[Bug 233597] Review Request: pigment - Media Center Toolkit
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Apr 16 09:27:43 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: pigment - Media Center Toolkit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233597
------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-04-16 05:27 EST -------
Updated packages here, which fix all problems reported :
Spec URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/pigment/pigment.spec
SRPM URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/pigment/pigment-0.1.4-2.src.rpm
(not the glib2-devel BR, since I prefer keeping it in this particular case)
About the license, I also think it's fine, but feel free to ask on the
mailing-list or even get FE-LEGAL to confirm if you think it's required.
About the name... indeed, pigment should maybe be considered like a python
package. I didn't really think about it, and since it's not just a python
module, but also a system library (libpgmrender.so) and a gstreamer plugin
(libpgmrendersink.so), it might be best to not rename it "python-pigment".
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list