is a command line utility that is designed to run on any system with an X11 implementation. It provides an interface to X selections ("the clipboard") from the command line. It can read data from standard in or a file and place it in an X selection for pasting into other X applications. xclip can also print an X selection to standard out, which can then be redirected to a file or another program. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 21:29:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:29:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226276] Merge Review: perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704242129.l3OLTnX3011234@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226276 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-04-24 17:29 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=153388) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=153388&action=view) x86_64 build fix for 16.3 The %{_libdir} issues actually became worse - the %exclude's were correct in 16.2 and the inclusions incorrect, but 16.3 made the %excludes incorrect too. The attached patch fixes the build for me on FC6 x86_64, resulting packages untested. "Provides: cpan-%{version}" looks odd, was it meant to be "Provides: cpan = %{version}"? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 22:06:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:06:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225248] Merge Review: ant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704242206.l3OM6KWI014710@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225248 ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-04-24 18:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Good: > + Naming seems ok. > + Tar ball matches with upstream. > + Mock build works fine for FC6 and rawhide. > > Bad: > - BR coreutils is not be included. BR coreutils removed. > - warning from rpmlint ant-manual: > > rpmlint of ant-manual: > W: ant-manual dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/ant-manual-1.6.5/manual/api > /usr/share/javadoc/ant-1.6.5 > W: ant-manual symlink-should-be-relative > /usr/share/doc/ant-manual-1.6.5/manual/api /usr/share/javadoc/ant-1.6.5 These are needed so that different versions of docs can be installed on the same machine. The symlink points to a macro, so it cannot be make relative. > W: ant-manual file-not-utf8 > /usr/share/doc/ant-manual-1.6.5/manual/tutorial-tasks-filesets-properties.zip This zip is taken directly from the source tar ball. > - Errors/warnings on rpmlint ant: > E: ant devel-dependency java-devel ant needed java-devel to run some of its tasks. > W: ant non-standard-group Development/Build Tools The group warning is OK. > W: ant incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.6.5-4jpp.2 0:1.6.5-4jpp.2.fc6 Fixed > W: ant obsolete-not-provided ant-optional > W: ant obsolete-not-provided ant-optional-full I tried adding these Provides, but then the main package conflicts with the sub-packages, so these were removed. > E: ant useless-explicit-provides ant That Provides: allows subpackages not in Fedora to be installed from JPackage. Updates srpm and spec file at the same location. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 22:12:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:12:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226276] Merge Review: perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704242212.l3OMCFIj015074@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226276 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-04-24 18:12 EST ------- argh, yes, I managed to get both 'fixes' exactly wrong, somehow. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 22:45:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:45:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 170303] Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704242245.l3OMjPKq016884@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170303 ------- Additional Comments From csilvers2000 at yahoo.com 2007-04-24 18:45 EST ------- } Yeah, this is a bug on your end (a minor one). Try building with make -j3 } (doesn't need to be on an SMP system). On my end, the libraries don't finish } building before the binaries try to link, and thus, it fails. Aha -- I found a problem with missing dependencies for profiler2_unittest and profiler4_unittest. Were these the binaries you were seeing trouble with as well? Once I fixed those up, everything seemed ok. I'll have this fixed in the next release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 22:47:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:47:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237705] Review Request: xclip - Command line clipboard grabber In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704242247.l3OMleaF017005@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xclip - Command line clipboard grabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237705 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dev at nigelj.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-04-24 18:47 EST ------- I'll take a look, although I can't test a build in mock sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 22:59:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:59:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220635] Review Request: livecd-tools - Tools for creating Live CD's In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704242259.l3OMxYwG017653@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: livecd-tools - Tools for creating Live CD's https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220635 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium dwmw2 at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2 at redhat.com 2007-04-24 18:59 EST ------- Package fails review guidelines. A bug must be filed for any use of ExcludeArch, and placed on the appropriate ExcludeArch tracker bug for Extras. Please file an appropriate bug, outlining what needs to be done to fix the problem. Presumably it's as trivial as just making the output bootable with yaboot? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 23:06:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:06:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237705] Review Request: xclip - Command line clipboard grabber In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704242306.l3ON69wK018046@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xclip - Command line clipboard grabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237705 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-04-24 19:05 EST ------- Package name: OK (xclip) License: OK (GPL) Spec Legible: OK (en_US) md5sum matches: OK (a90bde3fb0da6aad3a6042c4867245c6) rpmlint clean: OK Builds correctly: OK (i386) Spec has %clean: OK Macro use consistant: OK Contains code/content: OK -doc subpackage: NA -devel subpackage: NA -static subpackage: NA pkgconfig depend: NA Contains %doc: OK (COPYING README) Library suffix: NA No .la files: NA Use desktop-file-install: NA No duplicate ownerships: OK rm -rf %{buildroot}: OK RPM uses valid UTF-8: OK %defattr is set: OK No duplicate %files: OK Not relocatable: OK Calls ldconfig: NA Supports Locales: NA BR's are correct: OK Everything else seems fine, but I could not test in mock. None the less: APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 24 23:10:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:10:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237705] Review Request: xclip - Command line clipboard grabber In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704242310.l3ONAbhR018280@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xclip - Command line clipboard grabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237705 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-04-24 19:10 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Rpmlint output: empty on source, binary, debug rpm [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type:GPL [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is written in American English. [x] Spec file for the package is legible. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package : 2b20daab0523a2b4b2cab1f24887481556eadb8b [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: Arches excluded: - Why: - [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [-] Package is not relocatable. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on:devel/x86_64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on:devel/x86_64 [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] Latest version is packaged. === Issues === 1. SMP_flags are not taken into account Tom, please update the spec to honor SMP flags before uploading to CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 02:42:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:42:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237381] Review Request: ruby-zoom - Ruby binding to ZOOM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704250242.l3P2ghk4028812@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-zoom - Ruby binding to ZOOM Alias: ruby-zoom https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237381 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 02:59:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:59:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237381] Review Request: ruby-zoom - Ruby binding to ZOOM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704250259.l3P2xgll029912@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-zoom - Ruby binding to ZOOM Alias: ruby-zoom https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237381 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-24 22:59 EST ------- This is my first review attempt of a ruby package, so please, be kind -- I'm quite willing to be educated :) doc/ and README should be in %doc. Add these, and I'll approve. + source files match upstream: e38f664296b70b2d74962359f381cfb7 ruby-zoom-0.2.2.tar.gz e38f664296b70b2d74962359f381cfb7 ../ruby-zoom-0.2.2.tar.gz + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license field matches the actual license. + license is open source-compatible. (LGPL) License text included in package. + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. + %clean is present. + package installs properly + debuginfo package looks complete. + rpmlint is silent. final provides and requires are sane: ** ruby-zoom-0.2.2-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm == rpmlint == provides ruby(zoom) = 0.2.2-1.fc6 zoom.so()(64bit) ruby-zoom = 0.2.2-1.fc6 == requires libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) libcrypt.so.1()(64bit) libcrypto.so.6()(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libexslt.so.0()(64bit) libgcrypt.so.11()(64bit) libgpg-error.so.0()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libnsl.so.1()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libruby.so.1.8()(64bit) libssl.so.6()(64bit) libwrap.so.0()(64bit) libxml2.so.2()(64bit) libxslt.so.1()(64bit) libyaz.so.2()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) ruby ruby(abi) = 1.8 ** ruby-zoom-debuginfo-0.2.2-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm == rpmlint == provides zoom.so.debug()(64bit) ruby-zoom-debuginfo = 0.2.2-1.fc6 == requires O %check is NOT present -- but there appear to be no tests + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets present. + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. + no headers. + no pkgconfig files. + no libtool .la droppings. + not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 03:34:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:34:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225892] Merge Review: hwbrowser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704250334.l3P3YjtI031937@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: hwbrowser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225892 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-24 23:34 EST ------- Ok now rpmlint gave me W: hwbrowser incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.32 0.32-1.fc7 The last entry in %changelog contains a version identifier that is not coherent with the epoch:version-release tuple of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 03:42:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:42:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225892] Merge Review: hwbrowser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704250342.l3P3gDiC032333@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: hwbrowser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225892 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-24 23:42 EST ------- You just need to replace * Tue Apr 24 2007 Nils Philippsen - 0.32 with * Tue Apr 24 2007 Nils Philippsen - 0.32-1 and rpmlint will be silent then. I don't think its related with whether upstream is using release tag in tarball name or not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 04:00:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:00:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233388] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-CalendarButton - Gtk2::Ex::CalendarButton Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704250400.l3P40JHF001095@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-CalendarButton - Gtk2::Ex::CalendarButton Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233388 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-25 00:00 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 04:10:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:10:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237338] Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-SEC -- Perl support for DNSSEC -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704250410.l3P4ArnE001906@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-SEC -- Perl support for DNSSEC -- SPONSOR NEEDED Alias: perl-Net-DNS-SEC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237338 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-Net-DNS-SEC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 04:11:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:11:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236539] Review Request: perl-Math-Vec - Perl Math::Vec module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704250411.l3P4BEej001943@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-Vec - Perl Math::Vec module Alias: perl-Math-Vec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236539 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-Math-Vec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 04:28:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:28:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237738] New: Review Request: perl-Data-Dump - Pretty printing of data structures Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237738 Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Dump - Pretty printing of data structures Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Data-Dump/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Data-Dump-1.08-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Data-Dump.spec Description: This module provides a single function called dump() that takes a list of values as its argument and produces a string as its result. The string contains Perl code that, when evaled, produces a deep copy of the original arguments. The string is formatted for easy reading. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 04:29:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:29:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237738] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump - Pretty printing of data structures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704250429.l3P4TClp003223@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Dump - Pretty printing of data structures Alias: perl-Data-Dump https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237738 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-Data-Dump -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 04:31:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:31:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237738] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump - Pretty printing of data structures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704250431.l3P4VTHt003389@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Dump - Pretty printing of data structures Alias: perl-Data-Dump https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237738 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-25 00:31 EST ------- This package is a prereq of the Catalyst framework. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 04:36:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:36:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704250436.l3P4aUoS003553@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-25 00:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #96) > (In reply to comment #95) > > Well, for 1.1.25.9-2: > > Any other blockers? Otherwise, your suggestions can be fixed when the package > is imported into CVS since they're fairly minor. No any others. Then please fix in CVS. ------------------------------------------------- This package (evolution-brutus) is APPROVED by me ------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 04:42:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:42:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237739] New: Review Request: perl-File-Modified - Checks intelligently if files have changed Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237739 Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Modified - Checks intelligently if files have changed Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/File-Modified/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-File-Modified-0.07-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-File-Modified.spec Description: The Modified module is intended as a simple method for programs to detect whether configuration files (or modules they rely on) have changed. There are currently two methods of change detection implemented, mtime and MD5. The MD5 method will fall back to use timestamps if the Digest::MD5 module cannot be loaded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 04:43:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:43:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237739] Review Request: perl-File-Modified - Checks intelligently if files have changed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704250443.l3P4hNr2003860@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Modified - Checks intelligently if files have changed Alias: perl-File-Modified https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237739 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-File-Modified ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-25 00:43 EST ------- This package is a prereq of the Catalyst framework. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 04:55:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:55:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 212909] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Common - Base class for other HTML classes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704250455.l3P4tL1I004272@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Common - Base class for other HTML classes Alias: pear-HTML-Common https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212909 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-04-25 00:55 EST ------- Branch Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pear-HTML-Common Short Description: Base class for other HTML classes Owners: chris.stone at gmail.com Branches: EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 04:56:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:56:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 212912] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm - Class for creating, validating, processing HTML forms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704250456.l3P4udW1004336@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm - Class for creating, validating, processing HTML forms Alias: pear-HTML-QuickForm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212912 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-04-25 00:56 EST ------- Branch Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm Short Description: Class for creating, validating, processing HTML forms Owners: chris.stone at gmail.com Branches: EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 04:57:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:57:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 212915] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Table - Class to easily design HTML tables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704250457.l3P4veR1004389@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Table - Class to easily design HTML tables Alias: pear-HTML-Table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212915 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-04-25 00:57 EST ------- Branch Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pear-HTML-Table Short Description: Class to easily design HTML tables Owners: chris.stone at gmail.com Branches: EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 04:58:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:58:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237741] New: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Request-AsCGI - Setup a CGI enviroment from a HTTP::Request Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237741 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Request-AsCGI - Setup a CGI enviroment from a HTTP::Request Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/HTTP-Request-AsCGI/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-HTTP-Request-AsCGI-0.5-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-HTTP-Request-AsCGI.spec Description: Provides a convenient way of setting up an CGI enviroment from a HTTP::Request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 04:59:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:59:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 212916] Review Request: php-pear-DB-DataObject-FormBuilder - Automatically build HTML_QuickForm objects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704250459.l3P4x8pr004476@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-DB-DataObject-FormBuilder - Automatically build HTML_QuickForm objects Alias: DataObj-FormBuilder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212916 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-04-25 00:58 EST ------- Branch Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pear-DB-DataObject-FormBuilder Short Description: Automatically build HTML_QuickForm objects Owners: chris.stone at gmail.com Branches: EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 04:59:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:59:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237741] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Request-AsCGI - Setup a CGI enviroment from a HTTP::Request In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704250459.l3P4xdth004502@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Request-AsCGI - Setup a CGI enviroment from a HTTP::Request Alias: HTTP-Request-AsCGI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237741 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |HTTP-Request-AsCGI ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-25 00:59 EST ------- This package is a prereq of the Catalyst framework. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 05:15:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 01:15:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237742] New: Review Request: perl-Text-SimpleTable - Simple Eyecandy ASCII Tables Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237742 Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-SimpleTable - Simple Eyecandy ASCII Tables Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Text-SimpleTable/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Text-SimpleTable-0.03-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Text-SimpleTable.spec Description: Simple eyecandy ASCII tables, as seen in Catalyst. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 05:16:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 01:16:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237742] Review Request: perl-Text-SimpleTable - Simple Eyecandy ASCII Tables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704250516.l3P5GT5X005096@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-SimpleTable - Simple Eyecandy ASCII Tables Alias: Text-SimpleTable https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237742 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |Text-SimpleTable ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-25 01:16 EST ------- This package is a prereq of the Catalyst framework. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 05:21:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 01:21:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235960] Review Request: perl-Data-Visitor - Visitor style traversal of Perl data structures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704250521.l3P5L69t005408@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Visitor - Visitor style traversal of Perl data structures Alias: perl-Data-Visitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235960 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-25 01:21 EST ------- This package is a prereq of the Catalyst framework. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 05:21:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 01:21:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235954] Review Request: perl-Test-use-ok - Alternative to Test::More::use_ok In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704250521.l3P5LpYE005468@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-use-ok - Alternative to Test::More::use_ok Alias: perl-Test-use-ok https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235954 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-25 01:21 EST ------- This package is a prereq of the Catalyst framework. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 07:38:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 03:38:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225892] Merge Review: hwbrowser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704250738.l3P7c3mH011792@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: hwbrowser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225892 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-04-25 03:38 EST ------- Parag: Nils is the upstream for the package and - if I have understood correctly - he implied that rather then incrementing the release tag, he prefers to increase the version tag each time he modifies something. Basically this comes down to the fact that he does not intend to really use the release tag, which is why he ignores it in the Changelog. Only that this decision makes rpmlint unhappy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 08:00:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 04:00:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216536] Review Request: FuzzyOcr - Checks for specific keywords in image attachments, using gocr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704250800.l3P80QGk013326@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FuzzyOcr - Checks for specific keywords in image attachments, using gocr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216536 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 08:08:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 04:08:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704250808.l3P88ZD5014206@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221717 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-04-25 04:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > (In reply to comment #11) > > > The substantive issue is gpc, and in that case we're building with --disable-gpc > > to disable building and including gpc in the final rpm > > It isn't enough, the srpm should not contain non free or > legally problematic code. This should be reported upstream > anyway, upstream is violating gpc license and/or the GPL. In fact it isn't sure that there is a violation as long as no binaries are redistributed (with gpc linked in), but still there should be no non-free file shipped in fedora srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 08:11:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 04:11:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222998] Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704250811.l3P8Bq3H014355@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222998 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 08:22:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 04:22:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 209614] Review Request: wmmemload - windowmaker dock app In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704250822.l3P8MvYg014907@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wmmemload - windowmaker dock app https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209614 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-04-25 04:22 EST ------- What is the status of this submission? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 08:28:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 04:28:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225783] Merge Review: gdb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704250828.l3P8S0ea015069@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gdb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225783 skasal at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From skasal at redhat.com 2007-04-25 04:27 EST ------- According to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageReviewProcess you are supposed to set flag fedora-review to "?" and wait. It's not your responsibility to look for a reviewer, just let it rot here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 08:36:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 04:36:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225783] Merge Review: gdb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704250836.l3P8axAk015423@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gdb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225783 skasal at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | ------- Additional Comments From skasal at redhat.com 2007-04-25 04:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > to set flag fedora-review to "?" and wait. No, my mistake. The flag should be " ", not "?". I apologize that I'm messing with your bug. So you are done now and should patiently wait. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 08:38:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 04:38:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704250838.l3P8cf47015499@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alexl at users.sourceforge.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 08:40:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 04:40:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225783] Merge Review: gdb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704250840.l3P8efbA015571@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gdb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225783 jan.kratochvil at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 08:41:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 04:41:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225783] Merge Review: gdb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704250841.l3P8fIKW015625@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gdb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225783 jan.kratochvil at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|DEFERRED | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 08:42:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 04:42:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225783] Merge Review: gdb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704250842.l3P8gDFt015707@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gdb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225783 jan.kratochvil at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|Reopened | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 08:48:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 04:48:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226381] Merge Review: ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704250848.l3P8mLIi015922@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226381 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 08:49:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 04:49:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226381] Merge Review: ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704250849.l3P8njHU015995@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226381 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-25 04:49 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=153401) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=153401&action=view) missing directories list For 1.8.6-2: 0. File entry: * Static library - Is /usr/lib/libruby-static.a needed? If so, can this be split into -static rpm? Note: If this static archive cannot be removed, splitting into different subpackage is too late as F7T4 is frozen. * Duplicate file entry - Please check the following. -------------------------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost ruby]$ rpm -qlp /var/lib/mock/ruby-*i386*rpm | grep -v debug | sort | uniq -d /usr/lib/ruby /usr/lib/ruby/1.8 /usr/share/ri/1.8/system/IRB/Context/irb_level-i.yaml /usr/share/ri/1.8/system/IRB/ExtendCommand/Nop/irb-i.yaml /usr/share/ri/1.8/system/IRB/ExtendCommandBundle/irb_context-i.yaml /usr/share/ri/1.8/system/IRB/ExtendCommandBundle/irb_exit-i.yaml /usr/share/ri/1.8/system/IRB/ExtendCommandBundle/irb_load-i.yaml /usr/share/ri/1.8/system/IRB/ExtendCommandBundle/irb_original_method_name-c.yaml /usr/share/ri/1.8/system/IRB/ExtendCommandBundle/irb_require-i.yaml /usr/share/ri/1.8/system/IRB/IrbLoader/irb_load-i.yaml /usr/share/ri/1.8/system/IRB/JobManager/irb-i.yaml /usr/share/ri/1.8/system/IRB/JobManager/main_irb-i.yaml /usr/share/ri/1.8/system/IRB/irb-c.yaml /usr/share/ri/1.8/system/IRB/irb_abort-c.yaml /usr/share/ri/1.8/system/IRB/irb_exit-c.yaml -------------------------------------------------------------------- * Missing directory ownership - Too many, the result is attached. 1447 directories are not owned by any package. -------------------------------------------------------------------- ( for f in `rpm -qlp /var/lib/mock/ruby-*i386*rpm | grep -v debug` ; do dirname $f ; done ) | sort | uniq | LANG=C xargs rpm -qf | grep package -------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Due to this, on my system many files related to ruby cannot be seen by non-root users. Several ruby modules package I currently submit for review request fail to be rebuilt. * From build log: - For ruby-libs: -------------------------------------------------------------------- warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/1.8 warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8 warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/i386-linux --------------------------------------------------------------------- A. rpmlint - attached Summary : - doc-file-dependency Files included as %doc with executable permission adds additional dependency to its package. This is generally avioded and documentations should not have executable permission. - non-executable-script Generally "source"d scripts should not have shebangs. It there is some exceptions for ruby package, please explain why. - spurious-executable-perm Same as "doc-file-dependency" - wrong-script-interpreter Setting interpreter the files under /usr/local is wrong. Z. Question * Automatically set CFLAGS - One strange thing for me is that fedora ruby rpms sets CFLAGS as fedora specific compilation flags by default. For example, currently ruby-zoom I submitted (bug 237381) is under review. Then - Just unpack ruby-zoom-0.2.2.tar.gz - do cd ruby-zoom-0.2.2 - explicitly unset CFLAGS - do ruby extconf.rb Then Makefile is created. This Makefile sets CFLAGS as fedora specific compilation flags by default. Is this a expected behavior? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 08:50:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 04:50:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226381] Merge Review: ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704250850.l3P8oN89016067@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226381 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-25 04:50 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=153402) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=153402&action=view) rpmlint log for ruby 1.8.6-2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 08:51:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 04:51:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225783] Merge Review: gdb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704250851.l3P8pF6k016134@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gdb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225783 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |blizzard at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-25 04:51 EST ------- jan.kratochvil at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED So we can assume gdb not to be present in FC7? Or is this an attempt of @RH's to demonstrate their ability to overrule the community? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 08:58:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 04:58:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225783] Merge Review: gdb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704250858.l3P8wMUV016514@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gdb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225783 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-04-25 04:58 EST ------- Ralf, I think this was a mistake, because the report was opened again one minute after it got closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 08:58:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 04:58:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225807] Merge Review: glib-java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704250858.l3P8wK4N016501@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: glib-java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225807 skasal at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 08:58:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 04:58:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225807] Merge Review: glib-java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704250858.l3P8wuhu016570@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: glib-java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225807 skasal at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 08:59:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 04:59:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225807] Merge Review: glib-java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704250859.l3P8xrDt016628@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: glib-java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225807 skasal at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|Reopened | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 09:04:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 05:04:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225783] Merge Review: gdb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704250904.l3P94ZDl016916@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gdb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225783 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-25 05:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > Ralf, I think this was a mistake, because the report was opened again one > minute after it got closed. I am more than willing to believe this, but ... given how this review and other "merge reviews" (did not) proceeded doesn't give me much reason for trust. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 09:12:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 05:12:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 209614] Review Request: wmmemload - windowmaker dock app In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704250912.l3P9CQGG017312@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wmmemload - windowmaker dock app https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209614 ------- Additional Comments From dkovalsk at redhat.com 2007-04-25 05:12 EST ------- Hi Patrice, wmmemload uses internal libdockapp as well as wmcpuload. After a long time I've about rewriten wmcpuload to work with libdockap 0.6 which is already in extras, this will need the same work. I'll get right on it once I submit wmcpuload again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 09:15:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 05:15:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225783] Merge Review: gdb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704250915.l3P9F3YE017426@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gdb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225783 ------- Additional Comments From jan.kratochvil at redhat.com 2007-04-25 05:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > Ralf, I think this was a mistake, because the report was opened again one > minute after it got closed. It was an attempt to get this Bug into the state NEW as formerly reopened Bugs went to the state NEW (and they went to REOPENED state even before). Unfortunately I found out the Bugzilla behavior changed. It was being done to reinsert this Bug back to the list referenced from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageReviewProcess by its link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?product=Fedora+Extras&component=Package+Review&bug_status=NEW but unfortunately one would have to CLOSE this Bug completely and open a new one to reach its NEW state again. (In reply to comment #16) > I am more than willing to believe this, but ... given how this review ... > (did not) proceeded The issues listed in Comment 1 were implemented in about 2 days - is it such a tragical response time? During the implementation there was found one possible security hole which was being requested to be evaluated by security response entities but unfortunately this step took too long - it was not a real security threat but noone was willing to give a certification for it. It is a security policy to never disclose any security flaws until the fix is known to protect the users of the product. So far I am glad to be the White Hat - not the Black Hat (relationship to Red Hat is just a coincidence here :-) ). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 09:21:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 05:21:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704250921.l3P9LnWs017775@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-25 05:21 EST ------- Brian, by the way would you have a time to review migemo review request I submitted (bug 236493)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 09:39:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 05:39:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225783] Merge Review: gdb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704250939.l3P9d7OA018548@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gdb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225783 ------- Additional Comments From skasal at redhat.com 2007-04-25 05:39 EST ------- rpmlint v. 0.80 is not silent on gdb src.rpm. (rpmlint on the binary rpm is OK.) Jan, your advice is needed for the not-applied-patch issue. The rest are just a formal issues; is it OK with you if I fix them? W: gdb patch-not-applied Patch197: gdb-6.5-bz198365-IPv6.patch A patch is included in your package but was not applied. W: gdb summary-ended-with-dot A GNU source-level debugger for C, C++, Java and other languages. Summary ends with a dot. W: gdb unversioned-explicit-obsoletes gdb64 The specfile contains an unversioned Obsoletes: token, which will match all older, equal and newer versions of the obsoleted thing. This may cause update problems, restrict future package/provides naming, and may match something it was originally not inteded to match -- make the Obsoletes versioned if possible. E: gdb hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/libc.so A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. W: gdb macro-in-%changelog check W: gdb macro-in-%changelog p Macros are expanded in %changelog too, which can in unfortunate cases lead to the package not building at all, or other subtle unexpected conditions that affect the build. Even when that doesn't happen, the expansion results in possibly "rewriting history" on subsequent package revisions and generally odd entries eg. in source rpms, which is rarely wanted. Avoid use of macros in %changelog altogether, or use two '%'s to escape them, like '%%foo'. W: gdb mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 530, tab: line 517) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 09:44:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 05:44:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 209614] Review Request: wmmemload - windowmaker dock app In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704250944.l3P9iBlH018828@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wmmemload - windowmaker dock app https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209614 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-04-25 05:44 EST ------- Ok. As a side note I am the libdockapp maintainer in fedora (was needed for wmacpi update). Be sure to use the libdockapp api for command line args processing to have the -w option that allows to run in a window. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 09:46:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 05:46:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225892] Merge Review: hwbrowser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704250946.l3P9ksHb019003@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: hwbrowser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225892 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-25 05:46 EST ------- OK. As maintainer is also upstream developer so no issues then. Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for for RPM. - rpmlint is NOT silent for SRPM. + source files match upstream. c817a01e5bf60e30458df5b4b90d27d7 hwbrowser-0.32.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text COPYING is included in package. + %doc is small so no need of -doc subpackage. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no static libraries. + no .pc files are present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Desktop file installed correctly. + no scriptlets are used. + Provides: config(hwbrowser) = 0.32-1.fc7 + GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 11:08:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 07:08:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 170303] Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251108.l3PB8KmC023074@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170303 dmitry at butskoy.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2007-04-25 07:08 EST ------- I believe, that period of pregnancy has ended :) rpmlint: OK MUST/SHOULD items: OK APPROVED! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 11:09:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 07:09:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 170303] Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251109.l3PB9w5i023152@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170303 dmitry at butskoy.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL|http://goog- |http://code.google.com/p/goo |perftools.sourceforge.net/ |gle-perftools/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 11:34:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 07:34:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226387] Merge Review: samba In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251134.l3PBYeFQ024191@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: samba https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226387 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2007-04-25 07:34 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=153413) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=153413&action=view) proposed .spec changes to handle winbindd --> winbind change Consider this patch. Since %post section will be executed with the new code (i.e. with "winbind", not "winbindd"), just check for and rename "winbindd" lock to "winbind" before the actual service stop. And apply the latest winbind.init cosmetic changes to smb.init and nmb.init too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 11:43:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 07:43:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226387] Merge Review: samba In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251143.l3PBhNXq024692@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: samba https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226387 Bug 226387 depends on bug 203568, which changed state. Bug 203568 Summary: split out a -devel package for libsmbclient https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203568 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 12:06:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:06:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225892] Merge Review: hwbrowser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251206.l3PC6oIf026234@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: hwbrowser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225892 ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2007-04-25 08:06 EST ------- Parag, I already changed the version string in the changelog to "0.32-1", but only in the "upstream" CVS, not the actual built package. Once a new version (0.33) gets out, I'll surely remember why I put the -release in the changelog and will continue to do so. BTW, isn't someone supposed to close this if it is approved? Just curious... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 13:10:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:10:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237373] Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251310.l3PDAa3F029397@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237373 kmatsui at t3.rim.or.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #153353|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #153354|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From kmatsui at t3.rim.or.jp 2007-04-25 09:10 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=153418) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=153418&action=view) mcpp.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 13:15:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:15:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237373] Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251315.l3PDF8j8029554@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237373 ------- Additional Comments From kmatsui at t3.rim.or.jp 2007-04-25 09:14 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=153419) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=153419&action=view) mcpp-2.6.3-3.src.rpm I have rewritten again the spec file in order to avoid duplication in %file, and changed the installation of the documents. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 13:23:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:23:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225892] Merge Review: hwbrowser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251323.l3PDNZG0030021@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: hwbrowser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225892 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-04-25 09:23 EST ------- Nils, once your package is approved you are supposed to ask creation of the CVS bits (see warren's mail, "cvs with flags" ) and after you import the package and build it in plague you are the one who should close this bz ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 13:46:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:46:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237373] Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251346.l3PDkpSG031278@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237373 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-25 09:46 EST ------- Well, * release number http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/FrequentlyMadeMistakes ---------------------------------------------- Increase the "Release" tag every time you upload a new package to avoid confusion. The reviewer and other interested parties probably still have older versions of your SRPM lying around to check what has changed between the old and new packages; those get confused when the revision didn't change. ---------------------------------------------- So please bump release number. Well, then as I said on comment 6, would you do a pre-review of other person's review request or submit a new review request of other software? (usually people choose former) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 14:32:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:32:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227579] Review Request: spr - Statistical pattern recognition In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251432.l3PEWS2h001815@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spr - Statistical pattern recognition https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227579 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2007-04-25 10:32 EST ------- Imported and built. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 14:51:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:51:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225892] Merge Review: hwbrowser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251451.l3PEp3La003202@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: hwbrowser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225892 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-25 10:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > Parag, I already changed the version string in the changelog to "0.32-1", but > only in the "upstream" CVS, not the actual built package. Once a new version > (0.33) gets out, I'll surely remember why I put the -release in the changelog > and will continue to do so. > > BTW, isn't someone supposed to close this if it is approved? Just curious... anyone can CLOSE this bug. The reason I have not closed it immediately is that I thought you may also want to create EPEL cvs branch request. As package is always in CVS there is no requirement for setting fedora-cvs flag for Merge-Review packages. So you can close this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 14:52:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:52:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237373] Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251452.l3PEqDZQ003301@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237373 kmatsui at t3.rim.or.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #153418|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #153419|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From kmatsui at t3.rim.or.jp 2007-04-25 10:52 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=153424) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=153424&action=view) mcpp-2.6.3-4.i386.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 14:54:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:54:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237373] Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251454.l3PEs4rq003485@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237373 kmatsui at t3.rim.or.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #153424|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From kmatsui at t3.rim.or.jp 2007-04-25 10:53 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=153425) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=153425&action=view) mcpp-2.6.3-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 14:56:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:56:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237742] Review Request: perl-Text-SimpleTable - Simple Eyecandy ASCII Tables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251456.l3PEuDoI003708@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-SimpleTable - Simple Eyecandy ASCII Tables Alias: Text-SimpleTable https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237742 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-25 10:56 EST ------- You are building with TEST_POD disabled: ... t/02pod............skipped all skipped: set TEST_POD to enable this test t/03podcoverage....skipped all skipped: set TEST_POD to enable this test ... Enabling them reveals these bugs: + TEST_POD=1 + ./Build test t/01use............ok t/02pod............ok t/03podcoverage....NOK 1 # Failed test 'Pod coverage on Text::SimpleTable' # in /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Test/Pod/Coverage.pm at line 126. # Coverage for Text::SimpleTable is 66.7%, with 1 naked subroutine: # new # Looks like you failed 1 test of 1. t/03podcoverage....dubious Test returned status 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) DIED. FAILED test 1 Failed 1/1 tests, 0.00% okay t/04tables.........ok Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t/03podcoverage.t 1 256 1 1 100.00% 1 Failed 1/4 test scripts, 75.00% okay. 1/7 subtests failed, 85.71% okay. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.78813 (%check) Though Pod-tests are not really important, this doesn't necessarily provide trust into this package's quality. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 14:58:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:58:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237373] Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251458.l3PEwQC8003836@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237373 ------- Additional Comments From kmatsui at t3.rim.or.jp 2007-04-25 10:58 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=153427) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=153427&action=view) mcpp.spec Increased the release number. I have mis-uploaded a binary rpm, sorry. As for pre-review or other review request, please give me a few days of time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 15:03:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:03:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251503.l3PF3C1B004380@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2007-04-25 11:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #98) > Brian, by the way would you have a time to > review migemo review request I submitted (bug 236493)? Yeah, I'll give it a look later today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 15:05:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:05:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225892] Merge Review: hwbrowser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251505.l3PF52rU004555@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: hwbrowser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225892 ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2007-04-25 11:04 EST ------- Manuel, Parag, as this is a merge review I don't think I should be asking for any CVS creation just yet: It will be in the combined Core+Extras for Fedora 7 and is part of RHEL5 anyway... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 15:07:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:07:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237813] New: Review Request: taxipilot - Game where you pilot a taxi in space Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237813 Summary: Review Request: taxipilot - Game where you pilot a taxi in space Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/taxipilot.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/taxipilot-0.9.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Game where you pilot a taxi in space, the objective is to pick up passengers waiting on a number of platforms and to drop them where they want to go. That's basically it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 15:15:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:15:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237817] New: Review Request: pam_thinkfinger - Fingerprint PAM and usb libraries for Fedora Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237817 Summary: Review Request: pam_thinkfinger - Fingerprint PAM and usb libraries for Fedora Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jplans at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://belial.dead.li/~jmp/thinkfinger/Fedora/thinkfinger.spec SRPM URL: http://belial.dead.li/~jmp/thinkfinger/Fedora/SRPMS/pam_thinkfinger-0.3-2.src.rpm Description: ThinkFinger is a driver for the UPEK/SGS Thomson Microelectronics fingerprint reader (USB ID 0483:2016). The device is being found either as a standalone USB device, built into USB keyboards or built into laptops. The following laptop vendors are using the device: - Dell - IBM/Lenovo - Toshiba Toshiba is shipping their laptops either with the UPEK/SGS Thomson Microelectronics fingerprint reader or with a fingerprint reader built by AuthenTec. The AuthenTec fingerprint reader is *not* supported by ThinkFinger. SONY laptops with the UPEK/SGS Thomson Microelectronics fingerprint reader are not supported. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 15:17:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:17:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226276] Merge Review: perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251517.l3PFHBGq005720@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226276 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wtogami at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-04-25 11:17 EST ------- *** Bug 237564 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 15:19:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:19:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237817] Review Request: pam_thinkfinger - Fingerprint PAM and usb libraries for Fedora In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251519.l3PFJDQl005885@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_thinkfinger - Fingerprint PAM and usb libraries for Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237817 bnocera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |237760 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 15:27:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:27:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231774] Review Request: perl-DBIx-POS - Define a dictionary of SQL statements in a POD dialect (POS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251527.l3PFRTmZ006748@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-POS - Define a dictionary of SQL statements in a POD dialect (POS) Alias: perl-DBIx-POS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231774 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-25 11:27 EST ------- So we have a) D::P - Artistic or GPL b) C::S - Artistic c) License Tag - Artistic or GPL If the license tag is Artistic or GPL, doens't it imply that the entire package can be relicensed under the choice of Artistic or GPL? Nothing I see in Artistic license for C::S allows that AFAICS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 15:38:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:38:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237817] Review Request: pam_thinkfinger - Fingerprint PAM and usb libraries for Fedora In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251538.l3PFcjmQ007925@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_thinkfinger - Fingerprint PAM and usb libraries for Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237817 bnocera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rstrode at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-04-25 11:38 EST ------- A few random questions regarding the design of the program itself, rather than the package: - Why does pam_thinkfinger need uinput when pam_usb (http://www.pamusb.org/) doesn't? - Why does it need threading (which is likely to cause problems with PAM) (apart from a bad library design?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 15:39:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:39:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234791] Review Request: perl-Email-Send - Module for sending email In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251539.l3PFd6nN007996@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Send - Module for sending email Alias: perl-Email-Send https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234791 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-25 11:38 EST ------- ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 15:49:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:49:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234791] Review Request: perl-Email-Send - Module for sending email In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251549.l3PFn1ZZ008856@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Send - Module for sending email Alias: perl-Email-Send https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234791 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-25 11:48 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Email-Send Short Description: Module for sending email Owners: tcallawa at redhat.com Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 15:51:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:51:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237817] Review Request: pam_thinkfinger - Fingerprint PAM and usb libraries for Fedora In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251551.l3PFpFXi009091@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_thinkfinger - Fingerprint PAM and usb libraries for Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237817 ------- Additional Comments From jplans at redhat.com 2007-04-25 11:51 EST ------- Bastien, I was expecting these :-) - uinput has been added by the maintainer to send \n after the swiped image. Now this was working fine with the code from 0.2.. To me this is just a gadget and I will add --with-uinput in configure to give the choice. Ubuntu,debian and other folks already spoke to me about this. - threading... same as above! a choice from the maintainer and that I will find time sometime to get them out. Feel free to assist ;-) Jose -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 15:57:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:57:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237045] Review Request: perl-Hash-WithDefaults - Class for hashes with key-casing requirements supporting defaults In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251557.l3PFvGXJ009445@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Hash-WithDefaults - Class for hashes with key-casing requirements supporting defaults Alias: Hash-WithDefaults https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237045 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bjohnson at symetrix.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 15:58:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:58:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225892] Merge Review: hwbrowser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251558.l3PFwU7w009495@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: hwbrowser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225892 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-04-25 11:58 EST ------- Me too I was thinking about EPEL when I was speaking about CVS. Anyway, I'd say that the answer to closing the bug is here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2007-February/msg00380.html Please do correct me if I am wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 16:00:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:00:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237705] Review Request: xclip - Command line clipboard grabber In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251600.l3PG0d7L009777@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xclip - Command line clipboard grabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237705 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-25 12:00 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xclip Short Description: Command line clipboard grabber Owners: tcallawa at redhat.com Branches: FC-5 FC-6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 16:15:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:15:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237045] Review Request: perl-Hash-WithDefaults - Class for hashes with key-casing requirements supporting defaults In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251615.l3PGF2Za010744@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Hash-WithDefaults - Class for hashes with key-casing requirements supporting defaults Alias: Hash-WithDefaults https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237045 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-25 12:15 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Rpmlint output: None [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL or Artistic [-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is written in American English. [x] Spec file for the package is legible. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : e769b5f381e2b55ec53429b847f086c1 MD5SUM upstream package: e769b5f381e2b55ec53429b847f086c1 [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: Arches excluded: Why: [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] Latest version is packaged. === Issues === 1. === Final Notes === 1. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 16:16:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:16:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237817] Review Request: pam_thinkfinger - Fingerprint PAM and usb libraries for Fedora In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251616.l3PGGmmV010872@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_thinkfinger - Fingerprint PAM and usb libraries for Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237817 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-04-25 12:16 EST ------- Isn't this a duplicate of the already available/approved 'thinkfinger' package? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229291 Perhaps you could talk to the maintainer of that package and offer improvements and/or help co-maintain it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 16:20:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:20:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237045] Review Request: perl-Hash-WithDefaults - Class for hashes with key-casing requirements supporting defaults In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251620.l3PGKK1T011042@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Hash-WithDefaults - Class for hashes with key-casing requirements supporting defaults Alias: Hash-WithDefaults https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237045 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-25 12:20 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Hash-WithDefaults Short Description: Class for hashes with key-casing requirements supporting defaults Owners: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Branches: FC-5, FC-6, devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 16:20:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:20:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237045] Review Request: perl-Hash-WithDefaults - Class for hashes with key-casing requirements supporting defaults In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251620.l3PGKMRP011058@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Hash-WithDefaults - Class for hashes with key-casing requirements supporting defaults Alias: Hash-WithDefaults https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237045 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 16:22:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:22:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237041] Review Request: perl-JSON - Parse and convert to JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251622.l3PGMfqY011207@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-JSON - Parse and convert to JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) Alias: perl-JSON https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237041 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bjohnson at symetrix.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 16:24:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:24:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237817] Review Request: pam_thinkfinger - Fingerprint PAM and usb libraries for Fedora In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251624.l3PGOJED011287@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_thinkfinger - Fingerprint PAM and usb libraries for Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237817 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-04-25 12:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Isn't this a duplicate of the already available/approved 'thinkfinger' package? > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229291 > > Perhaps you could talk to the maintainer of that package and offer improvements > and/or help co-maintain it? It is indeed. As Jose is also helping upstream, it would be good if the original package could include some of Jose's patches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 16:26:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:26:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237817] Review Request: pam_thinkfinger - Fingerprint PAM and usb libraries for Fedora In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251626.l3PGQMXk011415@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_thinkfinger - Fingerprint PAM and usb libraries for Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237817 ------- Additional Comments From jplans at redhat.com 2007-04-25 12:26 EST ------- Also the guy is aware of this, CCing him. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 16:28:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:28:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237817] Merge some additional packages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251628.l3PGS8T3011546@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge some additional packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237817 bnocera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Merge some additional |pam_thinkfinger - |packages |Fingerprint PAM and usb | |libraries for Fedora | Component|Package Review |thinkfinger AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |belegdol at gmail.com QAContact|fedora-package- |extras-qa at fedoraproject.org |review at redhat.com | ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-04-25 12:28 EST ------- Moving to thinkfinger. Julian, could you check with Jose which patches you'd want to include in the package? The README might be useful as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 16:28:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:28:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221027] Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251628.l3PGSS8k011596@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221027 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-25 12:28 EST ------- Well, please change release number properly. Other things are okay. ----------------------------------------------------- This package (LabPlot) is APPROVED by me ----------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 16:32:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:32:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237416] Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251632.l3PGWDGk011812@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237416 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-04-25 12:32 EST ------- Good: + Tar ball maches with upstream for package berusky-data Bad: - The is no version 1.1 of berusky, there is only a 1.0 version. - Tab ball differ from upstream for package berusky. - Strange directory /var/games in package berusky-data. Perhaps it shold be /usr/games? