[Bug 236492] Review Request: ruby-bsearch - Binary search library for Ruby

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ruby-bsearch - Binary search library for Ruby


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236492





------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au  2007-04-16 03:18 EST -------
MUST Items:

- MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
- MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
- MUST: The package is licensed (GPL) with an open-source compatible license 
and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
- MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license 
Ruby(GPL).
- MUST: The spec file is written in American English.
- MUST: The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream 
source, as provided in the spec URL.
- MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
least i386.
- MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires.
- MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable
- MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates.
- MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files 
listing.
- MUST: Permissions on files are set properly.
- MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} 
(or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
- MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros 
section
of Packaging Guidelines.
- MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. This is described 
in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines.
- MUST: There are no Large documentation files
- MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If 
it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present.
- MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix 
- MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other 
packages. 

SHOULD Items:

 - SHOULD: mock builds succcessfully in i386.
 - SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. A
package should not segfault instead of running, for example.
 - SHOULD: No scriptlets were used, those scriptlets must be sane. 
 - SHOULD: No subpackages present.

APPROVED!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.