[Bug 233423] Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Apr 1 06:52:11 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233423
------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-04-01 02:52 EST -------
p.s.
(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #6)
> > Looks fine now, approved!
> Hmm, I don't see any applicable license, copyright not even any mention of an
> author.
>
You didn't look very good then the README clearly states the author.
(In reply to comment #14)
> Hans,
>
> Well, I didn't modify tarball. So the tarball in srpm does
> not contain License documents. Currently I copy the license
> documents from the main part of mecab
> ---------------------------------------------
> # LICENSE
> for doc in COPYING BSD GPL LGPL ; do
> %{__install} -cpm 644 %{_datadir}/doc/mecab-%{version}/$doc .
> done
> ---------------------------------------------
>
Ah that explains, when I reviewed this I didn't notice. Now I understand, I was
already puzzled how I could have missed a modified tarbal as I always check for
that. Yes please add a License.fedora instead, thats more acurate / honest.
I'm still waiting to hear from Ralf on this though, if my arguments are not
enough to convince him that this package is OK license-wise, we will need to ask
someone with more "powers" to make a judgement on this, for example Spot.
(In reply to comment #15)
> NOTE:
>
> It seems that my account on my university seems to have expired today....
> and sadly, today is Sunday. So while I can upload a modified
> spec file as attached, I cannot upload the whole srpm until
> I have my account again fixed....
Once the license issue is cleared, you can just attach the modified specfile
and License.fedora .
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list