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 16:34:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:34:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237041] Review Request: perl-JSON - Parse and convert to JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251634.l3PGYHN0011949@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-JSON - Parse and convert to JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) Alias: perl-JSON https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237041 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-25 12:34 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Rpmlint output: None [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL or Artistic [-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is written in American English. [x] Spec file for the package is legible. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : c1e50efa98c9f7c1907b0dfd6b2656a9 MD5SUM upstream package: c1e50efa98c9f7c1907b0dfd6b2656a9 [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: Arches excluded: Why: [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [-] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] Latest version is packaged. === Issues === 1. === Final Notes === 1. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 16:35:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:35:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225522] Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251635.l3PGZQpB012004@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225522 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-25 12:35 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=153429) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=153429&action=view) mock build log of cinepaint 0.22.0-1 on FC-devel i386 (autoconf added) Mock build failed FC-devel i386 because of missing BR about autoconf. Even if I added autoconf as BR, still mockbuild failed as attached. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 16:38:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:38:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225797] Merge Review: gimp-data-extras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251638.l3PGcHq1012226@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gimp-data-extras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225797 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium nphilipp at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 16:38:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:38:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227946] Review Request: stgit - StGIT provides similar functionality to Quilt on top of GIT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251638.l3PGcQta012241@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stgit - StGIT provides similar functionality to Quilt on top of GIT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227946 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(jbowes at redhat.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-25 12:38 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 16:39:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:39:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237041] Review Request: perl-JSON - Parse and convert to JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251639.l3PGd6Zi012302@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-JSON - Parse and convert to JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) Alias: perl-JSON https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237041 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-25 12:39 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-JSON Short Description: Parse and convert to JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) Owners: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Branches: FC-5, FC-6, devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 16:39:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:39:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237041] Review Request: perl-JSON - Parse and convert to JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251639.l3PGdILX012323@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-JSON - Parse and convert to JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) Alias: perl-JSON https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237041 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 16:43:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:43:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226455] Merge Review: system-config-date In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251643.l3PGhTGW012630@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-date https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226455 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium nphilipp at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 16:50:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:50:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225248] Merge Review: ant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251650.l3PGoNjq013167@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225248 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-04-25 12:50 EST ------- God: + BR fixed. + Rpmlint was OK (with warnings) *** APPrOVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 17:16:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:16:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251716.l3PHG1Rq015409@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2007-04-25 13:15 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: evolution-brutus Short Description: Brutus based Exchange connector for Evolution Owners: bdpepple at ameritech.net Branches: InitialCC: colding at omesc.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 17:18:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:18:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227946] Review Request: stgit - StGIT provides similar functionality to Quilt on top of GIT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251718.l3PHI4sO015672@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stgit - StGIT provides similar functionality to Quilt on top of GIT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227946 jbowes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(jbowes at redhat.com)| ------- Additional Comments From jbowes at redhat.com 2007-04-25 13:18 EST ------- I'm doing terrible with this review :) Thanks for the prodding. I'll fix up the macros when I import to CVS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 17:19:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:19:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227946] Review Request: stgit - StGIT provides similar functionality to Quilt on top of GIT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251719.l3PHJWFP015869@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stgit - StGIT provides similar functionality to Quilt on top of GIT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227946 jbowes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jbowes at redhat.com 2007-04-25 13:19 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: stgit Short Description: StGIT provides similar functionality to Quilt on top of GIT Owners: jbowes at redhat.com Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 17:42:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:42:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251742.l3PHgwh2018143@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 17:45:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:45:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227946] Review Request: stgit - StGIT provides similar functionality to Quilt on top of GIT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251745.l3PHjRXb018483@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stgit - StGIT provides similar functionality to Quilt on top of GIT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227946 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 17:54:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:54:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231758] Review Request: perl-Workflow - Simple, flexible system to implement workflows In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251754.l3PHsHou019086@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Workflow - Simple, flexible system to implement workflows Alias: perl-Workflow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231758 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 17:56:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:56:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233783] Review Request: vegastrike-data - Data files for Vega Strike In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251756.l3PHuBOn019209@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vegastrike-data - Data files for Vega Strike https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233783 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 18:02:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:02:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234784] Review Request: perl-Email-Date - Find and format date headers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251802.l3PI2ECV019753@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Date - Find and format date headers Alias: perl-Email-Date https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234784 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 18:06:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:06:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227946] Review Request: stgit - StGIT provides similar functionality to Quilt on top of GIT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251806.l3PI6IHq020219@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stgit - StGIT provides similar functionality to Quilt on top of GIT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227946 jbowes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jbowes at redhat.com 2007-04-25 14:06 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: stgit Updated Fedora Owners: jbowes at redhat.com, williams at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 18:07:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:07:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225114] Review Request: jamin - JACK Audio Mastering interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251807.l3PI7YCN020335@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jamin - JACK Audio Mastering interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225114 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-25 14:07 EST ------- Just to confirm... No one has reviewed this for 3 months. Florin, do you still want to import this to Fedora? This is just I want to make it sure if you are still watching this review request. (In reply to comment #2) > I don't know if I have to bump the Release number after every rebuild like > this, so I'm just using the same number. You *have to*. Well, from just I glanced at your spec file: * Source URL - Please refer to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL for sourceforge.net source URL * Using autotool - Generally calling autotool is not preferred for several reasons. If possible, patch against configure, not configure.in, for example * Deprecated categories - Categories "Application" "X-Fedora" are both deprecated for desktop file categories and should be removed. * Directory ownership - _Perhaps_ %{_libdir}/ladspa is not owned by any package (I have not tried to rebuild this package) * %exclude - Please don't use %exclude when it can. Just remove the file at %install stage. * Mimeinfo - Please check "mimeinfo" section of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 18:27:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:27:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234791] Review Request: perl-Email-Send - Module for sending email In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251827.l3PIRdAH022243@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Send - Module for sending email Alias: perl-Email-Send https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234791 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 18:37:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:37:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227032] Review Request: asm-1.5.3-2jpp - A code manipulation tool to implement adaptable systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251837.l3PIbFfh023228@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asm-1.5.3-2jpp - A code manipulation tool to implement adaptable systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227032 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium dbhole at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From dbhole at redhat.com 2007-04-25 14:37 EST ------- This package was originally an indirect dependency of maven2, but is no longer needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 18:39:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:39:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227048] Review Request: dom2-core-tests-0.0.1-0.20040405.1jpp - DOM Conformance Test Suite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251839.l3PIdbLq023490@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dom2-core-tests-0.0.1-0.20040405.1jpp - DOM Conformance Test Suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227048 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium dbhole at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From dbhole at redhat.com 2007-04-25 14:39 EST ------- This package was needed by maven2, but that is no longer the case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 18:40:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:40:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227099] Review Request: plexus-cdc-1.0-0.a4.2jpp - Plexus Component Descriptor Creator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251840.l3PIendM023708@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: plexus-cdc-1.0-0.a4.2jpp - Plexus Component Descriptor Creator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227099 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium dbhole at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|dbhole at redhat.com |nsantos at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From dbhole at redhat.com 2007-04-25 14:40 EST ------- Re-assigning to reviewer. Package is in extras, please close. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 18:43:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:43:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227122] Review Request: xmlbeans-2.1.0-3jpp - XML-Java binding tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251843.l3PIhQCH024118@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlbeans-2.1.0-3jpp - XML-Java binding tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227122 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium dbhole at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From dbhole at redhat.com 2007-04-25 14:43 EST ------- This package used to be an indirect dependency of maven2, but was found to be non-critical, and hence disabled for the time being. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 19:01:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:01:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231758] Review Request: perl-Workflow - Simple, flexible system to implement workflows In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251901.l3PJ1Mvw026339@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Workflow - Simple, flexible system to implement workflows Alias: perl-Workflow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231758 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-25 15:01 EST ------- Imported, built, and all that goodness. Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 19:01:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:01:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231755] Review Request: perl-Class-Observable - Allow other classes and objects to respond to events in yours In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251901.l3PJ1Ywl026364@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Observable - Allow other classes and objects to respond to events in yours https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231755 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 19:01:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:01:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232612] Review Request: perl-Class-Observable - Allow other classes and objects to respond to events in yours In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251901.l3PJ1Zhd026376@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Observable - Allow other classes and objects to respond to events in yours https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232612 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 19:01:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:01:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231753] Review Request: perl-DBD-Mock - Mock database driver for testing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251901.l3PJ1vRr026472@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBD-Mock - Mock database driver for testing Alias: perl-DBD-Mock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231753 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 19:02:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:02:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231754] Review Request: perl-Class-Factory - Base class for dynamic factory classes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251902.l3PJ29DX026505@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Factory - Base class for dynamic factory classes Alias: perl-Class-Factory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231754 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 19:03:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:03:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234717] Review Request: python-spambayes - Bayesian anti-spam filter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251903.l3PJ3dB8026682@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-spambayes - Bayesian anti-spam filter Alias: spambayes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234717 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-04-25 15:03 EST ------- Trond, did you get your bugzilla accounts sorted out? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 19:05:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:05:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225628] Merge Review: bsh In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251905.l3PJ5wRe026884@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bsh https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225628 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-04-25 15:05 EST ------- Any update on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 19:06:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:06:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230275] Review Request: varnish - High-performance HTTP accelerator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251906.l3PJ6kA3027047@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: varnish - High-performance HTTP accelerator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230275 ------- Additional Comments From ingvar at linpro.no 2007-04-25 15:06 EST ------- Ugh, fixec. src.rpm and spec in the same location. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 19:19:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:19:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234717] Review Request: python-spambayes - Bayesian anti-spam filter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251919.l3PJJwlw028551@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-spambayes - Bayesian anti-spam filter Alias: spambayes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234717 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-04-25 15:19 EST ------- fwiw, rpmlint is clean on both src.rpm and built .noarch rpm. neat. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 19:25:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:25:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227946] Review Request: stgit - StGIT provides similar functionality to Quilt on top of GIT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251925.l3PJP2PI029175@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stgit - StGIT provides similar functionality to Quilt on top of GIT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227946 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 19:26:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:26:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227032] Review Request: asm-1.5.3-2jpp - A code manipulation tool to implement adaptable systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251926.l3PJQJge029399@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asm-1.5.3-2jpp - A code manipulation tool to implement adaptable systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227032 dbhole at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|WONTFIX | ------- Additional Comments From dbhole at redhat.com 2007-04-25 15:26 EST ------- On second thought, I think I will keep this open. Although it is non-critical, it should really be added into Fedora at some point.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 19:26:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:26:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227048] Review Request: dom2-core-tests-0.0.1-0.20040405.1jpp - DOM Conformance Test Suite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251926.l3PJQMGk029428@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dom2-core-tests-0.0.1-0.20040405.1jpp - DOM Conformance Test Suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227048 dbhole at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|WONTFIX | ------- Additional Comments From dbhole at redhat.com 2007-04-25 15:26 EST ------- On second thought, I think I will keep this open. Although it is non-critical, it should really be added into Fedora at some point.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 19:26:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:26:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227122] Review Request: xmlbeans-2.1.0-3jpp - XML-Java binding tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251926.l3PJQcej029494@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlbeans-2.1.0-3jpp - XML-Java binding tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227122 dbhole at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|WONTFIX | ------- Additional Comments From dbhole at redhat.com 2007-04-25 15:26 EST ------- On second thought, I think I will keep this open. Although it is non-critical, it should really be added into Fedora at some point.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 19:27:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:27:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 166008] Review Request: uw-imap - UW Server daemons for IMAP and POP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251927.l3PJR6cv029553@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uw-imap - UW Server daemons for IMAP and POP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166008 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 19:28:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:28:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 212909] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Common - Base class for other HTML classes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251928.l3PJShn7029837@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Common - Base class for other HTML classes Alias: pear-HTML-Common https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212909 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 19:29:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:29:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 212912] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm - Class for creating, validating, processing HTML forms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251929.l3PJTda0030059@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm - Class for creating, validating, processing HTML forms Alias: pear-HTML-QuickForm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212912 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 19:31:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:31:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 212915] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Table - Class to easily design HTML tables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251931.l3PJVPi8030377@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Table - Class to easily design HTML tables Alias: pear-HTML-Table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212915 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 19:32:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:32:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 212916] Review Request: php-pear-DB-DataObject-FormBuilder - Automatically build HTML_QuickForm objects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251932.l3PJWaTL030488@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-DB-DataObject-FormBuilder - Automatically build HTML_QuickForm objects Alias: DataObj-FormBuilder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212916 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 19:34:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:34:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227099] Review Request: plexus-cdc-1.0-0.a4.2jpp - Plexus Component Descriptor Creator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251934.l3PJYApf030543@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: plexus-cdc-1.0-0.a4.2jpp - Plexus Component Descriptor Creator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227099 nsantos at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 19:34:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:34:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225783] Merge Review: gdb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251934.l3PJYCRY030554@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gdb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225783 ------- Additional Comments From jan.kratochvil at redhat.com 2007-04-25 15:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > W: gdb patch-not-applied Patch197: gdb-6.5-bz198365-IPv6.patch > A patch is included in your package but was not applied. It should be removed; it can be added again after it gets accepted upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 19:34:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:34:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234717] Review Request: python-spambayes - Bayesian anti-spam filter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251934.l3PJYekd030631@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-spambayes - Bayesian anti-spam filter Alias: spambayes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234717 trond.danielsen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |trond.danielsen at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com 2007-04-25 15:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Trond, did you get your bugzilla accounts sorted out? Indeed I did! Sorry for the slow progress. I will finish the review today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 19:36:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:36:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226399] Merge Review: scim-tables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251936.l3PJaSd5030845@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: scim-tables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226399 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 19:38:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:38:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237041] Review Request: perl-JSON - Parse and convert to JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251938.l3PJcp0M031059@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-JSON - Parse and convert to JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) Alias: perl-JSON https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237041 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 19:39:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:39:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237045] Review Request: perl-Hash-WithDefaults - Class for hashes with key-casing requirements supporting defaults In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251939.l3PJdrTH031151@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Hash-WithDefaults - Class for hashes with key-casing requirements supporting defaults Alias: Hash-WithDefaults https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237045 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 19:42:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:42:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234717] Review Request: python-spambayes - Bayesian anti-spam filter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251942.l3PJgHNi031360@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-spambayes - Bayesian anti-spam filter Alias: spambayes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234717 ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com 2007-04-25 15:42 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=153445) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=153445&action=view) Complete review report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 19:44:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:44:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234717] Review Request: python-spambayes - Bayesian anti-spam filter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251944.l3PJiJLR031489@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-spambayes - Bayesian anti-spam filter Alias: spambayes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234717 trond.danielsen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com 2007-04-25 15:44 EST ------- Package looks good to me! APPROVED by Trond Danielsen. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 19:46:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:46:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251946.l3PJkKn5031666@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208034 paul_kunz at slac.stanford.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(paul_kunz at slac.sta| |nford.edu) | ------- Additional Comments From paul_kunz at slac.stanford.edu 2007-04-25 15:46 EST ------- Icon filename changed to lower case only. Generated config header file now named hippoconfig.h It is included in only 5 header files of the library. The first 4 relate to ABI change in optional third party library. This library is not used for the rpm build as it doesn't have an rpm for any distribution. The last one is for templated C++ code that depends on which Python numeric package the library was built with (i.e. Numeric, numarray, or numpy). The buildrequires is set to python-numarray. Updated... RPMS ftp://ftp.slac.stanford.edu/users/pfkeb/hippodraw/HippoDraw-1.20.0-1.src.rpm SPEC ftp://ftp.slac.stanford.edu/users/pfkeb/hippodraw/HippoDraw.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 19:47:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:47:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237705] Review Request: xclip - Command line clipboard grabber In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704251947.l3PJlI6k031775@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xclip - Command line clipboard grabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237705 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 20:14:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:14:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234667] Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704252014.l3PKEkme002944@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234667 ------- Additional Comments From acme at redhat.com 2007-04-25 16:14 EST ------- When somebody steps up to review this package, please contact me about making a new release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 20:19:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:19:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704252019.l3PKJYs2003745@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com 2007-04-25 16:19 EST ------- Ok, build on x86_64. Just one more issue and everything should be ok: netgen.doc is installed in %{_libdir}/netgen/doc, should it not be in /usr/share/doc/netgen? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 20:25:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:25:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234784] Review Request: perl-Email-Date - Find and format date headers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704252025.l3PKP88a004467@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Date - Find and format date headers Alias: perl-Email-Date https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234784 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-25 16:25 EST ------- Built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 20:25:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:25:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234785] Review Request: perl-Email-Simple-Creator - Email::Simple constructor for starting anew In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704252025.l3PKP97T004476@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Simple-Creator - Email::Simple constructor for starting anew https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234785 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium Bug 234785 depends on bug 234784, which changed state. Bug 234784 Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Date - Find and format date headers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234784 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 20:25:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:25:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234790] Review Request: perl-Email-Abstract - Unified interface to mail representations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704252025.l3PKPBX5004489@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Abstract - Unified interface to mail representations Alias: perl-Email-Abstract https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234790 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 20:35:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:35:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227946] Review Request: stgit - StGIT provides similar functionality to Quilt on top of GIT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704252035.l3PKZ5pw005512@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stgit - StGIT provides similar functionality to Quilt on top of GIT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227946 jbowes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 20:37:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:37:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234791] Review Request: perl-Email-Send - Module for sending email In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704252037.l3PKbPOO005900@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Send - Module for sending email Alias: perl-Email-Send https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234791 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-25 16:37 EST ------- Built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 20:37:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:37:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234789] Review Request: perl-Return-Value - Polymorphic Return Values In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704252037.l3PKbQgK005908@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Return-Value - Polymorphic Return Values Alias: perl-Return-Value https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234789 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 20:38:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:38:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237045] Review Request: perl-Hash-WithDefaults - Class for hashes with key-casing requirements supporting defaults In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704252038.l3PKcvIH006166@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Hash-WithDefaults - Class for hashes with key-casing requirements supporting defaults Alias: Hash-WithDefaults https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237045 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-25 16:38 EST ------- Imported and built -- thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 20:39:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:39:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237046] Review Request: perl-Config-IniHash - Perl extension for reading and writing INI files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704252039.l3PKd8GX006194@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-IniHash - Perl extension for reading and writing INI files Alias: perl-Config-IniHash https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237046 Bug 237046 depends on bug 237045, which changed state. Bug 237045 Summary: Review Request: perl-Hash-WithDefaults - Class for hashes with key-casing requirements supporting defaults https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237045 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 20:39:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:39:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234717] Review Request: python-spambayes - Bayesian anti-spam filter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704252039.l3PKdAsO006210@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-spambayes - Bayesian anti-spam filter Alias: spambayes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234717 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-04-25 16:39 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-spambayes Short Description: Bayesian anti-spam filter Owners: chris.stone at gmail.com Branches: FC-5 FC-6 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 20:39:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:39:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 170303] Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704252039.l3PKdWK5006273@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170303 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-25 16:39 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: google-perftools Short Description: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools Owners: tcallawa at redhat.com Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 20:39:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:39:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237041] Review Request: perl-JSON - Parse and convert to JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704252039.l3PKdpLu006346@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-JSON - Parse and convert to JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) Alias: perl-JSON https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237041 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-25 16:39 EST ------- Imported and built -- thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 20:40:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:40:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235764] Review Request: perl-CGI-Ex - CGI utility suite - makes powerful application writing fun and easy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704252040.l3PKe2sr006369@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Ex - CGI utility suite - makes powerful application writing fun and easy Alias: perl-CGI-Ex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235764 Bug 235764 depends on bug 237041, which changed state. Bug 237041 Summary: Review Request: perl-JSON - Parse and convert to JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237041 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 20:44:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:44:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237883] New: Review Request: perl-SGML-Parser-OpenSP - Perl interface to the OpenSP SGML and XML parser Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237883 Summary: Review Request: perl-SGML-Parser-OpenSP - Perl interface to the OpenSP SGML and XML parser Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ville.skytta at iki.fi QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com http://cachalot.mine.nu/6/SRPMS/perl-SGML-Parser-OpenSP.spec http://cachalot.mine.nu/6/SRPMS/perl-SGML-Parser-OpenSP-0.99-3.cmn6.src.rpm SGML::Parser::OpenSP provides a native Perl interface, written in C++ and XS, to the OpenSP SGML and XML parser. This package is a requirement for an upcoming version of w3c-markup-validator. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 20:51:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:51:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237705] Review Request: xclip - Command line clipboard grabber In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704252051.l3PKpjNF008144@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xclip - Command line clipboard grabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237705 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-25 16:51 EST ------- Built, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 21:09:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:09:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237813] Review Request: taxipilot - Game where you pilot a taxi in space In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704252109.l3PL9MeP010342@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: taxipilot - Game where you pilot a taxi in space https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237813 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-04-25 17:09 EST ------- Good: + Naming seems good. + License seems ok. + Local Build works fine. + Rpmlint is quite on source rpm. + Local install and uninstall works fine. + Could start game. + Mock build works fine. Bad: - Rpmlint complaints binary package: rpmlint taxipilot-0.9.1-1.x86_64.rpm W: taxipilot dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/taxipilot/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common W: taxipilot symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/taxipilot/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common E: taxipilot zero-length /usr/share/apps/taxipilot/game_data/game_data_tag - Package doesn't conatins varbatin copy ot the license text. Upstream tar bar contains file COPYING which should be in the %doc stanza. - Rpmlint complaints the installed package: rpmlint taxipilot W: taxipilot dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/taxipilot/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common W: taxipilot symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/taxipilot/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common E: taxipilot zero-length /usr/share/apps/taxipilot/game_data/game_data_tag W: taxipilot undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEXT_wavpo.so.0.0.0 _ZN4Arts7Factory7startupEv W: taxipilot undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEXT_wavpo.so.0.0.0 _ZN4Arts7Factory8shutdownEv W: taxipilot undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEXT_wavpo.so.0.0.0 _ZTIN4Arts7FactoryE W: taxipilot undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEXT_wavpo.so.0.0.0 _ZTv0_n24_N4Arts11Object_skel6notifyERKNS_12NotificationE W: taxipilot undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEXT_wavpo.so.0.0.0 _ZTv0_n40_N4Arts11Object_skel5_skelEv W: taxipilot undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEXT_wavpo.so.0.0.0 _ZN4Arts11Object_base5_stubEv === CUT === for the undefined-non-week-symbol issue, please notify the upstream to fix it. There are a lot of such messages from rpmlint. - Source0 Tag in SPEC file doesn't show to the upstram tar ball. A HTTP-Code 404 occured. - Could not build package for target i686 on the x86_64 system: checking for perl... /usr/bin/perl checking for Qt... configure: error: Qt (>= Qt 3.1 (20021021)) (library qt-mt) not found. Please check your installation! For more details about this problem, look at the end of config.log. Make sure that you have compiled Qt with thread support! Fehler: Fehler-Status beim Beenden von /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.75137 (%build) BTW: Becouse I'm on vacation in the next way, I don't assign the review to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 21:11:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:11:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230344] Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704252111.l3PLBNq1010535@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230344 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From mmcgrath at redhat.com 2007-04-25 17:11 EST ------- Any updates available? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 21:16:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:16:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237888] New: Review Request: perl-Tree-Simple-VisitorFactory - Factory object for dispensing Visitor objects Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237888 Summary: Review Request: perl-Tree-Simple-VisitorFactory - Factory object for dispensing Visitor objects Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Tree-Simple-VisitorFactory/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Tree-Simple-VisitorFactory-0.10-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Tree-Simple-VisitorFactory.spec Description: This package contains a collection of Tree::Simple::Visitor::* objects, and a factory for easily creating instances of them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 21:17:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:17:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237888] Review Request: perl-Tree-Simple-VisitorFactory - Factory object for dispensing Visitor objects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704252117.l3PLH53O011204@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Tree-Simple-VisitorFactory - Factory object for dispensing Visitor objects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237888 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-25 17:17 EST ------- This package is a prereq of the Catalyst framework. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 21:31:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:31:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236493] Review Request: migemo - Japanese incremental search tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704252131.l3PLVhAt013076@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: migemo - Japanese incremental search tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236493 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bdpepple at ameritech.net Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 21:53:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:53:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236493] Review Request: migemo - Japanese incremental search tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704252153.l3PLrbnd016215@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: migemo - Japanese incremental search tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236493 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2007-04-25 17:53 EST ------- MD5Sums: 7021c45096b6816fccf16f8389324a91 migemo-0.40.tar.gz Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * All desired features are enabled * Make succeeds even when %{_smp_mflags} is defined * Files have appropriate permissions and owners * Rpmlint produces no errors Blocker: * Package doesn't specify the ruby abi, which is a must-item in the packaging guidelines. Refer to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby Once the blocker is fixed, this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 22:09:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:09:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210783] Review Request: php-pear-DB-QueryTool - An OO-interface for easily retrieving and modifying data in a DB In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704252209.l3PM98KR018229@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-DB-QueryTool - An OO-interface for easily retrieving and modifying data in a DB Alias: pear-DB-QueryTool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210783 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-04-25 18:09 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: php-pear-DB-QueryTool New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 22:10:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:10:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 219575] Review Request: php-pear-File - Common file and directory routines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704252210.l3PMAoXK018473@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-File - Common file and directory routines Alias: php-pear-File https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219575 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-04-25 18:10 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: php-pear-File New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 22:13:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:13:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 212883] Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL - Easy parsing of URLs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704252213.l3PMDJdk018861@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL - Easy parsing of URLs Alias: php-pear-Net-URL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212883 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-04-25 18:13 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: php-pear-Net-URL New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 22:19:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:19:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236493] Review Request: migemo - Japanese incremental search tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704252219.l3PMJfmj019834@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: migemo - Japanese incremental search tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236493 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-25 18:19 EST ------- Good morning! Thank you for reviewing. > * Package doesn't specify the ruby abi, which is a must-item in the packaging Oops.... http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/migemo.spec http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/migemo-0.40-9.fc7.src.rpm * Thu Apr 26 2007 Mamoru Tasaka - 0.40-9 - Specify Ruby abi Request for CVS admin: ---------------------------------------------------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: migemo Short Description: Japanese incremental search tool Owners: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Branches: devel FC-6 FC-5 InitialCC: (nobody) ----------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 23:01:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:01:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225929] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-fileupload In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704252301.l3PN1ul1024307@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-fileupload https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225929 mwringe at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-04-25 19:01 EST ------- OK, looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 23:08:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:08:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226565] Merge Review: xmlrpc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704252308.l3PN8jN8025050@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xmlrpc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226565 ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-04-25 19:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > X verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do) > - Source0 doesn't exist Updated link > * skim the summary and description for typos, etc. > * correct buildroot > - should be: > %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) > X if %{?dist} is used, it should be in that form (note the ? and % > locations) > - Please fix Release tag by adding %{?dist} Fixed Updated SRPM: https://mwringe.108.redhat.com/files/documents/175/348/xmlrpc-2.0.1-3jpp.3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 23:24:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:24:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234667] Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704252324.l3PNOeqq026581@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234667 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-04-25 19:24 EST ------- Just a quick check (NOT official review), to fix some things which are obviously wrong: - Source 0 is not downloadable (pahole-0.tar.bz2). -->please provide a means to verify that the included source is identical to upstreaml in particular, Source0 should be the full URL to the source or a description on how can the source be downloaded (for instance from svn or cvs) - wrong BuildRoot; please see Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot in the wiki - several packages are included by default in the buildroot and need not to be included: gcc, make, binutils, glibc-devel; please see Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions in the wiki - make does not honor SMP flags. If it doesn't build with it, please add a comment; please see Packaging/Guidelines#parallelmake in the wiki - make does not honor RPM_OPT_FLAGS; I suggest taking a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/cmake - cosmetical change: would be nice if the rm -f line in %install and %clean would use the same -r or -R flag - rpmlint on the generated binary gives lots of warnings/errors: rpmlint of dwarves: W: dwarves devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ctracer/ctracer_jprobe.c W: dwarves spurious-executable-perm /usr/lib64/ctracer/ctracer_jprobe.c E: dwarves script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/ctracer/Makefile W: dwarves devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ctracer/ctracer_relay.h W: dwarves spurious-executable-perm /usr/lib64/ctracer/ctracer_relay.h W: dwarves devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ctracer/ctracer_relay.c W: dwarves spurious-executable-perm /usr/lib64/ctracer/ctracer_relay.c W: dwarves non-standard-group Base W: dwarves no-version-in-last-changelog E: dwarves only-non-binary-in-usr-lib rpmlint of dwarves-debuginfo: W: dwarves-debuginfo no-version-in-last-changelog rpmlint of libdwarves-devel: W: libdwarves-devel no-documentation W: libdwarves-devel no-dependency-on libdwarves W: libdwarves-devel non-standard-group Development W: libdwarves-devel no-version-in-last-changelog rpmlint of libdwarves1: W: libdwarves1 no-documentation E: libdwarves1 library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib64/libdwarves.so.1.0.0 E: libdwarves1 library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib64/libdwarves.so.1.0.0 W: libdwarves1 non-standard-group Libraries W: libdwarves1 no-version-in-last-changelog - wrong permissions of files: all files --including .c, .h, .py? in package dwarves-0-18.x86_64.rpm have exec bit set (755 instead of 644) - same goes for the files in the debug package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 23:27:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:27:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226555] Merge Review: xerces-j2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704252327.l3PNRYi1026689@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xerces-j2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226555 ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-04-25 19:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > > * specfile name matches %{name} > X verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do) > - Source0 doesn't exist Updated link location > * skim the summary and description for typos, etc. > * correct buildroot > - should be: > %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) > * if %{?dist} is used, it should be in that form (note the ? and % > locations) > * license text included in package and marked with %doc > * keep old changelog entries; use judgement when removing (too old? > useless?) > * packages meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) > X rpmlint on .srpm gives no output > W: xerces-j2 non-standard-group Text Processing/Markup/XML > W: xerces-j2 unversioned-explicit-provides jaxp_parser_impl > The group one is OK, please fix the unversioned-explicit-provides Fixed > X specfile is legible > - please get rid of section tag Done > - URL indicates 'Xerces has moved out of the XML project and is now a project > in its own right.' , please update with the new URL This is the proper URL, they are just saying welcome to the new project page they are not part of the XML project anymore. > - in this spec file, commands are usually just plain commands instead of > macros except for %{__sed} Fixed > X consider using cp -p to preserve timestamps > - please use cp -p on lines 164, 248-253 fixed (note -a is the same as -dpR) > X run rpmlint on the binary RPMs > [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 pcheung]$ rpmlint > /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xerces-j2-*x86*rpm > W: xerces-j2 non-standard-group Text Processing/Markup/XML > W: xerces-j2 dangling-symlink /usr/share/java/jaxp_parser_impl.jar /etc/alternatives > W: xerces-j2 symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/java/jaxp_parser_impl.jar > /etc/alternatives > - Can these symlink warnings be fixed? No, the package needs to use the external Alternatives system, therefore the symlinks warnings can't be removed. > > W: xerces-j2-demo non-standard-group Development/Testing > W: xerces-j2-demo no-documentation > - Is there any doc for the -demo package? No > W: xerces-j2-javadoc-apis non-standard-group Development/Documentation > W: xerces-j2-javadoc-impl non-standard-group Development/Documentation > W: xerces-j2-javadoc-other non-standard-group Development/Documentation > W: xerces-j2-javadoc-xni non-standard-group Development/Documentation > W: xerces-j2-scripts non-standard-group Text Processing/Markup/XML > W: xerces-j2-scripts no-documentation > - Is there any doc for the -scripts package? No > > SHOULD: > * package should include license text in the package and mark it with %doc > * package should build on i386 > * package should build in mock > Updated SRPM: https://mwringe.108.redhat.com/files/documents/175/351/xerces-j2-2.7.1-9jpp.1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 25 23:47:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:47:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235802] Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704252347.l3PNlHvf027340@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235802 ------- Additional Comments From rayvd at bludgeon.org 2007-04-25 19:47 EST ------- Thank you everyone for the feedback. I believe I've incorporated the suggested changes. SRPM: http://www.bludgeon.org/~rayvd/rpms/remind/remind-03.00.24-1.1.src.rpm Spec: http://www.bludgeon.org/~rayvd/rpms/remind/remind.spec TIA! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 00:01:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:01:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226553] Merge Review: xdoclet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704260001.l3Q018jU027768@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xdoclet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226553 ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-04-25 20:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > > X specfile is legible > - please get rid of section tag Done > X package should build in mock > cant' build in mock: > [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 pcheung]$ mock xdoclet-1.2.3-8jpp.1.src.rpm > init > clean > prep > This may take a while > setup > 0:xjavadoc-1.1-4jpp.2.x86_64 > No Package Found for mockobjects > 0:jakarta-commons-logging-1.0.4-6jpp.1.x86_64 > 0:log4j-1.2.13-3jpp.2.x86_64 > 0:jakarta-commons-collections-3.1-9jpp.1.fc7.x86_64 > 0:struts-1.2.9-4jpp.6.x86_64 > 0:javacc-4.0-3jpp.3.x86_64 > 0:ant-trax-1.6.5-4jpp.2.fc7.x86_64 > 0:java-1.5.0-gcj-devel-1.5.0.0-14.fc7.x86_64 > 0:ant-nodeps-1.6.5-4jpp.2.fc7.x86_64 > 0:java-1.5.0-gcj-devel-1.5.0.0-14.fc7.x86_64 > 0:jakarta-commons-net-1.4.1-2jpp.1.fc7.noarch > 0:xml-commons-apis-1.3.03-0jpp.1.fc7.x86_64 > 0:jpackage-utils-1.7.3-1jpp.2.fc7.noarch > 0:xalan-j2-2.7.0-6jpp.1.x86_64 > 0:velocity-1.4-6jpp.1.x86_64 > 0:jakarta-commons-lang-2.1-6jpp.1.fc7.x86_64 > 0:ant-1.6.5-4jpp.2.fc7.x86_64 > 0:bsf-2.3.0-11jpp.1.x86_64 > 0:jrefactory-2.8.9-6jpp.3.x86_64 > 0:junit-3.8.2-3jpp.1.fc7.x86_64 > > Cannot find build req mockobjects. Exiting. > ending > done Fixed, mockobjects has been removed in Fedora and my spec file was a bit outdated. New SRPM: https://mwringe.108.redhat.com/files/documents/175/353/xdoclet-1.2.3-8jpp.1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 00:12:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:12:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704260012.l3Q0CxHM028205@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-04-25 20:12 EST ------- Spec: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/asterisk-1.4.3-1.fc6.spec SRPM: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/asterisk-1.4.3-1.fc6.src.rpm Update to 1.4.3 to fix some more security problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 00:19:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:19:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236521] Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704260019.l3Q0JcUU028530@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins Alias: nspluginwrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236521 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-25 20:19 EST ------- Ok, stupid question time :) I see configure supports a "--with-biarch" option, to compile for both arches at the same time (e.g. i386 and x86_64). Wouldn't enabling that obviate the need to copy builds around, or other multi-arch fun? Second stupid question: if we can use --with-biarch, do we even need to build this package for, say, i386? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 00:48:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:48:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236521] Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704260048.l3Q0mXR0029362@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins Alias: nspluginwrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236521 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-04-25 20:48 EST ------- The two questions are same IMO, and they are not stupid ;). The answer is simply because there's no way to require arch-specific package in rpm (that I know of). That is, you can require say gtk2-devel.x86_64 and gtk2-devel.i386 at the same time for an x86_64 build. However if you have these dependencies installed locally, you can easily build using --with-biarch to produce both the main nspluginwrapper package and the nspluginwrapper-i386 subpackage (i do that for my personal builds). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 00:57:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:57:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225922] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-codec In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704260057.l3Q0vNSq029725@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-codec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225922 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-04-25 20:57 EST ------- Built into Brew -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 00:58:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:58:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225927] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-discovery In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704260058.l3Q0wD8q029750@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-discovery https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225927 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-04-25 20:58 EST ------- Built into Brew -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 01:00:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:00:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226326] Merge Review: puretls In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704260100.l3Q101Mb029822@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: puretls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226326 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-04-25 20:59 EST ------- Build into Brew -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 01:00:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:00:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225934] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-modeler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704260100.l3Q10xDI029910@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-modeler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225934 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-04-25 21:00 EST ------- Build into Brew -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 01:03:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:03:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225938] Merge Review: jakarta-taglibs-standard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704260103.l3Q13oc3030034@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-taglibs-standard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225938 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-04-25 21:03 EST ------- Build into Brew -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 01:08:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:08:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225925] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-dbcp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704260108.l3Q180rL030222@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-dbcp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225925 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-04-25 21:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > Good: > + Tar ball matches with upstream. > > bad: > - Duplicated BRs > Duplicate BuildRequires: xml-commons-apis (by ant), jpackage-utils (by ant) I fail to see the point, my package shouldn't fail later on because ant decides it wants to change it dependencies. > - Mock build fails > This may take a while > setup > 0:jakarta-commons-pool-1.3-5jpp.1.x86_64 > 0:xml-commons-apis-1.3.02-0.b2.7jpp.10.x86_64 > 0:junit-3.8.2-3jpp.1.x86_64 > No Package Found for jakarta-commons-pool-tomcat5 Are you sure you are using rawhide? the *-tomcat5 packages have been there for a while -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 01:08:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:08:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225935] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-pool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704260108.l3Q18rgW030293@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-pool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225935 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-04-25 21:08 EST ------- Build into rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 01:09:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:09:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225923] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-collections In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704260109.l3Q19Ws7030396@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-collections https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225923 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-04-25 21:09 EST ------- Built into Rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 01:46:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:46:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226381] Merge Review: ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704260146.l3Q1kh4e031690@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226381 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-25 21:46 EST ------- One another note: * /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/i386-linux/config.h - Including config.h as header files are generally considered as "very bad" because * the name is very generic and may cause name space conflicts * the definition #HAVE_???? macro also may cause conflicts when other config.h is included. Actually, the content of this file (/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/i386-linux/config.h) seems very dangerous. * Also /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/i386-linux/defines.h seems dangerous. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 02:20:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:20:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226381] Merge Review: ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704260220.l3Q2KJCA000605@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226381 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-25 22:20 EST ------- Well, other than config.h and defines.h, there are many header files of which name are too generic and the contents are too dangerous under /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/i386-linux/ (such as env.h missing.h regex.h version.h....) IMO the name, structure of the files under this directory needs reconsideration. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 03:02:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:02:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237741] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Request-AsCGI - Setup a CGI enviroment from a HTTP::Request In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704260302.l3Q324V9002957@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Request-AsCGI - Setup a CGI enviroment from a HTTP::Request Alias: HTTP-Request-AsCGI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237741 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-25 23:01 EST ------- Clean package - APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 04:11:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 00:11:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704260411.l3Q4BScW006797@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208034 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-26 00:11 EST ------- For 1.20.0-1: * Release number dependency - Usually, the dependency for "main" package should be release number specific. Check the dependency of -devel-docs against -devel subpackage. * Desktop file - Icon name differs. * Again #define macro - My recognition is that Hans want to say that if #define macro is needed (this time in hippoconfig.h), the name to be defined should not generic. ----------------------------------------------- Last when the number of #ifdef HAVE_XXX lines in public header files is reduced the a minimum, change them to #ifdef HIPPODRAW_WITH_XXX, and create a hippodraw_conf.h with only the #ifdef HIPPODRAW_WITH_XXX defines in it, and include that from the header files who need the #ifdef HIPPODRAW_WITH_XXX defines. ------------------------------------------------ So, HAVE_CFITSIO should be renamed to WITH_HIPPODRAW_CFITSIO, for example. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 04:25:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 00:25:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236521] Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704260425.l3Q4PrMR007703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins Alias: nspluginwrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236521 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2007-04-26 00:25 EST ------- Building with --biarch is possible and i also do that. Dependencies should be put on file (/usr/lib/libX11.so and /usr/lib64/livX11.so p.e.) (see http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/SPEC/nspluginwrapper-0.9.91.4.spec) But this can't be build on mock where yum config exclude i386 RPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 05:12:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 01:12:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237883] Review Request: perl-SGML-Parser-OpenSP - Perl interface to the OpenSP SGML and XML parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704260512.l3Q5CrlI008944@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SGML-Parser-OpenSP - Perl interface to the OpenSP SGML and XML parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237883 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-26 01:12 EST ------- Package looks good, except for one detail: # POD Coverage is interesting for upstream, not us. %{__perl} -pi -e 's|t/99podcov.t||' MANIFEST ; rm t/99podcov.t It has always been Fedora's policy to "test to the max" and therefore always been Fedora policy to enable Pod-tests. Also pod-tests are some sort of package integrity check, which is interesting to us. I am not wanting to provide a precedence and therefor am not approving this package because of this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 05:14:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 01:14:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235802] Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704260514.l3Q5E8qC008975@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235802 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 05:25:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 01:25:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237741] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Request-AsCGI - Setup a CGI enviroment from a HTTP::Request In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704260525.l3Q5PvX7009545@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Request-AsCGI - Setup a CGI enviroment from a HTTP::Request Alias: HTTP-Request-AsCGI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237741 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-26 01:25 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-HTTP-Request-AsCGI Short Description: Setup a CGI enviroment from a HTTP::Request Owners: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Branches: FC-5, FC-6, devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 05:26:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 01:26:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237741] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Request-AsCGI - Setup a CGI enviroment from a HTTP::Request In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704260526.l3Q5Q8VL009563@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Request-AsCGI - Setup a CGI enviroment from a HTTP::Request Alias: HTTP-Request-AsCGI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237741 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 05:31:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 01:31:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222475] Review Request: sofia-sip - Sofia SIP User-Agent library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704260531.l3Q5VRs3009807@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sofia-sip - Sofia SIP User-Agent library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222475 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-04-26 01:31 EST ------- Spec URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/sofia-sip-1.12.6-1.fc6.