From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 01:40:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 21:40:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708010140.l711eRXJ009240@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From kaigai at kaigai.gr.jp 2007-07-31 21:40 EST ------- Oops, some fix in my comments: OLD:(1) Because these definitons are currently included in ... NEW:(1)' Because these definitons are NOT currently included in ... OLD:(4) "Source0" got a full location to indicate full location, as follows: NEW:(4)' "Source0" got a full location to indicate, as follows: (In reply to comment #3) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 05:08:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 01:08:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247513] Review Request: junit4 - java regression testing framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708010508.l7158MDF026547@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: junit4 - java regression testing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247513 ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-08-01 01:08 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=160393) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=160393&action=view) Detailed review Overview of things that need attention: X * skim the summary and description for typos, etc. # The summary is outdated - references EPL which may confuse people. See patch # for fix from http://www.junit.org/index.htm X * correct buildroot - should be: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) # Needs to be fixed X * license text included in package and marked with %doc # cpl-v10.html should be included in %doc X * rpmlint on .srpm gives no output # tab and space mixing issues: see patch X * run rpmlint on the binary RPMs XNote: group warnings can be ignored. # Results from binary rpm rpmlint-ing #$ rpmlint -v /var/lib/mock/fedora-7-x86_64/root/builddir/build/RPMS/junit4-* #I: junit4 checking #W: junit4 wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/junit4-4.3.1/README.html #I: junit4-debuginfo checking #I: junit4-demo checking #W: junit4-demo no-documentation #I: junit4-javadoc checking #I: junit4-manual checking #W: junit4-manual wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/junit4-manual-4.3.1/faq/faq.htm #W: junit4-manual wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/junit4-manual-4.3.1/testinfected/testing.htm #W: junit4-manual wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/junit4-manual-4.3.1/index.htm #W: junit4-manual wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/junit4-manual-4.3.1/cookbook/cookbook.htm #W: junit4-manual wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/junit4-manual-4.3.1/cookstour/cookstour.htm SHOULD: X * package should include license text in the package and mark it with %doc # See above, might need fixing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 05:22:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 01:22:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247513] Review Request: junit4 - java regression testing framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708010522.l715M400027630@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: junit4 - java regression testing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247513 ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-08-01 01:22 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=160394) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=160394&action=view) Suggested fixes for some of the issues NEEDSWORK: See above summary -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 05:30:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 01:30:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249352] Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708010530.l715UOJ1029178@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249352 ------- Additional Comments From pmatilai at redhat.com 2007-08-01 01:30 EST ------- There are a LOT of packages depending on popt actually: [pmatilai at localhost ~]$ repoquery --quiet --whatrequires --alldeps --queryformat "%{sourcerpm}" popt|sort -u|wc -l 297 A fair amount of duplicate versions in that number but it's > 200 packages anyway. They haven't needed the explicit BuildRequires on popt because main popt package gets pulled in by rpm always. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 05:31:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 01:31:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248301] Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708010531.l715V6SH029613@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248301 patrice.bouchand.fedora at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(patrice.bouchand.f| |edora at gmail.com) | ------- Additional Comments From patrice.bouchand.fedora at gmail.com 2007-08-01 01:31 EST ------- > ping? I get your remarks and I will work on it next week during my vacation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 06:07:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 02:07:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708010607.l7167Bvk031772@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-01 02:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > http://www6.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/~foster/extras/ice/ice.spec > http://www6.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/~foster/extras/ice/ice-3.2.0-6.fc7.lcg.src.rpm Well, I just tried to rebuild and have not done anything else: The results are: (you can browse/download the rpms, build log else from the following URL) * on i386 and ppc, the rebuild is okay (again, I just rebuilt) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=84407 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=84425 * rebuild fails on x86_64 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=84409 Build log says that file movement regarding to %_lib is wrong * Also rebuild fails on ppc64 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=84403 root log says that mono-core and db4-java are not available on ppc64. You have to disable the support of some components on ppc64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 06:09:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 02:09:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249892] Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708010609.l7169B1h031896@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249892 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-08-01 02:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > mkdir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%_datadir/doc/%name > cp -pr html pdf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%_datadir/doc/%name Just for the sake of consistency, would it be a problem if I used 'install' instead? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 06:09:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 02:09:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708010609.l7169uxe031955@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-01 02:09 EST ------- By the way, ice-dotnet is still seperated? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 06:11:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 02:11:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247556] Review Request: ice-java - Java runtime files for Ice In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708010611.l716BFj7032047@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ice-java - Java runtime files for Ice https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247556 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-01 02:11 EST ------- Again unified. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 234612 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 06:11:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 02:11:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708010611.l716BGKJ032077@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-01 02:11 EST ------- *** Bug 247556 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 06:20:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 02:20:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249892] Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708010620.l716Kr5W032519@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249892 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-01 02:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > > mkdir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%_datadir/doc/%name > > cp -pr html pdf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%_datadir/doc/%name > > Just for the sake of consistency, would it be a problem if I used 'install' instead? > My recognition is that "install" is to copy "files" (and set attributes), while "cp" is to copy "files _and_ directories (if needed, recursively)". For for this case, "install" command cannot be used (if I am not wrong). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 06:22:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 02:22:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249892] Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708010622.l716MXNA032607@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249892 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-01 02:22 EST ------- (Well, "install" can make directory, however I don't know how to copy files recursively using "install" command) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 06:41:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 02:41:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249034] Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708010641.l716fsB7001004@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249034 ------- Additional Comments From john at curioussymbols.com 2007-08-01 02:41 EST ------- Hi Tasaka, I have made changes according to your suggestions. FWIW on FC5, I get an *error* with rpmlint about having a dependency on the -devel package -- is that OK? Perhaps rpmlint should be backported to FC5? Anyway, I have removed the ldconfig, split out the -static package, added the release ID to the sub-package dependencies and added the defattr thing as you said. Please let me know if/what more is required. And thanks for your help. http://ascend.cheme.cmu.edu/ftp/jpye/ Cheers JP -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 08:28:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 04:28:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250340] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-F77 - Simple interface to F77 libs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708010828.l718SFj0009598@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-F77 - Simple interface to F77 libs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250340 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-01 04:28 EST ------- mock build failed + make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/require.... ExtUtils::F77: Version 1.16 Use of uninitialized value in pattern match (m//) at /builddir/build/BUILD/ExtUtils-F77-1.16/blib/lib/ExtUtils/F77.pm line 251. Can't exec "g77": No such file or directory at /builddir/build/BUILD/ExtUtils-F77-1.16/blib/lib/ExtUtils/F77.pm line 176. Use of uninitialized value in scalar chomp at /builddir/build/BUILD/ExtUtils-F77-1.16/blib/lib/ExtUtils/F77.pm line 177. Can't exec "g77": No such file or directory at /builddir/build/BUILD/ExtUtils-F77-1.16/blib/lib/ExtUtils/F77.pm line 176. Use of uninitialized value in scalar chomp at /builddir/build/BUILD/ExtUtils-F77-1.16/blib/lib/ExtUtils/F77.pm line 177. Can't exec "g77": No such file or directory at /builddir/build/BUILD/ExtUtils-F77-1.16/blib/lib/ExtUtils/F77.pm line 176. Use of uninitialized value in scalar chomp at /builddir/build/BUILD/ExtUtils-F77-1.16/blib/lib/ExtUtils/F77.pm line 177. Can't exec "g77": No such file or directory at /builddir/build/BUILD/ExtUtils-F77-1.16/blib/lib/ExtUtils/F77.pm line 176. Use of uninitialized value in scalar chomp at /builddir/build/BUILD/ExtUtils-F77-1.16/blib/lib/ExtUtils/F77.pm line 177. Can't exec "f77": No such file or directory at t/require.t line 28. FAILED test 2 Failed 1/2 tests, 50.00% okay Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t/require.t 2 1 50.00% 2 Failed 1/1 test scripts, 0.00% okay. 1/2 subtests failed, 50.00% okay. make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.33023 (%check) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.33023 (%check) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 09:06:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 05:06:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247557] Review Request: ice-dotnet - .Net runtime files for Ice In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708010906.l7196EH2013556@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ice-dotnet - .Net runtime files for Ice https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247557 mefoster at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From mefoster at gmail.com 2007-08-01 05:06 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 234612 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 09:06:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 05:06:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708010906.l7196H2o013593@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 ------- Additional Comments From mefoster at gmail.com 2007-08-01 05:06 EST ------- *** Bug 247557 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 10:15:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 06:15:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249892] Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011015.l71AFnOF020957@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249892 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-08-01 06:15 EST ------- Spec: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/bouml-doc.spec SRPM: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/bouml-doc-0-0.2.date20070520.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 10:17:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 06:17:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249352] Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011017.l71AHF3G021154@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249352 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-08-01 06:17 EST ------- The transition path could be eased by having rpm provide explicitly popt-devel, tell on the list that all packages that use popt should BuildRequires popt-devel, wait a bit that most important packages have been rebuilt then split out popt-devel (either in rpm on as part of popt). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 10:23:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 06:23:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239385] Review Request: peless - Text Browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011023.l71ANvbn022027@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: peless - Text Browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239385 ------- Additional Comments From pelliott at io.com 2007-08-01 06:23 EST ------- OK, please find: https://svn.berlios.de/svnroot/repos/peless/spec/peless.spec.fedora and ftp://ftp.BerliOS.de/pub/peless/fc6/SRPMS/peless-1.156-3.src.rpm I have removed 'Application' from the categories by changing the --with-dtcat parameter to %configure. Made fedora the vendor-id. added the --delete-original parameter to desktop-file-install. Removed the Packager line. Removed philo.txt from the list of files distributed to end user. Changed URL line to https://developer.berlios.de/projects/peless/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 10:32:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 06:32:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240652] Review Request: ocaml-pcre - Perl compatibility regular expressions (PCRE) for OCaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011032.l71AWjFg023299@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-pcre - Perl compatibility regular expressions (PCRE) for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240652 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-08-01 06:31 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ocaml-pcre Short Description: Perl compatibility regular expressions (PCRE) for OCaml Owners: rjones at redhat.com Branches: F-7 InitialCC: lxtnow at gmail.com,rjones at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 10:41:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 06:41:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240655] Review Request: ocaml-extlib - OCaml ExtLib additions to the standard library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011041.l71AfYCL024218@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-extlib - OCaml ExtLib additions to the standard library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240655 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-08-01 06:41 EST ------- An updated version is available here: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-extlib.spec http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-extlib-1.5-5.fc8.src.rpm This fixes all the problems you've pointed out above. The changelog is: * Wed Aug 1 2007 Richard W.M. Jones - 1.5-5 - ExcludeArch ppc64 - Added BR on ocaml-ocamldoc - Use %doc to install documentation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 10:47:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 06:47:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248649] Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011047.l71AleMv024889@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248649 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-01 06:47 EST ------- ping ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 10:48:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 06:48:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241656] Review Request: ocaml-csv - OCaml library for reading and writing CSV files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011048.l71AmFrZ024947@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-csv - OCaml library for reading and writing CSV files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241656 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |240655 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-08-01 06:48 EST ------- Added dependency on bug 240655. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 10:48:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 06:48:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240655] Review Request: ocaml-extlib - OCaml ExtLib additions to the standard library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011048.l71AmGuC024965@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-extlib - OCaml ExtLib additions to the standard library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240655 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |241656 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 11:28:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 07:28:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239385] Review Request: peless - Text Browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011128.l71BSrvA028931@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: peless - Text Browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239385 ------- Additional Comments From pelliott at io.com 2007-08-01 07:28 EST ------- peless is ready to be translated into other languages. if you cd to the po directory, and do make peless.pot you will make a .pot file. However, there are currently 0 translations. po/LINGUAS is a empty file. I have not got anybody to translate anything. Question: Should the .spec file have a %find_lang line? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 12:08:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 08:08:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245160] Review Request: fann - A fast artificial neural network library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011208.l71C8k3h032169@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fann - A fast artificial neural network library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245160 ------- Additional Comments From tsmetana at redhat.com 2007-08-01 08:08 EST ------- Sorry for that but I did never get those warnings. I've updated the packages, so it should be all OK now: http://www.smetana.name/fann2/fann.spec http://www.smetana.name/fann2/fann-2.0.0-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 12:34:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 08:34:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011234.l71CYrhZ001665@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-08-01 08:34 EST ------- FYI, kdebluetooth.fc7 has been pushed to update testing. ... BTW, is the -devel tree in test1 freeze? - Gilboa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 12:53:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 08:53:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248649] Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011253.l71CrSh2003219@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248649 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-08-01 08:53 EST ------- Looking at build.log: This append in the %prep section * "/usr/share/texmf/web2c/mktexupd: /var/lib/texmf/ls-R unwritable." Maybe, there is something to change with this file in %post (%postun ), so the changes it tries to write, will be done in %post (if ever usefull...) * "Overfull \hbox (29.40456pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 258--260 []\T1/bch/b/n/10 GRAAL \T1/bch/m/n/10 uses the en-vi-ron-ment vari-able \T1/bch /b/n/10 GRAAL_TECHNO_NAME\T1/bch/m/n/10 . It must be set to \T1/bch/b/n/10 /al- liance/etc/cmos.graal\T1/bch/m/n/10 . " See if there is something to change with paths * "No file start.aux. / synthesis.aux." * Files names are too generic: I still have a problem with theses files to be installed in _bindir as they are too generics... Is it possible to have prefixed named ? Another solution could be to uses bin in %{_libdir}/alliance/bin, then add the Path of the alliance binaries... (see the next comment about profile.d/alc_env.sh ) /usr/bin/a2def /usr/bin/a2lef /usr/bin/alcbanner /usr/bin/asimut /usr/bin/b2f /usr/bin/boog /usr/bin/boom /usr/bin/cougar /usr/bin/def2a /usr/bin/dreal /usr/bin/druc /usr/bin/exp /usr/bin/flatbeh /usr/bin/flatlo /usr/bin/flatph /usr/bin/flatrds /usr/bin/fmi /usr/bin/fsp /usr/bin/genlib /usr/bin/genpat /usr/bin/graal /usr/bin/k2f /usr/bin/l2p /usr/bin/loon /usr/bin/lvx /usr/bin/m2e /usr/bin/mips_asm /usr/bin/moka /usr/bin/nero /usr/bin/ocp /usr/bin/pat2spi /usr/bin/pdv /usr/bin/proof /usr/bin/ring /usr/bin/s2r /usr/bin/scapin /usr/bin/sea /usr/bin/seplace /usr/bin/seroute /usr/bin/sxlib2lef /usr/bin/syf /usr/bin/vasy /usr/bin/x2vy /usr/bin/x2y /usr/bin/xfsm /usr/bin/xpat /usr/bin/xsch /usr/bin/xvpn * alc_env.csh and alc_env.sh should be marked as %config (no replace do not seems to usefull in this case) @DATE@ - this macro isn't expanded... # System environment variables. PATH=$ALLIANCE_TOP/bin:$PATH export PATH * As previously talked with the prefix discution. $ALLIANCE_TOP is not arch independant from how upstream use it. So linking /usr/share/alliance/lib to /usr/lib64/alliance seems wrong (I expect it might be needed by the makefiles, is not, please remove this symlink). Thats because $ALLIANCE_TOP is not arch independant, that I would prefer to uses %{_libdir}/alliance (then using symlinks to /usr/share/alliance/$i from /usr/lib64/alliance/$i with $i as arch independant data - This seems more correct to me...) * There might be some testing todo with selinux... (then ask the selinux-policy-maintainer to add special context if this is needed...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 12:56:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 08:56:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011256.l71CuHTT003586@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 jnovy at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(rdieter at math.unl.e | |du) ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-08-01 08:56 EST ------- Rex, are you planning to do the review? We have not much time if we want to see texlive in F8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 13:16:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 09:16:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229591] Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011316.l71DGkLC005943@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229591 ------- Additional Comments From dtimms at iinet.net.au 2007-08-01 09:16 EST ------- Patrick: Yanko is correct in stating the spec needs to be Fedora specific and live in the fedora cvs. Are you happy for Terje to take over and develop the spec for fedora ? Terje: I am not a reviewer nor sponsor, but I want to help get this package into a suitable state to be included in Fedora. One thing I noticed is that upstream have released a later version: http://dev.ezix.org/software/files/lshw-B.02.11.tar.gz Are you still keen to be maintainer for lshw ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 13:28:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 09:28:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011328.l71DSfFU007196@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ------- Additional Comments From kengert at redhat.com 2007-08-01 09:28 EST ------- Are tools like kbtobexclient intentionally missing from the package? I used that in the past and was very happy with it. Am I supposed to use something else? Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 13:35:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 09:35:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248649] Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011335.l71DZkn6008121@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248649 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-01 09:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > Looking at build.log: This append in the %prep section > * "/usr/share/texmf/web2c/mktexupd: /var/lib/texmf/ls-R unwritable." > Maybe, there is something to change with this file in %post (%postun ), so the > changes it tries to write, will be done in %post (if ever usefull...) > * "Overfull \hbox (29.40456pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 258--260 > []\T1/bch/b/n/10 GRAAL \T1/bch/m/n/10 uses the en-vi-ron-ment vari-able \T1/bch > /b/n/10 GRAAL_TECHNO_NAME\T1/bch/m/n/10 . It must be set to \T1/bch/b/n/10 /al- > liance/etc/cmos.graal\T1/bch/m/n/10 . " > See if there is something to change with paths > * "No file start.aux. / synthesis.aux." > These are for pdf generation. That is for documentation. The "unwritable" warning has no influence on the final pdf and also chitlesh(~)[0]$rpm -qf /var/lib/texmf/ls-R tetex-fonts-3.0-34.fc6 chitlesh(~)[0]$rpm -qf /usr/share/texmf/web2c/mktexupd tetex-fonts-3.0-34.fc6 Documentation produced are used as tutorials and have nothing to do with modifying files from tetex-fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 14:01:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 10:01:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250416] New: Review Request: guile-lib - A repository of useful code written in Guile Scheme Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250416 Summary: Review Request: guile-lib - A repository of useful code written in Guile Scheme Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lxtnow at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/guile-lib/guile-lib.spec SRPM URL: http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/guile-lib/guile-lib-0.1.4-3.fc8.src.rpm Description: Guile-Lib is intended as an accumulation place for pure-scheme Guile modules, allowing for people to cooperate integrating their generic Guile modules into a coherent library. Think "a down-scaled, limited-scope CPAN for Guile". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 14:08:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 10:08:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250417] New: Review Request: guile-cairo - The Cairo graphics library for Guile Scheme Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250417 Summary: Review Request: guile-cairo - The Cairo graphics library for Guile Scheme Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lxtnow at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/guile-cairo/guile-cairo.spec SRPM URL: http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/guile-cairo/guile-cairo-1.4.0-2.fc8.src.rpm Description: Guile-Cairo wraps the Cairo graphics library for Guile Scheme -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 14:23:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 10:23:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011423.l71ENeei013933@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-08-01 10:23 EST ------- Kai, kbtobexclient seems to be broken (and disabled) by upstream. Hopefully it'll be re-enabled in b4. - Gilboa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 15:05:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 11:05:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249892] Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011505.l71F5quD018648@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249892 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 15:11:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 11:11:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229591] Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011511.l71FBDfH019175@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229591 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2007-08-01 11:11 EST ------- > Are you still keen to be maintainer for lshw ? Yes, updated to 2.11: SPECS: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/lshw/lshw.spec SRPMS: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/lshw/lshw-2.11-1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 15:17:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 11:17:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250340] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-F77 - Simple interface to F77 libs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011517.l71FH0Vc019659@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-F77 - Simple interface to F77 libs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250340 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-08-01 11:16 EST ------- Whoops: * Wed Aug 1 2007 Orion Poplawski 1.16-2 - Add BR: gcc-gfortran http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/perl-ExtUtils-F77.spec http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/perl-ExtUtils-F77-1.16-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 15:29:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 11:29:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239385] Review Request: peless - Text Browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011529.l71FTcZp020854@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: peless - Text Browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239385 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-01 11:29 EST ------- * for %find_lang: (In reply to comment #17) > However, there are > currently 0 translations. > Should the .spec file have a %find_lang line? - Should NOT. Two points. * desktop file name -------------------------------------------------------- mv ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_datadir}/applications/fedora-%{name}.desktop ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop -------------------------------------------------------- - Remove this line. i.e. the corresponding %file entry should be %{_datadir}/applications/fedora-%{name}.desktop . * macros in %changelog - Now you can see in the changelong %configure is expanded. To avoid this, use %% in %changelog, i.e. --------------------------------------------------------- %changelog - by removing it from --with-dtcat parameter to %%configure --------------------------------------------------------- Still I am waiting for your new request or your pre-review of other persons' review requests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 15:34:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 11:34:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249059] Review Request: wdaemon - hotplug helper for wacom x.org driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011534.l71FYtT9021767@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wdaemon - hotplug helper for wacom x.org driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249059 ------- Additional Comments From agazo at berlios.de 2007-08-01 11:34 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=160420) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=160420&action=view) Patch to /etc/udev/rules.d/50-udev.rules to create a /dev/uinput symlink to /dev/input/uinput -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 15:35:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 11:35:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222960] Review Request: XenMan - Graphical management tool for Xen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011535.l71FZf79022014@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: XenMan - Graphical management tool for Xen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222960 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-08-01 11:35 EST ------- well, here is the fix SPEC: http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/xenman/xenman.spec SRPM: http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/xenman/xenman-0.6-5.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 15:36:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 11:36:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249059] Review Request: wdaemon - hotplug helper for wacom x.org driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011536.l71FaCEP022081@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wdaemon - hotplug helper for wacom x.org driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249059 ------- Additional Comments From agazo at berlios.de 2007-08-01 11:36 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=160421) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=160421&action=view) Patch to /etc/udev/scripts/is_uinput.sh to let it detect vendor and product IDs correctly -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 15:37:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 11:37:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011537.l71FbKZZ022222@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 ------- Additional Comments From mefoster at gmail.com 2007-08-01 11:37 EST ------- Okay, here's a new version. Changelog: - Fixed arch-specific issues: - %ifnarch ppc64 in a lot of places; it doesn't have db4-java or mono-core, so no Java or CSharp packages - Replaced one literal "lib" with %{_lib} - Added IceGrid registry patch from ZeroC forum - Don't build "test" or "demo" subdirectories - Use "/sbin/ldconfig" instead of %{_sbindir} because that's /usr/sbin - Removed useless "dotnetversion" define (it's the same as "version") - Remove executable bit on all "*.ice" files (it gets set somehow on a few) Here are the new versions: http://www6.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/~foster/extras/ice/ice.spec http://www6.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/~foster/extras/ice/ice-3.2.0-6.fc7.lcg.src.rpm NB: I can only test building on i386, so I can't guarantee that the arch-specific issues are truly gone. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 15:40:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 11:40:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229591] Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011540.l71Fe2Co022548@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229591 ------- Additional Comments From lyonel at ezix.org 2007-08-01 11:40 EST ------- Thank you Terje for taking care of the Fedora flavour ;) Just one thing: the version is B.02.11, not 2.11. Please stick to the official version numbers to prevent confusion and problems with upgrades (RPM seems to think that B.02.11 < 2.04). (In reply to comment #22) > > Are you still keen to be maintainer for lshw ? > > Yes, updated to 2.11: > > SPECS: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/lshw/lshw.spec > SRPMS: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/lshw/lshw-2.11-1.fc7.src.rpm > > -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 15:40:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 11:40:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011540.l71FeiIH022651@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 ------- Additional Comments From mefoster at gmail.com 2007-08-01 11:40 EST ------- Whoops, that's still the old SRPM; here's the new one: http://www6.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/~foster/extras/ice/ice-3.2.0-7.fc7.lcg.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 15:41:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 11:41:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249059] Review Request: wdaemon - hotplug helper for wacom x.org driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011541.l71Ffs4s022840@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wdaemon - hotplug helper for wacom x.org driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249059 ------- Additional Comments From agazo at berlios.de 2007-08-01 11:41 EST ------- I attached two patches to let wdaemon work out-of-the box in fc7. I found two issues with wdaemon: First, wdaemon expect to find /dev/uinput device node, but I only have found /dev/input/uinput. I really think this could be changed in the wdaemon source code, but I temporally created a patch over 50udev.rules to create a symlink from /dev/input/uinput to /dev/uinput so wdaemon is happy. Second, the /etc/udev/scripts/is_uinput.sh detection logic for Vendor & Product IDs does not seem to work right, and /dev/input/uinput-devices/xxx symlinks are not created. I attached a patch to solve this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 15:43:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 11:43:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249059] Review Request: wdaemon - hotplug helper for wacom x.org driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011543.l71FhP0c022942@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wdaemon - hotplug helper for wacom x.org driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249059 ------- Additional Comments From arozansk at redhat.com 2007-08-01 11:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Created an attachment (id=160420) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=160420&action=view) [edit] > Patch to /etc/udev/rules.d/50-udev.rules to create a /dev/uinput symlink to > /dev/input/uinput Hi Alfonso, this one should be fixed during the build and I'll fix that in wdaemon package instead of creating an udev rule. /dev/uinput is used in RHEL-4 and wdaemon was developed to solve a problem in RHEL-4, that's why it defaults to /dev/uinput instead of /dev/input/uinput. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 15:44:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 11:44:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249059] Review Request: wdaemon - hotplug helper for wacom x.org driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011544.l71FiX2r023078@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wdaemon - hotplug helper for wacom x.org driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249059 ------- Additional Comments From arozansk at redhat.com 2007-08-01 11:44 EST ------- > Second, the /etc/udev/scripts/is_uinput.sh detection logic for Vendor & Product > IDs does not seem to work right, and /dev/input/uinput-devices/xxx symlinks are > not created. I attached a patch to solve this. Thanks, I'll apply this fix upstream and in the spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 15:47:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 11:47:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226275] Merge Review: perl-PDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011547.l71FloLn023532@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-PDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226275 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-08-01 11:47 EST ------- Looks like we also need a BR: libGLU-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 15:52:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 11:52:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229591] Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011552.l71Fqxbg025273@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229591 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2007-08-01 11:52 EST ------- > Just one thing: the version is B.02.11, not 2.11. Please stick to the official > version numbers to prevent confusion and problems with upgrades (RPM seems to > think that B.02.11 < 2.04). Ok, will your next major release be C.x.y or 1.0.x? Different issue: does lshw need dmidecode or other tools to work? - Terje -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 15:58:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 11:58:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229591] Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011558.l71FwvqU026349@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229591 ------- Additional Comments From yaneti at declera.com 2007-08-01 11:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #23) > Just one thing: the version is B.02.11, not 2.11. Please stick to the official > version numbers to prevent confusion and problems with upgrades (RPM seems to > think that B.02.11 < 2.04). Your version numbers might make sense to you but they are way off the normal package versioning practices, and certainly alien to any distribution versioning scheme (which has the purpose of preventing stuff like B.02.11 < 2.04). So, since you seem to be keeping al least the numeric part of the version in some common order thats what he is using. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 15:59:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 11:59:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249034] Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011559.l71FxWHb026459@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249034 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-01 11:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #23) > Hi Tasaka, > > I have made changes according to your suggestions. FWIW on FC5, > I get an *error* > with rpmlint about having a dependency on the -devel package On rawhide, there is no error (just note that FC5 is no longer supported) -4 seems good. I leave the judgment to Debarshi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 16:00:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 12:00:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250150] Review Request: rarian - a replacement for scrollkeeper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011600.l71G0jdk026596@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rarian - a replacement for scrollkeeper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250150 ------- Additional Comments From mbarnes at redhat.com 2007-08-01 12:00 EST ------- Updated to 0.5.6. This one builds successfully in mock. SRPM URL: http://baloo.boston.redhat.com/~mbarnes/rarian/rarian-0.5.6-1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 16:02:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 12:02:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240655] Review Request: ocaml-extlib - OCaml ExtLib additions to the standard library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011602.l71G2RhJ026753@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-extlib - OCaml ExtLib additions to the standard library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240655 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-08-01 12:02 EST ------- OK, All issues requested has been fixed. ========== *APPROVED* ========== -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 16:08:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 12:08:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229591] Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011608.l71G8LOT027341@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229591 ------- Additional Comments From lyonel at ezix.org 2007-08-01 12:08 EST ------- * all releases are named T.x.y[.z] so there may be B.02.12 < B.02.20 < C.03.01 * lshw is trying to be self-contained so it doesn't require dmidecode, lspci, etc. cheers, Lyonel. (In reply to comment #24) > > Just one thing: the version is B.02.11, not 2.11. Please stick to the official > > version numbers to prevent confusion and problems with upgrades (RPM seems to > > think that B.02.11 < 2.04). > > Ok, will your next major release be C.x.y or 1.0.x? > > Different issue: does lshw need dmidecode or other tools to work? > > - Terje > -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 16:09:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 12:09:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248649] Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011609.l71G9OFc027428@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248649 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-01 12:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > * As previously talked with the prefix discution. $ALLIANCE_TOP is not arch > independant from how upstream use it. chitlesh(~)[0]$ll /usr/share/alliance/ total 4 drwxr-xr-x 10 root root 4096 Jul 29 17:55 cells lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 21 Jul 29 17:55 etc -> ../../../etc/alliance lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 29 Jul 29 17:55 include -> ../../../usr/include/alliance lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 25 Jul 29 17:55 lib -> ../../../usr/lib/alliance The symbolic links are here to protect hardcorded bits of the codes that aren't dynamically set up during %configure. These symbolics links are here to meet _functionality_ when all the %{_bindir}/* are used at once( on a Makefile for example.) Please take note that libraries are placed at %{_libdir}/%{name} during %configure --libdir=%{_libdir}/%{name} As from the only "real" directory, cells which contains "technology files". Text files which specify the design rules of the respective technology. The latter is _NOT_ a must in the alliance distribution. Since the user might want to use his/her technology. for example from: * http://www.vlsitechnology.org/ * commercial technologies However the included cells are present so that one who doesn't have his/her own technology can use them for the first time. I hope I clarified that this is not arch-dependent, and should not be %{_libdir} but %{_datadir} Please also note, that once alliance is in the fedora collection, i'll start packaging the standard cells from http://www.vlsitechnology.org/, hence those will be placed in %{_datadir}, since there are only text files and images. Thus _not_ arch-dependent. The way that upstream uses the $ALLIANCE_TOP variable is similar to most commercial vendors do. But in my spec, these are split up in standard linux directories and made sure that users can still use $ALLIANCE_TOP. This variable IS NOT only for packagers or developers but users as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 16:10:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 12:10:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248649] Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011610.l71GAqNt027758@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248649 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-01 12:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > * There might be some testing todo with selinux... (then ask the > selinux-policy-maintainer to add special context if this is needed...) Is there any reason why alliance might require selinux policies ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 16:10:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 12:10:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226275] Merge Review: perl-PDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011610.l71GAr7Y027811@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-PDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226275 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-08-01 12:10 EST ------- Make that BR: libGLU-devel libGL-devel - though GLU depended on GL, but I guess not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 16:11:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 12:11:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240655] Review Request: ocaml-extlib - OCaml ExtLib additions to the standard library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011611.l71GBO57027881@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-extlib - OCaml ExtLib additions to the standard library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240655 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-08-01 12:11 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ocaml-extlib Short Description: OCaml ExtLib additions to the standard library Owners: rjones at redhat.com Branches: F-7 InitialCC: lxtnow at gmail.com,rjones at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 16:18:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 12:18:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229591] Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011618.l71GI9PZ028613@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229591 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2007-08-01 12:18 EST ------- > * all releases are named T.x.y[.z] so there may be B.02.12 < B.02.20 < C.03.01 Ok, that's fine. > * lshw is trying to be self-contained so it doesn't require dmidecode, lspci, Good. Updated package: SPECS: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/lshw/lshw.spec SRPMS: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/lshw/lshw-B.02.11-1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 16:30:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 12:30:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240655] Review Request: ocaml-extlib - OCaml ExtLib additions to the standard library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011630.l71GU3tD030136@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-extlib - OCaml ExtLib additions to the standard library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240655 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 16:34:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 12:34:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240652] Review Request: ocaml-pcre - Perl compatibility regular expressions (PCRE) for OCaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011634.l71GYDDa030465@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-pcre - Perl compatibility regular expressions (PCRE) for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240652 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 16:36:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 12:36:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229591] Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011636.l71GaKqx030764@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229591 ------- Additional Comments From lyonel at ezix.org 2007-08-01 12:36 EST ------- as a sidenote: for an explanation of that (weird?) versioning scheme, you can have a look at http://ezix.org/project/wiki/VersionNumbers (In reply to comment #25) > (In reply to comment #23) > > Just one thing: the version is B.02.11, not 2.11. Please stick to the official > > version numbers to prevent confusion and problems with upgrades (RPM seems to > > think that B.02.11 < 2.04). > > Your version numbers might make sense to you but they are way off the normal > package versioning practices, and certainly alien to any distribution versioning > scheme (which has the purpose of preventing stuff like B.02.11 < 2.04). > So, since you seem to be keeping al least the numeric part of the version in > some common order thats what he is using. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 16:38:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 12:38:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249892] Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011638.l71GcLJA031144@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249892 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-01 12:38 EST ------- (Maybe you have received the following comment, however I rewrite) Well, why don't you write just as following? ---------------------------------------------------- %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %_datadir/doc/%name ----------------------------------------------------- The file entry ----------------------------------------------------- %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) foo/ ----------------------------------------------------- (where foo/ is a directory) means the directory foo/ itself and all files/directories under foo/. Currently %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}/html/ and %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}/pdf/ are not owned by any packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 16:43:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 12:43:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247930] Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011643.l71Ghe9o031823@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247930 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-01 12:43 EST ------- Please close this bug as NEXTRELEASE when rebuild is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 16:54:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 12:54:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229591] Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011654.l71GsvlW000510@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229591 ------- Additional Comments From yaneti at declera.com 2007-08-01 12:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #28) > as a sidenote: for an explanation of that (weird?) versioning scheme, you can > have a look at http://ezix.org/project/wiki/VersionNumbers Some points on that. - You cannot expect people to obey your desire to not package your X.. or T.. versions. Especially in bleading edge Fedora land. And this is where this version scheme fails with rpm because X.00 > T.01 > C.02 - Fedora has guidelines on including such non-numeric information in the release field. These guidelines are probably the reason there is not a single package with non-numeric version in the repository. - All the other major distributions have stripped this field when packaging lshw. > (In reply to comment #25) > > (In reply to comment #23) > > > Just one thing: the version is B.02.11, not 2.11. Please stick to the official > > > version numbers to prevent confusion and problems with upgrades (RPM seems to > > > think that B.02.11 < 2.04). > > > > Your version numbers might make sense to you but they are way off the normal > > package versioning practices, and certainly alien to any distribution versioning > > scheme (which has the purpose of preventing stuff like B.02.11 < 2.04). > > So, since you seem to be keeping al least the numeric part of the version in > > some common order thats what he is using. > > -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 17:01:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 13:01:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250150] Review Request: rarian - a replacement for scrollkeeper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011701.l71H17a8000948@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rarian - a replacement for scrollkeeper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250150 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-08-01 13:01 EST ------- rpmlint output: [mclasen at dhcp83-186 Desktop]$ rpmlint rarian-0.5.6-1.fc8.i386.rpm E: rarian zero-length /usr/share/doc/rarian-0.5.6/AUTHORS This one should be fixed upstream, I guess. I poked Don. E: rarian explicit-lib-dependency libxslt This is ok, because it is actually requiring /usr/bin/xsltproc here Might want to add a comment next to the Requires: to explain that W: rarian obsolete-not-provided scrollkeeper I think the way you handle the Obsoletes/Provides here makes sense. rpmlint rarian-devel-0.5.6-1.fc8.i386.rpm W: rarian-devel no-documentation Ignorable rpmlint rarian-compat-0.5.6-1.fc8.i386.rpm W: rarian-compat no-documentation Ignorable W: rarian-compat devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/bin/rarian-sk-config rpmlint is just wrong here W: rarian-compat one-line-command-in-%post /usr/bin/rarian-sk-update I think that is fine, and using -p here would be pretty odd Detailed review: package name: ok spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: ok license: ok license field: - I think the -compat package should have a License: GPL, since the utils are GPL, not LGPL - if you want to preemptively adopt the new license field rules, the license tags should be LGPLv2+ and GPLv2+, respectively license file: should include COPYING.LIB and COPYING.UTILS spec language: ok spec legibility: ok upstream sources: ok buildable: ok excludearch: n/a build deps: ok ldconfig: ok relocatable: n/a directory ownership: ok file list dupes: ok file permissions: ok %clean: ok macro use: ok content: permissible large docs: n/a %doc: ok headers: ok static libs: n/a pc files: ok shared lib symlinks: ok devel package: ok la files: ok gui apps: n/a file ownership: ok %install ok utf8 filenames: ok -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 17:10:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 13:10:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229591] Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011710.l71HAmiX001967@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229591 ------- Additional Comments From yaneti at declera.com 2007-08-01 13:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #29) > ...there is not a single package with non-numeric version in the repository. Apparently I am wrong. There are 7. Still given the X. > T. > C. argument I think it would be wiser not to let that particular release distinction be first in the version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 17:13:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 13:13:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249059] Review Request: wdaemon - hotplug helper for wacom x.org driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011713.l71HDLZM002260@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wdaemon - hotplug helper for wacom x.org driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249059 ------- Additional Comments From arozansk at redhat.com 2007-08-01 13:13 EST ------- New upstream version/package with the fixes applied: http://people.redhat.com/arozansk/wdaemon/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 17:14:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 13:14:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250416] Review Request: guile-lib - A repository of useful code written in Guile Scheme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011714.l71HETSA002452@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-lib - A repository of useful code written in Guile Scheme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250416 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-01 13:14 EST ------- For 0.1.4-3: * Currently this package does not require guile, however only guile seems to own /usr/share/guile/site/ * Timestamps are not kept. For this package the following works. -------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT CPPROG="cp -p" -------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 17:17:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 13:17:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226668] Merge Review: zenity In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011717.l71HHqFx002719@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: zenity https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226668 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-08-01 13:17 EST ------- What the heck, let's get rid of the Zs. The License: tag says "GPL" but the COPYING file contains a copy of the LGPL and the README file says LGPL. /usr/share/gnome/help seems to be unowned and I can't trace anything in the dependency list that would bring in yelp. I know that there are some open issues relating to yelp but frankly I don't know the proper thing to do here. The scriptlets seem wrong; they aren't allowed to fail. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets recommends the following: %post scrollkeeper-update -q -o %{_datadir}/omf/%{name} || : %postun scrollkeeper-update -q || : Review: * source files match upstream: 0ac8e29fac4a2cbc26476fc7bfa8d4a0dd19247b3cd7dee89d5d855c2d996815 zenity-2.19.1.tar.bz2 * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. X license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: zenity = 2.19.1-1.fc8 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/perl libX11.so.6()(64bit) libart_lgpl_2.so.2()(64bit) libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libcairo.so.2()(64bit) libdbus-1.so.3()(64bit) libdbus-glib-1.so.2()(64bit) libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglade-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgmodule-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgnomecanvas-2.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libnotify.so.1()(64bit) libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libxml2.so.2()(64bit) scrollkeeper * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I installed the freshly built package and it seems to work for me. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. X /usr/share/gnome/help is unowned * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * locale files present; %find_lang used properly. X scriptlets don't seem correct. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. * not really a GUI app (even though it opens GUI dialogs), so no need for a desktop file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 17:23:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 13:23:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250150] Review Request: rarian - a replacement for scrollkeeper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011723.l71HNwxH003430@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rarian - a replacement for scrollkeeper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250150 ------- Additional Comments From mbarnes at redhat.com 2007-08-01 13:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > E: rarian explicit-lib-dependency libxslt > > This is ok, because it is actually requiring /usr/bin/xsltproc here > Might want to add a comment next to the Requires: to explain that I figured rpmlint was just getting confused by the fact that the package itself is named like a library. Added a comment just the same. Updated SRPM: http://baloo.boston.redhat.com/~mbarnes/rarian/rarian-0.5.6-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 17:26:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 13:26:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249892] Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011726.l71HQfMw003917@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249892 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-08-01 13:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > (Maybe you have received the following comment, however > I rewrite) Actually you are the first one to state it. :-) > Well, why don't you write just as following? > ---------------------------------------------------- > %files > %defattr(-,root,root,-) > %_datadir/doc/%name I tend to use the more verbose form for the sake of readability. A quick glance at the %files stanza reminds me that a directory (in this case %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}) has been created by the package, and a short listing of what it contains. I find this necessary since the %install stanza becomes too 'dirty' to realise what files are present with just a quick look at it. However I don't prefer to list out every file and sub-directory if the list is too long because that would defeat the initial idea. %dir %{_datadir}/doc/%{name} %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}/html/* %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}/pdf/* ...is just enough to remind me that the documentation directory, named %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}, contains the both the HTML and PDF representations. Another example where I have followed this style is in gengetopt.spec (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243607): %dir %{_datadir}/%{name} %{_datadir}/%{name}/getopt.c %{_datadir}/%{name}/getopt1.c %{_datadir}/%{name}/gnugetopt.h Since there were only 3 files, I listed them explicitly. If this does not violate the packaging guidelines and if you are compfortable with it, then I would be happy to keep them this way. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 17:33:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 13:33:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244894] Review Request: yum-cron - get yum updates via a cron job In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011733.l71HXHIA005088@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yum-cron - get yum updates via a cron job https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244894 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-08-01 13:33 EST ------- It's OK not to have a URL if there's a reason not to have one. Yes, rpmlint will complain but it's OK to ignore it when there's a valid reason to do so. This looks good to me. I've already done the sponsorship magic so you should be able to make your CVS resquest and get this imported whenever you have time. Note that because you're not using the dist tag and want to keep the same package version across multiple releases, you need to understand how the build inheritance works in koji. I suggest you contact the releng team for a pointer; it's possible they need to set something up. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 17:34:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 13:34:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249892] Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011734.l71HY4kB005357@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249892 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-01 13:33 EST ------- Well what is the real problem is that currently the directories %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}/html/ and %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}/pdf/ *themselves* are not owned by any package. In your way you must write: ------------------------------------------------------ %dir %_datadir/doc/%name %dir %_datadir/doc/%name/html %datadir/doc/%name/html/* ........... ------------------------------------------------------ or ------------------------------------------------------ %dir %_datadir/doc/%name %_datadir/doc/%name/html/ ....... ------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 17:36:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 13:36:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240693] Review Request: Perlbal - Reverse-proxy load balancer and webserver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011736.l71HaH53005871@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Perlbal - Reverse-proxy load balancer and webserver Alias: Perlbal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240693 ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2007-08-01 13:36 EST ------- Thanks Jason, Sorry that it took so long, I was on holiday New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: Perlbal Short Description: Reverse-proxy load balancer and webserver Owners: ruben at rubenkerkhof.com Branches: EL-4 EL-5 FC-6 F-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 17:38:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 13:38:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249892] Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011738.l71Hc0Rh006162@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249892 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-01 13:37 EST ------- (Well, the reason I comment my way is because directory ownership issue becomes difficult to check and is frequently overlooked in verbose list way...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 17:38:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 13:38:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226668] Merge Review: zenity In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011738.l71Hc7SA006198@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: zenity https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226668 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-08-01 13:38 EST ------- I've fixed the license and the sriptlets. For the /usr/share/gnome/help ownership, we recently added a yelp dependency to libgnomeui, which was helpfully dropped again by rel-eng, but seeing that zenity doesn't require libgnomeui anyway, and in the interest of getting rid of this review, I've added a yelp dependency here. The dependencies are almost sane. I'm a bit unappy that we pull in perl just for the gdialog compat script, that probably nobody ever uses. I'll ponder dropping it. And libdbus-glib is only pulled in because of a defective libnotify.pc file, I believe. Anyway, see if you are happy now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 17:40:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 13:40:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226275] Merge Review: perl-PDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011740.l71He9Wm006522@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-PDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226275 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-08-01 13:40 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=160436) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=160436&action=view) Remove -lXext library Scratch the BR libGL-devel, real fix is to remove -lXext from the GL linking options. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 17:45:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 13:45:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226668] Merge Review: zenity In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011745.l71Hjemi007360@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: zenity https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226668 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-08-01 13:45 EST ------- Yes, this looks good to me. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 17:49:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 13:49:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250150] Review Request: rarian - a replacement for scrollkeeper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011749.l71HnuR2007959@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rarian - a replacement for scrollkeeper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250150 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-08-01 13:49 EST ------- looking fine now. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 17:53:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 13:53:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240655] Review Request: ocaml-extlib - OCaml ExtLib additions to the standard library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011753.l71HrnWT008473@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-extlib - OCaml ExtLib additions to the standard library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240655 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 17:53:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 13:53:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241656] Review Request: ocaml-csv - OCaml library for reading and writing CSV files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011753.l71HrpUA008486@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-csv - OCaml library for reading and writing CSV files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241656 Bug 241656 depends on bug 240655, which changed state. Bug 240655 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-extlib - OCaml ExtLib additions to the standard library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240655 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 17:54:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 13:54:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011754.l71HsIl3008556@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-01 13:54 EST ------- Well again just rebuilt (I will check the rebuild failure later, however as I am also reviewing other persons' requests, I hope that you will fix the build failure before I try :) ) * i386, ppc okay http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=84848 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=84868 * x86_64 not okay, however some progress on build log. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=84850 * ppc64 not okay. According to the build log, you may want to disable ppc64 support completely? http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=84824 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 17:55:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 13:55:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249892] Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011755.l71HtJCi008688@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249892 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-08-01 13:55 EST ------- Spec: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/bouml-doc.spec I took the middle path. %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %dir %{_datadir}/doc/%{name} %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}/html %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}/pdf I am unable to upload the SRPM since I do not have the bandwidth to upload a 26MB file. If you want I can upload it tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 17:55:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 13:55:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240652] Review Request: ocaml-pcre - Perl compatibility regular expressions (PCRE) for OCaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011755.l71Hthq3008804@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-pcre - Perl compatibility regular expressions (PCRE) for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240652 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 17:56:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 13:56:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245160] Review Request: fann - A fast artificial neural network library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011756.l71HuF6b008924@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fann - A fast artificial neural network library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245160 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-08-01 13:56 EST ------- You won't see those warnings unless you install the package and run rpmlint against it, which is something I do for all packages I review.. I've built the -3 package; rpmlint is completely quiet now and as far as I can tell all of the complaints raised in this review have been dealt with. Tyler's review checklist above seems complete enough to me; in addition I checked the compiler flags and the debuginfo package and they're fine as well. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 17:58:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 13:58:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249761] Review Request: funionfs - Union filesystem in userspace using FUSE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011758.l71HwUkm009272@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: funionfs - Union filesystem in userspace using FUSE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249761 law at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 18:25:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 14:25:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250417] Review Request: guile-cairo - The Cairo graphics library for Guile Scheme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011825.l71IP5QH013245@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-cairo - The Cairo graphics library for Guile Scheme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250417 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-01 14:25 EST ------- For 1.4.0-2: * Dependency for main/subpackage - Usually the dependency for main/subpackage must be version-release specific. * Redundant BuildRequires - cairo-devel requires freetype-devel - cairo-devel requires pkgconfig (also see below) * pkgconfig dependency - Packages containing pkgconfig .pc file must have "Requires: pkgconfig" * "#include" message in header files - Check the dependency of -devel package, especially check what files the header files in -devel package needs to "include". The initial check can be done by: ---------------------------------------------------------------- $ grep -h 'include ' `rpm -ql guile-cairo-devel` | sort | uniq #include #include #include #include #include #include ---------------------------------------------------------------- And actually /usr/include/guile-cairo/guile-cairo.h contains: ---------------------------------------------------------------- 26 27 #include 28 #include 29 ---------------------------------------------------------------- , which means that -devel package must require cairo-devel and guile-devel. * Documents - Please add the following: ----------------------------------------------------------------- NEWS TODO ----------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 18:42:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 14:42:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229591] Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011842.l71IgpqW015263@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229591 ------- Additional Comments From lyonel at ezix.org 2007-08-01 14:42 EST ------- Even if it does include its own copy of PCI/USB/etc. database (normally provided by hwdata on Fedora I think), lshw can make use of it (if installed under the usual locations like /usr/share, etc.), especially if the hwdata version is more recent than lshw's... Is there a way to "recommend" a package (as it's not really a dependency)? I think Debian has something similar to this. In practice requiring hwdata wouldn't be a big problem I guess... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 18:49:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 14:49:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249892] Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011849.l71InBjK016160@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249892 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |247417 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-01 14:49 EST ------- Newest spec file is okay, however this review request is blocked by bouml. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 18:49:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 14:49:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011849.l71InDbL016205@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |249892 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 18:51:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 14:51:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189250] Review Request: python-lxml - ElementTree-like python bindings for libxml2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011851.l71Ipfnj016590@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-lxml - ElementTree-like python bindings for libxml2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189250 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-08-01 14:51 EST ------- Oops, forget to set the CVS flag... Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-lxml New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Updated EPEL Owners: jeff at ocjtech.us -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 19:07:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 15:07:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189250] Review Request: python-lxml - ElementTree-like python bindings for libxml2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011907.l71J7rWP018485@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-lxml - ElementTree-like python bindings for libxml2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189250 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-01 15:07 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 19:11:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 15:11:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250463] New: Review Request: python-pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250463 Summary: Review Request: python-pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: noah at coderanger.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dev.laptop.org/~coderanger/rpm/python-pyvserver/python-pyvserver.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.laptop.org/~coderanger/rpm/python-pyvserver/python-pyvserver-1.0-0.0.20070723git639686.src.rpm Description: This is a wrapper around libvserver (util-vserver-lib in Fedora) to allow Python programs to manipulate the VServer system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 19:13:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 15:13:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240693] Review Request: Perlbal - Reverse-proxy load balancer and webserver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011913.l71JDZgC019025@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Perlbal - Reverse-proxy load balancer and webserver Alias: Perlbal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240693 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-01 15:13 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 19:19:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 15:19:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250467] New: Review Request: rainbow - The service component of the OLPC Bitfrost security platform Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250467 Summary: Review Request: rainbow - The service component of the OLPC Bitfrost security platform Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: noah at coderanger.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dev.laptop.org/~coderanger/rpm/rainbow/rainbow.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.laptop.org/~coderanger/rpm/rainbow/rainbow-1.0-0.0.20070731gitde262e.src.rpm Description: This is the security service as described in the OLPC Bitfrost platform (http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Bitfrost). This package is reasonably specific to OLPC environment (though it would work on a standard desktop with VServer installed). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 19:23:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 15:23:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250468] New: Review Request: vcmd - A developers interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250468 Summary: Review Request: vcmd - A developers interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: noah at coderanger.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dev.laptop.org/~coderanger/rpm/vcmd/vcmd.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.laptop.org/~coderanger/rpm/vcmd/vcmd-0.09-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This is a developers tool to access and work with the VServer kernel interface. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 19:25:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 15:25:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225716] Review Request: gnome-screensaver-frogs - GNOME Screensaver Slideshow of Frogs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708011925.l71JPrja021178@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-screensaver-frogs - GNOME Screensaver Slideshow of Frogs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225716 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag| |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-08-01 15:25 EST ------- One of the pictures did have a "PreviewImage" on it, but it was easy enough to remove. Did my own CVS for this package: Package Name: gnome-screensaver-frogs Short Description: GNOME Screensaver Slideshow of Frogs Owners: tcallawa at redhat.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: Built too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 19:29:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 15:29:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250469] New: Review Request: olpc-security - A metapackage for the OLPC security platform Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250469 Summary: Review Request: olpc-security - A metapackage for the OLPC security platform Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: noah at coderanger.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dev.laptop.org/~coderanger/rpm/olpc-security/olpc-security.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.laptop.org/~coderanger/rpm/olpc-security/olpc-security-0.1-0.0.20070724.src.rpm Description: This is a metapackage to pull in the rest of the OLPC security platform. This exists to allow our developers to test the security system before we merge it into our builds and force it on. Even after that there is some value is letting people explore the system on a standard desktop (if they are using the jhbuild development environment). I know metapackages are generally discouraged, however groups are not an option given how the OLPC image build system is setup. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 20:07:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 16:07:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708012007.l71K7R79027273@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-08-01 16:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #32) > I am Bruno Pag?s, author of Bouml Hello. Nice to see you here. > I see you have many problems to compile Bouml and this is a big surprise Not many problems really. The issue was handling the value of BOUML_LIB for ppc64 and x86_64 systems. We tried to fiddle with the CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS used by qmake, which complicated things a bit, and we finally gave up trying to do that. > On the download page of the site (http://bouml.free.fr/download.html) I point to > several Bouml distributions, can I add a pointer to yours ? Sure. I will let you know the links to the RPMs for various architectures and distribution versions once this review is approved. > Do you have a page associated to Bouml, or a constant link to the rpm > (http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/bouml-2.29.1-1.fc8.src.rpm depend on the release > and may be more because I don't know the meaning of 'fc8'), or a way to find it > through a query (like for FreeBSD) ? Once the package is approved, it will become part of Fedora and be available from the official Fedora repositories. Whether it will be in the CD-ROMs or DVDs is something I can not tell, yet. Therefore all users need to do is: # yum install bouml ...to install it. However this behaviour will be restricted to users of Fedora Core 6 (if demanded), Fedora 7 and Rawhide (ie. Fedora development snapshot). http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/bouml-2.29.1-1.fc8.src.rpm is only a temporary URI being used for the purposes of this review request. "fc8" stands for "Fedora Collection 8", which refers to the version of the package built for Rawhide (Fedora 8 is going to be the next Fedora release). > Best regards and thank you to compile Bouml for Fedora users Thanks for creating such a wonderful tool. Folks at my workplace make extensive use of it. There are a few things which need fixing at your end, though. 1. The file src/diagram/DiagramWindow.cpp has the executable bit set. I think it should have 644 as the mode. 2. The projectControl and projectSynchro symlinks should be relative (targets should be ../lib/bouml/projectControl and ../lib/bouml/projectSynchro) and not absolute as they are now. This is helpful if the prefix is not '/usr' but something else. 3. Remove Applications from Categories in the .desktop files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 20:21:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 16:21:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708012021.l71KLkRQ028751@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-08-01 16:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #30) > - Well, when I launch projectControl or projectSynchro, > a dialog appears that shows "BOUML_ID is not defined" and then > immediately the program exits. > This behavior is not expected for programs launched by > desktop files. That is because one needs to define an environment variable named "BOUML_ID", so that many users can simultaneously work on same project, with each user having his own "BOUML_ID". http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines did not reveal much information about setting environment variables at installation time. I am looking for a solution in the meanwhile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 20:49:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 16:49:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708012049.l71Kn8fk001438@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(rdieter at math.unl.e| |du) | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-08-01 16:49 EST ------- Ugh, life/work/kde4 got in the way, I can't promise anything beyond when I get round-tuit, sorry. Any one else is free to beat me to the punch(review), I'll help where/when I can. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 20:53:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 16:53:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247312] Review Request: MyPasswordSafe - A graphical password management tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708012053.l71Kr3sg002148@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyPasswordSafe - A graphical password management tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247312 redhat-bugzilla at camperquake.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at camperquake.de 2007-08-01 16:52 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: MyPasswordSafe Short Description: A graphical password management tool Owners: redhat-bugzilla at camperquake.de Branches: F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 21:00:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 17:00:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250416] Review Request: guile-lib - A repository of useful code written in Guile Scheme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708012100.l71L0DOm002699@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-lib - A repository of useful code written in Guile Scheme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250416 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-08-01 17:00 EST ------- > Currently this package does not require guile, however > only guile seems to own /usr/share/guile/site/ Right ! > -------------------------------------------------- > make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT CPPROG="cp -p" > -------------------------------------------------- Doesn't seem to work well. Could you upload somewhere your build.log please ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 21:15:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 17:15:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247513] Review Request: junit4 - java regression testing framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708012115.l71LF1Ol005010@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: junit4 - java regression testing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247513 ------- Additional Comments From bkonrath at redhat.com 2007-08-01 17:14 EST ------- New files: http://bagu.org/eclipse/junit4.spec http://bagu.org/eclipse/junit4-4.3.1-1jpp.2.fc8.src.rpm (In reply to comment #2) > Created an attachment (id=160393) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=160393&action=view) [edit] > Detailed review > > Overview of things that need attention: > X * skim the summary and description for typos, etc. > # The summary is outdated - references EPL which may confuse people. See > patch > # for fix from http://www.junit.org/index.htm Fixed > X * correct buildroot > - should be: > %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) > # Needs to be fixed Fixed > X * license text included in package and marked with %doc > # cpl-v10.html should be included in %doc This license file is not installed so it's not needed. > X * rpmlint on .srpm gives no output > # tab and space mixing issues: see patch Fixed > X * run rpmlint on the binary RPMs Fix most issues. Running rpmlint on the binary rpm now gives these messages: %% rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/junit4-* E: junit4 no-binary This is ok because that package currently doesn't have binary files since aot-compile-rpm is temporarily disabled due to gcj bugs. E: junit4-debuginfo empty-debuginfo-package Again, this package is empty because aot-compile-rpm is temporarily disabled due to gcj bugs. W: junit4-demo no-documentation There is no documentation for the demo packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 21:18:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 17:18:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239385] Review Request: peless - Text Browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708012118.l71LIqEh005603@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: peless - Text Browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239385 ------- Additional Comments From pelliott at io.com 2007-08-01 17:18 EST ------- https://svn.berlios.de/svnroot/repos/peless/spec/peless.spec.fedora ftp://ftp.BerliOS.de/pub/peless/fc6/SRPMS/peless-1.156-4.src.rpm OK, I have done this but I do not understand it. None of the files on my system in /usr/share/applications/ begin with 'fedora-'. I am totally unqualified to review other people's pre-review requests. This byzantine process has me totally intimidated. There seem to be snakes everywhere waiting to bite you. For example, I could find no documentation that setting vendor=fedora would change the name of the resulting desktop file. I would not want to inflict my advise on someone else's project. Perhaps someday I will have a second project and I will qualify that way. At least that way, I will not mess up someone else's project, which is probably very important to them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 21:27:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 17:27:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250340] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-F77 - Simple interface to F77 libs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708012127.l71LRW4c006564@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-F77 - Simple interface to F77 libs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250340 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 21:44:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 17:44:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708012144.l71Li15x008295@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 rob.myers at gtri.gatech.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |250494 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 21:56:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 17:56:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250340] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-F77 - Simple interface to F77 libs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708012156.l71Lun7V009019@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-F77 - Simple interface to F77 libs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250340 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-08-01 17:56 EST ------- Not much to say. * source files match upstream: d3dfed878678495bbd1054d78ad100ddd3df59cbc8a2ce550dae9cd2e989b84c ExtUtils-F77-1.16.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package (or at least the COPYING file is). * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(ExtUtils::F77) = 1.16 perl-ExtUtils-F77 = 1.16-2.fc8 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Config) perl(File::Spec) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=2, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 cusr + 0.03 csys = 0.05 CPU) * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 22:23:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 18:23:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250504] New: Review Request: blktrace - block IO tracer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250504 Summary: Review Request: blktrace - block IO tracer Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: esandeen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/esandeen/blktrace-rpm/blktrace.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/esandeen/blktrace-rpm/blktrace-0.0-0.1.20070730162628git.src.rpm Description: blktrace is a block layer IO tracing mechanism which provides detailed information about request queue operations to user space. This package includes both blktrace, a utility which gathers event traces from the kernel; and blkparse, a utility which formats trace data collected by blktrace. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 22:23:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 18:23:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250342] Review Request: perl-Astro-FITS-CFITSIO - Perl extension for using the cfitsio library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708012223.l71MNO5f012440@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Astro-FITS-CFITSIO - Perl extension for using the cfitsio library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250342 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-08-01 18:23 EST ------- This one is pretty simple as well. The only question I have is why you don't package up the examples as documentation. But that's really up to you. * source files match upstream: bbeb6fd3b17b290842a88a8179c2526abae21fa67172295385a742b51bbfab70 Astro-FITS-CFITSIO-1.05.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines (ugly caps and all) * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: CFITSIO.so()(64bit) perl(Astro::FITS::CFITSIO) = 1.05 perl-Astro-FITS-CFITSIO = 1.05-1.fc8 = libcfitsio.so.0()(64bit) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(AutoLoader) perl(Carp) perl(DynaLoader) perl(Exporter) perl(strict) perl(vars) * %check is present and all tests pass: 149 / 149 tests passed (100.0%) * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 22:30:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 18:30:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708012230.l71MU4Eq012824@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From bouml at free.fr 2007-08-01 18:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #33) > There are a few things which need fixing at your end, though. > > 1. The file src/diagram/DiagramWindow.cpp has the executable bit set. I think > it should have 644 as the mode. done > 2. The projectControl and projectSynchro symlinks should be relative (targets > should be ../lib/bouml/projectControl and ../lib/bouml/projectSynchro) and not > absolute as they are now. This is helpful if the prefix is not '/usr' but > something else. I don't understand : the symlinks are made by "ln -s $(BOUML_LIB)/projectXXX", so they follow BOUML_LIB. Furthermore BOUML_LIB and BOUML_DIR may not have the same prefix (except '/') > 3. Remove Applications from Categories in the .desktop files. done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 22:32:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 18:32:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229591] Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708012232.l71MWOKT013013@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229591 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2007-08-01 18:31 EST ------- >especially if the hwdata version is more > recent than lshw's... And one point of maintaining the db, I will look into this issue and make a decision, thanks for the hands up. > Is there a way to "recommend" a package (as it's not really a dependency)? I > think Debian has something similar to this. It's on Panu's (fedora rpm maintainer) TODO list if I am not mistaken. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 22:34:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 18:34:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250340] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-F77 - Simple interface to F77 libs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708012234.l71MY1cI013112@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-F77 - Simple interface to F77 libs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250340 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-08-01 18:33 EST ------- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-ExtUtils-F77 Short Description: Simple interface to F77 libs Owners: orion at cora.nwra.com Branches: F-7 FC-6 EL-5 EL-4 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 22:34:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 18:34:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250340] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-F77 - Simple interface to F77 libs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708012234.l71MYUO5013201@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-F77 - Simple interface to F77 libs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250340 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 22:36:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 18:36:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708012236.l71MankL013319@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From bouml at free.fr 2007-08-01 18:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #34) > (In reply to comment #30) > > > - Well, when I launch projectControl or projectSynchro, > > a dialog appears that shows "BOUML_ID is not defined" and then > > immediately the program exits. > > This behavior is not expected for programs launched by > > desktop files. > > That is because one needs to define an environment variable named "BOUML_ID", so > that many users can simultaneously work on same project, with each user having > his own "BOUML_ID". yes, and because it is a personal environment variable not linked to a specific release of Bouml, to set it at installation time seems a very complicated way. Users just have to define this variable (and may be BOUML_EDITOR, BOUML_LIMIT_DESKTOP, BOUML_TEMPLATE and BOUML_CHARSET !) modifying *one* time their .login or .cshrc or .bashrc or ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 22:40:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 18:40:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250504] Review Request: blktrace - block IO tracer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708012240.l71MeCjs013507@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blktrace - block IO tracer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250504 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-08-01 18:40 EST ------- This fails to build for me. There are errors about not finding ghostscript while building the documentation: Transcript written on btt.log. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10(./activity.epssh: gs: command not found and then install fails (sorry if this wraps badly): + rm -rf /var/tmp/blktrace-0.0-0.1.20070730162628git.fc8-root-mockbuild + make dest=/var/tmp/blktrace-0.0-0.1.20070730162628git.fc8-root-mockbuild prefix=/var/tmp/blktrace-0.0-0.1.20070730162628git.fc8-root-mockbuild//usr mandir=/var/tmp/blktrace-0.0-0.1.20070730162628git.fc8-root-mockbuild/usr/share/man install install -m755 -d /var/tmp/blktrace-0.0-0.1.20070730162628git.fc8-root-mockbuild//usr/bin install -m755 -d /var/tmp/blktrace-0.0-0.1.20070730162628git.fc8-root-mockbuild/usr/share/man/man1 install -m755 -d /var/tmp/blktrace-0.0-0.1.20070730162628git.fc8-root-mockbuild/usr/share/man/man8 install blkparse blktrace verify_blkparse blkrawverify btrace btt/btt /var/tmp/blktrace-0.0-0.1.20070730162628git.fc8-root-mockbuild//usr/bin install doc/*.1 /var/tmp/blktrace-0.0-0.1.20070730162628git.fc8-root-mockbuild/usr/share/man/man1 install doc/*.8 /var/tmp/blktrace-0.0-0.1.20070730162628git.fc8-root-mockbuild/usr/share/man/man8 + chmod -R -x /var/tmp/blktrace-0.0-0.1.20070730162628git.fc8-root-mockbuild/usr/share/man/ chmod: cannot access `/var/tmp/blktrace-0.0-0.1.20070730162628git.fc8-root-mockbuild/usr/share/man/man1': Permission denied chmod: cannot access `/var/tmp/blktrace-0.0-0.1.20070730162628git.fc8-root-mockbuild/usr/share/man/man8': Permission denied error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.28627 (%install) This is in mock on x86_64 rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 22:46:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 18:46:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250504] Review Request: blktrace - block IO tracer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708012246.l71Mkj18013898@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blktrace - block IO tracer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250504 ------- Additional Comments From esandeen at redhat.com 2007-08-01 18:46 EST ------- Ok, sorry. I honestly just took a guess at BuildRequires... and am not familiar enough w/ mock I guess. Does just adding ghostscript to BuildRequires fix that up? Hrm, not sure about the install failing; the man pages were installed as executable by default, and rpmlint complained, so I chmod -x'd them in %install... I suppose that's cheating. Any other suggestion? Thanks, -Eric -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 23:04:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 19:04:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250504] Review Request: blktrace - block IO tracer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708012304.l71N4AUV014610@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blktrace - block IO tracer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250504 ------- Additional Comments From esandeen at redhat.com 2007-08-01 19:04 EST ------- Doh, %attr would probably work fine eh :) Ok, newer version put up http://people.redhat.com/esandeen/blktrace-rpm/blktrace-0.0-0.2.20070730162628git.src.rpm Thanks, -Eric -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 23:18:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 19:18:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250504] Review Request: blktrace - block IO tracer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708012318.l71NIBSl015144@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blktrace - block IO tracer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250504 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-08-01 19:18 EST ------- You can do scratch builds in koji, you know. Assuming you already have access, that is. koji build --scratch dist-fc8 blah.src.rpm Yes, adding ghostscript helps to get rid of the gs-related errors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 23:26:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 19:26:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708012326.l71NQ07L015660@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From rob.myers at gtri.gatech.edu 2007-08-01 19:25 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=160476) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=160476&action=view) spec file patch - removes a duplicate Group entry - changes the buildroot to comply with fedora packaging guidelines - uses the useradd scriptlet recipe from: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/UsersAndGroups - does not delete users and groups in postun, per the same guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 23:26:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 19:26:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708012326.l71NQqg8015743@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From rob.myers at gtri.gatech.edu 2007-08-01 19:26 EST ------- did you successfully build this in mock? there seem to be missing buildrequires when i attempt it. current rpmlint output: E: sepostgresql non-standard-uid /var/lib/sepgsql sepgsql E: sepostgresql non-standard-gid /var/lib/sepgsql sepgsql E: sepostgresql non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/sepgsql 0700 E: sepostgresql non-standard-uid /var/lib/sepgsql/data sepgsql E: sepostgresql non-standard-gid /var/lib/sepgsql/data sepgsql E: sepostgresql non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/sepgsql/data 0700 E: sepostgresql non-standard-uid /var/lib/sepgsql/backups sepgsql E: sepostgresql non-standard-gid /var/lib/sepgsql/backups sepgsql E: sepostgresql non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/sepgsql/backups 0700 W: sepostgresql incoherent-version-in-changelog 8.2.4-0.407 8.2.4-0.407.beta.fc8 W: sepostgresql dangerous-command-in-%postun userdel E: sepostgresql subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/sepostgresql -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 1 23:30:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 19:30:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250504] Review Request: blktrace - block IO tracer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708012330.l71NUK3Q015927@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blktrace - block IO tracer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250504 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-08-01 19:30 EST ------- Unfortunately that URL in comment 3 is 404 for me. One other thing I noticed is that the package naming is a bit weird. I guess it comes from upstream, though upstream doesn't have the "git" tacked on at the end. And what's the "62628" mean, anyway? I don't really see it as a problem, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 00:05:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 20:05:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229591] Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708020005.l7205Rlg017764@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229591 ------- Additional Comments From dtimms at iinet.net.au 2007-08-01 20:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #28) > as a sidenote: for an explanation of that (weird?) versioning scheme, you can > have a look at http://ezix.org/project/wiki/VersionNumbers A= alpha ? B= beta ? These would be the values that most quickly pop into my mind. If we ever packaged a T test or X experimental version, then this versioning system can no longer work (I understand they are not intended for release). They seem to tell me nothing more than the major version number. I would be keen to drop those preceding letter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 00:07:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 20:07:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229591] Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708020007.l7207oI2017956@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229591 ------- Additional Comments From dtimms at iinet.net.au 2007-08-01 20:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #32) > >especially if the hwdata version is more > > recent than lshw's... > > And one point of maintaining the db, I will look into this issue and make a > decision, thanks for the hands up. I would suggest that there should be only one implementation of each of these files within Fedora and hwdata package is currently the place for this information. My current F7 hwdata is a release from 2007-04, though. My suggestion would be to not include in the lshw package files already supplied by hwdata. This means that when the source of those files is updated, and we want lshw to be able to use them, we would request an update to the hwdata package. lshw would Requires hwdata. Lyonel: Is updated hwdata files a sole cause for a new lshw release ? If you are preparing to release a fix/enhancement, do you always retrieve/include updated hwdata files ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 00:20:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 20:20:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241483] Review Request: ocaml-expat - OCaml wrapper for the Expat XML parsing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708020020.l720Kkr5018717@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-expat - OCaml wrapper for the Expat XML parsing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241483 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-08-01 20:20 EST ------- === REQUIRED ITEMS === [ OK ] Package successfully compiles and builds on at least one supported arch. [ OK ] Mock built on x86_64 [ F-Devel ] [ OK ] Package is named according to the Package Naming and Ocaml Guidelines. [ OK ] Spec file name match the packaging naming Ocaml guidelines. [ Ok ] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [ OK ] Package is not relocatable. [ OK ] Buildroot is correct [ OK ] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license. [ OK ] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL [ OK ] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [ OK ] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [ OK ] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. [ OK ] The spec file handles locales properly. [ OK ] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [ OK ] Package must own all directories that it creates. [ OK ] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [ OK ] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [ OK ] Permissions on files are set properly. [ OK ] Package has a %clean section. [ OK ] Package consistently uses macros. [ OK ] Package contains code, or permissable content. [ SKIP ] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [ OK ] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [ SKIP ] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [ SKIP ] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [ SKIP ] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [ SKIP ] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [ CHECK ] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [ OK ] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [ SKIP ] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file. [ OK ] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages According to OCaml Packaging Guideline: [ OK ] OCaml modules / libs should be named ocaml-foo. [ OK ] The spec file should still build bytecode libraries and binaries. [ OK ] Should Test if the native compiler is present. [ OK ] main package should contain files matching all files which mentioned in OCaml guideline if present. [ OK ] -devel sub-package Should contains all files which're mentioned in OCaml guidelines if present. [CHECK] Requires: libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libexpat.so.0()(64bit) ocaml(Callback) = e5ca1fb5990fac2b7b17cbb1712cffe2 ocaml(Pervasives) = 8ba3d1faa24d659525c9025f41fd0c57 ocaml = 3.10.0-1.fc8 [ ? ] rpmlint: * on -devel package: silent * on main package: ---------------------------------------------- W: ocaml-expat devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ocaml/expat/expat.cmi According to the OCaml guidelines, those can be ignored. W: ocaml-expat unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/ocaml/stublibs/dllmlexpat.so E: ocaml-expat binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/ocaml/stublibs/dllmlexpat.so ['/usr/local/lib'] However those need some fix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 00:21:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 20:21:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241483] Review Request: ocaml-expat - OCaml wrapper for the Expat XML parsing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708020021.l720LUCS018791@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-expat - OCaml wrapper for the Expat XML parsing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241483 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-08-01 20:21 EST ------- typo: lisence is LGPL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 00:37:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 20:37:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247312] Review Request: MyPasswordSafe - A graphical password management tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708020037.l720bKJU019357@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyPasswordSafe - A graphical password management tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247312 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 00:42:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 20:42:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229591] Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708020042.l720gKuR019598@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229591 ------- Additional Comments From dtimms at iinet.net.au 2007-08-01 20:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #27) > SPECS: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/lshw/lshw.spec Just a quick look at this stage: . Should the comment for lshw be different from lshw-gui to indicate the second is a gui app ? Can the gui output the described file formats ? . Does the gui app require the cli app ? > SRPMS: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/lshw/lshw-B.02.11-1.fc7.src.rpm That does not appear to be a src rpm. You need to rpmbuild the .spec to get a .src.rpm. That is what you need to post, along with the spec for review. Lots of good information on fedoraproject wiki. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 00:46:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 20:46:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229591] Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708020046.l720kZHd019801@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229591 ------- Additional Comments From dtimms at iinet.net.au 2007-08-01 20:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #35) > > SRPMS: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/lshw/lshw-B.02.11-1.fc7.src.rpm > That does not appear to be a src rpm. Sorry, I was thinking bin rpm when I wrote this - please ignore, DaveT. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 00:47:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 20:47:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708020047.l720laY5019911@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208034 ------- Additional Comments From paul_kunz at slac.stanford.edu 2007-08-01 20:47 EST ------- Sorry of the delay, been unusally busy at work this week (meetings all day). I've changed to %ghost to %eclude Thsnks for suggestion on handling duplicate file with `%ifarch' which I've also implemented, but could not test. Updated files... RPMS ftp://ftp.slac.stanford.edu/users/pfkeb/hippodraw/HippoDraw-1.21.1-2.fc7.src.rpm SPEC ftp://ftp.slac.stanford.edu/users/pfkeb/hippodraw/HippoDraw.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 00:48:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 20:48:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229591] Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708020048.l720ms6F020006@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229591 ------- Additional Comments From dtimms at iinet.net.au 2007-08-01 20:48 EST ------- Can you please provide the output of rpmlint on both the src and bin rpms ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 01:21:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 21:21:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247268] Review Request: python-proctor - Proctor is a tool for running unit tests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708020121.l721LQRJ021511@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-proctor - Proctor is a tool for running unit tests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247268 ------- Additional Comments From smilner at redhat.com 2007-08-01 21:21 EST ------- This person is in need of a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 01:31:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 21:31:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249365] Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708020131.l721VWl5021861@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249365 smooge at mindspring.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |smooge at mindspring.com ------- Additional Comments From smooge at mindspring.com 2007-08-01 21:31 EST ------- I would say that we should probably confirm that it deals with the livna and maybe the old RHL one.. as those would be the most canonical ones. Anything beyond that would probably just need to be 'oh-well'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 01:59:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 21:59:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241486] Review Request: ocaml-curl - OCaml Curl library (ocurl) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708020159.l721xgOZ023047@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-curl - OCaml Curl library (ocurl) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241486 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-08-01 21:59 EST ------- === REQUIRED ITEMS === [ OK ] Package successfully compiles and builds on at least one supported arch. [ OK ] Mock built on x86_64 [ F-Devel ] [ OK ] Package is named according to the Package Naming and Ocaml Guidelines. [ OK ] Spec file name match the packaging naming Ocaml guidelines. [ Ok ] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [ OK ] Package is not relocatable. [ OK ] Buildroot is correct [ OK ] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license. [ OK ] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: LGPL [ OK ] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [ OK ] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [ OK ] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. [ OK ] The spec file handles locales properly. [ OK ] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [ OK ] Package must own all directories that it creates. [ OK ] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [ OK ] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [ OK ] Permissions on files are set properly. [ OK ] Package has a %clean section. [ OK ] Package consistently uses macros. [ OK ] Package contains code, or permissable content. [ SKIP ] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [ OK ] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [ SKIP ] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [ SKIP ] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [ SKIP ] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [ SKIP ] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [ CHECK ] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [ OK ] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [ SKIP ] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file. [ OK ] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages According to OCaml Packaging Guideline: [ OK ] OCaml modules / libs should be named ocaml-foo. [ OK ] The spec file should still build bytecode libraries and binaries. [ OK ] Should Test if the native compiler is present. [ OK ] main package should contain files matching all files which mentioned in OCaml guideline (if present). [ OK ] -devel sub-package Should contains all files which're mentioned in OCaml guidelines (if present). [ ? ] rpmlint output: * On -devel and SRPM packages: silent. * On main package: W: ocaml-curl devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ocaml/curl/curl.cmi E: ocaml-curl only-non-binary-in-usr-lib can be ignored E: ocaml-curl no-binary --> should fix === Some commnet: === # about docs Use %doc rules instead of "cp -r examples $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_docdir}/%{name}-devel-%{version}/" ----------------- %doc examples/* ----------------- # About requires As you BuildRequired curl-devel, you should not set curl on Requires. rpmbuild should do it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 02:06:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 22:06:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250340] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-F77 - Simple interface to F77 libs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708020206.l7226s2W023468@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-F77 - Simple interface to F77 libs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250340 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-01 22:06 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 02:53:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 22:53:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250533] New: Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for writing games on the OLPC platform Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250533 Summary: Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for writing games on the OLPC platform Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: noah at coderanger.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dev.laptop.org/~coderanger/rpm/python-olpcgames/python-olpcgames.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.laptop.org/~coderanger/rpm/python-olpcgames/python-olpcgames-1.0-0.0.20070801git4ab726.src.rpm Description: This python package contains general utilities for writing games for the OLPC system. The biggest piece of this right now is allowing PyGame games to work inside the Sugar framework (including using the mesh). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 03:40:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 23:40:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708020340.l723e8H5029397@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-08-01 23:40 EST ------- kdebluetooth-1.0-0.31.beta3.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 03:40:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 23:40:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199406] Review Request: vtkdata - Example data file for VTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708020340.l723eaX3029584@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtkdata - Example data file for VTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199406 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-08-01 23:40 EST ------- vtkdata-5.0.3-6.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 03:56:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 23:56:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708020356.l723uw99030877@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From kaigai at kaigai.gr.jp 2007-08-01 23:56 EST ------- Thanks for your comments. (In reply to comment #5) > Created an attachment (id=160476) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=160476&action=view) [edit] > spec file patch > - removes a duplicate Group entry > - changes the buildroot to comply with fedora packaging guidelines > - uses the useradd scriptlet recipe from: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/UsersAndGroups I applied these fixes. > - does not delete users and groups in postun, per the same guidelines I commented out the userdel and groupdel commands, not removed, because the postgresql-server package contains the same commands. I want to keep it for a while, if no matter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 04:08:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 00:08:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708020408.l72486Ce031515@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From kaigai at kaigai.gr.jp 2007-08-02 00:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > did you successfully build this in mock? there seem to be missing buildrequires > when i attempt it. Your patch intended to add "Requires(pre): shadow-utils", but it is not necessary because we can assume some fundamental packages are installed. See, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/FullExceptionList The shadow-utils is also contained the list. > current rpmlint output: > E: sepostgresql non-standard-uid /var/lib/sepgsql sepgsql > E: sepostgresql non-standard-gid /var/lib/sepgsql sepgsql > E: sepostgresql non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/sepgsql 0700 > E: sepostgresql non-standard-uid /var/lib/sepgsql/data sepgsql > E: sepostgresql non-standard-gid /var/lib/sepgsql/data sepgsql > E: sepostgresql non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/sepgsql/data 0700 > E: sepostgresql non-standard-uid /var/lib/sepgsql/backups sepgsql > E: sepostgresql non-standard-gid /var/lib/sepgsql/backups sepgsql > E: sepostgresql non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/sepgsql/backups 0700 The rpmlint generate same errors, except for paths, for the postgresql-server package. I don't think it's a problem. > W: sepostgresql incoherent-version-in-changelog 8.2.4-0.407 8.2.4- 0.407.beta.fc8 > W: sepostgresql dangerous-command-in-%postun userdel As I mentioned above, it's commented out. > E: sepostgresql subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/sepostgresql /etc/rc.d/init.d/sepostgresql uses pg_ctl to start/stop SE-PostgreSQL server process, and it creates lock file under the /var/lib/sepgsql. Should it be fixed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 04:13:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 00:13:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708020413.l724Dlqh031878@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 aravind at aravind.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |aravind at aravind.name ------- Additional Comments From aravind at aravind.name 2007-08-02 00:13 EST ------- I just tried to install TexLive 2007 on a F7 system which already has tetex following the instructions on this page http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/texlive/__README__ I installed teckit and teckit-devel using the Fedora development repo. Then I ran curl http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/texlive/packages/list | xargs -n1 curl -O followed by rpm -Uhv *.rpm I got the following error since my arch is x86. error: Failed dependencies: libc.so.6()(64bit) is needed ....... So I just executed rpm -Uhv *noarch.rpm but I get the following error message file /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/minitoc/estonian.mld from install of texlive-texmf-latex-2007-0.7.fc8 conflicts with file from package tetex-latex-3.0-39.fc7 file /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/minitoc/ethiopia.mld from install of texlive-texmf-latex-2007-0.7.fc8 conflicts with file from package tetex-latex-3.0-39.fc7 file /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/minitoc/ethiopian.mld from install of texlive-texmf-latex-2007-0.7.fc8 conflicts with file from package tetex-latex-3.0-39.fc7 ... ... ... The README file indicates that the tetex will be automatically uninstalled "This will install the noarch and x86_64 packages to your system and replace tetex if it's already installed on your system." Also I noticed that running this command curl http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/texlive/packages/list | xargs -n1 curl -O downloaded the following rpms texlive-2007-0.7.fc8.x86_64.rpm texlive-afm-2007-0.7.fc8.x86_64.rpm texlive-dvips-2007-0.7.fc8.x86_64.rpm texlive-dviutils-2007-0.7.fc8.x86_64.rpm texlive-fonts-2007-0.7.fc8.x86_64.rpm texlive-latex-2007-0.7.fc8.x86_64.rpm texlive-texmf-2007-0.7.fc8.noarch.rpm texlive-texmf-afm-2007-0.7.fc8.noarch.rpm texlive-texmf-common-2007-0.7.fc8.noarch.rpm texlive-texmf-dvips-2007-0.7.fc8.noarch.rpm texlive-texmf-errata-2007-0.7.fc8.noarch.rpm texlive-texmf-errata-afm-2007-0.7.fc8.noarch.rpm texlive-texmf-errata-common-2007-0.7.fc8.noarch.rpm texlive-texmf-errata-dvips-2007-0.7.fc8.noarch.rpm texlive-texmf-errata-fonts-2007-0.7.fc8.noarch.rpm texlive-texmf-errata-latex-2007-0.7.fc8.noarch.rpm texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-0.7.fc8.noarch.rpm texlive-texmf-latex-2007-0.7.fc8.noarch.rpm texlive-xdvi-2007-0.7.fc8.x86_64.rpm and this list does not have "texlive-2007*.noarch.rpm". Is there something wrong with my installation procedure. I am also eager to see texlive in F8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 05:07:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 01:07:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250538] New: Review Request: pidgin-otr - OTR messaging for pidgin (was gaim-otr) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250538 Summary: Review Request: pidgin-otr - OTR messaging for pidgin (was gaim-otr) Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: paul at xelerance.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/pidgin-otr/pidgin-otr.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/pidgin-otr/pidgin-otr-3.1.0-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: This is a Pidgin plugin which implements Off-the-Record (OTR) Messaging. It is known to work (at least) under the Linux and Windows versions of Pidgin. This package used to be called gaim-otr, also packaged by me. The intention is to obsolete gaim-otr. pidgin-otr requires libotr-3.1.0, which was only just pushed into devel/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 05:25:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 01:25:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248231] Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708020525.l725PB6m003346@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248231 ------- Additional Comments From james.antill at redhat.com 2007-08-02 01:24 EST ------- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/jantill/fedora/ustr.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/jantill/fedora/ustr-1.0.1-0.8.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 06:28:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 02:28:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245160] Review Request: fann - A fast artificial neural network library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708020628.l726SYwT007669@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fann - A fast artificial neural network library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245160 tsmetana at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From tsmetana at redhat.com 2007-08-02 02:28 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fann Short Description: A fast artificial neural network library Owners: tsmetana at redhat.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 07:06:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 03:06:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229591] Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708020706.l7276pBh010255@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229591 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2007-08-02 03:06 EST ------- > Should the comment for lshw be different from lshw-gui to indicate the second > is a gui app ? Yes, good point, will change. > Can the gui output the described file formats ? > > Does the gui app require the cli app ? Will check. > That does not appear to be a src rpm. You need to rpmbuild the .spec to get a > .src.rpm. That is what you need to post, along with the spec for review. Lots of > good information on fedoraproject wiki. Sorry, but currently I maintain 9 packages in Fedora, I know how to create a srpm... > Can you please provide the output of rpmlint on both the src and bin rpms ? There are no output :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 07:20:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 03:20:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229591] Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708020720.l727KZGN011067@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229591 ------- Additional Comments From lyonel at ezix.org 2007-08-02 03:20 EST ------- Just for clarification: lshw always uses *both* DBs (its own copy, which is updated before every release, therefore usually more recent) and the system's, so it gets the most up-to-date information. Stripping lshw from its DB would mean that we force it to use outdated data (10 April 2007 on my machine). (In reply to comment #34) > (In reply to comment #32) > > >especially if the hwdata version is more > > > recent than lshw's... > > > > And one point of maintaining the db, I will look into this issue and make a > > decision, thanks for the hands up. > I would suggest that there should be only one implementation of each of these > files within Fedora and hwdata package is currently the place for this > information. My current F7 hwdata is a release from 2007-04, though. > > My suggestion would be to not include in the lshw package files already supplied > by hwdata. This means that when the source of those files is updated, and we > want lshw to be able to use them, we would request an update to the hwdata > package. lshw would Requires hwdata. > > Lyonel: Is updated hwdata files a sole cause for a new lshw release ? > If you are preparing to release a fix/enhancement, do you always > retrieve/include updated hwdata files ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 07:23:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 03:23:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229591] Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708020723.l727Nd6V011272@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229591 ------- Additional Comments From lyonel at ezix.org 2007-08-02 03:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #35) > (In reply to comment #27) > > SPECS: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/lshw/lshw.spec > Just a quick look at this stage: > . Should the comment for lshw be different from lshw-gui to indicate the second > is a gui app ? Can the gui output the described file formats ? yes it can save hw config as XML, HTML and text > . Does the gui app require the cli app ? no, but they both share some data files. I think Debian (or is it Ubuntu) split lshw into 3 packages: lshw-data, lshw and lshw-gui > > SRPMS: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/lshw/lshw-B.02.11-1.fc7.src.rpm > That does not appear to be a src rpm. You need to rpmbuild the .spec to get a > .src.rpm. That is what you need to post, along with the spec for review. Lots of > good information on fedoraproject wiki. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 08:33:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 04:33:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226661] Merge Review: yaboot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708020833.l728XKaN017299@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: yaboot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226661 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 09:03:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 05:03:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708020903.l7293Oqn019683@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-08-02 05:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #36) > yes, and because it is a personal environment variable not linked to a > specific release of Bouml, to set it at installation time seems a very > complicated way. Users just have to define this variable (and may be > BOUML_EDITOR, BOUML_LIMIT_DESKTOP, BOUML_TEMPLATE and BOUML_CHARSET !) > modifying *one* time their .login or .cshrc or .bashrc or ... It would have been more elegant if the programs concerned had a provision for supplying the values, atleast the absolutely necessary ones, instead of just erroring out. Just my own view, though. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 10:24:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 06:24:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199406] Review Request: vtkdata - Example data file for VTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021024.l72AOKLw026476@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtkdata - Example data file for VTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199406 ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2007-08-02 06:24 EST ------- The only thing I don't really like is the disttag in the name. Even though I'm a disttag fan this package is distro-agnostic and should be used w/o rebuilding on any other distro. But that isn't reason enough to rebuild this package and repush it, I'll just drop the disttag on the next update. (FWIW I forgot to remove the disttag, as the disttag is used at ATrpms to denote repotag&disttag and is set to only have a repotag in this case) Thanks Ed for reviewing and Kevin for cvs work :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 10:35:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 06:35:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021035.l72AZGuS027963@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From bouml at free.fr 2007-08-02 06:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #37) > It would have been more elegant if the programs concerned had a provision for > supplying the values, atleast the absolutely necessary ones, instead of just > erroring out. the problem only concern BOUML_ID, if it is not defined, I search for a value compatible with the current use of the project, this means a value not used at the same time *on the current project image*, but I can't know if a user work on a separate (copy) view of the same project on an other disk. So after the error message appears, you can continue with the temporary value, even this is not a good way because you can't retry shortcuts, session etc ... Concerning the other variables : - BOUML_EDITOR allows to specify an external editor for multi-lines edition, I can't decide for the user to use Xcoral, Emacs etc ... In case this variable is not defined the edition is made with a Qt internal editor - BOUML_LIMIT_DESKTOP is dedicated to users having several monitors. Qt doesn't allow me to detect this case, if the user use several monitors without defining this variable, all will be displayed supposing he has a large monitor. Because many dialogs are centered this is not very practical, but this works. - BOUML_TEMPLATE allows to define a given project as a template, this allows to retrieve a blank project with the desired 'generation settings' etc. - BOUML_CHARSET is for users using non latin-1 charset, for instance using Cyrillic. An other time I can't detect this case As you can see, it is not mandatory to define these variables, they help users but and I can't define them myself for the users best regards -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 11:08:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 07:08:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239428] Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021108.l72B8Hcg000772@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239428 ------- Additional Comments From nikolay at vladimiroff.com 2007-08-02 07:08 EST ------- There is 1.3.0 release: >1.3.0 - 2006.07.14 > * Added PAM support by Martin Parm So the slim is ready for the stable fedora releases? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 11:29:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 07:29:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021129.l72BTxH9004013@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-08-02 07:29 EST ------- Sorry, I did not make myself clear. I meant: "It would have been more elegant if the programs concerned had a provision for asking the user to interactively set the values, atleast the absolutely necessary ones, instead of just erroring out." I did not want the program to provide the value by itself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 11:33:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 07:33:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021133.l72BXC8S004536@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-08-02 07:33 EST ------- Aravind, I only provided the x86_64 binaries, because of quota on my people.redhat.com account, so the packages won't work on your i?86 arch. It you want to install texlive and test in on i386, you need to rebuild the packages for i386, these instructions are in the section "How to build TeXlive and replace teTeX from a local build" in the README file. teTeX doesn't provide any noarch packages, so it's normal that the noarch part of the texlve texmf tree conflicts with tetex packages providing the same stuff. You need to pass all packages to the RPM transaction to correctly obsolete tetex. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 11:59:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 07:59:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021159.l72Bx0V4006601@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-02 07:58 EST ------- Um, one quick solution is to install wrapper script as /usr/bin/projectControl which contains like: ---------------------------------------------------------------- #!/bin/bash xterm -e /bin/bash -c 'if [ -z "$BOUML_ID" ] ; then echo "Input BOUML_ID" ; read BOUML_ID ; export BOUML_ID ; fi ; exec /usr/lib/bouml/projectControl' ---------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 12:27:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 08:27:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021227.l72CRPlr011128@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From bouml at free.fr 2007-08-02 08:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #40) > Um, one quick solution is to install wrapper script as /usr/bin/projectControl > which contains like: > ... oh no ! 1) BOUML_ID is not only necessary to projectControl, 2) for a given user, BOUML_ID *must* be the same for bouml, projectControl and projectSynchro 3) I can't image to ask for the value each time the user call one of the 3 tools ;-) The definition of the variable is a false problem, it is the responsibility of the user to define the variables he needs, and he will do that *one* time modifying its .bachrc or similar file. Do not make nodes with the brain for that ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 12:29:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 08:29:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249352] Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021229.l72CT9oE011354@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249352 karsten at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |243228 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 12:50:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 08:50:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250598] New: Review Request: dnscap - DNS traffic capture utility Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250598 Summary: Review Request: dnscap - DNS traffic capture utility Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: atkac at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/atkac/bind/dnscap-1.0-1.rc5.fc8.src.rpm Description: dnscap is a network capture utility designed specifically for DNS traffic. It produces binary data in pcap(3) format, either on standard output (by default) or in successive dump files (if the ?d command line option is given.) This utility is similar to tcpdump(1), but has finer grained packet recognition tailored to DNS transactions and protocol options. dnscap is expected to be used for gathering continuous research or audit traces. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 12:52:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 08:52:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241486] Review Request: ocaml-curl - OCaml Curl library (ocurl) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021252.l72CqmHg014100@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-curl - OCaml Curl library (ocurl) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241486 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-08-02 08:52 EST ------- About: E: ocaml-curl no-binary I don't know how to fix this one. I asked about it on fedora-devel-list some time ago and got a response which I took to mean that I should ignore the error. Search down in the following message for "no-binary": https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2007-May/msg00218.html Docs & requires are fixed in these packages: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-curl-0.2.1-3.fc8.src.rpm http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-curl.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 12:54:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 08:54:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021254.l72CsTCi014250@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-02 08:54 EST ------- Then the only solution is to remove desktop files of projectControl and so on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 12:56:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 08:56:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250598] Review Request: dnscap - DNS traffic capture utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021256.l72CuG7f014452@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnscap - DNS traffic capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250598 stransky at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |stransky at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 12:59:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 08:59:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250598] Review Request: dnscap - DNS traffic capture utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021259.l72CxP9s014781@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnscap - DNS traffic capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250598 atkac at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 13:04:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 09:04:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241483] Review Request: ocaml-expat - OCaml wrapper for the Expat XML parsing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021304.l72D4DrK015381@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-expat - OCaml wrapper for the Expat XML parsing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241483 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-08-02 09:04 EST ------- http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-expat-0.9.1-4.fc8.src.rpm http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-expat.spec Change log: * Thu Aug 2 2007 Richard W.M. Jones - 0.9.1-4 - ExcludeArch ppc64 - Remove rpath from the stublibs .so file. - Strip the stublibs .so file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 13:05:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 09:05:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021305.l72D5dlD015546@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-08-02 09:05 EST ------- What about using the real user ID ('id --real --user `whoami`') as the BOUML_ID? The real user ID would always be a unique number on the same system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 13:25:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 09:25:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250417] Review Request: guile-cairo - The Cairo graphics library for Guile Scheme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021325.l72DPBrG017414@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-cairo - The Cairo graphics library for Guile Scheme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250417 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-08-02 09:25 EST ------- Good point, all issues above has been fixed. SPEC: http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/guile-cairo/guile-cairo.spec SRPM: http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/guile-cairo/guile-cairo-1.4.0-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 13:28:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 09:28:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246138] Review Request: eclipse-QuickREx - QuickREx is a regular-expression test Eclipse Plug-In In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021328.l72DSEd0017843@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-QuickREx - QuickREx is a regular-expression test Eclipse Plug-In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246138 alcapcom at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 13:38:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 09:38:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249352] Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021338.l72DcuEM019273@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249352 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |249814 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 13:40:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 09:40:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249352] Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021340.l72Dej0G019535@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249352 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-08-02 09:40 EST ------- This spec installs libpopt to /usr/lib(64) instead of /lib(64), see #249814 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 13:45:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 09:45:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250598] Review Request: dnscap - DNS traffic capture utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021345.l72DjOmK020028@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnscap - DNS traffic capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250598 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xelerance.com 2007-08-02 09:45 EST ------- It fails to build in mock, so it is missing some Buildrequires: /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.76195: line 27: autoreconf: command not found rpmlint complains: E: dnscap explicit-lib-dependency libpcap W: dnscap incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0rc5-1 1.0-1.rc5.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 13:48:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 09:48:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250598] Review Request: dnscap - DNS traffic capture utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021348.l72DmR4U020333@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnscap - DNS traffic capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250598 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xelerance.com 2007-08-02 09:48 EST ------- # dnscap -i eth1 -g dnscap: usage error: -g option is disabled due to lack of libbind It might need more buildrequires too? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 14:05:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 10:05:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021405.l72E5G9W022166@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From bouml at free.fr 2007-08-02 10:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #42) > Then the only solution is to remove desktop files of > projectControl and so on. ? I don't understand, what is the goal or the reason to do that ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 14:09:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 10:09:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021409.l72E9jGI022890@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From bouml at free.fr 2007-08-02 10:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #43) > What about using the real user ID ('id --real --user `whoami`') as the BOUML_ID? > The real user ID would always be a unique number on the same system. this is possible under a Linux (Bouml work also under Windows) but this is restrictive. A user may want to work on a project at work and at home with the same right (projectControl) => with the same BOUML_ID, but with two user IDs Please, I insist : the environment variables is NOT a problem, don't try to solve it yourself for the users, else you will introduce problems and/or restrictions -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 14:20:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 10:20:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239385] Review Request: peless - Text Browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021420.l72EKqPJ024696@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: peless - Text Browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239385 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-02 10:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > https://svn.berlios.de/svnroot/repos/peless/spec/peless.spec.fedora > ftp://ftp.BerliOS.de/pub/peless/fc6/SRPMS/peless-1.156-4.src.rpm - Well, currently I cannot connent to ftp://ftp.BerliOS.de/? > > OK, I have done this but I do not understand it. None of the files on my system > in /usr/share/applications/ begin with 'fedora-'. - On my system: ------------------------------------------------------- $ ls -al /usr/share/applications/fedora-*.desktop | wc -l 75 ------------------------------------------------------- > I am totally unqualified to review other people's pre-review requests. - No, to become a Fedora maintainer also means * you can review and advice other person's review requests * you must fix your package when bugs are reported, packaging policy is changed, etc.... So we expect that Fedora maintainers have at least certain skill of packaging and modifying srpms. This is why Fedora package collection takes sponsor system. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored So as written in the URL above everyone who wants to get sponsored to maintain packages in Fedora must "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" (quoted) Currently I sponsor 27 people and all my sponsornee passed my request. > For example, I could find no documentation that > setting vendor=fedora would change the name of the resulting desktop file. - desktop-file-install --help-all > I would not want to inflict my advise on someone else's project. - Again, this skill is needed for Fedora maintainers, so please try. All my sponsornee actually did pre-review of other persons' review requests or sumbitted other review requests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 14:28:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 10:28:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021428.l72ESZVN025673@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-02 10:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #45) > Please, I insist : the environment variables is NOT a problem, don't try to > solve it yourself for the users, else you will introduce problems and/or > restrictions So again the only solution is to remove the desktop files of projectControl and so on. For desktop files the state that the application cannot be launched by default is not acceptable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 14:34:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 10:34:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250416] Review Request: guile-lib - A repository of useful code written in Guile Scheme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021434.l72EYnti026281@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-lib - A repository of useful code written in Guile Scheme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250416 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-02 10:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > > -------------------------------------------------- > > make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT CPPROG="cp -p" > > -------------------------------------------------- > > Doesn't seem to work well. > Could you upload somewhere your build.log please ? Well, actually compare the result (the created noarch.rpm) of http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=84723 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=85822 The build log shows no different, but the timestamps actually change. This is because the build log says: ---------------------------------------------------------------- /bin/sh /builddir/build/BUILD/guile-lib-0.1.4/install-sh -c -m 644 'config/load.scm' '/var/tmp/guile-lib-0.1.4-3.fc8.1-root-kojibuilder/usr/share/guile/site/config/load.scm' ----------------------------------------------------------------- for example, and in install-sh, CPPROG is used (so please check the contents of install-sh). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 14:51:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 10:51:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246138] Review Request: eclipse-QuickREx - QuickREx is a regular-expression test Eclipse Plug-In In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021451.l72EpHej028000@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-QuickREx - QuickREx is a regular-expression test Eclipse Plug-In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246138 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-08-02 10:51 EST ------- This is confusing; what happened to this bug? overholt approved it, but nobody ever made a CVS request and now it's been closed. But tickets that are closed should never block FE-NEEDSPONSOR. So, did Alphonse ever get sponsored? Why was this package never imported? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 14:51:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 10:51:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248231] Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021451.l72EpjtM028076@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248231 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-02 10:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > Then for -0.6: > * File entry > - I just noticed that: > ------------------------------------------------- > $ rpm -qlp ustr-*rpm | sort | uniq -d > /usr/include/ustr-conf-debug.h > /usr/include/ustr-debug.h > ------------------------------------------------- - This is not yet fixed on -0.8 . (i.e. both -devel and -debug package contain the files above.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 14:52:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 10:52:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021452.l72EqcL5028153@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From bouml at free.fr 2007-08-02 10:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #46) > So again the only solution is to remove the desktop files of > projectControl and so on. For desktop files the state that the application > cannot be launched by default is not acceptable. There is a misunderstanding / quiproquo The application CAN be launched in any case, calling it without defining BOUML_ID the user will have the message and will understand and know he has to define the environment variable. Please reread my respons #41 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417#c41). These applications are *graphical*, I can't imagine they can't be called through a menu or using an icon (even it is possible to start them through a shell), it is not g++ Frankly you are fixed on a non-problem, but *you* decide for *your* distribution ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 15:03:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 11:03:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246138] Review Request: eclipse-QuickREx - QuickREx is a regular-expression test Eclipse Plug-In In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021503.l72F3AOB029359@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-QuickREx - QuickREx is a regular-expression test Eclipse Plug-In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246138 ------- Additional Comments From alcapcom at gmail.com 2007-08-02 11:03 EST ------- Sorry Jason, it is a mistake of me about the procedure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 15:10:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 11:10:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021510.l72FA6ls030340@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-02 11:09 EST ------- Well, you are upstream and if you say it is as expected, I won't oppose anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 15:11:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 11:11:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250416] Review Request: guile-lib - A repository of useful code written in Guile Scheme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021511.l72FB3Sm030491@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-lib - A repository of useful code written in Guile Scheme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250416 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-08-02 11:10 EST ------- yep, it's not show up by the build process. Ok, Spec URL: http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/guile-lib/guile-lib.spec SRPM URL: http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/guile-lib/guile-lib-0.1.4-4.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 15:16:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 11:16:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250417] Review Request: guile-cairo - The Cairo graphics library for Guile Scheme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021516.l72FGOdu031180@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-cairo - The Cairo graphics library for Guile Scheme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250417 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-02 11:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > For 1.4.0-2: > > * Dependency for main/subpackage > - Usually the dependency for main/subpackage must be version-release > specific. - Well, this means that -devel subpackage should have: "Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}", not "Requiers: %{name} = %{version}". > * pkgconfig dependency > - Packages containing pkgconfig .pc file must have > "Requires: pkgconfig" - -devel package contains .pc file so -devel package should have "Requires: pkgconfig", not main package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 15:19:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 11:19:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250416] Review Request: guile-lib - A repository of useful code written in Guile Scheme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021519.l72FJxJU031517@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-lib - A repository of useful code written in Guile Scheme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250416 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-02 11:19 EST ------- Okay. -------------------------------------------------------- This package (guile-lib) is APPROVED by me -------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 15:26:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 11:26:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241483] Review Request: ocaml-expat - OCaml wrapper for the Expat XML parsing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021526.l72FQ4mF032077@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-expat - OCaml wrapper for the Expat XML parsing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241483 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-08-02 11:25 EST ------- well, All issues has been fixed. ========== *APPROVED* ========== -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 15:30:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 11:30:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250340] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-F77 - Simple interface to F77 libs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021530.l72FUuh1032397@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-F77 - Simple interface to F77 libs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250340 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-08-02 11:30 EST ------- Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 15:34:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 11:34:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021534.l72FYSRL032765@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From bouml at free.fr 2007-08-02 11:34 EST ------- Note : the reference manual is not up of date, the update will be available Monday in the worst case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 15:38:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 11:38:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021538.l72Fc1QW000611@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208034 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-02 11:37 EST ------- Well, for sponsor needed ticket, I usually ask the submitter to either do a pre-review of other persons' review requests or submit another review request per: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored However: * This review request is very long * We discussed packaging issue and I can assume that you are now familiar with packaging issue So for this review request, I won't ask above. ----------------------------------------------------------------- This package (HippoDraw) is APPROVED by me ----------------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account" At a point, I should receive a mail which notices that you need a sponsor, then I will sponsor you. If you want to release this package on Fedora 7, you have to read: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT after rebuilding on koji is done. If you have some questions, please feel free to ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 15:41:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 11:41:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021541.l72FfJqZ000912@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From rob.myers at gtri.gatech.edu 2007-08-02 11:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #6) > > did you successfully build this in mock? there seem to be missing > buildrequires > > when i attempt it. > > Your patch intended to add "Requires(pre): shadow-utils", but it is not > necessary because we can assume some fundamental packages are installed. > See, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/FullExceptionList > The shadow-utils is also contained the list. My patch was not meant to address missing BuildRequires. It was intended to follow the recipe from the newly ratified users and groups guidelines. As far as I can tell, the following BuildRequires are missing: autoconf readline-devel zlib-devel bison This is a problem because once #250494 is resolved, and the appropriate object classes are in the selinux policy, sepostgresql will still not build in the Fedora buildsystem. > > E: sepostgresql subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/sepostgresql > /etc/rc.d/init.d/sepostgresql uses pg_ctl to start/stop SE-PostgreSQL server > process, and it creates lock file under the /var/lib/sepgsql. > Should it be fixed? Good question- I am not sure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 15:41:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 11:41:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021541.l72FfpWV000995@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-02 11:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #49) > Note : the reference manual is not up of date, the update will be available > Monday in the worst case. I would appreciate it if you number manuals (in the way you like) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 15:43:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 11:43:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250342] Review Request: perl-Astro-FITS-CFITSIO - Perl extension for using the cfitsio library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021543.l72FhCF3001204@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Astro-FITS-CFITSIO - Perl extension for using the cfitsio library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250342 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-08-02 11:43 EST ------- Added examples to %doc Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Astro-FITS-CFITSIO Short Description: Perl extension for using the cfitsio library Owners: orion at cora.nwra.com Branches: F-7 FC-6 EL-5 EL-4 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 15:43:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 11:43:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241486] Review Request: ocaml-curl - OCaml Curl library (ocurl) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021543.l72FhZf9001256@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-curl - OCaml Curl library (ocurl) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241486 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-08-02 11:43 EST ------- Right, by set it to noarch, it can be arch-specific anymore. This error can be ignored. However i think those rpmlint issues should be mentioned in OCaml Packaging Guidelines (maybe you already plan to do it :)). Well, * All other issues above has been fixed in 0.2.1-3 ========== *APPROVED* ========== -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 15:44:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 11:44:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241483] Review Request: ocaml-expat - OCaml wrapper for the Expat XML parsing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021544.l72FimMA001384@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-expat - OCaml wrapper for the Expat XML parsing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241483 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-08-02 11:44 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ocaml-expat Short Description: OCaml wrapper for the Expat XML parsing library Owners: rjones at redhat.com Branches: F-7 InitialCC: rjones at redhat.com,lxtnow at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 15:46:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 11:46:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241486] Review Request: ocaml-curl - OCaml Curl library (ocurl) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021546.l72Fk9DB001755@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-curl - OCaml Curl library (ocurl) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241486 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-08-02 11:46 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ocaml-curl Short Description: OCaml Curl library (ocurl) Owners: rjones at redhat.com Branches: F-7 InitialCC: rjones at redhat.com,lxtnow at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 15:46:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 11:46:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241483] Review Request: ocaml-expat - OCaml wrapper for the Expat XML parsing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021546.l72FkDee001782@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-expat - OCaml wrapper for the Expat XML parsing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241483 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 15:46:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 11:46:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241486] Review Request: ocaml-curl - OCaml Curl library (ocurl) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021546.l72FkiOm001873@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-curl - OCaml Curl library (ocurl) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241486 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 15:46:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 11:46:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241472] Review Request: ocaml-ocamlnet - Network protocols for OCaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021546.l72FkpaD001898@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ocamlnet - Network protocols for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241472 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-08-02 11:46 EST ------- Starting review... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 16:03:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 12:03:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241472] Review Request: ocaml-ocamlnet - Network protocols for OCaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021603.l72G3mSs003092@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ocamlnet - Network protocols for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241472 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-08-02 12:03 EST ------- Xavier: I just tried to build ocamlnet now and this package seems to have suffered some bit-rot. There's a camlp4 problem in particular which I've asked about upstream. So you might want to leave this alone for now... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 16:23:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 12:23:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226662] Merge Review: yelp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021623.l72GNuuM004368@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: yelp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226662 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-08-02 12:23 EST ------- Is yelp being replaced by rarian in F8? If so, I don't suppose a review of this is needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 16:23:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 12:23:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250634] New: Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Perl module for DKIM support Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250634 Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Perl module for DKIM support Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lmb at biosci.ki.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://83.140.35.234/perl-Mail-DKIM.spec SRPM URL: http://83.140.35.234/perl-Mail-DKIM-0.28-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Mail-DKIM is a Perl module that implements the new Domain Keys Identified Mail (DKIM) standard, and the older Yahoo! DomainKeys standard, both of which sign and verify emails using digital signatures and DNS records. Mail-DKIM can be used by any Perl program that wants to provide support for DKIM and/or DomainKeys. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 16:27:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 12:27:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250150] Review Request: rarian - a replacement for scrollkeeper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021627.l72GRdbV004687@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rarian - a replacement for scrollkeeper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250150 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mbarnes at redhat.com 2007-08-02 12:27 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rarian Short Description: a documentation meta-data library, replaces scrollkeeper Owners: mbarnes at redhat.com Branches: (just devel) InitialCC: mclasen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 16:34:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 12:34:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021634.l72GY4Jv005454@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-08-02 12:32 EST ------- I am building BOUML 2.30, and will upload the spec and SRPM once it is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 16:34:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 12:34:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226662] Merge Review: yelp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021634.l72GYeJh005545@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: yelp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226662 ------- Additional Comments From mbarnes at redhat.com 2007-08-02 12:34 EST ------- No, scrollkeeper is being replaced by rarian in F8. Yelp will be using rarian instead of scrollkeeper. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 16:36:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 12:36:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226662] Merge Review: yelp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021636.l72Ga69J005618@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: yelp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226662 ------- Additional Comments From mbarnes at redhat.com 2007-08-02 12:36 EST ------- Also, rarian package review is already complete (bug #250150). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 16:37:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 12:37:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241483] Review Request: ocaml-expat - OCaml wrapper for the Expat XML parsing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021637.l72Gbk5H005775@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-expat - OCaml wrapper for the Expat XML parsing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241483 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-02 12:37 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 16:39:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 12:39:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241486] Review Request: ocaml-curl - OCaml Curl library (ocurl) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021639.l72Gdgsc005976@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-curl - OCaml Curl library (ocurl) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241486 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-02 12:39 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 16:43:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 12:43:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245160] Review Request: fann - A fast artificial neural network library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021643.l72Gh0pM006369@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fann - A fast artificial neural network library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245160 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-02 12:42 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 16:46:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 12:46:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250150] Review Request: rarian - a replacement for scrollkeeper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021646.l72Gk7tu006592@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rarian - a replacement for scrollkeeper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250150 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-02 12:46 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 16:48:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 12:48:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250342] Review Request: perl-Astro-FITS-CFITSIO - Perl extension for using the cfitsio library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021648.l72Gm6ck006800@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Astro-FITS-CFITSIO - Perl extension for using the cfitsio library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250342 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-02 12:48 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 17:07:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 13:07:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021707.l72H7hkb008153@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From bouml at free.fr 2007-08-02 13:07 EST ------- > I would appreciate it if you number manuals (in the way you like) do you want I number the files available in the download page, or to add a number in the text inside the manual ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 17:10:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 13:10:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250463] Review Request: python-pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021710.l72HAMvY008464@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250463 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lxtnow at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-08-02 13:10 EST ------- # Release tag: As you have an snapshot package which's post-released. 1.20070723git639686%{?dist} instead of 0.0.20070723git639686 # Package name: As a package of python module, a differente name scheme should be set. however the upstream source has already named the base package name of its source with "py"vserver which's enough. So move the name (including spec file name) to pyvserver only. # Source0: I think that you should mention on spec file it's an snapshop link/source # %build stage: As noarch package, the flags CFLAGS= SHOULD be remove (fc.the comment above it's there for reminder). # files: your package own others directoris which're own by other packages. All directories/sub-one which __python-sitelib contains. SHOULD be fix. # Changelog: version changelog need to be fix due tu first issues in this comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 17:10:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 13:10:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021710.l72HApAa008550@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From bouml at free.fr 2007-08-02 13:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #51) > I am building BOUML 2.30, and will upload the spec and SRPM once it is done. ok, good I will made the 2.30.1 at worse for Monday, mainly to fixe a crash when a "class instance" is duplicated in the browser, I detected this bug updating the manual ;-( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 17:15:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 13:15:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250416] Review Request: guile-lib - A repository of useful code written in Guile Scheme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021715.l72HFATv008935@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-lib - A repository of useful code written in Guile Scheme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250416 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-08-02 13:14 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: guile-lib Short Description: A repository of useful code written in Guile Scheme Owners: lxtnow at gmail.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 Devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 17:17:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 13:17:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250504] Review Request: blktrace - block IO tracer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021717.l72HHvOS009144@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blktrace - block IO tracer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250504 ------- Additional Comments From esandeen at redhat.com 2007-08-02 13:17 EST ------- > Unfortunately that URL in comment 3 is 404 for me. *sigh* fat fingered the rsync. It's there now. > One other thing I noticed is that the package naming is a bit weird. I guess it > comes from upstream, though upstream doesn't have the "git" tacked on at the > end. And what's the "62628" mean, anyway? I don't really see it as a > problem, though. Upstream is something like "blktrace-git-20070730162628.tar.gz" 162628 is a timestamp, 16:26:28. It's how the snap from the upstream tarball is named. I put "git" on the end just trying to follow some of the "pre-release naming conventions" I found on the wiki. I could use a git hash instead if preferred... since there is no release on this upstream package, I'm not really sure how to do the versioning. I'm open to any suggestions. I'm also considering skipping the latex->pdf part of the build process, would lighten up the build & chroot setup a bit, for a little hacker tool like this. There are already man pages & a README. Thanks, -Eric -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 17:36:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 13:36:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250417] Review Request: guile-cairo - The Cairo graphics library for Guile Scheme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021736.l72Ha1t6011457@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-cairo - The Cairo graphics library for Guile Scheme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250417 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-08-02 13:35 EST ------- oops, Sorry for the typo. I've just fix this in the same release *-3 (as its spawned to cleanly fix those issues) http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/guile-cairo/guile-cairo.spec http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/guile-cairo/guile-cairo-1.4.0-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 17:39:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 13:39:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241486] Review Request: ocaml-curl - OCaml Curl library (ocurl) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021739.l72HdJ6n012067@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-curl - OCaml Curl library (ocurl) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241486 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 17:39:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 13:39:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241487] Review Request: cduce - An XML-oriented functional language. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021739.l72HdL03012089@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cduce - An XML-oriented functional language. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241487 Bug 241487 depends on bug 241486, which changed state. Bug 241486 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-curl - OCaml Curl library (ocurl) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241486 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 17:42:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 13:42:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241483] Review Request: ocaml-expat - OCaml wrapper for the Expat XML parsing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021742.l72Hgnrq012323@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-expat - OCaml wrapper for the Expat XML parsing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241483 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 17:42:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 13:42:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241487] Review Request: cduce - An XML-oriented functional language. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021742.l72HgpCV012343@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cduce - An XML-oriented functional language. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241487 Bug 241487 depends on bug 241483, which changed state. Bug 241483 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-expat - OCaml wrapper for the Expat XML parsing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241483 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 17:44:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 13:44:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250150] Review Request: rarian - a replacement for scrollkeeper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021744.l72HisjC012517@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rarian - a replacement for scrollkeeper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250150 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Fixed In Version| |rarian-0.5.6-2.fc8 ------- Additional Comments From mbarnes at redhat.com 2007-08-02 13:44 EST ------- Cool, thanks Kevin. I guess we can close this now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 17:48:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 13:48:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250342] Review Request: perl-Astro-FITS-CFITSIO - Perl extension for using the cfitsio library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021748.l72Hme2N013356@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Astro-FITS-CFITSIO - Perl extension for using the cfitsio library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250342 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-08-02 13:48 EST ------- Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 18:06:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 14:06:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242206] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021806.l72I6YA6014458@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242206 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-02 14:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > I built glibc now and built a non-bootstrap GCC against it. C works, but C++ > chokes on this simple program: > #include > > int main(void) > { > std::cout << "Hello World!" << std::endl; > return 0; > } > > This compiles fine with the native g++, but arm-gp2x-linux-g++ gives me tons of > undefined references to `_Unwind_SjLj_Register', `_Unwind_SjLj_Unregister' > and`_Unwind_SjLj_Resume'. -fno-exceptions doesn't help. Thats to be expected, the C++ implementation of avr comes without libstdc++, it offers constructs like class, and inheritance, but no c++ library. Which still make it usefull, I know people acutally using it and its shipped with other popular versions of avr-gcc such as winavr too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 18:08:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 14:08:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242206] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021808.l72I8Wvo014619@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242206 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-08-02 14:08 EST ------- But this one is ARM, not AVR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 18:09:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 14:09:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242206] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021809.l72I9Swg014703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242206 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-02 14:09 EST ------- Erm, scrap that ( /me stupid ) that is not to be expected as this is not avr-gcc (which you just added and I mid-air colided with, that was fast), still this feels familiar, can you try with -lstdc++ added to the cmdline? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 18:13:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 14:13:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242206] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021813.l72IDlFW015062@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242206 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-08-02 14:13 EST ------- This looks like a linking order problem. If I use either -lsupc++ or -lgcc_eh, I get the same undefined references, but if I add -lsupc++ -lgcc_eh it links. (-lstdc++ doesn't help.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 18:16:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 14:16:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021816.l72IGfdD015424@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-08-02 14:16 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SOURCES/PyQt4/PyQt4.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SOURCES/PyQt4/PyQt4-4.2-3.src.rpm %changelog * Thu Aug 02 2007 Rex Dieter 4.2-3 - fix python_sitelib typo (wrt chrpath call) - move %%_bindir stuff to -devel - mark %%doc examples non-executable - add shebang to %%_bindir/pyuic4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 18:16:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 14:16:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230161] Review Request: rt61-firmware - Firmware for RT61 802.11 wireless devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021816.l72IGsON015490@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rt61-firmware - Firmware for RT61 802.11 wireless devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230161 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ivdoorn at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ivdoorn at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From ivdoorn at gmail.com 2007-08-02 14:16 EST ------- I have send a new mail to Ralink to ask them for legacl clearance for shipping the RT61 and RT73 firmware together with FC. I have CC'ed Nicolas Chauvet, Bill Nottingham and John Linville. Hopefully this new request will get more response. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 18:22:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 14:22:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242206] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021822.l72IM8j6015840@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242206 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-02 14:22 EST ------- Now I remember I saw this too, but when building statically, so I contributed it to the static linking as that is known to cause problems like this. Do you have any clues? Anyways I'll do a clean rebuild of my toolchain over here to be sure we are working from the same base and see if I can fix it, still any clues are appreciated as this is uncharted territory for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 18:28:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 14:28:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246138] Review Request: eclipse-QuickREx - QuickREx is a regular-expression test Eclipse Plug-In In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021828.l72ISlws016581@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-QuickREx - QuickREx is a regular-expression test Eclipse Plug-In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246138 alcapcom at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From alcapcom at gmail.com 2007-08-02 14:28 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: eclipse-quickrex Short Description: eclipse-quickrex is a regular-expression test Eclipse Plug-In Owners: alcapcom at gmail.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: alcapcom at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 18:29:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 14:29:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242206] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021829.l72ITN9Q016700@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242206 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-08-02 14:29 EST ------- g++ -v clarifies some things: If I only pass -lgcc_eh, I get -lgcc_eh -lstdc++ as the linking order. This doesn't work because libgcc_eh is static, so it needs to come after the shared objects. (If I don't pass it at all, it's missing entirely, which is again wrong for static libraries.) If I pass -lsupc++ -lgcc_eh, I get -lsupc++ -lgcc_eh -lstdc++ and this is enough to draw the symbols in. Passing -lstdc++ -lgcc_eh also works. The proper fix should be to add -lgcc_eh to the g++ specs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 18:30:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 14:30:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021830.l72IUJxM016783@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-02 14:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #52) > > I would appreciate it if you number manuals (in the way you like) > > do you want I number the files available in the download page, or to add a > number in the text inside the manual ? > The name of the files (please check the discussion of bug 249892) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 18:31:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 14:31:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242206] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021831.l72IVIR5016883@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242206 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-08-02 14:31 EST ------- Replying to your latest comment: indeed, the root cause of this issue is that libgcc_eh is static only. If there's a shared libgcc_eh on the GP2X (hopefully a compatible one), it makes sense to use one in the cross-compiler, otherwise adding -lgcc_eh to the specs is the way to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 18:48:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 14:48:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250417] Review Request: guile-cairo - The Cairo graphics library for Guile Scheme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021848.l72ImGYJ019262@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-cairo - The Cairo graphics library for Guile Scheme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250417 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-02 14:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > oops, > Sorry for the typo. > > I've just fix this in the same release *-3 (as its spawned to cleanly fix those > issues) > > http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/guile-cairo/guile-cairo.spec > http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/guile-cairo/guile-cairo-1.4.0-3.fc8.src.rpm > It seems your srpm does not fix the issue? > -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 18:51:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 14:51:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246138] Review Request: eclipse-QuickREx - QuickREx is a regular-expression test Eclipse Plug-In In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021851.l72Ip9kG019552@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-QuickREx - QuickREx is a regular-expression test Eclipse Plug-In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246138 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-08-02 14:51 EST ------- I'd like to be on the InitialCC or at least on CC after the package is imported. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 19:33:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 15:33:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250417] Review Request: guile-cairo - The Cairo graphics library for Guile Scheme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021933.l72JXiel023899@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-cairo - The Cairo graphics library for Guile Scheme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250417 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-08-02 15:33 EST ------- my bad, i uploaded the main package instead of the fixed srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 19:44:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 15:44:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250417] Review Request: guile-cairo - The Cairo graphics library for Guile Scheme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021944.l72JiCCr025443@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-cairo - The Cairo graphics library for Guile Scheme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250417 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-08-02 15:44 EST ------- Okay, the right one has been uploaded, same location. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 19:48:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 15:48:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246138] Review Request: eclipse-quickrex - QuickREx is a regular-expression test Eclipse Plug-In In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021948.l72JmVpk025937@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-quickrex - QuickREx is a regular-expression test Eclipse Plug-In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246138 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: eclipse- |Review Request: eclipse- |QuickREx - QuickREx is a |quickrex - QuickREx is a |regular-expression test |regular-expression test |Eclipse Plug-In |Eclipse Plug-In OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-02 15:48 EST ------- cvs done. Added initialCC per comment #17. Also, changed the review Summary for easy tracking and removed needsponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 19:53:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 15:53:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247312] Review Request: MyPasswordSafe - A graphical password management tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021953.l72JrhBa026318@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyPasswordSafe - A graphical password management tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247312 redhat-bugzilla at camperquake.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at camperquake.de 2007-08-02 15:53 EST ------- Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 19:59:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 15:59:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250416] Review Request: guile-lib - A repository of useful code written in Guile Scheme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708021959.l72Jx1Cd026916@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-lib - A repository of useful code written in Guile Scheme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250416 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-02 15:58 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 20:27:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 16:27:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226663] Merge Review: ypbind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708022027.l72KRePN030085@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ypbind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226663 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-08-02 16:27 EST ------- I question my sanity for even looking at this, but I used NIS in a past life so... Here's what rpmlint has to say: W: ypbind summary-ended-with-dot The NIS daemon which binds NIS clients to an NIS domain. Picky, I guess, but easy to fix. E: ypbind tag-not-utf8 %changelog E: ypbind non-utf8-spec-file ypbind.spec It's the ? in Trond's name; iconv should fix it up. W: ypbind strange-permission ypbind.init 0755 rpmlint complains about anything that's not 644 in the SRPM; I don't think this is a big deal. W: ypbind prereq-use /sbin/chkconfig Prereq: shouldn't be used. Actually the scriptlets and their dependencies need a few fixes. W: ypbind macro-in-%changelog config % signs need doubling in %changelog. W: ypbind patch-not-applied Patch5: ypbind-1.19-debuginfo.patch I guess this patch isn't needed at all any longer; it should probably just go. The packaging guidelines require that the buildroot contains %{name}, %{version} and %{release}. You shouldn't use %makeinstall unless the usual "make DESTDIR=..." doesn't work. Everything seems to work OK with the latter, so.... You need finegrained dependencies for the scriptlets instead of Prereq: Requires(post): /sbin/chkconfig Requires(preun): /sbin/chkconfig Requires(preun): /sbin/service Requires(postun): /sbin/service Initscripts must not be marked as %config files. There's a whole push to use LSB-standard initscripts, but I'm not sure where it stands and I'm not going to worry about that here. We're working on new standards for the license, but the files in the tarball don't agree about whether it's GPLv2 only or GPLv2 or later. You can probably drop the bash >= 2.0 requirement; rpm will find the need for /bin/bash on its own, and even FC-1 had bash 2.05b. This package should not own /var/yp; the filesystem pakage owns it. I'll attach a patch that fixes the minor issues; the license thing will probably require consultation with upstream. Review: * source files match upstream: f49e0706517f2761cfa45f7a02c5e1562a67b104a267b220a37fa3ab217f9e34 ypbind-mt-1.20.4.tar.bz2 * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. X summary ends in a period, annoying rpmlint * description is OK. * dist tag is present. X build root is missing %{release} ? license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. X rpmlint has valid complaints. X final provides and requires are missing /sbin/service config(ypbind) = 3:1.20.4-1.fc8 ypbind = 3:1.20.4-1.fc8 = /bin/bash /bin/sh /sbin/chkconfig bash >= 2.0 config(ypbind) = 3:1.20.4-1.fc8 libdbus-1.so.3()(64bit) libdbus-glib-1.so.2()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.3.2)(64bit) rpcbind yp-tools * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I have fortunately exorcised NIS from my network so I've no way to test this. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. X should not own /var/yp * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 20:28:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 16:28:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226663] Merge Review: ypbind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708022028.l72KSGB2030187@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ypbind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226663 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-08-02 16:28 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=160541) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=160541&action=view) Patch fixing most issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 20:32:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 16:32:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226663] Merge Review: ypbind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708022032.l72KWsZu030690@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ypbind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226663 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-08-02 16:32 EST ------- BTW, after this patch, rpmlint is silent except for the strange-permission complaint which I don't think is worth fixing. (I don't know how to do a chmod in any case.) With it applied and the license set to GPLv2, I'd approve this package, although it would be really nice to see if upstream really intends GPLv2+. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 20:42:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 16:42:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250416] Review Request: guile-lib - A repository of useful code written in Guile Scheme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708022042.l72Kgc9L032037@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-lib - A repository of useful code written in Guile Scheme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250416 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-08-02 16:42 EST ------- Imported and Built. Thanks all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 20:49:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 16:49:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250150] Review Request: rarian - a replacement for scrollkeeper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708022049.l72KnW0a001091@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rarian - a replacement for scrollkeeper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250150 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-08-02 16:49 EST ------- The obsoletes in this aren't going to work right. As it stands, rarian will obsolete rarian-compat because of the Provides. What you probably want is: rarian: Obsoletes: scrollkeeper <= (last scrollkeeper release) rarian-compat: Provides: scrollkeeper = -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 20:53:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 16:53:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242206] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708022053.l72KrDRX001561@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242206 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-02 16:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #22) I doubt gcc_eh is in the firmware and I'm sure it won't be compatible, so ... > > The proper fix should be to add -lgcc_eh to the g++ specs. I assume you mean something in gcc called "specs" and not the specfile, can you give me a little pointer to where exactly I should do this, (which file to patch / configure option to use). If you don't know I'll dig into this myself, but if you do know that would be great! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 21:00:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 17:00:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250504] Review Request: blktrace - block IO tracer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708022100.l72L045Z002617@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blktrace - block IO tracer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250504 ------- Additional Comments From esandeen at redhat.com 2007-08-02 16:59 EST ------- FWIW, taking out the pdf build knocks the build chroot down to about 100 rpms vs. 145. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 21:04:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 17:04:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237579] Review Request: cernlib-g77 - General purpose CERN library and associated binaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708022104.l72L42PR003093@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cernlib-g77 - General purpose CERN library and associated binaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237579 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-08-02 17:03 EST ------- Thanks for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cernlib-g77 Short Description: General purpose CERN library and associated binaries Owners: pertusus at free.fr Branches: F-7 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 21:34:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 17:34:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242206] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708022134.l72LYg1p006356@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242206 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-08-02 17:34 EST ------- Yes, GCC has something called "specs" where default options passed by gcc to the tools it invokes are stored. I'll write a patch for you (should be one line) ASAP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 21:35:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 17:35:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250463] Review Request: python-pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708022135.l72LZ505006537@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250463 ------- Additional Comments From noah at coderanger.net 2007-08-02 17:34 EST ------- # Release tag: This is actually a pre-release version. We are trying to get this in to Fedora now so people can test as we develop more. The other things should be fixed in pyvserver-1.0-0.1.20070723git639686. New spec file: http://dev.laptop.org/~coderanger/rpm/pyvserver/pyvserver.spec New SPRM: http://dev.laptop.org/~coderanger/rpm/pyvserver/pyvserver-1.0- 0.1.20070723git639686.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 21:40:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 17:40:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250469] Review Request: olpc-security - A metapackage for the OLPC security platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708022140.l72LelXN007286@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: olpc-security - A metapackage for the OLPC security platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250469 ------- Additional Comments From noah at coderanger.net 2007-08-02 17:40 EST ------- Version bump for dependency name change Spec is in the same place. SPRM: http://dev.laptop.org/~coderanger/rpm/olpc-security/olpc-security-0.1-0.1.20070724.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 22:50:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 18:50:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237579] Review Request: cernlib-g77 - General purpose CERN library and associated binaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708022250.l72MojIQ011861@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cernlib-g77 - General purpose CERN library and associated binaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237579 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-08-02 18:50 EST ------- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 23:54:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 19:54:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250150] Review Request: rarian - a replacement for scrollkeeper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708022354.l72Ns8eW015014@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rarian - a replacement for scrollkeeper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250150 ------- Additional Comments From mbarnes at redhat.com 2007-08-02 19:54 EST ------- That makes sense. Should be fixed in rarian-0.5.6-3.fc8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 00:59:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 20:59:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225761] Merge Review: fonts-chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708030059.l730xj9F018033@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225761 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-02 20:59 EST ------- Yes, since no update here. Also fc-cache needs to be passed the font directory. Please see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-4863fc4c93cec14292719d8901d83f5d90c3e477 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 01:22:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 21:22:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250634] Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Perl module for DKIM support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708030122.l731MD4Z019126@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Perl module for DKIM support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250634 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-08-02 21:22 EST ------- This fails to build for me; it looks like you need build dependencies on perl(Test::More), perl(Test::Simple). The license tag should be "GPL+ or Artistic" according to the new scheme in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/LicenseTag and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing although according to the website listed in the URL it's just GPL. I guess the code wins in this case, but it does show that upstream isn't being all that careful about licensing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 01:22:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 21:22:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225761] Merge Review: fonts-chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708030122.l731Mm6X019168@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225761 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-02 21:22 EST ------- umask's in %post and %postun can go too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 01:34:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 21:34:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242207] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-glibc - Cross Compiled GNU C Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708030134.l731YChE019719@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-glibc - Cross Compiled GNU C Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242207 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-08-02 21:34 EST ------- > * fix License to say LGPL, not GPL Actually, please change it to LGPLv2+ while you are at it. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 02:41:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 22:41:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245081] Review Request: libp11 - a small library for dealing with PKCS#11 tokens In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708030241.l732fZuT023910@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libp11 - a small library for dealing with PKCS#11 tokens https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245081 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-08-02 22:41 EST ------- libp11-0.2.2-5.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 02:41:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 22:41:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245081] Review Request: libp11 - a small library for dealing with PKCS#11 tokens In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708030241.l732feLg023950@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libp11 - a small library for dealing with PKCS#11 tokens https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245081 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |0.2.2-5.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 02:43:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 22:43:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199406] Review Request: vtkdata - Example data file for VTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708030243.l732hqUx024558@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtkdata - Example data file for VTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199406 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-08-02 22:43 EST ------- vtkdata-5.0.3-6.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 02:43:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 22:43:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199406] Review Request: vtkdata - Example data file for VTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708030243.l732hvmc024606@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtkdata - Example data file for VTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199406 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |5.0.3-6.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 03:02:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 23:02:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239385] Review Request: peless - Text Browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708030302.l7332sNG025846@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: peless - Text Browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239385 ------- Additional Comments From pelliott at io.com 2007-08-02 23:02 EST ------- I just do not feel compentent to pre-review other people's software. Sometimes it take me an extremely long time to figure out an issue related to my own software. Since I am the sole developer of peless, this does not hurt anybody. I would not want someone else's project held up by my delays, or messed up by my errors. I do not feel comfortable with the fedora process which is the most complicated I have encountered. I was able to get peless into debian without the problems I encountered here. I am gratefull for the help you have given me, and am extremely sorry if this causes problems for you. I did not know about this requirement when I submitted peless into the fedora process. I will have to wait until I have a second project. In the meantime, perhaps I will put the fedora version of peless into a private repository somewhere. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 03:03:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 23:03:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708030303.l7333jOY025924@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-08-02 23:03 EST ------- Spec: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/bouml.spec SRPM: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/bouml-2.30-1.fc8.src.rpm Koji info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=86998 Mamoru, I have not changed the License tag according to the new licensing guidelines, yet. This is because: a. I had started the build before I read the announcement. It takes so long to build completely freezes my 256MB RAM machine. b. The updated rpmlint is not yet there in the repositories. I plan to update the tag, when I bump the version to 2.30.1, which according to Bruno, is just around the corner. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 05:29:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 01:29:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708030529.l735Ta40002925@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-03 01:29 EST ------- Well, I will read this thread later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 07:14:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 03:14:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245160] Review Request: fann - A fast artificial neural network library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708030714.l737EIoc008771@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fann - A fast artificial neural network library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245160 tsmetana at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From tsmetana at redhat.com 2007-08-03 03:14 EST ------- Thanks all for your help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 07:15:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 03:15:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248231] Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708030715.l737FgIN008858@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248231 ------- Additional Comments From james.antill at redhat.com 2007-08-03 03:15 EST ------- Ok, hopefully for the final time... Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/jantill/fedora/ustr.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/jantill/fedora/ustr-1.0.1-0.9.