[Bug 237883] Review Request: perl-SGML-Parser-OpenSP - Perl interface to the OpenSP SGML and XML parser

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-SGML-Parser-OpenSP - Perl interface to the OpenSP SGML and XML parser


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237883





------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de  2007-04-27 09:09 EST -------
(In reply to comment #6)

> > Missing BRs on perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) and perl(Test::More) (due to 
> > perl/perl-devel splittage).
> 
> As discussed, perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) is intentionally missing. 
As discussed, I will not approve this package exactly because of this, because I
am not wanting produce a precendence for to undermine established practice for
many years.

> perl(Test::More) is pulled in by perl-Test-Pod
A random cooincidence.

> > but I'd prefer to see a discussion on fedora-perl-devel first.
> 
> Please do discuss (or let me know if you'd approve this right now if the pod
> coverage tests would be run).  BTW, in addition to Pod coverage tests IMO being
> of very doubtful usefulness in packaging, perl-Test-Pod-Coverage and
> perl-Pod-Coverage are not found packaged as often as perl-Test-Pod;

Whether you like it or not, they nevertheless are widely used packages.

> I think
> that's not a coincidence.  For example, EPEL doesn't have them,
Sorry, but this argument is irrelevant because this (1.) is Fedora and is not
EPEL, and (2.) isn't an argument at all, because RHEL lacks a lot of packages
which are present in Fedora.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.