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/sofia-sip-1.12.6-1.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 05:42:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 01:42:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235802] Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704260542.l3Q5gsKX010169@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235802 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-26 01:42 EST ------- I will review this formally ----------------------------------------------------- * MUST FIX or SHOULD FIX. If you have a reason you don't want to, please explain why. ? Question or suggestion. This is not a blocker ----------------------------------------------------- For 03.00.24-1.1: * Release number - Release number should be integer, except for some exceptions. * Timestamps - man pages are installed without any modification during build stage and keeping timestamps on these files is recommended. For this package, it can be done by ------------------------------------------------------ make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="%{__install} -c -p" ------------------------------------------------------ * %check - There seems to be a test program. ------------------------------------------------------ [tasaka1 at localhost remind-03.00.24]$ pwd /home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/BUILD/remind-03.00.24 [tasaka1 at localhost remind-03.00.24]$ cd src [tasaka1 at localhost src]$ make test sh ../tests/test-rem Remind: Acceptance test PASSED ------------------------------------------------------ Consider to add %check section. * Documentation - IMO it is better to add the followings as documentation ------------------------------------------------------ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ------------------------------------------------------ - The following documents are not needed ------------------------------------------------------ README - Unlike normal software, this README explains how to install by themselves and this is not needed for rpm users. ------------------------------------------------------ ? WWW scripts - docs/README.UNIX says: ------------------------------------------------------ The subdirectory "www" contains scripts for making a nice calendar web server. See the files README and Makefile in that directory. ------------------------------------------------------ IMO it is better to install the files under www by proper procedure. ? Icons - For desktop file, it is recommended to install a icon which represents this packge together. Please contact upstream to install some icon. Well, this package is almost okay. Then: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora Extras package review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed&namedcmd=mtasaka-review-noone NOTE: FE-NEW blockers are now not complete. Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 05:43:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 01:43:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230344] Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704260543.l3Q5hQAn010201@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230344 ------- Additional Comments From jamundso at gmail.com 2007-04-26 01:43 EST ------- Mostly research up to mid-April. Lately I started on a new spec file, for various reasons... 1. Comment #5 but no update made for 2.0,3, 2. IMO, bacula-docs should be a package on it's own, 3, Trying to understand why the bacula-storage- packages exist, and 4. For my own spec file practice. Went through a couple rounds with mach build. It still needs work. though I hope to have it in decent shape in a few days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 06:02:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 02:02:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230344] Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704260602.l3Q62p7n010793@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230344 ------- Additional Comments From felix.schwarz at web.de 2007-04-26 02:02 EST ------- What happend to Andreas Thienemanns work? According to #6 he did some internal improvements. Jerry, do have access to these improvements? Furthermore, Andreas' spec file looks quite good, so only minor updates (and maybe some extensions) are needed IMHO. Updating to 2.0.3 should be trivial. bacula-storage is split up into multiple packages due to different database backends. The package contains bcopy and btape which are linked against specific database libraries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 06:05:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 02:05:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235802] Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704260605.l3Q65Dc0010919@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235802 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 06:58:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 02:58:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237883] Review Request: perl-SGML-Parser-OpenSP - Perl interface to the OpenSP SGML and XML parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704260658.l3Q6wcVb013182@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SGML-Parser-OpenSP - Perl interface to the OpenSP SGML and XML parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237883 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-04-26 02:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Also pod-tests > are some sort of package integrity check, which is interesting to us. The interesting Pod tests (those done by Test::Pod) are enabled. I fail to see why we would be interested in the Pod coverage tests - if they fail, are we going to not ship a package because some of its Perl functions aren't adequately documented? > I am not wanting to provide a precedence and therefor am not approving this > package because of this. Quite a few packages disable various tests already, networking related, Module::Signature related, ones that start daemons etc. What about the other way - if I enable the Pod coverage tests, will you review/approve this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 07:05:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 03:05:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232797] Review Request: tasks - A simple to do list application that uses libecal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704260705.l3Q75PM5013451@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tasks - A simple to do list application that uses libecal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232797 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-26 03:05 EST ------- Well, actually I reviewed bug 230806 and the review is already finished...... Closing as duplicate. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 230806 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 07:05:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 03:05:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230806] Review Request: tasks - To-do list In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704260705.l3Q75cE9013484@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tasks - To-do list https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230806 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |splinux25 at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-26 03:05 EST ------- *** Bug 232797 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 07:08:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 03:08:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232797] Review Request: tasks - A simple to do list application that uses libecal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704260708.l3Q78P6S013630@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tasks - A simple to do list application that uses libecal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232797 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 07:22:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 03:22:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704260722.l3Q7MuD6014207@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-26 03:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20) > ust one more issue and everything should be ok: netgen.doc > is installed in %{_libdir}/netgen/doc, should it not be in > /usr/share/doc/netgen? It depends: - if a docfile is being accessed by the application at its runtime (e.g. as part of some interactive help system) /usr/share/, /usr/lib/ or %{_libdir}/ can be OK. What to use depends on a package's internals and working principles (e.g. are these docs shared between several packages?) - if a docfile is not being accessed by the application at its runtime, but is "optional user documentation" then it must be below /usr/share/doc/%name-%version AFAIS in this case, netgen.doc is mere "user documentation" and already is in /usr/share/doc/%name-%version. => %{_libdir}/netgen/netgen.doc probably should not be shipped at all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 08:12:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:12:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236177] Review Request: perl-NetAddr-IP - Manages IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and subnets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704260812.l3Q8CWGY018133@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-NetAddr-IP - Manages IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and subnets Alias: perl-NetAddr-IP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236177 ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2007-04-26 04:12 EST ------- Kay, new package at http://helena.bawue.de/~ixs/perl-NetAddr-IP/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 08:15:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:15:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234882] Review Request: libident - New LibIdent C library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704260815.l3Q8FCh6018397@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libident - New LibIdent C library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234882 ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2007-04-26 04:15 EST ------- New package with the require at the usual place. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 08:23:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:23:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232623] Review Request: perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple - Perl Module for Generating HTML Calendars In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704260823.l3Q8NwX9018970@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple - Perl Module for Generating HTML Calendars https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232623 andreas at bawue.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2007-04-26 04:23 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple Short Description: Perl Module for generating HTML Calendard Owners: andreas at bawue.net Branches: FC-5, FC-6, devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 08:27:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:27:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236642] Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704260827.l3Q8Re8G019292@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236642 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-04-26 04:27 EST ------- Okay the SOURCE0 tag still isn't good enough. I need a valid url at which I can find the revisor-2.0.1.tar.gz tarball or I need a comment block in the specfile which tells me how to generate the revisor-2.0.1.tar.gz using git commands. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 08:31:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:31:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237416] Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704260831.l3Q8VOTs019593@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237416 ------- Additional Comments From stransky at redhat.com 2007-04-26 04:31 EST ------- - Strange directory /var/games in package berusky-data. Perhaps it shold be /usr/games? /var/games/%{name} is the right place for runtime configuration. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Games?action=show&redirect=Extras%2FSIGs%2FGames#head-367e7208aacfec8f8aff1b34c1795e43c0967ecd- - The is no version 1.1 of berusky, there is only a 1.0 version. - Tab ball differ from upstream for package berusky. Do you mean the only problem is berusky 1.1 isn't published at upstream? (http://www.anakreon.cz) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 08:32:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:32:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221027] Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704260832.l3Q8WN7t019681@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221027 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-04-26 04:32 EST ------- Spec URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/LabPlot/LabPlot.spec SRPM URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/LabPlot/LabPlot-1.5.1.4-6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 08:33:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:33:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229490] Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704260833.l3Q8Xjl5019861@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229490 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-04-26 04:33 EST ------- MUST Items: - MUST: rpmlint's output is clean - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name} - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed (GPL) with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - MUST: the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - MUST: The spec file for the package is be legible. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least i386. - MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires. - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly. - MUST: If the package does not contain shared library files located in the dynamic linker's default paths - MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable - MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: There are no Large documentation files - MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - MUST: There are no Header files or static libraries - MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix - MUST: Package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives - MUST: Package containing GUI applications includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: The source package does include license text(s) as gpl.txt - SHOULD: mock builds succcessfully in i386. - SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. - SHOULD: No scriptlets were used, those scriptlets must be sane. - SHOULD: No subpackages present. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 08:36:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:36:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221027] Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704260836.l3Q8aBcg020156@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221027 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-04-26 04:35 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: LabPlot Short Description: Data Analysis and Visualization Owners: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au Branches: FC-6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 08:38:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:38:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229490] Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704260838.l3Q8cgWi020398@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229490 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-04-26 04:38 EST ------- Follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVSAdminProcedure for the CVS Request procedure. As we agreed, add me as your co-maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 08:43:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:43:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220635] Review Request: livecd-tools - Tools for creating Live CD's In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704260843.l3Q8hg1A020873@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: livecd-tools - Tools for creating Live CD's https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220635 dwmw2 at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dwmw2 at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2 at redhat.com 2007-04-26 04:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Will probably be ExclusiveArch: i386 initially; am planning to add x86-64 > support real soon. And at some point also ppc support. It's just not trivial to > support other arches due to the very nature of That unfinished sentence sounds like a promising start to something that should be noted in the ExcludeArch bug, pointing people at what needs to be done :) Looks like all that needs to be done is make it bootable (and not require syslinux). I can probably come up with a patch with the basic mechanisms, which makes it work for _only_ PPC. Making it generically DTRT on each arch is going to take more python-fu than I have. Do you want to do that part first, giving me empty stubs of ppc functions to fill in? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 08:45:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:45:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229490] Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704260845.l3Q8jjq0021065@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229490 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 09:00:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 05:00:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226276] Merge Review: perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704260900.l3Q90Vqt022195@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226276 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-26 05:00 EST ------- IMO, this perl-libs package (the libperl.so split out) is completely useless and doesn't solve anything, because the main perl package is i386 arch'ed and filled with i386 deps. I strongly recommend to revert this change. If you want real progress, split out %{_bindir}/* and move everything else into perl-libs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 09:06:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 05:06:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236642] Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704260906.l3Q961a7022850@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236642 ------- Additional Comments From kanarip at kanarip.com 2007-04-26 05:05 EST ------- Source0 tag is now: Source0: http://revisor.fedoraunity.org/releases/revisor-2.0/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz I'm not sure I understand what is wrong here, because that URL gives you the proper tarball, located at http://revisor.fedoraunity.org/releases/revisor-2.0/revisor-2.0.1.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 09:47:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 05:47:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227244] Review Request: gfa-0.4.1 - GTK+ fast address book In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704260947.l3Q9lXnm026097@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfa-0.4.1 - GTK+ fast address book https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227244 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(splinux25 at gmail.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-04-26 05:47 EST ------- Ping ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 10:00:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:00:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227228] Review Request: GshutDown - Advanced shut down utility for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261000.l3QA0M4L027182@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GshutDown - Advanced shut down utility for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227228 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-04-26 06:00 EST ------- # 001: (In reply to comment #5) > > Requires: libglade >= 0.17, libnotify >= 0.4.2 > > Make sure these are not caught by rpmbuild automatically. Query > the binary rpms and look out for the dependencies on the library > sonames. Avoid dependencies on package names wherever possible. > gshutdown already requires libnotify.so.1 and libglade-2.0.so.0 Requires: libX11.so.6 libXau.so.6 libatk-1.0.so.0 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libcairo.so.2 libdbus-1.so.3 libdbus-glib-1.so.2 libdl.so.2 libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 libglade-2.0.so.0 libglib-2.0.so.0 libgmodule-2.0.so.0 libgobject-2.0.so.0 libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 libm.so.6 libnotify.so.1 libpango-1.0.so.0 libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 libxml2.so.2 rtld(GNU_HASH) Remove "Requires: libglade >= 0.17, libnotify >= 0.4.2" from the spec file. # 002 : typo in changelog you wrote "- Removed "--add-categorie" from desktop-file-install." It should be "--add-category" and not "--add-categorie" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 10:03:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:03:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227228] Review Request: GshutDown - Advanced shut down utility for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261003.l3QA3SsC027415@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GshutDown - Advanced shut down utility for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227228 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-04-26 06:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > (in reply to commnet #2) > > All fixed except explicit BR for libglade2-devel which required, > mock failed while building whitout it. > libglade2-devel already requires gtk2-devel i.e to install libglade2-devel, yum will fetch gtk2-devel. Hence gtk2-devel is not required as BR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 10:06:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:06:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227228] Review Request: GshutDown - Advanced shut down utility for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261006.l3QA60AC027582@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GshutDown - Advanced shut down utility for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227228 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 10:06:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:06:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225038] Review Request: medit - Another very nice Gtk+ text editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261006.l3QA6Xao027649@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: medit - Another very nice Gtk+ text editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225038 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(splinux25 at gmail.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-04-26 06:06 EST ------- Ping Damien? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 11:57:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 07:57:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235804] Review Request: ocamlSDL - OCaml bindings for SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261157.l3QBv0CM032059@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocamlSDL - OCaml bindings for SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235804 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-04-26 07:56 EST ------- Spec URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/ocamlSDL.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/ocamlSDL-0.7.2-3.src.rpm After a bit of checking on the fedora mailing lists, as the static linking issue is upstream, I'm confident that this can now go ahead. As this is a static library, the -devel package now Provides: -static (this was a recommendation that I found the Fedora mailing lists, I'll try and find a reference if the reviewer wants). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 12:09:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 08:09:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234926] Review Request: ngircd - Next Generation IRC Daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261209.l3QC93fj000759@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ngircd - Next Generation IRC Daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234926 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dev at nigelj.com ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-04-26 08:09 EST ------- Noone else seems to want to take a look, so assigning to myself. I'll have a review based on the current status of libident's review tomorrow, but until libident is accepted I can't give a definate approval yet. Sound okay Andreas? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 12:15:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 08:15:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261215.l3QCFMNE001149@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2007-04-26 08:15 EST ------- Thanks for approving e-b :-) I also like to note that I'm releasing 1.1.26 tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 12:25:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 08:25:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234926] Review Request: ngircd - Next Generation IRC Daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261225.l3QCP8s2001926@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ngircd - Next Generation IRC Daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234926 ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2007-04-26 08:25 EST ------- If it is any consolidation, I'll just remove the libident requirement. I honestly do not care. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 12:29:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 08:29:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223592] Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261229.l3QCTbD7002291@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223592 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(dgoodwin at dangerous | |lyinc.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-26 08:29 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 12:39:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 08:39:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234926] Review Request: ngircd - Next Generation IRC Daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261239.l3QCdYrQ003106@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ngircd - Next Generation IRC Daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234926 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-04-26 08:39 EST ------- In the end it's up to you, but I feel (as a seasoned IRC user) that libident would be useful in a package such as ngircd. One possible work around is: provide a .spec file for ngircd without the libident requirement, once ngircd and libident is approved, readd the dependency, (after lots of checking, assuming all the static linking issues can be sorted). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 12:48:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 08:48:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234926] Review Request: ngircd - Next Generation IRC Daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261248.l3QCmnp9004040@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ngircd - Next Generation IRC Daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234926 ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2007-04-26 08:48 EST ------- Okay, new package without libident at the usual location. have fun. :> -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 13:12:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:12:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223592] Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261312.l3QDCSOl006856@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223592 dgoodwin at dangerouslyinc.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(dgoodwin at dangerous| |lyinc.com) | ------- Additional Comments From dgoodwin at dangerouslyinc.com 2007-04-26 09:12 EST ------- python-elementtree (available in FC6) has been removed from Fedora 7, I'm trying to find out why but have not yet had any luck. Until it is re-added, re-packaged, or I can find time to rework wuja to rely on a different XML parsing library it will not work. Should I close this ticket and re-open when the elementtree situation is resolved? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 13:14:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:14:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234926] Review Request: ngircd - Next Generation IRC Daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261314.l3QDE7fR007052@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ngircd - Next Generation IRC Daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234926 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-04-26 09:14 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=153508) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=153508&action=view) update to the writebuf patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 13:16:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:16:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234926] Review Request: ngircd - Next Generation IRC Daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261316.l3QDGoVa007386@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ngircd - Next Generation IRC Daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234926 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-04-26 09:16 EST ------- Mock Log: Installing /builddir/build/SRPMS/ngircd-0.10.1-3.fc7.src.rpm Building target platforms: x86_64 Building for target x86_64 Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.97021 + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + rm -rf ngircd-0.10.1 + /bin/gzip -dc /builddir/build/SOURCES/ngircd-0.10.1.tar.gz + tar -xf - + STATUS=0 + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']' + cd ngircd-0.10.1 ++ /usr/bin/id -u + '[' 509 = 0 ']' ++ /usr/bin/id -u + '[' 509 = 0 ']' + /bin/chmod -Rf a+rX,u+w,g-w,o-w . + echo 'Patch #0 (ngircd-writebuf-stupidity.diff):' Patch #0 (ngircd-writebuf-stupidity.diff): + patch -p1 -s missing header for unified diff at line 13 of patch The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |ngircds ancient WRITEBUFFER_LEN legacy crap actively sabotages |server connections (where a lot of stuff has to be sent at once) | |Work around this stupidity by tolerating pending writes of up to 512kb. | |Index: conn.c |=================================================================== |RCS file: /srv/cvs/ngircd/ngircd/src/ngircd/conn.c,v |retrieving revision 1.198.2.2 |diff -u -r1.198.2.2 conn.c |--- conn.c 17 Dec 2006 23:06:29 -0000 1.198.2.2 |+++ conn.c 3 Apr 2007 19:34:00 -0000 -------------------------- File to patch: Skip this patch? [y] 1 out of 1 hunk ignored error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.97021 (%prep) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.97021 (%prep) The patch file does not work because of the additional text in the header, I have updated the patch so that it should apply correctly. (See Comment #9) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 13:18:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:18:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234926] Review Request: ngircd - Next Generation IRC Daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261318.l3QDItOw007659@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ngircd - Next Generation IRC Daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234926 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 13:30:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:30:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223592] Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261330.l3QDUVbL008765@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223592 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-26 09:30 EST ------- Well, I am not a expert of python, however, when I just tried: ------------------------------------------------- --- feed.py.orig 2007-01-08 04:07:29.000000000 +0900 +++ feed.py 2007-04-26 22:18:54.000000000 +0900 @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ import urllib2 from datetime import datetime -from elementtree import ElementTree +import _elementtree as ElementTree from logging import getLogger from wuja.model import SingleOccurrenceEntry -------------------------------------------------------- and launched wuja, wuja icon(?) appeared on GNOME panel and when I clicked the icon, some menu appeared and finally a calendar appeared. So it *seems* to work for python 2.5. NOTE: _elemettree module is included in python-2.5-12.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 13:43:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:43:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237888] Review Request: perl-Tree-Simple-VisitorFactory - Factory object for dispensing Visitor objects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261343.l3QDhOFj009929@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Tree-Simple-VisitorFactory - Factory object for dispensing Visitor objects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237888 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-26 09:43 EST ------- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 13:46:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:46:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223592] Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261346.l3QDk8nD010100@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223592 ------- Additional Comments From dgoodwin at dangerouslyinc.com 2007-04-26 09:46 EST ------- Many thanks for pointing that out, did not realize the module was in Python 2.5 but renamed. Will adjust tonight to work with both 2.4 and 2.5 and prepare a proper SRPM. Cheers! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 13:51:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:51:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237416] Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261351.l3QDpqqw010629@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237416 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-04-26 09:51 EST ------- Yes and the differ of the tab ball agains the upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 14:39:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:39:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238000] New: Review Request: seahorse-adventures - Help barbie the seahorse float on bubbles to the moon Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238000 Summary: Review Request: seahorse-adventures - Help barbie the seahorse float on bubbles to the moon Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/seahorse-adventures.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/seahorse-adventures-1.0-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Help barbie the seahorse float on bubbles to the moon. This is a retro-side scroller game. It won the teams category in pyweek 4. Includes original soundtrack, graphics, and 15 levels! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 14:56:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:56:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220635] Review Request: livecd-tools - Tools for creating Live CD's In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261456.l3QEuMrT018976@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: livecd-tools - Tools for creating Live CD's https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220635 ------- Additional Comments From davidz at redhat.com 2007-04-26 10:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) Support for other archs/machine types we (need to consider more than just the arch) is of course welcome. But this bug is not the right place to discuss that; that needs to happen on the livecd list http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-livecd-list I have a Powerbook G4 12" and I'd be more than happy to help out testing the ppc bits there... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 15:04:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:04:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226276] Merge Review: perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261504.l3QF4fUa020410@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226276 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-04-26 11:04 EST ------- Ralf, The release team disagrees, I'm afraid, and thinks this is the way to go for F7. They do, however, 'promise', to fix multilib for F8, and then we can de-hack perl: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2007-April/msg00462.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 15:06:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:06:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236792] Review Request: redhat-artwork-kde - KDE portions temporarily split out of redhat-artwork (236633) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261506.l3QF6mb4020738@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redhat-artwork-kde - KDE portions temporarily split out of redhat-artwork (236633) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236792 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-04-26 11:06 EST ------- MUST items: 1. Omit/drop Conflicts: items. Not needed nor desirable (anymore) 2. Drop Autoreq: 0 We actually *can* afford to autoreq qt/kde here. :) 3. %files, replace %{_libdir}/kde3 with %{_libdir}/kde3/* (ie, don't own the parent dir) Otherwise, looks good. Make these changes, and I'll APPROVE this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 15:12:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:12:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237888] Review Request: perl-Tree-Simple-VisitorFactory - Factory object for dispensing Visitor objects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261512.l3QFCbDR021513@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Tree-Simple-VisitorFactory - Factory object for dispensing Visitor objects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237888 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-26 11:12 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Tree-Simple-VisitorFactory Short Description: Factory object for dispensing Visitor objects Owners: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Branches: FC-5, FC-6, devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 15:12:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:12:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237888] Review Request: perl-Tree-Simple-VisitorFactory - Factory object for dispensing Visitor objects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261512.l3QFColB021569@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Tree-Simple-VisitorFactory - Factory object for dispensing Visitor objects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237888 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 15:14:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:14:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237883] Review Request: perl-SGML-Parser-OpenSP - Perl interface to the OpenSP SGML and XML parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261514.l3QFEJli021752@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SGML-Parser-OpenSP - Perl interface to the OpenSP SGML and XML parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237883 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-26 11:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Also pod-tests > > are some sort of package integrity check, which is interesting to us. > > The interesting Pod tests (those done by Test::Pod) are enabled. I fail to see > why we would be interested in the Pod coverage tests - if they fail, are we > going to not ship a package because some of its Perl functions aren't > adequately documented? Well, it's an indication that a package is poorly implemented ... Whether lack of docs shall result into not shipping a package needs to be judged on a case by case basis. If the core functionalties aren't documented, I don't see a problem in qualifying a package as "not ready for shipping". > > I am not wanting to provide a precedence and therefor am not approving this > > package because of this. > > Quite a few packages disable various tests already, We also have a number of packages which are failing their tests :( > networking related, > Module::Signature related, ones that start daemons etc. I know, but these actually are limitations of the build-system. I prefer seeing these packages packaged in a way such tests can be enabled by rpmbuild options (--with ...) for builts outside of the build-system (It's at least what I try for my perl-packages. > What about the other > way - if I enable the Pod coverage tests, will you review/approve this > package? I probably will ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 15:15:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:15:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237813] Review Request: taxipilot - Game where you pilot a taxi in space In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261515.l3QFFZnC021835@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: taxipilot - Game where you pilot a taxi in space https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237813 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-26 11:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Bad: > - Rpmlint complaints binary package: > rpmlint taxipilot-0.9.1-1.x86_64.rpm > W: taxipilot dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/taxipilot/common > /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common > W: taxipilot symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/taxipilot/common > /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common This is standard for KDE packages and can be ignored > E: taxipilot zero-length /usr/share/apps/taxipilot/game_data/game_data_tag This file is needed and must stay > - Package doesn't conatins varbatin copy ot the license text. Upstream tar bar > contains file COPYING which should be in the %doc stanza. Oops, fixed > - Rpmlint complaints the installed package: > rpmlint taxipilot > W: taxipilot undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEXT_wavpo.so.0.0.0 > _ZN4Arts7Factory7startupEv > W: taxipilot undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEXT_wavpo.so.0.0.0 > _ZN4Arts7Factory8shutdownEv > W: taxipilot undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEXT_wavpo.so.0.0.0 > _ZTIN4Arts7FactoryE > W: taxipilot undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEXT_wavpo.so.0.0.0 > _ZTv0_n24_N4Arts11Object_skel6notifyERKNS_12NotificationE > W: taxipilot undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEXT_wavpo.so.0.0.0 > _ZTv0_n40_N4Arts11Object_skel5_skelEv > W: taxipilot undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libEXT_wavpo.so.0.0.0 > _ZN4Arts11Object_base5_stubEv > === CUT === Fixed > for the undefined-non-week-symbol issue, please notify the upstream to fix it. > There are a lot of such messages from rpmlint. > - Source0 Tag in SPEC file doesn't show to the upstram tar ball. A HTTP-Code 404 > occured. Typo, fixed > - Could not build package for target i686 on the x86_64 system: > checking for perl... /usr/bin/perl > checking for Qt... configure: error: Qt (>= Qt 3.1 (20021021)) (library qt-mt) > not found. Please check your installation! > For more details about this problem, look at the end of config.log. > Make sure that you have compiled Qt with thread support! > Fehler: Fehler-Status beim Beenden von /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.75137 (%build) > You mean trying to build an i386 version on x86_64 without using mock? Thats not supported and won't work for many packages. New version here: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/taxipilot.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/taxipilot-0.9.1-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 15:33:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:33:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225925] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-dbcp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261533.l3QFXEVN023974@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-dbcp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225925 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-04-26 11:33 EST ------- Good: + Mock build works fine for FC7. + Rpmlint for source rpm ok (with Warnings) + Tar ball matches with upstream. + Binary rpm are ok (with warnings) *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 15:33:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:33:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225929] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-fileupload In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261533.l3QFXPis024006@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-fileupload https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225929 ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-04-26 11:33 EST ------- Package built into brew. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 15:39:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:39:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234882] Review Request: libident - New LibIdent C library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261539.l3QFdfUG024568@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libident - New LibIdent C library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234882 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-04-26 11:39 EST ------- Sorry, But I could not found the suggested chage in the tools subpackage.:q! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 15:40:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:40:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225929] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-fileupload In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261540.l3QFeDD8024608@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-fileupload https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225929 mwringe at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 15:41:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:41:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236177] Review Request: perl-NetAddr-IP - Manages IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and subnets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261541.l3QFfCv4024754@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-NetAddr-IP - Manages IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and subnets Alias: perl-NetAddr-IP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236177 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 15:41:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:41:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236177] Review Request: perl-NetAddr-IP - Manages IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and subnets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261541.l3QFfqA5024854@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-NetAddr-IP - Manages IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and subnets Alias: perl-NetAddr-IP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236177 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-26 11:41 EST ------- Oddly enough, the module itself is (as near as I can determine) definitely under the Artistic license, though it includes a copy of the GPL at Lite/Util/GPL. Weird. --along the same lines, Makefile.PL complains if Test::Pod isn't installed, but no test actually uses it. The non-versioned requires on perl(NetAddr::IP::Util) would normally need to be filtered, but as this package also provides perl(NetAddr::IP::Util), it's really not worth the effort :) Missing BR on Test::More -- approval is contingent on this being added (which can be done post-import). + source files match upstream: 4f0ef938abf0b1e43ca96fb0068381df NetAddr-IP-4.004.tar.gz 4f0ef938abf0b1e43ca96fb0068381df ../NetAddr-IP-4.004.tar.gz + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license field matches the actual license. + license is open source-compatible. (Artistic) License text not included upstream. + latest version is being packaged. X BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. + %clean is present. + package installs properly + debuginfo package looks complete. + rpmlint is silent. + final provides and requires are sane: ** perl-NetAddr-IP-4.004-0.2.fc6.x86_64.rpm == rpmlint == provides Util.so()(64bit) perl(NetAddr::IP) = 4.4 perl(NetAddr::IP::Lite) = 1.5 perl(NetAddr::IP::Util) = 1.3 perl(NetAddr::IP::UtilPP) = 1.2 perl(NetAddr::IP::Util_IS) = 1.00 perl-NetAddr-IP = 4.004-0.2.fc6 == requires libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) libnsl.so.1()(64bit) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(AutoLoader) perl(Carp) perl(DynaLoader) perl(Exporter) perl(NetAddr::IP::Lite) >= 1.02 O perl(NetAddr::IP::Util) O perl(NetAddr::IP::Util) >= 0.17 perl(NetAddr::IP::Util_IS) perl(strict) perl(vars) ** perl-NetAddr-IP-debuginfo-4.004-0.2.fc6.x86_64.rpm == rpmlint == provides Util.so.debug()(64bit) perl-NetAddr-IP-debuginfo = 4.004-0.2.fc6 == requires + %check is present and all tests pass + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets present. + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. + no headers. + no pkgconfig files. + no libtool .la droppings. + not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 15:41:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:41:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236177] Review Request: perl-NetAddr-IP - Manages IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and subnets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261541.l3QFftsP024874@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-NetAddr-IP - Manages IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and subnets Alias: perl-NetAddr-IP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236177 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 15:42:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:42:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225925] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-dbcp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261542.l3QFgln8024981@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-dbcp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225925 ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-04-26 11:42 EST ------- Built into rawhide, it might take a while for it to make it to the mirrors (jakarta-commons-dbcp-1.2.1-10jpp.1.fc7) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 15:46:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:46:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226276] Merge Review: perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261546.l3QFk4if025367@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226276 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-26 11:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #32) > Ralf, > > The release team disagrees, I'm afraid, Well, ... the release team doesn't want to know what I think about this and them. > and thinks this is the way to go for F7. "perl" still contains TONS of i386 binaries, TONS of i386-paths. => You aren't fixing anything by splitting out libperl ... but probably to work around one of the many bugs inside of rpm and yum. While we're at it: FC6 yum still suffers from the "not being able to resolve perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) bug when an old monolytic "perl" is in one of the repos. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 15:54:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:54:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231774] Review Request: perl-DBIx-POS - Define a dictionary of SQL statements in a POD dialect (POS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261554.l3QFsBVu026455@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-POS - Define a dictionary of SQL statements in a POD dialect (POS) Alias: perl-DBIx-POS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231774 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-26 11:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > So we have > > a) D::P - Artistic or GPL > b) C::S - Artistic > c) License Tag - Artistic or GPL > > If the license tag is Artistic or GPL, doens't it imply that the entire package > can be relicensed under the choice of Artistic or GPL? Nothing I see in > Artistic license for C::S allows that AFAICS. Ok, sold. (for some reason I had it in my head it was akin to BSD/MIT, using snippets is OK with attribution.) I'll change the license tag to Artistic, and take the licensing issue upstream for further resolution? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 15:55:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:55:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234882] Review Request: libident - New LibIdent C library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261555.l3QFt6Ue026627@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libident - New LibIdent C library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234882 ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2007-04-26 11:54 EST ------- Uhm. Please check and . Both should have the Requires line you asked for. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 15:56:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:56:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225628] Merge Review: bsh In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261556.l3QFudb0026775@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bsh https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225628 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-04-26 11:56 EST ------- Good: + Naming is ok (perhaps may be BeanShell) + Tar ball matches with update when using diff -r + Mock build works fine. + Binary rpms are ok. *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 16:14:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:14:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226276] Merge Review: perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261614.l3QGE4VR028203@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226276 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-04-26 12:13 EST ------- Yes, I agree this is certainly a workaround, not a 'fix' in any way. No argument there, at all. But it's the path the release team has picked so far. Honestly, I don't understand multilib deeply enough by any means to debate meaningfully. If you can change the release team's mind, I'll be more than happy to revert the change. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 16:18:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:18:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231774] Review Request: perl-DBIx-POS - Define a dictionary of SQL statements in a POD dialect (POS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261618.l3QGIhce028685@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-POS - Define a dictionary of SQL statements in a POD dialect (POS) Alias: perl-DBIx-POS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231774 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-26 12:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > I'll change the license tag to Artistic, and > take the licensing issue upstream for further resolution? Sounds good. Everything else is in order. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 16:27:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:27:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231774] Review Request: perl-DBIx-POS - Define a dictionary of SQL statements in a POD dialect (POS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261627.l3QGRaca029482@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-POS - Define a dictionary of SQL statements in a POD dialect (POS) Alias: perl-DBIx-POS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231774 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-26 12:27 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-DBIx-POS Short Description: Define a dictionary of SQL statements in a POD dialect (POS) Owners: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Branches: FC-5, FC-6, devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 16:27:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:27:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231774] Review Request: perl-DBIx-POS - Define a dictionary of SQL statements in a POD dialect (POS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261627.l3QGRcwT029500@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-POS - Define a dictionary of SQL statements in a POD dialect (POS) Alias: perl-DBIx-POS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231774 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 16:34:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:34:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230344] Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261634.l3QGYlsA030296@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230344 ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2007-04-26 12:34 EST ------- Well, I do not know what happened to my specfile, I also have no idea who Jerry is and why he is creating a new specfile from scratch. Anyway, be that as it may, there's an updated bacula package at or the spec at . Take a look, it's basically finished and I'd like to see some last comments before I'll ask for a review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 17:00:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:00:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226276] Merge Review: perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261700.l3QH005W000552@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226276 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-26 12:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #34) > Honestly, I don't understand multilib I implemented and am maintaining many of them in GCC ;) > deeply enough by any means to debate > meaningfully. I don't think they fixed multilibs (The arch dependent perl paths do not intersect), but work around a the bug in rpm which causes it to insert bogus Provides/Requires: libperl.so(XXXX) into the rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 17:16:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:16:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223490] Review Request: alex - The lexer generator for Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261716.l3QHGk4H001915@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alex - The lexer generator for Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223490 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2007-04-26 13:16 EST ------- Well, that took a while to get around to :-) Spec URL: http://www.red-bean.com/~bos/alex.spec SRPM URL: http://www.red-bean.com/~bos/alex-2.1.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 17:19:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:19:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225628] Merge Review: bsh In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261719.l3QHJo6s002240@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bsh https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225628 ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-04-26 13:19 EST ------- I'll keep the name as bsh as it has been shipped in previous Fedora release in that name. The package has been built, should hit rawhide soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 17:29:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:29:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225628] Merge Review: bsh In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261729.l3QHTswQ003286@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bsh https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225628 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-04-26 13:29 EST ------- Thats ok, it was only a mind flash from me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 17:43:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:43:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261743.l3QHh7gl004381@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |Fedora at FamilleCollet.com ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2007-04-26 13:42 EST ------- Do you think vdrift license is OK for Extras ? Please read : http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=420965 Some content seems to be EA games property. Debian have choose to remove it from their repository. Regards. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 17:46:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:46:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238000] Review Request: seahorse-adventures - Help barbie the seahorse float on bubbles to the moon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261746.l3QHkgpq004664@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seahorse-adventures - Help barbie the seahorse float on bubbles to the moon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238000 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |Jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-04-26 13:46 EST ------- Good: + Naming seems ok. + Tar ball matches with upstream. + License seems ok. A email conversation was added to the package. + Email conversation was added to the %doc stanza. + Local buiid works fine. + Rpmlint is quite on source rpm. + Rpmlint is quite on binary rpm. + Local install and uninstall works fine. + Could start game locally. + Mock build works fine. *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 17:57:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:57:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261757.l3QHvXXi005645@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-04-26 13:57 EST ------- Hmm. A quick look at the link from the bug shows no content from the "not ok" list in the -minimal package. If we can verify the content from -minimal, we could push that and just nix the -full package. How do I verify the status of the material in question? Do I ask upstream to do it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 18:37:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:37:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226565] Merge Review: xmlrpc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261837.l3QIbLo9009992@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xmlrpc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226565 pcheung at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-04-26 14:37 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > > X verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do) > > - Source0 doesn't exist > Updated link md5sum matches > > > * skim the summary and description for typos, etc. > > * correct buildroot > > - should be: > > %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) > > X if %{?dist} is used, it should be in that form (note the ? and % > > locations) > > - Please fix Release tag by adding %{?dist} > Fixed > Great! > Updated SRPM: > https://mwringe.108.redhat.com/files/documents/175/348/xmlrpc-2.0.1-3jpp.3.src.rpm Just built in mock again, everything looks good. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 18:37:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:37:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230344] Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261837.l3QIbl29010052@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230344 ------- Additional Comments From jamundso at gmail.com 2007-04-26 14:37 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > Well, I do not know what happened to my specfile, I also have no idea who Jerry > is and why he is creating a new specfile from scratch. I'm Jerry, and I'm also sorry! I didn't mean to step on toes. But there'd been little activity lately, and I get nervous when mmcgrath bumps the severity to medium! :-) Anyway, thank you for the updated package... I also see the reason for bacula-storage, so my mumbling in Comment #10 can be ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 18:38:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:38:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238000] Review Request: seahorse-adventures - Help barbie the seahorse float on bubbles to the moon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261838.l3QIcojR010160@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seahorse-adventures - Help barbie the seahorse float on bubbles to the moon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238000 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-26 14:38 EST ------- That was quick, thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: seahorse-adventures Short Description: Help barbie the seahorse float on bubbles to the moon Owners: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Branches: FC-6 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 18:41:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:41:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236642] Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261841.l3QIfHgO010367@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236642 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-04-26 14:41 EST ------- oops sorry, I had a stale srpm here that i was looking at. The new SOURCE0 looks fine I should be able to start the formal review. One thing, you should consider changing how the consolehelper symlink is created in the release tarball for the next release, so we can avoid the hack to fix it in the specfile. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 18:47:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:47:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236642] Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261847.l3QIltYT011492@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236642 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-04-26 14:47 EST ------- Problem: md5sum from SOURCE0 url and included sources do not match. Please doublecheck that you are including the tarball as listed from the SOURCE0 location. Here's my local actions for md5sum test >wget http://revisor.fedoraunity.org/releases/revisor-2.0/revisor-2.0.1-3.fc7.src.rpm >rpm -ivh revisor-2.0.1-3.fc7.src.rpm >md5sum rpmbuild/SOURCES/revisor-2.0.1.tar.gz 1ae8d73266079f93e3d543631ce59704 rpmbuild/SOURCES/revisor-2.0.1.tar.gz >spectool rpmbuild/SPECS/revisor.spec Source0: http://revisor.fedoraunity.org/releases/revisor-2.0/revisor-2.0.1.tar.gz >wget http://revisor.fedoraunity.org/releases/revisor-2.0/revisor-2.0.1.tar.gz >md5sum revisor-2.0.1.tar.gz 6acf0e69808e014683607ab9628b5586 revisor-2.0.1.tar.gz -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 18:51:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:51:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261851.l3QIpVk0011816@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-26 14:51 EST ------- You could ask upstream, and/or you could go mailing authors of car models/ tracks yourself. For the EA tracks the solution is simple: don't distribute them. For now I would just rm -r all the dirs that contain content marked unsorted and not ok (so that the entire car / track gets removed), and then recreate the tarbal and use the _new_ tarbal as Source0 . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 18:52:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:52:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225637] Merge Review: castor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261852.l3QIqS0g011895@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: castor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225637 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium pcheung at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mwringe at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-04-26 14:52 EST ------- Updated spec file and srpm at: https://pcheung.108.redhat.com/files/documents/174/379/castor.spec https://pcheung.108.redhat.com/files/documents/174/378/castor-0.9.5-1jpp.9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 19:05:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:05:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226565] Merge Review: xmlrpc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261905.l3QJ5lcv013123@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xmlrpc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226565 ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-04-26 15:05 EST ------- built in rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 19:09:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:09:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230344] Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261909.l3QJ9HMh013719@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230344 ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2007-04-26 15:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) Hi Jerry :-D Don't worry, you are free to work on the bacula.spec as long as you wish. No toes to step on. :D I was just trying to answer Felix's question. *g* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 19:38:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:38:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237046] Review Request: perl-Config-IniHash - Perl extension for reading and writing INI files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261938.l3QJcMYd016940@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-IniHash - Perl extension for reading and writing INI files Alias: perl-Config-IniHash https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237046 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bjohnson at symetrix.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-26 15:38 EST ------- package won't mockbuild: + make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-Iblib/lib" "-Iblib/arch" test.pl 1..4 not ok 1 - use Config::IniHash; # Failed test 'use Config::IniHash;' # in test.pl at line 9. # Tried to use 'Config::IniHash'. # Error: Can't locate IO/Scalar.pm in @INC (@INC contains: blib/lib blib/arch /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8 .) at blib/lib/Config/IniHash.pm line 6. # BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at test.pl line 9. # Compilation failed in require at (eval 3) line 2. # BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at (eval 3) line 2. Undefined subroutine &main::WriteINI called at test.pl line 23. # Looks like you planned 4 tests but only ran 1. # Looks like you failed 1 test of 1 run. # Looks like your test died just after 1. make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.46589 (%check) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.46589 (%check) Error building package from perl-Config-IniHash-2.8-1.fc6.src.rpm, See build log ending done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 19:45:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:45:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237046] Review Request: perl-Config-IniHash - Perl extension for reading and writing INI files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704261945.l3QJjuGc018258@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-IniHash - Perl extension for reading and writing INI files Alias: perl-Config-IniHash https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237046 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-26 15:45 EST ------- Missing BR on perl(IO::Scalar) *sigh* SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Config-IniHash-2.8-2.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Config-IniHash.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 20:03:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:03:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237046] Review Request: perl-Config-IniHash - Perl extension for reading and writing INI files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704262003.l3QK3OlT019953@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-IniHash - Perl extension for reading and writing INI files Alias: perl-Config-IniHash https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237046 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-26 16:03 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Rpmlint output: None [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL or Artistic [-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is written in American English. [x] Spec file for the package is legible. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : fc8dff4d51cd0380f386e9f35bed59a2 MD5SUM upstream package: fc8dff4d51cd0380f386e9f35bed59a2 [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: Arches excluded: Why: [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [!] Latest version is packaged. === Issues === 1. Please package latest version or justify why packaging a 2 year old version is warranted. Latest version is 2.9.0 http://search.cpan.org/dist/Config-IniHash/ === Final Notes === 1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 20:37:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:37:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226553] Merge Review: xdoclet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704262037.l3QKbtuv022263@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xdoclet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226553 pcheung at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-04-26 16:37 EST ------- * verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 ~]$ rpm -pq --provides /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xdoclet-1.2.3-8jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm xdoclet-1.2.3.jar.so()(64bit) xdoclet-apache-module-1.2.3.jar.so()(64bit) xdoclet-bea-module-1.2.3.jar.so()(64bit) xdoclet-borland-module-1.2.3.jar.so()(64bit) xdoclet-caucho-module-1.2.3.jar.so()(64bit) xdoclet-ejb-module-1.2.3.jar.so()(64bit) xdoclet-exolab-module-1.2.3.jar.so()(64bit) xdoclet-hibernate-module-1.2.3.jar.so()(64bit) xdoclet-hp-module-1.2.3.jar.so()(64bit) xdoclet-ibm-module-1.2.3.jar.so()(64bit) xdoclet-java-module-1.2.3.jar.so()(64bit) xdoclet-jboss-module-1.2.3.jar.so()(64bit) xdoclet-jdo-module-1.2.3.jar.so()(64bit) xdoclet-jmx-module-1.2.3.jar.so()(64bit) xdoclet-jsf-module-1.2.3.jar.so()(64bit) xdoclet-libelis-module-1.2.3.jar.so()(64bit) xdoclet-macromedia-module-1.2.3.jar.so()(64bit) xdoclet-mvcsoft-module-1.2.3.jar.so()(64bit) xdoclet-mx4j-module-1.2.3.jar.so()(64bit) xdoclet-objectweb-module-1.2.3.jar.so()(64bit) xdoclet-openejb-module-1.2.3.jar.so()(64bit) xdoclet-oracle-module-1.2.3.jar.so()(64bit) xdoclet-orion-module-1.2.3.jar.so()(64bit) xdoclet-portlet-module-1.2.3.jar.so()(64bit) xdoclet-pramati-module-1.2.3.jar.so()(64bit) xdoclet-solarmetric-module-1.2.3.jar.so()(64bit) xdoclet-spring-module-1.2.3.jar.so()(64bit) xdoclet-sun-module-1.2.3.jar.so()(64bit) xdoclet-sybase-module-1.2.3.jar.so()(64bit) xdoclet-tjdo-module-1.2.3.jar.so()(64bit) xdoclet-web-module-1.2.3.jar.so()(64bit) xdoclet-webwork-module-1.2.3.jar.so()(64bit) xdoclet-wsee-module-1.2.3.jar.so()(64bit) xdoclet-xdoclet-module-1.2.3.jar.so()(64bit) xdoclet = 0:1.2.3-8jpp.1.fc7 [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 ~]$ rpm -pq --requires /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xdoclet-1.2.3-8jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm /bin/sh /bin/sh bsf jakarta-commons-collections jakarta-commons-logging java-gcj-compat java-gcj-compat libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgcj_bc.so.1()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) librt.so.1()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) log4j rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) velocity xalan-j2 >= 0:2.7.0 xjavadoc = 0:1.1 xml-commons-apis [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 ~]$ rpm -pq --provides /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xdoclet-debuginfo-1.2.3-8jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm xdoclet-1.2.3.jar.so.debug()(64bit) xdoclet-apache-module-1.2.3.jar.so.debug()(64bit) xdoclet-bea-module-1.2.3.jar.so.debug()(64bit) xdoclet-borland-module-1.2.3.jar.so.debug()(64bit) xdoclet-caucho-module-1.2.3.jar.so.debug()(64bit) xdoclet-ejb-module-1.2.3.jar.so.debug()(64bit) xdoclet-exolab-module-1.2.3.jar.so.debug()(64bit) xdoclet-hibernate-module-1.2.3.jar.so.debug()(64bit) xdoclet-hp-module-1.2.3.jar.so.debug()(64bit) xdoclet-ibm-module-1.2.3.jar.so.debug()(64bit) xdoclet-java-module-1.2.3.jar.so.debug()(64bit) xdoclet-jboss-module-1.2.3.jar.so.debug()(64bit) xdoclet-jdo-module-1.2.3.jar.so.debug()(64bit) xdoclet-jmx-module-1.2.3.jar.so.debug()(64bit) xdoclet-jsf-module-1.2.3.jar.so.debug()(64bit) xdoclet-libelis-module-1.2.3.jar.so.debug()(64bit) xdoclet-macromedia-module-1.2.3.jar.so.debug()(64bit) xdoclet-mvcsoft-module-1.2.3.jar.so.debug()(64bit) xdoclet-mx4j-module-1.2.3.jar.so.debug()(64bit) xdoclet-objectweb-module-1.2.3.jar.so.debug()(64bit) xdoclet-openejb-module-1.2.3.jar.so.debug()(64bit) xdoclet-oracle-module-1.2.3.jar.so.debug()(64bit) xdoclet-orion-module-1.2.3.jar.so.debug()(64bit) xdoclet-portlet-module-1.2.3.jar.so.debug()(64bit) xdoclet-pramati-module-1.2.3.jar.so.debug()(64bit) xdoclet-solarmetric-module-1.2.3.jar.so.debug()(64bit) xdoclet-spring-module-1.2.3.jar.so.debug()(64bit) xdoclet-sun-module-1.2.3.jar.so.debug()(64bit) xdoclet-sybase-module-1.2.3.jar.so.debug()(64bit) xdoclet-tjdo-module-1.2.3.jar.so.debug()(64bit) xdoclet-web-module-1.2.3.jar.so.debug()(64bit) xdoclet-webwork-module-1.2.3.jar.so.debug()(64bit) xdoclet-wsee-module-1.2.3.jar.so.debug()(64bit) xdoclet-xdoclet-module-1.2.3.jar.so.debug()(64bit) xdoclet-debuginfo = 0:1.2.3-8jpp.1.fc7 [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 ~]$ rpm -pq --requires /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xdoclet-debuginfo-1.2.3-8jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 ~]$ rpm -pq --provides /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xdoclet-javadoc-1.2.3-8jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm xdoclet-javadoc = 0:1.2.3-8jpp.1.fc7 [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 ~]$ rpm -pq --requires /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xdoclet-javadoc-1.2.3-8jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 ~]$ rpm -pq --provides /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xdoclet-manual-1.2.3-8jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm xdoclet-manual = 0:1.2.3-8jpp.1.fc7 [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 ~]$ rpm -pq --requires /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xdoclet-manual-1.2.3-8jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 * run rpmlint on the binary RPMs [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 ~]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/*x86*rpm W: xdoclet non-standard-group Development/Framework W: xdoclet-javadoc non-standard-group Development/Documentation W: xdoclet-manual non-standard-group Development/Documentation These group warnings are OK. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 20:55:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:55:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237046] Review Request: perl-Config-IniHash - Perl extension for reading and writing INI files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704262055.l3QKtZBk023780@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-IniHash - Perl extension for reading and writing INI files Alias: perl-Config-IniHash https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237046 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-26 16:55 EST ------- No justification possible (though I will admit to being confused how cpanspec would pick that version). For your convienence: http://search.cpan.org/diff?from=Config-IniHash-2.8&to=Config-IniHash-2.9.0 No changes except for a changelog entry and the version bump. SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Config-IniHash-2.9.0-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Config-IniHash.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 21:12:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:12:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237883] Review Request: perl-SGML-Parser-OpenSP - Perl interface to the OpenSP SGML and XML parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704262112.l3QLCjmj024809@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SGML-Parser-OpenSP - Perl interface to the OpenSP SGML and XML parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237883 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-04-26 17:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > > What about the other > > way - if I enable the Pod coverage tests, will you review/approve this > > package? > I probably will ;) If that's what it takes to get this package in, so be it. Le me know when you've decided for real, perhaps in the form of conditional "to be done before the first build" approval; until then I'm leaving the package as is in case others are willing to take a look. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 21:19:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:19:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237046] Review Request: perl-Config-IniHash - Perl extension for reading and writing INI files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704262119.l3QLJKiF025232@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-IniHash - Perl extension for reading and writing INI files Alias: perl-Config-IniHash https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237046 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-26 17:19 EST ------- [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : 012e9bc3e320dcb031886a3ffcc19c09 MD5SUM upstream package: 012e9bc3e320dcb031886a3ffcc19c09 [x] Latest version is packaged. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 21:24:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:24:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226555] Merge Review: xerces-j2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704262124.l3QLOiFn025601@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xerces-j2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226555 pcheung at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-04-26 17:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > > > * specfile name matches %{name} > > X verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do) > > - Source0 doesn't exist > Updated link location md5sum matches > > > * skim the summary and description for typos, etc. > > * correct buildroot > > - should be: > > %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) > > * if %{?dist} is used, it should be in that form (note the ? and % > > locations) > > * license text included in package and marked with %doc > > * keep old changelog entries; use judgement when removing (too old? > > useless?) > > * packages meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) > > X rpmlint on .srpm gives no output > > W: xerces-j2 non-standard-group Text Processing/Markup/XML > > W: xerces-j2 unversioned-explicit-provides jaxp_parser_impl > > The group one is OK, please fix the unversioned-explicit-provides > Fixed > > > > X specfile is legible > > - please get rid of section tag > Done > Great! > > - URL indicates 'Xerces has moved out of the XML project and is now a project > > in its own right.' , please update with the new URL > This is the proper URL, they are just saying welcome to the new project page > they are not part of the XML project anymore. OK > > > - in this spec file, commands are usually just plain commands instead of > > macros except for %{__sed} > Fixed > Great! > > X consider using cp -p to preserve timestamps > > - please use cp -p on lines 164, 248-253 > fixed (note -a is the same as -dpR) > Ah, OK. > > X run rpmlint on the binary RPMs > > [pcheung at to-fcjpp1 pcheung]$ rpmlint > > /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-pcheung/result/xerces-j2-*x86*rpm > > W: xerces-j2 non-standard-group Text Processing/Markup/XML > > W: xerces-j2 dangling-symlink /usr/share/java/jaxp_parser_impl.jar > /etc/alternatives > > W: xerces-j2 symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/java/jaxp_parser_impl.jar > > /etc/alternatives > > - Can these symlink warnings be fixed? > No, the package needs to use the external Alternatives system, therefore the > symlinks warnings can't be removed. > OK > > > > W: xerces-j2-demo non-standard-group Development/Testing > > W: xerces-j2-demo no-documentation > > - Is there any doc for the -demo package? > No OK > > > W: xerces-j2-javadoc-apis non-standard-group Development/Documentation > > W: xerces-j2-javadoc-impl non-standard-group Development/Documentation > > W: xerces-j2-javadoc-other non-standard-group Development/Documentation > > W: xerces-j2-javadoc-xni non-standard-group Development/Documentation > > W: xerces-j2-scripts non-standard-group Text Processing/Markup/XML > > W: xerces-j2-scripts no-documentation > > - Is there any doc for the -scripts package? > No OK > > > > > SHOULD: > > * package should include license text in the package and mark it with %doc > > * package should build on i386 > > * package should build in mock > > > > Updated SRPM: > > https://mwringe.108.redhat.com/files/documents/175/351/xerces-j2-2.7.1-9jpp.1.src.rpm > Looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 21:27:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:27:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237046] Review Request: perl-Config-IniHash - Perl extension for reading and writing INI files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704262127.l3QLRe2v026065@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-IniHash - Perl extension for reading and writing INI files Alias: perl-Config-IniHash https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237046 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-26 17:27 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Config-IniHash Short Description: Perl extension for reading and writing INI files Owners: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Branches: FC-5, FC-6, devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 21:27:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:27:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237046] Review Request: perl-Config-IniHash - Perl extension for reading and writing INI files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704262127.l3QLRss4026129@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-IniHash - Perl extension for reading and writing INI files Alias: perl-Config-IniHash https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237046 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 21:34:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:34:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236792] Review Request: redhat-artwork-kde - KDE portions temporarily split out of redhat-artwork (236633) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704262134.l3QLYNjG026853@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redhat-artwork-kde - KDE portions temporarily split out of redhat-artwork (236633) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236792 ------- Additional Comments From kevin.kofler at chello.at 2007-04-26 17:34 EST ------- Done. Spec URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f7/redhat-artwork-kde.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f7/redhat-artwork-kde-5.0.12-5.fc7.src.rpm (I didn't forget defining dist when building the SRPM this time. ;-) ) * Thu Apr 26 2007 Kevin Kofler 5.0.12-5 - drop obsolete/unneeded Conflicts (review #236792) - don't disable AutoReq, we can afford to autoreq KDE/Qt here (review #236792) - don't own libdir/kde3 (review #236792) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 21:56:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:56:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236792] Review Request: redhat-artwork-kde - KDE portions temporarily split out of redhat-artwork (236633) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704262156.l3QLuKco028212@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redhat-artwork-kde - KDE portions temporarily split out of redhat-artwork (236633) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236792 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-04-26 17:56 EST ------- APPROVED. Apply for fedora account: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join (steps 9, 10) and I'll sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 22:09:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:09:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234826] Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704262209.l3QM9I4f028896@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234826 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-26 18:09 EST ------- Fabrice, Please finish up the steps listed at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageReviewProcess#head-df921556b35438a4c78b4b6a790151ea568e8f9e Namely, import, build, and close the review ticket. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 22:38:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:38:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238073] New: Review Request: perl-GTop - Perl interface to libgtop Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238073 Summary: Review Request: perl-GTop - Perl interface to libgtop Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/GTop/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-GTop-0.16-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-GTop.spec Description: This is a perl interface to the libgtop library, useful for collecting real-time performance and other system statistics -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 22:38:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:38:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238073] Review Request: perl-GTop - Perl interface to libgtop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704262238.l3QMcu6L030565@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GTop - Perl interface to libgtop Alias: perl-GTop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238073 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-GTop ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-26 18:38 EST ------- This package is a (testing) prereq of the Catalyst framework. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 23:15:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:15:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236792] Review Request: redhat-artwork-kde - KDE portions temporarily split out of redhat-artwork (236633) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704262315.l3QNFlWm032013@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redhat-artwork-kde - KDE portions temporarily split out of redhat-artwork (236633) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236792 ------- Additional Comments From Kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-04-26 19:15 EST ------- So: Username kkofler, CLA submitted successfully, I just applied for membership in cvsextras and fedorabugs, now according to the wiki the next step is for you to move me from "pending" to "sponsored". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 23:20:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:20:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223592] Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704262320.l3QNKjgg032183@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223592 ------- Additional Comments From dgoodwin at dangerouslyinc.com 2007-04-26 19:20 EST ------- New version modified to use the Python 2.5 elementtree module if it's available: http://dangerouslyinc.com/files/wuja/wuja.spec http://dangerouslyinc.com/files/wuja/wuja-0.0.7-1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 26 23:41:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:41:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237883] Review Request: perl-SGML-Parser-OpenSP - Perl interface to the OpenSP SGML and XML parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704262341.l3QNfnRC000462@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SGML-Parser-OpenSP - Perl interface to the OpenSP SGML and XML parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237883 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-26 19:41 EST ------- There's a samples/ directory. Why not include it in %doc? For the purposes of this review, I added it. Also... perl is referred to as %{__perl}, while, e.g., rm isn't %{__rm}. Doesn't it fit better with the consistentcy guideline to use all one or the other? (with the customary exception for the "%{__perl} Makefile.PL ..." incantation, of course) Missing BRs on perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) and perl(Test::More) (due to perl/perl-devel splittage). I tend to agree with you -- documentation in and of itself isn't a _reliable_ quality measurement at all -- but it has been customary for perl reviewers to enforce the enabling of this test (unless it fails, interestingly enough). I'd be all for overturning this custom -- good/bad/whatever documentation has no bearing on how code actually functions -- but I'd prefer to see a discussion on fedora-perl-devel first. + source files match upstream: cb08669ed566ef4070671cf57aa749e3 SGML-Parser-OpenSP-0.99.tar.gz cb08669ed566ef4070671cf57aa749e3 ../SGML-Parser-OpenSP-0.99.tar.gz + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license field matches the actual license. + license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. + latest version is being packaged. X BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. + %clean is present. + package installs properly + debuginfo package looks complete. X rpmlint is silent. + final provides and requires are sane: ** perl-SGML-Parser-OpenSP-0.99-3.fc6.x86_64.rpm == rpmlint W: perl-SGML-Parser-OpenSP wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/perl-SGML-Parser-OpenSP-0.99/samples/xml.dcl W: perl-SGML-Parser-OpenSP wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/perl-SGML-Parser-OpenSP-0.99/samples/test.soc == provides OpenSP.so()(64bit) perl(SGML::Parser::OpenSP) = 0.99 perl(SGML::Parser::OpenSP::Tools) perl-SGML-Parser-OpenSP = 0.99-0.3.fc6 == requires libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libosp.so.5()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) perl >= 0:5.008 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(Class::Accessor) perl(File::Temp) perl(SGML::Parser::OpenSP::Tools) perl(XSLoader) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) ** perl-SGML-Parser-OpenSP-debuginfo-0.99-3.fc6.x86_64.rpm == rpmlint == provides OpenSP.so.debug()(64bit) perl-SGML-Parser-OpenSP-debuginfo = 0.99-0.3.fc6 == requires + %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=20, Tests=246, 4 wallclock secs ( 2.31 cusr + 0.76 csys = 3.07 CPU) + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets present. + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. + no headers. + no pkgconfig files. + no libtool .la droppings. + not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 00:41:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:41:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236486] Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704270041.l3R0fnIZ002533@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236486 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 01:25:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:25:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231267] Review Request: stardict-dic-zh_CN - Simplified Chinese(zh_CN) dictionaries for StarDict In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704270125.l3R1PCX3003967@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stardict-dic-zh_CN - Simplified Chinese(zh_CN) dictionaries for StarDict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231267 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 01:34:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:34:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229440] Review Request: redhat-lsb - package for LSB comformance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704270134.l3R1YPSk004166@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redhat-lsb - package for LSB comformance https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229440 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-26 21:34 EST ------- I saw that your name is not there in owners.list. That mean this is your first package contribution to Fedora Extras. Am I right? If yes then you need to request for Sponsrship to cvsextras group. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 02:17:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:17:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218581] Review Request: mediawiki-openid - The OpenID extension for MediaWiki In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704270217.l3R2H5Ya005557@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-openid - The OpenID extension for MediaWiki https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218581 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-04-26 22:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Description: > This extension lets users log in with an OpenID instead of a username > and password. An OpenID is a special URL that people can use to log in > to a Web site. The extension also lets users who have an account on > the wiki log in to other OpenID-aware Web sites with their wiki user > page as their OpenID. > > You must create a table in your MediaWiki database to hold the OpenID > URL mappings. The openid_table.sql script in > %{_datadir}/mediawiki/extensions/OpenID/ should do the > trick. Typically you do this using the mysql command-line client, like > so: > > mysql -h yourdbhost -u youradminuser -p yourwikidb < openid_table.sql > > In your MediaWiki LocalSettings.php, add the following line some place > towards the bottom of the file: > > require_once("$IP/extensions/OpenID/OpenID.php"); > > Theoretically it should work out of the box, but you'll almost > definitely want to set the trust root and access controls. > > Cut it off after the first paragraph, if you think you have to provide an extra file such as README.Fedora (not sure what the standard is) explaining the proceedure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 03:03:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:03:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230344] Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704270303.l3R33Aku008252@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230344 ------- Additional Comments From jamundso at gmail.com 2007-04-26 23:03 EST ------- There's a minor difference with 2.0.3-verify.patch - please refresh from sf.net for the next round. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 03:15:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:15:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223592] Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704270315.l3R3FNT6009185@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223592 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-26 23:15 EST ------- Assiging to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 03:25:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:25:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237355] Review Request: kflickr - an easy to use photo uploader for flickr written for KDE. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704270325.l3R3PJtk009910@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kflickr - an easy to use photo uploader for flickr written for KDE. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237355 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-26 23:25 EST ------- mock build gave me cp: warning: source file `AUTHORS' specified more than once =>remove double entry of AUTHORS from SPEC and rpmlint on rpm W: kflickr dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kflickr/common ../../en/common => which I assume for kde packages is OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 03:37:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:37:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236792] Review Request: redhat-artwork-kde - KDE portions temporarily split out of redhat-artwork (236633) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704270337.l3R3baUl010749@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redhat-artwork-kde - KDE portions temporarily split out of redhat-artwork (236633) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236792 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-04-26 23:37 EST ------- sponsored, welcome aboard. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 03:40:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:40:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235825] Review Request: kftpgrabber - Graphical FTP client for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704270340.l3R3eG2Q010938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kftpgrabber - Graphical FTP client for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235825 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-26 23:40 EST ------- unable to download SRPM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 04:32:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:32:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236792] Review Request: redhat-artwork-kde - KDE portions temporarily split out of redhat-artwork (236633) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704270432.l3R4WaWw015757@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redhat-artwork-kde - KDE portions temporarily split out of redhat-artwork (236633) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236792 Kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From Kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-04-27 00:32 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: redhat-artwork-kde Short Description: KDE portions temporarily split out of redhat-artwork Owners: Kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 04:50:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:50:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235825] Review Request: kftpgrabber - Graphical FTP client for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704270450.l3R4oBft016325@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kftpgrabber - Graphical FTP client for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235825 ------- Additional Comments From johan at x-tnd.be 2007-04-27 00:49 EST ------- Fixed (my apache was down...). Thank you for poiting me out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 05:54:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 01:54:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199592] Review Request: icu4j In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704270554.l3R5sPgY019090@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: icu4j https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199592 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From bkonrath at redhat.com 2007-04-27 01:54 EST ------- Can this bug be closed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 06:25:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:25:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237883] Review Request: perl-SGML-Parser-OpenSP - Perl interface to the OpenSP SGML and XML parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704270625.l3R6P8X6019785@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SGML-Parser-OpenSP - Perl interface to the OpenSP SGML and XML parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237883 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-04-27 02:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > There's a samples/ directory. Why not include it in %doc? I can't imagine what those files would be useful for if included. They're just data used by the test suite. Did I miss something? > Also... perl is referred to as %{__perl}, while, e.g., rm isn't %{__rm}. That's on purpose; it's what the perl (and python and php-pear) spec templates, cpanspec, and 620+ perl-* packages in Fedora do. rpmbuild itself uses %{__perl} for setting the install paths and macroizing it serves a functional purpose of making it possible to rebuild these packages with a perl other than /usr/bin/perl. And we know %{__perl} is available or the installation will fail anyway, so why not use it for the in-place edits as well (+ for consistency)? It's quite hard to come up with a use case where plain "rm" in $PATH wouldn't work (ie. wouldn't grok "-f" or "-rf"). So I think this is a valid example of consistently using the non-macroized "base" case in which certain commands that are really useful to have/use macroized are done so. > Missing BRs on perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) and perl(Test::More) (due to > perl/perl-devel splittage). As discussed, perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) is intentionally missing. perl(Test::More) is pulled in by perl-Test-Pod and perl-Test-Exception (through perl(Test::Builder) being in the same post-perl-split perl-Test-Simple package as perl(Test::More)). Even if this is not quite as explicit as it could be, I don't see this becoming a problem. Will of course fix if it does. > but I'd prefer to see a discussion on fedora-perl-devel first. Please do discuss (or let me know if you'd approve this right now if the pod coverage tests would be run). BTW, in addition to Pod coverage tests IMO being of very doubtful usefulness in packaging, perl-Test-Pod-Coverage and perl-Pod-Coverage are not found packaged as often as perl-Test-Pod; I think that's not a coincidence. For example, EPEL doesn't have them, so rebuilding this package (assuming the Test::Pod::Coverage BR in place) for it would have to jump through extra hoops of packaging the coverage things first for IMO no gain. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 06:29:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:29:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237883] Review Request: perl-SGML-Parser-OpenSP - Perl interface to the OpenSP SGML and XML parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704270629.l3R6TqO7019878@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SGML-Parser-OpenSP - Perl interface to the OpenSP SGML and XML parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237883 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-04-27 02:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > we know %{__perl} is available or the installation will fail s/installation/build/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 06:31:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:31:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234826] Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704270631.l3R6VVkb019943@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234826 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-27 02:31 EST ------- AFAIK Fabrice is on vacation, I'm sure he will handle this when he is back. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 06:45:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:45:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238073] Review Request: perl-GTop - Perl interface to libgtop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704270645.l3R6j89Z020396@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GTop - Perl interface to libgtop Alias: perl-GTop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238073 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ville.skytta at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-04-27 02:45 EST ------- Missing '.' at end of %description. examples/perlbloat.pl doesn't add any problematic dependencies and it's a useful script, so I think it could be considered better included executable. Perhaps fix up the interpreters to %{__perl} instead of hardcoded /usr/bin/perl for the examples? Those are mild suggestions only, otherwise looks good, approved no matter if addressed or not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 06:45:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:45:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236792] Review Request: redhat-artwork-kde - KDE portions temporarily split out of redhat-artwork (236633) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704270645.l3R6jDoK020419@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redhat-artwork-kde - KDE portions temporarily split out of redhat-artwork (236633) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236792 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-04-27 02:45 EST ------- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 07:02:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 03:02:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235825] Review Request: kftpgrabber - Graphical FTP client for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704270702.l3R72AiQ020977@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kftpgrabber - Graphical FTP client for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235825 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-27 03:02 EST ------- the -devel package is missing to include 'Requires: pkgconfig'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 07:05:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 03:05:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230344] Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704270705.l3R75rWA021173@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230344 ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2007-04-27 03:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > There's a minor difference with 2.0.3-verify.patch - please refresh from > sf.net for the next round. Nope. The patch from sf.net will not apply as the first hunk fails. As it's just a change in the copyright comments at th start of the file, I removed hunk 1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 07:07:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 03:07:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235825] Review Request: kftpgrabber - Graphical FTP client for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704270707.l3R77xdP021392@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kftpgrabber - Graphical FTP client for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235825 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-27 03:07 EST ------- oops my bad ignore above comment -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 07:10:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 03:10:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235825] Review Request: kftpgrabber - Graphical FTP client for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704270710.l3R7AGj1021472@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kftpgrabber - Graphical FTP client for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235825 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 07:15:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 03:15:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235825] Review Request: kftpgrabber - Graphical FTP client for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704270715.l3R7Fg7V021686@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kftpgrabber - Graphical FTP client for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235825 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-27 03:15 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPMs. + source files match upstream. dbbbca5cd4303db886a2d8dac39dd98c kftpgrabber-0.8.0.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text COPYING is included in package. + %doc is small so no need of -doc subpackage. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no static libraries. + no .pc files are present. + -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Desktop file installed correctly. + scriptlets are used. + kftpgrabber Provides: kftpimportplugin_filezilla3.so kftpimportplugin_gftp.so kftpimportplugin_kftp.so kftpimportplugin_ncftp.so + kftpgrabber-libs Provides: libkftpinterfaces.so.0 + GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 07:44:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 03:44:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236792] Review Request: redhat-artwork-kde - KDE portions temporarily split out of redhat-artwork (236633) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704270744.l3R7ibYO023154@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redhat-artwork-kde - KDE portions temporarily split out of redhat-artwork (236633) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236792 Kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From Kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-04-27 03:44 EST ------- 32553 (redhat-artwork-kde): Build on target fedora-development-extras succeeded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 07:44:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 03:44:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233783] Review Request: vegastrike-data - Data files for Vega Strike In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704270744.l3R7iuT5023189@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vegastrike-data - Data files for Vega Strike https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233783 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-27 03:44 EST ------- Imported, but not build yet, since thas has a runtime Requires on vegastrike itself which isstill awaiting review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 07:56:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 03:56:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230344] Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704270756.l3R7u6IK024257@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230344 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jamundso at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-04-27 03:56 EST ------- Just a quick note, I've removed Jerry as the bug assignee as he is not sponsored into cvsextras (https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/dump-group.cgi?group=cvsextras&format=html) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 07:56:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 03:56:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223592] Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704270756.l3R7uMM6024350@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223592 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-27 03:56 EST ------- For 0.0.7-1: ------------------------------------------------ * MUST/SHOULD fix: If you have some reason you don't want to fix, please explain why. ? Question/Suggestion ------------------------------------------------ ? %pre entry - Would you write %pre section after %install section? * Requires - Some missing Requires found. Python releated dependencies are not checked by rpmbuild automatically, so you have to check it by yourself. From ------------------------------------------------- $ grep -h 'import ' `rpm -ql wuja` | sort | uniq ------------------------------------------------- import pynotify -> notify-python (available on FC6<=) from egg import trayicon -> gnome-python2-libegg import gconf -> gnome-python2-gconf import gtk (and others) -> pygtk2 ------------------------------------------------- ! Just a note: Currently I get the following warning of deprecated module: ------------------------------------------------- /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/wuja/application.py:35: DeprecationWarning: the module egg.trayicon is deprecated; equivalent functionality can now be found in pygtk 2.10 from egg import trayicon ------------------------------------------------- * CFLAGS - While this is a noarch rpm, do you have to set CFLAGS? * Provides ------------------------------------------------- Provides: wuja = %{version}-%{release} ------------------------------------------------- - This is not needed and should be removed. Then: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora Extras package review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed&namedcmd=mtasaka-review-noone NOTE: FE-NEW blockers are now not complete. Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 08:01:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 04:01:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235825] Review Request: kftpgrabber - Graphical FTP client for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704270801.l3R81ddF024839@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kftpgrabber - Graphical FTP client for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235825 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-27 04:01 EST ------- Several comments: * Are there any benefit for splitting -libs subpackage? Should this package support multilib installation, for example? If so, please explain why. * Sourcing /etc/profile.d/qt.sh should not be needed now. * Usually "INSTALL" document is needed for people who want to install this package by themselves and should not be needed for people using rpm system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 08:28:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 04:28:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231669] Review Request: libsynce - Connection library for Pocket PC devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704270828.l3R8Sgmu027545@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsynce - Connection library for Pocket PC devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231669 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2007-04-27 04:28 EST ------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 * OK: rpmlint output: W: libsynce-devel no-documentation can be ignored * OK: package is named according to the guidelines * OK: spec file name matches base package name * OK: package meets packaging guidelines * OK: license * OK: license field matches actual license * OK: license is not included as own file and thus is not included in %doc * OK: Spec file seems to be in AE * OK: no obfuscated code spec * OK: sources match upstream: 9b793d1ef241fa7fca6ca7832b3b4811 synce-libsynce-0.9.3.tar.gz 9b793d1ef241fa7fca6ca7832b3b4811 /homes/awjb/rpmbuild/SOURCES/synce-libsynce-0. 9.3.tar.gz * OK: Builds fine on mock: i386/fc6 x86_64/fc6 * OK: BR seem fine * OK: package has no locale support * OK: ldconfig is run on %post and $postun * OK: package is not explicitly designed to be relocatable * OK: package does not create any direcoties * OK: no duplicate files in file listing * OK: %defattr and permissions seem ok * OK: %clean section is present * OK: macros are used consistently * OK: content is ok * OK: no doc package needed * OK: %doc files do not affect runtime * OK: header files are in -devel * OK: no static libraries * OK: -devel requires pkgconfig * OK: .so file is in -devel * OK: -devel requires main package * OK: package does not contain .la archives * OK: no .desktop needed * OK: does not own files/directories from other packages * OK: buildroot is rm at beginning of install * OK: filenames seem to be valid utf8 Thus 52e4f38b46e94c26907b554be38d0dfa libsynce-0.9.3-1.src.rpm is APPROVED. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGMbO2QEQyPsWM8csRApLTAKCaGXxVzFxRcJMJUv2tqaAcgI9H7gCgk0uQ vlk7eIPUQnzClPpkB+iayto= =zxCF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 08:39:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 04:39:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229490] Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704270839.l3R8dNlf028377@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229490 ------- Additional Comments From maxime.carron at fedoraproject.org 2007-04-27 04:39 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pypar2 Short Description: A GTK frontend for par2cmdline Owners: maxime.carron at fedoraproject.org, cgoorah at yahoo.com.au Branches: FC-5 FC-6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 08:47:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 04:47:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231670] Review Request: librapi - Library to connect to Pocket PC devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704270847.l3R8l3cV028980@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librapi - Library to connect to Pocket PC devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231670 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2007-04-27 04:46 EST ------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 * OK: rpmlint output: W: librapi-devel no-documentation can be ignored * OK: package is named according to the guidelines * OK: spec file name matches base package name * OK: package meets packaging guidelines * OK: license * OK: license field matches actual license * OK: license is not included as own file and thus is not included in %doc * OK: Spec file seems to be in AE * OK: no obfuscated code spec * OK: sources match upstream: 1dcb43bbbb43688839c3b19de77b7b4e synce-librapi-0.9.3.tar.gz 1dcb43bbbb43688839c3b19de77b7b4e /homes/awjb/rpmbuild/SOURCES/synce-librapi-0.9.3.tar.gz * OK: Builds fine on x86_64/fc6 * OK: BR seem fine * OK: package has no locale support * OK: ldconfig is run on %post and $postun * OK: package is not explicitly designed to be relocatable * OK: package does not create any directories * OK: no duplicate files in file listing * OK: %defattr and permissions seem ok * OK: %clean section is present * OK: macros are used consistently * OK: content is ok * OK: no doc package needed * OK: %doc files do not affect runtime * OK: header files are in -devel * OK: no static libraries * OK: -devel requires pkgconfig * OK: .so file is in -devel * OK: -devel requires main package * OK: package does not contain .la archives * OK: no .desktop needed * OK: does not own files/directories from other packages * OK: buildroot is rm at beginning of install * OK: filenames seem to be valid utf8 c37a38cb27ecaa23c25f69a387c365fe librapi-0.9.3-1.src.rpm is APPROVED with this patch: - --- librapi.spec.1 2007-03-09 22:57:51.000000000 +0100 +++ librapi.spec 2007-04-27 10:45:09.000000000 +0200 @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildRequires: libsynce-devel +BuildRequires: libtool # Provide an upgrade path from the monilithic synce package Provides: synce = %{version}-%{release} @@ -39,14 +40,14 @@ %build %configure --disable-static --disable-rpath - -make %{?_smp_mflags} +make LIBTOOL=%{_bindir}/libtool %{?_smp_mflags} %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT - -rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/*.la +rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/*.{la,a} %clean -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGMbhHQEQyPsWM8csRAjjSAJ9Orf2hkD8w4LboCZemvzedLWfqhgCeMl+Q QUPL0R/omWuC3yccGNXa/Vs= =kqk2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 09:01:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 05:01:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235825] Review Request: kftpgrabber - Graphical FTP client for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704270901.l3R91AAH030418@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kftpgrabber - Graphical FTP client for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235825 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-27 05:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Several comments: > > * Are there any benefit for splitting -libs subpackage? Do we always need to ask this question to submitter? > Should this package support multilib installation, for example? > If so, please explain why. > > * Sourcing /etc/profile.d/qt.sh should not be needed now. ohh I have less experience on KDE package reviewing. Is that somewhere mentioned (may be I missed to read that)? > > * Usually "INSTALL" document is needed for people who want to > install this package by themselves and should not be needed for > people using rpm system. Why should we so bother about INSTALL file installation? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 09:02:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 05:02:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235825] Review Request: kftpgrabber - Graphical FTP client for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704270902.l3R92UCe030511@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kftpgrabber - Graphical FTP client for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235825 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-27 05:02 EST ------- mtasaka, thanks for pointing out some missing things. removing fedora-review+ flag for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 09:18:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 05:18:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231674] Review Request: libmimedir - Library to parse MIME Directory Profile In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704270918.l3R9InQj031766@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmimedir - Library to parse MIME Directory Profile https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231674 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2007-04-27 05:18 EST ------- * OK: rpmlint output: W: libmimedir-devel no-documentation can be ignored * NOTOK: E: libmimedir-debuginfo empty-debuginfo-package should probably be fixed * OK: package is named according to the guidelines * OK: spec file name matches base package name * OK: package meets packaging guidelines * OK: license * OK: license field matches actual license * OK: license is not included as own file and thus is not included in %doc * OK: Spec file seems to be in AE * OK: no obfuscated code spec * OK: sources match upstream: 156e1eb69377d9ae9180a09e38148ec6 libmimedir-0.4.tar.gz 156e1eb69377d9ae9180a09e38148ec6 /homes/awjb/rpmbuild/SOURCES/libmimedir-0.4.tar.gz * OK: Builds fine on x86_64/fc6 * OK: BR seem fine * OK: package has no locale support * OK: package does not contain a shared library * OK: package is not explicitly designed to be relocatable * OK: package does not create any directories * OK: no duplicate files in file listing * OK: %defattr and permissions seem ok * OK: %clean section is present * OK: macros are used consistently * OK: content is ok * OK: no doc package needed * OK: %doc files do not affect runtime * OK: header files are in -devel * OK: static lib in -static * OK: pkgconfig is not needed * OK: no .so file * OK: -devel requires main package * OK: package does not contain .la archives * OK: no .desktop needed * OK: does not own files/directories from other packages * OK: buildroot is rm at beginning of install * OK: filenames seem to be valid utf8 The debuginfo package is empty so either turn of the generation of the debuginfo package or (better) fix the generation. Other then that consider the package 8edf3312a0ab5b68bf670b50ed2b4f89 libmimedir-0.4-2.src.rpm APPROVED with the following patch: --- libmimedir.spec.1 2007-04-27 11:05:23.000000000 +0200 +++ libmimedir.spec 2007-04-27 10:58:24.000000000 +0200 @@ -34,32 +34,23 @@ %build CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -fPIC" %configure make %{?_smp_mflags} -# build shared libmimedir to work around x86_64 build error -#ld --shared --whole-archive libmimedir.a -o libmimedir.so -#rm libmimedir.a %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir} mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_includedir} install -m 644 libmimedir.h $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_includedir} -install -m 444 libmimedir.a $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir} -#install -m 775 libmimedir.so $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/libmimedir.so +install -m 644 libmimedir.a $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir} rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/*.la %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -%post -p /sbin/ldconfig - -%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig - %files static %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc README COPYING ChangeLog %{_libdir}/libmimedir.a -#%{_libdir}/libmimedir.so %files devel %defattr(-,root,root,-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 09:18:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 05:18:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235825] Review Request: kftpgrabber - Graphical FTP client for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704270918.l3R9IomG031780@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kftpgrabber - Graphical FTP client for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235825 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-27 05:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #7) > > Several comments: > > > > * Are there any benefit for splitting -libs subpackage? > Do we always need to ask this question to submitter? Splitting -libs package usually means that there are _other_ software which uses only this -libs package and does not require the "main" package of this software. We should avoid unnecessary splitting of subpackage, which causes only confusion. > > * Usually "INSTALL" document is needed for people who want to > > install this package by themselves and should not be needed for > > people using rpm system. > Why should we so bother about INSTALL file installation? Just because "don't install unnecessary files". For INSTALL files, I see many people including INSTALL file without any consideration and for most cases this file is not necessary. The other case is that people don't include AUTHORS or COPYING files.. We must check what files should be installed as documentation carefully. On several (not a few) review requests, I comment about documentation like "This file should be included as documentation" or "This file is not necessary" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 09:19:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 05:19:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231675] Review Request: librra - Connection to Pocket PC devices, part of SynCE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704270919.l3R9JcoF031850@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librra - Connection to Pocket PC devices, part of SynCE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231675 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2007-04-27 05:19 EST ------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 * OK: rpmlint is silent * OK: package is named according to the guidelines * OK: spec file name matches base package name * OK: package meets packaging guidelines * OK: license * OK: license field matches actual license * OK: license is not included as own file and thus is not included in %doc * OK: Spec file seems to be in AE * OK: no obfuscated code spec * OK: sources match upstream: 72742f93f19d5727159989ec80a725f0 synce-rra-0.9.1.tar.gz 72742f93f19d5727159989ec80a725f0 /homes/awjb/rpmbuild/SOURCES/synce-rra-0.9.1.tar.gz * OK: Builds fine on x86_64/fc6 * OK: BR seem fine * OK: package has no locale support * OK: ldconfig is run * OK: package is not explicitly designed to be relocatable * OK: package owns %{_includedir}/rra * OK: no duplicate files in file listing * OK: %defattr and permissions seem ok * OK: %clean section is present * OK: macros are used consistently * OK: content is ok * OK: no doc package needed * OK: %doc files do not affect runtime * OK: header files are in -devel * OK: no static lib * OK: pkgconfig is not needed * OK: no .so file * OK: -devel requires main package * OK: package does not contain .la archives * OK: no .desktop needed * OK: does not own files/directories from other packages * OK: buildroot is rm at beginning of install * OK: filenames seem to be valid utf8 Package d9d02a54ebbab717ec4ec0fa55aa9405 librra-0.9.1-1.src.rpm is APPROVED with the following patch: - --- librra.spec.1 2007-03-09 22:58:01.000000000 +0100 +++ librra.spec 2007-04-27 11:13:08.000000000 +0200 @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildRequires: libsynce-devel, librapi-devel, libmimedir-devel +BuildRequires: libtool # Provide an upgrade path from the monilithic synce package Provides: synce = %{version}-%{release} @@ -35,14 +36,14 @@ %build %configure --disable-static --disable-rpath - -make %{?_smp_mflags} +make LIBTOOL=%{_bindir}/libtool %{?_smp_mflags} %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT - -rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/*.la +rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/*.{la,a} %clean -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGMb/JQEQyPsWM8csRApGNAKCm5tpg0LrxBKoAud3PQH4/Sfef/gCfdsWV 2VBWLC3r5yvtiFQJQXKXmGo= =gIso -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 09:23:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 05:23:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231680] Review Request: vdccm - Serial connection daemon for Pocket PC devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704270923.l3R9NVNX032120@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdccm - Serial connection daemon for Pocket PC devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231680 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |andreas.bierfert at lowlatency. | |de -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 09:31:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 05:31:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229490] Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704270931.l3R9VZ02032717@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229490 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2007-04-27 05:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #41) > New Package CVS Request [...] You need to set the flag fedora-cvs, for such requests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 09:33:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 05:33:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207896] Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704270933.l3R9X4ED000368@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207896 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776, 177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-04-27 05:33 EST ------- Ping? (Also adding FE-NEW & FE-SPONSOR so someone can find this package) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 09:33:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 05:33:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231680] Review Request: vdccm - Serial connection daemon for Pocket PC devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704270933.l3R9XfVZ000453@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdccm - Serial connection daemon for Pocket PC devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231680 andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2007-04-27 05:33 EST ------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 * OK: E: vdccm setuid-binary /usr/bin/vdccm root 04755 E: vdccm non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/vdccm 04755 This is ok and should be setuid root * W: vdccm-devel no-documentation can be ignored * OK: package is named according to the guidelines * OK: spec file name matches base package name * OK: package meets packaging guidelines * OK: license * OK: license field matches actual license * OK: license is not included as own file and thus is not included in %doc * OK: spec file seems to be in AE * OK: no obfuscated code spec * OK: sources match upstream: 996236320a6b4c9410050c4dc6e53164 synce-vdccm-0.9.3.tar.gz 996236320a6b4c9410050c4dc6e53164 /homes/awjb/rpmbuild/SOURCES/synce-vdccm-0.9.3.tar.gz * OK: Builds fine on x86_64/fc6 * OK: BR seem fine * OK: package has no locale support * OK: ldconfig is run * OK: package is not explicitly designed to be relocatable * OK: does not create own dirs * OK: no duplicate files in file listing * OK: %defattr and permissions seem ok * OK: %clean section is present * OK: macros are used consistently * OK: content is ok * OK: no doc package needed * OK: %doc files do not affect runtime * OK: header files are in -devel * OK: no static lib * OK: pkgconfig is not needed * OK: .so file in -devel package * OK: -devel requires main package * OK: package does not contain .la archives * OK: no .desktop needed * OK: does not own files/directories from other packages * OK: buildroot is rm at beginning of install * OK: filenames seem to be valid utfp Package APPROVED with the following patch: - --- vdccm.spec.1 2007-03-09 22:59:44.000000000 +0100 +++ vdccm.spec 2007-04-27 11:27:34.000000000 +0200 @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildRequires: libsynce-devel +BuildRequires: libtool Requires: synce-serial @@ -34,14 +35,14 @@ %build %configure --disable-static - -make %{?_smp_mflags} +make LIBTOOL=%{_bindir}/libtool %{?_smp_mflags} %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT - -rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/*.la +rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/*.{la,a} %clean -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGMcNJQEQyPsWM8csRAuiVAJ9RELkJMIAf4Z8+r9P2UtUu+2NVxgCgmIIC gJDh9CKruUTYvbm4lFejTeI= =VExq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 09:37:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 05:37:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222618] Review Request: llk_linux - A very popular game from inernet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704270937.l3R9bRkV000697@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: llk_linux - A very popular game from inernet Alias: llk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222618 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-04-27 05:37 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Umm?? I think Mamoru wanted to say that if you would like to see a package in Fedora it MUST (and I really stress MUST) meet all Package Guidelines, it MUST also be updated when required to ensure it meets all changes to Package Guidelines. I suggest you read the links provided in Comment #2 and look at other review requests to see what is expected. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 09:44:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 05:44:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231679] Review Request: synce-serial - Serial connection support for Pocket PC devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704270944.l3R9iBET001128@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-serial - Serial connection support for Pocket PC devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231679 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2007-04-27 05:44 EST ------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 * OK: rpmlint W: synce-serial devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/bin/synce-serial-config this is not a devel file so the warning can be ignored * OK: package is named according to the guidelines * OK: spec file name matches base package name * OK: package meets packaging guidelines * OK: license * OK: license field matches actual license * OK: license is not included as own file and thus is not included in %doc * OK: Spec file seems to be in AE * OK: no obfuscated code spec * OK: sources match upstream: 77f8879486469118386fb7429ec5a794 synce-serial-0.9.1.tar.gz 77f8879486469118386fb7429ec5a794 /homes/awjb/rpmbuild/SOURCES/synce-serial-0.9.1.tar.gz * OK: Builds fine on x86_64/fc6 * OK: BR seem fine * OK: package has no locale support * OK: ldconfig is not needed * OK: package is not explicitly designed to be relocatable * OK: does not create own dirs * OK: no duplicate files in file listing * OK: %defattr and permissions seem ok * OK: %clean section is present * OK: macros are used consistently * OK: content is ok * OK: no doc package needed * OK: %doc files do not affect runtime * OK: no header files * OK: no static lib * OK: pkgconfig is not needed * OK: no .so file * OK: no devel package * OK: package does not contain .la archives * OK: no .desktop needed * OK: does not own files/directories from other packages * OK: buildroot is rm at beginning of install * OK: filenames seem to be valid utf8 Package 297b755c883c6d5d98cf69559796d02a synce-serial-0.9.1-2.src.rpm APPROVED with the following patch: - --- synce-serial.spec.1 2007-04-27 11:42:27.000000000 +0200 +++ synce-serial.spec 2007-04-27 11:40:48.000000000 +0200 @@ -23,17 +23,14 @@ Please read the included README.Fedora for details - - %prep %setup -q cp -p %{SOURCE1} README.Fedora - - %build %configure make %{?_smp_mflags} - - %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT @@ -42,16 +39,9 @@ mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/udev/rules.d/ echo 'ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="usb_device", SYSFS{idVendor}=="0bb4", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0a06", SYMLINK+="ipaq", RUN+="%{_bindir}/synce-serial-start"' > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/udev/rules.d/60-synce.rules - - %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT - - - -%post -p /sbin/ldconfig - - - -%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig - - - - %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc README README.Fedora TODO LICENSE @@ -60,8 +50,6 @@ %{_mandir}/man8/synce-serial-* %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/udev/rules.d/*.rules - - - - %changelog * Mon Apr 02 2007 Aurelien Bompard 0.9.1-2 - fix typo in description -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGMcXCQEQyPsWM8csRAlQOAJ4hJdPfGNXuA3LSuAEMWBDwOJbrqACfWXpR YxDkHbzmQFYlNn4ocjX2OWo= =7QZc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 09:53:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 05:53:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231681] Review Request: synce-kde - Connection service application for Pocket PC handhelds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704270953.l3R9rxGw001738@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-kde - Connection service application for Pocket PC handhelds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231681 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2007-04-27 05:53 EST ------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 * OK: W: synce-kde dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/raki/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common W: synce-kde symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/raki/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common W: synce-kde-devel no-documentation can be ignored * OK: package is named according to the guidelines * OK: spec file name matches base package name * OK: package meets packaging guidelines * OK: license * OK: license field matches actual license * OK: license is not included as own file and thus is not included in %doc * OK: spec file seems to be in AE * OK: no obfuscated code spec * OK: sources match upstream: 213ea85f85414b9f05f4252028bce134 synce-kde-0.9.1.tar.gz 213ea85f85414b9f05f4252028bce134 /homes/awjb/rpmbuild/SOURCES/synce-kde-0.9.1.tar.gz * OK: Builds fine on x86_64/fc6 * OK: BR seem fine * OK: package supports locales via find_lang * OK: ldconfig is not needed * OK: package is not explicitly designed to be relocatable * OK: does not create own dirs * OK: no duplicate files in file listing * OK: %defattr and permissions seem ok * OK: %clean section is present * OK: macros are used consistently * OK: content is ok * OK: no doc package needed * OK: %doc files do not affect runtime * OK: header files are in -devel * OK: no static lib * OK: pkgconfig is not needed * OK: no .so file package * OK: -devel requires main package * OK: package does not contain .la archives * OK: desktop files provided * OK: does not own files/directories from other packages * OK: buildroot is rm at beginning of install * OK: filenames seem to be valid utf8 Package 6918f26374de9f1a253a851c83182bbd synce-kde-0.9.1-1.src.rpm is APPROVED. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGMcgNQEQyPsWM8csRAmZLAJ9a+ADr8ay3d5cmKbLIlt7otIaG5QCeJlb1 6tOu/JY7u8pFOLl3Qj0eI4s= =xDkB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 10:17:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 06:17:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229490] Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704271017.l3RAHRvJ002636@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229490 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-04-27 06:17 EST ------- I'm doing it for him :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 10:22:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 06:22:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231683] Review Request: syncekonnector - Synchronization application for Pocket PC handhelds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704271022.l3RAMsle002789@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: syncekonnector - Synchronization application for Pocket PC handhelds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231683 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2007-04-27 06:22 EST ------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 * OK: W: syncekonnector mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 7) please clean this up before pushing.. W: syncekonnector devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libksynce.so W: syncekonnector dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/syncekonnector/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common W: syncekonnector symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/syncekonnector/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common E: syncekonnector invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libsyncedevicekonnector.so libsyncedevicekonnector.so E: syncekonnector invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libsyncelocalkonnector.so libsyncelocalkonnector.so E: syncekonnector invalid-soname /usr/lib64/librakikpimsync.so librakikpimsync.so rest can probably be ignored due to kde env... * OK: package is named according to the guidelines * OK: spec file name matches base package name * OK: package meets packaging guidelines * OK: license * OK: license field matches actual license * OK: license is not included as own file and thus is not included in %doc * OK: spec file seems to be in AE * OK: no obfuscated code spec * OK: sources match upstream: a0ec8a8d4d8a9302b9009bc78439a004 syncekonnector-0.3.2.tar.gz a0ec8a8d4d8a9302b9009bc78439a004 /homes/awjb/rpmbuild/SOURCES/syncekonnector-0.3.2.tar.gz * OK: Builds fine on x86_64/fc6 * OK: BR seem fine * OK: package does not support locales * OK: ldconfig is run * OK: package is not explicitly designed to be relocatable * OK: does not create own dirs * OK: no duplicate files in file listing * OK: %defattr and permissions seem ok * OK: %clean section is present * OK: macros are used consistently * OK: content is ok * OK: no doc package needed * OK: %doc files do not affect runtime * OK: no header files * OK: no static lib * OK: pkgconfig is not needed * OK: .so files are in main package but due to kde nature should be ok * OK: no devel package * OK: package does not contain .la archives * OK: desktop files provided * OK: does not own files/directories from other packages * OK: buildroot is rm at beginning of install * OK: filenames seem to be valid utf8 Package 6832ddebdb2b5cab31734ea0e9fb9e90 syncekonnector-0.3.2-1.src.rpm is APPROVED if nobody objects against the .so files. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGMc7oQEQyPsWM8csRAk8aAJ4/gpdyrRQvpEt+BtmSmbVtt01EhACeJRLL WfYlq8wujwmBE/fw99GyYWE= =KWGR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 10:29:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 06:29:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231685] Review Request: kcemirror - Remote display control for PocketPC devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704271029.l3RATPwL003024@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kcemirror - Remote display control for PocketPC devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231685 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2007-04-27 06:29 EST ------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 * OK: W: kcemirror dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kcemirror/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common W: kcemirror symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kcemirror/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common can be ignored * OK: package is named according to the guidelines * OK: spec file name matches base package name * OK: package meets packaging guidelines * OK: license * OK: license field matches actual license * OK: license is not included as own file and thus is not included in %doc * OK: spec file seems to be in AE * OK: no obfuscated code spec * OK: sources match upstream: bcd19781a3215222d96300d1e26f0a36 kcemirror-0.1.5.tar.gz bcd19781a3215222d96300d1e26f0a36 /homes/awjb/rpmbuild/SOURCES/kcemirror-0.1.5.tar.gz * OK: Builds fine on x86_64/fc6 * OK: BR seem fine * OK: package supports locales via find_lang * OK: ldconfig is not needed * OK: package is not explicitly designed to be relocatable * OK: owns %{_datadir}/apps/kcemirror * OK: no duplicate files in file listing * OK: %defattr and permissions seem ok * OK: %clean section is present * OK: macros are used consistently * OK: content is ok * OK: no doc package needed * OK: %doc files do not affect runtime * OK: no header files * OK: no static lib * OK: pkgconfig is not needed * OK: no .so * OK: no devel package * OK: package does not contain .la archives * OK: no desktop files needed * OK: does not own files/directories from other packages * OK: buildroot is rm at beginning of install * OK: filenames seem to be valid utf8 Package b4a7bae070162151e0a66c24399ef999 kcemirror-0.1.5-1.src.rpm is APPROVED. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGMdBnQEQyPsWM8csRAialAJ9e9RjSJWwiZic//plMw62rB0c7LwCeLQYc y4m7AB9t7jnL5J9xHHnkL5I= =4LnV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 11:05:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:05:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229490] Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704271105.l3RB5fPw005157@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229490 ------- Additional Comments From maxime.carron at fedoraproject.org 2007-04-27 07:05 EST ------- Thanks chitlesh. Strangely i got "You tried to request fedora-cvs. Only an authorized user can make this change." when i tried. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 11:12:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:12:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229490] Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704271112.l3RBCHTP005658@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229490 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-27 07:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #44) > Strangely i got "You tried to request fedora-cvs. Only an authorized user can > make this change." when i tried. I just noticed from your comment: (In reply to comment #0) > This is the first RPM I propose on Extras. Laurent, this means that you have to get sponsored? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 11:13:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:13:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229490] Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704271113.l3RBDEF7005699@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229490 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-27 07:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #45) > Laurent, this means that you have to get sponsored? Sorry, this comment of mine was for Maxime. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 11:22:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:22:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222618] Review Request: llk_linux - A very popular game from internet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704271122.l3RBMaKP006132@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: llk_linux - A very popular game from internet Alias: llk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222618 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: llk_linux - |Review Request: llk_linux - |A very popular game from |A very popular game from |inernet |internet -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 11:43:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:43:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704271143.l3RBhTSJ007521@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-04-27 07:43 EST ------- Well, crud. That wipes out the whole data-minimal package. I suppose I should close both reviews? I don't see much point in pursuing this with upstream with so many sources. I guess I could do a release with just the approved material, but two cars and no tracks is not a recipe for a good race. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 11:45:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:45:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236792] Review Request: redhat-artwork-kde - KDE portions temporarily split out of redhat-artwork (236633) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704271145.l3RBjj3j007811@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redhat-artwork-kde - KDE portions temporarily split out of redhat-artwork (236633) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236792 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 11:50:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:50:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229322] Review Request: pgpool-ha : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704271150.l3RBoP7j008347@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool-ha : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229322 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-04-27 07:50 EST ------- Any progress on the build error, or a new SPEC/SRPM addressing #4? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 11:55:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:55:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229323] Review Request: PgpoolAdmin - web-based pgpool administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704271155.l3RBtDYH008849@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PgpoolAdmin - web-based pgpool administration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229323 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-04-27 07:55 EST ------- rpmlint on SRPM: W: postgresql-pgpoolAdmin mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 3) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. Should be an easy fix. on RPM: W: postgresql-pgpoolAdmin symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/postgresql-pgpoolAdmin/conf/pgmgt.conf.php /etc/postgresql-pgpoolAdmin/pgmgt.conf.php Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot environments. W: postgresql-pgpoolAdmin dangerous-command-in-%post chmod Instead of chmod in %post, set permissions with an %attr tag on the %files section. Much safer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 12:10:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 08:10:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229490] Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704271210.l3RCAfQT009712@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229490 ------- Additional Comments From maxime.carron at fedoraproject.org 2007-04-27 08:10 EST ------- Chitlesh is already my sponsor, no? For the account system : > Group Name Username Role Type Role Status Sponsor > cvsextras mxcarron user approved chitlesh -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 12:34:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 08:34:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704271234.l3RCY2vd010860@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-27 08:33 EST ------- Either close both reviews, or you could try to contact some of the non EA track authors. If we can get a few decent tracks then we can still ship vdrift IMHO. @ cars is not much, but I concider it enough. Also you could try asking upstream, maybe they can help to clearify some of the content marked unsorted by the Debian review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 12:36:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 08:36:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229490] Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704271236.l3RCa6CM010941@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229490 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2007-04-27 08:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #47) > Chitlesh is already my sponsor, no? > > For the account system : > > Group Name Username Role Type Role Status Sponsor > > cvsextras mxcarron user approved chitlesh Yes. As for the "fedora-cvs flag" of the current bug, what you need is to be member of the "fedorabugs" group. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 12:50:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 08:50:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226189] Merge Review: neon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704271250.l3RCo9Pq011940@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: neon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226189 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-04-27 08:50 EST ------- Joe, could you please provide a more comprehensive justification for .la files than the terse "not acceptable"? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 12:54:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 08:54:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226189] Merge Review: neon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704271254.l3RCs93o012489@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: neon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226189 ------- Additional Comments From jorton at redhat.com 2007-04-27 08:54 EST ------- It's part of the neon-config interface as defined upstream, and breaking interfaces is unacceptable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 12:54:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 08:54:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229490] Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704271254.l3RCsHWI012514@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229490 ------- Additional Comments From maxime.carron at fedoraproject.org 2007-04-27 08:54 EST ------- I'm also member of fedorabugs. The problem is : how my account on the bugzilla is linked to my fedora account? I think they aren't linked. That's why i'm not recognized. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 13:01:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:01:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704271301.l3RD1J9A013216@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2007-04-27 09:01 EST ------- As promised: http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Rawhide/SPECS/evolution-brutus.spec http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Rawhide/SRPMS/evolution-brutus-1.1.26.0-1.fc7.src.rpm http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Rawhide/RPMS/i386/evolution-brutus-devel-1.1.26.0-1.fc7.i386.rpm http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Rawhide/RPMS/i386/evolution-brutus-debuginfo-1.1.26.0-1.fc7.i386.rpm http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Rawhide/RPMS/i386/evolution-brutus-1.1.26.0-1.fc7.i386.rpm http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Rawhide/SOURCES/evolution-brutus-1.1.26.0.tar.gz The main change is that I've moved from GPGME to libgcrypt. GPGME did not behave the way I wanted on OpenSUSE so I had to change to a lower level API if I wanted identical behavior on all supported platforms. Have a nice weekend, jules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 13:05:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:05:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227241] Review Request: kde-settings - Config files for kde In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704271305.l3RD5lo9013754@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kde-settings - Config files for kde Alias: kde-settings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227241 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-04-27 09:05 EST ------- Chris, here's the promised "make kdelibs use /etc for config files" patch/issue-bug-tracker, bug #238136 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 13:09:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:09:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237883] Review Request: perl-SGML-Parser-OpenSP - Perl interface to the OpenSP SGML and XML parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704271309.l3RD9ww7014161@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SGML-Parser-OpenSP - Perl interface to the OpenSP SGML and XML parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237883 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-27 09:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > > Missing BRs on perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) and perl(Test::More) (due to > > perl/perl-devel splittage). > > As discussed, perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) is intentionally missing. As discussed, I will not approve this package exactly because of this, because I am not wanting produce a precendence for to undermine established practice for many years. > perl(Test::More) is pulled in by perl-Test-Pod A random cooincidence. > > but I'd prefer to see a discussion on fedora-perl-devel first. > > Please do discuss (or let me know if you'd approve this right now if the pod > coverage tests would be run). BTW, in addition to Pod coverage tests IMO being > of very doubtful usefulness in packaging, perl-Test-Pod-Coverage and > perl-Pod-Coverage are not found packaged as often as perl-Test-Pod; Whether you like it or not, they nevertheless are widely used packages. > I think > that's not a coincidence. For example, EPEL doesn't have them, Sorry, but this argument is irrelevant because this (1.) is Fedora and is not EPEL, and (2.) isn't an argument at all, because RHEL lacks a lot of packages which are present in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 13:10:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:10:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226189] Merge Review: neon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704271310.l3RDAapQ014241@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: neon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226189 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-04-27 09:10 EST ------- If that's all you've got, then I still don't buy it (sorry). What I'd *really* like to see is concrete examples of breakage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 13:15:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:15:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226189] Merge Review: neon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704271315.l3RDFCv0014664@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: neon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226189 ------- Additional Comments From jorton at redhat.com 2007-04-27 09:15 EST ------- What do you not buy? That it's part of the interface as defined upstream, or that breaking interfaces is unacceptable? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 13:23:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:23:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226189] Merge Review: neon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704271323.l3RDNYTl015451@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: neon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226189 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-04-27 09:23 EST ------- I buy neither (yet). Of course omitting .la files sometimes involves a little collateral damage. The short-term pain/damage in *most* cases outweighes the pain/suffering caused by .la file presence in rpm packaging (ie, why Fedora packaging policy to omit .la files by default exists). Now, without knowing any details of the "collateral damage" to which you infer, it's not possible to judge whether it merits an exception. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 13:30:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:30:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226189] Merge Review: neon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704271330.l3RDU0rq015720@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: neon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226189 ------- Additional Comments From jorton at redhat.com 2007-04-27 09:29 EST ------- The interface in question is `neon-config --la-file`, which is documented in "man neon-config", and also by `neon-config --help`. Can you explain why you don't think this is an interface defined upstream? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 13:34:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:34:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226189] Merge Review: neon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704271334.l3RDYeHf016043@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: neon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226189 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-04-27 09:34 EST ------- I don't think the advantage of keeping the upstream interface outweighs the packaging beneifits of omitting it. Again, do you have any examples of concrete breakage in other packages/software that depend on this interface, or not? I'd like to explore the full ramifications of removing it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 13:37:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:37:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704271337.l3RDbXS1016358@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-04-27 09:37 EST ------- I think I'll just contact upstream. They'd probably appreciate the heads-up froma legal front. The only thing that bothers me is that the potentially OK tracks are in the Full package. Imagine having a +200MB SRPM for 2 cars and a handful of tracks. . . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 13:47:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:47:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704271347.l3RDlf0s017056@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-04-27 09:47 EST ------- Can't find specific contact info: vdrift forum post: http://vdrift.net/Forum/viewtopic.php?t=665&start=0&postdays=0&postorder=asc&highlight= -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 13:59:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:59:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226189] Merge Review: neon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704271359.l3RDxMlF018061@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: neon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226189 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org ------- Additional Comments From jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org 2007-04-27 09:59 EST ------- Joe, I don't think Rex's request for examples of something that would actually break if the .la files were removed is unreasonable. Could you please provide a few? The guidelines are there for a reason and having that extra information may make a case either way for providing an exception or not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 14:43:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:43:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704271443.l3REhGh7023188@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-27 10:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #43) > I think I'll just contact upstream. They'd probably appreciate the heads-up > froma legal front. The only thing that bothers me is that the potentially OK > tracks are in the Full package. Imagine having a +200MB SRPM for 2 cars and a > handful of tracks. . . That (200MB SRPMs) won't happen, as we cannot ship any of the tainted stuff in any way, iow you must create your own tarbals for inclusion into the srpm, which will only include the allowed stuff and thus be small. Then in the spec file you put a little howto above Source0 as comment which explains how to recreate the tarbal from the official tarbal, or you add a script to the source rpm as SourceX, which can be used by people who want to recreate the shipped / srpm tarbal from upstreams original tarbal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 14:44:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:44:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226189] Merge Review: neon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704271444.l3REi5tf023284@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: neon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226189 ------- Additional Comments From jorton at redhat.com 2007-04-27 10:44 EST ------- It's not actually relevant whether or not I can give examples of apps which break if the .la file is removed. The point is that doing so breaks an interface which is defined upstream (`neon-config --la-file`). It is a golden rule of packaging that you do not break interfaces defined upstream. But, examples I know of: Subversion, which uses --la-file to link against neon, and I think also the static build of RPM (at least upstream), which IIRC on libtool resolving dependencies via the .la file -- exactly what .la files are designed for. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 14:48:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:48:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704271448.l3REmBs2023697@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-04-27 10:48 EST ------- Duh. :) I knew that. I'm thinking about doing the same thing with Roundcube if upstream doesn't re-release soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 14:55:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:55:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226189] Merge Review: neon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704271455.l3REtVRN024226@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: neon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226189 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-04-27 10:55 EST ------- Let me (re)iterate that the "golden rule of packaging" is trumped if: 1. following it violates packaging guidelines and/or 2. upstream interface is stooopid. re: static linking. This is a valid use-case for keeping .la files, but these need to be packaged separately in a -static (sub)package. But you had already stated (in comment #13) "I'm not sure it is worth the hassle of going through creating all those -static packages. We could just drop the libneon.a ...", in which case, this is moot. In non-static cases, packages that depend on .la presence for building, are, imo, broken, and can/should be fixed. I'll take the bait and look at subversion and see how hard it is to fix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 15:00:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:00:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226553] Merge Review: xdoclet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704271500.l3RF09fD024664@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xdoclet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226553 ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-04-27 10:59 EST ------- built into rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 15:27:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:27:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237373] Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704271527.l3RFRxvx027134@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237373 ------- Additional Comments From kmatsui at t3.rim.or.jp 2007-04-27 11:27 EST ------- Updated to 2.6.3-5. to apply a new patch for mcpp. mcpp.spec: http://sourceforge.net/project/downloading.php?groupname=mcpp&filename=mcpp-2.6.3-5.spec mcpp-2.6.3-5.src.rpm: http://sourceforge.net/project/downloading.php?groupname=mcpp&filename=mcpp-2.6.3-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 15:39:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:39:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704271539.l3RFdWHo027916@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mr.ecik at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-04-27 11:39 EST ------- Spec file quote: > # The correct dependency would be the following, but it doesn't exist on RHEL4/3 > #BuildRequires: lapack-devel > BuildRequires: %{_libdir}/liblapack.so Unfortunately, the new dependency breaks mock (fc6/x86_64) for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 15:51:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:51:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704271551.l3RFpR1l029936@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-04-27 11:51 EST ------- To be precise, this happens because instead of lapack-devel, mock installs atlas-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 15:52:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:52:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226189] Merge Review: neon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704271552.l3RFqRQH030072@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: neon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226189 ------- Additional Comments From jorton at redhat.com 2007-04-27 11:52 EST ------- Playing the "We're smarter than upstream" game is a losing proposition in the long term, and one I will not indulge in for any package I maintain. Fedora does not exist in a vacuum, it exists in main due to the work done in upstream projects. If you have changes which you think can improve the software you should be getting involved in the upstream projects to get those changes integrated. This may help you better understand the motivation behind things which you consider to be "stupid". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 16:43:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 12:43:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704271643.l3RGhEde001059@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2007-04-27 12:43 EST ------- How does it break? Maybe it is an atlas <-> lapack generic issue? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 16:50:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 12:50:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226189] Merge Review: neon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704271650.l3RGoAcN001397@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: neon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226189 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-04-27 12:50 EST ------- When/if the .la dependence is fixed, the changes most certainly should be pushed upstream. Your assertion that this be a prerequisite to any modification of fedora packaging is misplaced, imo. And I stand by my statement, any app that needs help to build via 'neon-config --la-file' and fails without libneon.la presence, is broken by design (hopefully that's nicer than saying stooopid). I'm making progress wrt subversion... looks like a one-line patch is all that is required(1): --- subversion-1.4.3/build/ac-macros/neon.m4.la_file 2006-10-20 18:44:09.000000000 -0500 +++ subversion-1.4.3/build/ac-macros/neon.m4 2007-04-27 11:34:44.000000000 -0500 @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ test "$svn_allowed_neon" = "any"; then svn_allowed_neon_on_system="yes" SVN_NEON_INCLUDES=[`$neon_config --cflags | sed -e 's/-D[^ ]*//g'`] - NEON_LIBS=`$neon_config --la-file` + NEON_LIBS=`$neon_config --libs` CFLAGS=["$CFLAGS `$neon_config --cflags | sed -e 's/-I[^ ]*//g'`"] svn_lib_neon="yes" break any others? (1) Though one could *greatly* simplify it's content/logic by simply using pkg-config constructs, esp since pkg-config is able to differentiate between static and non-static configs (but that goes beyond the scope of this discussion) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 17:38:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:38:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238073] Review Request: perl-GTop - Perl interface to libgtop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704271738.l3RHc9Ps004464@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GTop - Perl interface to libgtop Alias: perl-GTop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238073 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-27 13:38 EST ------- Thanks for the review :) I just started a "perl vs %{__perl}" thread on fedora-perl-devel -- from your comment in the other bug it sounds like this might be a good idea across the board... Making that script executable and your other comments are well taken :) I'll make the modifications post-import if that's ok... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 17:38:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:38:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238073] Review Request: perl-GTop - Perl interface to libgtop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704271738.l3RHcYAK004482@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GTop - Perl interface to libgtop Alias: perl-GTop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238073 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-27 13:38 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-GTop Short Description: Perl interface to libgtop Owners: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Branches: FC-5, FC-6, devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 17:38:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:38:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238073] Review Request: perl-GTop - Perl interface to libgtop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704271738.l3RHckr3004506@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GTop - Perl interface to libgtop Alias: perl-GTop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238073 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 18:33:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:33:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229291] Review Request: thinkfinger - A driver for the UPEK/SGS Thomson Microelectronics fingerprint reader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704271833.l3RIX1vg008201@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thinkfinger - A driver for the UPEK/SGS Thomson Microelectronics fingerprint reader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229291 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium belegdol at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2007-04-27 14:32 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: thinkfinger Updated Fedora Owners: belegdol at gmail.com, jplans at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 18:47:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:47:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233975] Review Request: freefem++ - PDE solving tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704271847.l3RIlHWX008987@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freefem++ - PDE solving tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233975 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mr.ecik at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-04-27 14:47 EST ------- I'll review it shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 19:27:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 15:27:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234031] Review Request: eclipse-pydev - an Eclipse plugin for working with Python. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704271927.l3RJROUE011646@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-pydev - an Eclipse plugin for working with Python. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234031 ifoox at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From ifoox at redhat.com 2007-04-27 15:27 EST ------- Built as eclipse-pydev-1.3.1-5 in devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 19:49:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 15:49:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233975] Review Request: freefem++ - PDE solving tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704271949.l3RJnO18013034@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freefem++ - PDE solving tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233975 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-04-27 15:49 EST ------- REVIEW: * %{?dist} tag's present * package's licensed under LGPL and license's included in package !* rpmlint output: W: freefem++-glx non-standard-group Applications/Scientific Why don't use Applications/Engineering as in the main package? W: freefem++-glx no-documentation E: freefem++ binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/FreeFem++-client ['/usr/ lib64'] E: freefem++ binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/FreeFem++-cs ['/usr/lib64'] E: freefem++ binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/FreeFem++-ide ['/usr/lib64'] Has to be fixed. Unfortunately, I'm currently unable to check if the way to fix the rpath from PackagingGuidelines works for this package, but it should be checked. W: freefem++ spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man1/FreeFem++.1.gz Change wrong permissions E: freefem++-debuginfo script-without-shebang /usr/src/debug/freefem++-2.14-1/ src/fflib/mt19937ar.cpp E: freefem++-debuginfo script-without-shebang /usr/src/debug/freefem++-2.14-1/ src/lglib/mymain.cpp W: freefem++-mpi non-standard-group Applications/Scientific W: freefem++-mpi no-documentation * md5sums match each other. However, 2.14 is not the newest freefem++'s release so you have to package the newer version * BRs seem to be proper, mock fc6/x86_64 builds fine * final provides and requires are sane * package doesn't create any new directory and it doesn't own any one it shouldn't * %clean section fine * build root's proper !* %files sections don't look good. Manpage has improper permissions. Also, it doesn't seem to me that setting 755 permissions globally is a good solution 'cause it lead up to wrong permissions (as in the manpage case) so I'll suggest to change it * except for Group tag, everything related with subpackages seems good THINGS TO DO: * change subpackages' groups * fix rpath issue * package the newer version * fix permissions of manpage * don't set 755 permissions globally -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 20:51:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:51:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227241] Review Request: kde-settings - Config files for kde In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704272051.l3RKpUNm017973@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kde-settings - Config files for kde Alias: kde-settings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227241 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-04-27 16:51 EST ------- ==== REVIEW CHECKLIST ==== - rpmlint output: W: kde-settings no-documentation okay to ignore. W: kde-settings hidden-file-or-dir /etc/skel/.kde/Autostart/.directory W: kde-settings non-conffile-in-etc /etc/skel/.kde/Autostart/.directory W: kde-settings hidden-file-or-dir /etc/skel/.kde W: kde-settings hidden-file-or-dir /etc/skel/.kde okay to ignore, bug probably should be filed against rpmlint for these. W: kde-settings no-url-tag okay to ignore. E: kde-settings file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config/clockappletrc E: kde-settings file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config/kcmnspluginrc E: kde-settings file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config/kdeglobals E: kde-settings file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config/kdesktoprc E: kde-settings file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config/kdewizardrc E: kde-settings file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config/kickerrc E: kde-settings file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config/kmailrc E: kde-settings file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config/kminipagerappletrc E: kde-settings file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config/knotify.eventsrc E: kde-settings file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config/knotifyrc E: kde-settings file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config/konquerorrc E: kde-settings file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config/konsolerc E: kde-settings file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config/korgacrc E: kde-settings file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config/ksmserverrc E: kde-settings file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config/ksplashrc E: kde-settings file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config/ktiprc E: kde-settings file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config/kwinrc E: kde-settings file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config/profilerc X explained in bug #238136, a comment should be added to the spec. W: kde-settings no-url-tag okay to ignore. W: kde-settings strange-permission xdg_env-hack.sh 0755 what is strange about that?! W: kde-settings setup-not-quiet OMG this is so easy to fix. W: kde-settings mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 7, tab: line 3) OMG this is so easy to fix. W: kde-settings-kdm no-documentation okay to ignore. W: kde-settings-kdm dangling-relative-symlink /etc/kde/kdm/Xsetup ../../X11/xdm/Xsetup_0 W: kde-settings-kdm dangling-relative-symlink /etc/kde/kdm/Xservers ../../X11/xdm/Xservers W: kde-settings-kdm dangling-relative-symlink /etc/kde/kdm/Xwilling ../../X11/xdm/Xwilling W: kde-settings-kdm dangling-relative-symlink /etc/kde/kdm/Xaccess ../../X11/xdm/Xaccess W: kde-settings-kdm dangling-relative-symlink /etc/kde/kdm/Xresources ../../X11/xdm/Xresources These are okay since it Requires xorg-x11-xdm W: kde-settings-kdm no-url-tag okay to ignore. W: kde-settings-kdm obsolete-not-provided kde-config-kdebase Why is an obsolte not provided?? W: kde-settings-kdm dangerous-command-in-%pre mv W: kde-settings-kdm dangerous-command-in-%post cp OMG these are so easy to fix. - package named according to package naming guidelines - spec filename matches %{name} - package meets packaging guidelines - package is licensed with open source compatible license - license matches actual license - no license in %doc because there really is no license NOTE: These are just config files, no real license associated with them. - spec written in American english - spec file legible X There are no upstream sources to match against yet no comment either - package successfully compiles and builds on FC-6 x86_64 - all dependencies listed in BR - no locales - no shared libraries in dynamic linkers path - package is not relocatable - package owns all directories it creates - directories it does not create are brought in through Requires - no duplicates in %files - file permissions are okay - contains proper %clean - macro usage consistent - contains code - no large documentation - files in %doc do not affect runtime - no header files - no static libraries - no pkgconfig files - no libraries with suffix - no need for devel subpackage - no libtool archives - not a GUI application ? package does not own files or directories owned by other packages - contains proper %install - filenames are UTF-8 I still have to verify there are no conflicts with kdebase in devel. ==== MUST FIX ==== - Add comment in spec as mentioned here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#head-413e1c297803cfa9de0cc4c56f3ac384bff5dc9e - Add a comment in spec file mentioning bug #238136 ==== SHOULD FIX ==== - Fix rpmlint warnings: W: kde-settings setup-not-quiet W: kde-settings mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 7, tab: line 3) W: kde-settings-kdm obsolete-not-provided kde-config-kdebase W: kde-settings-kdm dangerous-command-in-%pre mv W: kde-settings-kdm dangerous-command-in-%post cp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 20:57:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:57:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227241] Review Request: kde-settings - Config files for kde In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704272057.l3RKvGqM018602@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kde-settings - Config files for kde Alias: kde-settings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227241 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-04-27 16:57 EST ------- > I still have to verify there are no conflicts with kdebase in devel. fyi, likely there are conflicts with current(devel) versions of both kdelibs and kdebase, mainly because we're moving all/most config's from those two *here*. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 23:13:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 19:13:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174504] Review Request: wine-docs - Documentation for wine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704272313.l3RND3p0023759@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wine-docs - Documentation for wine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174504 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2007-04-27 19:12 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: wine-docs New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 23:14:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 19:14:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171526] Review Request: wine - A Windows 16/32 bit emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704272314.l3RNEBKl023838@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wine - A Windows 16/32 bit emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171526 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2007-04-27 19:13 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: wine New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 23:19:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 19:19:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220635] Review Request: livecd-tools - Tools for creating Live CD's In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704272319.l3RNJbQ8023974@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: livecd-tools - Tools for creating Live CD's https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220635 ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2 at redhat.com 2007-04-27 19:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #14) > > Support for other archs/machine types we (need to consider more than just the > arch) is of course welcome. But this bug is not the right place to discuss > that Indeed. Fedora package review says there MUST be a separate bug for the existence of the ExcludeArch: in the specfile. And that bug must be on the FE-ExcludeArch tracker for the architecture(s) which are excluded. > I have a Powerbook G4 12" and I'd be more than happy to help out testing the ppc > bits there... The basics are in http://git.infradead.org/?p=users/dwmw2/livecd-ppc.git Obviously it needs to be abstracted a little to work for _both_ ppc and x86. We could also do with being able to install the 64-bit and 32-bit kernels at the same time, so that we can boot on all hardware. It seems silly to make a 'ppc64 livecd' which has all the same userspace as the ppc32 version, but just a different kernel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 00:00:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:00:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234926] Review Request: ngircd - Next Generation IRC Daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280000.l3S00KcD025093@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ngircd - Next Generation IRC Daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234926 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(andreas at bawue.net) ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-04-27 20:00 EST ------- Okay, here is the state of things: I've done a rough review at the moment, but it the spec file needs some changes first: 1. The diff needs replacing (See Comment #9 and Comment #10) 2. The dependency on tcp_wrappers is correct for fc6, but not f7 (devel), the development libraries got moved to tcp_wrappers-devel. I'm not totally sure how other reviewers have counteracted this in the past, but my suggestion is for review change the builddep to: /usr/include/tcpd.h this will counteract the problem, the problem here is it puts increased demands on yum, so when you commit to CVS you will need to alter the BR's to specific packages (tcp_wrappers for FC-5 & 6, tcp_wrappers-devel for F7/devel) (I have confirmed that this workaround works under mock okay) Once the two changes are made, I should be able to build it fine without altering the src.rpm myself, and should be able to give it a review and test it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 00:04:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:04:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238211] New: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238211 Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Catalyst-Runtime/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Catalyst-Runtime-5.7007-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Catalyst-Runtime.spec Description: This is the primary class for the Catalyst-Runtime distribution. It provides the core of the of any runtime Catalyst instance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 00:08:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:08:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238211] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280008.l3S08ihX025338@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules Alias: Catalyst-Runtime https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238211 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |237738, 237739, 237741, | |237742, 237888, 238073 Alias| |Catalyst-Runtime -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 00:08:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:08:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237741] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Request-AsCGI - Setup a CGI enviroment from a HTTP::Request In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280008.l3S08jVO025346@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Request-AsCGI - Setup a CGI enviroment from a HTTP::Request Alias: HTTP-Request-AsCGI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237741 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |238211 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 00:08:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:08:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237742] Review Request: perl-Text-SimpleTable - Simple Eyecandy ASCII Tables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280008.l3S08uVW025366@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-SimpleTable - Simple Eyecandy ASCII Tables Alias: Text-SimpleTable https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237742 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |238211 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 00:08:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:08:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237739] Review Request: perl-File-Modified - Checks intelligently if files have changed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280008.l3S08vLO025374@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Modified - Checks intelligently if files have changed Alias: perl-File-Modified https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237739 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |238211 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 00:08:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:08:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237738] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump - Pretty printing of data structures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280008.l3S08tMR025357@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Dump - Pretty printing of data structures Alias: perl-Data-Dump https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237738 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |238211 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 00:08:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:08:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238073] Review Request: perl-GTop - Perl interface to libgtop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280008.l3S08w0K025387@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GTop - Perl interface to libgtop Alias: perl-GTop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238073 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |238211 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 00:09:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:09:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237888] Review Request: perl-Tree-Simple-VisitorFactory - Factory object for dispensing Visitor objects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280009.l3S099XK025401@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Tree-Simple-VisitorFactory - Factory object for dispensing Visitor objects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237888 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |238211 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 00:46:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:46:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229291] Review Request: thinkfinger - A driver for the UPEK/SGS Thomson Microelectronics fingerprint reader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280046.l3S0ki7p026389@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thinkfinger - A driver for the UPEK/SGS Thomson Microelectronics fingerprint reader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229291 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 00:49:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:49:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210783] Review Request: php-pear-DB-QueryTool - An OO-interface for easily retrieving and modifying data in a DB In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280049.l3S0nR6i026450@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-DB-QueryTool - An OO-interface for easily retrieving and modifying data in a DB Alias: pear-DB-QueryTool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210783 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 00:49:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:49:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 212883] Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL - Easy parsing of URLs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280049.l3S0nWvB026474@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL - Easy parsing of URLs Alias: php-pear-Net-URL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212883 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 00:49:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:49:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 219575] Review Request: php-pear-File - Common file and directory routines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280049.l3S0nf1v026487@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-File - Common file and directory routines Alias: php-pear-File https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219575 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 00:50:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:50:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221027] Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280050.l3S0ot7k026531@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221027 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 00:52:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:52:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229490] Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280052.l3S0qUFS026614@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229490 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 00:54:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:54:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231774] Review Request: perl-DBIx-POS - Define a dictionary of SQL statements in a POD dialect (POS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280054.l3S0s3NS026676@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-POS - Define a dictionary of SQL statements in a POD dialect (POS) Alias: perl-DBIx-POS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231774 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 02:41:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 22:41:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238211] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280241.l3S2fMq4030056@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules Alias: Catalyst-Runtime https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238211 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-27 22:41 EST ------- catalyst.pl requires perl(Catalyst::Helper) which is (will be) provided by perl-Catalyst-Devel... which has a BR on this package. So we drop catalyst.pl from here, and will include it with perl-Catalyst-Devel instead. See also http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=26758 SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Catalyst-Runtime-5.7007-2.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Catalyst-Runtime.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 02:56:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 22:56:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238230] New: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Action-RenderView - Sensible default end action for view renders Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238230 Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Action-RenderView - Sensible default end action for view renders Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Catalyst-Action-RenderView/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Catalyst-Action-RenderView-0.04-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Catalyst-Action-RenderView.spec Description: This action implements a sensible default end action, which will forward to the first available view, unless status is set to 3xx, or there is a response body. It also allows you to pass dump_info=1 to the url in order to force a debug screen, while in debug mode. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 02:56:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 22:56:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237741] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Request-AsCGI - Setup a CGI enviroment from a HTTP::Request In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280256.l3S2uO6a030805@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Request-AsCGI - Setup a CGI enviroment from a HTTP::Request Alias: HTTP-Request-AsCGI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237741 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |238230 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 03:05:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:05:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238232] New: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Manual - Catalyst web framework manual Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238232 Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Manual - Catalyst web framework manual Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Catalyst-Manual/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Catalyst-Manual-5.700701-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Catalyst-Manual.spec Description: This is the manual to the Catalyst web framework. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 03:06:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:06:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238232] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Manual - Catalyst web framework manual In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280306.l3S36cLJ031294@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Manual - Catalyst web framework manual Alias: perl-Catalyst-Manual https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238232 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-Catalyst-Manual -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 03:08:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:08:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231774] Review Request: perl-DBIx-POS - Define a dictionary of SQL statements in a POD dialect (POS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280308.l3S38IJN031382@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-POS - Define a dictionary of SQL statements in a POD dialect (POS) Alias: perl-DBIx-POS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231774 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-27 23:08 EST ------- Imported and built. Will follow up with upstream, thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 03:32:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:32:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236486] Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280332.l3S3W6oW032647@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236486 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-27 23:32 EST ------- Although I don't know well about this package, from just I checked the spec file on comment 6, it needs not a few modification. * Group is incorrect * Usually the name of the tarball "0.1-3.tar.gz" means that the version of spec/srpm should be 0.1.3, not 0.1 * macro is not used correctly * config file should be marked in a proper way * Handling service scripts needs some proper treatment * %install stage has unneeded procedure (check: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 03:41:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:41:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238233] New: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader - Load config files of various types Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238233 Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader - Load config files of various types Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Catalyst-Plugin- ConfigLoader/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader-0.14-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader.spec Description: This module will attempt to load find and load a configuration file of various types. Currently it supports YAML, JSON, XML, INI and Perl formats. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 03:41:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:41:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235962] Review Request: perl-Config-Any - Load configuration from different file formats, transparently In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280341.l3S3fkNf000704@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Any - Load configuration from different file formats, transparently Alias: perl-Config-Any https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235962 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |238233 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 03:41:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:41:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235960] Review Request: perl-Data-Visitor - Visitor style traversal of Perl data structures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280341.l3S3fvB5000723@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Visitor - Visitor style traversal of Perl data structures Alias: perl-Data-Visitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235960 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |238233 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 03:55:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:55:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238235] New: Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238235 Summary: Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lightsolphoenix at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://crystalsanctuary.rpgsource.net/packages/specs/tastymenu.spec SRPM URL: http://crystalsanctuary.rpgsource.net/packages/source/tastymenu-0.7.1-0.nixa.2.src.rpm Description: Tasty Menu is a KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability, or at least to be a testbed for usability concepts and ideas for a future KMenu replacement. The left part of the menu is very similar to the Novell idea (http://www.novell.com/products/desktop/preview.html); you have a search box that is always selected when the menu is opened (the search results are displayed in the leftmost listview), followed by a combobox that decides what appears in the following listview: favorite applications (default), most used applications, recently used applications or recent documents. The right part contains the whole KMenu and takes the aspect from KBFX (http://www.kbfx.org); the middle column contains the top level categorization (plus in the current KMenu arrangment the Control Center, Home folder and Find Files, but I think only categories should be present). and the left-most listview contains the content of the category currently selected in the middle column. I think in this way even if it has the same number of items it "appears" less huge than with a popup menu/submenu structure. Every item has two rows, for the name and for the description, in order to make it more informative. On each selected item an action icon appears on the right; at the moment they are "add bookmark" on application icons and "remove bookmark" on favorite apps list. The bottom buttons are the usual switch user, lock session and logout. At first I didn't want to put them, I thought that these functions should be delegated to another applet (like http://kde-apps.org/content/show.php?content=26150), but it seems that this doesn't work very well in practice. The left-most button contains the user name and icon, and clicking on it opens the Profile Editor. I know it seems silly, but it's only an experiment, probably it will be merged with the switch user button. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 03:56:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:56:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232623] Review Request: perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple - Perl Module for Generating HTML Calendars In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280356.l3S3uCxT001488@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple - Perl Module for Generating HTML Calendars https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232623 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 03:58:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:58:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238235] Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280358.l3S3wgai001630@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238235 lightsolphoenix at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 04:00:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:00:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234717] Review Request: python-spambayes - Bayesian anti-spam filter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280400.l3S40XLS001764@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-spambayes - Bayesian anti-spam filter Alias: spambayes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234717 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO CC| |wtogami at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?(chris.stone at gmail. | |com) ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-04-28 00:00 EST ------- Before we add this, a question. python-$name naming was originally intended to be used mainly for libraries, not the leaf-node applications. yum isn't called python-yum. system-config-securitylevel is not called python-system-config-security level. It might be best to name the Fedora package just plain "spambayes" because that matches the upstream name, and that is what people would expect it be called when they try to install it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 04:04:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:04:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238236] New: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-SubRequest - Make subrequests to actions in Catalyst Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238236 Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-SubRequest - Make subrequests to actions in Catalyst Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Catalyst-Plugin-SubRequest/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-SubRequest-0.11-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-SubRequest.spec Description: Make subrequests to actions in Catalyst. Uses the catalyst dispatcher, so it will work like an external url call. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 04:04:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:04:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238211] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280404.l3S44YLB002018@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules Alias: Catalyst-Runtime https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238211 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |238236 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 04:08:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:08:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 170303] Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280408.l3S484Tl002230@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170303 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 04:08:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:08:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236493] Review Request: migemo - Japanese incremental search tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280408.l3S48tua002304@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: migemo - Japanese incremental search tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236493 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 04:11:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:11:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237046] Review Request: perl-Config-IniHash - Perl extension for reading and writing INI files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280411.l3S4BDsx002443@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-IniHash - Perl extension for reading and writing INI files Alias: perl-Config-IniHash https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237046 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 04:11:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:11:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238237] New: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Static-Simple - Make serving static pages painless Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238237 Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Static-Simple - Make serving static pages painless Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Catalyst-Plugin-Static- Simple/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Static-Simple-0.15-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Static-Simple.spec Description: The Static::Simple plugin is designed to make serving static content in your application during development quick and easy, without requiring a single line of code from you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 04:11:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:11:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238211] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280411.l3S4Bf5k002487@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules Alias: Catalyst-Runtime https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238211 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |238237 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 04:11:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:11:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238236] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-SubRequest - Make subrequests to actions in Catalyst In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280411.l3S4BqW7002505@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-SubRequest - Make subrequests to actions in Catalyst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238236 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |238237 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 04:12:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:12:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237741] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Request-AsCGI - Setup a CGI enviroment from a HTTP::Request In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280412.l3S4COW5002553@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Request-AsCGI - Setup a CGI enviroment from a HTTP::Request Alias: HTTP-Request-AsCGI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237741 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 04:37:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:37:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238238] New: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Devel - Catalyst Development Tools Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238238 Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Devel - Catalyst Development Tools Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Catalyst-Devel/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Catalyst-Devel-1.02-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Catalyst-Devel.spec Description: The Catalyst::Devel package includes a variety of modules useful for the development of Catalyst applications, but not required to run them. This is intended to make it easier to deploy Catalyst apps. The runtime parts of Catalyst are now known as Catalyst::Runtime. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 04:37:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:37:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238211] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280437.l3S4bCwm003341@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules Alias: Catalyst-Runtime https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238211 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |238238 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 04:37:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:37:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238230] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Action-RenderView - Sensible default end action for view renders In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280437.l3S4bDb3003349@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Action-RenderView - Sensible default end action for view renders https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238230 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |238238 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 04:37:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:37:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238232] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Manual - Catalyst web framework manual In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280437.l3S4bND6003363@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Manual - Catalyst web framework manual Alias: perl-Catalyst-Manual https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238232 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |238238 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 04:37:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:37:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238236] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-SubRequest - Make subrequests to actions in Catalyst In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280437.l3S4bZ2N003380@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-SubRequest - Make subrequests to actions in Catalyst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238236 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |238238 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 04:37:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:37:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238233] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader - Load config files of various types In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280437.l3S4bYWc003372@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader - Load config files of various types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238233 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |238238 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 04:40:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:40:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238238] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Devel - Catalyst Development Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280440.l3S4eYEP003415@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Devel - Catalyst Development Tools Alias: perl-Catalyst-Devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238238 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-Catalyst-Devel ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-28 00:40 EST ------- Whew, that should be the last of the "minimal" Catalyst modules needed. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 05:05:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 01:05:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237046] Review Request: perl-Config-IniHash - Perl extension for reading and writing INI files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280505.l3S55N5g004101@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-IniHash - Perl extension for reading and writing INI files Alias: perl-Config-IniHash https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237046 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-28 01:05 EST ------- Imported and building... thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 05:05:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 01:05:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235764] Review Request: perl-CGI-Ex - CGI utility suite - makes powerful application writing fun and easy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280505.l3S55PIR004113@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Ex - CGI utility suite - makes powerful application writing fun and easy Alias: perl-CGI-Ex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235764 Bug 235764 depends on bug 237046, which changed state. Bug 237046 Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-IniHash - Perl extension for reading and writing INI files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237046 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 05:07:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 01:07:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237741] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Request-AsCGI - Setup a CGI enviroment from a HTTP::Request In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280507.l3S57Mf6004258@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Request-AsCGI - Setup a CGI enviroment from a HTTP::Request Alias: HTTP-Request-AsCGI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237741 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-28 01:07 EST ------- Imported and building. Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 05:07:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 01:07:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238211] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280507.l3S57X8f004282@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules Alias: Catalyst-Runtime https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238211 Bug 238211 depends on bug 237741, which changed state. Bug 237741 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Request-AsCGI - Setup a CGI enviroment from a HTTP::Request https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237741 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 05:07:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 01:07:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238230] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Action-RenderView - Sensible default end action for view renders In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280507.l3S57iI4004294@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Action-RenderView - Sensible default end action for view renders https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238230 Bug 238230 depends on bug 237741, which changed state. Bug 237741 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Request-AsCGI - Setup a CGI enviroment from a HTTP::Request https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237741 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 05:33:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 01:33:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231669] Review Request: libsynce - Connection library for Pocket PC devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280533.l3S5XwvE005566@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsynce - Connection library for Pocket PC devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231669 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2007-04-28 01:33 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libsynce Short Description: Connection library for Pocket PC devices Owners: andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de,gauret at free.fr Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 05:35:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 01:35:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231670] Review Request: librapi - Library to connect to Pocket PC devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280535.l3S5ZYwT005645@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librapi - Library to connect to Pocket PC devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231670 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2007-04-28 01:35 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: librapi Short Description: Library to connect to Pocket PC devices Owners: andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de,gauret at free.fr Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 05:37:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 01:37:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231674] Review Request: libmimedir - Library to parse MIME Directory Profile In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280537.l3S5bwHP005785@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmimedir - Library to parse MIME Directory Profile https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231674 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2007-04-28 01:37 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libmimedir Short Description: Library to parse MIME Directory Profile Owners: andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de,gauret at free.fr Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 05:38:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 01:38:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236493] Review Request: migemo - Japanese incremental search tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280538.l3S5cNVu005819@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: migemo - Japanese incremental search tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236493 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-28 01:38 EST ------- Rebuilt successfully on all branch, closing. Thank you for reviewing and approving this package! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 05:40:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 01:40:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231675] Review Request: librra - Connection to Pocket PC devices, part of SynCE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280540.l3S5e7Hk005900@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librra - Connection to Pocket PC devices, part of SynCE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231675 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2007-04-28 01:40 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: librra Short Description: Connection to Pocket PC devices, part of SynCE Owners: andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de,gauret at free.fr Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 05:43:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 01:43:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231680] Review Request: vdccm - Serial connection daemon for Pocket PC devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280543.l3S5h0T9006048@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdccm - Serial connection daemon for Pocket PC devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231680 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2007-04-28 01:42 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: vdccm Short Description: Serial connection daemon for Pocket PC devices Owners: andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de,gauret at free.fr Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 05:43:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 01:43:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231680] Review Request: vdccm - Serial connection daemon for Pocket PC devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280543.l3S5hnHu006149@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdccm - Serial connection daemon for Pocket PC devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231680 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 05:46:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 01:46:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231679] Review Request: synce-serial - Serial connection support for Pocket PC devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280546.l3S5kBLd006237@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-serial - Serial connection support for Pocket PC devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231679 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2007-04-28 01:45 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: synce-serial Short Description: Serial connection support for Pocket PC devices Owners: andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de,gauret at free.fr Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 05:47:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 01:47:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231685] Review Request: kcemirror - Remote display control for PocketPC devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280547.l3S5lkn5006284@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kcemirror - Remote display control for PocketPC devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231685 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2007-04-28 01:47 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kcemirror Short Description: Remote display control for PocketPC devices Owners: andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de,gauret at free.fr Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 05:54:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 01:54:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231683] Review Request: syncekonnector - Synchronization application for Pocket PC handhelds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280554.l3S5sBtd006409@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: syncekonnector - Synchronization application for Pocket PC handhelds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231683 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2007-04-28 01:53 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: syncekonnector Short Description: Synchronization application for Pocket PC handhelds Owners: andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de,gauret at free.fr Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 05:55:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 01:55:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231681] Review Request: synce-kde - Connection service application for Pocket PC handhelds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280555.l3S5taxN006454@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-kde - Connection service application for Pocket PC handhelds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231681 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2007-04-28 01:55 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: synce-kde Short Description: Connection service application for Pocket PC handhelds Owners: andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de,gauret at free.fr Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 06:12:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 02:12:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234717] Review Request: spambayes - Bayesian anti-spam filter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280612.l3S6CUXp006826@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spambayes - Bayesian anti-spam filter Alias: spambayes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234717 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: python- |Review Request: spambayes - |spambayes - Bayesian anti- |Bayesian anti-spam filter |spam filter | Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(chris.stone at gmail.| |com) | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-04-28 02:12 EST ------- Yes, I added python- because I thought it was needed. Updated version to change name to just spambayes: Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/spambayes.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/spambayes-1.0.4-3.src.rpm %changelog * Fri Apr 27 2007 Christopher Stone 1.0.4-4 - Remove python from package name New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: spambayes Short Description: Bayesian anti-spam filter Owners: chris.stone at gmail.com Branches: FC-5 FC-6 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 06:13:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 02:13:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234717] Review Request: spambayes - Bayesian anti-spam filter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280613.l3S6DYJt006857@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spambayes - Bayesian anti-spam filter Alias: spambayes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234717 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-04-28 02:13 EST ------- oops forgot to edit my copy&paste, fixed URL: SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/spambayes-1.0.4-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 07:01:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 03:01:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238233] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader - Load config files of various types In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280701.l3S71cVC007749@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader - Load config files of various types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238233 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 07:48:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 03:48:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234717] Review Request: spambayes - Bayesian anti-spam filter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280748.l3S7mD2O009356@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spambayes - Bayesian anti-spam filter Alias: spambayes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234717 ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com 2007-04-28 03:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > Before we add this, a question. > > python-$name naming was originally intended to be used mainly for libraries, not > the leaf-node applications. > yum isn't called python-yum. > system-config-securitylevel is not called python-system-config-security level. > > It might be best to name the Fedora package just plain "spambayes" because that > matches the upstream name, and that is what people would expect it be called > when they try to install it? > Whops, sorry for not catching that during the review :(. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 07:57:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 03:57:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235764] Review Request: perl-CGI-Ex - CGI utility suite - makes powerful application writing fun and easy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280757.l3S7vM9e010197@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Ex - CGI utility suite - makes powerful application writing fun and easy Alias: perl-CGI-Ex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235764 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-28 03:57 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Rpmlint output: None [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL or Artistic [-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is written in American English. [x] Spec file for the package is legible. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : 7f1d41e11c63da1a836bbbb71fda0a08 MD5SUM upstream package: 7f1d41e11c63da1a836bbbb71fda0a08 [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: Arches excluded: Why: [!] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [!] Latest version is packaged. === Issues === 1. Missing BR perl(Hash::Case) needed for %check 2. Latest version is 2.10 (recently released) === Final Notes === 1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 08:19:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 04:19:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221027] Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280819.l3S8JiAd012217@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221027 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-04-28 04:19 EST ------- It fails on PPC F7 http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/32607-LabPlot-1.5.1.5-6.fc7/ppc/build.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 08:30:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 04:30:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238235] Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280830.l3S8UDGI012992@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238235 ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com 2007-04-28 04:30 EST ------- - The release tag is incorrect. Use a single digit unless to do something else. - The description tag is very long; I would suggest reducing it to one or two paragraphs. - According to the list of files, a static library is included in the package. Take a look at this: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-2302ec1e1f44202c9cc4bcce24cb711266557ad7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 08:46:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 04:46:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221027] Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280846.l3S8k1GA013964@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221027 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-28 04:45 EST ------- I don't know well about ocaml, however from I tried on FC-devel i386, the line -------------------------------------- ocamlc -c tex.mli -------------------------------------- seems to fail when -------------------------------------- ocamlc -c render_info.mli -------------------------------------- is not finished. So... would you try to disable parallel make support? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 08:55:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 04:55:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233754] Review Request: marble - A KDE Desktop Globe In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280855.l3S8tZEV014535@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: marble - A KDE Desktop Globe https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233754 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-28 04:55 EST ------- Would you upload a new spec/srpm with ignoring timestamps keeping problem for now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 09:23:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 05:23:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233754] Review Request: marble - A KDE Desktop Globe In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280923.l3S9NoA7016182@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: marble - A KDE Desktop Globe https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233754 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-04-28 05:23 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/marble/marble.spec SRPM URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/marble/marble-0.3.1-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 09:26:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 05:26:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234926] Review Request: ngircd - Next Generation IRC Daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280926.l3S9Q7HU016348@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ngircd - Next Generation IRC Daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234926 andreas at bawue.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(andreas at bawue.net)| ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2007-04-28 05:25 EST ------- Thanks, I'll change the patch accordingly. About the tcp_wrappers requirement, the correct way of solving this is left up to the developer. Adding a file-dependency is what I do not want to do. I might either have a different specfile for the devel tree or I'd use conditionals like "%{fedora}" < "7" or something similar. I haven't decided yet, but I guess I'll go with the former. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 09:37:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 05:37:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237416] Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280937.l3S9b7Ir017047@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237416 ------- Additional Comments From stransky at redhat.com 2007-04-28 05:36 EST ------- Okay, all files are at upstream now (http://www.anakreon.cz/en/Download.htm) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 09:41:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 05:41:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238248] New: Review Request: ddccontrol - TFT monitor parameters control Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238248 Summary: Review Request: ddccontrol - TFT monitor parameters control Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: akontsevich at mail.ru QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Propose to add ddccontrol to the repository for setup TTF monitors from DDC that have not buttons. This is an analogue of MagicTune for Samsung monitors. Could be used for others too. Description: DDCcontrol is a program running on Linux, used to control monitor parameters,like brightness and contrast, by software, i.e. without using the OSD and the buttons in front of the monitor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 09:44:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 05:44:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238248] Review Request: ddccontrol - TFT monitor parameters control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704280944.l3S9iIT5017721@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ddccontrol - TFT monitor parameters control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238248 ------- Additional Comments From akontsevich at mail.ru 2007-04-28 05:44 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=153693) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=153693&action=view) ddccontrol SRPM DDC Control Source RPM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 10:38:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 06:38:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281038.l3SAcU67019363@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-04-28 06:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #29) > How does it break? Maybe it is an atlas <-> lapack generic issue? > Yes, it is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 10:59:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 06:59:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234926] Review Request: ngircd - Next Generation IRC Daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281059.l3SAxGia019774@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ngircd - Next Generation IRC Daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234926 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-04-28 06:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > Thanks, I'll change the patch accordingly. > > About the tcp_wrappers requirement, the correct way of solving this is left up > to the developer. I agree, I was just suggesting one way. > Adding a file-dependency is what I do not want to do. I don't like file based dependencies myself to tell the truth. > The reason why I suggested a file dependency for review only, is because once reviewed, the spec file in FC6 can BR on tcp_wrappers and devel can BR on tcp_wrappers-devel Just for the sake of been complete with suggestions, the another appropriate way is: As mentioned with the dependency altered to -devel, it can be built in RAWHIDE obviously your using a FC-6 machine when creating packages (like myself), so another method to settle the problem is to change the spec file with rawhide compatible dependencies, and when testing on FC-6 use --nodeps. Although not specified in the PackageReviewGuidelines I'm pretty sure that most reviews agree that packages must be buildable on the current devel at the very least. The first solution I've provided will allow you build on both FC-6 and devel while under review, the second will make the package only buildable on devel during review, or with --nodeps on FC-6 As an after thought, depending on changes to the spec file, I know that it will build on rawhide, and can approve a FC-6 compat spec file. > I might either have a different specfile for the devel tree or I'd use > conditionals like "%{fedora}" < "7" or something similar. > I haven't decided yet, but I guess I'll go with the former. I'd be happy to review a devel spec file, and a FC-6 spec file as another option I've leave the choice up to you, but just remember, any workarounds for review will be changed by the time it enters cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 11:22:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 07:22:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235804] Review Request: ocamlSDL - OCaml bindings for SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281122.l3SBMHOB020347@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocamlSDL - OCaml bindings for SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235804 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-04-28 07:22 EST ------- Here is the reference I was talking about, I'm doing the package under the suggestion made at http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2006-December/msg00042.html (point 3.1) I realise this is not official policy, but it seems the best way of handling the issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 11:33:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 07:33:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281133.l3SBXDoY020567@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2007-04-28 07:33 EST ------- Is there a bugzilla for this? If yes, we should add this as a blocker to this bug, or at least reference it. If not, could you please open one and block/reference this to this bug? Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 11:42:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 07:42:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234926] Review Request: ngircd - Next Generation IRC Daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281142.l3SBgw56020904@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ngircd - Next Generation IRC Daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234926 ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2 at redhat.com 2007-04-28 07:42 EST ------- Package uses obsolete networking functions. Please update it to use the current networking API. See the 'Example Server Code' section at http://people.redhat.com/drepper/userapi-ipv6.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 11:59:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 07:59:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234079] Review Request: kicker-compiz - Pager applet for kicker to make it work with compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281159.l3SBxNiM021825@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kicker-compiz - Pager applet for kicker to make it work with compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234079 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-04-28 07:59 EST ------- The requested URL /lxtnow/fedora/devel/SRPMS/kicker-compiz-3.5.4-2.fc7.src.rpm was not found on this server. Please upload a new SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 12:13:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 08:13:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223557] Review Request: mdbtools - tools for extracting things from Access databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281213.l3SCDPMH022236@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mdbtools - tools for extracting things from Access databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223557 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-04-28 08:13 EST ------- No response for over a month, I will close this within a week, per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Policy/StalledReviews . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 12:28:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 08:28:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281228.l3SCSjiX022714@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-04-28 08:28 EST ------- Spec: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/asterisk-1.4.4-1.fc6.spec SRPM: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/asterisk-1.4.4-1.fc6.src.rpm Bugfix release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 13:09:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 09:09:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216322] Review Request: tailor - VCS repository conversion tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281309.l3SD9sMi024863@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tailor - VCS repository conversion tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216322 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2007-04-28 09:09 EST ------- Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/tailor.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/tailor-0.9.28-1.fc7.src.rpm - updated to upstream version 0.9.28 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 13:35:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 09:35:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226431] Merge Review: squid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281335.l3SDZxCW025840@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: squid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226431 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2007-04-28 09:35 EST ------- Again, Remove "chgrp" fall-back in %triggerin, it is not needed. Moreover, it uses /var/cache/samba, whereas samba do not use such a dir anymore now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 14:14:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 10:14:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228186] Review Request: gsm - Shared libraries for GSM speech compressor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281414.l3SEEwJH026911@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gsm - Shared libraries for GSM speech compressor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228186 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rpm at greysector.net OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-04-28 10:14 EST ------- Taking the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 14:16:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 10:16:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228186] Review Request: gsm - Shared libraries for GSM speech compressor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281416.l3SEGfFr027004@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gsm - Shared libraries for GSM speech compressor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228186 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 14:19:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 10:19:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228186] Review Request: gsm - Shared libraries for GSM speech compressor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281419.l3SEJNIr027074@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gsm - Shared libraries for GSM speech compressor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228186 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-04-28 10:19 EST ------- ... after the proposed package has been updated according to the comments above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 14:27:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 10:27:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281427.l3SEROBt027316@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2007-04-28 10:27 EST ------- Not a review, but several remarks (with the help of rpmlint). Packaging remarks: -?next src.rpm should be compiled with a blank %{?dist} (at least to please rpmlint), - kdebluetooth owns "/usr/share/applnk/Settings/{Network,Peripherals}", seems strange, - %{_datadir}/config/obexrc should not be marked as %config file. Things to be fixed with upstream: -?%{_llibdir}/libirmcsynckonnector.so should be in ${_libdir}/kde3, and without any SONAME, -?%{_datadir}/config/obexrc should have a name that is linked with KDE (kobexrc?), -?kcm_btpaired.desktop and kcm_kbluetoothd.desktop are not correct (/usr/bin/desktop-file-validate complains about "Keywords"). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 14:31:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 10:31:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237381] Review Request: ruby-zoom - Ruby binding to ZOOM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281431.l3SEVaJ1027436@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-zoom - Ruby binding to ZOOM Alias: ruby-zoom https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237381 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-28 10:31 EST ------- Oops... Just I didn't notice the line 3 of your comment... Sorry for delay... http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/ruby-zoom.spec http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/ruby-zoom-0.2.2-2.fc7.src.rpm ----------------------------------------------- * Sat Apr 28 2007 Mamoru Tasaka - 0.2.2-2 - Add more documents -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 14:40:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 10:40:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281440.l3SEeUmB027748@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2007-04-28 10:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > - %{_datadir}/config/obexrc should not be marked as %config file. Actually, a precision: %{_datadir}/config/obexrc is for default settings. If the administrator of the machine wants some other settings, /etc/kde/obexrc can override that. And at the user level, there is ~/.kde/share/config/obexrc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 14:45:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 10:45:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238235] Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281445.l3SEjlfH027920@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238235 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2007-04-28 10:45 EST ------- Kelly needs sponsor. As a KDE user, I?would like to participate to the review of that package, but there is a tradition in Fedora that the review of the first package of a new contributor is done by the sponsor. I can however give several remarks. -?I second remarks of comment #1 about the release and descriptions tags. However, the file list shows no static lib. The .la file is a libtool auxiliary file, needed by the dlopen implementation used in KDE3. - The tarball shipped in the src.rpm is the same as the upstream one. - Read the guidelines about the use of desktop-file-install: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-d559ee7363418a5840ce63090c608c991cd39ce6 - There is something special to do with the HTML documentation. See the spec file of kdebluetooth (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203) for an example. Rex, I thought there was a project for Packaging/KDE in the Wiki. Do you have a draft somewhere? I am quite disappointed not to be able to link a wiki page about the KDE HTML doc packaging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 14:52:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 10:52:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216322] Review Request: tailor - VCS repository conversion tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281452.l3SEqqUg028165@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tailor - VCS repository conversion tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216322 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2007-04-28 10:52 EST ------- Running tests with "tailor test" is not possible on installed package, because the test python module is excluded during the installation run of setup.py. Also local copy of tailor's darcs repository is required. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 15:09:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:09:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238235] Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281509.l3SF91TM028640@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238235 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2007-04-28 11:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > -?I second remarks of comment #1 about the release and descriptions tags. As regards the release tag, read the guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines It would also nice that you use a disttag: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 15:28:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:28:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237381] Review Request: ruby-zoom - Ruby binding to ZOOM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281528.l3SFSRXY029168@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-zoom - Ruby binding to ZOOM Alias: ruby-zoom https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237381 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-28 11:28 EST ------- Not a problem -- my cuecat just came in the mail yesterday ;) APPROVED! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 15:36:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:36:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237381] Review Request: ruby-zoom - Ruby binding to ZOOM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281536.l3SFaHb5029346@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-zoom - Ruby binding to ZOOM Alias: ruby-zoom https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237381 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-28 11:36 EST ------- Thank you! Request for CVS admin: ----------------------------------------------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ruby-zoom Short Description: Ruby binding to ZOOM Owners: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Branches: devel FC-6 FC-5 InitialCC: (nobody) ----------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 15:39:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:39:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233754] Review Request: marble - A KDE Desktop Globe In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281539.l3SFdJk3029452@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: marble - A KDE Desktop Globe https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233754 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-28 11:39 EST ------- Okay!! --------------------------------------------------- This package (marble) is APPROVED by me --------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 15:39:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:39:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235764] Review Request: perl-CGI-Ex - CGI utility suite - makes powerful application writing fun and easy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281539.l3SFddcw029477@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Ex - CGI utility suite - makes powerful application writing fun and easy Alias: perl-CGI-Ex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235764 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-28 11:39 EST ------- * Sat Apr 28 2007 Chris Weyl 2.10-1 - add perl(Hash::Case) as a BR - update to 2.10 SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-CGI-Ex-2.10-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-CGI-Ex.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 15:49:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:49:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238233] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader - Load config files of various types In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281549.l3SFn54q029738@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader - Load config files of various types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238233 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |238211 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 15:49:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:49:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238211] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281549.l3SFn6Jb029746@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules Alias: Catalyst-Runtime https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238211 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |238233 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 15:54:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:54:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223422] Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281554.l3SFsWOL029931@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223422 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-28 11:54 EST ------- What is the status of this bug report? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 15:55:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:55:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223422] Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281555.l3SFtJbK029973@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223422 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(gnome at dux- | |linux.org) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 15:57:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:57:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235741] Review Request: hippo-canvas - Crossplatform canvas using cairo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281557.l3SFvYWI030065@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hippo-canvas - Crossplatform canvas using cairo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235741 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-28 11:57 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=153716) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=153716&action=view) mock build log of hippo-canvas-0.2.13-2 on FC-devel i386 Mock build on FC-devel i386 failed as attached. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 16:04:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:04:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233754] Review Request: marble - A KDE Desktop Globe In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281604.l3SG4E7a030212@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: marble - A KDE Desktop Globe https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233754 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-04-28 12:03 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: marble Short Description: A KDE Desktop Globe Owners: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au Branches: FC-6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 16:08:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:08:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233754] Review Request: marble - A KDE Desktop Globe In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281608.l3SG86Kd030332@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: marble - A KDE Desktop Globe https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233754 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-04-28 12:07 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: marble Short Description: A KDE Desktop Globe Owners: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au Branches: FC-6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 16:42:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:42:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238270] New: Review Request: widelands - realtime-strategy game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238270 Summary: Review Request: widelands - realtime-strategy game Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: karlikt at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://karlik.nonlogic.org/widelands/widelands.spec SRPM URL: http://karlik.nonlogic.org/widelands/widelands-0-0.1.build10.src.rpm Description: Widelands is an open source (GPLed), realtime-strategy game, using SDL and other free libraries, which is still under development. Widelands is inspired by Settlers II (Bluebyte) and is partly similar to it, so if you know it, you perhaps will have a thought, what Widelands is all about. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 16:53:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:53:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221027] Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281653.l3SGrexk031524@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221027 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-04-28 12:53 EST ------- It works when parallel make for ppc arch is disabled. thanks Mamoru -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 16:53:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:53:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238235] Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281653.l3SGrw68031552@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238235 ------- Additional Comments From lightsolphoenix at gmail.com 2007-04-28 12:53 EST ------- > - Read the guidelines about the use of desktop-file-install: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-d559ee7363418a5840ce63090c608c991cd39ce6 I was actually wondering about this one; do I still have to use desktop-file-install, even though it's installing the .desktop file to Kicker and not to the menu proper? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 17:04:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 13:04:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238235] Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281704.l3SH4Xg1031783@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238235 ------- Additional Comments From lightsolphoenix at gmail.com 2007-04-28 13:04 EST ------- Okay, now I'm confused. I changed the Release tag to 1%{?dist} as suggested in the DistTag guide, but instead of calling the package -1.fcX.i386.rpm, it's calling it -1fcX.i386.rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 17:06:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 13:06:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201418] Review Request: widelands - GPL Settlers II clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281706.l3SH6ImI031859@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: widelands - GPL Settlers II clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201418 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium karlikt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From karlikt at gmail.com 2007-04-28 13:06 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 238270 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 17:06:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 13:06:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238270] Review Request: widelands - realtime-strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281706.l3SH6oYK031899@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: widelands - realtime-strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238270 karlikt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |brkamikaze at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From karlikt at gmail.com 2007-04-28 13:06 EST ------- *** Bug 201418 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 17:09:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 13:09:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235764] Review Request: perl-CGI-Ex - CGI utility suite - makes powerful application writing fun and easy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281709.l3SH9n7D031992@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Ex - CGI utility suite - makes powerful application writing fun and easy Alias: perl-CGI-Ex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235764 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-28 13:09 EST ------- [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : e48feeff7c3a85c7b0d7c51aac3e6f2f MD5SUM upstream package: e48feeff7c3a85c7b0d7c51aac3e6f2f [x] Latest version is packaged. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 17:31:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 13:31:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238235] Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281731.l3SHVvoD000346@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238235 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-04-28 13:31 EST ------- > do I still have to use desktop-file-install... no. Re: %{?dist} usage, 1%{?dist} is correct. and dist *should* = .fcX (not fcX). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 17:32:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 13:32:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234785] Review Request: perl-Email-Simple-Creator - Email::Simple constructor for starting anew In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281732.l3SHW8IT000371@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Simple-Creator - Email::Simple constructor for starting anew https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234785 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bjohnson at symetrix.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 17:46:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 13:46:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238235] Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281746.l3SHkGAa001035@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238235 ------- Additional Comments From lightsolphoenix at gmail.com 2007-04-28 13:46 EST ------- Okay, since I'm not sure what the problem with the dist naming is, I've uploaded the updated spec and source files. Spec URL: http://crystalsanctuary.rpgsource.net/packages/specs/tastymenu.spec SRPM URL: http://crystalsanctuary.rpgsource.net/packages/source/tastymenu-0.7.1-1fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 17:48:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 13:48:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235764] Review Request: perl-CGI-Ex - CGI utility suite - makes powerful application writing fun and easy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281748.l3SHmGM1001089@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Ex - CGI utility suite - makes powerful application writing fun and easy Alias: perl-CGI-Ex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235764 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-28 13:48 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-CGI-Ex Short Description: CGI utility suite - makes powerful application writing fun and easy Owners: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Branches: FC-5, FC-6, devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 17:48:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 13:48:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235764] Review Request: perl-CGI-Ex - CGI utility suite - makes powerful application writing fun and easy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281748.l3SHmS7W001105@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Ex - CGI utility suite - makes powerful application writing fun and easy Alias: perl-CGI-Ex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235764 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 17:51:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 13:51:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234785] Review Request: perl-Email-Simple-Creator - Email::Simple constructor for starting anew In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281751.l3SHpXRh001199@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Simple-Creator - Email::Simple constructor for starting anew https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234785 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-28 13:51 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Rpmlint output: None [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL or Artistic [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is written in American English. [x] Spec file for the package is legible. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : 0129737130e106af223ac1e3f03b55b0 MD5SUM upstream package: 0129737130e106af223ac1e3f03b55b0 [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: Arches excluded: Why: [!] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] Latest version is packaged. === Issues === 1. WARNING: LICENSE is not a known parameter. (build output) 2. Missing BR perl(Test::Pod), perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) === Final Notes === 1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 18:32:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:32:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238235] Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281832.l3SIWL8Q002571@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238235 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chris.stone at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-04-28 14:32 EST ------- Kelly, I can sponser you, however I really prefer it if you can log onto EFNet IRC #fedora-devel as communication this way is much faster and easier. My nick there is XulChris. Some initial comments on your spec file: - Release tag needs a dist tag, for example: Release: 2%{?dist} Do not use 0.nixa. stuff, also remove dist tag stuff from your changelog comments, it should just be: * Fri Apr 27 2007 Kelly Miller 0.7.1-2 - The URL tag should just be: http://www.notmart.org - Your BR lists redundant packages, change it to: BuildRequires: qt-devel >= 3.0.0, kdelibs-devel >= 3.0.0 - I would recommend just using the first paragraph for summary - Change %files to %{_docdir}/HTML/en/tastymenu so that you own the directory, do not bother listing each file under this directory, the directory is all you need to list, anything under it gets picked up automatically. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 18:37:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:37:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238235] Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281837.l3SIbBJT002707@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238235 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-04-28 14:36 EST ------- oops, sorry for lack of sleep last night I mentioned the wrong IRC network :) #fedora-devel is on freenode.net, not EFNet Also, please shorten the Summary tag, all you need is: Summary: KMenu replacement -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 18:39:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:39:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235471] Review Request: perl-PDF-API2 - Perl module for creation and modification of PDF files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281839.l3SIdlTO002802@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-PDF-API2 - Perl module for creation and modification of PDF files Alias: perl-PDF-API2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235471 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-28 14:39 EST ------- Spec URL: http://symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/fedora/perl-PDF-API2.spec SRPM URL: http://symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/fedora/perl-PDF-API2-0.60-1.fc6.src.rpm * Sat Apr 28 2007 Bernard Johnson - 0.60-1 - v 0.60 - deliberately remove 027_winfont example as it wants Win32.pm - BR on perl(Ext::MakeMaker) rather than perl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 18:40:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:40:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238235] Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281840.l3SIepR8002846@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238235 ------- Additional Comments From lightsolphoenix at gmail.com 2007-04-28 14:40 EST ------- > - Your BR lists redundant packages, change it to: > BuildRequires: qt-devel >= 3.0.0, kdelibs-devel >= 3.0.0 Actually, that was my original BuildRequires list, but when I tested the build using mock, the system complained about qt and kdelibs not being there. When I added them to the BuildRequires list, the package compiled under mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 19:03:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 15:03:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281903.l3SJ30cj003380@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-04-28 15:02 EST ------- Laurent, Thanks for the comments. I'll look'em up and release a new SRPM tomorrow. BTW, feel free to review this submission if you have the spare time. (Given what needs to be done in bluez-utils, kdebluetooth is unlikely for F7-release... Hopefully we'll be able to get it running following the actual release.) - Gilboa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 19:04:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 15:04:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238235] Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281904.l3SJ4wx0003452@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238235 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-04-28 15:04 EST ------- Kelly: qt-devel and kdelibs-devel will bring in those other packages automatically. I imagine you made some other mistake previously. I tested it myself and it works here just fine. If you are getting build failures in mock check your build.log and root.log. The root.log should show those packages being added. Also, I tested this build on a 64bit system and there are 64bit rpath problems, please add this to your %prep section: # Avoid lib64 rpaths sed -i -e 's|"/lib /usr/lib|"/%{_lib} %{_libdir}|' configure Also, please run rpmlint on your packages after they are built, there are some rpmlint output which can be easily fixed, for example: W: tastymenu mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 46) W: tastymenu dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/tastymenu/common ../common W: tastymenu incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.fc6 0.7.1-1.fc6 E: tastymenu-debuginfo script-without-shebang /usr/src/debug/tastymenu-0.7.1/src/misc.cpp Rex: I'm not sure about the following rpmlint error, is this typical of KDE apps? E: tastymenu invalid-soname /usr/lib64/tastymenu_panelapplet.so tastymenu_panelapplet.so -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 19:08:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 15:08:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238235] Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281908.l3SJ8pf7003573@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238235 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-04-28 15:08 EST ------- W: tastymenu dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/tastymenu/common ../common Actually, this can be ignored. Also, in comment #8 I said: - I would recommend just using the first paragraph for summary I actually meant the description tag, not summary tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 19:31:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 15:31:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238235] Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281931.l3SJVKbn004247@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238235 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2007-04-28 15:31 EST ------- Nice work! tastymenu-0.7.1-1fc6.src.rpm seems a far better packaging than the previous one. There is still the issue of ${_libdir}/ tastymenu_panelapplet.so And your BuidlRequires are a little too long. "BuildRequires: qt-devel, kdelibs-devel" should be enough, even though it is not a critical issue. I have not looked that the compilation itself, but why kdebase is build-required? I copy-paste the issues found by rpmlint below: lrineau at tsetse ~/RPM $ rpmlint SRPMS/tastymenu-0.7.1-1.amoi_rineau.src.rpm W: tastymenu mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 42) lrineau at tsetse ~/RPM $ rpmlint tastymenu W: tastymenu incoherent-version-in-changelog 1 0.7.1-1.amoi_rineau E: tastymenu invalid-soname /usr/lib/tastymenu_panelapplet.so tastymenu_panelapplet.so W: tastymenu undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/tastymenu_panelapplet.so _ZTI8KService W: tastymenu undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/tastymenu_panelapplet.so _ZTI13KServiceGroup W: tastymenu undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/tastymenu_panelapplet.so _ZN8KService20serviceByDesktopPathERK7QString W: tastymenu undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/tastymenu_panelapplet.so _ZN13KServiceGroup7entriesEbbbb W: tastymenu undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/tastymenu_panelapplet.so _ZN9KDirWatch7addFileERK7QString W: tastymenu undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/tastymenu_panelapplet.so _ZN4KRun10runCommandE7QString W: tastymenu undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/tastymenu_panelapplet.so _ZNK9KFileItem4timeEjRb W: tastymenu undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/tastymenu_panelapplet.so _ZN13KServiceGroup4rootEv W: tastymenu undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/tastymenu_panelapplet.so _ZN13KServiceGroup5groupERK7QString W: tastymenu undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/tastymenu_panelapplet.so _ZN15KRecentDocument15recentDocumentsEv W: tastymenu undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/tastymenu_panelapplet.so _ZN13KServiceGroup10childCountEv W: tastymenu undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/tastymenu_panelapplet.so _ZN10KDirListerC1Eb W: tastymenu undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/tastymenu_panelapplet.so _ZN11KIconButtonC1EP7QWidgetPKc W: tastymenu undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/tastymenu_panelapplet.so _ZN18KDEDesktopMimeType3runERK4KURLb W: tastymenu undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/tastymenu_panelapplet.so _ZNK8KService6menuIdEv W: tastymenu undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/tastymenu_panelapplet.so _ZNK8KService6pixmapEN5KIcon5GroupEiiP7QString W: tastymenu undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/tastymenu_panelapplet.so _ZN9KDirWatchC1EP7QObjectPKc W: tastymenu unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/tastymenu_panelapplet.so /lib/libm.so.6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 19:50:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 15:50:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233975] Review Request: freefem++ - PDE solving tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281950.l3SJo6cB005088@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freefem++ - PDE solving tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233975 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |238284 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 19:53:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 15:53:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233975] Review Request: freefem++ - PDE solving tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281953.l3SJrTod005292@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freefem++ - PDE solving tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233975 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-04-28 15:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > REVIEW: > > * %{?dist} tag's present > * package's licensed under LGPL and license's included in package > !* rpmlint output: > > W: freefem++-glx non-standard-group Applications/Scientific > > Why don't use Applications/Engineering as in the main package? Copy & paste error from an old version. > W: freefem++-glx no-documentation > E: freefem++ binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/FreeFem++-client ['/usr/ > lib64'] > E: freefem++ binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/FreeFem++-cs ['/usr/lib64'] > E: freefem++ binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/FreeFem++-ide ['/usr/lib64'] > > Has to be fixed. Unfortunately, I'm currently unable to check if the way to fix > the rpath from PackagingGuidelines works for this package, but it should be > checked. Can't fix. The bug is in fltk package. See bug 214967. > W: freefem++ spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man1/FreeFem++.1.gz > > Change wrong permissions Will fix. > E: freefem++-debuginfo script-without-shebang /usr/src/debug/freefem++-2.14-1/ > src/fflib/mt19937ar.cpp > E: freefem++-debuginfo script-without-shebang /usr/src/debug/freefem++-2.14-1/ > src/lglib/mymain.cpp Will fix. > W: freefem++-mpi non-standard-group Applications/Scientific > W: freefem++-mpi no-documentation > > * md5sums match each other. However, 2.14 is not the newest freefem++'s > release so you have to package the newer version OK. > * BRs seem to be proper, mock fc6/x86_64 builds fine But devel doesn't. I'm working on this right now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 19:57:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 15:57:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235526] Review Request: pyxattr - Extended attributes library wrapper for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704281957.l3SJvfEk005544@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyxattr - Extended attributes library wrapper for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235526 mszpak at wp.pl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mszpak at wp.pl 2007-04-28 15:57 EST ------- It took me some time, but there is a big delay between build and publish packages in a file repository. After change of a name I added: Provides: python-xattr = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: python-xattr <= %{version}-%{release} (python-xattr name was used in DAG repository and package wasn't automatically updated). I talked with upstream and he promised to add a file with a license text to a tarball in the next version (if any :) ). Thanks for your help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 20:12:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 16:12:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704282012.l3SKCRwP005986@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-04-28 16:12 EST ------- The problem seems interesting but I've got a question. You've written that lapack-devel doesn't exist on RHEL. So which package provides %{_libdir}/ liblapack.so in RHEL? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 20:14:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 16:14:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704282014.l3SKEAwh006086@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-04-28 16:13 EST ------- Axel, why don't you keep BuildRequires: lapack-devel and just change it in RHEL branch of the specfile? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 21:31:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 17:31:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235527] Review Request: pylibacl - POSIX.1e ACLs library wrapper for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704282131.l3SLVDgH007893@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pylibacl - POSIX.1e ACLs library wrapper for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235527 ------- Additional Comments From mszpak at wp.pl 2007-04-28 17:31 EST ------- After change of a name I added: Provides: python-libacl = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: python-libacl <= %{version}-%{release} (python-libacl name was used in DAG repository and package wasn't automatically updated). I talked with upstream and he promised to add a file with a license text to a tarball in the next version (if any :) ). Because of a delay between build and publish package in a file repository there is still no version with added Provides/Obsoletes tags. I will close this issue when I will back from my holidays and verify that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 21:49:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 17:49:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233975] Review Request: freefem++ - PDE solving tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704282149.l3SLnhFg008283@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freefem++ - PDE solving tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233975 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-04-28 17:49 EST ------- New SRPM uploaded, fixing all except rpaths. Builds in mock devel/x86_64, too. http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/freefem++-2.16-1.src.rpm http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/freefem++.spec Current rpmlint output: W: freefem++-mpi no-documentation E: freefem++ binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/FreeFem++-ide ['/usr/lib64'] E: freefem++ binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/FreeFem++-client ['/usr/lib64'] E: freefem++ binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/FreeFem++-cs ['/usr/lib64'] W: freefem++-glx no-documentation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 28 22:58:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 18:58:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238235] Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704282258.l3SMwNdp009979@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238235 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-04-28 18:58 EST ------- indeed, there seems to be some linking problems. Also, I get a segfault when trying to configure tastymenu. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 01:05:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 21:05:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238235] Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704290105.l3T15Tpf012608@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238235 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-04-28 21:05 EST ------- it appears this needs to be linked against libkio as well. Kelly, you might want to contact upstream author and ask him about this. It seems tastymenu uses KServiceGroup class which is part of the kio library, but he does not link against libkio. I've fixed this by adding this line after %configure: sed -i -e 's|$(LIB_KDEUI)|$(LIB_KDEUI) $(LIB_KIO)|' src/Makefile The unused-direct-shlib-dependency warnings (I get two of them) are caused by libraries brought in through libtool from this line: postdeps="-lstdc++ -lm -lgcc_s -lc -lgcc_s" This cannot be worked-around by using Fedora's libtool because it does the same thing. I'm not sure how to avoid this warning other than adding this after %configure: sed -i -e 's|"-lstdc++ -lm -lgcc_s -lc -lgcc_s|"-lstdc++ -lc|' libtool But I'm not entirely sure what is going on here and if this is the proper fix. It might be okey to just ignore those warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 01:29:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 21:29:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220635] Review Request: livecd-tools - Tools for creating Live CD's In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704290129.l3T1T7CC012997@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: livecd-tools - Tools for creating Live CD's https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220635 ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2 at redhat.com 2007-04-28 21:28 EST ------- What's in the git tree should work for both x86 and ppc now, although it still needs a few things fixed for CHRP, and we need to work out how to include the 64-bit kernel. Seems rather unnecessary to have a whole separate ppc64 livecd when only the kernel would be different. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 01:58:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 21:58:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704290158.l3T1wC6E013404@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2007-04-28 21:58 EST ------- > The problem seems interesting but I've got a question. You've written that > lapack-devel doesn't exist on RHEL. So which package provides %{_libdir}/ > liblapack.so in RHEL? lapack itself, e.g. what I meant is that RHEL does have lapack, but hasn't split out the development files to lapack-devel, but the file dependency covers both. It's a packaging difference just in naming and subpackaging - at the end it's lapack bits that are being used in both cases. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 04:23:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 00:23:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238235] Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704290423.l3T4Nt2Q016353@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238235 ------- Additional Comments From lightsolphoenix at gmail.com 2007-04-29 00:23 EST ------- After a bunch of adjustments, here's the updated file list: Spec URL: http://crystalsanctuary.rpgsource.net/packages/specs/tastymenu.spec SRPM URL: http://crystalsanctuary.rpgsource.net/packages/source/tastymenu-0.7.1-4fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 04:28:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 00:28:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235191] Review Request: postr - Flickr uploader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704290428.l3T4Sqxo016488@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postr - Flickr uploader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235191 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-04-29 00:28 EST ------- Okay, now that nautilus-python is built in devel, I can move on with the review of this. Is the srpm and spec from the initial report still the most current? -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 04:29:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 00:29:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235191] Review Request: postr - Flickr uploader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704290429.l3T4TbLK016504@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postr - Flickr uploader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235191 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-04-29 00:29 EST ------- Okay, now that nautilus-python is built in devel, I can move on with the review of this. Is the srpm and spec from the initial report still the most current? I see from the website he got an icon submitted. Do you want to respin an srpm and include the new icon as well? -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 04:30:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 00:30:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235191] Review Request: postr - Flickr uploader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704290430.l3T4Ug3r016528@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postr - Flickr uploader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235191 jspaleta at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jspaleta at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 04:56:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 00:56:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233597] Review Request: pigment - Media Center Toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704290456.l3T4uRBq017021@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pigment - Media Center Toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233597 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium jspaleta at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-04-29 00:56 EST ------- ping! Matthias, you forgot to set the fedora-cvs flag. I'm setting it now. -jef"wondering why i hadn't seen a pigment build notice, cuz I'm really keen on doing the review for elisa after pigments in the tree"spaleta -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 05:03:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 01:03:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235191] Review Request: postr - Flickr uploader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704290503.l3T53SgG017155@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postr - Flickr uploader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235191 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-04-29 01:03 EST ------- Whoa! the md5sum from the postr-0.5.tar.gz you include in your srpm doesn't match the one pulled from http://burtonini.com/computing/postr-0.5.tar.gz. I did a quick diff of the contents, there is a difference, upstream did a quick fix to setup.py which the tarball you are using doesn't include. diff -u postr-0.5/setup.py /tmp/postr-0.5/setup.py --- postr-0.5/setup.py 2007-02-09 08:22:14.000000000 -0900 +++ /tmp/postr-0.5/setup.py 2007-04-03 23:08:51.000000000 -0800 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ from distutils.core import setup setup(name='Postr', - version='0.4', + version='0.5', description='Flickr Uploader', author='Ross Burton', author_email='ross at burtonini.com', Please update your source tarball and do a srpm release bump. Might as well include that upstream icon as a new source while your at it. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 09:09:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 05:09:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235191] Review Request: postr - Flickr uploader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704290909.l3T99J1j021415@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postr - Flickr uploader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235191 ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com 2007-04-29 05:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Whoa! > > the md5sum from the postr-0.5.tar.gz you include in your srpm doesn't match the > one pulled from http://burtonini.com/computing/postr-0.5.tar.gz. > > I did a quick diff of the contents, there is a difference, upstream did a quick > fix to setup.py which the tarball you are using doesn't include. > > diff -u postr-0.5/setup.py /tmp/postr-0.5/setup.py > --- postr-0.5/setup.py 2007-02-09 08:22:14.000000000 -0900 > +++ /tmp/postr-0.5/setup.py 2007-04-03 23:08:51.000000000 -0800 > @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ > from distutils.core import setup > > setup(name='Postr', > - version='0.4', > + version='0.5', > description='Flickr Uploader', > author='Ross Burton', > author_email='ross at burtonini.com', > > Please update your source tarball and do a srpm release bump. Might as well > include that upstream icon as a new source while your at it. > > -jef Thanks for pointing out all the issues. The version number was wrong in setup.py earlier, but I did not notice that a new tarball was released. I'll create a new version tonight, with the icons from bzr included. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 10:08:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 06:08:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187317] Review Request: mindi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704291008.l3TA8TsB024316@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mindi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187317 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From bruno.cornec at hp.com 2007-04-29 06:08 EST ------- Due to problems on 1.2.2/2.2.2 I skiped those packages. Could you check the status of the mindi package available at ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/fedora-extras/mindi-1.2.3-1.fc6.src.rpm (notice that mindi now needs also mindi-busybox available at the same place: ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/fedora-extras/mindi-busybox-1.2.2-2.fc6.src.rpm) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 10:22:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 06:22:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187318] Review Request: mondo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704291022.l3TAMb3J024597@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mondo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187318 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From bruno.cornec at hp.com 2007-04-29 06:22 EST ------- An updated version is now available at ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/fedora-extras/mondo-2.2.3-1.fc6.src.rpm which hopefully solves the issues encountered in the past. Of course, mindi needs to be accepted first, so this has to wait till that point. TIA for your feedback. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 10:39:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 06:39:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187317] Review Request: mindi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704291039.l3TAdf2l025033@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mindi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187317 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-04-29 06:39 EST ------- i still stand by my earlier comment. you should use the busybox in fedora. not some other version. If there is extra functionality you need you should get it upstream to busybox rather than forking busybox. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 12:52:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 08:52:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233975] Review Request: freefem++ - PDE solving tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704291252.l3TCq1HC028847@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freefem++ - PDE solving tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233975 Bug 233975 depends on bug 238284, which changed state. Bug 238284 Summary: fltk-config --ldflags introduces rpaths https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238284 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |ERRATA Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 13:33:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 09:33:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206871] Review Request: ekg2 - Multi-protocol instant messaging and chat client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704291333.l3TDXova031320@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ekg2 - Multi-protocol instant messaging and chat client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206871 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-04-29 09:33 EST ------- http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/ekg2-0-0.6.20070427.src.rpm http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/ekg2.