[Bug 231774] Review Request: perl-DBIx-POS - Define a dictionary of SQL statements in a POD dialect (POS)

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Apr 20 02:58:34 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-POS - Define a dictionary of SQL statements in a POD dialect (POS)
Alias: perl-DBIx-POS

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231774





------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com  2007-04-19 22:58 EST -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> that is, that fragments of code licensed under the Artistic license may be 
> reliscensed under the GPL (as would be the case if someone opted to use this
> package under the terms of the GPL). 

This is where I don't quite follow you.  What part of the Artistic license
allows this?  And why would you consider the portion under the Artistic license
a "fragment"?

Note:  I think we both understand that this is not a blocker on the package
itself because mixing these two licenses is certainly compatible.  It's just a
matter of getting the tag to reflect the realistic licensing of the package as a
 whole.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list