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 08:17:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 04:17:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250634] Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Perl module for DKIM support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708030817.l738HsAG014617@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Perl module for DKIM support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250634 ------- Additional Comments From lmb at biosci.ki.se 2007-08-03 04:17 EST ------- I shouldn't have to include indirect dependencies? >From mocks root.log Installing: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA x86_64 0.25-1.fc7 updates-released 39 k perl-Digest-SHA x86_64 5.44-5.fc7 updates-released 52 k perl-Digest-SHA1 x86_64 2.11-1.2.1 fedora 49 k perl-Error noarch 1:0.17008-1.fc7 fedora 25 k perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker x86_64 6.30-18.fc7 fedora 291 k perl-MailTools noarch 1.77-1.fc7 updates-released 89 k perl-Net-DNS x86_64 0.60-1.fc7 updates-released 220 k Installing for dependencies: perl-CPAN x86_64 1.76_02-18.fc7 fedora 127 k perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random x86_64 0.04-2.fc7 updates-released 21 k perl-Digest-HMAC noarch 1.01-15 fedora 12 k perl-ExtUtils-Embed x86_64 1.26-18.fc7 fedora 32 k perl-Net-IP noarch 1.25-3.fc7 fedora 31 k perl-Test-Harness x86_64 2.56-18.fc7 fedora 77 k perl-Test-Simple x86_64 0.62-18.fc7 fedora 108 k perl-TimeDate noarch 1:1.16-3.2.1 fedora 32 k perl-devel x86_64 4:5.8.8-18.fc7 fedora 387 k $ rpm -q --whatprovides 'perl(Test::Simple)' perl-Test-Simple-0.62-18.fc7 $ rpm -q --whatprovides 'perl(Test::More)' perl-Test-Simple-0.62-18.fc7 $ rpm -q --whatrequires 'perl(Test::Simple)' perl-devel-5.8.8-18.fc7 How can you test perlbased rpms without perl-devel? ;-) Changing the license tag and sending a mail to upstream to be more excplicit about the licensing terms. Oh, how qute. The new license tag generate a warning from rpmlint. ;-) A bugreport should probably be filed if it hasn't already. Updated stuff: Spec URL: http://83.140.35.234/perl-Mail-DKIM.spec SRPM URL: http://83.140.35.234/perl-Mail-DKIM-0.28-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 08:20:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 04:20:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250598] Review Request: dnscap - DNS traffic capture utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708030820.l738KbeV014845@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnscap - DNS traffic capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250598 ------- Additional Comments From atkac at redhat.com 2007-08-03 04:20 EST ------- it was due some missing buildrequires and typo in configure.ac. Fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 08:21:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 04:21:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242207] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-glibc - Cross Compiled GNU C Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708030821.l738LExd014918@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-glibc - Cross Compiled GNU C Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242207 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-03 04:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > MUST FIX: > * fix License to say LGPL, not GPL > * don't own %{_prefix}/%{target} and %{_prefix}/%{target}/include (owned by > arm-gp2x-linux-kernel-headers) As always, many thanks for the review! Here is a new version with both fixed: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/arm-gp2x-linux-glibc.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/arm-gp2x-linux-glibc-2.3.6-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 08:50:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 04:50:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250598] Review Request: dnscap - DNS traffic capture utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708030850.l738oVf9017648@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnscap - DNS traffic capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250598 ------- Additional Comments From atkac at redhat.com 2007-08-03 04:50 EST ------- Final version is: spec:http://people.redhat.com/atkac/bind/dnscap.spec srpm:http://people.redhat.com/atkac/bind/dnscap-1.0-0.1.rc5.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 08:51:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 04:51:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250598] Review Request: dnscap - DNS traffic capture utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708030851.l738pJwe017742@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnscap - DNS traffic capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250598 stransky at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 09:15:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 05:15:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229321] Review Request :postgresql-pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708030915.l739FcVE020028@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request :postgresql-pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229321 ------- Additional Comments From ch.nolte at noltec.org 2007-08-03 05:15 EST ------- First, a question: Why is it that postgresql-pgpool-II has been pushed into the fedora repo before this package is approved? postgresql-pgpool-II needs an init-script to start pgpool as a service. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 10:18:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 06:18:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229321] Review Request :postgresql-pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708031018.l73AIb06026912@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request :postgresql-pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229321 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-08-03 06:18 EST ------- See flag and comment #21. But you're right, it could use an init script. Should this have been a blocker? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 11:09:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 07:09:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249034] Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708031109.l73B9lcI030842@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249034 ------- Additional Comments From john at curioussymbols.com 2007-08-03 07:09 EST ------- Hi Debarshi, I think that you need to mark this as 'fedora-review +' and possibly 'fedora-cvs +' so that I can proceed, assuming you're happy with the package now. Cheers JP -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 11:49:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 07:49:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242207] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-glibc - Cross Compiled GNU C Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708031149.l73Bn4w8001017@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-glibc - Cross Compiled GNU C Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242207 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-08-03 07:49 EST ------- All the issues found in the review have been adressed. => APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 12:17:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 08:17:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250417] Review Request: guile-cairo - The Cairo graphics library for Guile Scheme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708031217.l73CH5k8003535@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-cairo - The Cairo graphics library for Guile Scheme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250417 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-03 08:17 EST ------- For -3: * License - Well, as we now see the discussion of the license tag on -devel list, license tag policy is changed. https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-August/msg00108.html For this package, please use "LGPLv2+". -------------------------------------------------------------- This package (guile-cairo) is APPROVED by me -------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 12:23:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 08:23:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248231] Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708031223.l73CNRJI004072@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248231 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-03 08:23 EST ------- Ah.. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=87418 Note: You can use %exclude . i.e. for example: ----------------------------------------------- %files devel .............. %{_includedir}/ustr.h %{_includedir}/ustr-*.h %exclude %{_includedir}/ustr*debug.h .............. %files debug .............. %{_includedir}/ustr*debug.h .............. ---------------------------------------------------- Perhaps this should be okay -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 12:29:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 08:29:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250417] Review Request: guile-cairo - The Cairo graphics library for Guile Scheme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708031229.l73CTvAE004624@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-cairo - The Cairo graphics library for Guile Scheme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250417 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-08-03 08:29 EST ------- Sure, it'll done before importing ;). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 12:31:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 08:31:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250417] Review Request: guile-cairo - The Cairo graphics library for Guile Scheme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708031231.l73CVQqc004724@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-cairo - The Cairo graphics library for Guile Scheme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250417 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-08-03 08:31 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: guile-cairo Short Description: The Cairo graphics library for Guile Scheme Owners: lxtnow at gmail.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 Devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 12:33:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 08:33:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248231] Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708031233.l73CXO16004904@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248231 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-03 08:33 EST ------- More one point: - As we can see on the -devel list, the license tag guideline is changed. For this package, please use: --------------------------------------------- MIT or LGPLv2 or BSD --------------------------------------------- (the seperator seems changed to "or", and for LGPL now we have to specify version, i.e. LGPLv2 or LGPLv2+) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 12:59:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 08:59:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247930] Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708031259.l73CxhqO007104@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247930 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(mike at flyn.org) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 13:06:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 09:06:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242207] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-glibc - Cross Compiled GNU C Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708031306.l73D6n1V008191@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-glibc - Cross Compiled GNU C Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242207 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-03 09:06 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: arm-gp2x-linux-glibc Short Description: Cross Compiled GNU C Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux Owners: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Branches: Fc-6 F-7 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 13:07:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 09:07:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250315] Review Request: Linux-Complete-Backup-and-Recovery-HOWTO - bare metal recovery scripts & docs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708031307.l73D71qm008250@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Linux-Complete-Backup-and-Recovery-HOWTO - bare metal recovery scripts & docs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250315 charlescurley at charlescurley.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: Linux- |Review Request: Linux- |Complete-Backup-and- |Complete-Backup-and- |Recovery-HOWTO - bare metal |Recovery-HOWTO - bare metal |recovery scripts & docs |recovery scripts & docs Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From charlescurley at charlescurley.com 2007-08-03 09:06 EST ------- This is my first package; I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 13:07:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 09:07:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242206] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708031307.l73D7OaC008323@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242206 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-08-03 09:07 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=160608) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=160608&action=view) The promised gcc-4.1.2-gcc_eh.patch (patches gcc-c++, so only for non-bootstrap GCC) It turns out the C++ specs are actually hardcoded in gcc/cp/g++-spec.c, not stored as text. There's a LIBSTDCXX macro which the target can redefine, but it's assumed to always be a single argument. So I had to patch the code itself to add the -lgcc_eh. I tested it to work. I'm also attaching a specfile patch with this patch applied and some minor cleanups (VERSUFFIX, License tag). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 13:09:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 09:09:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242206] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708031309.l73D98Is008516@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242206 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-08-03 09:09 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=160609) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=160609&action=view) The specfile patch for gcc-4.1.2-gcc_eh.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 13:10:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 09:10:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242206] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708031310.l73DAZS8008845@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242206 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-08-03 09:10 EST ------- I should clarify the "tested" part: I've tested that it makes the C++ "Hello World" link, but I don't have a GP2X, so I can't test whether it actually runs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 13:19:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 09:19:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250747] New: Review Request: Linux-Complete-Backup-and-Recovery-HOWTO - bare metal recovery scripts & docs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250747 Summary: Review Request: Linux-Complete-Backup-and-Recovery-HOWTO - bare metal recovery scripts & docs Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: charlescurley at charlescurley.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com This is my first package; sponsor, please. Spec URL: http://www.charlescurley.com/Linux-Complete-Backup-and-Recovery-HOWTO/Linux-Complete-Backup-and-Recovery-HOWTO.spec SRPM URL: http://www.charlescurley.com/Linux-Complete-Backup-and-Recovery-HOWTO/Linux-Complete-Backup-and-Recovery-HOWTO-2.3-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: A set of scripts to back up and restore a minimal system for bare metal restoration. They are useful on i386 systems. Patches for others are welcome. Install this package on clients, and the documentation package where you want it. This bug replaces bug 250315, which somehow got marked "closed". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 13:20:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 09:20:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250747] Review Request: Linux-Complete-Backup-and-Recovery-HOWTO - bare metal recovery scripts & docs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708031320.l73DK8gK010254@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Linux-Complete-Backup-and-Recovery-HOWTO - bare metal recovery scripts & docs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250747 charlescurley at charlescurley.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 15:13:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 11:13:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226022] Merge Review: libgpod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708031513.l73FDUq5027465@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libgpod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226022 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tmz at pobox.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|alexl at redhat.com |bnocera at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From tmz at pobox.com 2007-08-03 11:13 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: libgpod Updated Fedora Owners: bnocera at redhat.com,tmz at pobox.com (This might need an explicit ACK from Bastien, so the CVS admins don't think I'm trying to pull one over. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 15:15:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 11:15:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244894] Review Request: yum-cron - get yum updates via a cron job In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708031515.l73FFYPB027903@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yum-cron - get yum updates via a cron job https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244894 mail at frankwittig.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mail at frankwittig.de ------- Additional Comments From mail at frankwittig.de 2007-08-03 11:15 EST ------- I've made an addidtion to the yum-cron script that makes yum skip all updates except those for its own package. It then reports all pending updates by cron-mail instead to inform the administrator instead of installing them. The check-only feature can be configured by editing /etc/sysconfig/yum-cron. I've merged my own additions into the above mentioned package version 0.2-5. The resulting SRPM can be obtained under ftp://ftp.weisshuhn.de/pub/yum-cron-0.2-6.src.rpm Please consider including this changes into future releases. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 16:04:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 12:04:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708031604.l73G4xNc001778@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-03 12:04 EST ------- Umm.. actually I am not familiar with SELinux and I don't know how to deal with SELinux policy, so I may be missing a lot, however: * What is the difference between that you ask dwalsh at redhat.com to include your SELinux policy of PostgreSQL and that we don't modify the default policy of PostgreSQL and release the different variant of PostgreSQL as SE-PostgreSQL? (Again I may be missing a lot, so please explain....) Putting several variants of the same package is generally unwilling. For example, once bugs (especially security issues) against one variants are reported, we have to ping all variants and check if all variants fixed the issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 16:13:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 12:13:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250634] Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Perl module for DKIM support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708031613.l73GDfdT002805@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Perl module for DKIM support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250634 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-08-03 12:13 EST ------- Erm, I'm building in mock; it doesn't matter what I have installed on my systems. If it won't build for me, it won't build in the buildsys, and if you don't trust me then do a koji scratch build. perl-devel is simply not in the default buildroot for F8; you must require the modules your package needs to build. The SRPM linked in the above comment is 404 for me. > wget http://83.140.35.234/perl-Mail-DKIM-0.28-2.fc7.src.rpm --11:10:21-- http://83.140.35.234/perl-Mail-DKIM-0.28-2.fc7.src.rpm Connecting to 83.140.35.234:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found 11:10:21 ERROR 404: Not Found. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 16:16:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 12:16:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708031616.l73GGsjf003055@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-03 12:16 EST ------- Well, I will check srpm in comment 55 "today" (note: in Japan it is 1:17 on Saturday now) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 16:49:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 12:49:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248231] Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708031649.l73GnkEQ005461@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248231 ------- Additional Comments From james.antill at redhat.com 2007-08-03 12:49 EST ------- Ok, sorry, I thought my mock builds were checking for installed but not covered files. Thanks for the except tip, I didn't kjnow about that. Also fixed the license: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/jantill/fedora/ustr.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/jantill/fedora/ustr-1.0.1-0.10.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 16:51:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 12:51:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242207] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-glibc - Cross Compiled GNU C Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708031651.l73GpdeQ005726@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-glibc - Cross Compiled GNU C Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242207 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-03 12:51 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 16:54:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 12:54:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250417] Review Request: guile-cairo - The Cairo graphics library for Guile Scheme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708031654.l73GsDf1006070@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-cairo - The Cairo graphics library for Guile Scheme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250417 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-03 12:54 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 16:54:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 12:54:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226022] Merge Review: libgpod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708031654.l73GssjD006208@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libgpod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226022 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-03 12:54 EST ------- Yes, Bastien: Can you ack this change here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 17:36:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 13:36:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708031736.l73HaBYT010095@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From kaigai at kaigai.gr.jp 2007-08-03 13:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) Tasaka-san, Thanks for your comments. SELinux is a feature implemented in the kernel. It hooks any system call to make a decision based on the security policy, whether it should be allowed, or not. It enables to control accesses onto resources managed by the kernel, like file, socket and so on. However, the kernel cannot identify user space objects like a window of X, or a table of database. It means bare-SELinux cannot control accesses onto user space objects. * What is differences between PostgreSQL with SELinux and SE-PostgreSQL Both PostgreSQL and SE-PostgreSQL execute system calls to operate something. SELinux hooks them as mentioned above. In addition, SE-PostgreSQL hooks any SQL query to make a decision based on the policy, whether it should be allowed, or not. It means that the security policy enables to control accesses onto userspace objects including tables, columns and so on. PostgreSQL does not have such a mechanism, so any operation are out of scope of the security policy. It is the most fundamental difference. * The reason why I submit a patch for selinux-policy SELinux has a feature of loadable policy package. It enables to plug/unplug a set of security policy without modification of policy source. But some kinds of policy are exception. The definitions of object classes and access vectors are one of exception. It defines permissions related to a specific object type. No need to say, object classes related to database is a new concept for SELinux, so these permissions are currently undefined. The patch I posted complement these lacking definitions. If these definitions are integrated into the base security policy, we can pack the rest of policy within RPM of SE-PostgreSQL. Thus, it is necessary the patch to be merged. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 18:06:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 14:06:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230164] Review Request: rt71w-firmware - Firmware for RT71 802.11 wireless devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708031806.l73I6w72013437@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rt71w-firmware - Firmware for RT71 802.11 wireless devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230164 ivdoorn at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ivdoorn at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From ivdoorn at gmail.com 2007-08-03 14:06 EST ------- I have send a new mail to Ralink to ask them for legacl clearance for shipping the RT61 and RT73 firmware together with FC. I have CC'ed Nicolas Chauvet, Bill Nottingham and John Linville. First responce from Ralink seemed rather positive, so hopefully they will indeed a nice license to their firmware that allows redistribution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 18:13:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 14:13:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242206] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708031813.l73IDt4e014190@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242206 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-03 14:13 EST ------- Thanks a lot for both patches! I've applied both as is and I'm now chain building arm-gp2x-glibc, followed by a non bootstrap gcc using your patch and specfile. About the testing I have compiled and run some serious c++ programs, working around the -lgcc_eh bug by just adding it at the end of the link cmd myself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 18:19:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 14:19:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250417] Review Request: guile-cairo - The Cairo graphics library for Guile Scheme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708031819.l73IJVos014840@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-cairo - The Cairo graphics library for Guile Scheme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250417 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-08-03 14:19 EST ------- Imported & built. Thanks all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 18:21:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 14:21:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250804] New: Review Request: perl-Encode-Detect - Detects the encoding of data Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250804 Summary: Review Request: perl-Encode-Detect - Detects the encoding of data Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ralston at pobox.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com NOTE: this is my first package; I am seeking a sponsor. Spec URL: http://www.l33tskillz.org/RPMs/perl-Encode-Detect.spec SRPM URL: http://www.l33tskillz.org/RPMs/perl-Encode-Detect-1.00-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: This Perl module is an Encode::Encoding subclass that uses Encode::Detect::Detector to determine the charset of the input data and then decodes it using the encoder of the detected charset. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 18:21:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 14:21:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250804] Review Request: perl-Encode-Detect - Detects the encoding of data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708031821.l73ILbUL015205@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Encode-Detect - Detects the encoding of data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250804 ralston at pobox.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 18:34:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 14:34:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248231] Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708031834.l73IYtG7018201@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248231 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-03 14:34 EST ------- One question (for clarification) You seemed to choose LGPLv2+ (not LGPLv2), however where can I found that this can be licensed as LGPL "and later"? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 18:55:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 14:55:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244704] Review Request: bontmia - Backup over network to multiple incremental archives In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708031855.l73ItwQH020886@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bontmia - Backup over network to multiple incremental archives https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244704 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2007-08-03 14:55 EST ------- Bodhi stuff done, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 19:25:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 15:25:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248231] Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708031925.l73JPAmh023817@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248231 ------- Additional Comments From james.antill at redhat.com 2007-08-03 15:25 EST ------- Well the LICENSE file refers to LICENSE_LGPL which says: If the Library does not specify a license version number, you may choose any version ever published by the Free Software Foundation. ...and version 2 was the oldest version of LGPL. If that's not enough does an upstream change of: diff --git a/LICENSE b/LICENSE index 5d03476..c1faf88 100644 --- a/LICENSE +++ b/LICENSE @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ This code is multi Licensed under all/any one of: -LGPL - http://www.and.org/ustr/LICENSE_LGPL +LGPLv2+ - http://www.and.org/ustr/LICENSE_LGPL New Style BSD (2 clause) - http://www.and.org/ustr/LICENSE_BSD MIT - http://www.and.org/ustr/LICENSE_MIT ...make this clearer? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 19:37:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 15:37:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243254] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-zlib - Cross Compiled zlib Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708031937.l73Jb4YT025674@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-zlib - Cross Compiled zlib Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243254 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: arm-gp2x- |Review Request: arm-gp2x- |linux-zlib - Cross Compiled |linux-zlib - Cross Compiled |zlib Library targeted at |zlib Library targeted at |avr |arm-gp2x-linux -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 19:38:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 15:38:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243147] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-SDL - Cross Compiled SDL Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708031938.l73JcJvF026059@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-SDL - Cross Compiled SDL Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243147 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-08-03 15:38 EST ------- Can you please submit an updated specfile for this with the missing %defattr added and the License tag updated to the new standard (specifying LGPL version) so we don't waste time on these during the review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 19:40:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 15:40:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243254] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-zlib - Cross Compiled zlib Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708031940.l73JeKKT026909@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-zlib - Cross Compiled zlib Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243254 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-08-03 15:40 EST ------- Can you please submit an updated specfile for this with the missing %defattr added and the License tag updated to the new canonical abbreviation (just "zlib" instead of "zlib/libpng License") so we don't waste time on these during the review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 20:14:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 16:14:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708032014.l73KE0jX032557@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 jiri.cerny at epfl.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jiri.cerny at epfl.ch ------- Additional Comments From jiri.cerny at epfl.ch 2007-08-03 16:13 EST ------- To get i?86 packages, I tried to build version 0.7 of this srpm on FC7. The build finishes during the compilation of xdvik. Relevant log messages are gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../.. -W -Wall -Wunused -I.. -I./.. -DPS_GS -DXSERVER_INFO -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -c help-window.c -o help-window.o help-window.c:43:28: error: X11/Xaw/Paned.h: No such file or directory help-window.c:44:27: error: X11/Xaw/Form.h: No such file or directory etc. The missing files are in libXaw-devel, which is not required. Actually it looks more that "--with-xdvi-x-toolkit=xaw3d" configure switch gets ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 20:58:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 16:58:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249034] Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708032058.l73KwrT8006891@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249034 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-08-03 16:58 EST ------- +------------------------+ | FORMAL REVIEW (contd.) | +------------------------+ * Due to a change in the Licensing Guidelines (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines) the value of the License tag, should be filled with the appropriate license Short License identifier(s) from the "Good License" tables on the Fedora Licensing (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing) page. "BSD-style" is not one of the accepted values for the License tag. * Your usage of macros is inconsistent. eg., you have used %{name}-%{version} in Source0 while using hard-coded strings in Patch0; you have used both %{_libdir} and %_libdir to refer to directories; etc.. A possible solution would be to use: Patch0: %{name}-ltmain.patch ...and decide on whether to use the braces ('{' '}') or not while referring to directories. Consistency is necessary for QA and usability. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#macros -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 21:12:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 17:12:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248163] Review Request: gtk-nodoka-engine - The Nodoka gtk engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708032112.l73LCQ3T009043@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-nodoka-engine - The Nodoka gtk engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248163 martin.sourada at seznam.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From martin.sourada at seznam.cz 2007-08-03 17:12 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gtk-nodoka-engine Short Description: The Nodoka GTK2 theme rendering engine with its default GTK2 theme Owners: martin.sourada at seznam.cz Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 21:19:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 17:19:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249034] Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708032119.l73LJZcG010490@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249034 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-08-03 17:19 EST ------- I am curious about the reason for this comment: # Parallel build seems to require some fixes from upstream I have twice scratch built this package on Koji without any issues on all the four architectures (i386, x86_64, ppc, ppc64) without any problems. So what are the fixes that you have commented about? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 22:18:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 18:18:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 224254] Review Request: boswars - Real-time strategy game using the Stratagus game engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708032218.l73MIFrB016994@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boswars - Real-time strategy game using the Stratagus game engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224254 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(lemenkov at gmail.com| |) | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-08-03 18:18 EST ------- And still no response; closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 22:32:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 18:32:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 224254] Review Request: boswars - Real-time strategy game using the Stratagus game engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708032232.l73MWWpQ017982@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boswars - Real-time strategy game using the Stratagus game engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224254 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 22:35:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 18:35:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226022] Merge Review: libgpod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708032235.l73MZ6u5018275@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libgpod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226022 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-08-03 18:35 EST ------- Yep, Todd's the one doing the work :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 22:52:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 18:52:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228214] Review Request: poco - C++ POrtable COmponents framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708032252.l73Mqmim019381@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poco - C++ POrtable COmponents framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228214 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-08-03 18:52 EST ------- I will close this ticket soon if there is no response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 23:47:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 19:47:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248231] Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708032347.l73NlOKa022735@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248231 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-03 19:47 EST ------- Yes, I think it makes the license clearer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 23:53:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 19:53:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234581] Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708032353.l73NrrgZ023164@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234581 ------- Additional Comments From charlescurley at charlescurley.com 2007-08-03 19:53 EST ------- It will be nice to have this, as the development version of GPSdrive (http://www.gpsdrive.de/) will use mapnik if it can find it. (Which answers the question in comment 15, above, about whether other programs can use mapnik.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 00:36:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 20:36:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226207] Merge Review: numactl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708040036.l740aZrl024919@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: numactl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226207 nhorman at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED ------- Additional Comments From nhorman at redhat.com 2007-08-03 20:36 EST ------- fixed in -3.fc8. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 00:39:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 20:39:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246312] Review Request: Pygments - A syntax highlighting engine written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708040039.l740dD4h025043@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Pygments - A syntax highlighting engine written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246312 smilner at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From smilner at redhat.com 2007-08-03 20:39 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-pygments New Branches: EL-5 FC6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 01:30:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 21:30:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234581] Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708040130.l741U1gu027223@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234581 ------- Additional Comments From charlescurley at charlescurley.com 2007-08-03 21:29 EST ------- Build problem: -------------------------------------------------- ... + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-compress + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-static-archive /usr/bin/strip + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-comment-note /usr/bin/strip /usr/bin/objdump + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-python-bytecompile + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-java-repack-jars Processing files: mapnik-0.4.0-3.fc7 error: File not found: /var/tmp/mapnik-0.4.0-3.fc7-root-ccurley/usr/bin/.sconsign error: File not found: /var/tmp/mapnik-0.4.0-3.fc7-root-ccurley/usr/lib/.sconsign Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.95117 ... -------------------------------------------------- I installed scons immediately before starting to run this build. Is there something I should have done with scons first? Or is something calling the wrong program: [ccurley at charlesc rpm]$ ll /usr/bin/.sconsign ls: cannot access /usr/bin/.sconsign: No such file or directory [ccurley at charlesc rpm]$ ll /usr/bin/sconsign -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 14935 2007-05-17 10:36 /usr/bin/sconsign [ccurley at charlesc rpm]$ ll /usr/lib/.sconsign ls: cannot access /usr/lib/.sconsign: No such file or directory [ccurley at charlesc rpm]$ ll /usr/lib/sconsign ls: cannot access /usr/lib/sconsign: No such file or directory I am python illiterate, so this could be something I haven't done. If so, can you automate it so that other python illiterates can use the package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 01:33:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 21:33:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234581] Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708040133.l741XC9f027459@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234581 ------- Additional Comments From charlescurley at charlescurley.com 2007-08-03 21:33 EST ------- You have 88 .hpp files (c++ headers). Can those and other development goodies go into a -devel subpackage? Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 02:00:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 22:00:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250315] Review Request: Linux-Complete-Backup-and-Recovery-HOWTO - bare metal recovery scripts & docs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708040200.l7420T3h028664@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Linux-Complete-Backup-and-Recovery-HOWTO - bare metal recovery scripts & docs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250315 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-03 22:00 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 250747 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 02:00:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 22:00:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250747] Review Request: Linux-Complete-Backup-and-Recovery-HOWTO - bare metal recovery scripts & docs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708040200.l7420VJ7028696@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Linux-Complete-Backup-and-Recovery-HOWTO - bare metal recovery scripts & docs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250747 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-03 22:00 EST ------- *** Bug 250315 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 02:08:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 22:08:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234581] Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708040208.l7428bVI029158@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234581 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-03 22:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > It will be nice to have this, as the development version of GPSdrive > (http://www.gpsdrive.de/) will use mapnik if it can find it. (Which answers the > question in comment 15, above, about whether other programs can use mapnik.) > - No, this does not answer my question. I am not asking how this program is used, but how *libmapnik.so* is used. I am asking if * this library is linked from other applications * or this library is dlopened * or this library is never used from other applications (In reply to comment #18) > You have 88 .hpp files (c++ headers). Can those and other development goodies go > into a -devel subpackage? - If the software itself is a development tool, it may contain header files etc.. by default. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 05:48:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 01:48:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249034] Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708040548.l745m8kX010966@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249034 john at curioussymbols.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From john at curioussymbols.com 2007-08-04 01:48 EST ------- * Regarding the licensing guidelines, email sent to "Spot" Callaway. * Your point about macros is rather pedantic. I don't see the value in going through another cycle to correct this. * The comment about parallel builds indicates that I tried to include support for nvec_parallel but failed due to an build error. From what I could tell, it *seemed* to need some patching of the upstream code. For the moment I will not be providing parallel support but would hope to do so in future. Note that the Debian package of SUNDIALS does not include parallel either. Requesting CVS access. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 05:53:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 01:53:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248231] Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708040553.l745rBw6011316@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248231 ------- Additional Comments From james.antill at redhat.com 2007-08-04 01:53 EST ------- Ok, official upstream release 1.0.1 vers. 1: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/jantill/fedora/ustr.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/jantill/fedora/ustr-1.0.1-1.fc7.src.rpm ...also has the LICENSE changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 06:04:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 02:04:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249034] Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708040604.l74641tr011738@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249034 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-04 02:03 EST ------- John. Please wait and only request CVS access once your package has been approved (fedora-review flag is +). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 06:08:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 02:08:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226022] Merge Review: libgpod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708040608.l7468PUO011914@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libgpod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226022 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-04 02:08 EST ------- thanks. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 06:11:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 02:11:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246312] Review Request: Pygments - A syntax highlighting engine written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708040611.l746BIoH012025@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Pygments - A syntax highlighting engine written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246312 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-04 02:11 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 06:15:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 02:15:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248163] Review Request: gtk-nodoka-engine - The Nodoka gtk engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708040615.l746Fjxu012189@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-nodoka-engine - The Nodoka gtk engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248163 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-04 02:15 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 07:07:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 03:07:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234581] Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708040707.l7477Cme013698@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234581 ------- Additional Comments From kms at passback.co.uk 2007-08-04 03:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > > You have 88 .hpp files (c++ headers). Can those and other development goodies > > go into a -devel subpackage? > > - If the software itself is a development tool, it may contain header files etc.. by default. I agree - Mapnik does nothing on its own, so I would consider the whole thing to be a development package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 07:10:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 03:10:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234581] Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708040710.l747AZLH013844@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234581 ------- Additional Comments From kms at passback.co.uk 2007-08-04 03:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > I installed scons immediately before starting to run this build. Is there > something I should have done with scons first? Or is something calling the wrong > program: > > [ccurley at charlesc rpm]$ ll /usr/bin/.sconsign > ls: cannot access /usr/bin/.sconsign: No such file or directory > [ccurley at charlesc rpm]$ ll /usr/bin/sconsign > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 14935 2007-05-17 10:36 /usr/bin/sconsign > [ccurley at charlesc rpm]$ ll /usr/lib/.sconsign > ls: cannot access /usr/lib/.sconsign: No such file or directory > [ccurley at charlesc rpm]$ ll /usr/lib/sconsign > ls: cannot access /usr/lib/sconsign: No such file or directory Use the most recent SPEC (0.4.0-4) file from comment #7. The way Scons works changed from FC6 to F7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 07:38:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 03:38:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248231] Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708040738.l747cTQS014974@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248231 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-04 03:38 EST ------- Please add the last entry "1.0.1-1" to %changelog before you commit to CVS. ------------------------------------------------------------- This package (ustr) is APPROVED by me ------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 07:50:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 03:50:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249034] Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708040750.l747o7E6015792@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249034 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-08-04 03:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #28) > * Your point about macros is rather pedantic. I don't see the value in going > through another cycle to correct this. It may seem pedantic when we see it in the perspective of one package. Take into consideration a 4000 packages, and suddenly such things become important. Any way "consisten use of macros" is a "must" item in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines and I would like you to do something about it. In any case we have to wait for the Licensing issue to be resolved. > * The comment about parallel builds indicates that I tried to include support > for nvec_parallel but failed due to an build error. From what I could tell, it > *seemed* to need some patching of the upstream code. For the moment I will not > be providing parallel support but would hope to do so in future. Note that the > Debian package of SUNDIALS does not include parallel either. Ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 08:50:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 04:50:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249034] Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708040850.l748o85G021128@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249034 ------- Additional Comments From john at curioussymbols.com 2007-08-04 04:50 EST ------- I have uploaded another version that fixes the macro issue. I have changed the License to BSD after looking over the additional conditions in the SUNDIALS license and seeing that they really weren't restricting the use of the code in any way. http://ascend.cheme.cmu.edu/ftp/jpye/ Please take a look and if you are happy give me 'review +'. I suspect it might not be necessary to wait for Spot's reply, as (note) the 'License' field is in no way legally binding. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 11:03:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 07:03:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248163] Review Request: gtk-nodoka-engine - The Nodoka gtk engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708041103.l74B33nF029457@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-nodoka-engine - The Nodoka gtk engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248163 martin.sourada at seznam.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 11:03:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 07:03:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248516] Review Request: nodoka-theme-gnome - The Nodoka Metacity theme and Gnome metatheme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708041103.l74B35pX029495@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nodoka-theme-gnome - The Nodoka Metacity theme and Gnome metatheme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248516 Bug 248516 depends on bug 248163, which changed state. Bug 248163 Summary: Review Request: gtk-nodoka-engine - The Nodoka gtk engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248163 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 11:10:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 07:10:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250598] Review Request: dnscap - DNS traffic capture utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708041110.l74BA5NC029793@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnscap - DNS traffic capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250598 atkac at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From atkac at redhat.com 2007-08-04 07:10 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dnscap Short Description: DNS traffic capture utility Owners: atkac at redhat.com Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 13:07:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 09:07:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234581] Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708041307.l74D7MWk003050@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234581 ------- Additional Comments From charlescurley at charlescurley.com 2007-08-04 09:07 EST ------- Re Comment #21: The spec file from comment 7 works with the older SRPM. I got a 404 on the SRPM in comment 7, though. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 13:12:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 09:12:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250150] Review Request: rarian - a replacement for scrollkeeper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708041312.l74DCCZd003588@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rarian - a replacement for scrollkeeper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250150 ------- Additional Comments From bbbush.yuan at gmail.com 2007-08-04 09:12 EST ------- Still not fixed: [root at mstar packages]# rpm -Uvh rarian-0.5.6-3.fc8.i386.rpm --nodeps Preparing... ########################################### [100%] 1:rarian ########################################### [100%] [root at mstar packages]# rpm -q --provides rarian librarian.so.0 rarian = 0.5.6-3.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 13:15:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 09:15:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250150] Review Request: rarian - a replacement for scrollkeeper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708041315.l74DFCwO003842@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rarian - a replacement for scrollkeeper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250150 bbbush.yuan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bbbush.yuan at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From bbbush.yuan at gmail.com 2007-08-04 09:15 EST ------- @_@ /me just found that rarian-compat is another package but yum install rarian will not bring in rarian-compat thus fails. yum-3.2.2-3.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 13:30:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 09:30:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234581] Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708041330.l74DUghw004644@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234581 ------- Additional Comments From charlescurley at charlescurley.com 2007-08-04 09:30 EST ------- Sorry, I should have been clearer. My thinking on a separate devel package (comment 18) is that while a developer would need the headers, an end user -- someone not developing with mapnik, but using a program which calls the library -- would not need or want them. Case in point: I have the X11 libraries loaded, but no X11 header files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 14:01:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 10:01:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234581] Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708041401.l74E1ZUq006841@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234581 ------- Additional Comments From kms at passback.co.uk 2007-08-04 10:01 EST ------- Apologies, the URL for the SRPM should be: http://www.passback.org.uk/maps/rpms/SRPMS/mapnik-0.4.0-4.fc7.src.rpm I take your point about splitting into mapnik and mapnik-devel. Comments from other reviewers or potential sponsors would be welcome. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 14:02:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 10:02:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250417] Review Request: guile-cairo - The Cairo graphics library for Guile Scheme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708041402.l74E2u3p007003@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-cairo - The Cairo graphics library for Guile Scheme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250417 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-04 10:02 EST ------- This is a typo in the spec file, that unables the installation of guile-cairo http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/guile-cairo/guile-cairo.spec Line 30: Requires: pkconfig It should be: Requires: pkg-config [root at goorah chitlesh]# rpm -Uvh guile-cairo-* error: Failed dependencies: pkconfig is needed by guile-cairo-devel-1.4.0-3.fc7.i386 (rpms from: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=12758 ) Can you fix it and build them as should as possible to prevent yum failures ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 14:10:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 10:10:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248516] Review Request: nodoka-theme-gnome - The Nodoka Metacity theme and Gnome metatheme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708041410.l74EAIM2007451@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nodoka-theme-gnome - The Nodoka Metacity theme and Gnome metatheme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248516 ------- Additional Comments From martin.sourada at seznam.cz 2007-08-04 10:10 EST ------- I made a new release addressing the above mentioned issues. New SPEC: http://feannatar.hostuju.cz/fedora/files/development/SPECS/nodoka-theme-gnome.spec New SRPM: http://feannatar.hostuju.cz/fedora/files/development/SRPMS/nodoka-theme-gnome-0.3.1.1-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 14:16:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 10:16:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250417] Review Request: guile-cairo - The Cairo graphics library for Guile Scheme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708041416.l74EGUUX007756@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-cairo - The Cairo graphics library for Guile Scheme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250417 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-04 10:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > This is a typo in the spec file, that unables the installation of guile-cairo > http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/guile-cairo/guile-cairo.spec > > Line 30: Requires: pkconfig - Ah.. Sorry I didn't notify it (note I don't have the right to fix this) > It should be: > Requires: pkg-config Well, it should be "Requires: pkgconfig", not pkg-config -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 14:46:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 10:46:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234581] Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708041446.l74EkoEr008844@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234581 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-08-04 10:46 EST ------- runtime libraries (and executables) should be separated from development parts, ie parts that are needed only when building against mapnik library. scripts that are used only during the build can go to the -devel subpackage. It may also be relevant to split the python part, depending on the case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 15:04:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 11:04:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708041504.l74F4lbc009446@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-04 11:04 EST ------- Well. for 2.30-1: * License - Well I checked all files (7300+). Some sources are explicitly licensed under GPLv2+ and all others does not have any license declaration. Bruno, can we regard this as licensed under GPLv2+? or you want to license this as strict GPLv2? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 15:10:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 11:10:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234581] Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708041510.l74FAwIa009670@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234581 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-04 11:10 EST ------- So again back to my question. (In reply to comment #19) > (In reply to comment #16) > > It will be nice to have this, as the development version of GPSdrive > > (http://www.gpsdrive.de/) will use mapnik if it can find it. (Which answers the > > question in comment 15, above, about whether other programs can use mapnik.) > > > - No, this does not answer my question. I am not asking how > this program is used, but how *libmapnik.so* is used. > I am asking if > * this library is linked from other applications > * or this library is dlopened > * or this library is never used from other applications (In reply to comment #25) > runtime libraries (and executables) should be separated So is libmapnik.so "runtime library"? i.e. how libmapnik.so is used from other application? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 15:14:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 11:14:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708041514.l74FEGgv009880@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From bouml at free.fr 2007-08-04 11:14 EST ------- to be frank I don't really know the response on the legal-mentions I write "either version 2, or (at your option) any later version", you '+' is linked to the second part of the sentence ? I write a licence in the header of file written by hand, I don't write any licence/header in the generated files is it a problem ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 15:17:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 11:17:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708041517.l74FHjaO010040@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From bouml at free.fr 2007-08-04 11:17 EST ------- additional comment : the up to date reference manual is also available on the site and the tar.gz/7z files are numbered with the corresponding release of bouml (2.30 in this case, 2.30.1 doesn't have impact on the doc) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 15:23:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 11:23:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708041523.l74FN1xH010259@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-04 11:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #58) > I write a licence in the header of file written by hand, I don't write any > licence/header in the generated files Okay, then the license is "GPLv2+" (version 2 and any later). Debarshi, please update the license field as "GPLv2+" ----------------------------------------------------------------- This package (bouml) is APPROVED by me ----------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 15:26:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 11:26:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250417] Review Request: guile-cairo - The Cairo graphics library for Guile Scheme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708041526.l74FQDBm010439@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-cairo - The Cairo graphics library for Guile Scheme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250417 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-08-04 11:26 EST ------- Fixed & rebuilt. Thanks for notify -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 15:51:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 11:51:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248231] Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708041551.l74FpMSu011396@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248231 james.antill at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From james.antill at redhat.com 2007-08-04 11:51 EST ------- N/p, on the changelog thing (although I assume it's ok if I use 1.0.1-2, given that's probably the first version I'll upload?). New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ustr Short Description: String library, very very low memory overhead, simple to import Owners: james.antill at redhat.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 16:30:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 12:30:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248231] Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708041630.l74GUDge013217@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248231 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-04 12:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #35) > (although I assume it's ok if I use 1.0.1-2, given > that's probably the first version I'll upload?). No problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 16:42:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 12:42:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249034] Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708041642.l74GgdpR013862@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249034 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-08-04 12:42 EST ------- +----------+ | APPROVED | +----------+ John, you may like to take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/FEver to receive automatic reminders when there is a new upstream release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 17:37:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 13:37:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708041737.l74HbA7u016197@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-08-04 13:37 EST ------- (In reply to comment #60) > Okay, then the license is "GPLv2+" (version 2 and any > later). > > Debarshi, please update the license field as "GPLv2+" Fine. I am building the package. In the meantime I shall ask for CVS access. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 17:39:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 13:39:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708041739.l74HdIvT016312@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-08-04 13:39 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bouml Short Description: UML2 tool box to specify and generate code in C++, Java and IDL. Owners: debarshi.ray at gmail.com Branches: FC-6, F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 17:52:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 13:52:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250893] New: Review Request: audio-convert-mod - A simple audio file converter supporting many formats Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250893 Summary: Review Request: audio-convert-mod - A simple audio file converter supporting many formats Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: s.adam at diffingo.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/audio-convert-mod/audio-convert-mod.spec SRPM URL: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/audio-convert-mod/audio-convert-mod-3.45.0-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: audio-convert-mod is a simple audio file converter supporting various formats via external binaries. It facilitates the batch conversion of audio files from one format to another by access from the menu or by the user script where at a right-click files can be converted at once. It also supports file tags/metadata where applicable. rpmlint is silent on the source and binary rpms. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 17:58:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 13:58:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241596] Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708041758.l74HwRsQ017313@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241596 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From johan-fedora at deds.nl 2007-08-04 13:58 EST ------- Maildrop version 2.0.4 was released last April. Can you update to the latest version? When trying to rebuild this srpm with mock I end up with a error: . maildrop/uidgid ; test -z "$gid" && exit 0; test -w /etc || exit 0; cd /var/tmp/maildrop-2.0.3-2.fc7- root/usr/bin && chgrp $gid maildrop lockmail chgrp: changing group of `maildrop': Operation not permitted chgrp: changing group of `lockmail': Operation not permitted make[2]: *** [install-maildrop] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/maildrop-2.0.3' make[1]: *** [install-am] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/maildrop-2.0.3' make: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.39432 (%install) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.39432 (%install) Error building package from maildrop-2.0.3-2.fc7.src.rpm, See build log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 18:08:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 14:08:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229591] Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708041808.l74I8aVq017745@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229591 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2007-08-04 14:08 EST ------- New version is uploaded: SPEC: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/lshw/lshw.spec SRPM: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/lshw/lshw-B.02.11-2.fc7.src.rpm I have verified that lshw-gui need lshw and that lshw is using data from hwdata (if found). hwdata is not very frequent updated in Fedora, hence it's little value in requiring hwdata. If this changes and lshw releases is slowing down, hwdata can be a requirement in later lshw releases in fedora. License tag is changed to GPLv2 (as I read COPYING to be GPL versoin 2 only, correct?) More information about license tag: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/60553 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 18:09:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 14:09:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708041809.l74I9Ou0017818@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-04 14:09 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 18:13:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 14:13:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248231] Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708041813.l74IDxL1018033@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248231 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-04 14:13 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 18:27:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 14:27:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241596] Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708041827.l74IRgtI018577@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241596 ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2007-08-04 14:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Maildrop version 2.0.4 was released last April. Can you update to the latest version? OK, will do so. > When trying to rebuild this srpm with mock I end up with a error: > > . maildrop/uidgid ; test -z "$gid" && exit 0; test -w /etc || exit 0; cd /var/tmp/maildrop-2.0.3-2.fc7-root/usr/bin && chgrp $gid maildrop lockmail > chgrp: changing group of `maildrop': Operation not permitted > chgrp: changing group of `lockmail': Operation not permitted I don't see that here, and according to the above: o you don't have root privileges (that's perfectly OK), but o you are allowed to write in /etc nonetheless So something looks wrong in the chroot setup. Is /etc in there really writable by the mock user? If so, fix this and the build should succeed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 18:34:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 14:34:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239428] Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708041834.l74IYF3r018811@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239428 ------- Additional Comments From nikolay at vladimiroff.com 2007-08-04 14:34 EST ------- I made something like a FedoraFlyingHigh theme for SLiM. The theme: http://turki.fedorapeople.org/slim.theme The panel: http://turki.fedorapeople.org/panel.png In action: http://turki.fedorapeople.org/slim.png I used gdm's artwork to put together the panel. Any comments and suggestions are welcome. (NOTE: this is my first slim theme ever) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 18:36:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 14:36:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250598] Review Request: dnscap - DNS traffic capture utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708041836.l74IaL5M018911@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnscap - DNS traffic capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250598 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-04 14:36 EST ------- According to the new license guidelines the License: field here should probibly be "ISC". See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing Can you provide a full Source0 URL? I don't see the rc5 version upstream, it looks like it's all cvs snapshots. If it's a cvs snapshot, why are you calling it rc5? In addition looks like you don't need the Requires: libpcap. rpmlint says: E: dnscap explicit-lib-dependency libpcap (as mentioned above). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 21:43:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 17:43:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250903] New: Review Request: python-exif - Python module to extract EXIF information Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250903 Summary: Review Request: python-exif - Python module to extract EXIF information Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: terjeros at phys.ntnu.no QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/python-exif/python-exif.spec SRPM: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/python-exif/python-exif-1.0.2-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Python Library to extract EXIF information in digital camera image files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 21:50:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 17:50:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250904] New: Review Request: fuse-python - Python bindings for FUSE Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250904 Summary: Review Request: fuse-python - Python bindings for FUSE Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lemenkov at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/fuse-python.spec SRPM URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/fuse-python-0.2-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: This package provides python bindings for FUSE. FUSE makes it possible to implement a filesystem in a userspace program. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 4 23:25:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 19:25:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239428] Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708042325.l74NPqav031286@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239428 ------- Additional Comments From nikolay at vladimiroff.com 2007-08-04 19:25 EST ------- slim-update_slim_wmlist requires perl-File-DesktopEntry -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 5 00:27:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 20:27:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248516] Review Request: nodoka-theme-gnome - The Nodoka Metacity theme and Gnome metatheme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708050027.l750R4Xi000472@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nodoka-theme-gnome - The Nodoka Metacity theme and Gnome metatheme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248516 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-08-04 20:27 EST ------- Looks fine now. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 5 00:58:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 20:58:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250909] New: Review Request: gkrellm-timestamp - UNIX timestamp clock plugin for GKrellM Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250909 Summary: Review Request: gkrellm-timestamp - UNIX timestamp clock plugin for GKrellM Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nikolay at vladimiroff.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://turki.fedorapeople.org/gkrellm-timestamp.spec SRPM URL: http://turki.fedorapeople.org/gkrellm-timestamp-0.1.4-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: GkrellM Timestamp is a GkrellM plugin that shows the current UNIX timestamp like the default clock. LICENSE is missing. I sent request to upstream to include the license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 5 01:30:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 21:30:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229321] Review Request :postgresql-pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708050130.l751Ur5g002558@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request :postgresql-pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229321 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2007-08-04 21:30 EST ------- I pushed init script and /etc/sysconfig/pgpool to -devel. Could you please test? Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 5 03:01:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 23:01:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249034] Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708050301.l75317J9005920@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249034 john at curioussymbols.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 5 03:02:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 23:02:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249034] Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708050302.l7532ioQ006038@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249034 ------- Additional Comments From john at curioussymbols.com 2007-08-04 23:02 EST ------- Note: response from Spot: Actually, the extra items on the license are not new conditions, nor are they exceptions. In vast simplifications, they say: 1. LLNL did this for the DOE. 2. The US government disclaims liability (which the BSD license above it already did) 3. the US goverment doesn't endorse or recommend this, nor can you use its trademarks to imply this. (again, the BSD license above it already covered it). So, just saying "BSD" is correct here, since there really are no additional restrictions or exceptions. ~spot -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 5 03:12:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 23:12:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249034] Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708050312.l753CkP9006336@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249034 ------- Additional Comments From john at curioussymbols.com 2007-08-04 23:12 EST ------- Note: for use of 'FEver' the following settings seem to be ok and will be put in place once I get edit privileges on the Fedora Wiki: URL: http://www.llnl.gov/CASC/sundials/download/download.html Filename (regex): sundials-([0-9.]+)\.tar\.[gzb2]+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 5 03:58:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 23:58:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249034] Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708050358.l753wCg6007526@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249034 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-08-04 23:58 EST ------- Follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/WikiEditing to get edit access on the Wiki. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 5 04:14:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 00:14:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249034] Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708050414.l754EfJ7008030@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249034 ------- Additional Comments From john at curioussymbols.com 2007-08-05 00:14 EST ------- I have done that. Apparently I am supposed to ask someone who has edit privileges to give me permission. You are on that list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 5 05:45:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 01:45:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249034] Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708050545.l755jBRb010772@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249034 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-08-05 01:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #36) > I have done that. Apparently I am supposed to ask someone who has edit > privileges to give me permission. You are on that list. Oops! I did not know that I can give you permission. Well now that I know, what is your Wiki user name? JohnPye? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 5 06:04:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 02:04:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708050604.l7564jNn011375@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 5 06:04:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 02:04:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249892] Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708050604.l7564lF9011411@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249892 Bug 249892 depends on bug 247417, which changed state. Bug 247417 Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 5 06:18:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 02:18:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249034] Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708050618.l756I1gj011749@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249034 ------- Additional Comments From john at curioussymbols.com 2007-08-05 02:17 EST ------- JohnPye. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 5 07:21:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 03:21:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248516] Review Request: nodoka-theme-gnome - The Nodoka Metacity theme and Gnome metatheme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708050721.l757L0jd013487@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nodoka-theme-gnome - The Nodoka Metacity theme and Gnome metatheme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248516 martin.sourada at seznam.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From martin.sourada at seznam.cz 2007-08-05 03:20 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: nodoka-theme-gnome Short Description: The Nodoka Metacity theme and Gnome metatheme Owners: martin.sourada at seznam.cz Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 5 07:47:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 03:47:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708050747.l757lJW6014559@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-05 03:47 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=160709) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=160709&action=view) mock build log of 8.2.4-0.409.beta on rawhide i386 Just from packaging issue: * Patch0 -------------------------------------------------- Patch0: sepostgresql-%{version}-%{release}.patch -------------------------------------------------- - Please don't write in this way. This surely fails on F-7 FC-6 (i.e. except for rawhide) because release is defined as: -------------------------------------------------- Release: 0.409%{?sepgextension}%{?dist} -------------------------------------------------- * BuildRequires - rebuild fails at least on rawhide i386. At least autoconf is missing for BuildRequires. Even after adding autoconf to BuildRequiers, rebuild still fails (build log attached). I cannot proceed review without making srpm rebuilt.. * AutoProv: no - Why is this needed? * CFLAGS -------------------------------------------------- CFLAGS=`echo $CFLAGS|xargs -n 1|grep -v ffast-math|xargs -n 100` -------------------------------------------------- - This is redundant because Fedora's CFLAGS does not contain -ffast-math * Macros - Please use macros correctly. /var -> %_localstatedir /usr/sbin -> %_sbindir * Install usage - Please make sure that "install" "cp" commands keep timestamp. i.e. Use "-p" option when using "install" or "cp". * For group/user adding scripts: (from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/UsersAndGroups : this is ratified and now this is not a draft) (In reply to comment #8) > Your patch intended to add "Requires(pre): shadow-utils", but it is not > necessary because we can assume some fundamental packages are installed. > See, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/FullExceptionList > The shadow-utils is also contained the list. - FullExceptionList is for BuildRequires, not for Requires. So adding "Requires(pre): shadow-utils" is still needed * Initscripts Conventions (check the section "Services" http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ) - Add some Requires(pre) or so on according to the description written on above. * Directory ownership - Please make it sure that all the directories newly creted by installing this package are surely owned by this package. Currently the following directories are not owned. ----------------------------------------------------------- %{_datadir}/sepgsql/ %{_libdir}/sepgsql/ ------------------------------------------------------------ * From the brief check of sepostgresql.init: - Usually the commands which are not within normal users' paths must be specified with full path (otherwith this will cause problems when invoked with sudo rpm -Fvh , for example) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 5 07:49:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 03:49:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708050749.l757n2dU014770@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-05 03:49 EST ------- BTW now rawhide has selinux-policy-3.0.5-1.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 5 09:11:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 05:11:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250904] Review Request: fuse-python - Python bindings for FUSE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708050911.l759B6Q4020699@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-python - Python bindings for FUSE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250904 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-08-05 05:11 EST ------- BTW what correct naming should be for this package - fuse-python (as in upstream) or python-fuse? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 5 09:55:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 05:55:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249034] Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708050955.l759tIKM023937@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249034 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-08-05 05:55 EST ------- I have added you. Please create a Wiki page introducing yourself at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JohnPye . If there are any issues, let me know. Happy editing... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 5 09:56:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 05:56:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249034] Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708050956.l759ue3N024030@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249034 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-08-05 05:56 EST ------- Once you have imported sundials into CVS and built it successfully, remember to close this bug as "NEXTRELEASE". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 5 11:11:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 07:11:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250909] Review Request: gkrellm-timestamp - UNIX timestamp clock plugin for GKrellM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708051111.l75BBbgK026391@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gkrellm-timestamp - UNIX timestamp clock plugin for GKrellM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250909 ------- Additional Comments From nikolay at vladimiroff.com 2007-08-05 07:11 EST ------- Spec URL: http://turki.fedorapeople.org/gkrellm-timestamp.spec SRPM URL: http://turki.fedorapeople.org/gkrellm-timestamp-0.1.4-2.fc7.src.rpm * Sun Aug 5 2007 Nikolay Vladimirov 0.1.4-2 - Upstream added LICENSE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 5 11:46:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 07:46:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250924] New: Review Request: flashrom - Simple program for reading/writing BIOS chips content Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250924 Summary: Review Request: flashrom - Simple program for reading/writing BIOS chips content Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lemenkov at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/flashrom.spec SRPM URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/flashrom-0.0-1.2742svn.fc7.src.rpm Description: Utility which can be used to detect BIOS chips (DIP, PLCC), read their contents and write new contents on the chips ("flash the chip"). All of you, no doubt, heard something about LinuxBIOS project which has slow but constant progress in providing completely open startup-firmware (also known as BIOS) for a not so little number of mainboards (from desktop ones to more specific). Since the project continues to rise there are some utilities appears which may be useful even for users of proprietary BIOSes. One of such utilities is flashrom - it helps (re)flashing firmware w/o needs to create LiveCDs powered with my grandma's 8-bit DOS and rebooting to it. See some user cases at the link below: http://www.hermann-uwe.de/blog/flashing-a-bios-the-linux-way-tm-using-flashrom I've got some thing to discuss - versioning of this package. Upstream still haven't any version (just svn revision) so I decided to name it as flashrom-0.0-1.2742svn.fc7 but maybe it would be better to name it like flashrom-0-1.2742svn.fc7 or something similar? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 5 12:32:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 08:32:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229591] Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708051232.l75CWUS9029821@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229591 ------- Additional Comments From lyonel at ezix.org 2007-08-05 08:32 EST ------- Looks good to me. I'd have separated SVG cliparts from core lshw package, though: they're only used by lshw-gui. You are correct about the license: it is still GPLv2 (I still have no firm stance on GPLv3 so I decided to stick to a well-known and well-accepted license for now). Another useful trick w/ GUI could be an integration with Fedora's consolehelper (as lshw must be run as root to report anything useful) (In reply to comment #41) > New version is uploaded: > > SPEC: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/lshw/lshw.spec > SRPM: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/lshw/lshw-B.02.11-2.fc7.src.rpm > > I have verified that lshw-gui need lshw and that lshw is using data > from hwdata (if found). > > hwdata is not very frequent updated in Fedora, hence it's little value > in requiring hwdata. If this changes and lshw releases is slowing down, > hwdata can be a requirement in later lshw releases in fedora. > > License tag is changed to GPLv2 (as I read COPYING to be GPL versoin 2 only, > correct?) > > More information about license tag: > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/60553 > > -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 5 12:41:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 08:41:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229591] Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708051241.l75Cf92B030239@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229591 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2007-08-05 08:41 EST ------- > Looks good to me. I'd have separated SVG cliparts from core lshw package, > though: they're only used by lshw-gui. Yes, will do. > Another useful trick w/ GUI could be an integration with Fedora's consolehelper > (as lshw must be run as root to report anything useful) Will look into this, it would indeed be nice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 5 14:07:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 10:07:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229591] Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708051407.l75E7PAJ003711@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229591 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2007-08-05 10:07 EST ------- Updated packages: o moved artwork to gui subpackage o support for consolehelper (it seems to work too :-) SPEC: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/lshw/lshw.spec SRPM: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/lshw/lshw-B.02.11-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 5 15:20:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 11:20:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708051520.l75FKCMo006937@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From kaigai at kaigai.gr.jp 2007-08-05 11:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > * Patch0 > -------------------------------------------------- > Patch0: sepostgresql-%{version}-%{release}.patch > -------------------------------------------------- > - Please don't write in this way. This surely > fails on F-7 FC-6 (i.e. except for rawhide) because > release is defined as: > -------------------------------------------------- > Release: 0.409%{?sepgextension}%{?dist} > -------------------------------------------------- Is it possible to use an immediate version identifier instead of "${version}-% {release}", like "Patch0: sepostgresql-0.409.patch" ? If not so, we cannot identify differenct patches. > * AutoProv: no > - Why is this needed? It got unnecessary in the current version. I'll remove it. > * CFLAGS > -------------------------------------------------- > CFLAGS=`echo $CFLAGS|xargs -n 1|grep -v ffast-math|xargs -n 100` > -------------------------------------------------- > - This is redundant because Fedora's CFLAGS does not contain > -ffast-math It's just a copy from postgresql.spec. I'll remove it. > * Macros > - Please use macros correctly. > /var -> %_localstatedir > /usr/sbin -> %_sbindir The translation of "/usr/sbin -> %_sbindir" also targets /usr/sbin/semodule? In my understanding, the location of external commands don't have any relationship with %_prefix of sepostgresql. I don't have any specific note for the rest of your comments. I'll fix them. Please wait for updating the specfile. Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 5 16:32:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 12:32:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241596] Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708051632.l75GW4Mo010035@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241596 ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2007-08-05 12:32 EST ------- Spec URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/maildrop.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/maildrop-2.0.4-3.src.rpm * Sat Aug 4 2007 Axel Thimm - 2.0.4-3 - Update to 2.0.4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 5 17:16:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 13:16:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708051716.l75HG3E1011872@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-05 13:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > The translation of "/usr/sbin -> %_sbindir" also targets /usr/sbin/semodule? Yes. > In my understanding, the location of external commands don't have any > relationship with %_prefix of sepostgresql. - Actually policycoreutils spec file uses %_sbindir . Using proper macros is necessary because we have to make it sure that spec files in Fedora follow FHS. So we expect that semodule is under %_sbindir. Let's say %_prefix changes, then if macros are used properly, all the affected commands will change the location properly. If you still use /usr/sbin, it surely fails. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 5 17:43:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 13:43:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241596] Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708051743.l75HhEpm013109@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241596 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-05 13:43 EST ------- I just only tried to rebuild 2.0.4-3 and it seems okay. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=89925 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 5 18:38:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 14:38:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248516] Review Request: nodoka-theme-gnome - The Nodoka Metacity theme and Gnome metatheme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708051838.l75Icapl015054@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nodoka-theme-gnome - The Nodoka Metacity theme and Gnome metatheme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248516 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-05 14:38 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 5 18:40:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 14:40:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249034] Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708051840.l75IemNU015175@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249034 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-05 14:40 EST ------- John: Can you post a cvs template so we know what branches and such you want? See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure for templates/examples. Reset fedora-cvs to ? when you are ready. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 5 19:03:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 15:03:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243147] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-SDL - Cross Compiled SDL Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708051903.l75J3RiM016246@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-SDL - Cross Compiled SDL Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243147 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-05 15:03 EST ------- New version with these changes: * Sat Aug 4 2007 Hans de Goede 1.2.9-3 - Add missing %%defattr to %%files - Strip some unneeded file removals / additions from Patch0, dramatically reducing it in size - Update License tag for new Licensing Guidelines compliance - Do NOT provide and require native .so files here: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/arm-gp2x-linux-SDL.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/arm-gp2x-linux-SDL-1.2.9-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 5 19:04:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 15:04:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243254] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-zlib - Cross Compiled zlib Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708051904.l75J4EVB016302@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-zlib - Cross Compiled zlib Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243254 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-05 15:04 EST ------- New version with the following changes: * Sat Aug 4 2007 Hans de Goede 1.2.3-5 - Add missing %%defattr to %%files - Update License tag for new Licensing Guidelines compliance - Do NOT provide and require native .so files here: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/arm-gp2x-linux-zlib.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/arm-gp2x-linux-zlib-1.2.3-5.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 5 19:13:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 15:13:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229416] Review Request: qpidj - qpid java implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708051913.l75JDUjr016696@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qpidj - qpid java implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229416 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-08-05 15:13 EST ------- those unresolved packages dependencie's bugs should be paste in dependencies block below. That's avoid confusion for any reviewer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 5 19:17:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 15:17:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226452] Merge Review: system-config-bind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708051917.l75JH9ts016902@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-bind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226452 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(odvorace at redhat.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-05 15:17 EST ------- Hey Ondrej: Can you look at addressing the issues in the review in comment #1? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 5 19:18:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 15:18:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226453] Merge Review: system-config-boot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708051918.l75JIPk1016972@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-boot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226453 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-05 15:18 EST ------- This can be closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 5 19:20:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 15:20:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226456] Merge Review: system-config-display In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708051920.l75JKUJ6017079@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-display https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226456 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-05 15:20 EST ------- Hey Ajax. Any replies to the stuff in comment #4? I think this is close to done. Perhaps you could also try again on the devel list for someone to take it over. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 5 19:22:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 15:22:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226458] Merge Review: system-config-keyboard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708051922.l75JMIr8017195@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-keyboard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226458 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(pnasrat at redhat.com | |) ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-05 15:22 EST ------- Hey Paul. Have you had a chance to look at the items in comment #1? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 5 19:55:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 15:55:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199310] Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708051955.l75JtuuF018927@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199310 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+, fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-05 15:55 EST ------- Package Rename CVS Request ======================= Old Package Name: sturmbahnfahrer New Package Name: stormbaancoureur Upstream has renamed the package because sturmXXXX has a bad ring to it in europe (World War II related). Other then changing the Name tag there are only very minor changes, so a CVS module rename seems the best and easiest solution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 5 20:04:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 16:04:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250538] Review Request: pidgin-otr - OTR messaging for pidgin (was gaim-otr) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708052004.l75K4EGj019319@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-otr - OTR messaging for pidgin (was gaim-otr) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250538 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: pidgin-otr -|Review Request: pidgin-otr - |OTR messaging for pidgin |OTR messaging for pidgin |(was gaim-otr) |(was gaim-otr) Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-05 16:04 EST ------- I'd be happy to review this package. Look for a full review in a bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 5 20:35:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 16:35:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242207] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-glibc - Cross Compiled GNU C Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708052035.l75KZ0XH020453@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-glibc - Cross Compiled GNU C Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242207 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-05 16:34 EST ------- Imported and build, for some unknown reason the first build didn't produce an rpm (although it succeeded according to koji). Doing a second build has fixed this, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 5 20:35:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 16:35:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242206] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708052035.l75KZngP020500@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242206 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-05 16:35 EST ------- For some unknown reason the first glibc build didn't produce an rpm (although it succeeded according to koji). Doing a second build has fixed this, and a new non bootstrap gcc with c++ and your patch has been build now. ONce more, many thanks for all your input. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 5 20:36:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 16:36:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242206] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708052036.l75KaC3G020530@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242206 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 5 20:41:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 16:41:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248516] Review Request: nodoka-theme-gnome - The Nodoka Metacity theme and Gnome metatheme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708052041.l75KfKYT020767@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nodoka-theme-gnome - The Nodoka Metacity theme and Gnome metatheme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248516 martin.sourada at seznam.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 5 21:03:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 17:03:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250943] New: Review Request: x3d-xsl - Web3D Consortium stylesheets for X3D Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250943 Summary: Review Request: x3d-xsl - Web3D Consortium stylesheets for X3D Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: braden at endoframe.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://endoframe.com/x3d-xsl.spec SRPM URL: http://endoframe.com/x3d-xsl-20070723-1.src.rpm Description: XSL stylesheets for transforming X3D XML (model/x3d+xml) to VRML97 (model/vrml) and VRML-syntax X3D (model/x3d+vrml). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 5 21:50:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 17:50:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250538] Review Request: pidgin-otr - OTR messaging for pidgin (was gaim-otr) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708052150.l75Loq85023587@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-otr - OTR messaging for pidgin (was gaim-otr) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250538 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-05 17:50 EST ------- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. See below - License OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: f4ca8bc228069616d4c8fa9288af6bb5 pidgin-otr-3.1.0.tar.gz f4ca8bc228069616d4c8fa9288af6bb5 pidgin-otr-3.1.0.tar.gz.1 See below - BuildRequires correct OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - .la files are removed. OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have sane scriptlets. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. Per the new License guidelines I think the License: tag here should be GPLv2 (GPL version 2 only). 2. Your Provides and Obsoletes for gaim-otr don't look right to me. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-3cfc1ea19d28975faad9d56f70a6ae55661d3c3d I think you should have: Provides: gaim-otr = 3.0.1-0.7.20060712cvs.fc7 Obsoletes: gaim-otr < 3.0.1-0.6.20060712cvs.fc7 3. Doesn't build here under mock. I get: checking for XML::Parser... configure: error: XML::Parser perl module is required for intltool error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.1879 (%build) If I add a "BuildRequires: perl(XML::Parser)" it gets further and then blows up with: make[2]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/pidgin-otr-3.1.0/po' file=`echo es | sed 's,.*/,,'`.gmo \ && rm -f $file && -o $file es.po file=`echo fr | sed 's,.*/,,'`.gmo \ && rm -f $file && -o $file fr.po /bin/sh: line 1: -o: command not found make[2]: *** [es.gmo] Error 127 make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... /bin/sh: line 1: -o: command not found make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... /bin/sh: line 1: -o: command not found make[2]: *** [fr.gmo] Error 127 make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/pidgin-otr-3.1.0/po' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/pidgin-otr-3.1.0' make: *** [all] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.47112 (%build) Needs to also have "BuildRequires: gettext" That gets it building. 4. rpmlint says: W: pidgin-otr invalid-license GPL W: pidgin-otr invalid-license GPL W: pidgin-otr unversioned-explicit-obsoletes gaim-otr W: pidgin-otr-debuginfo invalid-license GPL Would be fixed by the issue 1 and issue 2 being fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 5 22:12:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 18:12:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250903] Review Request: python-exif - Python module to extract EXIF information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708052212.l75MCel3024264@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-exif - Python module to extract EXIF information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250903 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-05 18:12 EST ------- I'd be happy to review this. Look for a full review in a few. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 5 23:30:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 19:30:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250903] Review Request: python-exif - Python module to extract EXIF information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708052330.l75NUlTZ027176@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-exif - Python module to extract EXIF information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250903 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-05 19:30 EST ------- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (BSD) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 7df9f94e98b6ff5da872105a11069356 EXIFpy_1.0.2.tar.gz 7df9f94e98b6ff5da872105a11069356 EXIFpy_1.0.2.tar.gz.1 See below - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. You have a typo in the 2nd line of the spec that makes it not build. 2. Your url has a typo: http://http://sourceforge.net/projects/... 3. Doesn't build under mock. Perhaps You need a BuildRequires: python-devel ? Adding that gets it building here. 4. It seems a bit odd to include the entire .py file as a doc to get the license. Perhaps you could split out the license? Are you releasing your added setup.py under the same license? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 5 23:34:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 19:34:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249235] Review Request: pidgin-knotify - KNotify plugin for Pidgin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708052334.l75NY89S027303@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-knotify - KNotify plugin for Pidgin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249235 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-05 19:34 EST ------- I'd be happy to review this. Look for a full review in a bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 5 23:35:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 19:35:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249235] Review Request: pidgin-knotify - KNotify plugin for Pidgin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708052335.l75NZcs7027383@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-knotify - KNotify plugin for Pidgin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249235 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-05 19:35 EST ------- Wrong flag. Fixing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 00:18:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 20:18:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708060018.l760IKBp028980@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-05 20:18 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: netgen [Removed Branches: FC-6 devel ] [Removed Fedora Owners: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au ] this package crashes (segmentation faults) during its main functionality. Upstream didn't reply to me and there is no reason to push it into the fedora collection nor maintaining it for the moment. Please remove netgen's FC-6 and development branches. It was neither built nor released into the mirrors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 00:28:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 20:28:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249235] Review Request: pidgin-knotify - KNotify plugin for Pidgin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708060028.l760ST7Q029571@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-knotify - KNotify plugin for Pidgin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249235 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-05 20:28 EST ------- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License(LGPLv2) See below - License field in spec matches See below - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 00c9a07cbe529e1375d2dc5ad7a3b1fb knotify-plugin_0.1.tar.gz 00c9a07cbe529e1375d2dc5ad7a3b1fb knotify-plugin_0.1.tar.gz.1 OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. Ok - Package has a correct %clean section. Ok - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. See below - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. You might make the summary a bit less harsh, perhaps just remove the second sentence, or just change it to "This is for KDE pidgin users". Not a blocker, just a comment. 2. According to the new license rules the License tag here should be: LGPLv2. You could ask upstream to include a copy in the package. 3. In your patch, you might make the cp do a 'cp -a' to preserve timestamps on the plugin as it was built. 4. rpmlint says: W: pidgin-knotify no-documentation Can ignore. W: pidgin-knotify invalid-license LGPL W: pidgin-knotify invalid-license LGPL W: pidgin-knotify-debuginfo invalid-license LGPL Should be LGPLv2. W: pidgin-knotify mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 10) Fix if you get a chance, not a blocker. 5. Doesn't build here on x86_64... I get: + make -j2 gcc -o knotify-plugin.so -shared knotify-plugin.c `pkg-config pidgin --cflags --libs` -g -Wall /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccfkilnZ.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 against `a local symbol' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC /tmp/ccfkilnZ.o: could not read symbols: Bad value collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [knotify-plugin.so] Error 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.66121 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 01:19:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 21:19:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249235] Review Request: pidgin-knotify - KNotify plugin for Pidgin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708060119.l761JEgi032386@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-knotify - KNotify plugin for Pidgin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249235 ------- Additional Comments From lightsolphoenix at gmail.com 2007-08-05 21:19 EST ------- Okay, updated a few things. Spec URL: http://crystalsanctuary.rpgsource.net/packages/specs/pidgin-knotify.spec SRPM URL: http://crystalsanctuary.rpgsource.net/packages/source/pidgin-knotify-0.1-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 02:43:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 22:43:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249034] Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708060243.l762haPH004220@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249034 ------- Additional Comments From john at curioussymbols.com 2007-08-05 22:43 EST ------- Hi Kevin, Sorry, I forgot about that step. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sundials Short Description: Suite of nonlinear solvers Owners: john at curioussymbols.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: john at curioussymbols.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 02:44:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 22:44:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249034] Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708060244.l762ig06004321@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249034 john at curioussymbols.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 03:52:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 23:52:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249235] Review Request: pidgin-knotify - KNotify plugin for Pidgin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708060352.l763qMV3007226@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-knotify - KNotify plugin for Pidgin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249235 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-05 23:52 EST ------- 1. looks good. ok. 2. looks good. ok. 3. looks good. ok. 4. looks good. ok. 5. It still doesn't build on x86_64, but for a different reason: error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/pidgin/knotify-plugin.so Your patch has a hard coded /usr/lib in it. Looking at the compile options you should patch it to use rpm's normal optflags if at all possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 04:32:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 00:32:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249235] Review Request: pidgin-knotify - KNotify plugin for Pidgin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708060432.l764WVJU008465@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-knotify - KNotify plugin for Pidgin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249235 ------- Additional Comments From lightsolphoenix at gmail.com 2007-08-06 00:32 EST ------- Updated. Spec URL: http://crystalsanctuary.rpgsource.net/packages/specs/pidgin-knotify.spec SRPM URL: http://crystalsanctuary.rpgsource.net/packages/source/pidgin-knotify-0.1-4.fc7.src.rpm I changed it to use a define at the beginning to find pidgin, which relies on the libdir macro. It should work fine, but this way it can be quickly fixed if Pidgin is installed in another directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 05:20:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 01:20:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249235] Review Request: pidgin-knotify - KNotify plugin for Pidgin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708060520.l765KYvM010275@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-knotify - KNotify plugin for Pidgin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249235 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-06 01:20 EST ------- ok, the package from comment #8 builds ok on x86_64. You still do need to make it honor the rpm optflags when compiling however. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-8b14098227aebff1cf6188939e9d0877295ac448 Thats the last blocker I see... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 05:40:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 01:40:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239385] Review Request: peless - Text Browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708060540.l765eLnd011352@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: peless - Text Browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239385 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp |nobody at fedoraproject.org CC|mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp | Flag|fedora-review? | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-06 01:40 EST ------- Sorry, but I cannot admit that you don't like to do a pre-review. For now I withdraw reviewing this request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 05:58:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 01:58:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247227] Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708060558.l765w2Gb012293@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method Alias: nabi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247227 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-06 01:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > Which package should own %_sysconfdir/X11/xinit/xinput.d ? I think it should be owned by im-chooser now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 06:07:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 02:07:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 211761] Review Request: dfu-programmer - USB DFU based programmer for Atmel chips In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708060607.l76679FD012866@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dfu-programmer - USB DFU based programmer for Atmel chips https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211761 weston_schmidt at alumni.purdue.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(weston_schmidt at alu| |mni.purdue.edu) | ------- Additional Comments From weston_schmidt at alumni.purdue.edu 2007-08-06 02:07 EST ------- I'm not sure what happened to my last comment - I have updated the package and it is located at: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=147246 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 06:13:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 02:13:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247227] Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708060613.l766Dghb013136@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method Alias: nabi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247227 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-06 02:13 EST ------- So actually it should be the nabi config file listed there not the directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 07:22:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 03:22:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250903] Review Request: python-exif - Python module to extract EXIF information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708060722.l767MJin016626@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-exif - Python module to extract EXIF information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250903 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2007-08-06 03:22 EST ------- New version ready: - Fix typo in url - Add python-devel to buildreq - Add license to setup.py - Strip code from %%doc file - Fix typo in sitelib macro SPEC: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/python-exif/python-exif.spec SRPM: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/python-exif/python-exif-1.0.2-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 07:57:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 03:57:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247227] Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708060757.l767va8Y019665@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method Alias: nabi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247227 ------- Additional Comments From sbehera at redhat.com 2007-08-06 03:57 EST ------- Upgraded with required fixes. Spec URL: http://oriya.sourceforge.net/0.18-3/nabi.spec SRPM URL: http://oriya.sourceforge.net/0.18-3/nabi-0.18-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 08:25:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 04:25:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250598] Review Request: dnscap - DNS traffic capture utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708060825.l768PmCl023182@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnscap - DNS traffic capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250598 ------- Additional Comments From atkac at redhat.com 2007-08-06 04:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > According to the new license guidelines the License: field here should probibly > be "ISC". See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing You're right, fixed. > Can you provide a full Source0 URL? I don't see the rc5 version upstream, it > looks like it's all cvs snapshots. If it's a cvs snapshot, why are you calling > it rc5? I believe that I somewhere saw that version is rc5. But I can't find now where exactly :) - release changed to 0.2.20070516cvs > In addition looks like you don't need the Requires: libpcap. rpmlint says: > E: dnscap explicit-lib-dependency libpcap (as mentioned above). > Which version of rpmlint are you using? My is rpmlint-0.80-2.fc8 and says nothing :) Updated package is http://people.redhat.com/atkac/bind/dnscap-1.0-0.2.20070516cvs.fc8.src.rpm Adam -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 08:25:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 04:25:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225761] Merge Review: fonts-chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708060825.l768PpYv023218@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225761 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-06 04:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > umask's in %post and %postun can go too. Well maybe not - they also appear in other packages actually. So need some consensus on that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 08:48:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 04:48:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250969] New: Review Request: ocaml-curses - OCaml bindings for ncurses Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250969 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-curses - OCaml bindings for ncurses Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-curses.spec SRPM URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-curses-0.1-2.20020319.fc8.src.rpm Description: OCaml bindings for ncurses. The upstream project is http://www.nongnu.org/ocaml-tmk/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 09:02:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 05:02:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250970] New: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250970 Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: axel.thimm at atrpms.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/ivtv-firmware-fedora.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/ivtv-firmware-20070217-13.src.rpm Description: This package contains the firmware for WinTV PVR 250/350/150/500 cards. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 09:02:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 05:02:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250971] New: Review Request: ivtv - An iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driver Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250971 Summary: Review Request: ivtv - An iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driver Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: axel.thimm at atrpms.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/ivtv-fedora.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/ivtv-1.0.1-1.src.rpm Description: The primary goal of the IvyTV Project is to create a kernel driver for the iTVC15 familiy of MPEG codecs. The iTVC15 family includes the iTVC15 (CX24315) and iTVC16 (CX24316). These chips are commonly found on Hauppauge's WinTV PVR-250 and PVR-350 TV capture cards. This package contans the userland tools required. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 09:38:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 05:38:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708060938.l769c1qt030876@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2007-08-06 05:37 EST ------- Claudio, could you please open a separate bug for this (comment #68), and use http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi/99-port-to-vtk5.patch?bug=385519;msg=5;att=1 in the interim? Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 11:05:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 07:05:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241487] Review Request: cduce - An XML-oriented functional language (ocaml) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061105.l76B5N9Y005012@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cduce - An XML-oriented functional language (ocaml) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241487 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: cduce - An |Review Request: cduce - An |XML-oriented functional |XML-oriented functional |language. |language (ocaml) ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-08-06 07:05 EST ------- Add magic word ocaml to summary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 11:16:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 07:16:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229591] Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061116.l76BGw7o005682@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229591 ------- Additional Comments From dtimms at iinet.net.au 2007-08-06 07:16 EST ------- One concern as I look through this in detail: is the included clipart patent / copyright free. That is: is it developed by the lshw project, or used with an appropriate open license for fedora - the ones I noticed were AMD, Apple, bluetooth, PowerPC, USB. I am not a licensing person, so I think we need to find the history of these images, and determine if they are consider restricted content within the Fedora {US based} world. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 12:29:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 08:29:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229591] Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061229.l76CTLN7010558@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229591 ------- Additional Comments From lyonel at ezix.org 2007-08-06 08:29 EST ------- All the cliparts except the Intel logo were created from scratch using Inkscape and are released under GPLv2 (cf. the tags in SVG files). The Intel logo was converted from the official Intel EPS. hope that helps... (In reply to comment #45) > One concern as I look through this in detail: is the included clipart patent / > copyright free. That is: is it developed by the lshw project, or used with an > appropriate open license for fedora - the ones I noticed were AMD, Apple, > bluetooth, PowerPC, USB. > I am not a licensing person, so I think we need to find the history of these > images, and determine if they are consider restricted content within the Fedora > {US based} world. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 12:33:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 08:33:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243254] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-zlib - Cross Compiled zlib Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061233.l76CXJSo010790@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-zlib - Cross Compiled zlib Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243254 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-08-06 08:33 EST ------- This one tries to call ldconfig during the build process: > cd /var/tmp/arm-gp2x-linux-zlib-1.2.3-5.fc7-root/usr/arm-gp2x-linux/lib; if test -f libz.so.1.2.3; then \ > rm -f libz.so libz.so.1; \ > ln -s libz.so.1.2.3 libz.so; \ > ln -s libz.so.1.2.3 libz.so.1; \ > (ldconfig || true) >/dev/null 2>&1; \ > fi which is a big no-no (package builds aren't supposed to touch the running system), even more so for a cross-compiling package. ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 12:38:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 08:38:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239428] Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061238.l76Ccdnw011073@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239428 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-08-06 08:38 EST ------- Are you planning on making it available in EPEL? - Gilboa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 12:40:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 08:40:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243254] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-zlib - Cross Compiled zlib Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061240.l76CeYMP011203@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-zlib - Cross Compiled zlib Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243254 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-08-06 08:40 EST ------- The native package: http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/rpms/zlib/devel/ has a patch to use autotools and libtool instead of the custom configure script, which should also fix this nonsense as a side effect, along with the 3 other makefile patches in the native package (which are now commented out) and also the need to run configure twice to get both shared and static libraries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 13:16:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 09:16:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243254] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-zlib - Cross Compiled zlib Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061316.l76DGh4U014771@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-zlib - Cross Compiled zlib Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243254 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-06 09:16 EST ------- Good idea, here is a new version using the native zlib autotool patch: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/arm-gp2x-linux-zlib.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/arm-gp2x-linux-zlib-1.2.3-6.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 13:50:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 09:50:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248231] Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061350.l76Do1sq018346@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248231 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-06 09:49 EST ------- Please close this bug as NEXTRELEASE when rebuild is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 14:26:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 10:26:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249996] Review Request: perl-File-chmod - perl module implementing symbolic and ls chmod modes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061426.l76EQpKO022671@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-chmod - perl module implementing symbolic and ls chmod modes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249996 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-08-06 10:26 EST ------- Whom do I need to bribe to have this package released? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 14:27:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 10:27:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248363] Review Request: mpfr - A C library for multiple-precision floating-point computations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061427.l76ERfqb022843@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpfr - A C library for multiple-precision floating-point computations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248363 varekova at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-08-06 10:27 EST ------- mpfr-2.2.1-1 package is just built. If there is any problem please create a separate bug for this component. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 14:45:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 10:45:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248231] Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061445.l76EjomP025133@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248231 james.antill at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 14:45:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 10:45:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225809] Merge Review: gmp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061445.l76Ejrs3025201@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gmp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225809 Bug 225809 depends on bug 218041, which changed state. Bug 218041 Summary: Please compile libmpfr with --enable-shared https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218041 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 14:46:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 10:46:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243147] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-SDL - Cross Compiled SDL Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061446.l76EkXUe025379@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-SDL - Cross Compiled SDL Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243147 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-08-06 10:46 EST ------- Currently going through the review checklist. Any particular reason you aren't using %{?_smp_mflags}? The native SDL package is built with it (and has been even back when it was at 1.2.9). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 14:50:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 10:50:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249892] Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061450.l76Eol0F026168@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249892 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-06 10:50 EST ------- Now I can see that the manual files are numbered, so please update your spec/srpm as such. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 14:52:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 10:52:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249996] Review Request: perl-File-chmod - perl module implementing symbolic and ls chmod modes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061452.l76EqCab026374@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-chmod - perl module implementing symbolic and ls chmod modes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249996 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jkeating at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2007-08-06 10:52 EST ------- Ralf, you'd need to click "Push to testing" or "Push to stable" in your bodhi update page: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pending/F7/perl-File-chmod-0.32-1.fc7 I'll do it for you to -testing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 14:52:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 10:52:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243147] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-SDL - Cross Compiled SDL Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061452.l76EqME2026422@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-SDL - Cross Compiled SDL Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243147 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-06 10:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Currently going through the review checklist. Any particular reason you aren't > using %{?_smp_mflags}? The native SDL package is built with it (and has been > even back when it was at 1.2.9). No reason, probably a cut and paste error. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 15:03:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 11:03:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225809] Merge Review: gmp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061503.l76F3rPE028049@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gmp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225809 Bug 225809 depends on bug 211762, which changed state. Bug 211762 Summary: Please upgrade gmp if possible and at least mpfr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211762 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 15:08:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 11:08:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250538] Review Request: pidgin-otr - OTR messaging for pidgin (was gaim-otr) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061508.l76F8EZ8028692@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-otr - OTR messaging for pidgin (was gaim-otr) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250538 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xelerance.com 2007-08-06 11:08 EST ------- Thanks for the review! I have fixed the license, the unversioned obsolete, and the buildrequires How did you build pidgin-otr in mock, with libotr not being available? Or did you run mock on a "devel" system? I don't have a devel system, so I couldn't run it easilly with mock, and I'm waiting for pidgin-otr to be available before bumping both libotr and pidgin-otr into f7 and fc6. Spec URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/pidgin-otr/pidgin-otr.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/pidgin-otr/pidgin-otr-3.1.0-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 15:09:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 11:09:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249996] Review Request: perl-File-chmod - perl module implementing symbolic and ls chmod modes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061509.l76F9heI028833@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-chmod - perl module implementing symbolic and ls chmod modes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249996 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-08-06 11:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Ralf, you'd need to click "Push to testing" or "Push to stable" in your bodhi > update page: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pending/F7/perl-File-chmod-0.32-1.fc7 I can't find any such buttons on this page nor can I find any online help nor online documentation on this bureaucratic act you want me to execute available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 15:11:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 11:11:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243147] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-SDL - Cross Compiled SDL Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061511.l76FBGRP029254@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-SDL - Cross Compiled SDL Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243147 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-08-06 11:11 EST ------- MUST Items: + rpmlint output: + SRPM: W: arm-gp2x-linux-SDL invalid-license LGPLv2+ This is the F7 rpmlint being out of date. :-) E: arm-gp2x-linux-SDL configure-without-libdir-spec This one's OK for a cross library. (There's no 64-bit GP2X ;-).) + noarch RPM: W: arm-gp2x-linux-SDL devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/arm-gp2x-linux/include/SDL/SDL_cpuinfo.h (and more like this). OK because this is a cross-development package, and these are all target development files. It would make no sense to make a separate devel vs. runtime part because we aren't going to run ARM GP2X binaries on i386/x86_64/ppc/... Fedora anyway. E: arm-gp2x-linux-SDL library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/arm-gp2x-linux/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0.7.2 E: arm-gp2x-linux-SDL library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/arm-gp2x-linux/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0.7.2 OK, as these are target libraries which aren't even in the ldconfig search path. The required symlinks are already there anyway. W: arm-gp2x-linux-SDL invalid-license LGPLv2+ Again, the F7 rpmlint being out of date. E: arm-gp2x-linux-SDL arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/arm-gp2x-linux/lib/libSDLmain.a E: arm-gp2x-linux-SDL arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/arm-gp2x-linux/lib/libSDL.a E: arm-gp2x-linux-SDL arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/arm-gp2x-linux/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0.7.2 Again, this is OK because those are target files. W: arm-gp2x-linux-SDL non-standard-dir-in-usr arm-gp2x-linux This one's OK too for a cross-library package. + named and versioned according to the Package Naming Guidelines + spec file name matches base package name + Packaging Guidelines: + License LGPLv2+ OK, matches actual license + No known patent problems + No emulator, no firmware, no binary-only or prebuilt components + Complies with the FHS (with the cross-toolchain exception for %{_prefix}/%{target}) + proper changelog, tags, BuildRoot, Requires, BuildRequires, Summary, Description + no non-UTF-8 characters + relevant documentation is included + It would make no sense to use RPM_OPT_FLAGS here because this is a target package, which is built using a cross GCC which won't understand stuff like -fstack-protector, and for which x86 -march and -mtune switches definitely don't make sense. Thus the omission of RPM_OPT_FLAGS is correct. + no -debuginfo package because this is noarch + no host static libraries nor .la files (I think we can give the target static libraries a pass. This isn't a Fedora target, so trying to apply our static library policies to the target wouldn't make much sense.) + no duplicated system libraries + no rpaths (no host executables or libraries at all, I also ran readelf -d on the target shared library to make sure and there's no rpath there either) + no configuration files, so %config guideline doesn't apply + no init scripts, so init script guideline doesn't apply + no GUI programs, so no .desktop file present or needed + no timestamp-clobbering file commands ! _smp_mflags not used + scriptlets are valid + not a web application, so web application guideline doesn't apply + no conflicts + complies with all the legal guidelines + COPYING (yes, it's the LGPL, even if it's not named COPYING.LIB) included as %doc + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + source matches upstream: MD5SUM: 80919ef556425ff82a8555ff40a579a0 SHA1SUM: 8140de00e73ccdbdee196fa8fd9952ddb3cc75f1 (This one looks like a pretty pointless exercise given the 380 KB patch applied to it, but... ;-) ) + builds on at least one arch (F7 i386 live system) + no known non-working arches, so no ExcludeArch needed + no missing BR + no translations, so translation/locale guidelines don't apply + no host shared libraries, so no ldconfig calls needed + package not relocatable + ownership correct (owns package-specific directories, doesn't own directories owned by another package) + no duplicate files in %files + permissions set properly (%defattr present) + %clean section present and correct + macros used where possible (%configure not used for several reasons, including it playing jokes with --target and using host-specific RPM_OPT_FLAGS) + no non-code content + no large documentation files, so no -doc package needed + %doc files not required at runtime + no host headers, target headers are OK in this cross-development package + no host static libraries, so no -static package needed + no .pc files, so no Requires: pkgconfig needed + no host shared libraries, so .so symlink guidelines don't apply + no -devel package, so the guideline to require the main package in it doesn't apply + no .la files + no GUI programs, so no .desktop file needed + buildroot is deleted at the beginning of %install (same nitpick about mkdir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT as for arm-gp2x-linux-binutils) + all filenames are valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: + license already included upstream + no translations for description and summary provided by upstream * Skipping mock test. * Skipping the "all architectures" test, I only have i386. + package functions as described: The following test program: #include #include int main(void) { if (SDL_Init(SDL_INIT_AUDIO|SDL_INIT_VIDEO) < 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Unable to init SDL: %s\n", SDL_GetError()); return 1; } atexit(SDL_Quit); return 0; } compiles and links fine using: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc -Wall -Wextra -Os gp2x-sdl-test.c `arm-gp2x-linux-sdl-config --cflags --libs` -o gp2x-sdl-test + scriptlets are sane + no subpackages other than -devel, so "Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency." is irrelevant + no .pc files, so "placement of .pc files" is irrelevant + no file dependencies MUST FIX: * please use _smp_mflags as there's no good reason not to -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 15:18:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 11:18:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249996] Review Request: perl-File-chmod - perl module implementing symbolic and ls chmod modes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061518.l76FIm5Q030769@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-chmod - perl module implementing symbolic and ls chmod modes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249996 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2007-08-06 11:18 EST ------- You don't see the links because I already did it for you as I stated in my entry. The documentation on how to use it is at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/UpdatingPackageHowTo along with all the other documentation we're trying to gather for Package Maintainers. Hopefully Luke is done with his move and can process some of the feature requests, like having a help link that leads you to this documentation from within bodhi itself. And is it really "bureaucratic" for you to choose whether you want this update item you created to be pushed to testing or stable? Come on Ralf, lighten up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 15:20:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 11:20:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251019] New: Review Request: lshw - Hardware lister Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251019 Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware lister Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: terjeros at phys.ntnu.no QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com SPEC: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/lshw/lshw.spec SRPM: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/lshw/lshw-B.02.11.01-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: lshw is a small tool to provide detailed informaton on the hardware configuration of the machine. It can report exact memory configuration, firmware version, mainboard configuration, CPU version and speed, cache configuration, bus speed, etc. on DMI-capable x86 systems and on some PowerPC machines (PowerMac G4 is known to work). Add GUI frontend is also included in a subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 15:20:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 11:20:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229591] Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061520.l76FKm6b031128@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229591 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2007-08-06 11:20 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 251019 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 15:20:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 11:20:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251019] Review Request: lshw - Hardware lister In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061520.l76FKpve031161@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware lister https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251019 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |patrick.pichon at laposte.net ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2007-08-06 11:20 EST ------- *** Bug 229591 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 15:24:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 11:24:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229591] Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061524.l76FOHoO031551@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229591 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2007-08-06 11:24 EST ------- Closing as dup to change reporter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 15:27:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 11:27:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251020] New: Review Request: libflaim - Flaim Database Engine Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251020 Summary: Review Request: libflaim - Flaim Database Engine Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: snecklifter at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://snecker.fedorapeople.org/libflaim/libflaim.spec SRPM URL: http://snecker.fedorapeople.org/libflaim/libflaim-4.9.1046-9.1.fc7.src.rpm Description: FLAIM is an embeddable cross-platform database engine that provides a rich, powerful, easy-to-use feature set. It is the database engine used by Novell eDirectory. It has proven to be highly scalable, reliable, and robust. It is available on a wide variety of 32 bit and 64 bit platforms. Notes: This is the first of a number of packages in order to provide iFolder[1] for Fedora. I am already in ACL and familiar with Koji, plague etc. Builds cleanly in mock. [1] http://www.ifolder.com/index.php/Main_Page -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 15:30:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 11:30:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249996] Review Request: perl-File-chmod - perl module implementing symbolic and ls chmod modes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061530.l76FUIsM032334@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-chmod - perl module implementing symbolic and ls chmod modes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249996 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-08-06 11:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > And is it really "bureaucratic" for you to choose whether you want this update > item you created to be pushed to testing or stable? Yes, it is. Anything beyond a "make release" or similar as part of the CVS tree is bureaucratic and insane. > Come on Ralf, lighten up. Stop killing Fedora by implementing more and more bureaucratic hurdles and forcing us to use unusable web-applications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 15:45:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 11:45:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243254] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-zlib - Cross Compiled zlib Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061545.l76FjDDf001954@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-zlib - Cross Compiled zlib Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243254 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-08-06 11:45 EST ------- MUST Items: + rpmlint output: + SRPM: W: arm-gp2x-linux-zlib invalid-license zlib This is the F7 rpmlint being out of date. :-) E: arm-gp2x-linux-zlib configure-without-libdir-spec This one's OK for a cross library. (There's no 64-bit GP2X ;-).) + noarch RPM: W: arm-gp2x-linux-zlib devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/arm-gp2x-linux/lib/libz.so W: arm-gp2x-linux-zlib devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/arm-gp2x-linux/lib/libz.a W: arm-gp2x-linux-zlib devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/arm-gp2x-linux/include/zconf.h W: arm-gp2x-linux-zlib devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/arm-gp2x-linux/include/zlib.h OK because this is a cross-development package, and these are all target development files. It would make no sense to make a separate devel vs. runtime part because we aren't going to run ARM GP2X binaries on i386/x86_64/ppc/... Fedora anyway. E: arm-gp2x-linux-zlib library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/arm-gp2x-linux/lib/libz.so.1.2.3 E: arm-gp2x-linux-zlib library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/arm-gp2x-linux/lib/libz.so.1.2.3 OK, as this a target library (twice the same...) which isn't even in the ldconfig search path. The required symlinks are already there anyway. W: arm-gp2x-linux-zlib invalid-license zlib Again, the F7 rpmlint being out of date. E: arm-gp2x-linux-zlib arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/arm-gp2x-linux/lib/libz.a E: arm-gp2x-linux-zlib arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/arm-gp2x-linux/lib/libz.so.1.2.3 Again, this is OK because those are target files. W: arm-gp2x-linux-zlib non-standard-dir-in-usr arm-gp2x-linux This one's OK too for a cross-library package. + named and versioned according to the Package Naming Guidelines + spec file name matches base package name + Packaging Guidelines: + License zlib OK, matches actual license + No known patent problems + No emulator, no firmware, no binary-only or prebuilt components + Complies with the FHS (with the cross-toolchain exception for %{_prefix}/%{target}) + proper changelog, tags, BuildRoot, Requires, BuildRequires, Summary, Description + no non-UTF-8 characters + relevant documentation is included + It would make no sense to use RPM_OPT_FLAGS here because this is a target package, which is built using a cross GCC which won't understand stuff like -fstack-protector, and for which x86 -march and -mtune switches definitely don't make sense. Thus the omission of RPM_OPT_FLAGS is correct. + no -debuginfo package because this is noarch + no host static libraries nor .la files (I think we can give the target static library a pass. This isn't a Fedora target, so trying to apply our static library policies to the target wouldn't make much sense.) + no duplicated system libraries + no rpaths (no host executables or libraries at all, I also ran readelf -d on the target shared library to make sure and there's no rpath there either) + no configuration files, so %config guideline doesn't apply + no init scripts, so init script guideline doesn't apply + no GUI programs, so no .desktop file present or needed + no timestamp-clobbering file commands + _smp_mflags used + scriptlets are valid + not a web application, so web application guideline doesn't apply + no conflicts + complies with all the legal guidelines + license contained in README which is included as %doc + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + source matches upstream: MD5SUM: dee233bf288ee795ac96a98cc2e369b6 SHA1SUM: 967e280f284d02284b0cd8872a8e2e04bfdc7283 The patch also matches the one in the native package. + builds on at least one arch (F7 i386 live system) + no known non-working arches, so no ExcludeArch needed + no missing BR + no translations, so translation/locale guidelines don't apply + no host shared libraries, so no ldconfig calls needed + package not relocatable + ownership correct (owns package-specific directories, doesn't own directories owned by another package) + no duplicate files in %files + permissions set properly (%defattr present) + %clean section present and correct + macros used where possible (%configure not used for several reasons, including it playing jokes with --target and using host-specific RPM_OPT_FLAGS) + no non-code content + no large documentation files, so no -doc package needed + %doc files not required at runtime + no host headers, target headers are OK in this cross-development package + no host static libraries, so no -static package needed + no .pc files, so no Requires: pkgconfig needed + no host shared libraries, so .so symlink guidelines don't apply + no -devel package, so the guideline to require the main package in it doesn't apply + no .la files + no GUI programs, so no .desktop file needed + buildroot is deleted at the beginning of %install (same nitpick about mkdir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT as for arm-gp2x-linux-binutils) + all filenames are valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: + license already included upstream (in README) + no translations for description and summary provided by upstream * Skipping mock test. * Skipping the "all architectures" test, I only have i386. + package functions as described: All the examples from the zlib source code compile and link (except gzlog.c which doesn't include a main function, just utility functions). + scriptlets are sane + no subpackages other than -devel, so "Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency." is irrelevant + no .pc files, so "placement of .pc files" is irrelevant + no file dependencies APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 16:02:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 12:02:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199310] Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061602.l76G2XDT010135@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199310 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-08-06 12:02 EST ------- Renamed module. Please test it to be sure it was done properly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 16:04:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 12:04:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061604.l76G4Njk010347@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 16:05:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 12:05:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249034] Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061605.l76G5OIa010438@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249034 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 16:06:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 12:06:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250598] Review Request: dnscap - DNS traffic capture utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061606.l76G6W7U010622@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnscap - DNS traffic capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250598 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 16:24:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 12:24:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241550] Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061624.l76GOb9I013348@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241550 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-06 12:24 EST ------- I will close this bug as NOTABUG if no response from the reporter is received within ONE WEEK, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 16:37:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 12:37:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239428] Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061637.l76Gbf4K014778@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239428 ------- Additional Comments From afb at users.sourceforge.net 2007-08-06 12:37 EST ------- (In reply to comment #38) > There is 1.3.0 release: > > >1.3.0 - 2006.07.14 > > * Added PAM support by Martin Parm > > So the slim is ready for the stable fedora releases? I'll try to roll a 1.3.0 version as soon as I get back in track after summer -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 16:39:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 12:39:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239428] Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061639.l76Gdaur015201@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239428 ------- Additional Comments From afb at users.sourceforge.net 2007-08-06 12:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #40) > slim-update_slim_wmlist requires perl-File-DesktopEntry That's OK, cause it already has perl(File::DesktopEntry) ? So I don't see any need to add the package explicitly. (BTW it is being used to parse the available wm list) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 17:05:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 13:05:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250598] Review Request: dnscap - DNS traffic capture utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061705.l76H5UsS020806@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnscap - DNS traffic capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250598 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-06 13:05 EST ------- In reply to comment #7: Thanks for fixing those things. My rpmlint is also 0.80-2, so not sure why yours wouldn't be giving that error as well. :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 17:13:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 13:13:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199310] Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061713.l76HDi6x021641@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199310 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wtogami at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-06 13:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > Renamed module. Please test it to be sure it was done properly. Warren, Thanks, looks good. But could you rename the .spec, .desktop and .png files too, otherwise their history still gets lost. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 17:15:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 13:15:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199310] Review Request: stormbaancoureur - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061715.l76HF3IO021860@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stormbaancoureur - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199310 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated |stormbaancoureur - Simulated |obstacle course for |obstacle course for |automobiles |automobiles -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 17:23:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 13:23:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250538] Review Request: pidgin-otr - OTR messaging for pidgin (was gaim-otr) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061723.l76HN05i022995@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-otr - OTR messaging for pidgin (was gaim-otr) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250538 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xelerance.com 2007-08-06 13:22 EST ------- ok, confirmed it with a koji scratch build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 17:33:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 13:33:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226275] Merge Review: perl-PDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061733.l76HXERq024087@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-PDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226275 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-08-06 13:33 EST ------- ok, applied your patches, added the additional files to %docs, fixed the 'unescaped % in %changelog' warning, and a non-UTF-8 PDL::Complex.3pm. However, rpmlint is still complaining about: W: perl-PDL unversioned-explicit-provides perl(PDL::Config) etc... And company. Wouldn't it be better to version these with the same version as perl-PDL? also rpmlint complains about: W: perl-PDL devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/PDL/Core/pdlsimple.h etc... We could probably move these to a perl-PDL-devel package, if they aren't needed at runtime. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 17:35:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 13:35:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249992] Review Request: glglobe - OpenGl Globe - Earth simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061735.l76HZWB9024349@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glglobe - OpenGl Globe - Earth simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249992 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-06 13:35 EST ------- Well, for 0.2-3: * Source1-4 - How did these created? If you downloaded from some URLs, please write the full URLs like Source1. Otherwise please write comments how you created these files. * Desktop file - Categories "X-Red-Hat-Extra X-Red-Hat-Base" are both deprecated and should be removed. * Requires for scriptlets -------------------------------------------------- Requires(post): desktop-file-utils Requires(postun): desktop-file-utils -------------------------------------------------- - are not needed (actually no scriptlets require desktop-file-utils ). * Documents -------------------------------------------------- %install .... mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_docdir}/glglobe install -p -m 0644 ChangeLog COPYING README TODO %{buildroot}%{_docdir}/glglobe .... %files %doc %{_datadir}/doc/* -------------------------------------------------- - Usually documents must be version specific. Just use: -------------------------------------------------- %doc ChangeLog COPYING README TODO -------------------------------------------------- (and check what actually happens). * desktop-file-utils usage -------------------------------------------------- install -p -m 0644 %{SOURCE4} %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications desktop-file-install --vendor fedora --delete-original \ --dir %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications \ --add-category X-Red-Hat-Base \ %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/glglobe.desktop ---------------------------------------------------- - This can be replaced by ---------------------------------------------------- desktop-file-install --vendor fedora \ --dir %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications \ %{SOURCE4} ---------------------------------------------------- (and remove deprecated categories) * Directory ownership - The directory %{_datadir}/glglobe/ is not owned by any packages - The directories -------------------------------------------------- %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/* %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/*/apps -------------------------------------------------- are already owned by hicolor-icon-theme and this package must not own these. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 17:39:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 13:39:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248778] Review Request: gtkperf - Test GTK+ performance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061739.l76HdPoa024710@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkperf - Test GTK+ performance https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248778 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(patrice.bouchand.f | |edora at gmail.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-06 13:39 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 17:47:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 13:47:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249992] Review Request: glglobe - OpenGl Globe - Earth simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061747.l76HllA1025876@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glglobe - OpenGl Globe - Earth simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249992 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-06 13:47 EST ------- One more issue * License - License tag policy is changed and now you (we) must follow: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing As far as I checked the source code, this is licensed under GPL version 2 only. So please use "GPLv2" as license tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 17:53:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 13:53:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243147] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-SDL - Cross Compiled SDL Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061753.l76HrTfE026577@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-SDL - Cross Compiled SDL Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243147 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-06 13:53 EST ------- Many thanks for the review! (In reply to comment #7) > MUST FIX: > * please use _smp_mflags as there's no good reason not to Fixed, new version here: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/arm-gp2x-linux-SDL.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/arm-gp2x-linux-SDL-1.2.9-4.fc8.src.rpm p.s. I don't want to discourage you / abuse your kindness, but SDL and zlib are just the top of the mountain, to be able to provide a full SDK on which most gp2x software can be found, the following are needed to: tremor (integer vorbis decoder) libogg SDL_mixer libpng libjpg libtiff SDL_image And I might be forgetting some. I haven't submitted these yet as I still need to clean them up, and I first wanted to get some more experience, but I will be slowly submitting them in the near future, now that the base is there. Once I've submitted a few I'll drop you a note, if you don't feel like reviewing these too thats 100% understandable, no hard feelings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 17:54:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 13:54:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243254] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-zlib - Cross Compiled zlib Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061754.l76Hsnw7026792@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-zlib - Cross Compiled zlib Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243254 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-06 13:54 EST ------- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: arm-gp2x-linux-zlib Short Description: Cross Compiled zlib Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux Owners: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Branches: FC-6 F-7 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 17:55:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 13:55:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249590] Review Request: and - Auto nice daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061755.l76HtZlU026944@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: and - Auto nice daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249590 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-08-06 13:55 EST ------- and-1.2.2-3.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 17:55:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 13:55:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249590] Review Request: and - Auto nice daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061755.l76Htc5K026983@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: and - Auto nice daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249590 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |1.2.2-3.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 17:56:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 13:56:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061756.l76HuTVC027185@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-06 13:56 EST ------- I'm now closing this bug as WONTFIX! If anyone happened to know an opensource LVS checker which can be used with other opensource tools such as magic and xcircuit, please, let me know: chitlesh [AT] fedoraproject DOT org http://clunixchit.blogspot.com/2007/08/loss-there-is-no-opensource-lvs-netlist.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 17:58:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 13:58:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061758.l76HwfBG028142@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-08-06 13:58 EST ------- vtk-5.0.3-18.2.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 17:58:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 13:58:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061758.l76Hwokm028224@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |5.0.3-18.2.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 18:00:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 14:00:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243147] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-SDL - Cross Compiled SDL Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061800.l76I0onD028790@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-SDL - Cross Compiled SDL Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243147 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-08-06 14:00 EST ------- Verified fixed. => APPROVED For the other libraries needed for a complete SDK: We'll see about these once you submit them. We can still hope that the presence of the base packages (especially the really hard ones like GCC) will motivate more people to help out. :-) Otherwise, I will, it would be sad to see half a SDK in and the other half stuck in the review queue forever. It's too bad there aren't more people interested in cross-toolchains. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 18:21:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 14:21:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249892] Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061821.l76ILRvU030616@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249892 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-08-06 14:21 EST ------- What should the version-release values be? Although the files are numbered, it still says; "Last revision August 4th 2007, up to date, new compatible with Bouml releases since 2.30 "? I think I should also put in: Requires: bouml >= 2.30 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 18:24:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 14:24:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229321] Review Request :postgresql-pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061824.l76IOgTq030992@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request :postgresql-pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229321 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-08-06 14:24 EST ------- /etc/sysconfig/pgpool is 755, shouldn't it be 644? Otherwise, looks great. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 18:27:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 14:27:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229321] Review Request :postgresql-pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061827.l76IR8Ix031190@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request :postgresql-pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229321 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-08-06 14:27 EST ------- Although I don't see it in the system services menu in the text mode config tools. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 19:24:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 15:24:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240693] Review Request: Perlbal - Reverse-proxy load balancer and webserver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061924.l76JOGJr006654@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Perlbal - Reverse-proxy load balancer and webserver Alias: Perlbal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240693 ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 19:38:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 15:38:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243147] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-SDL - Cross Compiled SDL Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708061938.l76JcZ0u008690@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-SDL - Cross Compiled SDL Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243147 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-06 15:38 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: arm-gp2x-linux-SDL Short Description: Cross Compiled SDL Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux Owners: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Branches: FC-6 F-7 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 20:23:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 16:23:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222248] Review Request: alsa-plugins - backend plugins for alsa sound system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708062023.l76KN6NW014351@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-plugins - backend plugins for alsa sound system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222248 ------- Additional Comments From lpoetter at redhat.com 2007-08-06 16:23 EST ------- Hmm, why this -maemo package? Has anyone ported Fedora to the N800 now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 20:33:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 16:33:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222248] Review Request: alsa-plugins - backend plugins for alsa sound system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708062033.l76KXAp1015264@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-plugins - backend plugins for alsa sound system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222248 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|stransky at redhat.com |mclasen at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-08-06 16:33 EST ------- Ok, I'm going to take this review over, since nobody else seems to be serious about this. We really want alsa-plugins-pulseaudio in F8... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 20:35:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 16:35:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222248] Review Request: alsa-plugins - backend plugins for alsa sound system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708062035.l76KZM0J015390@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-plugins - backend plugins for alsa sound system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222248 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|POST |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 20:36:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 16:36:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239933] Review Request: perl-Danga-Socket - Event loop and event-driven async socket base class In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708062036.l76KaM2A015472@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Danga-Socket - Event loop and event-driven async socket base class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239933 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2007-08-06 16:36 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Danga-Socket New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 20:42:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 16:42:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202334] Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708062042.l76KgdhW015787@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202334 ------- Additional Comments From bkonrath at redhat.com 2007-08-06 16:42 EST ------- Updated RPM to fix the problems in comment #9 and add the manifest needed for Eclipse 3.3. http://www.bagu.org/eclipse/jetty5.spec http://www.bagu.org/eclipse/jetty5-5.1.12-1jpp.1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 21:06:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 17:06:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239428] Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708062106.l76L6THI018361@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239428 ------- Additional Comments From afb at users.sourceforge.net 2007-08-06 17:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #37) > Question: Did you start the update process in bodthi? I have now... (after doing my homework on CVS/Koji/Bodhi) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 21:09:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 17:09:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240571] Review Request: ocaml-calendar - Objective CAML library for managing dates and times In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708062109.l76L99ec018931@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-calendar - Objective CAML library for managing dates and times https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240571 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lxtnow at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-08-06 17:09 EST ------- === REQUIRED ITEMS === [ OK ] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [ OK ] Spec file name must match the base package. [ OK ] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [ OK ] Package successfully to build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [ CHECK ] Tested on: Mock i3864 [F-devel] [ OK ] Package is not relocatable. [ OK ] Buildroot is correct [ OK ] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license. [ FAILED ] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [ OK ] License type: LGPLv2 [ FAILED ] The source package includes the text of the license(s). [ OK ] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [ SKIP ] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [ OK ] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. [ OK ] The spec file handles locales properly. [ SKIP ] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [ Ok ] Package must own all directories that it creates. [ OK ] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [ OK ] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [ OK ] Permissions on files are set properly. [ OK ] Package has a %clean section. [ OK ] Package consistently uses macros. [ OK ] Package contains code, or permissable content. [ SKIP ] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [ CHECK ] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [ SKIP] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [ SKIP ] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [ SKIP ] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [ SKIP ] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [ CHECK ] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [ OK ] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [ SKIP ] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file. [ OK ] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. According to OCaml Packaging Guideline: [ OK ] OCaml modules / libs should be named ocaml-foo. [ OK ] The spec file should still build bytecode libraries and binaries. [ OK ] Should Test if the native compiler is present. [ OK ] main package should contain files matching all files which're mentioned in OCaml guideline if present. [ OK ] -devel sub-package Should contains all files which're mentioned in OCaml guidelines if present. [ CHECK ] rpmlint output: * On -devel & srpm packages: silent. * On main package: W: ocaml-calendar devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ocaml/calendar/date.cmi W: ocaml-calendar devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ocaml/calendar/printer.cmi W: ocaml-calendar devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ocaml/calendar/calendar.cmi W: ocaml-calendar devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ocaml/calendar/time_Zone.cmi W: ocaml-calendar devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ocaml/calendar/period.cmi W: ocaml-calendar devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ocaml/calendar/time.cmi E: ocaml-calendar no-binary E: ocaml-calendar only-non-binary-in-usr-lib === ISSUES === # License - Well, as we know that the license policy has been changed since few days see -devel list. https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-August/msg00108.html And your package is LGPLv2 licensed, You have to use "LGPLv2" in license field instead. # rpmlint output on main package: - According to the OCaml pacjaging guidelines, those error/warning can be ignored. # Documents: - Please add the following: LGPL COPYING calendarFAQ-2.6.txt Also doc directory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 21:19:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 17:19:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251068] New: Review Request: ocaml-libvirt - OCaml binding for libvirt Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251068 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-libvirt - OCaml binding for libvirt Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-libvirt.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-libvirt-0.3.1.2-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: OCaml binding for libvirt (http://libvirt.org) and also the virtualization utility 'virt-top'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 21:19:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 17:19:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243254] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-zlib - Cross Compiled zlib Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708062119.l76LJrHb020050@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-zlib - Cross Compiled zlib Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243254 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-08-06 17:19 EST ------- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 21:19:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 17:19:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243147] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-SDL - Cross Compiled SDL Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708062119.l76LJvHw020083@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-SDL - Cross Compiled SDL Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243147 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-08-06 17:19 EST ------- Cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 21:27:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 17:27:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251071] New: Review Request: StatelessServer - Server for Stateless Clients Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251071 Summary: Review Request: StatelessServer - Server for Stateless Clients Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: law at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/~law/StatelessServer.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/~law/StatelessServer-0.1-1.src.rpm Description: Minimal setup and configuration of a server for stateless clients. The stateless server is responsible for initial imaging, updates and configuration management of stateless clients. rpmlint issues errors due to non-standard uid/gids as several files need to be owned by the puppet uid/gid. I'm not sure how to prevent this error from rpmlint (StatelessServer does list the puppet packages as dependencies). rpmlint also complains about % in the %post section. One of the puppet configuration files updated by the %post section has a %H and %h in it which trips rpmlint. Finally, the %post actually builds another RPM and installs it into the www directory on the server via cp, this causes rpmlint to balk with a dangerous command in %post error. I'm open to any suggestions for how to resolve those errors and/or cleaning up the %post section which (IMHO) has to do far too much tweaking of existing configuration files to set up the stateless server. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 22:03:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 18:03:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229182] Review Request: texlive-texmf-errata - Errata for texlive-texmf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708062203.l76M3MNO023286@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf-errata - Errata for texlive-texmf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229182 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2007-08-06 18:03 EST ------- As I mentioned before, I think the texlive-errata scheme smells quite bad and is a new paradigm for fedora packaging. This SHOULD be discussed by FESCO and the packaging committee before being accepted IMO. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 23:07:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 19:07:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251019] Review Request: lshw - Hardware lister In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708062307.l76N7Y1Z027554@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware lister https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251019 dtimms at iinet.net.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dtimms at iinet.net.au, | |lyonel at ezix.org ------- Additional Comments From dtimms at iinet.net.au 2007-08-06 19:07 EST ------- Note: The bug "duplicate"d tracks the original submitters requests of upstream to make fedora specific changes to the upstream spec. Terje has since picked up this package, and the initial discussions and changes to the package are documented in the duplicated bug. --- Re: SPEC: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/lshw/lshw.spec There is something a bit weird about the versions: the upstream Changelog log is calling this B.02.12, while the src and this spec, web site call it B.02.11.01. That's probably just an oversight. --- From: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageReviewProcess#head-f3a689ab03b01268036d0533d25e2fcfba3f38ea "If the package is legally risky for whatever reason (known patent or copyright infringement, trademark concerns) close the bug WONTFIX and leave an appropriate comment (i.e. we don't ship mp3, so stop submitting it). Set the fedora-review flag to -, and have the review ticket block FE-Legal." For an external trademarked logo, I believe you would have to get specific permission to use the logo in other settings/software. I don't think it would matter whether the image is an original from the owner of the trademark or recreated by an upstream project, it would still be content that can't be included. I'll ask on f-devel-l whether such logos would be permissible content. Lionel: if we aren't able to use other entities' trademarks, can lshw-gui operate if it can't find these images ? Would you be prepared to provide alternative non-trademarked content - eg an artistic rendering like the images of Apple boxes ? --- I notice the the installed location is now /sbin. Is it the intent that gtk-lshw not be called through consolehelper, but lshw-gui is ? {I haven't experience in this area}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 23:54:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 19:54:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247268] Review Request: python-proctor - Proctor is a tool for running unit tests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708062354.l76Ns8xi029914@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-proctor - Proctor is a tool for running unit tests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247268 ------- Additional Comments From smilner at redhat.com 2007-08-06 19:54 EST ------- * Package passes rpmlint [steve at psycho Desktop]$ rpmlint /home/steve/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/python-proctor-1.2-2.fc7.noarch.rpm [steve at psycho Desktop]$ * Package passes Package Naming Guidelines * %{name} is the same as spec file * Meets the Packaging Guidelines * Licensed under BSD. NOTE: license is not in upsteam source. Please notify the owner and request it be added. * The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. * spec file is written in American English. * spec is legible * Upstream matches whats in srpm [steve at psycho Desktop]$ md5sum Proctor-1.2.tar.gz* cee63679980ea25816511bb1b8be0d7f Proctor-1.2.tar.gz cee63679980ea25816511bb1b8be0d7f Proctor-1.2.tar.gz-orig [steve at psycho Desktop]$ * Package compiles in noarch * BuildRequires looks sane. * Build doesn't have duplicate files listed * %files look sane * %clean is sane * macros used throughout spec * package is python libraries which is code * Package does not require docs to run X Unclear if gui.py should be available or if it is in progress. If it should work then a %{name}.desktop file is needed and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. Please talk with the developer. * Does not own files or directories owned by other packages * %install has rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT * Files are all valid UTF-8 X Package seems to require Pmw (http://pmw.sourceforge.net/ I believe). Without Pmw warnings are thrown on running tests and gui does not work. [steve at psycho rpmbuild]$ python /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/proctorlib/gui.py Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/proctorlib/gui.py", line 38, in import Pmw ImportError: No module named Pmw [steve at psycho rpmbuild]$ - Note: A later version has been released -- 1.3 Mon Jul 30 07:43:36 2007 (http://www.doughellmann.com/projects/Proctor/) * Package seems to work as expected with the noted exception of the missing GUI lib: [steve at psycho proctorlib]$ proctorbatch --list WARNING: Could not import icon (No module named PmwContribD) test: tests.ExampleTestCase.test00 test: tests.ExampleTestCase.test01 test: tests.ExampleTestCase.test02 test: tests.ExampleTestCase.test03Failure test: tests.ExampleTestCase.test04Error test: tests.ExampleTestCase.test05 test: tests.ExampleTestCase.test06 test: tests.ExampleTestCase.test07 test: tests.ExampleTestCase.test08Failure test: tests.ExampleTestCase.test09Error test: tests.ExampleTestCase.test10 test: tests.ExampleTestCase.test11 test: tests.ExampleTestCase.test12 .... It also is importable as expected .... [steve at psycho proctorlib]$ python Python 2.5 (r25:51908, Apr 10 2007, 10:29:13) [GCC 4.1.2 20070403 (Red Hat 4.1.2-8)] on linux2 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> import proctorlib >>> print proctorlib.__doc__ Library for Proctor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 6 23:59:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 19:59:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222248] Review Request: alsa-plugins - backend plugins for alsa sound system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708062359.l76NxahX030230@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-plugins - backend plugins for alsa sound system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222248 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-08-06 19:59 EST ------- Initial comments: - I second Lennarts comment about maemo - is it useful to package that plugin without any other part of maemo in fedora ? - OSSO DSP SW <--> ALSA DSP plugin ======================== Don't put ascii formatting into the %description, please. - BuildRequires are per source package, there is no reason to put them into the subpackage sections (of course, it doesn't hurt either) - Requires: alsa-lib is unnecessary, since library dependencies pull it in anyway - The license tag needs some work; GPL is no longer a valid value for that field, it should probably be GPLv2+. But some of the plugins appear to be LGPLv2+, so maybe it would be better to put license tags in the subpackages according to their actual licenses. In fact, all but the samplerate plugin appear to be LGPL, not GPL. - What is the touching in %prep about ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 00:24:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 20:24:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247227] Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708070024.l770OGII031314@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method Alias: nabi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247227 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-06 20:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > > Which package should own %_sysconfdir/X11/xinit/xinput.d ? > I think it should be owned by im-chooser now. BTW Tagoh already kindly fixed this in bug 250960. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 00:26:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 20:26:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225767] Merge Review: fonts-korean In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708070026.l770Qda4031553@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-korean https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225767 cchance at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2007-08-06 20:26 EST ------- Thanks a million, Parag! Built in rawhide. CLOSED RAWHIDE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 00:33:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 20:33:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251019] Review Request: lshw - Hardware lister In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708070033.l770X8O7031833@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware lister https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251019 ------- Additional Comments From lyonel at ezix.org 2007-08-06 20:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Note: The bug "duplicate"d tracks the original submitters requests of upstream > to make fedora specific changes to the upstream spec. Terje has since picked up > this package, and the initial discussions and changes to the package are > documented in the duplicated bug. > --- > Re: SPEC: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/lshw/lshw.spec > There is something a bit weird about the versions: the upstream Changelog log is > calling this B.02.12, while the src and this spec, web site call it B.02.11.01. > That's probably just an oversight. yes, my mistake. > --- > From: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageReviewProcess#head-f3a689ab03b01268036d0533d25e2fcfba3f38ea > "If the package is legally risky for whatever reason (known patent or copyright > infringement, trademark concerns) close the bug WONTFIX and leave an appropriate > comment (i.e. we don't ship mp3, so stop submitting it). Set the fedora-review > flag to -, and have the review ticket block FE-Legal." > > For an external trademarked logo, I believe you would have to get specific > permission to use the logo in other settings/software. I don't think it would > matter whether the image is an original from the owner of the trademark or > recreated by an upstream project, it would still be content that can't be included. > > I'll ask on f-devel-l whether such logos would be permissible content. > Lyonel: if we aren't able to use other entities' trademarks, can lshw-gui > operate if it can't find these images ? Would you be prepared to provide > alternative non-trademarked content - eg an artistic rendering like the images > of Apple boxes ? well... there isn't much to do with USB/SCSI/firewire logos :-) (I don't think these ones can be problematic, AMD/Intel/PowerPC might be) in any case, lshw-gui can of course operate without the logos > --- > I notice the the installed location is now /sbin. Is it the intent that gtk-lshw > not be called through consolehelper, but lshw-gui is ? {I haven't experience in > this area}. * I think there is a mixup in the installation section: make install SBINDIR=/usr/sbin doesn't do anything. * shouldn't /usr/sbin be replaced by some %{value} (in .consolehelper)? * shouldn't /usr/bin be removed from .desktop launcher? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 01:46:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 21:46:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199310] Review Request: stormbaancoureur - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708070146.l771kke5005273@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stormbaancoureur - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199310 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-08-06 21:46 EST ------- Err... I'm not quite sure how to do this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 01:50:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 21:50:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239933] Review Request: perl-Danga-Socket - Event loop and event-driven async socket base class In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708070150.l771oHRm005603@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Danga-Socket - Event loop and event-driven async socket base class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239933 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 02:07:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 22:07:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250903] Review Request: python-exif - Python module to extract EXIF information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708070207.l7727kg4006962@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-exif - Python module to extract EXIF information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250903 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-06 22:07 EST ------- Looks good. All issues I saw have been fixed. This package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this request once it's been imported and built. Also, do consider reviewing another waiting package and helping with the review backlog. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 02:29:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 22:29:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250538] Review Request: pidgin-otr - OTR messaging for pidgin (was gaim-otr) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708070229.l772Ttfe008465@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-otr - OTR messaging for pidgin (was gaim-otr) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250538 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-06 22:29 EST ------- Yes, I build in mock for devel by default. I also often build f7 and fc6. In this case I just looked at the devel output. Your Provides is still using the version of this package instead of just slightly larger than the last gaim-otr that it's replacing. Thats not a big deal in this case, but the guidelines have that rule so that if the package you are replacing ever did come back you could just add it back and it would be ok, instead of needing to be a higher version than this package. Since gaim-otr is unlikely ever to return, that can be ignored in this case. I see no further blockers, so this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this once it's been imported and built. Also, do consider doing some reviews of other waiting packages to help spread out the review load. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 02:41:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 22:41:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250040] Review Request: new - A simple template system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708070241.l772fXlZ009244@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: new - A simple template system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250040 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-06 22:41 EST ------- Rebuilding this package failed. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=91592 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 02:49:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 22:49:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250538] Review Request: pidgin-otr - OTR messaging for pidgin (was gaim-otr) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708070249.l772nxF5009993@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-otr - OTR messaging for pidgin (was gaim-otr) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250538 paul at xelerance.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From paul at xelerance.com 2007-08-06 22:49 EST ------- Actually, the latest release of gaim-otr is 3.0.1-0.6.20060712cvs So as per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-3cfc1ea19d28975faad9d56f70a6ae55661d3c3d I bumped the release one to 3.0.1-0.7.20060712cvs for the Obsoletes: Thanks for the review. I will pick up a few other reviews in return. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pidgin-otr Short Description: OTR messaging for pidgin (was gaim-otr) Owners: paul at xelerance.com Branches: F-7 (since pidgin is not in <= FC-6) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 02:52:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 22:52:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247227] Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708070252.l772qZ2G010242@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method Alias: nabi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247227 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-06 22:52 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=160792) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=160792&action=view) nabi.spec-5.patch This should hopefully address the rest of the points raised by Tasaka-san. Please check them and update package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 02:59:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 22:59:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250538] Review Request: pidgin-otr - OTR messaging for pidgin (was gaim-otr) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708070259.l772xBX4010908@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-otr - OTR messaging for pidgin (was gaim-otr) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250538 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xelerance.com 2007-08-06 22:59 EST ------- Actually there is pidgin for FC-6, so I'm asking for a branche there too. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pidgin-otr Short Description: OTR messaging for pidgin (was gaim-otr) Owners: paul at xelerance.com Branches: FC-6, F-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 03:07:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 23:07:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247513] Review Request: junit4 - java regression testing framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708070307.l7737i4g011504@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: junit4 - java regression testing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247513 vivekl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fnasser at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-08-06 23:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > New files: > > http://bagu.org/eclipse/junit4.spec > http://bagu.org/eclipse/junit4-4.3.1-1jpp.2.fc8.src.rpm > Thanks and sorry for the delay. I dont think you need to bump the release for this, but whatever :) This is probably really nit-picky but I recommend using the %define _with_gcj_support 0 up top to disable aot compilation for the moment if you want to. So you wont have to comment out ownership under the %{_libdir}/gcj etc. and once the bugs in gcj are fixed simply switching the gcj_support thing would do. Also, it seems that the version of spec-gcj-convert used to build the spec has bugs: %postun %if %{gcj_support} ... %endif while it really should be: %if %{gcj_support} %postun ... %endif This leaves empty script sections when gcj support is disabled by default - which is the case in jpackage and currently, due to the said gcj bug for Fedora as well. Adding fnasser to CC since he is going to handle the push of the package to jpackage. NEEDSWORK: See above -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 03:21:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 23:21:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235925] Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708070321.l773LVvq012515@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones Alias: dnssec-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925 paul at xelerance.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From paul at xelerance.com 2007-08-06 23:21 EST ------- OK rpmlint warnings fixed OK license updated OK includes directories it creates (/usr/include/validator) OK missing ldconfig calls added OK source url fixed OK builds in mock OK rpmlint only gives one warning which may be ignored (dnssec-tools-libs no-documentation) When trying to install, I still seem to be missing two dependancies (at least in F7): perl(Net::DNS::SEC) perl(Mail::Send) I do find perl-Net-DNS-SEC and perl-Mail-Sender in FC6, but not in F7. Did you forget to request branches and/or fire of a few build requests? Once these dependancies exist in F7, the package is approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 03:26:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 23:26:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250538] Review Request: pidgin-otr - OTR messaging for pidgin (was gaim-otr) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708070326.l773QJYO012774@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-otr - OTR messaging for pidgin (was gaim-otr) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250538 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-06 23:26 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 06:27:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 02:27:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251019] Review Request: lshw - Hardware lister In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708070627.l776RrIp023579@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware lister https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251019 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2007-08-07 02:27 EST ------- > * I think there is a mixup in the installation section: make install > SBINDIR=/usr/sbin doesn't do anything. Well, bins are installed in /usr/sbin > * shouldn't /usr/sbin be replaced by some %{value} (in .consolehelper)? As %{_sbin}/%{name}-qui ? > * shouldn't /usr/bin be removed from .desktop launcher? Why? I want to launch /usr/bin/lshw-gui, not anything else. >I notice the the installed location is now /sbin. Yes, Lyonel said lshw* had to run as root, then they belong in /usr/sbin, the consolehelper is of course in /usr/bin, see consolehelper(8) . > Is it the intent that gtk-lshw not be called through consolehelper, but > lshw-gui is ? {I haven't experienc in this area}. A choice I made, the result is that normal users will not see the gtk-lshw command, only lshw-gui. Don't a big problem? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 06:40:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 02:40:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199310] Review Request: stormbaancoureur - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708070640.l776eMEX024356@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stormbaancoureur - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199310 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-07 02:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > Err... I'm not quite sure how to do this? > I hope you knew / could as CVS-admin. Then I will just remove the old named files and add the new named ones (this is the standard rename procedure for CVS), then we atleast will have the history in the form of dead files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 06:40:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 02:40:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199310] Review Request: stormbaancoureur - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708070640.l776egcC024424@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stormbaancoureur - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199310 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 07:05:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 03:05:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251019] Review Request: lshw - Hardware lister In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708070705.l7775sq2025519@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware lister https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251019 ------- Additional Comments From lyonel at ezix.org 2007-08-07 03:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > > * I think there is a mixup in the installation section: make install > > SBINDIR=/usr/sbin doesn't do anything. > > Well, bins are installed in /usr/sbin > > > * shouldn't /usr/sbin be replaced by some %{value} (in .consolehelper)? > > As %{_sbin}/%{name}-gui ? yes, or %{_sbindir}/gtk-lshw for example > > * shouldn't /usr/bin be removed from .desktop launcher? > > Why? I want to launch /usr/bin/lshw-gui, not anything else. I noticed that (most of?) system-config*.desktop files don't honour $PATH but other applications (gimp-2.2.desktop, etc.) do. Is there a rule of thumb for this? > >I notice the the installed location is now /sbin. > > Yes, Lyonel said lshw* had to run as root, then they belong in /usr/sbin, > the consolehelper is of course in /usr/bin, see consolehelper(8) . > > > Is it the intent that gtk-lshw not be called through consolehelper, but > > lshw-gui is ? {I haven't experienc in this area}. > > A choice I made, the result is that normal users will not see the > gtk-lshw command, only lshw-gui. Don't a big problem? > > -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 07:18:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 03:18:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247227] Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708070718.l777I0i4026293@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method Alias: nabi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247227 ------- Additional Comments From sbehera at redhat.com 2007-08-07 03:17 EST ------- Package Updated. Spec URL: http://oriya.sourceforge.net/0.18-4/nabi.spec SRPM URL: http://oriya.sourceforge.net/0.18-4/nabi-0.18-4.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 08:03:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 04:03:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251110] New: Review Request: perl-IPC-RUN3 - Run a subprocess in batch mode Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251110 Summary: Review Request: perl-IPC-RUN3 - Run a subprocess in batch mode Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rc040203 at freenet.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-IPC-Run3.spec SRPM URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-IPC-Run3-0.037-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: This module allows you to run a subprocess and redirect stdin, stdout, and/or stderr to files and perl data structures. It aims to satisfy 99% of the need for using system, qx, and open3 with a simple, extremely Perlish API and none of the bloat and rarely used features of IPC::Run. This package is a prerequisite of perl-Test-Script, which is a new prerequisite of perl-Test-Inline. Without perl-IPC-RUN3, upgrading/bug-fixing perl-Test-Inline is not possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 09:47:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 05:47:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248301] Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708070947.l779leEu007592@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248301 ------- Additional Comments From patrice.bouchand.fedora at gmail.com 2007-08-07 05:47 EST ------- > * If -devel subpackage is licensed under LGPL, the corresponding > documents should be installed as a %doc of -devel subpackage > (i.e. add LICENSE.LIB to %doc of -devel subpackage). COPYING.LIB has been added to -devel subpackage. > * Add ChangeLog to %doc Done. > * Usually the dependency against main or subpackage should be > version-release specific. > i.e. main package should have: > Requires: %{name}-libs = %{version}-%{release} Main package seems to not require -libs to work. > and -devel package should have: > Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} -devel does not require main package to work, but if I remove it rpmlint complains ? > * Provides: %{name}-devel = ... on -devel subpackage is not needed This has been removed. > * Explain why -devel package *must* have > Provides: lzmadec-devel = %{version}-%{release} > (I suggest to remove this) The devel package only provides a way to decompress lzma archive, not to compress. As you suggest, I remove it. Should lzma-libs become lzmadec-libs ? ( and lzma-devel -> lzmadec-devel ) > * Please use the following to keep timestamps on header files > and man pages. > ---------------------------------------------------- > make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="%{_install} -p" > ----------------------------------------------------- Done, but I have to use __install instead of _install ? > * We now recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) Done. > * and %defattr(0644,root,root,-755) on -devel package is not needed. Done. > * You define %{src_version} and it seems that it can be > used also for source tarball name. Done. > * Files under %{_mandir} is automatically tagged as %doc %doc has been removed for %{_mandir} The new files: Spec URL: http://patrice.bouchand.free.fr/rpm/lzma.spec SRPM URL: http://patrice.bouchand.free.fr/rpm/lzma-4.32.0-0.5.beta3.fc7.src.rpm Thanks for your time. Patrice -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 10:13:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 06:13:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251128] New: Review Request: perl-Test-Script - Cross-platform basic tests for scripts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251128 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Script - Cross-platform basic tests for scripts Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rc040203 at freenet.