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 15:18:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 11:18:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187317] Review Request: mindi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704291518.l3TFIQF8001049@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mindi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187317 ------- Additional Comments From bruno.cornec at hp.com 2007-04-29 11:18 EST ------- I still stand on my earlier comments: you've not understood what is mindi's goal, not why I need to control the way busybox is built. I don't use whatever busybox, I make a special binary based on busybox hold under rootfs/sbin that will be use at restore time. You asked to not have a binary in the tree, and I agreed on that, even if it wasn't a priority for the project. Now let me use what I need, no what you would like us to do !! We're not here to discuss on upstream functions but to package an existing app ! Now, I think I won't pass any more time on this. After all people wanting to use it on fedore have packages since a long time, and use them. My goal was to make it easy for fedore users. You disagree. That's fine. I'll rather work on creating repodata info and config files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 16:36:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 12:36:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 214106] Review Request: php-pear-Net-FTP - Provides an OO interface to the PHP FTP functions plus some additions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704291636.l3TGa3r6002448@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-FTP - Provides an OO interface to the PHP FTP functions plus some additions Alias: pear-Net-FTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214106 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2007-04-29 12:36 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: php-pear-Net-FTP New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 16:37:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 12:37:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207313] Review Request: php-pear-PHP-Compat - Provides missing functionality for older versions of PHP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704291637.l3TGb1pY002491@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHP-Compat - Provides missing functionality for older versions of PHP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207313 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2007-04-29 12:36 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: php-pear-PHP-Compat New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 16:37:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 12:37:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206052] Review Request: php-pear-PHP-CompatInfo - Find out version and extensions required for a piece of code to ru n In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704291637.l3TGbvWO002552@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHP-CompatInfo - Find out version and extensions required for a piece of code to ru n Alias: pear-PHP-CompatInfo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206052 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2007-04-29 12:37 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: php-pear-PHP-CompatInfo New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 17:27:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 13:27:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233975] Review Request: freefem++ - PDE solving tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704291727.l3THRfnB004007@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freefem++ - PDE solving tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233975 Bug 233975 depends on bug 238284, which changed state. Bug 238284 Summary: fltk-config --ldflags introduces rpaths https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238284 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|ERRATA | Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 17:30:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 13:30:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202376] Review Request: openwebmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704291730.l3THUavZ004141@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openwebmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202376 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-29 13:30 EST ------- spec file and srpm give 404 errors -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 17:34:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 13:34:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230710] Review Request: boolstuff - Disjunctive Normal Form boolean expression library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704291734.l3THYWSc004338@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boolstuff - Disjunctive Normal Form boolean expression library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230710 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-29 13:34 EST ------- For 0.1.10-1: ? Subpackages - Please justify to split booldnf "subpackage" from boolstuff "main" package. Multilib effect or something? ( I don't know about multilib issue well) Usually splitting packages only addes complexity and confusion. Also, if you still want to split booldnf package, please reconsider the name of main package (usually, these type of package should be named as "-libs"). * Timestamps - This software installs some files which are not modified during build stage (e.g. header files, man files) and keeping timestamps on these files is recommended. For this package, the following method works. ------------------------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="%{__install} -p" docdir=%{_datadir}/tmpdocdir ------------------------------------------------------------------- ? File entry ------------------------------------------------------------------- /usr/include/boolstuff-0.1/boolstuff/BoolExpr.cpp ------------------------------------------------------------------- - Why is this file needed? (well, actually this file is called from BoolExpr.h, however is it correct?) ? documentation - For -devel subpackage: ------------------------------------------------------------------- %doc examples/example.cpp examples/test-booldnf.pl examples/non-string-nodes.cpp ------------------------------------------------------------------- - Any reason you want to remove example/ directory? =================================================================== !! I would appreciate it if you would review any of my ruby modules related review requests (bug 237380 and bug 237379 , both needed by alexandria < bug 237382 > bug 237381 is being reviewed by Chris Weyl) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 17:44:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 13:44:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233975] Review Request: freefem++ - PDE solving tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704291744.l3THihWn004666@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freefem++ - PDE solving tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233975 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-04-29 13:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > Can't fix. The bug is in fltk package. See bug 214967. I meant bug 238284. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 17:51:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 13:51:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233975] Review Request: freefem++ - PDE solving tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704291751.l3THpame004814@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freefem++ - PDE solving tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233975 Bug 233975 depends on bug 238284, which changed state. Bug 238284 Summary: fltk-config --ldflags introduces rpaths https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238284 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |ERRATA Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 18:03:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 14:03:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238348] New: Review Request: xfce4-verve-plugin - A comfortable command line plugin for the Xfce panel Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238348 Summary: Review Request: xfce4-verve-plugin - A comfortable command line plugin for the Xfce panel Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at christoph-wickert.de QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras/review/SPECS/xfce4-verve-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras/review/SRPMS/xfce4-verve-plugin-0.3.5-2.fc7.src.rpm Description: This plugin is like the (quite old) xfce4-minicmd-plugin, except that it ships more cool features, such as: * Command history * Auto-completion (including command history) * Open URLs and eMail addresses in your favourite applications * Focus grabbing via D-BUS (so you can bind a shortcut to it) * Custom input field width Note: I'm thinking about orphaning xfce4-minicmd-plugin after this package has been added to the repo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 18:04:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 14:04:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238349] New: Review Request: xfce4-places-plugin - Places menu for the Xfce panel Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238349 Summary: Review Request: xfce4-places-plugin - Places menu for the Xfce panel Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at christoph-wickert.de QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras/review/SPECS/xfce4-places-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras/review/SRPMS/xfce4-places-plugin-0.2.0-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: A menu with quick access to folders, documents, and removable media. The Places plugin brings much of the functionality of GNOME?s Places menu to Xfce. It puts a simple button on the panel. Clicking on this button opens up a menu with 4 sections: 1) System-defined directories (home folder, trash, desktop, file system) 2) Removable media (using thunar-vfs) 3) User-defined bookmarks (reads ~/.gtk-bookmarks) 4) Recent documents submenu (requires GTK v2.10 or greater) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 18:06:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 14:06:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237738] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump - Pretty printing of data structures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704291806.l3TI6VsT005281@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Dump - Pretty printing of data structures Alias: perl-Data-Dump https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237738 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bjohnson at symetrix.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 18:11:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 14:11:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237739] Review Request: perl-File-Modified - Checks intelligently if files have changed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704291811.l3TIBO1w005413@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Modified - Checks intelligently if files have changed Alias: perl-File-Modified https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237739 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-29 14:11 EST ------- You might want to look into this: + make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/test....ok 2/44 skipped: Digest:: is installed, 1/44 unexpectedly succeeded All tests successful (1 subtest UNEXPECTEDLY SUCCEEDED), 2 subtests skipped. Files=1, Tests=44, 4 wallclock secs ( 0.35 cusr + 0.05 csys = 0.40 CPU) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 18:14:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 14:14:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238248] Review Request: ddccontrol - TFT monitor parameters control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704291814.l3TIENZb005550@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ddccontrol - TFT monitor parameters control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238248 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-29 14:14 EST ------- Looks like you don't have a sponsor, so I'm adding the FE-NEEDSPONSOR blocker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 18:25:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 14:25:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237738] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump - Pretty printing of data structures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704291825.l3TIPdrL005887@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Dump - Pretty printing of data structures Alias: perl-Data-Dump https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237738 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-29 14:25 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Rpmlint output: None [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL or Artistic [-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is written in American English. [x] Spec file for the package is legible. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : a61c1537bdb484b909cfb9a514853838 MD5SUM upstream package: a61c1537bdb484b909cfb9a514853838 [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: Arches excluded: Why: [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] Latest version is packaged. === Issues === 1. === Final Notes === 1. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 18:31:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 14:31:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235780] Review Request: perl-Class-Prototyped - Fast prototype-based OO programming in Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704291831.l3TIV5ne006135@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Prototyped - Fast prototype-based OO programming in Perl Alias: Class-Prototyped https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235780 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bjohnson at symetrix.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 18:33:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 14:33:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 212885] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Request - Provides an easy way to perform HTTP requests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704291833.l3TIX7Rw006232@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Request - Provides an easy way to perform HTTP requests Alias: pear-HTTP-Request https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212885 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-04-29 14:33 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: php-pear-HTTP-Request New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 18:36:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 14:36:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218229] Review Request: php-pear-Image-Color - Manage and handles color data and conversions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704291836.l3TIaWqE006304@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Image-Color - Manage and handles color data and conversions Alias: pear-Image-Color https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218229 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-04-29 14:36 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: php-pear-Image-Color New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 18:37:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 14:37:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218230] Review Request: php-pear-Image-Canvas - Common interface to image drawing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704291837.l3TIbxk8006434@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Image-Canvas - Common interface to image drawing Alias: pear-Image-Canvas https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218230 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-04-29 14:37 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: php-pear-Image-Canvas New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 18:39:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 14:39:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235780] Review Request: perl-Class-Prototyped - Fast prototype-based OO programming in Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704291839.l3TIdE3F006486@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Prototyped - Fast prototype-based OO programming in Perl Alias: Class-Prototyped https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235780 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-29 14:39 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Rpmlint output: None [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL or Artistic [-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is written in American English. [x] Spec file for the package is legible. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : 82d22ef4628e276b2eb7d4debabdf31d MD5SUM upstream package: 82d22ef4628e276b2eb7d4debabdf31d [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: Arches excluded: Why: [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] Latest version is packaged. === Issues === 1. === Final Notes === 1. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 18:39:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 14:39:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222593] Review Request: php-pear-Image-Graph - Displays numerical data as a graph/chart/plot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704291839.l3TIdNNA006503@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Image-Graph - Displays numerical data as a graph/chart/plot Alias: pear-Image-Graph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222593 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-04-29 14:39 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: php-pear-Image-Graph New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 20:01:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 16:01:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223592] Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704292001.l3TK1Y76009702@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223592 ------- Additional Comments From dgoodwin at dangerouslyinc.com 2007-04-29 16:01 EST ------- Updated spec file as per the above suggestions. Left the deprecation warning in, just noticed this myself after upgrading to Fedora 7. Will investigate the equivalent functionality and change in an upcoming wuja release. http://dangerouslyinc.com/files/wuja/wuja.spec http://dangerouslyinc.com/files/wuja/wuja-0.0.7-2.fc7.src.rpm Will read these guidelines and attempt to start submitting some review requests as soon as I can find some free time. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 20:24:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 16:24:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238235] Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704292024.l3TKOwMv010665@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238235 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-04-29 16:24 EST ------- Please remove the qt-devel from BuildRequires, this is redundant and is picked up by kdelibs-devel. There is also a new version out. I'm not sure yet what to do with the .so name. Perhaps Rex might know more. I found another bug with new subfolders not showing up. For example if you install an application that creates a new subfolder, the application will not show up in tastymenu, but shows up in kmenu. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 20:35:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 16:35:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238270] Review Request: widelands - realtime-strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704292035.l3TKZbnq010838@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: widelands - realtime-strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238270 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bjohnson at symetrix.com ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-29 16:35 EST ------- I see several problems right away... 1. You might want to get some feedback on the version numbering. Upstream is pretty messed up. You way of handling it seems reasonable, but I've never seen it done that way. 2. During build: "WARNING: Could not find pngwrite. PNG compatification disabled." 3. Compile completely ignores CXXFLAGS, this is a blocker. 4. Does not update desktop database: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-de6770dd9867fcd085a73a4700f6bcd0d10294ef 5. During build: "Checking for EF_newFrame() in C library efence... no" Wants to be linked to ElectricFence?? 6. Several messages like this: msgmerge: error while opening "widelands_en_EN.po" for reading: No such file or directory msgfmt: error while opening "widelands_en_EN.po" for reading: No such file or directory are these actual problems? 7. Is this important: INFORMATION: Astyle produces malformed indentation (see for example [https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1642489&group_id=2319&atid=102319]) and is disabled whilst waiting for repair. If you really want to use it, execute "cd /usr/bin && ln -s astyle buggy-astyle" and try again. 8. Provides a lot of perl junk but doesn't require perl: Provides: perl(Client) perl(ProtocolPacket) perl(ProtocolPacket_ChatMessage) perl(ProtocolPacket_Connect) perl(ProtocolPacket_GetRoomInfo) perl(ProtocolPacket_GetUserInfo) perl(ProtocolPacket_Hello) perl(ProtocolPacket_Ping) perl(ProtocolPacket_UserEntered) perl(Server) This seems to be because of /usr/share/widelands/game_server. Possibly this might be better split off. But it certainly doesn't belong in the -data package. 9. Locale handling is incorrect: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-8c605ebf8330f6d505f384e671986fa99a8f72ee 10. Desktop database is not updated: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets?#head-de6770dd9867fcd085a73a4700f6bcd0d10294ef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 20:55:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 16:55:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235471] Review Request: perl-PDF-API2 - Perl module for creation and modification of PDF files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704292055.l3TKt4Ur011603@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-PDF-API2 - Perl module for creation and modification of PDF files Alias: perl-PDF-API2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235471 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-29 16:55 EST ------- Ok, so :) Sorry for the delay, but I wanted to both think this one through (and had some sort of obsessive desire to get all of Catalyst-Devel's prereqs posted for review) So, fonts. The key bits that control where fonts are looked for appears to be at the beginning of lib/PDF/API2.pm: " @FontDirs = ( (map { "$_/PDF/API2/fonts" } @INC), qw[ /usr/share/fonts /usr/local/share/fonts c:/windows/fonts c:/winnt/fonts ] ); " They do appear to be integral to the function and operation of the package. I've taken a peek at a number of other font packages, the canonical place for fonts seems to be /usr/share/fonts... The bitstream-vera-fonts package has %post and %postun scriptlets that seem to help with enabling other apps to use these fonts. So, my suggestion here would be to: 1. make a little patch to change @FontDirs defaults to sensible paths 2. move the fonts from their location in @INC to %{_sharedir}/fonts/%{name} 3. break the fonts out into a subpackage, requiring that subpackage by the main package (but not vice-versa) 4. determine what %post/%postun scriptlets are needed to get these fonts recognized and usable by the system 5. (really post-approval/import/build) include the sub-package in the right spot in the comps.xml files such that people will see it with other fonts packages That should break these fonts out in a sensible fashion that makes them available to the rest of the system without impacting the functioning of this module. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 20:56:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 16:56:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235780] Review Request: perl-Class-Prototyped - Fast prototype-based OO programming in Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704292056.l3TKuHUr011683@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Prototyped - Fast prototype-based OO programming in Perl Alias: Class-Prototyped https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235780 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-29 16:56 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Class-Prototyped Short Description: Fast prototype-based OO programming in Perl Owners: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Branches: FC-5, FC-6, devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 20:56:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 16:56:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235780] Review Request: perl-Class-Prototyped - Fast prototype-based OO programming in Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704292056.l3TKuTlg011708@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Prototyped - Fast prototype-based OO programming in Perl Alias: Class-Prototyped https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235780 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 20:57:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 16:57:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237738] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump - Pretty printing of data structures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704292057.l3TKvi4q011813@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Dump - Pretty printing of data structures Alias: perl-Data-Dump https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237738 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-29 16:57 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Data-Dump Short Description: Pretty printing of data structures Owners: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Branches: FC-5, FC-6, devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 20:57:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 16:57:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237738] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump - Pretty printing of data structures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704292057.l3TKvjlp011829@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Dump - Pretty printing of data structures Alias: perl-Data-Dump https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237738 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 20:58:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 16:58:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238366] New: Review Request: autodownloader - GUI-tool to automate the download of certain files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238366 Summary: Review Request: autodownloader - GUI-tool to automate the download of certain files Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/autodownloader.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/autodownloader-0.2.0-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Some software (usually games) requires certain data files to operate, sometimes these datafiles can be freely downloaded but may not be redistributed and thus cannot be put into so called packages as part of a distro. autodownloader is a tool which can be used as part of a package to automate the download of the needed files. It will prompt the user explaining to him the need of the download and asking if it is ok to make an internet connection, after this it will show the license of the to be downloaded files and last it will do the actual download and md5 verification off these files. This whole process can be configured by the packager through a simple configuration file. Notice that autodownloader itself is a piece of software / tool that is fully free software, written in Python and licensed under the GNU GPL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 21:00:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:00:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238367] New: Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238367 Summary: Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/xu4.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/xu4-1.0-0.1.beta3.fc7.src.rpm Description: XU4 is a remake of the computer game Ultima IV. This game requires the original Ultima IV datafiles, which can be freely downloaded from the internet but may not be (re)distributed. When you start xu4 for the first time it will offer to download the datafiles for you. XU4 isn't a new game based on the Ultima IV story -- it is a faithful recreation of the old game, right up to the crappy graphics. If you are looking for a game with modern gameplay and graphics, this is not it -- yet. New features that improve the gameplay and keep with the spirit of the original game will be added. --- Notice to reviewers, this package Requires: autodownloader, which has been submitted for review in bug 238366 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 21:01:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:01:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238366] Review Request: autodownloader - GUI-tool to automate the download of certain files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704292101.l3TL1UXW011921@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autodownloader - GUI-tool to automate the download of certain files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238366 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |238367 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-29 17:01 EST ------- Notice to reviewers, reviewing this package will make much more sense, when also reviewing / looking at the xu4 review, which uses this. The xu4 review is bug 238367 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 21:01:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:01:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238367] Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704292101.l3TL1VCw011930@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238367 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |238366 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 21:07:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:07:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238235] Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704292107.l3TL7xkP012119@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238235 ------- Additional Comments From lightsolphoenix at gmail.com 2007-04-29 17:07 EST ------- Done, and I also updated the package to version 0.8. Spec URL: http://crystalsanctuary.rpgsource.net/packages/specs/tastymenu.spec SRPM URL: http://crystalsanctuary.rpgsource.net/packages/source/tastymenu-0.8-1fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 21:41:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:41:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187317] Review Request: mindi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704292141.l3TLfg5S013014@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mindi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187317 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-04-29 17:41 EST ------- I'm sorry you feel that way. To give you some perspective of where i'm coming from. say i start some project and fork busybox for my needs and so does someone else. with your version we would now have 4 slightly different versions of busybox. that means 4 seperate people need to maintain it. The reason i suggest and its not a must just a suggestion that you use the fedora busybox. is so that we don't end up with a ton of pretty much the same but just a litte different versions of the same package. You need to submit your mindi-busybox package for review. Please continue to work with us. I did a quick check of the package last night. you are still not using disttags as per the guidelines. you are not allowed to hardcode the disttag value. /etc/mindi/ needs to be owned by mindi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 21:48:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:48:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237739] Review Request: perl-File-Modified - Checks intelligently if files have changed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704292148.l3TLm9Hr013176@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Modified - Checks intelligently if files have changed Alias: perl-File-Modified https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237739 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-29 17:48 EST ------- That appears to be a broken (and badly written) TODO test that doesn't have the decentcy to fail successfully. :) The skipped tests are expected. Patched, added a br of perl(Test::Exception) SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-File-Modified-0.07-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-File-Modified.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 21:54:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:54:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218230] Review Request: php-pear-Image-Canvas - Common interface to image drawing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704292154.l3TLs1Sd013296@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Image-Canvas - Common interface to image drawing Alias: pear-Image-Canvas https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218230 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 21:54:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:54:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222593] Review Request: php-pear-Image-Graph - Displays numerical data as a graph/chart/plot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704292154.l3TLs6XQ013311@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Image-Graph - Displays numerical data as a graph/chart/plot Alias: pear-Image-Graph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222593 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 21:54:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:54:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218229] Review Request: php-pear-Image-Color - Manage and handles color data and conversions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704292154.l3TLs9mw013334@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Image-Color - Manage and handles color data and conversions Alias: pear-Image-Color https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218229 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 21:54:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:54:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207313] Review Request: php-pear-PHP-Compat - Provides missing functionality for older versions of PHP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704292154.l3TLsS3J013402@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHP-Compat - Provides missing functionality for older versions of PHP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207313 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 21:54:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:54:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 214106] Review Request: php-pear-Net-FTP - Provides an OO interface to the PHP FTP functions plus some additions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704292154.l3TLsOWG013380@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-FTP - Provides an OO interface to the PHP FTP functions plus some additions Alias: pear-Net-FTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214106 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 21:54:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:54:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 212885] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Request - Provides an easy way to perform HTTP requests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704292154.l3TLsVle013408@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Request - Provides an easy way to perform HTTP requests Alias: pear-HTTP-Request https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212885 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 21:54:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:54:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206052] Review Request: php-pear-PHP-CompatInfo - Find out version and extensions required for a piece of code to ru n In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704292154.l3TLsckd013436@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHP-CompatInfo - Find out version and extensions required for a piece of code to ru n Alias: pear-PHP-CompatInfo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206052 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 21:57:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:57:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231669] Review Request: libsynce - Connection library for Pocket PC devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704292157.l3TLvmQn013527@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsynce - Connection library for Pocket PC devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231669 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 21:58:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:58:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231670] Review Request: librapi - Library to connect to Pocket PC devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704292158.l3TLwTrt013559@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librapi - Library to connect to Pocket PC devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231670 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 22:01:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 18:01:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231674] Review Request: libmimedir - Library to parse MIME Directory Profile In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704292201.l3TM1q5L013660@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmimedir - Library to parse MIME Directory Profile https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231674 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 22:04:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 18:04:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231675] Review Request: librra - Connection to Pocket PC devices, part of SynCE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704292204.l3TM4Ka8013721@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librra - Connection to Pocket PC devices, part of SynCE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231675 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 22:06:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 18:06:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231679] Review Request: synce-serial - Serial connection support for Pocket PC devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704292206.l3TM6r6u013855@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-serial - Serial connection support for Pocket PC devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231679 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 22:07:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 18:07:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231680] Review Request: vdccm - Serial connection daemon for Pocket PC devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704292207.l3TM7xpn013905@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdccm - Serial connection daemon for Pocket PC devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231680 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 22:11:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 18:11:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231681] Review Request: synce-kde - Connection service application for Pocket PC handhelds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704292211.l3TMBakA014002@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-kde - Connection service application for Pocket PC handhelds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231681 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 22:12:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 18:12:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231683] Review Request: syncekonnector - Synchronization application for Pocket PC handhelds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704292212.l3TMCaMj014039@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: syncekonnector - Synchronization application for Pocket PC handhelds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231683 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 22:14:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 18:14:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231685] Review Request: kcemirror - Remote display control for PocketPC devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704292214.l3TME2E9014081@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kcemirror - Remote display control for PocketPC devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231685 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 22:14:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 18:14:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238270] Review Request: widelands - realtime-strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704292214.l3TMEZYs014114@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: widelands - realtime-strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238270 ------- Additional Comments From karlikt at gmail.com 2007-04-29 18:14 EST ------- 1. I thought a lot of time about it and when I was begining to write a spec, the version was build10 or 10 (two ways :P ), but it is not a numerical version and I think it will be easier to update when developers release normal versions (like X.YZ), because I will not need epoch 2. It is not important, I asked developer about it and it is not require 3. I am working about it (setting flags is in python and I do not know how can I fix it) 4. I forgot about it, added 5. I will check it. 6. I think it is not important (all works correctly I think) 7. I'll check it 8. I have added require perl in data subpackage 9. It might be a problem. The locales can't be in /usr/share/locale, because it is not a one file and the names can conflict with other package and tehere is a directory. I think in this situation using %find_lang does not make any sense. 10. Like 4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 22:15:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 18:15:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237739] Review Request: perl-File-Modified - Checks intelligently if files have changed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704292215.l3TMF6TJ014149@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Modified - Checks intelligently if files have changed Alias: perl-File-Modified https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237739 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-29 18:15 EST ------- Err, that should have been: SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-File-Modified-0.07-2.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 22:16:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 18:16:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233597] Review Request: pigment - Media Center Toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704292216.l3TMG5Gp014179@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pigment - Media Center Toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233597 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 22:18:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 18:18:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234717] Review Request: spambayes - Bayesian anti-spam filter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704292218.l3TMILQQ014235@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spambayes - Bayesian anti-spam filter Alias: spambayes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234717 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 22:20:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 18:20:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233754] Review Request: marble - A KDE Desktop Globe In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704292220.l3TMKtN7014312@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: marble - A KDE Desktop Globe https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233754 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 22:21:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 18:21:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235764] Review Request: perl-CGI-Ex - CGI utility suite - makes powerful application writing fun and easy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704292221.l3TMLpbO014368@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Ex - CGI utility suite - makes powerful application writing fun and easy Alias: perl-CGI-Ex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235764 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 22:22:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 18:22:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235780] Review Request: perl-Class-Prototyped - Fast prototype-based OO programming in Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704292222.l3TMMi7C014430@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Prototyped - Fast prototype-based OO programming in Perl Alias: Class-Prototyped https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235780 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 22:23:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 18:23:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237381] Review Request: ruby-zoom - Ruby binding to ZOOM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704292223.l3TMNaI2014468@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-zoom - Ruby binding to ZOOM Alias: ruby-zoom https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237381 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 22:24:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 18:24:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237738] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump - Pretty printing of data structures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704292224.l3TMOdkC014515@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Dump - Pretty printing of data structures Alias: perl-Data-Dump https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237738 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 22:25:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 18:25:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237888] Review Request: perl-Tree-Simple-VisitorFactory - Factory object for dispensing Visitor objects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704292225.l3TMPqwU014553@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Tree-Simple-VisitorFactory - Factory object for dispensing Visitor objects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237888 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 22:27:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 18:27:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238000] Review Request: seahorse-adventures - Help barbie the seahorse float on bubbles to the moon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704292227.l3TMR1n8014621@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seahorse-adventures - Help barbie the seahorse float on bubbles to the moon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238000 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 22:32:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 18:32:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238073] Review Request: perl-GTop - Perl interface to libgtop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704292232.l3TMWNvH014786@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GTop - Perl interface to libgtop Alias: perl-GTop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238073 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 22:46:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 18:46:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238366] Review Request: autodownloader - GUI-tool to automate the download of certain files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704292246.l3TMkknG015236@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autodownloader - GUI-tool to automate the download of certain files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238366 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dev at nigelj.com ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-04-29 18:46 EST ------- I'll look into doing this review soon (I can't right now), but an inital note: Description: "[...] Notice that autodownloader itself is a piece of software / tool that is fully free software, written in Python and licensed under the GNU GPL." I'd nearly question if this should be removed? Rational: 1. Fedora only accepts 'free' software licenses 2. It does not appear to be a program directly interfaced with by users (so why would a user care that it's written in python?) 3. If you want to stress the fact that it's python then way not mention it as "Autodownloader is a python based tool which can be used as [...]" I'd also note that the other two paragraphs seem to be in the wrong order ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 22:58:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 18:58:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238373] New: Review Request: libopenraw - decode camera RAW files. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238373 Summary: Review Request: libopenraw - decode camera RAW files. Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: trond.danielsen at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://open-gnss.org/pub/fedora/libopenraw/libopenraw.spec SRPM URL: ftp://open-gnss.org/pub/fedora/libopenraw/libopenraw-0.0.2-1.src.rpm Description: libopenraw is an ongoing project to provide a free software implementation for camera RAW files decoding. One of the main reason is that dcraw is not suited for easy integration into applications, and there is a need for an easy to use API to build free software digital image processing application. Package builds in mock. rpmlint reports no error except from a warning regarding documentation for the devel package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 29 23:27:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 19:27:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235471] Review Request: perl-PDF-API2 - Perl module for creation and modification of PDF files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704292327.l3TNRnUa016111@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-PDF-API2 - Perl module for creation and modification of PDF files Alias: perl-PDF-API2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235471 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-29 19:27 EST ------- Wait, even better... I just notice that these fonts are just deja-vu fonts and are all located in either dejavu-fonts or dejavu-fonts-experimental packages in Fedora(-Extras). So I removed the fonts from the installation entirely and pointed the FontDir to search the dejavu font directory, and now require those packages. I think that gets us what we want right? Spec URL: http://symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/fedora/perl-PDF-API2.spec SRPM URL: http://symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/fedora/perl-PDF-API2-0.60-2.fc6.src.rpm * Sun Apr 29 2007 Bernard Johnson - 0.60-2 - remove fonts and depend on dejavu-fonts and dejavu-fonts-experimental - change font search path - remove font docs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 00:38:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 20:38:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238379] New: Review Request: Emesene - Emesene is an MSN Messenger client writed in python and GTK Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238379 Summary: Review Request: Emesene - Emesene is an MSN Messenger client writed in python and GTK Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wilmer at fedoraproject.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.linuxtachira.org/review/emesene.spec SRPM URL: http://www.linuxtachira.org/review/emesene-1.0-1.src.rpm Description: emesene is an OS independent MSN Messenger client writted in python an GTK. The main idea is to make a client similar to the official MSN Messenger client but kepping it simple and with a nice GUI. I need Sponsor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 00:42:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 20:42:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238379] Review Request: Emesene - Emesene is an MSN Messenger client writted in python and GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704300042.l3U0grs9017726@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Emesene - Emesene is an MSN Messenger client writted in python and GTK Alias: Emesene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238379 wilmer at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: Emesene - |Review Request: Emesene - |Emesene is an MSN Messenger |Emesene is an MSN Messenger |client writed in python and |client writted in python and |GTK |GTK OtherBugsDependingO| |163776, 177841 nThis| | Alias| |Emesene -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 00:56:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 20:56:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234717] Review Request: spambayes - Bayesian anti-spam filter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704300056.l3U0uZtd018053@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spambayes - Bayesian anti-spam filter Alias: spambayes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234717 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-04-29 20:56 EST ------- Built on all branches, thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 01:02:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 21:02:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237381] Review Request: ruby-zoom - Ruby binding to ZOOM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704300102.l3U12kuv018217@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-zoom - Ruby binding to ZOOM Alias: ruby-zoom https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237381 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-29 21:02 EST ------- Rebuilt successfully on all branches. Closing as NEXTRELEASE. Thank you for reviewing and approving this package!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 01:02:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 21:02:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237382] Review Request: alexandria - Book collection manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704300102.l3U12vEW018235@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alexandria - Book collection manager Alias: alexandria https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237382 Bug 237382 depends on bug 237381, which changed state. Bug 237381 Summary: Review Request: ruby-zoom - Ruby binding to ZOOM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237381 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 01:09:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 21:09:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238379] Review Request: Emesene - Emesene is an MSN Messenger client writted in python and GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704300109.l3U19S49018429@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Emesene - Emesene is an MSN Messenger client writted in python and GTK Alias: Emesene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238379 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-04-29 21:09 EST ------- The spelling needs improving, i.e. the summary should be changed from: "Emesene is an OS independent MSN Messenger client writted in python and GTK" to something like: "Emesene is an OS independent MSN Messenger client written in Python and GTK" Also note that there is a potential trademark violation with the use of "MSN Messenger" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 01:27:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 21:27:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221665] Review Request: php-pear-Numbers-Roman - Provides methods for converting to and from Roman Numerals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704300127.l3U1RMCX018734@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Numbers-Roman - Provides methods for converting to and from Roman Numerals Alias: pear-Numbers-Roman https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221665 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-04-29 21:27 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: php-pear-Numbers-Roman New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 01:28:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 21:28:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221667] Review Request: php-pear-Numbers-Words - Methods for spelling numerals in words In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704300128.l3U1SKvV018766@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Numbers-Words - Methods for spelling numerals in words Alias: pear-Numbers-Words https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221667 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-04-29 21:28 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: php-pear-Numbers-Words New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 01:35:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 21:35:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238379] Review Request: Emesene - Emesene is an MSN Messenger client writted in python and GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704300135.l3U1Z1US018891@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Emesene - Emesene is an MSN Messenger client writted in python and GTK Alias: Emesene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238379 ------- Additional Comments From wilmer at fedoraproject.org 2007-04-29 21:34 EST ------- I also was believing the same, neverthless, I consult an similar packages ?aMsn? and "Gaim" in extras: $ rpm -qi amsn gaim amsn: "This is an MSN Messenger clone for Unix, Windows, and Macintosh. It is written in tcl/tk and supports filetransfers, webcam, etc." gaim: "Gaim allows you to talk to anyone using a variety of messaging protocols, including AIM (Oscar and TOC), ICQ, IRC, Yahoo!, MSN Messenger, Jabber, Gadu-Gadu, Napster, and Zephyr." these programs also should be there trademark violating? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 01:38:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 21:38:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238379] Review Request: Emesene - Emesene is an MSN Messenger client written in python and GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704300138.l3U1c9YF019011@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Emesene - Emesene is an MSN Messenger client written in python and GTK Alias: Emesene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238379 wilmer at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: Emesene - |Review Request: Emesene - |Emesene is an MSN Messenger |Emesene is an MSN Messenger |client writted in python and|client written in python and |GTK |GTK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 01:43:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 21:43:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238379] Review Request: Emesene - Emesene is an MSN Messenger client written in python and GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704300143.l3U1hjH5019276@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Emesene - Emesene is an MSN Messenger client written in python and GTK Alias: Emesene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238379 ------- Additional Comments From wilmer at fedoraproject.org 2007-04-29 21:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > The spelling needs improving, i.e. the summary should be changed from: > "Emesene is an OS independent MSN Messenger client writted in python and GTK" > to something like: > "Emesene is an OS independent MSN Messenger client written in Python and GTK" Done. Spec URL: http://www.linuxtachira.org/review/emesene.spec SRPM URL: http://www.linuxtachira.org/review/emesene-1.0-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 02:47:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 22:47:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230710] Review Request: boolstuff - Disjunctive Normal Form boolean expression library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704300247.l3U2l17h020918@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boolstuff - Disjunctive Normal Form boolean expression library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230710 ------- Additional Comments From sarrazip at sarrazip.com 2007-04-29 22:46 EST ------- Version 0.1.11 is out. I fixed the installation targets so that the example programs do not get installed anymore. http://sarrazip.com/dev/boolstuff.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 02:53:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 22:53:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238388] New: Review Request: pidgin-rhythmbox - Rhythmbox plugin for Pidgin Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238388 Summary: Review Request: pidgin-rhythmbox - Rhythmbox plugin for Pidgin Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michel.salim at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://hircus.org/fedora/pidgin-rhythmbox/pidgin-rhythmbox.spec SRPM URL: http://hircus.org/fedora/pidgin-rhythmbox/pidgin-rhythmbox-2.0-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Previously known as gaim-rhythmbox; project renamed upstream to match the transition from gaim to pidgin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 02:55:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 22:55:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238388] Review Request: pidgin-rhythmbox - Rhythmbox plugin for Pidgin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704300255.l3U2tPF1021095@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-rhythmbox - Rhythmbox plugin for Pidgin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238388 michel.salim at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2007-04-29 22:55 EST ------- Probably does not need reviewing, but needs the attention the CVS admin team (new module name) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 03:32:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 23:32:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 170303] Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704300332.l3U3Wt2t021832@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170303 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-29 23:32 EST ------- 567 days later, this package is finally in Fedora. Thanks to all. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 03:47:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 23:47:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234785] Review Request: perl-Email-Simple-Creator - Email::Simple constructor for starting anew In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704300347.l3U3lJwd022089@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Simple-Creator - Email::Simple constructor for starting anew https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234785 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-29 23:47 EST ------- Fixed in -2: New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Email-Simple-Creator.spec New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Email-Simple-Creator-1.420-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 03:49:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 23:49:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238373] Review Request: libopenraw - decode camera RAW files. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704300349.l3U3nCXj022113@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopenraw - decode camera RAW files. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238373 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-29 23:49 EST ------- Building on a system which doesn't have glib2-devel installed: ... checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes checking for LIBGLIB... configure: WARNING: glib-2.0 missing, ignore GdkPixbuf support. Are you intentionally building without glib2/gnome support? If yes, you probably want --disable-gnome: ./configure --help .. --disable-gnome .. If no, you probably want BuildRequires: glib2-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 03:55:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 23:55:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234786] Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Creator - Email::MIME constructor for starting anew In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704300355.l3U3tdxi022200@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Creator - Email::MIME constructor for starting anew https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234786 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-29 23:55 EST ------- Pre-emptive fix! New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Email-MIME-Creator.spec New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Email-MIME-Creator-1.452-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 03:59:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 23:59:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234787] Review Request: perl-Email-Reply - Reply to an email message In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704300359.l3U3xS0c022291@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Reply - Reply to an email message Alias: perl-Email-Reply https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234787 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-29 23:59 EST ------- Pre-emptive fix! New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Email-Reply.spec New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Email-Reply-1.201-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 05:20:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 01:20:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238366] Review Request: autodownloader - GUI-tool to automate the download of certain files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704300520.l3U5KecC025128@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autodownloader - GUI-tool to automate the download of certain files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238366 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-30 01:20 EST ------- The 3rd paragraph is there to make it clear / emphasize that although autodownloader is mean't to download files which we cannot distribute, that autodownloader itself is 100% OSS. The order of the 1st and 2nd paragraph is like this, because I think the proper order to describe the use is first describing why and then how. The how only makes little sense without first knowing the why. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 05:48:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 01:48:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176733] Review Request: php-pear-DB (PEAR database abstraction layer) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704300548.l3U5mFHf026134@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-DB (PEAR database abstraction layer) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176733 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |Fedora at FamilleCollet.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 05:55:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 01:55:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234785] Review Request: perl-Email-Simple-Creator - Email::Simple constructor for starting anew In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704300555.l3U5tmbw026251@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Simple-Creator - Email::Simple constructor for starting anew https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234785 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-30 01:55 EST ------- ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 05:59:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 01:59:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235954] Review Request: perl-Test-use-ok - Alternative to Test::More::use_ok In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704300559.l3U5xg8Q026323@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-use-ok - Alternative to Test::More::use_ok Alias: perl-Test-use-ok https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235954 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 06:00:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 02:00:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235954] Review Request: perl-Test-use-ok - Alternative to Test::More::use_ok In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704300600.l3U60fSK026356@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-use-ok - Alternative to Test::More::use_ok Alias: perl-Test-use-ok https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235954 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-30 02:00 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url c49b0bbb37a6764b8b96d9fcef954ba2 Test-use-ok-0.02.tar.gz i+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'inc', 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/01-basic....ok All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=3, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.03 cusr + 0.00 csys = 0.03 CPU) + Provides: perl(Test::use::ok) perl(ok) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 06:20:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 02:20:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238373] Review Request: libopenraw - decode camera RAW files. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704300620.l3U6Kb78026941@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopenraw - decode camera RAW files. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238373 ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com 2007-04-30 02:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Building on a system which doesn't have glib2-devel installed: > ... > checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes > checking for LIBGLIB... configure: WARNING: glib-2.0 missing, ignore GdkPixbuf > support. > > Are you intentionally building without glib2/gnome support? > If yes, you probably want --disable-gnome: > ./configure --help > .. > --disable-gnome > .. > > If no, you probably want > BuildRequires: glib2-devel New BuildRequires added; updated spec file and source rpm at ftp://open-gnss.org/pub/fedora/libopenraw -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 07:13:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 03:13:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225066] Review Request: gedit-plugins - Collections of plugins for gedit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704300713.l3U7DYKI028244@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gedit-plugins - Collections of plugins for gedit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225066 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com 2007-04-30 03:13 EST ------- I have uploaded a new version that disables the sessionsaver plugin, and also removes two .la files. Spec file and source rpm can be found here: ftp://open-gnss.org/pub/fedora/gedit-plugins -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 07:25:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 03:25:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227228] Review Request: GshutDown - Advanced shut down utility for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704300725.l3U7PP27028829@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GshutDown - Advanced shut down utility for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227228 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(lxtnow at gmail.com) ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-04-30 03:25 EST ------- ping ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 07:27:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 03:27:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704300727.l3U7RYdh028938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-04-30 03:27 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/RPMS/netgen.spec SRPM http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/RPMS/netgen-1.3.7-7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 07:41:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 03:41:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233754] Review Request: marble - A KDE Desktop Globe In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704300741.l3U7f1OS029587@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: marble - A KDE Desktop Globe https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233754 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-04-30 03:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > --------------------------------------------------- > /usr/bin/cmake -E cmake_progress_report > /home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/BUILD/marble/CMakeFiles 2 > [ 39%] [ 41%] Building CXX object src/CMakeFiles/marble.dir/katlascontrol.o > /usr/bin/c++ -I/home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/BUILD/marble/src -DQT_SHARED -O2 -msse > -o src/CMakeFiles/marble.dir/katlascontrol.o -c > /home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/BUILD/marble/src/katlascontrol.cpp > --------------------------------------------------- > Using CXXFLAGS seems good > ? -msse > - As the above log says, -msse seems to be used anyway. For some reason, it fails on ppc with cc1plus: error: unrecognized command line option "-msse" I thought it was fedora specific compilation flags. http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/32731-marble-0.3.1-2.fc7/ppc/build.