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Test-Script.spec SRPM URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Test-Script-1.02-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: The intent of this module is to provide a series of basic tests for scripts in the bin directory of your Perl distribution. This package is a prerequisite of perl-Test-Inline. Without perl-Test-Script, upgrading/bug-fixing perl-Test-Inline is not possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 10:14:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 06:14:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251128] Review Request: perl-Test-Script - Cross-platform basic tests for scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071014.l77AEWO1010093@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Script - Cross-platform basic tests for scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251128 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |251110 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 10:14:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 06:14:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251110] Review Request: perl-IPC-RUN3 - Run a subprocess in batch mode In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071014.l77AEZ4G010127@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IPC-RUN3 - Run a subprocess in batch mode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251110 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |251128 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 10:17:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 06:17:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251128] Review Request: perl-Test-Script - Cross-platform basic tests for scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071017.l77AHnnd010472@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Script - Cross-platform basic tests for scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251128 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |249807 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 11:11:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 07:11:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248778] Review Request: gtkperf - Test GTK+ performance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071111.l77BBrR4015224@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkperf - Test GTK+ performance https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248778 patrice.bouchand.fedora at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(patrice.bouchand.f| |edora at gmail.com) | ------- Additional Comments From patrice.bouchand.fedora at gmail.com 2007-08-07 07:11 EST ------- > * For sourceforge source, please refert to the section "Sourceforge.net" of > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL Change source path to http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}_%{version}.tar.gz > * Please follow the fedora usage of build root > (section: "BuildRoot tag" of > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines ) Change BuildRoot to %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) Use only %{buildroot} now (no more mixed with $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) > * export CFLAGS="%{optflags}" > This is not needed as %configure sets it (please check what %configure > actually does by "rpm --eval %configure") This has been removed. It is implicitly done by %configure. > * Please set vendor id for desktop file (the section "desktop-file-install usage" > of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines ) vendor Id set to fedora. > * We now recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) Done. > * rebuild failed. At least desktop-file-utils is missing from > BuildRequires. > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=80492 Add BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils The new files: Spec URL: http://patrice.bouchand.free.fr/rpm/gtkperf.spec SRPM URL: http://patrice.bouchand.free.fr/rpm/gtkperf-0.40-4.fc7.src.rpm Thanks for you time. Patrice -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 11:52:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 07:52:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247227] Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071152.l77BqM1s018160@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method Alias: nabi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247227 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-07 07:52 EST ------- * rpmlint - rpmlint complains about: ----------------------------------------------- W: nabi invalid-license GPL W: nabi rpm-buildroot-usage %prep rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ----------------------------------------------- - License tag policy is updated so please change license tag accordingly. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing As far as I checked the source code, this is GPLv2+. - "rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" is not needed for %prep -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 11:52:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 07:52:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247227] Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071152.l77Bqr1p018245@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method Alias: nabi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247227 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-07 07:52 EST ------- Other things seems okay for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 12:14:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 08:14:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248301] Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071214.l77CEiZG019808@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248301 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 12:31:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 08:31:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249034] Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071231.l77CVaXX021614@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249034 john at curioussymbols.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From john at curioussymbols.com 2007-08-07 08:31 EST ------- closing as NEXTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 13:04:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 09:04:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249352] Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071304.l77D40bu025061@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249352 ------- Additional Comments From pmatilai at redhat.com 2007-08-07 09:03 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=160808) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=160808&action=view) Suggested spec tweaks I'd suggest the attached patch to the spec: 1) move the library to /lib[64] as per bug #249814 2) generate and include api documentation Whether a separate subpackage is needed for 2) is another question, it could of course be stuffed into -devel just as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 13:22:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 09:22:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250598] Review Request: dnscap - DNS traffic capture utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071322.l77DMZJ4027370@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnscap - DNS traffic capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250598 atkac at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 13:23:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 09:23:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248301] Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071323.l77DNneh027522@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248301 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-07 09:23 EST ------- First for your comment 14: (In reply to comment #14) > > * If -devel subpackage is licensed under LGPL, the corresponding > > documents should be installed as a %doc of -devel subpackage > > (i.e. add LICENSE.LIB to %doc of -devel subpackage). > COPYING.LIB has been added to -devel subpackage. - Well, -libs package is also licensed under LGPL and it is more proper that LICENSE.LIB be owned by -libs, not -devel (or you can have LICENSE.LIB owned by both -libs and -devel). > > * Usually the dependency against main or subpackage should be > > version-release specific. > > i.e. main package should have: > > Requires: %{name}-libs = %{version}-%{release} > > Main package seems to not require -libs to work. - Umm... this is undesirable. I checked the build log and for example: ------------------------------------------------------- /bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -I../../src/liblzmadec -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -static -o lzmadec lzmadec.o ../../src/liblzmadec/liblzmadec.la mkdir .libs gcc -I../../src/liblzmadec -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -o lzmadec lzmadec.o ../../src/liblzmadec/.libs/liblzmadec.a make[3]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/lzma-4.32.0beta3/src/lzmadec' -------------------------------------------------------- Here /usr/bin/lzmadec needs liblzmadec.la but liblzmadec.la is used staticly, which must not be and /usr/bin/lzmadec should be linked against liblzmadec.so For this package you can disable static link against liblzmadec.so by passing "--diable-static" to configure. You also have to kill unneeded rpath. (check "Removing Rpath" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines) The following seems to work. -------------------------------------------------------- %build CFLAGS="%{optflags} -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64" \ CXXFLAGS="%{optflags} -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64" \ %configure --disable-static # kill rpath sed -i 's|^hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=.*|hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=""|g' libtool sed -i 's|^runpath_var=LD_RUN_PATH|runpath_var=DIE_RPATH_DIE|g' libtool make %{?_smp_mflags} -------------------------------------------------------- > > and -devel package should have: > > Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} > > -devel does not require main package to work, but if I remove it > rpmlint complains ? - The reason I said so is because your -4 spec file had --------------------------------------------------------- Requires: %{name} = %{version} --------------------------------------------------------- for -devel package. However actually -devel package does not require main package so you can remove the line. > The devel package only provides a way to decompress lzma archive, not to > compress. As you suggest, I remove it. Should lzma-libs become lzmadec-libs ? - Just okay with lzma-libs. > Done, but I have to use __install instead of _install ? - Sorry, my typo. Then another issues are: * Source - The newest seems to be beta5. * License - License tag policy is recently changed and we must follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing As far as I checked this source code, - -libs and -devel package should be tagged as "LGPLv2+" (this means that License field in spec file should be tagged as "LGPLv2+") - For main package, I cannot find the phrase "and any later" on LzmaDecode.c so I guess this code is licensed under strict LGPL version 2. However (according to the license matrix) LGPLv2 can be relicensed to GPLv2+ (GPL version 2 and any later), and other parts are licensed under LGPLv2+ and GPLv2+, so the main package can be tagged with "GPLv2+". * -devel package still has %defattr(-,root,root) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 13:31:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 09:31:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250634] Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Perl module for DKIM support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071331.l77DV3qT028223@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Perl module for DKIM support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250634 ------- Additional Comments From lmb at biosci.ki.se 2007-08-07 09:31 EST ------- Ok, mocked against rawhide, got the same problem you had. So try this: Spec URL: http://83.140.35.234/perl-Mail-DKIM.spec SRPM URL: http://83.140.35.234/perl-Mail-DKIM-0.28-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 13:36:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 09:36:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249352] Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071336.l77DaZhC028528@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249352 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-08-07 09:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > Created an attachment (id=160808) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=160808&action=view) [edit] > Suggested spec tweaks > > I'd suggest the attached patch to the spec: > 1) move the library to /lib[64] as per bug #249814 I am opposed to this change, because this would put devel-libs into /lib. Instead I'd suggest that you apply the same approach as glib2 does: Put the devel libs into /usr/lib, put the run-time-libs into /lib and add a couple of symlinks inbetween. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 13:50:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 09:50:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249352] Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071350.l77DoMQF029584@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249352 ------- Additional Comments From pmatilai at redhat.com 2007-08-07 09:50 EST ------- Right, stuffing devel libs into /lib was indeed a stupid oversight on my behalf :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 14:11:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 10:11:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243147] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-SDL - Cross Compiled SDL Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071411.l77EBGvr032654@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-SDL - Cross Compiled SDL Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243147 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-07 10:11 EST ------- imported and build for rawhide (rest is slow due to new F-7 procedures delaying needed other bits) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 14:11:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 10:11:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243254] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-zlib - Cross Compiled zlib Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071411.l77EBLN6032682@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-zlib - Cross Compiled zlib Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243254 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-07 10:11 EST ------- imported and build for rawhide (rest is slow due to new F-7 procedures delaying needed other bits) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 14:11:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 10:11:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240571] Review Request: ocaml-calendar - Objective CAML library for managing dates and times In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071411.l77EBhYS032728@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-calendar - Objective CAML library for managing dates and times https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240571 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-08-07 10:11 EST ------- http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-calendar.spec http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-calendar-1.10-6.fc8.src.rpm Those should fix all of the problems mentioned in comment 7. * Tue Aug 7 2007 Richard W.M. Jones - 1.10-6 - ExcludeArch ppc64 - Clarify license is LGPLv2 - Add LGPL, COPYING, calendarFAQ-2.6.txt and doc/ subdirectory to docs. - BR +ocaml-ocamldoc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 14:18:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 10:18:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248649] Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071418.l77EIbSP001142@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248649 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-07 10:18 EST ------- Updated: SRPM: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/alliance/alliance-5.0-6.20070718snap.fc8.src.rpm SPEC: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/alliance/alliance.spec Build.log (i386): http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/alliance/build.log rpmlint: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/alliance/rpmlint -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 14:49:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 10:49:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202334] Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071449.l77En2oS005066@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202334 overholt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |overholt at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-08-07 10:49 EST ------- I guess it would help if I CC'd myself on things ... I can't see how I didn't hit the same thing Jason did, but thanks for fixing it, Ben! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 14:49:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 10:49:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248301] Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071449.l77EnJlp005126@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248301 ------- Additional Comments From patrice.bouchand.fedora at gmail.com 2007-08-07 10:49 EST ------- > - Well, -libs package is also licensed under LGPL and > it is more proper that LICENSE.LIB be owned by -libs, not -devel > (or you can have LICENSE.LIB owned by both -libs and -devel). COPYING.LIB has been moved to -libs package. > For this package you can disable static link against liblzmadec.so > by passing "--diable-static" to configure. You also have to kill > unneeded rpath. Done. I checked it using ldd and chrpath. > - The reason I said so is because your -4 spec file had > --------------------------------------------------------- > Requires: %{name} = %{version} > --------------------------------------------------------- > for -devel package. However actually -devel package does not > require main package so you can remove the line. Done. > Then another issues are: > * Source > - The newest seems to be beta5. SRPM use the latest release now. > As far as I checked this source code, > - -libs and -devel package should be tagged as "LGPLv2+" > (this means that License field in spec file > should be tagged as "LGPLv2+") License has been set to LGPLv2+ for -libs and -devel. > - For main package, I cannot find the phrase "and any later" on > LzmaDecode.c so I guess this code is licensed under strict LGPL > version 2. > However (according to the license matrix) LGPLv2 can be > relicensed to GPLv2+ (GPL version 2 and any later), and other > parts are licensed under LGPLv2+ and GPLv2+, > so the main package can be tagged with "GPLv2+". License has been set to GPLv2+ for main package. * -devel package still has %defattr(-,root,root) Sorry, I think it's ok now. The new files: Spec URL: http://patrice.bouchand.free.fr/rpm/lzma.spec SRPM URL: http://patrice.bouchand.free.fr/rpm/lzma-4.32.0-0.6.beta5.fc7.src.rpm Thanks Patrice -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 15:25:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 11:25:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251110] Review Request: perl-IPC-RUN3 - Run a subprocess in batch mode In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071525.l77FP0hY010189@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IPC-RUN3 - Run a subprocess in batch mode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251110 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: perl-IPC- |Review Request: perl-IPC- |RUN3 - Run a subprocess in |RUN3 - Run a subprocess in |batch mode |batch mode Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 15:35:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 11:35:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071535.l77FZiTs011805@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From kaigai at kaigai.gr.jp 2007-08-07 11:35 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=160820) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=160820&action=view) specfile diff 0.409 to 0.410 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 15:42:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 11:42:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071542.l77FgaNa012752@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-07 11:42 EST ------- Please upload full spec/srpm so that we can check them easily :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 15:46:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 11:46:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071546.l77FkofJ013353@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From kaigai at kaigai.gr.jp 2007-08-07 11:46 EST ------- (From update of attachment 160820) I updated sepostgresql.spec as the attachment. * Macros are removed from Patch0: line. * "AutoProv: no" is removed. * Several needed packages are added into BuildRequires. These are imported from the postgresql package's description. * Several needed packages are added into Requires(xxx). * add '-p' option into cp and install command. * Redundant script to strip -ffast-math is removed. * unnecessary '/' is removed. * '/var' -> %{_localstatedir} * '/usr/sbin' -> %{_sbindir} * using /sbin/service instead of /etc/init.d/%{name} * %dir %{_datadir}/sepgsql and %dir %{_libdir}/sepgsql are added, for owning directories. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 15:49:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 11:49:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071549.l77FnBiR013677@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From kaigai at kaigai.gr.jp 2007-08-07 11:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > Please upload full spec/srpm so that we can check them > easily :) SpecUrl: http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/files/sepostgresql.spec SrpmUrl: http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/files/sepostgresql-8.2.4- 0.410.beta.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 15:55:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 11:55:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071555.l77FtiUp014475@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From kaigai at kaigai.gr.jp 2007-08-07 11:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > BTW now rawhide has selinux-policy-3.0.5-1.fc8 I found a problem with the selinux-policy-devel-3.0.5-1.fc8 as I reported to fedora-selinux list as follows: http://marc.info/?l=fedora-selinux-list&m=118645893208232&w=2 Thus, the base policy of SE-PostgreSQL is still selinux-policy-3.0.4-1.fc8 for the rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 16:04:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 12:04:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248301] Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071604.l77G4jcq015784@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248301 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-07 12:04 EST ------- Well * Now lzma is okay * As this is sponsor needed issue, we usually ask the submitter to do a pre-review of other persons' review requests or submit another review request . http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Now you have another review request (bug 248778) and although I have not checked gtkperf in detail, it looks (at least almost) good. Okay. --------------------------------------------------------- This package (lzma) is APPROVED by me --------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure according to: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". At a point a mail should be sent to sponsor members which notifies that you need a sponsor (at the stage, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship) Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 7, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 16:07:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 12:07:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251110] Review Request: perl-IPC-RUN3 - Run a subprocess in batch mode In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071607.l77G7DP7016078@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IPC-RUN3 - Run a subprocess in batch mode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251110 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-08-07 12:07 EST ------- rpmlint complains about the license: W: perl-IPC-Run3 invalid-license GPL W: perl-IPC-Run3 invalid-license Artistic "GPL" should be "GPL+" since the LICENSE file explicitly says "any version". I have no idea why rpmlint complains about Artistic but it should obviously be ignored here. Otherwise there are a couple of minor issues with this package; it would be nice if they were fixed or documented but I don't think are blockers: It looks like it has an executable (run3profpp) which could be installed to /usr/bin, but it's your decision as to whether to install it or not. One test is skipped because Test::Pod is not installed. Generally you'd want complete test coverage, but I don't think it's a blocker in this case as it's only some checks of the documentation. Still, I'd urge you to add the build dependency so the whole test suite can run. Since there are other tickets blocked on this one, I'll go ahead and approve this and you can fix the license tag when you check in. Review: * source files match upstream: da7a829997fb8c2bf9389b016848aabb1ee946f6a57d69d492b74f31593392f2 IPC-Run3-0.037.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. X license field needs "GPL+" bit. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (would use perl(Test::Pod) for better test coverage) * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly X rpmlint has a valid complaint (license tag) * final provides and requires are sane: perl(IPC::Run3) = 0.037 perl(IPC::Run3::ProfArrayBuffer) = 0.030 perl(IPC::Run3::ProfLogReader) = 0.030 perl(IPC::Run3::ProfLogger) = 0.030 perl(IPC::Run3::ProfPP) = 0.000 perl(IPC::Run3::ProfReporter) = 0.000 perl-IPC-Run3 = 0.037-1.fc8 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(Exporter) perl(File::Temp) perl(IPC::Run3::ProfReporter) perl(POSIX) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful, 1 test skipped. Files=11, Tests=54, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.51 cusr + 0.42 csys = 0.93 CPU) The skipped test is due to a missing Test::Pod dependency and is not critical * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED; just change GPL to GPL+ in the license tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 16:36:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 12:36:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199310] Review Request: stormbaancoureur - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071636.l77GaCQG020117@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stormbaancoureur - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199310 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-07 12:36 EST ------- Well, there is no good way to do it... cvs is just bad at renaming things. See: http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/notes/cvs/renaming-files.html We could move the RCS files, and that would keep history, but the history has the old filenames in it, even tho they no longer exist. I think just cvs rming them and adding them is the better way to do it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 16:46:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 12:46:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071646.l77Gk36L021315@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-07 12:46 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=160828) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=160828&action=view) mock build log of 410 This time many files are installed but not listed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 16:54:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 12:54:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251019] Review Request: lshw - Hardware lister In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071654.l77GsiUG022425@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware lister https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251019 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2007-08-07 12:54 EST ------- spot, fedora's license guru has spoken: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/60831 I will rm -f the in svgs that can't be shipped. Would of course be nice to have those replaced, however I don't see this as blocker for inclusion in fedora (as long the app will work without the svgs.) Thanks for the help, David. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 17:12:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 13:12:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244356] Review Request: xapian-bindings - Bindings for Xapian In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071712.l77HCrdU024553@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xapian-bindings - Bindings for Xapian https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244356 mpg at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |adel.gadllah at gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mpg at redhat.com 2007-08-07 13:12 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: xapian-bindings New Branches: F-7 Updated Fedora Owners: mpg at redhat.com, adel.gadllah at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 17:14:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 13:14:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244355] Review Request: xapian-core - The Xapian Probabilistic Information Retrieval Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071714.l77HEB5k024747@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xapian-core - The Xapian Probabilistic Information Retrieval Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244355 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mpg at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |adel.gadllah at gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mpg at redhat.com 2007-08-07 13:14 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: xapian-core New Branches: F-7 Updated Fedora Owners: mpg at redhat.com, adel.gadllah at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 17:41:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 13:41:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251190] New: Review Request: gds2pov - GDS2 layout file to POV-Ray conversion Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251190 Summary: Review Request: gds2pov - GDS2 layout file to POV-Ray conversion Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/gds2pov/gds2pov.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/gds2pov/gds2pov-0.20070426-1.fc8.src.rpm Build.log: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/gds2pov/build.log Description: GDS2POV is a program to take a GDS2 layout file and output a POV-Ray scene description file of the GDS2 data. This allows the creation of attractive 3D pictures of a layout. GDS2POV is mostly used by VLSI designers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 17:51:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 13:51:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251191] New: Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251191 Summary: Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/glew.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/glew-1.4.0-2.fc8.src.rpm Description: The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library (GLEW) is a cross-platform C/C++ extension loading library. GLEW provides efficient run-time mechanisms for determining which OpenGL extensions are supported on the target platform. OpenGL core and extension functionality is exposed in a single header file. GLEW is available for a variety of operating systems, including Windows, Linux, Mac OS X, FreeBSD, Irix, and Solaris. --- Notice this package has been approved for all the legal stuff surrounding the removed SGI files by Spot. Reviewers if you want I can forward the approval mail. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 17:58:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 13:58:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250903] Review Request: python-exif - Python module to extract EXIF information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071758.l77HwjUp029778@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-exif - Python module to extract EXIF information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250903 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2007-08-07 13:58 EST ------- Thanks Kevin! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-exif Short Description: Python module to extract EXIF information Owners: terjeros at phys.ntnu.no Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 18:10:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 14:10:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251190] Review Request: gds2pov - GDS2 layout file to POV-Ray conversion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071810.l77IAbUR030856@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gds2pov - GDS2 layout file to POV-Ray conversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251190 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-07 14:10 EST ------- Example from the %doc: gdsoglviewer -p example_process.txt -i example.gds P+ -c example_config.txt One will get: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/gds2pov/example.png -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 18:24:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 14:24:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222248] Review Request: alsa-plugins - backend plugins for alsa sound system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071824.l77IODbo032111@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-plugins - backend plugins for alsa sound system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222248 ------- Additional Comments From eric.moret at epita.fr 2007-08-07 14:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #38) > Initial comments: > > - I second Lennarts comment about maemo - is it useful to package that plugin > without any other part of maemo in fedora ? Removed Maemo > - OSSO DSP SW <--> ALSA DSP plugin > ======================== > Don't put ascii formatting into the %description, please. Fixed > - BuildRequires are per source package, there is no reason to put them > into the subpackage sections (of course, it doesn't hurt either) I did it this way so build dependencies would not be forgotten when a package would be removed, like above for the maemo plugin. > - Requires: alsa-lib > is unnecessary, since library dependencies pull it in anyway Fixed > - The license tag needs some work; GPL is no longer a valid value for > that field, it should probably be GPLv2+. But some of the plugins > appear to be LGPLv2+, so maybe it would be better to put license > tags in the subpackages according to their actual licenses. In fact, > all but the samplerate plugin appear to be LGPL, not GPL. Tried to address it but the global License field seems to be mandatory. > - What is the touching in %prep about ? Not sure where this came from. I removed it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 18:25:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 14:25:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222248] Review Request: alsa-plugins - backend plugins for alsa sound system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071825.l77IPecm032361@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-plugins - backend plugins for alsa sound system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222248 eric.moret at epita.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #160236|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From eric.moret at epita.fr 2007-08-07 14:25 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=160836) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=160836&action=view) Updated spec file following initial review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 18:29:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 14:29:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251191] Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071829.l77ITbPl000423@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251191 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-08-07 14:29 EST ------- Have you seen the existing GLEW review ticket? It's bug 229419. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 18:33:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 14:33:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071833.l77IXDJw000934@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2007-08-07 14:33 EST ------- 2 problems: 1) conflict: sudo rpm -Uhv *.rpm Preparing... ########################################### [100%] file /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/eurofont/eurofont.cfg from install of texlive-texmf-latex-2007-0.7.fc8 conflicts with file from package tetex-eurofont-1.1.3-6.fc6 file /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/eurofont/uzmvs.fd from install of texlive-texmf-latex-2007-0.7.fc8 conflicts with file from package tetex-eurofont-1.1.3-6.fc6 file /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/eurofont/uzpeur.fd from install of texlive-texmf-latex-2007-0.7.fc8 conflicts with file from package tetex-eurofont-1.1.3-6.fc6 file /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/eurofont/uzpeuss.fd from install of texlive-texmf-latex-2007-0.7.fc8 conflicts with file from package tetex-eurofont-1.1.3-6.fc6 file /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/eurofont/uzpeutt.fd from install of texlive-texmf-latex-2007-0.7.fc8 conflicts with file from package tetex-eurofont-1.1.3-6.fc6 2) Missing lmodern (this was included with tetex). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 18:37:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 14:37:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248301] Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071837.l77IbNTD001488@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248301 ------- Additional Comments From patrice.bouchand.fedora at gmail.com 2007-08-07 14:37 EST ------- > Well > * Now lzma is okay > * As this is sponsor needed issue, we usually ask the submitter to > do a pre-review of other persons' review requests or submit another > review request . > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored > Now you have another review request (bug 248778) and although > I have not checked gtkperf in detail, it looks (at least almost) good. > > Okay. > --------------------------------------------------------- > This package (lzma) is APPROVED by me > --------------------------------------------------------- Thanks a lot ! > Please follow the procedure according to: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join > from "Get a Fedora Account". > At a point a mail should be sent to sponsor members which notifies > that you need a sponsor (at the stage, please also write on > this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship) > Then I will sponsor you. I think it's done. > If you want to import this package into Fedora 7, you also have > to look at > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT > (after once you rebuilt this package on Fedora rebuilding system). > > If you have questions, please ask me. Ok, thanks again for your time and for your help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 18:38:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 14:38:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071838.l77Ic30U001622@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2007-08-07 14:37 EST ------- Test with trivial file (hello.tex) goes into latex 2.09 compat mode and dies: pdflatex hello.tex This is pdfTeXk, Version 3.141592-1.40.3 (Web2C 7.5.6) %&-line parsing enabled. entering extended mode (./hello.tex LaTeX2e <2005/12/01> Babel and hyphenation patterns for english, usenglishmax, dumylang, noh yphenation, arabic, basque, bulgarian, coptic, welsh, czech, slovak, german, ng erman, danish, esperanto, spanish, catalan, galician, estonian, farsi, finnish, french, greek, monogreek, ancientgreek, croatian, hungarian, interlingua, ibyc us, indonesian, icelandic, italian, latin, mongolian, dutch, norsk, polish, por tuguese, pinyin, romanian, russian, slovenian, uppersorbian, serbian, swedish, turkish, ukenglish, ukrainian, loaded. (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/latex209.def Entering LaTeX 2.09 COMPATIBILITY MODE ************************************************************* !!WARNING!! !!WARNING!! !!WARNING!! !!WARNING!! This mode attempts to provide an emulation of the LaTeX 2.09 author environment so that OLD documents can be successfully processed. It should NOT be used for NEW documents! New documents should use Standard LaTeX conventions and start with the \documentclass command. Compatibility mode is UNLIKELY TO WORK with LaTeX 2.09 style files that change any internal macros, especially not with those that change the FONT SELECTION or OUTPUT ROUTINES. Therefore such style files MUST BE UPDATED to use Current Standard LaTeX: LaTeX2e. If you suspect that you may be using such a style file, which is probably very, very old by now, then you should attempt to get it updated by sending a copy of this error message to the author of that file. ************************************************************* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 18:49:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 14:49:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244597] Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071849.l77InME6003116@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244597 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-08-07 14:49 EST ------- ping ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 18:55:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 14:55:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229419] Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071855.l77ItM5G004290@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229419 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-07 14:55 EST ------- GLEW is not ok for Fedora as is, this has been discussed with Tom "spot" Callaway, who is the authority on this several times. So yes blocking FE-legal would be a very good idea, except that the answer is no. GLEW is not acceptable. But ... I got here, because Tibbs pointed to this review after I submitted glew myself, see bug 251191 . The version of glew I submitted however has got several encumbered parts removed / replaced, and has been approved legal wise by Spot. Which brings us to the question how to move on from here, we could use this version and merge in the necessary changes from mine, or start with my version, either is fine by me. About the GPL/BSD license questions, see the README I've added to my package, the GPL only applies to the scripts used to autogenerate some of the code. The code itself and thus the GLEW lib + headers is BSD. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 18:56:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 14:56:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251191] Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071856.l77IuX7K004531@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251191 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-07 14:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Have you seen the existing GLEW review ticket? It's bug 229419. No I didn't, I didn't expect there to be a GLEW review as GLEW has been denied on legal grounds by Spot several time, this version has had some surgery and some replacements written to make it ok. I've added a comment to bug 229419 to coordinate things. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 18:59:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 14:59:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248301] Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071859.l77IxbkY004871@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248301 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-07 14:59 EST ------- Now I am sponsoring you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 19:00:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 15:00:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248778] Review Request: gtkperf - Test GTK+ performance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071900.l77J0Dpg004999@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkperf - Test GTK+ performance https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248778 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-07 15:00 EST ------- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR: bug 248301) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 19:10:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 15:10:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202334] Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071910.l77JAJlk006011@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202334 ------- Additional Comments From bkonrath at redhat.com 2007-08-07 15:10 EST ------- I forgot to disable the demos package. This needs to be done to avoid having to push security updates for bugs in the example code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 19:22:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 15:22:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222248] Review Request: alsa-plugins - backend plugins for alsa sound system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071922.l77JMc1b007672@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-plugins - backend plugins for alsa sound system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222248 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-08-07 15:22 EST ------- rpmlint is silent on all generated package, good. package name: ok spec name: ok packaging guidelines: ok license: ok license field: ok license file: ok spec language: ok spec legible: yes upstream source: ok buildable: yes ExludeArch: n/a build deps: ok shared libs: n/a relocatable: n/a directory ownership: ok duplicate files: ok permissions: ok %clean: ok macro use: consistent content: permissible large docs: n/a %doc: ok headers: n/a static libs: n/a pkgconfig files: n/a shared lib symlinks: n/a devel package: n/a libtool archives: ok gui apps: n/a directory ownership: ok %install: ok utf8 filenames: ok Looking good. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 19:22:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 15:22:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241550] Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071922.l77JMluw007770@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241550 lephilousophe at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(lephilousophe at user| |s.sourceforge.net) | ------- Additional Comments From lephilousophe at users.sourceforge.net 2007-08-07 15:22 EST ------- Hi, sorry for the late reply but I must say that I haven't any experience with soversions and upstream doesn't seem to want to add them to the makefiles... So without any help saying me how to add them (I don't really know how libtool does) I think I will have to give up this package (in addition, it seems to be really beta). Sorry... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 19:24:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 15:24:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247513] Review Request: junit4 - java regression testing framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071924.l77JOZAA008038@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: junit4 - java regression testing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247513 ------- Additional Comments From bkonrath at redhat.com 2007-08-07 15:24 EST ------- New Files: http://bagu.org/eclipse/junit4-4.3.1-1jpp.1.fc8.src.rpm http://bagu.org/eclipse/junit4.spec (In reply to comment #5) > Thanks and sorry for the delay. I dont think you need to bump the release for > this, but whatever :) Ok, I put it back to 1. > This is probably really nit-picky but I recommend using the > %define _with_gcj_support 0 up top to disable aot compilation for the moment if > you want to. So you wont have to comment out ownership under the %{_libdir}/gcj > etc. and once the bugs in gcj are fixed simply switching the gcj_support thing > would do. The macro wasn't working so I just set gcj_support to 0 manually. > Also, it seems that the version of spec-gcj-convert used to build the > spec has bugs: > %postun > %if %{gcj_support} > ... > %endif > > while it really should be: > %if %{gcj_support} > %postun > ... > %endif > > This leaves empty script sections when gcj support is disabled by default - > which is the case in jpackage and currently, due to the said gcj bug for Fedora > as well. Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 19:46:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 15:46:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239369] Review Request: perl-Sys-Syscall - Access system calls that Perl doesn't normally provide access to In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708071946.l77JktVI010727@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sys-Syscall - Access system calls that Perl doesn't normally provide access to Alias: perl-Sys-Syscall https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239369 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2007-08-07 15:46 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Sys-Syscall New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 20:08:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 16:08:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251190] Review Request: gds2pov - GDS2 layout file to POV-Ray conversion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708072008.l77K8KAE014622@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gds2pov - GDS2 layout file to POV-Ray conversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251190 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-07 16:08 EST ------- for those having difficulties in connecting to http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/gds2pov/ here is a mirror: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/gds2pov/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 20:24:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 16:24:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226207] Merge Review: numactl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708072024.l77KOBaI016954@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: numactl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226207 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-08-07 16:24 EST ------- Looks like the License tag needs updating as per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing You don't want %{dist} in the change log: --- numactl.spec 4 Aug 2007 00:34:50 -0000 1.42 +++ numactl.spec 7 Aug 2007 20:18:25 -0000 @@ -71,12 +71,12 @@ %{_mandir}/man3/*.3* %changelog -* Fri Aug 03 2007 Neil Horman - 0.9.8-3%{dist} +* Fri Aug 03 2007 Neil Horman - 0.9.8-3 - fixing up merge review (bz 226207) -* Fri Jan 12 2007 Neil Horman - 0.9.8-2%{dist} +* Fri Jan 12 2007 Neil Horman - 0.9.8-2 - Properly fixed bz 221982 -- Updated revision string to include %{dist} +- Updated revision string to include %%{dist} * Thu Jan 11 2007 Neil Horman - 0.9.8-1.38 - Fixed -devel to depend on base package so libnuma.so resolves But I think that's about it... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 20:36:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 16:36:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244597] Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708072036.l77Kah3J018168@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244597 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-07 16:36 EST ------- #001: License should NOW be GPLv2+ https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-August/msg00108.html #002: missing %post and %postun: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets?action=show&redirect=ScriptletSnippets#head-7103f6c38d1b5735e8477bdd569ad73ea2c49bda %post touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/locolor touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/crystalsvg %postun touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/locolor touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/crystalsvg #003: rm -f ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_datadir}/apps/katepart/syntax/r.xml ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} should be $RPM_BUILD_ROOT #004: diff -Naur /var/tmp/rkward-0.4.7-2-root-chitlesh/usr/lib/R/library/R.css /usr/lib/R/library/R.css see patch rkward-rcss.patch I won't block this for approval. But however, I would like that you file a bug against the package R stating that he/she should apply that patch! (added me as CC: please) Reason: better integration :) #005: remove the useless comment (though I won't block this for approval) : #mkdir -p ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_libdir}/R #006: you can remove CXXFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" from the spec file. As the optflags are already pulled out as shown below: if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I/usr/include/kde -I/usr/lib/qt-3.3/include -I. -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -D_REENTRANT -DQT_NO_ASCII_CAST -Wno-long-long -Wundef -ansi -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -Wcast-align -Wconversion -Wchar-subscripts -Wall -W -Wpointer-arith -O2 -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -Wformat-security -Wmissing-format-attribute -Wno-non-virtual-dtor -fno-exceptions -fno-check-new -fno-common -MT rkeditordataframe.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/rkeditordataframe.Tpo" -c -o rkeditordataframe.o rkeditordataframe.cpp; \ then mv -f ".deps/rkeditordataframe.Tpo" ".deps/rkeditordataframe.Po"; else rm -f ".deps/rkeditordataframe.Tpo"; exit 1; fi #007: BuildRequires remove : * R from the BR as R-devel already requires R * qt-devel from the BR as kdebase-devel requires kdelibs-devel and kdelibs-devel requires qt-devel In the future you can use: rpm -qR R-devel R = 2.5.1 [..] to know whether R or any other package depends on it. #008: %doc missing TODO and AUTHORS in %doc #009: rpath http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines?highlight=%28rpath%29#head-7cea8c7aa96400a4687e843156354476434ff883 add sed -i 's|^hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=.*|hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=""|g' libtool sed -i 's|^runpath_var=LD_RUN_PATH|runpath_var=DIE_RPATH_DIE|g' libtool after %configure even though you added --disable-rpath (I don't trust it :) ) I'm taking up the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 20:39:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 16:39:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244597] Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708072039.l77KdnEO018640@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244597 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-07 16:39 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=160854) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=160854&action=view) R -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 20:43:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 16:43:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244597] Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708072043.l77KhZ4F019638@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244597 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-07 16:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > There is one last warning that you may want to get rid of: > > $ rpmlint -i rkward-0.4.7-2.x86_64.rpm > W: rkward dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/rkward/common ../common > The relative symbolic link points nowhere. > > All the rest seems OK to me. > Jason Tibbitts's answer should be enough. while : rpmlint rkward you'll no longer find that warning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 21:00:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:00:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 209614] Review Request: wmmemload - windowmaker dock app In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708072100.l77L0Qxv022032@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wmmemload - windowmaker dock app https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209614 dkovalsk at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(dkovalsk at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From dkovalsk at redhat.com 2007-08-07 17:00 EST ------- Sorry, been swamped with other things over the last few months. I'll try to post the work that I have done so far so if someone with spares cycles wants to continue can do so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 21:03:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:03:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251019] Review Request: lshw - Hardware lister In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708072103.l77L3XQo022290@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware lister https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251019 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2007-08-07 17:03 EST ------- After talking with spot I have removed some logos, package should be safe now. lshw-gui seems to work ok without the logos. SPEC: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/lshw/lshw.spec SRPM: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/lshw/lshw-B.02.11.01-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 21:05:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:05:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244597] Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708072105.l77L58Ip022583@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244597 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-08-07 17:04 EST ------- You can find here http://www.pingoured.fr/public/RPM/rkward/R.R A R script that should give you the following graph http://www.pingoured.fr/public/RPM/rkward/plot.png -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 21:25:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:25:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708072125.l77LPOsl025365@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-08-07 17:25 EST ------- Spec: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/7/SRPMS/asterisk-1.4.9-7.fc7.spec SRPM: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/7/SRPMS/asterisk-1.4.9-7.fc7.src.rpm * Tue Aug 7 2007 Jeffrey C. Ollie - 1.4.9-7 - Add a patch that allows alternate extensions to be defined in users.conf * Mon Aug 6 2007 Jeffrey C. Ollie - 1.4.9-6 - Update app_conference patch. Enter/leave sounds are now possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 21:42:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:42:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244597] Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708072142.l77LgTep026923@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244597 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-08-07 17:42 EST ------- The new spec file http://www.pingoured.fr/public/RPM/rkward/rkward.spec The new SRPM http://www.pingoured.fr/public/RPM/rkward/rkward-0.4.7-3.fc6.src.rpm I am just not really sure about the diff. Let me know if it needs any changes. Thanks for the review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 21:51:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:51:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249235] Review Request: pidgin-knotify - KNotify plugin for Pidgin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708072151.l77Lp8AR027909@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-knotify - KNotify plugin for Pidgin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249235 ------- Additional Comments From lightsolphoenix at gmail.com 2007-08-07 17:51 EST ------- Done. Spec URL: http://crystalsanctuary.rpgsource.net/packages/specs/pidgin-knotify.spec SRPM URL: http://crystalsanctuary.rpgsource.net/packages/source/pidgin-knotify-0.1-5.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 21:53:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:53:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251191] Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708072153.l77LrpWV028359@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251191 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-08-07 17:53 EST ------- Good work Hans. Regarding you're mail, no problem it makes sense for me to review it. I'll hold on though until a decision is made on how to handle the 'duplicate' reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 21:57:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:57:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244597] Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708072157.l77LvArM028846@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244597 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-08-07 17:57 EST ------- There are the new SRPM http://www.pingoured.fr/public/RPM/rkward/rkward-0.4.7-4.fc6.src.rpm and the spec http://www.pingoured.fr/public/RPM/rkward/rkward.spec Thanks for the review :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 21:58:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:58:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244597] Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708072158.l77Lws35029082@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244597 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-07 17:58 EST ------- MUST Items: - MUST: rpmlint's output is clean except one symbolic warning - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name} - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed (GPL) with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - MUST: the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - MUST: The spec file for the package is be legible. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least i386. - MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires. - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly. - MUST: If the package does not contain shared library files located in the dynamic linker's default paths - MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable - MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: There are no Large documentation files - MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - MUST: There are no Header files or static libraries - MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix - MUST: Package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives - MUST: Package containing GUI applications includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: The source package does include license text(s) as COPYING - SHOULD: mock builds succcessfully in i386. - SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. - SHOULD: No subpackages present. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 22:01:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 18:01:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244597] Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708072201.l77M1N4i029369@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244597 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-07 18:01 EST ------- PS: can you review #251190 (gds2pov - GDS2 layout file to POV-Ray conversion) for me ? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 22:07:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 18:07:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244597] Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708072207.l77M79Du030252@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244597 pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-08-07 18:07 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rkward Short Description: Graphical frontend for R language Owners: pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 22:31:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 18:31:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244597] Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708072231.l77MVW63001395@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244597 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-08-07 18:31 EST ------- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 22:33:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 18:33:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222248] Review Request: alsa-plugins - backend plugins for alsa sound system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708072233.l77MXtqO001876@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-plugins - backend plugins for alsa sound system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222248 eric.moret at epita.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From eric.moret at epita.fr 2007-08-07 18:33 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: alsa-plugins Short Description: backend plugins for alsa sound system Owners: eric.moret at epita.fr Branches: F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 22:34:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 18:34:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239369] Review Request: perl-Sys-Syscall - Access system calls that Perl doesn't normally provide access to In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708072234.l77MYP1v002016@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sys-Syscall - Access system calls that Perl doesn't normally provide access to Alias: perl-Sys-Syscall https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239369 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-08-07 18:34 EST ------- I'm seeing perl-Sys-Syscall as having been branched for EPEL on May 15, 2007. So I guess it's already been done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 23:22:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 19:22:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250903] Review Request: python-exif - Python module to extract EXIF information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708072322.l77NMToH005780@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-exif - Python module to extract EXIF information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250903 toshio at tiki-lounge.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2007-08-07 19:22 EST ------- Cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 23:56:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 19:56:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222248] Review Request: alsa-plugins - backend plugins for alsa sound system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708072356.l77NusgK008682@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-plugins - backend plugins for alsa sound system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222248 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-07 19:56 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 00:06:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 20:06:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244355] Review Request: xapian-core - The Xapian Probabilistic Information Retrieval Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708080006.l780689d009138@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xapian-core - The Xapian Probabilistic Information Retrieval Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244355 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-07 20:06 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 00:09:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 20:09:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244356] Review Request: xapian-bindings - Bindings for Xapian In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708080009.l7809nxx009443@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xapian-bindings - Bindings for Xapian https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244356 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-07 20:09 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 00:31:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 20:31:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233946] Review Request: secondlife - The Second Life client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708080031.l780VxH2010777@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: secondlife - The Second Life client Alias: secondlife https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233946 ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2007-08-07 20:31 EST ------- http://www.haxxed.com/rpms/secondlife/secondlife.spec http://www.haxxed.com/rpms/secondlife/secondlife-1.18.0.6-1.fc7.src.rpm * Thu Jul 12 2007 Callum Lerwick 1.18.0.6-1 - New upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 02:04:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 22:04:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247227] Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708080204.l7824bxV015686@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method Alias: nabi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247227 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-07 22:04 EST ------- Thanks, Tasaka-san, for your careful checking: seems the new version of rpmlint is more strict. Ok, Subhransu, if you can do one more update I'd like to move into the final formal next. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 04:04:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 00:04:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708080404.l7844DN0023414@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From kaigai at kaigai.gr.jp 2007-08-08 00:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #22) > mock build log of 410 > This time many files are installed but not listed. These unpacked files are not necessary for the sepostgresql package. SE-PostgreSQL provides several features as a database server, like as postgresql-server package provides, so we don't need to pack all of files installed, such as frontend utilities, HTML documentation and header and library files. In the native postgresql case, these are also unpacked in postgresql-server package. Rest of subpackages contain them. Removing them makes harder to maintain the package, so I applied "_unpackaged_files_terminate_build" configuration. Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 05:16:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 01:16:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251282] New: Review Request: x3d-dtd-schema - X3D DTDs and schemata Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251282 Summary: Review Request: x3d-dtd-schema - X3D DTDs and schemata Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: braden at endoframe.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://endoframe.com/x3d-dtd-schema.spec SRPM URL: http://endoframe.com/x3d-dtd-schema-3.0-1.src.rpm Description: X3D DTDs and schemata. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 05:53:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 01:53:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240571] Review Request: ocaml-calendar - Objective CAML library for managing dates and times In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708080553.l785r1Ev030376@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-calendar - Objective CAML library for managing dates and times https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240571 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-08-08 01:53 EST ------- Rebuilt & tested, All issues has been fixed. ========== *APPROVED* ========== -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 06:11:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 02:11:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222248] Review Request: alsa-plugins - backend plugins for alsa sound system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708080611.l786BPxk031328@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-plugins - backend plugins for alsa sound system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222248 eric.moret at epita.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 06:41:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 02:41:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247227] Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708080641.l786fefA000708@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method Alias: nabi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247227 ------- Additional Comments From sbehera at redhat.com 2007-08-08 02:41 EST ------- Package Updated. Spec URL: http://oriya.sourceforge.net/0.18-5/nabi.spec SRPM URL: http://oriya.sourceforge.net/0.18-5/nabi-0.18-5.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 07:12:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 03:12:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248301] Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708080712.l787CDlf002254@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248301 patrice.bouchand.fedora at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From patrice.bouchand.fedora at gmail.com 2007-08-08 03:12 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lzma Short Description: lzma compression tools Owners: patriceb Branches: F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 07:56:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 03:56:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248301] Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708080756.l787urS6005851@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248301 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-08 03:56 EST ------- Ah.. Owners must be your bugzilla email. Please rewrite CVS request and again set cvs flag to ? . (Note: I don't have the right to do the needed CVS admin procedure. Someone else will do it and then will set CVS flag to +) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 08:03:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 04:03:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248301] Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708080803.l78832sH007076@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248301 patrice.bouchand.fedora at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From patrice.bouchand.fedora at gmail.com 2007-08-08 04:02 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lzma Short Description: lzma compression tools Owners: patrice.bouchand.fedora at gmail.com Branches: F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 08:16:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 04:16:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240571] Review Request: ocaml-calendar - Objective CAML library for managing dates and times In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708080816.l788GLDc008735@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-calendar - Objective CAML library for managing dates and times https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240571 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-08-08 04:16 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ocaml-calendar Short Description: Objective CAML library for managing dates and times Owners: rjones at redhat.com Branches: F-7 InitialCC: rjones at redhat.com,lxtnow at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 08:17:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 04:17:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251068] Review Request: ocaml-libvirt - OCaml binding for libvirt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708080817.l788HjG4008908@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-libvirt - OCaml binding for libvirt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251068 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |250969 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 08:17:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 04:17:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250969] Review Request: ocaml-curses - OCaml bindings for ncurses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708080817.l788HmRj008938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-curses - OCaml bindings for ncurses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250969 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |251068 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 09:45:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 05:45:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174883] Review Request: distcc -- A free distributed C/C++ compiler system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708080945.l789jwFT015756@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: distcc -- A free distributed C/C++ compiler system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174883 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora at normalesup.org 2007-08-08 05:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #26) > 2) distcc.sh is incredibly unreadable. And broken, it will fail on x86_64 > because ccache is in /usr/lib64/ccache, which is also broken. That script is also broken even on i386: "PATH=$__d$PATH" should be "PATH=$__:d$PATH". Anyway, that script cannot be shipped in Fedora like that. It should be easily readable. What is more, do we really want to modify all users' PATH like that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 09:59:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 05:59:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174883] Review Request: distcc -- A free distributed C/C++ compiler system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708080959.l789xAE0016973@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: distcc -- A free distributed C/C++ compiler system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174883 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora at normalesup.org 2007-08-08 05:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #30) > That script is also broken even on i386: "PATH=$__d$PATH" should > be "PATH=$__:d$PATH". "PATH=$__d:$PATH", of course. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 11:18:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 07:18:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251317] New: Review Request: pinot - Personal search and metasearch for the Desktop Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251317 Summary: Review Request: pinot - Personal search and metasearch for the Desktop Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: adel.gadllah at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/pinot.spec SRPM URL: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/pinot-0.75-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Pinot is a D-Bus service that crawls, indexes your documents and monitors them for changes, as well as a GTK-based user interface that enables to query the index built by the service and your favourite Web engines, and display and analyze the results Note: It only builds on devel due to deps that are only in devel. smp make is not used because it fails to build with it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 11:58:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 07:58:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240308] Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708081158.l78BwFh0025263@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240308 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-08 07:58 EST ------- Recently, I took over the qwtplot3d package. I'm planning to ship a qwtplot3d-qt4 package out of qwtplot3d. Take a look at: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/result/ and tell me what you think about it, before I commit to cvs. Ultimately, this bug can be closed once committed to cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 13:21:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 09:21:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237579] Review Request: cernlib-g77 - General purpose CERN library and associated binaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708081321.l78DLked031049@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cernlib-g77 - General purpose CERN library and associated binaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237579 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 13:56:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 09:56:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708081356.l78DuA9Y002169@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-08-08 09:55 EST ------- Spec: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/7/SRPMS/asterisk-1.4.10-1.fc7.spec SRPM: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/7/SRPMS/asterisk-1.4.10-1.fc7.src.rpm * Tue Aug 7 2007 Jeffrey C. Ollie - 1.4.10-1 - Update to 1.4.10 (security update). http://downloads.digium.com/pub/asa/ASA-2007-019.pdf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 14:05:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 10:05:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708081405.l78E5bVu003429@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2007-08-08 10:05 EST ------- Sorry my mistake, ignore comment #20 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 14:07:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 10:07:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708081407.l78E7Ir9003675@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2007-08-08 10:07 EST ------- Working, but I have tons of warnings like this: {/home/nbecker/.texlive2007/texmf-var/fonts/map/pdftex/updmap/pdftex.map pdfTeX warning: pdflatex (file /home/nbecker/.texlive2007/texmf-var/fonts/map/p dftex/updmap/pdftex.map): ambiguous entry for `ebbx10': font file present but n ot included, will be treated as font file not present -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 14:30:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 10:30:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230812] Review Request: tcpxtract - tool for extracting files from network traffic based on file signatures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708081430.l78EUd7n006377@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcpxtract - tool for extracting files from network traffic based on file signatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230812 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-08-08 10:30 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: tcpxtract New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 15:26:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 11:26:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250504] Review Request: blktrace - block IO tracer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708081526.l78FQcDZ014264@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blktrace - block IO tracer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250504 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 15:28:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 11:28:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245760] Review Request: engine_pkcs11 - A PKCS11 engine for use with OpenSSL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708081528.l78FSlZt014899@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: engine_pkcs11 - A PKCS11 engine for use with OpenSSL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245760 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-08-08 11:28 EST ------- engine_pkcs11-0.1.3-4.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 15:28:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 11:28:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244597] Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708081528.l78FSsmo014939@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244597 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-08-08 11:28 EST ------- rkward-0.4.7-4.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 15:30:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 11:30:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708081530.l78FUrOo015479@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-08-08 11:30 EST ------- kdebluetooth-1.0-0.31.beta3.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 15:31:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 11:31:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708081531.l78FV6x2015721@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |1.0-0.31.beta3.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 15:38:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 11:38:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251361] New: Review Request: compat-expat1 - libray compat package for expat 1.x Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251361 Summary: Review Request: compat-expat1 - libray compat package for expat 1.x Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jorton at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://jorton.fedorapeople.org/expat/compat-expat1.spec SRPM URL: http://jorton.fedorapeople.org/expat/compat-expat1-1.95.8-1.src.rpm Description: library compat package for expat 1.x This is a library compat package for expat 1.x, to go along with the forthcoming expat soname bump with the upgrade to 2.x. (expat is such a popular library, it is certainly worth having a compat package) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 15:40:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 11:40:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226054] Merge Review: libuser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708081540.l78FeRJA017844@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libuser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226054 ------- Additional Comments From mitr at redhat.com 2007-08-08 11:40 EST ------- Patch applied, thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 15:41:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 11:41:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251361] Review Request: compat-expat1 - libray compat package for expat 1.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708081541.l78FfenU018050@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-expat1 - libray compat package for expat 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251361 jorton at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |195888 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 16:11:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 12:11:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248778] Review Request: gtkperf - Test GTK+ performance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708081611.l78GBTq0023779@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkperf - Test GTK+ performance https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248778 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-08 12:11 EST ------- Some remarks. * Fedora specific compilation flags are not honored (Compiler flags of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines ) Check the log: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=92083&name=build.log Also debuginfo rpm does not contain debug information and this should be fixed. * (From build log) Suppress the call of automated autoheader ("touch"ing some files, i.e. fixing the timestamp of some files should fix this issue) * Update License tag. (IMO this is GPLv2, not GPLv2+) * Change the encoding of "ChangeLog" from ISO-8859-1 to UTF-8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 16:17:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 12:17:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241550] Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708081617.l78GHx39025694@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241550 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-08 12:17 EST ------- Well, what does upstream actually say? Even on the newest CVS there is no soversion (would you update to the latest anyway)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 16:19:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 12:19:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247227] Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708081619.l78GJd51026377@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method Alias: nabi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247227 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-08 12:19 EST ------- Seems okay to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 16:36:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 12:36:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235925] Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708081636.l78GaQLs030790@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones Alias: dnssec-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-08-08 12:36 EST ------- perl(Net::DNS::SEC) is satisfied by an rpm currently in testing (will be pushed final in a week or so) perl(Mail::Send) is provided by perl-MailTools so it already exists in the packaging system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 16:41:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 12:41:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235925] Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708081641.l78GfjJk031442@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones Alias: dnssec-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925 wjhns174 at hardakers.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-08-08 12:41 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dnssec-tools Short Description: Tools for manipulating and maintaining DNSSEC zones Owners: hardaker Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: hardaker -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 16:44:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 12:44:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248301] Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708081644.l78Gi097031704@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248301 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2007-08-08 12:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #21) > Ah.. Owners must be your bugzilla email. > Please rewrite CVS request and again set cvs flag to ? . > > (Note: I don't have the right to do the needed CVS admin procedure. > Someone else will do it and then will set CVS flag to +) This has just changed. Fedora Account System Username is what is needed now because we're in the process of switching to the Package Database. I'm sending an announcement about needing FAS username today. Sorry for the confusion during the transition. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 16:54:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 12:54:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247930] Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708081654.l78GsPOX032601@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247930 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-08 12:54 EST ------- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 16:54:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 12:54:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708081654.l78GsxGa032672@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208034 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(paul_kunz at slac.sta | |nford.edu) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-08 12:54 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 17:05:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 13:05:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240308] Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708081705.l78H5c2w001567@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240308 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2007-08-08 13:05 EST ------- When it is linked again Qt4 all will be ok:) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 17:10:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 13:10:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240308] Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708081710.l78HAdmo002111@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240308 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-08 13:10 EST ------- What do you mean ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 17:16:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 13:16:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240308] Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708081716.l78HGWAd002591@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240308 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2007-08-08 13:16 EST ------- You must build it twice. One time again Qt3 an the second time with Qt4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 17:23:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 13:23:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240308] Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708081723.l78HNI4v004058@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240308 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-08 13:23 EST ------- I did so in the spec file: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/result/qwtplot3d.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 17:26:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 13:26:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708081726.l78HQh3G004487@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-08 13:26 EST ------- Well, actually unless bug 250494 is resolved, it seems that I cannot go further on this review request?? However for initscripts: * lock file and pid file - Usually when daemon is running, there should be two files - /var/run/.pid - contains the info of the pid number - /var/lock/subsys/ (Please refer to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FCNewInit/Initscripts Although I am not sure to what degree we should follow these guidelines... and "Init Script Functions" seems to be supported only partially) * status - and what does "service sepostgresql status" return? Usually the format is: ---------------------------------------------------- [root at localhost ~]# LANG=C service xfs status xfs (pid 2343) is running... ---------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 17:34:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 13:34:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240308] Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708081734.l78HYkSd005334@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240308 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2007-08-08 13:34 EST ------- This is not correct, because you must remove all old stuff after build, before you can built it for Qt4. The easy way is simple copy the sources after extract to an second directory. Than build it for Qt3 in the original dir, move to the second and build it for Qt4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 17:40:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 13:40:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251190] Review Request: gds2pov - GDS2 layout file to POV-Ray conversion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708081740.l78HeJK7006026@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gds2pov - GDS2 layout file to POV-Ray conversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251190 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-08-08 13:40 EST ------- MUST Items: - MUST: rpmlint's output is clean except a warning about the absence of doc for the devel package I will not block approval for this - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. ok - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name} ok - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. ok - MUST: The package is licensed (GPL) with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. ok * MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. I have found only GPLv2 not GPLv2+ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing - MUST: the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. ok - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. ok - MUST: The spec file for the package is be legible. ok - MUST: The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. ok - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least i386. ok in FC6 i386 - MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires. ok - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly. ok - MUST: If the package does not contain shared library files located in the dynamic linker's default paths ok - MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable ok - MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates. ok - MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. ok - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. ok - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). ok - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. ok - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. ok - MUST: There are no Large documentation files ok - MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. ok - MUST: There are no Header files or static libraries ok - MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix ok - MUST: Package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives ok - MUST: Package containing GUI applications includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. ok - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. ok SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: The source package does include license text(s) as COPYING ok - SHOULD: mock builds succcessfully in i386. ok - SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. ok - SHOULD: No subpackages present. ok -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 17:59:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 13:59:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251190] Review Request: gds2pov - GDS2 layout file to POV-Ray conversion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708081759.l78HxZCH008508@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gds2pov - GDS2 layout file to POV-Ray conversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251190 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-08 13:59 EST ------- Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/gds2pov/gds2pov.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/gds2pov/gds2pov-0.20070426-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 18:11:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 14:11:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251190] Review Request: gds2pov - GDS2 layout file to POV-Ray conversion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708081811.l78IBN9S010248@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gds2pov - GDS2 layout file to POV-Ray conversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251190 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-08-08 14:11 EST ------- Everything fixed APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 18:17:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 14:17:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251190] Review Request: gds2pov - GDS2 layout file to POV-Ray conversion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708081817.l78IH9qi011108@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gds2pov - GDS2 layout file to POV-Ray conversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251190 pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 18:18:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 14:18:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251190] Review Request: gds2pov - GDS2 layout file to POV-Ray conversion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708081818.l78IINST011201@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gds2pov - GDS2 layout file to POV-Ray conversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251190 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-08 14:18 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gds2pov Short Description: GDS2 layout file to POV-Ray conversion Owners: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 18:21:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 14:21:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247513] Review Request: junit4 - java regression testing framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708081821.l78ILasi011734@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: junit4 - java regression testing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247513 fnasser at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|vivekl at redhat.com |fnasser at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From fnasser at redhat.com 2007-08-08 14:21 EST ------- Starting import procedure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 18:23:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 14:23:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247513] Review Request: junit4 - java regression testing framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708081823.l78INGPC011952@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: junit4 - java regression testing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247513 fnasser at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+, fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From fnasser at redhat.com 2007-08-08 14:23 EST ------- Confirmed that the changes requested by the reviewer were implemented. Requesting 'junit4' cvs branch for import. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 20:33:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 16:33:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244597] Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708082033.l78KX4W9032456@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244597 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-08 16:33 EST ------- you can now close this bug :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 20:40:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 16:40:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244597] Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708082040.l78Ke8WI001156@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244597 pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 20:41:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 16:41:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251361] Review Request: compat-expat1 - libray compat package for expat 1.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708082041.l78KfM9I001345@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-expat1 - libray compat package for expat 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251361 ------- Additional Comments From jorton at redhat.com 2007-08-08 16:41 EST ------- Updated versions: Spec URL: http://jorton.fedorapeople.org/expat/compat-expat1.spec SRPM URL: http://jorton.fedorapeople.org/expat/compat-expat1-1.95.8-2.src.rpm have fixed the License tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 20:52:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 16:52:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230812] Review Request: tcpxtract - tool for extracting files from network traffic based on file signatures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708082052.l78Kqkkp002767@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcpxtract - tool for extracting files from network traffic based on file signatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230812 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-08 16:52 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 20:52:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 16:52:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226054] Merge Review: libuser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708082052.l78KqrTv002805@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libuser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226054 ------- Additional Comments From yaneti at declera.com 2007-08-08 16:52 EST ------- Just a notice that the python split affects the Requires for at least anaconda, firstboot, system-config-rootpassword, system-config-samba and system-config-users. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 20:55:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 16:55:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240308] Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708082055.l78KtDQb003179@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240308 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-08 16:55 EST ------- I have updated the spec without dumping the release: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/result/qwtplot3d.spec the qwtplot3d-qt4 libraries are compiled first and outputs on the qt4 directory. Then make clean. Afterwards qwtplot3d (qt3.3) libraries are compiled. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 20:55:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 16:55:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240308] Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708082055.l78Ktuqg003286@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240308 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-08 16:55 EST ------- do you want to be the co-packager for qwtplot3d ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 20:58:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 16:58:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235925] Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708082058.l78KwkWJ003694@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones Alias: dnssec-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-08 16:58 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 21:04:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 17:04:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240571] Review Request: ocaml-calendar - Objective CAML library for managing dates and times In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708082104.l78L42EC004659@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-calendar - Objective CAML library for managing dates and times https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240571 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-08 17:03 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 21:05:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 17:05:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226054] Merge Review: libuser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708082105.l78L5peB004994@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libuser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226054 ------- Additional Comments From mitr at redhat.com 2007-08-08 17:05 EST ------- Yes, I have filed bugs against all of the packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 21:06:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 17:06:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247513] Review Request: junit4 - java regression testing framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708082106.l78L6Avq005149@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: junit4 - java regression testing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247513 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-08 17:06 EST ------- Can the submitter add a CVS template so we know what branches are needed, etc? See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure Set the fedora-cvs flag back to ? when you are ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 21:09:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 17:09:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248301] Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708082109.l78L9YYS005501@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248301 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-08 17:09 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 21:16:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 17:16:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251190] Review Request: gds2pov - GDS2 layout file to POV-Ray conversion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708082116.l78LGtlh006258@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gds2pov - GDS2 layout file to POV-Ray conversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251190 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-08 17:16 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 21:18:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 17:18:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251419] New: Review Request: mdbtools - Access data stored in Microsoft Access databases Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251419 Summary: Review Request: mdbtools - Access data stored in Microsoft Access databases Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/mdbtools.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/mdbtools-0.5-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: MDB Tools is a suite of programs for accessing data stored in Microsoft Access databases. --- Note to reviewers, this package has been declated patent issues free by Spot ("Tom \"spot\" Callaway" ). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 21:24:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 17:24:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250903] Review Request: python-exif - Python module to extract EXIF information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708082124.l78LOFZ2007035@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-exif - Python module to extract EXIF information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250903 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2007-08-08 17:24 EST ------- Bodhi done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 8 22:45:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 18:45:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251190] Review Request: gds2pov - GDS2 layout file to POV-Ray conversion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708082245.l78MjANk011462@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gds2pov - GDS2 layout file to POV-Ray conversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251190 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 00:04:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 20:04:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708090004.l7904x6C014993@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 ------- Additional Comments From wilmer at fedoraproject.org 2007-08-08 20:04 EST ------- Updated with you suggestions: Spec: http://mybashburn.sourceforge.net/mybashburn.spec SRPM: http://mybashburn.sourceforge.net/mybashburn-1.0.2-1.src.rpm Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 00:16:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 20:16:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251428] New: Review Request: aopalliance - Java/J2EE AOP standards Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251428 Summary: Review Request: aopalliance - Java/J2EE AOP standards Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://aopalliance.sourceforge.net/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vivekl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/aopalliance.spec SRPM URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/aopalliance-1.0-2jpp.2.fc8.src.rpm Java/J2EE AOP standards Needed to add Aspect Oriented Programming infrastructure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 02:06:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 22:06:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249235] Review Request: pidgin-knotify - KNotify plugin for Pidgin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708090206.l7926h4h027067@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-knotify - KNotify plugin for Pidgin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249235 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-08 22:06 EST ------- ok, that looks good. I see no further blockers, so this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this request once it's been imported and built. Also, do consider reviewing another waiting package and helping out with the reviewing load. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 02:27:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 22:27:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249235] Review Request: pidgin-knotify - KNotify plugin for Pidgin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708090227.l792RWjP029079@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-knotify - KNotify plugin for Pidgin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249235 lightsolphoenix at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lightsolphoenix at gmail.com 2007-08-08 22:27 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pidgin-knotify Short Description: Pidgin plugin to use KNotify Owners: lightsolphoenix at gmail.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 03:26:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 23:26:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249235] Review Request: pidgin-knotify - KNotify plugin for Pidgin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708090326.l793QAgc000678@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-knotify - KNotify plugin for Pidgin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249235 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-08 23:26 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 04:00:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 00:00:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247227] Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708090400.l794019C003420@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method Alias: nabi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247227 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-08 23:59 EST ------- Here is my review: Good: + rpmlint clean + package follows naming and packaging guidelines + specifies GPL version and includes COPYING + spec file is legible + source is pristine 0d0fba8851a1ac367d7b52840e6bef3e nabi-0.18.tar.gz + builds in mock and runs correctly + buildreqs listed + uses %find_lang + file and dir ownership looks correct + consistent macro usage + does not contain devel files + scriplets reasonable Need attention: - actually thinking more, I realised that the desktop is not needed since we don't normally run input methods from the desktop menu - they should be configured with im-chooser instead. - minor, but I think ChangeLog can be dropped from %doc Apart from that all MUST items from ReviewGuidelines are satisfied. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 04:03:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 00:03:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247227] Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708090403.l79435KP003944@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method Alias: nabi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247227 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-09 00:03 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=160954) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=160954&action=view) nabi.spec-6.patch this patch fixes the above: - remove unnecessary desktop file - tidy doc filelist -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 04:19:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 00:19:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249892] Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708090419.l794JV39005474@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249892 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-09 00:19 EST ------- Sorry for reply.. (In reply to comment #18) > What should the version-release values be? The latest doc files seem to have the name 2.30 explicitly, so it is reasonable that the rpm version is 2.30. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 06:26:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 02:26:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708090626.l796Qb6i017414@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-08-09 02:26 EST ------- Jiri, this is now fixed in the 0.8 version of the texlive packages. xdvi doesn't take into account that the X toolkit could be anything different than Motif or Xaw. There are also available i386 prebuild packages from: http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/texlive/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 06:39:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 02:39:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708090639.l796dNws018016@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 jnovy at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |drepper at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-08-09 02:39 EST ------- There's a new version of texlive packages (0.8) downloadable from: http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/texlive/ The prebuilt packages are now available also for i386. I removed sources and useless tpms from the tarball what decreased the SRPM size of about 15M. There were missing some pool files that are now added. Neal, I'll remove euro fonts in the next release to avoid this conflict. The warnings seems to be caused by updmap which is likely used to generate the font map files from incorrectly set updmap.cfg. I'm having a look at it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 07:30:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 03:30:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248301] Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708090730.l797UlNO021216@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248301 patrice.bouchand.fedora at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 09:18:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 05:18:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248815] Review Request: trac-bazaar-plugin - Support for Bazaar source repositories in trac In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708090918.l799I7VV030415@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trac-bazaar-plugin - Support for Bazaar source repositories in trac https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248815 toshio at tiki-lounge.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |0.2-2.20070717bzr180 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2007-08-09 05:18 EST ------- Package built and pushed to the repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 11:07:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 07:07:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251317] Review Request: pinot - Personal search and metasearch for the Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708091107.l79B7iMH008056@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pinot - Personal search and metasearch for the Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251317 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 11:08:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 07:08:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250240] Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708091108.l79B8vll008208@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250240 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-08-09 07:08 EST ------- upstream has fixed this in svn should I ship a svn snapshot or wait for the release? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 11:09:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 07:09:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249524] Review Request: wxdfast - Multi-threaded download manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708091109.l79B9U9k008314@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wxdfast - Multi-threaded download manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249524 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 12:39:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 08:39:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225795] Merge Review: ghostscript In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708091239.l79CdiY7018732@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ghostscript https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225795 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From nsoranzo at tiscali.it 2007-08-09 08:39 EST ------- FYI on the 1st of August GPL Ghostscript 8.60 has been released, first stable release after the merge with ESP: http://www.ghostscript.com/awki/GPL_Ghostscript_8.60 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 13:23:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 09:23:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210553] Review Request: xerces-c - Validating XML Parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708091323.l79DNQSp024046@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xerces-c - Validating XML Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210553 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-08-09 09:23 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: xerces-c New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 13:26:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 09:26:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210553] Review Request: xerces-c - Validating XML Parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708091326.l79DQDES024396@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xerces-c - Validating XML Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210553 lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cbalint at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-08-09 09:26 EST ------- *** Bug 251492 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 14:39:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 10:39:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249992] Review Request: glglobe - OpenGl Globe - Earth simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708091439.l79EdbnQ031400@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glglobe - OpenGl Globe - Earth simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249992 ------- Additional Comments From dtimms at iinet.net.au 2007-08-09 10:39 EST ------- Mamoru, thanks for taking a look: (In reply to comment #7) Updated spec: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/glglobe/glglobe.spec SRPM: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/glglobe/glglobe-0.2-4.fc7.src.rpm - add comment re Source1..4 creation - mod .desktop category to Education, although some or all of the {Education, Graphics, DataVisualization, Geography, Amusement, ImageProcessing } might fit ? - del .desktop category deprecated items - del extraneous BR and Requires(post/postun) for desktop-file-utils > desktop-file-install --vendor fedora --delete-original \ When I followed other packages as an example, it seems that --delete-original was normal. Is this a changed packaging standard ? - mod desktop-file-install to simpler command, using SOURCEx - add ownership of app data directory - mod ownership of icon data to glglobe specific filenames (In reply to comment #8) - mod License to meet new Licensing Guidelines Changed but didn't work out rpmlint's unhappiness until I realized I hadn't updated rpmlint on that machine ;) Current spec: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/glglobe/glglobe.spec Updated SRPM: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/glglobe/glglobe-0.2-4.fc7.src.rpm A query: is it worth testing in fc6 and fdevel {my testing has been in f7}? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 15:00:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 11:00:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708091500.l79F0GXm001413@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From maxime.carron at fedoraproject.org 2007-08-09 11:00 EST ------- It seems that one or more ruby dependencies are missing. $ texexec --version /usr/bin/env: ruby: Aucun fichier ou r?pertoire de ce type -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 15:00:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 11:00:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235925] Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708091500.l79F0H0P001446@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones Alias: dnssec-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925 wjhns174 at hardakers.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-08-09 11:00 EST ------- checked in. thanks! (make -j4 turned out to be a problem, so there is a new patch in the repo for that) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 15:00:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 11:00:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247513] Review Request: junit4 - java regression testing framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708091500.l79F0Rkk001491@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: junit4 - java regression testing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247513 fnasser at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From fnasser at redhat.com 2007-08-09 11:00 EST ------- Sorry, missed the template: Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: junit4 New Branches: devel Fedora Owners: fnasser at redhat.com, bkonrath at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 15:09:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 11:09:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251521] New: Review Request: ilmbase - Abract/convenience libraries (used in openexr) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251521 Summary: Review Request: ilmbase - Abract/convenience libraries (used in openexr) Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rdieter at math.unl.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kdeforge.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SOURCES/ilmbase/ilmbase.spec SRPM URL: http://kdeforge.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SOURCES/ilmbase/ilmbase-1.0.0-1.src.rpm Description: Half is a class that encapsulates our 16-bit floating-point format. IlmThread is a thread abstraction library for use with OpenEXR and other software packages. It currently supports pthreads and Windows threads. Imath implements 2D and 3D vectors, 3x3 and 4x4 matrices, quaternions and other useful 2D and 3D math functions. Iex is an exception-handling library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 15:10:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 11:10:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251521] Review Request: ilmbase - Abraction/convenience libraries (used in openexr) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708091510.l79FAS9r002817@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ilmbase - Abraction/convenience libraries (used in openexr) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251521 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: ilmbase - |Review Request: ilmbase - |Abract/convenience libraries|Abraction/convenience |(used in openexr) |libraries (used in openexr) ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-08-09 11:10 EST ------- FIXME: better summary. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 15:13:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 11:13:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251521] Review Request: ilmbase - Abraction/convenience libraries (used in openexr) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708091513.l79FDrT2003501@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ilmbase - Abraction/convenience libraries (used in openexr) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251521 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-08-09 11:13 EST ------- This is a new build requirement for openexr >= 1.6.0 (these were included in openexr < 1.6.0) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 15:21:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 11:21:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251525] New: Review Request: bibexport - Extract entries from BibTeX and .aux files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251525 Summary: Review Request: bibexport - Extract entries from BibTeX and .aux files Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pertusus at free.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/bibexport.spec SRPM URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/bibexport-2.10-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: bibexport.sh is a small shell script, relying on BibTeX, that extracts entries of one or several bib file(s). It will expand abbreviations and cross-references, except standard month and journal abbreviations. The output is indented as neatly as possible, yielding a readable bib file even if the original one was not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 15:37:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 11:37:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251529] New: Review Request: armacycles-ad - A tron lightcycle game in 3D Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251529 Summary: Review Request: armacycles-ad - A tron lightcycle game in 3D Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: limb at jcomserv.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/armacycles-ad/armacycles-ad.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/armacycles-ad/armacycles-ad-0.2.8.2.1-1.final.1.fc7.src.rpm Description: In this game you ride a lightcycle; that is a sort of motorbike that cannot be stopped and leaves a wall behind it. The main goal of the game is to make your opponents' lightcycles crash into a wall while avoiding the same fate. The focus of the game lies on the multiplayer mode, but it provides challanging AI opponents for a quick training match. This is Armagetron Advanced, rebranded as approved by upstream and spot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 15:39:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 11:39:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250240] Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708091539.l79FdSe6007789@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250240 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 15:44:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 11:44:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251317] Review Request: pinot - Personal search and metasearch for the Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708091544.l79FiadS008503@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pinot - Personal search and metasearch for the Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251317 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 15:45:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 11:45:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249524] Review Request: wxdfast - Multi-threaded download manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708091545.l79Fj5rs008614@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wxdfast - Multi-threaded download manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249524 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 15:57:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 11:57:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240571] Review Request: ocaml-calendar - Objective CAML library for managing dates and times In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708091557.l79FvPS9010293@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-calendar - Objective CAML library for managing dates and times https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240571 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-08-09 11:57 EST ------- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=95339 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 16:31:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 12:31:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240308] Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708091631.l79GVXVc013927@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240308 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-08-09 12:31 EST ------- I'd recommend using macros provided by qt4-devel (in /etc/rpm/macros.qt4): %_qt4_headerdir, %_qt4_libdir (or output from qmake-qt4 -query QT_INSTALL_HEADERS qmake-qt4 -query QT_INSTALL_LIBS respectively). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 16:34:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 12:34:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708091634.l79GYbYU014329@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 ------- Additional Comments From aravind at aravind.name 2007-08-09 12:34 EST ------- I installed the latest on a F8Test1 system. Installation was without a glitch. I had to remove tetex which was part of F8Test1, which was strange. I though that teTex would have been at least removed if not replace by TeXLive. I am yet to run LaTeX with my test files. I will do it soon and report if I encounter any problem. The last rpm on the list.noarch is texlive-xdvi-2007-0.8.fc8.x86_64.rpm. I guess if you are installing for i386 it is already included in list.i386 (besides it is for x86_64). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 16:36:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 12:36:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251536] New: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-diamondtouch - Xorg diamondtouch input driver Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251536 Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-diamondtouch - Xorg diamondtouch input driver Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ajackson at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~ajax/diamondtouch/xorg-x11-drv-diamondtouch.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~ajax/diamondtouch/xorg-x11-drv-diamondtouch-0.2.0-0.1.fc8.src.rpm Description: The MERL Diamondtouch is a multi-user touchscreen. See demo video: http://wearables.unisa.edu.au/mpx/?q=node/86 This is the X driver for same. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 17:12:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 13:12:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249892] Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708091712.l79HCMHF019371@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249892 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-08-09 13:12 EST ------- Spec: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/bouml-doc.spec Will be uploading the SRPM tomorrow. Don't have sufficient bandwidth now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 17:20:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 13:20:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240308] Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708091720.l79HKgZY020593@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240308 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2007-08-09 13:20 EST ------- Sorry, but I have to less time at now. To be an co-packager for more projects. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 17:35:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 13:35:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251545] New: Review Request: setroubleshoot-plugins - analysis plugins for setroubleshoot Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251545 Summary: Review Request: setroubleshoot-plugins - analysis plugins for setroubleshoot Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jdennis at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/jdennis/setroubleshoot-plugins.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/jdennis/setroubleshoot-plugins-1.10.0-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: The setroubleshoot-server package formerly contained all the analysis plugins. This new package splits the plugins into their own completely independent package (*not* a subpackage) to ease updating. The plugin package contains only the plugins and their i18n translations. There is not much new here, the contents of this package had been previously been included elsewhere, this is just a packaging partition which probably should have been done originally. Note, both setroubleshoot and setroubleshoot-server have dependencies on this package. This package does not have a dependency on either of the two aforementioned packages since either one of those can be installed independently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 18:08:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 14:08:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251529] Review Request: armacycles-ad - A tron lightcycle game in 3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708091808.l79I8qlG028148@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: armacycles-ad - A tron lightcycle game in 3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251529 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-09 14:08 EST ------- Ugh, you are using the "Tron" trademark in the Summary, please don't, thats considered user visible. Also since this is going in I think it would be wise to not use the word Armagetron on the Games SIG page to refer to this review either. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 18:13:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 14:13:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251529] Review Request: armacycles-ad - A lightcycle game in 3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708091813.l79IDYYM028699@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: armacycles-ad - A lightcycle game in 3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251529 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: armacycles- |Review Request: armacycles- |ad - A tron lightcycle game |ad - A lightcycle game in 3D |in 3D | ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-08-09 14:13 EST ------- Corrected both. Oops! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 18:16:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 14:16:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249992] Review Request: glglobe - OpenGl Globe - Earth simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708091816.l79IGvGc029149@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glglobe - OpenGl Globe - Earth simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249992 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-09 14:16 EST ------- I have not checked -4 spec/srpm, for now just answering your comment: (In reply to comment #9) > - mod .desktop category to Education, although some or all of the {Education, > Graphics, DataVisualization, Geography, Amusement, ImageProcessing } might fit ? - IMO only one Category "Education" is enough. > > desktop-file-install --vendor fedora --delete-original \ > When I followed other packages as an example, it seems that --delete-original > was normal. Is this a changed packaging standard ? - You don't have to (and must not) delete the original SOURCEx. The reason you had to use --delete-original was if you didn't use it, i.e. -------------------------------------------------- install -p -m 0644 %{SOURCE4} %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications desktop-file-install --vendor fedora \ --dir %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications \ --add-category X-Red-Hat-Base \ %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/glglobe.desktop ---------------------------------------------------- This result in leaving 2 desktop files named "glglobe.desktop" and "fedora-glglobe.desktop" under %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications . So in this usage --delete-original was actually needed. By the new usage (written below:) ---------------------------------------------------- desktop-file-install --vendor fedora \ --dir %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications %{SOURCE4} ---------------------------------------------------- Only one desktop file named "fedora-glglobe.desktop" is created under %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications so it is already okay. And you don't have to (and must not) delete the original SOURCE4 file. > A query: is it worth testing in fc6 and fdevel {my testing has been in f7}? - If you have FC6 or rawhide machine and you can test on them, of course it is appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 18:22:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 14:22:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246138] Review Request: eclipse-quickrex - QuickREx is a regular-expression test Eclipse Plug-In In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708091822.l79IMEFk029985@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-quickrex - QuickREx is a regular-expression test Eclipse Plug-In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246138 alcapcom at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 18:23:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 14:23:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249352] Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708091823.l79INqRv030145@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249352 pmatilai at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |102254, 135428 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 19:31:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 15:31:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251529] Review Request: armacycles-ad - A lightcycle game in 3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708091931.l79JVNPw005511@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: armacycles-ad - A lightcycle game in 3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251529 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-08-09 15:31 EST ------- Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/armacycles-ad/armacycles-ad.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/armacycles-ad/armacycles-ad-0.2.8.2.1-2.final.1.fc7.src.rpm New build with .desktop and icon, as well as fixed summary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 20:09:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 16:09:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226275] Merge Review: perl-PDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708092009.l79K9G3l010854@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-PDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226275 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-08-09 16:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > > However, rpmlint is still complaining about: > > W: perl-PDL unversioned-explicit-provides perl(PDL::Config) > etc... > > And company. Wouldn't it be better to version these with the same version as > perl-PDL? Well, the vast majority of the automatic perl provides are unversioned too, so my take would be to leave the version out for now. > also rpmlint complains about: > > W: perl-PDL devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/PDL/Core/pdlsimple.h > etc... > > We could probably move these to a perl-PDL-devel package, if they aren't needed > at runtime. > Not according to: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Perl#head-b867c6067f009c5ea8f21723d028e8b40fae15c7 Some more stuff: - I've got perl-ExtUtils-F77 added to Fedora, so we can add: BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::F77) BuildRequires: gcc-gfortran I'll also attach a patch that uses the RPM_OPT_FLAGS and -fPIC to compile to fortran code, and fixes a test for gfortran/f77 compatibility. This allows PDL::Slatec to build, so we can remove that from the listed Provides. - Still need BuildRequires: libGLU-devel - Looks like the License should be re-examined and the tag updated. Possibly "GPL+ or Artistic" though some files seem a little different. - Looks like we need to add Provides: perl(PDL::Graphics::TriD::Objects) - We need to filter perl(Win32::DDE::Client) from Requires now. - Don't forget to bump release and add changelog entries! I'll attach a patch for my spec changes as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 20:11:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 16:11:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226275] Merge Review: perl-PDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708092011.l79KB3sm011194@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-PDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226275 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-08-09 16:11 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=161017) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=161017&action=view) Patch to spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 20:11:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 16:11:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226275] Merge Review: perl-PDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708092011.l79KBneF011306@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-PDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226275 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-08-09 16:11 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=161018) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=161018&action=view) patch to fix fortran issues -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 21:18:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 17:18:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210553] Review Request: xerces-c - Validating XML Parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708092118.l79LIgFY018207@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xerces-c - Validating XML Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210553 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-09 17:18 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 21:24:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 17:24:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239963] Review Request: perl-IO-AIO - Asynchronous Input/Output In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708092124.l79LONLn018844@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-AIO - Asynchronous Input/Output https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239963 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2007-08-09 17:24 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-IO-AIO New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 21:31:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 17:31:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247513] Review Request: junit4 - java regression testing framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708092131.l79LVGAY019697@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: junit4 - java regression testing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247513 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vivekl at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-09 17:31 EST ------- I'm a little confused here... Vivek was reviewing this package, but Fernando approved it and is going to maintain it as well? It's not typically allowed to approve a package that you are going to maintain. (With the idea a reviewer should be a disinterested party). Could we get a ack from Vivek that he approves this review and sees no further issues? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 22:04:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 18:04:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245655] Review Request: perl-Gearman - Distributed job system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708092204.l79M4qlN023638@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gearman - Distributed job system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245655 ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2007-08-09 18:04 EST ------- ackage Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Gearman New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 22:07:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 18:07:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245697] Review Request: perl-Gearman-Server - Function call "router" and load balancer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708092207.l79M7Ml9023855@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gearman-Server - Function call "router" and load balancer Alias: perl-Gearman-Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245697 ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2007-08-09 18:07 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Gearman-Server New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 22:39:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 18:39:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247513] Review Request: junit4 - java regression testing framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708092239.l79Mdfjg027833@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: junit4 - java regression testing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247513 ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-08-09 18:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Fixed. Thanks Ben, Everything looks good. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 22:48:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 18:48:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247513] Review Request: junit4 - java regression testing framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708092248.l79MmQT8028535@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: junit4 - java regression testing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247513 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-09 18:48 EST ------- Sorry to be a pain about that...just want to make sure everything is aboveboard and correct. :) cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 22:52:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 18:52:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239963] Review Request: perl-IO-AIO - Asynchronous Input/Output In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708092252.l79MqVGW028834@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-AIO - Asynchronous Input/Output https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239963 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-09 18:52 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 22:53:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 18:53:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245655] Review Request: perl-Gearman - Distributed job system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708092253.l79MrRrv028936@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gearman - Distributed job system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245655 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-09 18:53 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 22:54:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 18:54:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247513] Review Request: junit4 - java regression testing framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708092254.l79MsYEq029045@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: junit4 - java regression testing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247513 ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-08-09 18:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > Sorry to be a pain about that...just want to make sure everything is aboveboard > and correct. :) > > cvs done. Thanks Kevin! Your concern was valid. I mentioned to Fernando elsewhere that everything was OK with the package but he might have been a bit too eager to get this out on rawhide :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 22:55:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 18:55:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245697] Review Request: perl-Gearman-Server - Function call "router" and load balancer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708092255.l79Mt2gk029110@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gearman-Server - Function call "router" and load balancer Alias: perl-Gearman-Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245697 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-09 18:55 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 9 23:47:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 19:47:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247227] Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708092347.l79Nlax5031748@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method Alias: nabi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247227 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-09 19:47 EST ------- I contacted upstream about the questionable themes which we are excluding from the package. I hope they can be removed in a future release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 01:56:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 21:56:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248431] Review Request: perl-Net-FTPServer - Secure, extensible and configurable Perl FTP server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708100156.l7A1utlG004531@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-FTPServer - Secure, extensible and configurable Perl FTP server Alias: perl-Net-FTPServer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248431 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Alias| |perl-Net-FTPServer ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-08-09 21:56 EST ------- Excellent. I'm going to need this package on a couple boxes of mine soon :) (In reply to comment #2) > I was debating adding BR /usr/bin/uudecode, but that would make more sense if I > added a runtime dependency also, and I'm not sure I really want to encourage > turning on that functionality in a FTP server. Adding a BR will allow the test suite to fully exercise functional bits of the module and would seem to be in order... > The zip generation is optional functionality. I'm not sure how important the > test error is. The build completed fine for me even with that error. > > I can look into it a little deeper now if you want though. (I planned on > looking at that later anyway...) Filing a bug upstream and noting it in the spec would probably be a good way to address this sort of error in the test itself. (Just from the message here, it sounds like t/350generatorzip.t is probably mis-calling Archive::Zip.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 02:07:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 22:07:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245342] Review Request: perl-Gnome2 - Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOME libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708100207.l7A27aj8004993@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gnome2 - Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOME libraries Alias: perl-Gnome2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245342 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-Gnome2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 02:09:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 22:09:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238238] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Devel - Catalyst Development Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708100209.l7A29lc7005096@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Devel - Catalyst Development Tools Alias: perl-Catalyst-Devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238238 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-08-09 22:09 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Catalyst-Devel Short Description: Catalyst Development Tools Owners: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Branches: FC-6, F-7, devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 02:09:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 22:09:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238238] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Devel - Catalyst Development Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708100209.l7A29tX2005127@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Devel - Catalyst Development Tools Alias: perl-Catalyst-Devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238238 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 02:13:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 22:13:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233388] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-CalendarButton - Gtk2::Ex::CalendarButton Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708100213.l7A2DTmO005369@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-CalendarButton - Gtk2::Ex::CalendarButton Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233388 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-08-09 22:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Why isn't this ticket assigned to anyone? I don't think Parag even saw the ping > as he's not even in the CC list for this ticket. Good question :) Fixing... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 02:31:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 22:31:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251611] New: Review Request: perl-Template-Alloy - TT2/3, HT, HTE, Tmpl, and Velocity Engine Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251611 Summary: Review Request: perl-Template-Alloy - TT2/3, HT, HTE, Tmpl, and Velocity Engine Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Template-Alloy/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Template-Alloy-1.006-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Template-Alloy.spec Description: "An alloy is a homogeneous mixture of two or more elements" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alloy). Template::Alloy represents the mixing of features and capabilities from all of the major mini-language based template systems (support for non-mini-language based systems will happen eventually). With Template::Alloy you can use your favorite template interface and syntax and get features from each of the other major template systems. And Template::Alloy is fast - whether you're using mod_perl, cgi, or running from the commandline. There is even Template::Alloy::XS for getting a little more speed when that is necessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 02:31:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 22:31:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251611] Review Request: perl-Template-Alloy - TT2/3, HT, HTE, Tmpl, and Velocity Engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708100231.l7A2VXEB006539@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Template-Alloy - TT2/3, HT, HTE, Tmpl, and Velocity Engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251611 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |251612 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 02:32:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 22:32:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251611] Review Request: perl-Template-Alloy - TT2/3, HT, HTE, Tmpl, and Velocity Engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708100232.l7A2WK0D006636@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Template-Alloy - TT2/3, HT, HTE, Tmpl, and Velocity Engine Alias: perl-Template-Alloy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251611 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-Template-Alloy -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 03:04:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 23:04:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226363] Merge Review: redhat-lsb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708100304.l7A34CLW008928@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: redhat-lsb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226363 ------- Additional Comments From llim at redhat.com 2007-08-09 23:04 EST ------- Made some changes to the spec file. Let me know if there's any issue. In the meantime, I will look at some of the symlinks to see if they are legite. Thanks. http://people.redhat.com/llim/redhat-lsb/3.1-16/redhat-lsb-3.1-16.fc8.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/llim/redhat-lsb/3.1-16/redhat-lsb-3.1-16.fc7.x86_64.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 04:35:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 00:35:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251536] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-diamondtouch - Xorg diamondtouch input driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708100435.l7A4ZUiS016627@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-diamondtouch - Xorg diamondtouch input driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251536 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-10 00:35 EST ------- I'd be happy to review this package, although I don't have the hardware. Look for a full review in a bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 04:51:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 00:51:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251536] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-diamondtouch - Xorg diamondtouch input driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708100451.l7A4pXb6018197@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-diamondtouch - Xorg diamondtouch input driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251536 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-10 00:51 EST ------- This package doesn't seem to build for me under devel mock: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -Wall -I../include -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -I/usr/include/xorg -I../src -MT diamondtouch_drv_la-diamondtouch.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/diamondtouch_drv_la-diamondtouch.Tpo -c diamondtouch.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/diamondtouch_drv_la-diamondtouch.o diamondtouch.c: In function 'DtReadInput': diamondtouch.c:417: warning: implicit declaration of function 'xf86DisableDevice' diamondtouch.c: In function '_dt_init_axes': diamondtouch.c:698: error: 'GetMotionHistory' undeclared (first use in this function) diamondtouch.c:698: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once diamondtouch.c:698: error: for each function it appears in.) diamondtouch.c:699: warning: implicit declaration of function 'GetMotionHistorySize' diamondtouch.c:704: warning: implicit declaration of function 'InitAbsoluteClassDeviceStruct' make[2]: *** [diamondtouch_drv_la-diamondtouch.lo] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/xf86-input-diamondtouch-0.2.0/src' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/xf86-input-diamondtouch-0.2.0' make: *** [all] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.91130 (%build) Missing BuildRequires? Or something else going on? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 05:25:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 01:25:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229098] Review Request: openjpeg - JPEG 2000 codec library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708100525.l7A5Pp5H020295@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openjpeg - JPEG 2000 codec library Alias: openjpeg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229098 ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2007-08-10 01:25 EST ------- http://www.haxxed.com/rpms/secondlife/openjpeg.spec http://www.haxxed.com/rpms/secondlife/openjpeg-1.2-2.20070808svn.fc7.src.rpm * Thu Aug 09 2007 Callum Lerwick 1.2-2.20070808svn - Put binaries in main package, move libraries to -libs subpackage. Based on an SVN snapshot, with a whole load of patches that I'm trying to get upstream, that speeds it up about 25%... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 05:40:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 01:40:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231809] Review Request: xmlrpc-epi - An implementation of the xmlrpc protocol in C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708100540.l7A5eIXQ021305@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlrpc-epi - An implementation of the xmlrpc protocol in C Alias: xmlrpc-epi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231809 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-10 01:40 EST ------- ping again?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 06:24:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 02:24:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247227] Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708100624.l7A6OKms023225@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method Alias: nabi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247227 ------- Additional Comments From sbehera at redhat.com 2007-08-10 02:24 EST ------- Package Updated. Spec URL: http://oriya.sourceforge.net/0.18-6/nabi.spec SRPM URL: http://oriya.sourceforge.net/0.18-6/nabi-0.18-6.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 06:44:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 02:44:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708100644.l7A6icsP024059@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From kaigai at kaigai.gr.jp 2007-08-10 02:44 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=161040) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=161040&action=view) init script of sepostgresql-8.2.4-0.418.beta.fc8 Here is the new version of SE-PostgreSQL SpecURL: http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/files/sepostgresql.spec SrpmURL: http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/files/sepostgresql-8.2.4-0.418.beta.fc8.src.rpm (In reply to comment #24) > Well, actually unless bug 250494 is resolved, it seems that > I cannot go further on this review request?? Yes, it depends on selinux-package with object classes definition for SE-PostgreSQL, so it has to be resolved. Fortunatelly, these new object classes are merged into the upstreamed reference policy yesterday. I think it will be integrated within the selinux-policy package soon. http://marc.info/?l=selinux&m=118666527208126&w=2 The new version of SE-PostgreSQL contains some modifications of the init script. > However for initscripts: > * lock file and pid file > - Usually when daemon is running, there should be two files > - /var/run/.pid - contains the info of the pid > number > - /var/lock/subsys/ I added a code to create lock file and pid file on startup, and to remove them on shutdown. rpmlint got a silent. I uses "/var/lock/subsys/${NAME}.lock" as a pathname of the lock file. It is same manner with postgresql's one, but rpmlint made warnings. Should it be replaced by an immediate value? > * status > - and what does "service sepostgresql status" return? > Usually the format is: > ---------------------------------------------------- > [root at localhost ~]# LANG=C service xfs status > xfs (pid 2343) is running... > ---------------------------------------------------- It displays the following message. ------------------------------------------ [root at masu ~]# service sepostgresql status sepostgresql: server is running (PID: 11726) [root at masu ~]# service sepostgresql stop Stopping sepostgresql service: [ OK ] [root at masu ~]# service sepostgresql status sepostgresql: no server running [root at masu ~]# echo $? 3 [root at masu ~]# ------------------------------------------ In addition, I updated the path of the commands run by /sbin/runuser as follows: | cd ${SEPGSQL_BIN} | /sbin/runuser sepgsql -- -c "./pg_ctl -D ${SEPGSQL_DATA} status" When /sbin/runuser is run with CWD sepgsql cannot access, typically /root, a noisy warnning message will be generated. "cd ${SEPGSQL_BIN}" ensure that sepgsql can be placed on his accesable CWD. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 06:54:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 02:54:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233388] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-CalendarButton - Gtk2::Ex::CalendarButton Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708100654.l7A6saKT024788@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-CalendarButton - Gtk2::Ex::CalendarButton Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233388 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-10 02:54 EST ------- Good to add examples directory under %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 06:57:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 02:57:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233388] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-CalendarButton - Gtk2::Ex::CalendarButton Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708100657.l7A6v7jx024940@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-CalendarButton - Gtk2::Ex::CalendarButton Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233388 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-10 02:57 EST ------- oops sorry wrong comment. Ignore above comment plz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 07:03:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 03:03:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233388] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-CalendarButton - Gtk2::Ex::CalendarButton Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708100703.l7A73UGx025499@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-CalendarButton - Gtk2::Ex::CalendarButton Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233388 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-10 03:03 EST ------- now with new License Changes, you need to change License tag -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 08:14:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 04:14:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225797] Merge Review: gimp-data-extras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708100814.l7A8E5cK031898@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gimp-data-extras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225797 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora nphilipp at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |blitters at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2007-08-10 04:14 EST ------- *** Bug 251614 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 09:29:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 05:29:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249892] Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708100929.l7A9TdPq009227@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249892 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-08-10 05:29 EST ------- SRPM: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/bouml-doc-2.30-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 09:57:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 05:57:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249352] Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708100957.l7A9vkk6012711@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249352 pmatilai at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |178413 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 10:08:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 06:08:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251110] Review Request: perl-IPC-RUN3 - Run a subprocess in batch mode In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708101008.l7AA8Zcs013860@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IPC-RUN3 - Run a subprocess in batch mode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251110 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-08-10 06:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > I have no idea why rpmlint complains about Artistic but it should obviously > be ignored here. The issue is a bit hairy as Artistic alone is not an acceptable license for Fedora, but "GPL+ or Artistic" is. There will be an update to rpmlint pretty soon that should resolve this to some extent, but tibbs is correct, specifying "GPL+ or Artistic" and ignoring the warning from rpmlint is correct for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 10:11:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 06:11:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251419] Review Request: mdbtools - Access data stored in Microsoft Access databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708101011.l7AABaaW014208@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mdbtools - Access data stored in Microsoft Access databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251419 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-08-10 06:11 EST ------- Already submitted in bug 239968, although that one seems stalled. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 10:12:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 06:12:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249352] Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708101012.l7AACc7e014311@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249352 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-08-10 06:12 EST ------- Ralf, thanks for this hint. Panu, thanks for your inital patch, I'll merge today your patch with Ralfs last comment into a -2 and push to the same base URL as my initial review request. When done, URLs will get added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 10:28:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 06:28:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249352] Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708101028.l7AASsHn015908@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249352 ------- Additional Comments From pmatilai at redhat.com 2007-08-10 06:28 EST ------- Yup. Once the /lib move has been done I think it's ok to proceed with the review. I've done a bit of testing with rpm 4.4.2.1 and didn't see any problems with the newer popt. Some of points worth noting: - rpm needs to loose the strict dependency on popt = - (will do) - fedora-maintainers + fedora-devel-announce needs to be notified because the amount of implicit build dependencies on popt-devel - once this package hits rawhide, rpm needs to be modified to build against external popt and kill of the internal version entirely (will do) - I want co-maintainership for the new popt package, just so I know what's going on with it due to the close marriage with rpm (not that I expect much to happen, popt isn't that actively developed) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 10:28:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 06:28:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239968] Review Request: mdbtools - tools for extracting things from Access databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708101028.l7AASwbv015978@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mdbtools - tools for extracting things from Access databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239968 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-10 06:28 EST ------- Oops I did it again ... I submitted a review for a package already in review, livinded, ping again ... do you want to continue with this package submission or shall we close this and move forward with mine? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 10:30:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 06:30:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251419] Review Request: mdbtools - Access data stored in Microsoft Access databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708101030.l7AAU1bx016069@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mdbtools - Access data stored in Microsoft Access databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251419 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-10 06:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Already submitted in bug 239968, although that one seems stalled. Oops, I added a comment there pinging the submitter and trying to coordinate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 10:36:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 06:36:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249352] Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708101036.l7AAaXhl016514@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249352 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-08-10 06:36 EST ------- The License Tag does not math current Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines - it needs to have a value that is mentioned in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing It seems to be a MIT License "Modern Style with sublicense": http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/MIT So the License-tag should be "MIT" instead of "X Consortium". But I do not know, whether or not it is a problem that, test2.c is (L)GPL licensed according to its header, but I guess it is not distributed in the binary rpm. Also some files are missing a license header (test3.c, popint.c and system.h) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 11:05:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 07:05:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 166377] Review Request: erlang - General-purpose programming language and runtime environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708101105.l7AB5rUx018327@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: erlang - General-purpose programming language and runtime environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166377 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora gemi at bluewin.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2007-08-10 07:05 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: erlang New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Updated EPEL Owners: lemenkov at gmail.com,gemi at bluewin.ch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 11:23:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 07:23:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248778] Review Request: gtkperf - Test GTK+ performance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708101123.l7ABNMtJ019562@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkperf - Test GTK+ performance https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248778 ------- Additional Comments From patrice.bouchand.fedora at gmail.com 2007-08-10 07:23 EST ------- > * Fedora specific compilation flags are not honored > (Compiler flags of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines ) > Check the log: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=92083&name=build.log > Also debuginfo rpm does not contain debug information and this > should be fixed. CFLAGS entry in Makefile is empty. I did not find yet why configure substitutes @CFLAGS@ with an empty string in Makefile.in. I try this which seems to work: |for f in `find -name Makefile` | do | sed -i -e "s/^CFLAGS =.*$/CFLAGS = %{optflags}/" $f | done but I do not think it's acceptable. Do you have an idea about what could be wrong ? > * (From build log) > Suppress the call of automated autoheader ("touch"ing some files, > i.e. fixing the timestamp of some files should fix this issue) Done > * Update License tag. (IMO this is GPLv2, not GPLv2+) Done > * Change the encoding of "ChangeLog" from ISO-8859-1 to UTF-8. Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 11:38:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 07:38:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249352] Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708101138.l7ABcKs4020622@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249352 pmatilai at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |202061 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 11:57:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 07:57:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251680] New: Review Request: amtterm - Serial-over-lan (sol) client for Intel AMT Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251680 Summary: Review Request: amtterm - Serial-over-lan (sol) client for Intel AMT Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kraxel at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/amtterm/amtterm.spec SRPM URL: http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/amtterm/amtterm-0.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Serial-over-lan (sol) client for Intel AMT. fc7 (scratch) builds are here: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=95723 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 12:06:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 08:06:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249352] Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708101206.l7AC6dcY022941@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249352 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|202061 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 12:34:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 08:34:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249352] Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708101234.l7ACYEIK025493@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249352 pmatilai at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |202061 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 13:15:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 09:15:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250747] Review Request: Linux-Complete-Backup-and-Recovery-HOWTO - bare metal recovery scripts & docs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708101315.l7ADFgVA029976@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Linux-Complete-Backup-and-Recovery-HOWTO - bare metal recovery scripts & docs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250747 ------- Additional Comments From charlescurley at charlescurley.com 2007-08-10 09:15 EST ------- New SRPM: http://www.charlescurley.com/Linux-Complete-Backup-and-Recovery-HOWTO/Linux-Complete-Backup-and-Recovery-HOWTO-2.3-2.fc7.src.rpm The spec, revised, is at the same place: http://www.charlescurley.com/Linux-Complete-Backup-and-Recovery-HOWTO/Linux-Complete-Backup-and-Recovery-HOWTO.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 13:45:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 09:45:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248778] Review Request: gtkperf - Test GTK+ performance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708101345.l7ADjKH5001396@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkperf - Test GTK+ performance https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248778 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-08-10 09:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > CFLAGS entry in Makefile is empty. I did not find yet why configure substitutes > @CFLAGS@ with an empty string in Makefile.in. The culprit is a bug in configure.in ... CFLAGS="" AC_SUBST(CFLAGS) ... Here they overwrite CFLAGS with an empty string, which causes the configure script to propagate this empty string into the Makefiles. The "right fix" would be upstream to remove these two lines. They are plain wrong. A work-around applicable to packagers is to override CFLAGS from the environment. I.e. use make CFLAGS=${RPM_OPT_FLAGS} in all places in your spec where you invoke "make". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 14:50:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 10:50:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245342] Review Request: perl-Gnome2 - Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOME libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708101450.l7AEoAlg008062@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gnome2 - Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOME libraries Alias: perl-Gnome2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245342 ------- Additional Comments From dcantrell at redhat.com 2007-08-10 10:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > You bumped the release number in the changelog, but not in the release field. Fixed. New files: http://people.redhat.com/dcantrel/RPMS/perl-Gnome2/perl-Gnome2.spec http://people.redhat.com/dcantrel/RPMS/perl-Gnome2/perl-Gnome2-1.041-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 15:08:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:08:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248778] Review Request: gtkperf - Test GTK+ performance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708101508.l7AF8Dtu009864@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkperf - Test GTK+ performance https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248778 ------- Additional Comments From patrice.bouchand.fedora at gmail.com 2007-08-10 11:08 EST ------- > A work-around applicable to packagers is to override CFLAGS from the > environment. I.e. use > make CFLAGS=${RPM_OPT_FLAGS} > in all places in your spec where you invoke "make". This is what I have done, thanks for your help. The updated files: Spec URL: http://patrice.bouchand.free.fr/rpm/gtkperf.spec SRPM URL: http://patrice.bouchand.free.fr/rpm/gtkperf-0.40-5.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 15:46:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:46:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251710] New: Review Request: potrace - Transforming bitmaps into vector graphics Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251710 Summary: Review Request: potrace - Transforming bitmaps into vector graphics Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cbalint at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/potrace.spec SRPM URL: http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/potrace-1.8-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Transforming bitmaps into vector graphics -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 16:12:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 12:12:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226275] Merge Review: perl-PDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708101612.l7AGC9Ou016199@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-PDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226275 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-08-10 12:11 EST ------- Awesome. Applied your patch, except for the change to the License field. I've pinged Tom Callaway to take a look at the license first. Looks like the standard 'same terms as perl itself' to me - plus the one public domain image. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 16:47:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 12:47:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249992] Review Request: glglobe - OpenGl Globe - Earth simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708101647.l7AGltFl019969@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glglobe - OpenGl Globe - Earth simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249992 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-10 12:47 EST ------- Well, for -4: * Desktop category Category "X-Red-Hat-Extra" is still there, which is not needed. Then: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html (NOTE: please don't choose "Merge Review") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 16:56:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 12:56:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226275] Merge Review: perl-PDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708101656.l7AGu9Vt021076@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-PDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226275 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-08-10 12:56 EST ------- Tom confirmed that you are correct about the license issue, I'll fix it. Also, it is failing to build in the buildsystem. I'll take a look and try to fix it today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 17:11:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 13:11:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238238] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Devel - Catalyst Development Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708101711.l7AHBn84022799@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Devel - Catalyst Development Tools Alias: perl-Catalyst-Devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238238 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-10 13:11 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 17:17:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 13:17:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248778] Review Request: gtkperf - Test GTK+ performance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708101717.l7AHHABs023295@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkperf - Test GTK+ performance https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248778 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-10 13:17 EST ------- Well, actually %attr(755,root,root) can be removed. Other things are okay. ---------------------------------------------------------- This package (gtkperf) is APPROVED by me ---------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 20:41:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 16:41:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225812] Merge Review: gnome-audio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708102041.l7AKfsDu014037@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-audio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225812 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-08-10 16:41 EST ------- This review is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 20:42:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 16:42:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225819] Merge Review: gnome-keyring In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708102042.l7AKgPiY014087@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-keyring https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225819 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-08-10 16:42 EST ------- This review is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 20:43:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 16:43:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225820] Merge Review: gnome-keyring-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708102043.l7AKhsRY014325@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-keyring-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225820 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-08-10 16:43 EST ------- This review is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 20:44:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 16:44:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225981] Merge Review: lcms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708102044.l7AKibNi014452@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: lcms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225981 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-08-10 16:44 EST ------- This review is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 20:46:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 16:46:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225635] Merge Review: cairo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708102046.l7AKkRTw014555@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: cairo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225635 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-08-10 16:46 EST ------- Stalled review ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 21:02:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 17:02:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202334] Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708102102.l7AL2IS1016071@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202334 jjohnstn at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From jjohnstn at redhat.com 2007-08-10 17:02 EST ------- The demo package has been disabled. The new spec file and src rpms can be found here: http://www.vermillionskye.com/downloads/jetty5.spec http://www.vermillionskye.com/downloads/jetty5-5.1.12-1jpp.1.src.rpm Jason, would you be willing to review this? I cc'd you on the bug, I hope that is ok. Please feel free to remove your name if you did not wish to be on the list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 21:49:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 17:49:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251529] Review Request: armacycles-ad - A lightcycle game in 3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708102149.l7ALnU4w020949@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: armacycles-ad - A lightcycle game in 3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251529 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-10 17:49 EST ------- I tried to do a review on this, I really did, but ... UGH, specfile makes eyes hurt. Can you please clean it up considerably and then resubmit? Here are some things to fix: * Don't write: " # inform automake of the rpm build directory DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT export DESTDIR pushd bindist-dedicated make install popd pushd bindist make install popd " instead write (as all other specs do) : " pushd bindist-dedicated make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT popd pushd bindist make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT popd " * There is no need to activate the armacycles default sdl audiodriver hack, our SDL already defaults to alsa. So no need to pass CXXFLAGS="-DDEFAULT_SDL_AUDIODRIVER=alsa" * This is a gnu autoconf configure script, so call it using %configure instead of passing all the dir options and CXXFLAGS yourself * please check all the non dir configure options if they are really necessary, for example atleast --disable-restoreold is useless as you don't also pass --enable-multiver (and you don't want to do that either). * even more bogus are the configure options (esp the combination): "--enable-useradd --disable-useradd" ?? * also please do not make (configure) lines wider then 80 chars, please put a \ at the end and continue on the next line * this also is bogus: --enable-automakedefaults --localstatedir=/var Quoting from ./configure --help: --enable-automakedefaults enforce the default installation directories as set by automake. localstatedir=prefix/var violates the FHS, so this is off by default. * looking even more at the configure flags, I notice that they both have: --disable-sysinstall Yet also both specify: --enable-etc --enable-initscript --enable-useradd Which (according to ./configure --help) have no influence when --disable-sysinstall is passed * long story short, it would seem that this is all thats needed for configure: %configure --disable-sysinstall --disable-uninstall --disable-glout resp: %configure --disable-sysinstall --disable-uninstall * these 2 shell variables are not used, please remove them: CLIENTPATH=%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-root/share/games/armagetronad/ SERVERPATH=%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-root/share/games/armagetronad-dedicat * Please use macros where ever possible for example do not write: mkdir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc but write: mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_sysconfdir} * please put the description and tags of subpackages at the top of the spec directly after the main package, not between the %files * please use %defattr instead of %attr for each file * please do not use /usr/share/games/armagetronad but /usr/share/armagetronad (hint try using the --enable-games configure argument) * I think you will want to buildrequire libxml2-devel not libxml2 * why patch progtitle into configure, but not progname? why still have progtitle bits in the .spec if its patched in why not just write: export progtitle="Armacycles Advanced" export progname=armacyclesad before the 2 calls to %configure, then the patching is no longer needed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 21:53:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 17:53:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251529] Review Request: armacycles-ad - A lightcycle game in 3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708102153.l7ALreux021280@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: armacycles-ad - A lightcycle game in 3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251529 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-10 17:53 EST ------- erm correction, make the hint about not using /usr/share games: hint try using the --disable-games configure argument -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 22:05:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 18:05:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251529] Review Request: armacycles-ad - A lightcycle game in 3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708102205.l7AM5hjN022195@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: armacycles-ad - A lightcycle game in 3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251529 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-10 18:05 EST ------- More stuff: * files / dirs owned by both the main and dedicated packages: /etc/armagetronad /usr/share/games/armagetronad/language /usr/share/games/armagetronad/resource /usr/share/games/armagetronad/scripts Please put these in a -common packae and make both packages require the -common package * dirs which are bogus and must not be shipped: /usr/etc /usr/share/games/armagetronad/desktop * the -dedicated package should have a /etc/rc.d/init.d script to stop / start it as a server, and run as its own user. See batch/rcd_startstop for inspiration for writing a service start / stop script. Or alternatively you could completely forgo the -dedicated sub package, I doubt anyone will use it, then you also only have to call configure and make once, can forget about the common package, all in all then this would become a pretty normal package. (you could then also start over with /etc/rpmdevtools/spectemplate-minimal as basis to make a much better spec). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 23:07:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 19:07:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240308] Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708102307.l7AN7Aiu027901@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240308 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-10 19:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > I'd recommend using macros provided by qt4-devel > (in /etc/rpm/macros.qt4): %_qt4_headerdir, %_qt4_libdir > (or output from > qmake-qt4 -query QT_INSTALL_HEADERS > qmake-qt4 -query QT_INSTALL_LIBS > respectively). I have updated the spec without dumping the release: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/result/qwtplot3d.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 23:39:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 19:39:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233388] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-CalendarButton - Gtk2::Ex::CalendarButton Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708102339.l7ANdmkC029207@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-CalendarButton - Gtk2::Ex::CalendarButton Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233388 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-08-10 19:39 EST ------- Note rpmlint now complains: W: perl-Gtk2-Ex-CalendarButton invalid-license GPL+ or Artistic SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Gtk2-Ex-CalendarButton-0.01-3.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Gtk2-Ex-CalendarButton.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 23:52:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 19:52:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238238] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Devel - Catalyst Development Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708102352.l7ANq2Zk029568@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Devel - Catalyst Development Tools Alias: perl-Catalyst-Devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238238 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-08-10 19:52 EST ------- Imported and building; thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 23:52:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 19:52:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238232] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Manual - Catalyst web framework manual In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708102352.l7ANq38e029587@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Manual - Catalyst web framework manual Alias: perl-Catalyst-Manual https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238232 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 23:52:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 19:52:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238211] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708102352.l7ANq5Wq029611@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules Alias: Catalyst-Runtime https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238211 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 23:52:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 19:52:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238233] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader - Load config files of various types In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708102352.l7ANq6s9029635@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader - Load config files of various types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238233 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 23:52:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 19:52:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238236] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-SubRequest - Make subrequests to actions in Catalyst In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708102352.l7ANq7IS029653@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-SubRequest - Make subrequests to actions in Catalyst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238236 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 10 23:57:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 19:57:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202334] Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708102357.l7ANvc2c029853@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202334 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-08-10 19:57 EST ------- Unfortunately I think this package is a bit beyond my ken. I was trying to see of these old packages awaiting review would at least build, but I have no idea what this package does, I know pretty close to zero about java and frankly I just haven't the chops to review a java package of this complexity. Perhaps if nobody has stepped forward to look at this after I've made some good progress elsewhere in the review queue I'll try to come back and learn more about java packaging and try to help out here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 00:15:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 20:15:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225618] Merge Review: bitstream-vera-fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708110015.l7B0F65E030473@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bitstream-vera-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225618 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-08-10 20:15 EST ------- I've fiexed the license and shortened the description line. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 00:41:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 20:41:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226003] Merge Review: libexif In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708110041.l7B0fBFt031393@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libexif https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226003 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-08-10 20:41 EST ------- This review is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 00:57:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 20:57:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240308] Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708110057.l7B0v6uJ031925@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240308 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-10 20:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221163 > > * If you have a special reason to use qt4, not qt3, then > the most file names should be renamed to avoid conflict > of qt3 version qwtplot3d, or explicit conflict must be used. So again both qwtplot3d and qwtplot3d-qt4 - install the libraries with the same name "libqwtplot3d.so" - to different directories, although both directories are under ld search path (on i386 one is /usr/lib/qt-3.3/lib, and the other is /usr/lib) So if both qwtplot3d and qwtplot3d-qt4 are installed, one of the two libraries is always used (according to the order of the ld search), this is not desirable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 01:01:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 21:01:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240308] Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708110101.l7B113ce032102@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240308 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-10 21:00 EST ------- And why must qwtplot3d-qt4 require qwtplot3d (Qt 3 version)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 01:25:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 21:25:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225822] Merge Review: gnome-media In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708110125.l7B1Pqjo000649@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-media https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225822 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-08-10 21:25 EST ------- This review is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 01:28:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 21:28:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225751] Merge Review: file-roller In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708110128.l7B1SBKe000735@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: file-roller https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225751 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-08-10 21:28 EST ------- Review done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 01:28:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 21:28:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225838] Merge Review: gnome-system-monitor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708110128.l7B1Sj9e000795@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-system-monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225838 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-08-10 21:28 EST ------- This is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 01:29:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 21:29:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225291] Merge Review: audiofile In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708110129.l7B1TR4o000832@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: audiofile https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225291 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-08-10 21:29 EST ------- Review done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 01:30:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 21:30:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226056] Merge Review: libvorbis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708110130.l7B1U6ZT000903@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libvorbis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226056 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-08-10 21:30 EST ------- Review done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 01:31:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 21:31:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226424] Merge Review: sound-juicer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708110131.l7B1VNsc000963@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sound-juicer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226424 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-08-10 21:31 EST ------- Review done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 01:35:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 21:35:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225757] Merge Review: flac In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708110135.l7B1Zwgt001114@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: flac https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225757 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-08-10 21:35 EST ------- Review done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 01:37:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 21:37:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225718] Merge Review: eel2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708110137.l7B1b4EB001195@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: eel2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225718 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-08-10 21:37 EST ------- Review done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 01:38:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 21:38:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225730] Merge Review: eog In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708110138.l7B1c0JH001243@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: eog https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225730 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-08-10 21:37 EST ------- Review done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 01:39:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 21:39:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225826] Merge Review: gnome-netstatus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708110139.l7B1d8FS001295@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-netstatus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225826 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-08-10 21:39 EST ------- Review done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 01:40:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 21:40:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225827] Merge Review: gnome-nettool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708110140.l7B1eL6c001357@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-nettool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225827 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-08-10 21:40 EST ------- Review done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 02:36:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 22:36:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225839] Merge Review: gnome-terminal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708110236.l7B2agVX003857@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-terminal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225839 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-08-10 22:36 EST ------- review done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 02:40:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 22:40:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225779] Merge Review: GConf2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708110240.l7B2ev1U004122@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: GConf2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225779 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-08-10 22:40 EST ------- Review done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 02:41:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 22:41:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225629] Merge Review: bug-buddy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708110241.l7B2fuxZ004248@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bug-buddy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225629 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-08-10 22:41 EST ------- Ok, review done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 02:42:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 22:42:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226668] Merge Review: zenity In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708110242.l7B2gvmi004321@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: zenity https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226668 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-08-10 22:42 EST ------- Review done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 02:44:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 22:44:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225736] Merge Review: evince In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708110244.l7B2i2QH004421@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: evince https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225736 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-08-10 22:43 EST ------- Review done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 02:55:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 22:55:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225918] Merge Review: iso-codes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708110255.l7B2tnic005136@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: iso-codes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225918 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-08-10 22:55 EST ------- All the material objections have been taken care of. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 03:02:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 23:02:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225875] Merge Review: gtksourceview In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708110302.l7B32LQf005598@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gtksourceview https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225875 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-08-10 23:02 EST ------- It does indirectly, via gtksourceview-devel -> gtk2-devel -> gtk-doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 03:11:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 23:11:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225680] Merge Review: desktop-backgrounds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708110311.l7B3BOU4006286@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: desktop-backgrounds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225680 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-08-10 23:11 EST ------- In the meantime, we have decided that desktop-backgrounds-basic should own /usr/share/backgrounds, and thus we've added a dependency on desktop-backgrounds-basic to gnome-backgrounds. Consequently, desktop-backgrounds-basic should own /usr/share/gnome-background-properties, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 03:26:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 23:26:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225880] Merge Review: hal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708110326.l7B3QTFt007219@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: hal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225880 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-08-10 23:26 EST ------- The hal-gnome package (and with it the desktop file) is gone now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 06:02:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 02:02:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234326] Review Request: bandsaw - A syslog monitoring program for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708110602.l7B62Ck6014943@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bandsaw - A syslog monitoring program for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234326 ------- Additional Comments From dtimms at iinet.net.au 2007-08-11 02:02 EST ------- Damien, have you had a chance to peruse my pre-review ? It is possibly not obvious that for each element listed: .x = Not ok .? = Either I don't understand enough to confirm that the element is acceptable, or I don't understand what the spec is doing. I would request some comment to explain if you believe that item is OK. ./ = tick - OK. No work required. Usually a comment was included after: to describe what I found. If you need bigger hints, please say so in this review request, and I'll try to help. (In reply to comment #7) > .? build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires: > - no listed BR is in the auto included list, the package built on my system > after yum localinstall the .src.rpm installed lots of -devel rpms. > - yet to try mock build. ./ package builds in mock: see attached build.log On that machine {fedora 7}, the mock built package installs OK. When run as a user I see: $ bandsaw Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/bandsaw", line 31, in import egg.trayicon File "/usr/lib/python2.5/warnings.py", line 62, in warn globals) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/warnings.py", line 83, in warn_explicit for item in filters: ImportError: could not import gtk - should the package work when run as a user ? . when run as root: # bandsaw /usr/bin/bandsaw:31: DeprecationWarning: the module egg.trayicon is deprecated; equivalent functionality can now be found in pygtk 2.10 import egg.trayicon As root, I get the config dialog, {after I make the fifo file, and add to the /etc/syslog.conf}, and it then runs the notify icon. Clicking this opens the UI. Even when I cause stuff that gets appended to /var/log/messages, no items are added to the gui. Hence, I can't tell for sure whether it is working OK, what should I be seeing ? {what is good syslog config that gives lots of messages into bandsaw ?} === .x rpm install should be silent: - On my normal machine if I rpmbuild -ba the spec, the resultant yum install: ... Installing: bandsaw i386 0.3.0-2.fc7 /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/bandsaw-0.3.0-2.fc7.i386.rpm 256 k Transaction Summary ============================================================================= Install 1 Package(s) Update 0 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) Total download size: 256 k Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: Running Transaction Test Finished Transaction Test Transaction Test Succeeded Running Transaction Installing: bandsaw ######################### [1/1] gconfd-2: no process killed Installed: bandsaw.i386 0:0.3.0-2.fc7 Complete! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 07:15:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 03:15:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249992] Review Request: glglobe - OpenGl Globe - Earth simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708110715.l7B7FeIq017884@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glglobe - OpenGl Globe - Earth simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249992 ------- Additional Comments From dtimms at iinet.net.au 2007-08-11 03:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > Well, for -4: > * Desktop category > Category "X-Red-Hat-Extra" is still there, which is not needed. Oops, I forgot to cp the updated .desktop to the SOURCES directory, so it built with the earlier version. fix noted in spec: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/glglobe/glglobe.spec Updated SRPM: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/glglobe/glglobe-0.2-5.fc7.src.rpm It builds in f7 mock. It installs and runs on a minimal noX f7 install {forwarding the X connection to my normal gui desktop}, so it seems rpm is picking up the correct runtime libs - but is that a reasonable way to check Requires ? ===== Currently I am pre-reviewing: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234326 and initial looks at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251019 with a more complete pre-review to come. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 07:42:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 03:42:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248778] Review Request: gtkperf - Test GTK+ performance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708110742.l7B7gGej019075@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkperf - Test GTK+ performance https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248778 ------- Additional Comments From patrice.bouchand.fedora at gmail.com 2007-08-11 03:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > Well, actually %attr(755,root,root) can be removed. Ok ,I will fix this before the first cvs import. > Other things are okay. > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > This package (gtkperf) is APPROVED by me > ---------------------------------------------------------- Thanks ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 07:52:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 03:52:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248778] Review Request: gtkperf - Test GTK+ performance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708110752.l7B7qLpI019760@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkperf - Test GTK+ performance https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248778 patrice.bouchand.fedora at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From patrice.bouchand.fedora at gmail.com 2007-08-11 03:52 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gtkperf Short Description: GTK+ performance tester Owners: patriceb Branches: F-7 InitialCC: Commits by cvsextras: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 14:15:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 10:15:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251019] Review Request: lshw - Hardware lister In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708111415.l7BEFDT4005922@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware lister https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251019 ------- Additional Comments From dtimms at iinet.net.au 2007-08-11 10:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > After talking with spot I have removed some logos, package should be safe now. > > lshw-gui seems to work ok without the logos. > > SPEC: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/lshw/lshw.spec > SRPM: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/lshw/lshw-B.02.11.01-2.fc7.src.rpm In terms of the requiring admin privileges to run: lshw can run as a normal user - if so, only hardware information available as a normal user will be shown. More information is show if run as root {or through consolehelper}. Pre-review of lshw-B.02.11.01-2.fc7.src.rpm: ===== key: .x = Not ok .? = Either I don't understand enough to confirm that the element is acceptable, or I don't understand what the spec is doing. I would request some comment to explain if you believe that the item is OK. ./ = tick - OK. No work required. Usually a comment was included after: to describe what I found. ===== MUST Items: ./ rpmlint result: no warnings nor errors. ./ named according to the Package Naming Guidelines: matches upstream project and source download name. ./ spec file name matches the base package: lshw.spec lshw .? package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. ./ package must be licensed with an open-source compatible license: - web site indicates GPL and upstream source includes GPLv2. ./ License field in the package spec file must match the actual license: - GPLv2 as required by new licensing guideline ./ source package includes the text of the license, so text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc: - COPYING is included as required. - 6* Trademark svg graphics are included in the source tarball, but the spec removes them. Discussion on fedora-devel and with spot lead to this requirement. - build log shows successful removal: + for f in powermacg5 intel powermac amd mini powerpc + rm -fv /var/tmp/lshw-B.02.11.01-2.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/lshw/artwork/powermacg5.svg removed `/var/tmp/lshw-B.02.11.01-2.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/lshw/artwork/powermacg5.svg' + for f in powermacg5 intel powermac amd mini powerpc + rm -fv /var/tmp/lshw-B.02.11.01-2.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/lshw/artwork/intel.svg removed `/var/tmp/lshw-B.02.11.01-2.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/lshw/artwork/intel.svg' + for f in powermacg5 intel powermac amd mini powerpc + rm -fv /var/tmp/lshw-B.02.11.01-2.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/lshw/artwork/powermac.svg removed `/var/tmp/lshw-B.02.11.01-2.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/lshw/artwork/powermac.svg' + for f in powermacg5 intel powermac amd mini powerpc + rm -fv /var/tmp/lshw-B.02.11.01-2.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/lshw/artwork/amd.svg removed `/var/tmp/lshw-B.02.11.01-2.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/lshw/artwork/amd.svg' + for f in powermacg5 intel powermac amd mini powerpc + rm -fv /var/tmp/lshw-B.02.11.01-2.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/lshw/artwork/mini.svg removed `/var/tmp/lshw-B.02.11.01-2.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/lshw/artwork/mini.svg' + for f in powermacg5 intel powermac amd mini powerpc + rm -fv /var/tmp/lshw-B.02.11.01-2.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/lshw/artwork/powerpc.svg removed `/var/tmp/lshw-B.02.11.01-2.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/lshw/artwork/powerpc.svg' - emac.svg {artistic view of apple logo} is still included - is it OK to include in Fedora ? ./ The spec file must be written in American English. ./ spec file for the package must be legible: ./ source in .src.rpm matches upstream md5sum: - $ md5sum lshw-B.02.11.01.tar.gz 23debbc3c0a719f301861cfc079b3f4b lshw-B.02.11.01.tar.gz {web source} 23debbc3c0a719f301861cfc079b3f4b /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/lshw-B.02.11.01.tar.gz ./ successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms: i386 {athlon} .? If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture - : - I tried only on i386{i686/athlon} - no excludearchs listed. - have you tested on x86_64 or mac ? ./ build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires: - no listed BR is in the auto included list - the package built on my system - package built in mock - built package runs OK, works as expected ./ spec file MUST handle locales properly: - neither find_lang macro nor %{_datadir}/locale are used. ./ has no shared library files: - contains only standalone executables with external text lookup files ./ not relocatable and does not use Prefix: /usr ./ package must own all directories that it creates: - ./ A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing: - does not appear to. ./ Permissions on files must be set properly. - Executables are set with executable permissions - other files aren't - %files section includes a %defattr(...) line. .x must have a %clean section, containing rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT): - %{__rm} -rf %{buildroot} differs from this requirement. .? Each package must consistently use macros: - no new macros are defined. - %{x} are actually %{__X}, again, why ? ./ The package must contain code, or permissable content. - contains a GUI app ./ Large documentation files: - no. total doc is 43kB ? - COPYING is included in both lshw and lshw-gui. However, lshw-gui Requires lshw, so the COPYING is guaranteed to be installed already. I don't know if that is normal, or whether it could / should be removed. ./ %doc files must not affect the runtime of the application: - OK. ./ Header files must be in a -devel package: - no header files. ./ Static libraries must be in a -static package: - no static libraries. ./ has no pkgconfig(.pc) files. ./ library files with a suffix: no libraries ./ devel packages must require the base package: - no -devel package ./ Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives - no .la's ./ Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install - done and the menu entry works. ./ Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. .x At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT): - the command is: %{__rm} -rf %{buildroot}, which is not standard, why ? ./ All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: ./ If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it: included. ./ The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages: - no other translations available .? The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures: - only tested on i386 {athlon} ./ package functions as described - both GUI and CLI provide a lot of hw information as the summary describes ./ If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane: - none used. ./ subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. ./ no pkgconfig(.pc) files. ./ no file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin. ===== Personally, I think console helper should be saying ~"this program performs better when run with root privileges", and give the normal user a chance to ~run unprivileged". This makes the app at least somewhat useful if you do not have root rights on the system. This might also means not placing in /usr/sbin ? I also suggest: that even though lshw includes a copy of hw data, that any such files included by fedora hwdata should not be packaged. This has the advantages of: - removes any confusion / discrepancy that would otherwise occur if the result of other fedora hardware tools is compared to lshw that included different hwdata files. - shouldn't require updates to lshw when only hw data has been updated. disadvantages: - fedora's hwdata does not seem to be updated very often - but perhaps it should get updated say once a month or so to take into account newly released hardware. - if lshw is updated {upstream updates all hw data before a release}, the fedora lshw would not be able to immediately use new data. This is countered by the fact that a package should be essentially static during a distribution's release life. If the main change is to hw data - then only a new hwdata should be released. What do others think ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 14:18:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 10:18:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251019] Review Request: lshw - Hardware lister In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708111418.l7BEIOls006033@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware lister https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251019 ------- Additional Comments From dtimms at iinet.net.au 2007-08-11 10:18 EST ------- ps: Lyonel, I noticed I mispelled your name, my apologies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 14:43:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 10:43:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251805] New: Review Request: postgresql-orafce - Implementation of some Oracle functions into PostgreSQL Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251805 Summary: Review Request: postgresql-orafce - Implementation of some Oracle functions into PostgreSQL Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: devrim at commandprompt.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/orafce/postgresql-orafce.spec SRPM URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/orafce/postgresql-orafce-2.1.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: The goal of this project is implementation some functions from Oracle database. Some date functions (next_day, last_day, trunc, round, ...) are implemented now. Functionality was verified on Oracle 10g and module is useful for production work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 15:18:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 11:18:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246747] Review Request: postgresql-ip4r - IPv4 and IPv4 range index types for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708111518.l7BFILnA008120@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-ip4r - IPv4 and IPv4 range index types for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246747 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2007-08-11 11:18 EST ------- Sorry, I forgot to update this :-( New spec URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/ip4r/postgresql-ip4r.spec New SRPM URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/ip4r/postgresql-ip4r-1.01-2.fc7.src.rpm Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 15:25:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 11:25:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249892] Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708111525.l7BFPgqv008402@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249892 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-11 11:25 EST ------- Actually almost nothing to be reviewed, however: * rpmlint complaints: -------------------------------------------------- W: bouml-doc invalid-license GPL W: bouml-doc no-%build-section -------------------------------------------------- - Change the license to GPLv2+ - Add %build section, even if it is empty -------------------------------------------------- $ rpmlint -I no-%build-section no-%build-section : The spec file does not contain a %build section. Even if some packages don't directly need it, section markers may be overridden in rpm's configuration to provide additional "under the hood" functionality, such as injection of automatic -debuginfo subpackages. Add the section, even if empty. -------------------------------------------------- Other thing okay. Please fix the issue above before committing to CVS. -------------------------------------------------- This package (bouml-doc) is APPROVED by me -------------------------------------------------- Note: the template of CVSAdminProcedure changed so please re-read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 15:55:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 11:55:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234326] Review Request: bandsaw - A syslog monitoring program for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708111555.l7BFtYJT009578@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bandsaw - A syslog monitoring program for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234326 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(splinux25 at gmail.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-11 11:55 EST ------- David, if you want to do this style of (pre-)review, please also write the summary of your (pre-)review, especially what you think is the problem with this package so that everyone (not only you and the submitter but also someone else) can check your review easily... >From very quick check of this package and your comment: (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #4) > > new spec: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/bandsaw/bandsaw.spec > > %post > > update-desktop-database &> /dev/null ||: > - I don't know if it makes a difference, but the snippet shows || : - You can check what "|| :" means by "man bash". This is to ensure that %post stage will exit successfully even if the command failed with some reason. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets > MUST Items: > .x rpmlint result: > W: bandsaw non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/bandsaw.schemas - For GConf schemas file, this rpmlint can be removed. > E: bandsaw no-binary > - Please use the output of rpmlint -i for more info to solve these. - This package seems to be noarch package so actually this must be fixed. > %{!?python_sitearch: %define python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c "from > distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib(1)")} > Can you point to an existing fedora spec that uses similar ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python > .x Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and > that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install > >+ desktop-file-install --vendor= --delete-original --dir > /var/tmp/bandsaw-0.3.0-2.fc7-root-root/usr/share/applications > /var/tmp/bandsaw-0.3.0-2.fc7-root-root//usr/share/applications/bandsaw.desktop > /var/tmp/bandsaw-0.3.0-2.fc7-root-root/usr/share/applications/bandsaw.desktop: > warning: The 'Application' category is not defined by the desktop entry > specification. Please use one of "AudioVideo", "Audio", "Video", "Development", > "Education", "Game", "Graphics", "Network", "Office", "Settings", "System", > "Utility" instead > - Application category is not defined in: > http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html. Please remove. - Please fix this, Damien > - this is a python/gtk/glade program. Is python bytecode crossplatform, ie > will it just work on any platform ? If so should it be noarch ? - This is noarch. (In reply to comment #8) > When run as a user I see: > $ bandsaw > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/bin/bandsaw", line 31, in > import egg.trayicon > File "/usr/lib/python2.5/warnings.py", line 62, in warn > globals) > File "/usr/lib/python2.5/warnings.py", line 83, in warn_explicit > for item in filters: > ImportError: could not import gtk - Lots of dependencies are missing. Approprate "Requires" should be added. Setting to NEEDINFO as reply from the submitter is missing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 15:57:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 11:57:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240308] Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708111557.l7BFvlGJ009676@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240308 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-11 11:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > So if both qwtplot3d and qwtplot3d-qt4 are installed, one of the > two libraries is always used (according to the order of the ld > search), this is not desirable. what do you recommend to do ? so in this case, we can't use the macros proposed by Rex ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 16:03:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 12:03:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248778] Review Request: gtkperf - Test GTK+ performance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708111603.l7BG3IlO009887@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkperf - Test GTK+ performance https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248778 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-11 12:03 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 16:08:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 12:08:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249992] Review Request: glglobe - OpenGl Globe - Earth simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708111608.l7BG8LG9010091@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glglobe - OpenGl Globe - Earth simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249992 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-11 12:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > It builds in f7 mock. It installs and runs on a minimal noX f7 install > {forwarding the X connection to my normal gui desktop}, so it seems rpm is > picking up the correct runtime libs - but is that a reasonable way to check > Requires ? It depends on cases. This (glglobe) is a single package with no subpackages and dependency check is rather easy. If one srpm creates some subpackages the dependencies between those subpackages should be carefully examined. Also there are some dependencies which rpmbuild does not detect automatically.. So actually it depends on cases... > ===== > Currently I am pre-reviewing: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234326 - Please check my comment. * If you do a (pre)review, please write clearly what you think is blocking the review However I will accept this review ------------------------------------------------------------- This package (glglobe) is APPROVED by me ------------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure according to: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". At a point a mail should be sent to sponsor members which notifies that you need a sponsor (at the stage, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship) Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 7, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 16:12:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 12:12:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250240] Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708111612.l7BGC0ZD010276@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250240 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-11 12:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > upstream has fixed this in svn should I ship a svn snapshot or wait for the release? One way is to extract the needed patch from CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 16:21:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 12:21:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240308] Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708111621.l7BGLqCW010699@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240308 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-11 12:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > (In reply to comment #17) > > So if both qwtplot3d and qwtplot3d-qt4 are installed, one of the > > two libraries is always used (according to the order of the ld > > search), this is not desirable. > > what do you recommend to do ? > so in this case, we can't use the macros proposed by Rex ? What I want to say is of no relation with what Rex said (so you can still use qt4 macros). So for the case qtwplot3d and qwtplot3d-qt4 are both installed, - the name of the library in qwtplot3d-qt4 must be renamed (to libqwtplot3d-qt4.so, for example) - Well, IMO we don't have to rename the header files..... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 16:25:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 12:25:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240308] Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708111625.l7BGP3NP010850@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240308 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2007-08-11 12:25 EST ------- I thing you shut named it libqwtplot3d-qt3.so and libqwtplot3d-qt4.so to make the naming clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 16:36:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 12:36:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240308] Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708111636.l7BGa9DU011471@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240308 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-11 12:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #21) > I thing you shut named it libqwtplot3d-qt3.so and libqwtplot3d-qt4.so to make > the naming clean. In that case the trouble is that as Qt3 version qwtplot3d is already in Fedora and renaming Qt3 version library will cause problems if there are packages which already use qwtplot3d (I have not checked if there is). Or we can use symlink like: libqwtplot3d.so -> libqwtplot3d-qt3.so -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 16:53:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 12:53:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251317] Review Request: pinot - Personal search and metasearch for the Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708111653.l7BGrcQa012151@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pinot - Personal search and metasearch for the Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251317 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-11 12:53 EST ------- Rebuild fails even on rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=97891 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 16:56:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 12:56:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251019] Review Request: lshw - Hardware lister In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708111656.l7BGuRjA012278@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware lister https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251019 ------- Additional Comments From lyonel at ezix.org 2007-08-11 12:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #7) > > After talking with spot I have removed some logos, package should be safe now. > > > > lshw-gui seems to work ok without the logos. > > > > SPEC: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/lshw/lshw.spec > > SRPM: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/lshw/lshw-B.02.11.01-2.fc7.src.rpm > > In terms of the requiring admin privileges to run: lshw can run as a normal user > - if so, only hardware information available as a normal user will be shown. > More information is show if run as root {or through consolehelper}. The problem is that the reported information will be highly inaccurate (and, on certain platforms like x86, not only incomplete but *different* from what you get as root) when lshw is run as normal user. Maybe I should add a warning in the GUI (like what you get when running the CLI as non-root user). What do others think? > Pre-review of lshw-B.02.11.01-2.fc7.src.rpm: > ===== key: > .x = Not ok > .? = Either I don't understand enough to confirm that the element is acceptable, > or I don't understand what the spec is doing. I would request some comment to > explain if you believe that the item is OK. > ./ = tick - OK. No work required. Usually a comment was included after: to > describe what I found. > ===== > MUST Items: > ./ rpmlint result: no warnings nor errors. > ./ named according to the Package Naming Guidelines: matches upstream project > and source download name. > ./ spec file name matches the base package: lshw.spec lshw > .? package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. > ./ package must be licensed with an open-source compatible license: > - web site indicates GPL and upstream source includes GPLv2. > ./ License field in the package spec file must match the actual license: > - GPLv2 as required by new licensing guideline > ./ source package includes the text of the license, so text of the license(s) > for the package must be included in %doc: > - COPYING is included as required. > - 6* Trademark svg graphics are included in the source tarball, but the spec > removes them. Discussion on fedora-devel and with spot lead to this requirement. > - build log shows successful removal: > + for f in powermacg5 intel powermac amd mini powerpc > + rm -fv /var/tmp/lshw-B.02.11.01-2.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/lshw/artwork/powermacg5.svg > removed > `/var/tmp/lshw-B.02.11.01-2.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/lshw/artwork/powermacg5.svg' > + for f in powermacg5 intel powermac amd mini powerpc > + rm -fv > /var/tmp/lshw-B.02.11.01-2.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/lshw/artwork/intel.svg > removed > `/var/tmp/lshw-B.02.11.01-2.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/lshw/artwork/intel.svg' > + for f in powermacg5 intel powermac amd mini powerpc > + rm -fv > /var/tmp/lshw-B.02.11.01-2.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/lshw/artwork/powermac.svg > removed > `/var/tmp/lshw-B.02.11.01-2.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/lshw/artwork/powermac.svg' > + for f in powermacg5 intel powermac amd mini powerpc > + rm -fv > /var/tmp/lshw-B.02.11.01-2.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/lshw/artwork/amd.svg > removed > `/var/tmp/lshw-B.02.11.01-2.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/lshw/artwork/amd.svg' > + for f in powermacg5 intel powermac amd mini powerpc > + rm -fv > /var/tmp/lshw-B.02.11.01-2.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/lshw/artwork/mini.svg > removed > `/var/tmp/lshw-B.02.11.01-2.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/lshw/artwork/mini.svg' > + for f in powermacg5 intel powermac amd mini powerpc > + rm -fv > /var/tmp/lshw-B.02.11.01-2.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/lshw/artwork/powerpc.svg > removed > `/var/tmp/lshw-B.02.11.01-2.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/lshw/artwork/powerpc.svg' I have added to lshw's SVN some drawings without logos and also "replacement" logos for intel, amd, powerpc (cf. http://dev.ezix.org/source/packages/artwork/nologo/ comments welcome). > - emac.svg {artistic view of apple logo} is still included - is it OK to > include in Fedora ? > > ./ The spec file must be written in American English. > ./ spec file for the package must be legible: > ./ source in .src.rpm matches upstream md5sum: > - $ md5sum lshw-B.02.11.01.tar.gz > 23debbc3c0a719f301861cfc079b3f4b lshw-B.02.11.01.tar.gz {web source} > 23debbc3c0a719f301861cfc079b3f4b /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/lshw-B.02.11.01.tar.gz > > ./ successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms: i386 {athlon} > .? If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an > architecture - : > - I tried only on i386{i686/athlon} > - no excludearchs listed. > - have you tested on x86_64 or mac ? ppc is OK, that's my test/dev machine. > ./ build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires: > - no listed BR is in the auto included list > - the package built on my system > - package built in mock > - built package runs OK, works as expected > ./ spec file MUST handle locales properly: > - neither find_lang macro nor %{_datadir}/locale are used. > ./ has no shared library files: > - contains only standalone executables with external text lookup files > ./ not relocatable and does not use Prefix: /usr > ./ package must own all directories that it creates: > - > ./ A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing: > - does not appear to. > ./ Permissions on files must be set properly. > - Executables are set with executable permissions > - other files aren't > - %files section includes a %defattr(...) line. > .x must have a %clean section, containing rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT): > - %{__rm} -rf %{buildroot} differs from this requirement. > > .? Each package must consistently use macros: > - no new macros are defined. > - %{x} are actually %{__X}, again, why ? > > ./ The package must contain code, or permissable content. > - contains a GUI app > ./ Large documentation files: > - no. total doc is 43kB > ? - COPYING is included in both lshw and lshw-gui. However, lshw-gui Requires > lshw, so the COPYING is guaranteed to be installed already. I don't know if > that is normal, or whether it could / should be removed. > > ./ %doc files must not affect the runtime of the application: > - OK. > ./ Header files must be in a -devel package: > - no header files. > ./ Static libraries must be in a -static package: > - no static libraries. > ./ has no pkgconfig(.pc) files. > ./ library files with a suffix: no libraries > ./ devel packages must require the base package: > - no -devel package > ./ Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives > - no .la's > ./ Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and > that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install > - done and the menu entry works. > ./ Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. > .x At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT): > - the command is: %{__rm} -rf %{buildroot}, which is not standard, why ? > > ./ All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. > > SHOULD Items: > ./ If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file > from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it: included. > ./ The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain > translations for supported Non-English languages: > - no other translations available > .? The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported > architectures: > - only tested on i386 {athlon} > > ./ package functions as described > - both GUI and CLI provide a lot of hw information as the summary describes > ./ If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane: > - none used. > ./ subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a > fully versioned dependency. > ./ no pkgconfig(.pc) files. > ./ no file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin. > ===== > Personally, I think console helper should be saying ~"this program performs > better when run with root privileges", and give the normal user a chance to ~run > unprivileged". This makes the app at least somewhat useful if you do not have > root rights on the system. This might also means not placing in /usr/sbin ? > > I also suggest: that even though lshw includes a copy of hw data, that any such > files included by fedora hwdata should not be packaged. This has the advantages of: > - removes any confusion / discrepancy that would otherwise occur if the result > of other fedora hardware tools is compared to lshw that included different > hwdata files. > - shouldn't require updates to lshw when only hw data has been updated. > > disadvantages: > - fedora's hwdata does not seem to be updated very often - but perhaps it should > get updated say once a month or so to take into account newly released hardware. > - if lshw is updated {upstream updates all hw data before a release}, the fedora > lshw would not be able to immediately use new data. This is countered by the > fact that a package should be essentially static during a distribution's release > life. If the main change is to hw data - then only a new hwdata should be released. > > What do others think ? as discussed earlier (cf. duplicate BR), lshw makes use of *both* sources (system's hwdata and bundled data files) so it always uses the most recent data. It'd be good to have Fedora's hwdata updated once a month but it's currently very old and updated infrequently. I may add an option (in the GUI) to download fresher files in the future and cache them in $XDG_CACHE_HOME/lshw (usually $HOME/.cache/lshw). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 17:33:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 13:33:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240308] Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708111733.l7BHXBql013970@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240308 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-08-11 13:33 EST ------- The lib-soname issue here should be taken upstream. They should at least be made aware of this problem, and ultimately, their problem to address. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 17:45:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 13:45:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251317] Review Request: pinot - Personal search and metasearch for the Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708111745.l7BHjfNu014510@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pinot - Personal search and metasearch for the Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251317 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-08-11 13:45 EST ------- Shoould be fixed now: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/pinot.spec http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/pinot-0.75-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 17:47:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 13:47:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250240] Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708111747.l7BHl2cC014582@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250240 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-08-11 13:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > upstream has fixed this in svn should I ship a svn snapshot or wait for the > release? > > One way is to extract the needed patch from CVS. > it isn't just a small patch but it moves the configuration stuff to use gconf... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 18:01:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 14:01:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202334] Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708111801.l7BI1wWI015234@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202334 bkonrath at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vivekl at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From bkonrath at redhat.com 2007-08-11 14:01 EST ------- Vivek, since you're currently maintaining the tomcat5 rpm, do you think you could review this package? If you're too busy, just say so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 18:02:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 14:02:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202334] Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708111802.l7BI2cgk015313@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202334 bkonrath at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(vivekl at redhat.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 18:21:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 14:21:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249352] Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708111821.l7BIL3FC016001@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249352 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(pmatilai at redhat.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-08-11 14:21 EST ------- Panu, does rpm.org's rpm depend on the libpopt.la file? Can you please verify, whether rebuilding without works or shall we simply keep this file? IIRC rpm is the only package which at least was depending on this file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 18:28:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 14:28:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248778] Review Request: gtkperf - Test GTK+ performance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708111828.l7BISEGl016304@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkperf - Test GTK+ performance https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248778 patrice.bouchand.fedora at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 20:42:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 16:42:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251019] Review Request: lshw - Hardware lister In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708112042.l7BKgUV7021589@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware lister https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251019 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-08-11 16:42 EST ------- lshw-B.02.11.01-2.fc7.src.rpm builds fine in devel/x86_64. rpmlint is silent on all generated rpm files: [wolfy at wolfy64 ~]$ mock -r fedora-devel-x86_64 lshw-B.02.11.01-2.fc7.src.rpm [...]Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64/result [wolfy at wolfy64 ~]$ ll /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64/result total 4560 -rw-r--r-- 1 wolfy mock 26224 2007-08-11 23:30 build.log -rw-rw-r-- 1 wolfy mock 1169217 2007-08-11 23:28 lshw-B.02.11.01-2.fc8.src.rpm -rw-rw-r-- 1 wolfy mock 1145047 2007-08-11 23:30 lshw-B.02.11.01-2.fc8.x86_64.rpm -rw-rw-r-- 1 wolfy mock 1844959 2007-08-11 23:30 lshw-debuginfo-B.02.11.01-2.fc8.x86_64.rpm -rw-rw-r-- 1 wolfy mock 402023 2007-08-11 23:30 lshw-gui-B.02.11.01-2.fc8.x86_64.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 wolfy mock 171 2007-08-11 23:26 mockconfig.log -rw-r--r-- 1 wolfy mock 20131 2007-08-11 23:30 root.log [wolfy at wolfy64 ~]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64/result/*rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 21:34:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 17:34:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249892] Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708112134.l7BLYKIl024673@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249892 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-08-11 17:34 EST ------- Spec: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/bouml-doc.spec New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bouml-doc Short Description: Documentation for the BOUML tool. Owners: debarshi.ray at gmail.com Branches: FC-6, F-7 InitialCC: Commits by cvsextras: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 22:25:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 18:25:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249892] Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708112225.l7BMPX1S027161@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249892 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-11 18:25 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 22:41:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 18:41:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251317] Review Request: pinot - Personal search and metasearch for the Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708112241.l7BMfunC027946@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pinot - Personal search and metasearch for the Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251317 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-11 18:41 EST ------- Still not... http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=98146 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 22:51:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 18:51:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251317] Review Request: pinot - Personal search and metasearch for the Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708112251.l7BMpWhw028462@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pinot - Personal search and metasearch for the Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251317 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-11 18:51 EST ------- Note: I tried this by: koji build --scratch dist-f8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 22:57:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 18:57:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251317] Review Request: pinot - Personal search and metasearch for the Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708112257.l7BMvMBk028739@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pinot - Personal search and metasearch for the Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251317 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-08-11 18:57 EST ------- sry its not dbus-devel but dbus-glib-devel which is needed. here a fixed packages: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/pinot.spec http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/pinot-0.75-3.fc7.src.rpm I am currently running a test build in mock but it havn't failed at the configure stage ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 22:58:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 18:58:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251317] Review Request: pinot - Personal search and metasearch for the Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708112258.l7BMwDN1028812@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pinot - Personal search and metasearch for the Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251317 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-08-11 18:58 EST ------- after submitting this the build finished in mock ... so should be working now :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 23:20:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 19:20:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251824] New: Review Request: maniadrive - 3D stunt driving game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251824 Summary: Review Request: maniadrive - 3D stunt driving game Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/maniadrive.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/maniadrive-1.2-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: ManiaDrive is an arcade car game on acrobatic tracks, with a quick and nervous gameplay (tracks almost never exceed one minute). Features: Complex car physics, Challenging "story mode", LAN and Internet mode, Live scores, Track editor, Dedicated server with HTTP interface and More than 30 blocks. --- Reviewers note, this package requires: * glew - review is bug 251191 * php-embedded - a new php subpackage, available here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=97540 (should be in rawhide with the next push) * maniadrive-data - will post bug number once submitted for review * maniadrive-music - will post bug number once submitted for review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 23:21:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 19:21:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251825] New: Review Request: maniadrive-data - Data files for maniadrive, a 3D stunt driving game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251825 Summary: Review Request: maniadrive-data - Data files for maniadrive, a 3D stunt driving game Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/maniadrive-data.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/maniadrive-data-1.2-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Data files for maniadrive, a 3D stunt driving game. Notice this package does not include the original ManiaDrive soundtrack as the original soundtrack is licensed under a CC BY-NC-SA license, which is not acceptable to Fedora. --- maniadrive's review is bug 251824 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 23:23:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 19:23:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251826] New: Review Request: maniadrive-music - Replacement soundtrack for the non free ManiaDrive soundtrack Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251826 Summary: Review Request: maniadrive-music - Replacement soundtrack for the non free ManiaDrive soundtrack Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/maniadrive-music.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/maniadrive-music-1.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Soundtrack for ManiaDrive. This is not the original ManiaDrive soundtrack as the original soundtrack is licensed under a CC BY-NC-SA license, which is not acceptable to Fedora. This replacement music was carefully chosen to keep the same atmosphere as the original music. This soundtrack contains music from the following artists / groups: Black moon http://www.dogmazic.net/static.php?op=musiqueIndex.php&group=Black+moon Kitoy http://www.dogmazic.net/static.php?op=musiqueIndex.php&group=Kitoy little http://www.dogmazic.net/static.php?op=musiqueIndex.php&group=little Syndrome: http://www.dogmazic.net/static.php?op=musiqueIndex.php&group=Syndrome Zzjmc http://www.dogmazic.net/static.php?op=musiqueIndex.php&group=Zzjmc --- maniadrive's review is bug 251824 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 23:24:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 19:24:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251824] Review Request: maniadrive - 3D stunt driving game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708112324.l7BNOQRA029955@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maniadrive - 3D stunt driving game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251824 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-11 19:24 EST ------- Reviews of other needed packages: * maniadrive-data - bug 251825 * maniadrive-music - bug 251826 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 11 23:36:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 19:36:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229419] Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708112336.l7BNag8P030332@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229419 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-08-11 19:36 EST ------- ping Bruno! My point of view is to review the Hans's version... I will do some testing, to see if it works with the package i'm preparing that BR glew-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 00:05:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 20:05:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251191] Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708120005.l7C05h0X031198@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251191 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-08-11 20:05 EST ------- mock rebuild on x86_64 show that: cc -shared -Wl,-soname=libGLEW.so.1.4 -o lib/libGLEW.so.1.4.0 src/glew.pic_o -L/usr/X11R6/lib64 -lXmu -lXi -lGLU -lGL -lXext -lX11 /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lXext collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [lib/libGLEW.so.1.4.0] Error 1 My point of view about multilibs is that binaries have to be split into another (-utils) package...But that won't breaks things if i386 and x86_64 are installed together, indeed.. I will try to test it with some package that BR glew-devel then... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 00:19:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 20:19:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251317] Review Request: pinot - Personal search and metasearch for the Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708120019.l7C0JuTR031717@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pinot - Personal search and metasearch for the Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251317 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-11 20:19 EST ------- Only tried to rebuild and now it seems okay. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=98210 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 00:23:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 20:23:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234326] Review Request: bandsaw - A syslog monitoring program for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708120023.l7C0Ng5F031881@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bandsaw - A syslog monitoring program for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234326 ------- Additional Comments From dtimms at iinet.net.au 2007-08-11 20:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > David, if you want to do this style of (pre-)review, please also > write the summary of your (pre-)review, especially what you > think is the problem with this package so that everyone (not only > you and the submitter but also someone else) can check your review > easily... Thanks, Mamoru, will do. > > > update-desktop-database &> /dev/null ||: > > - I don't know if it makes a difference, but the snippet shows || : > - You can check what "|| :" means by "man bash". This is to > ensure that %post stage will exit successfully even if the > command failed with some reason. > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets >From man bash, I understand that || is an token that is a control operator, and that : is the null command and always returns exit code of zero. It would seem then that the " " between the two parts is necessary {this was the point I was querying the submitter about}. {Off topic - how can you search man or internet for such a construct ??}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 00:34:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 20:34:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251536] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-diamondtouch - Xorg diamondtouch input driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708120034.l7C0YFGt032281@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-diamondtouch - Xorg diamondtouch input driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251536 ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-08-11 20:34 EST ------- Mmm. Might require either MPX branch of X, or else new input stuff that'll be in 1.4, and it only built for me because I had sdk pollution. Feel free to ignore this for a while. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 00:38:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 20:38:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251828] New: Review Request: quesa - OSS implementation of QuickDraw 3D Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251828 Summary: Review Request: quesa - OSS implementation of QuickDraw 3D Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ajackson at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ajax.fedorapeople.org/quesa/quesa.spec SRPM URL: http://ajax.fedorapeople.org/quesa/quesa-1.8-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Quesa is an open source implementation of the QuickDraw 3D API. It acts as a scene graph while using OpenGL for a renderer. More information at http://www.quesa.org/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 00:56:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 20:56:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251019] Review Request: lshw - Hardware lister In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708120056.l7C0uTqw000647@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware lister https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251019 ------- Additional Comments From dtimms at iinet.net.au 2007-08-11 20:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > I have added to lshw's SVN some drawings without logos and also "replacement" > logos for intel, amd, powerpc (cf. > http://dev.ezix.org/source/packages/artwork/nologo/ comments welcome). Perusing the nologo images, I find that actual trademarks have been replaced with chip-like icons with a plain font describing the type {alpha /amx /intel /mips /pa-risc /powerpc /sparc} and the boxen graphics show the form of the apple boxes, without using a logo. I would say these are acceptable for inclusion in Fedora. Lyonel, will these be included in a future source release ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 03:27:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:27:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249352] Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708120327.l7C3RKRb004989@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249352 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-08-11 23:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > Panu, does rpm.org's rpm depend on the libpopt.la file? No, rpm.org's hg mainline doesn't > Can you please verify, > whether rebuilding without works or shall we simply keep this file? At least, rpm.org'd hg mainline doesn't. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 07:50:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 03:50:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249892] Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708120750.l7C7ojer013856@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249892 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-08-12 03:50 EST ------- Spec: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/bouml-doc.spec I had to update the Spec to fix this build issue:http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=98683&name=build.log Last %changelog entry: %changelog * Sun Aug 12 2007 Debarshi Ray - 2.30-3 - Added 'mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT' in install stanza. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 08:13:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 04:13:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251191] Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708120813.l7C8DXE1016369@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251191 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-12 04:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > mock rebuild on x86_64 show that: > > cc -shared -Wl,-soname=libGLEW.so.1.4 -o lib/libGLEW.so.1.4.0 src/glew.pic_o > -L/usr/X11R6/lib64 -lXmu -lXi -lGLU -lGL -lXext -lX11 > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lXext > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > make: *** [lib/libGLEW.so.1.4.0] Error 1 > Hmm, strange: [hans at shalem ~]$ rpm -q --requires libXmu-devel libXmu-devel-1.0.3-1.fc7.x86_64 libX11-devel libXext-devel And libXmu-devel is BR'd, anyways I'll just add libXext-devel to the BR's too, I'll do a new version with this fixed when a full review is done, as I dislike doing a zillion iterations. > My point of view about multilibs is that binaries have to be split into another > (-utils) package...But that won't breaks things if i386 and x86_64 are installed > together, indeed.. > I still don't know I don't necessarily object to having a -utils package, but the other glew submission has the docs seperate too, no I think that most of the docs should be moved to the -devel packahge, but splitting them off? All files in the combined packages way in at 1 MB combined, I think splitting this up 4 ways is over the top. I really only see 2 (3) reasons for splitting of any utility binaries from libs: 1) They drag in dependencies on which the lib itself doesn't depend 2) They take up lots of diskspace 3) The cause multilib conflicts (this is fixable by making scripts identical between the i3986 and x86_64 version though) Non of this is the case here, so I say lets just have a glew and a glew-devel (and move most of the docs to glew-devel, as they describe mostly the API. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 08:24:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 04:24:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249505] Review Request: gdhcpd - GTK+ administration tool for DHCPD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708120824.l7C8OGVF019813@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdhcpd - GTK+ administration tool for DHCPD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249505 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 08:26:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 04:26:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248857] Review Request: schedtool - A tool to query or alter process scheduling policy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708120826.l7C8Q0PL017148@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: schedtool - A tool to query or alter process scheduling policy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248857 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 10:09:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 06:09:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249212] Review Request: inchi - The IUPAC International Chemical Identifier library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708121009.l7CA9icc023931@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inchi - The IUPAC International Chemical Identifier library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249212 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-08-12 06:09 EST ------- Will this reply: http://sf.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=20070810112606.ZSMM17393.aamtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com%40ALAN suffice to get this review a green light? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 12:10:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 08:10:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249352] Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708121210.l7CCA4M4030275@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249352 pmatilai at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(pmatilai at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From pmatilai at redhat.com 2007-08-12 08:10 EST ------- No need to package the .la file, even 4.4.2.1 appears to builds ok without it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 12:52:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 08:52:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250467] Review Request: rainbow - The service component of the OLPC Bitfrost security platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708121252.l7CCqZun000856@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rainbow - The service component of the OLPC Bitfrost security platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250467 bdpepple at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: rainbow - |Review Request: rainbow - |The service component of the|The service component of the |OLPC Bitfrost security |OLPC Bitfrost security |platform |platform AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bdpepple at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 13:43:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 09:43:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250467] Review Request: rainbow - The service component of the OLPC Bitfrost security platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708121343.l7CDhGsL005312@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rainbow - The service component of the OLPC Bitfrost security platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250467 bdpepple at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at gmail.com 2007-08-12 09:43 EST ------- MD5Sums: 9a2c828bf6b91aa2f343fc88b3ab2eab rainbow-20070731gitde262e.tar.bz2 Good: * Source URL is canonical * git source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * Buildroot has all required elements * All directories are owned by this or other packages * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * Package build fine in Mock Bad: * rpmlint produces the following error, which should be easy to fix: E: rainbow non-standard-executable-perm /usr/sbin/rainbow 0744 E: rainbow non-readable /etc/rainbow/rainbow.conf 0600 * You should use a macro for '/usr/sbin/rainbow'. refer to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros * Does the package really need python-setuptools as a Require? Minor: * you can drop the sitearch variable from the spec, since it's unused. * you can remove the CFLAGS from the build call, since it's a noarch package. +1 approved, please review and fix the bad items before importing into CVS. thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 13:52:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 09:52:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250468] Review Request: vcmd - A developers interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708121352.l7CDqGlc005616@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vcmd - A developers interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250468 bdpepple at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bdpepple at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 13:54:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 09:54:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248649] Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708121354.l7CDsZgS005806@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248649 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-08-12 09:54 EST ------- OK Exept for the cells (and all arch independant data) that should be in /usr/share/alliance, thoses directories seems rights... The aim is to sort arch dependant and arch-independant data. But the remaining problems is about $alliance_top/{etc,cells,...}, Actually thoses directory are hardcoded in configure* and Makefile*, but that would be better to change them with autotools (to be set at configure step). So you will have something like @alliance_etc@ and @alliance_cells@ I think this would be better so upstream can merge thoses changes. I don't mean to re-run autotools but to have patches to that can be merged upstream... About the desktop files (nices icons) Thoses links wasn't working has alliance_bin wasn't yet in the path... (I expect that it will be after a reboot) I ever you wanted to make comment (and comment{fr] ) in you .desktop files, you have to follow : http://developer.gnome.org/projects/gup/hig/2.0/desktop-integration.html#menu-item-tooltips And specially uses verbs in the comments line... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 14:08:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 10:08:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249352] Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708121408.l7CE8JGN006528@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249352 ------- Additional Comments From pmatilai at redhat.com 2007-08-12 10:08 EST ------- Oh and btw this part is now done in latest rawhide rpm to remove silly testing roadblocks: > - rpm needs to loose the strict dependency on popt = - -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 14:10:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 10:10:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250468] Review Request: vcmd - A developers interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708121410.l7CEAiFJ006693@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vcmd - A developers interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250468 bdpepple at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review- ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at gmail.com 2007-08-12 10:10 EST ------- MD5Sum: ef7787845e698017b370923b919ab023 vcmd-0.09.tar.bz2 Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * Buildroot has all required elements * All directories are owned by this or other packages * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * Make succeeds even when %{_smp_mflags} is defined * Files have appropriate permissions and owners * Package builds fine in Mock. Bad: * Not all paths use macros. In particular, look at '/usr/sbin/'. refer to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros * rpmlint produces the following errors: W: vcmd no-documentation This error can be ignored, since the tarball contains no documentation. W: vcmd invalid-license GPL This error needs to fixed though. I looked through the tarball, and couldn't find any mention of the license used. Also, if it is actually GPL, we will need to clarify what version according to the new license tag guidelines. refer to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing Note: Looks like a newer version of this package is available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 14:14:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 10:14:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250533] Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for writing games on the OLPC platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708121414.l7CEEvkN006875@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for writing games on the OLPC platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250533 bdpepple at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bdpepple at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 14:27:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 10:27:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250533] Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for writing games on the OLPC platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708121427.l7CERxx3007424@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for writing games on the OLPC platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250533 bdpepple at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at gmail.com 2007-08-12 10:27 EST ------- MD5Sum: ecadb8e31684dc2e4994f06078a40999 olpcgames-20070801git4ab726.tar.bz2 Good: * Source URL is canonical * git tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * Buildroot has all required elements * All directories are owned by this or other packages * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * Files have appropriate permissions and owners * Package builds fine in Mock. * rpmlint produces no error. Minor: * You can remove sitearch variable, since this is a no arch package. * The CFLAGS call in the build section is unnecessary. * You should drop the %{python_sitearch} from the file section, since this is a noarch package +1 APPROVE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 14:30:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 10:30:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248649] Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708121430.l7CEUZif007563@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248649 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-12 10:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #24) > The aim is to sort arch dependant and arch-independant data. Ok, will do > But the remaining problems is about $alliance_top/{etc,cells,...}, Actually > thoses directory are hardcoded in configure* and Makefile*, but that would be > better to change them with autotools (to be set at configure step). So you will > have something like @alliance_etc@ and @alliance_cells@ > > I think this would be better so upstream can merge thoses changes. I don't mean > to re-run autotools but to have patches to that can be merged upstream... should I do every upstream's job it as a packager? Would you block the review, if I don't ? > Thoses links wasn't working has alliance_bin wasn't yet in the path... > (I expect that it will be after a reboot) True > And specially uses verbs in the comments line... Will do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 15:22:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 11:22:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249992] Review Request: glglobe - OpenGl Globe - Earth simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708121522.l7CFMFqX009628@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glglobe - OpenGl Globe - Earth simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249992 ------- Additional Comments From dtimms at iinet.net.au 2007-08-12 11:22 EST ------- As described in the /Join link, I am confirming that I have requested membership in the cvsextras and fedorabugs groups as described in the /Join link. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 15:38:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 11:38:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249992] Review Request: glglobe - OpenGl Globe - Earth simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708121538.l7CFcfDo010190@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glglobe - OpenGl Globe - Earth simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249992 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-12 11:38 EST ------- Now I am sponsoring you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 15:49:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 11:49:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249892] Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708121549.l7CFnirX010528@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249892 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-12 11:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #25) > Spec: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/bouml-doc.spec > > I had to update the Spec to fix this build > issue:http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=98683&name=build.log > > Last %changelog entry: > > %changelog > * Sun Aug 12 2007 Debarshi Ray - 2.30-3 > - Added 'mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT' in install stanza. Maybe you can (or should) file against "rpm". I guess this is due to recent changes in /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh (in rpm-build). Anyway when rebuild is done, please close this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 17:15:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 13:15:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246227] Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708121715.l7CHFmcq013911@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt Alias: brutus-keyring https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246227 bdpepple at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at gmail.com 2007-08-12 13:15 EST ------- Ok, finally got Evolution-Brutus to build in rawhide. yeah. Thanks for the review, Mamoru. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 17:23:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 13:23:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246524] Review Request: libquikgrid - The QuikGrid generator and contouring routine library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708121723.l7CHN4xR014386@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libquikgrid - The QuikGrid generator and contouring routine library Alias: libquikgrid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246524 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2007-08-12 13:23 EST ------- The author has updated the license to remove the confusion and issued the clarifying statement on the website. I'll get the source updated in the next week or so and publish a new revision. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 18:02:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 14:02:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246524] Review Request: libquikgrid - The QuikGrid generator and contouring routine library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708121802.l7CI2KwN015754@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libquikgrid - The QuikGrid generator and contouring routine library Alias: libquikgrid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246524 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-08-12 14:02 EST ------- good! So, do we have some news about minizip to be enabled from withit zlib ?! There is also a mini update with the appropriate license bundled (but not autotools patched merged in...) I will take a quick look on vtp asap... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 18:14:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 14:14:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229419] Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708121814.l7CIEaBJ016251@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229419 bruno at postle.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From bruno at postle.net 2007-08-12 14:14 EST ------- [Sorry, I've been away at a conference] Yes I'm happy for Hans to take this package, I'll mark it as a duplicate of 251191 if that is ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 19:01:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 15:01:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249352] Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708121901.l7CJ19Mn018850@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249352 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-08-12 15:01 EST ------- The /lib move has been done, other suggested changes have been merged in. Can we walk through the official review now? Updated package below: Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/popt.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/popt-1.12-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 19:15:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 15:15:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229419] Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708121915.l7CJFvVr019552@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229419 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-12 15:15 EST ------- Thanks! Marking at as a dup is fine, but the current resolution of notabug also is ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 19:18:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 15:18:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251857] New: Review Request: figlet - ascii banner generator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251857 Summary: Review Request: figlet - ascii banner generator Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ajackson at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ajax.fedorapeople.org/figlet/figlet.spec SRPM URL: http://ajax.fedorapeople.org/figlet/figlet-2.2.2-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: __ _ _ _ _ / _(_) __ _| | ___| |_ _ __ ___ ___| | _____ | |_| |/ _` | |/ _ \ __| | '__/ _ \ / __| |/ / __| | _| | (_| | | __/ |_ | | | (_) | (__| <\__ \_ |_| |_|\__, |_|\___|\__| |_| \___/ \___|_|\_\___(_) |___/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 19:18:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 15:18:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251191] Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708121918.l7CJIrtJ019809@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251191 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-12 15:18 EST ------- Ok, the issue of the duplicate review requests has been sorted out and the decision has been made this is the one to review. Ian if you feel like it and have the time, I would be very grateful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 19:27:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 15:27:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248649] Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708121927.l7CJRdqh020195@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248649 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-12 15:27 EST ------- Updated: SRPM: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/alliance/alliance-5.0-7.20070718snap.fc8.src.rpm SPEC: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/alliance/alliance.spec Build.log (i386): http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/alliance/build.log rpmlint: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/alliance/rpmlint -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 19:39:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 15:39:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251857] Review Request: figlet - ascii banner generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708121939.l7CJdvEq020733@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: figlet - ascii banner generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251857 ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-08-12 15:39 EST ------- Possible license issue? http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=274950 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 20:09:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 16:09:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251191] Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708122009.l7CK9uxk022017@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251191 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-08-12 16:09 EST ------- No problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 20:10:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 16:10:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251191] Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708122010.l7CKAhk9022158@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251191 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |packages at amiga-hardware.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 20:11:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 16:11:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251191] Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708122011.l7CKBU4U022252@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251191 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 20:52:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 16:52:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251191] Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708122052.l7CKqdcq024360@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251191 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|packages at amiga-hardware.com |kwizart at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-08-12 16:52 EST ------- Ok i will take the review then: * well indeed,libXext-devel was only required on FC6, since F7 it works without BR it...If you add it the same spec file will work from FC6->devel * splitting the doc to -devel is fine for me * About the bin split i think it is the same as glx-utils (and glxinfo) {case-study} - If I install binaries nvidia drivers on x86_64 but without the compat32 libs which i don't care to have. Then, install glew.x86_64 but later an update or a dependency bring me glew.i386. /usr/bin/{glewinfo,visualinfo} will be i386 ... then ldd will link with default mesa's GL libs and not nvidia's which will return wrong values if i uses thoses i386 binaries on x86_64... * unused-direct-shlib-dependency (at least on FC6 x86_64 ) Maybe a problem with -L/usr/X11R6/lib64 that do not exist on my system W: glew unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libGLEW.so.1.4.0 /usr/lib64/libXmu.so.6 W: glew unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libGLEW.so.1.4.0 /usr/lib64/libXi.so.6 W: glew unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libGLEW.so.1.4.0 /usr/lib64/libGLU.so.1 W: glew unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libGLEW.so.1.4.0 /usr/lib64/libXext.so.6 W: glew unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libGLEW.so.1.4.0 /usr/lib64/libX11.so.6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 20:56:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 16:56:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251191] Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708122056.l7CKu2C5024623@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251191 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-08-12 16:55 EST ------- @Ian Chapman Sorry for the miss-collision - I haven't noticed you talk to take the review Feel free to re-take it... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 21:07:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 17:07:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251191] Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708122107.l7CL70GK025221@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251191 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-12 17:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > * About the bin split i think it is the same as glx-utils (and glxinfo) > {case-study} - If I install binaries nvidia drivers on x86_64 but without the > compat32 libs which i don't care to have. Then, install glew.x86_64 but later an > update or a dependency bring me glew.i386. /usr/bin/{glewinfo,visualinfo} will > be i386 ... then ldd will link with default mesa's GL libs and not nvidia's > which will return wrong values if i uses thoses i386 binaries on x86_64... > Except that if you first install the x86_64 package and then the i386 package, the x86_64 files will be kept, if you do it the other way around the x86_64 files will override the i386 ones, so in the end if you install both you will always end up with the 64 bit versions (on x86_64, on ppc you will always end up with the 32 bit versions), this is how rpm multilib works, for binaries it has a preferred arch and when both installed that arch wins. > * unused-direct-shlib-dependency (at least on FC6 x86_64 ) > Maybe a problem with -L/usr/X11R6/lib64 that do not exist on my system > > W: glew unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libGLEW.so.1.4.0 > /usr/lib64/libXmu.so.6 > W: glew unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libGLEW.so.1.4.0 > /usr/lib64/libXi.so.6 > W: glew unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libGLEW.so.1.4.0 > /usr/lib64/libGLU.so.1 > W: glew unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libGLEW.so.1.4.0 > /usr/lib64/libXext.so.6 > W: glew unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libGLEW.so.1.4.0 > /usr/lib64/libX11.so.6 I will fix this as soon as the rest is sorted out (like who does the review, and once that sorted out we need to agree on what to do with the binaties). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 21:16:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 17:16:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251191] Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708122116.l7CLGj50025857@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251191 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-08-12 17:16 EST ------- Well, overriding files is always bad, as it is probably unexpected... But as others apps that uses glew-devel is linking fine with this version, I'm ok to leave the decision to you about the binary split... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 21:35:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 17:35:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251864] New: Review Request: kpogre - PostgreSQL graphical frontend for KDE 3.x Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251864 Summary: Review Request: kpogre - PostgreSQL graphical frontend for KDE 3.x Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: devrim at commandprompt.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/kpogre/kpogre.spec SRPM URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/kpogre/kpogre-1.5.4-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: KPoGre is graphical administration tool for PostgreSQL. It uses libpqxx library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 21:37:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 17:37:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251864] Review Request: kpogre - PostgreSQL graphical frontend for KDE 3.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708122137.l7CLbZEg027020@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kpogre - PostgreSQL graphical frontend for KDE 3.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251864 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2007-08-12 17:37 EST ------- Quick tip for the reviewer: I could not test this package in mock -- so BRs and R's may be missing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 23:41:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 19:41:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239184] Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708122341.l7CNf9x7031538@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239184 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-08-12 19:41 EST ------- libdc1394 1.2.2 has been updated but no juju support for Fedora 7 for now! same error Rathann reported in #9 Kristian, how can we backport juju for libdc1394-1 ? Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/rpmfusion/libdc1394.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/rpmfusion/libdc1394-1.2.2-1.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Description: High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 23:52:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 19:52:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249251] Review Request: hardinfo - System Profiler and Benchmark In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708122352.l7CNqh1S031937@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hardinfo - System Profiler and Benchmark https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249251 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-08-12 19:52 EST ------- Adel, I see the package was sucessfully built, so I guess you should close this bug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 12 23:54:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 19:54:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189949] Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708122354.l7CNsrtH032048@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189949 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-08-12 19:54 EST ------- Andreas, anything new ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 00:46:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 20:46:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251864] Review Request: kpogre - PostgreSQL graphical frontend for KDE 3.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708130046.l7D0kwsR002069@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kpogre - PostgreSQL graphical frontend for KDE 3.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251864 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-08-12 20:46 EST ------- For a start, the source URL should be similar to: Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz Mock build fails with: checking for KDE... configure: error: in the prefix, you've chosen, are no KDE headers installed. This will fail. So, check this please and use another prefix! error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.40521 (%prep) Adding kdelibs-devel solves this, but rpmlint exposes some more problems: E: kpogre standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share W: kpogre dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kpogre/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common W: kpogre symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kpogre/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common E: kpogre standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/bin E: kpogre standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/doc E: kpogre standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/icons -> you try to own directories that you should not W: kpogre invalid-license GPL -> The lists with the valid licenses is available at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#head-489bc5bbf14ecdb808316674e9fc465243cfa4f5 E: kpogre binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/kpogre ['/usr/lib64', '/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/lib'] You should try to get rid of the rpath. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines?highlight=%28rpath%29#head-a1dfb5f46bf4098841e31a75d833e6e1b3e72544 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 01:07:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 21:07:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247930] Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708130107.l7D175CT002977@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247930 mike at flyn.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|needinfo?(mike at flyn.org) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 06:00:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 02:00:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250040] Review Request: new - A simple template system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708130600.l7D60Ies016459@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: new - A simple template system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250040 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(mike at flyn.org) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-13 02:00 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 06:05:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 02:05:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239968] Review Request: mdbtools - tools for extracting things from Access databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708130605.l7D651OE016860@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mdbtools - tools for extracting things from Access databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239968 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-13 02:04 EST ------- Closing as NOTABUG as one month and one week has passed since the last ping by Jason (comment 5) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 06:08:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 02:08:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232855] Review Request: surfraw-1.0.7-1 - Shell Users Revolutionary Front Rage Against the Web In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708130608.l7D68vlm017116@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: surfraw-1.0.7-1 - Shell Users Revolutionary Front Rage Against the Web https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232855 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-13 02:08 EST ------- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 06:09:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 02:09:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251419] Review Request: mdbtools - Access data stored in Microsoft Access databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708130609.l7D69MA7017230@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mdbtools - Access data stored in Microsoft Access databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251419 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-13 02:09 EST ------- The other review turns out to be dead (just closed by the reviewer) so anyone interested, feel free to review this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 06:10:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 02:10:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232855] Review Request: surfraw-1.0.7-1 - Shell Users Revolutionary Front Rage Against the Web In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708130610.l7D6AC78017309@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: surfraw-1.0.7-1 - Shell Users Revolutionary Front Rage Against the Web https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232855 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|needinfo?(livinded at deadbytes| |.net) | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-13 02:10 EST ------- Well, it seems that this package is already rebuilt on FC-7 and rawhide, so closing as NEXTRELEASE for now... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 08:06:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 04:06:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249251] Review Request: hardinfo - System Profiler and Benchmark In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708130806.l7D86ddQ024971@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hardinfo - System Profiler and Benchmark https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249251 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 08:24:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 04:24:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251317] Review Request: pinot - Personal search and metasearch for the Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708130824.l7D8ODuG026470@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pinot - Personal search and metasearch for the Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251317 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-13 04:24 EST ------- Some notes: * On %build section ---------------------------------------- %configure CFLAGS=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS make ---------------------------------------- - %configure sets CFLAGS and setting CFLAGS environ on make should not be needed. * Directory ownership - Please make it sure that all directory this package creates newly are owned by this package. Currently the following directories are not owned by any packages. ---------------------------------------- %_libdir/pinot/ %_libdir/pinot/filters/ %_sysconfdir/pinot/ ---------------------------------------- * Debuginfo source permission - Currently rpmlint complains a lot against debuginfo rpm like: ---------------------------------------- E: pinot-debuginfo script-without-shebang /usr/src/debug/pinot-0.75/UI/GTK2/src/indexDialog.cc E: pinot-debuginfo script-without-shebang /usr/src/debug/pinot-0.75/UI/GTK2/src/WorkerThreads.cpp ---------------------------------------- This is because the original source codes have inappropritate permission (which must be 0644). * Executable permission v.s. shebang ----------------------------------------- E: pinot-deskbar non-executable-script /usr/lib/deskbar-applet/handlers/pinot-live.py 0644 ----------------------------------------- - This is because this script has shebang (#!/usr/bin/env python) but does not have executable permission. It looks that this script is called by some software and it is not executed directly. So remove shebang from this script. * scriptlets - update of gtk icon cache - (please check "GTK+ icon cache" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ) * Scriptlets are needed even for %postun. * Please make it sure that this script ends with success (i.e. add "|| : " or add "exit 0") -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 08:34:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 04:34:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251419] Review Request: mdbtools - Access data stored in Microsoft Access databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708130834.l7D8YIQM027187@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mdbtools - Access data stored in Microsoft Access databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251419 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-13 04:34 EST ------- Just tried to rebuild (on rawhide) but it failed.. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=99778 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 08:42:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 04:42:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241792] Review Request: Empathy - An instant messaging client built using Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708130842.l7D8gRVD027755@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Empathy - An instant messaging client built using Telepathy Alias: empathy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241792 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-08-13 04:42 EST ------- I'd like to unorphan and take ownership of Empathy, now that I've got Telepathy working nicely with AIM. Thanks. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: empathy Updated Fedora Owners: peter at thecodergeek.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 09:03:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 05:03:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238863] Review Request: avant-window-navigator - Fully customisable dock-like window navigator for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708130903.l7D93Y4Q029506@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avant-window-navigator - Fully customisable dock-like window navigator for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238863 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-13 05:03 EST ------- Closing as now this is on rawhide... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 09:15:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 05:15:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251317] Review Request: pinot - Personal search and metasearch for the Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708130915.l7D9FGlh030402@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pinot - Personal search and metasearch for the Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251317 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-08-13 05:15 EST ------- >This is because the original source codes have inappropritate >permission (which must be 0644). how can I fix this whitout changing the tarball itself? chmod 0644 in %build or %install causes permisson issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 09:18:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 05:18:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251317] Review Request: pinot - Personal search and metasearch for the Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708130918.l7D9I12U030575@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pinot - Personal search and metasearch for the Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251317 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-08-13 05:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > >This is because the original source codes have inappropritate > >permission (which must be 0644). > how can I fix this whitout changing the tarball itself? > chmod 0644 in %build or %install causes permisson issues. stupid mistake please ignore this comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 09:42:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 05:42:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251317] Review Request: pinot - Personal search and metasearch for the Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708130942.l7D9glhf032657@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pinot - Personal search and metasearch for the Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251317 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-08-13 05:42 EST ------- I uploaded a fixed srpm and spec: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/pinot.spec http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/pinot-0.75-4.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 10:08:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 06:08:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251317] Review Request: pinot - Personal search and metasearch for the Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708131008.l7DA8DDl002057@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pinot - Personal search and metasearch for the Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251317 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-13 06:08 EST ------- For -4: (I am still rebuilding -4 srpm, so just checked your spec file) ---------------------------------------------------- @@ -85,6 +108,7 @@ %{_bindir}/pinot-index %{_bindir}/pinot-search %{_datadir}/pinot/ +%{_libdir}/pinot/ %{_libdir}/pinot/filters/libexternalfilter.so* %{_libdir}/pinot/filters/libmboxfilter.so* %{_libdir}/pinot/filters/libtaglibfilter.so* @@ -100,6 +124,7 @@ %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/24x24/apps/pinot.png %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/22x22/apps/pinot.png %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/pinot.png +%{_sysconfdir}/pinot/ %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/pinot/external-filters.xml %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/pinot/globalconfig.xml %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/pinot/textcat_conf.txt ----------------------------------------------------- - The file entry ----------------------------------------------------- foo/ ----------------------------------------------------- (where foo is the directory) means the directory foo itself and all files/directories/ etc.. under foo/ so this makes duplicate file entries. For %{_libdir}/pinot/, %{_libdir}/pinot/filters/libexternalfilter.so* and on are now not needed. For {_sysconfdir}/pinot/, mark this as %dir, i.e. ------------------------------------------------- %dir %{_sysconfdir}/pinot %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/pinot/external-filters.xml ......... ------------------------------------------------- or just: ------------------------------------------------- %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/pinot/ ------------------------------------------------- The latter description contains directory %_sysconfdir/pinot and all files under the directory, and mark all files under %_sysconfdir/pinot as %config(noreplace). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 10:23:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 06:23:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251317] Review Request: pinot - Personal search and metasearch for the Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708131023.l7DANVCT003132@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pinot - Personal search and metasearch for the Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251317 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-08-13 06:23 EST ------- fixed the duplicate ownership: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/pinot.spec http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/pinot-0.75-5.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 12:09:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 08:09:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249992] Review Request: glglobe - OpenGl Globe - Earth simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708131209.l7DC94C5010581@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glglobe - OpenGl Globe - Earth simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249992 dtimms at iinet.net.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From dtimms at iinet.net.au 2007-08-13 08:08 EST ------- Thanks for the review and sponsoring me, Mamoru. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: glglobe Short Description: OpenGl Globe - Earth simulation for linux Owners: dtimms Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 13:15:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 09:15:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248649] Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708131315.l7DDFpbF016275@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248649 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-08-13 09:15 EST ------- good! * Works fine on installation/uninstallation (directory ownership is good) Beware that upgrading from previous reviewing packages it might leave from directory ownership problems (ie sprecially from the cells directory switch ) * Runtime test works --------------------- This package ( alliance ) is APPROVED by me --------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 13:44:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 09:44:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249212] Review Request: inchi - The IUPAC International Chemical Identifier library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708131344.l7DDie21019628@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inchi - The IUPAC International Chemical Identifier library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249212 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-08-13 09:44 EST ------- Given that this package is fine split, I'd rather wait until the upstream source is fully fixed and explicitly clarified before approving this. IANAL, but upstream merely stating "go ahead" doesn't satisfy #2 above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 14:32:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 10:32:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251317] Review Request: pinot - Personal search and metasearch for the Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708131432.l7DEWAMS023910@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pinot - Personal search and metasearch for the Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251317 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-13 10:32 EST ------- Okay One comment and one rpmlint * desktop-file-install -------------------------------------------------------- desktop-file-install --vendor fedora \ --dir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications/pinot.desktop rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications/pinot.desktop -------------------------------------------------------- - This can be done by one line: -------------------------------------------------------- desktop-file-install --vendor fedora \ --dir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications \ --delete-original \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications/pinot.desktop -------------------------------------------------------- * rpmlint -------------------------------------------------------- W: pinot macro-in-%changelog files -------------------------------------------------------- - In changelog, use %% (i.e. Fix %%files section) to avoid that % macro is expanded. Please fix the issues above before committing into Fedora CVS. --------------------------------------------------------- This package (pinot) is APPROVED by me --------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 14:48:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 10:48:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251317] Review Request: pinot - Personal search and metasearch for the Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708131448.l7DEm1KP026081@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pinot - Personal search and metasearch for the Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251317 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-08-13 10:47 EST ------- ok thx for the review fixed both in -6: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/pinot.spec http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/pinot-0.75-6.fc7.src.rpm --------------------------------------------------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pinot Short Description: Personal search and metasearch for the Desktop Owners: drago01 Branches: devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 14:49:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 10:49:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251419] Review Request: mdbtools - Access data stored in Microsoft Access databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708131449.l7DEnj5o026235@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mdbtools - Access data stored in Microsoft Access databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251419 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-13 10:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Just tried to rebuild (on rawhide) but it failed.. > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=99778 Hmm, so it turns out some parts use glib1 and other parts glib2, not pretty, anyways I've just updated to a new version, because of some other issues. And that fixes the need for glib1 too (no longer needed), here is the new version: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/mdbtools.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/mdbtools-0.6-0.1.pre1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 14:54:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 10:54:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251317] Review Request: pinot - Personal search and metasearch for the Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708131454.l7DEsa2k027185@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pinot - Personal search and metasearch for the Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251317 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-13 10:54 EST ------- Well, now CVS Request templete has "Commits by cvsextras" line. Please re-check http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 14:57:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 10:57:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708131457.l7DEvj5P027700@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(mefoster at gmail.com | |) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-13 10:57 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 15:16:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 11:16:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248649] Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708131516.l7DFGhSF030245@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248649 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-13 11:16 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: alliance Short Description: Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem Owners: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au Branches: FC-6 F-7 devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 15:30:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 11:30:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251317] Review Request: pinot - Personal search and metasearch for the Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708131530.l7DFUt17000330@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pinot - Personal search and metasearch for the Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251317 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Package Review |4Suite ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-08-13 11:30 EST ------- Ok, I missed that part, added. ---------------------------------------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pinot Short Description: Personal search and metasearch for the Desktop Owners: drago01 Branches: devel Commits by cvsextras: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 15:33:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 11:33:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202334] Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708131533.l7DFXtV2000753@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202334 vivekl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |vivekl at redhat.com Flag|needinfo?(vivekl at redhat.com)| ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-08-13 11:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > Vivek, since you're currently maintaining the tomcat5 rpm, do you think you > could review this package? If you're too busy, just say so. If you can wait for a day or two I can certainly take a shot at reviewing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 15:35:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 11:35:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202334] Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708131535.l7DFZ5r0000887@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202334 ------- Additional Comments From bkonrath at redhat.com 2007-08-13 11:34 EST ------- That would be great, thanks Vivek! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 15:37:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 11:37:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251317] Review Request: pinot - Personal search and metasearch for the Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708131537.l7DFb4mT001322@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pinot - Personal search and metasearch for the Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251317 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|4Suite |Package Review ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-08-13 11:37 EST ------- Ok, I missed that part, added. ---------------------------------------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pinot Short Description: Personal search and metasearch for the Desktop Owners: drago01 Branches: devel Commits by cvsextras: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 15:43:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 11:43:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247268] Review Request: python-proctor - Proctor is a tool for running unit tests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708131543.l7DFh3Df002090@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-proctor - Proctor is a tool for running unit tests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247268 anderson.silva at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX ------- Additional Comments From anderson.silva at redhat.com 2007-08-13 11:43 EST ------- I've resolved to move along to a new package, I will try to get someone else to pick this package up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 16:27:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 12:27:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251947] New: Review Request: libkarma - Library to manage the Rio Karma via TCP/IP Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251947 Summary: Review Request: libkarma - Library to manage the Rio Karma via TCP/IP Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gauret at free.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/libkarma/libkarma.spec SRPM URL: http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/libkarma/libkarma-0.1.0-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Libkarma is a C library for managing the Rio Karma via TCP/IP. It supports all basic protocol commands and some advanced functions on top of these, like caching of the Rio database. Warning: I don't have a Rio Karma to test this package, I packaged it as an extension Amarok can take advantage of. The reviewer (or one of the commenters) should test it on an actual Rio Karma device. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 16:29:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 12:29:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251950] New: Review Request: moodbar - Identifies the "mood" of your music files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251950 Summary: Review Request: moodbar - Identifies the "mood" of your music files Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gauret at free.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/moodbar/moodbar.spec SRPM URL: http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/moodbar/moodbar-0.1.2-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Moodbar is a program that takes a music file and generates a .mood file identifying the "mood" of the music. It can be used by Amarok to create playlists based on your mood. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 16:48:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 12:48:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251950] Review Request: moodbar - Identifies the "mood" of your music files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708131648.l7DGmRm1010650@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: moodbar - Identifies the "mood" of your music files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251950 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2007-08-13 12:48 EST ------- Hmm, actually amarok does not use it to create playlists, but to show a visual representation of what happens in the song. See the home page for more info. I've updated the description. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 16:59:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 12:59:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251419] Review Request: mdbtools - Access data stored in Microsoft Access databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708131659.l7DGxd46011604@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mdbtools - Access data stored in Microsoft Access databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251419 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-13 12:59 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=161187) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=161187&action=view) gdb log of gmdb2 rebuild seems okay. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=100188 Some notes: * Dependency for -devel subpackage - Check the dependency for -devel subpackage. Header files included in this package contains some "#include" macros, which require some additional development rpms. (maybe pkgconfig .pc files also need to be fixed) * GUI program causes SEGV - /usr/bin/gmdb2 causes SEGV when File->Properties is selected (gdb log attached) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 17:06:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:06:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244597] Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708131706.l7DH6wCH013130@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244597 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-08-13 13:06 EST ------- rkward-0.4.7-4.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 17:07:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:07:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244597] Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708131707.l7DH77KG013175@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244597 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |0.4.7-4.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 17:52:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:52:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202334] Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708131752.l7DHqqHA019527@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202334 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-08-13 13:52 EST ------- This may be of interest: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UsersAndGroups -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 17:56:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:56:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232725] Review Request: eclipse-mylar - A task-focused UI for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708131756.l7DHudex019877@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-mylar - A task-focused UI for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232725 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora overholt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-08-13 13:56 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: eclipse-mylar Re-name package to eclipse-mylyn. I can take care of the actual specfile re-naming and the re-naming of the generated packages. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 18:30:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:30:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247513] Review Request: junit4 - java regression testing framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708131830.l7DIUNqm025181@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: junit4 - java regression testing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247513 fnasser at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From fnasser at redhat.com 2007-08-13 14:30 EST ------- Built into Rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 18:33:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:33:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250467] Review Request: rainbow - The service component of the OLPC Bitfrost security platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708131833.l7DIXPLL025638@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rainbow - The service component of the OLPC Bitfrost security platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250467 noah at coderanger.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From noah at coderanger.net 2007-08-13 14:33 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rainbow Short Description: The service component of the OLPC Bitfrost security platform Owners: coderanger Branches: OLPC-2 InitialCC: coderanger, Commits by cvsextras: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 18:36:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:36:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251419] Review Request: mdbtools - Access data stored in Microsoft Access databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708131836.l7DIa86g026189@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mdbtools - Access data stored in Microsoft Access databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251419 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-13 14:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Created an attachment (id=161187) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=161187&action=view) [edit] > gdb log of gmdb2 > > rebuild seems okay. > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=100188 > > Some notes: > > * Dependency for -devel subpackage > - Check the dependency for -devel subpackage. Header files > included in this package contains some "#include" macros, > which require some additional development rpms. > (maybe pkgconfig .pc files also need to be fixed) > Hmm, it installed headers used for building the tools too, fixed. Added glib2-devel Requires as that one gets used by the lib headers too. The .pc files were/are fine. > * GUI program causes SEGV > - /usr/bin/gmdb2 causes SEGV when File->Properties is selected > (gdb log attached) Ah it allows you to press properties without having a file open, fixed. New version: * Mon Aug 13 2007 Hans de Goede 0.6-0.2.pre1 - Stop gmdb from crashing when selecting file->properties without having a file loaded (bz 251419) - Don't install headers used to build tools (install only those of libmdb) - Add glib2-devel to the -devel Requires Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/mdbtools.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/mdbtools-0.6-0.2.pre1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 18:37:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:37:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250533] Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for writing games on the OLPC platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708131837.l7DIbish026340@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for writing games on the OLPC platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250533 noah at coderanger.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From noah at coderanger.net 2007-08-13 14:37 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-olpcgames Short Description: Utilities and support tools for writing games on the OLPC system Owners: coderanger Branches: F-7 OLPC-2 InitialCC: coderanger Commits by cvsextras: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 18:43:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:43:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251998] New: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage - Allows perl modules to check test coverage with Devel::Cover Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251998 Summary: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage - Allows perl modules to check test coverage with Devel::Cover Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rnorwood at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage-0.05-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: This module allows ExtUtils::MakeMaker to use Devel::Coverage to do code coverage tests on a module. Useful for module developers and packagers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 18:50:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:50:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251019] Review Request: lshw - Hardware lister In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708131850.l7DIoLMJ028044@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware lister https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251019 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2007-08-13 14:50 EST ------- > MUST Items: > - emac.svg {artistic view of apple logo} is still included - is it OK to > include in Fedora ? Logo? It's a drawing of a computer monitor, must be ok. > .? If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an > architecture - : > - I tried only on i386{i686/athlon} > - no excludearchs listed. > - have you tested on x86_64 or mac ? Lyonel on ppc, I have tested x86_64, ok. > .x At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT): > - the command is: %{__rm} -rf %{buildroot}, which is not standard, why ? > >.x must have a %clean section, containing rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT): > - %{__rm} -rf %{buildroot} differs from this requirement. Not fixed, see next issue. >.? Each package must consistently use macros: > - no new macros are defined. > - %{x} are actually %{__X}, again, why ? I read this as not to mix $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot}, sed and %{__sed}. I prefer to use the macro versions, hence rm -rf is %{__rm} -rf. Anyway, this is pedantic. > ? - COPYING is included in both lshw and lshw-gui. However, lshw-gui Requires > lshw, so the COPYING is guaranteed to be installed already. I don't know if > that is normal, or whether it could / should be removed. Requires is not enough, lshw-gui could e.g have a BSD license. > .? The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported > architectures: > - only tested on i386 {athlon} Tested on i386, ppc and x86_64. > Personally, I think console helper should be saying ~"this program performs > better when run with root privileges", and give the normal user a chance to ~run > unprivileged". This makes the app at least somewhat useful if you do not have > root rights on the system. This might also means not placing in /usr/sbin ? This not make sense to me. > I also suggest: that even though lshw includes a copy of hw data, that any such > files included by fedora hwdata should not be packaged. This has the advantages of: > - removes any confusion / discrepancy that would otherwise occur if the result > of other fedora hardware tools is compared to lshw that included different > hwdata files. > - shouldn't require updates to lshw when only hw data has been updated. Until hwdata is more frequently updated the way lshw is doing this now is most sane, if things changes hwdata info in lshw can be removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 19:04:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 15:04:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251019] Review Request: lshw - Hardware lister In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708131904.l7DJ4EMV029505@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware lister https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251019 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2007-08-13 15:04 EST ------- > The problem is that the reported information will be highly inaccurate (and, on > certain platforms like x86, not only incomplete but *different* from what you > get as root) when lshw is run as normal user. Agree, you should be root to run the tool consolehelper solves this. > Maybe I should add a warning in > the GUI (like what you get when running the CLI as non-root user). What do > others think? A warning would be nice, however that's is feature request in lshw, is not critical for this review which is about inclusion in Fedora (let's not forget that). > I have added to lshw's SVN some drawings without logos and also "replacement" > logos for intel, amd, powerpc (cf. > http://dev.ezix.org/source/packages/artwork/nologo/ comments welcome). Looks great, will include them when they are part of a proper release. Again: lshw works great without logs, this issue is not critical for this Fedora inclusion review. > as discussed earlier (cf. duplicate BR), lshw makes use of *both* sources > (system's hwdata and bundled data files) so it always uses the most recent data. > It'd be good to have Fedora's hwdata updated once a month but it's currently > very old and updated infrequently. In a perfect world hwdata would be updated every month, it's not so lshw must be included it's own data. Things might change and then we will adapt. > I may add an option (in the GUI) to download fresher files in the > future and cache them in $XDG_CACHE_HOME/lshw (usually > $HOME/.cache/lshw). Nothing stop you, it's your software, however it outside the scope of this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 19:20:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 15:20:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251191] Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708131920.l7DJKCOV031524@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251191 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|kwizart at gmail.com |packages at amiga-hardware.com ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-08-13 15:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > @Ian Chapman > Sorry for the miss-collision - I haven't noticed you talk to take the review > Feel free to re-take it... No problem then Nicolas, seeing as you've already made a start, feel free to continue with the review, I'm sure Hans won't object. I'm CC'ed in anyway as I have an interest in seeing this in Fedora. Cheers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 19:36:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 15:36:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252010] New: Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252010 Summary: Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: anderson.silva at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.the-silvas.com/rpmrebuild.spec SRPM URL: http://www.the-silvas.com/rpmrebuild-2.1.1-2.src.rpm Description: You have an installed package on a computer, want to install on other one, and do not find the rpm file anymore. Or you want to distribute your customization in an rpm format this tool is for you. A few extra notes: --- This is my first package, and I need a sponsor. --- Output from rpmlint: W: rpmrebuild hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/rpmrebuild/.popt E: rpmrebuild only-non-binary-in-usr-lib W: rpmrebuild dangerous-command-in-%postun rm --- The Error are related to some shell scripts that go into the rpmrebuild directory, which seems consistent with the way rpm-4.x package is distributed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 19:37:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 15:37:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248649] Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708131937.l7DJbUqW002549@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248649 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-13 15:37 EST ------- cvs done. Note that the cvs template now should include your Fedora Account system name instead of email, and that there is a 'cvsextras can all commit' item. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 19:41:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 15:41:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249992] Review Request: glglobe - OpenGl Globe - Earth simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708131941.l7DJfpVl003398@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glglobe - OpenGl Globe - Earth simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249992 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-13 15:41 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 19:45:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 15:45:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250467] Review Request: rainbow - The service component of the OLPC Bitfrost security platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708131945.l7DJjANn004244@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rainbow - The service component of the OLPC Bitfrost security platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250467 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-13 15:45 EST ------- I don't see a 'coderanger' user in the account system. Can you check that and resubmit by resetting the fedora-cvs flag? Perhaps should be 'kantrn' ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 19:46:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 15:46:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250533] Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for writing games on the OLPC platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708131946.l7DJk21k004538@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for writing games on the OLPC platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250533 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-13 15:45 EST ------- I don't see a 'coderanger' account. Can you doublecheck and resubmit? (set fedora-cvs back to ? when you are ready) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 19:49:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 15:49:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250467] Review Request: rainbow - The service component of the OLPC Bitfrost security platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708131949.l7DJncOP005801@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rainbow - The service component of the OLPC Bitfrost security platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250467 noah at coderanger.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From noah at coderanger.net 2007-08-13 15:49 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rainbow Short Description: The service component of the OLPC Bitfrost security platform Owners: kantrn Branches: OLPC-2 InitialCC: kantrn Commits by cvsextras: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 19:50:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 15:50:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250533] Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for writing games on the OLPC platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708131950.l7DJops9006047@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for writing games on the OLPC platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250533 noah at coderanger.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From noah at coderanger.net 2007-08-13 15:50 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-olpcgames Short Description: Utilities and support tools for writing games on the OLPC system Owners: kantrn Branches: F-7 OLPC-2 InitialCC: kantrn Commits by cvsextras: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 20:01:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:01:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251317] Review Request: pinot - Personal search and metasearch for the Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708132001.l7DK1KAI008621@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pinot - Personal search and metasearch for the Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251317 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-13 16:01 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 20:03:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:03:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241792] Review Request: Empathy - An instant messaging client built using Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708132003.l7DK3LH4009209@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Empathy - An instant messaging client built using Telepathy Alias: empathy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241792 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-08-13 16:03 EST ------- Oops; forget to set the fedora-cvs flag... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 20:41:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:41:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234331] Review Request: linuxdcpp - Direct Connect client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708132041.l7DKfVnJ015875@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linuxdcpp - Direct Connect client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234331 ------- Additional Comments From mgarski at post.pl 2007-08-13 16:41 EST ------- It's the same as it was. Seven months ago you have asked me "* The software seems to be an cvs snapshot, what is the level of stablity of this application?". I'm still using my package (just with newer snapshots) and maybe linuxdcpp crashed to times, but I don't even remember what I was doing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 20:45:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:45:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252040] New: Review Request: aopalliance - Java/J2EE AOP standards Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252040 Summary: Review Request: aopalliance - Java/J2EE AOP standards Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://aopalliance.sourceforge.net/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vivekl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/aopalliance.spec SRPM URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/aopalliance-1.0-2jpp.2.fc8.src.rpm Java/J2EE AOP standards Needed to add Aspect Oriented Programming infrastructure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 20:49:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:49:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252040] Review Request: aopalliance - Java/J2EE AOP standards In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708132049.l7DKn5sw016808@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aopalliance - Java/J2EE AOP standards https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252040 vivekl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-08-13 16:49 EST ------- Sorry! Forgot I had already filed one for aopalliance.. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 251428 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 20:49:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:49:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251428] Review Request: aopalliance - Java/J2EE AOP standards In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708132049.l7DKn603016832@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aopalliance - Java/J2EE AOP standards https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251428 ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-08-13 16:49 EST ------- *** Bug 252040 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 20:50:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:50:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252045] New: Review Request: asm - A code manipulation tool to implement adaptable systems Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252045 Summary: Review Request: asm - A code manipulation tool to implement adaptable systems Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://asm.objectweb.org/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vivekl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/asm.spec SRPM URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/asm-1.5.3-1jpp.2.fc8.src.rpm ASM is a code manipulation tool to implement adaptable systems. Needed for supporting application servers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 20:52:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:52:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252046] New: Review Request: util-linux-ng (util-linux replacement) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252046 Summary: Review Request: util-linux-ng (util-linux replacement) Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kzak at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/kzak/util-linux/util-linux-ng-2.13-0.52.fc8.src.rpm Description: http://kernel.org/~kzak/util-linux-ng/ The util-linux-ng is a fork of the original util-linux project. The goal of the util-linux-ng is a transparent and reliable development that follows the Linux kernel and Linux distributions. For more details see discusion at lkml 6 months ago. Please, review ASAP! $ rpmlint util-linux-ng-2.13-0.52.fc8.src.rpm W: util-linux-ng unversioned-explicit-obsoletes clock .. this Warning is legacy from old util-linux. I have no clue how to fix it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 20:53:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:53:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252047] New: Review Request: jakarta-commons-transaction - Commons Transaction Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252047 Summary: Review Request: jakarta-commons-transaction - Commons Transaction Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/transaction/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vivekl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/jakarta-commons-transaction.spec SRPM URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/jakarta-commons-transaction-1.1-3jpp.1.fc8.src.rpm Commons Transaction aims at providing lightweight, standardized, well tested and efficient implementations of utility classes commonly used in transactional Java programming. Initially there are implementations for multi level locks, transactional collections and transactional file access. There may be additional implementations when the common need for them becomes obvious. However, the complete component shall remain compatible to JDK1.2 and should have minimal dependencies. Needed for supporting application servers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 20:54:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:54:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252048] New: Review Request: xml-im-exporter - XML Im-/Exporter Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252048 Summary: Review Request: xml-im-exporter - XML Im-/Exporter Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://xml-im-exporter.sourceforge.net/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vivekl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/xml-im-exporter.spec SRPM URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/xml-im-exporter-1.1-2jpp.2.fc8.src.rpm XML Im-/Exporter is a low level library to assist you in the straight forward process of importing and exporting XML from and to your Java classes. All of this is designed having performance and simplicity in mind. Needed for supporting application servers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 20:56:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:56:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252049] New: Review Request: asm2 - A code manipulation tool to implement adaptable systems Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252049 Summary: Review Request: asm2 - A code manipulation tool to implement adaptable systems Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://asm.objectweb.org/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vivekl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/asm2.spec SRPM URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/asm2-2.1-2jpp.2.fc8.src.rpm ASM is a code manipulation tool to implement adaptable systems. Needed for supporting application servers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 20:59:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:59:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252050] New: Review Request: aspectwerkz - AOP for Java Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252050 Summary: Review Request: aspectwerkz - AOP for Java Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://aspectwerkz.codehaus.org/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vivekl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/aspectwerkz.spec SRPM URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/aspectwerkz-2.0-2jpp.2.fc8.src.rpm AspectWerkz is a dynamic, lightweight and high-performant AOP/AOSD framework for Java. AspectWerkz utilizes runtime bytecode modification to weave your classes at runtime. It hooks in and weaves classes loaded by any class loader except the bootstrap class loader. It has a rich join point model. Aspects, advices and introductions are written in plain Java and your target classes can be regular POJOs. You have the possibility to add, remove and re-structure advices as well as swapping the implementation of your introductions at runtime. Your aspects can be defined using either an XML definition file or using Runtime Attributes. Needed for supporting application servers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 21:00:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:00:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252051] New: Review Request: avalon-excalibur - Java development components Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252051 Summary: Review Request: avalon-excalibur - Java development components Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://avalon.apache.org/excalibur/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vivekl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/avalon-excalibur.spec SRPM URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/avalon-excalibur-4.1-8jpp.2.fc8.src.rpm Avalon Excalibur was created in order to ease development of new projects. To that end, Excalibur contains a number of ready to use components and utilities that handle everything from command line parsing to thread concurrency management. The components in the Excalibur package have been well tested and do work reliably. Needed for supporting application servers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 21:02:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:02:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252046] Review Request: util-linux-ng (util-linux replacement) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708132102.l7DL2IQq018404@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: util-linux-ng (util-linux replacement) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252046 ------- Additional Comments From kzak at redhat.com 2007-08-13 17:02 EST ------- Note, don't worry with release number. The version (upstream 2.13-rc3) is not final yet. I'll update to the final 2.13-1 before Fedora Freeze. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 21:03:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:03:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252046] Review Request: util-linux-ng (util-linux replacement) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708132103.l7DL3R8D018594@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: util-linux-ng (util-linux replacement) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252046 mitr at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mitr at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 21:12:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:12:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252058] New: Review Request: classpathx-jaxp - Java XML parser Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252058 Summary: Review Request: classpathx-jaxp - Java XML parser Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://www.gnu.org/software/classpathx/jaxp/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vivekl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/classpathx-jaxp.spec SRPM URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/classpathx-jaxp-1.0-0.1.beta1.10jpp.1.fc8.src.rpm GNU JAXP, a part of the GNU Classpath Extensions project (hosted at savannah.gnu.org) is a free implementation of the standard XML processing APIs for Java: - SAX Parser API - DOM Level 2 generic XML data structures - Sun's JAXP v1.1 interfaces Needed for supporting application servers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 21:15:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:15:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252059] New: Review Request: derby - Derby DB (ex Cloudscape) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252059 Summary: Review Request: derby - Derby DB (ex Cloudscape) Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://incubator.apache.org/derby/index.html OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vivekl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/derby.spec SRPM URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/derby-10.0.2.1-3jpp.2.fc8.src.rpm The Derby project develops open source database technology that is: Pure Java, Easy to use, Small footprint, Standards based, Secure. The core of the technology, Derby.s database engine is a full functioned relational embedded database engine. JDBC and SQL are the programming APIs. The Derby network server increases the reach of the Derby database engine by providing traditional client server functionality. The network server allows clients to connect over TCP/IP using the standard DRDA protocol. The network server allows the Derby engine to support networked JDBC, ODBC/CLI, Perl and PHP. Database Utilities: ij -- a tool that allows SQL scripts to be executed against any JDBC database. dblook -- Schema extraction tool for a Derby database. sysinfo -- Utility to display version numbers and class path. Needed for supporting application servers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 21:08:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:08:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252054] New: Review Request: c3p0 - JDBC DataSources/Resource Pools Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252054 Summary: Review Request: c3p0 - JDBC DataSources/Resource Pools Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/c3p0 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vivekl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/c3p0.spec SRPM URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/c3p0-0.9.0-2jpp.2.fc8.src.rpm c3p0 is an easy-to-use library for augmenting traditional (DriverManager-based) JDBC drivers with JNDI-bindable DataSources, including DataSources that implement Connection and Statement Pooling, as described by the jdbc3 spec and jdbc2 standard extension. Needed for supporting application servers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 21:07:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:07:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252052] New: Review Request: bsh2 - Lightweight Scripting for Java Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252052 Summary: Review Request: bsh2 - Lightweight Scripting for Java Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://www.beanshell.org/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vivekl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/bsh2.spec SRPM URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/bsh2-2.0-0.1.b4.1jpp.1.fc8.src.rpm BeanShell is a small, free, embeddable, Java source interpreter with object scripting language features, written in Java. BeanShell executes standard Java statements and expressions, in addition to obvious scripting commands and syntax. BeanShell supports scripted objects as simple method closures like those in Perl and JavaScript(tm). You can use BeanShell interactively for Java experimentation and debugging or as a simple scripting engine for your applications. In short: BeanShell is a dynamically interpreted Java, plus some useful stuff. Another way to describe it is to say that in many ways BeanShell is to Java as Tcl/Tk is to C: BeanShell is embeddable - You can call BeanShell from your Java applications to execute Java code dynamically at run-time or to provide scripting extensibility for your applications. Alternatively, you can call your Java applications and objects from BeanShell; working with Java objects and APIs dynamically. Since BeanShell is written in Java and runs in the same space as your application, you can freely pass references to "real live" objects into scripts and return them as results. Needed for supporting application servers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 21:24:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:24:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252065] New: Review Request: emma - Code Coverage Tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252065 Summary: Review Request: emma - Code Coverage Tool Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://emma.sourceforge.net/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vivekl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/emma.spec SRPM URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/emma-2.0-0.5312.1jpp.1.fc8.src.rpm EMMA is an open-source toolkit for measuring and reporting Java code coverage. EMMA distinguishes itself from other tools by going after a unique feature combination: support for large-scale enterprise software development while keeping individual developer's work fast and iterative. Needed for supporting application servers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 21:20:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:20:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252062] New: Review Request: ehcache - Easy Hibernate Cache Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252062 Summary: Review Request: ehcache - Easy Hibernate Cache Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://ehcache.sourceforge.net/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vivekl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/ehcache.spec SRPM URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/ehcache-1.2.3-1jpp.1.fc8.src.rpm Ehcache is a pure Java, in-process cache with the following features: 1. Fast 2. Simple 3. Acts as a pluggable cache for Hibernate 2.1, 3 and 3.1. 4. Small foot print. Both in terms of size and memory requirements. 5. Minimal dependencies. 6. Fully documented. See the online Documentation, FAQ and the online JavaDoc. 7. Provides Memory and Disk stores. 8. Comprehensively Test Coverage. See the clover test report. 9. Scalable to hundreds of caches and large multi-cpu servers. 10. Multiple CacheManagers per virtual machine (new in 1.2) 11. Provides LRU, LFU and FIFO cache eviction policies. (new in 1.2) 12. Persistent disk store which stores data between VM restarts. 13. Supports the registration of CacheManager and CacheEventListener for flexible integration(new in 1.2) 14. Distributed caching, with fine grained control overf discovery and delivery options. 15. Pluggable distribution API for extending distribution with different mechanisms. 16. Available under the Apache 1.1license. Ehcache's copyright and licensing has been reviewed and approved by the Apache Software Foundation, making ehcache suitable for use in Apache projects. 17. Production tested. All final versions of ehcache are production tested for several weeks on a large and very busy eCommerce site before release. 18. BlockingCache, SelfPopulatingCache, gzipping, caching Servlet filters, and AsynchronousFaultTolerantCommandExecutor available in the optional ehcache-constructs package. Needed for supporting application servers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 21:32:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:32:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252065] Review Request: emma - Code Coverage Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708132132.l7DLWK3f022334@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emma - Code Coverage Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252065 vivekl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-08-13 17:32 EST ------- Pending review already filed *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 227052 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 21:32:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:32:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227052] Review Request: emma-2.0-0.5312.1jpp - Code Coverage Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708132132.l7DLWOTO022367@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emma-2.0-0.5312.1jpp - Code Coverage Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227052 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora vivekl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vivekl at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-08-13 17:32 EST ------- *** Bug 252065 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 21:43:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:43:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252077] New: Review Request: ivy - Dependency manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252077 Summary: Review Request: ivy - Dependency manager Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://www.jayasoft.org/ivy OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vivekl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/ivy.spec SRPM URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/ivy-1.3-0.1.rc2.2jpp.1.fc8.src.rpm Ivy is a free java based dependency manager, with powerful features such as transitive dependencies, ant integration, maven repository compatibility, continuous integration, html reports and many more. Needed for supporting application servers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 21:46:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:46:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252080] New: Review Request: jakarta-poi - Java API To Access Microsoft Format Files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252080 Summary: Review Request: jakarta-poi - Java API To Access Microsoft Format Files Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://jakarta.apache.org/poi/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vivekl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/jakarta-poi.spec SRPM URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/jakarta-poi-2.5.1-2jpp.1.fc8.src.rpm The POI project consists of APIs for manipulating various file formats based upon Microsoft's OLE 2 Compound Document format using pure Java. In short, you can read and write MS Excel files using Java. Soon, you'll be able to read and write Word files using Java. POI is your Java Excel solution as well as your Java Word solution. However, we have a complete API for porting other OLE 2 Compound Document formats and welcome others to participate. OLE 2 Compound Document Format based files include most Microsoft Office files such as XLS and DOC as well as MFC serialization API based file formats. Needed for supporting application servers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 21:46:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:46:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252082] New: Review Request: jarjar - Jar Jar Links Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252082 Summary: Review Request: jarjar - Jar Jar Links Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://tonicsystems.com/products/jarjar/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vivekl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/jarjar.spec SRPM URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/jarjar-0.6-2jpp.1.fc8.src.rpm Jar Jar Links is a utility that makes it easy to repackage Java libraries and embed them into your own distribution. This is useful for two reasons: You can easily ship a single jar file with no external dependencies. You can avoid problems where your library depends on a specific version of a library, which may conflict with the dependencies of another library. Needed for supporting application servers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 21:47:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:47:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252083] New: Review Request: jdbm - JDBM transactional persistence engine Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252083 Summary: Review Request: jdbm - JDBM transactional persistence engine Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://jdbm.sourceforge.net/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vivekl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/jdbm.spec SRPM URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/jdbm-0.20-3jpp.2.fc8.src.rpm JDBM is a transactional persistence engine for Java. It aims to be for Java what GDBM is for Perl, Python, C, etcetera: a simple persistence engine that is lightweight and fast. Needed for supporting application servers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 21:49:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:49:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252084] New: Review Request: jgraph - JGraph Diagram Component Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252084 Summary: Review Request: jgraph - JGraph Diagram Component Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/jgraph/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vivekl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/jgraph.spec SRPM URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/jgraph-5.8.2.1-2jpp.1.fc8.src.rpm JGraph is the most powerful, lightweight, feature-rich, and thoroughly documented open-source graph component available for Java. It is accompanied by JGraphpad, the first free diagram editor for Java that offers XML, Drag and Drop and much more! Needed for supporting application servers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 21:50:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:50:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252086] New: Review Request: jmock - Test Java code using mock objects Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252086 Summary: Review Request: jmock - Test Java code using mock objects Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://jmock.codehaus.org/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vivekl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/jmock.spec SRPM URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/jmock-1.0.1-3jpp.1.fc8.src.rpm jMock is a library for testing Java code using mock objects. Mock objects help you design and test the interactions between the objects in your programs. The jMock package: * makes it quick and easy to define mock objects, so you don't break the rhythm of programming. * lets you define flexible constraints over object interactions, reducing the brittleness of your tests. * is easy to extend. Needed for supporting application servers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 21:51:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:51:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252087] New: Review Request: joda-time - Java date and time API Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252087 Summary: Review Request: joda-time - Java date and time API Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://www.joda.org/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vivekl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/joda-time.spec SRPM URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/joda-time-1.2.1-1jpp.1.fc8.src.rpm Joda-Time provides a quality replacement for the Java date and time classes. The design allows for multiple calendar systems, while still providing a simple API. The 'default' calendar is the ISO8601 standard which is used by XML. The Gregorian, Julian, Buddhist, Coptic and Ethiopic systems are also included, and we welcome further additions. Supporting classes include time zone, duration, format and parsing. Needed for supporting application servers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 21:52:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:52:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252088] New: Review Request: objectweb-anttask - ObjectWeb Ant task Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252088 Summary: Review Request: objectweb-anttask - ObjectWeb Ant task Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://forge.objectweb.org/projects/monolog/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vivekl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/objectweb-anttask.spec SRPM URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/objectweb-anttask-1.2-1jpp.2.fc8.src.rpm ObjectWeb Ant task Needed for supporting application servers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 21:54:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:54:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252089] New: Review Request: oscache - High performance J2EE caching solution Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252089 Summary: Review Request: oscache - High performance J2EE caching solution Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://www.opensymphony.com/oscache/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vivekl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/oscache.spec SRPM URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/oscache-2.2-2jpp.2.fc8.src.rpm OSCache solves fundamental problems for dynamic websites: + Caching Dynamic Content - Dynamic content must often be executed in some form each request, but sometimes that content doesn't change every request. Caching the whole page does not help because sections of the page change every request. OSCache solves this problem by providing a means to cache sections of JSP pages. + Caching Binary Content - Generated images and PDFs can be very costly in terms of server load. OSCache solves this problem through a Servlet 2.3 CachingFilter which can cache any URI (such as an entire page or a generated image/PDF) + Error Tolerance - If one error occurs somewhere on your dynamic page, chances are the whole page will be returned as an error, even if 95% of the page executed correctly. OSCache solves this problem by allowing you to serve the cached content in the event of an error, and then reporting the error appropriately. Needed for supporting application servers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 21:56:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:56:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252090] New: Review Request: proxool - Proxool Java connection pool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252090 Summary: Review Request: proxool - Proxool Java connection pool Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://proxool.sourceforge.net/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vivekl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/proxool.spec SRPM URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/proxool-0.8.3-10jpp.1.fc8.src.rpm Transparently adds connection pooling to your existing JDBC driver. Our licence allows you flexibility to use it in both commercial and other open source products. Complies with the J2SE API, giving you the confidence to develop to standards. You can monitor the performance of your database connections and listen to connection events. It's easy to configure using the JDBC API, XML, or Java property files - you decide. Needed for supporting application servers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 21:57:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:57:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252091] New: Review Request: proxytoys - ProxyToys Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252091 Summary: Review Request: proxytoys - ProxyToys Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://proxytoys.codehaus.org/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vivekl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/proxytoys.spec SRPM URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/proxytoys-0.2.1-1jpp.2.fc8.src.rpm ProxyToys. Needed for supporting application servers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 21:59:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:59:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252092] New: Review Request: swarmcache - Cluster-aware Caching for Java Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252092 Summary: Review Request: swarmcache - Cluster-aware Caching for Java Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://swarmcache.sourceforge.net/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vivekl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/swarmcache.spec SRPM URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/swarmcache-1.0-0.1.cvs040225.6jpp.1.fc8.src.rpm SwarmCache is a simple but effective distributed cache. It uses IP multicast to efficiently communicate with any number of hosts on a LAN. It is specifically designed for use by clustered, database-driven web applications. Such applications typically have many more read operations than write operations, which allows SwarmCache to deliver the greatest performance gains. SwarmCache uses JavaGroups internally to manage the membership and communications of its distributed cache. Needed for supporting application servers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 22:01:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:01:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252093] New: Review Request: xercesjarv - JARV driver for Xerces-2 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252093 Summary: Review Request: xercesjarv - JARV driver for Xerces-2 Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://www.kohsuke.org/jarv/xerces/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vivekl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/xercesjarv.spec SRPM URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/xercesjarv-0.1-0.20030530.4jpp.1.fc8.src.rpm This driver allows you to control the XML Schema validation engine of Xerces-2 through JARV, a vendor-neutral open-source interface for validation engines. Needed for supporting application servers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 22:02:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:02:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252094] New: Review Request: xstream - XML serialization library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252094 Summary: Review Request: xstream - XML serialization library Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://xstream.codehaus.org/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vivekl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/xtsream.spec SRPM URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/xstream-1.1.3-1jpp.2.fc8.src.rpm XStream is a simple library to serialize objects to XML and back again. A high level facade is supplied that simplifies common use cases. Custom objects can be serialized without need for specifying mappings. Speed and low memory footprint are a crucial part of the design, making it suitable for large object graphs or systems with high message throughput. No information is duplicated that can be obtained via reflection. This results in XML that is easier to read for humans and more compact than native Java serialization. XStream serializes internal fields, including private and final. Supports non-public and inner classes. Classes are not required to have default constructor. Duplicate references encountered in the object-model will be maintained. Supports circular references. By implementing an interface, XStream can serialize directly to/from any tree structure (not just XML). Strategies can be registered allowing customization of how particular types are represented as XML. When an exception occurs due to malformed XML, detailed diagnostics are provided to help isolate and fix the problem. Needed for supporting application servers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 22:03:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:03:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252095] New: Review Request: hessian - Hessian binary web service protocol Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252095 Summary: Review Request: hessian - Hessian binary web service protocol Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://www.caucho.com/hessian/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vivekl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/hessian.spec SRPM URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/hessian-3.0.8-1jpp.1.fc8.src.rpm The Hessian binary web service protocol makes web services usable without requiring a large framework, and without learning yet another alphabet soup of protocols. Because it is a binary protocol, it is well-suited to sending binary data without any need to extend the protocol with attachments. Needed for supporting application servers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 22:04:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:04:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252096] New: Review Request: cglib - Code Generation Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252096 Summary: Review Request: cglib - Code Generation Library Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://cglib.sourceforge.net/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vivekl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/cglib.spec SRPM URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/cglib-2.1.3-2jpp.1.fc8.src.rpm cglib is a powerful, high performance and quality Code Generation Library, It is used to extend JAVA classes and implements interfaces at runtime. NOTE: To use the Aspectwerks hook (net.sf.cglib.transform.hook.*), make sure aspectwerks.jar is in the Classpath (from the 'aspectwerks' RPM) NOTE: If you use the cglib.jar you may need to add asm.jar to your ClassPath (from the 'asm' RPM). The cglib-nodep.jar includes the ASM classes already. Needed for supporting application servers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 22:05:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:05:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252097] New: Review Request: gnu-trove - High performance collections for Java Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252097 Summary: Review Request: gnu-trove - High performance collections for Java Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://trove4j.sourceforge.net/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vivekl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/gnu-trove.spec SRPM URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/gnu-trove-1.0.2-5jpp.1.fc8.src.rpm The GNU Trove library has two objectives: Provide "free" (as in "free speech" and "free beer"), fast, lightweight implementations of the java.util Collections API. These implementations are designed to be pluggable replacements for their JDK equivalents. Whenever possible, provide the same collections support for primitive types. This gap in the JDK is often addressed by using the "wrapper" classes (java.lang.Integer, java.lang.Float, etc.) with Object-based collections. For most applications, however, collections which store primitives directly will require less space and yield significant performance gains. Needed for supporting application servers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 22:08:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:08:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252098] New: Review Request: jacorb - Free Java implementation of OMG's CORBA standard Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252098 Summary: Review Request: jacorb - Free Java implementation of OMG's CORBA standard Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://www.jacorb.org/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vivekl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/jacorb.spec SRPM URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/jacorb-2.3.0-1jpp.1.fc8.src.rpm - high-performance, fully multithreaded ORB - IDL compiler, supports OMG IDL/Java language mapping rev. 2.3, OBV - native IIOP, GIOP 1.2 and Bidirectional GIOP - POA (Portable Object Adapter) - AMI (Asynchronous Method Invocations) - ETF (Extensible Transport Framework) - POAMonitor, a GUI tools that lets you inspect your object adapters (screenshot) - Dynamic Invocation Interface (DII) and Dynamic Skeleton Interface (DSI) - Dynamic Management of Anys (DynAny) - Portable Interceptors (standard) - OMG Interoperable Naming Service - NameManager, a GUI browser for the name service (requires Swing or JDK 1.2) (screenshot) - improved IIOP over SSL, includes KeyStoreManager - OMG Notification and Event service - Transaction Service, Collection and Concurrency services - TradingService (supports trader links), an extension of Mark Spruiell's free JTrader - CORBA 2.3 Code set support - Appligator, an IIOP proxy - Support for HTTP tunneling - Domain Manager, an object domain management service, includes a domain browser GUI - Interface Repository - IRBrowser, a GUI front end for the Interface Repository - Implementation Repository - Implementation Repository Manager, a GUI front end for the Implementation Repository - IDL and Java source for all CORBA/COSS interfaces - examples and full source code included - 100% pure Java, JDK 1.3 and 1.4 compatible, also cooperates with Sun's JDK 1.2 classes (releases prior to 1.4 are compatible with JDK 1.1) ClassPath: antlr-2.7.2.jar:avalon-framework-4.1.5.jar:logkit-1.2.jar:commons-collections-2.0.jar:commons-logging.jar:wrapper-3.1.0.jar (see 'rpm --requires jacorb-jboss') Note: To use on Java 1.4 add backport-util-concurrent.jar to the ClassPath (from the RPM with the same name) Note: To use the CORBA Notification Service add picocontainer-1.2.jar to the ClassPath (from the 'picocontainer' RPM). Needed for supporting application servers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 22:09:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:09:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252099] New: Review Request: javassist - Java Programming Assistant: bytecode manipulation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252099 Summary: Review Request: javassist - Java Programming Assistant: bytecode manipulation Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://www.csg.is.titech.ac.jp/~chiba/javassist/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vivekl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/javassist.spec SRPM URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/javassist-3.5.0-1jpp.1.fc8.src.rpm Javassist (Java Programming Assistant) makes Java bytecode manipulation simple. It is a class library for editing bytecodes in Java; it enables Java programs to define a new class at runtime and to modify a class file when the JVM loads it. Unlike other similar bytecode editors, Javassist provides two levels of API: source level and bytecode level. If the users use the source-level API, they can edit a class file without knowledge of the specifications of the Java bytecode. The whole API is designed with only the vocabulary of the Java language. You can even specify inserted bytecode in the form of source text; Javassist compiles it on the fly. On the other hand, the bytecode-level API allows the users to directly edit a class file as other editors. Needed for supporting application servers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 22:10:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:10:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252100] New: Review Request: jakarta-slide-webdavclient - Slide WebDAV client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252100 Summary: Review Request: jakarta-slide-webdavclient - Slide WebDAV client Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://jakarta.apache.org/slide/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vivekl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/jakarta-slide-webdavclient.spec SRPM URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/jakarta-slide-webdavclient-2.1-3jpp.1.fc8.src.rpm Slide includes a fully featured WebDAV client library and command line client. Needed for supporting application servers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 22:11:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:11:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252101] New: Review Request: joesnmp - Java SNMP class library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252101 Summary: Review Request: joesnmp - Java SNMP class library Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/joesnmp/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vivekl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/joesnmp.spec SRPM URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/joesnmp-0.3.4-1jpp.1.fc8.src.rpm joeSNMP is an open-source Java SNMP class library published under the LGPL. Needed for supporting application servers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 22:12:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:12:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252102] New: Review Request: juddi - Open source Java implementation UDDI specification. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252102 Summary: Review Request: juddi - Open source Java implementation UDDI specification. Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://ws.apache.org/juddi/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vivekl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/juddi.spec SRPM URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/juddi-0.9-0.1.rc4.2jpp.1.fc8.src.rpm jUDDI (pronounced "Judy") is an open source Java implementation of the Universal Description, Discovery, and Integration (UDDI) specification for Web Services. Needed for supporting application servers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 22:12:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:12:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252103] New: Review Request: odmg - ODMG 3.0 Java Binding Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252103 Summary: Review Request: odmg - ODMG 3.0 Java Binding Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://www.ozone-db.org/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vivekl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/odmg.spec SRPM URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/odmg-3.0-3jpp.2.fc8.src.rpm Interfaces and Exceptions for ODMG 3.0 Needed for supporting application servers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 22:13:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:13:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252104] New: Review Request: perl-Perlbal-XS-HTTPHeaders - Perlbal extension for processing HTTP headers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252104 Summary: Review Request: perl-Perlbal-XS-HTTPHeaders - Perlbal extension for processing HTTP headers Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ruben at rubenkerkhof.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/perl-Perlbal-XS-HTTPHeaders.spec SRPM URL: http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/perl-Perlbal-XS-HTTPHeaders-0.19-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: This module is used to read HTTP headers from a string and to parse them into an internal storage format for easy access and modification. You can also ask the module to reconstitute the headers into one big string, useful if you're writing a proxy and need to read and write headers while maintaining the ability to modify individual parts of the whole. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 22:14:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:14:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252105] New: Review Request: quartz - Quartz Enterprise Job Scheduler Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252105 Summary: Review Request: quartz - Quartz Enterprise Job Scheduler Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://www.opensymphony.com/quartz/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vivekl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/quartz.spec SRPM URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/quartz-1.5.2-1jpp.2.fc8.src.rpm Quartz is a job scheduling system that can be integrated with, or used along side virtually any J2EE or J2SE application. Quartz can be used to create simple or complex schedules for executing tens, hundreds, or even tens-of-thousands of jobs; jobs whose tasks are defined as standard Java components or EJBs. Note: If you want Quartz to be able to send e-mail then add javamail.jar to your ClassPath. Needed for supporting application servers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 22:14:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:14:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248649] Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708132214.l7DMETT3027501@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248649 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 22:15:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:15:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252106] New: Review Request: servletapi6 - Java servlet and JSP implementation classes Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252106 Summary: Review Request: servletapi6 - Java servlet and JSP implementation classes Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://tomcat.apache.org/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vivekl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/servletapi6.spec SRPM URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/servletapi6-6.0.10-3jpp.1.fc8.src.rpm This subproject contains the source code for the implementation classes of the Java Servlet 2.5 and JSP 2.1 APIs (packages javax.servlet). Needed for supporting application servers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 22:16:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:16:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252107] New: Review Request: snmptrapappender - SNMP Trap Appender extension for log4j Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252107 Summary: Review Request: snmptrapappender - SNMP Trap Appender extension for log4j Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://www.m2technologies.net/asp/snmpTrapAppender.asp OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vivekl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/snmptrapappender.spec SRPM URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/snmptrapappender-1.2.8-5jpp.2.fc8.src.rpm An appender to send formatted logging event strings to a specified managment host (typically, a MLM of some sort, but could also be an SNMP management console) in the form of an SNMP trap. This appender does not attempt to provide full access to the SNMP API. In particular, use of this appender does not make an SNMP agent out of the calling application. You cannot use this appender as an interface to do SNMP GET or SET calls -- all it does is pass on your logging event as a TRAP. Needed for supporting application servers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 22:17:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:17:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252108] New: Review Request: python-html5lib - A python based HTML5 parser/tokenizer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252108 Summary: Review Request: python-html5lib - A python based HTML5 parser/tokenizer Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oded at geek.co.il QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rpms.geek.co.il/fc7/python-html5lib.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.geek.co.il/fc7/python-html5lib-0.9-2fc7.src.rpm Description: A python library to parse HTML 5 as defined by the WHATWG HTML5 specification, see http://code.google.com/p/html5lib This package is wanted for building gtk-doc for library.gnome.org, see http://blogs.gnome.org/ovitters/2007/08/13/wanted-html5lib-package-for-epel-fedora/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 22:17:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:17:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252109] New: Review Request: wsdl4j16 - Web Services Description Language Toolkit for Java Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252109 Summary: Review Request: wsdl4j16 - Web Services Description Language Toolkit for Java Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/wsdl4j OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vivekl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/wsdl4j16.spec SRPM URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/wsdl4j16-1.6.2-0jpp.2.fc8.src.rpm The Web Services Description Language for Java Toolkit (WSDL4J) allows the creation, representation, and manipulation of WSDL documents describing services. This codebase will eventually serve as a reference implementation of the standard created by JSR110. Needed for supporting application servers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 22:18:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:18:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252110] New: Review Request: wstx - Woodstox Stax Implementation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252110 Summary: Review Request: wstx - Woodstox Stax Implementation Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://annogen.codehaus.org/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vivekl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/wstx.spec SRPM URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/wstx-3.1.1-1jpp.2.fc8.src.rpm Woodstox is a high-performance validating namespace-aware StAX-compliant (JSR-173) Open Source XML-processor written in Java. XML processor means that it handles both input (== parsing) and output (== writing, serialization)), as well as supporting tasks such as validation. Needed for supporting application servers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 22:19:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:19:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252111] New: Review Request: xml-commons-resolver12 - Resolver subproject of xml-commons Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252111 Summary: Review Request: xml-commons-resolver12 - Resolver subproject of xml-commons Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://xml.apache.org/commons/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vivekl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/xml-commons-resolver12.spec SRPM URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/xml-commons-resolver12-1.2-0.1.20060226svn.0jpp.1.fc8.src.rpm Resolver subproject of xml-commons. Needed for supporting application servers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 22:20:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:20:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252108] Review Request: python-html5lib - A python based HTML5 parser/tokenizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708132220.l7DMK9V0028510@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-html5lib - A python based HTML5 parser/tokenizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252108 oded at geek.co.il changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: python- |Review Request: python- |html5lib - A python based |html5lib - A python based |HTML5 parser/tokenizer |HTML5 parser/tokenizer ------- Additional Comments From oded at geek.co.il 2007-08-13 18:20 EST ------- rpmlint output: W: python-html5lib uncompressed-zip /html5lib-0.9.zip I can recompress the source zip file, but that would break the requirement for the source file to be md5sum identical to the upstream source, here - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 22:21:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:21:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252113] New: Review Request: xml-security - Implementation of W3C security standards for XML Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252113 Summary: Review Request: xml-security - Implementation of W3C security standards for XML Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://xml.apache.org/security OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vivekl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/xml-security.spec SRPM URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/xml-security-1.3.0-1jpp.3.fc8.src.rpm The XML Security project is aimed at providing implementation of security standards for XML. Currently the focus is on the W3C standards : - XML-Signature Syntax and Processing; and - XML Encryption Syntax and Processing. Once these are implemented, XML Key Management is likely to be the next focus for the project. Two libraries are currently available. A Java library, which includes a mature Digital Signature implementation. Encryption is currently under development. A C++ library is also now available. Functionality is currently more basic than that provided by the Java library. Needed for supporting application servers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 22:22:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:22:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252114] New: Review Request: jcommon - Common library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252114 Summary: Review Request: jcommon - Common library Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://www.jfree.org/jcommon/index.html OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vivekl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/jcommon.spec SRPM URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/jcommon-0.9.7-1jpp.1.fc8.src.rpm Collection of classes used by Object Refinery Projects, for example jfreechart Needed for supporting application servers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 22:24:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:24:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252115] New: Review Request: jfreechart - Charts Generation library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252115 Summary: Review Request: jfreechart - Charts Generation library Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://www.jfree.org/jfreechart/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vivekl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/jfreechart.spec SRPM URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/jfreechart-0.9.21-2jpp.1.fc8.src.rpm Free Java class library for generating charts. Needed for supporting application servers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 22:32:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:32:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252116] New: Review Request: berkeleydb - Berkeley DB Java Edition Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252116 Summary: Review Request: berkeleydb - Berkeley DB Java Edition Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://www.sleepycat.com/products/bdbje.html OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vivekl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/berkeleydb.spec SRPM URL: http://vivekl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/berkeleydb-2.0.90-1jpp.2.fc8.src.rpm Berkeley DB Java Edition is a high performance, transactional storage engine written entirely in Java. Like the highly successful Berkeley DB product, Berkeley DB Java Edition executes in the address space of the application, without the overhead of client/server communication. It stores data in the application's native format, so no runtime data translation is required. Berkeley DB Java Edition supports full ACID transactions and recovery. It provides an easy-to-use, programmatic interface, allowing developers to store and retrieve information quickly, simply and reliably. Needed for supporting application servers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 22:37:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:37:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252046] Review Request: util-linux-ng (util-linux replacement) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708132237.l7DMb3XQ029630@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: util-linux-ng (util-linux replacement) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252046 ------- Additional Comments From mitr at redhat.com 2007-08-13 18:37 EST ------- Blockers: * Licensing: - "If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, must be included as documentation." - Please update License: per Packaging/LicensingGuidelines * BuildRoot value is invalid, see Packaging/Guidelines * Inconsistent use of both BuildRoot and %{buildroot} * Use %config(noreplace) - at least for 60-raw.rules, I'm not sure about the files in /etc/pam.d/ Possible improvements: * Obsoletes: clock - seems to be pre-Fedora, can be removed IMHO. Same for timeconfig. * mnt_test_sysinfo.c:74: warning: right shift count >= width of type on i386 - probably should be fixed upstream * BuildRequires: sed is unnecessary Questions: * does floppy really need %makeinstall? * why is the [ "%{_infodir}" != "%{_prefix}/info" ... ] section necessary? * why is (gzip -9nf ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_infodir}/ipc.info) necessary? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 22:48:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:48:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251019] Review Request: lshw - Hardware lister In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708132248.l7DMmkr7030575@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware lister https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251019 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-08-13 18:48 EST ------- Official review (not final yet!) ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on:all available archs, see http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=101050 [x] Rpmlint output: no output [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPLv2 [see issue 1] [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [?] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: See issue 2 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: Arches excluded: Why: [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [x] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [?] Latest version is packaged. See issue 3 [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on:http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=101050 : devel/ i386, x86_64, ppc, ppc64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on:devel/i386, x86_64, ppc, ppc64 [?] Package functions as described. See issue 4 [x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-] File based requires are sane. === Issues === 1. I am not sure which license is used by the program. The Copying file mentions the GPLv2 or later clauses,which would mean that the correct tag is GPLv2+. However I might misinterpretate it, so Lyonel, please assist and let us know what is the intended licensing scheme. 2. The source URL included was not accesible, the site seemed to be down at the moment of the review 3. The file named "Changes" references a later version of the source. As the site for upstream was not accessible, I could not check 4. I will verify this a bit later. 5. Please use separate files for the pam and desktop files. Creating them in the spec is technically OK, but is prone to errors, while using separate files allows better time/version/MD5 checking 6. (pedantic, feel free to ignore): Please verify if "make" and "make gui" are both needed. I cannot test now, but at the first glance I think that "make gui" is enough, it will build everything. === Final Notes === The package is in excellent shape. Once we clarify the license tag and I can verify against upstream sources, I will do a test run and approve. I would appreciate if meanwhile you would implement a solution to issue 5 above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 22:54:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:54:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249992] Review Request: glglobe - OpenGl Globe - Earth simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708132254.l7DMsuLa031092@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glglobe - OpenGl Globe - Earth simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249992 dtimms at iinet.net.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From dtimms at iinet.net.au 2007-08-13 18:54 EST ------- Thanks Kevin. 101193 build (dist-f8, devel:glglobe-0_2-5_fc8) completed successfully Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 22:56:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:56:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241792] Review Request: Empathy - An instant messaging client built using Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708132256.l7DMuJh5031259@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Empathy - An instant messaging client built using Telepathy Alias: empathy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241792 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-13 18:56 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 22:57:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:57:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252118] New: Review Request: ws-scout - Apache Scout Implementation of JSR 93 (JAXR) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252118 Summary: Review Request: ws-scout - Apache Scout Implementation of JSR 93 (JAXR) Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://ws.apache.org/scout/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vivekl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tequila-sunrise.ath.cx/rpmreviews/F8/ws-scout.spec SRPM URL: http://tequila-sunrise.ath.cx/rpmreviews/F8/ws-scout-1.0-4jpp.1.fc8.src.rpm Apache Scout is an implementation of the JSR 93 (JAXR). Needed for supporting application servers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 23:00:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 19:00:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250467] Review Request: rainbow - The service component of the OLPC Bitfrost security platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708132300.l7DN0nqa031575@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rainbow - The service component of the OLPC Bitfrost security platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250467 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-13 19:00 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 23:02:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 19:02:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252119] New: Review Request: picocontainer - Dependency-injection container Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252119 Summary: Review Request: picocontainer - Dependency-injection container Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://picocontainer.codehaus.org/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vivekl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tequila-sunrise.ath.cx/rpmreviews/F8/picocontainer.spec SRPM URL: http://tequila-sunrise.ath.cx/rpmreviews/F8/picocontainer-1.3-1jpp.1.fc8.src.rpm PicoContainer is a lightweight and highly embeddable container for components that honour Dependency Injection. Needed for supporting application servers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 23:03:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 19:03:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250533] Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for writing games on the OLPC platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708132303.l7DN3Hbw031876@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for writing games on the OLPC platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250533 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-13 19:03 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 23:09:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 19:09:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240308] Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708132309.l7DN9Yc0032420@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240308 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-13 19:09 EST ------- I have updated the spec without dumping the release: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/result/qwtplot3d.spec upstream will be contacted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 23:29:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 19:29:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252113] Review Request: xml-security - Implementation of W3C security standards for XML In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708132329.l7DNTYpQ001158@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xml-security - Implementation of W3C security standards for XML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252113 vivekl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-08-13 19:29 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 231305 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 23:29:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 19:29:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231305] Review Request: xml-security - Implementation of W3C security standards for XML In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708132329.l7DNTZ6u001194@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xml-security - Implementation of W3C security standards for XML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231305 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora vivekl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vivekl at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-08-13 19:29 EST ------- *** Bug 252113 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 23:41:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 19:41:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252045] Review Request: asm - A code manipulation tool to implement adaptable systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708132341.l7DNf3Mj001963@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asm - A code manipulation tool to implement adaptable systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252045 vivekl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-08-13 19:41 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 227032 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 23:41:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 19:41:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227032] Review Request: asm-1.5.3-2jpp - A code manipulation tool to implement adaptable systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708132341.l7DNf4IX001999@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asm-1.5.3-2jpp - A code manipulation tool to implement adaptable systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227032 vivekl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vivekl at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-08-13 19:41 EST ------- *** Bug 252045 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 23:42:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 19:42:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227032] Review Request: asm-1.5.3-2jpp - A code manipulation tool to implement adaptable systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708132342.l7DNghLj002108@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asm-1.5.3-2jpp - A code manipulation tool to implement adaptable systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227032 ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-08-13 19:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > *** Bug 252045 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** This package is still needed. Please file a CVS request and subsequently merge with spec from bug 252045 if possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 23:48:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 19:48:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250467] Review Request: rainbow - The service component of the OLPC Bitfrost security platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708132348.l7DNmuPm002410@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rainbow - The service component of the OLPC Bitfrost security platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250467 noah at coderanger.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 23:53:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 19:53:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252058] Review Request: classpathx-jaxp - Java XML parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708132353.l7DNrPqA002641@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: classpathx-jaxp - Java XML parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252058 vivekl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-08-13 19:53 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 227046 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 23:53:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 19:53:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227046] Review Request: classpathx-jaxp-1.0-0.beta1.10jpp - Java XML parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708132353.l7DNrRGT002671@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: classpathx-jaxp-1.0-0.beta1.10jpp - Java XML parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227046 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora vivekl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vivekl at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-08-13 19:53 EST ------- *** Bug 252058 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 00:00:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:00:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252086] Review Request: jmock - Test Java code using mock objects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708140000.l7E008UE003064@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jmock - Test Java code using mock objects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252086 vivekl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-08-13 20:00 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 227072 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 00:00:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:00:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227072] Review Request: jmock-1.0.1-3jpp - Test Java code using mock objects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708140000.l7E009eJ003094@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jmock-1.0.1-3jpp - Test Java code using mock objects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227072 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora vivekl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vivekl at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-08-13 20:00 EST ------- *** Bug 252086 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 00:02:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:02:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252087] Review Request: joda-time - Java date and time API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708140002.l7E02Ox0003238@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: joda-time - Java date and time API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252087 vivekl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-08-13 20:02 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 227073 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 00:02:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:02:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227073] Review Request: joda-time-1.2.1-1jpp - Java date and time API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708140002.l7E02PHK003269@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: joda-time-1.2.1-1jpp - Java date and time API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227073 vivekl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vivekl at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-08-13 20:02 EST ------- *** Bug 252087 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 00:05:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:05:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252088] Review Request: objectweb-anttask - ObjectWeb Ant task In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708140005.l7E05qQc003524@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: objectweb-anttask - ObjectWeb Ant task https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252088 vivekl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-08-13 20:05 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 227091 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 00:05:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:05:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227091] Review Request: objectweb-anttask - ObjectWeb Ant task In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708140005.l7E05tvk003562@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: objectweb-anttask - ObjectWeb Ant task https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227091 vivekl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vivekl at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-08-13 20:05 EST ------- *** Bug 252088 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 00:08:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:08:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227091] Review Request: objectweb-anttask - ObjectWeb Ant task In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708140008.l7E08O7s003691@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: objectweb-anttask - ObjectWeb Ant task https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227091 ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-08-13 20:08 EST ------- The package is ready to be imported. If possible, please compare with contents of bug 252088 and import the result in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 00:10:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:10:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227093] Review Request: picocontainer-1.2-2jpp - Dependency-injection container In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708140010.l7E0ACKi003784@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: picocontainer-1.2-2jpp - Dependency-injection container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227093 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora vivekl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-08-13 20:10 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 252119 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 00:10:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:10:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252119] Review Request: picocontainer - Dependency-injection container In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708140010.l7E0ADXb003798@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: picocontainer - Dependency-injection container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252119 vivekl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rafaels at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-08-13 20:10 EST ------- *** Bug 227093 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 00:12:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:12:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252091] Review Request: proxytoys - ProxyToys In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708140012.l7E0CYr4004013@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: proxytoys - ProxyToys https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252091 vivekl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-08-13 20:12 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 227110 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 00:12:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:12:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227110] Review Request: proxytoys-0.2.1-1jpp - ProxyToys In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708140012.l7E0CapG004044@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: proxytoys-0.2.1-1jpp - ProxyToys https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227110 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora vivekl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vivekl at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-08-13 20:12 EST ------- *** Bug 252091 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 00:14:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:14:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252094] Review Request: xstream - XML serialization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708140014.l7E0EePT004152@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xstream - XML serialization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252094 vivekl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-08-13 20:14 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 227128 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 00:14:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:14:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227128] Review Request: xstream-1.1.3-1jpp - XML serialization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708140014.l7E0Ef2g004182@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xstream-1.1.3-1jpp - XML serialization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227128 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora vivekl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vivekl at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-08-13 20:14 EST ------- *** Bug 252094 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 00:16:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:16:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252096] Review Request: cglib - Code Generation Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708140016.l7E0G9X8004305@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cglib - Code Generation Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252096 vivekl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-08-13 20:16 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 227043 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 00:16:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:16:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227043] Review Request: cglib-2.1.3-2jpp - Code Generation Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708140016.l7E0GBZv004335@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cglib-2.1.3-2jpp - Code Generation Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227043 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora vivekl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vivekl at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-08-13 20:16 EST ------- *** Bug 252096 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 00:19:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:19:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227062] Review Request: jacorb-2.2.3-2jpp - Free Java implementation of OMG's CORBA standard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708140019.l7E0JdLQ004502@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jacorb-2.2.3-2jpp - Free Java implementation of OMG's CORBA standard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227062 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora vivekl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-08-13 20:19 EST ------- Newer version requested in another review: bug 252098 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 252098 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 00:19:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:19:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252098] Review Request: jacorb - Free Java implementation of OMG's CORBA standard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708140019.l7E0Je4J004527@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jacorb - Free Java implementation of OMG's CORBA standard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252098 vivekl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rafaels at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-08-13 20:19 EST ------- *** Bug 227062 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 00:23:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:23:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227067] Review Request: javassist-3.1-1jpp - Java Programming Assistant: bytecode manipulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708140023.l7E0Nr3v004968@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: javassist-3.1-1jpp - Java Programming Assistant: bytecode manipulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227067 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-08-13 20:23 EST ------- new version requested for review: bug 252099 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 00:24:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:24:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252099] Review Request: javassist - Java Programming Assistant: bytecode manipulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708140024.l7E0OZhb005030@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: javassist - Java Programming Assistant: bytecode manipulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252099 vivekl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-08-13 20:24 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 227067 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 00:24:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:24:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227067] Review Request: javassist-3.1-1jpp - Java Programming Assistant: bytecode manipulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708140024.l7E0ObjM005067@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: javassist-3.1-1jpp - Java Programming Assistant: bytecode manipulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227067 vivekl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vivekl at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-08-13 20:24 EST ------- *** Bug 252099 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 00:26:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:26:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252102] Review Request: juddi - Open source Java implementation UDDI specification. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708140026.l7E0Qs5a005290@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: juddi - Open source Java implementation UDDI specification. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252102 vivekl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-08-13 20:26 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 227076 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 00:26:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:26:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227076] Review Request: juddi-0.9-0.rc4.2jpp - Open source Java implementation UDDI specification. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708140026.l7E0Qt0w005320@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: juddi-0.9-0.rc4.2jpp - Open source Java implementation UDDI specification. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227076 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora vivekl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vivekl at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-08-13 20:26 EST ------- *** Bug 252102 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 00:29:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:29:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252110] Review Request: wstx - Woodstox Stax Implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708140029.l7E0Tmdv005442@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wstx - Woodstox Stax Implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252110 vivekl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-08-13 20:29 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 227121 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 00:29:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:29:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227121] Review Request: wstx-2.9.3-1jpp - Woodstox Stax Implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708140029.l7E0TnQL005472@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wstx-2.9.3-1jpp - Woodstox Stax Implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227121 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora vivekl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vivekl at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-08-13 20:29 EST ------- *** Bug 252110 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 00:30:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:30:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227121] Review Request: wstx-2.9.3-1jpp - Woodstox Stax Implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708140030.l7E0UZ4d005581@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wstx-2.9.3-1jpp - Woodstox Stax Implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227121 ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-08-13 20:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > *** Bug 252110 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** A newer version requested for review above -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 00:33:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:33:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252118] Review Request: ws-scout - Apache Scout Implementation of JSR 93 (JAXR) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708140033.l7E0XeKu005782@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ws-scout - Apache Scout Implementation of JSR 93 (JAXR) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252118 vivekl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-08-13 20:33 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 227120 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 00:33:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:33:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227120] Review Request: ws-scout-1.0-4jpp - Apache Scout Implementation of JSR 93 (JAXR) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708140033.l7E0XgGq005813@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ws-scout-1.0-4jpp - Apache Scout Implementation of JSR 93 (JAXR) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227120 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora vivekl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vivekl at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-08-13 20:33 EST ------- *** Bug 252118 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 01:14:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 21:14:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252124] New: Review Request: filezilla - FileZilla is a fast FTP and SFTP client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252124 Summary: Review Request: filezilla - FileZilla is a fast FTP and SFTP client Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com SRPMS: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/7/testing/filezilla/filezilla-3.0.0-0.2.rc1.