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 07:57:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 03:57:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235954] Review Request: perl-Test-use-ok - Alternative to Test::More::use_ok In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704300757.l3U7v1fD030912@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-use-ok - Alternative to Test::More::use_ok Alias: perl-Test-use-ok https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235954 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-30 03:57 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Test-use-ok Short Description: Alternative to Test::More::use_ok Owners: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Branches: FC-5, FC-6, devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 07:57:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 03:57:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235954] Review Request: perl-Test-use-ok - Alternative to Test::More::use_ok In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704300757.l3U7v30l030932@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-use-ok - Alternative to Test::More::use_ok Alias: perl-Test-use-ok https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235954 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 07:59:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 03:59:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233754] Review Request: marble - A KDE Desktop Globe In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704300759.l3U7xUQE031163@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: marble - A KDE Desktop Globe https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233754 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-30 03:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #5) > > --------------------------------------------------- > > /usr/bin/cmake -E cmake_progress_report > > /home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/BUILD/marble/CMakeFiles 2 > > [ 39%] [ 41%] Building CXX object src/CMakeFiles/marble.dir/katlascontrol.o > > /usr/bin/c++ -I/home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/BUILD/marble/src -DQT_SHARED -O2 -msse > > -o src/CMakeFiles/marble.dir/katlascontrol.o -c > > /home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/BUILD/marble/src/katlascontrol.cpp > > --------------------------------------------------- > > Using CXXFLAGS seems good > > > ? -msse > > - As the above log says, -msse seems to be used anyway. > > For some reason, it fails on ppc with > cc1plus: error: unrecognized command line option "-msse" > > I thought it was fedora specific compilation flags. > > http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/32731-marble-0.3.1-2.fc7/ppc/build.log -msse is not in fedora specific compilation flags. This is added by src/CMakeLists.txt. If -msse is not accepted on ppc, ------------------------------------------------- sed -i.flags -e 's|-msse||' src/CMakeLists.txt ------------------------------------------------- is needed on ppc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 08:33:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 04:33:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233754] Review Request: marble - A KDE Desktop Globe In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704300833.l3U8Xh5C001562@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: marble - A KDE Desktop Globe https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233754 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-30 04:33 EST ------- BTW would you have a time to review one of my review requests of ruby modules (bug 237379 or bug 237380)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 08:35:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 04:35:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238366] Review Request: autodownloader - GUI-tool to automate the download of certain files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704300835.l3U8ZJoX001672@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autodownloader - GUI-tool to automate the download of certain files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238366 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dev at nigelj.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-04-30 04:35 EST ------- Okay, happy to review. (In reply to comment #3) > The 3rd paragraph is there to make it clear / emphasize that although > autodownloader is mean't to download files which we cannot distribute, that > autodownloader itself is 100% OSS. Autodownloader would have to be OSS to make it into Fedora, if you want to make it clear, I'd perfer something to the effect of: "NOTE: Autodownloader while open source may download files which are not permitted to be distributed in Fedora" > The order of the 1st and 2nd paragraph is like this, because I think the proper > order to describe the use is first describing why and then how. The how only > makes little sense without first knowing the why. I think what it is, is more important than why you want to use it, why you want to use it, is what a developer or another packager would want to know, and they most likely have had a tip off from another maintainer that the package is useful for what they wish to do The reason you have what it is first, is so users can decide if they really want to have it on their system without been bored to death first. Also, I'm tempted to suggest that before inclusion, a database of downloaded files may need to be created, (also meaning that programs that have downloaded files, should ALWAYS require autodownloader) with a %preun to remove downloaded files (remembering that you wouldn't be able to remove autodownloader without removing dependencies that require the files first). This prevents unneeded/unwanted files been left behind after uninstall. Both are only suggestions as I don't think anything specific is in PackagingGuidelines regarding this yet, but I will check while testing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 08:40:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 04:40:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238232] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Manual - Catalyst web framework manual In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704300840.l3U8eJUt001993@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Manual - Catalyst web framework manual Alias: perl-Catalyst-Manual https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238232 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-04-30 04:40 EST ------- Could you explain this? # this is actually better done in perl-Catalyst-Runtime %exclude %{_mandir}/man3/Catalyst::Manual.3* It doesn't seem right to me to exclude the documentation of the primary perl-module being within a package (Here: perl(Catalyst::Manual)) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 08:51:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 04:51:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237380] Review Request: ruby-gettext-package - Localization Library and Tools for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704300851.l3U8pYec002753@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-gettext-package - Localization Library and Tools for Ruby Alias: ruby-gettext-package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237380 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 08:52:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 04:52:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237379] Review Request: ruby-amazon - Ruby interface to Amazon Web Services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704300852.l3U8qA7M002829@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-amazon - Ruby interface to Amazon Web Services Alias: ruby-amazon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237379 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 08:52:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 04:52:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233754] Review Request: marble - A KDE Desktop Globe In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704300852.l3U8q84L002808@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: marble - A KDE Desktop Globe https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233754 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-04-30 04:52 EST ------- Sure mamoru. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 09:30:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 05:30:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235960] Review Request: perl-Data-Visitor - Visitor style traversal of Perl data structures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704300930.l3U9UP0N005198@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Visitor - Visitor style traversal of Perl data structures Alias: perl-Data-Visitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235960 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 09:34:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 05:34:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235960] Review Request: perl-Data-Visitor - Visitor style traversal of Perl data structures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704300934.l3U9YFnZ005453@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Visitor - Visitor style traversal of Perl data structures Alias: perl-Data-Visitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235960 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-30 05:34 EST ------- BR: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) missing? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 11:13:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 07:13:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225743] Merge Review: expect In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704301113.l3UBDt7W009241@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: expect https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225743 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium vcrhonek at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED ------- Additional Comments From vcrhonek at redhat.com 2007-04-30 07:13 EST ------- expect-5.43.0-8 in devel contains abovementioned changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 12:50:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 08:50:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234785] Review Request: perl-Email-Simple-Creator - Email::Simple constructor for starting anew In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704301250.l3UCoUkB014101@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Simple-Creator - Email::Simple constructor for starting anew https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234785 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-30 08:50 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Email-Simple-Creator Short Description: Email::Simple constructor for starting anew Owners: tcallawa at redhat.com Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 13:43:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 09:43:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704301343.l3UDhk6E018648@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-04-30 09:43 EST ------- Discussion in VDrift forum indicates that currently, 4 cars are known clean and 2 tracks are of dubious legality. The next release will have all clean data. Getting an ETA. . . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 13:51:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 09:51:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233975] Review Request: freefem++ - PDE solving tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704301351.l3UDpTfB019084@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freefem++ - PDE solving tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233975 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-04-30 09:51 EST ------- I hope mock works for devel right now (can't check). If so, I'm happy to approve the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 14:32:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 10:32:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206871] Review Request: ekg2 - Multi-protocol instant messaging and chat client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704301432.l3UEWOB5021783@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ekg2 - Multi-protocol instant messaging and chat client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206871 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |228186 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-04-30 10:32 EST ------- ekg2 now requires libgsm, under review in bug 228186. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 14:32:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 10:32:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228186] Review Request: gsm - Shared libraries for GSM speech compressor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704301432.l3UEWRsU021803@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gsm - Shared libraries for GSM speech compressor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228186 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |206871 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 14:35:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 10:35:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228186] Review Request: gsm - Shared libraries for GSM speech compressor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704301435.l3UEZjQq022016@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gsm - Shared libraries for GSM speech compressor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228186 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-04-30 10:35 EST ------- Hm. It looks like the original submitter hasn't posted anything since February. In that case, this will be closed and marked as FE-DEADREVIEW if the submitter doesn't reply within a week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 14:44:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 10:44:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238366] Review Request: autodownloader - GUI-tool to automate the download of certain files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704301444.l3UEiY4x022707@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autodownloader - GUI-tool to automate the download of certain files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238366 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-30 10:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Okay, happy to review. > > (In reply to comment #3) > > The 3rd paragraph is there to make it clear / emphasize that although > > autodownloader is mean't to download files which we cannot distribute, that > > autodownloader itself is 100% OSS. > Autodownloader would have to be OSS to make it into Fedora, if you want to make > it clear, I'd perfer something to the effect of: > "NOTE: Autodownloader while open source may download files which are not > permitted to be distributed in Fedora" Okay, I'll change it into the above. > > The order of the 1st and 2nd paragraph is like this, because I think the > proper > > order to describe the use is first describing why and then how. The how only > > makes little sense without first knowing the why. > I think what it is, is more important than why you want to use it, why you want > to use it, is what a developer or another packager would want to know, and they > most likely have had a tip off from another maintainer that the package is > useful for what they wish to do > > The reason you have what it is first, is so users can decide if they really > want to have it on their system without been bored to death first. > Well the second paragraph is hard to understand for someone not into the matter without first reading the first, it can be reworded to not depend on the first, but that won't make things clearer IMHO, also I think its important to have the first paragraph there, to make it clear how this is different from yum / a wget gui. > Also, I'm tempted to suggest that before inclusion, a database of downloaded > files may need to be created, (also meaning that programs that have downloaded > files, should ALWAYS require autodownloader) with a %preun to remove downloaded > files (remembering that you wouldn't be able to remove autodownloader without > removing dependencies that require the files first). This prevents > unneeded/unwanted files been left behind after uninstall. > Interesting point, but autodownloader is not suid anything, and thus cannnot write to such a global log file. It was designed to run as a normal user and download files to dirs under the users $HOME. Yes this has a few downsides, but from a security POV, this really is the best solution IMHO. We might need to take another look at this (adding a suid helper written in C) which can install files under /usr if autodownloader becomes popular and is used to download big(ger) files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 15:16:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 11:16:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235960] Review Request: perl-Data-Visitor - Visitor style traversal of Perl data structures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704301516.l3UFGhvk025199@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Visitor - Visitor style traversal of Perl data structures Alias: perl-Data-Visitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235960 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-30 11:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > BR: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) missing? No, this is deliberate: the package uses Module::Build to build itself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 15:28:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 11:28:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238232] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Manual - Catalyst web framework manual In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704301528.l3UFSjRN026466@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Manual - Catalyst web framework manual Alias: perl-Catalyst-Manual https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238232 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-30 11:28 EST ------- Yes -- perl-Catalyst-Runtime actually includes a manpage for Catalyst::Manual, one that is (oddly) more useful than the one included in this package. Given that we'd have a conflict, I chose the one that seemed more useful. Looking back over the spec, because of this it'd probably make more sense to also require perl(Catalyst). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 15:38:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 11:38:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236792] Review Request: redhat-artwork-kde - KDE portions temporarily split out of redhat-artwork (236633) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704301538.l3UFc2xq027527@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redhat-artwork-kde - KDE portions temporarily split out of redhat-artwork (236633) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236792 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-04-30 11:37 EST ------- fyi, added to comps-f7 (kde-desktop group): -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 16:32:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 12:32:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237738] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump - Pretty printing of data structures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704301632.l3UGWsT8031772@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Dump - Pretty printing of data structures Alias: perl-Data-Dump https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237738 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-30 12:32 EST ------- Imported and building. Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 16:32:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 12:32:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238211] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704301632.l3UGWt76031781@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules Alias: Catalyst-Runtime https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238211 Bug 238211 depends on bug 237738, which changed state. Bug 237738 Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Dump - Pretty printing of data structures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237738 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 16:34:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 12:34:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235764] Review Request: perl-CGI-Ex - CGI utility suite - makes powerful application writing fun and easy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704301634.l3UGY3dr031862@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Ex - CGI utility suite - makes powerful application writing fun and easy Alias: perl-CGI-Ex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235764 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-30 12:33 EST ------- Imported and building. Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 16:34:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 12:34:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235780] Review Request: perl-Class-Prototyped - Fast prototype-based OO programming in Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704301634.l3UGYmoL031904@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Prototyped - Fast prototype-based OO programming in Perl Alias: Class-Prototyped https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235780 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-30 12:34 EST ------- Imported and building. Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 16:34:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 12:34:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235790] Review Request: perl-CGI-Prototype - Create a CGI application by subclassing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704301634.l3UGYnGu031912@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Prototype - Create a CGI application by subclassing Alias: perl-CGI-Prototype https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235790 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium Bug 235790 depends on bug 235780, which changed state. Bug 235780 Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Prototyped - Fast prototype-based OO programming in Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235780 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 16:36:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 12:36:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237888] Review Request: perl-Tree-Simple-VisitorFactory - Factory object for dispensing Visitor objects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704301636.l3UGa5uW031995@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Tree-Simple-VisitorFactory - Factory object for dispensing Visitor objects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237888 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-30 12:36 EST ------- Imported and building. Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 16:36:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 12:36:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238211] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704301636.l3UGa6CF032008@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules Alias: Catalyst-Runtime https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238211 Bug 238211 depends on bug 237888, which changed state. Bug 237888 Summary: Review Request: perl-Tree-Simple-VisitorFactory - Factory object for dispensing Visitor objects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237888 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 16:52:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 12:52:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238366] Review Request: autodownloader - GUI-tool to automate the download of certain files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704301652.l3UGqgBH000513@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autodownloader - GUI-tool to automate the download of certain files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238366 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-30 12:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Interesting point, but autodownloader is not suid anything, and thus cannnot > write to such a global log file. It was designed to run as a normal user and > download files to dirs under the users $HOME. Yes this has a few downsides, but > from a security POV, this really is the best solution IMHO. > > We might need to take another look at this (adding a suid helper written in C) > which can install files under /usr if autodownloader becomes popular and is used > to download big(ger) files. Note that the "oddjob" package can help with this, without needing to set things suid or some other mechanism... It provides a simple, modular dbus-enabled mechanism for non-privlidged processes to invoke predefined privlidged operations. I'd definitely take a look at this first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 16:52:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 12:52:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237739] Review Request: perl-File-Modified - Checks intelligently if files have changed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704301652.l3UGqkfE000527@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Modified - Checks intelligently if files have changed Alias: perl-File-Modified https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237739 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bjohnson at symetrix.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 16:59:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 12:59:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237739] Review Request: perl-File-Modified - Checks intelligently if files have changed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704301659.l3UGxPmx000840@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Modified - Checks intelligently if files have changed Alias: perl-File-Modified https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237739 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-30 12:59 EST ------- I love it ;) + find . -type f -name .cvsignore -exec rm -v '{}' ';' removed `./.cvsignore' removed `./t/.cvsignore' ... + /usr/bin/perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor Checking if your kit is complete... Warning: the following files are missing in your kit: .cvsignore t/.cvsignore Please inform the author. Writing Makefile for File::Modified Just sed those out of the MANIFEST as well. Also, I see it's still skipping two of the tests: + make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/test....ok 2/44 skipped: Digest:: is installed All tests successful, 2 subtests skipped. Files=1, Tests=44, 3 wallclock secs ( 0.37 cusr + 0.04 csys = 0.41 CPU) I didn't look at the actuals skipped tests, but if it's indicating that it doesn't need to run the test because perl(Digest) is installed (and the tests are irrelevent when perl(Digest) is present), then that should be noted in the spec file near %check. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 17:07:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:07:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237742] Review Request: perl-Text-SimpleTable - Simple Eyecandy ASCII Tables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704301707.l3UH7thG001209@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-SimpleTable - Simple Eyecandy ASCII Tables Alias: Text-SimpleTable https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237742 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-30 13:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Though Pod-tests are not really important, this doesn't necessarily provide > trust into this package's quality. Well, IMHO any failure in %check is a blocker until it is known why the test fails. The tests are there for a reason. If the test reveals a bug (in the software package, not the buildsystem or Fedora) - and it is deemed minor to the operation of the package, it should be reported upstream and the test failure should be commented in the spec file as a known problem. If the failure is a bug in the test itself or the test is invalid, the test should be removed (with a proper comment in the spec file) or fixed. It should also be reported upstream. Blindly ignoring failures is never a good thing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 17:10:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:10:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237338] Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-SEC -- Perl support for DNSSEC -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704301710.l3UHAJUC001280@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-SEC -- Perl support for DNSSEC -- SPONSOR NEEDED Alias: perl-Net-DNS-SEC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237338 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-30 13:10 EST ------- Copy and paste error on your SRPM URL. Please fix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 17:13:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:13:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237337] perl-Digest-SHA -- Perl support for SHA digests -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704301713.l3UHDhr9001381@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Digest-SHA -- Perl support for SHA digests -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237337 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-30 13:13 EST ------- Please post SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 17:14:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:14:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237334] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for RSA support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704301714.l3UHEAfw001409@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for RSA support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237334 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-30 13:14 EST ------- Please post SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 17:14:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:14:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237333] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for DSA support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704301714.l3UHEjYJ001437@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for DSA support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237333 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-30 13:14 EST ------- Please post SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 17:15:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:15:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237332] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for big numbers support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704301715.l3UHFXl4001475@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for big numbers support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237332 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-30 13:15 EST ------- Please post SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 17:35:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:35:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238270] Review Request: widelands - realtime-strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704301735.l3UHZS8D003185@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: widelands - realtime-strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238270 ------- Additional Comments From karlikt at gmail.com 2007-04-30 13:35 EST ------- Well...: 1. I have changed versions numerating for more clearly naming of packages. Now it is 0-0.%{buildnum}.%{rel}.build%{buildnum} 3. I have prepared a patch and now it is compiling with %{optflags} 5. Efence is require only for one compiling-method and it is not require for normal working 7. I think it might be ignored New URLs: http://karlik.nonlogic.org/widelands/widelands.spec http://karlik.nonlogic.org/widelands/widelands-0-0.10.1.build10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 18:01:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 14:01:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238235] Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704301801.l3UI1axW005380@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238235 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-04-30 14:01 EST ------- Kelly, to fix the last remaining rpmlint issue, please compile with: %configure --disable-rpath --libdir=%{_libdir}/kde3 and changes your %files to read: %{_libdir}/kde3/* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 18:30:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 14:30:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237352] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Getopt - Moose role for processing command line options In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704301830.l3UIUKYK009091@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Getopt - Moose role for processing command line options Alias: perl-MooseX-Getopt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237352 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bjohnson at symetrix.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 18:36:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 14:36:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237352] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Getopt - Moose role for processing command line options In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704301836.l3UIaI6V009936@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Getopt - Moose role for processing command line options Alias: perl-MooseX-Getopt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237352 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-30 14:36 EST ------- It's possible that this is not a problem, but I'd sure look into it (Fedora 6): + /usr/bin/perl Build.PL installdirs=vendor - ERROR: Getopt::Long (2.35) is installed, but we need version >= 2.36 ERRORS/WARNINGS FOUND IN PREREQUISITES. You may wish to install the versions of the modules indicated above before proceeding with this installation If it can be /verified/ to work correctly with perl(Getopt::Long) = 2.35, then patch the Makefile.PL to change the required version. If it must have 2.36 or better, then maybe you only intend to build for newer versions of perl? If that is the case, a BR with the required version number should be used. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 18:42:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 14:42:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227241] Review Request: kde-settings - Config files for kde In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704301842.l3UIgvCd010750@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kde-settings - Config files for kde Alias: kde-settings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227241 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-04-30 14:42 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.math.unl.edu/~rdieter/fedora/kde-settings.spec %changelog * Mon Apr 30 2007 Rex Dieter 3.5-19 - omit xdg_hack (for now, anyway) - fc7+: Req: redhat-artwork-kde - reference: kdelibs: use FHS-friendly /etc/kde (vs. /usr/share/config), bug #238136 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 18:47:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 14:47:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237340] Review Request: python-BeautifulSoup - HTML/XML parser for quick-turnaround applications like screen-scraping In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704301847.l3UIlQxH011369@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-BeautifulSoup - HTML/XML parser for quick-turnaround applications like screen-scraping https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237340 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bjohnson at symetrix.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 19:04:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:04:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237340] Review Request: python-BeautifulSoup - HTML/XML parser for quick-turnaround applications like screen-scraping In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704301904.l3UJ4GhI012737@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-BeautifulSoup - HTML/XML parser for quick-turnaround applications like screen-scraping https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237340 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-30 15:04 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [x] Rpmlint output: None [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: Python Software Foundation License [-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : 13a7a16e7f3b8febaace13b1b2790550 MD5SUM upstream package: 13a7a16e7f3b8febaace13b1b2790550 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: Arches excluded: Why: [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-] File based requires are sane. === Issues === 1. === Final Notes === 1. I'm not sure that the PKG-INFO file in %doc is useful for a regular user. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 19:43:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:43:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221667] Review Request: php-pear-Numbers-Words - Methods for spelling numerals in words In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704301943.l3UJhKtH016105@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Numbers-Words - Methods for spelling numerals in words Alias: pear-Numbers-Words https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221667 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 19:43:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:43:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221665] Review Request: php-pear-Numbers-Roman - Provides methods for converting to and from Roman Numerals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704301943.l3UJhFGS016072@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Numbers-Roman - Provides methods for converting to and from Roman Numerals Alias: pear-Numbers-Roman https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221665 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 19:44:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:44:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234785] Review Request: perl-Email-Simple-Creator - Email::Simple constructor for starting anew In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704301944.l3UJiIxt016276@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Simple-Creator - Email::Simple constructor for starting anew https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234785 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 19:46:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:46:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235954] Review Request: perl-Test-use-ok - Alternative to Test::More::use_ok In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704301946.l3UJknvh016660@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-use-ok - Alternative to Test::More::use_ok Alias: perl-Test-use-ok https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235954 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 19:52:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:52:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238388] Review Request: pidgin-rhythmbox - Rhythmbox plugin for Pidgin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704301952.l3UJqLkd017115@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-rhythmbox - Rhythmbox plugin for Pidgin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238388 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-04-30 15:52 EST ------- FC-6 and devel created. These two distros will have pidgin-2.0.0. FC-6 will come a bit later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 19:56:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:56:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238000] Review Request: seahorse-adventures - Help barbie the seahorse float on bubbles to the moon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704301956.l3UJuave017566@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seahorse-adventures - Help barbie the seahorse float on bubbles to the moon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238000 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-30 15:56 EST ------- Imported and Build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 20:12:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 16:12:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238366] Review Request: autodownloader - GUI-tool to automate the download of certain files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704302012.l3UKCOai019064@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autodownloader - GUI-tool to automate the download of certain files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238366 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-04-30 16:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > Also, I'm tempted to suggest that before inclusion, a database of downloaded > > files may need to be created, (also meaning that programs that have downloaded > > files, should ALWAYS require autodownloader) with a %preun to remove downloaded > > files (remembering that you wouldn't be able to remove autodownloader without > > removing dependencies that require the files first). This prevents > > unneeded/unwanted files been left behind after uninstall. > > > > Interesting point, but autodownloader is not suid anything, and thus cannnot > write to such a global log file. It was designed to run as a normal user and > download files to dirs under the users $HOME. Yes this has a few downsides, but > from a security POV, this really is the best solution IMHO. Okay in that case, it's like firefox and it's profile directories, they exist in /home so they are the users responsibility to maintain. It also means that a database of downloaded files to /home directories are a 'bad thing' as home directory names have susceptible to change. > > We might need to take another look at this (adding a suid helper written in C) > which can install files under /usr if autodownloader becomes popular and is used > to download big(ger) files. Agreed, files in /usr need to have something taking responsibility for them, normally the package manager, but a %preun for something like this would be just as fine. I'm happy to continue with the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 20:23:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 16:23:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238366] Review Request: autodownloader - GUI-tool to automate the download of certain files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704302023.l3UKNhsb020079@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autodownloader - GUI-tool to automate the download of certain files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238366 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-04-30 16:23 EST ------- Package name: OK (autodownloader) License: OK (GPL) Spec Legible: OK (en_US) md5sum matches: OK (5ec9b35266be518b8384a7fea581680c) rpmlint clean: OK Builds correctly: OK (noarch) Spec has %clean: OK Macro use consistant: OK Contains code/content: OK -doc subpackage: NA -devel subpackage: NA -static subpackage: NA pkgconfig depend: NA Contains %doc: OK (COPYING ChangeLog GladeWindow-license.txt README.txt TODO example.autodlrc) Library suffix: NA No .la files: NA Use desktop-file-install: NA No duplicate ownerships: OK rm -rf %{buildroot}: OK RPM uses valid UTF-8: OK %defattr is set: OK No duplicate %files: OK Not relocatable: OK Calls ldconfig: NA Supports Locales: NA BR's are correct: OK Other notes: * Builds in mock (obviously) * I have not been able to test but it appears to be okay * As downloaded files are written to home, it's generally not rpm's responsibility to cleanup (but the users) * When downloads start going to /usr then autodownloader should provide some way of deleting on uninstall. APPROVED (p.s. Any chance you could take a look at ocamlSDL (235804)? I've still got to get camlimages & windowlab back in shape but that one is ready) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 20:35:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 16:35:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238366] Review Request: autodownloader - GUI-tool to automate the download of certain files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704302035.l3UKZsUU020639@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autodownloader - GUI-tool to automate the download of certain files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238366 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-30 16:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > APPROVED > Thanks. > (p.s. Any chance you could take a look at ocamlSDL (235804)? I've still got to > get camlimages & windowlab back in shape but that one is ready) I'll try to make some time for this tomorrow. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: autodownloader Short Description: GUI-tool to automate the download of certain files Owners: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Branches: FC-6 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 20:40:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 16:40:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235954] Review Request: perl-Test-use-ok - Alternative to Test::More::use_ok In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704302040.l3UKefu0020888@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-use-ok - Alternative to Test::More::use_ok Alias: perl-Test-use-ok https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235954 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-30 16:40 EST ------- Imported and building... Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 20:41:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 16:41:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235960] Review Request: perl-Data-Visitor - Visitor style traversal of Perl data structures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704302041.l3UKf2Ik020916@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Visitor - Visitor style traversal of Perl data structures Alias: perl-Data-Visitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235960 Bug 235960 depends on bug 235954, which changed state. Bug 235954 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-use-ok - Alternative to Test::More::use_ok https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235954 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 21:02:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:02:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238073] Review Request: perl-GTop - Perl interface to libgtop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704302102.l3UL2UVj023594@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GTop - Perl interface to libgtop Alias: perl-GTop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238073 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-30 17:02 EST ------- Imported and building -- thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 21:02:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:02:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238211] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704302102.l3UL2gco023615@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules Alias: Catalyst-Runtime https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238211 Bug 238211 depends on bug 238073, which changed state. Bug 238073 Summary: Review Request: perl-GTop - Perl interface to libgtop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238073 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 21:15:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:15:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234785] Review Request: perl-Email-Simple-Creator - Email::Simple constructor for starting anew In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704302115.l3ULFmBM025542@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Simple-Creator - Email::Simple constructor for starting anew https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234785 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-30 17:15 EST ------- Built, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 21:15:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:15:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237739] Review Request: perl-File-Modified - Checks intelligently if files have changed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704302115.l3ULFr4i025560@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Modified - Checks intelligently if files have changed Alias: perl-File-Modified https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237739 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-30 17:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Just sed those out of the MANIFEST as well. Done. Also filed at rt.cpan.org... > Also, I see it's still skipping two of the tests: ...snip... > I didn't look at the actuals skipped tests, but if it's indicating that it > doesn't need to run the test because perl(Digest) is installed (and the tests > are irrelevent when perl(Digest) is present), then that should be noted in the > spec file near %check. Done -- it's expected, and perl(Digest) is core so it's always going to be there... noted in the spec. SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-File-Modified-0.07-3.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-File-Modified.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 21:15:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:15:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234786] Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Creator - Email::MIME constructor for starting anew In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704302115.l3ULFxsJ025572@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Creator - Email::MIME constructor for starting anew https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234786 Bug 234786 depends on bug 234785, which changed state. Bug 234785 Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Simple-Creator - Email::Simple constructor for starting anew https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234785 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 21:18:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:18:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238235] Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704302118.l3ULItvo025847@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238235 ------- Additional Comments From lightsolphoenix at gmail.com 2007-04-30 17:18 EST ------- Done. Spec URL: http://crystalsanctuary.rpgsource.net/packages/specs/tastymenu.spec SRPM URL: http://crystalsanctuary.rpgsource.net/packages/source/tastymenu-0.8-3fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 21:21:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:21:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238499] New: Review Request: kio_p7zip - Kio-slave for viewing 7zip files using p7zip Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238499 Summary: Review Request: kio_p7zip - Kio-slave for viewing 7zip files using p7zip Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lightsolphoenix at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://crystalsanctuary.rpgsource.net/packages/specs/kio_p7zip.spec SRPM URL: http://crystalsanctuary.rpgsource.net/packages/source/kio_p7zip-0.3.1-1fc6.src.rpm Description: This is a kioslave for KDE to handle 7zip files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 21:22:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:22:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238499] Review Request: kio_p7zip - Kio-slave for viewing 7zip files using p7zip In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704302122.l3ULMogd026185@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kio_p7zip - Kio-slave for viewing 7zip files using p7zip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238499 lightsolphoenix at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: kio_p7zip - |Review Request: kio_p7zip - |Kio-slave for viewing 7zip |Kio-slave for viewing 7zip |files using p7zip |files using p7zip BugsThisDependsOn| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 21:32:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:32:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237352] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Getopt - Moose role for processing command line options In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704302132.l3ULWI4w027289@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Getopt - Moose role for processing command line options Alias: perl-MooseX-Getopt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237352 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-30 17:32 EST ------- Yeah -- I took a good look at this when putting the srpm together. It looks like, aside from bugfixes, the main changes to Getopt::Long 2.36 vs 2.35 is the addition of GetOptionsFromArray and GetOptionsFromString... A quick grep of the code turned up neither of these. In any case, I just filed a "seriously?" bug with upstream: http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=26844 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 21:36:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:36:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237739] Review Request: perl-File-Modified - Checks intelligently if files have changed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704302136.l3ULaoYk027606@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Modified - Checks intelligently if files have changed Alias: perl-File-Modified https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237739 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-30 17:36 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [x] Rpmlint output: None [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL or Artistic [-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : 271a991b96ccbdaeb7098272c9f97d51 MD5SUM upstream package: 271a991b96ccbdaeb7098272c9f97d51 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: Arches excluded: Why: [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-] File based requires are sane. === Issues === 1. === Final Notes === 1. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 21:46:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:46:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237739] Review Request: perl-File-Modified - Checks intelligently if files have changed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704302146.l3ULkClj028024@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Modified - Checks intelligently if files have changed Alias: perl-File-Modified https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237739 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-30 17:46 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-File-Modified Short Description: Checks intelligently if files have changed Owners: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Branches: FC-5, FC-6, devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 21:46:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:46:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237739] Review Request: perl-File-Modified - Checks intelligently if files have changed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704302146.l3ULkZ64028077@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Modified - Checks intelligently if files have changed Alias: perl-File-Modified https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237739 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 21:46:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:46:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234786] Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Creator - Email::MIME constructor for starting anew In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704302146.l3ULkpGW028095@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Creator - Email::MIME constructor for starting anew https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234786 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bjohnson at symetrix.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 21:47:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:47:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238499] Review Request: kio_p7zip - Kio-slave for viewing 7zip files using p7zip In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704302147.l3ULlXHv028123@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kio_p7zip - Kio-slave for viewing 7zip files using p7zip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238499 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tcallawa at redhat.com CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-30 17:47 EST ------- Just a couple of really minor issues with this package: rpmlint says: W: kio_p7zip wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/kio_p7zip-0.3.1/ChangeLog W: kio_p7zip wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/kio_p7zip-0.3.1/README E: kio_p7zip zero-length /usr/share/doc/kio_p7zip-0.3.1/NEWS Basically, you don't need to package the empty NEWS file. Also, you'll want to use iconv to fix those file encodings: (add this to %install) # Fix file encoding recode() { iconv -f "$2" -t utf-8 < "$1" > "${1}_" mv -f "${1}_" "$1" } recode ChangeLog iso-8859-1 recode README iso-8859-1 Last but not least, I assume the .la files are really needed for KDE? I'm not a KDE user, but if they can be avoided, that would be ideal. Adding Rex to the CC for this, as he'll know. Fix those minor items, show me a new spec/SRPM, and I'll do the rest of the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 22:03:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:03:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235790] Review Request: perl-CGI-Prototype - Create a CGI application by subclassing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704302203.l3UM3BbB028767@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Prototype - Create a CGI application by subclassing Alias: perl-CGI-Prototype https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235790 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bjohnson at symetrix.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-30 18:03 EST ------- > # note the "skipped: CGI::Prototype::Mecha not found" is expected; this module > # is a runtime requirement of that module, resulting in a > # plugin-before-the-base-module sorta deal. Are your intentions to submit this package? Also, I noticed this: Provides: perl(CGI::Prototype) = 0.9053 perl(CGI::Prototype::Hidden) perl(My::App) perl(My::App::thanks) perl(My::App::welcome) I haven't checked to see what perl(MY::App), perl(My::App::thanks), and perl(My::App:welcome) are yet, but they seem a bit dubious. Although probably harmless as a Provide, you might want to make sure that's right. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 22:07:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:07:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237338] Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-SEC -- Perl support for DNSSEC -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704302207.l3UM7E7u028971@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-SEC -- Perl support for DNSSEC -- SPONSOR NEEDED Alias: perl-Net-DNS-SEC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237338 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-04-30 18:07 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Net-DNS-SEC.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Net-DNS-SEC.src.rpm (whoops). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 22:08:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:08:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237338] Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-SEC -- Perl support for DNSSEC -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704302208.l3UM8KZL029050@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-SEC -- Perl support for DNSSEC -- SPONSOR NEEDED Alias: perl-Net-DNS-SEC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237338 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-04-30 18:08 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Net-DNS-SEC.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.14-1.src.rpm (double whoops). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 22:08:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:08:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237332] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for big numbers support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704302208.l3UM8mJT029086@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for big numbers support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237332 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-04-30 18:08 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum-0.03-1.src.rpm whoops. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 22:09:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:09:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237334] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for RSA support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704302209.l3UM9Dln029125@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for RSA support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237334 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-04-30 18:09 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA-0.24-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 22:09:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:09:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237337] perl-Digest-SHA -- Perl support for SHA digests -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704302209.l3UM9pEo029165@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Digest-SHA -- Perl support for SHA digests -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237337 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-04-30 18:09 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Digest-SHA.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Digest-SHA-5.44-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 22:10:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:10:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237333] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for DSA support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704302210.l3UMABe3029213@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for DSA support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237333 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-04-30 18:10 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA-0.13-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 22:12:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:12:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237330] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for AES support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704302212.l3UMC2aI029365@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for AES support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237330 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-04-30 18:12 EST ------- Fixing SRPM URL: Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES-0.01-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 22:12:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:12:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237331] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for Random Number support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704302212.l3UMCg36029391@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for Random Number support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237331 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-04-30 18:12 EST ------- Fixed srpm url: Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random-0.03-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 22:13:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:13:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237335] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for PKCS10 support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704302213.l3UMDkx0029467@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for PKCS10 support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237335 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-04-30 18:13 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10-0.06-1.spec (fixed srpm url) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 22:14:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:14:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237336] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for X509 support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704302214.l3UMEFHQ029489@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for X509 support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237336 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-04-30 18:14 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509-0.4-1.src.rpm fixed srpm url. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 22:18:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:18:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232465] Review Request: lv2 - An Audio Plugin Standard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704302218.l3UMIHGA029610@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lv2 - An Audio Plugin Standard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232465 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bjohnson at symetrix.com ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-30 18:18 EST ------- A few things: 1) This package creates 0 byte debuginfo packages. 2) There is no arch-dependent files in this package, it should be a noarch. This should fix the problem with #1 too. 3) Why do you create /usr/lib/lv2 directory? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 22:24:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:24:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238499] Review Request: kio_p7zip - Kio-slave for viewing 7zip files using p7zip In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704302224.l3UMO7cr029826@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kio_p7zip - Kio-slave for viewing 7zip files using p7zip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238499 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-04-30 18:23 EST ------- Actually, the files are encoded properly, its just the line endings which are incorrect. You can fix it with just: # Fix end-of-line-encoding sed -i 's/\r//' ChangeLog sed -i 's/\r//' README -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 22:35:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:35:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235790] Review Request: perl-CGI-Prototype - Create a CGI application by subclassing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704302235.l3UMZBJv030415@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Prototype - Create a CGI application by subclassing Alias: perl-CGI-Prototype https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235790 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-30 18:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Are your intentions to submit this package? Not at the moment. Even if it were in, I'd be unable to list it as a BR for this package without creating a circular dependency, as it requires this package to function. > Also, I noticed this: > Provides: perl(CGI::Prototype) = 0.9053 perl(CGI::Prototype::Hidden) > perl(My::App) perl(My::App::thanks) perl(My::App::welcome) > > I haven't checked to see what perl(MY::App), perl(My::App::thanks), and > perl(My::App:welcome) are yet, but they seem a bit dubious. Although probably > harmless as a Provide, you might want to make sure that's right. Good catch -- for whatever reason it looks like the autoprov script was picking that up. SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-CGI-Prototype-0.9053-2.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-CGI-Prototype.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 22:57:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:57:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234786] Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Creator - Email::MIME constructor for starting anew In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704302257.l3UMvONO031541@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Creator - Email::MIME constructor for starting anew https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234786 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-30 18:57 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [x] Rpmlint output: None [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL or Artistic [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : 97f55f12a4c5f31df28fb7f7f62522b7 MD5SUM upstream package: 97f55f12a4c5f31df28fb7f7f62522b7 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: Arches excluded: Why: [!] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [!] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-] File based requires are sane. === Issues === 1. Missing BR perl(Email::Date) 2. Latest version is 1.453 === Final Notes === 1. Any reason not to package Changes in %doc? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 23:07:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:07:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235790] Review Request: perl-CGI-Prototype - Create a CGI application by subclassing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704302307.l3UN7W8C031925@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Prototype - Create a CGI application by subclassing Alias: perl-CGI-Prototype https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235790 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-30 19:07 EST ------- > - disable autoprov -- with this small of a package it's easier than filtering Well, maybe. But I'd argue that filtering is more reliable. If you update the package at a later time and don't notice new functionality that would have a provide, the filtering will automatically pick it up. Your method won't. > - include full test suite in %%doc What's the rationale here? Is this needed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 23:07:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:07:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237340] Review Request: python-BeautifulSoup - HTML/XML parser for quick-turnaround applications like screen-scraping In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704302307.l3UN7bnZ031942@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-BeautifulSoup - HTML/XML parser for quick-turnaround applications like screen-scraping https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237340 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-04-30 19:07 EST ------- Well Since there is no license file this PKG-INFO is the only one provinding such information...That's why i've used it... This package is needed by freevo which is a Multimedia system written in python: http://freevo.sourceforge.net/ I'm working on packaging it but since it "prefer" player that are not present in Extras i will ask on the possibility to submit it on extras... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 23:08:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:08:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237340] Review Request: python-BeautifulSoup - HTML/XML parser for quick-turnaround applications like screen-scraping In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704302308.l3UN8p9x031973@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-BeautifulSoup - HTML/XML parser for quick-turnaround applications like screen-scraping https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237340 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-04-30 19:08 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-BeautifulSoup Short Description: HTML/XML parser for quick-turnaround applications like screen-scraping Owners: kwizart at gmail.com Branches: FC-6 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 23:19:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:19:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238499] Review Request: kio_p7zip - Kio-slave for viewing 7zip files using p7zip In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704302319.l3UNJCkv032341@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kio_p7zip - Kio-slave for viewing 7zip files using p7zip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238499 ------- Additional Comments From lightsolphoenix at gmail.com 2007-04-30 19:19 EST ------- Okay, I updated both the spec and source files. Spec URL: http://crystalsanctuary.rpgsource.net/packages/specs/kio_p7zip.spec SRPM URL: http://crystalsanctuary.rpgsource.net/packages/source/kio_p7zip-0.3.1-2fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 23:20:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:20:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238235] Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704302320.l3UNK9r6032367@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238235 ------- Additional Comments From lightsolphoenix at gmail.com 2007-04-30 19:20 EST ------- Another quick update; I added the script to remove the unnecessary .la files from the package. Spec URL: http://crystalsanctuary.rpgsource.net/packages/specs/tastymenu.spec SRPM URL: http://crystalsanctuary.rpgsource.net/packages/source/tastymenu-0.8-4fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 23:32:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:32:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237352] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Getopt - Moose role for processing command line options In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704302332.l3UNWLsC032755@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Getopt - Moose role for processing command line options Alias: perl-MooseX-Getopt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237352 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-30 19:32 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [x] Rpmlint output: None [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL or Artistic [-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : 250c71cde95ec48e9edcebacb80d0d44 MD5SUM upstream package: 250c71cde95ec48e9edcebacb80d0d44 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: Arches excluded: Why: [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-] File based requires are sane. === Issues === 1. Patch Build.PL to require a lower version of perl(Getopt::Long) so that the testing won't complain. 2. Document why you are doing this including your bug report (Note that self tests pass otherwise) === Final Notes === 1. Be prepared to submit patches to the core perl package of every %dist that you build for if problems appear with using perl(Getopt::Long) = 2.35 (if it's because of a bug), or be prepared to patch around it in this package if needed. 2. Watch very carefully when you schedule the build to make sure that the self tests still pass on each %dist. If we are on the same page here, I'll approve the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 23:34:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:34:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237340] Review Request: python-BeautifulSoup - HTML/XML parser for quick-turnaround applications like screen-scraping In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704302334.l3UNYX9h000336@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-BeautifulSoup - HTML/XML parser for quick-turnaround applications like screen-scraping https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237340 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-30 19:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Well Since there is no license file this PKG-INFO is the only one provinding > such information...That's why i've used it... Which is the only thing I noticed too, otherwise it would be useless :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 23:56:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:56:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238373] Review Request: libopenraw - decode camera RAW files. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704302356.l3UNujD4001257@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopenraw - decode camera RAW files. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238373 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bjohnson at symetrix.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-30 19:56 EST ------- I'll provide a review soon, but noticed this in the build: Options: Gnome support: no You might be missing some BRs, perhaps libgnome-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.