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm SPEC: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/7/testing/filezilla/filezilla.spec Description: FileZilla is a fast FTP and SFTP client #232434 is a known "duplicate" of this request -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 01:15:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 21:15:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232434] Review Request: FileZilla 3 - fast FTP and SFTP client with a lot of features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708140115.l7E1Fb1j007929@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FileZilla 3 - fast FTP and SFTP client with a lot of features https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232434 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-08-13 21:15 EST ------- Closing this bug to start a new review request: #252124 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 01:16:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 21:16:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252125] New: Review Request: flpsed - WYSIWYG pseudo PostScript editor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252125 Summary: Review Request: flpsed - WYSIWYG pseudo PostScript editor Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nsboyle at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.emich.edu/nboyle/flpsed.spec SRPM URL: http://people.emich.edu/nboyle/flpsed-0.5.0-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Flpsed is a WYSIWYG pseudo PostScript editor. "Pseudo", because you can't remove or modify existing elements of a document. Flpsed lets you add arbitrary text lines to existing PostScript 1 documents. Added lines can later be reedited with flpsed. Using pdftops, which is part of xpdf, one can convert PDF documents to PostScript and also add text to them. flpsed is useful for filling in forms, adding notes etc. This is my first package, so I will be in need of a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 01:17:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 21:17:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252125] Review Request: flpsed - WYSIWYG pseudo PostScript editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708140117.l7E1HLVq008069@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flpsed - WYSIWYG pseudo PostScript editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252125 nsboyle at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 02:15:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 22:15:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246526] Review Request: minizip - Minizip manipulates files from a .zip archive In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708140215.l7E2F04x010973@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: minizip - Minizip manipulates files from a .zip archive Alias: minizip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246526 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |varekova at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-08-13 22:14 EST ------- cc'd the zlib maintainer... What is the current status about the minizip buildin into zlib ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 02:18:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 22:18:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252128] New: Review Request: telepathy-haze - A multi-protocol Libpurple connection manager for Telepathy Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252128 Summary: Review Request: telepathy-haze - A multi-protocol Libpurple connection manager for Telepathy Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: peter at thecodergeek.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://pgordon.fedorapeople.org/for-review/telepathy-haze.spec SRPM URL: http://pgordon.fedorapeople.org/for-review/telepathy-haze-0.1.0-1.src.rpm Description: Haze is a connection manager for the Telepathy communications framework. It is special in that it uses the Libpurple backend of the Pidgin instant-messaging client for its protocol implementations. This means that Haze (in theory) supports nearly every protocol that Pidgin does, such as AIM, MSN, and XMPP (Jabber). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 02:19:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 22:19:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252128] Review Request: telepathy-haze - A multi-protocol Libpurple connection manager for Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708140219.l7E2J6Lq011236@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-haze - A multi-protocol Libpurple connection manager for Telepathy Alias: telepathy-haze https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252128 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |telepathy-haze -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 03:35:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 23:35:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250747] Review Request: Linux-Complete-Backup-and-Recovery-HOWTO - bare metal recovery scripts & docs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708140335.l7E3ZMbX016691@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Linux-Complete-Backup-and-Recovery-HOWTO - bare metal recovery scripts & docs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250747 ------- Additional Comments From nsboyle at gmail.com 2007-08-13 23:35 EST ------- I'm not sponsored, so this isn't official: ? - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines --> Seems more a set of scripts than documentation... although I could be looking at what it does all wrong :P Consider renaming after script-suite? OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK? - Spec has consistant macro usage. --> $RPM_BUILD_ROOT could be macro-ified as %{buildroot} OK - License field in spec matches OK - License is GPL OK - License file is included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. NOT OK - Sources SHOULD match upstream md5sum --> Source: e44ce87defb0b7f3688dbbded79bedc4 Package: e44ce87defb0b7f3688dbbded79bedc4 OK - Package has correct buildroot. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. ? - Changelog section is correct. --> Not sure if one should put such direct references to the specfile in %changelog... but it's probably bad form to change the %changelog after the fact... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 05:07:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 01:07:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252133] New: Review Request: quicksynergy - GTK frontend for synergy Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252133 Summary: Review Request: quicksynergy - GTK frontend for synergy Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: shadowarts at shadowarts.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://shadowarts.nonlogic.org/projects/fedora/quicksynergy/quicksynergy.spec SRPM URL: http://shadowarts.nonlogic.org/projects/fedora/quicksynergy/quicksynergy-0.7-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: QuickSynergy is a GTK frontend for the keyboard and mouse sharing application synergy (think software kvm). It allows you to quickly and easily configure synergy to be either the client or the server. I find it extremely useful and much more convenient then editing the configuration file for synergy all the time. Inexperienced users would benefit from this a lot. This is my try at a package so I am also seeking a sponsor. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 06:44:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 02:44:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251419] Review Request: mdbtools - Access data stored in Microsoft Access databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708140644.l7E6iPbB031120@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mdbtools - Access data stored in Microsoft Access databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251419 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-14 02:44 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=161254) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=161254&action=view) (another) gdb log of gmdb2 Almost okay, except that I found another crash.. When I clicked cross button, gdmb2 SEGVs. gdm log attached (this is due to gtk2 side bug?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 06:49:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 02:49:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251419] Review Request: mdbtools - Access data stored in Microsoft Access databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708140649.l7E6n52h031413@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mdbtools - Access data stored in Microsoft Access databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251419 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 08:03:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 04:03:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251317] Review Request: pinot - Personal search and metasearch for the Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708140803.l7E83Xeq004939@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pinot - Personal search and metasearch for the Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251317 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 09:56:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 05:56:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708140956.l7E9uZra013676@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-08-14 05:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > It seems that one or more ruby dependencies are missing. > > $ texexec --version > /usr/bin/env: ruby: Aucun fichier ou r?pertoire de ce type When you run $ LANG=C texexec --version there should be an english error message, which would be easier to understand by a lot of people. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 11:36:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 07:36:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205798] Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708141136.l7EBa3Ep024134@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205798 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-08-14 07:35 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: xine-lib Updated Fedora Owners: abompard,scop Updated Fedora CC: [none] I've been already co-maintaining this package for a while, so I suppose it wouldn't hurt to move me from initialcc to a real co-maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 11:39:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 07:39:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181068] Review Request: html401-dtds - HTML 4.01 document type definitions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708141139.l7EBduMI024529@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: html401-dtds - HTML 4.01 document type definitions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181068 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-08-14 07:39 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: html401-dtds Updated Description: HTML 4.01 document type definitions Remove reference to the spec from package description as the docs are no longer shipped due to the W3C Documentation License being non-free: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 12:27:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 08:27:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246526] Review Request: minizip - Minizip manipulates files from a .zip archive In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708141227.l7ECRprM028965@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: minizip - Minizip manipulates files from a .zip archive Alias: minizip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246526 tmraz at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tmraz at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From tmraz at redhat.com 2007-08-14 08:27 EST ------- Is it worth it including also the minizip and miniunzip binaries to the potential zlib subpackage? We have zip already. The libminizip is of course useful thing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 12:35:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 08:35:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181068] Review Request: html401-dtds - HTML 4.01 document type definitions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708141235.l7ECZQqL029449@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: html401-dtds - HTML 4.01 document type definitions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181068 ------- Additional Comments From veillard at redhat.com 2007-08-14 08:35 EST ------- Can you explain Comment #22, problem as well as effects on the package. The W3C documentation is freely copiable what is the problem ? Daniel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 12:48:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 08:48:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181068] Review Request: html401-dtds - HTML 4.01 document type definitions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708141248.l7ECmZGq030580@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: html401-dtds - HTML 4.01 document type definitions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181068 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-08-14 08:48 EST ------- See link in comment 22, the W3C Documentation License does not permit modification of content licensed under it, making it "not okay" for Fedora. The effect on this package is that the documentation will no longer be shipped in the binary rpm. This is already implemented in the html401-dtds package in F7 updates-testing. The DTDs and related items will stay because the W3C Software (not Documentation) License can be used for them, and that license is ok. http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/IPR-FAQ-20000620#DTD -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 13:50:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 09:50:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229182] Review Request: texlive-texmf-errata - Errata for texlive-texmf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708141350.l7EDoFeD005580@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf-errata - Errata for texlive-texmf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229182 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|rdieter at math.unl.edu |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 13:50:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 09:50:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708141350.l7EDoTXi005618@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|rdieter at math.unl.edu |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 13:53:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 09:53:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708141353.l7EDrOiI006022@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From maxime.carron at fedoraproject.org 2007-08-14 09:53 EST ------- I'm sorry. LANG=C texexec --version /usr/bin/env: ruby: No such file or directory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 13:55:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 09:55:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708141355.l7EDtOJw006366@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 ------- Additional Comments From matt at truch.net 2007-08-14 09:55 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=161270) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=161270&action=view) rpm build errors I was thinking about attempting this review, however I cannot build the package (on F7), due to files not being installed. Attached is the pertinent output from rpmbuild. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 13:56:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 09:56:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708141356.l7EDuY44006508@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-08-14 09:56 EST ------- 'mock' is your friend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 14:11:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 10:11:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708141411.l7EEBU8K008631@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 matt at truch.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matt at truch.net ------- Additional Comments From matt at truch.net 2007-08-14 10:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #26) > 'mock' is your friend. Well, last time I tried to setup mock (which was a while ago), setting it up was *not* my friend. Perhaps I'll try again. No promises on getting it set up any time soon. :-( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 14:14:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 10:14:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708141414.l7EEE3He009672@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 ------- Additional Comments From matt at truch.net 2007-08-14 10:14 EST ------- The license is listed as distributable. Currently this is a no-no. I've already contacted Spot, and he's looking into what label is appropriate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 15:05:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 11:05:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708141505.l7EF5tuH015831@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|WONTFIX | Flag|fedora-review+, fedora-cvs+ |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-14 11:05 EST ------- Now, with Denis's patch we are back on track. Updated: SRPM: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/netgen/netgen-1.3.7-8.src.rpm SPEC: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/netgen/netgen.spec Changelog: - added patch netgen-1.3.7-free.patch by Denis Leroy Example http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/netgen/NOR/ netgen & readnet sim nor readnet sim nor2 lvs nor nor2 "reinitialize", should be used to restart another LVS check Trond Danielsen still interested in reviewing this application ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 16:05:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 12:05:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240308] Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708141605.l7EG5U2H028230@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240308 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-14 12:05 EST ------- ------------------------------------------------- cd qt4 %{__mkdir} -p %{buildroot}%{_qt4_libdir} %{__install} -p -m 0755 lib/libqwtplot3d.so.* %{buildroot}%{_qt4_libdir} ln -s libqwtplot3d.so.%{version} %{buildroot}%{_qt4_libdir}/libqwtplot3d-qt4.so ------------------------------------------------- This does not solve the problem I mentioned. Qt4 libqwtplot3d.so must be renamed (and would you also provide the new srpm?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 16:17:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 12:17:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240308] Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708141617.l7EGHAjr029523@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240308 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-08-14 12:17 EST ------- Right, each lib (qt3 vs qt4 one) needs to have a unique soname. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 17:05:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 13:05:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251019] Review Request: lshw - Hardware lister In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708141705.l7EH5fHU002014@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware lister https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251019 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2007-08-14 13:05 EST ------- > === Issues === > 1. I am not sure which license is used by the program. The Copying file mentions > the GPLv2 or later clauses,which would mean that the correct tag is GPLv2+. > However I might misinterpretate it, so Lyonel, please assist and let us know > what is the intended licensing scheme. GPLv2 is correct, ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229591#c42 > 2. The source URL included was not accesible, the site seemed to be down at the > moment of the review > 3. The file named "Changes" references a later version of the source. As the > site for upstream was not accessible, I could not check That is a known issue, ref: comment #3 over. > 4. I will verify this a bit later. > 5. Please use separate files for the pam and desktop files. Creating them in the > spec is technically OK, but is prone to errors, while using separate files > allows better time/version/MD5 checking Fixed. > 6. (pedantic, feel free to ignore): Please verify if "make" and "make gui" are > both needed. I cannot test now, but at the first glance I think that "make gui" > is enough, it will build everything. You are right, fixed. Updated version: SPEC: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/lshw/lshw.spec SRPM: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/lshw/lshw-B.02.11.01-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 17:18:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 13:18:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708141718.l7EHIW0i003995@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-08-14 13:18 EST ------- Setting FE-Legal on this one. It includes LOTS of stuff that is under non-free licenses. Emailed Matthrew, Jindrich, fedora-legal-list, upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 17:49:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 13:49:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229098] Review Request: openjpeg - JPEG 2000 codec library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708141749.l7EHnndc008978@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openjpeg - JPEG 2000 codec library Alias: openjpeg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229098 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-08-14 13:49 EST ------- Okay, All issues above has been fixed. However, the release tag need to be fix. As a pre-release svn checkout, its should be set like this: 0.%{X}.%{alphatag} So move it to "0.1.%{snapshot}%{?dist}" instead of "2.%{snapshot}%{?dist}". Also note that as an snapshot version, you should comment above the source0 the svn external link to get the source. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 18:21:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 14:21:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251529] Review Request: armacycles-ad - A lightcycle game in 3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708141821.l7EILjlw013513@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: armacycles-ad - A lightcycle game in 3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251529 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-08-14 14:21 EST ------- Started working in issues in #4. Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/armacycles-ad/armacycles-ad.spec No SRPM, because it won't build. It seems to make a difference which directory I called the configure script from. Sorry, I'm an autoconf n00b. And --disable-games seems not to work. Might I need to patch the Makefile? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 18:36:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 14:36:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234331] Review Request: linuxdcpp - Direct Connect client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708141836.l7EIadYX015760@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linuxdcpp - Direct Connect client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234331 ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-08-14 14:36 EST ------- Okey, If ther no official version of the software until the end of this month, I will close the review with a minus flag. Of course you can restart a review, if there an official version. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 18:40:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 14:40:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239428] Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708141840.l7EIeme3016439@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239428 ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-08-14 14:40 EST ------- Your package is pending on bodhi, You have to push it to update-texting explicitly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 18:43:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 14:43:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241097] Review Request: perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu - Extension for the GNU Readline/History library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708141843.l7EIhWTi016756@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu - Extension for the GNU Readline/History library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241097 ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-08-14 14:43 EST ------- Ping agein. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 18:48:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 14:48:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247482] Review Request: pwsafe - A unix command line utility that manages encrypted password databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708141848.l7EImH07017200@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pwsafe - A unix command line utility that manages encrypted password databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247482 jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-08-14 14:48 EST ------- I close this bug. But you should enter the bug number of the review on the update process in bodhi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 18:49:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 14:49:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247983] Review Request: squeak-vm - Squeak virtual machine for OLPC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708141849.l7EInHnA017515@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: squeak-vm - Squeak virtual machine for OLPC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247983 ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-08-14 14:49 EST ------- Ping Bert. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 18:58:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 14:58:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250747] Review Request: Linux-Complete-Backup-and-Recovery-HOWTO - bare metal recovery scripts & docs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708141858.l7EIwPYi018583@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Linux-Complete-Backup-and-Recovery-HOWTO - bare metal recovery scripts & docs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250747 ------- Additional Comments From charlescurley at charlescurley.com 2007-08-14 14:58 EST ------- Thank you, Mr. Boyle. > ? - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines > --> Seems more a set of scripts than documentation... although I could be > looking at what it does all wrong :P Consider renaming after script-suite? Hmmm. The current name is the name of the document at the Linux Documentation Project, and I figured that consistency would be a good idea. The main package is some of the scripts (more are to come), and the -doc subpackage is the original HOWTO in various formats. I could make the docs the main package and put the scripts into a -scripts subpackage, I suppose, but the current naming and subpackaging are consistent with current Fedora usage. I'm open to suggestions here. > OK? - Spec has consistant macro usage. > --> $RPM_BUILD_ROOT could be macro-ified as %{buildroot} OK, done. It should show up in the next version. > NOT OK - Sources SHOULD match upstream md5sum > --> Source: e44ce87defb0b7f3688dbbded79bedc4 Package: > e44ce87defb0b7f3688dbbded79bedc4 I'm not sure where that came from. In any case, it should go away as soon as I put new packages up on my server. > ? - Changelog section is correct. > --> Not sure if one should put such direct references to the specfile in > %changelog... but it's probably bad form to change the %changelog after the fact... That was the reason for the new package version, and the sole change. As with this one. Again, new SRPM: http://www.charlescurley.com/Linux-Complete-Backup-and-Recovery-HOWTO/srpms/Linux-Complete-Backup-and-Recovery-HOWTO-2.3-3.fc7.src.rpm And the revised spec is at the usual: http://www.charlescurley.com/Linux-Complete-Backup-and-Recovery-HOWTO/Linux-Complete-Backup-and-Recovery-HOWTO.spec BTW, since my web page is pretty much automated, and comments for this bugzilla entry are not, the web page (http://www.charlescurley.com/Linux-Complete-Backup-and-Recovery-HOWTO.html) is authoritative for the most recent version, not bugzilla. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 18:58:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 14:58:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239428] Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708141858.l7EIwUH9018635@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239428 ------- Additional Comments From afb at users.sourceforge.net 2007-08-14 14:58 EST ------- Ah, thanks. Should build 1.2.6-6 and 1.3.0-1 (rawhide) as well.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 18:59:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 14:59:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251529] Review Request: armacycles-ad - A lightcycle game in 3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708141859.l7EIxi1p018809@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: armacycles-ad - A lightcycle game in 3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251529 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-08-14 14:59 EST ------- Ooh, made some progress, hang on. . . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 19:11:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 15:11:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244523] Review Request: ddrescue - Data recovery tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708141911.l7EJBOmP020346@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ddrescue - Data recovery tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244523 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-08-14 15:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Blocker: Fedora contains "ddrescue" and "dd_rescue". There are several > versions of the tool. The current Fedora package "Obsoletes: ddrescue"! > Afaik, Fedora only contains dd_rescue which was packaged with the wrong name ddrescue. At least the changelog in rpms/ddrescue imply this. dd_rescue in Fedora is from http://www.garloff.de/kurt/linux/ddrescue/ and the version in this review was from gnu. So if someone still wants to package ddrescue, please reopen the bug and a bug against dd_rescue, not to obsolete ddrescue. Maybe an versioned Obsoletes works here, because dd_rescue has a lower version that ddrescue. Also before you can import ddrescue after an successfull review, some cvs master has to clean up cvs first I guess. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 19:51:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 15:51:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252223] New: Review Request: eclipse-rse - Remote System Explorer for eclipse Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252223 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-rse - Remote System Explorer for eclipse Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: alcapcom at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://download.tuxfamily.org/borsalino/7/SPECS/eclipse-rse.spec SRPM URL: http://download.tuxfamily.org/borsalino/7/SRPMS/eclipse-rse-2.0.0.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Remote System Explorer (RSE) is a framework and toolkit in Eclipse Workbench that allows you to connect and work with a variety of remote systems. All seems to work like expect with the GCJ version in F-7 and the rawhide eclipse (3.3.0-5). There is just a strange bug when the package is build in mock (at less here). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 19:55:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 15:55:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181068] Review Request: html401-dtds - HTML 4.01 document type definitions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708141955.l7EJtFh5029532@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: html401-dtds - HTML 4.01 document type definitions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181068 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-14 15:55 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 19:58:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 15:58:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205798] Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708141958.l7EJwgqD030243@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205798 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-14 15:58 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 20:00:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 16:00:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232725] Review Request: eclipse-mylar - A task-focused UI for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708142000.l7EK025i030490@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-mylar - A task-focused UI for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232725 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-14 15:59 EST ------- Sorry for the delay here... we are trying to figure out how best to handle renames with the packagedb. Right now I think we are leaning toward just making a new package with the new name. That of course doesn't preserve any history in the new module. ;( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 20:10:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 16:10:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229098] Review Request: openjpeg - JPEG 2000 codec library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708142010.l7EKAjxd031341@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openjpeg - JPEG 2000 codec library Alias: openjpeg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229098 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-08-14 16:10 EST ------- @Xavier This is a post release, so 2 is right in this case... @Callum About the snapshoot, it is often recommanded to use a bash script to retrieve the sources (and remove CVS or .svn ), so you can have a method to compare differents snapshoots... This script have to be provided also (Source10)... You can find an sample in the dirac cvs directory if you want... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 20:14:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 16:14:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250504] Review Request: blktrace - block IO tracer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708142014.l7EKEe7b031913@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blktrace - block IO tracer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250504 ------- Additional Comments From esandeen at redhat.com 2007-08-14 16:14 EST ------- I put up a newer version (0.3) which removes the pdf build. -Eric -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 21:07:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 17:07:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217259] Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708142107.l7EL7xr7009180@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217259 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2007-08-14 17:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) Thanks for the review, Jason. > W: alsa-firmware strange-permission alsa-firmware.spec 0660 > Kind of weird and quite insecure on many systems. Should be 644. I don't > know if this matters at all once things are in CVS. I'm sure it doesn't. > W: alsa-firmware mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 10, tab: line 1) > I don't see this as a problem; fix it if you like. Sorted. (but see below) > W: alsa-firmware incoherent-version-in-changelog 0:1.0.12-1 1.0.12-1.fc8 > rpmlint doesn't like seeing the epoch there, but I think this is an rpmlint > issue. Looks like it. > This does not install, due to an unsatisfied dependency on alsa-tools-firmware > >= 1.0.12. I guess this is a subpackage of alsa-tools which is currently > disabled. You own alsa-tools so it should be pretty easy to get it turned on. Yes. It's disabled as a subpackage of alsa-tools for the exact reason that having the -firmware package without alsa-firmware makes no sense. As soon as we're reasonably happy with this package, I'll enable alsa-tools-firmware. > The specfile does not consistently use macros. If you want to use %{__make} and > %{__rm}, you need to use them everywhere and also use %{__mv} and %{__cp}. Sorted. > The current version seems to be 1.0.14, which came out in June. Any reason > not to package it? Nope, updated. Will post updated packages when I get a chance to build and test them. It seems that just dropping in 1.0.14 to the current spec leads to all kinds of craziness. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 21:10:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 17:10:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226275] Merge Review: perl-PDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708142110.l7ELAhiO010368@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-PDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226275 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #160368|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-08-14 17:10 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=161309) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=161309&action=view) Updated test patch Looks like ppc is pickier about test output for some reason. This updated patch shuts up xvals.t some more. With this change it builds for me on ppc and ppc64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 21:30:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 17:30:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217259] Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708142130.l7ELUcEM016340@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217259 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2007-08-14 17:30 EST ------- Aha. May have solved one of the mysteries raised earlier in comment #10. From README: "The recent ALSA driver supports the hotplug firmware loader. As default, the package will install firmware data to the places for both the old ALSA fw loader and the hotplug fw loader. To disable the installation of old ALSA fw loader data (if both ALSA and hotplug fw loaders are available), pass --disable-loader to configure." This disables the generation of the /usr/share/alsa/firmware/* files. Will test without these in place; I imagine it's going to work just fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 21:38:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 17:38:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251419] Review Request: mdbtools - Access data stored in Microsoft Access databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708142138.l7ELcJ47017390@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mdbtools - Access data stored in Microsoft Access databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251419 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-14 17:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Almost okay, except that I found another crash.. > > When I clicked cross button, gdmb2 SEGVs. > gdm log attached (this is due to gtk2 side bug?) Alsmost the same issue as with the properties, this is fixed now too: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/mdbtools.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/mdbtools-0.6-0.2.pre1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 21:38:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 17:38:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251419] Review Request: mdbtools - Access data stored in Microsoft Access databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708142138.l7ELcqpt017519@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mdbtools - Access data stored in Microsoft Access databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251419 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-14 17:38 EST ------- Oops, the fixed srpm should be: SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/mdbtools-0.6-0.3.pre1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 22:26:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 18:26:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251826] Review Request: maniadrive-music - Replacement soundtrack for the non free ManiaDrive soundtrack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708142226.l7EMQ0Jb022515@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maniadrive-music - Replacement soundtrack for the non free ManiaDrive soundtrack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251826 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-14 18:25 EST ------- Here is a new version which adds 2 songs form the original soundtrack whose unclear license situation has been cleared now: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/maniadrive-music.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/maniadrive-music-1.0-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 22:40:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 18:40:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252257] New: Review Request: perl-MogileFS-Server - Server part of the MogileFS distributed filesystem Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252257 Summary: Review Request: perl-MogileFS-Server - Server part of the MogileFS distributed filesystem Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ruben at rubenkerkhof.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/perl-MogileFS-Server.spec SRPM URL: http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/perl-MogileFS-Server-2.17-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Server part of the MogileFS distributed filesystem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 01:20:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 21:20:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250040] Review Request: new - A simple template system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708150120.l7F1K4WS003814@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: new - A simple template system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250040 mike at flyn.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(mike at flyn.org) | ------- Additional Comments From mike at flyn.org 2007-08-14 21:20 EST ------- Spec URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/new.spec SRPM URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/new-1.3.9-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 02:36:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 22:36:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250468] Review Request: vcmd - A developers interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708150236.l7F2a6cC008463@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vcmd - A developers interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250468 noah at coderanger.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From noah at coderanger.net 2007-08-14 22:36 EST ------- Bumped the version to 0.12, which now includes a COPYING file (which is indeed GPL). Fixed the macros issue too. SRPM: http://dev.laptop.org/~coderanger/rpm/vcmd/vcmd-0.12-1.fc8.src.rpm Spec is in the same place. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 03:10:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 23:10:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250463] Review Request: python-pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708150310.l7F3AuRP010827@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250463 ------- Additional Comments From noah at coderanger.net 2007-08-14 23:10 EST ------- New version SRPM: http://dev.laptop.org/~coderanger/rpm/pyvserver/pyvserver-1.0- 0.2.20070723git639686.src.rpm Spec in the same place -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 05:07:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 01:07:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250504] Review Request: blktrace - block IO tracer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708150507.l7F57nOO019868@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blktrace - block IO tracer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250504 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-08-15 01:07 EST ------- I'm sorry for taking so long with this, but lately I've been having trouble finding any free time. The license should be GPLv2+ according to the information in the source files. Other than a complaint about the license, rpmlint is silent. The "pre-release naming conventions" it looks like you're following relate to when you have no Source URL and are constructing a snapshot from upstream's SCM. In this case you have a tarball should follow upstream's naming conventions. That said, I have no particular issue with moving the "git" bit to the end. There's a COPYING file in the tarball; it needs to be included in the built package. The proper CFLAGS aren't passed to the compiler, although the debuginfo package looks OK because -g is in the default set. Unfortunately the Makefiles are rather poor; I added CFLAGS="%{optflags}" to the make line and that gets the proper flags passed, but this causes things to fail to build. Looks like some Makefile patching is in order. * source files match upstream: 70aa39a254b6c4007e5f184829a5fb7cae354efbf6801883f49853519a02cf99 blktrace-git-20070730162628.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. X license field should be GPLv2+ * license is open source-compatible. X license text is in tarball but not included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. X compiler flags are not appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. X rpmlint complains about the license. * final provides and requires are sane: blktrace = 0.0-0.3.20070730162628git.fc8 = /bin/sh libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. The executables seem to run without crashing, but outside of that I've no idea how to test this package. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 05:11:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 01:11:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250504] Review Request: blktrace - block IO tracer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708150511.l7F5BTi2020176@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blktrace - block IO tracer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250504 ------- Additional Comments From esandeen at redhat.com 2007-08-15 01:11 EST ------- Thanks Jason - I'll fix up those last bits (guess I need a newer rpmlint for some of this!) -Eric -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 07:33:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 03:33:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251419] Review Request: mdbtools - Access data stored in Microsoft Access databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708150733.l7F7XlOw028052@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mdbtools - Access data stored in Microsoft Access databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251419 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-15 03:33 EST ------- (I have not rebuilt and installed -0.3 yet) One question: While rpm name has "pre1", there is a patch for pre1 -> cvs20051109 and so this is essentially the version "cvs 2005-11-09", not "pre1"? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 07:44:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 03:44:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251419] Review Request: mdbtools - Access data stored in Microsoft Access databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708150744.l7F7ivaL029090@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mdbtools - Access data stored in Microsoft Access databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251419 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-15 03:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > (I have not rebuilt and installed -0.3 yet) > > One question: > While rpm name has "pre1", there is a patch for pre1 -> cvs20051109 > and so this is essentially the version "cvs 2005-11-09", not "pre1"? True, especially considering the large amount of changes in the cvs patch. I'll change the release field to 0.x.cvs20051109 with the next iteration. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 10:40:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 06:40:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251019] Review Request: lshw - Hardware lister In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708151040.l7FAeboX012957@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware lister https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251019 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-08-15 06:40 EST ------- The log of the mock build includes the following lines: Processing files: lshw-debuginfo-B.02.11.01-3.fc8 warning: File listed twice: /usr/src/debug/lshw-B.02.11.01 warning: File listed twice: /usr/src/debug/lshw-B.02.11.01/src warning: File listed twice: /usr/src/debug/lshw-B.02.11.01/src/core warning: File listed twice: /usr/src/debug/lshw-B.02.11.01/src/gui This looks like a bug to me, so maybe you should report it. On with the rest of the review - source matches upstream, sha1sum is 3a7e790b2912abb5d896a2de21c594009be52d78 lshw-B.02.11.01.tar.gz - license tag is OK - all other questions were properly answered. Package APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 10:52:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 06:52:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251680] Review Request: amtterm - Serial-over-lan (sol) client for Intel AMT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708151052.l7FAqCtl014345@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: amtterm - Serial-over-lan (sol) client for Intel AMT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251680 ------- Additional Comments From kraxel at redhat.com 2007-08-15 06:52 EST ------- Updated to version 0.2. SRPM: http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/amtterm/amtterm-0.2-1.fc7.src.rpm Spec: same as above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 11:02:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 07:02:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251419] Review Request: mdbtools - Access data stored in Microsoft Access databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708151102.l7FB2oCg015402@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mdbtools - Access data stored in Microsoft Access databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251419 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-15 07:02 EST ------- Okay. * Build okay http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=103010 * Spec file okay * Seems to work well ------------------------------------------------ This package (mdbtools) is APPROVED by me ------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 11:17:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 07:17:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708151117.l7FBHXee016492@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-08-15 07:17 EST ------- Version of 0.9 is now available via the yum repo for i386 and x86_64: http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/texlive/texlive.repo just install it to /etc/yum.repos.d/ and yum install texlive (and texlive-latex). The new packages contain updated xpdf-3.02 from upstream to fix CVE-2007-3387, pdftex no more links statically with libstdc++, xdvi.xaw3d is now part of texlive-xdvi and contains other packaging fixes that mostly affects upgrading from tetex. The new texmf packages contain packaging fixes, it obsoletes tetex-eurofont and tetex-tex4ht as it's part of TeXLive. We can add tetex-eurofont and tetex-tex4ht maintainers to comaintainer list so that they can maintain it in TeXLive if they are interested. License audit is now in progress, currently finished for texlive-texmf and some license changes are discussed upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 11:22:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 07:22:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250040] Review Request: new - A simple template system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708151122.l7FBM96T016888@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: new - A simple template system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250040 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-15 07:22 EST ------- Before checking -2: ------------------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost SRPMS]$ ls -al new-1.3.9-*/*gz -rw-rw-r-- 1 tasaka1 tasaka1 686079 2007-07-30 10:02 new-1.3.9-1.fc8/new-1.3.9.tar.gz -rw-rw-r-- 1 tasaka1 tasaka1 416816 2007-08-15 10:06 new-1.3.9-2.fc8/new-1.3.9.tar.gz ------------------------------------------------------------- What happened?? Are you the upstream developer of this package? If so, please don't alter the original tarball without changing version number (so restore the original 1.3.9 tarball and release new one as 1.3.9.1, for example). If not, where did you actually download them? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 11:28:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 07:28:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252046] Review Request: util-linux-ng (util-linux replacement) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708151128.l7FBSk4N017277@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: util-linux-ng (util-linux replacement) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252046 ------- Additional Comments From kzak at redhat.com 2007-08-15 07:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Blockers: > * Licensing: > - "If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in > its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the > package, must be included as documentation." Fixed, added README.licensing and licenses/* to %doc. > * BuildRoot value is invalid, see Packaging/Guidelines Fixed. > * Inconsistent use of both BuildRoot and %{buildroot} Fixed. > * Use %config(noreplace) - at least for 60-raw.rules, I'm not sure about the > files in /etc/pam.d/ Fixed, the "noreplace" used for pam.d/ files too. > * Obsoletes: clock - seems to be pre-Fedora, can be removed IMHO. Fixed (removed). > Same for timeconfig. Fixed (removed). > * mnt_test_sysinfo.c:74: warning: right shift count >= width of type Fixed (upstream). > * BuildRequires: sed is unnecessary Fixed. > * does floppy really need %makeinstall? No, fixed. > * why is the [ "%{_infodir}" != "%{_prefix}/info" ... ] section necessary? Fixed (removed). > * why is (gzip -9nf ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_infodir}/ipc.info) necessary? Fixed (removed). Please, try a new version: http://people.redhat.com/kzak/util-linux/util-linux-ng-2.13-0.53.fc8.x86_64.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 11:47:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 07:47:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708151147.l7FBlVo3019054@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-08-15 07:47 EST ------- Version of 0.9 is now available via the yum repo for i386 and x86_64: http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/texlive/texlive.repo just install it to /etc/yum.repos.d/ and yum install texlive (and texlive-latex). The new packages contain updated xpdf-3.02 from upstream to fix CVE-2007-3387, pdftex no more links statically with libstdc++, xdvi.xaw3d is now part of texlive-xdvi and contains other packaging fixes that mostly affects upgrading from tetex. The new texmf packages contain packaging fixes, it obsoletes tetex-eurofont and tetex-tex4ht as it's part of TeXLive. We can add tetex-eurofont and tetex-tex4ht maintainers to comaintainer list so that they can maintain it in TeXLive if they are interested. License audit is now in progress, currently finished for texlive-texmf and some license changes are discussed upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 12:16:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 08:16:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251419] Review Request: mdbtools - Access data stored in Microsoft Access databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708151216.l7FCGVAS021307@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mdbtools - Access data stored in Microsoft Access databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251419 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-15 08:16 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mdbtools Short Description: Access data stored in Microsoft Access databases Owners: jwrdegoede / j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Branches: FC-6 F-7 devel InitialCC: Commits by cvsextras: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 12:28:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 08:28:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246526] Review Request: minizip - Minizip manipulates files from a .zip archive In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708151228.l7FCSlZO022139@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: minizip - Minizip manipulates files from a .zip archive Alias: minizip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246526 ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-08-15 08:28 EST ------- minizip is build now (it is in version -1.2.3-14.fc8). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 12:40:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 08:40:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708151240.l7FCeIXh022958@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From jiri.cerny at epfl.ch 2007-08-15 08:40 EST ------- i386 repo has problems. yum install texlive gives (4/21): texlive-texmf-fon 100% |=========================| 43 MB 01:14 http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/texlive/i386/texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-0.9.f c7.noarch.rpm: [Errno -1] Package does not match intended download Trying other mirror. (6/21): texlive-texmf-lat 100% |=========================| 0 B 00:00 http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/texlive/i386/texlive-texmf-latex-2007-0.9.f c7.noarch.rpm: [Errno -1] Package does not match intended download Trying other mirror. (21/21): texlive-xdvi-200 100% |=========================| 0 B 00:00 http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/texlive/i386/texlive-xdvi-2007-0.9.fc7.i386 .rpm: [Errno -1] Package does not match intended download Trying other mirror. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 12:47:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 08:47:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229182] Review Request: texlive-texmf-errata - Errata for texlive-texmf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708151247.l7FClFR6023656@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf-errata - Errata for texlive-texmf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229182 ------- Additional Comments From tmraz at redhat.com 2007-08-15 08:47 EST ------- Isn't the main reason why it wasn't done for other packages that it wouldn't gain much and/or wasn't feasible for them? The texlive-texmf source is special in this regard that it consists of huge number of relatively small files which makes the errata rpm workable. I don't see anything wrong with it if we always ensure that before each release of Fedora the errata package is empty and it will get filled only in the updates repository. The only problem with it I could see is that it is additional burden on the maintainer of texlive packages but if he is willing to take it I'd say why not? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 14:59:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 10:59:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226275] Merge Review: perl-PDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708151459.l7FExflr008595@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-PDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226275 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-08-15 10:59 EST ------- Excellent, thanks. 2.4.3-4 should be in rawhide now. Please take a look. By the by, are any of these patches submitted upstream? Looks like some of them would be appropriate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 15:08:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 11:08:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193712] Review Request: sos In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708151508.l7FF824X009650@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193712 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-08-15 11:07 EST ------- Is there some reason this package has not been imported yet? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 15:13:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 11:13:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227062] Review Request: jacorb-2.2.3-2jpp - Free Java implementation of OMG's CORBA standard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708151513.l7FFD45J010450@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jacorb-2.2.3-2jpp - Free Java implementation of OMG's CORBA standard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227062 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 15:13:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 11:13:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227093] Review Request: picocontainer-1.2-2jpp - Dependency-injection container In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708151513.l7FFDBNo010471@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: picocontainer-1.2-2jpp - Dependency-injection container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227093 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 15:33:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 11:33:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226581] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-calcomp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708151533.l7FFXQYS015001@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-calcomp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226581 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 15:34:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 11:34:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226592] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-evdev In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708151534.l7FFYc95015192@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-evdev https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226592 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-08-15 11:34 EST ------- This has been approved for two weeks now; I'll just close it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 15:36:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 11:36:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226614] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-palmax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708151536.l7FFa5cq015308@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-palmax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226614 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 15:36:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 11:36:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226616] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-rendition In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708151536.l7FFaWmi015435@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-rendition https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226616 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 15:37:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 11:37:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226617] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-s3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708151537.l7FFb7c3015567@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-s3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226617 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 15:37:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 11:37:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226618] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-s3virge In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708151537.l7FFba71015712@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-s3virge https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226618 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 15:38:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 11:38:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226619] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-savage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708151538.l7FFcDEH015834@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-savage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226619 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 15:38:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 11:38:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226620] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-siliconmotion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708151538.l7FFcuhV016011@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-siliconmotion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226620 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 15:39:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 11:39:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226621] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-sis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708151539.l7FFdbcx016133@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-sis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226621 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 15:41:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 11:41:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226623] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-spaceorb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708151541.l7FFfeA6016547@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-spaceorb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226623 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 15:41:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 11:41:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226624] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-summa In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708151541.l7FFfr07016586@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-summa https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226624 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 15:42:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 11:42:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226625] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-tdfx In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708151542.l7FFg8jB016666@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-tdfx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226625 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 15:42:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 11:42:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226626] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-tek4957 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708151542.l7FFgieK016723@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-tek4957 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226626 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 15:43:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 11:43:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226627] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-trident In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708151543.l7FFhDmF016791@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-trident https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226627 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 15:43:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 11:43:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226628] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-tseng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708151543.l7FFhidF016850@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-tseng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226628 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 15:43:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 11:43:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226629] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-ur98 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708151543.l7FFhtwX016890@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-ur98 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226629 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 15:44:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 11:44:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226630] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-v4l In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708151544.l7FFi83L016929@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-v4l https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226630 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 15:44:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 11:44:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226631] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-vesa In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708151544.l7FFiNpZ016967@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-vesa https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226631 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 15:45:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 11:45:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226634] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-vmmouse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708151545.l7FFj1SD017033@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-vmmouse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226634 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 15:45:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 11:45:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226635] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-vmware In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708151545.l7FFjEN8017115@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-vmware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226635 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 15:45:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 11:45:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226637] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-voodoo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708151545.l7FFjL4P017141@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-voodoo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226637 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 16:34:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 12:34:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247852] Review Request: R-systemfit - Simultaneous Equation Estimation R Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708151634.l7FGYFrx022968@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-systemfit - Simultaneous Equation Estimation R Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247852 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-08-15 12:34 EST ------- It looks like this is in rawhide but hasn't been pushed to F7. (I don't see it in the FC-6 extras repository, either.) Do you need assistance getting this package pushed out? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 16:43:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 12:43:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 211761] Review Request: dfu-programmer - USB DFU based programmer for Atmel chips In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708151643.l7FGheqj024473@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dfu-programmer - USB DFU based programmer for Atmel chips https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211761 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-08-15 12:43 EST ------- OK, all of the complaints I had above are fixed. However, since that initial review, our guidelines for the License: tag have changed. I believe this package is under the GPL, version 2 or any later version, so the License: tag should read "GPLv2+". I'll go ahead and approve this package and you can fix the License: tag when you check in. I believe you'll also need to apply for sponsorship. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join has the details of the process; you're probably at "Get a Fedora Account". APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 16:49:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 12:49:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708151649.l7FGnxRi025499@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-08-15 12:49 EST ------- I'm confused; this package is older (release 1) than the package linked in comment 38 (release 2). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 16:56:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 12:56:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193529] Review Request: radiusclient-ng - RADIUS protocol client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708151656.l7FGu1Yh026340@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: radiusclient-ng - RADIUS protocol client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193529 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-08-15 12:55 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: radiusclient-ng New Branches: EL-5 Updated EPEL Owners: jcollie (jeff at ocjtech.us) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 17:23:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 13:23:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251019] Review Request: lshw - Hardware lister In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708151723.l7FHN7sm029510@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware lister https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251019 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2007-08-15 13:23 EST ------- > Package APPROVED Thanks for the review manuel! Thanks to other guys too, and of course to a very helpful upstream maintainer! - Terje New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lshw Short Description: Hardware lister Owners: terjeros Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 17:54:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 13:54:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249352] Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708151754.l7FHsHVt001951@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249352 redhat at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |205849 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 17:54:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 13:54:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193529] Review Request: radiusclient-ng - RADIUS protocol client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708151754.l7FHsUOd002030@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: radiusclient-ng - RADIUS protocol client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193529 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-15 13:54 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 17:57:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 13:57:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249352] Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708151757.l7FHv6ET002712@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249352 redhat at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |119782 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 18:02:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 14:02:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251019] Review Request: lshw - Hardware lister In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708151802.l7FI2si6003541@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware lister https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251019 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-15 14:02 EST ------- cvs done. Note that your License tag should be: GPLv2+ if it's really GPL version 2 or later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 18:46:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 14:46:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251419] Review Request: mdbtools - Access data stored in Microsoft Access databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708151846.l7FIktvh008718@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mdbtools - Access data stored in Microsoft Access databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251419 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-15 14:46 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 19:59:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 15:59:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241549] Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708151959.l7FJxrXL021290@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241549 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-08-15 15:59 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/Pixie/Pixie.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/Pixie/Pixie-2.2.2-1.kwizart.fc7.src.rpm Description: 3D renderer Renderman compliant building in mock x86_64 (fc6) might need to test also in devel and maybe ppc (ppc64) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 20:02:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 16:02:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 219889] Review Request: bootchart - a utility for profiling the boot process In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708152002.l7FK2fh6021744@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bootchart - a utility for profiling the boot process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219889 ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-08-15 16:02 EST ------- This has stalled for a while but I still really want it. So: http://ajax.fedorapeople.org/bootchart/ Has new spec and srpm (and noarch rpms). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 20:07:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 16:07:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708152007.l7FK7tib022333@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From jiri.cerny at epfl.ch 2007-08-15 16:07 EST ------- Ignore comment #13 it works now. Problem is that updmap.cfg file is missing after the update to version 0.9. It seems that this file gets removed by the "%post fonts" scriplet in texlive.spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 20:16:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 16:16:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247852] Review Request: R-systemfit - Simultaneous Equation Estimation R Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708152016.l7FKGwsK023696@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-systemfit - Simultaneous Equation Estimation R Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247852 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-08-15 16:16 EST ------- Just got pushed to the back burner. Builds are on their way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 20:36:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 16:36:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225287] Merge Review: atk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708152036.l7FKaGsZ027395@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: atk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225287 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora caillon at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |caillon at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From caillon at redhat.com 2007-08-15 16:36 EST ------- * rpmlint fails % rpmlint atk-1.19.6-2.fc8.i386.rpm E: atk tag-not-utf8 %changelog % rpmlint atk-devel-1.19.6-2.fc8.i386.rpm E: atk-devel tag-not-utf8 %changelog % rpmlint atk-1.19.6-2.fc8.src.rpm E: atk tag-not-utf8 %changelog E: atk non-utf8-spec-file atk.spec Packaging Guidelines: * Consider DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT make install instead of %makeinstall * Consider make %{?_smp_mflags} Looks good otherwise. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 21:25:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 17:25:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225813] Merge Review: gnome-backgrounds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708152125.l7FLP084000967@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-backgrounds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225813 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora caillon at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |caillon at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From caillon at redhat.com 2007-08-15 17:24 EST ------- % rpmlint gnome-backgrounds-2.18.3-1.fc8.noarch.rpm W: gnome-backgrounds no-documentation * rpmlint: Consider adding the COPYING NEWS and README files to %doc * Consider nuking %define gettext_package at the top of the spec and simply use %{name} instead Fine, otherwise. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 21:25:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 17:25:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252046] Review Request: util-linux-ng (util-linux replacement) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708152125.l7FLP9CN001004@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: util-linux-ng (util-linux replacement) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252046 ------- Additional Comments From kzak at redhat.com 2007-08-15 17:24 EST ------- Sorry, SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/kzak/util-linux/util-linux-ng-2.13-0.53.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 21:33:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 17:33:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251419] Review Request: mdbtools - Access data stored in Microsoft Access databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708152133.l7FLXCQ7001887@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mdbtools - Access data stored in Microsoft Access databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251419 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-15 17:33 EST ------- Thanks for the review! Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 21:38:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 17:38:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251019] Review Request: lshw - Hardware lister In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708152138.l7FLcfZJ002528@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware lister https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251019 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2007-08-15 17:38 EST ------- > Note that your License tag should be: GPLv2+ if it's really GPL version 2 or later. It's GPLv2. Bodhi done. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 21:47:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 17:47:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252046] Review Request: util-linux-ng (util-linux replacement) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708152147.l7FLl0bg003318@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: util-linux-ng (util-linux replacement) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252046 ------- Additional Comments From mitr at redhat.com 2007-08-15 17:46 EST ------- Thanks, one more thing: > - Please update License: per Packaging/LicensingGuidelines Perhaps to: # See README.licensing License: GPLv2 and GPLv2+ and BSD and Public Domain [Should "BSD" be "BSD with advertising"?] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 23:32:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 19:32:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252418] New: Review Request: gtk-vnc - a VNC viewer widget for GTK Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252418 Summary: Review Request: gtk-vnc - a VNC viewer widget for GTK Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: berrange at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~berrange/review/gtk-vnc/gtk-vnc.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~berrange/review/gtk-vnc/gtk-vnc-0.1.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: gtk-vnc is a VNC viewer widget for GTK. It is built using coroutines allowing it to be completely asynchronous while remaining single threaded. It implements the VeNCrypt protocol extension providing SSL/TLS encryption and x509 certificate authentication for VNC clients. This package is a requirement for the next release of virt-manager (already in Fedora), and is a requirement for the Fedora 8 Virtualization Security goals. As such I'd like to get it included prior to F8 Test2 Freeze http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureVirtSecurity -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 23:40:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 19:40:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225287] Merge Review: atk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708152340.l7FNeWCb011628@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: atk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225287 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-08-15 19:40 EST ------- Updated -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 23:40:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 19:40:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225287] Merge Review: atk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708152340.l7FNewbC011665@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: atk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225287 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 15 23:45:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 19:45:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225813] Merge Review: gnome-backgrounds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708152345.l7FNjIEr011966@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-backgrounds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225813 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-08-15 19:45 EST ------- Fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 00:59:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 20:59:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252418] Review Request: gtk-vnc - a VNC viewer widget for GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708160059.l7G0xFjG016835@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-vnc - a VNC viewer widget for GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252418 ------- Additional Comments From berrange at redhat.com 2007-08-15 20:59 EST ------- Discovered that the -devel RPM was missing a Requires: gnutls-devel, so got a new src.rpm (spec file url is unchanged) http://fedorapeople.org/~berrange/review/gtk-vnc/gtk-vnc-0.1.0-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 01:10:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 21:10:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252421] New: Review Request: virt-viewer - a viewer for virtualized guest OS graphical consoles Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252421 Summary: Review Request: virt-viewer - a viewer for virtualized guest OS graphical consoles Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: berrange at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~berrange/review/virt-viewer/virt-viewer.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~berrange/review/virt-viewer/virt-viewer-0.0.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Virtual Machine Viewer provides a graphical console client for connecting to virtual machines. It uses the GTK-VNC widget to provide the display, and libvirt for looking up VNC server details. This application will be required by the next release of python-virtinst (and the virt-install tool for provisioning guest OS). It provides a replacement for vncviewer which knows how to securely connect to VNC servers using SSL/TLS and x509 certificates. This is required for the Fedora 8 Virtualization Security goals: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureVirtSecurity -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 01:10:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 21:10:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252421] Review Request: virt-viewer - a viewer for virtualized guest OS graphical consoles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708160110.l7G1Amqw017681@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: virt-viewer - a viewer for virtualized guest OS graphical consoles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252421 berrange at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |252418 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 01:10:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 21:10:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252418] Review Request: gtk-vnc - a VNC viewer widget for GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708160110.l7G1Aoq1017720@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-vnc - a VNC viewer widget for GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252418 berrange at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |252421 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 03:00:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 23:00:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226363] Merge Review: redhat-lsb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708160300.l7G3027w025004@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: redhat-lsb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226363 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-15 22:59 EST ------- thx for updates Still I can see rpmlint complaining on SRPM as W: redhat-lsb invalid-license GPL The value of the License tag was not recognized. Known values are: "AFL", "Affero GPL", "ASL 1.0", "ASL 1.0+", "ASL 1.1", "ASL 1.1+", "ASL 2.0", "ASL 2.0+", "APSL 2.0", "APSL 2.0+", "Artistic clarified", "Boost", "BSD with advertising", "BSD", "CeCILL", "CDDL", "CPL", "Condor", "Cryptix", "EPL", "eCos", "EFL 2.0", "EFL 2.0+", "EU Datagrid", "GPL+", "GPLv2", "GPLv2+", "GPLv3", "GPLv3+", "IBM", "iMatix", "Intel ACPI", "Interbase", "Jabber", "LaTeX", "LGPL+", "LGPLv2", "LGPLv2 with exceptions", "LGPLv2+", "LGPLv3", "LGPLv3+", "LPL", "mecab-ipadic", "MIT", "MPLv1.0", "MPLv1.0+", "MPLv1.1", "MPLv1.1+", "NCSA", "NGPL", "NOSL", "Netscape", "Nokia", "OpenLDAP", "OSL 1.0", "OSL 1.0+", "OpenSSL", "Phorum", "PHP", "Public Domain", "Python", "QPL", "RPSL", "Ruby", "Sleepycat", "SMLNJL", "SISSL", "SPL", "Vim", "VNLSL", "VSL", "W3C", "WTFPL", "wxWindows", "xinetd", "Zend", "ZPLv1.0", "ZPLv1.0+", "ZPLv2.0", "ZPLv2.0+", "zlib", "CDL", "FBSDDL", "GFDL", "Open Publication", "CC-BY", "CC-BY-SA", "DSL", "Free Art", "Arphic", "SIL Open Font", "Redistributable, no modification permitted", "Freely redistributable without restriction". E: redhat-lsb hardcoded-library-path in /lib/lsb A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. W: redhat-lsb macro-in-%changelog endif Macros are expanded in %changelog too, which can in unfortunate cases lead to the package not building at all, or other subtle unexpected conditions that affect the build. Even when that doesn't happen, the expansion results in possibly "rewriting history" on subsequent package revisions and generally odd entries eg. in source rpms, which is rarely wanted. Avoid use of macros in %changelog altogether, or use two '%'s to escape them, like '%%foo'. AND rpmlint output on RPM as W: redhat-lsb dangling-relative-symlink /lib/ld-lsb.so.3 ld-linux.so.2 The relative symbolic link points nowhere. E: redhat-lsb zero-length /etc/lsb-release.d/core-3.1-ia32 W: redhat-lsb non-conffile-in-etc /etc/lsb-release.d/core-3.1-ia32 A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. E: redhat-lsb non-readable /usr/sbin/redhat_lsb_trigger.i386 0700 The file can't be read by everybody. If this is expected (for security reasons), contact your rpmlint distributor to get it added to the list of exceptions for your distro (or add it to your local configuration if you installed rpmlint from the source tarball). E: redhat-lsb non-standard-executable-perm /usr/sbin/redhat_lsb_trigger.i386 0700 A standard executable should have permission set to 0755. If you get this message, it means that you have a wrong executable permissions in some files included in your package. E: redhat-lsb zero-length /etc/lsb-release.d/graphics-3.1-noarch W: redhat-lsb non-conffile-in-etc /etc/lsb-release.d/graphics-3.1-noarch A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. E: redhat-lsb zero-length /etc/lsb-release.d/graphics-3.1-ia32 W: redhat-lsb non-conffile-in-etc /etc/lsb-release.d/graphics-3.1-ia32 A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. W: redhat-lsb dangling-relative-symlink /bin/mailx mail The relative symbolic link points nowhere. W: redhat-lsb dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/lsb/install_initd ../../../sbin/chkconfig The relative symbolic link points nowhere. W: redhat-lsb dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/lsb/remove_initd ../../../sbin/chkconfig The relative symbolic link points nowhere. E: redhat-lsb zero-length /etc/lsb-release.d/core-3.1-noarch W: redhat-lsb non-conffile-in-etc /etc/lsb-release.d/core-3.1-noarch A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. W: redhat-lsb invalid-license GPL The value of the License tag was not recognized. Known values are: "AFL", "Affero GPL", "ASL 1.0", "ASL 1.0+", "ASL 1.1", "ASL 1.1+", "ASL 2.0", "ASL 2.0+", "APSL 2.0", "APSL 2.0+", "Artistic clarified", "Boost", "BSD with advertising", "BSD", "CeCILL", "CDDL", "CPL", "Condor", "Cryptix", "EPL", "eCos", "EFL 2.0", "EFL 2.0+", "EU Datagrid", "GPL+", "GPLv2", "GPLv2+", "GPLv3", "GPLv3+", "IBM", "iMatix", "Intel ACPI", "Interbase", "Jabber", "LaTeX", "LGPL+", "LGPLv2", "LGPLv2 with exceptions", "LGPLv2+", "LGPLv3", "LGPLv3+", "LPL", "mecab-ipadic", "MIT", "MPLv1.0", "MPLv1.0+", "MPLv1.1", "MPLv1.1+", "NCSA", "NGPL", "NOSL", "Netscape", "Nokia", "OpenLDAP", "OSL 1.0", "OSL 1.0+", "OpenSSL", "Phorum", "PHP", "Public Domain", "Python", "QPL", "RPSL", "Ruby", "Sleepycat", "SMLNJL", "SISSL", "SPL", "Vim", "VNLSL", "VSL", "W3C", "WTFPL", "wxWindows", "xinetd", "Zend", "ZPLv1.0", "ZPLv1.0+", "ZPLv2.0", "ZPLv2.0+", "zlib", "CDL", "FBSDDL", "GFDL", "Open Publication", "CC-BY", "CC-BY-SA", "DSL", "Free Art", "Arphic", "SIL Open Font", "Redistributable, no modification permitted", "Freely redistributable without restriction". E: redhat-lsb statically-linked-binary /usr/sbin/redhat_lsb_trigger.i386 The package installs a statically linked binary or object file. Usually this is a packaging bug. If not, contact your rpmlint distributor about this so that this error gets included in the exception file for rpmlint and will not be flagged as a packaging bug in the future (or add it to your local configuration if you installed rpmlint from the source tarball). E: redhat-lsb only-non-binary-in-usr-lib There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 03:46:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 23:46:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241549] Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708160346.l7G3k6H5028176@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241549 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-15 23:46 EST ------- Failed at least on ppc64, both rawhide & F-7, perhaps due to OOM killer *on koji*. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=104258 (rawhide) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=104314 (F-7) IMO codes must be fixed to reduce the burden on compilation anyway... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 04:27:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 00:27:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252456] New: Review Request: silo - The SILO boot loader for SPARCs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252456 Summary: Review Request: silo - The SILO boot loader for SPARCs Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dennis at ausil.us QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ausil.us/packages/silo.spec SRPM URL: http://ausil.us/packages/silo-1.4.13-3.al3.src.rpm Description: The silo package installs the SILO (Sparc Improved LOader) boot loader, which you'll need to boot the Linux kernel on a SPARC. SILO installs onto your system's boot block and can be configured to boot Linux, Solaris and SunOS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 04:37:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 00:37:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252457] New: Review Request: prtconf - SPARC OpenPROM dump utility Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252457 Summary: Review Request: prtconf - SPARC OpenPROM dump utility Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dennis at ausil.us QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ausil.us/packages/prtconf.spec SRPM URL: http://ausil.us/packages/prtconf-1.3-6.al3.src.rpm Description: This utility will dump SPARC OpenPROM device tree in the format similar to Solaris prtconf, that is, in a nicely readable compact format. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 04:39:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 00:39:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226363] Merge Review: redhat-lsb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708160439.l7G4dJ80032012@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: redhat-lsb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226363 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-16 00:39 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=161430) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=161430&action=view) Partial Modification to SPEC to silent rpmlint messages on SRPM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 05:52:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 01:52:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225760] Merge Review: fonts-arabic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708160552.l7G5qaxu004537@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-arabic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225760 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 05:52:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 01:52:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225762] Merge Review: fonts-hebrew In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708160552.l7G5qiEu004569@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-hebrew https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225762 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 05:53:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 01:53:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225763] Merge Review: fonts-indic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708160553.l7G5r3xa004610@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-indic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225763 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 05:54:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 01:54:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244368] Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708160554.l7G5sDkE004711@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244368 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-16 01:54 EST ------- is this built in cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 05:55:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 01:55:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248996] Review Request: libopensync-plugin-synce - Synce plugin for libopensync In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708160555.l7G5ttTx004828@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync-plugin-synce - Synce plugin for libopensync https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248996 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-16 01:55 EST ------- any progress? Can this be closed now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 05:57:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 01:57:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248996] Review Request: libopensync-plugin-synce - Synce plugin for libopensync In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708160557.l7G5vo8Y004996@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync-plugin-synce - Synce plugin for libopensync https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248996 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |0.22-3.fc7 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-08-16 01:57 EST ------- It has been pushed already. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 06:23:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 02:23:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708160623.l7G6NaA7013416@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-08-16 02:23 EST ------- Jiri, it is intentional, I moved updmap.cfg to /etc/texmf/web2c in 0.9, former updmap.cfg was in /usr/share/texmf/web2c, but all system config files belong to /etc hierarchy, the previous spec files assumed that all configuration files has extension .cnf, but there's one exception, updmap.cfg so that all config files were moved to /etc except updmap.cfg. It is now fixed in 0.9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 06:36:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 02:36:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708160636.l7G6aijP018554@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From ji.cerny at gmail.com 2007-08-16 02:36 EST ------- But there is no updmap.cfg in /etc/texmf/web2c after the update to 0.9, and this looks suspicious to me: %post fonts %{_bindir}/texconfig-sys rehash 2> /dev/null || : /sbin/install-info %{_infodir}/web2c.info.gz %{_infodir}/dir %{__rm} -f %{_texmf_conf}/web2c/updmap.cfg %{__rm} -f %{_texmf_conf}/web2c/updmap.log %{_bindir}/updmap-sys --syncwithtrees > /dev/null 2>&1 || : -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 07:10:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 03:10:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247983] Review Request: squeak-vm - Squeak virtual machine for OLPC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708160710.l7G7AEcQ020965@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: squeak-vm - Squeak virtual machine for OLPC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247983 ------- Additional Comments From bert at freudenbergs.de 2007-08-16 03:10 EST ------- Heh, thanks for the ping. Now *I* am on vacation, should get back to this at the end of August. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 08:15:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 04:15:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252946] New: Review Request: xmms2 - X-platform Music Multiplexing System 2 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252946 Summary: Review Request: xmms2 - X-platform Music Multiplexing System 2 Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: patrice.bouchand.fedora at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://patrice.bouchand.free.fr/rpm/xmms2.spec SRPM URL: http://patrice.bouchand.free.fr/rpm/xmms2-0.2-0.2.DrJekyll.fc7.src.rpm Description: XMMS2 is a redesign of the XMMS (http://www.xmms.org) music player. It features a client-server model, allowing multiple (even simultaneous!) user interfaces, both textual and graphical. All common audio formats are supported using plugins. On top of this, there is a flexible media library to organize your music. * Since xmms2 code contains code with patents, the upstream sources must be reworked to remove it. This is done by xmms2-generate-tarball.sh which comes within the srpm. Plugins that should be produced by the removed code will be provided by a livna rpm "xmms2-plugins" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 08:38:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 04:38:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252950] New: Review Request: othello - Classic board game with ai plugins and network support Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252950 Summary: Review Request: othello - Classic board game with ai plugins and network support Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: hellwolf.misty at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://ftp.fedora.cn/pub/fedora-cn/in-review/othello.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.fedora.cn/pub/fedora-cn/in-review/othello-0.2.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Othello is a classic strategy game, also known as Reversi. Its objective is to finish the game with the greater amount of pieces (circles) of the same color. Features : * Cross Platformed (Currently support Linux and win32) * Support writing ai plugin using C++, and also support writing ai plugin in python script directly. * Support network game. * Support interface theme. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 09:18:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 05:18:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252418] Review Request: gtk-vnc - a VNC viewer widget for GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708160918.l7G9I3el002218@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-vnc - a VNC viewer widget for GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252418 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 09:20:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 05:20:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244368] Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708160920.l7G9KCZn002467@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244368 mpg at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From mpg at redhat.com 2007-08-16 05:20 EST ------- Yep it is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 09:33:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 05:33:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252456] Review Request: silo - The SILO boot loader for SPARCs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708160933.l7G9XxC1003792@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: silo - The SILO boot loader for SPARCs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252456 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-08-16 05:33 EST ------- There are a few small problems with the spec - I'd say that /usr/share/man/man1/tilo.1* /usr/share/man/man1/maketilo.1* /usr/share/man/man5/silo.conf.5* /usr/share/man/man8/silo.8* should use %{_mandir} (for instance %{_mandir}/man?/*), /usr/sbin/silocheck should be replaced with %{_sbindir}/silocheck, /usr/bin/stuff with %{_bindir}/stuff ... (Packaging/Guidelines#macros) - According to Packaging/Guidelines#parallelmake SMP flags should be used if possible - mock build fails with No Package Found for elftoaout Cannot find build req elftoaout. Exiting. ending done I assume this comes from testing being done on x86 ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 09:44:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 05:44:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252418] Review Request: gtk-vnc - a VNC viewer widget for GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708160944.l7G9iRxh005233@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-vnc - a VNC viewer widget for GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252418 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-16 05:44 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=161642) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=161642&action=view) Apply this patch Apply above patch which makes rpmlint silent. Also update new package with chmod 644 gtk-vnc.spec bump release tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 09:50:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 05:50:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252418] Review Request: gtk-vnc - a VNC viewer widget for GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708160950.l7G9oZaB005925@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-vnc - a VNC viewer widget for GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252418 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-16 05:50 EST ------- Also, Do you think you should add same %doc files to all sub packages also? You can remove AUTHORS, COPYING.LIB ,ChangeLog, NEWS, README from gtk-vnc-python and gtk-vnc-devel. They are already present in gtk-vnc rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 12:44:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 08:44:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230164] Review Request: rt71w-firmware - Firmware for RT71 802.11 wireless devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708161244.l7GCisil020442@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rt71w-firmware - Firmware for RT71 802.11 wireless devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230164 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-08-16 08:44 EST ------- Thx for your help Ivo! I've received the Ralink license by mail, now i think we can re-distribute Rakink's-firmware. But from a packager point of view, I usually have to download files from a public place...(so I can also take care of the timestamp, but this is a minor problem)... Actually, what could be better is to download the license from the Ralink website. Or even better, to have it within the firmware archives... Thx again from your help! I will update the spec file (and drop dist tag) Also, notting reminded me that firmware name is taken from the kernel module which is used (rt73usb in this case, and rt61pci for rt61-firmware ) I will probably need to rename the spec file name, which was taken from the archive name (rt71w-firmware) or taken from the chipset suffix rt2571w... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 14:43:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 10:43:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249892] Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708161443.l7GEhsAq005752@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249892 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-16 10:43 EST ------- Once you rebuilt this, please close this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 14:51:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 10:51:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252046] Review Request: util-linux-ng (util-linux replacement) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708161451.l7GEpS97006832@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: util-linux-ng (util-linux replacement) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252046 mgarski at post.pl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mgarski at post.pl ------- Additional Comments From mgarski at post.pl 2007-08-16 10:51 EST ------- FYI: Maybe you could switch to floppy-0.16? (http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=20137) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 15:35:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 11:35:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708161535.l7GFZ7w0012997@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 mefoster at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(mefoster at gmail.com| |) | ------- Additional Comments From mefoster at gmail.com 2007-08-16 11:35 EST ------- Argh, dammit, I made those changes right after receiving your last message, but I never actually uploaded them. *sigh* As a bonus, ZeroC has released version 3.2.1 in the meantime, so here's a new srpm and spec. (The website I normally put these on is having trouble, so they're on a different server.) http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/mef/extras/ice-3.2.1-1.fc7.src.rpm http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/mef/extras/ice.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 15:37:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 11:37:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251680] Review Request: amtterm - Serial-over-lan (sol) client for Intel AMT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708161537.l7GFbxNO013867@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: amtterm - Serial-over-lan (sol) client for Intel AMT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251680 kraxel at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 15:38:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 11:38:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251680] Review Request: amtterm - Serial-over-lan (sol) client for Intel AMT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708161538.l7GFcgWi014005@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: amtterm - Serial-over-lan (sol) client for Intel AMT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251680 ------- Additional Comments From kraxel at redhat.com 2007-08-16 11:38 EST ------- Updated to version 0.3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 16:37:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 12:37:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252124] Review Request: filezilla - FileZilla is a fast FTP and SFTP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708161637.l7GGbSAp021490@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filezilla - FileZilla is a fast FTP and SFTP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252124 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-08-16 12:37 EST ------- Actually, there is a problem while handling locales with this version... Upstream is adviced, (hardcoded configure options will be removed for better handling locales...) Will changes license to GPLv2+ next time (may change to GPLv3, but not done...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 16:42:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 12:42:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251529] Review Request: armacycles-ad - A lightcycle game in 3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708161642.l7GGgltu022212@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: armacycles-ad - A lightcycle game in 3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251529 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-08-16 12:42 EST ------- Ok, I've addressed most of #4-#5, and part of #6. Not sure how to rid my self of /usr/etc. Also, for the language, resource and script bits that are duplicated, should I just put them in /usr/share/armacycles-ad-common/language||resource||scripts and put symlinks in the main and -dedicated packages? Still need to work on the init script. Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/armacycles-ad/armacycles-ad.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/armacycles-ad/armacycles-ad-0.2.8.2.1-3.final.1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 17:09:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 13:09:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252418] Review Request: gtk-vnc - a VNC viewer widget for GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708161709.l7GH9qYC025086@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-vnc - a VNC viewer widget for GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252418 ------- Additional Comments From berrange at redhat.com 2007-08-16 13:09 EST ------- Applied the patch, changed the permissions (although its pointless since they get set to neccessary mode when the spec is finally imported into CVS) and removed duplicated docs. Updated src.rpm at: http://fedorapeople.org/~berrange/review/gtk-vnc/gtk-vnc-0.1.0-3.fc8.src.rpm New spec file at same url as before. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 17:18:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 13:18:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253020] New: Review Request: animorph - Libraries for animorph Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253020 Summary: Review Request: animorph - Libraries for animorph Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/makehuman/animorph.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/makehuman/animorph-0.2-1.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Description: Libraries for animorph -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 17:20:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 13:20:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253022] New: Review Request: mhgui - Libraries for mhgui Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253022 Summary: Review Request: mhgui - Libraries for mhgui Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/makehuman/mhgui.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/makehuman/mhgui-0.1-1.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Description: Libraries for mhgui -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 17:20:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 13:20:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253022] Review Request: mhgui - Libraries for mhgui In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708161720.l7GHKiuZ026592@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mhgui - Libraries for mhgui https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253022 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |253020 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 17:20:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 13:20:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253020] Review Request: animorph - Libraries for animorph In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708161720.l7GHKjmi026617@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: animorph - Libraries for animorph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253020 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |253022 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 17:21:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 13:21:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253024] New: Review Request: makehuman - Modeling of three-dimensional humanoid characters Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253024 Summary: Review Request: makehuman - Modeling of three- dimensional humanoid characters Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/makehuman/makehuman.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/makehuman/makehuman-0.9-1.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Description: Modeling of three-dimensional humanoid characters -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 17:22:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 13:22:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253024] Review Request: makehuman - Modeling of three-dimensional humanoid characters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708161722.l7GHMs1W027046@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: makehuman - Modeling of three-dimensional humanoid characters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253024 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |253022 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 17:22:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 13:22:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253022] Review Request: mhgui - Libraries for mhgui In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708161722.l7GHMt5b027071@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mhgui - Libraries for mhgui https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253022 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |253024 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 17:25:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 13:25:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222888] Review Request: Tiquit - A PHP5-compatible help desk incident tracking/knowledgebase system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708161725.l7GHPpPx027490@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Tiquit - A PHP5-compatible help desk incident tracking/knowledgebase system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222888 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-08-16 13:25 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: tiquit New Branches: F-7 Not sure why this isn't there. . . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 17:50:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 13:50:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 219889] Review Request: bootchart - a utility for profiling the boot process In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708161750.l7GHorJi032175@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bootchart - a utility for profiling the boot process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219889 caillon at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|green at redhat.com |caillon at redhat.com CC| |green at redhat.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review- ------- Additional Comments From caillon at redhat.com 2007-08-16 13:50 EST ------- Comandeering this package review... % rpmlint *rpm W: bootchart invalid-license GPL W: bootchart invalid-license GPL W: bootchart-logger non-standard-group System/Boot W: bootchart-logger invalid-license GPL * Please choose one of GPL+, GPLv2, GPLv2+, GPLv3, GPLv3+. See various mailing list threads about it. Also, I'll note that one of the files you install (/usr/share/doc/bootchart-0.9/LICENSE.compress.txt) mentions the Apache License. Might want to figure out what's up with that. * System Environment/Base seems to be the right group for the logger * Preserve your file timestamps by using the -p flag to install(1) * There's a new preferred buildroot of the day, it appears, though you're using the second-best version of it. Just figured I'd point that out since it humors me. * I'll assume this builds under mock. If it doesn't you'll find out when you try to build into koji. * Also, is this package really useful without the logger subpackage? Might consider killing the subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 17:59:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 13:59:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 219889] Review Request: bootchart - a utility for profiling the boot process In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708161759.l7GHx1pG000823@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bootchart - a utility for profiling the boot process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219889 ------- Additional Comments From caillon at redhat.com 2007-08-16 13:58 EST ------- Oh and if you don't kill the subpackage, you need to Requires: %{name} from it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 18:04:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:04:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249892] Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708161804.l7GI4rNF001378@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249892 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 18:21:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:21:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253043] New: Review Request: elftoaout - A utility for converting ELF binaries to a.out binaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253043 Summary: Review Request: elftoaout - A utility for converting ELF binaries to a.out binaries Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dennis at ausil.us QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ausil.us/packages/elftoaout.spec SRPM URL: http://ausil.us/packages/elftoaout-2.3-8.fc8.src.rpm Description: The elftoaout utility converts a static ELF binary to a static a.out binary. If you're using an ELF system (i.e., Fedora) on a SPARC, you'll need to run elftoaout on the kernel image so that the SPARC PROM can netboot the image. If you're installing Fedora on a SPARC, you'll need to install the elftoaout package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 18:27:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:27:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252456] Review Request: silo - The SILO boot loader for SPARCs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708161827.l7GIRk2q004977@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: silo - The SILO boot loader for SPARCs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252456 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |253043 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-08-16 14:27 EST ------- Teach me for submitting a package before i go to bed. elftoaout needs adding also i submitted a review for it. Fixed the issues and built in mock. If you want to build on sparc i can give you access to a machine. SPEC: http://ausil.us/packages/silo.spec SRPM: http://ausil.us/packages/silo-1.4.13-4.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 18:27:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:27:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253043] Review Request: elftoaout - A utility for converting ELF binaries to a.out binaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708161827.l7GIRnQ7005027@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elftoaout - A utility for converting ELF binaries to a.out binaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253043 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |252456 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 18:33:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:33:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251529] Review Request: armacycles-ad - A lightcycle game in 3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708161833.l7GIX6wZ006083@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: armacycles-ad - A lightcycle game in 3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251529 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-16 14:33 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=161672) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=161672&action=view) Updated specfile (In reply to comment #9) > Ok, I've addressed most of #4-#5, and part of #6. Not sure how to rid my self > of /usr/etc. > Attached is a specfile which fixes /usr/etc and a couple of other things. I hope you don't mind me doing it this way, thats easier then typing a long list of Must Fix items. Notice that rpmlint still complains about some none executable scripts / scripts without shebang, these need to be fixed too, I wonder if we need to ship these scripts at all, they seam maintainer oriented and are probably not needed to play the game. > Also, for the language, resource and script bits that are duplicated, should I > just put them in /usr/share/armacycles-ad-common/language||resource||scripts and > put symlinks in the main and -dedicated packages? > Ah, I thought the 2 packages used the same dir under /usr/share, as it turns out they both have there own dir, its ok to leave things as as. Last, please remove Version=1.0 from the .desktop, .desktop files should not contain a Version= field. An also please remove "Applcation;" from the Categories field in the .desktop file, thats wrong too. p.s. Great job in getting the trademark issue cleared, it will be good to have this in Fedora! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 18:59:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:59:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226275] Merge Review: perl-PDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708161859.l7GIxL9H009087@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-PDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226275 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-08-16 14:59 EST ------- Looks good to me. APPROVED. I haven't sent any patches upstream, I haven't yet managed to subscribe to PDL-porters. Looks like that there are similar patches for some of this issues in upstream CVS. I would be nice if they did a new release, it's been almost a full year since the last one. I'd love to see this make it into EPEL for EL-5 at least. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 19:15:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 15:15:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253043] Review Request: elftoaout - A utility for converting ELF binaries to a.out binaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708161915.l7GJF29s011755@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elftoaout - A utility for converting ELF binaries to a.out binaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253043 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-08-16 15:15 EST ------- update from irc comments SRPM: http://ausil.us/packages/elftoaout-2.3-9.fc8.src.rpm SPEC: http://ausil.us/packages/elftoaout.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 19:42:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 15:42:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253043] Review Request: elftoaout - A utility for converting ELF binaries to a.out binaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708161942.l7GJg7jU017624@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elftoaout - A utility for converting ELF binaries to a.out binaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253043 jima at beer.tclug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jima at beer.tclug.org Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From jima at beer.tclug.org 2007-08-16 15:42 EST ------- OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: be3bd6f7ba8ae107cbdbaa820ba64f86 elftoaout-2.3.tgz be3bd6f7ba8ae107cbdbaa820ba64f86 elftoaout-2.3.tgz.1 n/a - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane: Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) Provides: elftoaout = 2.3-9.fc8 SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. See below (#1) - Should build on all supported archs See below (#2) - Should function as described. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version 0 bugs - check for outstanding bugs on package. Notes: #1: Package is designed for SPARC. Will it build anywhere else? Is there any practical use for it anywhere else? I won't claim to know. (However, will we need to file ExclusiveArch bugs?) #2: As far as I can tell, it works. It generates the exact same a.out image as Aurora Corona's elftoaout. (Not that that's terribly conclusive...it's a good sign, though.) I think we're probably good for now. We might want to look at DaveM's patch, which is dated 2006-01-03 as opposed to our 2002-06-03-ish patch (and includes the same and then some), but I don't think it's dire. I'm calling elftoaout APPROVED. Pass Go, collect 200 bogomips. It's amusing to note, by the way, that while this package doesn't have any open bugs, it does have two closed ones: BZ#446 and BZ#9679. No, those numbers aren't typos. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 20:17:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 16:17:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226275] Merge Review: perl-PDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708162017.l7GKH83A023615@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-PDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226275 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-08-16 16:17 EST ------- "I'd love to see this make it into EPEL for EL-5 at least." If someone were to file a bug for that, I'd be happy to take a look at it. I'm guessing the deps will be a pain, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 20:50:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 16:50:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253043] Review Request: elftoaout - A utility for converting ELF binaries to a.out binaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708162050.l7GKo8im029657@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elftoaout - A utility for converting ELF binaries to a.out binaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253043 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-08-16 16:50 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: elftoaout Short Description: A utility for converting ELF binaries to a.out binaries Owners: spot, ausil, pjones, jima Branches: InitialCC: Commits by cvsextras: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 20:50:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 16:50:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253043] Review Request: elftoaout - A utility for converting ELF binaries to a.out binaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708162050.l7GKoOZo029743@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elftoaout - A utility for converting ELF binaries to a.out binaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253043 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 20:51:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 16:51:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 219889] Review Request: bootchart - a utility for profiling the boot process In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708162051.l7GKp5Mb029895@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bootchart - a utility for profiling the boot process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219889 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-08-16 16:50 EST ------- Better make that Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 21:02:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 17:02:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251545] Review Request: setroubleshoot-plugins - analysis plugins for setroubleshoot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708162102.l7GL27UM031287@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setroubleshoot-plugins - analysis plugins for setroubleshoot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251545 tmraz at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |setroubleshoot-plugins - |setroubleshoot-plugins - |analysis plugins for |analysis plugins for |setroubleshoot |setroubleshoot Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tmraz at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 21:07:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 17:07:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 219889] Review Request: bootchart - a utility for profiling the boot process In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708162107.l7GL7Udx032251@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bootchart - a utility for profiling the boot process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219889 ajackson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-08-16 17:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > * Please choose one of GPL+, GPLv2, GPLv2+, GPLv3, GPLv3+. See various mailing > list threads about it. Also, I'll note that one of the files you install > (/usr/share/doc/bootchart-0.9/LICENSE.compress.txt) mentions the Apache License. > Might want to figure out what's up with that. Everything looks to be v2+, but then also links against org.apache.commons.compress.tar, which is Apache 2.0. So I'm just claiming it's GPLv3+ for now. I'll ask upstream what they really mean though. > * System Environment/Base seems to be the right group for the logger Done. > * Preserve your file timestamps by using the -p flag to install(1) Done. > * There's a new preferred buildroot of the day, it appears, though you're using > the second-best version of it. Just figured I'd point that out since it humors me. Done. > * I'll assume this builds under mock. If it doesn't you'll find out when you > try to build into koji. Yep. > * Also, is this package really useful without the logger subpackage? Might > consider killing the subpackage. Yeah, it's sort of backwards. The core package is the renderer, the logger is the init wrapper. I could do it as bootchart / bootchart-renderer I guess? The intent is to just have bootchart-logger always active, and let people either render stuff themselves or go to the web UI for it on bootchart.org. New packages and spec at the same URL as before. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 21:23:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 17:23:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252124] Review Request: filezilla - FileZilla is a fast FTP and SFTP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708162123.l7GLNkaG002242@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filezilla - FileZilla is a fast FTP and SFTP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252124 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-08-16 17:23 EST ------- Ok thoses issue are solved upstream... I'm waiting for rc2 to provides fixes, until then, filezilla rc1 with locales fixes is in my kwizart-testing repository for fc7... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 21:29:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 17:29:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251545] Review Request: setroubleshoot-plugins - analysis plugins for setroubleshoot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708162129.l7GLTh8I003291@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setroubleshoot-plugins - analysis plugins for setroubleshoot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251545 ------- Additional Comments From tmraz at redhat.com 2007-08-16 17:29 EST ------- First notes: Incorrect license tag: GPL - should be GPLv2+ instead. rpmlint -v ~/download/setroubleshoot-plugins-1.10.0-1.fc7.src.rpm I: setroubleshoot-plugins checking W: setroubleshoot-plugins tag-in-description BuildRequires: The Buildrequires: python is misplaced into the description. W: setroubleshoot-plugins strange-permission setroubleshoot-plugins.spec 0600 Please assign 0644 permissions. W: setroubleshoot-plugins mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 12, tab: line 49) Is it really necessary to use the leading tabs in the changelog? rpmlint -v setroubleshoot-plugins-1.10.0-1.fc8.noarch.rpm I: setroubleshoot-plugins checking E: setroubleshoot-plugins zero-length /usr/share/doc/setroubleshoot-plugins-1.10.0/TODO E: setroubleshoot-plugins zero-length /usr/share/doc/setroubleshoot-plugins-1.10.0/NEWS E: setroubleshoot-plugins zero-length /usr/share/doc/setroubleshoot-plugins-1.10.0/ChangeLog E: setroubleshoot-plugins zero-length /usr/share/doc/setroubleshoot-plugins-1.10.0/README Perhaps these empty files shouldn't be included in the package? W: setroubleshoot-plugins tag-in-description BuildRequires: W: setroubleshoot-plugins incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.10.1-1 1.10.0-1.fc8 Changelog mentions 1.10.1 Version is 1.10.0. W: setroubleshoot-plugins empty-%postun Shouldn't the setroubleshootd be notified through dbus on uninstall too? In the %post - the dbus-send output+stderr probably should be redirected to /dev/null and also the command safeguarded for non-zero exit status by '||:' As I see there is setroubleshoot repository on hosted.fedoraproject.org would it be possible to also host upstream tarballs there? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 21:43:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 17:43:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253043] Review Request: elftoaout - A utility for converting ELF binaries to a.out binaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708162143.l7GLhebg005313@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elftoaout - A utility for converting ELF binaries to a.out binaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253043 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-08-16 17:43 EST ------- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 22:01:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 18:01:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225522] Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708162201.l7GM1vqX006996@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225522 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|236067 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 22:50:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 18:50:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246046] gtksourceview2 - GtkSourceView v2.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708162250.l7GMo9AM011263@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gtksourceview2 - GtkSourceView v2.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246046 johnp at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|RAWHIDE | ------- Additional Comments From johnp at redhat.com 2007-08-16 18:50 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: gtksourceview2 Branches: OLPC-2 Owners: chris at void.printf.net, johnp at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 22:52:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 18:52:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708162252.l7GMqtwr011560@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-08-16 18:52 EST ------- There is a conflict with ps2eps. file /usr/bin/bbox from install of texlive-2007-0.9.fc7 conflicts with file from package ps2eps-1.64-2.fc8 file /usr/bin/ps2eps from install of texlive-2007-0.9.fc7 conflicts with file from package ps2eps-1.64-2.fc8 file /usr/share/man/man1/ps2eps.1.gz from install of texlive-2007-0.9.fc7 conflicts with file from package ps2eps-1.64-2.fc8 The standalone packaged ps2eps is more recent. The version of tex4ht bundled in texlive is also old. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 22:58:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 18:58:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708162258.l7GMwFaw012210@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-08-16 18:58 EST ------- I cannot rebuild texlive: $ rpmbuild -bp texlive.spec error: Failed build dependencies: texlive-texmf = 2007 is needed by texlive-2007-0.9.fc8.i386 texlive-texmf-afm = 2007 is needed by texlive-2007-0.9.fc8.i386 texlive-texmf-dvips = 2007 is needed by texlive-2007-0.9.fc8.i386 texlive-texmf-fonts = 2007 is needed by texlive-2007-0.9.fc8.i386 texlive-texmf-latex = 2007 is needed by texlive-2007-0.9.fc8.i386 And then, yum install texlive-texmf texlive-texmf-afm texlive-texmf-dvips texlive-texmf-fonts texlive-texmf-latex ends with: Running rpm_check_debug --> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait. ---> Package texlive-texmf-errata-afm.noarch 0:2007-0.9.fc7 set to be updated ---> Package texlive-texmf-errata-fonts.noarch 0:2007-0.9.fc7 set to be updated ---> Package texlive-texmf-latex.noarch 0:2007-0.9.fc7 set to be updated ---> Package texlive-texmf.noarch 0:2007-0.9.fc7 set to be updated ---> Package texlive-texmf-errata-latex.noarch 0:2007-0.9.fc7 set to be updated ---> Package texlive-texmf-dvips.noarch 0:2007-0.9.fc7 set to be updated ---> Package texlive-texmf-common.noarch 0:2007-0.9.fc7 set to be updated ---> Package texlive-texmf-errata.noarch 0:2007-0.9.fc7 set to be updated ---> Package texlive-texmf-errata-common.noarch 0:2007-0.9.fc7 set to be updated ---> Package texlive-texmf-fonts.noarch 0:2007-0.9.fc7 set to be updated ---> Package texlive-texmf-errata-dvips.noarch 0:2007-0.9.fc7 set to be updated ---> Package texlive-texmf-afm.noarch 0:2007-0.9.fc7 set to be updated ERROR with rpm_check_debug vs depsolve: Package latex2html needs tetex-latex, this is not available. Package tetex-elsevier needs tetex-latex, this is not available. Package secante_conf needs tetex-latex, this is not available. Package xmltex needs tetex-latex, this is not available. Package jadetex needs tetex-latex >= 3.0, this is not available. Package linuxdoc-tools needs tetex-latex, this is not available. Package tetex-frogg needs tetex-latex, this is not available. Package a2ps needs tetex-latex, this is not available. Package tetex-tex4ht needs tetex-latex, this is not available. Package passivetex needs tetex, this is not available. Package jadetex needs tetex >= 3.0, this is not available. Package jadetex needs tetex >= 3.0, this is not available. Package bibexport needs tetex, this is not available. Package texinfo-tex needs tetex, this is not available. Package a2ps needs tetex-fonts, this is not available. Package tetex-elsevier needs /usr/bin/texhash, this is not available. Package tetex-elsevier needs /usr/bin/texhash, this is not available. Package tetex-frogg needs /usr/bin/texhash, this is not available. Package tetex-frogg needs /usr/bin/texhash, this is not available. Package tetex-tex4ht needs /usr/bin/texhash, this is not available. Package tetex-tex4ht needs /usr/bin/texhash, this is not available. Package bibexport needs /usr/bin/texhash, this is not available. Package bibexport needs /usr/bin/texhash, this is not available. Package latex2html needs tetex-dvips, this is not available. Package docbook-utils-pdf needs tetex-dvips, this is not available. Package tetex-xdvi needs tetex-dvips = 3.0, this is not available. Package a2ps needs tetex-dvips, this is not available. Complete! I am not sure that it is a good idea to have Obsoletes: tetex-afm <= 3.0 Provides: tetex-afm = 3.0 It seems to me that tetex-afm = 3.0 is then provided and obsoleted at the same time, it may be wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 23:01:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 19:01:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708162301.l7GN19Xl012736@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-08-16 19:01 EST ------- In kpathsea-devel the Requires should be: Requires: kpathsea = %{version}-%{release} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 23:24:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 19:24:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245597] Review Request: pygtksourceview - Python bindings for gtksourceview In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708162324.l7GNOUev014823@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pygtksourceview - Python bindings for gtksourceview https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245597 chris at void.printf.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chris at void.printf.net ------- Additional Comments From chris at void.printf.net 2007-08-16 19:24 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: pygtksourceview Branches: OLPC-2 Owners: chris at void.printf.net, johnp at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 23:26:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 19:26:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245597] Review Request: pygtksourceview - Python bindings for gtksourceview In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708162326.l7GNQE2r015050@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pygtksourceview - Python bindings for gtksourceview https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245597 johnp at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 23:43:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 19:43:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250040] Review Request: new - A simple template system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708162343.l7GNh3Vt016433@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: new - A simple template system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250040 ------- Additional Comments From mike at flyn.org 2007-08-16 19:43 EST ------- I am the upstream maintainer of new. New 1.3.9 hadn't been released yet. 1.3.9 is now available for download and the -2 package uses this released version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 00:26:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 20:26:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239936] Review Request: oyranos - The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708170026.l7H0QrJr019325@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: oyranos - The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239936 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-08-16 20:26 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/oyranos/oyranos.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/oyranos/oyranos-0.1.7-6.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Description: The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS) I've dropped the elektra key registration users should lauch oyranos to set the default for it... I didn't drop -libs sub-package... I'm still a little weak about multibs compatibility... Actually, only cinepaint is using oyranos, so I will move cinepaint for fc8 to multilibs compatibility...(and rebuild fc7 version that live in testing becasue of that) That will be the same scheme as gimp and gimp-libs... To come... There is a new icc_examin 0.44 version that should build externally (from cinepaint). But for now i'm only abble to build it internally from cinepaint... I don't plan to work on it (externally) for Fedora 8... But i will submit a review as soon as I have some success... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 00:42:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 20:42:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247227] Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708170042.l7H0gY1l020726@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method Alias: nabi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247227 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-16 20:42 EST ------- I suggest preparing a new tarball with the unappropriate images removed. Upstream has agreed to remove them in the next release. The new tarball should have a distinct name from the upstream one: say something like nabi-0.18_fedora.tar.gz. Probably need to patch some of the makefiles too for the removed themes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 01:04:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 21:04:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247227] Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708170104.l7H144Tv022461@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method Alias: nabi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247227 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-16 21:03 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=161708) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=161708&action=view) nabi-remove-bad-themes A small shellscript does the theme removal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 01:44:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 21:44:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233522] Review Request: nginx - http and reverse proxy server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708170144.l7H1iutC024566@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nginx - http and reverse proxy server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233522 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora jeremy at hinegardner.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jeremy at hinegardner.org 2007-08-16 21:44 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: nginx New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 02:02:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 22:02:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222888] Review Request: Tiquit - A PHP5-compatible help desk incident tracking/knowledgebase system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708170202.l7H22Wij025558@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Tiquit - A PHP5-compatible help desk incident tracking/knowledgebase system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222888 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-16 22:02 EST ------- cvs done. It's not there because you didn't request it before? ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 02:04:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 22:04:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233522] Review Request: nginx - http and reverse proxy server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708170204.l7H24vL5025817@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nginx - http and reverse proxy server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233522 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-16 22:04 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 03:00:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 23:00:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252421] Review Request: virt-viewer - a viewer for virtualized guest OS graphical consoles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708170300.l7H30rJL030332@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: virt-viewer - a viewer for virtualized guest OS graphical consoles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252421 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 03:29:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 23:29:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252418] Review Request: gtk-vnc - a VNC viewer widget for GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708170329.l7H3TDrN032641@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-vnc - a VNC viewer widget for GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252418 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-16 23:29 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM. + source files match upstream. f0781695819bd00d5ba160205723a3b4 gtk-vnc-0.1.0.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + gtk-vnc-1.0.pc file present. + -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + ldconfig scriptlets are used. + gtk-vnc-0.1.0-3.fc8 rpm =>Provides: libgtk-vnc-1.0.so.0 =>Requires: libatk-1.0.so.0 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libcairo.so.2 libdl.so.2 libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 libglib-2.0.so.0 libgmodule-2.0.so.0 libgnutls.so.13 libgnutls.so.13(GNUTLS_1_3) libgobject-2.0.so.0 libgtk-vnc-1.0.so.0 libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 libpango-1.0.so.0 libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 rtld(GNU_HASH) + gtk-vnc-devel-0.1.0-3.fc8 rpm =>Requires: gnutls-devel gtk-vnc = 0.1.0 gtk2-devel libgtk-vnc-1.0.so.0 pkgconfig pygtk2-devel + gtk-vnc-python-0.1.0-3.fc8 rpm =>Provides: gtkvnc.so =>Requires: gtk-vnc = 0.1.0 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libglib-2.0.so.0 libgobject-2.0.so.0 libgtk-vnc-1.0.so.0 python(abi) = 2.5 rtld(GNU_HASH) + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 03:31:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 23:31:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252421] Review Request: virt-viewer - a viewer for virtualized guest OS graphical consoles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708170331.l7H3VI4W000342@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: virt-viewer - a viewer for virtualized guest OS graphical consoles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252421 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 03:32:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 23:32:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252421] Review Request: virt-viewer - a viewer for virtualized guest OS graphical consoles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708170332.l7H3W7tV000495@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: virt-viewer - a viewer for virtualized guest OS graphical consoles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252421 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-16 23:32 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM. + source files match upstream. 1bb5b589b20f45922a59da25d71c95b3 virt-viewer-0.0.1.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Requires: libatk-1.0.so.0 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libcairo.so.2 libdl.so.2 libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 libglib-2.0.so.0 libgmodule-2.0.so.0 libgnutls.so.13 libgobject-2.0.so.0 libgtk-vnc-1.0.so.0 libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 libpango-1.0.so.0 libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 libvirt.so.0 libxenstore.so.3.0 libxml2.so.2 rtld(GNU_HASH) + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 03:36:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 23:36:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253134] New: Review Request: jlint - Java program checker Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253134 Summary: Review Request: jlint - Java program checker Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: loganjerry at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/jlint/jlint.spec SRPM URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/jlint/jlint-3.1-1.src.rpm Description: Jlint will check your Java code and find bugs, inconsistencies and synchronization problems by doing data flow analysis and building the lock graph. Jlint is extremely fast - even on large projects, it requires only one second to check all classes! It is easy to learn and requires no changes to the class files. Jlint has been used in an industrial environment and successfully uncovered faults with little effort! The original version of Jlint was written by Konstantin Knizhnik. It was extended by Cyrille Artho to perform more extensive synchronization checks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 03:39:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 23:39:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252104] Review Request: perl-Perlbal-XS-HTTPHeaders - Perlbal extension for processing HTTP headers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708170339.l7H3dNH2001322@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Perlbal-XS-HTTPHeaders - Perlbal extension for processing HTTP headers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252104 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-16 23:39 EST ------- change License tag to GPL+ or Artistic -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 03:52:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 23:52:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250804] Review Request: perl-Encode-Detect - Detects the encoding of data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708170352.l7H3qbx3002440@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Encode-Detect - Detects the encoding of data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250804 ------- Additional Comments From nsboyle at gmail.com 2007-08-16 23:52 EST ------- I'm not sponsored, so this isn't official: This builds OK for me in mock i386. I don't have much experience with .spec files for perl modules so I can't reliably make a ton of comments on it. In your Source0: you should consider changing the URL to http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/J/JG/JGMYERS/%{module}-%{version}.tar.gz (or something similar) as that will save you an edit when updating versions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 03:55:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 23:55:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252124] Review Request: filezilla - FileZilla is a fast FTP and SFTP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708170355.l7H3t22S002624@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filezilla - FileZilla is a fast FTP and SFTP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252124 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-16 23:55 EST ------- cool. Just checked in mock and found same problem as No translations found for filezilla in /var/tmp/filezilla-3.0.0-0.2.rc1.fc8-root-mockbuild -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 04:09:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 00:09:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251998] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage - Allows perl modules to check test coverage with Devel::Cover In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708170409.l7H49gVA003959@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage - Allows perl modules to check test coverage with Devel::Cover https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251998 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-17 00:09 EST ------- Got following mock build failure log + make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/00.load...............Can't locate Test/More.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /builddir/build/BUILD/ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage-0.05/blib/lib /builddir/build/BUILD/ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage-0.05/blib/arch /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8 .) at t/00.load.t line 1. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/00.load.t line 1. dubious Test returned status 2 (wstat 512, 0x200) t/mm_coverage...........Can't locate Test/More.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /builddir/build/BUILD/ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage-0.05/blib/lib /builddir/build/BUILD/ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage-0.05/blib/arch /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8 .) at t/mm_coverage.t line 5. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/mm_coverage.t line 5. dubious Test returned status 2 (wstat 512, 0x200) t/mm_coverage_config....Can't locate Test/More.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /builddir/build/BUILD/ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage-0.05/blib/lib /builddir/build/BUILD/ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage-0.05/blib/arch /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8 .) at t/mm_coverage_config.t line 5. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/mm_coverage_config.t line 5. dubious Test returned status 2 (wstat 512, 0x200) t/pod-coverage..........Can't locate Test/More.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /builddir/build/BUILD/ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage-0.05/blib/lib /builddir/build/BUILD/ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage-0.05/blib/arch /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8) at t/pod-coverage.t line 3. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/pod-coverage.t line 3. dubious Test returned status 2 (wstat 512, 0x200) FAILED--5 test scripts could be run, alas--no output ever seen make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 04:12:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 00:12:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253134] Review Request: jlint - Java program checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708170412.l7H4Cvmq004242@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jlint - Java program checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253134 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-17 00:12 EST ------- Is this your first package submission to Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 04:39:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 00:39:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250504] Review Request: blktrace - block IO tracer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708170439.l7H4ddqR006304@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blktrace - block IO tracer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250504 ------- Additional Comments From esandeen at redhat.com 2007-08-17 00:39 EST ------- Ok, blktrace-0.0-0.4.20070730162628git.src.rpm should have those last bits fixed up. -Eric -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 05:25:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 01:25:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233388] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-CalendarButton - Gtk2::Ex::CalendarButton Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708170525.l7H5P0gf008952@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-CalendarButton - Gtk2::Ex::CalendarButton Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233388 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-17 01:24 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 9013466a6dead8c2072e49826e9a7ab7 Gtk2-Ex-CalendarButton-0.01.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs nothing + Provides: perl(Gtk2::Ex::CalendarButton) = 0.01 + Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(Glib) perl(Gtk2) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 05:26:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 01:26:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251998] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage - Allows perl modules to check test coverage with Devel::Cover In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708170526.l7H5QleV009229@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage - Allows perl modules to check test coverage with Devel::Cover https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251998 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-17 01:26 EST ------- good to have t/* added under %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 05:26:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 01:26:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252104] Review Request: perl-Perlbal-XS-HTTPHeaders - Perlbal extension for processing HTTP headers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708170526.l7H5QvJq009273@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Perlbal-XS-HTTPHeaders - Perlbal extension for processing HTTP headers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252104 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-17 01:26 EST ------- good to have t/* added under %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 05:59:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 01:59:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 219889] Review Request: bootchart - a utility for profiling the boot process In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708170559.l7H5xmkw011612@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bootchart - a utility for profiling the boot process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219889 ------- Additional Comments From caillon at redhat.com 2007-08-17 01:59 EST ------- Erm, I see no new packages on several computars... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 07:05:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 03:05:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252104] Review Request: perl-Perlbal-XS-HTTPHeaders - Perlbal extension for processing HTTP headers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708170705.l7H75Ahs015322@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Perlbal-XS-HTTPHeaders - Perlbal extension for processing HTTP headers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252104 ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2007-08-17 03:05 EST ------- > change License tag to GPL+ or Artistic Actually, there's no license information in the tarball. I asked upstream for clarification > good to have t/* added under %doc What are the advantages of doing that? make check already runs on the buildservers, and adding tests to doc is not a very common thing to do for perl packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 07:09:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 03:09:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252104] Review Request: perl-Perlbal-XS-HTTPHeaders - Perlbal extension for processing HTTP headers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708170709.l7H79FQK015829@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Perlbal-XS-HTTPHeaders - Perlbal extension for processing HTTP headers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252104 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-08-17 03:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > > change License tag to GPL+ or Artistic > > Actually, there's no license information in the tarball. Wrong. As with most perl-dists, it's inlined into the source code: http://search.cpan.org/~marksmith/Perlbal-XS-HTTPHeaders-0.19/lib/Perlbal/XS/HTTPHeaders.pm#COPYRIGHT_AND_LICENSE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 07:15:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 03:15:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252104] Review Request: perl-Perlbal-XS-HTTPHeaders - Perlbal extension for processing HTTP headers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708170715.l7H7FgBF016210@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Perlbal-XS-HTTPHeaders - Perlbal extension for processing HTTP headers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252104 ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2007-08-17 03:15 EST ------- Sorry, your right, missed that. New version: http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/perl-Perlbal-XS-HTTPHeaders-0.19-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 07:33:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 03:33:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225767] Merge Review: fonts-korean In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708170733.l7H7XC7K017386@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-korean https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225767 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-17 03:33 EST ------- The Source1 and Source2 fields should list the full url to the source: Source1: http://kldp.net/frs/download.php/1428/baekmuk-bdf-2.2.tar.gz Source2: http://kldp.net/frs/download.php/1429/baekmuk-ttf-2.2.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 08:15:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 04:15:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239936] Review Request: oyranos - The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708170815.l7H8F4Td021781@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: oyranos - The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239936 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-17 04:15 EST ------- Currently I meet a strange buildroot failure on koji so I cannot rebuild your new srpm and I am asking fedora-devel mailing list why... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 08:15:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 04:15:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708170815.l7H8FGkM021818@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-17 04:15 EST ------- Currently I meet a strange buildroot failure on koji so I cannot rebuild your new srpm and I am asking fedora-devel mailing list why... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 08:43:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 04:43:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252104] Review Request: perl-Perlbal-XS-HTTPHeaders - Perlbal extension for processing HTTP headers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708170843.l7H8hi3Q024624@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Perlbal-XS-HTTPHeaders - Perlbal extension for processing HTTP headers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252104 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-17 04:43 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url d011eeda6adedf069620e11e6d701b77 Perlbal-XS-HTTPHeaders-0.19.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/HTTPHeaders....ok All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=31, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.19 cusr + 0.02 csys = 0.21 CPU) + exit 0 + Provides: HTTPHeaders.so perl(Perlbal::XS::HTTPHeaders) = 0.19 + Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) libstdc++.so.6 libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4) perl >= 0:5.008 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(AutoLoader) perl(Carp) perl(Exporter) perl(Perlbal) perl(Perlbal::HTTPHeaders) perl(XSLoader) perl(strict) perl(warnings) rtld(GNU_HASH) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 08:49:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 04:49:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253163] New: Review Request: sazanami-fonts - Sazanami Japanese TrueType fonts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253163 Summary: Review Request: sazanami-fonts - Sazanami Japanese TrueType fonts Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tagoh at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/sazanami-fonts/sazanami-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/sazanami-fonts/sazanami-fonts-0.20040629-1.20061016.fc8.src.rpm Description: This package contains Japanese TrueType fonts. Sazanami type faces are automatically generated from Wadalab font kit. These also contains some bitmap fonts except naga10, 10pt bitmap font. which the original fonts contains. it was removed for the license issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 08:49:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 04:49:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708170849.l7H8nifT025151@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-17 04:49 EST ------- Updated: SRPM: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/netgen/netgen-1.3.7-9.fc7.src.rpm SPEC: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/netgen/netgen.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 08:52:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 04:52:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253163] Review Request: sazanami-fonts - Sazanami Japanese TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708170852.l7H8q417025308@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sazanami-fonts - Sazanami Japanese TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253163 tagoh at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |253149 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 09:10:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 05:10:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253134] Review Request: jlint - Java program checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708170910.l7H9Aql7028890@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jlint - Java program checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253134 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-08-17 05:10 EST ------- No, Jerry (in case you're the same Jerry James) already maintains some packages in Fedora. Dunno whether the different email address here from the earlier ones is a problem (earlier are assigned to Jerry.James at usu.edu in the no longer used owners.list) jlint is already in Fedora CVS, orphaned and dropped from the distro a few releases ago. I used to maintain it, and speaking from that experience, I would suggest using the package already in CVS as the base, or most importantly using Konstantin Knizhnik's original 1.x versions instead of the extended 3.x ones. When I last compared them, 1.x gave much better results than 3.x which reported lots of false positives, which is why I kept the Fedora package at 1.x. I don't remember more details and I'm no longer using jlint, so I'm afraid there's no more info about this I can share. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 10:09:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 06:09:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253175] New: Review Request: jisksp16-1990-fonts - 16x16 JIS X 0212:1990 Bitmap font Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253175 Summary: Review Request: jisksp16-1990-fonts - 16x16 JIS X 0212:1990 Bitmap font Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tagoh at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/jisksp16-1990-fonts/jisksp16-1990-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/jisksp16-1990-fonts/jisksp16-1990-fonts-0.983-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This package provides 16x16 Japanese bitmap font for JIS X 0212:1990. JIS X 0212:1990 is a character sets that contains the auxiliary kanji characters. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 11:10:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 07:10:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252046] Review Request: util-linux-ng (util-linux replacement) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171110.l7HBAWI3007422@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: util-linux-ng (util-linux replacement) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252046 ------- Additional Comments From kzak at redhat.com 2007-08-17 07:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > License: GPLv2 and GPLv2+ and BSD and Public Domain > [Should "BSD" be "BSD with advertising"?] Well, fixed in upstream tree. (In reply to comment #6) > FYI: Maybe you could switch to floppy-0.16? > (http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=20137) Good point. Thanks. I need to review this version. Now I'd like to introduce util-linux-ng to Fedora with the old and well tested floppy version. We can update it later. It's nothing urgent. All? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 11:30:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 07:30:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252046] Review Request: util-linux-ng (util-linux replacement) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171130.l7HBUNBn009645@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: util-linux-ng (util-linux replacement) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252046 mitr at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mitr at redhat.com 2007-08-17 07:30 EST ------- To avoid another iteration - approved, but the approval is conditional on fixing the License field as shown in comment #5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 11:32:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 07:32:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252946] Review Request: xmms2 - X-platform Music Multiplexing System 2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171132.l7HBWQ93009821@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms2 - X-platform Music Multiplexing System 2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252946 ------- Additional Comments From patrice.bouchand.fedora at gmail.com 2007-08-17 07:32 EST ------- Spec URL: http://patrice.bouchand.free.fr/rpm/xmms2.spec SRPM URL: http://patrice.bouchand.free.fr/rpm/xmms2-0.2-0.3.DrJekyll.fc7.src.rpm Add Requires: pkgconfig in -devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 11:34:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 07:34:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252046] Review Request: util-linux-ng (util-linux replacement) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171134.l7HBYDCH010001@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: util-linux-ng (util-linux replacement) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252046 ------- Additional Comments From kzak at redhat.com 2007-08-17 07:34 EST ------- Yes, I will update in spec file to: License: GPLv2 and GPLv2+ and BSD with advertising and Public Domain -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 11:53:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 07:53:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252046] Review Request: util-linux-ng (util-linux replacement) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171153.l7HBrPcd011549@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: util-linux-ng (util-linux replacement) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252046 kzak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kzak at redhat.com 2007-08-17 07:53 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: util-linux-ng Short Description: basic linux utils Owners: kzak at redhat.com Branches: InitialCC: Commits by cvsextras: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 12:07:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 08:07:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253191] New: Exist XML database Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253191 Summary: Exist XML database Product: Fedora Version: f8test1 Platform: All URL: http://exist-db.org/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dojo_ten at yahoo.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Now that IcedTea will bring complete support for Java to Fedora 8, I suggest that Exist XML database be added. Maybe it could be even be compiled to native code using gcj? It is written in Java, has LGPL license, is actively developed (participates in Google SOC 07) and offers a quite complete set of standard features. XML databasing is a new paradigm that has only advantages to RDBMS, performance issues aside. It deserves more acceptance though, and therefore it needs better availability. Then it could benefit a lot of applications now relying on RDBMS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 12:16:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 08:16:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171216.l7HCGknL013517@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-08-17 08:16 EST ------- ping Bryan, afaict, I've fixed the MUST items you asked for... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 12:34:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 08:34:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225667] Merge Review: cryptsetup-luks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171234.l7HCY9cv014821@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: cryptsetup-luks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225667 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED CC| |opensource at till.name Flag|needinfo?(pjones at redhat.com)| ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-08-17 08:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > 1. Might have the devel subpackage > Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} > instead of just > Requires: %{name} = %{version} committed in devel > 2. Ditto the docs comments from comment #2. commited in devel > 3. rpmlint says: > E: cryptsetup-luks statically-linked-binary /sbin/cryptsetup > > Needs to be static per the bug mentioned in the changelog. not anymore, it is build dynamically in devel > E: cryptsetup-luks zero-length /usr/share/doc/cryptsetup-luks-1.0.3/NEWS > E: cryptsetup-luks zero-length /usr/share/doc/cryptsetup-luks-1.0.3/README > > Should be removed, per issue 2 commited in devel > Can be ignored. > > 4. 1.0.4 is out, perhaps upgrade to that? Updated to 1.0.5 in devel > 5. Should the static lib be shipped in the devel package here? > Is there anything that uses it? Static stuff has been removed in devel. > 6. 8 outstanding bugs. Might look at those. I think at least one should > be solved by upgrading to 1.0.4, possibly more. done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 12:40:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 08:40:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252104] Review Request: perl-Perlbal-XS-HTTPHeaders - Perlbal extension for processing HTTP headers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171240.l7HCe2mi015409@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Perlbal-XS-HTTPHeaders - Perlbal extension for processing HTTP headers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252104 ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2007-08-17 08:39 EST ------- Thanks Parag New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Perlbal-XS-HTTPHeaders Short Description: Perlbal extension for processing HTTP Headers Owners: ruben at rubenkerkhof.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 13:54:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 09:54:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216734] Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171354.l7HDsTgQ027114@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216734 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2007-08-17 09:54 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gnome-compiz-manager Short Description: Compiz configuration utility Owners: jpmahowa Branches: F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 14:07:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 10:07:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252418] Review Request: gtk-vnc - a VNC viewer widget for GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171407.l7HE7Sk7028852@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-vnc - a VNC viewer widget for GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252418 berrange at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From berrange at redhat.com 2007-08-17 10:07 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gtk-vnc Short Description: gtk-vnc is a VNC viewer widget for GTK Owners: berrange,hbrock Branches: F-7 InitialCC: Commits by cvsextras: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 14:09:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 10:09:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252421] Review Request: virt-viewer - a viewer for virtualized guest OS graphical consoles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171409.l7HE9DqZ029177@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: virt-viewer - a viewer for virtualized guest OS graphical consoles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252421 berrange at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From berrange at redhat.com 2007-08-17 10:09 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: virt-viewer Short Description: A graphical console client for connecting to virtual machines. Owners: berrange,hbrock Branches: F-7 InitialCC: Commits by cvsextras: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 14:23:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 10:23:14 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_248224=5D_Review_Request=3A_iwl4965-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_4965_A/G?= =?iso-8859-1?q?/N_network_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171423.l7HENE6s031171@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iwl4965-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 4965 A/G/N network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248224 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-08-17 10:23 EST ------- SRPMS: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/7/testing/iwl4965-firmware/iwl4965-firmware-4.44.1.18-1.src.rpm SPEC: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/7/testing/iwl4965-firmware/iwl4965-firmware.spec Description: Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 4965 A/G/N network adaptors This package now bundle two firmwares (like ipw2200 do previously) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 14:23:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 10:23:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253134] Review Request: jlint - Java program checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171423.l7HENT3I031231@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jlint - Java program checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253134 ------- Additional Comments From loganjerry at gmail.com 2007-08-17 10:23 EST ------- I'm the same Jerry James. I changed jobs, and hence email addresses. I updated my Fedora Account with the new email address, and added an identity to my GPG key. Is there something else I need to do? Did I miss a wiki page somewhere on what to do when one's email address changes? The web page where I found jlint listed as an orphan said it had been removed from CVS. Is that information incorrect? I've never compared the 1.x version to the 3.x version. I'll do that before proceeding further with this request. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 14:40:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 10:40:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253232] New: Review Request: system-config-firewall - graphical interface for basic firewall setup Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253232 Summary: Review Request: system-config-firewall - graphical interface for basic firewall setup Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: twoerner at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://twoerner.fedorapeople.org/system-config-firewall.spec SRPM URL: http://twoerner.fedorapeople.org/system-config-firewall-1.0.2-2.fc8.src.rpm Description: system-config-firewall replaces system-config-securitylevel. The SELinux configuration has been dropped from this tool, because there is system-config-selinux. s-c-firewall contains compat files for anaconda, firstboot and system-config-kickstart until these are updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 14:48:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 10:48:57 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_248224=5D_Review_Request=3A_iwl4965-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_4965_A/G?= =?iso-8859-1?q?/N_network_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171448.l7HEmvxr003354@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iwl4965-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 4965 A/G/N network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248224 ------- Additional Comments From linville at redhat.com 2007-08-17 10:48 EST ------- ACK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 14:54:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 10:54:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230161] Review Request: rt61-firmware - Firmware for RT61 802.11 wireless devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171454.l7HEsbbo004146@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rt61-firmware - Firmware for RT61 802.11 wireless devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230161 ------- Additional Comments From linville at redhat.com 2007-08-17 10:54 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=161738) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=161738&action=view) LICENSE.ralink-firmware.txt License received in email dated Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:18:00 +0800 from Paul Lin . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 14:55:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 10:55:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233388] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-CalendarButton - Gtk2::Ex::CalendarButton Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171455.l7HEtZ36004348@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-CalendarButton - Gtk2::Ex::CalendarButton Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233388 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-08-17 10:55 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Gtk2-Ex-CalendarButton Short Description: Gtk2::Ex::CalendarButton Perl module Owners: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Branches: FC-6, F-7, devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 14:55:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 10:55:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233388] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-CalendarButton - Gtk2::Ex::CalendarButton Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171455.l7HEtbKB004379@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-CalendarButton - Gtk2::Ex::CalendarButton Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233388 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 14:57:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 10:57:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253134] Review Request: jlint - Java program checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171457.l7HEvdbo004614@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jlint - Java program checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253134 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-08-17 10:57 EST ------- I suppose the mail address is ok, I just didn't recognize it. jlint is in CVS, except for the FC-6 and F-7 branches. FC-5 contains the last revision I've worked on, and devel contains just the "dead.package" marker file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 15:05:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 11:05:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252046] Review Request: util-linux-ng (util-linux replacement) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171505.l7HF5Q8v005653@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: util-linux-ng (util-linux replacement) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252046 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-08-17 11:05 EST ------- Note that with a scary license tag like that, you really need to describe somewhere in the spec which files are under which license. See the "Multiple Licensing Scenarios" section of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 15:08:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 11:08:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253191] Exist XML database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171508.l7HF81hP006046@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Exist XML database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253191 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-08-17 11:07 EST ------- This really isn't a package review request since you're not submitting a package for review. Could you add this to the wishlist at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WishList ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 15:08:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 11:08:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252950] Review Request: othello - Classic board game with ai plugins and network support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171508.l7HF8jP6006128@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: othello - Classic board game with ai plugins and network support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252950 jlu3389 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jlu3389 at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From jlu3389 at gmail.com 2007-08-17 11:08 EST ------- jlu3389 at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 15:15:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 11:15:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252950] Review Request: othello - Classic board game with ai plugins and network support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171515.l7HFFm9e007263@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: othello - Classic board game with ai plugins and network support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252950 cnjoyfun at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cnjoyfun at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From cnjoyfun at gmail.com 2007-08-17 11:15 EST ------- Can I do sth for this proj -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 15:34:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 11:34:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252950] Review Request: othello - Classic board game with ai plugins and network support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171534.l7HFYuqN011786@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: othello - Classic board game with ai plugins and network support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252950 bbbush.yuan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bbbush.yuan at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From bbbush.yuan at gmail.com 2007-08-17 11:34 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=161745) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=161745&action=view) Initial review during #fedora-cn meetings Not a formal review. One rpmlint warning is still there. Split to main and -devel packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 15:37:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 11:37:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252104] Review Request: perl-Perlbal-XS-HTTPHeaders - Perlbal extension for processing HTTP headers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171537.l7HFbcb0012598@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Perlbal-XS-HTTPHeaders - Perlbal extension for processing HTTP headers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252104 ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2007-08-17 11:37 EST ------- Oops, wrong flag New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Perlbal-XS-HTTPHeaders Short Description: Perlbal extension for processing HTTP Headers Owners: ruben Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 15:40:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 11:40:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253249] New: Review Request: classads - a powerful and flexible, semi-structured representation of data Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253249 Summary: Review Request: classads - a powerful and flexible, semi-structured representation of data Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mfarrellee at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://grid.et.redhat.com/files/classads.spec SRPM URL: http://grid.et.redhat.com/files/classads-1.0-rc2.src.rpm Description: Classified Advertisements (classads) are the lingua franca of Condor. They are used for describing jobs, workstations, and other resources. They are exchanged by Condor processes to schedule jobs. They are logged to files for statistical and debugging purposes. They are used to enquire about current state of the system. // A classad is a mapping from attribute names to expressions. In the simplest cases, the expressions are simple constants (integer, floating point, or string). A classad is thus a form of property list. Attribute expressions can also be more complicated. There is a protocol for evaluating an attribute expression of a classad vis a vis another ad. For example, the expression "other.size > 3" in one ad evaluates to true if the other ad has an attribute named size and the value of that attribute is (or evaluates to) an integer greater than three. Two classads match if each ad has an attribute requirements that evaluates to true in the context of th! e other ad. Classad matching is used by the Condor central manager to determine the compatibility of jobs and workstations where they may be run. NOTES: 1) This is my first package and I need a sponsor 2) The license is currently unacceptable, but negotiations are nearly complete for a compatible license -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 15:41:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 11:41:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253249] Review Request: classads - a powerful and flexible, semi-structured representation of data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171541.l7HFfJQx013385@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: classads - a powerful and flexible, semi-structured representation of data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253249 mfarrellee at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 15:56:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 11:56:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252950] Review Request: othello - Classic board game with ai plugins and network support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171556.l7HFuD7i015620@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: othello - Classic board game with ai plugins and network support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252950 bbbush.yuan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #161745|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From bbbush.yuan at gmail.com 2007-08-17 11:56 EST ------- (From update of attachment 161745) patch against wrong file (not the initial one in srpm but updated slightly to build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 15:57:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 11:57:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171557.l7HFvksM015874@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-17 11:57 EST ------- Well, * I only have i386 * I only tried to rebuild the srpm and I did not do anything else but build fails at least on x86_64 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=107147 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 16:08:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 12:08:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252950] Review Request: othello - Classic board game with ai plugins and network support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171608.l7HG8TpE017666@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: othello - Classic board game with ai plugins and network support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252950 ------- Additional Comments From bbbush.yuan at gmail.com 2007-08-17 12:08 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=161751) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=161751&action=view) The right one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 16:14:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 12:14:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245760] Review Request: engine_pkcs11 - A PKCS11 engine for use with OpenSSL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171614.l7HGEQJG019040@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: engine_pkcs11 - A PKCS11 engine for use with OpenSSL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245760 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-08-17 12:14 EST ------- engine_pkcs11-0.1.3-4.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 16:14:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 12:14:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245760] Review Request: engine_pkcs11 - A PKCS11 engine for use with OpenSSL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171614.l7HGETNu019078@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: engine_pkcs11 - A PKCS11 engine for use with OpenSSL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245760 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |0.1.3-4.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 16:46:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 12:46:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252950] Review Request: othello - Classic board game with ai plugins and network support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171646.l7HGkAYr021967@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: othello - Classic board game with ai plugins and network support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252950 ------- Additional Comments From hellwolf.misty at gmail.com 2007-08-17 12:46 EST ------- Updated spec : ftp://ftp.fedora.cn/pub/fedora-cn/in-review/othello.spec SRPM : ftp://ftp.fedora.cn/pub/fedora-cn/in-review/othello-0.2.1-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 17:11:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 13:11:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171711.l7HHBEob025641@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-17 13:11 EST ------- I'll look at it. However how can you upload the srpm and build on koji ? Can I do it too ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 17:22:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 13:22:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171722.l7HHMS9E026793@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-17 13:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #35) > However how can you upload the srpm and build on koji ? > Can I do it too ? Yes. Actually I was told from Jason Tibbitts that now we can try to rebuild arbitrary srpm by scratch build: koji build --scratch Currently target may be: dist-f8, dist-fc7-updates-candidate. If the rebuild ends successfully, the result rpms are to be put on http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch//task_/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 17:55:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 13:55:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171755.l7HHt9SR029998@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-17 13:55 EST ------- I just did a quick look and have not rechecked this package fully, however: * Rebuild fails at least on ppc64 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=107108 * This package contains arch-dependent modules and putting them under python_sitelib is not proper. * Please update license tag. * Would you have any idea what is causing rpath issue? the build log on i386 can be found under: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=107155 (I have not checked the build log) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 18:06:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 14:06:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216734] Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171806.l7HI60bH031431@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216734 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 18:14:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 14:14:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251191] Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171814.l7HIEfgA032297@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251191 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-08-17 14:14 EST ------- Nicolas, I noticed that this review has been reassigned back to me. (See comment 12). Are you currently performing the review? If not I'll take it over. Please let me know ASAP. If I don't here in the next few days, I'll assume not. Cheers :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 18:24:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 14:24:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171824.l7HIO5sf001136@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208034 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-17 14:23 EST ------- Now I am sponsoring you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 18:30:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 14:30:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233388] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-CalendarButton - Gtk2::Ex::CalendarButton Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171830.l7HIUsWL001865@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-CalendarButton - Gtk2::Ex::CalendarButton Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233388 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-08-17 14:30 EST ------- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure The format for these requests has changed. Please see. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 18:31:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 14:31:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252046] Review Request: util-linux-ng (util-linux replacement) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171831.l7HIVJxe001929@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: util-linux-ng (util-linux replacement) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252046 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-08-17 14:31 EST ------- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure Please use the new request format. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 18:32:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 14:32:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251998] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage - Allows perl modules to check test coverage with Devel::Cover In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171832.l7HIWw0D002282@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage - Allows perl modules to check test coverage with Devel::Cover https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251998 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-08-17 14:32 EST ------- ok - new spec file and SRPM with fixed BuildRequires: http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage-0.05-2.fc7.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage.spec wrt the suggestion of including tests in %doc - that doesn't seem to be standard procedure for perl rpms in fedora. If we were to do this, I'd rather make the decision to do in wholesale than on a case by case basis. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 18:38:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 14:38:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251191] Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171838.l7HIcRWQ002759@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251191 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-08-17 14:38 EST ------- Well I was expecting Hans to solve the issue state in #8 (maybe some INSTALL="install -p -c" would be better at %install step... ) I don't see anything more to be fixed... Unless you have other comments to make, i can follow the review... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 18:46:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 14:46:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252104] Review Request: perl-Perlbal-XS-HTTPHeaders - Perlbal extension for processing HTTP headers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171846.l7HIkLWl003694@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Perlbal-XS-HTTPHeaders - Perlbal extension for processing HTTP headers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252104 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 18:49:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 14:49:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233388] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-CalendarButton - Gtk2::Ex::CalendarButton Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171849.l7HInVNu004002@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-CalendarButton - Gtk2::Ex::CalendarButton Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233388 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-08-17 14:49 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Gtk2-Ex-CalendarButton Short Description: Gtk2::Ex::CalendarButton Perl module Owners: cweyl Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes InitialCC should be to fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com, but I'm not sure how to specify that anymore... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 18:50:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 14:50:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252421] Review Request: virt-viewer - a viewer for virtualized guest OS graphical consoles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171850.l7HIo9jQ004075@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: virt-viewer - a viewer for virtualized guest OS graphical consoles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252421 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 18:50:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 14:50:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252418] Review Request: gtk-vnc - a VNC viewer widget for GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171850.l7HIoDP6004132@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-vnc - a VNC viewer widget for GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252418 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 18:50:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 14:50:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233388] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-CalendarButton - Gtk2::Ex::CalendarButton Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171850.l7HIonCX004262@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-CalendarButton - Gtk2::Ex::CalendarButton Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233388 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 19:31:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 15:31:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253249] Review Request: classads - a powerful and flexible, semi-structured representation of data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171931.l7HJVYg3011942@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: classads - a powerful and flexible, semi-structured representation of data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253249 ------- Additional Comments From nsboyle at gmail.com 2007-08-17 15:31 EST ------- "Release:" number should reflect ONLY the packaging version (IE- the first time you package= Release: 1, second = Release: 2, etc etc..). It shouldn't have anything whatsoever to do with the upstream source version. This tends to fall under naming so consult http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines Source0 URL should probably be changed to something like ftp://ftp.cs.wisc.edu/condor/classad/c++/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz I don't know that it's required, but it'll certainly save you from forgetting to bump up the version number in Source0: if you ever bump the version of the package. AFAIK, the CHANGELOG included with the source is only used to reflect changes made to the upstream source and should not be used to document changes to the package itself (nor should it be referred to by the packages %changelog section... I believe the two are to be considered mutually exclusive). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 19:52:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 15:52:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708171952.l7HJqrAF017844@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-08-17 15:52 EST ------- > sitelib, license tag Will have to wait till next week when/if I have time (at least the sitelib part). > * Rebuild fails at least on ppc64 some qt4 stuff has issues there, maybe not PyQt4's fault, but hard to speculate based on the build.log. > rpath issue? should be gone, we're now using chrpath -delete -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 20:04:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 16:04:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253249] Review Request: classads - a powerful and flexible, semi-structured representation of data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708172004.l7HK446C019657@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: classads - a powerful and flexible, semi-structured representation of data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253249 ------- Additional Comments From mfarrellee at redhat.com 2007-08-17 16:04 EST ------- I have fixed the Release Tag to be "0.1.rc2" as per the NamingGuidelines I'm going to stick with the explicit Source0 because I would not be able to properly identify the tarball using %name, %version, %release In the future, I'll properly use the %changelog section, though changes will likely also be documented in CHANGELOG New URLs... Spec: http://grid.et.redhat.com/files/classads.spec SRPM: http://grid.et.redhat.com/files/classads-1.0-0.1.rc2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 20:41:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 16:41:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253322] New: Review Request: tomsfastmath - A fast public domain, open source, large integer arithmetic library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253322 Summary: Review Request: tomsfastmath - A fast public domain, open source, large integer arithmetic library Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: noah at coderanger.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dev.laptop.org/~coderanger/rpm/tomsfastmath/tomsfastmath.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.laptop.org/~coderanger/rpm/tomsfastmath/tomsfastmath-0.12-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: TomsFastMath is a fast public domain, open source, large integer arithmetic library written in portable ISO C. It is a port of LibTomMath with optional support for inline assembler multipliers. It has the following features. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 20:49:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 16:49:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253324] New: Review Request: pytomcrypt - Python bindings for libtomcrypt Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253324 Summary: Review Request: pytomcrypt - Python bindings for libtomcrypt Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: noah at coderanger.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dev.laptop.org/~coderanger/rpm/pytomcrypt/pytomcrypt.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.laptop.org/~coderanger/rpm/pytomcrypt/pytomcrypt-0.19-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: A ctypes Python wrapper for LibTomCrypt. Regarding the no-soname warning from rpmlint, I have notified upstream about this, however I don't think it is much of a problem as nothing else should be linking against the included library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 20:57:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 16:57:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249365] Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708172057.l7HKvuBM026429@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249365 ------- Additional Comments From smooge at mindspring.com 2007-08-17 16:57 EST ------- What are the current outstanding issues? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 21:05:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 17:05:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252128] Review Request: telepathy-haze - A multi-protocol Libpurple connection manager for Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708172105.l7HL5c2d027780@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-haze - A multi-protocol Libpurple connection manager for Telepathy Alias: telepathy-haze https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252128 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-08-17 17:05 EST ------- I've updated it to version 0.1.1, which fixes some segfaults when closing text and list channels, and potential g_free corruptions. Spec: http://pgordon.fedorapeople.org/for-review/telepathy-haze.spec SRPM: http://pgordon.fedorapeople.org/for-review/telepathy-haze-0.1.1-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 21:06:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 17:06:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252046] Review Request: util-linux-ng (util-linux replacement) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708172106.l7HL6w2u028094@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: util-linux-ng (util-linux replacement) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252046 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 21:57:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 17:57:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708172157.l7HLv7JP000741@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-08-17 17:57 EST ------- I have checked texlive to give an advice about what should be in texlive and what should be outside. In utils/, I think that everything should be outside, except for tpic2pdftex. sam2p, lcdf-typetools seems to me to be interesting packages for fedora, and there is also pdfopen, even though of less interest, but definitely not in texlive. Now, the big part is texk. I didn't had a look at web2c/ since I assume that everything in that directory is part of texlive. For the remaining, I classified in 3 parts. Directories that are rightly in texlive in my opinion and don't have a license issue (as far as I know), directories that are rightly in texlive but have license issues, and last projects that are also outside of texlive and should be maintained separately in my opinion. For the projects that are also out of texlive and should be maintained separately it seems to me that it would be better if you submitted them separately in parallel, but many depend on kpathsea, so can only be approved after texlive. If you don't like that approach I think that the second best would be to leave out the projects that weren't part of tetex and submit them only after texlive has been accepted. Now lets list the projects. I have also put some notes like the licenses in the list. No problem ---------- cjkutils (conv/ Public Domain, hbf2gf/ Public Domain + BSD, scripts/ GPL), dvipos (GPLv2+) lacheck (GPL+), seetexk (is under dvibook on CTAN; MIT and Copyright Only) ttfdump (GPL) contrib (unuseful in unix; GPL and Public Domain) dvidvi, clarified license here (GPL+): http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/d/dvidvi/dvidvi_1.0-10/dvidvi.copyright xdvipdfmx(GPL), in XeteX, latest seems to be in texlive gsftopk is in CTAN but it isn't the same than in texlive (changes in the main file), although it is the same latest version. No ChangeLog. MIT. http://math.berkeley.edu/~vojta/gsftopk.html points to CTAN owindvi: xdvi launch script (?) Projects from texlive/CTAN, but with license problem ---------------------------------------------------- texlive: unclear license nts.pl A script refers to context, GPL. Remaining right. tetex: GPL, public domain, LPPL context/texmfstart no license, on http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Read_Me it is said that default is GPL e2pall can certainly be considered Public Domain: # Author: Jody Klymak , publisted by a posting # to the pdftex mailinglist. epstopdf unknown license makeindexk (makeindex) is in CTAN/texlive Classical license, and "All modified versions should be reported back to the author." Said to be Public Domain in ACK, but it certainly means free software. dvips page, without interest. Latest is in texlive: http://www.radicaleye.com/dvips.html Only installed are afm2tfm (Public Domain), dvips and *.lpro. License in dvips.h and hps/*: * This is dvips, a freely redistributable PostScript driver * for dvi files. It is (C) Copyright 1986-2004 by Tomas Rokicki. * You may modify and use this program to your heart's content, * so long as you send modifications to Tomas Rokicki. It can * be included in any distribution, commercial or otherwise, so * long as the banner string defined below is not modified (except * for the version number) and this banner is printed on program * invocation, or can be printed on program invocation with the -? option. Some files are under the GPL. unclear license in tex.lpro tex/*.tex contrib/bbfig/bb.ps contrib/pspic/pspic.sty contrib/psfntmac/ps_*.tex contrib/MakeTeXPK.pl no sell: contrib/timesmat.sty from CTAN/texlive, unclear license for: musixflx ps2pkm dtl ttf2pk. Derived from afm2tfm (dvipsk) and gsftopkk dviljk from CTAN/texlive. Based on dvi2xx in dvi2xx.c * Adapted for the PC: Gustaf Neumann In README dviljk is free software; Gustaf's original files are (I believe) public domain. The files I wrote are covered by the GNU General Public License. xdv2pdf from CTAN/texlive. Common Public License, additions (which ones?) under LICENSE.txt BSD. unknown license for SimplePSInterpreter.h, SimplePSInterpreter.m bibtex8 is from CTAN/texlive: some is GPL, ** The original BibTeX was written by Oren Patashnik using Donald ** Knuth's WEB system. This format produces a PASCAL program for ** execution and a TeX documented version of the source code. This ** program started as a (manual) translation of the WEB source into C. Here is bibtex license (same than TeX) % Copying of this file is authorized only if (1) you are Oren Patashnik, or if % (2) you make absolutely no changes to your copy. (The WEB system provides % for alterations via an auxiliary file; the master file should stay intact.) % See Appendix H of the WEB manual for hints on how to install this program. However I have seen written that this restriction is only when the program name isn't changed. Separate projects ----------------- afm2pl last version in texlive, but separate project http://tex.aanhet.net/afm2pl/ GPL COPYING, based on afm2tfm, copyright without license. chktex seems never installed, it is a distinct project. detex latest version in texlive, but it is a separate project. Unclear license. http://www.cs.purdue.edu/homes/trinkle/detex/ devnag latest version in texlive, but it is a separate project. GPL+. http://devnag.sarovar.org/ xdvik (xdvi) http://sourceforge.net/projects/xdvi read-mapfile.c (getpsinfo() in resident.c) tfmload.c stolen from dvips, These file don't have a copyright notice, the include dvips.h * This is dvips, a freely redistributable PostScript driver * for dvi files. It is (C) Copyright 1986-2004 by Tomas Rokicki. * You may modify and use this program to your heart's content, * so long as you send modifications to Tomas Rokicki. It can * be included in any distribution, commercial or otherwise, so * long as the banner string defined below is not modified (except * for the version number) and this banner is printed on program * invocation, or can be printed on program invocation with the -? option. Mostly MIT + GPL ttf2pt1 latest version not in texlive http://ttf2pt1.sourceforge.net/ see COPYRIGHT (BSD), and BSD-like dvi2tty, old in texlive and non free license in texlive. It is in fact free and it is visible in the latest versions: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=424018 http://www.mesa.nl/pub/dvi2tty/ dvipdfm not latest in texlive. Is only for tex distributions, but we qualify as a TeX distribution in that sense. GPLv2+ http://gaspra.kettering.edu/dvipdfm/ dvipdfmx last snapshot more recent, GPLv2+ http://project.ktug.or.kr/dvipdfmx/ dvipng latest in texlive, but it is a separate project: http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/dvipng/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 23:00:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 19:00:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251545] Review Request: setroubleshoot-plugins - analysis plugins for setroubleshoot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708172300.l7HN0qTg004964@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setroubleshoot-plugins - analysis plugins for setroubleshoot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251545 jdennis at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED ------- Additional Comments From jdennis at redhat.com 2007-08-17 19:00 EST ------- Thank you for your review Tomas, its very much appreciated. New files have been loaded at the above URL (sorry, at the moment I don't think FedoraProject will allow puting the files there, at least that used to be case, perhaps it's changed) All the above issues have been addressed, except one. The permissions on the spec file are still 0600 and that seems to be the result of using rpmbuild in tar file mode. The permissions on the spec file in the tar file is 0664. If you use rpmbuld to create the srpm in non-tar file mode the spec file is 0644, but if you use rpmbuild to create the spec file in tar file mode it appears to change the permissions from 0644 in the tar file to 0600, go figure, I don't know why. Other spec files have 0600 and it hasn't created a problem yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 00:10:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 20:10:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708180010.l7I0Aev5008599@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-17 20:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #10) > > (In reply to comment #9) > > > make install still fails for some reason, but I solved it by manually > > creating > > > %{_libdir}/%{name} in the build root before running make install in > > the %install > > > section. > > > > Can i have a look why it's failing on x86_64 arch? > > The problem is simply that the Makefile in lib/ does not check for the existence > of $prefix/%{_libdir}/%{name} before attempting to copy the file. I can create > an account on my x86_64 machine if you want to check for your self, but the > problem can easily be fixed either by adding the directory to the install-dirs > rule in the top level Makefile, or by manually running mkdir -p > %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/%{name} before running make install. > > On the other hand, it seems kind of strange to me to install the scripts in > libdir in the first place. Wouldn't the correct location be libexec? > > Updated: SRPM: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/netgen/netgen-1.3.7-10.fc7.src.rpm SPEC: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/netgen/netgen.spec logs: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/chitlesh/task_107798/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 05:45:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 01:45:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253355] New: Review Request: twill - A simple scripting language for Web browsing Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253355 Summary: Review Request: twill - A simple scripting language for Web browsing Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lmacken at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/twill.spec SRPM URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/twill-0.9-0.1.b1.fc7.src.rpm Description: twill is a simple language that allows users to browse the Web from a command-line interface. With twill, you can navigate through Web sites that use forms, cookies, and most standard Web features. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 07:04:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 03:04:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253358] New: Review Request: compiz-bcop - Compiz option code generator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253358 Summary: Review Request: compiz-bcop - Compiz option code generator Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: adel.gadllah at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/compiz-bcop.spec SRPM URL: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/compiz-bcop-0.5.2-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Compiz-bcop is a tool to autogenerate code for working with options in compiz plugins; this is required to build some plugins NOTES: This is rawhide only and is required for the compiz-fusion plugins that will come next. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 08:43:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 04:43:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253361] New: Review Request: wyrd - A ncurses frontend for the calendar application remind Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253361 Summary: Review Request: wyrd - A ncurses frontend for the calendar application remind Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: opensource at till.name QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/wyrd.spec SRPM URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/wyrd-1.4.3-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: wyrd is a ncurses frontend for the calendar application remind. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 08:47:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 04:47:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253361] Review Request: wyrd - A ncurses frontend for the calendar application remind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708180847.l7I8lHcc004685@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wyrd - A ncurses frontend for the calendar application remind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253361 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmahut at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 09:18:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 05:18:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708180918.l7I9Ijm1006933@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-08-18 05:18 EST ------- 3 other questions: * how did you generate the xpdf tarball? * why the Build dependencies on texlive-texmf*? There is a comment but I don't understand it * why export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=`pwd`/texk/kpathsea/.libs in %install? Nothing is meant to be compiled at that point. X-Red-Hat-Extra and Application categories shouldn't be added to xdvi.desktop. in install-info scriptlets the .gz should be removed. there is still a comment about using internal freetype, although it seems to be fixed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 09:28:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 05:28:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253355] Review Request: twill - A simple scripting language for Web browsing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708180928.l7I9S5AK007758@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: twill - A simple scripting language for Web browsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253355 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-08-18 05:28 EST ------- - The Group-tag is wrong: Group: TODO - iirc is python no longer in the default build eviroment, so this package should not build in devel koji. Afaik you need to add "python-devel" to BuildRequires. - Imho you should remove this defination, because they are not used in the spec: %{!?python_sitearch: %define python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib(1)")} - This should be imho ended with a "/" to show, that it is directory, also it is not working, %{python_sitelib}/%{name}-%{version}-py%{pyver}.egg-info so it should be: %{python_sitelib}/%{name}-%{version}%{beta_ver}-py%{pyver}.egg-info/ (the %{beta_ver} was missing) - The license, which is in docs/LICENSE.txt in the tarball is not packaged. - Also the everything else in docs/ is not packaged but may be useful, e.g. ChangeLog and all the .txt files, and the example in advocacy. - The Requires seem not to be sufficient, too. E.g. it seems that pyhon-mechanize should be required and imho python does not need to be in Requires. - The buildarch should be noarch: BuildArch: noarch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 09:30:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 05:30:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253361] Review Request: wyrd - A ncurses frontend for the calendar application remind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708180930.l7I9UDAP007931@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wyrd - A ncurses frontend for the calendar application remind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253361 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-08-18 05:30 EST ------- Hey Marek, if you want to review this, you need also set "fedora-review" to "?" afaik. Btw. wyrd requires the remind version that is currently in updates-testing. in case you run into problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 09:33:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 05:33:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251191] Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708180933.l7I9XvMt008267@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251191 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-18 05:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > Well I was expecting Hans to solve the issue state in #8 And I was waiting for you and Ian to sort out the who is going to review this issue, as I already said in comment #10, so I guess we were all waiting for eachother :) Anyways here is a new version, notice that I did _not_ add the BuildRequires: libXext-devel, as libXext is no longer needed now that the unused-direct-shlib-dependencies are fixed. * Sat Aug 18 2007 Hans de Goede 1.4.0-3 - Fix multiple unused direct shlib dependencies in libGLEW.so - Remove the "SGI Free Software License B" and "GLX Public License" tekst from the doc dir in the tarbal - Patch credits.html to no longer refer to the 2 non free licenses, instead it now points to LICENSE-README.fedora - Put API docs in -devel instead of main package Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/glew.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/glew-1.4.0-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 09:44:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 05:44:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253361] Review Request: wyrd - A ncurses frontend for the calendar application remind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708180944.l7I9iSGL008961@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wyrd - A ncurses frontend for the calendar application remind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253361 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2007-08-18 05:44 EST ------- You're right. Assigning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 10:12:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 06:12:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253358] Review Request: compiz-bcop - Compiz option code generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708181012.l7IACD1x011212@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-bcop - Compiz option code generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253358 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dev at nigelj.com Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-08-18 06:12 EST ------- Package name: PASS (compiz-bcop) License: PASS (GPLv2+) Spec Legible: PASS (en_US) md5sum matches: PASS rpmlint clean: PASS Builds correctly: PASS (i386) RPaths removed: PASS Spec has %clean: PASS Macro use consistant: PASS Contains code/content: PASS -doc subpackage: NA -devel subpackage: NA -static subpackage: NA pkgconfig depend: PASS Contains %doc: PASS Library suffix: NA No .la files: NA Use desktop-file-install: NA No duplicate ownerships: PASS rm -rf %{buildroot}: PASS RPM uses valid UTF-8: PASS %defattr is set: PASS No duplicate %files: PASS Not relocatable: PASS Calls ldconfig: PASS Supports Locales: NA BR's are correct: PASS NA - Not Applicable NT - Not Tested -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 10:15:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 06:15:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253358] Review Request: compiz-bcop - Compiz option code generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708181015.l7IAFMWT011483@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-bcop - Compiz option code generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253358 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-08-18 06:15 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: compiz-bcop Short Description: Compiz option code generator Owners: drago01, krh Branches: devel Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 10:46:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 06:46:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246215] Review Request: comgt - Linux UMTS/GPRS command-line tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708181046.l7IAk7SF012683@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: comgt - Linux UMTS/GPRS command-line tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246215 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-08-18 06:46 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: comgt Short Description: Linux UMTS/GPRS command-line tool Owners: rpm at greysector.net Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: Commits by cvsextras: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 10:58:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 06:58:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253361] Review Request: wyrd - A ncurses frontend for the calendar application remind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708181058.l7IAwcam013178@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wyrd - A ncurses frontend for the calendar application remind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253361 ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2007-08-18 06:58 EST ------- + make ocamlc.opt -c locale_wrap.c ocamlc.opt -c -g -I ./curses curses/curses.mli ocamlopt.opt -c -I ./curses curses/curses.ml cd curses && ocamlc.opt -ccopt " -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"\" -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"\" -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"\" -DPACKAGE_STRING=\"\" -DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\"\" -DCURSES_HEADER=\ -DCURSES_TERM_H=\ -DHAVE_WIDE_CURSES=1 -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -Wall -fPIC -DPIC" -c ml_curses.c ocamlopt.opt -c -pp camlp4o -I ./curses install.ml sh: camlp4o: command not found Preprocessor error make: *** [install.cmx] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.81178 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.81178 (%build) camlp4o command is missing in dependencies as it's not in ocaml-camlp4 package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 10:59:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 06:59:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253361] Review Request: wyrd - A ncurses frontend for the calendar application remind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708181059.l7IAxoCn013272@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wyrd - A ncurses frontend for the calendar application remind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253361 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(opensource at till.na | |me) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 11:12:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 07:12:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251191] Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708181112.l7IBCNtk013832@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251191 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|packages at amiga-hardware.com |kwizart at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-08-18 07:12 EST ------- Ok then re-assign the bug to me (last time) (mock testing) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 11:27:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 07:27:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251191] Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708181127.l7IBRRbP014466@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251191 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-08-18 07:27 EST ------- * mock tested in fc6 x86_64 * rpmlint on installed package is quiet * Since header files are patched in %prep, it is not relevant to use install -p for headers ------------------- This package (glew) is APPROVED by me ------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 12:25:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 08:25:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708181225.l7ICPe1k017470@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-18 08:25 EST ------- Well, still not good on 64 bits. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/chitlesh/task_107798/logs/x86_64/build.log says : -------------------------------------------- checking for tkConfig.sh... /usr/lib64/tkConfig.sh checking for wish executable... /usr/bin/wish Can't find tcl library Reverting to non-Tcl compile checking for X... libraries , headers -------------------------------------------- Some detailed logs are found on: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=108275 I may try to check how to fix this after I finith commenting on other review requests... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 12:30:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 08:30:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708181230.l7ICUgW3017639@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-18 08:30 EST ------- Still almost the same as comment 21: * okay on i386, ppc: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=108304 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=108308 * not okay on x86_64 A little more fix seems to be needed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=108306 * not okay on ppc64 Maybe you want to disable ppc64 completely... http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=108319 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 14:11:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 10:11:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708181411.l7IEBCOf022548@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From ji.cerny at gmail.com 2007-08-18 10:11 EST ------- Jindrich, is there some interest in building texlive against poppler instead of against the included xpdf. With some copying from debian (unstable) I have managed to do it. There are two ways how to do it. In any case one should modify poppler SRPM to install XPDF headers. This is easy, because poppler has a configure switch to do it. I made these headers to go in a new suppackage, that will be probably usefull only for building TeXlive but anyway. Building TeXlive is then essentially renaming GString to GooString. The only problem is pdftosrc that does not compile. If one decide not to include it in the installation (as debian does now, if I understand it well), the changes to poppler package are really minimal. To include also pdftosrc, one should patch the poppler a little bit more, essentially one should move the definition of class ObjectSteam from XRef.cc to XRef.h. I will attach the second version of patches, both for poppler and texlive, I can provide the first, of course. Hope that it helps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 14:11:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 10:11:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239936] Review Request: oyranos - The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708181411.l7IEBdaX022639@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: oyranos - The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239936 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-18 10:11 EST ------- For 0.1.7-6: * ldconfig - Please call ldconfig for -libs. - And main package does not seem to require ldconfig call * pkgconfig .pc file: - fix up pc files * Name entry is the same * oyranos_monitor.pc - contains duplicate includedir entry - has strange Libs entry (-X11 ?) * oyranos-config -------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost oyranos]$ oyranos-config --version 0.1.7 Package elektra was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing `elektra.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable No package 'elektra' found -------------------------------------------------- - oyranos-config complains elektra.pc is not found (however I don't think oyranos-devel should require elecktra-devel) - And move the corresponding man file (oyranos-config.1) from main package to -devel subpackage. * License - As far as I checked the actual source code, this is licensed under GPLv2+. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 14:12:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 10:12:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708181412.l7IECTso022686@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From ji.cerny at gmail.com 2007-08-18 10:12 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=161796) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=161796&action=view) patch for texlive to compile against poppler -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 14:14:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 10:14:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708181414.l7IEENHe022817@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From ji.cerny at gmail.com 2007-08-18 10:14 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=161797) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=161797&action=view) patch for poppler-0.5.91 to include the Xpdf headers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 15:06:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 11:06:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250040] Review Request: new - A simple template system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708181506.l7IF6BDl025163@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: new - A simple template system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250040 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-18 11:06 EST ------- For -2: * rpmlint - rpmlint (for rpms) complaints about: -------------------------------------------------- E: new non-executable-script /usr/share/new/templates/missing/default 0644 E: new non-executable-script /usr/share/new/templates/py/default 0644 E: new non-executable-script /usr/share/new/templates/sh/default 0644 W: new invalid-license GPL W: new invalid-license GPL W: new setup-not-quiet W: new macro-in-%changelog files W: new macro-in-%changelog doc W: new mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 22, tab: line 112) W: new-debuginfo invalid-license GPL W: new-devel no-documentation W: new-devel invalid-license GPL W: new-java no-documentation E: new-java library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib/libnewfmt_ptrnjni.so.1.3.9 E: new-java library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/libnewfmt_ptrnjni.so.1.3.9 E: new-java library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib/libnewfmt_ptrnjava.so.1.3.9 E: new-java library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/libnewfmt_ptrnjava.so.1.3.9 W: new-java invalid-license GPL ------------------------------------------------------ * Summary - Some scripts have shebangs but don't have executable permission. * If the scripts are to be executed by users directly, then the scripts should have executable permission * If they are to be called by other programs and are not to be executed directory, then shebangs should be removed. - Update License tag according to: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing - Supress verbose messages on %setup. i.e. use %setup -q - In the %changelog, please use %% (i.e. %%files, %%doc) to prevent macros from being expanded. - For identation, please use spaces OR tabs, not both. - Call ldconfig for libnewfmt_ptrnjni.so and so on (and check the section "dependency between main <-> subpackages" written below) * parallel make support: - Rebuild failed on ppc (-j8) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=108280 When I disabled parallel make support, it seems okay http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=108298 So, please either * temporally disable parallel make support * or fix to support parallel make correctly * Unneeded dependency ---------------------------------------------------- Requires: zlib ---------------------------------------------------- - This must be removed. rpmbuild checks and adds the dependency of libraries automatically and the dependency against libz.so should automatically pulls zlib. * %makeinstall - Please don't use %makeinstall unless this is surely needed (check the section "Why the %makeinstall macro should not be used" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines ) * defattr - Now we recommand %defattr(-,root,root,-) * dependency between main <-> subpackages ---------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost new]$ rpm -qp --requires new-1.3.9-2.fc8.1.i386.rpm | grep libnew libnewfmt_ptrn.so.1 libnewfmt_ptrnjava.so.1 libnewfmt_ptrnjni.so.1 libnewtemplate.so.1 [tasaka1 at localhost new]$ rpm -qp --provides new-1.3.9-2.fc8.1.i386.rpm | grep libnew libnewfmt_ptrn.so.1 libnewtemplate.so.1 ---------------------------------------------------- - This is undesirable. This shows that new main package require libnewfmt_ptrnjava.so, but it is not provided by itself and so main package requires -java subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 15:39:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 11:39:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708181539.l7IFdZX6026591@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-08-18 11:39 EST ------- There is support for external libs for most of the libs in texlive, I have a patch for texlive.spec to use it. The trick is to delete the lib dirs only after running configure. It allows to remove some patches and simplify others. More precisely, I removed texlive-build.patch, modified texlive-pdftex.patch and texlive-ttf2pk-freetype.patch and replaced texlive-xetex.patch by texlive-system_teckit.patch. It doesn't work for teckit as using an external teckit isn't supported, hopefully it will be in next releases. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 15:40:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 11:40:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708181540.l7IFehkb026691@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-08-18 11:40 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=161799) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=161799&action=view) use support for external libs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 15:42:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 11:42:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708181542.l7IFgBcM026820@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-08-18 11:42 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=161800) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=161800&action=view) modified texlive-ttf2pk-freetype.patch patch to let texlive handle the link -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 15:43:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 11:43:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708181543.l7IFhMWQ026938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-08-18 11:43 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=161801) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=161801&action=view) modified texlive-pdftex.patch to let texlive handle the link -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 15:44:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 11:44:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708181544.l7IFiB6O027031@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-08-18 11:44 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=161802) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=161802&action=view) patch to use external teckit. Replaces texlive-xetex.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 16:21:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 12:21:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253361] Review Request: wyrd - A ncurses frontend for the calendar application remind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708181621.l7IGLlD4029335@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wyrd - A ncurses frontend for the calendar application remind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253361 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(opensource at till.na| |me) | ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-08-18 12:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > camlp4o command is missing in dependencies as it's not in ocaml-camlp4 package On which Collection are you building it? Is it Rawhide? In Fedora 7 I get this: $ rpm -qf `which camlp4o` camlp4-3.09.3-2.fc7 an camlp4 is in BuildRequires. I will search which is the right package for devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 16:25:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 12:25:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253361] Review Request: wyrd - A ncurses frontend for the calendar application remind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708181625.l7IGPjm3029611@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wyrd - A ncurses frontend for the calendar application remind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253361 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-08-18 12:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > I will search which is the right package for devel. Seems this is: ocaml-camlp4-devel But the camlp4 package in F7 seems not to provides this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 16:35:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 12:35:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253361] Review Request: wyrd - A ncurses frontend for the calendar application remind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708181635.l7IGZLx2030146@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wyrd - A ncurses frontend for the calendar application remind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253361 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-08-18 12:35 EST ------- It seems that ocaml-camlp4-devel should be installed when a spec BuildRequires camlp4, I will see what mock for development does. $ repoquery --quiet --repoid=development --provides ocaml-camlp4-devel Loading "priorities" plugin Loading "protectbase" plugin Loading "skip-broken" plugin 0 packages excluded due to repository priority protections 0 packages excluded due to repository protections camlp4 = 3.10.0-1.fc8 ocaml-camlp4-devel = 3.10.0-1.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 17:31:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 13:31:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708181731.l7IHVjlW000630@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-08-18 13:31 EST ------- texlive-use_xdvi.bin.patch seems to me to be unuseful, the substitution is already performed by configure. Moreover it seems to solve a debian specific issue. Why is there a Requires: flex bison ed It seems to me that lesstif isn't needed. lesstif-devel may be, for the include file Xm/XpmP.h, but X11/xpm.h is used if detected. So I think that there should not be any lesstif related Requires or BuildRequires. I propose a slightly updated texlive-texdoc.patch more fedora centric. The main package should Requires: xdg-utils htmlview -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 17:33:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 13:33:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708181733.l7IHX37D000759@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-08-18 13:33 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=161803) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=161803&action=view) more fedora centric texlive-texdoc.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 17:52:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 13:52:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253361] Review Request: wyrd - A ncurses frontend for the calendar application remind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708181752.l7IHqbRo001724@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wyrd - A ncurses frontend for the calendar application remind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253361 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |253387 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 17:55:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 13:55:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253361] Review Request: wyrd - A ncurses frontend for the calendar application remind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708181755.l7IHtj3G001894@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wyrd - A ncurses frontend for the calendar application remind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253361 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-08-18 13:55 EST ------- Problem is, that camlp4 is provided by two packages in rawhide8, see #253387 $ repoquery --repoid=development --whatprovides camlp4 ocaml-camlp4-0:3.10.0-1.fc8.i386 ocaml-camlp4-devel-0:3.10.0-1.fc8.i386 I want to wait for the answers to #253387, until I adjust the Spec, maybe it will not be neccessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 17:56:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 13:56:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239936] Review Request: oyranos - The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708181756.l7IHurA1001986@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: oyranos - The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239936 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-08-18 13:56 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/oyranos/oyranos.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/oyranos/oyranos-0.1.7-7.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Description: The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS) About oyranos-config. The better fix is to use pkg-config for apps that links to oyranos, but for now cinepaint (and icc_examin, maybe others) still uses oyranos-config. So for now the quickfix is to BuildRequires elektra-devel also... I will use, this in cinepaint to prevent linking issues: # clean unused-direct-shlib-dependencies sed -i -e 's! -shared ! -Wl,--as-needed\0!g' libtool -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 18:20:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 14:20:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253361] Review Request: wyrd - A ncurses frontend for the calendar application remind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708181820.l7IIKfsC003608@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wyrd - A ncurses frontend for the calendar application remind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253361 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2007-08-18 14:20 EST ------- Probably only ocaml-camlp4 should provide camlp4. In F8, if camlp4 is required to build than BuildRequires should be ocaml-camlp4-devel. In F7, it should be BuildRequires: camlp4. The ocaml packages will probably not be updated for F-7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 18:28:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 14:28:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251191] Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708181828.l7IIS9Zs004006@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251191 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-18 14:28 EST ------- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: glew Short Description: The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library Owners: jwrdegoede / j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Branches: FC-6 F-7 devel InitialCC: Commits by cvsextras: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 18:33:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 14:33:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253355] Review Request: twill - A simple scripting language for Web browsing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708181833.l7IIXSpf004264@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: twill - A simple scripting language for Web browsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253355 ------- Additional Comments From lmacken at redhat.com 2007-08-18 14:33 EST ------- Updated RPM: Spec URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/twill.spec SRPM URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/twill-0.9-0.1.b1.fc7.src.rpm I fixed almost everything that you mentioned, Till. The only thing that is a bit questionable is the mechanize requirement. It looks as if twill ships it's own mechanize code, so I don't think we need to worry about pulling our own in. What do you think? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 18:33:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 14:33:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233388] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-CalendarButton - Gtk2::Ex::CalendarButton Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708181833.l7IIXlwY004332@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-CalendarButton - Gtk2::Ex::CalendarButton Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233388 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-18 14:33 EST ------- cvs done. The perl list can be added with a cc to 'perl-sig' (which I have done here). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 18:38:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 14:38:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246215] Review Request: comgt - Linux UMTS/GPRS command-line tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708181838.l7IIcFFR004524@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: comgt - Linux UMTS/GPRS command-line tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246215 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-18 14:38 EST ------- Note that cvsrequests have changed somewhat... see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure for details. (ie, use fedora account name instead of email). cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 18:41:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 14:41:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253358] Review Request: compiz-bcop - Compiz option code generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708181841.l7IIfj3O004692@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-bcop - Compiz option code generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253358 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-18 14:41 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 18:48:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 14:48:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251191] Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708181848.l7IImKJq004928@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251191 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-18 14:48 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 18:54:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 14:54:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708181854.l7IIsQrL005237@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From kaigai at kaigai.gr.jp 2007-08-18 14:54 EST ------- SpecURL: http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/files/sepostgresql.spec SrpmURL: http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/files/sepostgresql-8.2.4- 0.427.beta.fc8.src.rpm The SE-PostgreSQL package is updated. It contains the following fixes. 1. A bug in the sepostgresql security policy module was fixed. An administration domain could execute a function with sepgsql_user_proc_t. The policy developer intend to deny it. 2. A script in the specfile was fixed. The name of the SELinux object classes are changed. We appanded "db_" prefix onto any object classed related to SE-PostgreSQL while we have a discussion in the selinux-list. Therefore, "SECCLASS_DATABASE" is also renamed to "SECCLASS_DB_DATABSE", and a script to calculate its value in %build section is changed. 3. sepostgresql-pg_dump-renaming.patch is added pg_dumpall calls pg_dump internally, however, SE-PostgreSQL package installs an enhanced pg_dump(all) as sepg_dump(all) to avoid confliction with the native postgresql package. This small patch enables sepg_dumpall to use sepg_dump. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 19:00:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 15:00:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708181900.l7IJ0ku5005670@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From kaigai at kaigai.gr.jp 2007-08-18 15:00 EST ------- FYI: dwalsh has a plan to merge the upstreamed reference policy into the selinux- policy package on the next Monday. It contains the required definitions of object classes/permission, so we will restart the reviewing process soon. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 19:13:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 15:13:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253355] Review Request: twill - A simple scripting language for Web browsing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708181913.l7IJDDjB006425@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: twill - A simple scripting language for Web browsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253355 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-08-18 15:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > I fixed almost everything that you mentioned, Till. The only thing that is a > bit questionable is the mechanize requirement. It looks as if twill ships it's > own mechanize code, so I don't think we need to worry about pulling our own in. > What do you think? >From the twill hp: | pyparsing, mechanize, and BeautifulSoup are included with twill for convenience, | but are under their own licenses. Fedora contains a newer version of pyparsing, the same version of mechanize and an older version of clientform (also in devel, so if there is none, imho a bug should be filed). I cannot find BeatifulSoup being included in twill and subproccess is included in python-2.5 . Do you know how setup.py works? The best approach would be to patch it in a way that it accepts an argument, e.g. "--exclude-other-packages", that makes the other packages not being installed and submit this upstream. Otherwise it seems a simple patch to setup.py is enough to make these packages not being installed. With these being installed afaik you have to add each license to the License Tag and also it may violate the Guidelines, because it is imho the same case with binary packages that contain their own copy of a library. I also noticed that twill contains some tests, maybe these should be run in %check, but I do not know how to do this, but I saw someone mentioning this in another review. But he wrote that there are no tests, so %check is not needed. ;-) All the changes look good, btw. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 19:18:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 15:18:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233388] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-CalendarButton - Gtk2::Ex::CalendarButton Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708181918.l7IJIcYs006718@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-CalendarButton - Gtk2::Ex::CalendarButton Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233388 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-08-18 15:18 EST ------- Thanks Kevin! Added a note about that to PackagingDrafts/Perl, too. Thanks for the review, Parag :) Imported, built, and push request made. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 19:47:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 15:47:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252124] Review Request: filezilla - FileZilla is a fast FTP and SFTP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708181947.l7IJlY11008331@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filezilla - FileZilla is a fast FTP and SFTP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252124 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-08-18 15:47 EST ------- So, we are waiting for rc2 to start review... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 19:54:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 15:54:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253024] Review Request: makehuman - Modeling of three-dimensional humanoid characters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708181954.l7IJsY5i008727@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: makehuman - Modeling of three-dimensional humanoid characters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253024 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 21:41:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 17:41:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250210] Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708182141.l7ILfScR013947@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250210 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lxtnow at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-08-18 17:41 EST ------- Well, # Top comment is unnecessary, summary tag is enough. # license tag need to be fix, as the license policy has been changed, you need to set explicitly the version of the licensed package now. So, set it to GPLv2 as your package is. # Yous should use the recommanded default buildroot which is: BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) # RPM variable style VS RPM macros style: You should use one of them, not mixe them in spec. Also there are duplicate command is the spec, should be fix. # Package doesn't honor RPM_OPT_FLAGS # Failed to build on mock F-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [...] g++ `gimptool --cflags` -O3 -Wall -fno-common -ffast-math -frename-registers -fomit-frame-pointer -o resynth resynth.cc `gimptool --libs` -lm resynth.cc:83: error: template with C linkage resynth.cc:979: error: expected `}' at end of input make: *** [resynth] Error 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.33961 (%build) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 22:33:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 18:33:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234355] Review Request: klear - graphical TV viewer with an integrated recording system for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708182233.l7IMXqJb016057@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: klear - graphical TV viewer with an integrated recording system for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234355 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-08-18 18:33 EST ------- suggestion: startup error -> consult upstream? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 18 22:37:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 18:37:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217259] Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708182237.l7IMbCnB016250@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217259 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2007-08-18 18:37 EST ------- Well, the firmware for the Echo Indigo DJ card (the only hardware I have that needs firmware) works fine with the firmware just in /lib/firmware, so great. Updated package here: Spec URL: http://www.timj.co.uk/linux/specs/alsa-firmware.spec SRPM URL: http://www.timj.co.uk/linux/srpms/alsa-firmware-1.0.14-1.src.rpm rpmlint is clean on all packages, and it builds in mock. Additionally, the alsa-tools-firmware dependency has been built in FC-6. (In the needsign queue as I write) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 19 00:19:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 20:19:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252128] Review Request: telepathy-haze - A multi-protocol Libpurple connection manager for Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708190019.l7J0JhMf019833@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-haze - A multi-protocol Libpurple connection manager for Telepathy Alias: telepathy-haze https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252128 ------- Additional Comments From smilner at redhat.com 2007-08-18 20:19 EST ------- + rpmlint output is good [steve at psycho ~]$ rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/telepathy-haze-mission-control-0.1.1-1.fc7.i386.rpm [steve at psycho ~]$ rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/telepathy-haze-0.1.1-1.fc7.i386.rpm [steve at psycho ~]$ + Package name looks good + spec name looks good + License is GPLv2 or later + spec license matches license stated in code + License in doc + spec in us english + spec is readable + source matches official source + Compiles and builds + Content looks good + Build deps look good - Deps seem a bit odd ... for instance .... [steve at psycho Desktop]$ sudo rpm -ivh ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/telepathy-haze-0.1.1-1.fc7.i386.rpm ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/telepathy-haze-mission-control-0.1.1-1.fc7.i386.rpm error: Failed dependencies: telepathy-mission-control is needed by telepathy-haze-mission-control-0.1.1-1.fc7.i386 [steve at psycho Desktop]$ + No dupe files in rpm + perms look sane + clean exists + macros used + Does not require %doc items to run + install is sane - Application runs but outputs quite a bit of warnings ... ** Message: [error] plugins: /usr/lib/purple-2/liboscar.so is not usable because the 'purple_init_plugin' symbol could not be found. Does the plugin call the PURPLE_INIT_PLUGIN() macro? ** Message: [error] plugins: /usr/lib/purple-2/libsametime.so has a prefs_info, but is a prpl. This is no longer supported. ** Message: [error] plugins: /usr/lib/purple-2/libjabber.so is not usable because the 'purple_init_plugin' symbol could not be found. Does the plugin call the PURPLE_INIT_PLUGIN() macro? ** Message: [info] util: Reading file accounts.xml from directory /tmp/haze-qcKVMk ** Message: [info] util: File /tmp/haze-qcKVMk/accounts.xml does not exist (this is not necessarily an error) ** Message: [info] util: Reading file status.xml from directory /tmp/haze-qcKVMk ** Message: [info] util: File /tmp/haze-qcKVMk/status.xml does not exist (this is not necessarily an error) ** Message: [info] stun: using server ** Message: [info] stun: using server ** Message: [info] util: Reading file blist.xml from directory /tmp/haze-qcKVMk ** Message: [info] util: File /tmp/haze-qcKVMk/blist.xml does not exist (this is not necessarily an error) ** Message: [info] prefs: Reading /tmp/haze-qcKVMk/prefs.xml ** Message: [info] prefs: Reading /etc/purple/prefs.xml ** Message: [info] prefs: Finished reading /etc/purple/prefs.xml ** (haze:7697): DEBUG: libpurple initialized. ** (haze:7697): DEBUG: Initializing (HazeConnectionManager *)0x9264ac0 ** (haze:7697): DEBUG: started version 0.1.1 (telepathy-glib version 0.5.13) ** Message: [info] network: Entering nm_callback_func! ** (haze:7697): DEBUG: no connections, and timed out ** Message: [info] util: Writing file status.xml to directory /tmp/haze-qcKVMk ** Message: [info] util: Writing file prefs.xml to directory /tmp/haze-qcKVMk ** Message: [info] main: Unloading all plugins ** Message: [info] plugins: Unloading plugin QQ ** Message: [info] plugins: Unloading plugin XMPP ** Message: [info] plugins: Unloading plugin AIM ** Message: [info] plugins: Unloading plugin Gadu-Gadu ** Message: [info] plugins: Unloading plugin IRC ** Message: [info] plugins: Unloading plugin Yahoo ** Message: [info] plugins: Unloading plugin SILC ** Message: [info] plugins: Unloading plugin ICQ ** Message: [info] plugins: Unloading plugin Bonjour ** Message: [info] plugins: Unloading plugin SIMPLE ** Message: [info] plugins: Unloading plugin Sametime ** Message: [info] plugins: Unloading plugin Zephyr ** Message: [info] plugins: Unloading plugin GroupWise ** Message: [info] plugins: Unloading plugin MSN ** (haze:7697): DEBUG: deleting /tmp/haze-qcKVMk/status.xml ** (haze:7697): DEBUG: deleting /tmp/haze-qcKVMk/prefs.xml ** (haze:7697): DEBUG: deleting /tmp/haze-qcKVMk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 19 00:23:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 20:23:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708190023.l7J0NBbc020013@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-18 20:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #27) > FYI: > > dwalsh has a plan to merge the upstreamed reference policy into the selinux- > policy package on the next Monday. Good news! Then I will recheck this package again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 19 00:32:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 20:32:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708190032.l7J0WR1x020472@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-18 20:32 EST ------- (When new selinux-policy is published, please update your spec/srpm. And you are splitting writing srpm URL into two lines? Please write srpm URL in one line (even if it is long) so that we can download it easily) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 19 00:37:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 20:37:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250040] Review Request: new - A simple template system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708190037.l7J0bqJh020841@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: new - A simple template system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250040 ------- Additional Comments From mike at flyn.org 2007-08-18 20:37 EST ------- Spec URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/new.spec SRPM URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/new-1.3.10-1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 19 03:30:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 23:30:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253134] Review Request: jlint - Java program checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708190330.l7J3Urdt027249@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jlint - Java program checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253134 ------- Additional Comments From loganjerry at gmail.com 2007-08-18 23:30 EST ------- The 1.x version has not been touched in 9 years. The 3.x version has not been touched in 9 months. I have some hopes that the 3.x version can be updated as needed; I have little hope that the 1.x version will be. I can't know for certain without seeing your test cases, Ville, but it is possible that the spurious warnings you got from 3.x are due to the new tests introduced in 3.x, rather than corrupted tests that were present in 1.x. If you send me code that triggers spurious warnings, I pledge to work with upstream to make those warnings go away. Can we proceed with the review using the 3.x version? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 19 05:09:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 01:09:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708190509.l7J59VqX031042@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-08-19 01:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #21) > 3 other questions: > > * how did you generate the xpdf tarball? Checking the sources out from the TeXLive upstream SVN: svn://tug.org/texlive/trunk/Build/source/libs/ It shouldn't be needed if we manage to compile texlive against poppler. > * why the Build dependencies on texlive-texmf*? There is a comment > but I don't understand it Binary texlive won't build without the main texmf tree. Configure complains: ***************************************************************** * Error: The main texmf tree was not found. * * If you do not have the files, you should be able to them from * * the same place you got these sources from, or from one of the * * CTAN hosts. * ***************************************************************** Winging it. then it tries to use files in $TEXMFMAIN: tcfmgr: config file `tcfmgr.map' (usually in $TEXMFMAIN/texconfig) not found. fmtutil: config file `fmtutil.cnf' not found. and ends up with some utilities not build/installed: RPM build errors: File not found: /var/tmp/texlive-2007-0.10.fc8-root-jnovy/usr/bin/amstex File not found: /var/tmp/texlive-2007-0.10.fc8-root-jnovy/usr/bin/etex File not found: /var/tmp/texlive-2007-0.10.fc8-root-jnovy/usr/bin/lambda File not found: /var/tmp/texlive-2007-0.10.fc8-root-jnovy/usr/bin/lamed File not found: /var/tmp/texlive-2007-0.10.fc8-root-jnovy/usr/bin/pdfetex File not found: /var/tmp/texlive-2007-0.10.fc8-root-jnovy/usr/bin/csplain File not found: /var/tmp/texlive-2007-0.10.fc8-root-jnovy/usr/bin/mltex File not found: /var/tmp/texlive-2007-0.10.fc8-root-jnovy/usr/bin/pdfcsplain File not found: /var/tmp/texlive-2007-0.10.fc8-root-jnovy/usr/bin/eplain File not found: /var/tmp/texlive-2007-0.10.fc8-root-jnovy/usr/bin/physe File not found: /var/tmp/texlive-2007-0.10.fc8-root-jnovy/usr/bin/phyzzx File not found: /var/tmp/texlive-2007-0.10.fc8-root-jnovy/usr/bin/texsis File not found: /var/tmp/texlive-2007-0.10.fc8-root-jnovy/usr/bin/xelatex File not found: /var/tmp/texlive-2007-0.10.fc8-root-jnovy/usr/bin/latex File not found: /var/tmp/texlive-2007-0.10.fc8-root-jnovy/usr/bin/pdflatex File not found: /var/tmp/texlive-2007-0.10.fc8-root-jnovy/usr/bin/platex File not found: /var/tmp/texlive-2007-0.10.fc8-root-jnovy/usr/bin/cslatex File not found: /var/tmp/texlive-2007-0.10.fc8-root-jnovy/usr/bin/mllatex File not found: /var/tmp/texlive-2007-0.10.fc8-root-jnovy/usr/bin/pdfcslatex File not found: /var/tmp/texlive-2007-0.10.fc8-root-jnovy/usr/bin/pdfplatex > * why > export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=`pwd`/texk/kpathsea/.libs > in %install? Nothing is meant to be compiled at that point. It's useless, so it's now removed. > > X-Red-Hat-Extra and Application categories shouldn't be added > to xdvi.desktop. Removed. > in install-info scriptlets the .gz should be removed. Fixed. > there is still a comment about using internal freetype, although > it seems to be fixed? Yes, it's now fixed. Comment removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 19 05:10:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 01:10:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708190510.l7J5AoxL031163@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-08-19 01:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > But there is no updmap.cfg in /etc/texmf/web2c after the update to 0.9, and this > looks suspicious to me: > > %post fonts > %{_bindir}/texconfig-sys rehash 2> /dev/null || : > /sbin/install-info %{_infodir}/web2c.info.gz %{_infodir}/dir > %{__rm} -f %{_texmf_conf}/web2c/updmap.cfg > %{__rm} -f %{_texmf_conf}/web2c/updmap.log > %{_bindir}/updmap-sys --syncwithtrees > /dev/null 2>&1 || : Yes, the post scriplet puts updmap.cfg accidentially away. Fixed in 0.10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 19 05:16:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 01:16:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708190516.l7J5GODo031435@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-08-19 01:16 EST ------- Do you agree with this license tag for binary texlive? License: GPLv2 and BSD and Public Domain and LGPLv2+ and GPLv2+ and LPPL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 19 05:25:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 01:25:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708190525.l7J5PUPK032034@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 jnovy at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mclasen at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-08-19 01:25 EST ------- Matthias, could you please have a look at comment #24 ? There's a patch for poppler to include xpdf headers what makes texlive able to build against poppler instead of its internal xpdf. It would be very nice from a texlive POV if this patch is applied. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 19 05:32:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 01:32:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708190532.l7J5W3DM032381@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |krh at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-08-19 01:32 EST ------- CCing Kristian, since I am on vacation for the next 2 weeks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 19 06:32:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 02:32:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251191] Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708190632.l7J6WXic001966@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251191 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-19 02:32 EST ------- Imported and build, closing. I'll also be pushing this as an F-7 update, and once it has hit the F-7 repo, I'll build it for FC-6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 19 06:33:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 02:33:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251191] Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708190633.l7J6XEds002040@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251191 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 19 08:11:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 04:11:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253358] Review Request: compiz-bcop - Compiz option code generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708190811.l7J8BxFR007770@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-bcop - Compiz option code generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253358 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 19 09:34:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 05:34:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252946] Review Request: xmms2 - X-platform Music Multiplexing System 2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708190934.l7J9Y9k2013964@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms2 - X-platform Music Multiplexing System 2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252946 ------- Additional Comments From patrice.bouchand.fedora at gmail.com 2007-08-19 05:34 EST ------- Spec URL: http://patrice.bouchand.free.fr/rpm/xmms2.spec SRPM URL: http://patrice.bouchand.free.fr/rpm/xmms2-0.2-0.4.DrJekyll.fc7.src.rpm - Force waf to use CFLAGS - Non free plugins rpm will be named xmms2-plugins-nonfree -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 19 09:49:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 05:49:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253134] Review Request: jlint - Java program checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708190949.l7J9nxgh014714@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jlint - Java program checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253134 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-08-19 05:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > The 1.x version has not been touched in 9 years. The 3.x version has not > been touched in 9 months. The most recent modification inside the 1.21 tarball is from 2004-04-05, and the last code modification from 2003-12-08 so it's not quite that old. The newest modification in the 3.x series is compilation fixes for gcc 3.4.x, no other changes in 3.1 vs 3.0 according to the release notes. 3.0 was released 2004-06-22. Additionally, the original 1.x author was very responsive to my mails, whereas the sourceforge tracker for 3.x does not look too promising regarding upstream activity (not a single comment to any open item in almost 3 years): http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?atid=514797&group_id=66529&func=browse > If you send me code that > triggers spurious warnings, I pledge to work with upstream to make those > warnings go away. Sorry, as said, I don't have more details about this handy any more. Will send if I remember more details or come across them again. > Can we proceed with the review using the 3.x version? Your call, but before that I do suggest taking a closer look at the 3.x upstream's activity as well as comparing 1.x functionality to 3.x (unless you already did and I just failed to parse it from your earlier comments). Also, it'd be better to find someone who actually uses jlint/antic nowadays to do the review, but I can chime in later if nobody shows up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 19 12:42:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 08:42:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250040] Review Request: new - A simple template system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708191242.l7JCg8OS021579@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: new - A simple template system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250040 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-19 08:42 EST ------- For 1.3.10-1 * description ------------------------------------------------------- // Copyright (C) 1999 %(FULLNAME) %(EMAIL) ------------------------------------------------------- - Please use %%(FULLNAME) %%(EMAIL) so that build log does not warn as below: ------------------------------------------------------- sh: FULLNAME: command not found sh: EMAIL: command not found Installing /builddir/build/SRPMS/new-1.3.10-1.fc8.src.rpm Building target platforms: i386 Building for target i386 Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.30592 ------------------------------------------------------- * Documents - The file "INSTALL" is for people who want to rebuild this package by themselves and not needed for people who want to install by rpm method. * rpmlint issues - Still some issues mentioned in the comment 6 are not fixed Also another issues are found. ------------------------------------------------------- E: new non-executable-script /usr/share/new/templates/missing/default 0644 E: new non-executable-script /usr/share/new/templates/py/default 0644 E: new non-executable-script /usr/share/new/templates/sh/default 0644 W: new undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libnewfmt_ptrn.so.1.3.10 template_find W: new-java no-documentation E: new-java library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib/libnewfmt_ptrnjava.so.1.3.10 E: new-java library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/libnewfmt_ptrnjava.so.1.3.10 E: new-java library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib/libnewfmt_ptrnjni.so.1.3.10 E: new-java library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/libnewfmt_ptrnjni.so.1.3.10 W: new-java unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libnewfmt_ptrnjava.so.1.3.10 /lib/libz.so.1 W: new-java unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libnewfmt_ptrnjava.so.1.3.10 /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 W: new-java unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libnewfmt_ptrnjava.so.1.3.10 /lib/libm.so.6 W: new-java unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libnewfmt_ptrnjava.so.1.3.10 /lib/libpthread.so.0 W: new-java unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libnewfmt_ptrnjava.so.1.3.10 /lib/librt.so.1 W: new-java unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libnewfmt_ptrnjava.so.1.3.10 /lib/libdl.so.2 W: new-java undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libnewfmt_ptrnjni.so.1.3.10 fmt_ptrn_get_keys W: new-java undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libnewfmt_ptrnjni.so.1.3.10 fmt_ptrn_init W: new-java undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libnewfmt_ptrnjni.so.1.3.10 fmt_ptrn_close W: new-java unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libnewfmt_ptrnjni.so.1.3.10 /lib/libz.so.1 W: new-devel no-documentation -------------------------------------------------------- * Summary * About /usr/share/new/templates/*/default: - Please fix the permission of these scripts or remove shebangs of these scripts. * libnewfmt_ptrnjni.so.1 and /usr/lib/libnewfmt_ptrnjava.so.1 - Please call ldconfig for these libraries (i.e. -java subpackage also must call /sbin/ldconfig on %post and %postun) * Undefined non-weak symbols - are found on libnewfmt_ptrn.so and libnewfmt_ptrnjni.so. (can be checked as below:) --------------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ ldd -r /usr/lib/libnewfmt_ptrn.so undefined symbol: template_find (/usr/lib/libnewfmt_ptrn.so) linux-gate.so.1 => (0x00110000) libglib-2.0.so.0 => /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 (0x0011a000) libz.so.1 => /lib/libz.so.1 (0x001e3000) libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x001f6000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x80000000) --------------------------------------------------------- This is not allowed when you want to provide -devel subpackage because leaving undefined non-weak symbols causes linkage failure. * defattr - We recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 19 13:37:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 09:37:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253434] New: Review Request: eclipse-rpm-editor - RPM Specfile editor for Eclipse Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253434 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-rpm-editor - RPM Specfile editor for Eclipse Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: alcapcom at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://alcapcom.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/eclipse-rpm-editor.spec SRPM URL: http://alcapcom.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/eclipse-rpm-editor-0.1.0-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: The Eclipse Specfile Editor package contains Eclipse plugins that are useful for RPM specfiles maintenance within the Eclipse IDE. The specfile editor need some code of rpmlint 0.81, I will ask Ville if it's possible to include needed patch at less in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 19 13:47:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 09:47:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253434] Review Request: eclipse-rpm-editor - RPM Specfile editor for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708191347.l7JDl4Bc025297@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-rpm-editor - RPM Specfile editor for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253434 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-08-19 09:47 EST ------- I expect that rpmlint 0.81 will be released fairly soon. It'll be a slightly backwards incompatible release with <= 0.80, so I'm not yet sure whether it will be pushed to <= F7, but it'll be in F8+. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 19 13:54:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 09:54:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239936] Review Request: oyranos - The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708191354.l7JDsigD025801@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: oyranos - The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239936 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-19 09:54 EST ------- For -7: * Again pc file - This time oyranos_monitor.pc has: -------------------------------------------- Requires: x11 xinerama -------------------------------------------- This means that -devel package should have: "Requires: libX11-devel libXinerama-devel". However, are these Requires really needed? #include macro search returns: -------------------------------------------- $ grep -h '#include ' `rpm -ql oyranos-devel | grep /usr/include` | sort | uniq #include "oyranos.h" #include "oyranos_definitions.h" #include "oyranos_version.h" #include /* for linux size_t */ -------------------------------------------- and it does not seem to require those two -devel package. * Documents - IMO all files "AUTHORS COPYING ChangeLog README" must be installed into -libs subpackage, because both main and -devel package require -libs subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 19 13:57:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 09:57:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253434] Review Request: eclipse-rpm-editor - RPM Specfile editor for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708191357.l7JDvBOL025992@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-rpm-editor - RPM Specfile editor for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253434 ------- Additional Comments From alcapcom at gmail.com 2007-08-19 09:57 EST ------- The only thing that the specfile editor need is the patch to run rpmlint on .spec file. Is there a way to just include this patch for <= F7? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 19 14:46:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 10:46:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253434] Review Request: eclipse-rpm-editor - RPM Specfile editor for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708191446.l7JEkLYR028616@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-rpm-editor - RPM Specfile editor for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253434 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-08-19 10:46 EST ------- It is premature to think about that too much right now. I don't plan to do that myself, but in a nutshell, I suppose if the decision is not to ship 0.81+ for <= F7 and someone volunteers to extract that functionality from 0.81 and backport and maintain it as a patch to earlier versions, I'll look into it, but only after 0.81 is out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 19 14:56:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 10:56:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253434] Review Request: eclipse-rpm-editor - RPM Specfile editor for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708191456.l7JEuxf9029154@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-rpm-editor - RPM Specfile editor for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253434 ------- Additional Comments From alcapcom at gmail.com 2007-08-19 10:56 EST ------- Okay thanks for the clarification, once 0.81 is out I would like to backport this functionality as a patch for <= F7 rpmlint package, so that I can maintain a F7 and EPEL branch for this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 19 16:48:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 12:48:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253024] Review Request: makehuman - Modeling of three-dimensional humanoid characters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708191648.l7JGmgFJ002196@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: makehuman - Modeling of three-dimensional humanoid characters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253024 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 19 16:48:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 12:48:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252124] Review Request: filezilla - FileZilla is a fast FTP and SFTP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708191648.l7JGmw5l002259@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filezilla - FileZilla is a fast FTP and SFTP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252124 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 19 16:55:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 12:55:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252950] Review Request: othello - Classic board game with ai plugins and network support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708191655.l7JGt00l002594@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: othello - Classic board game with ai plugins and network support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252950 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-08-19 12:54 EST ------- "Othello" in this context is a registered trademark of Tsukuda Original; someone needs to provide evidence that this package is acceptable. Otherwise, please block the FE-Legal ticket so that the lawyers can take a look. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 19 17:25:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 13:25:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236486] Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708191725.l7JHPq3r004537@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236486 ------- Additional Comments From kuznetsovaval at yahoo.ca 2007-08-19 13:25 EST ------- Hi Mamoru, finally i fixed almost everything and uploaded it to sourceforge SRPM URL : http://downloads.sourceforge.net/profugus/profugus-0.2.3-2.src.rpm Spec URL : http://downloads.sourceforge.net/profugus/profugus.spec Noarch URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/profugus/profugus-0.2.3-2.noarch.rpm x86_64 URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/profugus/profugus-0.2.3-2.x86_64.rpm I'm confused by your statement "BuildArch is not noarch yet" In your previous comment you mention that i need to create noarch package, that i created. Probably i misunderstand something. Can please clarify? Thanks, Anton -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 19 17:26:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 13:26:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201061] Review Request: IServerd - Groupware ICQ server clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708191726.l7JHQgAH004683@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: IServerd - Groupware ICQ server clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201061 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-08-19 13:26 EST ------- This still fails to build for me: config/actions/lex.yy.o: In function `input': /builddir/build/BUILD/IServerd-2.4.14/lex.yy.c:1739: undefined reference to `yywrap' config/actions/lex.yy.o: In function `yylex': /builddir/build/BUILD/IServerd-2.4.14/lex.yy.c:1390: undefined reference to `yywrap' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [bin/iserverd] Error 1 If you don't have a mock setup, you can still make sure your packages build by doing scratch builds with koji: koji build --scratch dist-f8 whatever.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 19 18:20:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 14:20:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708191820.l7JIKdi8008659@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-08-19 14:20 EST ------- The SRPMs/specs and x86_64 repo is now updated to 0.10, I'll update the i386 repo on monday. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 19 22:03:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 18:03:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250210] Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708192203.l7JM3oLL023132@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250210 ------- Additional Comments From ewan at macmahon.me.uk 2007-08-19 18:03 EST ------- Hi, Thanks for the comments; taking them in order: - The pointless comment's gone, - License field set to GPLv2+ (the COPYING file is indeed GPLv2, but the header on the actual code specifies the 'or any later version' text), - According to: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-76294f12c6b481792eb001ba9763d95e2792e825 the mktemp based build root I've used is now the most preferred option - I'm happy to change it if I'm misinterpreting the guidelines, - RPM variable/macro style; that was a leftover from testing something, not sure how it got left in. It's all macro style now, that also removes the duplicate. - CFLAGS are now set to %{optflags}, this overrides the defaults in the Makefile, - I can't reliably reproduce the build errors; I've had different errors (and some successful builds) at different times today with identical input SRPMS, including most recently: > Error: Missing Dependency: zlib = 1.2.3-13.fc8 is needed by package zlib-devel > Error performing yum command: /usr/sbin/mock-helper yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64/root install 'gimp-devel' 'gimp' So it looks like there may be some churn occurring in the dependencies at the moment. It does build cleanly for F7, and has just built for -devel. Revised packages (built with mock for fedora-devel) containing the fixes so far are here: SPEC (same url): http://www.macmahon.me.uk/linux/fedora/SPECS/gimp-resynthesizer.spec SRPM: http://www.macmahon.me.uk/linux/fedora/SRPMS/gimp-resynthesizer-0.15-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 19 22:27:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 18:27:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250040] Review Request: new - A simple template system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708192227.l7JMR9nn024342@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: new - A simple template system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250040 ------- Additional Comments From mike at flyn.org 2007-08-19 18:27 EST ------- Spec URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/new.spec SRPM URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/new-1.3.10-2.fc7.src.rpm The shebangs are not an issue. These are templates, so the shebangs should remain, but they are not in themselves executable scripts. As far as the undefined symbols, this is really an issue in new. New provides two libraries, libnewfmt_ptrn and libnewtemplate. I'm in the process of determining how to decouple the fmt_ptrn library from the template library -- template_find is the one sticking point. I hope that I can get this package released in the mean time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 19 23:40:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 19:40:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252125] Review Request: flpsed - WYSIWYG pseudo PostScript editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708192340.l7JNeU6P027360@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flpsed - WYSIWYG pseudo PostScript editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252125 ewan at macmahon.me.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ewan at macmahon.me.uk ------- Additional Comments From ewan at macmahon.me.uk 2007-08-19 19:40 EST ------- Hi, I can't sponsor you, I'm afraid, so this is an entirely unofficial review but I hope it's useful: - Licence field is plain GPL; according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines it should be versioned; in this case COPYING is GPLv2, and the source makes no mention of the 'or any later version' text, so this field should read GPLv2. - rpmlint is clear except for license problem. - Buildroot is the older, now second preference version, not really a problem. (see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-b4fdd45fa76cbf54c885ef0836361319ab962473) - %files includes INSTALL which are just the generic instructions, this is considered irrelevant as per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-9bbfa57478f0460c6160947a6bf795249488182b - This is a GUI application, but does not include a .desktop file. (see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop) Otherwise it looks OK to to me, and builds in mock for F7 and F-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 00:48:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 20:48:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253163] Review Request: sazanami-fonts - Sazanami Japanese TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708200048.l7K0mviq031776@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sazanami-fonts - Sazanami Japanese TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253163 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |petersen at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 01:41:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 21:41:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252950] Review Request: othello - Classic board game with ai plugins and network support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708200141.l7K1fuas002628@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: othello - Classic board game with ai plugins and network support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252950 bbbush.yuan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From bbbush.yuan at gmail.com 2007-08-19 21:41 EST ------- Thanks, Jason. I was thinking about the same thing. To every fedora-cn contributor in the CC-list, please post your informal review before next Friday meeting. The review should be made according to package guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 01:42:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 21:42:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252950] Review Request: othello - Classic board game with ai plugins and network support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708200142.l7K1g6Sa002714@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: othello - Classic board game with ai plugins and network support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252950 ------- Additional Comments From bbbush.yuan at gmail.com 2007-08-19 21:42 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=161835) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=161835&action=view) UI proposal Errata: the 3rd menu item of the settings drop down menu should be "reload plugins". See google group thread http://groups.google.com/group/fedora-cn/t/29069fa071c74ff -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 03:11:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 23:11:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253469] New: Review Request: opyum - Offline package installation and update tools Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253469 Summary: Review Request: opyum - Offline package installation and update tools Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: debarshi.ray at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/opyum.spec SRPM URL: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/opyum-0.0.2-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Opyum (pronounced 'opium') provides a set of tools to enable users, who do not have a good network (eg., Internet) connection at their ready disposal, to easily install new packages or update existing ones through the conventional package management system available in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 03:42:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 23:42:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226363] Merge Review: redhat-lsb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708200342.l7K3gGNP009080@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: redhat-lsb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226363 ------- Additional Comments From llim at redhat.com 2007-08-19 23:42 EST ------- changes made from Comment #15 committed to cvs and redhat-lsb-3.1-16.fc8 has been built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 03:58:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 23:58:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251998] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage - Allows perl modules to check test coverage with Devel::Cover In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708200358.l7K3wRl9009771@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage - Allows perl modules to check test coverage with Devel::Cover https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251998 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-19 23:58 EST ------- t/pod-coverage..........skipped all skipped: Test::Pod::Coverage 1.04 required for testing POD coverage t/pod...................skipped all skipped: Test::Pod 1.14 required for testing POD All tests successful, 2 tests skipped. tests got skipped. Can you enable them and test that also? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 04:47:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 00:47:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253469] Review Request: opyum - Offline package installation and update tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708200447.l7K4lX7Z012425@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opyum - Offline package installation and update tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253469 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-20 00:47 EST ------- mock build failed with following error. checking python module: pirut... no configure: error: failed to find required module pirut error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.23798 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 08:09:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 04:09:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231835] Review Request: uisp - Universal In-System Programmer for Atmel AVR and 8051 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708200809.l7K89QPa028715@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uisp - Universal In-System Programmer for Atmel AVR and 8051 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231835 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-20 04:09 EST ------- Woops looks like you forgot to set the cvs flag, setting. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 08:09:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 04:09:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231814] Review Request: avarice - Program for interfacing the Atmel JTAG ICE to GDB In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708200809.l7K89aGj028754@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avarice - Program for interfacing the Atmel JTAG ICE to GDB https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231814 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-20 04:09 EST ------- Woops looks like you forgot to set the cvs flag, setting. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 08:30:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 04:30:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708200830.l7K8UTRQ031082@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 ------- Additional Comments From mefoster at gmail.com 2007-08-20 04:30 EST ------- Oh, argh, head slap -- the version I sent didn't actually have my ExcludeArch fixes in it. Here you go: http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/mef/extras/ice-3.2.1-2.fc7.src.rpm http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/mef/extras/ice.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 09:58:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 05:58:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708200958.l7K9w0JW007067@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 ------- Additional Comments From mefoster at gmail.com 2007-08-20 05:57 EST ------- p.s. -- Is there any way for me to get my own Koji account so that I can catch brainos like that myself without needing you to do a new build? Or do I need to wait until I'm sponsored ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 10:46:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 06:46:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708201046.l7KAkuQj010534@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-08-20 06:46 EST ------- The patch in comment #27 seems to be useless as we don't build ttf2pk. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 11:06:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 07:06:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708201106.l7KB6Qhg012330@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-08-20 07:06 EST ------- All repos are now updated to 0.10! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 11:21:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 07:21:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250040] Review Request: new - A simple template system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708201121.l7KBL7GK013498@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: new - A simple template system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250040 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-20 07:21 EST ------- Well, actually * libnewfmt_ptrn.so has undefined non-weak symbol * And libnewfmt_ptrnjni.so also has undefined non-weak symbols Apart from these issues: * one-line-command-in-%post(un) - If you want to call only /sbin/ldconfig on %post(un), please don't call unneeded shell. i.e. write as --------------------------------------------------- %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %post java -p /sbin/ldconfig --------------------------------------------------- for example, not --------------------------------------------------- %post /sbin/ldconfig --------------------------------------------------- The latter format calls unneeded shell (here /bin/bash). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 11:25:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 07:25:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708201125.l7KBPlcL013892@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-20 07:25 EST ------- Well, this time rebuild passed (ppc64 explicitly excluded) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=110075 I will check the result package later. As this package is large, it may take several time... (In reply to comment #27) > p.s. -- Is there any way for me to get my own Koji account so that I can catch > brainos like that myself without needing you to do a new build? Or do I need to > wait until I'm sponsored ... You have to wait... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 11:27:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 07:27:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708201127.l7KBRmL6014031@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-20 07:27 EST ------- Meantime you can check if the result binary rpms are as you expect. The result binary rpms and build logs can be downloaded from: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/mtasaka/task_110075/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 12:06:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 08:06:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252046] Review Request: util-linux-ng (util-linux replacement) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708201206.l7KC6jmN017951@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: util-linux-ng (util-linux replacement) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252046 kzak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 12:36:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 08:36:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236486] Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708201236.l7KCaMtl021774@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236486 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-20 08:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #22) > I'm confused by your statement "BuildArch is not noarch yet" In your previous > comment you mention that i need to create noarch package, that i created. > Probably i misunderstand something. Can please clarify? - You have to specify in your spec file explicitly that this package is noarch. i.e. Write: ----------------------------------------------------------- BuildArch: noarch ----------------------------------------------------------- like: http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/*checkout*/devel/comix/comix.spec Also: * Macros - Well, please use macros. Check: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros For example, replace /etc/rc.d/init.d with %{__initrddir} * License tag - License tag policy is now changed. Please change license tag according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing * service status - Would you check what "service profugusd status" returns? ( I don't have Xen machine ). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 13:59:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 09:59:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252421] Review Request: virt-viewer - a viewer for virtualized guest OS graphical consoles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708201359.l7KDxgFd031659@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: virt-viewer - a viewer for virtualized guest OS graphical consoles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252421 berrange at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From berrange at redhat.com 2007-08-20 09:59 EST ------- Built into rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 14:00:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:00:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252418] Review Request: gtk-vnc - a VNC viewer widget for GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708201400.l7KE0STS031812@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-vnc - a VNC viewer widget for GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252418 berrange at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From berrange at redhat.com 2007-08-20 10:00 EST ------- Built into rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 14:00:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:00:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252421] Review Request: virt-viewer - a viewer for virtualized guest OS graphical consoles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708201400.l7KE0UIi031857@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: virt-viewer - a viewer for virtualized guest OS graphical consoles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252421 Bug 252421 depends on bug 252418, which changed state. Bug 252418 Summary: Review Request: gtk-vnc - a VNC viewer widget for GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252418 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 14:12:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:12:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231814] Review Request: avarice - Program for interfacing the Atmel JTAG ICE to GDB In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708201412.l7KECkU3001105@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avarice - Program for interfacing the Atmel JTAG ICE to GDB https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231814 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-08-20 10:12 EST ------- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure Please follow the updated request template, where we need your FAS name instead of e-mail. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 14:13:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:13:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231835] Review Request: uisp - Universal In-System Programmer for Atmel AVR and 8051 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708201413.l7KED69o001220@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uisp - Universal In-System Programmer for Atmel AVR and 8051 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231835 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-08-20 10:13 EST ------- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure Please follow the updated request template, where we need your FAS name instead of e-mail. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 14:15:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:15:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253434] Review Request: eclipse-rpm-editor - RPM Specfile editor for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708201415.l7KEFNn3001508@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-rpm-editor - RPM Specfile editor for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253434 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-08-20 10:15 EST ------- So we can at least review this for rawhide, right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 14:17:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:17:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252421] Review Request: virt-viewer - a viewer for virtualized guest OS graphical consoles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708201417.l7KEHTjX001749@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: virt-viewer - a viewer for virtualized guest OS graphical consoles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252421 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-08-20 10:17 EST ------- It appears that this request is complete? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 14:26:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:26:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253434] Review Request: eclipse-rpm-editor - RPM Specfile editor for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708201426.l7KEQFLI002632@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-rpm-editor - RPM Specfile editor for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253434 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-08-20 10:26 EST ------- I'm getting: W: eclipse-rpm-editor invalid-license Eclipse Public License from rpmlint. Perhaps make it EPL? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 15:11:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 11:11:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253549] New: Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253549 Summary: Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chris at theknight.co.uk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.theknight.co.uk/releases/tzclock.spec SRPM URL: http://www.theknight.co.uk/releases/tzclock-2.51-1.src.rpm Description: While working aboard I looked for a nice graphical clock that could display the time for many locations. Because I could not find one that did all that I needed I developed TzClock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 15:13:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 11:13:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251998] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage - Allows perl modules to check test coverage with Devel::Cover In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708201513.l7KFDsN9008877@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage - Allows perl modules to check test coverage with Devel::Cover https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251998 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-08-20 11:13 EST ------- Alright - a new version of the spec file and a new SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage-0.05-3.fc7.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 15:14:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 11:14:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708201514.l7KFEP02008985@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-20 11:14 EST ------- For 3.2.1-2: 1. First, for spec file: 1-1: Description stage A: ruby-libs dependency - This package has "BuildRequires: ruby-libs" and -ruby subpackage has "Requires: ruby(abi) = 1.8" For consistency (i.e. to avoid that this package is rebuild against ruby 1.9), IMO "BuildRequires: ruby-libs" should be replaced with "ruby(abi) = 1.8". B. Release number specific dependency - Usually the dependency between main package and subpackages MUST be EVR (epoch-version-release) specific. i.e. for example -server subpackage must have: -------------------------------------------------- Requires: ice = %{version}-%{release} -------------------------------------------------- C. Dependency between subpackages - Please check if this is correct. For example, is the following correct? - -java subpackage does not require main package - -java-devel subpackage does not require -java subpackage - -csharp subpackage does not require main package D. naming - Usually foo-devel package should have the corresponding package named foo. IMO -cxx-devel subpackage should just be named as "ice-devel". E. pkgconfig dependency - Packages which contains pkgconfig .pc files must have "Requires: pkgconfig" 1-2: %files and scriptlets A. User/group registry - Please refer to: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UsersAndGroups B. ldconfig - It does not seem that -c++-devel subpackage should call ldconfig on %post and %postun C. Directory ownership issue - The following directories are not owned by any packages ----------------------------------------------------- %{python_sitelib}/Ice/*/ ----------------------------------------------------- 2. rpmlint complaint A. script-without-shebang ----------------------------------------------------- E: ice script-without-shebang /usr/share/Ice-3.2.1/slice/Freeze/Connection.ice E: ice script-without-shebang /usr/share/Ice-3.2.1/slice/IceGrid/FileParser.ice E: ice script-without-shebang /usr/share/Ice-3.2.1/slice/Freeze/Transaction.ice E: ice script-without-shebang /usr/share/Ice-3.2.1/slice/Glacier2/PermissionsVerifierF.ice ----------------------------------------------------- - Why do these scripts have executable permission? B. non-standard-group ----------------------------------------------------- W: ice-csharp non-standard-group System Environment/Libaries ------------------------------------------------------ - Please fix typo C. License tags ------------------------------------------------------ W: ice invalid-license GPL ------------------------------------------------------ - License tag policy changed. Please fix according to: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines D. macro-in-%changelog ------------------------------------------------------- W: ice macro-in-%changelog ifnarch W: ice macro-in-%changelog _lib W: ice macro-in-%changelog _sbindir W: ice macro-in-%changelog _libdir W: ice macro-in-%changelog _prefix -------------------------------------------------------- - Use %% in the %changelog to prevent macros from being expanded. For example: -------------------------------------------------------- * Wed Aug 1 2007 Mary Ellen Foster 3.2.0-7 - Fixed arch-specific issues: - %%ifnarch ppc64 in a lot of places; it doesn't have db4-java or mono-core, so no Java or CSharp packages - Replaced one literal "lib" with %%{_lib} -------------------------------------------------------- 3. build log check - Still some compilation does not honor fedora specific compilation flags (build log also available under http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/mtasaka/task_110075/ ) --------------------------------------------------------- 163 make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/Ice-3.2.1/src/IceUtil' 164 making all in icecpp 165 make[2]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/Ice-3.2.1/src/icecpp' 166 cc -c -I../../include -O2 -I. -DPREFIX=\"\" cccp.c 167 cc -c -I../../include -O2 -I. -DPREFIX=\"\" cexp.c 168 cc -c -I../../include -O2 -I. -DPREFIX=\"\" prefix.c 169 rm -f ../../bin/icecpp 170 cc -O2 -I. -DPREFIX=\"\" -o ../../bin/icecpp cccp.o cexp.o prefix.o 171 make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/Ice-3.2.1/src/icecpp' ---------------------------------------------------------- 4. All source codes check (especially license issue check) - Well, this is extremely hard.. Actually there are (in total) 10448 files (the most number in the packages I have reviewed...) I may skip this check during review, however if I find any issues I will report later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 16:44:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 12:44:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253564] New: Review Request: ocaml-camomile - Unicode library for OCaml Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253564 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-camomile - Unicode library for OCaml Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-camomile.spec SRPM URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-camomile-0.7.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Camomile is the main Unicode library for OCaml. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 16:48:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 12:48:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253566] New: Review Request: ocaml-xml-light - Minimal XML parser and printer for OCaml Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253566 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-xml-light - Minimal XML parser and printer for OCaml Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-xml-light.spec SRPM URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-xml-light-2.2.cvs20070817-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Xml-Light is a minimal XML parser & printer for OCaml. It provides functions to parse an XML document into an OCaml data structure, work with it, and print it back to an XML document. It support also DTD parsing and checking, and is entirely written in OCaml, hence it does not require additional C library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 16:51:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 12:51:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253570] New: Review Request: ocaml-camlp5 - Classical version of camlp4 OCaml preprocessor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253570 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-camlp5 - Classical version of camlp4 OCaml preprocessor Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-camlp5.spec SRPM URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-camlp5-4.07-2.fc8.src.rpm Description: Camlp5 is a preprocessor-pretty-printer of OCaml. It is the continuation of the classical camlp4 with new features. OCaml 3.10 and above have an official camlp4 which is incompatible with classical (<= 3.09) versions. You can find that in the ocaml-camlp4 package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 16:53:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 12:53:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253571] New: Review Request: ocaml-fileutils - OCaml library for common file and filename operations Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253571 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-fileutils - OCaml library for common file and filename operations Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-fileutils.spec SRPM URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-fileutils-0.3.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This library is intended to provide a basic interface to the most common file and filename operation. It provides different filename function : reduce, make_absolute, make_relative... It also enables to manipulate real file : cp, mv, rm, touch... It is separated in two modules : SysUtil and SysPath. The first one manipulate files ( real one ), the second one is made for manipulating abstract filename. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 17:07:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 13:07:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250210] Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708201707.l7KH7t35024711@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250210 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-08-20 13:07 EST ------- okay, All issues above has been fixed. However, Mock still failed at the same point (On F-devel_i386), not tested on x86_64 Just tested on F-7_i386 and built successfully. can you make a try on mock F-devel_i386 # Also removing FE-NEEDSPONSOR (i'll sponsor you) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 17:08:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 13:08:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250210] Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708201708.l7KH8kGn024821@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250210 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 17:13:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 13:13:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234326] Review Request: bandsaw - A syslog monitoring program for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708201713.l7KHDYav025400@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bandsaw - A syslog monitoring program for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234326 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-20 13:13 EST ------- Damien, ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 17:19:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 13:19:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253579] New: Review Request: php-pecl-memcache - Extension to work with the Memcached caching daemon Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253579 Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-memcache - Extension to work with the Memcached caching daemon Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at famillecollet.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/php-pecl-memcache.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/php-pecl-memcache-2.1.2-1.fc8.src.rpm Mock log: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/php-pecl-memcache-build.log Description: Memcached is a caching daemon designed especially for dynamic web applications to decrease database load by storing objects in memory. This extension allows you to work with memcached through handy OO and procedural interfaces. -- Note : this package register the PECL extension (as PEAR ones). This is not yet in the PHP Guidelines (but nothing against). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 18:13:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 14:13:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253588] New: Review Request: ocaml-cil - CIL - Infrastructure for C Program Analysis and Transformation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253588 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-cil - CIL - Infrastructure for C Program Analysis and Transformation Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-cil.spec SRPM URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-cil-1.3.6-2.fc8.src.rpm Description: CIL (C Intermediate Language) is a high-level representation along with a set of tools that permit easy analysis and source-to-source transformation of C programs. CIL is both lower-level than abstract-syntax trees, by clarifying ambiguous constructs and removing redundant ones, and also higher-level than typical intermediate languages designed for compilation, by maintaining types and a close relationship with the source program. The main advantage of CIL is that it compiles all valid C programs into a few core constructs with a very clean semantics. Also CIL has a syntax-directed type system that makes it easy to analyze and manipulate C programs. Furthermore, the CIL front-end is able to process not only ANSI-C programs but also those using Microsoft C or GNU C extensions. If you do not use CIL and want instead to use just a C parser and analyze programs expressed as abstract-syntax trees then your analysis will have to handle a lot of ugly corners of the language (let alone the fact that parsing C itself is not a trivial task). In essence, CIL is a highly-structured, "clean" subset of C. CIL features a reduced number of syntactic and conceptual forms. For example, all looping constructs are reduced to a single form, all function bodies are given explicit return statements, syntactic sugar like "->" is eliminated and function arguments with array types become pointers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 18:37:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 14:37:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253434] Review Request: eclipse-rpm-editor - RPM Specfile editor for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708201837.l7KIbldU005650@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-rpm-editor - RPM Specfile editor for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253434 ------- Additional Comments From alcapcom at gmail.com 2007-08-20 14:37 EST ------- Oups, I use a old rpmlint (0.81) without the last license checks. I must replace Eclipse Public License by EPL in all my eclipse packages, perhaps we may do that in all the eclipse packages. About review without rpmlint 0.81 in rawhide, I think that we can begin the review because rpmlint is only need at "use" time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 20:30:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 16:30:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244894] Review Request: yum-cron - get yum updates via a cron job In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708202030.l7KKU5oH016980@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yum-cron - get yum updates via a cron job https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244894 ahabig at umn.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ahabig at umn.edu 2007-08-20 16:29 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: yum-cron Short Description: Files needed to run yum updates as a cron job Owners: habig Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: Commits by cvsextras: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 21:53:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 17:53:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251680] Review Request: amtterm - Serial-over-lan (sol) client for Intel AMT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708202153.l7KLr7vo024227@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: amtterm - Serial-over-lan (sol) client for Intel AMT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251680 dlutter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 21:53:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 17:53:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251680] Review Request: amtterm - Serial-over-lan (sol) client for Intel AMT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708202153.l7KLrvbV024326@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: amtterm - Serial-over-lan (sol) client for Intel AMT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251680 dlutter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dlutter at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 22:07:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 18:07:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708202207.l7KM7XbC025409@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-08-20 18:07 EST ------- The use of sources isn't right currently. The source urls should be used. The source urls aren't currently versionned, so I think that it would be good to contact upstream to ask for a versionned directory containing the archives (or maybe the whole texlive hierarchy). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 22:24:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 18:24:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251680] Review Request: amtterm - Serial-over-lan (sol) client for Intel AMT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708202224.l7KMOxYd026719@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: amtterm - Serial-over-lan (sol) client for Intel AMT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251680 ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2007-08-20 18:24 EST ------- Review (based on 0.4 srpm/spec): OK - Naming, versioning, sources identical with upstream OK - Package builds in rawhide/fc7/fc6 buildroot OK - spec file is sane FIX - License tag is ok, but there's no license text anywhere. At the least, include an appropriate copy of the GPLv2 as %doc; even better if the source files have a header that gives the license/copyright, too. (In general, we defer to upstream on these issues, but since you are upstream, it would be good to fix that) FIX - rpmlint complains about missing 'rm -rf %{buildroot}' in %install FIX - Source should point to full URL for downloading the source tarball, i.e. http://dl.bytesex.org/releases/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz FIX - Remove the 'Autoreqprov' line from the specfile; AFAIK, not needed for Fedora Apart from these cosmetic fixes, looks good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 22:57:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 18:57:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253649] New: Review Request: vinagre - VNC client for the GNOME desktop Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253649 Summary: Review Request: vinagre - VNC client for the GNOME desktop Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bnocera at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/bnocera/vinagre/vinagre.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/bnocera/vinagre/vinagre-0.2-1.src.rpm Description: Vinagre is a VNC client for the GNOME desktop environment. It uses gtk-vnc. Upstream is at: http://www.gnome.org/~jwendell/vinagre/ (Note that 0.2 doesn't appear there, because I asked Jonh to do a release for me, so I could get to upload this package before feature freeze). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 22:59:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 18:59:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251545] Review Request: setroubleshoot-plugins - analysis plugins for setroubleshoot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708202259.l7KMxC9x029743@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setroubleshoot-plugins - analysis plugins for setroubleshoot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251545 ------- Additional Comments From jdennis at redhat.com 2007-08-20 18:59 EST ------- FYI: I tracked down the reason the spec file produced by rpmbuild had the wrong permissions and opened bug 253648 against rpmbuild. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 23:01:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 19:01:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244894] Review Request: yum-cron - get yum updates via a cron job In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708202301.l7KN1Udn030017@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yum-cron - get yum updates via a cron job https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244894 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-20 19:01 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 23:12:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 19:12:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250804] Review Request: perl-Encode-Detect - Detects the encoding of data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708202312.l7KNCbRh030676@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Encode-Detect - Detects the encoding of data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250804 ------- Additional Comments From ralston at pobox.com 2007-08-20 19:12 EST ------- Yeah, the Fedora Packaging Guidelines don't speak that much on building perl modules. What I used, I originally copied from a RHEL package. (I have multiple other perl packages I want to contribute, which is why I'm waiting for this one to be reviewed before I proceed.) The reason why I don't use %{module} et. al. macros in Source0: is because I always download the source by copying-and-pasting it into a wget command. I actually like having the additional edit; it forces me to Do The Right Thing whenever I grab a new version of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 23:38:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 19:38:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250040] Review Request: new - A simple template system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708202338.l7KNcXqc031943@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: new - A simple template system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250040 ------- Additional Comments From mike at flyn.org 2007-08-20 19:38 EST ------- Spec URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/new.spec SRPM URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/new-1.3.10-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 03:04:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 23:04:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251998] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage - Allows perl modules to check test coverage with Devel::Cover In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708210304.l7L34MaA012806@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage - Allows perl modules to check test coverage with Devel::Cover https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251998 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-20 23:04 EST ------- cool. Thanks for updates Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url c48557fe6e6c92e2d36e2eda9ae7e746 ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage-0.05.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/00.load...............# Testing ExtUtils::MakeMaker::Coverage 0.05 ok t/mm_coverage...........ok t/mm_coverage_config....ok t/pod-coverage..........ok t/pod...................ok All tests successful. Files=5, Tests=39, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.34 cusr + 0.07 csys = 0.41 CPU) + exit 0 + Provides: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker::Coverage) = 0.05 + Requires: /usr/bin/perl perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker::Coverage) perl(File::Basename) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 03:07:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 23:07:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252125] Review Request: flpsed - WYSIWYG pseudo PostScript editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708210307.l7L37gKw013118@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flpsed - WYSIWYG pseudo PostScript editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252125 ------- Additional Comments From nsboyle at gmail.com 2007-08-20 23:07 EST ------- Thanks for the review Ewan! Updated stuff: SPEC: http://people.emich.edu/nboyle/flpsed.spec SRPM: http://people.emich.edu/nboyle/flpsed-0.5.0-2.fc7.src.rpm I rolled in all of the suggestions from above. On the topic of a .desktop file, I wasn't sure what the convention was if there is no existing icon (and I don't have the artistic skill to create one :P ), so there is no icon specified. It seemed to me a "Requires: [package with a bunch of stock icons]" would be kind of silly, but of course I could be mistaken. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 05:31:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 01:31:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225661] Merge Review: createrepo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708210531.l7L5VUcW031742@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: createrepo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225661 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora AssignedTo|pnasrat at redhat.com |pjones at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From bugzilla at redhat.com 2007-08-21 01:31 EST ------- User pnasrat at redhat.com's account has been closed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 07:18:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 03:18:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250040] Review Request: new - A simple template system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708210718.l7L7Ihs2010740@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: new - A simple template system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250040 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-21 03:18 EST ------- Still undefined non-weak symbols remain. Also new.pc returns nothing.. -------------------------------------------- [root at localhost ~]# pkg-config --libs new -------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 07:22:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 03:22:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225767] Merge Review: fonts-korean In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708210722.l7L7MA0n010950@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-korean https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225767 ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2007-08-21 03:22 EST ------- Updated .spec file according to comment# 25. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 09:43:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 05:43:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201061] Review Request: iserverd - Groupware ICQ server clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708210943.l7L9hJgb024792@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iserverd - Groupware ICQ server clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201061 andy at smile.org.ua changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: IServerd - |Review Request: iserverd - |Groupware ICQ server clone |Groupware ICQ server clone ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2007-08-21 05:43 EST ------- I've pushed new upstreamed version here: ftp://toaster.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/iserverd-2.5.5-1.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=111570 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 10:26:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 06:26:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253691] New: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253691 Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fitzsim at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://icedtea.classpath.org/hg/fedora/file/d30f0842b5c3/java-1.7.0-icedtea.spec SRPM URL: http://icedtea.classpath.org/download/fedora/java-1.7.0-icedtea-1.7.0.0-0.11.b18.snapshot.nosrc.rpm Description: The IcedTea runtime and development environments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 10:31:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 06:31:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253692] New: Review Request: compiz-fusion - Collection of Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253692 Summary: Review Request: compiz-fusion - Collection of Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: adel.gadllah at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/compiz-fusion.spec SRPM URL: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/compiz-fusion-0.5.2-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: The Compiz Fusion Project brings 3D desktop visual effects that improve usability of the X Window System and provide increased productivity though plugins and themes contributed by the community giving a rich desktop experience NOTE: This package is rawhide only. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 10:35:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 06:35:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253693] New: Review Request: compiz-fusion-extras - Additional Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253693 Summary: Review Request: compiz-fusion-extras - Additional Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: adel.gadllah at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/compiz-fusion-extras.spec SRPM URL: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/compiz-fusion-extras-0.5.2-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: The Compiz Fusion Project brings 3D desktop visual effects that improve usability of the X Window System and provide increased productivity though plugins and themes contributed by the community giving a rich desktop experience. This package contains additional plugins from the Compiz Fusion Project NOTES: This package is rawhide only. This package depends on compiz-fusion: Review Request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253692 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 10:37:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 06:37:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253693] Review Request: compiz-fusion-extras - Additional Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708211037.l7LAb3SG029938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-fusion-extras - Additional Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253693 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |253692 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 10:37:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 06:37:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253692] Review Request: compiz-fusion - Collection of Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708211037.l7LAb5u4029974@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-fusion - Collection of Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253692 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |253693 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 10:54:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 06:54:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708211054.l7LAsDVc031493@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-21 06:54 EST ------- Updated (without dumping the release): SRPM: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/netgen/netgen-1.3.7-10.fc7.src.rpm SPEC: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/netgen/netgen.spec logs: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/chitlesh/task_111617/ changes: %configure --with-tcl=%{_libdir} --with-tk=%{_libdir} \ --with-tcllibs=%{_libdir} --with-tklibs=%{_libdir} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 11:06:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 07:06:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253691] Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708211106.l7LB6ffk000568@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253691 ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2007-08-21 07:06 EST ------- rpmlint commentary: $ rpmlint java-1.7.0-icedtea-1.7.0.0-0.11.b18.snapshot.nosrc.rpm E: java-1.7.0-icedtea hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib See comment in spec file: # Hard-code libdir on 64-bit architectures to make the 64-bit JDK # simply be another alternative. E: java-1.7.0-icedtea configure-without-libdir-spec The %configure macro causes problems for IcedTea. I plan to fix this before Fedora 8, but it doesn't seem release critical. $ rpmlint java-1.7.0-icedtea-1.7.0.0-0.11.b18.snapshot.i586.rpm E: java-1.7.0-icedtea useless-explicit-provides jdbc-stdext This comes from JPackage. I'll remove it from the next package build. E: java-1.7.0-icedtea binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-icedtea-1.7.0.0/jre/bin/keytool ['$ORIGIN/../lib/i386/jli', '$ORIGIN/../jre/lib/i386/jli'] rpmlint should check for $ORIGIN before issuing this message since $ORIGIN rpaths are not hard-coded. E: java-1.7.0-icedtea file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-icedtea-1.7.0.0/jre/lib/security/cacerts IcedTea expects jre/lib/security files to be in this location. I plan to fix this before Fedora 8 but it is not release-critical. W: java-1.7.0-icedtea uncompressed-zip /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-icedtea-1.7.0.0/jre/lib/jsse.jar This is an rpmlint bug: the jar file is compressed. $ rpmlint java-1.7.0-icedtea-demo-1.7.0.0-0.11.b18.snapshot.i586.rpm W: java-1.7.0-icedtea-demo devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-icedtea-1.7.0.0/demo/jvmti/hprof/src/hprof_error.h These are fine since the demo package contains demos geared towards developers. E: java-1.7.0-icedtea-demo non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-icedtea-1.7.0.0/sample/scripting/scriptpad/src/scripts/memory.sh 0555 E: java-1.7.0-icedtea-demo script-without-shebang /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-icedtea-1.7.0.0/sample/scripting/scriptpad/src/scripts/memory.sh I'll fix these in the next package build. E: java-1.7.0-icedtea-demo invalid-soname /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-icedtea-1.7.0.0/demo/jvmti/mtrace/lib/libmtrace.so libmtrace.so These files are meant to be dlopen'd, not linked-to directly, so they should not have a versioned soname. $ rpmlint java-1.7.0-icedtea-devel-1.7.0.0-0.11.b18.snapshot.i586.rpm W: java-1.7.0-icedtea-devel dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/jvm-exports/java-1.7.0-icedtea java-1.7.0-icedtea-1.7.0.0 /usr/lib/jvm-exports/java-1.7.0-icedtea-1.7.0.0 is provided by the base package which java-1.7.0-icedtea-devel requires. $ rpmlint java-1.7.0-icedtea-javadoc-1.7.0.0-0.11.b18.snapshot.i586.rpm No warnings or errors. $ rpmlint java-1.7.0-icedtea-plugin-1.7.0.0-0.11.b18.snapshot.i586.rpm W: java-1.7.0-icedtea-plugin no-documentation This subpackage doesn't require documentation. $ rpmlint java-1.7.0-icedtea-rmi-1.7.0.0-0.11.b18.snapshot.i586.rpm W: java-1.7.0-icedtea-plugin no-documentation Likewise. $ rpmlint java-1.7.0-icedtea-src-1.7.0.0-0.11.b18.snapshot.i586.rpm W: java-1.7.0-icedtea-src no-documentation Likewise. E: java-1.7.0-icedtea-src only-non-binary-in-usr-lib Applications that refer to src.zip expect it to be in JAVA_HOME. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 11:10:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 07:10:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253691] Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708211110.l7LBAbwh000968@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253691 ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2007-08-21 07:10 EST ------- I noticed that I didn't package the IcedTea documentation. I'll do so in the next build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 11:45:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 07:45:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253232] Review Request: system-config-firewall - graphical interface for basic firewall setup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708211145.l7LBj2HP004999@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-firewall - graphical interface for basic firewall setup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253232 ------- Additional Comments From twoerner at redhat.com 2007-08-21 07:45 EST ------- There is a new Package: Spec URL: http://twoerner.fedorapeople.org/system-config-firewall.spec SRPM URL: http://twoerner.fedorapeople.org/system-config-firewall-1.0.3-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 11:49:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 07:49:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253232] Review Request: system-config-firewall - graphical interface for basic firewall setup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708211149.l7LBn5NN005482@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-firewall - graphical interface for basic firewall setup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253232 karsten at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |karsten at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 11:49:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 07:49:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253691] Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708211149.l7LBnYtL005556@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253691 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-08-21 07:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) Not a full review, just a few observations: > E: java-1.7.0-icedtea binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath > /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-icedtea-1.7.0.0/jre/bin/keytool > ['$ORIGIN/../lib/i386/jli', '$ORIGIN/../jre/lib/i386/jli'] > > rpmlint should check for $ORIGIN before issuing this message since $ORIGIN > rpaths are not hard-coded. Not all $ORIGIN RPATHs are desirable anyway though. See /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths-worker in >= 4.4.2.1 rpm-build versions (or rpmdevtools <= 5.4) and/or try building the package with these checks enabled (see rpmdev-setuptree) to see if it flags them as bad. > W: java-1.7.0-icedtea uncompressed-zip > /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-icedtea-1.7.0.0/jre/lib/jsse.jar > > This is an rpmlint bug: the jar file is compressed. Can you upload the binary package or just the jsse.jar which triggers this message somewhere so I can check what's up? > E: java-1.7.0-icedtea-demo invalid-soname > /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-icedtea-1.7.0.0/demo/jvmti/mtrace/lib/libmtrace.so > libmtrace.so > > These files are meant to be dlopen'd, not linked-to directly, so they should > not have a versioned soname. Isn't versioning the very purpose of sonames? What would a versionless soname be useful for? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 11:58:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 07:58:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225764] Merge Review: fonts-ISO8859-2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708211158.l7LBwr4s006793@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-ISO8859-2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225764 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com CC|majain at redhat.com |rbhalera at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 12:14:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 08:14:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253579] Review Request: php-pecl-memcache - Extension to work with the Memcached caching daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708211214.l7LCEp6u008560@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-memcache - Extension to work with the Memcached caching daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253579 fedora at famillecollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matthias at rpmforge.net ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2007-08-21 08:14 EST ------- I Add Matthias in CC: as is the maintener for this package at rpmforge. @Matthias : my spec is closed to your. We can work as co-maintener for this if you want. I will push it to Fedora and EPEL after review. Remi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 12:21:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 08:21:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253232] Review Request: system-config-firewall - graphical interface for basic firewall setup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708211221.l7LCLsP5009335@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-firewall - graphical interface for basic firewall setup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253232 ------- Additional Comments From karsten at redhat.com 2007-08-21 08:21 EST ------- - doesn't use smp flags, but it doesn't matter here as it doesn't build anything - buildroot not the preferred method of the day, but still ok - many fuzzy translation messages during build, but I'd guess that'll be fixed soon after the string freeze as long as the catalogs are submitted fro translation in time - s-c-f-t should provide lokkit as it obsoletes it and contains /usr/sbin/lokkit - /usr/share/system-config-securitylevel/firstboot_selinux.py and /usr/share/system-config-securitylevel/securitylevel.py should be relative symlinks to /usr/share/firstboot/modules/{securitylevel.py,firstboot_selinux.py} - /usr/bin/system-config-firewall-tui should be a relative symlink to /usr/sbin/lokkit - I don't think we support direct upgrades from FC-1 to F8. The obsoletes on redhat-config-securitylevel* can therefore be dropped. - executable bits on /usr/share/redhat-config-securitylevel/pixmaps/network.png should be removed (how about %defattr(0644,root,root) instead of defining 644 for each file separately and missing some ? ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 12:24:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 08:24:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253232] Review Request: system-config-firewall - graphical interface for basic firewall setup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708211224.l7LCOjmF009479@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-firewall - graphical interface for basic firewall setup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253232 ------- Additional Comments From karsten at redhat.com 2007-08-21 08:24 EST ------- - forget about /usr/share/redhat-config-securitylevel/pixmaps/network.png, but the comment about defattr still stands -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 12:54:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 08:54:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251998] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage - Allows perl modules to check test coverage with Devel::Cover In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708211254.l7LCs5GA012378@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage - Allows perl modules to check test coverage with Devel::Cover https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251998 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-08-21 08:54 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage Short Description: Allows perl modules to check test coverage with Devel::Cover Owners: rnorwood at redhat.com Branches: devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com Commits by cvsextras: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 13:11:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 09:11:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253232] Review Request: system-config-firewall - graphical interface for basic firewall setup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708211311.l7LDBfWm014837@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-firewall - graphical interface for basic firewall setup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253232 ------- Additional Comments From twoerner at redhat.com 2007-08-21 09:11 EST ------- All done.. Same name and EVR :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 14:05:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 10:05:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708211405.l7LE5AvC021287@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-08-21 10:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #32) > > * why the Build dependencies on texlive-texmf*? There is a comment > > but I don't understand it > > Binary texlive won't build without the main texmf tree. Configure complains: > ***************************************************************** > * Error: The main texmf tree was not found. * > * If you do not have the files, you should be able to them from * > * the same place you got these sources from, or from one of the * > * CTAN hosts. * > ***************************************************************** > Winging it. This is not the cause of the failure. The only side effect of the corresponding code is to set texmf, and it is set right with or without installed texlive-texmf. > then it tries to use files in $TEXMFMAIN: > tcfmgr: config file `tcfmgr.map' (usually in $TEXMFMAIN/texconfig) not found. > fmtutil: config file `fmtutil.cnf' not found. Here is a serious issue, indeed. > and ends up with some utilities not build/installed: Indeed, that's because mktexlsr and fmtutil-sys fail (and the failure is ignored in the makefile). It may work better with texlive-texmf installed (or tetex), but it is still fundamentaly broken in my opinion, since although the intent of the code (in Makefile.in, after 'temporary fix for missing links') is to use the just built stuff it isn't what happens for 2 reasons. First reason is that kpsewhich is run, so the trick is indeed needed (contrary to what I said earlier): export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=`pwd`/texk/kpathsea/.libs Even with that line uncommented, it is still using installed files and tries to write to installed directories because in build kpsewhich uses in build texmf.cnf which points to /usr/share/texmf/web2c. The only solution I have found is to keep {$SELFAUTOLOC,$SELFAUTODIR,$SELFAUTOPARENT}{,{/share,}/texmf{-local,}/web2c} in front of TEXMFCNF More generally I don't like much the way paths are handled currently. It is a mix with debian patch and sed substitution which in my opinion renders it a bit hard to follow, and moreover it seems to me that it doesn't do exactly the right thing, not only for TEXMFCNF, but only for paths.h. I propose 2 patches. The first one could be sent upstream, it is called texlive-more_paths.patch it adds more paths to be substituted in texmf.in. The other patch is called texlive-fedora_paths.patch and it takes care of substituting the right paths for fedora. paths.h and texmf.cnf are modified. these patches replace texlive-builtin-searchpath-fix.patch texlive-2007-varconfig.patch and the sed substitutions between pushd texk/kpathsea and popd. Now it is clear that these changes aren't of that big importance since they are only for defaults and out-of-FHS use of kpathsea, still I think that it would be better like that. As a side note, I think that using the sed substitutions is better in the case of texlive-texmf, only think is that it should be checked that the result isn't too far from the kpathsea defaults. I will attach a patch for texlive.spec, with the following changes: - change in the kpathsea default paths - don't BuildRequires the *-texmf - ship kpathsea defaults as documentation - simpler handlig of ps2eps I tested a mock build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 14:07:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 10:07:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708211407.l7LE7orX021560@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-08-21 10:07 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=161973) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=161973&action=view) mainly correct kpathsea paths and allow for build without texlive-texmf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 14:08:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 10:08:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708211408.l7LE8wYm021800@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-08-21 10:08 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=161974) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=161974&action=view) add more paths for substitution in texmf.in -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 14:10:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 10:10:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708211410.l7LEAP1F022154@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-08-21 10:10 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=161975) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=161975&action=view) change default kpathsea paths to be more fedora friendly -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 14:13:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 10:13:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253232] Review Request: system-config-firewall - graphical interface for basic firewall setup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708211413.l7LEDjaw022783@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-firewall - graphical interface for basic firewall setup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253232 karsten at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From karsten at redhat.com 2007-08-21 10:13 EST ------- - package looks ok now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 14:16:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 10:16:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251680] Review Request: amtterm - Serial-over-lan (sol) client for Intel AMT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708211416.l7LEGUJl023217@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: amtterm - Serial-over-lan (sol) client for Intel AMT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251680 ------- Additional Comments From kraxel at redhat.com 2007-08-21 10:16 EST ------- New release 0.5 and new package uploaded to http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/amtterm/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 14:23:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 10:23:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253232] Review Request: system-config-firewall - graphical interface for basic firewall setup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708211423.l7LENcna024323@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-firewall - graphical interface for basic firewall setup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253232 twoerner at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From twoerner at redhat.com 2007-08-21 10:23 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: system-config-firewall Short Description: A graphical interface for basic firewall setup Owners: twoerner Branches: devel InitialCC: Commits by cvsextras: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 14:56:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 10:56:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253232] Review Request: system-config-firewall - graphical interface for basic firewall setup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708211456.l7LEu3ts028979@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-firewall - graphical interface for basic firewall setup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253232 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-08-21 10:56 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 14:58:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 10:58:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251998] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage - Allows perl modules to check test coverage with Devel::Cover In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708211458.l7LEwUQ4029256@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage - Allows perl modules to check test coverage with Devel::Cover https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251998 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-08-21 10:58 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 14:59:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 10:59:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251361] Review Request: compat-expat1 - library compat package for expat 1.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708211459.l7LExhdW029396@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-expat1 - library compat package for expat 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251361 jorton at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: compat- |Review Request: compat- |expat1 - libray compat |expat1 - library compat |package for expat 1.x |package for expat 1.x Flag| |fedora-review?, fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jorton at redhat.com 2007-08-21 10:59 EST ------- This is essentially a renaming of the expat package with a stripped %files. Not sure it needs to go through a separate spec review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 15:01:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 11:01:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251361] Review Request: compat-expat1 - library compat package for expat 1.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708211501.l7LF10t9029570@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-expat1 - library compat package for expat 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251361 ------- Additional Comments From jorton at redhat.com 2007-08-21 11:00 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: compat-expat1 Short Description: Library compatibility package for expat 1 Owners: jorton Branches: devel InitialCC: Commits by cvsextras: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 15:01:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 11:01:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253649] Review Request: vinagre - VNC client for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708211501.l7LF1sdo029747@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vinagre - VNC client for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253649 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rstrode at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 15:12:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 11:12:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253691] Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708211512.l7LFCSPk030786@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253691 ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2007-08-21 11:12 EST ------- I ran: find /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-icedtea-1.7.0.0 -type f -print0 | xargs -0r /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths-worker and it didn't produce any warning or error messages. I was wrong about the uncompressed-zip warnings: the jars are created with jar c0mf, probably to speed class loading. Are most jars created this way for lookup speed? If so, maybe rpmlint should treat jars differently from zip files... Yes, you're right: I should eliminate soname generation altogether for those dlopen'd DSOs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 15:14:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 11:14:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253649] Review Request: vinagre - VNC client for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708211514.l7LFENPu030994@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vinagre - VNC client for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253649 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-08-21 11:14 EST ------- When building in mock I get: checking for XML::Parser... configure: error: XML::Parser perl module is required for intltool I've seen that problem before although I don't remember the details. Is it that the packaged intltool requires XML::Parser? I'm guessing either BuildRequires the parser or BuildRequires intltool and re-intltoolize will fix it. Overall looks very good. Minor nits that don't matter: - rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/doc/vinagre/ has an extra / in it (between ROOT and %{_datadir} - what docs are in the above anyway? omf files? Are they worth shipping? - vendor isn't required anymore for desktop-file-install, just ditch it. - There are a handful or so Application categories, normally when tossing the Application category, you pick one of them to replace it with (Maybe use Network?) - you have %{_datadir}/%{name}/* in the file list but the package should probably own the %{_datadir}/%{name} dir too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 15:23:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 11:23:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253649] Review Request: vinagre - VNC client for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708211523.l7LFNNlZ031852@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vinagre - VNC client for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253649 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-08-21 11:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > When building in mock I get: > > > checking for XML::Parser... configure: error: XML::Parser perl module is > required for intltool > > I've seen that problem before although I don't remember the details. Is it that > the packaged intltool requires XML::Parser? I'm guessing either BuildRequires > the parser or BuildRequires intltool and re-intltoolize will fix it. added perl-XML-Parser as a BR > Overall looks very good. Minor nits that don't matter: > > - rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/doc/vinagre/ has an extra / in it (between > ROOT and %{_datadir} Fixed. > - what docs are in the above anyway? omf files? Are they worth shipping? No, they're the usual AUTHORS, README, etc., but the maintainer thought it was good to install them by himself. I'm removing those, and installing in the usual versioned docs dir in %files > - vendor isn't required anymore for desktop-file-install, just ditch it. Done. > - There are a handful or so Application categories, normally when tossing the > Application category, you pick one of them to replace it with (Maybe use Network?) It's already in Network, so appears in the same menu as TSClient > - you have %{_datadir}/%{name}/* in the file list but the package should > probably own the %{_datadir}/%{name} dir too. Fixed, we want the whole dir. Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/bnocera/vinagre/vinagre.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/bnocera/vinagre/vinagre-0.2-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 15:38:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 11:38:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253649] Review Request: vinagre - VNC client for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708211538.l7LFcLCc001762@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vinagre - VNC client for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253649 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-08-21 11:38 EST ------- change that added BuildRequires to BuildRequires: perl(XML::Parser) and add one for libglade2-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 15:42:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 11:42:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253649] Review Request: vinagre - VNC client for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708211542.l7LFgRf5002500@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vinagre - VNC client for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253649 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-08-21 11:42 EST ------- My mistake, fixed here: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/bnocera/vinagre/vinagre.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/bnocera/vinagre/vinagre-0.2-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 15:46:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 11:46:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253691] Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708211546.l7LFkwZI003130@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253691 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-08-21 11:46 EST ------- It's very much possible that rpmlint's checks could be improved regarding jars, or perhaps messages filtered out altogether if it's not clear that compressed or uncompressed jars are in most cases a better choice (classloading performance vs space savings balanced) for Fedora than the other choice. I don't have any numbers nor really even a gut feeling for this. Regarding classloading from jars, somewhat off topic for this review, it could also be interesting to see if indexing the jars makes any performance difference if the jar tool in use supports indexing them (the -i option) and the runtime uses the indexes (of course if indexing is free of side effects). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 16:02:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 12:02:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253649] Review Request: vinagre - VNC client for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708211602.l7LG2Qeh005138@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vinagre - VNC client for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253649 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-08-21 12:02 EST ------- looks like avahi-ui-devel is missing a Requires: avahi-glib-devel which is breaking mock too, but that's not a problem with this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 16:08:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 12:08:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225243] Merge Review: amanda In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708211608.l7LG8wVN006557@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: amanda https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225243 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |orion at cora.nwra.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-08-21 12:08 EST ------- More thorough review to come shortly, but: Requires(pre): useradd should be Requires(pre): shadow-utils or you get: Error: Missing Dependency: useradd is needed by package amanda -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 16:10:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 12:10:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253649] Review Request: vinagre - VNC client for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708211610.l7LGAbJX006736@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vinagre - VNC client for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253649 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-08-21 12:10 EST ------- Filed as bug 253734 Worked around in: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/bnocera/vinagre/vinagre.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/bnocera/vinagre/vinagre-0.2-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 16:12:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 12:12:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253649] Review Request: vinagre - VNC client for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708211612.l7LGCoK0006956@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vinagre - VNC client for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253649 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-08-21 12:12 EST ------- More missing deps, this time it's gettext and co. Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/bnocera/vinagre/vinagre.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/bnocera/vinagre/vinagre-0.2-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 16:29:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 12:29:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251545] Review Request: setroubleshoot-plugins - analysis plugins for setroubleshoot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708211629.l7LGTCRR008916@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setroubleshoot-plugins - analysis plugins for setroubleshoot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251545 tmraz at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tmraz at redhat.com 2007-08-21 12:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Thank you for your review Tomas, its very much appreciated. > > New files have been loaded at the above URL (sorry, at the moment I don't think > FedoraProject will allow puting the files there, at least that used to be case, > perhaps it's changed) I think that you can simply attach the .tar.gz files to the Trac wiki of your project. It's not ideal but it works - like here: https://hosted.fedoraproject.org/projects/vixie-cron/ Also the URL field should point to the project pages rather than www.redhat.com. > All the above issues have been addressed, except one. The permissions on the > spec file are still 0600 and that seems to be the result of using rpmbuild in > tar file mode. The permissions on the spec file in the tar file is 0664. If you > use rpmbuld to create the srpm in non-tar file mode the spec file is 0644, but > if you use rpmbuild to create the spec file in tar file mode it appears to > change the permissions from 0644 in the tar file to 0600, go figure, I don't > know why. Other spec files have 0600 and it hasn't created a problem yet. That's nothing critical as when you'll import the spec file with right permissions into packages CVS the perms should be OK in the rpms built by koji. rpmlint output: rpmlint -v RPMS/noarch/setroubleshoot-plugins-1.10.0-1.fc8.noarch.rpm I: setroubleshoot-plugins checking rpmlint -v SRPMS/setroubleshoot-plugins-1.10.0-1.fc8.src.rpm I: setroubleshoot-plugins checking W: setroubleshoot-plugins strange-permission setroubleshoot-plugins.spec 0600 OK - see above As I wrote above - perhaps you have overlooked that: In the %post - the dbus-send output+stderr probably should be redirected to /dev/null and also the command safeguarded for non-zero exit status by '||:' Otherwise it's OK so APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 16:30:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 12:30:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253649] Review Request: vinagre - VNC client for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708211630.l7LGUA4I009029@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vinagre - VNC client for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253649 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-08-21 12:30 EST ------- Also need BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 16:35:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 12:35:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253649] Review Request: vinagre - VNC client for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708211635.l7LGZDqW009644@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vinagre - VNC client for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253649 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-08-21 12:35 EST ------- And missing desktop-file-utils: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/bnocera/vinagre/vinagre.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/bnocera/vinagre/vinagre-0.2-6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 16:47:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 12:47:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253649] Review Request: vinagre - VNC client for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708211647.l7LGlDZN012037@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vinagre - VNC client for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253649 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-08-21 12:47 EST ------- looks good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 17:07:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 13:07:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253741] New: Review Request: perl-VCS-LibCVS - Access CVS working directories and repositories Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253741 Summary: Review Request: perl-VCS-LibCVS - Access CVS working directories and repositories Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rnorwood at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-VCS-LibCVS.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-VCS-LibCVS-1.0002-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: LibCVS provides native Perl access to CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 17:15:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 13:15:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253649] Review Request: vinagre - VNC client for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708211715.l7LHFnwF015737@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vinagre - VNC client for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253649 bnocera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-08-21 13:15 EST ------- Thanks Ray! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: vinagre Short Description: VNC client for the GNOME desktop Owners: hadess Branches: devel InitialCC: bnocera at redhat.com Commits by cvsextras:yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 17:43:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 13:43:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235456] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-advmultiselect - Element for HTML_QuickForm that emulate a multi-select In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708211743.l7LHhiKE020024@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-advmultiselect - Element for HTML_QuickForm that emulate a multi-select https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235456 sebastien.prudhomme at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From sebastien.prudhomme at gmail.com 2007-08-21 13:43 EST ------- I close the bug so that Remi can do a real release -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 17:53:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 13:53:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253749] New: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-advmultiselect - Element for HTML_QuickForm that emulate a multi-select Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253749 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-advmultiselect - Element for HTML_QuickForm that emulate a multi-select Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at famillecollet.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-advmultiselect.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-advmultiselect-1.4.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Mock log: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-advmultiselect-build.log Description: The HTML_QuickForm_advmultiselect package adds an element to the HTML_QuickForm package that is two select boxes next to each other emulating a multi-select. -- I take ownership on the very old Review : Bug #235456 This is the last missing dep for Oreon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 17:59:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 13:59:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241387] Review Request: codeina - GStreamer Codec Installation Application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708211759.l7LHxjYi022968@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: codeina - GStreamer Codec Installation Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241387 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora bnocera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-08-21 13:59 EST ------- Updated package and spec: http://people.redhat.com/bnocera/codeina/codeina-0.10.0.1-0.20070525.170400.2.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/bnocera/codeina/codeina.spec It took me a while to work around codeina's broken dir names, but I managed it in the end. The source SVN wasn't updated as there were no changes since the last SVN snapshot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 18:03:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 14:03:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241387] Review Request: codeina - GStreamer Codec Installation Application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708211803.l7LI3ZSJ023911@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: codeina - GStreamer Codec Installation Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241387 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rstrode at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 18:04:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 14:04:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241387] Review Request: codeina - GStreamer Codec Installation Application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708211804.l7LI4lLs024110@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: codeina - GStreamer Codec Installation Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241387 bnocera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-08-21 14:04 EST ------- Removing the fedora_cvs flag, I turned it on accidentally. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 18:18:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 14:18:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251680] Review Request: amtterm - Serial-over-lan (sol) client for Intel AMT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708211818.l7LIIxRX026155@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: amtterm - Serial-over-lan (sol) client for Intel AMT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251680 dlutter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2007-08-21 14:18 EST ------- APPROVED. One minor misunderstanding: the 'Source' tag in the specfile should have the full URL to the source tarball (what's in the 'URL' tag right now). The 'URL' field generally should point to a project page or similar (since amtterm doesn't have one, leaving it as-is is fine) Please request CVS branches following http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure and close this bug as RAWHIDE when it's been imported. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 18:19:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 14:19:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251680] Review Request: amtterm - Serial-over-lan (sol) client for Intel AMT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708211819.l7LIJZpr026215@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: amtterm - Serial-over-lan (sol) client for Intel AMT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251680 dlutter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|RAWHIDE | ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2007-08-21 14:19 EST ------- Oops .. fatfingered status -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 18:27:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 14:27:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253757] New: Review Request: tesseract-langpack - Langpacks for tesseract Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253757 Summary: Review Request: tesseract-langpack - Langpacks for tesseract Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: karlikt at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://karlik.nonlogic.org/tesseract/tesseract-langpack.spec SRPM URL: http://karlik.nonlogic.org/tesseract/tesseract-langpack-2.00-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Langpacks for tesseract. The english version is included in core package. It will be working with: http://karlik.nonlogic.org/tesseract/tesseract.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 19:05:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 15:05:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241387] Review Request: codeina - GStreamer Codec Installation Application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708211905.l7LJ57rr001963@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: codeina - GStreamer Codec Installation Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241387 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-08-21 15:05 EST ------- With the absence of a full URL to source, could you at least include anonymous checkout instructions in a comment above it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 19:21:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 15:21:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244894] Review Request: yum-cron - get yum updates via a cron job In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708211921.l7LJL9X8004958@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yum-cron - get yum updates via a cron job https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244894 ahabig at umn.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ahabig at umn.edu 2007-08-21 15:21 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: yum-cron New Branches: EL-5 Re-reading comments from reviewers, I see that this is needed for EL-5 as well as the existing FC-6 and F-7. Sorry for missing this on the first go-round. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 20:06:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 16:06:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253757] Review Request: tesseract-langpack - Langpacks for tesseract In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708212006.l7LK6wRw010526@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tesseract-langpack - Langpacks for tesseract https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253757 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rpm at greysector.net ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-08-21 16:06 EST ------- Some comments after a quick glance: Tarball versioning suggests that these files are for tesseract version 2.0. I think you should use Requires: %{upstreamname} = %{version}. They might work with newer releases, too, but check with upstream if this is true or not. In each %files section, you should mark the files using the %lang macro, i.e.: %lang(fr) %{_datadir}/%{upstreamname}/tessdata/fra* I might do a formal review in a few days, if nobody beats me to it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 20:20:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 16:20:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251545] Review Request: setroubleshoot-plugins - analysis plugins for setroubleshoot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708212020.l7LKKFLL011835@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setroubleshoot-plugins - analysis plugins for setroubleshoot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251545 ------- Additional Comments From jdennis at redhat.com 2007-08-21 16:20 EST ------- Thank you Tomas. You are correct, I overlooked the safegaurding of the dbus-send command and fixed that. I also updated the URL. I agree, the permissions on the spec file are not a significant issue. Thank you for taking the time for a thourough review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 20:24:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 16:24:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253757] Review Request: tesseract-langpack - Langpacks for tesseract In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708212024.l7LKOeoS012536@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tesseract-langpack - Langpacks for tesseract https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253757 ------- Additional Comments From karlikt at gmail.com 2007-08-21 16:24 EST ------- see: http://code.google.com/p/tesseract-ocr/downloads/list There is that the lagpacks are for 2.00 and up Thanks for suggest with %lang, I will fix it after review (with other changes or before build on koji). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 21:13:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 17:13:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241387] Review Request: codeina - GStreamer Codec Installation Application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708212113.l7LLD3mO017892@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: codeina - GStreamer Codec Installation Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241387 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-08-21 17:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > With the absence of a full URL to source, could you at least include anonymous > checkout instructions in a comment above it? Sure, I'll add the details we have from the CodecBuddy wiki page. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 21:13:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 17:13:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253781] New: Review Request: outerspace - client for 4x on-line strategy game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253781 Summary: Review Request: outerspace - client for 4x on-line strategy game Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: qark at ospace.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ospace.net/files/outerspace.spec SRPM URL: http://ospace.net/files/outerspace-0.2.1-1.src.rpm Description: Outer Space is an on-line strategy game which takes place in the dangerous universe. You will become powerful commander of many stars, planets, and great fleets and will struggle for survival with other commanders. This package contains client for the game. This is my first package in Fedora and I look for sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 21:13:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 17:13:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253781] Review Request: outerspace - client for 4x on-line strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708212113.l7LLDsKN018085@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: outerspace - client for 4x on-line strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253781 qark at ospace.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 21:18:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 17:18:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241387] Review Request: codeina - GStreamer Codec Installation Application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708212118.l7LLIQYV019428@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: codeina - GStreamer Codec Installation Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241387 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-08-21 17:18 EST ------- maybe add a %{?dist} tag? what's the BuildRequires: gcc-c++ followed by: BuildArch: noarch about? You use $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in some places and %{buildroot} in others, which is a little inconsistent mock build fails with Possible unintended interpolation of @INTLTOOL_ICONV in string at ../intltool-merge line 96 Global symbol "@INTLTOOL_ICONV" requires explicit package name at ../intltool-merge line 96. not sure what that's about -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 21:45:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 17:45:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247406] Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708212145.l7LLjqOi024602@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247406 Bug 247406 depends on bug 247409, which changed state. Bug 247409 Summary: [RFE] Compiz 0.5.1 and a rewrite of DesktopEffects to make use of compizconfig-python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247409 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 22:43:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 18:43:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241387] Review Request: codeina - GStreamer Codec Installation Application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708212243.l7LMhcNq029310@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: codeina - GStreamer Codec Installation Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241387 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-08-21 18:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > maybe add a %{?dist} tag? > > what's the > BuildRequires: gcc-c++ > followed by: > BuildArch: noarch > > about? You didn't see the "sigh, libtool" comment. Basically, libtool needed it, and complained if it's not there. Not the case anymore though, thus removed. > You use $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in some places and %{buildroot} in others, which is a > little inconsistent Fixed. > mock build fails with > > Possible unintended interpolation of @INTLTOOL_ICONV in string at > ../intltool-merge line 96 > Global symbol "@INTLTOOL_ICONV" requires explicit package name at > ../intltool-merge line 96. > > not sure what that's about Version mismatch between the tarball intltool and the system one. Running intltoolize fixes it. Build properly under mock. http://people.redhat.com/bnocera/codeina/codeina-0.10.0.1-0.20070525.170400.3.fc8.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/bnocera/codeina/codeina.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 22:56:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 18:56:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251545] Review Request: setroubleshoot-plugins - analysis plugins for setroubleshoot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708212256.l7LMu36e029952@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setroubleshoot-plugins - analysis plugins for setroubleshoot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251545 jdennis at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jdennis at redhat.com 2007-08-21 18:55 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: setroubleshoot-plugins Short Description: Analysis plugins for use with setroubleshoot Owners: jdennis Branches: FC-6 F-7 F-8 InitialCC: dwalsh Commits by cvsextras: No -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 23:19:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 19:19:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708212319.l7LNJcgE031738@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora denis at poolshark.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2007-08-21 19:19 EST ------- Closing this, as there seems to be no interest in picking this up. New takers should file a new review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 23:21:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 19:21:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244894] Review Request: yum-cron - get yum updates via a cron job In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708212321.l7LNLloa032267@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yum-cron - get yum updates via a cron job https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244894 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-21 19:21 EST ------- cvs done. Note that EL-5 builds will go to the EPEL testing repository, so look for your completed builds there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 23:30:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 19:30:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251545] Review Request: setroubleshoot-plugins - analysis plugins for setroubleshoot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708212330.l7LNUmTl000974@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setroubleshoot-plugins - analysis plugins for setroubleshoot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251545 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-21 19:30 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 23:33:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 19:33:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253649] Review Request: vinagre - VNC client for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708212333.l7LNXUPb001267@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vinagre - VNC client for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253649 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-21 19:33 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 23:34:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 19:34:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251361] Review Request: compat-expat1 - library compat package for expat 1.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708212334.l7LNYt3f001542@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-expat1 - library compat package for expat 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251361 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com Flag|fedora-review?, fedora-cvs? | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-21 19:34 EST ------- Yeah, everything should get reviewed. In this case it would be good to do to make sure it works fine installed along side the non-compat version. I can probibly review it in a while if no one beats me to it... Unsetting flags for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 23:43:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 19:43:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232725] Review Request: eclipse-mylar - A task-focused UI for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708212343.l7LNhYqt002034@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-mylar - A task-focused UI for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232725 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-21 19:43 EST ------- ok. I have created a new eclipse-mylyn package for you. Can you please follow the end of life procedure for the old package name: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/PackageEndOfLife Also, be carefull about Obsoletes and Provides on the new package. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-3cfc1ea19d28975faad9d56f70a6ae55661d3c3d -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 00:57:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 20:57:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250040] Review Request: new - A simple template system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708220057.l7M0vVA7006547@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: new - A simple template system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250040 ------- Additional Comments From mike at flyn.org 2007-08-21 20:57 EST ------- I updated new.pc so that "pkg-config --libs new" displays "-L/usr/lib -lnewfmt_ptrn -lnewtemplate -lglib-2.0." As I mentioned, I'd like to postpone fixing the undefined non-weak symbols issue. Spec URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/new.spec SRPM URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/new-1.3.11-1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 01:08:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 21:08:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251071] Review Request: StatelessServer - Server for Stateless Clients In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708220108.l7M18W1G007160@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: StatelessServer - Server for Stateless Clients https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251071 ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2007-08-21 21:08 EST ------- Not a full review, but seeing such a large %post script makes me very uncomfortable. For starters, what is going to happen when people update to a newer version of the package (at least for lokkit, you append to its config file every time) ... restarting services from %post is very bad, since it breaks installing the package into buildroots (mock) Please turn the %post script into a file that gets installed by the package and has to be run manually. (You could of course turn this into a puppet manifest, but having stateless-server manage itself through puppet seems a little too clever) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 01:19:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 21:19:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253805] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253805 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dchen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/scim-array.spec SRPM URL: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/scim-array-0.0.1-0.fc7.src.rpm Description: scim-array is a Array 30 input method engine for SCIM to support all the functions of Array 30, including first-level and second-level short codes, special codes, and symbols. It also provides the notification of special codes and the "special code only" mode. scim-array is a free software and distributed with General Public License. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 01:22:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 21:22:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253805] Review Request: scim-array - Array 30 input method engine for SCIM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708220122.l7M1MKHo008418@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-array - Array 30 input method engine for SCIM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253805 dchen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- |for SCIM Version|devel |f7 Severity|medium |low Priority|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 01:41:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 21:41:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227091] Review Request: objectweb-anttask - ObjectWeb Ant task In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708220141.l7M1fjXE009629@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: objectweb-anttask - ObjectWeb Ant task https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227091 dbhole at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From dbhole at redhat.com 2007-08-21 21:41 EST ------- Package has been built in Koji. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 02:07:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 22:07:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253812] New: Package Review: taipei-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253812 Summary: Package Review: taipei-fonts (splitted from fonts- chinese) Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cchance at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: eng-i18n-bugs at redhat.com,fedora-package- review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #253161 +++ Description of problem: fonts-chinese contains a number of different fonts, they should be moved to packages that reflect the upstream project's name as far as possible: eg to arphic-fonts and taipei-fonts. -- Additional comment from cchance at redhat.com on 2007-08-19 07:58 EST -- Excuse me to ask, how could this proposal conserve the current convenience for user to install formal chinese fonts when it is carried out? -- Additional comment from petersen at redhat.com on 2007-08-19 20:42 EST -- fonts-chinese will require the new fonts packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 02:07:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 22:07:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253161] move fonts to packages reflecting upstream name In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708220207.l7M27dmx011447@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: move fonts to packages reflecting upstream name https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253161 cchance at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |253812 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 02:09:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 22:09:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253813] New: Package Review: cjkunifonts-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts-fonts (splitted from fonts- chinese). Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: cchance at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: eng-i18n-bugs at redhat.com,fedora-package- review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com,petersen at redhat.com +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #253161 +++ Description of problem: fonts-chinese contains a number of different fonts, they should be moved to packages that reflect the upstream project's name as far as possible: eg to arphic-fonts and taipei-fonts. -- Additional comment from cchance at redhat.com on 2007-08-19 07:58 EST -- Excuse me to ask, how could this proposal conserve the current convenience for user to install formal chinese fonts when it is carried out? -- Additional comment from petersen at redhat.com on 2007-08-19 20:42 EST -- fonts-chinese will require the new fonts packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 02:09:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 22:09:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253161] move fonts to packages reflecting upstream name In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708220209.l7M29JF0011774@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: move fonts to packages reflecting upstream name https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253161 cchance at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |253813 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 02:33:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 22:33:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253741] Review Request: perl-VCS-LibCVS - Access CVS working directories and repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708220233.l7M2XdO8013842@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-VCS-LibCVS - Access CVS working directories and repositories Alias: perl-VCS-LibCVS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253741 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-VCS-LibCVS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 02:42:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 22:42:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253812] Package Review: taipei-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708220242.l7M2gHi6014617@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: taipei-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253812 cchance at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cchance at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 03:59:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 23:59:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250040] Review Request: new - A simple template system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708220359.l7M3xjU8020644@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: new - A simple template system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250040 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-08-21 23:59 EST ------- Some remarks: * configure script spews out a pretty drastic warning: checking for check - version >= 0.8.2... no *** Could not run check test program, checking why... *** The test program failed to compile or link. See the file config.log for *** the exact error that occured. configure: WARNING: Check not found; cannot run unit tests! Dunno how serious this warning is - If it shall be taken serious, then there the spec lacks some dependencies, if it isn't serious, then this configure script is a bit too "loud". * pass --disable-static to %configure, spares wasting time on building the static libs. Finally, something more general, you will not like: I find calling a package "new" to not be a "clever decision", because naming files and directories "new" is a pretty sure way to cause conflicts and clashes in future. Consider your package is shipping this: /usr/include/new Would your package be named "list", you now would clash with c++. "new" isn't in a better position. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 04:34:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 00:34:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253805] Review Request: scim-array - Array 30 input method engine for SCIM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708220434.l7M4YajV023254@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-array - Array 30 input method engine for SCIM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253805 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-22 00:34 EST ------- Change License to GPLv2 and remove INSTALL from %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 04:43:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 00:43:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253805] Review Request: scim-array - Array 30 input method engine for SCIM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708220443.l7M4hqnB024031@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-array - Array 30 input method engine for SCIM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253805 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-22 00:43 EST ------- remove .la files not required to pass prefix to %configure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 05:03:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 01:03:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251361] Review Request: compat-expat1 - library compat package for expat 1.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708220503.l7M53dLo025049@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-expat1 - library compat package for expat 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251361 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-22 01:03 EST ------- ok, look for a full review in a bit here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 05:05:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 01:05:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253812] Package Review: taipei-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708220505.l7M55ZaK025222@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: taipei-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253812 cchance at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(petersen at redhat.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2007-08-22 01:05 EST ------- http://hiro.brisbane.redhat.com/~cchance/20070822_taipei/taipei-fonts.spec http://hiro.brisbane.redhat.com/~cchance/20070822_taipei/taipei-fonts-0.1-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 05:14:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 01:14:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251361] Review Request: compat-expat1 - library compat package for expat 1.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708220514.l7M5ENrB025684@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-expat1 - library compat package for expat 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251361 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-22 01:14 EST ------- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (MIT) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: aff487543845a82fe262e6e2922b4c8e expat-1.95.8.tar.gz aff487543845a82fe262e6e2922b4c8e expat-1.95.8.tar.gz.1 OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun OK - .la files are removed. OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs See below - Should have dist tag Issues: 1. Does this package need %makeinstall? You shouldn't use it if you can avoid it. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/MakeInstall 2. The URL in the Source line looks wrong... http://download.sourceforge.net/expat/expat-%{version}.tar.gz should be http://downloads.sourceforge.net/expat/expat-%{version}.tar.gz (note the plural). 3. By no means a blocker, but there's no dist tag. Since this is a compat package and hopefully won't be around for a long time it's probibly fine not to bother with one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 05:27:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 01:27:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708220527.l7M5RjdO026753@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2007-08-22 01:27 EST ------- http://hiro.brisbane.redhat.com/~cchance/20070822_cjkuni/cjkuni-fonts.spec http://hiro.brisbane.redhat.com/~cchance/20070822_cjkuni/cjkuni-fonts-0.1-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 05:28:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 01:28:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708220528.l7M5SDIv026828@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 cchance at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(petersen at redhat.co | |m) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 05:28:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 01:28:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253805] Review Request: scim-array - Array 30 input method engine for SCIM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708220528.l7M5SexR026894@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-array - Array 30 input method engine for SCIM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253805 ------- Additional Comments From dchen at redhat.com 2007-08-22 01:28 EST ------- After .la files removed, the rpmbuild -bi scim-array.spec states that: ==================================================== error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib64/scim-1.0/1.4.0/IMEngine/array.la /usr/lib64/scim-1.0/1.4.0/SetupUI/array-imengine-setup.la RPM build errors: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib64/scim-1.0/1.4.0/IMEngine/array.la /usr/lib64/scim-1.0/1.4.0/SetupUI/array-imengine-setup.la =========================================== What should I do with it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 05:36:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 01:36:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253812] Package Review: taipei-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708220536.l7M5aSoW027375@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: taipei-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253812 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-22 01:36 EST ------- Add license file in tarball. Change License tag to one of compatible licenses allowed. add postun section Change buildroot why Obsolete needed? Is taipeifonts package present in fedora currently? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 05:37:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 01:37:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253812] Package Review: taipei-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708220537.l7M5b1tU027458@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: taipei-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253812 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|cchance at redhat.com |panemade at gmail.com Flag|needinfo?(petersen at redhat.co|fedora-review? |m) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 05:37:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 01:37:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253812] Package Review: taipei-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708220537.l7M5bbOo027532@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: taipei-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253812 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(cchance at redhat.com | |) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 05:58:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 01:58:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253812] Package Review: taipei-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708220558.l7M5w8SU028507@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: taipei-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253812 cchance at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(cchance at redhat.com| |) | ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2007-08-22 01:58 EST ------- http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/20070822_taipei/taipei-fonts.spec http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/20070822_taipei/taipei-fonts-0.1-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 05:59:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 01:59:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708220559.l7M5xw3k028616@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2007-08-22 01:59 EST ------- http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/20070822_cjkuni/cjkuni-fonts.spec http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/20070822_cjkuni/cjkuni-fonts-0.1-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 06:07:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 02:07:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708220607.l7M67o6a029131@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(petersen at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-22 02:07 EST ------- I am still wondering if it is better to split the ukai and uming fonts into separate packages. This might also be better for casual Chinese users who don't need them both. Another way to do that would be to subpackage them from the same srpm - that would be less package maintainence work anyway. Anyway I think the base name should be cjkunifonts like the upstream project. I don't mind if the package is called cjkunifonts or cjkunifonts-fonts say. http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/CJKUnifonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 06:50:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 02:50:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252104] Review Request: perl-Perlbal-XS-HTTPHeaders - Perlbal extension for processing HTTP headers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708220650.l7M6oYDq003001@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Perlbal-XS-HTTPHeaders - Perlbal extension for processing HTTP headers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252104 ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 07:34:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 03:34:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249524] Review Request: wxdfast - Multi-threaded download manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708220734.l7M7YmaZ005547@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wxdfast - Multi-threaded download manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249524 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2007-08-22 03:34 EST ------- some notes from testing before formal review: - update license tag GPL => GPLv2, icons are using Creative Commons Public License - in %build - using %configure is enough, no need to set prefix, ..., no need to explicitly set CXXFLAGS for make - remove execute bit from source files (find + xargs chmod a-x) - debug package does not contain the sources (tested in mock for Rawhide/i386 and natively on FC6/x86_64) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 07:40:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 03:40:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250240] Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708220740.l7M7eUNs005989@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250240 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-08-22 03:40 EST ------- Updated to new upstream version, fixes the rawhide build issues. http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/linkage.spec http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/linkage-0.1.4-1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 08:13:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 04:13:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190040] Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708220813.l7M8D9n6009226@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190040 ------- Additional Comments From lmacken at redhat.com 2007-08-22 04:12 EST ------- I'm getting this build error with that patch: src/lib/FLACFile.cpp: In member function 'void FLACFile_real::load(std::string)': src/lib/FLACFile.cpp:167: error: 'set_filename' was not declared in this scope src/lib/FLACFile.cpp:169: error: no matching function for call to 'FLACFile_real::init()' /usr/include/FLAC++/decoder.h:226: note: candidates are: virtual FLAC__StreamDecoderInitStatus FLAC::Decoder::File::init(FILE*) /usr/include/FLAC++/decoder.h:227: note: virtual FLAC__StreamDecoderInitStatus FLAC::Decoder::File::init(const char*) /usr/include/FLAC++/decoder.h:228: note: virtual FLAC__StreamDecoderInitStatus FLAC::Decoder::File::init(const std::string&) src/lib/FLACFile.cpp:170: error: 'FLAC__FILE_DECODER_OK' was not declared in this scope src/lib/FLACFile.cpp:174: error: 'process_until_end_of_file' was not declared in this scope make[1]: *** [src/FLACFile.o] Error 1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 08:23:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 04:23:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251680] Review Request: amtterm - Serial-over-lan (sol) client for Intel AMT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708220823.l7M8NP5O010276@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: amtterm - Serial-over-lan (sol) client for Intel AMT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251680 kraxel at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kraxel at redhat.com 2007-08-22 04:23 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: amtterm Short Description: Serial-over-lan (sol) client for Intel AMT. Owners: kraxel Branches: F-7 EL-5 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 08:35:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 04:35:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249524] Review Request: wxdfast - Multi-threaded download manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708220835.l7M8Z9EA011303@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wxdfast - Multi-threaded download manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249524 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2007-08-22 04:35 EST ------- Sorry, overwriting the CXXFLAGS is necessary. Only in the top-level makefile they are OK. The debug package is created correctly too. But I have a solution that can be posted upstream, see attachments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 08:36:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 04:36:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249524] Review Request: wxdfast - Multi-threaded download manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708220836.l7M8a2Av011487@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wxdfast - Multi-threaded download manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249524 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2007-08-22 04:36 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=162036) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=162036&action=view) patch for Makefile.* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 08:36:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 04:36:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249524] Review Request: wxdfast - Multi-threaded download manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708220836.l7M8aXTU011569@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wxdfast - Multi-threaded download manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249524 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2007-08-22 04:36 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=162037) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=162037&action=view) spec file patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 08:59:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 04:59:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251361] Review Request: compat-expat1 - library compat package for expat 1.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708220859.l7M8xrb3013617@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-expat1 - library compat package for expat 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251361 ------- Additional Comments From jorton at redhat.com 2007-08-22 04:59 EST ------- Thanks for the review! (In reply to comment #6) > 1. Does this package need %makeinstall? Yes, the Makefile doesn't support DESTDIR. > 2. The URL in the Source line looks wrong... Fixed in -3 at above location. > 3. By no means a blocker, but there's no dist tag. This is by intent, I see no need to use the dist tag on the devel branch for any package. (particularly so for a package like this, as you say, which will never exist in any branch) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 09:00:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 05:00:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253232] Review Request: system-config-firewall - graphical interface for basic firewall setup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708220900.l7M90DFp013664@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-firewall - graphical interface for basic firewall setup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253232 twoerner at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From twoerner at redhat.com 2007-08-22 05:00 EST ------- Sucessfully built: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=112438 Closing as NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 09:07:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 05:07:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253579] Review Request: php-pecl-memcache - Extension to work with the Memcached caching daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708220907.l7M97NLf014445@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-memcache - Extension to work with the Memcached caching daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253579 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |matthias at rpmforge.net Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-08-22 05:07 EST ------- Veeeery nice, clean and portable spec file. This will be a real pleasure to review. Thanks for CC'ing me, feel free to do it again ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 09:09:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 05:09:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249524] Review Request: wxdfast - Multi-threaded download manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708220909.l7M993AY014558@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wxdfast - Multi-threaded download manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249524 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-08-22 05:08 EST ------- hi thx for the patches I applied them, new package here: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/wxdfast.spec http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/wxdfast-0.6.0-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 09:25:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 05:25:58 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_230096=5D_Review_Request=3A_iwlwifi-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_3945_A/B?= =?iso-8859-1?q?/G_network_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708220925.l7M9PwpG015905@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iwlwifi-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 3945 A/B/G network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230096 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-08-22 05:25 EST ------- New package, which includes the firmware version still required for the F7 kernels (and current devel?), and also the very latest version, probably required soon by the devel kernels if not already : http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/iwl3945-firmware/iwl3945-firmware.spec http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/iwl3945-firmware/iwl3945-firmware-2.14.1.5-1.src.rpm And I'm reopening the bug to make it easier to track it. I'll be asking for the CVS rename now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 09:29:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 05:29:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253692] Review Request: compiz-fusion - Collection of Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708220929.l7M9TW7t016195@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-fusion - Collection of Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253692 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-08-22 05:29 EST ------- fixed a gconf bug, new urls: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/compiz-fusion.spec http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/compiz-fusion-0.5.2-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 09:30:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 05:30:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253693] Review Request: compiz-fusion-extras - Additional Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708220930.l7M9UFqL016307@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-fusion-extras - Additional Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253693 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-08-22 05:30 EST ------- fixed a gconf bug, new urls: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/compiz-fusion-extras.spec http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/compiz-fusion-extras-0.5.2-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 09:30:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 05:30:39 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_230096=5D_Review_Request=3A_iwl3945-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_3945_A/B?= =?iso-8859-1?q?/G_network_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708220930.l7M9UdYb016381@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iwl3945-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 3945 A/B/G network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230096 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: iwlwifi- |Review Request: iwl3945- |firmware - Firmware for |firmware - Firmware for |Intel? PRO/Wireless 3945 |Intel? PRO/Wireless 3945 |A/B/G network adaptors |A/B/G network adaptors Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-08-22 05:30 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: iwlwifi-firmware The package need to be renamed to iwl3945-firmware per upstream split (iwl3945 and iwl4965). Please make the required changes, then I'll commit the new spec files with the changed name and rebuild new packages for the current branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 09:31:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 05:31:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253833] New: Review Request: compat-neon025 - library compat package for neon 0.25 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253833 Summary: Review Request: compat-neon025 - library compat package for neon 0.25 Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jorton at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://jorton.fedorapeople.org/neon/compat-neon025.spec SRPM URL: http://jorton.fedorapeople.org/neon/compat-neon025-0.25.5-1.src.rpm Description: A library compatibility package for neon 0.25 Given that (among other things) rpm is linked against neon 0.25 in F7 it seems prudent to include a compat package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 09:32:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 05:32:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253833] Review Request: compat-neon025 - library compat package for neon 0.25 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708220932.l7M9WbQt016761@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-neon025 - library compat package for neon 0.25 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253833 jorton at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 09:33:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 05:33:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233596] Review Request: python-Coherence - Python framework to participate in digital living networks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708220933.l7M9XdZ6016912@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-Coherence - Python framework to participate in digital living networks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233596 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-08-22 05:33 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-Coherence New Branches: F-7 For some reason, when devel was branched off for F-7, the F-7 branch of python-Coherence wasn't created (no F-7 directory) : [dude at python3 python-Coherence]$ cvs update -dP cvs update: Updating . cvs update: Updating EL-4 cvs update: Updating EL-5 cvs update: Updating FC-5 cvs update: Updating FC-6 cvs update: Updating devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 10:08:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 06:08:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249352] Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708221008.l7MA8QAP020191@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249352 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|119782, 205849 | OtherBugsDependingO| |119782, 205849 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-08-22 06:08 EST ------- It seems that the bugs in "depends on" were intended for "blocks", because one is for RHEL and may be fixed in this version and the other is more a feature request and may also be already fixed in the reviewed version. Please change this back in case I am wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 11:42:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 07:42:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249352] Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708221142.l7MBgDR2028096@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249352 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |opensource at till.name Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-08-22 07:42 EST ------- graphviz (or something else that provides dot) is missing in the BuildRequires, without it errors like this are shown: sh: dot: command not found Problems running dot: exit code=127, command='dot', Arguments='"poptint_8h__dep__incl.dot" -Tpng -o "poptint_8h__dep__incl.png"' Review: - rpmlint: ok (this is with BR on graphviz) E: popt-devel zero-length /usr/share/doc/popt-devel-1.12/html/popt_8h__incl.map This is created by doxygen, imho there is no need to remove it manually. W: popt-static no-documentation This is no problem, too. - naming: ok - spec file readability: ok - source: ok f45290e9ac4b1cf209d0042eb6755543 /tmp/popt-1.12.tar.gz f45290e9ac4b1cf209d0042eb6755543 popt-1.12.tar.gz - mockbuild i386 F7: ok - BuildRequires: NEEDSWORK (add graphviz) - ldconfig scriptlets: ok - Directory Ownership: ok - %clean section: ok - macro usage: ok - doc: large api doc is in devel, ok - devel subpackage with headers: ok - static subpackage: ok - .so file in -devel: ok - subpackage requires: ok - .la removed: ok - correct %install - license included: ok - Buildroot: ok Add graphviz to BR before you import the package and it is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 12:12:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:12:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251068] Review Request: ocaml-libvirt - OCaml binding for libvirt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708221212.l7MCCJn4030625@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-libvirt - OCaml binding for libvirt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251068 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |253566 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-08-22 08:12 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-libvirt.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-libvirt-0.3.2.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: OCaml binding for libvirt (http://libvirt.org) and also the virtualization utility 'virt-top'. * Wed Aug 22 2007 Richard W.M. Jones - 0.3.2.1-1 - Upstream version 0.3.2.1. - Put HTML documentation in -devel package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 12:12:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:12:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253566] Review Request: ocaml-xml-light - Minimal XML parser and printer for OCaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708221212.l7MCCKx4030651@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-xml-light - Minimal XML parser and printer for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253566 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |251068 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 12:16:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:16:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708221216.l7MCGZjX032076@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-22 08:16 EST ------- One question. * Desktop file - This package does not contain any desktop file. However xcircuit is also Tcl/Tk application and xcircuit has desktop file So may it be that netgen should also have desktop file? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 12:48:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:48:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251068] Review Request: ocaml-libvirt - OCaml binding for libvirt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708221248.l7MCmb9q002535@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-libvirt - OCaml binding for libvirt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251068 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-08-22 08:48 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-libvirt.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-libvirt-0.3.2.1-2.fc8.src.rpm Description: OCaml binding for libvirt (http://libvirt.org) and also the virtualization utility 'virt-top'. There was an unclosed %if section in the previous spec file - fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 12:49:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:49:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708221249.l7MCnmN6002655@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 ------- Additional Comments From mefoster at gmail.com 2007-08-22 08:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #30) I'm working on this. I've made most of the changes, but I'd like some advice on a couple of them. > A: ruby-libs dependency > - This package has "BuildRequires: ruby-libs" and > -ruby subpackage has "Requires: ruby(abi) = 1.8" > > For consistency (i.e. to avoid that this package is > rebuild against ruby 1.9), IMO "BuildRequires: ruby-libs" > should be replaced with "ruby(abi) = 1.8". You can't actually "BuildRequire: ruby(abi)" ... what I've got there right now is consistent with my reading of the Ruby packaging guidelines (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby). NB: I don't actually use Ruby ... > D. naming > - Usually foo-devel package should have the corresponding > package named foo. > IMO -cxx-devel subpackage should just be named as > "ice-devel". The thing is, the main ice package provides a large number of runtime files and documentation, as well as a set of .so.* libraries (that the runtime files are linked to). The c++-devel package adds two tools and a set of .h files and .so links so that you can build Ice packages using c++ -- it is clearly a c++ development package, not an overall "-devel" package. I can see the argument for calling it "ice-devel", but that's a bit confusing because that sounds like it's *the* Ice development package when in truth it's really just for C++. > 4. All source codes check (especially license issue check) > - Well, this is extremely hard.. Actually there are (in total) > 10448 files (the most number in the packages I have reviewed...) > > I may skip this check during review, however if I find any issues > I will report later. I've done some preliminary looking around. It seems that the majority of source files are under the "Ice license", which is the GPLv2 with exceptions for OpenSSL and Orca Robotics components. Here are some numbers (just simple "grep" for now ...) - 10448 files - 6944 have the Ice license - 13 have GPLv2 "or later" A lot of the remainder are in the "test" or "demo" directories, which I don't build at all -- is that an issue? There are also a lot of ".depend" files which have no license information at all. And then there are the *.png/*.gif files in the documentation ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 12:52:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:52:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708221252.l7MCqVM6003039@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 ------- Additional Comments From mefoster at gmail.com 2007-08-22 08:52 EST ------- > - 10448 files > - 6944 have the Ice license Okay, whoops, forgot to subtract there: I think something like 3504 have the Ice license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 12:53:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:53:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253191] Exist XML database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708221253.l7MCrDJq003168@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Exist XML database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253191 ------- Additional Comments From dojo_ten at yahoo.com 2007-08-22 08:53 EST ------- OK, I see. I would add it to that list, but it seems to be write protected, even after I created an account on the wiki. Maybe it's only for developers, I'm a regular user. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 12:59:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:59:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250924] Review Request: flashrom - Simple program for reading/writing BIOS chips content In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708221259.l7MCx9rS003885@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flashrom - Simple program for reading/writing BIOS chips content https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250924 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-08-22 08:59 EST ------- minor update - svn 2744 where added support for EPoX EP-BX3 board. http://peter.fedorapeople.org/flashrom.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/flashrom-0.0-1.2744svn.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 13:19:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 09:19:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253833] Review Request: compat-neon025 - library compat package for neon 0.25 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708221319.l7MDJNfY006630@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-neon025 - library compat package for neon 0.25 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253833 jorton at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |243638 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 13:21:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 09:21:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253579] Review Request: php-pecl-memcache - Extension to work with the Memcached caching daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708221321.l7MDLBF3006788@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-memcache - Extension to work with the Memcached caching daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253579 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-08-22 09:21 EST ------- I just went through the ReviewGuidelines, double checked the license and tested a Fedora 7 x86_64 build. It all looks fine. Just two minor nitpicks : - Some sections of your spec file are separated by 2 spaces, others only by one. It would be more readable if all were separated by 2 IMHO :-) (before %prep, %build and %changelog). - It's harmless here, but you should always escape macros in comments and the %changelog, so change "use %name rather than %pecl_name" to "use %%name rather than %%pecl_name" or even simply "use name rather than pecl_name". Again, no big deal, but if some day you put some multi-line macro, it'll do nasty stuff ;-) APPROVED even as-is in any case, great work on PHP packaging, keep it up! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 13:31:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 09:31:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253858] New: Review Request: system-config-vsftpd - graphical utility for administrating vsftpd Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253858 Summary: Review Request: system-config-vsftpd - graphical utility for administrating vsftpd Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mbarabas at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vsftpd-config.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/*checkout*/vsftpd-config/trunk/system-config-vsftpd.spec SRPM URL: http://easynews.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/vsftpd-config/system-config-vsftpd-0.4.4-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: System-config-vsftpd is a graphical utility for administrating Very Secure FTP Daemon ( VSFTPD ). This is my first package and I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 13:58:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 09:58:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241387] Review Request: codeina - GStreamer Codec Installation Application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708221358.l7MDwcaV010612@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: codeina - GStreamer Codec Installation Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241387 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-08-22 09:58 EST ------- Only thing that bothers me a little is install -D -m 0755 %{SOURCE1} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libexecdir}/gst-install-plugins-helper.sh should that go into %{_libexecdir}/codeina/gst-install-plugins-helper.sh ? Regardless of the answer to that question looks good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 14:03:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:03:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231814] Review Request: avarice - Program for interfacing the Atmel JTAG ICE to GDB In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708221403.l7ME3YX0011318@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avarice - Program for interfacing the Atmel JTAG ICE to GDB https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231814 ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com 2007-08-22 10:03 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: avarice Short Description: Program for interfacing the Atmel JTAG ICE to GDB to allow users to debug their embedded AVR target. Owners: trondd Branches: FC6, F-7, EL-5 InitialCC: Commits by cvsextras: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 14:04:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:04:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231835] Review Request: uisp - Universal In-System Programmer for Atmel AVR and 8051 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708221404.l7ME4Y0H011407@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uisp - Universal In-System Programmer for Atmel AVR and 8051 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231835 ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com 2007-08-22 10:04 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: uisp Short Description: Universal In-System Programmer for Atmel AVR and 8051 Owners: trondd Branches: FC-6, F-7, EL-5 InitialCC: Commits by cvsextras: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 14:07:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:07:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241387] Review Request: codeina - GStreamer Codec Installation Application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708221407.l7ME7gOk011692@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: codeina - GStreamer Codec Installation Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241387 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-08-22 10:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > Only thing that bothers me a little is > > install -D -m 0755 %{SOURCE1} > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libexecdir}/gst-install-plugins-helper.sh > > should that go into %{_libexecdir}/codeina/gst-install-plugins-helper.sh No, gst-install-plugins-helper is the hook for gstreamer uses to call the plugin helper, so this needs to match the path used in GStreamer. > ? Regardless of the answer to that question looks good. The question, or the package? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 14:13:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:13:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241387] Review Request: codeina - GStreamer Codec Installation Application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708221413.l7MED9Q0013958@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: codeina - GStreamer Codec Installation Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241387 bnocera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-08-22 10:13 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: codeina Short Description: GStreamer Codec Installation Application Owners: hadess thomasvs Branches: devel InitialCC: bnocera at redhat.com thomas at apestaart.org Commits by cvsextras: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 14:49:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:49:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249352] Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708221449.l7MEngeT023309@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249352 redhat at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From redhat at linuxnetz.de 2007-08-22 10:49 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: popt Short Description: C library for parsing command line parameters Owners: redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de,pmatilai at redhat.com For the guy doing the CVS: /me is maintainer, Panu is co-maintainer. Only development branch (upcoming F8), please. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 14:56:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:56:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708221456.l7MEuXZ4024087@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-22 10:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #31) > (In reply to comment #30) > > A: ruby-libs dependency > > For consistency (i.e. to avoid that this package is > > rebuild against ruby 1.9), IMO "BuildRequires: ruby-libs" > > should be replaced with "ruby(abi) = 1.8". > > You can't actually "BuildRequire: ruby(abi)" ... what I've got there right now > is consistent with my reading of the Ruby packaging guidelines > (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby). Yes. Currently Fedora ruby guideline does not have "BuildRequires: ruby(abi) = 1.8", however this is consistent with python, perl, .... etc and I think this is needed. Also another reviewer (who reviewed ruby module packages I maintain) asked me to do so. > > D. naming > > - Usually foo-devel package should have the corresponding > > package named foo. > > IMO -cxx-devel subpackage should just be named as > > "ice-devel". > > The thing is, the main ice package provides a large number of runtime files and > documentation, as well as a set of .so.* libraries (that the runtime files are > linked to). The c++-devel package adds two tools and a set of .h files and .so > links so that you can build Ice packages using c++ -- it is clearly a c++ > development package, not an overall "-devel" package. Please read http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-devel-list/2007-August/msg00532.html Actually * Most people expects that the development package of ice is named as ice-devel * And some people even think that splitting development packages are of no means. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 15:20:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 11:20:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708221520.l7MFK80m027311@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-22 11:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #40) > So may it be that netgen should also have desktop file? Yes, true. Netgen should have a desktop file. However, is this the only issue (meanwhile I'm searching for an appropriate icon )? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 15:22:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 11:22:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708221522.l7MFMww8027707@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-22 11:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #41) > However, is this the only issue (meanwhile I'm searching for an appropriate > icon )? Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 15:30:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 11:30:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253874] New: Review Request: lsdvd - Small application for displaying the contents of a DVD Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253874 Summary: Review Request: lsdvd - Small application for displaying the contents of a DVD Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: matthias at rpmforge.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://thias.fedorapeople.org/review/lsdvd/lsdvd.spec SRPM URL: http://thias.fedorapeople.org/review/lsdvd/lsdvd-0.16-2.src.rpm Description: Lsdvd is a c application for reading the contents of a DVD and printing the contents to your terminal. Lsdvd uses libdvdread, the most popular dvd reading library for *nix. Note : Very simple package, very simple codebase. Should be easy to review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 15:45:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 11:45:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253874] Review Request: lsdvd - Small application for displaying the contents of a DVD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708221545.l7MFjioT030255@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lsdvd - Small application for displaying the contents of a DVD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253874 ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2007-08-22 11:45 EST ------- Good review ticket for someone who needs to be sponsored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 15:59:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 11:59:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708221559.l7MFxL1K031638@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 ------- Additional Comments From mefoster at gmail.com 2007-08-22 11:59 EST ------- Okay, I've made a new version with most of your concerns addressed. Here's the changelog: - Changed BuildRequires on ruby to ruby(abi) = 1.8 - Fixed all dependencies between subpackages: everything requires the base package, and -devel packages should all require their corresponding non-devel package now - Made ice-csharp require pkgconfig - Modified the user/group creation process based on the wiki - Removed ldconfig for ice-c++-devel subpackage - Made the python_sitelib subdirectory owned by ice-python - Removed executable permission on all files under slice (how did that happen?) - Fixed typo on ice-csharp group - Changed license tag to GPLv2 - Removed macros in changelog - Set CFLAGS as well as CPPFLAGS for make so that building icecpp gets the correct flags too - Renamed ice-c++-devel to ice-devel - Added Provides: for ice-c++-devel and ice-dotnet for people moving from the ZeroC RPMs - Also don't build "test" or "demo" for IceCS http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/mef/extras/ice-3.2.1-3.fc7.src.rpm http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/mef/extras/ice.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 16:07:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 12:07:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251361] Review Request: compat-expat1 - library compat package for expat 1.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708221607.l7MG74kj032476@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-expat1 - library compat package for expat 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251361 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-22 12:06 EST ------- ok. Too bad about %makeinstall. ;( I see no further blockers here, so this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this once it's been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 16:07:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 12:07:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253874] Review Request: lsdvd - Small application for displaying the contents of a DVD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708221607.l7MG7BhG032509@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lsdvd - Small application for displaying the contents of a DVD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253874 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ville.skytta at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-08-22 12:06 EST ------- I'm afraid I'll ruin that joy for someone as I already did the review :P - Could use %configure --disable-dependency-tracking but it doesn't make much difference for a package this small. - %description contains some info which is not relevant to end users, I would shorten it to simply "lsdvd is an application for reading the contents of a DVD and printing the list of contents to your terminal." - Please bump release to 5%{?dist} to upgrade the NEVR of this package already present in some 3rd party repositories. All above comments can be addressed after import and before the first build, or just ignored. Your choice, approved anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 16:07:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 12:07:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253649] Review Request: vinagre - VNC client for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708221607.l7MG7l7J032622@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vinagre - VNC client for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253649 bnocera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Fixed In Version| |0.2-1 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-08-22 12:07 EST ------- Uploaded to rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 16:08:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 12:08:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708221608.l7MG8MNv032711@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-22 12:08 EST ------- Updated: SRPM: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/netgen/netgen-1.3.7-11.fc7.src.rpm SPEC: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/netgen/netgen.spec The png is a screenshot taken on adder4 (an alliance's example) by me. Its license is GPL+. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 16:14:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 12:14:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251361] Review Request: compat-expat1 - library compat package for expat 1.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708221614.l7MGE981000869@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-expat1 - library compat package for expat 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251361 ------- Additional Comments From jorton at redhat.com 2007-08-22 12:13 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: compat-expat1 Short Description: Library compatibility package for expat 1 Owners: jorton Branches: devel InitialCC: Commits by cvsextras: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 16:15:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 12:15:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251361] Review Request: compat-expat1 - library compat package for expat 1.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708221615.l7MGFBg7001039@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-expat1 - library compat package for expat 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251361 jorton at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jorton at redhat.com 2007-08-22 12:15 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: compat-expat1 Short Description: Library compatibility package for expat 1 Owners: jorton Branches: devel InitialCC: Commits by cvsextras: no [third time lucky with the correct flag waving] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 16:25:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 12:25:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253874] Review Request: lsdvd - Small application for displaying the contents of a DVD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708221625.l7MGPHnI001875@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lsdvd - Small application for displaying the contents of a DVD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253874 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-08-22 12:25 EST ------- Thanks Ville! You can check the updated spec file which I'll be importing in the same location as the previous one, and shout if anything's wrong with it ;-) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lsdvd Short Description: Small application for displaying the contents of a DVD Owners: matthias at rpmforge.net Branches: devel F-7 FC-6 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 16:32:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 12:32:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253874] Review Request: lsdvd - Small application for displaying the contents of a DVD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708221632.l7MGWP0o002553@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lsdvd - Small application for displaying the contents of a DVD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253874 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-08-22 12:32 EST ------- The new specfile looks good, thanks. You missed one tiny detail though - "printing the contents of a DVD to your terminal" sounds scary to me, which is why I suggested "list of contents" :) (Applies to Summary too if you like the suggestion, BTW) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 16:49:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 12:49:36 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_230096=5D_Review_Request=3A_iwl3945-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_3945_A/B?= =?iso-8859-1?q?/G_network_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708221649.l7MGnaMQ005178@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iwl3945-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 3945 A/B/G network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230096 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-08-22 12:49 EST ------- By the new procedure, we will no longer rename CVS modules. I have added iwl3945-firmware as a new package owned by you. Please use the dead.package procedure in the old CVS module. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 16:53:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 12:53:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233596] Review Request: python-Coherence - Python framework to participate in digital living networks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708221653.l7MGrKPW006222@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-Coherence - Python framework to participate in digital living networks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233596 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 16:56:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 12:56:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241387] Review Request: codeina - GStreamer Codec Installation Application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708221656.l7MGuZhx007069@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: codeina - GStreamer Codec Installation Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241387 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 16:57:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 12:57:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249352] Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708221657.l7MGvZv5007231@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249352 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-08-22 12:57 EST ------- Could you please provide this in the new template format? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure Specifically, we need the FAS account names. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 16:59:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 12:59:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251361] Review Request: compat-expat1 - library compat package for expat 1.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708221659.l7MGxmxK007545@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-expat1 - library compat package for expat 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251361 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 17:02:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 13:02:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251680] Review Request: amtterm - Serial-over-lan (sol) client for Intel AMT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708221702.l7MH2UU7007800@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: amtterm - Serial-over-lan (sol) client for Intel AMT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251680 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 17:18:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 13:18:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708221718.l7MHIcLd009666@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From kaigai at kaigai.gr.jp 2007-08-22 13:18 EST ------- SpecURL: http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/files/sepostgresql.spec SrpmURL: http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/files/sepostgresql-8.2.4- 0.428.beta.fc8.src.rpm The SE-PostgreSQL package is updated. It depends on selinux-policy-3.0.6 or latest, not a SE-PostgreSQL specific one. (In reply to comment #29) > And you are splitting writing srpm URL into two lines? Unfortunatelly, it is splitted into two lines implicitly. :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 17:22:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 13:22:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253874] Review Request: lsdvd - Small application for displaying the contents of a DVD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708221722.l7MHMiGe011008@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lsdvd - Small application for displaying the contents of a DVD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253874 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-08-22 13:22 EST ------- Indeed, I had missed that, will fix, thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 18:03:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 14:03:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253874] Review Request: lsdvd - Small application for displaying the contents of a DVD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708221803.l7MI3bYG022121@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lsdvd - Small application for displaying the contents of a DVD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253874 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 18:20:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 14:20:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249352] Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708221820.l7MIKE9t025466@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249352 redhat at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From redhat at linuxnetz.de 2007-08-22 14:19 EST ------- Okay Warren, here we go again: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: popt Short Description: C library for parsing command line parameters Owners: robert,pmatilai Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 19:24:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 15:24:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253874] Review Request: lsdvd - Small application for displaying the contents of a DVD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708221924.l7MJOUDf004880@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lsdvd - Small application for displaying the contents of a DVD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253874 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kwizart at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-08-22 15:24 EST ------- I think we get a little to speed for this! I little more investigation show that lsdvd isn't used by freevo since 1.7. Instead it uses python-kaa-metadata (which also orphan mmpython). kaa.metadata is already in Fedora... Futhermore lsdvd's sourceforge repository is now empty I think this is good to have it for compat with fc6 f7 And unless others apps are using it (do you you some example ?) I am for orphaning it... Usually apps can access lsdvd output by using kaa.metadata and should uses it instead... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 19:58:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 15:58:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253874] Review Request: lsdvd - Small application for displaying the contents of a DVD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708221958.l7MJwqGg014430@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lsdvd - Small application for displaying the contents of a DVD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253874 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-08-22 15:58 EST ------- Yes, there are apps that use lsdvd. kaa-metadata is in Python, this is in plain C, they fit different scenarios. Python is an undesirably big dependency for trimmed down setups, but on the other hand apps written in Python almost certainly want to use a Python lib for this stuff. There's no indication that lsdvd's SF CVS has ever been anything but empty. Apples and oranges, what's the problem? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 20:33:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 16:33:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253874] Review Request: lsdvd - Small application for displaying the contents of a DVD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708222033.l7MKXwJd023265@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lsdvd - Small application for displaying the contents of a DVD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253874 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-08-22 16:33 EST ------- ok sorry for the false positive then... i thought lsdvd was already orphaned So everything is fine...good! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 20:54:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 16:54:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253910] New: Review Request: ksirk - Turnbased multiplayer board strategy game (conquer the world!) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253910 Summary: Review Request: ksirk - Turnbased multiplayer board strategy game (conquer the world!) Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ksirk.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ksirk-1.7-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: KsirK is a computerized version of a well known strategy board game. In the current version, KsirK is a usable multi-player mono-machine game with a basic AI. The goal of the game is simply to conquer the World... It is done by attacking your neighbors with your armies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 20:49:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 16:49:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251361] Review Request: compat-expat1 - library compat package for expat 1.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708222049.l7MKnpxt026896@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-expat1 - library compat package for expat 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251361 jorton at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jorton at redhat.com 2007-08-22 16:49 EST ------- Thanks a lot - now who do I bribe to review compat-neon025! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 20:49:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 16:49:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253909] New: Review Request: libpano13 - Library for manipulating panoramic images Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253909 Summary: Review Request: libpano13 - Library for manipulating panoramic images Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bruno at postle.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://bugbear.blackfish.org.uk/~bruno/apt/SPECS/libpano13.spec SRPM URL: http://bugbear.blackfish.org.uk/~bruno/apt/fedora/linux/7/x86_64/SRPMS.panorama/libpano13-2.9.12-3.fc7.src.rpm Description: Helmut Dersch's Panorama Tools library. Provides very high quality manipulation, correction and stitching of panoramic photographs. Note: I already package libpano12 for fedora, libpano13 is a fork of this libpano12, but is designed to be installed in parallel. Currently they are very similar and the SPEC is almost identical, the differences being that: 1. various command-line tools have been moved from pano12 to pano13 2. pano12 is in the process of being relicensed to LGPLv3+ (from GPLv2+) libpano13 is required for the next hugin release, after that libpano12 can be dropped from fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 21:11:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 17:11:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241387] Review Request: codeina - GStreamer Codec Installation Application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708222111.l7MLB3wQ032220@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: codeina - GStreamer Codec Installation Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241387 bnocera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-08-22 17:11 EST ------- It was missing a gawk BR (is it not in the minimum builds anymore?), pushed to rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 21:24:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 17:24:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253469] Review Request: opyum - Offline package installation and update tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708222124.l7MLOKBD003584@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opyum - Offline package installation and update tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253469 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-08-22 17:24 EST ------- Trying to check for Pirut in the configure script using $ $PYTHON -c "import pirut" gives the following traceback on Koji. The absence of a running X server causes the issue, since the pirut modules eventually pull in gtk too. Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pirut/__init__.py", line 26, in import gtk File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gtk/__init__.py", line 76, in _init() File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gtk/__init__.py", line 64, in _init _gtk.init_check() RuntimeError: could not open display It is important to have the check in the upstream tarball, since Pirut is a critical dependency for Opyum and anybody building from the release tarball should be made aware of that. However, I am going to patch out the check for the RPM package since Pirut is already mentioned as a Requires and BuildRequires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 21:42:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 17:42:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252128] Review Request: telepathy-haze - A multi-protocol Libpurple connection manager for Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708222142.l7MLgLdR005466@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-haze - A multi-protocol Libpurple connection manager for Telepathy Alias: telepathy-haze https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252128 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-08-22 17:42 EST ------- Thanks for the review, Steve! (In reply to comment #2) > - Deps seem a bit odd ... for instance .... > [steve at psycho Desktop]$ sudo rpm -ivh > ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/telepathy-haze-0.1.1-1.fc7.i386.rpm > ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/telepathy-haze-mission-control-0.1.1-1.fc7.i386.rpm > error: Failed dependencies: > telepathy-mission-control is needed by > telepathy-haze-mission-control-0.1.1-1.fc7.i386 Yeah, this is a subpackage which provides a profile for Mission Control, which allows Haze (AIM, at least) to be used by it and applications which use it for their telepathy configuration (such as Empathy). My goal is to make Empathy and other MC apps "Just Work" with Haze as a backend; there are profiles for Jabber and GTalk in upstream as well but those seem quite redundant as we already have Gabble for XMPP connections. > - Application runs but outputs quite a bit of warnings ... > ** Message: [error] plugins: /usr/lib/purple-2/liboscar.so is not usable because > the 'purple_init_plugin' symbol could not be found. Does the plugin call the > PURPLE_INIT_PLUGIN() macro? > ** Message: [error] plugins: /usr/lib/purple-2/libsametime.so has a prefs_info, > but is a prpl. This is no longer supported. > ** Message: [error] plugins: /usr/lib/purple-2/libjabber.so is not usable > because the 'purple_init_plugin' symbol could not be found. Does the plugin > call the PURPLE_INIT_PLUGIN() macro? These look specific to Pidgin/libpurple; I don't get these messages when running Empathy. :| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 22:10:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 18:10:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244894] Review Request: yum-cron - get yum updates via a cron job In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708222210.l7MMA5Hq012675@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yum-cron - get yum updates via a cron job https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244894 ahabig at umn.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From ahabig at umn.edu 2007-08-22 18:09 EST ------- yum-cron has appeared in the devel tree. Thanks to everyone for your help getting this off the ground. Frank's tweaks from comment #18 are not included yet, I wanted to get the part I'd thought about longer out first, and will use including his enhancements as an excuse to go through the patch-build-test-release cycle once the initial package successfully propagates (best way for me to learn the system is to do it). It's also been tagged for pushing into testing for F-7, is awaiting signatures for EPEL-5, and plague refuses to cooperate (plague throws an error even though it builds OK) for FC-6. But I can beat on that weirdness later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 22:29:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 18:29:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253469] Review Request: opyum - Offline package installation and update tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708222229.l7MMT9MT017180@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opyum - Offline package installation and update tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253469 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-08-22 18:29 EST ------- Spec: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/opyum.spec SRPM: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/opyum-0.0.2-2.fc8.src.rpm Here is the new pair of Spec & SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 22:47:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 18:47:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252128] Review Request: telepathy-haze - A multi-protocol Libpurple connection manager for Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708222247.l7MMlblM020062@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-haze - A multi-protocol Libpurple connection manager for Telepathy Alias: telepathy-haze https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252128 ------- Additional Comments From smilner at redhat.com 2007-08-22 18:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Thanks for the review, Steve! No prob. > (In reply to comment #2) > > - Deps seem a bit odd ... for instance .... > > [steve at psycho Desktop]$ sudo rpm -ivh > > ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/telepathy-haze-0.1.1-1.fc7.i386.rpm > > ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/telepathy-haze-mission-control-0.1.1-1.fc7.i386.rpm > > error: Failed dependencies: > > telepathy-mission-control is needed by > > telepathy-haze-mission-control-0.1.1-1.fc7.i386 > > Yeah, this is a subpackage which provides a profile for Mission Control, which > allows Haze (AIM, at least) to be used by it and applications which use it for > their telepathy configuration (such as Empathy). > > My goal is to make Empathy and other MC apps "Just Work" with Haze as a backend; > there are profiles for Jabber and GTalk in upstream as well but those seem quite > redundant as we already have Gabble for XMPP connections. So the telepathy-mission-control dep issue is a literal different package and not suppose to be telepathy-haze-mission-control? > > - Application runs but outputs quite a bit of warnings ... > > ** Message: [error] plugins: /usr/lib/purple-2/liboscar.so is not usable because > > the 'purple_init_plugin' symbol could not be found. Does the plugin call the > > PURPLE_INIT_PLUGIN() macro? > > ** Message: [error] plugins: /usr/lib/purple-2/libsametime.so has a prefs_info, > > but is a prpl. This is no longer supported. > > ** Message: [error] plugins: /usr/lib/purple-2/libjabber.so is not usable > > because the 'purple_init_plugin' symbol could not be found. Does the plugin > > call the PURPLE_INIT_PLUGIN() macro? > > These look specific to Pidgin/libpurple; I don't get these messages when running > Empathy. :| I should have noted that the warnings I saw came running telepathy-haze. Is there a better way I can test it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 23:41:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 19:41:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252010] Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708222341.l7MNfYSo024628@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252010 ------- Additional Comments From smilner at redhat.com 2007-08-22 19:41 EST ------- -/+ rpmlint ran. Errors found but rpm does have the 'dangerous command' note. the hidden file looks as if it is needed. The only-non-binary-in-usr-lib worries me a bit ... + package name is correct + spec name is correct + accepted license - Looks like it's actually GPLv2+ - license not in %doc (commented out) + US English spec + Readable spec + Source is same as upstream + built and installed on i386 + Deps look sane + No locale files + no .so files + not relocateable + no duplicate files + perms look sane + clean is good + macros in use + contains code and OK content -/+ %doc missing ... but doesn't look like it affects the code + doesn't own files/dirs in other packages + install cleans first - the descirption seems a bit odd. Maybe the following (from the rpmrebuild site) would suite it: rpmrebuild is a tool to build an RPM file from a package that has already been installed in a basic use, rpmrebuild use do not require any rpm building knowledge + tested locally and worked -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 01:52:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 21:52:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253941] New: Review Request: cgi-util - A C library for creating Common Gateway Interface ("CGI") programs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253941 Summary: Review Request: cgi-util - A C library for creating Common Gateway Interface ("CGI") programs Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mike at flyn.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/cgi-util.spec SRPM URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/cgi-util-2.2.1-9.src.rpm Description: cgi-util is a library which provides a set of C functions you can use to create Common Gateway Interface ("CGI") programs. Simply call cgi-util's initialization function and send HTML (or any other kind of data) out from your program and to the user's web browser. This package was orphaned more than six months ago. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 01:55:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 21:55:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253941] Review Request: cgi-util - A C library for creating Common Gateway Interface ("CGI") programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708230155.l7N1tXBN010819@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cgi-util - A C library for creating Common Gateway Interface ("CGI") programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253941 mike at flyn.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 02:17:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 22:17:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708230217.l7N2HWoj014514@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From kaigai at kaigai.gr.jp 2007-08-22 22:17 EST ------- [Spec URL] http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/files/sepostgresql.spec [SRPM URL] http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/files/sepostgresql-8.2.4-0.428.beta.fc8.src.rpm # just a test to avoid splitting, please ignore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 03:21:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 23:21:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253163] Review Request: sazanami-fonts - Sazanami Japanese TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708230321.l7N3LUlA024922@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sazanami-fonts - Sazanami Japanese TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253163 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2007-08-22 23:21 EST ------- hmm, I was confused. here is the *correct* description: Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/sazanami-fonts/sazanami-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/sazanami-fonts/sazanami-fonts-0.20040629-2.20061016.fc8.src.rpm Description: This package contains Japanese TrueType fonts. Sazanami type faces are automatically generated from Wadalab font kit. These also contains some Japanese bitmap fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 04:06:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 00:06:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708230406.l7N46VLX000795@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-23 00:06 EST ------- Rebuild failed. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=121392 Not checked in detail, however "Requires: ruby(abi) = 1.8" only pulls ruby-libs and ruby package is not pulled. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 04:07:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 00:07:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708230407.l7N47fIL000984@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-23 00:07 EST ------- At least desktop-file-utils is missing from BR. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=121359 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 04:38:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 00:38:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241596] Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708230438.l7N4cwik007078@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241596 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-23 00:38 EST ------- Well, I retried and this time the rebuild failed... http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=121364 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 05:42:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 01:42:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708230542.l7N5gvE3016173@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2007-08-23 01:42 EST ------- I agree to split ukai and uming fonts into separate packages. Generally users will accept the installation of both even most users only need uming for daily use. Okay, let's use cjkunifonts-fonts as package name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 05:50:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 01:50:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249524] Review Request: wxdfast - Multi-threaded download manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708230550.l7N5oGn2017431@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wxdfast - Multi-threaded download manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249524 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2007-08-23 01:50 EST ------- there is a typo in the spec file when doing chmod a-x - there is \*.cpp twice -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 07:10:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 03:10:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253163] Review Request: sazanami-fonts - Sazanami Japanese TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708230710.l7N7A0eu030058@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sazanami-fonts - Sazanami Japanese TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253163 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-23 03:09 EST ------- Thanks. Just a few initial comments/questions: It would probably be good to add a comment explaining how and why the tarball was rolled with a reference to bug 196433. Eventually it would be nice if it could be built from source. I wonder if it would be useful at all or make sense to consider subpackaging the gothic and mincho fonts? (Anyway that could also easily be done later if it is useful since they are in the same tarball anyway.) rpmlint on the binary package gives: W: sazanami-fonts symlink-should-be-relative /etc/X11/fontpath.d/sazanami-fonts /usr/share/fonts/sazanami-fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 08:05:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 04:05:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253163] Review Request: sazanami-fonts - Sazanami Japanese TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708230805.l7N85rZB007260@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sazanami-fonts - Sazanami Japanese TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253163 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-23 04:05 EST ------- For reference the sazanami fonts are currently part of the fonts-japanese package in Fedora, so this not new content for Fedora per se, but will allow those fonts to be housed in their own package. Here is the review: Good - package follows upstream project name - spec filename matches package name - meets Packaging Guidelines - upstream license is BSD and included - spec file is well written - source tarball is identical to the current one included in fonts-japanese b312f77829011547b19fc16956dc6f12 sazanami-20061016.tar.bz2 (which fixes a bug in the last upstream release - see above bug) - noarch package and builds correctly - lists build dependencies - rest of filelist looks good (see below) - permissions correct - has %clean - consistent macro usage - tarball contains two free truetype fonts which is acceptable content - filenames are all ascii Needs attention: - rpmlint output is above (might be better to use a relative symlink) - good to add a reference to bug 196433 - the package should require the new fonts-japanese package rather than conflict with the old one (see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Conflicts) - it should not own %{catalogue}/ since this is now owned by filesystem Suggestions: - might be nice to have a summary and description in ja too -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 08:13:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 04:13:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253163] Review Request: sazanami-fonts - Sazanami Japanese TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708230813.l7N8Dwmk009257@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sazanami-fonts - Sazanami Japanese TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253163 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-23 04:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > - the package should require the new fonts-japanese package rather > than conflict with the old one > (see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Conflicts) Erm, no, that is not desirable in practice since we don't want the new package to depend on fonts-japanese. Anyway I could not install the current package in my test machine. I think the Conflicts and Provides conflict. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 08:16:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 04:16:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253163] Review Request: sazanami-fonts - Sazanami Japanese TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708230816.l7N8G3Pu009959@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sazanami-fonts - Sazanami Japanese TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253163 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-23 04:16 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=168003) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=168003&action=view) sazanami-fonts.spec-1.patch A few suggested fixes and minor tweaks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 09:39:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 05:39:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250210] Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708230939.l7N9dv2I023080@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250210 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-08-23 05:39 EST ------- ping ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 09:46:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 05:46:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708230946.l7N9kO2Y024577@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-23 05:46 EST ------- Updated: (without dumping the release) SRPM: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/netgen/netgen-1.3.7-11.fc7.src.rpm SPEC: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/netgen/netgen.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 09:52:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 05:52:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250240] Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708230952.l7N9qcro025673@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250240 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-08-23 05:52 EST ------- Fixed many spec file issues and a runtime bug: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/linkage.spec http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/linkage-0.1.4-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 09:52:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 05:52:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253163] Review Request: sazanami-fonts - Sazanami Japanese TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708230952.l7N9qjLS025726@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sazanami-fonts - Sazanami Japanese TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253163 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2007-08-23 05:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Thanks. > > Just a few initial comments/questions: > > It would probably be good to add a comment explaining how and why > the tarball was rolled with a reference to bug 196433. > > Eventually it would be nice if it could be built from source. Well, upstream only puts the binary, ttf files. the source code (almost is a common lisp code) is only available on CVS though, it quite depends on the env it seems and isn't supposed to be built usually by users. > I wonder if it would be useful at all or make sense to consider subpackaging > the gothic and mincho fonts? (Anyway that could also easily be done later > if it is useful since they are in the same tarball anyway.) It could be. I'm not sure how much it's useful. but yeah I can. > rpmlint on the binary package gives: > > W: sazanami-fonts symlink-should-be-relative /etc/X11/fontpath.d/sazanami-fonts > /usr/share/fonts/sazanami-fonts Hmm, I'm not sure about it. there were some discussions but I don't see any conclusions at the mailing list that started Threads from: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2007-July/msg00444.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2007-August/msg00096.html nor any updates at the wiki: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureNoMoreXFS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 10:18:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 06:18:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236521] Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231018.l7NAI9DZ029081@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins Alias: nspluginwrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236521 stransky at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 10:27:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 06:27:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253163] Review Request: sazanami-fonts - Sazanami Japanese TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231027.l7NAR7BD030570@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sazanami-fonts - Sazanami Japanese TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253163 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2007-08-23 06:27 EST ------- Ok, here is a take 3. now gothic and mincho are packaged separately. Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/sazanami-fonts/sazanami-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/sazanami-fonts/sazanami-fonts-0.20040629-3.20061016.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 11:22:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 07:22:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231122.l7NBMIcv003023@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-23 07:22 EST ------- Please hold on. I'll make a new release soon today. Actually the desktop files of my applications point to "Education;Science;Engineering". In fact this is wrong and should be changed to "Science;Engineering" or "Science;Electronics" as stated by http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html Additional Category - Description - Related Categories Electronics - Electronics software, e.g. a circuit designer - [ ] Engineering - Engineering software, e.g. CAD programs - [ ] For "netgen", I'll use: [Desktop Entry] Categories=Science;Electronics; I'll produce patches for other packages for electronic simulation and data computing (that others are packaging, such as qucs, octave, pikdev,..) and requests the changes on rawhide soon. At the same time, I'll be filing bugs for duplicate entries. Since those packages are not meant for "Education" (but instead Engineering), the category "Education" is inappropriate. Meanwhile your thoughts are welcome. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 11:35:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 07:35:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249524] Review Request: wxdfast - Multi-threaded download manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231135.l7NBZljG004200@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wxdfast - Multi-threaded download manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249524 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-08-23 07:35 EST ------- Fixed package is here: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/wxdfast.spec http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/wxdfast-0.6.0-3.fc7.src.rpm also some .h files needed fixing added that too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 11:36:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 07:36:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253691] Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231136.l7NBaoN7004322@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253691 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-08-23 07:36 EST ------- Why not to provide all necessary files in SRPM-package? Why it's ugly nosrc-package? Looks like something from the past, then we can't distribute java sourcecode. Another one technical note - it's a bad idea not to provide direct link to spec-file but only link to mercurial page. And one more tech note: [petro at host-12-89 SPECS]$ LANG=C rpmbuild -ba java-1.7.0-icedtea.spec error: Architecture is not included: i386 [petro at host-12-89 SPECS]$ So... Java cannot be built on x86?! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 11:37:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 07:37:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225288] Merge Review: at In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231137.l7NBbjEC004477@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225288 mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2007-08-23 07:37 EST ------- Package Name: at Short Description: At allows you to specify when will be run command. Owners: mmaslano at redhat.com Branches: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 11:39:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 07:39:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253691] Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231139.l7NBdoH6004773@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253691 ------- Additional Comments From aph at redhat.com 2007-08-23 07:39 EST ------- There were some legal issues covering some of the files which didn't appear to be free software. We've fixed those now and we expect soon to provide a real RPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 11:51:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 07:51:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231151.l7NBpWhe005965@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 ------- Additional Comments From mefoster at gmail.com 2007-08-23 07:51 EST ------- Oh whoops -- guess I should be compiling with mock, not with rpmbuild, even if it does take longer. *sigh* Here are some new ones. In addition to the ruby fix, I also made the following changes: - Redirected getent output to /dev/null - Really got rid of the execute bit on those .ice files - Moved ImportKey.class to /usr/share from /usr/bin http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/mef/extras/ice-3.2.1-4.fc7.src.rpm http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/mef/extras/ice.spec And this package actually *does* build in mock, for both Fedora 7 and Fedora development (i386). :) The only remaining rpmlint issues are a bunch of "no-documentation" warnings and the one error (apparently expected with Mono packages) from ice-csharp-devel about only non-binary files in /usr/lib. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 12:02:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:02:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225288] Merge Review: at In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231202.l7NC2hHl007152@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225288 mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|fedora-cvs? | ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2007-08-23 08:02 EST ------- Oop mistake, closing as next release without cvs branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 12:03:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:03:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225907] Merge Review: iptraf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231203.l7NC3cot007329@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: iptraf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225907 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE AssignedTo|dan at danny.cz |mmaslano at redhat.com Flag|needinfo?(dan at danny.cz) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 12:07:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:07:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225948] Merge Review: joe In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231207.l7NC7Txj007690@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: joe https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225948 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 12:07:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:07:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225951] Merge Review: jpilot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231207.l7NC7edP007733@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jpilot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225951 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 12:08:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:08:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226118] Merge Review: mailx In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231208.l7NC866b007796@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mailx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226118 mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 12:08:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:08:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226121] Merge Review: man-pages-cs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231208.l7NC8HMT007825@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: man-pages-cs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226121 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 12:08:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:08:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226122] Merge Review: man-pages-da In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231208.l7NC8fkg007862@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: man-pages-da https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226122 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 12:08:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:08:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226128] Merge Review: man-pages-pl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231208.l7NC8q3x007885@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: man-pages-pl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226128 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 12:09:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:09:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250240] Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231209.l7NC90wj007918@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250240 denis at poolshark.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |denis at poolshark.org Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2007-08-23 08:08 EST ------- Hi Adel, 1. There as some unused-direct-shlib-dependency issues on liblinkage-1.so.0.0.3. See discussions at http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2006-June/msg00176.html http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2007-January/msg00158.html There's a "hack" used in a number of packages already (alliance, clamav), that simply patches the "-Wl,--as-needed" option into libtool right after configure. That looks to me like the simplest option. 2. The --prefix and --libdir options to configure are not necessary 3. libupnp-devel BR is not needed. The package looks for libgupnp, which appears to be something completely different (and not in fedora as of yet). There's also a libtorrent vs rb_libtorrent conflict that needs to be addressed at some point, though that's outside the scope of this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 12:09:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:09:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226129] Merge Review: man-pages-ru In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231209.l7NC9Hdb007956@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: man-pages-ru https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226129 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 12:12:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:12:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231212.l7NCCNPv008342@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-23 08:12 EST ------- Updated: SRPM: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/netgen/netgen-1.3.7-12.fc7.src.rpm SPEC: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/netgen/netgen.spec logs: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/chitlesh/task_122773/logs/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 12:14:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:14:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225631] Merge Review: busybox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231214.l7NCEFeQ008554@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: busybox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225631 varekova at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|varekova at redhat.com |pertusus at free.fr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 12:16:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:16:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226451] Merge Review: sysstat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231216.l7NCG9va008772@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sysstat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226451 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora varekova at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|varekova at redhat.com |mmaslano at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 12:19:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:19:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226671] Merge Review: zlib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231219.l7NCJ29t009130@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: zlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226671 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora varekova at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|varekova at redhat.com |pertusus at free.fr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 12:19:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:19:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226130] Merge Review: man-pages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231219.l7NCJ6RL009149@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: man-pages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226130 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 12:19:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:19:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226131] Merge Review: man In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231219.l7NCJKAT009184@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: man https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226131 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 12:19:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:19:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226296] Merge Review: pilot-link In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231219.l7NCJaXB009226@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pilot-link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226296 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 12:19:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:19:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251680] Review Request: amtterm - Serial-over-lan (sol) client for Intel AMT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231219.l7NCJfr6009253@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: amtterm - Serial-over-lan (sol) client for Intel AMT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251680 kraxel at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From kraxel at redhat.com 2007-08-23 08:19 EST ------- package committed to cvs and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 12:19:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:19:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226320] Merge Review: psacct In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231219.l7NCJkx6009279@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: psacct https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226320 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 12:20:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:20:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226494] Merge Review: tk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231220.l7NCKBIY009349@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: tk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226494 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 12:20:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:20:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225257] Merge Review: aspell-af In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231220.l7NCKNjV009416@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: aspell-af https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225257 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 12:20:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:20:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226479] Merge Review: tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231220.l7NCKi1H009631@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226479 mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 12:20:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:20:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228782] Review Request: tcl-html - HTML documentation for Tcl/Tk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231220.l7NCKkBh009669@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcl-html - HTML documentation for Tcl/Tk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228782 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Bug 228782 depends on bug 226479, which changed state. Bug 226479 Summary: Merge Review: tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226479 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 12:20:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:20:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225910] Merge Review: ipv6calc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231220.l7NCKsb9009704@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ipv6calc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225910 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 12:21:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:21:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226123] Merge Review: man-pages-de In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231221.l7NCL7ID009754@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: man-pages-de https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226123 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 12:21:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:21:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226480] Merge Review: tclx In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231221.l7NCLtiA009906@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: tclx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226480 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 12:22:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:22:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225786] Merge Review: gd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231222.l7NCMKbe009973@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225786 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|needinfo? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 12:25:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:25:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225286] Merge Review: aspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231225.l7NCPM3K010218@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225286 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora varekova at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|varekova at redhat.com |enrico.scholz at informatik.tu- | |chemnitz.de -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 12:25:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:25:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226164] Merge Review: mtr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231225.l7NCPtNB010322@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mtr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226164 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 12:29:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:29:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225662] Merge Review: crontabs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231229.l7NCTxwG010594@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: crontabs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225662 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora atkac at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 12:30:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:30:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225293] Merge Review: authconfig In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231230.l7NCUsV7010680@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: authconfig https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225293 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tmraz at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |F7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 12:31:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:31:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226232] Merge Review: passwd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231231.l7NCVBZq010811@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: passwd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226232 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tmraz at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |F7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 12:32:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:32:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250240] Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231232.l7NCW5HF010908@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250240 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-08-23 08:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > Hi Adel, > > 1. There as some unused-direct-shlib-dependency issues on liblinkage-1.so.0.0.3. > > See discussions at > http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2006-June/msg00176.html > http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2007-January/msg00158.html > > There's a "hack" used in a number of packages already (alliance, clamav), that > simply patches the "-Wl,--as-needed" option into libtool right after configure. > That looks to me like the simplest option. > ok thx, added this hack for now. > 2. The --prefix and --libdir options to configure are not necessary removed. > 3. libupnp-devel BR is not needed. The package looks for libgupnp, which appears > to be something completely different (and not in fedora as of yet). upstream changed the upnp lib in 0.1.4 removed this for now (package not in fedora) Updated package: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/linkage.spec http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/linkage-0.1.4-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 12:32:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:32:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225859] Merge Review: groff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231232.l7NCWvgG010988@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: groff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225859 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |varekova at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 12:41:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:41:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225662] Merge Review: crontabs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231241.l7NCfiEC011639@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: crontabs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225662 mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 13:38:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 09:38:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253691] Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231338.l7NDc3JI018321@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253691 ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2007-08-23 09:38 EST ------- The nosrc format also conserves space and bandwidth for icedtea.classpath.org which is hosted by a GNU Classpath community member. The first SRPM will be available when the first Fedora build completes. Why not refer to a Mercurial revision? Try: LANG=C rpmbuild -ba --target i586 java-1.7.0-icedtea.spec It's an i586 RPM rather than an i386 RPM because the JIT emits i586-level instructions that will not run on processors earlier than i586. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 13:49:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 09:49:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241549] Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231349.l7NDnSkv020153@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241549 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-08-23 09:49 EST ------- ping ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 13:53:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 09:53:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240308] Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231353.l7NDrnlM020671@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240308 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-23 09:53 EST ------- updated: SPEC: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/result/qwtplot3d.spec SRPM: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/result/qwtplot3d-0.2.7-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 14:09:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 10:09:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253691] Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231409.l7NE9ecp023346@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253691 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-08-23 10:09 EST ------- > Why not refer to a Mercurial revision? wget downloads html garbage instead of pretty spec-file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 14:13:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 10:13:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253781] Review Request: outerspace - client for 4x on-line strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231413.l7NEDgf1024001@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: outerspace - client for 4x on-line strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253781 ------- Additional Comments From qark at ospace.net 2007-08-23 10:13 EST ------- Package fixed according to Games SIG recomendations. Spec URL: http://www.ospace.net/files/outerspace.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ospace.net/files/outerspace-0.2.2-1.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 14:15:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 10:15:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253691] Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231415.l7NEFYld024235@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253691 ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2007-08-23 10:15 EST ------- I'll post the raw-file link instead: http://icedtea.classpath.org/hg/fedora/raw-file/d30f0842b5c3/java-1.7.0-icedtea.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 14:31:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 10:31:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225906] Merge Review: iptables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231431.l7NEVL9g026962@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: iptables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225906 ------- Additional Comments From twoerner at redhat.com 2007-08-23 10:31 EST ------- *** Bug 238791 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 14:56:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 10:56:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232725] Review Request: eclipse-mylar - A task-focused UI for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231456.l7NEuAgu032356@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-mylar - A task-focused UI for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232725 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-08-23 10:56 EST ------- Did things not get imported into the new package in CVS? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 15:36:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 11:36:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231536.l7NFalKs007432@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-23 11:36 EST ------- Okay, -------------------------------------------------------- This package (netgen) is APPROVED by me -------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 15:41:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 11:41:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253691] Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231541.l7NFfO8Z008878@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253691 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-08-23 11:41 EST ------- A few initial questions: - why the need for "snapshot" in the release? - is the license tag okay as it's stated? - where does the access bridge source come from? - is generate-cacerts.pl in version control somewhere? - do we really need the registered trademark notice in %description? - why doesn't the CGI script work on x86_64? can we have a note about it in the spec? - rather than "IcedTea Plugin" can we have something more descriptive? "Browser plugin" or "Mozilla plugin" or something? - why the two stages of symlinking around line 313? - why the ghost touching? - should the man pages work with alternatives? or do I always have to use 'man java-java-1.7.0-icedtea? looking at the stuff in %post, it appears it should work. - do some of the single quotes around line 384 need escaping? - you had mentioned issues with binfmt_misc at one point to me - is that sorted out? - wow, the number of alternatives is crazy! I'll try building now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 15:43:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 11:43:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231543.l7NFhaNn009421@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-23 11:43 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: netgen Short Description: LVS netlist comparison tool Owners: chitlesh Branches: FC-6 F-7 devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 15:46:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 11:46:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253691] Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231546.l7NFkOwS010052@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253691 ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2007-08-23 11:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > I'll try building now. Before you try a Rawhide mock build, I should point out that IcedTea doesn't build in Rawhide yet because of a bug in eclipse-ecj 3.3: http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61 The SRPM will build fine on Fedora 7 though, and I'll include Francis's workaround in the next review package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 15:47:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 11:47:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232725] Review Request: eclipse-mylar - A task-focused UI for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231547.l7NFlj1H010437@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-mylar - A task-focused UI for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232725 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-23 11:47 EST ------- I didn't import anything into the new package... I thought you would generate a new spec or src.rpm with the new name and import it. (just as you would if it was a new package). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 15:49:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 11:49:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232725] Review Request: eclipse-mylar - A task-focused UI for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231549.l7NFnW33010722@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-mylar - A task-focused UI for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232725 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-08-23 11:49 EST ------- Okay, that's what I suspected. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 15:53:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 11:53:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225786] Merge Review: gd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231553.l7NFr1aZ011679@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225786 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-08-23 11:52 EST ------- The issues I point out should be fixed, reopening. In fact, these issues should have been raisen during the review. It may happen that a reviewer didn't saw an issue, but if a serious issue is raised later (and I think these are serious issues, they impact seriously other packages) normally either the reviewer should ask for these issues to be solved, or the submitter should fix them before closing the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 16:00:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 12:00:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225786] Merge Review: gd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231600.l7NG0O1v013382@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225786 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-08-23 12:00 EST ------- I can make patches if you want to, but something needs to be done, my remarks date from March. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 16:09:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 12:09:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253691] Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231609.l7NG9II3014861@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253691 ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2007-08-23 12:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > A few initial questions: > > - why the need for "snapshot" in the release? The release string format is: significant_digits.OpenJDK_build.IcedTea_version IcedTea_version = snapshot means that the IcedTea tarball is a snapshot rather than an IcedTea release. I will include IcedTea 1.3 when it is released. > - is the license tag okay as it's stated? Yes, that's the new rpmlint-suggested License tag format. > - where does the access bridge source come from? http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/java-access-bridge/ I'll add a comment in the spec file. > - is generate-cacerts.pl in version control somewhere? Yes: http://icedtea.classpath.org/hg/fedora/raw-file/f38a4e9e2134/generate-cacerts.pl > - do we really need the registered trademark notice in %description? No, I suppose not. > - why doesn't the CGI script work on x86_64? can we have a note about it in the > spec? No good reason I can see. We plan to enable it before Fedora 8. I can add a comment in the meantime. > - rather than "IcedTea Plugin" can we have something more descriptive? "Browser > plugin" or "Mozilla plugin" or something? Sure. > - why the two stages of symlinking around line 313? So that you can specify e.g., "a sasl jar", "a sasl 1.7.0 jar" or "the sasl 1.7.0.0 jar". $ ls -l /usr/lib/jvm-exports/jre-1.7.0-icedtea/sasl* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 51 2007-07-14 21:51 /usr/lib/jvm-exports/jre-1.7.0-icedtea/sasl-1.7.0.0.jar -> ../../jvm/java-1.7.0-icedtea-1.7.0.0/jre/lib/rt.jar lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 2007-07-14 21:51 /usr/lib/jvm-exports/jre-1.7.0-icedtea/sasl-1.7.0.jar -> sasl-1.7.0.0.jar lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 2007-07-14 21:51 /usr/lib/jvm-exports/jre-1.7.0-icedtea/sasl.jar -> sasl-1.7.0.0.jar > - why the ghost touching? ISTR this addressing some RPM warning. I'll experiment with it for the next package build. > - should the man pages work with alternatives? or do I always have to use 'man > java-java-1.7.0-icedtea? looking at the stuff in %post, it appears it should work. They should work, e.g. "man java" should bring up java-java-1.7.0-icedtea when IcedTea's java alternative is selected. > - do some of the single quotes around line 384 need escaping? No, the three strings are concatenated in shell, e.g.: $ echo 'a'b'c' abc > - you had mentioned issues with binfmt_misc at one point to me - is that sorted out? I'm not sure what issues I mentioned. I enabled binfmt_misc as an experiment so that people could try it. I'm not sure if it's useful or not. It only helps on the command-line, since GNOME uses a different mechanism for executing files. > - wow, the number of alternatives is crazy! Yes, but all (except maybe the jce policy one) are necessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 16:10:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 12:10:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254008] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254008 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fnasser at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://fnasser.fedorapeople.org/objectweb-asm.spec SRPM URL: http://fnasser.fedorapeople.org/objectweb-asm-3.0-1jpp.src.rpm Description: Version 3.0 of the ObjectWeb ASM ASM is a code manipulation tool to implement adaptable systems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 16:14:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 12:14:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254008] Review Request:
- In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231614.l7NGE5YN015819@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254008 fnasser at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- - |summary here> ------- Additional Comments From fnasser at redhat.com 2007-08-23 12:14 EST ------- This version is needed by the newer versions of findbugs, which someone wants to contribute. P.S.: The old versions of ASM are named 'asm' and 'asm2' respecitively for 1.x and 2.x versions. ObjectWeb has requested JPackage.org to add the 'objectweb-' prefix to the name of the package, so I prefered to do this to call it 'asm3'. The APIs have changed by these are widely used and each usptream project seems to need a specific one. So we need 1.x, 2.x and 3.x ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 16:17:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 12:17:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232725] Review Request: eclipse-mylar - A task-focused UI for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231617.l7NGHVgG016419@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-mylar - A task-focused UI for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232725 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-08-23 12:17 EST ------- Kevin: should I be getting odd errors with the new makefile? $ make help rpmq: no arguments given for query rpmq: no arguments given for query -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 16:36:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 12:36:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231636.l7NGaWxB019418@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |201449 nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 17:01:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 13:01:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231701.l7NH1XPZ023008@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-08-23 13:01 EST ------- Spec: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/7/SRPMS/asterisk-1.4.11-1.fc7.spec SRPM: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/7/SRPMS/asterisk-1.4.11-1.fc7.src.rpm * Wed Aug 22 2007 Jeffrey C. Ollie - 1.4.11-1 - Update to 1.4.11 * Fri Aug 10 2007 Jeffrey C. Ollie - 1.4.10.1-1 - Update to 1.4.10.1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 17:13:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 13:13:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254015] New: Review Request: rubygem-mongrel - A small fast HTTP library and server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254015 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-mongrel - A small fast HTTP library and server Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sseago at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/sseago/fedora/spec/rubygem-mongrel.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/sseago/fedora/SRPMS/rubygem-mongrel-1.0.1-2.fc7.src.rpm Description: A small fast HTTP library and server that runs Rails, Camping, Nitro and Iowa apps. Note that this is my first package submission -- David Lutterkort has already agreed to sponsor it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 17:18:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 13:18:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254016] New: Review Request: rubygem-gem_plugin - plugin system based on rubygems Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254016 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-gem_plugin - plugin system based on rubygems Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sseago at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/sseago/fedora/spec/rubygem-gem_plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/sseago/fedora/SRPMS/rubygem-gem_plugin-0.2.2-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: A plugin system based only on rubygems that uses dependencies only -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 17:20:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 13:20:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254018] New: Review Request: rubygem-fastthread - optimized thread.rb replacement Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254018 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-fastthread - optimized thread.rb replacement Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sseago at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/sseago/fedora/spec/rubygem-fastthread.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/sseago/fedora/SRPMS/rubygem-fastthread-1.0-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Optimized replacement for thread.rb primitives -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 17:21:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 13:21:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254019] New: Review Request: rubygem-daemons - A toolkit to create and control ruby daemons Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254019 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-daemons - A toolkit to create and control ruby daemons Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sseago at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/sseago/fedora/spec/rubygem-daemons.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/sseago/fedora/SRPMS/rubygem-daemons-1.0.7-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Daemons provides an easy way to wrap existing ruby scripts (for example a self-written server) to be run as a daemon and to be controlled by simple start/stop/restart commands. You can also call blocks as daemons and control them from the parent or just daemonize the current process. Besides this basic functionality, daemons offers many advanced features like exception backtracing and logging (in case your ruby script crashes) and monitoring and automatic restarting of your processes if they crash. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 18:12:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 14:12:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251068] Review Request: ocaml-libvirt - OCaml binding for libvirt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231812.l7NICP8s001517@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-libvirt - OCaml binding for libvirt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251068 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |241656 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-08-23 14:12 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-libvirt.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-libvirt-0.3.2.3-2.fc8.src.rpm Description: OCaml binding for libvirt (http://libvirt.org) and also the virtualization utility 'virt-top'. * Thu Aug 23 2007 Richard W.M. Jones - 0.3.2.3-2 - build_* macros so we can choose what subpackages to build. * Thu Aug 23 2007 Richard W.M. Jones - 0.3.2.3-1 - Upstream version 0.3.2.3. - Add missing BR libvirt-devel. * Wed Aug 22 2007 Richard W.M. Jones - 0.3.2.2-1 - Upstream version 0.3.2.2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 18:12:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 14:12:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241656] Review Request: ocaml-csv - OCaml library for reading and writing CSV files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231812.l7NICVnn001544@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-csv - OCaml library for reading and writing CSV files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241656 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |251068 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 18:23:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 14:23:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708231823.l7NINVqY004092@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-23 14:23 EST ------- For -4: * Redundant Requires - For -java-devel subpackage, "Requires: ice = %{version}-%{release}" is redundant because -java-devel requires -java subpackage and -java subpackage requires ice main package * scriptlets -------------------------------------------------------- getent group iceuser > /dev/null || groupadd -r iceuser -------------------------------------------------------- - Ah.. "groupadd" must be written in full path (%_sbindir/groupadd) otherwise this will cause problem when normal user do "su -c 'yum install'" or so. Please write groupadd, useradd and so on (i.e. commands which are not user normal users' path) in full path. I also asked Fedora-packaing to change wiki. * Directory ownership issue - Well, still for python subpackage this is not fixed. For example: -------------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ LANG=C rpm -qf /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Ice/Glacier2/__init__.py ice-python-3.2.1-4.fc8 [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ LANG=C rpm -qf /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Ice/Glacier2/ file /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Ice/Glacier2 is not owned by any package --------------------------------------------------------- Please check the line --------------------------------------------------------- %{python_sitelib}/Ice/*/*.py* --------------------------------------------------------- Note: When we write ---------------------------------------------------------- %files foo/ ---------------------------------------------------------- (here foo/ is a directory), this contains the directory foo itself and all files/directories/etc under foo/, where when we write ----------------------------------------------------------- %files %dir foo/ ------------------------------------------------------------ this contains only foo/ itself. So, for example ------------------------------------------------------------ %files ruby %defattr(644,root,root,755) %dir %{ruby_sitearch}/Ice %{ruby_sitearch}/Ice/* ------------------------------------------------------------ is the same as ------------------------------------------------------------ %files ruby %defattr(644,root,root,755) %{ruby_sitearch}/Ice/ ------------------------------------------------------------ (it is my habit to add slash at last when the entry is a directory) ? /var/lib/icegrid - Well actually I don't know how to use ice at all, however anyway I tried: ------------------------------------------------------------- [root at localhost ~]# service icegridregistry start Starting icegridregistry: runuser: warning: cannot change directory to /var/lib/icegrid: No such file or directory /usr/bin/icegridregistry: failure occurred in daemon [FAILED] ------------------------------------------------------------- While I don't think the failure is the issue (perhaps some configuration is needed beforehand), does this mean that %_localstatedir/lib/icegrid must be owned by some package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 20:04:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:04:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254048] New: Review Request: biosdevname - udev helper for naming devices per BIOS names Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254048 Summary: Review Request: biosdevname - udev helper for naming devices per BIOS names Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: matt_domsch at dell.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://linux.dell.com/biosdevname/biosdevname.spec SRPM URL: http://linux.dell.com/biosdevname/biosdevname-0.2.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: biosdevname in its simplest form takes an kernel name name as an argument, and returns the BIOS-given name it "should" be. This is necessary on systems where the BIOS name for a given device (e.g. the label on the chassis is "Gb1") doesn't map directly and obviously to the kernel name (e.g. eth0). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 20:18:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:18:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249524] Review Request: wxdfast - Multi-threaded download manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708232018.l7NKI8X1021212@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wxdfast - Multi-threaded download manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249524 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2007-08-23 16:18 EST ------- the review is here: OK source files match upstream: 09f8a13c399e6e8f40e9b0a2776acd4133f0f1f6 wxdfast_0.6.0.tar.gz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Development/i386). OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane: OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK is a GUI app and correctly install its desktop file this package is APPROVED PS: are you aware of the many unresolved bugs in the project's sf.net bugtracker? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 20:19:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:19:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253691] Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708232019.l7NKJl24021770@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253691 fitzsim at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2007-08-23 16:19 EST ------- Here are the updated spec file and nosrc RPM, which have the ecj 3.3 workaround and should build in Rawhide: Spec URL: http://icedtea.classpath.org/hg/fedora/raw-file/7d5daf9e46e0/java-1.7.0-icedtea.spec SRPM URL: http://icedtea.classpath.org/download/fedora/java-1.7.0-icedtea-1.7.0.0-0.12.b18.snapshot.nosrc.rpm I'm testing a mock build now. Here's the changelog: - Fully qualify Java Access Bridge for GNOME and generate-cacerts source paths. - Fix plugin post alternatives invocation. - Include IcedTea documentation. - Update icedteasnapshot. I didn't fix items that don't seem release-critical: I didn't fix memory.sh because it's only a demo file, I didn't eliminate sonames in demo files and I didn't look into why we touch ghosted files. I'll fix all these later in the Fedora 8 release cycle. With the inclusion of the IcedTea documentation the licensing situation is now clearly explained. The NoSource comment was out-dated so I updated it. Here is the relevant excerpt from IcedTea's README: A Note About License Headers ---------------------------- Some sources downloaded from openjdk.java.net do not display the GPL license header. Instances are: - The files in openjdk/j2se/src/share/classes/javax/xml/stream/ seem to comprise the BEA-StAX source code http://ftpna2.bea.com/pub/downloads/jsr173.jar with some Sun-specific modifications. We're assuming that Sun is bundling BEA-StAX under the terms of the Apache License 2.0 and that the modifications are owned by Sun. - We are assuming that these files are owned by Sun: openjdk/j2se/src/share/classes/**/resources/*.properties The downloaded sources include two scripts that insert proprietary license headers into the source files they generate. The scripts themselves are GPL'd so we patched them to emit the GPL header. These files are: openjdk/j2se/make/java/nio/genExceptions.sh openjdk/hotspot/src/share/vm/prims/jvmtiLib.xsl I've CC'ed Tom Callaway for a second opinion: Tom does this reasoning satisfy you that IcedTea can be shipped in Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 20:20:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:20:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249524] Review Request: wxdfast - Multi-threaded download manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708232020.l7NKKx2R021991@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wxdfast - Multi-threaded download manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249524 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 20:23:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:23:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251998] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage - Allows perl modules to check test coverage with Devel::Cover In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708232023.l7NKN5NJ022350@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage - Allows perl modules to check test coverage with Devel::Cover https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251998 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-08-23 16:22 EST ------- Built for devel/f8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 20:24:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:24:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708232024.l7NKOoC1022497@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-23 16:24 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 20:28:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:28:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249352] Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708232028.l7NKSj84022776@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249352 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-23 16:28 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 20:34:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:34:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254056] New: Review Request: e16 - The Enlightenment window manager, DR16 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254056 Summary: Review Request: e16 - The Enlightenment window manager, DR16 Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: terjeros at phys.ntnu.no QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/e16/e16.spec SRPM URL: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/e16/e16-0.16.8.9-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Enlightenment is a window manager for the X Window System that is designed to be powerful, extensible, configurable and pretty darned good looking! It is one of the more graphically intense window managers. Enlightenment goes beyond managing windows by providing a useful and appealing graphical shell from which to work. It is open in design and instead of dictating a policy, allows the user to define their own policy, down to every last detail. This package will install the Enlightenment window manager. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 20:36:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:36:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254057] New: Review Request: e16-docs - Dcumentation for Enlightenment, DR16 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254057 Summary: Review Request: e16-docs - Dcumentation for Enlightenment, DR16 Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: terjeros at phys.ntnu.no QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/e16/e16-docs.spec SRPM URL: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/e16/e16-docs-0.16.8-0.1.0.02.fc8.src.rpm Description: This package contains documentation for Enlightenment, DR16. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 20:37:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:37:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252010] Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708232037.l7NKb3MQ024117@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252010 ------- Additional Comments From anderson.silva at redhat.com 2007-08-23 16:36 EST ------- fixed the following items: - Looks like it's actually GPLv2+ - license not in %doc (commented out) -/+ %doc missing ... but doesn't look like it affects the code -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 20:37:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:37:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252010] Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708232037.l7NKbbqs024273@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252010 ------- Additional Comments From anderson.silva at redhat.com 2007-08-23 16:37 EST ------- New src RPM posted: http://www.the-silvas.com/rpmrebuild-2.1.1-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 20:38:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:38:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254058] New: Review Request: e16-themes - Themes for Enlightenment, DR16 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254058 Summary: Review Request: e16-themes - Themes for Enlightenment, DR16 Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: terjeros at phys.ntnu.no QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/e16/e16-themes.spec SRPM URL: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/e16/e16-themes-0.16.8.0.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: The BlueSteel, BrushedMetal-Tigert, Ganymede, and ShinyMetal themes for Enlightenment, DR16. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 20:39:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:39:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254059] New: Review Request: e16-keyedit - GUI for editing keybindings for Enlightenment, DR16 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254059 Summary: Review Request: e16-keyedit - GUI for editing keybindings for Enlightenment, DR16 Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: terjeros at phys.ntnu.no QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/e16/e16-keyedit.spec SRPM URL: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/e16/e16-keyedit-0.5-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: e16keyedit provides a graphical interface for managing keybindings in Enlightenment, DR16. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 20:41:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:41:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254060] New: Review Request: e16-epplets - Epplets for Enlightenment, DR16 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254060 Summary: Review Request: e16-epplets - Epplets for Enlightenment, DR16 Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: terjeros at phys.ntnu.no QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/e16/e16-epplets.spec SRPM URL: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/e16/e16-epplets-0.10-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Epplets are small, handy Enlightenment applets, similar to "dockapps" or "applets" for other packages. The epplets package contains the base epplet API library and header files, as well as the core set of epplets, including CPU monitors, clocks, a mail checker, mixers, a slideshow, a URL grabber, a panel-like toolbar, and more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 21:04:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 17:04:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249524] Review Request: wxdfast - Multi-threaded download manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708232104.l7NL4rjx027683@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wxdfast - Multi-threaded download manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249524 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-08-23 17:04 EST ------- > this package is APPROVED ok, thx for the review. > PS: are you aware of the many unresolved bugs in the project's sf.net bugtracker? no was working quite good for me (no issues yet) but thx will look at them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 21:07:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 17:07:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249524] Review Request: wxdfast - Multi-threaded download manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708232107.l7NL7IHD027894@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wxdfast - Multi-threaded download manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249524 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-08-23 17:07 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: wxdfast Short Description: Multi-threaded download manager Owners: drago01 Branches: FC-6 F7 devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 21:28:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 17:28:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254015] Review Request: rubygem-mongrel - A small fast HTTP library and server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708232128.l7NLSMeH030480@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-mongrel - A small fast HTTP library and server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254015 sseago at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |254016, 254018, 254019 ------- Additional Comments From sseago at redhat.com 2007-08-23 17:28 EST ------- Note the following change in the SRPM URL, as I had to bump the rev to deal with some dependency issues: SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/sseago/fedora/SRPMS/rubygem-mongrel-1.0.1-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 21:28:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 17:28:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254018] Review Request: rubygem-fastthread - optimized thread.rb replacement In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708232128.l7NLSQbg030510@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-fastthread - optimized thread.rb replacement https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254018 sseago at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |254015 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 21:28:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 17:28:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254016] Review Request: rubygem-gem_plugin - plugin system based on rubygems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708232128.l7NLSSpX030537@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-gem_plugin - plugin system based on rubygems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254016 sseago at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |254015 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 21:28:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 17:28:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254019] Review Request: rubygem-daemons - A toolkit to create and control ruby daemons In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708232128.l7NLSVx9030570@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-daemons - A toolkit to create and control ruby daemons https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254019 sseago at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |254015 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 21:49:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 17:49:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254015] Review Request: rubygem-mongrel - A small fast HTTP library and server for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708232149.l7NLn0Vf000328@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-mongrel - A small fast HTTP library and server for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254015 sseago at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: rubygem- |Review Request: rubygem- |mongrel - A small fast HTTP|mongrel - A small fast HTTP |library and server |library and server for Ruby -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 22:44:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 18:44:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250210] Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708232244.l7NMidEh005615@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250210 ------- Additional Comments From ewan at macmahon.me.uk 2007-08-23 18:44 EST ------- Pong :-) Sorry - I've not disappeared, just been a bit short of time. The current state of play is that the package builds cleanly on F-7-i386 and F-7-x86_64, but fails (reliably now; I'm guessing all the mirrors have caught up with whatever change is tripping the problem) on F-devel-i386 and F-devel-x86_64. So far I don't know why, but I'm digging into it. More news as I have it... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 23:10:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 19:10:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249352] Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708232310.l7NNAWil008585@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249352 redhat at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|119782 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 23:13:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 19:13:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249352] Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708232313.l7NND8RT008906@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249352 redhat at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|243228 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 23:22:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 19:22:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249352] Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708232322.l7NNMfYl009998@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249352 redhat at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From redhat at linuxnetz.de 2007-08-23 19:22 EST ------- popt 1.12-3 was sucessfully built for Rawhide in Koji. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 23:31:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 19:31:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253691] Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708232331.l7NNVFSQ011201@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253691 ------- Additional Comments From k.georgiou at imperial.ac.uk 2007-08-23 19:31 EST ------- Is it sensible to drop java-rmi.cgi in cgi-bin considering that it's puprose is to tunnel rmi to any host/port bypassing any local firewall? Here is what http://java.sun.com/developer/onlineTraining/rmi/RMI.html says about it: "Additionally, using the java-rmi.cgi script exposes a fairly large security loophole on your server machine, as now, the script can redirect any incoming request to any port, completely bypassing your firewalling mechanism." IMHO it would be better to install it somewhere else, anyone that needs to use it will have to modify it anyway to restrict to specific ports at the minimum so it's more of an example than a usefull application. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 23:37:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 19:37:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254016] Review Request: rubygem-gem_plugin - plugin system based on rubygems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708232337.l7NNb9Gm011835@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-gem_plugin - plugin system based on rubygems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254016 ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2007-08-23 19:37 EST ------- OK - Package name OK - License info is accurate OK - License tag is correct and licenses are approved OK - Specfile name OK - Specfile is legible OK - No prebuilt binaries included OK - BuildRoot value (one of the recommended values) OK - PreReq not used OK - Source md5sum matches upstream OK - No hardcoded pathnames OK - Package owns all the files it installs OK - Package requires create needed unowned directories OK - Package builds successfully on i386 and x86_64 (mock) OK - BuildRequires sufficient OK - File permissions set properly (except for rpmlint error below) OK - Macro usage is consistent OK - Package is named rubygem-%{gemname} OK - Source points to full URL of gem OK - Package version identical with gem version OK - Package Requires and BuildRequires rubygems OK - Package provides rubygem(%{gemname}) = %version OK - Package requires gem dependencies correctly OK - %prep and %build are empty OK - %gemdir defined properly, and gem installed into it OK - Package owns its directories under %gemdir OK - No arch-specific content in %{gemdir} OK - Package is noarch FIX - License files are not installed as %doc Mark %{geminstdir}/{LICENSE,COPYING} as %doc FIX - rpmlint complains E: rubygem-gem_plugin script-without-shebang /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/gem_plugin-0.2.2/bin/gpgen Omitting the chmod of %{buildroot}%{geminstdir}/bin/* should do the right thing FIX - Requires: rubygem(rake) can not be met since that's not packaged -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 00:20:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 20:20:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253941] Review Request: cgi-util - A C library for creating Common Gateway Interface ("CGI") programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240020.l7O0KME2015042@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cgi-util - A C library for creating Common Gateway Interface ("CGI") programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253941 ------- Additional Comments From mike at flyn.org 2007-08-23 20:20 EST ------- Spec URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/cgi-util.spec SRPM URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/cgi-util-2.2.1-10.src.rpm Modified the autotools patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 00:23:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 20:23:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241656] Review Request: ocaml-csv - OCaml library for reading and writing CSV files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240023.l7O0Ne3S015305@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-csv - OCaml library for reading and writing CSV files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241656 berrange at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |berrange at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 00:47:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 20:47:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254018] Review Request: rubygem-fastthread - optimized thread.rb replacement In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240047.l7O0lY0j017419@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-fastthread - optimized thread.rb replacement https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254018 dlutter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dlutter at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2007-08-23 20:47 EST ------- OK - Package name OK - License tag is correct and licenses are approved OK - Specfile name OK - Specfile is legible OK - No prebuilt binaries included OK - BuildRoot value (one of the recommended values) OK - PreReq not used OK - Source md5sum matches upstream OK - No hardcoded pathnames OK - Package owns all the files it installs OK - Package requires create needed unowned directories OK - Package builds successfully on i386 and x86_64 (mock) OK - BuildRequires sufficient OK - File permissions set properly OK - Macro usage is consistent OK - rpmlint output. rpmlint complains about missing docs, but that's an upstream problem OK - Package is named rubygem-%{gemname} OK - Source points to full URL of gem OK - Package version identical with gem version OK - Package Requires and BuildRequires rubygems OK - Package provides rubygem(%{gemname}) = %version OK - Package requires gem dependencies correctly OK - %prep and %build are empty OK - %gemdir defined properly, and gem installed into it OK - Package owns its directories under %gemdir OK - No arch specific content in %{gemdir} OK - Defines ruby_sitearch from rbconfig OK - arch specific content moved to %{ruby_sitearch} BAD - License info isn't given explicitly, only inferred from the fact that fastthread is part of mongrel and falls under mongrel licensing (not something to fix for this review, but to point out to upstream at some point) Package doesn't create a -debuginfo; but given the gyrations of building rubygems, that can't be done sanely. APPROVED Please follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVSAdminProcedure and import the package. Close this bug as RAWHIDE once it's been successfully imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 00:48:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 20:48:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254016] Review Request: rubygem-gem_plugin - plugin system based on rubygems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240048.l7O0mQmN017537@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-gem_plugin - plugin system based on rubygems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254016 dlutter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dlutter at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 00:48:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 20:48:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241656] Review Request: ocaml-csv - OCaml library for reading and writing CSV files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240048.l7O0mZRh017589@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-csv - OCaml library for reading and writing CSV files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241656 berrange at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(rjones at redhat.com) ------- Additional Comments From berrange at redhat.com 2007-08-23 20:48 EST ------- - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. [WARNING] $ rpmlint ocaml-csv-1.1.6-2.src.rpm W: ocaml-csv invalid-license LGPL Needs fixing $ rpmlint ocaml-csv-1.1.6-2.fc8.x86_64.rpm W: ocaml-csv devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ocaml/csv/csv.cmi Bogus warning W: ocaml-csv invalid-license LGPL Needs fixing E: ocaml-csv only-non-binary-in-usr-lib Bogus Error for OCaml packages $ rpmlint ocaml-csv-devel-1.1.6-2.fc8.x86_64.rpm W: ocaml-csv-devel invalid-license LGPL Needs fixing - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [OK] - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} [OK] - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [OK] - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license [OK] - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [WARNING: tar.gz contains no license info. Website says LGPL + OCaml Linking Exception & links to LGPLv3. Please clarify specfile & upstream] - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [OK] - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [OK] - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [OK] - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [OK] - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [OK x86_64 rawhide] - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [N/A] - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [OK] - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. [N/A] - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [N/A] - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review. [N/A] - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [OK] - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [OK] - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [OK] - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section [OK] - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros [OK] - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [OK] - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. [N/A] - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [N/A] - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [OK] - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [N/A] - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [N/A] - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [N/A] - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [OK] - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives [N/A] - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file [N/A] - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [OK] - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. [OK] - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [OK] OK, all supplementary guidelines for OCaml at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/OCaml Will approve pending clarification of LGPL version, and addition of OCaml Linker Exception note to License. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 00:54:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 20:54:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250969] Review Request: ocaml-curses - OCaml bindings for ncurses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240054.l7O0sVEk017997@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-curses - OCaml bindings for ncurses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250969 berrange at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |berrange at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 01:03:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 21:03:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253691] Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240103.l7O13mtt018928@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253691 ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2007-08-23 21:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > Is it sensible to drop java-rmi.cgi in cgi-bin considering that it's puprose is > to tunnel rmi to any host/port bypassing any local firewall? Here is what > http://java.sun.com/developer/onlineTraining/rmi/RMI.html says about it: > > "Additionally, using the java-rmi.cgi script exposes a fairly large security > loophole on your server machine, as now, the script can redirect any incoming > request to any port, completely bypassing your firewalling mechanism." > > IMHO it would be better to install it somewhere else, anyone that needs to use > it will have to modify it anyway to restrict to specific ports at the minimum so > it's more of an example than a usefull application. What about just restricting all ports in the default configuration? I put java-rmi.cgi in its own subpackage so that it is completely optional, and to isolate the cgibindir requirement. Other options would be to move the script to the demo subpackage or just not include it in the IcedTea packages. Is the java-rmi.cgi script actually deployed frequently, or is it just meant as a demo for system administrators? The comments seem to suggest that it's useful in practice and not just a demo. If it's actually deployed frequently, I'd like to keep the subpackage + cgibindir requirement + all ports locked down. This minimizes the fiddling needed to get the script working while still providing out-of-the-box security. On the other hand, if java-rmi.cgi is just a toy then it should go in the demo subpackage and we can drop the cgibindir requirement in favour of a README. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 01:03:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 21:03:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241656] Review Request: ocaml-csv - OCaml library for reading and writing CSV files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240103.l7O13rxg019011@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-csv - OCaml library for reading and writing CSV files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241656 ------- Additional Comments From berrange at redhat.com 2007-08-23 21:02 EST ------- Correction: needs to have an ExcludeArch: ppc64, since the ocaml base package has an ExcludeArch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 01:06:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 21:06:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250969] Review Request: ocaml-curses - OCaml bindings for ncurses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240106.l7O168R4019213@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-curses - OCaml bindings for ncurses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250969 ------- Additional Comments From berrange at redhat.com 2007-08-23 21:05 EST ------- - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. [WARNING] $ rpmlint ocaml-curses-0.1-2.20020319.fc8.src.rpm W: ocaml-curses invalid-license LGPL $ rpmlint ocaml-curses-0.1-2.20020319.fc8.x86_64.rpm W: ocaml-curses devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ocaml/curses/curses.cmi W: ocaml-curses invalid-license LGPL $ rpmlint ocaml-curses-devel-0.1-2.20020319.fc8.x86_64.rpm W: ocaml-curses-devel invalid-license LGPL Clarify LGPL license version. devel file package warning is bogus for OCaml - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [OK] - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} [OK] - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [OK] - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license [OK] - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [WARNING: need to clarify LGPL version to 2.1+] - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [OK] - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [OK] - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [OK] - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [OK] - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [OK x86_64 rawhide] - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [N/A] - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [OK] - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. [N/A] - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [N/A] - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review. [N/A] - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [OK] - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [OK] - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [OK] - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section [OK] - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros [OK] - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [OK] - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. [N/A] - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [N/A] - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [OK] - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [N/A] - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [N/A] - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [N/A] - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [OK] - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives [N/A] - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file [N/A] - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [OK] - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. [OK] - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [OK] OK, all supplementary guidelines for OCaml at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/OCaml Will approve pending clarification of LGPL version in spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 01:06:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 21:06:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253566] Review Request: ocaml-xml-light - Minimal XML parser and printer for OCaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240106.l7O16Wcv019283@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-xml-light - Minimal XML parser and printer for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253566 berrange at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |berrange at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 01:09:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 21:09:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254019] Review Request: rubygem-daemons - A toolkit to create and control ruby daemons In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240109.l7O19cn9019483@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-daemons - A toolkit to create and control ruby daemons https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254019 dlutter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dlutter at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 01:10:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 21:10:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240110.l7O1Atmm019576@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 01:14:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 21:14:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253566] Review Request: ocaml-xml-light - Minimal XML parser and printer for OCaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240114.l7O1EoV4019713@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-xml-light - Minimal XML parser and printer for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253566 berrange at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(rjones at redhat.com) ------- Additional Comments From berrange at redhat.com 2007-08-23 21:14 EST ------- - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. [WARNING] $ rpmlint ocaml-xml-light-2.2.cvs20070817-1.fc8.src.rpm W: ocaml-xml-light invalid-license LGPL Clarify version $ rpmlint ocaml-xml-light-2.2.cvs20070817-1.fc8.x86_64.rpm W: ocaml-xml-light devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ocaml/xml-light/xml_parser.cmi W: ocaml-xml-light devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ocaml/xml-light/xml_lexer.cmi W: ocaml-xml-light devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ocaml/xml-light/xml.cmi W: ocaml-xml-light devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ocaml/xml-light/xmlParser.cmi W: ocaml-xml-light devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ocaml/xml-light/test.cmi W: ocaml-xml-light devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ocaml/xml-light/dtd.cmi Bogus warnings for OCaml W: ocaml-xml-light invalid-license LGPL Clarify version E: ocaml-xml-light no-binary E: ocaml-xml-light only-non-binary-in-usr-lib Bogus errors for OCaml $ rpmlint ocaml-xml-light-devel-2.2.cvs20070817-1.fc8.x86_64.rpm W: ocaml-xml-light-devel invalid-license LGPL Clarify version - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [OK] - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} [OK] - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [OK] - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license [OK] - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [WARNING: Clarify version - LGPL + OCaml Exception] - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [OK] - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [OK] - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [OK] - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [N/A - CVS snapshot] - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [OK x86_64 rawhide] - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [OK] - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [OK] - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. [N/A] - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [N/A] - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review. [N/A] - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [OK] - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [OK] - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [OK] - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section [OK] - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros [OK] - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [OK] - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. [N/A] - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [N/A] - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [OK] - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [N/A] - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [N/A] - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [N/A] - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [OK] - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives [N/A] - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file [N/A] - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [OK] - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. [OK] - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [OK] OK, all supplementary guidelines for OCaml at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/OCaml Will approve pending clarification of LGPL version and add OCaml exception note. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 01:20:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 21:20:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251068] Review Request: ocaml-libvirt - OCaml binding for libvirt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240120.l7O1Km6c020090@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-libvirt - OCaml binding for libvirt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251068 berrange at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |berrange at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 01:27:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 21:27:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254019] Review Request: rubygem-daemons - A toolkit to create and control ruby daemons In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240127.l7O1RjFA020446@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-daemons - A toolkit to create and control ruby daemons https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254019 dlutter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2007-08-23 21:27 EST ------- OK - Package name OK - Specfile name OK - Specfile is legible OK - No prebuilt binaries included OK - BuildRoot value (one of the recommended values) OK - PreReq not used OK - Source md5sum matches upstream OK - No hardcoded pathnames OK - Package owns all the files it installs OK - Package requires create needed unowned directories OK - Package builds successfully on i386 and x86_64 (mock) OK - BuildRequires sufficient OK - File permissions set properly OK - Macro usage is consistent OK - rpmlint is silent OK - Package is named rubygem-%{gemname} OK - Source points to full URL of gem OK - Package version identical with gem version OK - Package Requires and BuildRequires rubygems OK - Package provides rubygem(%{gemname}) = %version OK - Package requires gem dependencies correctly OK - %prep and %build are empty OK - %gemdir defined properly, and gem installed into it OK - Package owns its directories under %gemdir OK - No arch-specific content in %{gemdir} OK - Package is noarch FIX - Mark the LICENSE file as %doc FIX - License info is not accurate The license seems to be BSD, but not quite. Needs to be clarified -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 01:28:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 21:28:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254015] Review Request: rubygem-mongrel - A small fast HTTP library and server for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240128.l7O1Sswt020513@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-mongrel - A small fast HTTP library and server for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254015 dlutter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dlutter at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 01:29:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 21:29:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251068] Review Request: ocaml-libvirt - OCaml binding for libvirt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240129.l7O1TdTc020674@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-libvirt - OCaml binding for libvirt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251068 ------- Additional Comments From berrange at redhat.com 2007-08-23 21:29 EST ------- - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. [OK] $ rpmlint /home/berrange/rpm/RPMS/x86_64/ocaml-libvirt-0.3.2.3-2.fc8.x86_64.rpm $ rpmlint /home/berrange/rpm/SRPMS/ocaml-libvirt-0.3.2.3-2.fc8.src.rpm $ rpmlint /home/berrange/rpm/RPMS/x86_64/ocaml-libvirt-devel-0.3.2.3-2.fc8.x86_64.rpm $ rpmlint /home/berrange/rpm/RPMS/x86_64/mlvirsh-0.3.2.3-2.fc8.x86_64.rpm $ rpmlint /home/berrange/rpm/RPMS/x86_64/virt-top-0.3.2.3-2.fc8.x86_64.rpm - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [OK] NB: the subpackags mlvirsh & virt-top do not have ocaml-libvirt prefix. This makes sense in context, since they are top level apps which happen to be part of main tar.gz => OK - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} [OK] - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [OK] - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license [OK] - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [OK] - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [OK] - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [OK] - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [OK] - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [OK] - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [OK x86_64 rawhide] - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [OK] - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [OK] - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. [N/A] - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [N/A] - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review. [N/A] - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [OK] - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [OK] - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [OK] - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section [OK] - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros [OK] - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [OK] - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. [N/A] - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [N/A] - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [OK] - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [N/A] - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [N/A] - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [N/A] - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [OK] - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives [N/A] - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file [N/A] - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [OK] - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. [OK] - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [OK] OK, all supplementary guidelines for OCaml at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/OCaml Will approve once block bug 241656, bug 250969, and bug 253566 are approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 01:31:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 21:31:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254019] Review Request: rubygem-daemons - A toolkit to create and control ruby daemons In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240131.l7O1Vv9L020877@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-daemons - A toolkit to create and control ruby daemons https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254019 ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2007-08-23 21:31 EST ------- Contrary to what I said above, rpmlint is not silent: E: rubygem-daemons non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/daemons-1.0.7/examples/run/myserver.rb 0644 Since it's just an example, nothing to worry about. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 01:46:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 21:46:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254015] Review Request: rubygem-mongrel - A small fast HTTP library and server for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240146.l7O1kSWL021745@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-mongrel - A small fast HTTP library and server for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254015 ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2007-08-23 21:46 EST ------- OK - Package name OK - License info is accurate OK - License tag is correct and licenses are approved OK - Specfile name OK - Specfile is legible OK - No prebuilt binaries included OK - BuildRoot value (one of the recommended values) OK - PreReq not used OK - Source md5sum matches upstream OK - No hardcoded pathnames OK - Package owns all the files it installs OK - 'Requires' create needed unowned directories OK - Package builds successfully on i386 and x86_64 (mock) OK - BuildRequires sufficient OK - File permissions set properly OK - Macro usage is consistent OK - Package is named rubygem-%{gemname} OK - Source points to full URL of gem OK - Package version identical with gem version OK - Package Requires and BuildRequires rubygems OK - Package provides rubygem(%{gemname}) = %version OK - Package requires gem dependencies correctly OK - %prep and %build are empty OK - %gemdir defined properly, and gem installed into it OK - Package owns its directories under %gemdir OK - No arch specific content in %{gemdir} OK - Defines ruby_sitearch from rbconfig OK - arch specific content moved to %{ruby_sitearch} Package does not produce debuginfo, but given the gyrations of building rubygems that's not practical. FIX - rpmlint is noisy It warns on the srpm about an unapplied patch; that can be ignored since gems can't be patched in a way that rpmlint will notice On the binary RPM, it complains about a number of things that should be fixed FIX - License files are not installed as %doc Mark LICENSE and COPYING as %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 02:00:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 22:00:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254019] Review Request: rubygem-daemons - A toolkit to create and control ruby daemons In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240200.l7O20nE4022758@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-daemons - A toolkit to create and control ruby daemons https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254019 ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2007-08-23 22:00 EST ------- Actually, the license for most of the code is MIT; for daemonize.rb it's (GPLv2+ or Ruby) ... the overall license tag therefore is 'MIT and (GPLv2+ or Ruby)' and daemonize.rb's license should be pointed out according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines?highlight=%28Packaging%29#head-5dcaa7704b32aabaddc2e709f328f48eea6c91de -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 02:04:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 22:04:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254088] New: Review Request: b43-fwcutter - firmware cutter which outputs new format used by b43 drivers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254088 Summary: Review Request: b43-fwcutter - firmware cutter which outputs new format used by b43 drivers Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: linville at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://linville.fedorapeople.org/b43-fwcutter.spec SRPM URL: http://linville.fedorapeople.org/b43-fwcutter-008-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: This package contains the 'b43-fwcutter' tool which is used to extract firmware for the Broadcom network devices. See the README.Fedora file shipped in the package's documentation for instructions on using this tool. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 02:08:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 22:08:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254088] Review Request: b43-fwcutter - firmware cutter which outputs new format used by b43 drivers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240208.l7O28rVS023356@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: b43-fwcutter - firmware cutter which outputs new format used by b43 drivers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254088 ------- Additional Comments From linville at redhat.com 2007-08-23 22:08 EST ------- The spec is basically a cut & paste of the bcm43xx-fwcutter package. A new package is needed due to the different output format. With both the existing bcm43xx-fwcutter and the new b43-fwcutter packages, one can still produce firmware for either the new b43/b43legacy drivers or the old bcm43xx/bcm43xx-mac80211 drivers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 02:23:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 22:23:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254048] Review Request: biosdevname - udev helper for naming devices per BIOS names In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240223.l7O2NDCL024496@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: biosdevname - udev helper for naming devices per BIOS names https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254048 matt_domsch at dell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |179260, 238953 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From matt_domsch at dell.com 2007-08-23 22:23 EST ------- I'm going to ExclusiveArch %{ix86} x86_64 ia64 and put a comment in the spec. # SMBIOS and PCI IRQ Routing Tables only exist on these arches. It's # also likely that other arches don't expect the PCI bus to be sorted # breadth-first, or of so, there haven't been any comments about that # on LKML. Marking this as blocking ppc and ppc64 ExcludeArch trackers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 02:50:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 22:50:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254091] New: Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254091 Summary: Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dchen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/libsvm.spec SRPM URL: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/libsvm-2.84-0.fc7.src.rpm Description: LIBSVM is an integrated software for support vector classification, (C-SVC, nu-SVC ), regression (epsilon-SVR, nu-SVR) and distribution estimation (one-class SVM ). It supports multi-class classification. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 02:59:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 22:59:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254091] Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240259.l7O2x1FQ028072@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254091 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 03:05:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 23:05:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254093] New: Review Request: rubygem-rake - Ruby based make-like utility Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254093 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rake - Ruby based make-like utility Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dlutter at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/spec/rubygem-rake.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/SRPMS/rubygem-rake-0.7.3-2.src.rpm Description: Rake is a Make-like program implemented in Ruby. Tasks and dependencies are specified in standard Ruby syntax. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 03:05:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 23:05:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254093] Review Request: rubygem-rake - Ruby based make-like utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240305.l7O35q74028583@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rake - Ruby based make-like utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254093 dlutter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |254015 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 03:05:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 23:05:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254015] Review Request: rubygem-mongrel - A small fast HTTP library and server for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240305.l7O35suU028614@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-mongrel - A small fast HTTP library and server for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254015 dlutter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |254093 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 03:20:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 23:20:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253805] Review Request: scim-array - Array 30 input method engine for SCIM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240320.l7O3KLQn029338@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-array - Array 30 input method engine for SCIM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253805 ------- Additional Comments From dchen at redhat.com 2007-08-23 23:20 EST ------- The SPEC is updated according to COMMENTS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 03:23:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 23:23:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254091] Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240323.l7O3NMJT029468@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254091 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-23 23:23 EST ------- rpmlint gave me W: libsvm mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 11) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. W: libsvm wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/libsvm-2.84/FAQ.html This file has wrong end-of-line encoding, usually caused by creation or modification on a non-Unix system. It could prevent it from being displayed correctly in some circumstances. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 03:38:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 23:38:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253805] Review Request: scim-array - Array 30 input method engine for SCIM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240338.l7O3cQng030857@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-array - Array 30 input method engine for SCIM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253805 ------- Additional Comments From dchen at redhat.com 2007-08-23 23:38 EST ------- New Spec URL: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/scim-array.spec New SRPM URL: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/scim-array-0.0.1- 1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 03:41:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 23:41:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254099] New: Review Request: libsvm-devel - Development files of libsvm Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254099 Summary: Review Request: libsvm-devel - Development files of libsvm Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dchen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/libsvm-devel.spec SRPM URL: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/libsvm-devel-2.84-0.fc7.src.rpm Description: libsvm-devel include the C header file, compiled object file, and source code for Python and Java LIBSVM is an integrated software for support vector classification, (C-SVC, nu-SVC ), regression (epsilon-SVR, nu-SVR) and distribution estimation (one-class SVM ). It supports multi-class classification. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 03:54:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 23:54:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253805] Review Request: scim-array - Array 30 input method engine for SCIM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240354.l7O3sBXZ000362@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-array - Array 30 input method engine for SCIM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253805 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 04:00:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 00:00:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253805] Review Request: scim-array - Array 30 input method engine for SCIM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240400.l7O40NXO000957@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-array - Array 30 input method engine for SCIM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253805 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-24 00:00 EST ------- package is not owning /usr/share/scim/Array -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 04:41:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 00:41:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253805] Review Request: scim-array - Array 30 input method engine for SCIM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240441.l7O4ftId004341@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-array - Array 30 input method engine for SCIM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253805 ------- Additional Comments From dchen at redhat.com 2007-08-24 00:41 EST ------- SPEC file update according to Comment #6 New Spec URL: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/scim-array.spec New SRPM URL: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/scim-array-0.0.1- 2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 04:48:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 00:48:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240448.l7O4mfMF005089@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-24 00:48 EST ------- hmm. another long discussed review got DEAD-REVIEW status. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 05:32:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 01:32:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253805] Review Request: scim-array - Array 30 input method engine for SCIM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240532.l7O5WXoZ017610@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-array - Array 30 input method engine for SCIM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253805 ------- Additional Comments From dchen at redhat.com 2007-08-24 01:32 EST ------- SPEC file updated. Remove following files in %file section %{_datadir}/scim/Array/array-shortcode.cin %{_datadir}/scim/Array/array-special.cin %{_datadir}/scim/Array/array30.cin New Spec URL: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/scim-array.spec New SRPM URL: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/scim-array-0.0.1- 3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 05:33:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 01:33:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253874] Review Request: lsdvd - Small application for displaying the contents of a DVD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240533.l7O5X9ku017692@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lsdvd - Small application for displaying the contents of a DVD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253874 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-08-24 01:33 EST ------- lsdvd-0.16-5.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 06:02:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 02:02:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253805] Review Request: scim-array - Array 30 input method engine for SCIM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240602.l7O62Pt0022063@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-array - Array 30 input method engine for SCIM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253805 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-24 02:02 EST ------- W: scim-array macro-in-%changelog file Macros are expanded in %changelog too, which can in unfortunate cases lead to the package not building at all, or other subtle unexpected conditions that affect the build. Even when that doesn't happen, the expansion results in possibly "rewriting history" on subsequent package revisions and generally odd entries eg. in source rpms, which is rarely wanted. Avoid use of macros in %changelog altogether, or use two '%'s to escape them, like '%%foo'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 06:02:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 02:02:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245488] Review Request: maradns - security-aware DNS server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240602.l7O62jQW022102@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maradns - security-aware DNS server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245488 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2007-08-24 02:02 EST ------- Spec URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/maradns.spec SRPM URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/maradns-1.2.12.07-1.fc7.src.rpm Updated to 1.2.12.07 Fixed the incorrect symlinks (rather than copy the files) make condrestart happen only on upgrades Added a maradns user/group -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 06:09:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 02:09:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253805] Review Request: scim-array - Array 30 input method engine for SCIM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240609.l7O69DFJ022478@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-array - Array 30 input method engine for SCIM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253805 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-24 02:09 EST ------- replace changelog as given below * Fri Aug 17 2007 Ding-Yi Chen - 0.0.1-3 - Remove following files in %%file section %%{_datadir}/scim/Array/array-shortcode.cin %%{_datadir}/scim/Array/array-special.cin %%{_datadir}/scim/Array/array30.cin * Fri Aug 17 2007 Ding-Yi Chen - 0.0.1-2 - Add %%{_datadir}/scim/Array in %%file section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 06:26:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 02:26:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240626.l7O6Qdvm023493@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-24 02:26 EST ------- Now selinux-policy 3.0.6-1.fc8 is rebuilt. I am checking comment 31 now, however: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package may be accepted with another few (or some) work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html (NOTE: please don't choose "Merge Review") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 06:40:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 02:40:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240640.l7O6e40G024273@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-24 02:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #37) > For -4: > * scriptlets > -------------------------------------------------------- > getent group iceuser > /dev/null || groupadd -r iceuser > -------------------------------------------------------- > - Ah.. "groupadd" must be written in full path > (%_sbindir/groupadd) otherwise this will cause problem > when normal user do "su -c 'yum install'" or so. > Please write groupadd, useradd and so on (i.e. > commands which are not user normal users' path) in > full path. > I also asked Fedora-packaing to change wiki. Well, I asked on Fedora packaging and I was told that it is okay that groupadd and so on can be only basename, not full path. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 06:52:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 02:52:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254048] Review Request: biosdevname - udev helper for naming devices per BIOS names In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240652.l7O6qMVm025176@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: biosdevname - udev helper for naming devices per BIOS names https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254048 ------- Additional Comments From harald at redhat.com 2007-08-24 02:52 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=172394) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=172394&action=view) proposed patch to the specfile my patch to let it build and install -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 06:53:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 02:53:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254048] Review Request: biosdevname - udev helper for naming devices per BIOS names In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240653.l7O6rIYW025330@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: biosdevname - udev helper for naming devices per BIOS names https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254048 harald at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #172394|text/x-patch |text/plain mime type| | Attachment #172394|0 |1 is patch| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 06:55:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 02:55:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226224] Merge Review: pam_ccreds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240655.l7O6tuWa025569@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pam_ccreds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226224 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tmraz at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |F7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 06:56:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 02:56:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254048] Review Request: biosdevname - udev helper for naming devices per BIOS names In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240656.l7O6upFL025645@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: biosdevname - udev helper for naming devices per BIOS names https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254048 harald at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #172394|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From harald at redhat.com 2007-08-24 02:56 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=172396) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=172396&action=view) revised patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 07:02:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 03:02:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253805] Review Request: scim-array - Array 30 input method engine for SCIM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240702.l7O72ZRF026000@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-array - Array 30 input method engine for SCIM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253805 ------- Additional Comments From dchen at redhat.com 2007-08-24 03:02 EST ------- SPEC file updated. Changes: Remove tags in the changelog section New Spec URL: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/scim-array.spec New SRPM URL: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/scim-array-0.0.1- 4.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 07:12:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 03:12:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253163] Review Request: sazanami-fonts - Sazanami Japanese TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240712.l7O7CCXQ026784@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sazanami-fonts - Sazanami Japanese TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253163 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-24 03:12 EST ------- Thanks for the update. (In reply to comment #6) > > I wonder if it would be useful at all or make sense to consider subpackaging > > the gothic and mincho fonts? (Anyway that could also easily be done later > > if it is useful since they are in the same tarball anyway.) > > It could be. I'm not sure how much it's useful. but yeah I can. Okay, thanks, looks good to me. :) Some basic users of Japanese may just be happy with gothic. > > W: sazanami-fonts symlink-should-be-relative /etc/X11/fontpath.d/sazanami-fonts > > /usr/share/fonts/sazanami-fonts > > Hmm, I'm not sure about it. there were some discussions but I don't see any > conclusions at the mailing list that started Threads from: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2007-July/msg00444.html > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2007-August/msg00096.html Thanks for digging out the thread. :) Anyway it is not a blocker anyway. I got the impression the preference was for relsymlinks for better behaviour in a chroot tree but for fonts maybe it is not such a big issue. > nor any updates at the wiki: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureNoMoreXFS I agree this should be updated first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 07:22:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 03:22:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253163] Review Request: sazanami-fonts - Sazanami Japanese TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240722.l7O7MC3A027651@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sazanami-fonts - Sazanami Japanese TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253163 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-24 03:22 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=172397) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=172397&action=view) sazanami-fonts.spec-2.patch I do know if we still need to provide fonts-ja, specially now that the fonts are split? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 07:45:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 03:45:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253805] Review Request: scim-array - Array 30 input method engine for SCIM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240745.l7O7jHiN029305@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-array - Array 30 input method engine for SCIM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253805 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-24 03:45 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM. + source files match upstream. 1cc73fbc2990898fbee2cfff4c718b15 scim-array-0.0.1.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Provides: array-imengine-setup.so array.so + Requires: libatk-1.0.so.0 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libcairo.so.2 libdl.so.2 libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 libglib-2.0.so.0 libgmodule-2.0.so.0 libgobject-2.0.so.0 libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 libm.so.6 libpango-1.0.so.0 libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 libscim-1.0.so.8 libscim-1.0.so.8(LIBSCIM_1.0) libscim-gtkutils-1.0.so.8 libstdc++.so.6 libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4) rtld(GNU_HASH) scim + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 07:45:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 03:45:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253163] Review Request: sazanami-fonts - Sazanami Japanese TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240745.l7O7jeMb029383@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sazanami-fonts - Sazanami Japanese TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253163 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-24 03:45 EST ------- Overall the package satisfies all MUST requirements. You may still want to consider the provides and symlink. Package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 07:47:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 03:47:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254099] Review Request: libsvm-devel - Development files of libsvm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240747.l7O7lkOB029673@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsvm-devel - Development files of libsvm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254099 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-24 03:47 EST ------- this should be made part of package bug #254091 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 07:53:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 03:53:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253693] Review Request: compiz-fusion-extras - Additional Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240753.l7O7rjCn030344@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-fusion-extras - Additional Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253693 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-08-24 03:53 EST ------- New fixed package: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/compiz-fusion-extras.spec http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/compiz-fusion-extras-0.5.2-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 07:55:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 03:55:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253692] Review Request: compiz-fusion - Collection of Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240755.l7O7t1S7030597@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-fusion - Collection of Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253692 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-08-24 03:54 EST ------- New fixed package: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/compiz-fusion.spec http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/compiz-fusion-0.5.2-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 07:57:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 03:57:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250240] Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240757.l7O7vxVd030984@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250240 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2007-08-24 03:57 EST ------- Some more nitpicks :-) - Patches are traditionally named something like --tag.patch, where version if the upstream version the patch was generated from (and not necessarily that of the spec itself). Could you rename the patch to "linkage-0.1.4-plugindir.patch" ? - Exporting the '-Wl,--as-needed' option will not work, due to a flaw/bug/feature in libtool (remember all compiler and linker flags are processed by libtool) : it'll move the linker option at the end of the command-line and that won't work (see discussions in the link I posted above). I used the following line after configure: # clean unused-direct-shlib-dependencies sed -i -e 's! -shared ! -Wl,--as-needed\0!g' libtool - Also, you don't need to set CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS before calling make. Review will be approved after these fixes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 07:58:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 03:58:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254112] New: Review Request: bind - update package ACL Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254112 Summary: Review Request: bind - update package ACL Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: atkac at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: bind [Updated Description: more people will commit to BIND] [Updated Cvsextras Commits: atkac at redhat.com, stransky at redhat.com, skasal at redhat.com] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 07:58:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 03:58:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240758.l7O7wOeW031079@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-24 03:58 EST ------- Well, for 428: = rebuild - rebuild seems okay on all archs (i386 x86_64 ppc ppc64) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=123684 * Scriptlets requirement - As %post and %postun calls commands in policycoreutils, "Requires(post)" and "Requires(postun)" should also have policycoreutils. * macros in %changelog - Please don't use macros in changelog. If you want to write .fc8 in %changelog, please write it explicitly (normally, we simply omit %dist part) https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-August/msg01580.html Other things are okay. Also check my comment 32. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 08:01:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 04:01:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254008] Review Request: objectweb-asm - Version 3.0 of the ObjectWeb ASM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240801.l7O81gkQ031453@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: objectweb-asm - Version 3.0 of the ObjectWeb ASM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254008 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- |ObjectWeb ASM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 08:04:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 04:04:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250240] Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240804.l7O84jx3032173@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250240 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-08-24 04:04 EST ------- OK fixed: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/linkage.spec http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/linkage-0.1.4-4.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 08:09:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 04:09:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226377] Merge Review: rpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240809.l7O893YW032725@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: rpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226377 pmatilai at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED CC|pnasrat at redhat.com |pauln at truemesh.com Flag|needinfo?(pnasrat at redhat.com| |) | ------- Additional Comments From pmatilai at redhat.com 2007-08-24 04:09 EST ------- Okay, now with popt split out of rpm I think it's time to move forward with this one. Practically all of rpmlint whining against current CVS is from non-standard-[gu]id and other rather rpm specific things such as owning /var/lib/rpm directory. The spec remains a bit of a mess with all the __foodir and _prefix stuff, but I'd rather get rid of those later with next major rpm version that can actually be built using it's own %configure macro, rpm 4.4.2.1 wont survive that, and I've a feeling there are some gotchas lurking in there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 08:10:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 04:10:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254112] Review Request: bind - update package ACL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240810.l7O8A2St000417@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bind - update package ACL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254112 atkac at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From atkac at redhat.com 2007-08-24 04:10 EST ------- done throught cvsadmin. Closing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 08:13:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 04:13:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253163] Review Request: sazanami-fonts - Sazanami Japanese TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240813.l7O8D5cY000814@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sazanami-fonts - Sazanami Japanese TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253163 tagoh at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 08:16:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 04:16:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226377] Merge Review: rpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240816.l7O8GhMC001124@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: rpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226377 ------- Additional Comments From redhat at linuxnetz.de 2007-08-24 04:16 EST ------- Panu, I already did this job more or less - but for rpm5. It is less pain and seems to work well. If next week matches, my rpm5 package should reach review and then you can copy over bits from there to get the rpm.spec file friendly to rpmlint (of course, there will be some warnings and errors further on, because rpm is a special package). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 08:40:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 04:40:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226377] Merge Review: rpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240840.l7O8eEDs003266@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: rpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226377 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-08-24 04:40 EST ------- Stop and sorry! My comment #6 was NOT thought to start any rpm5.org vs. rpm.org discussion. I'm trying to get rpm5.org rpm ready for an add-on package and NOT to replace the current rpm package used in Fedora. If somebody of you tries to complain here about rpm5 in Fedora itself: I already talked with Max Spevack about this and he said, Fedora is open to any package it only has to follow the Fedora Packaging Guidelines to technically match the needs. And IMHO the rest is up to the users. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 08:53:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 04:53:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254048] Review Request: biosdevname - udev helper for naming devices per BIOS names In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240853.l7O8rN7Y004695@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: biosdevname - udev helper for naming devices per BIOS names https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254048 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |matthias at rpmforge.net Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-08-24 04:53 EST ------- I just saw the announcement on the poweredge-list. This looks neat! I'll start the review of this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 09:01:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 05:01:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254048] Review Request: biosdevname - udev helper for naming devices per BIOS names In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240901.l7O91ERS005378@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: biosdevname - udev helper for naming devices per BIOS names https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254048 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-08-24 05:01 EST ------- One immediate question : The resulting binary package depends on the shared libsysfs.so.2 which is in /usr/lib*/ and not /lib*/ so for Harald's patch needs further changes to get the package to be able to do anything useful before /usr is mounted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 09:13:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 05:13:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254048] Review Request: biosdevname - udev helper for naming devices per BIOS names In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240913.l7O9D91t006398@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: biosdevname - udev helper for naming devices per BIOS names https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254048 ------- Additional Comments From harald at redhat.com 2007-08-24 05:13 EST ------- right... either move libsysfs or make biosdevname static... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 09:15:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 05:15:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253693] Review Request: compiz-fusion-extras - Additional Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240915.l7O9Fhps006605@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-fusion-extras - Additional Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253693 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-08-24 05:15 EST ------- Some small fixes: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/compiz-fusion-extras.spec http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/compiz-fusion-extras-0.5.2-4.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 09:16:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 05:16:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253692] Review Request: compiz-fusion - Collection of Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240916.l7O9G9Xs006697@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-fusion - Collection of Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253692 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-08-24 05:16 EST ------- Some small fixes: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/compiz-fusion.spec http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/compiz-fusion-0.5.2-4.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 09:17:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 05:17:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226377] Merge Review: rpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240917.l7O9HOjk006860@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: rpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226377 ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2007-08-24 05:17 EST ------- I think rpm5 in Fedora is dangerous. At the very least it reverses the ordering of letters and digits and thus breaks a ton of packaging techniques. Any *-1.fc8 -> *.1.1.fc8 upgrade path is busted for example. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 09:19:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 05:19:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226377] Merge Review: rpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240919.l7O9Jjgt007139@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: rpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226377 ------- Additional Comments From pmatilai at redhat.com 2007-08-24 05:19 EST ------- Please STOP! This rpm(.org) merge review, anything else needs to be discussed elsewhere. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 09:20:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 05:20:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254048] Review Request: biosdevname - udev helper for naming devices per BIOS names In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240920.l7O9Kpv4007324@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: biosdevname - udev helper for naming devices per BIOS names https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254048 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-08-24 05:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > right... either move libsysfs or make biosdevname static... Yup. Current libsysfs-devel still provides the static library, so that would be an option, but surely moving libsysfs would be cleaner. From the spec file comment, it seems like the static libsysfs should already have been used, but it hasn't been. That comment kind of confuses me overall, though : # some distros won't have a static lib version of libsysfs, which # would be needed to generate these .so files I guess the comment is (at least partially) wrong, since even with the static libsysfs available, the shared one is used. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 09:29:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 05:29:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240929.l7O9TCQQ008314@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 09:51:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 05:51:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247227] Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708240951.l7O9p2N3010686@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method Alias: nabi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247227 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-24 05:51 EST ------- Well, what is the status of this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 10:03:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 06:03:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254048] Review Request: biosdevname - udev helper for naming devices per BIOS names In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241003.l7OA33qt011718@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: biosdevname - udev helper for naming devices per BIOS names https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254048 ------- Additional Comments From kay.sievers at vrfy.org 2007-08-24 06:02 EST ------- Matt, please just get rid of libsysfs usage. It's an outdated, unmaintained and useless library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 10:04:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 06:04:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247227] Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241004.l7OA4N4G011891@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method Alias: nabi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247227 ------- Additional Comments From sbehera at redhat.com 2007-08-24 06:04 EST ------- Hi Mamoru San, We're waiting for upstream to remove the unappropriate images till the end of the this month. Or else, we can go ahead as per as the suggestion of Jens. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 10:21:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 06:21:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254099] Review Request: libsvm-devel - Development files of libsvm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241021.l7OALoVD013685@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsvm-devel - Development files of libsvm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254099 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-08-24 06:21 EST ------- Agree. No need to create two reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 10:33:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 06:33:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253691] Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241033.l7OAXDTe014785@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253691 ------- Additional Comments From k.georgiou at imperial.ac.uk 2007-08-24 06:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > What about just restricting all ports in the default configuration? I put > java-rmi.cgi in its own subpackage so that it is completely optional, and to > isolate the cgibindir requirement. Other options would be to move the script to > the demo subpackage or just not include it in the IcedTea packages. It got dropped from windows at 1.1 http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6512052 http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4418631 and nobody really cared so I don't think it will be missed here either. > Is the java-rmi.cgi script actually deployed frequently, or is it just meant as > a demo for system administrators? The comments seem to suggest that it's useful > in practice and not just a demo. If it's actually deployed frequently, I'd like > to keep the subpackage + cgibindir requirement + all ports locked down. This > minimizes the fiddling needed to get the script working while still providing > out-of-the-box security. On the other hand, if java-rmi.cgi is just a toy then > it should go in the demo subpackage and we can drop the cgibindir requirement in > favour of a README. I never had to deploy it but I don't have any rmi programs either. I suspect that anyone that needs rmi will try to open the firewall ports first and if for some reason it's not possible and the proxy is required they will go for the servlet version instead of the cgi. It's best to ask around for someone that uses rmi just to make sure though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 10:33:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 06:33:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250240] Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241033.l7OAXTOm014878@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250240 denis at poolshark.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2007-08-24 06:33 EST ------- Review: OK: rpmlint W: linkage non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/linkage.schemas (that's fine) W: linkage-devel no-documentation (that's fine also) OK: name is according to guidelines OK: package meets guidelines OK: License is GPLv2+ OK: Source code matches upstream OK: Compiles and works OK: Calls ldconfig OK: BRs ok, builds in mock OK: locale handled correctly OK: owns all created directories OK: %files section is clean OK: headers and *.so are in -devel package OK: *.la removed OK: desktop file handled correctly OK: seems to work just fine, tested on i386 and x86_64 APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 10:41:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 06:41:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247227] Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241041.l7OAfkjv015918@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method Alias: nabi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247227 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-24 06:41 EST ------- Okay, thank you for imformation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 10:44:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 06:44:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247402] Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241044.l7OAiUka016167@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247402 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-24 06:44 EST ------- Well, as I am not familiar with GspiceUI, would you tell me how you are working on the left packages to get this package imported into Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 10:54:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 06:54:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247402] Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241054.l7OAsnKd017153@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247402 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-24 06:54 EST ------- Well g-wrap-1.9.9rc1 was working fine. The new release of g-wrap (1.9.9) broke guile-gnome-platform. Xavier came up with a fix last night. In accordance to our last night's IRC chat, he should be submitting: g-wrap guile-gnome-platform and I: gwave today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 11:04:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 07:04:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226377] Merge Review: rpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241104.l7OB4pf1018173@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: rpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226377 ------- Additional Comments From pmatilai at redhat.com 2007-08-24 07:04 EST ------- Back to the actual topic: on a second thought, this is as good or bad time as any to do the rest of the cleanup. So hold back with the review for a bit more, I had a large amount of further spec cleanups pending, I might as well finish that up now (and meanwhile let the dust settle a bit from the popt splitout) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 11:34:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 07:34:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246716] Review Request: ruby-RMagick - Graphics Processing for Ruby and Ruby on Rails In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241134.l7OBYecZ021400@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-RMagick - Graphics Processing for Ruby and Ruby on Rails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246716 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-24 07:34 EST ------- Sorry, once I withdraw this review submit as currenly I have no idea of how to resolve ImageMagick issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 11:34:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 07:34:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250240] Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241134.l7OBY7a1021331@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250240 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-08-24 07:34 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: linkage Short Description: Lightweight bittorent client Owners: drago01 Branches: FC-6 F7 devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 11:45:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 07:45:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254048] Review Request: biosdevname - udev helper for naming devices per BIOS names In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241145.l7OBjKad023009@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: biosdevname - udev helper for naming devices per BIOS names https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254048 ------- Additional Comments From matt_domsch at dell.com 2007-08-24 07:45 EST ------- OK, I'll nuke the libsysfs usage. That comes from my use of code from the pcmciautils-014 package, but for what is used there, it's easy enough to replace with standard C lib calls. The code can already build a static binary, called biosdevnameS. I just disabled this for now, but if we really need this called before /usr is mounted (e.g. inside an initrd or NFS-root or something) it's easy enough to build again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 11:48:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 07:48:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241148.l7OBmGS4023422@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From kaigai at kaigai.gr.jp 2007-08-24 07:48 EST ------- I updated the packeges as follows: [Spec URL] http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/files/sepostgresql.spec [SRPM Url] http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/files/sepostgresql-8.2.4-0.429.beta.fc8.src.rpm - "policycoreutils" is added into Requires(post) and Requires(postun) - Any macro are simply removed from %changelog (In reply to comment #32) > Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other > submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. OK, I'll join the reviewing for several packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 11:50:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 07:50:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254135] New: Review Request: libpanelappletmm - C++ interface for Gnome panel applets Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254135 Summary: Review Request: libpanelappletmm - C++ interface for Gnome panel applets Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: denis at poolshark.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/libpanelappletmm.spec SRPM URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/libpanelappletmm-2.6.0-1.src.rpm Description: libpanelappletmm is part of the gnomemm project and provides a C++ interface for developing Gnome panel applets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 12:00:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 08:00:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249365] Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241200.l7OC0fOE024845@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249365 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rdieter at math.unl.edu ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-08-24 08:00 EST ------- > outstanding issues? probably few, if any, but I'll double-check with a formal review... and I'll offer to sponsor Joshua (provided we follow-through with jima as comaintainer). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 12:06:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 08:06:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253757] Review Request: tesseract-langpack - Langpacks for tesseract In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241206.l7OC6mbe025334@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tesseract-langpack - Langpacks for tesseract https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253757 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mr.ecik at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-08-24 08:06 EST ------- REVIEW: * rpmlint: W: tesseract-langpack-de no-documentation E: tesseract-langpack-de zero-length /usr/share/tesseract/tessdata/deu.user- words W: tesseract-langpack-es no-documentation E: tesseract-langpack-es zero-length /usr/share/tesseract/tessdata/spa.user- words W: tesseract-langpack-fr no-documentation E: tesseract-langpack-fr zero-length /usr/share/tesseract/tessdata/fra.user- words W: tesseract-langpack-it no-documentation E: tesseract-langpack-it zero-length /usr/share/tesseract/tessdata/ita.user- words W: tesseract-langpack-nl no-documentation E: tesseract-langpack-nl zero-length /usr/share/tesseract/tessdata/nld.user- words E: tesseract-langpack-nl script-without-shebang /usr/share/tesseract/tessdata/ nld.DangAmbigs nld.DangAmbigs has to be chmoded -x * sums (sha1): d8d89e2681421a144f3a1ec61ee0c530686f5096 tesseract-2.00.deu.tar.gz 24f58cab2b1418816ba09e6f28e33aee34605889 tesseract-2.00.fra.tar.gz 8ac6c41708950660fd66789f5925068577fb89b1 tesseract-2.00.ita.tar.gz 8bc0a5877c1992ab10a9e124643fd9006ff30350 tesseract-2.00.nld.tar.gz 49206b79407cb23bc23b1cd95bee02544f2fcf9b tesseract-2.00.spa.tar.gz every sum matches with one given on http://code.google.com/p/tesseract-ocr/ downloads/list everything else is fine. (In reply to comment #1) > In each %files section, you should mark the files using the %lang macro, i.e.: > %lang(fr) %{_datadir}/%{upstreamname}/tessdata/fra* It doesn't need to be done while these aren't locale files actually, but language data files. I'll approve this. Just chmod -x nld.DangAmbigs when you submit this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 12:07:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 08:07:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241656] Review Request: ocaml-csv - OCaml library for reading and writing CSV files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241207.l7OC7gWY025427@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-csv - OCaml library for reading and writing CSV files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241656 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(rjones at redhat.com)| ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-08-24 08:07 EST ------- Updated version: Spec URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-csv.spec SRPM URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-csv-1.1.6-3.src.rpm * Fri Aug 24 2007 Richard W.M. Jones - 1.1.6-3 - License clarified to LGPLv2+ (and fixed/clarified upstream). - Added ExcludeArch ppc64 A note on the "OCaml linking exception": This is an additional permission/freedom given to users of OCaml libraries which allows users to disregard section 6 of the LGPL (the one where a proprietary app has to ship a relinkable binary), as this requirement makes no sense for OCaml libraries because of the way they are linked. Since it's an additional freedom given to users of the library, I didn't include it in the License field. Library users may if they want confine themselves to the additional terms of LGPLv2 section 6. http://caml.inria.fr/pub/old_caml_site/ocaml/LICENSE.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 12:07:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 08:07:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241207.l7OC7t71025504@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 Bug 249522 depends on bug 250494, which changed state. Bug 250494 Summary: RFE: Add object classes for Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250494 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 12:14:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 08:14:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250969] Review Request: ocaml-curses - OCaml bindings for ncurses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241214.l7OCEk81026334@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-curses - OCaml bindings for ncurses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250969 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-08-24 08:14 EST ------- Spec URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-curses.spec SRPM URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-curses-0.1-3.20020319.fc8.src.rpm * Mon Aug 24 2007 Richard W.M. Jones - 0.1-3.20020319 - License is LGPL 2.1 or any later version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 12:16:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 08:16:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250240] Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241216.l7OCGbmM026468@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250240 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2007-08-24 08:16 EST ------- Watch out, it won't build on FC-6: it doesn't have libnotify >= 0.4.4 Also, for F7, be sure to mark the License as GPL rather than GPLv2+... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 12:20:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 08:20:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250240] Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241220.l7OCKi0A026704@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250240 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-08-24 08:20 EST ------- thx for catching this, why should I mark the License GPL on F7 ? ------------------------------------------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: linkage Short Description: Lightweight bittorent client Owners: drago01 Branches: F7 devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 12:22:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 08:22:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253566] Review Request: ocaml-xml-light - Minimal XML parser and printer for OCaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241222.l7OCM8bm026813@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-xml-light - Minimal XML parser and printer for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253566 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(rjones at redhat.com)| ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-08-24 08:22 EST ------- Spec URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-xml-light.spec SRPM URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-xml-light-2.2.cvs20070817-2.src.rpm * Fri Aug 24 2007 Richard W.M. Jones - 2.2.cvs20070817-2 - Clarified that the license is LGPLv2+. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 12:44:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 08:44:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253757] Review Request: tesseract-langpack - Langpacks for tesseract In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241244.l7OCiGS9028312@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tesseract-langpack - Langpacks for tesseract https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253757 ------- Additional Comments From karlikt at gmail.com 2007-08-24 08:44 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tesseract-langpack Short Description: Langpacks for tesseract Owners: karlikt at gmail.com Branches: F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 12:47:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 08:47:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253757] Review Request: tesseract-langpack - Langpacks for tesseract In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241247.l7OClZiW028658@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tesseract-langpack - Langpacks for tesseract https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253757 karlikt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 12:51:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 08:51:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249365] Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241251.l7OCpPEv029218@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249365 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-08-24 08:51 EST ------- a few quick things I'd like to see: * enable PASSFILE * consider linking against system uw-imap-libs shlib instead of bundled static copy... if we go this route, you probably ought to become comaintainer for the uw-imap pkg. * web alpine. This will likely require a not insignificant amount of work for clean, seemless integration, so I'm ok to postponing this work till later. Joshua, any objections? now back to nitty-griggy packaging details... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 13:30:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 09:30:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254142] New: Review Request: OpenSER - Open Source SIP Server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254142 Summary: Review Request: OpenSER - Open Source SIP Server Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lemenkov at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/openser.spec SRPM URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/openser-1.2.2-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: OpenSER or OPEN SIP Express Router is a very fast and flexible SIP (RFC3261) proxy server. Written entirely in C, openser can handle thousands calls per second even on low-budget hardware. A C Shell like scripting language provides full control over the server's behaviour. It's modular architecture allows only required functionality to be loaded. Currently the following modules are available: digest authentication, CPL scripts, instant messaging, MySQL and UNIXODBC support, a presence agent, radius authentication, record routing, an SMS gateway, a jabber gateway, a transaction and dialog module, OSP module, statistics support, registrar and user location. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 13:31:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 09:31:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254142] Review Request: OpenSER - Open Source SIP Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241331.l7ODVYCf001198@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: OpenSER - Open Source SIP Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254142 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-08-24 09:31 EST ------- Actually it's still in work-in-progress stage (I want to better modularize it), but almost ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 13:35:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 09:35:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241656] Review Request: ocaml-csv - OCaml library for reading and writing CSV files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241335.l7ODZ56a001624@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-csv - OCaml library for reading and writing CSV files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241656 berrange at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From berrange at redhat.com 2007-08-24 09:35 EST ------- All items addressed -> APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 13:36:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 09:36:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250969] Review Request: ocaml-curses - OCaml bindings for ncurses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241336.l7ODa78C001806@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-curses - OCaml bindings for ncurses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250969 berrange at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From berrange at redhat.com 2007-08-24 09:36 EST ------- All items addressed -> APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 13:37:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 09:37:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253566] Review Request: ocaml-xml-light - Minimal XML parser and printer for OCaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241337.l7ODb7oq001995@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-xml-light - Minimal XML parser and printer for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253566 berrange at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From berrange at redhat.com 2007-08-24 09:37 EST ------- All items addressed -> APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 13:38:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 09:38:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251068] Review Request: ocaml-libvirt - OCaml binding for libvirt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241338.l7ODcT3Q002158@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-libvirt - OCaml binding for libvirt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251068 berrange at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From berrange at redhat.com 2007-08-24 09:38 EST ------- All dependant packages are approved, so this is now APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 13:49:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 09:49:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253566] Review Request: ocaml-xml-light - Minimal XML parser and printer for OCaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241349.l7ODn848003046@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-xml-light - Minimal XML parser and printer for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253566 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-08-24 09:48 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ocaml-xml-light Short Description: Minimal XML parser and printer for OCaml Owners: rjones at redhat.com Branches: F-7 InitialCC: rjones at redhat.com Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 13:49:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 09:49:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250969] Review Request: ocaml-curses - OCaml bindings for ncurses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241349.l7ODnF62003099@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-curses - OCaml bindings for ncurses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250969 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-08-24 09:48 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ocaml-curses Short Description: OCaml bindings for ncurses Owners: rjones at redhat.com Branches: F-7 InitialCC: rjones at redhat.com Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 13:49:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 09:49:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241656] Review Request: ocaml-csv - OCaml library for reading and writing CSV files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241349.l7ODnSaq003182@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-csv - OCaml library for reading and writing CSV files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241656 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-08-24 09:49 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ocaml-csv Short Description: OCaml library for reading and writing CSV files Owners: rjones at redhat.com Branches: F-7 InitialCC: rjones at redhat.com Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 13:49:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 09:49:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249365] Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241349.l7ODnqer003342@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249365 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-08-24 09:49 EST ------- MUST: +Requires: mailcap alpine makes use of /etc/mailcap, /etc/mime.types MUST: make ... EXTRACFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" so $RPM_OPT_FLAGS propogate to imap/ too SHOULD: %configure --with-c-client-target=lfd not sure if this is absolutely required, I wasn't sure if it guessed right without it. SHOULD: %configure --with-passfile=.alpine.passfile (no preference on the name of the passfile, if you like something else. livna's pine uses .pine.pwd, which in retrospect, isn't all that good of a choice). Here's updated sources, alpine.spec, alpine.spec.diff (and srpm) implementing these recommended changes: http://kdeforge.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SOURCES/alpine/devel/ Implement at least the MUST items, and I'll approve this. everything else looks pretty good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 13:49:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 09:49:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251068] Review Request: ocaml-libvirt - OCaml binding for libvirt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241349.l7ODnuW7003421@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-libvirt - OCaml binding for libvirt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251068 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-08-24 09:49 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ocaml-libvirt Short Description: OCaml binding for libvirt Owners: rjones at redhat.com Branches: F-7 InitialCC: rjones at redhat.com Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 13:52:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 09:52:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249365] Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241352.l7ODqk91003814@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249365 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-08-24 09:52 EST ------- Joshua, in the meantime, continue with steps outlined in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join in particular, get the ball rolling on Step "9. Get a Fedora Account" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 14:09:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 10:09:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221677] Review Request: atmel-firmware - Firmware for Atmel at76c50x wireless network chips In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241409.l7OE9jwv006409@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: atmel-firmware - Firmware for Atmel at76c50x wireless network chips https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221677 ------- Additional Comments From linville at redhat.com 2007-08-24 10:09 EST ------- The at76_usb driver is now in rawhide. In fact, this message brought to you by it, with the firmware from kwizart's rebuilt src.rpm package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 14:27:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 10:27:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251805] Review Request: postgresql-orafce - Implementation of some Oracle functions into PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241427.l7OERZ8c008421@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-orafce - Implementation of some Oracle functions into PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251805 ------- Additional Comments From kaigai at kaigai.gr.jp 2007-08-24 10:27 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=172420) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=172420&action=view) postgresql-orafce build log The following comments are based on the Package Review Guidelines and the Packaging Guidelines. But I'm not a sponsor of the Fedora project, so these are not official review comments. - You should post the results of rpmlint command. - You should apply the common compiler flags defined as $RPM_OPT_FLAGS or %{optflags} . - You should use -p option with 'install' command to preserve timestamps. - You should improve Makefile to enable to build with non-privilleged user. See the attachment. "make install" tries to make a directory of "/usr/share/pgsql/contrib", and %buildroot is not used. I could not build your package because of this problem. - In addition, "/usr/share/pgsql/contrib" should be owned this package, if you intend to create the directory actually. It is not owned by the postgresql package. [Package Review Guidelines] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines [The Packaging Guidelines] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 14:36:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 10:36:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250893] Review Request: audio-convert-mod - A simple audio file converter supporting many formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241436.l7OEaCGL009629@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audio-convert-mod - A simple audio file converter supporting many formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250893 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jpmahowald at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2007-08-24 10:36 EST ------- License: GPL is not sufficient, you have to specify which one, as per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing I notice source files specifying GPL 2 or later. You have your python macro backwards: get_python_lib(1) is how the sitearch macro is defined. Really it should be get_python_lib() for a noarch. However, in the Makefile, it expands $(LIBDIR). I suggest fixing this to use python to PYMODDIR. There is an uninstall script. Remove, rpm is going to manage this. Does not use restricted code, rather calls programs if they exist. Good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 14:39:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 10:39:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253691] Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241439.l7OEdwXL010141@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253691 overholt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-08-24 10:39 EST ------- I'll take this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 14:53:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 10:53:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221677] Review Request: atmel-firmware - Firmware for Atmel at76c50x wireless network chips In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241453.l7OErbe8011483@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: atmel-firmware - Firmware for Atmel at76c50x wireless network chips https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221677 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-08-24 10:53 EST ------- Good news ! i will drop the at76_usb kmod soon then! Thx for this feedback linville! I'm know waiting for reviewer advice (i will probably drop the dist tag, which is not relevant for firmwares... ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 14:58:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 10:58:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241458.l7OEwsi1011951@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 ------- Additional Comments From mefoster at gmail.com 2007-08-24 10:58 EST ------- Okay, here's another new version: - Clean up packaging of icegridgui: it's a gui app, so we should treat it as such (NB: building this package is still disabled by default because it needs jgoodies) - Actually create the working directory for the Ice services - Remove redundant requires on java-devel and csharp-devel packages - Fix file list for python package to own directories too - Modified the README to accurately reflect what's in the Fedora package Note that, with the python %files changes, I get a spew of "file listed twice" errors because python_sitelib and python_sitearch are the same directory on my i386 machine, but this doesn't stop anything from building. Note also that building icegrid-gui is disabled at the moment because it depends on some additional Java packages that aren't there yet. I've got packages that I'm intending to submit soon, but for now I'd like to concentrate on getting the guts of Ice in. http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/mef/extras/ice-3.2.1-5.fc7.src.rpm http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/mef/extras/ice.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 15:02:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:02:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241502.l7OF26mC012447@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 ------- Additional Comments From mefoster at gmail.com 2007-08-24 11:01 EST ------- Whoops, just noticed that I wasn't actually using python_sitearch anywhere, so I just removed all references to it in the spec file. No more duplicate files. SRPM and spec are in the same place. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 15:09:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:09:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241509.l7OF9Zrg013183@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-24 11:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #34) > (In reply to comment #32) > > Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other > > submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. > > OK, I'll join the reviewing for several packages. Well, just to confirm that I want to see your pre-review or your another review request _before_ I approve this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 15:18:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:18:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246782] Review Request: postgresql-plr - Procedural language interface between PostgreSQL and R In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241518.l7OFIWJB014327@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-plr - Procedural language interface between PostgreSQL and R https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246782 kaigai at kaigai.gr.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kaigai at kaigai.gr.jp ------- Additional Comments From kaigai at kaigai.gr.jp 2007-08-24 11:18 EST ------- The following comments are based on the Package Review Guidelines and the Packaging Guidelines. But I'm not a sponsor of the Fedora project, so these are not official review comments. - You should post the result of rpmlint command. Just I tried to run rpmlint for the binary package which I built, so it generate no errors/warnnings. - You should confirm the license of the package. "BSD" is put on the License: tag in the specfile, but plr/README.plr in the source tree says this software distributed under GPLv2 or later. - You should own the directories on which this package creates, such as % {_datadir}/%{name} and %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} - You should use -p option with install command to preserve timestamps. - You should add the R package into BuildRequires: tag, because the package obviously uses /usr/lib/R/include/R.h to build. - You should apply common compiler flags defined as $RPM_OPT_FLAGS or % {optflags}. (See, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head- 8b14098227aebff1cf6188939e9d0877295ac448) - [Package Review Guidelines] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines [The Packaging Guidelines] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 15:25:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:25:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241525.l7OFPehg015013@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From kaigai at kaigai.gr.jp 2007-08-24 11:25 EST ------- At first, I posted my reviews for two PostgreSQL related packages. Bug #251805: postgresql-orafce - Implementation of some Oracle functions into PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251805 Bug #246782: postgresql-plr - Procedural language interface between PostgreSQL and R https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246782 (In reply to comment #35) > Well, just to confirm that I want to see your pre-review or your another > review request _before_ I approve this package. Is it correct for your intention? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 15:30:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:30:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241656] Review Request: ocaml-csv - OCaml library for reading and writing CSV files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241530.l7OFUD6Q015369@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-csv - OCaml library for reading and writing CSV files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241656 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-24 11:29 EST ------- moving forward please use your Fedora Account System name in requests, not email. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 15:31:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:31:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221677] Review Request: atmel-firmware - Firmware for Atmel at76c50x wireless network chips In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241531.l7OFVFDg015516@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: atmel-firmware - Firmware for Atmel at76c50x wireless network chips https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221677 katzj at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |katzj at redhat.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From katzj at redhat.com 2007-08-24 11:31 EST ------- Bill's out on vacation and wrapping this up for test2 would be good. All of Bill's comments have been addressed and a quick check over stuff myself also looks sane. So approved. Leaving dist tag or not I leave up to you; it doesn't really make a big difference either way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 15:32:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:32:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249524] Review Request: wxdfast - Multi-threaded download manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241532.l7OFWoxi015696@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wxdfast - Multi-threaded download manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249524 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-24 11:32 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 15:37:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:37:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250240] Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241537.l7OFbO4t016182@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250240 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-24 11:37 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 15:39:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:39:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250240] Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241539.l7OFdbv9016332@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250240 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-08-24 11:39 EST ------- Umm, you need to mark the License as GPLv2+ on all branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 15:40:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:40:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250969] Review Request: ocaml-curses - OCaml bindings for ncurses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241540.l7OFeprg016523@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-curses - OCaml bindings for ncurses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250969 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-24 11:40 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 15:44:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:44:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251068] Review Request: ocaml-libvirt - OCaml binding for libvirt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241544.l7OFi9g8016744@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-libvirt - OCaml binding for libvirt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251068 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-24 11:44 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 15:44:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:44:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250804] Review Request: perl-Encode-Detect - Detects the encoding of data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241544.l7OFiehI016839@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Encode-Detect - Detects the encoding of data Alias: perl-Encode-Detect https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250804 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Alias| |perl-Encode-Detect ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-08-24 11:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Yeah, the Fedora Packaging Guidelines don't speak that much on building perl > modules. What I used, I originally copied from a RHEL package. (I have > multiple other perl packages I want to contribute, which is why I'm waiting for > this one to be reviewed before I proceed.) There is a collection of perl packaging "best practices" under https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Perl . Note that these aren't official guidelines, but are generally what perl reviewers will use when looking at a package. > The reason why I don't use %{module} et. al. macros in Source0: is because I > always download the source by copying-and-pasting it into a wget command. I > actually like having the additional edit; it forces me to Do The Right Thing > whenever I grab a new version of the package. An interesting approach :) I find "spectool -g foo.spec" helps to download new versions of sources with slightly fewer mouse/key strokes than wget. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 15:46:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:46:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253163] Review Request: sazanami-fonts - Sazanami Japanese TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241546.l7OFkuqX017087@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sazanami-fonts - Sazanami Japanese TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253163 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-24 11:46 EST ------- Please provide a CVS template so we know what you want here for cvs... See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure Reset fedora-cvs flag when you are ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 15:47:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:47:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221677] Review Request: atmel-firmware - Firmware for Atmel at76c50x wireless network chips In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241547.l7OFleEv017172@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: atmel-firmware - Firmware for Atmel at76c50x wireless network chips https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221677 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-08-24 11:47 EST ------- Thanks for the review! I will remove the dist tag and build for F-7 so it will be available into the rawhide repository without a fc7 tag... I can do EPEL's later if needed... New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: atmel-firmware Short Description: Firmware for Atmel at76c50x wireless network chips Owners: kwizart / kwizart at gmail.com Branches: F-7 devel InitialCC: Commits by cvsextras: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 15:49:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:49:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253566] Review Request: ocaml-xml-light - Minimal XML parser and printer for OCaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241549.l7OFn8gi017296@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-xml-light - Minimal XML parser and printer for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253566 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-24 11:49 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 15:52:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:52:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253757] Review Request: tesseract-langpack - Langpacks for tesseract In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241552.l7OFqJOA017701@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tesseract-langpack - Langpacks for tesseract https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253757 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-24 11:52 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 16:30:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 12:30:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241630.l7OGUuR6023438@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-24 12:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #36) > (In reply to comment #35) > > Well, just to confirm that I want to see your pre-review or your another > > review request _before_ I approve this package. > > Is it correct for your intention? Actually "before". Okay. * spec/srpm good * rebuilds properly http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=125954 * can be installed properly, seems to work well * from very quick check your pre-review seems good ------------------------------------------------------------- This package (sepostgresql) is APPROVED by me ------------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure according to: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". At a point a mail should be sent to sponsor members which notifies that you need a sponsor (at the stage, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship) Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 7, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 16:34:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 12:34:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253757] Review Request: tesseract-langpack - Langpacks for tesseract In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241634.l7OGYXRY024222@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tesseract-langpack - Langpacks for tesseract https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253757 karlikt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From karlikt at gmail.com 2007-08-24 12:34 EST ------- Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 16:47:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 12:47:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241656] Review Request: ocaml-csv - OCaml library for reading and writing CSV files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241647.l7OGlUHk026293@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-csv - OCaml library for reading and writing CSV files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241656 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 16:47:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 12:47:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251068] Review Request: ocaml-libvirt - OCaml binding for libvirt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241647.l7OGlX2T026329@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-libvirt - OCaml binding for libvirt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251068 Bug 251068 depends on bug 241656, which changed state. Bug 241656 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-csv - OCaml library for reading and writing CSV files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241656 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 16:47:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 12:47:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250969] Review Request: ocaml-curses - OCaml bindings for ncurses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241647.l7OGlh6w026384@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-curses - OCaml bindings for ncurses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250969 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 16:47:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 12:47:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251068] Review Request: ocaml-libvirt - OCaml binding for libvirt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241647.l7OGljlc026427@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-libvirt - OCaml binding for libvirt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251068 Bug 251068 depends on bug 250969, which changed state. Bug 250969 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-curses - OCaml bindings for ncurses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250969 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 16:47:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 12:47:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253566] Review Request: ocaml-xml-light - Minimal XML parser and printer for OCaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241647.l7OGlx6O026489@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-xml-light - Minimal XML parser and printer for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253566 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 16:48:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 12:48:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251068] Review Request: ocaml-libvirt - OCaml binding for libvirt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241648.l7OGm1DT026534@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-libvirt - OCaml binding for libvirt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251068 Bug 251068 depends on bug 253566, which changed state. Bug 253566 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-xml-light - Minimal XML parser and printer for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253566 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 17:18:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 13:18:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254093] Review Request: rubygem-rake - Ruby based make-like utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241718.l7OHIkq6031029@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rake - Ruby based make-like utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254093 sseago at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |254016 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 17:18:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 13:18:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254016] Review Request: rubygem-gem_plugin - plugin system based on rubygems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241718.l7OHIiT9030996@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-gem_plugin - plugin system based on rubygems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254016 sseago at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |254093 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 17:19:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 13:19:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241719.l7OHJpxP031140@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-24 13:19 EST ------- Well, I have not checked -5 in detail, however: >From diff of -4 and -5: ------------------------------------------------------- @@ -327,10 +350,8 @@ done mkdir -p ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{ruby_sitearch}/Ice mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/ruby/* ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{ruby_sitearch}/Ice -mkdir -p ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{python_sitearch}/Ice -mv ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/python/IcePy.so* ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{python_sitearch}/Ice mkdir -p ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{python_sitelib}/Ice -cp -p %SOURCE7 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{python_sitelib} +cp -p %{SOURCE7} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{python_sitelib} mv ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/python/* ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{python_sitelib}/Ice mkdir -p ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_datadir}/Ice-%{version} ----------------------------------------------------------------- Well, actually IcePy.so is arch-dependent binary and this must be put under python_sitearch, not python_sitelib. (In reply to comment #39) > Note that, with the python %files changes, I get a spew of "file listed twice" > errors because python_sitelib and python_sitearch are the same directory on my > i386 machine, Yes, this has always been a issue when both sitelib and sitearch are needed. Perhaps the following will work. ----------------------------------------------------- %files python %defattr(644,root,root,755) %ifarch x86_64 ppc64 %{python_sitearch}/Ice/ %endif %{python_sitelib}/Ice/ %{python_sitelib}/%{name}.pth ------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 17:30:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 13:30:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202334] Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241730.l7OHUCJ4001113@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202334 fitzsim at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|vivekl at redhat.com |fitzsim at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 17:43:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 13:43:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241743.l7OHhBvM002977@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-24 13:43 EST ------- Now I am sponsoring you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 17:50:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 13:50:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254015] Review Request: rubygem-mongrel - A small fast HTTP library and server for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241750.l7OHo9R6003704@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-mongrel - A small fast HTTP library and server for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254015 ------- Additional Comments From sseago at redhat.com 2007-08-24 13:50 EST ------- Fixed listed issues. Updated SRPM is at: http://people.redhat.com/sseago/fedora/SRPMS/rubygem-mongrel-1.0.1-4.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 17:50:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 13:50:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241750.l7OHoTdn003766@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From kaigai at kaigai.gr.jp 2007-08-24 13:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #37) > Okay. > * spec/srpm good > * rebuilds properly > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=125954 > * can be installed properly, seems to work well > * from very quick check your pre-review seems good > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This package (sepostgresql) is APPROVED by me > ------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks, > Please follow the procedure according to: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join > from "Get a Fedora Account". > At a point a mail should be sent to sponsor members which notifies > that you need a sponsor (at the stage, please also write on > this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship) > Then I will sponsor you. I got a Fedora account as "kaigai", and made a request to belong to "cvsextras" and "fedoradebugs" group. (And it was approved during I'm writing this comment.) I have to set up the Build-System Client Tools next, don't you? > If you want to import this package into Fedora 7, you also have > to look at > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT > (after once you rebuilt this package on Fedora rebuilding system). > If you have questions, please ask me. Unfortunatelly, it is not possible, because the selinux-policy package in Fedora 7 does not contains the definitions of object classes and permissions, as mentioned in Bug #250494 . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 17:51:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 13:51:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254016] Review Request: rubygem-gem_plugin - plugin system based on rubygems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241751.l7OHpWxw003951@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-gem_plugin - plugin system based on rubygems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254016 ------- Additional Comments From sseago at redhat.com 2007-08-24 13:51 EST ------- Fixed listed spec issues. Updated RPM is at: http://people.redhat.com/sseago/fedora/SRPMS/rubygem-gem_plugin-0.2.2-2.fc7.src.rpm rubygem(rake) has been submitted for approval and is now listed as a dependency for this request -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 17:56:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 13:56:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252456] Review Request: silo - The SILO boot loader for SPARCs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241756.l7OHuG8R004639@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: silo - The SILO boot loader for SPARCs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252456 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-08-24 13:56 EST ------- SRPM: http://ausil.us/packages/silo-1.4.13-5.fc8.src.rpm SPEC: http://ausil.us/packages/silo.spec use smp flags for building. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 17:57:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 13:57:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241757.l7OHvIEd004868@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-24 13:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #39) > I got a Fedora account as "kaigai", and made a request to belong to > "cvsextras" and "fedoradebugs" group. > (And it was approved during I'm writing this comment.) > > I have to set up the Build-System Client Tools next, don't you? Yes, please go on. > > If you want to import this package into Fedora 7, you also have > > to look at > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT > > (after once you rebuilt this package on Fedora rebuilding system). > > If you have questions, please ask me. > > Unfortunatelly, it is not possible, because the selinux-policy package in > Fedora 7 does not contains the definitions of object classes and permissions, > as mentioned in Bug #250494 . Okay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 17:58:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 13:58:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254019] Review Request: rubygem-daemons - A toolkit to create and control ruby daemons In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241758.l7OHwFeV005073@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-daemons - A toolkit to create and control ruby daemons https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254019 ------- Additional Comments From sseago at redhat.com 2007-08-24 13:58 EST ------- License and spec issues sorted out, SRPM is: http://people.redhat.com/sseago/fedora/SRPMS/rubygem-daemons-1.0.7-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 18:06:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:06:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254048] Review Request: biosdevname - udev helper for naming devices per BIOS names In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241806.l7OI6w7B006773@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: biosdevname - udev helper for naming devices per BIOS names https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254048 ------- Additional Comments From matt_domsch at dell.com 2007-08-24 14:06 EST ------- I've applied Harald's RPM spec patch moving this into /lib* and /sbin. I removed the libsysfs dependency completely. I am building, but not RPM installing, the static copy of the app, in case we decide we need it later. This builds and runs on Fedora 7 and OpenSUSE 10.3 beta. rpmlint results are empty. The SuSE and Fedora spec files are identical now, and hopefully they can stay that way and I can nuke one. Version 0.2.2 is posted now to http://linux.dell.com/files/biosdevname and pushed into the git tree. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 18:25:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:25:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251068] Review Request: ocaml-libvirt - OCaml binding for libvirt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241825.l7OIPHbt009190@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-libvirt - OCaml binding for libvirt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251068 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 18:27:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:27:29 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_248224=5D_Review_Request=3A_iwl4965-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_4965_A/G?= =?iso-8859-1?q?/N_network_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241827.l7OIRTb5009423@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iwl4965-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 4965 A/G/N network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248224 katzj at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |katzj at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From katzj at redhat.com 2007-08-24 14:27 EST ------- Everything looks good to me here. tibbs -- do you have anything else or can we approve this and get it built? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 18:48:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:48:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250970] Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241848.l7OImjoN011932@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250970 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kwizart at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-08-24 14:48 EST ------- So, found it ! We should probably block requirement at the bugzilla level (if it needs for exemple ivtv and perls scripts) I've found ivtv but not perls scripts whereas they are still Required by ivtv ivtv is here #250971 >From preliminaries comments : 1- Requirements: Check if it is necessay for the firmware to requires ivtv (or ivtv to requires the firmware..)- then set the appropriate blocks in bugzilla 2- We should drop compats locations to only provides firmwares in /lib/firmware for F7 -> devel 3- Buildroot: those are others values but the one choosen is acceptable also... %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) 4- ivtv-firmware.spec is the name of the spec (this is the case from the src.rpm so everything is right...) 5- Version field is wrong: 20070217 you be taken from a release tag. If we have 0 in a version tag, I think it is acceptable to have release tag not <1. This leads to have: epoch: 3 version: 0 release: 1.%{snapshoot}snap 3:0-1.20070217snap Using this if upstream ever provides version 1.0 of the firmware or else, this scheme will continue to work... 6- setup -n %{name}-%{version} is unneeded at this time, but it will more likely have to be replaced by -n %{name}-%{snapshot} 7- /lib/firmware/v4l-cx2341x-init.mpg is also a requirement but is arch independant and could benefit to be bundled from an arch independant package instead of ivtv (which one is arch dependant) - Anyway as we shouldn't be concerned by multilibs problems with ivtv, this shouldn't be really important... 8- mv *.fw %{buildroot}/lib/firmware/ - you should better use install -pm 0644 to prevent timestamp. 9- A license to allow redistribution of the firmware is missing from the package... Theres is Licenses files from the firmware archive and they need to be provided in the %doc directory. I'm not abble to state if this license allow Fedora to redistribute the firmware within an iso so users can uses ivtv "out of the box"... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 18:55:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:55:39 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_248224=5D_Review_Request=3A_iwl4965-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_4965_A/G?= =?iso-8859-1?q?/N_network_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241855.l7OItdgc012648@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iwl4965-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 4965 A/G/N network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248224 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-08-24 14:55 EST ------- I had a promise of some testing om #fedora-devel which I was hoping to see, but in lieu of that, here's a full review. The only comment I can make is that it would be good to have, in the spec, some explanation of why there are multiple versions bundled and some statement of how long old versions need to be kept bundled in the package. * source files match upstream: 6c1c870562c259af3df33756a811967e7e5ae6176e5ebdfc3d74a1fdc5f86d8d iwlwifi-4965-ucode-4.44.1.18.tgz dc48285a93577aee3a24614c089a24f9aff7e29ab92bbea505704b54aeeed6d5 iwlwifi-4965-ucode-4.44.17.tgz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is acceptable for firmware in Fedora. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (none) * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane; provides itself and requires nothing. * No automated testing possible, but several successful test reports in this ticket. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * acceptable content (firmware) * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 18:57:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:57:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250970] Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241857.l7OIvciM012902@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250970 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-08-24 14:57 EST ------- 10 - URL produced a 404 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 18:58:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:58:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250971] Review Request: ivtv - An iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241858.l7OIwmPa013040@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv - An iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250971 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kwizart at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-08-24 14:58 EST ------- starting this review ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 19:18:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 15:18:15 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_248224=5D_Review_Request=3A_iwl4965-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_4965_A/G?= =?iso-8859-1?q?/N_network_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241918.l7OJIFWN015375@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iwl4965-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 4965 A/G/N network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248224 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-08-24 15:18 EST ------- Thanks for the review! I will remove the dist tag and build for F-7 so it will be available into the rawhide repository without a fc7 tag... I can do EPEL's later if needed... I'm searching for a co-maintainer for this package, because if it often change, we probably need to make an update with a low time to answear... About the time to obsolete firmware version, it's when Fedora 7 will be end-of life (since Fedora Core 6 do not allow firmwares). Then we have to keept the firmware which "will" be used when Fedora 8 will be released...This drop can be done on new firmware release... About this comment, I can make it within the spec file or inside the cvs as a packager_note.txt ... (which will not be bundled - that's our internal kitchen after all) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: iwl4965-firmware Short Description: Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 4965 A/G/N network adaptors Owners: kwizart / kwizart at gmail.com Branches: F-7 devel InitialCC: Commits by cvsextras: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 19:23:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 15:23:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254209] New: Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254209 Summary: Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lxtnow at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec : http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/g-wrap/g-wrap.spec SRPM : http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/g-wrap/g-wrap-1.9.9-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This is a tool for specifying types, functions, and constants to import into a Scheme interpreter, and for generating code (in C) to interface these to the Guile and RScheme interpreters in particular. # note 1: I took over the maintenance of g-wrap which has been orphaned in order to resolve dependence tree on GspiceUI bug #247402. # note 2: This new release of g-wrap (1.9.9) is shipped with libffi libraries. Those libraries is essantial in the GspiceUI's dependence tree. # note 3: rpmlint ouput on -devel subpackage, ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ W: g-wrap-devel dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/g-wrap/modules/libgw-guile-standard.so libgw-guile-standard.so.0.0.0 W: g-wrap-devel dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/g-wrap/modules/libgw-guile-gw-glib.so libgw-guile-gw-glib.so.0.0.0 E: g-wrap-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Those ouptut can be ignored. Those libraries are indeed not broken once installed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 19:29:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 15:29:15 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_248224=5D_Review_Request=3A_iwl4965-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_4965_A/G?= =?iso-8859-1?q?/N_network_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241929.l7OJTFe1016757@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iwl4965-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 4965 A/G/N network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248224 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-08-24 15:29 EST ------- Updated cvs request as bjensen proposed me his help... ( don't know if it is good enought for multiple owers...) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: iwl4965-firmware Short Description: Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 4965 A/G/N network adaptors Owners: kwizart,bjensen Branches: F-7 devel InitialCC: Commits by cvsextras: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 19:29:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 15:29:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254211] New: Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254211 Summary: Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lxtnow at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec : http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/guile-gnome-platform/guile-gnome-platform.spec SRPM : http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/guile-gnome-platform/guile-gnome-platform-2.15.93-2.fc8.src.rpm Description: The guile-gnome project brings the power of Scheme to your graphical application. guile-gnome modules support the entire GNOME library stack: from Pango to GnomeCanvas, GTK+ to GStreamer, Glade to GtkSourceView, you will find in guile-gnome a comprehensive environment for developing modern applications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 19:29:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 15:29:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241929.l7OJTicM016890@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora bbbush.yuan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|ERRATA | ------- Additional Comments From bbbush.yuan at gmail.com 2007-08-24 15:29 EST ------- Now fedora has changed a policy about fonts, that is to use libXfont's embeded parser instead of xfs. Simply speaking, a font path is not added to /etc/X11/fs/config using chkfontpath, but rather referred to by using a symbol link in the /etc/X11/fontpath.d/ directory. Then libXfont will scan that directory. This change requires in the spec, replace the chkfontpath usage with another scriplet to create symbol links. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 19:31:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 15:31:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254209] Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241931.l7OJV4o6017033@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254209 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |254211 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 19:51:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 15:51:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253691] Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708241951.l7OJpDWr019648@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253691 ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2007-08-24 15:51 EST ------- Andrew requested a full SRPM. Here it is, along with the exact spec file used to create it: Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~fitzsim/java-1.7.0-icedtea.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~fitzsim/java-1.7.0-icedtea-1.7.0.0-0.12.b18.snapshot.src.rpm In addition, I've posted the IcedTea snapshot so that its md5sum is verifiable: http://icedtea.classpath.org/download/source/icedtea-1.3-200060a622000dd98da0ad0c3f4d1e5d49e350bc.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 20:12:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 16:12:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253691] Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708242012.l7OKCu64022183@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253691 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-08-24 16:12 EST ------- MUST items: ? package is named appropriately - falls in line with JPackage JVM naming - what's going to happen with the release tag when we hit 1.3? Will it just be 1.3%{?dist}? Or will we always have the leading 0.NN.%{openjdkver}.%{icedtearelease}? OK it is legal for Fedora to distribute this - assuming the assumptions about the three things listed in comment #14 are okay OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. OK specfile name matches %{name} NEEDS_FIXING verify source and patches - there's a "1.19" missing in the java-access-bridge URL - if I get the actual java-access-bridge tarball, all of the source files check out OK summary and description fine OK acceptable buildroot OK %{?dist} used correctly OK license text included in package and marked with %doc OK packages meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) - except for the /usr/lib on x86_64 stuff which I'm okay with, I think we're good OK changelog fine OK Packager tag not used OK Vendor tag not used OK Distribution tag not used OK use License and not Copyright OK Summary tag should not end in a period OK if possible, replace PreReq with Requires(pre) and/or Requires(post) OK specfile is legible ? package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86 - I don't have enough disk space on my laptop. I'm trying a build on another box and will report back when it's done. OK BuildRequires are proper - I know Tom's done mock builds so I'm going to assume they're okay OK summary should be a short and concise description of the package OK description expands upon summary OK make sure lines are <= 80 characters - except for changelog lines, I think we're okay OK specfile written in American English OK make a -doc sub-package if necessary - the package layout is JPackage-standard and we have -javadoc for API docs ? packages including libraries should exclude static libraries if possible - I guess I'll have to wait until my build finishes ? are the rpath issues all sorted out in the comments above? OK config files marked with %config(noreplace) OK not a GUI app so no .desktop OK macros used appropriately and consistently OK don't use %makeinstall OK install section must begin with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot} OK locale data handling correct (find_lang) - no locale data NEEDS_FIXING consider using cp -p to preserve timestamps - can we add -p to the accessibility bridge copying? OK split Requires(pre,post) into two separate lines OK package should probably not be relocatable OK package contains code OK package should own all directories and files OK there should be no %files duplicates OK file permissions should be okay; %defattrs should be present OK %clean should be present OK %doc files should not affect runtime OK rpmlint on .srpm gives no output E: java-1.7.0-icedtea hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib - I'm okay with this as alternatives for x86_64 and 32-bit JVMs is very important ... it's also consistent with JPackage standards E: java-1.7.0-icedtea configure-without-libdir-spec E: java-1.7.0-icedtea configure-without-libdir-spec - I see Tom's comment in comment #1 about this and I'm okay with it. Does anyone disagree? ? verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs - awaiting results ? run rpmlint on the binary RPMs - awaiting results SHOULD items: OK package should include license text in the package and mark it with %doc ? package should build on i386 - awaiting results ? package should build in mock - awaiting results Remaining issues: - rmi cgi script - are we keeping it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 20:22:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 16:22:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254093] Review Request: rubygem-rake - Ruby based make-like utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708242022.l7OKMtOa023400@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rake - Ruby based make-like utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254093 mdehaan at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mdehaan at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 20:26:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 16:26:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250971] Review Request: ivtv - An iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708242026.l7OKQbnd023829@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv - An iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250971 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-08-24 16:26 EST ------- mock build works but rpmlint show errors: 1- Same treatment as the firmware for Requires: There is no perl scripts at this time to be reviewed at this time. They need to be reviewed first... 2- License is now GPLv2 (not GPLv2+ ) this probably concern the kernel module part... I haven't checked if the tools are concerned also... (we only care of the tools actually) 3- We shouldn't provided a ivtv-devel for this, as kernel-headers should provide it - which do not seems the case on a recent Fedora 7 kernel...Unless this headers is made for tools...(I don't think so...) 4- make must honnor $RPM_OPT_FLAGS and %{?_smp_mflags} - you have to state why you don't use them if it's don't work... 5- rpmlint error: E: ivtv only-non-binary-in-usr-lib This concerns: "install -p utils/ivtvfwextract.pl %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/ivtv/ see if they can be installed into %{_datadir}/ivtv/ or %{_bindir}/ if needed... And it will probably need some perl dependency (but they could also be bring by Perl-Video-ivtv and perl-Video-Frequencies ) 6- symlinks have to be relative - But maybe those who produced the warning aren't usefull anymore... install -p v4l-cx2341x-init.mpg %{buildroot}/lib/modules/v4l-cx2341x-init.mpg See if we can only install it in /lib/firmware 7- %{_libdir}/ivtv Directory ownership - It has to be %{_libdir}/ivtv/ if ever still used... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 20:39:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 16:39:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254093] Review Request: rubygem-rake - Ruby based make-like utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708242039.l7OKda0D025263@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rake - Ruby based make-like utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254093 ------- Additional Comments From mdehaan at redhat.com 2007-08-24 16:39 EST ------- basics: + rpmlint clean for both src and built RPM + src.rpm builds fine + name good + license + general overview of specfile + docs/changelog Ruby guidelines: + source good + requires/buildrequires good + provides good + prep and build empty + install to gemdir follows guidelines + marked noarch + installs fine + trivial test "rake" runs fine when installed potential things to look at according to packaging doc: - "Ruby packages must require ruby at build time with a BuildRequires: ruby, and may indicate the minimal ruby version they need for building." - "Each Ruby package must indicate the Ruby ABI version it depends on with a line like Requires: ruby(abi) = 1.8" Some of the above is implicit from gem BuildRequires/usage, though I would imagine it can't hurt if the above information is known and set explicitly. Let me know about the above and I'll approve this. Everything else looks fine according to the packaging spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 21:07:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 17:07:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202334] Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708242107.l7OL78nh027944@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202334 ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2007-08-24 17:07 EST ------- A few general comments while I wait for the mock build to complete: - the license field is invalid according to new versions of rpmlint: $ rpmlint jetty5-5.1.12-1jpp.1.src.rpm W: jetty5 invalid-license Apache Software License - I don't understand this comment: # we need a shell to be able to use su - later Can it be expanded to justify why /bin/sh instead of /sbin/nologin? - I guess you'll add an entry in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageUserRegistry ? - does fedora-usermgmt make preun user deletion OK? I suppose the problems mentioned in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UsersAndGroups are addressed by having the user registry + reserved address blocks? - Maybe elaborate on why excluding the demo package is more secure and why you don't just delete those sections of the spec file. - can the javadoc versioned directory be owned by the package? - why the manual removal of %{homedir}/extra/ext/*.jar. Can't they be owned by the package? An explanatory comment would be good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 21:28:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 17:28:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254015] Review Request: rubygem-mongrel - A small fast HTTP library and server for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708242128.l7OLS8u9030944@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-mongrel - A small fast HTTP library and server for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254015 sseago at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 22:34:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 18:34:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 219889] Review Request: bootchart - a utility for profiling the boot process In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708242234.l7OMYbMU003544@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bootchart - a utility for profiling the boot process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219889 ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-08-24 18:34 EST ------- Sorry, was late about it. Current build: http://ajax.fedorapeople.org/bootchart/bootchart.spec http://ajax.fedorapeople.org/bootchart/bootchart-0.9-4.fc8.src.rpm Folds the subpackages together just for the hell of it, and applies gcj precompilation (patch from overholt). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 22:37:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 18:37:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254209] Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708242237.l7OMbalE003866@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254209 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-24 18:37 EST ------- #001: Requires should entail %{release} as well Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} #002: Please remove useless comments so as to remove confusions for others. #003: as for > #remove .la (kill the build on guile-gnome & gnucash not requires g-wrap > anymore) > %exclude %{_libdir}/*.la please replace %exclude %{_libdir}/*.la by: %exclude %{_libdir}/libgwrap-core-runtime.la %exclude %{_libdir}/libgwrap-guile-runtime.la This might be very helpful for others reading the spec file. #004 add the following comment on top of "make": # Is not parallel-build-safe -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 24 22:41:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 18:41:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253691] Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708242241.l7OMfD8a004152@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253691 ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2007-08-24 18:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20) > MUST items: > > ? package is named appropriately > - falls in line with JPackage JVM naming > - what's going to happen with the release tag when we hit 1.3? Will it just > be 1.3%{?dist}? Or will we always have the leading No, the IcedTea release will continue to be encoded in the symbolic part of the release string. The 0.X prefix of the release string means that this is a pre-release of what will become the 1.7.0.0 IcedTea release (derived from the OpenJDK 1.7.0 final sources). When 1.7.0.0 is released, the prefix will become just X, representing a package revision of a final-release package. > 0.NN.%{openjdkver}.%{icedtearelease}? > OK it is legal for Fedora to distribute this > - assuming the assumptions about the three things listed in comment #14 are > okay I talked to spot about this on IRC and he's fine with our rationale. > NEEDS_FIXING verify source and patches > - there's a "1.19" missing in the java-access-bridge URL Fixed. > ? are the rpath issues all sorted out in the comments above? There weren't any rpath issues, according to the more-precise-than-rpmlint checks in check-rpaths-worker. > NEEDS_FIXING consider using cp -p to preserve timestamps > - can we add -p to the accessibility bridge copying? I'm already using cp -a which implies -p. > Remaining issues: > - rmi cgi script - are we keeping it? No, I removed it. Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~fitzsim/java-1.7.0-icedtea.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~fitzsim/java-1.7.0-icedtea-1.7.0.0-0.13.b18.snapshot.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 25 15:34:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 11:34:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254209] Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708251534.l7PFYRxC028621@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254209 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-25 11:34 EST ------- #005: %setup -q -n %{name}-%{version} you can remove -n %{name}-%{version} #006: The patches (%patch0 -p1) Take as good example : %patch0 -p1 -b .REASON #007: (devel package) same for %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/* /usr/lib/pkgconfig/ is required by pkgconfig #008: as well for the (devel package) add the following Requires due to directory ownership: ORBit2-devel, automake #009 the directory /usr/share/guile/site/ is required by guile Add guile as Requires: #010: You can replace all these # remove .la files rm -f %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/{*.a,libffi.la} [..] %{_libdir}/%{name}/modules/*.la [..] #remove .la (kill the build on guile-gnome & gnucash not requires g-wrap anymore) %exclude %{_libdir}/*.la by: find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name '*.la' -exec rm -f {} ';' since both guile-gnome-platform and gwave build successfully with the *.la (I've lost my comments on guile-gnome-platform during the shift to bugzilla's maintenance. I'll catch up later on) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 25 16:18:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 12:18:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250893] Review Request: audio-convert-mod - A simple audio file converter supporting many formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708251618.l7PGIZif001191@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audio-convert-mod - A simple audio file converter supporting many formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250893 ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2007-08-25 12:18 EST ------- I've made a new new release 3.45.1 (fixes the Makefiles) and adds a few new features. In terms of the spec, I reverted to sitelib rather than sitearch. SPEC: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/audio-convert-mod/audio-convert-mod.spec SRPM: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/audio-convert-mod/audio-convert-mod-3.45.1-1.fc8.src.rpm rpmlint is still silent on both. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 25 16:51:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 12:51:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 211761] Review Request: dfu-programmer - USB DFU based programmer for Atmel chips In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708251651.l7PGpBP8004941@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dfu-programmer - USB DFU based programmer for Atmel chips https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=211761 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-08-25 12:51 EST ------- So I did the sponsorship dance a while back when you made the request; do you need help making your CVS request and getting this package imported, built and released? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 25 16:56:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 12:56:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230802] Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708251656.l7PGuBVP005501@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks Alias: perl-Callback https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230802 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-08-25 12:56 EST ------- So it's been another month; this package is in rawhide and was built for but never pushed to F7. Do you need help getting your package released? Or can you close this ticket? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 25 17:07:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 13:07:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243665] Review Request: perl-Geo-IP - Efficient GeoIP bindings for Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708251707.l7PH7FiX006629@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-IP - Efficient GeoIP bindings for Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243665 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-08-25 13:07 EST ------- So, anything happening here? The last package you put up doesn't have anything which would alter the failing test at all; maybe it's the wrong package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 25 17:10:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 13:10:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239162] Review Request: perl-Net-Packet - A framework to easily send and receive frames from layer 2 to la yer 7 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708251710.l7PHAtgM007132@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Packet - A framework to easily send and receive frames from layer 2 to la yer 7 Alias: perl-Net-Packet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239162 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-08-25 13:10 EST ------- Are those dependencies in the repo now? Any chance this ticket can ever be closed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 25 17:15:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 13:15:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231835] Review Request: uisp - Universal In-System Programmer for Atmel AVR and 8051 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708251715.l7PHF9vC007671@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uisp - Universal In-System Programmer for Atmel AVR and 8051 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231835 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-08-25 13:14 EST ------- Looks like fedora-cvs didn't get set back to '?'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 25 17:15:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 13:15:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231814] Review Request: avarice - Program for interfacing the Atmel JTAG ICE to GDB In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708251715.l7PHFKjL007670@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avarice - Program for interfacing the Atmel JTAG ICE to GDB https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231814 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 25 18:36:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 14:36:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217259] Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708251836.l7PIa6ke015963@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=217259 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-08-25 14:35 EST ------- Actually rpmlint isn't quite completely clean: W: alsa-firmware invalid-license GPL E: alsa-firmware arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /lib/firmware/mixart/miXart8.elf The latter is OK, but the former is not. I see a GPL copying file and some LGPL headers in some of the code (echoaudio/DSP/Echo3gDSP.c, for example), plus weird things like "aica/license.txt". Honestly I don't think it's the package reviewer's job to do complete license review and I'm certainly not a lawyer so I can't really do so in any case. The other issues I had are fixed now, so I'll just leave it to you to make a determination as to what the new-style License: tag should be (ping spot or block FE-Legal if you need to) and then go ahead and check in. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 25 18:38:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 14:38:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 211761] Review Request: dfu-programmer - USB DFU based programmer for Atmel chips In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708251838.l7PIc3pM016174@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dfu-programmer - USB DFU based programmer for Atmel chips https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=211761 weston_schmidt at alumni.purdue.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From weston_schmidt at alumni.purdue.edu 2007-08-25 14:37 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dfu-programmer Short Description: USB DFU based programmer for Atmel chips Owners: schmidtw Branches: F-7 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 25 18:42:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 14:42:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247405] Review Request: compiz-bcop - Compiz option code generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708251842.l7PIgvLA016717@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-bcop - Compiz option code generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247405 mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com 2007-08-25 14:42 EST ------- I forgot to mention that this is my first package and need a sponsor .. anyway .. it seems like Adel Gadllah already pushed his compiz-bcop package to rawhide .. and most probably he'll be maintaining the whole compiz-fusion package set .. guess i'll leave the rest to him bug closed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 25 18:43:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 14:43:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247406] Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708251843.l7PIhQu0016790@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247406 Bug 247406 depends on bug 247405, which changed state. Bug 247405 Summary: Review Request: compiz-bcop - Compiz option code generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247405 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 25 19:33:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 15:33:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254088] Review Request: b43-fwcutter - firmware cutter which outputs new format used by b43 drivers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708251933.l7PJXa0t021940@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: b43-fwcutter - firmware cutter which outputs new format used by b43 drivers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254088 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-08-25 15:33 EST ------- Package Review: =============== * md5sum matches upstream: 3f7fbf4f8dcd296c6d1b0d42eab0f9ac -> OK --------------- * rpmlint output: none -> OK --------------- * Package is named correctly -> OK --------------- * uses macros consistently -> OK --------------- * uses disttag -> OK --------------- * License field is correct -> OK --------------- * License is ok to ship and file is included -> OK --------------- * BuildRequires are correct -> OK --------------- * Ownership is set correctly -> OK --------------- * scriplets are ok -> N/A --------------- * buildroot is correct -> OK --------------- * clean is present -> OK --------------- * use $RPM_OPT_FLAGS -> ok --------------- * desktop file installed correctly -> N/A --------------- * file permissions are appropriate -> OK --------------- * %docs are not needed for the package to work -> OK --------------- * no devel package -> OK --------------- * builds in mock -> OK --------------- * no rpaths -> OK =============== => APPROVED =============== --------------- NOTES: Please add: Obsoletes: bcm43xx-fwcutter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 25 21:36:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 17:36:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226347] Merge Review: python-urlgrabber In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708252136.l7PLaJiX003229@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: python-urlgrabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226347 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora jbowes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jbowes at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From jbowes at redhat.com 2007-08-25 17:36 EST ------- I'll review this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 25 22:07:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 18:07:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226347] Merge Review: python-urlgrabber In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708252207.l7PM7dLQ005658@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: python-urlgrabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226347 ------- Additional Comments From jbowes at redhat.com 2007-08-25 18:07 EST ------- Notes: X package meets packaging guidelines: %install should being by removing the buildroot * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. X license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * License text included in package. * source files match upstream * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock. X rpmlint has 3 warnings: W: python-urlgrabber invalid-license LGPL W: python-urlgrabber redundant-prefix-tag W: python-urlgrabber setup-not-quiet * final provides and requires are sane: urlgrabber = 3.0.0-1.fc7 python-urlgrabber = 3.0.0-1.fc7 ====== /usr/bin/python python(abi) = 2.5 * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is not present * scriptlets OK * code, not content. * upstream includes no docs. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. The license must be updated and %install must be fixed as well. The other two rpmlint warnings should be fixed as well. Source0 should also be a url. I'll approve the package when these are fixed. Three nice to haves: * use one of the three standard buildroot definitions * use the 4 arg form of defattr * use the single '%{python_sitelib}/urlgrabber' in files rather than the two %dir and /* lines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 25 23:15:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 19:15:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253691] Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708252315.l7PNFKT1013723@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253691 ------- Additional Comments From k.georgiou at imperial.ac.uk 2007-08-25 19:14 EST ------- Under x86_64 the plugin rpm requires and is installed under /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins, it should be /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 00:34:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 20:34:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243665] Review Request: perl-Geo-IP - Efficient GeoIP bindings for Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708260034.l7Q0Y1LT021072@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-IP - Efficient GeoIP bindings for Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243665 ------- Additional Comments From mfleming+rpm at enlartenment.com 2007-08-25 20:33 EST ------- Yeah, sorry - been otherwise busy. I've found and fixed a braino in my patch so it applies correctly (now that the spec actually uses it) . I've also updated the License tag, fixed macros and patched out a bad interpreter in one of the examples. Locally it builds fine in F6 and F7 (i386 and x86_64) - YMMV, but I hope and expect not ;-) http://mfleming.fedorapeople.org/perl-Geo-IP-1.28-3.fc7.src.rpm http://mfleming.fedorapeople.org/perl-Geo-IP.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 01:07:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 21:07:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708260107.l7Q17fns025429@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From kaigai at kaigai.gr.jp 2007-08-25 21:07 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sepostgresql Short Description: Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL Owners: kaigai Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no ---- I'm wondering whether the New Package CVS Request is delivered correctly, because the Comment #41 has not appeared on the fedora-package-review list for? half of a day. (Is there something related to yesterday's maintenance of the Bugzilla?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 01:14:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 21:14:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253691] Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708260114.l7Q1Ei8j025357@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253691 ------- Additional Comments From k.georgiou at imperial.ac.uk 2007-08-25 21:14 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=172721) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=172721&action=view) install the plugin at /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins under x86_64 Here is a patch to install the plugin at /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins. Note that the alternatives name had to be changed to something else than libjavaplugin.so since otherwise it fails with: the primary link for libjavaplugin.so must be /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libjavaplugin.so error: %post(java-1.7.0-icedtea-plugin-1.7.0.0-0.13.b18.snapshotFC7.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status 2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 06:06:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 02:06:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708260606.l7Q66vkp024622@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(rdieter at math.unl.e | |du) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-26 02:06 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 06:24:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 02:24:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240308] Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708260624.l7Q6Oo5q026296@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240308 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-26 02:24 EST ------- Well, for -3: -------------------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost qwtplot3d]$ LANG=C rpm -qlpv qwtplot3d-qt4-0.2.7-3.fc8.i386.rpm | sed -e 's|^.*root||' 21 Aug 26 02:23 /usr/lib/libqwtplot3d-qt4.so.0 -> libqwtplot3d.so.0.2.7 350552 Aug 26 02:23 /usr/lib/libqwtplot3d-qt4.so.0.2 350552 Aug 26 02:23 /usr/lib/libqwtplot3d-qt4.so.0.2.7 0 Aug 26 02:23 /usr/share/doc/qwtplot3d-qt4-0.2.7 939 Aug 26 02:22 /usr/share/doc/qwtplot3d-qt4-0.2.7/COPYING -------------------------------------------------------------- - libqwtplot3d-qt4.so.0 must point to libqwtplot3d-qt4.so.0.2.7 - libqwtplot3d-qt4.so.0.2 must be a symlink. * And please change license tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 06:32:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 02:32:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708260632.l7Q6WxLh026670@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Keywords|Reopened | Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-26 02:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #71) > Now fedora has changed a policy about fonts, that is to use libXfont's embeded > parser instead of xfs. Please don't reopen this bug. Instead create a new bug report. Note that this is already tracked by bug 252279. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 06:45:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 02:45:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254142] Review Request: OpenSER - Open Source SIP Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708260645.l7Q6jMOn028277@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: OpenSER - Open Source SIP Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254142 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-08-26 02:45 EST ------- New version - 1.2.2-4 http://peter.fedorapeople.org/openser.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/openser-1.2.2-4.fc7.src.rpm %changelog * Sun Aug 26 2007 Peter Lemenkov 1.2.2-4 - Introduced acc and acc_radius modules (Jan Ondrej) - Dropped radius_accounting condition * Sat Aug 25 2007 Peter Lemenkov 1.2.2-3 - Changed license according to Fedora's policy - Make rpmlint more silent * Fri Aug 24 2007 Jan ONDREJ (SAL) 1.2.2-2 - added openser.init script - removed Patch0: openser--Makefile.diff and updated build section - spec file is 80 characters wide - added radius_accounting condition -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 07:14:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 03:14:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239162] Review Request: perl-Net-Packet - A framework to easily send and receive frames from layer 2 to la yer 7 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708260714.l7Q7EGqp031138@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Packet - A framework to easily send and receive frames from layer 2 to la yer 7 Alias: perl-Net-Packet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239162 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 07:14:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 03:14:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239163] Review Request: perl-Net-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708260714.l7Q7EQli031165@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses Alias: perl-Net-IPv6Addr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239163 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 07:14:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 03:14:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239164] Review Request: perl-Net-SinFP - Full operating system stack fingerprinting suite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708260714.l7Q7EXlf031182@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SinFP - Full operating system stack fingerprinting suite Alias: perl-Net-SinFP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239164 Bug 239164 depends on bug 239162, which changed state. Bug 239162 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Packet - A framework to easily send and receive frames from layer 2 to la yer 7 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239162 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 07:14:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 03:14:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239158] Review Request: perl-Net-Write - A portable interface to open and send raw data to network In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708260714.l7Q7Ehi8031205@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Write - A portable interface to open and send raw data to network Alias: perl-Net-Write https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239158 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 07:14:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 03:14:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239161] Review Request: perl-Net-Libdnet - Perl Interface to libdnet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708260714.l7Q7Eqii031234@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Libdnet - Perl Interface to libdnet Alias: perl-Net-Libdnet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239161 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 07:47:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 03:47:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 211761] Review Request: dfu-programmer - USB DFU based programmer for Atmel chips In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708260747.l7Q7lSl6002302@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dfu-programmer - USB DFU based programmer for Atmel chips https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=211761 ------- Additional Comments From weston_schmidt at alumni.purdue.edu 2007-08-26 03:47 EST ------- I'm not quite sure what to do - is this right? I'm trying to follow: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 12:34:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 08:34:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241549] Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708261234.l7QCY38u028930@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241549 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(kwizart at gmail.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 12:49:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 08:49:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241549] Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708261249.l7QCntVS030694@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241549 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(kwizart at gmail.com)| ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-08-26 08:46 EST ------- Well i don't know if it is normal for 64bit arch to need hours to compile instead of 10min for 32bit... Upstream says it takes times because of some expensive optimized macros within the source code. I supposed that theses macros needed a lot of swap size (Mamoru: do you know how much swap have the koji builders?) I expect that it needs around 5Gio , maybe more (3Gio was used when it fails on x86_64 for me - swap was full and kswap took lot of cpu time before OOM killer). There is some changes upstream in the rib.c, maybe I can backport this change and see if something is better, anyway, i will try to contact upstream about this subject... ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-08-26 08:49 EST ------- @Mamoru thx for this test! I will try to backport changes from cvs... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 13:08:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 09:08:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253020] Review Request: animorph - Libraries for animorph In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708261308.l7QD8XK6000383@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: animorph - Libraries for animorph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253020 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-26 09:08 EST ------- Well, as this is rather a small package, there are not so many items to be checked... For 0.2-1: * Redundant BuildRequires - glibc-headers in minimal build environ * License - The following source files are under GPLv2+ ----------------------------------------------- ./include/animorph/PoseSemiTarget.h ./include/animorph/PoseTarget.h ./src/PoseSemiTarget.cpp ./src/PoseTarget.cpp ------------------------------------------------ Change license tag to GPLv2+ (However, I guess the author intended to release this under LGPLv2+. So after/before this package is approved, would you contact with upstream?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 13:14:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 09:14:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253022] Review Request: mhgui - Libraries for mhgui In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708261314.l7QDEseI000654@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mhgui - Libraries for mhgui https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253022 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 17:08:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 13:08:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708261708.l7QH8AcT025913@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(rdieter at math.unl.e| |du) | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-08-26 13:07 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SOURCES/PyQt4/PyQt4.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SOURCES/PyQt4/PyQt4-4.2-4.src.rpm %changelog * Sun Aug 26 2007 Rex Dieter 4.2-4 - use %%python_sitearch - License: GPLv2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 17:11:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 13:11:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708261711.l7QHBb70026628@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-08-26 13:11 EST ------- The previous ppc64 issue was qt4's fault, which should be fixed latest qt4 builds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 17:18:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 13:18:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253022] Review Request: mhgui - Libraries for mhgui In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708261718.l7QHIPTI027364@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mhgui - Libraries for mhgui https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253022 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-26 13:18 EST ------- Some notes for 0.1-1: * configure says -------------------------------------------- checking for X... no -------------------------------------------- - Perhaps some BRs are missing. Actually the Requires of mhgui differs between the result of mockbuild and the one of rpmbuild with X related devel package installed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 17:42:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 13:42:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708261742.l7QHgQrv030123@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-26 13:42 EST ------- Still seems to not okay? (I just tried to rebuild -4 and have not checked -4 yet) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=130289 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 17:44:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 13:44:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241549] Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708261744.l7QHirlR029709@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241549 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-26 13:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #26) > Failed at least on ppc64, both rawhide & F-7, perhaps due to > OOM killer *on koji*. > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=104258 (rawhide) > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=104314 (F-7) > > IMO codes must be fixed to reduce the burden on compilation > anyway... Well, I retried and this time it was okay for all arch... http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=129921 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 18:55:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 14:55:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250970] Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708261855.l7QItUG4006041@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250970 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2007-08-26 14:55 EST ------- Ok, my take (not a full review since that's already started, just a few additions/confirmations) 1. there is a lot of legacy garbage in the spec (symlinks, deps, epochs, etc). ivtv took enough time to get cleanly upstream, IMHO the supporting packages need the same cleanup too. Cleaning up later will be painful and users expect some changes at Fedora inclusion time 2. URL should be http://www.ivtvdriver.org/ 3. I'd simplify %install in %install rm -rf %{buildroot} install -d -m 0755 %{buildroot}/lib/firmware install -p -m 0644 *.fw *.mpg %{buildroot}/lib/firmware/ 4. I'd simplify %files in %files %defattr(0755,root,root,0644) %doc *.txt /lib/firmware/*.fw /lib/firmware/*.mpg 5. I'd add a %build, even if it's empty, because %build-less specs are not tested against @rpm.org 6. I'd change the summary to only include the actual chip reference and out the full "? for hardware based on Conexant's CX23415/CX23416 codec chip such as the Hauppauge PVR 150/250/350/500 models and other supported hardware." in %description, as the current string is misleading and overly restrictive 7. the deps if any should go in the tools not in the firmware package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 19:11:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 15:11:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250971] Review Request: ivtv - An iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708261911.l7QJBx58007732@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv - An iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250971 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2007-08-26 15:11 EST ------- Some other comments 1. upstream released a new version, please update 2. now perl is not in the buildroots, a sed buildrequires would be lighter for munging 3. should probably require the firmware stuff 4. the mpg stuff should be dumped since it's part of firmware 5. kill the kernel header 6. personnaly, I prefer explicit defattr that set permissions and install -d instead of mkdir 7. I'd classify ivtv in System Environment/Kernel as those are low-level tools closely associated to the kernel 8. I'd also build and install the tools in test, in a separate package if necessary -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 19:28:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 15:28:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253434] Review Request: eclipse-rpm-editor - RPM Specfile editor for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708261928.l7QJSxCQ009423@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-rpm-editor - RPM Specfile editor for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253434 ------- Additional Comments From alcapcom at gmail.com 2007-08-26 15:28 EST ------- Spec URL: http://alcapcom.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/eclipse-rpm-editor.spec SRPM URL: http://alcapcom.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/eclipse-rpm-editor-0.1.0-2.fc7.src.rpm I have just fixed the License tag problem, any other stuff to do? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 20:18:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 16:18:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 255361] New: Review Request: cbios - A third party BIOS compatible with the MSX BIOS Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=255361 Summary: Review Request: cbios - A third party BIOS compatible with the MSX BIOS Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: packages at amiga-hardware.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/cbios.spec SRPM URL: http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/cbios-0.21-2.src.rpm Description: C-BIOS is a BIOS compatible with the MSX BIOS written from scratch by BouKiCHi. It is available for free, including its source code and can be shipped with MSX emulators so they are usable out-of-the-box without copyright issues Note: CBIOS is in preparation for OpenMSX for which a review request will also be submitted. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 20:19:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 16:19:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252010] Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708262019.l7QKJXKQ015097@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252010 ------- Additional Comments From smilner at redhat.com 2007-08-26 16:19 EST ------- + license is correct + license in %doc (COPYING) - description makes more sense but ... E: rpmrebuild description-line-too-long in a basic use, rpmrebuild use do not require any rpm building knowledgethis tool is for you. Changing the description to the following fixes this: %description A tool to build an RPM file from a package that has already been installed in a basic use, rpmrebuild use do not require any rpm building knowledge. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 20:21:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 16:21:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 255381] New: Review Request: openmsx - An emulator for the MSX home computer system Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=255381 Summary: Review Request: openmsx - An emulator for the MSX home computer system Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: packages at amiga-hardware.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/openmsx.spec SRPM URL: http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/openmsx-0.6.2-3.src.rpm Description: openMSX is an emulator for the MSX home computer system. Its goal is to emulate all aspects of the MSX with 100% accuracy. Note: OpenMSX also depends on CBIOS, for which a review request exists. Bug #255361 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 20:23:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 16:23:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 255361] Review Request: cbios - A third party BIOS compatible with the MSX BIOS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708262023.l7QKNLAc015642@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cbios - A third party BIOS compatible with the MSX BIOS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=255361 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-08-26 16:23 EST ------- Openmsx review request: Bug #255381 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 20:23:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 16:23:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 255381] Review Request: openmsx - An emulator for the MSX home computer system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708262023.l7QKNkuT015435@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openmsx - An emulator for the MSX home computer system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=255381 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |255361 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 20:24:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 16:24:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 255361] Review Request: cbios - A third party BIOS compatible with the MSX BIOS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708262024.l7QKO529015487@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cbios - A third party BIOS compatible with the MSX BIOS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=255361 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |255381 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 20:49:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 16:49:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708262049.l7QKnscL018221@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-08-26 16:49 EST ------- specfile had a typo in python_sitearch macro. respun .spec,srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 20:59:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 16:59:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 255461] New: Review Request: pidgin-plugin_pack - A set of plugins for pidgin Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=255461 Summary: Review Request: pidgin-plugin_pack - A set of plugins for pidgin Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ivazqueznet at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ivazquez.fedorapeople.org/packages/pidgin-plugin_pack/pidgin-plugin_pack.spec SRPM URL: http://ivazquez.fedorapeople.org/packages/pidgin-plugin_pack/pidgin-plugin_pack-2.1.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: This is a set of plugins designed to be used with the pidgin IM/IRC client. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 21:15:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 17:15:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254088] Review Request: b43-fwcutter - firmware cutter which outputs new format used by b43 drivers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708262115.l7QLF1Hh021374@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: b43-fwcutter - firmware cutter which outputs new format used by b43 drivers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254088 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-08-26 17:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > NOTES: > Please add: > Obsoletes: bcm43xx-fwcutter Based on comment 1, sounds like bcm43xx-fwcutter serves a different purpose and will stay -> the Obsoletes would be incorrect. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 21:27:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 17:27:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253020] Review Request: animorph - Libraries for animorph In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708262127.l7QLRWpn022974@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: animorph - Libraries for animorph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253020 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-08-26 17:27 EST ------- Actually the COPYING says LGPLv2+ e-mail send upstream about the license question... I hope an answear to have this state clearly... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 21:41:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 17:41:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708262141.l7QLfffU024395@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-26 17:41 EST ------- I see that this package "Conflicts: postgresql-server". Why? Can't you simply add a 'se' prefix on to conflicting filenames from that package? See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Conflicts In particular: "There are many types of files which can conflict between multiple packages. Fedora strongly discourages using Conflicts: to resolve these cases." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 21:42:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 17:42:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708262142.l7QLgBXE024554@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 ------- Additional Comments From wilmer at fedoraproject.org 2007-08-26 17:42 EST ------- I'm sorry, I was confused too, it's just fixed, i can looking some changes in rpmlint tool and was changed license name of GPL to GPLv2. Update files: SPEC: http://mybashburn.sourceforge.net/mybashburn.spec RPMS: http://mybashburn.sourceforge.net/mybashburn-1.0.2-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 21:47:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 17:47:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 211761] Review Request: dfu-programmer - USB DFU based programmer for Atmel chips In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708262147.l7QLlcTm025157@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dfu-programmer - USB DFU based programmer for Atmel chips https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=211761 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-26 17:47 EST ------- Yes, that request is correct. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 21:50:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 17:50:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231814] Review Request: avarice - Program for interfacing the Atmel JTAG ICE to GDB In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708262150.l7QLo9r0025383@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avarice - Program for interfacing the Atmel JTAG ICE to GDB https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231814 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-26 17:49 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 21:53:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 17:53:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231835] Review Request: uisp - Universal In-System Programmer for Atmel AVR and 8051 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708262153.l7QLri1D025601@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uisp - Universal In-System Programmer for Atmel AVR and 8051 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231835 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-26 17:53 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 22:05:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 18:05:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221677] Review Request: atmel-firmware - Firmware for Atmel at76c50x wireless network chips In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708262205.l7QM5KlN027522@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: atmel-firmware - Firmware for Atmel at76c50x wireless network chips https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221677 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-26 18:05 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 22:16:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 18:16:36 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_248224=5D_Review_Request=3A_iwl4965-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=EF=BF=BD_PRO/Wireless_4965_?= =?iso-8859-1?q?A/G/N_network_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708262216.l7QMGaS9028638@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iwl4965-firmware - Firmware for Intel??? PRO/Wireless 4965 A/G/N network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248224 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: iwl4965- |Review Request: iwl4965- |firmware - Firmware for |firmware - Firmware for |Intel? PRO/Wireless 4965 |Intel??? PRO/Wireless 4965 |A/G/N network adaptors |A/G/N network adaptors Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-26 18:16 EST ------- I don't see a 'bjensen' account in the account system. Can you doublecheck and reset fedora-cvs flag for additional changes? In the mean time, cvs done for all except the co-maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 22:35:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 18:35:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225286] Merge Review: aspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708262235.l7QMZoXC030559@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225286 enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-|varekova at redhat.com |chemnitz.de | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 23:00:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 19:00:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708262300.l7QN07dD001014@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From kaigai at kaigai.gr.jp 2007-08-26 18:59 EST ------- It is not possible obviously. The PostgreSQL implimentation which SE-PostgreSQL is based on uses its program name internally, so it is hard to prove the renaming gives us no degrading. In addition, SE-PostgreSQL has to work for the database clients as if native PostgreSQL works on. Therefore, SE-PostgreSQL provides its service using the same network port (5432) to avoid client side modifications, but we cannot use both packages in same time. It is a "implicit conflicts" with postgresql-server package. Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 22:30:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 18:30:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708262230.l7QMUEGp029915@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-08-26 18:30 EST ------- ok, respun a second time, with successful build to confirm (see x86_64 dir in spec/srpm URL). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 23:07:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 19:07:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222589] Review Request: dolphin - A file manager for KDE focusing on usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708262307.l7QN7N1k001773@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dolphin - A file manager for KDE focusing on usability https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222589 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-26 19:07 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: dolphin [Removed Branches: FC-6 FC-7 devel ] [Removed Fedora Owners: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au ] Reason: d3lphin will obsolete dolphin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 23:33:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 19:33:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 255561] New: Review Request: d3lphin - A file manager for KDE focusing on usability Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=255561 Summary: Review Request: d3lphin - A file manager for KDE focusing on usability Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/d3lphin/d3lphin.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/d3lphin/d3lphin-0.9.2-2.fc7.src.rpm Description: D3lphin is a fork of dolphin, since the latter is unmaintained for kde3. D3lphin focuses on being only a file manager. This approach allows to optimize the user interface for the task of file management. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 23:34:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 19:34:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222589] Review Request: dolphin - A file manager for KDE focusing on usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708262334.l7QNYr9L004192@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dolphin - A file manager for KDE focusing on usability https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222589 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |248800 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 23:35:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 19:35:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 255561] Review Request: d3lphin - A file manager for KDE focusing on usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708262335.l7QNZull004939@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: d3lphin - A file manager for KDE focusing on usability https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=255561 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |248800 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 23:38:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 19:38:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238379] Review Request: Emesene - Emesene is an MSN Messenger client written in python and GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708262338.l7QNcOLv005026@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Emesene - Emesene is an MSN Messenger client written in python and GTK Alias: Emesene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238379 ------- Additional Comments From wilmer at fedoraproject.org 2007-08-26 19:38 EST ------- Hi Jason. > I can't compare the sources with upstream, because this is a checkout from a > subversion tree. It's OK to package snapshots like this, but you need to > provide instructions on creating the tarball you are packaging. See > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL Thank you, i don't know this page, is good information, fixed of course. > You're using the versioning scheme for post-release snapshots, but according to > the upstream URL it seems to me that version 1.0 has not been released. Thus > you'd have to use a version-release of something like 1.0-0.2.20070711svn, so > that when 1.0 is finally released you can go to just 1.0-1. See > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines (look for the > "Pre-Release packages" section). Fixed. ;) > I would remove "It's" from the summary, as I can't think of any summaries that > begin with pronouns. This isn't a big deal, however. Fixed. > Your call to desktop-file-install is a little weird; why is it indented like that? desktop-file-install only permit install emesene.desktop files on /usr/share/applications/ directory for the menu in desktops environments such as GNOME or KDE, and update-desktop-database is necessary for update the main menu with the emesene icon and MIME information in the desktops environments. > /usr/share/emesene is unowned; change %{_datadir}/%{name}/* in %files to > %{_datadir}/%{name} to fix it. Fixed. > ? latest version is being packaged. Since svn just the last version tested and stable, soon the _first_ release candidate of emesene. Please refresh with the last update: Spec URL: http://www.linuxtachira.org/review/emesene.spec SRPM URL: http://www.linuxtachira.org/review/emesene-1.0-0.3.20070711svn.src.rpm Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 23:42:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 19:42:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248314] Review Request: cheese - A cheesy program to take pictures and videos from your web cam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708262342.l7QNgo7B005596@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cheese - A cheesy program to take pictures and videos from your web cam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248314 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-26 19:42 EST ------- ping ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 23:49:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 19:49:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254209] Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708262349.l7QNn498006221@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254209 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-26 19:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > since both guile-gnome-platform and gwave build successfully with the *.la TYPO: _WITHOUT_ the *.la -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 23:53:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 19:53:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254211] Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708262353.l7QNrBEY006512@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254211 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-26 19:52 EST ------- #001: guile-cairo-devel already requires guile-devel [build at goorah ~]$ rpm -qR guile-cairo-devel cairo-devel guile-cairo = 1.4.0-4.fc7 guile-devel Remove guile-devel from the BR #002: Requires should entail %{release} Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} #003: ORBit2-devel owns /usr/lib//orbit-2.0 remove %dir %{_libdir}/orbit-2.0 and add ORBit2-devel as requires #004: (devel package) %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/* is owned by pkgconfig. Add pkconfig as requires #005 the directory /usr/share/guile/site/ is required by guile Add guile as Requires: #006: typo Group: Development/Librarie missing "s" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 23:55:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 19:55:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240308] Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708262355.l7QNtC42007397@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240308 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-26 19:55 EST ------- Corrected and committed to rawhide. Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=130729 I'm therefore closing this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 26 23:55:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 19:55:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240373] Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708262355.l7QNtTOh007532@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240373 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Bug 240373 depends on bug 240308, which changed state. Bug 240308 Summary: Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240308 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 00:07:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 20:07:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221677] Review Request: atmel-firmware - Firmware for Atmel at76c50x wireless network chips In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708270007.l7R07nqR008270@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: atmel-firmware - Firmware for Atmel at76c50x wireless network chips https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221677 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 00:08:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 20:08:13 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_248224=5D_Review_Request=3A_iwl4965-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=EF=BF=BD_PRO/Wireless_4965_?= =?iso-8859-1?q?A/G/N_network_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708270008.l7R08Dfs008315@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iwl4965-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 4965 A/G/N network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248224 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 01:30:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 21:30:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708270130.l7R1UqeI017889@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-26 21:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #55) > ok, respun a second time, with successful build to confirm (see x86_64 dir in > spec/srpm URL). Do you mean the following? http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SOURCES/PyQt4/x86_64/PyQt4-4.2-4.fc8.src.rpm If so it is not okay yet. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=130842 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 01:41:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 21:41:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217262] Review Request: tdom - DOM parser for Tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708270141.l7R1fg4e019036@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tdom - DOM parser for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=217262 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2007-08-26 21:41 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: tdom New Branches: F-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 01:58:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 21:58:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708270158.l7R1wi4k020737@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-08-26 21:58 EST ------- OK, so ppc64 is screwed atm, that isn't a blocker, i hope? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 02:15:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 22:15:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 255721] New: Review Request: ruby-rrdtool - RRDtool module for Ruby Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=255721 Summary: Review Request: ruby-rrdtool - RRDtool module for Ruby Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kanarip at kanarip.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kanarip.fedorapeople.org/ruby-rrdtool.spec SRPM URL: http://kanarip.fedorapeople.org/ruby-rrdtool-0.6.0-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: RRDtool library for Ruby I packaged this tiny Ruby module in order to get puppet masters produce graphs representing what happens with the puppets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 02:17:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 22:17:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708270217.l7R2HbsU022973@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-26 22:17 EST ------- Well, then I will recheck -4 after I have lunch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 02:51:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 22:51:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253163] Review Request: sazanami-fonts - Sazanami Japanese TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708270251.l7R2pFln026800@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sazanami-fonts - Sazanami Japanese TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253163 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-26 22:50 EST ------- Since Tagoh-san is away right now - I went ahead and added the package to the db. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 02:53:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 22:53:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253163] Review Request: sazanami-fonts - Sazanami Japanese TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708270253.l7R2r9P4026895@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sazanami-fonts - Sazanami Japanese TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253163 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-26 22:52 EST ------- Tagoh-san, should the CID files from fonts-japanese be moved to this package or is it better to keep them in fonts-japanese? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 04:12:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 00:12:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253163] Review Request: sazanami-fonts - Sazanami Japanese TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708270412.l7R4C3fN003864@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sazanami-fonts - Sazanami Japanese TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253163 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-27 00:11 EST ------- I built sazanami-fonts-0.20040629-3.20061016.fc8 on behalf of tagoh so that it can be included in f8t2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 04:49:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 00:49:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708270449.l7R4ntmZ008146@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-27 00:49 EST ------- So Kevin, what prevents this from getting imported? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 05:12:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 01:12:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708270512.l7R5CgQL010934@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 cchance at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(petersen at redhat.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2007-08-27 01:12 EST ------- http://hiro.brisbane.redhat.com/~cchance/20070827_cjkunifonts/cjkunifonts-fonts.spec http://hiro.brisbane.redhat.com/~cchance/20070827_cjkunifonts/cjkunifonts-fonts-0.1.20060928-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 05:23:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 01:23:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708270523.l7R5N8ea012111@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(petersen at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-27 01:22 EST ------- I suggest using the name cjkunifonts for the source package or maybe cjkuni-fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 05:26:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 01:26:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708270526.l7R5Q9de012846@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2007-08-27 01:25 EST ------- http://hiro.brisbane.redhat.com/~cchance/20070827_cjkunifonts/cjkuni-fonts.spec http://hiro.brisbane.redhat.com/~cchance/20070827_cjkunifonts/cjkuni-fonts-0.1.20060928-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 06:09:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 02:09:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708270609.l7R692V6017505@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-27 02:08 EST ------- For 4.2-4: ** First from build log: * Possibly missing files ---------------------------------------------------------- make[1]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/PyQt-x11-gpl-4.2/designer' install -m 755 -p "libpythonplugin.so" "/usr/lib/qt4/plugins/designer/libpythonplugin.so" install: cannot create regular file `/usr/lib/qt4/plugins/designer/libpythonplugin.so': Permission denied make[1]: [install_target] Error 1 (ignored) cp -f -r /builddir/build/BUILD/PyQt-x11-gpl-4.2/designer/python /usr/lib/qt4/plugins/designer/ cp: cannot create directory `/usr/lib/qt4/plugins/designer/python': Permission denied make[1]: [install_python] Error 1 (ignored) ---------------------------------------------------------- - And it seems all files which may supposed to be installed under %_libdir/qt4/plugins/designer are missing. * Dependency for -devel subpackage - I don't know about *.sip files well, however it seems that *.sip files included in -devel subpackage requires qt4-devel for "Requires". * About "Qt License Agreement" - What does the following statement mean? (what is "valid Qt License Agreement"?) ############################################################################# ## ## Copyright (C) 2006-2006 Trolltech ASA. All rights reserved. ## ## This file is part of the example classes of the Qt Toolkit. ## ## Licensees holding a valid Qt License Agreement may use this file in ## accordance with the rights, responsibilities and obligations ## contained therein. Please consult your licensing agreement or ## contact sales at trolltech.com if any conditions of this licensing ## agreement are not clear to you. ## ## Further information about Qt licensing is available at: ## http://www.trolltech.com/products/qt/licensing.html or by ## contacting info at trolltech.com. ## ## This file is provided AS IS with NO WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, INCLUDING THE ## WARRANTY OF DESIGN, MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. ## ############################################################################# * Source - I tried to download source tarball from URL written as Source0, however it is not found. Also, the newest seems 4.3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 07:04:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 03:04:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708270704.l7R74VZY023840@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-27 03:04 EST ------- Thanks. I think it would be better to generate the static fonts files at build time rather than in %post like sazanami-fonts now does. So only fc-cache needs to be run in the scripts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 07:08:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 03:08:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708270708.l7R78kG0024489@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ondrejj at salstar.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ondrejj at salstar.sk ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2007-08-27 03:08 EST ------- Does the rxfax or tffax application work for you? I hear only silence when fax call is received or sent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 07:13:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 03:13:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 211761] Review Request: dfu-programmer - USB DFU based programmer for Atmel chips In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708270713.l7R7DkHj025272@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dfu-programmer - USB DFU based programmer for Atmel chips https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=211761 weston_schmidt at alumni.purdue.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From weston_schmidt at alumni.purdue.edu 2007-08-27 03:13 EST ------- Thanks for your help - it looks like I was able to complete the process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 07:33:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 03:33:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254099] Review Request: libsvm-devel - Development files of libsvm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708270733.l7R7X3QB027771@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsvm-devel - Development files of libsvm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254099 dchen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From dchen at redhat.com 2007-08-27 03:32 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 254091 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 07:33:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 03:33:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254091] Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708270733.l7R7XTPl027856@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254091 ------- Additional Comments From dchen at redhat.com 2007-08-27 03:33 EST ------- *** Bug 254099 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 07:43:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 03:43:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254091] Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708270743.l7R7ho8o028942@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254091 ------- Additional Comments From dchen at redhat.com 2007-08-27 03:43 EST ------- Issue addressed in Comment #1 fixed. New SPEC: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/libsvm.spec New SRPM: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/libsvm-2.84-1.fc7.src.rpm Changed: - Fix rpmlint error - Move python related files to libsvm-python -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 08:07:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 04:07:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708270807.l7R87Z7p032699@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-27 04:07 EST ------- rpmlint on srpm: W: cjkuni-fonts summary-ended-with-dot Chinese TrueType Font -- Simplified and Traditional Chinese Ming and Kai Face. E: cjkuni-fonts description-line-too-long Chinese TTF Fonts donated by Arphic company, with additional Hong Kong characters by Hong Kong font project. Read license files for details. W: cjkuni-fonts invalid-license Arphic Public License W: cjkuni-fonts invalid-license GPL-like W: cjkuni-fonts unversioned-explicit-obsoletes ttfonts-zh_CN W: cjkuni-fonts unversioned-explicit-obsoletes ttfonts-zh_TW W: cjkuni-fonts unversioned-explicit-obsoletes ttf-moe_sung W: cjkuni-fonts unversioned-explicit-obsoletes ttf-arphic_bming W: cjkuni-fonts unversioned-explicit-obsoletes ttfonts-zh_CN W: cjkuni-fonts unversioned-explicit-obsoletes ttfonts-zh_TW W: cjkuni-fonts unversioned-explicit-obsoletes ttf-moe_kai W: cjkuni-fonts unversioned-explicit-obsoletes ttf-arphic_bkai rpmlint output on binary packages: W: cjkuni-fonts-ukai non-conffile-in-etc /etc/ghostscript/cidfmap.zh_CN W: cjkuni-fonts-ukai non-conffile-in-etc /etc/ghostscript/FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN W: cjkuni-fonts-ukai non-conffile-in-etc /etc/ghostscript/FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW W: cjkuni-fonts-ukai non-conffile-in-etc /etc/ghostscript/CIDFnmap.zh_TW W: cjkuni-fonts-ukai non-conffile-in-etc /etc/ghostscript/cidfmap.zh_TW W: cjkuni-fonts-ukai symlink-should-be-relative /etc/X11/fontpath.d/cjkuni-fonts-ukai /usr/share/fonts/cjkuni-fonts-ukai W: cjkuni-fonts-ukai non-conffile-in-etc /etc/ghostscript/CIDFnmap.zh_CN W: cjkuni-fonts-ukai invalid-license Arphic Public License W: cjkuni-fonts-ukai invalid-license GPL-like W: cjkuni-fonts-ukai obsolete-not-provided ttfonts-zh_CN W: cjkuni-fonts-ukai obsolete-not-provided ttfonts-zh_TW W: cjkuni-fonts-ukai obsolete-not-provided ttf-moe_kai W: cjkuni-fonts-ukai obsolete-not-provided ttf-arphic_bkai W: cjkuni-fonts-uming non-conffile-in-etc /etc/ghostscript/cidfmap.zh_CN W: cjkuni-fonts-uming non-conffile-in-etc /etc/ghostscript/FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN W: cjkuni-fonts-uming non-conffile-in-etc /etc/ghostscript/FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW W: cjkuni-fonts-uming non-conffile-in-etc /etc/ghostscript/CIDFnmap.zh_TW W: cjkuni-fonts-uming non-conffile-in-etc /etc/ghostscript/cidfmap.zh_TW W: cjkuni-fonts-uming non-conffile-in-etc /etc/ghostscript/CIDFnmap.zh_CN W: cjkuni-fonts-uming symlink-should-be-relative /etc/X11/fontpath.d/cjkuni-fonts-uming /usr/share/fonts/cjkuni-fonts-uming W: cjkuni-fonts-uming invalid-license Arphic Public License W: cjkuni-fonts-uming invalid-license GPL-like W: cjkuni-fonts-uming obsolete-not-provided ttfonts-zh_CN W: cjkuni-fonts-uming obsolete-not-provided ttfonts-zh_TW W: cjkuni-fonts-uming obsolete-not-provided ttf-moe_sung W: cjkuni-fonts-uming obsolete-not-provided ttf-arphic_bming W: cjkuni-fonts-uming dangerous-command-in-%post ln -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 08:21:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 04:21:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708270821.l7R8Lr26001937@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-27 04:21 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=173401) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=173401&action=view) cjkuni-fonts.spec-1.patch some initial suggested text changes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 08:23:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 04:23:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253163] Review Request: sazanami-fonts - Sazanami Japanese TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708270823.l7R8NFgh002270@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sazanami-fonts - Sazanami Japanese TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253163 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora_requires_release_note | |+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-27 04:22 EST ------- I added a relnotes about the new package in the I18n docs beat. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 08:45:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 04:45:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254048] Review Request: biosdevname - udev helper for naming devices per BIOS names In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708270845.l7R8jb1T004977@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: biosdevname - udev helper for naming devices per BIOS names https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254048 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-08-27 04:45 EST ------- Looking better. Two more questions : - What is the point of creating a shared library which is used only by the binary from this package? Since the .so symlink is wiped out, nothing will be able to link against it, so not using the static version of the binary only makes us loose the time it takes to run ldconfig, right? - The dynamic file list confuses me. Some distros would have something else than the .so.0 and .so.0.0.0 files without changing the spec file? (btw, the comment regarding libsysfs above it needs updating now ;-)) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 08:45:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 04:45:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250210] Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708270845.l7R8jqWR005123@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250210 ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2007-08-27 04:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Pong :-) Sorry - I've not disappeared, just been a bit short of time. > > The current state of play is that the package builds cleanly on F-7-i386 and > F-7-x86_64, but fails (reliably now; I'm guessing all the mirrors have caught > up with whatever change is tripping the problem) on F-devel-i386 and > F-devel-x86_64. So far I don't know why, but I'm digging into it. This may be connected to Rawhide having the gimp 2.4.0 release candidate and not 2.2.x. One thing though (and sorry for chiming in so late, I've been on vacation): I'd like the package name changed to e.g. "gimp-plugin-resynthesizer" to reflect that it's a plugin and not e.g. a brush, pattern or theme. This hasn't been discussed anywhere else yet and yours is the first package of a gimp plugin in Fedora proper, but this seems to be a sensible thing to do for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 09:01:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 05:01:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247402] Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708270901.l7R91ep6006832@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247402 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-27 05:01 EST ------- Xavier, can you upload a new spec file with the update and fixes requested in the above comments ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 10:52:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 06:52:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226377] Merge Review: rpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271052.l7RAqc3R020458@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: rpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226377 ------- Additional Comments From pmatilai at redhat.com 2007-08-27 06:52 EST ------- Ok, a large spec cleanup done now and rebuilt for rawhide, see latest cvs / rpm-4.4.2.1-10.fc8. And now lets have the real review finally :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 10:54:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 06:54:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254142] Review Request: OpenSER - Open Source SIP Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271054.l7RAsXBQ019973@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: OpenSER - Open Source SIP Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254142 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-08-27 06:54 EST ------- New rev. - 1.2.2-6 http://peter.fedorapeople.org/openser.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/openser-1.2.2-6.fc7.src.rpm %changelog * Sun Aug 26 2007 Jan ONDREJ (SAL) 1.2.2-6 - Fedora Core 6 build updates - changed attributes for openser.init to be rpmlint more silent * Sun Aug 26 2007 Peter Lemenkov 1.2.2-5 - fixed paths for openssl libs and includes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 11:38:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 07:38:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254048] Review Request: biosdevname - udev helper for naming devices per BIOS names In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271138.l7RBcRUn025969@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: biosdevname - udev helper for naming devices per BIOS names https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254048 ------- Additional Comments From matt_domsch at dell.com 2007-08-27 07:38 EST ------- it's purely a "convenience" library, meaning I want to separate all the table parsing and lookups from the "frontend" command line application and it's parsing. I don't at this point expect other applications to use the "convenience" library, but at some point in the future, if I clean up the API and there's good reason something else needs those functions, it can be done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 12:01:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 08:01:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230802] Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271201.l7RC15o7029166@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks Alias: perl-Callback https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230802 ------- Additional Comments From mkpai at redhat.com 2007-08-27 08:00 EST ------- I am surprised this has not been pushed yet. I got the following mail from updates at fedoraproject.org on 30th July. ... mkpai has submitted a new update for Fedora 7 ================================================================================ perl-Callback-1.07-1.fc7 ================================================================================ Release: Fedora 7 Status: pending Type: bugfix Notes: Object interface for function callbacks Submitter: mkpai Submitted: 2007-07-30 05:58:33 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 12:08:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 08:08:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254048] Review Request: biosdevname - udev helper for naming devices per BIOS names In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271208.l7RC8IOF030282@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: biosdevname - udev helper for naming devices per BIOS names https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254048 ------- Additional Comments From matt_domsch at dell.com 2007-08-27 08:08 EST ------- The reason for the dynamic file list is that some versions of some distros don't compile libpci.a with -fPIC, so it can't then be included in a shared library. There's autoconf code to detect this and automatically sets enable_shared=no which results in no libbiosdevname.so.* being created. (OpenSUSE and SLES are this way right now, as were earlier versions of Fedora). This spec builds Fedora, RHEL, OpenSuSE, and SLES at this point, the dynamic file list being the only magic involved (to add, or not, depending on existance of those .so.* files, appropriately). I'm not tied to the idea of the convenience library. If it's really that ugly, it can disappear too. And yes I can fix the spec file comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 12:27:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 08:27:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256341] New: Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256341 Summary: Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ondrejj at salstar.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SPECS/micq.spec SRPM URL: http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SRPMS/7/micq-0.5.4.2-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: mICQ is a portable, small, yet powerful console based ICQ client. It supports password changing, auto-away, creation of new accounts, searching, file transfer, acknowledged messages, SMS, client identification, logging, scripting, transcoding, multi-UIN usage and other features that makes it a very complete yet simple internationalized client supporting the current ICQ v8 protocol. It has leading support for (ICQ2002+/ICQ Lite/ICQ2go) unicode encoded messages unreached by other ICQ clones. A lot of other ICQ clients are based in spirit on mICQ, nevertheless mICQ is still _the_ console based ICQ client. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 12:31:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 08:31:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256341] Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271231.l7RCVntk000858@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256341 ondrejj at salstar.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 12:34:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 08:34:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271234.l7RCYjem001009@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-08-27 08:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #118) > Does the rxfax or tffax application work for you? I hear only silence when fax > call is received or sent. I have not used Rx/TxFAX in a while. Other than suggesting you use the latest possible SpanDSP (0.0.4pre6 is in updates-testing for F-7 and 0.0.4pre7 should be available soon). Other than that I would suggest using the Asterisk IRC channels or mailing lists to help resolve the problem. If there's a problem that can be fixed with a patch I'll try and get an updated version out ASAP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 13:27:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 09:27:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271327.l7RDRtcA006743@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2007-08-27 09:27 EST ------- I am using spandsp-0.0.4-0.3.pre7.fc7 from Koji. This is my answer on IRC: rxfax/txfax are real problems on 1.4 :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 13:33:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 09:33:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225631] Merge Review: busybox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271333.l7RDXZpa007689@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: busybox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225631 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-08-27 09:33 EST ------- The package is in a much better shape. The patches are now readable, as the spec is. Well done. I still have some comments, but they are not blockers. I spot some remnants from the past: #SELINUX Patch %ifarch ppc64 #%patch4 -b .ppc64 -p1 %endif mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_mandir}/man1 Maybe a comment explaining that the petitboot .config file comes from a previous version so the depconfig file is recreated using make oldconfig non interactively may be added -- or something like this. You could use %__cc instead of hardcoding gcc. Using other optflags than RPM_OPT_FLAGS (like -Os) is not considered right by some reviewers. I personally don't care much, I guess you have a valid reason to do so. You must add a comment, though: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-8b14098227aebff1cf6188939e9d0877295ac448 Also the build doesn't show the options used during compilation. How can they be checked? This deserves a spec file comment. Nothing is a blocker, except if the compile flags turn out to be wrong. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 13:41:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 09:41:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271341.l7RDfB4P008977@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-08-27 09:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #120) > I am using spandsp-0.0.4-0.3.pre7.fc7 from Koji. > > This is my answer on IRC: rxfax/txfax are real problems on 1.4 That's too bad... Did they give any reasons/hope? I put rxfax/txfax into my package hoping that they'd be useful for someone but if they aren't useful at all I might as well remove them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 14:00:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:00:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254211] Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271400.l7RE0Mlb011758@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254211 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-27 10:00 EST ------- #007: Missing g-wrap-devel as Requires for %package devel Requires: g-wrap-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 14:03:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:03:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256481] New: Review Request: gwave - Analog Waveform Viewing Environment Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256481 Summary: Review Request: gwave - Analog Waveform Viewing Environment Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/gwave/gwave.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/gwave/gwave-2-1.20070514snap.fc7.src.rpm Description: Gwave is a waveform viewer, intended originaly for displaying the output of analog simulators such as spice, but also useful for other purposes. Gwave can read tabluar ascii files in addition to the specialized output files from Spice3, NGSpice, and Hspice. It displays the data as 2-D plots, and allows for scrolling, zooming, and measuring the waveforms. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 14:05:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:05:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247402] Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271405.l7RE5sWq014662@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247402 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |256481 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 14:06:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:06:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256481] Review Request: gwave - Analog Waveform Viewing Environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271406.l7RE6HuE014845@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwave - Analog Waveform Viewing Environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256481 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |247402 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 14:07:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:07:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256481] Review Request: gwave - Analog Waveform Viewing Environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271407.l7RE7RHO012637@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwave - Analog Waveform Viewing Environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256481 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |254211 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 14:07:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:07:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254211] Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271407.l7RE7odg012699@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254211 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |256481 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 14:12:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:12:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251824] Review Request: maniadrive - 3D stunt driving game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271412.l7RECx89015826@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maniadrive - 3D stunt driving game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251824 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |packages at amiga-hardware.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 14:14:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:14:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251825] Review Request: maniadrive-data - Data files for maniadrive, a 3D stunt driving game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271414.l7REEfhj013486@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maniadrive-data - Data files for maniadrive, a 3D stunt driving game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251825 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |packages at amiga-hardware.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 14:14:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:14:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251826] Review Request: maniadrive-music - Replacement soundtrack for the non free ManiaDrive soundtrack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271414.l7REEvJv013552@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maniadrive-music - Replacement soundtrack for the non free ManiaDrive soundtrack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251826 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |packages at amiga-hardware.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 14:15:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:15:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256481] Review Request: gwave - Analog Waveform Viewing Environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271415.l7REFXt2014038@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwave - Analog Waveform Viewing Environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256481 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-27 10:15 EST ------- Log: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/gwave/build.log Example: gwave /usr/share/doc/gwave-2/examples/rlc.raw drag and drop V(1) V(2) and V(3) on the first pane and the rest on the second pane. You should see: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/gwave/gwave-rlc.png -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 14:23:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:23:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256521] New: Review Request: php-pear-Creole - A database abstraction layer for PHP5 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256521 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Creole - A database abstraction layer for PHP5 Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: akahl at iconmobile.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SPECS/php-pear-Creole.spec SRPM URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SRPMS/php-pear-Creole-1.1.0-3.fc7.src.rpm Description: Creole is a database abstraction layer for PHP5. It abstracts PHP's native db-specific API to create more portable code while also providing developers with a clean fully object-oriented interface based loosely on the API for Java's JDBC. -- This is my first package and I'm searching for a sponsor. php-pear-Creole relies on php-channel-phpdb that is also available in the same repository. I wasn't sure about the channel's license because there are no clear indicators if there is any, so I've left the license field 'N/A' for now. My employer explicitly allowed me to release packages I've made at work and there are several other PHP5-related ones available in my repository that I'd like to commit as soon as I've got approval. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 14:25:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:25:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256521] Review Request: php-pear-Creole - A database abstraction layer for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271425.l7REPd9k016003@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Creole - A database abstraction layer for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256521 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 14:51:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:51:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226480] Merge Review: tclx In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271451.l7REpemQ022491@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: tclx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226480 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-08-27 10:51 EST ------- Please have a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Tcl The advocated paths seem better to me than what it used currently. In this draft there is something about the name, but I think that it shouldn't be changed for now. There are comments above that I think should be addressed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 15:21:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:21:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181534] Review Request: kst - plots scientific data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271521.l7RFLJhu027730@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kst - plots scientific data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=181534 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora matt at truch.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From matt at truch.net 2007-08-27 11:21 EST ------- I'd like kst in EPEL as well, I'll maintain them: ==================== Package Name: kst Owners: mtruch Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 15:23:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:23:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 219889] Review Request: bootchart - a utility for profiling the boot process In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271523.l7RFNCbn026101@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bootchart - a utility for profiling the boot process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=219889 caillon at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From caillon at redhat.com 2007-08-27 11:23 EST ------- Cool. * Pick one syntax format for your if blocks in %post and %postun * Consider %{_sysconfdir} for /etc and %{_sbindir} for /sbin * %define boottitle is unused? * Url tag -> URL (personal nit). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 15:24:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:24:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226347] Merge Review: python-urlgrabber In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271524.l7RFOT1j026198@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: python-urlgrabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226347 ------- Additional Comments From katzj at redhat.com 2007-08-27 11:24 EST ------- All fixed for -2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 15:28:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:28:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226347] Merge Review: python-urlgrabber In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271528.l7RFSoQP026867@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: python-urlgrabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226347 jbowes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From jbowes at redhat.com 2007-08-27 11:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > All fixed for -2. Great. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 15:40:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:40:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271540.l7RFeJYB031467@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2007-08-27 11:40 EST ------- Please, leave them here. I will test it periodically, if it is not fixed. The problem can be also in spandsp. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 15:45:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:45:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271545.l7RFjEbK032400@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 ------- Additional Comments From mefoster at gmail.com 2007-08-27 11:45 EST ------- Okay, I fixed the Python stuff to put IcePy.so* into sitearch and the rest into sitelib, and added the ifarch to the %files list. I also modified the CSharp build process so that it actually uses gacutil to install instead of faking it. The net result is the same, but it's neater. The Mono packaging spec on the Wiki is ambiguous about whether dlls should go into %{_libdir} or %{_prefix}/lib. In this rpm, they go into %{_libdir} for now ... NB: I've asked about this on fedora-packaging. http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/mef/extras/ice-3.2.1-6.fc7.src.rpm http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/mef/extras/ice.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 15:50:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:50:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202334] Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271550.l7RFoP1j000817@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=202334 ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2007-08-27 11:50 EST ------- rpmlint Comments ================ $ rpmlint jetty5-5.1.12-1jpp.1.fc8.i386.rpm | sort E: jetty5 non-standard-gid /var/cache/jetty5/temp jetty5 ... OK. rpmlint needs fedora-usermgmt support. E: jetty5 no-status-entry /etc/init.d/jetty5 Fix. I don't consider this release-critical but it should be fixed at some point. E: jetty5 zero-length /etc/jetty5/jetty.conf Fix. How about a comment header explaining this file? W: jetty5 dangling-symlink /usr/share/jetty5/ext/ant.jar /usr/share/java/ant.jar ... OK. All provided by requirements, except: W: jetty5 dangling-symlink /usr/share/jetty5/ext/jspapi.jar /usr/share/java/jspapi.jar Fix. Not provided by any required packages. Should: Requires: jsse be Requires: jsp ? W: jetty5 hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/jetty5/.jettyrc Fix. Rename jettyrc. W: jetty5 invalid-license Apache Software License Fix. See new rpmlint -i output. W: jetty5 no-reload-entry /etc/init.d/jetty5 Fix. Again, not release critical. W: jetty5 spurious-executable-perm /etc/logrotate.d/jetty5 Fix. W: jetty5 symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/jetty5/demo /var/lib/jetty5/demo ... Fix. Not release critical. $ rpmlint jetty5-javadoc-5.1.12-1jpp.1.fc8.i386.rpm | sort E: jetty5-javadoc zero-length /var/lib/jetty5/webapps/template/WEB-INF/lib/.keepme Fix. If this file's only purpose is to prevent CVS directory pruning then it should be removed in %build. W: jetty5-javadoc dangerous-command-in-%post ln Fix. See general comment above. W: jetty5-javadoc hidden-file-or-dir /var/lib/jetty5/webapps/template/WEB-INF/lib/.keepme Fix. W: jetty5-javadoc invalid-license Apache Software License Fix. W: jetty5-javadoc non-standard-group Development Fix. W: jetty5-javadoc wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/javadoc/jetty5-5.1.12/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF Fix. $ rpmlint jetty5-manual-5.1.12-1jpp.1.fc8.i386.rpm | sort E: jetty5-manual version-control-internal-file /usr/share/doc/jetty5-5.1.12/WEB-INF/.cvsignore Fix. W: jetty5-manual dangerous-command-in-%post ln Fix. W: jetty5-manual invalid-license Apache Software License Fix. W: jetty5-manual non-standard-group Development/Documentation Fix. $ rpmlint jetty5-debuginfo-5.1.12-1jpp.1.fc8.i386.rpm | sort W: jetty5-debuginfo invalid-license Apache Software License Fix. $ rpmlint jetty5-5.1.12-1jpp.1.fc8.src.rpm | sort W: jetty5 invalid-license Apache Software License Fix. Review Guidelines Comments ========================== MUST items: OK rpmlint OK naming OK spec filename FIX packaging guidelines see below FIX Fedora-approved license remove proprietary code to create modified source zip OK license field matches actual license FIX license file included in %doc include all license files as %doc, not just main LICENSE.TXT OK english OK legible FIX match upstream sources Source0 URL invalid OK package builds in x86 mock OK buildrequires OK no locale data OK no shared libraries OK not relocatable OK owns its directories FIX files listed twice warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/gcj/jetty5 warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/gcj/jetty5/jetty5-5.1.12.jar.db warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/gcj/jetty5/jetty5-5.1.12.jar.so warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/gcj/jetty5/jetty5-jmx-5.1.12.jar.db warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/gcj/jetty5/jetty5-jmx-5.1.12.jar.so warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/gcj/jetty5/jetty5-servlet-5.1.12.jar.db warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/gcj/jetty5/jetty5-servlet-5.1.12.jar.so warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/gcj/jetty5/start.jar.db warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/gcj/jetty5/start.jar.so warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/gcj/jetty5/stop.jar.db warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/gcj/jetty5/stop.jar.so OK %clean OK consistent macros OK code vs content OK separate javadoc and manual subpackages OK proper operation not dependent on %doc files OK no header files OK no static libraries OK no pkgconfig files OK no .so files OK devel package requires base package OK no libtool archives OK no desktop entries OK doesn't own other packages' directories OK remove buildroot at start of %install OK UTF-8 filenames SHOULD items: OK project includes license file OK no translations available OK package builds in mock ?? didn't check all architectures OK jetty starts properly OK scriptlets sane FIX subpackages requiring base package remove '0:' epoch references in base package requires (extras and manual subpackages) javadoc subpackage doesn't require base which is fine OK placement of pkgconfig files OK package vs file requires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 15:50:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:50:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 219889] Review Request: bootchart - a utility for profiling the boot process In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271550.l7RFos7c031371@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bootchart - a utility for profiling the boot process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=219889 ajackson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-08-27 11:50 EST ------- Fixed those locally, they'll show up in the import. Except for the sbin thing, since %{_sbindir} is /usr/sbin; once I remember what the macro for /sbin is, I'll fix that. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bootchart Short Description: A utility for boot time profiling Owners: ajax Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 15:56:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:56:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202334] Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271556.l7RFuCKq002059@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=202334 ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2007-08-27 11:56 EST ------- The main release-critical issues: 1) jetty includes many pre-built jars 2) two pre-built jars are licensed under the Binary Code License Agreement. 1) can be fixed by removing the pre-built jars at the start of %build. To fix 2) you'll need to modify the source zip file to remove the BCLA-licensed jars. Here are the relevant licenses, which are currently simply removed in the spec file: ./etc/LICENSE.javax.xml.html ./etc/LICENSE.jsse.txt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 16:30:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 12:30:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271630.l7RGU2jQ007412@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-27 12:29 EST ------- Well, this time rebuild failed (at least on x86_64) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=131964 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 16:34:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 12:34:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257061] New: Review Request: osslsigncode - Tool for Authenticode signing of EXE/CAB files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257061 Summary: Review Request: osslsigncode - Tool for Authenticode signing of EXE/CAB files Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: matthias at rpmforge.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://thias.fedorapeople.org/review/osslsigncode/osslsigncode.spec SRPM URL: http://thias.fedorapeople.org/review/osslsigncode/osslsigncode-1.2-2.src.rpm Description: Tool for Authenticode signing of EXE/CAB files. Note: A quick look doesn't show any patent infringement, but this might deserve a double check, just to be sure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 16:38:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 12:38:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271638.l7RGclMv006015@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 ------- Additional Comments From mefoster at gmail.com 2007-08-27 12:38 EST ------- Argh, dammit, that'll fail on the other architectures too. Hopefully this fixes it. http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/mef/extras/ice-3.2.1-7.fc7.src.rpm http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/mef/extras/ice.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 16:40:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 12:40:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 219889] Review Request: bootchart - a utility for profiling the boot process In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271640.l7RGe8ko006467@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bootchart - a utility for profiling the boot process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=219889 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-27 12:39 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 16:41:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 12:41:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222589] Review Request: dolphin - A file manager for KDE focusing on usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271641.l7RGftN6006695@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dolphin - A file manager for KDE focusing on usability https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222589 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-27 12:41 EST ------- Any reason you can't use the package end of life procedure? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/PackageEndOfLife I don't think we ever want to remove cvs branches if possible, so people can go back and get history on what was available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 16:44:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 12:44:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252128] Review Request: telepathy-haze - A multi-protocol Libpurple connection manager for Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271644.l7RGiBKE009681@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-haze - A multi-protocol Libpurple connection manager for Telepathy Alias: telepathy-haze https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252128 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-08-27 12:44 EST ------- > So the telepathy-mission-control dep issue is a literal different package and > not suppose to be telepathy-haze-mission-control? Correct. Apologies for the potential confusion. > I should have noted that the warnings I saw came running telepathy-haze. Is > there a better way I can test it? Yeah, the telepathy-haze binary on its own simply runs and listens for D-Bus signals which it then uses to connect and send/receive messages on its respective supporting protocols. I recommend using a client such as Empathy or one of the other clients listed on http://telepathy.freedesktop.org/wiki/Components to actually interface with it. (The recent Empathy releases needed a new version of the mission-control backend. Now that Sindre has bumped those, I'll bump Empathy as well once my new monitor arrives within the next day or two.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 16:45:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 12:45:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254135] Review Request: libpanelappletmm - C++ interface for Gnome panel applets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271645.l7RGjdIB010182@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpanelappletmm - C++ interface for Gnome panel applets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254135 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 17:00:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:00:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181534] Review Request: kst - plots scientific data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271700.l7RH0Ls2009944@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kst - plots scientific data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=181534 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-27 13:00 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 17:04:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:04:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271704.l7RH48J3012619@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-08-27 13:03 EST ------- Axel, it's been 2 months with no changes. I've asked you to apply a simple workaround for the lapack issue, which you ignored. You offered to clean up the patch from freefem, but nothing has happened since. If nothing changes within a few days, I'm going to close this review and submit my own request. This has been holding up my freefem++ package for too long now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 17:09:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:09:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 219889] Review Request: bootchart - a utility for profiling the boot process In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271709.l7RH9Us3010762@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bootchart - a utility for profiling the boot process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=219889 ajackson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-08-27 13:09 EST ------- Imported, building 0.9-5.fc8 now. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 17:19:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:19:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271719.l7RHJ6Jq014849@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-27 13:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #44) > http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/mef/extras/ice-3.2.1-7.fc7.src.rpm > http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/mef/extras/ice.spec Would you check the permission? Accessing this srpm returns 403 ---------------------------------------------------- You don't have permission to access /mef/extras/ice-3.2.1-7.fc7.src.rpm on this server. --------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 17:20:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:20:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257181] New: Review Request: komparator - kompare/sync files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257181 Summary: Review Request: komparator - kompare/sync files Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ndbecker2 at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: https://nbecker.dyndns.org/RPM/komparator.spec SRPM URL: https://nbecker.dyndns.org/RPM/komparator-0.6-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Kompare and merge two folders. They will be searched for duplicate files and empty folders. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 17:35:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:35:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271735.l7RHZnMa017520@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 a.badger at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tgl at redhat.com, | |a.badger at gmail.com Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo? ------- Additional Comments From a.badger at gmail.com 2007-08-27 13:35 EST ------- Rereading the Conflicts Guidelines with your comments in mind I think I see a point of confusion. The "Implicit Conflicts" section highlights the fact that implicit conflicts are never acceptable. It says that all conflicts must be explicit (marked with Conflicts: PKG). If I understand, your reading of that section is what leads you to mark the package Conflicts: postgresql-server. However, that section, taken in context with the preceding paragraph is meant only to convey that implicit conflicts are disallowed. To use "Conflicts: PKG" you still need to fit under one of the other categories (presently "Other Functionality" or "Compat Packages") which this package does not. This package comes closest to the "Binary Name Conflicts" section. In that section, two alternatives are given: Rename the files (in this case you would also have to use a different port) or use alternatives to manage the dual install. This package is a prime candidate for alternatives as it creates binaries that are commandline compatible with postgresql-server and needs to use the same port. You'll need to talk to Tom Lane (tgl redhat.com; now CC'd), the postgresql maintainer about how he feels about doing that with the main postgres package. He might also have a different idea on how to make the packages co-exist. If you and tgl decide that Conflicts really is the best way to go, present your reasoning to the Packaging Committee (fedora-packaging redhat.com) so they can consider adding another case where "Conflicts: PKG" is allowed. As a side note: I think that using rm to clean up files that you don't want to include in the package is much cleaner than using %define _unpackaged_files_terminate_build 0 Turning off the check is using a bigger stick than necessary. Turning off the check means that you won't be warned of cases where the build changes and starts creating differently named binaries or new files that you actually want to install. Using rm will target specific files so it's more future proof. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 17:38:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:38:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271738.l7RHcBQe017793@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-08-27 13:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #51) > In continuation to comment #47 > > The atlas vs lapack issue is quite mysterious: > > # repoquery -q --whatprovides /usr/lib64/liblapack.so > Importing additional filelist information > atlas-devel-0:3.6.0-11.fc6.x86_64 > lapack-devel-0:3.1.1-1.fc6.x86_64 > # rpm -q atlas-devel > atlas-devel-3.6.0-11.fc6 > # rpm -ql atlas-devel | grep liblapack.so$ > /usr/lib64/atlas/liblapack.so > # rpm -q atlas-devel --provides > atlas-devel = 3.6.0-11.fc6 > > So repoquery (and therefore also yum/mock) think atlas-devel contains > %{_libdir}/liblapack.so while in reality it does not? I haven't looked at the > atlas specfile, but the situation above should not be possible to happen. > > Why is repoquery fooled that atlas-devel contains %{_libdir}/liblapack.so? It > isn't a %file and not a virtual Provides: either. > > (this comment probably belongs as a bug report against atlas or yum-metadata-parser) > FWIW, F-7's repoquery doesn't have this problem: $ repoquery -q --whatprovides /usr/lib64/liblapack.so Loading "fastestmirror" plugin Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile Importing additional filelist information lapack-devel-0:3.1.0-4.fc7.x86_64 lapack-devel-0:3.1.1-1.fc7.x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 17:52:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:52:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 255361] Review Request: cbios - A third party BIOS compatible with the MSX BIOS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271752.l7RHqQwN020346@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cbios - A third party BIOS compatible with the MSX BIOS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=255361 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-27 13:52 EST ------- Fully reviewed, looks fine. One should fix item though, please use the preferred form of the sourceforge download URL for Source0: Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.zip No blockers, approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 17:53:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:53:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 255361] Review Request: cbios - A third party BIOS compatible with the MSX BIOS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271753.l7RHrB0x020441@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cbios - A third party BIOS compatible with the MSX BIOS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=255361 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 18:12:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:12:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 255381] Review Request: openmsx - An emulator for the MSX home computer system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271812.l7RICrYY023624@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openmsx - An emulator for the MSX home computer system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=255381 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-27 14:12 EST ------- I've done a full review, there is one must fix and one should fix. Must FIX ======== * I couldn't find a specification of the license version anywhere, so the license tag should be "GPL+" not "GPLv2". Should FIX ========== * please use the preferred form of the sourceforge download URL for Source0: Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 18:19:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:19:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254135] Review Request: libpanelappletmm - C++ interface for Gnome panel applets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271819.l7RIJ7r9024626@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpanelappletmm - C++ interface for Gnome panel applets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254135 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-27 14:18 EST ------- For 2.6.0-1: * Possibly missing BuildRequires - From build.log: ----------------------------------------------------- Generating code for file enums.h... Generatsh: dot: command not found Problems running dot: exit code=127, command='dot', arguments='"classGtk_1_1EventBox__inherit__graph.dot" -Tpng -o "classGtk_1_1EventBox__inherit__graph.png"' sh: dot: command not found ------------------------------------------------------ (and similar lines follow) Perhaps graphviz is missing from BuildRequires (also graphviz-gd or so MAY be needed for BuildRequries). * %install ------------------------------------------------------ %install make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name "*.la" -exec rm -f {} ';' mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/ ------------------------------------------------------ - What is the last line for? * Timestamps - This file installs some text files (such as header files) and keeping timestamps on them is preferable. For recent Makefile, the following method usually works (and also for this package) ------------------------------------------------------ make install DESTDIR=foo INSTALL="%{_install} -p" ------------------------------------------------------ ? %_dist tag - Just a question, however do you dislike to use %_dist tag? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 18:26:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:26:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257181] Review Request: komparator - kompare/sync files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271826.l7RIQ7V5024080@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: komparator - kompare/sync files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257181 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Summary|Review Request: komparator -|Review Request: komparator - |kompare/sync files |kompare/sync files Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-27 14:25 EST ------- I'll take the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 18:32:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:32:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225300] Merge Review: automake16 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271832.l7RIWU2b028093@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: automake16 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225300 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-08-27 14:32 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=174101) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=174101&action=view) finish Makefile.in patching For an unknown reason, part of my patch above wasn't applied. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 18:36:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:36:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257341] New: Review Request: obexfs - FUSE based filesystem using ObexFTP Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257341 Summary: Review Request: obexfs - FUSE based filesystem using ObexFTP Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rpm at greysector.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/obexfs.spec SRPM URL: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/obexfs-0.11-0.1.rc2.fc7.src.rpm Description: The ObexFS driver is a wrapper for ObexFTP to provide filesystem access to mobile phones. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 18:37:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:37:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254093] Review Request: rubygem-rake - Ruby based make-like utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271837.l7RIbjiK026720@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rake - Ruby based make-like utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254093 ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2007-08-27 14:37 EST ------- Thanks for the review .. both of those requires are taken care of by the Requires/BR of rubygems; so listing them again would just be redundant. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 18:38:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:38:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257381] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257381 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: a.badger at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-sqlalchemy0.3.spec SRPM URL: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-sqlalchemy0.3-0.3.10-3.fc7.src.rpm Description: SQLAlchemy is an Object Relational Mappper (ORM) that provides a flexible, high-level interface to SQL databases. Database and domain concepts are decoupled, allowing both sides maximum flexibility and power. SQLAlchemy provides a powerful mapping layer that can work as automatically or as manually as you choose, determining relationships based on foreign keys or letting you define the join conditions explicitly, to bridge the gap between database and domain. This package contains compatibility modules for the 0.3 version of SQLAlchemy. If possible, new code should be written against the newest version of the python-sqlalchemy package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 18:40:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:40:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254019] Review Request: rubygem-daemons - A toolkit to create and control ruby daemons In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271840.l7RIe4Lo027471@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-daemons - A toolkit to create and control ruby daemons https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254019 dlutter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2007-08-27 14:39 EST ------- Excellent. APPROVED Please follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVSAdminProcedure and import the package. Close this bug as RAWHIDE once it's been successfully imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 18:41:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:41:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254209] Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271841.l7RIfn4s027872@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254209 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-08-27 14:41 EST ------- Ok, All issues have been fixed. Spec : http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/g-wrap/g-wrap.spec SRPM : http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/g-wrap/g-wrap-1.9.9-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 18:44:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:44:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254015] Review Request: rubygem-mongrel - A small fast HTTP library and server for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271844.l7RIiuqa031488@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-mongrel - A small fast HTTP library and server for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254015 ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2007-08-27 14:44 EST ------- APPROVED Please follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVSAdminProcedure and import the package. Close this bug as RAWHIDE once it's been successfully imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 18:45:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:45:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254015] Review Request: rubygem-mongrel - A small fast HTTP library and server for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271845.l7RIjgYV031911@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-mongrel - A small fast HTTP library and server for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254015 dlutter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 18:46:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:46:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254093] Review Request: rubygem-rake - Ruby based make-like utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271846.l7RIk1wM031979@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rake - Ruby based make-like utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254093 mdehaan at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WORKSFORME Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mdehaan at redhat.com 2007-08-27 14:45 EST ------- Works for me. *APPROVED* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 18:46:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:46:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254093] Review Request: rubygem-rake - Ruby based make-like utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271846.l7RIk5xG032094@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rake - Ruby based make-like utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254093 mdehaan at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WORKSFORME Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mdehaan at redhat.com 2007-08-27 14:45 EST ------- Works for me. *APPROVED* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 18:46:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:46:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254015] Review Request: rubygem-mongrel - A small fast HTTP library and server for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271846.l7RIkQ18032216@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-mongrel - A small fast HTTP library and server for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254015 Bug 254015 depends on bug 254093, which changed state. Bug 254093 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rake - Ruby based make-like utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254093 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WORKSFORME -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 18:46:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:46:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254016] Review Request: rubygem-gem_plugin - plugin system based on rubygems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271846.l7RIkRuG032223@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-gem_plugin - plugin system based on rubygems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254016 Bug 254016 depends on bug 254093, which changed state. Bug 254093 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rake - Ruby based make-like utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254093 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WORKSFORME -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 18:46:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:46:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257381] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.3 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271846.l7RIkkQ6032332@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.3 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257381 a.badger at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- |flexible ORM library for | |python -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 18:48:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:48:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257181] Review Request: komparator - kompare/sync files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271848.l7RImnZH029358@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: komparator - kompare/sync files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257181 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-27 14:48 EST ------- #001: rpmlint issues chitlesh(SPECS)[1]$rpmlint /home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/komparator-0.6-1.fc7.i386.rpm W: komparator dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/komparator/common ../common W: komparator summary-ended-with-dot Kompare and merge two folders. E: komparator no-changelogname-tag W: komparator invalid-license GPL a) dangling-relative-symlink this can be ignored b) summary-ended-with-dot remove the "." at the end of Summary: Kompare and merge two folders. c) no-changelogname-tag Use the format : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Changelog d) invalid-license GPL in accordance to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing, the license should be GPLv2 #002: invalid Desktop file when built for rawhide + popd ~/build/BUILD/komparator-0.6 + mkdir -p /var/tmp/komparator-0.6-1.fc8-root-kojibuilder/usr/share/applications + desktop-file-install --vendor fedora --dir /var/tmp/komparator-0.6-1.fc8-root-kojibuilder/usr/share/applications --add-category Development --add-category X-Fedora --delete-original /var/tmp/komparator-0.6-1.fc8-root-kojibuilder/usr/share/applnk/Utilities/komparator.desktop /var/tmp/komparator-0.6-1.fc8-root-kojibuilder/usr/share/applications/fedora-komparator.desktop: error: value "komparator %u %u" for key "Exec" in group "Desktop Entry" may contain at most one "-7670078101866630651717873087102748035497564288251167604132490569112640036869789081810181048277000760644432835593864709837114785281552514193246661663024168431575453304593947146415735068891226057192084963021678008061970004877307024271847785645658180104637099495058473739470073431290845100014481512884795867136.000000", "4159892954", "0.000000" or "%U" field code desktop-file-install created an invalid desktop file! error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.68670 (%install) #003: build requires kdebase-devel already requires kdelibs-devel. Remove kdelibs-devel from the BuildRequires: #004 Desktop file a) --add-category X-Fedora \ is not longer needed b) --add-category Development \ will add a duplicate menu entry on kmenu. either use the catogory Utility or Development #005: useless directory creation You can remove mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications from the spec as desktop-file-creation does create the directory by itself. #006 disabling rpath add the following after the %configure macro # disabling rpath sed -i 's|^hardcode_libdir_flag_spec="\\${wl}--rpath \\${wl}\\$libdir"|hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=""|g' libtool sed -i 's|^runpath_var=LD_RUN_PATH|runpath_var=DIE_RPATH_DIE|g' libtool -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 18:49:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:49:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253691] Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271849.l7RIn3mB029425@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253691 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-08-27 14:48 EST ------- My build went fine on x86_64. I've reviewed the rpmlint output for the binary RPMs. When read in light of the comments above, I'm okay with most of the issues. I've attached the rpmlint output for brevity's sake. Here are the only remaining issues as I see them: Release critical items: 1. move plugin on x86_64 as per Kostas' patch 2. remove useless-explicit-provides jdbc-stdext 3. are you going to disable soname generation for the dlopen'd .sos? 4. should there be documentation for -plugin and -src? Non-critical but please fix before F8: 1. fix missing shebang and permissions on sample/scripting/scriptpad/src/scripts/memory.sh 2. other non-critical items brought up by rpmlint (see comments above and attached rpmlint output) Thanks, Tom! It'll be great to have IcedTea in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 18:49:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:49:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271849.l7RInSYu029512@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 kaigai at kaigai.gr.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo? | ------- Additional Comments From kaigai at kaigai.gr.jp 2007-08-27 14:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #46) > Rereading the Conflicts Guidelines with your comments in mind I think I see a > point of confusion. The "Implicit Conflicts" section highlights the fact that > implicit conflicts are never acceptable. It says that all conflicts must be > explicit (marked with Conflicts: PKG). I might have a bit misunderstandings. > This package comes closest to the "Binary Name Conflicts" section. In that > section, two alternatives are given: Rename the files (in this case you would > also have to use a different port) or use alternatives to manage the dual install. If possible, I want to avoid to apply the renaming approach, because it requires us unnecessary differences from the native PostgreSQL, and the difference may degrade the quality of package. However, it seems to me that using alternatives is also overdoing approach, because SE-PostgreSQL is a software to provide an advanced experimental feature and has much less users than the native PostgreSQL. > This package is a prime candidate for alternatives as it creates binaries that > are commandline compatible with postgresql-server and needs to use the same > port. You'll need to talk to Tom Lane (tgl redhat.com; now CC'd), the > postgresql maintainer about how he feels about doing that with the main postgres > package. He might also have a different idea on how to make the packages co- exist. > If you and tgl decide that Conflicts really is the best way to go, present your > reasoning to the Packaging Committee (fedora-packaging redhat.com) so they can > consider adding another case where "Conflicts: PKG" is allowed. I also want to hear his opinion. In my opinion, we should add the third case to apply Conflicts: tag. When the package provides an experimental feature based on existing package, it can use Conflicts: tag to separate from the native package. It may correspond with the filename conflicts cases, but applying alternatives between the experimental package and the native package is like as comparison between a giant and an ant. It's not a realistic way. > As a side note: I think that using rm to clean up files that you don't want to > include in the package is much cleaner than using > %define _unpackaged_files_terminate_build 0 > Turning off the check is using a bigger stick than necessary. Turning off the > check means that you won't be warned of cases where the build changes and starts > creating differently named binaries or new files that you actually want to > install. Using rm will target specific files so it's more future proof. At the first, I didn't use "_unpackaged_files_terminate_build", but I had to put massive 'rm' commands. I can remove it and remove unnecessary files, but I don't know whether it is simple, or not. Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 18:57:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:57:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253691] Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271857.l7RIv00D031358@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253691 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-08-27 14:56 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=174201) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=174201&action=view) rpmlint output on x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 18:42:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:42:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254016] Review Request: rubygem-gem_plugin - plugin system based on rubygems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271842.l7RIg7iP031170@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-gem_plugin - plugin system based on rubygems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254016 dlutter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2007-08-27 14:41 EST ------- Excellent. APPROVED Please follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVSAdminProcedure and import the package. Close this bug as RAWHIDE once it's been successfully imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 19:04:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:04:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271904.l7RJ4rpe032597@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From tgl at redhat.com 2007-08-27 15:04 EST ------- Trying to conflict with just one subpackage of the postgresql group seems like a pretty bad idea. For example, the PL and -test subpackages Require: postgresql-server, which would mean you'd have to duplicate those as se-specific versions. (Which maybe you have to do anyway, for the PLs ... are they going to be binary-compatible? What about postgresql-contrib?) Using alternatives is a possibility, but I'm not real excited about it because of its invasive effects on the regular postgresql package. I've also been reminded the hard way recently that RPM is not good about package upgrades that involve replacing files/directories with symlinks or vice versa; I'm afraid we'd hit one of those gotchas while trying to upgrade a postgresql installation into an alternatives-based setup. I don't see the reason why you can't make it install parallel files with different names (sepostgres etc). The argument that some error messages include the program name seems a bit silly, and it's been awhile since there were any hard dependencies on the executable name. Rather than Conflicts: postgresql-server, I wonder whether you shouldn't be trying to Require: postgresql-server = %{version} so that you can share whichever files are in common, instead of shipping duplicates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 19:05:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:05:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253691] Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271905.l7RJ5PVD003180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253691 ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2007-08-27 15:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #24) > Release critical items: > > 1. move plugin on x86_64 as per Kostas' patch Will do. > 2. remove useless-explicit-provides jdbc-stdext Although I said I should remove this in the comments above, after re-reading the comment I left myself in the spec file, I think both these explicit provides are necessary: # Both these versioned provides need to be here since either may be # required explicitly. Requiring the first one means requiring a # version of the JDBC API; requiring the second one means requiring # the JDBC API provided by this version of the JDK. This convention # comes from JPackage. > 3. are you going to disable soname generation for the dlopen'd .sos? I'd rather that this wait until post-F8 since fixing it will be fiddly and it won't negatively affect the initial release. > 4. should there be documentation for -plugin and -src? Yeah, probably a good idea, just to explain what they are. I'll write two READMEs. Some new minor licensing issues came to our attention today. They're very similar to the ones we discussed above. Lillian Angel and I are currently working around the newly-discovered issues and we'll keep the workaround list up-to-date in the IcedTea README. I consider these issues release-critical, but we should have things ready-to-go by later today. > > Non-critical but please fix before F8: > > 1. fix missing shebang and permissions on > sample/scripting/scriptpad/src/scripts/memory.sh > 2. other non-critical items brought up by rpmlint (see comments above and > attached rpmlint output) Yes, thanks for the summary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 19:06:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:06:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253434] Review Request: eclipse-rpm-editor - RPM Specfile editor for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271906.l7RJ6xMH000828@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-rpm-editor - RPM Specfile editor for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253434 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-08-27 15:06 EST ------- Okay, everything is perfect except for one small nit in the desription. Thanks! MUST items: OK package is named appropriately OK is it legal for Fedora to distribute this? OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. OK specfile name matches %{name} OK verify source and patches NEEDS_FIXING skim the summary and description for typos, etc. - "... RPM specfiles maintenance ..." -> "... maintenance of RPM specfiles ..." OK correct buildroot OK if %{?dist} is used, it should be in that form OK license text included in package and marked with %doc OK keep old changelog entries; use judgement when removing OK packages meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) OK rpmlint on .srpm gives no output - I'm fine with the odd permissions on the fetch script OK changelog should be in one of these formats: [...] OK Vendor tag should not be used OK Distribution tag should not be used OK use License and not Copyright OK Summary tag should not end in a period OK if possible, replace PreReq with Requires(pre) and/or Requires(post) OK specfile is legible OK package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86 OK BuildRequires are proper OK summary should be a short and concise description of the package OK description expands upon summary OK make sure lines are <= 80 characters OK specfile written in American English OK make a -doc sub-package if necessary OK should the package contain a -devel sub-package? OK use macros appropriately and consistently OK don't use %makeinstall OK install section must begin with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot} OK locale data handling correct (find_lang) OK consider using cp -p to preserve timestamps OK split Requires(pre,post) into two separate lines OK package should probably not be relocatable OK package contains code OK package should own all directories and files OK there should be no %files duplicates OK file permissions should be okay; %defattrs should be present OK %clean should be present OK %doc files should not affect runtime OK verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs $ rpm -qp --provides ../RPMS/x86_64/eclipse-rpm-editor-0.1.0-2.fc8.x86_64.rpm org.eclipse.linuxtools.rpm.rpmlint_0.0.1.jar.so()(64bit) org.eclipse.linuxtools.rpm.ui.editor_0.0.1.jar.so()(64bit) eclipse-rpm-editor = 0.1.0-2.fc8 $ rpm -qp --requires ../RPMS/x86_64/eclipse-rpm-editor-0.1.0-2.fc8.x86_64.rpm /bin/sh /bin/sh eclipse-changelog >= 2.5.1 eclipse-platform >= 3.3.1 java-gcj-compat java-gcj-compat libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgcj_bc.so.1()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) librt.so.1()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) rpmdevtools rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlint >= 0.81 rtld(GNU_HASH) OK run rpmlint on the binary RPMs (no output) SHOULD items: OK package should include license text in the package and mark it with %doc ? package should build on i386 (I tried x86_64) ? package should build in mock -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 19:08:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:08:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253434] Review Request: eclipse-rpm-editor - RPM Specfile editor for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271908.l7RJ8Tla003640@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-rpm-editor - RPM Specfile editor for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253434 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-08-27 15:08 EST ------- Is rpmlint >= 0.81 expected to hit rawhide soon? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 19:13:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:13:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254211] Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271913.l7RJDKF7004639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254211 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-08-27 15:13 EST ------- All issues have been fixed. Spec : http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/guile-gnome-platform/guile-gnome-platform.spec SRPM : http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/guile-gnome-platform/guile-gnome-platform-2.15.93-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 19:13:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:13:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253691] Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271913.l7RJDfub001702@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253691 ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2007-08-27 15:13 EST ------- One more item: we need to patch the version string so that: $ /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-icedtea/bin/java -version java version "1.7.0" OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0-mockbuild_23_aug_2007_17_44-b00) OpenJDK Client VM (build 1.7.0-mockbuild_23_aug_2007_17_44-b00, mixed mode) becomes $ /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-icedtea/bin/java -version java version "1.7.0" IcedTea Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0-mockbuild_23_aug_2007_17_44-b00) IcedTea Client VM (build 1.7.0-mockbuild_23_aug_2007_17_44-b00, mixed mode) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 19:17:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:17:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253434] Review Request: eclipse-rpm-editor - RPM Specfile editor for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271917.l7RJH6PO002465@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-rpm-editor - RPM Specfile editor for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253434 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-08-27 15:16 EST ------- rpmlint 0.81 does not even exist upstream yet. My guess is that it's a matter of a week or few until it will be released, and it will be available in Rawhide shortly after that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 19:22:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:22:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271922.l7RJMIMd006121@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-08-27 15:22 EST ------- > licensing http://www.trolltech.com/products/qt/licensing.html "Qt Open Source Edition Licensing" addesses that, in short, qt(4) can/is dual licensed QPL/GPLv2, but as far as fedora is concerned, it's only GPLv2 > Re: -devel Requires: qt4-devel agreed. > Re: designer plugin issue(s) My builds mention: The Designer plugin will be installed in /usr/lib64/qt4/plugins/designer near the beginning, but then doesn't actually ever does anything with it. ?? > Re: the newest seems 4.3. Which requires a newer version of sip than we have in fedora/rawhide atm (per comment #43 ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 19:23:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:23:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254209] Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271923.l7RJNdas006310@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254209 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |250792 nThis| | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-27 15:23 EST ------- typo: - Remoed all libtool archive. missing "v" I believe you can fix this before committing to cvs. =============================== This package is approved by ME. =============================== Please don't forget to close the bug #250792 once you have built g-wrap on koji. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 19:32:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:32:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202334] Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271932.l7RJWb2x007907@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=202334 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-08-27 15:32 EST ------- What are the BCLA-licensed jars? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 19:33:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:33:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257701] New: Review Request: w3lib - GRIB1 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257701 Summary: Review Request: w3lib - GRIB1 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pertusus at free.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/w3lib.spec SRPM URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/w3lib-1.4-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This library contains Fortran 90 decoder/encoder routines for GRIB edition 1, general date manipulation routines, and a Fortran 90 interface to "C" language I/O routines. The user API for the GRIB1 routines is described in file "grib1.doc". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 19:36:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:36:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257741] New: Review Request: g2clib - GRIB2 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines in C Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257741 Summary: Review Request: g2clib - GRIB2 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines in C Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pertusus at free.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/g2clib.spec SRPM URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/g2clib-1.0.4-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This library contains "C" decoder/encoder routines for GRIB edition 2. The user API for the GRIB2 routines is described in file "grib2c.doc". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 19:38:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:38:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257761] New: Review Request: g2lib - GRIB2 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257761 Summary: Review Request: g2lib - GRIB2 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pertusus at free.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/g2lib.spec SRPM URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/g2lib-1.0.9-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This library contains Fortran 90 decoder/encoder routines for GRIB edition 2, as well as indexing/searching utility routines. The user API for the GRIB2 routines is described in file "grib2.doc". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 19:40:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:40:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257781] New: Review Request: cnvgrib - GRIB1 <--> GRIB2 conversion utility Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257781 Summary: Review Request: cnvgrib - GRIB1 <--> GRIB2 conversion utility Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pertusus at free.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/cnvgrib.spec SRPM URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/cnvgrib-1.1.4-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This command line utility program converts every GRIB message in the input file from one GRIB edition to another. It currently converts GRIB1 to GRIB2, and GRIB2 to GRIB1 using WMO master tables as well as various NCEP local tables. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 19:41:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:41:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257061] Review Request: osslsigncode - Tool for Authenticode signing of EXE/CAB files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271941.l7RJfm0c006605@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: osslsigncode - Tool for Authenticode signing of EXE/CAB files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257061 yaneti at declera.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |yaneti at declera.com ------- Additional Comments From yaneti at declera.com 2007-08-27 15:41 EST ------- > Note: A quick look doesn't show any patent infringement, but this might deserve a double check, just to be sure. To this one can only add an even faster non-look that says its infringing ..someone's.. something... ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 19:42:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:42:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257781] Review Request: cnvgrib - GRIB1 <--> GRIB2 conversion utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271942.l7RJgxZo006751@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cnvgrib - GRIB1 <--> GRIB2 conversion utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257781 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |257701, 257761 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 19:43:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:43:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254088] Review Request: b43-fwcutter - firmware cutter which outputs new format used by b43 drivers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271943.l7RJhEKQ009687@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: b43-fwcutter - firmware cutter which outputs new format used by b43 drivers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254088 linville at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From linville at redhat.com 2007-08-27 15:42 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: b43-fwcutter Short Description: Firmware extraction tool for Broadcom wireless drivers Owners: linville Branches: F-7 InitialCC: /dev/null Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 19:43:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:43:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257701] Review Request: w3lib - GRIB1 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271943.l7RJhJiS006805@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: w3lib - GRIB1 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257701 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |257781 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 19:43:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:43:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257761] Review Request: g2lib - GRIB2 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271943.l7RJhcjS006861@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: g2lib - GRIB2 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257761 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |257781 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 19:49:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:49:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202334] Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271949.l7RJn959010588@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=202334 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-08-27 15:48 EST ------- Tom: I can't figure out what you mean by the licenses. $ for g in javax\\.servlet javax\\.xml jsse; do for f in `find -name \*.jar`; do unzip -l $f | grep $g; done; done Archive: ./lib/javax.servlet.jar 50 02-20-04 13:52 META-INF/services/javax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilderFactory 44 02-20-04 13:52 META-INF/services/javax.xml.parsers.SAXParserFactory $ find -name javax.servlet.txt[toxic:jetty-5.1.12]$ find -name javax.xml.html $ find -name jsse.txt $ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 19:49:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:49:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254211] Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708271949.l7RJnwIs007752@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254211 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-27 15:49 EST ------- I'm missing the following while installing : [root at goorah ~]# rpm -ivh /home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/guile-gnome-platform-devel-2.15.93-3.fc7.i386.rpm /home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/guile-gnome-platform-2.15.93-3.fc7.i386.rpm Preparing... ########################################### [100%] 1:guile-gnome-platform ########################################### [ 50%] install-info: No such file or directory for /usr/share/info/quile-gnome-tutorial.info.gz 2:guile-gnome-platform-de########################################### [100%] Notice the "q" on /usr/share/info/quile-gnome-tutorial.info.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 20:08:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:08:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708272008.l7RK8qpd013647@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 ------- Additional Comments From mefoster at gmail.com 2007-08-27 16:08 EST ------- oops, try now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 20:13:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:13:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222589] Review Request: dolphin - A file manager for KDE focusing on usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708272013.l7RKDT0A011977@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dolphin - A file manager for KDE focusing on usability https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222589 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-27 16:13 EST ------- done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 20:18:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:18:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257941] New: Review Request: hedgewars - 2D tankbattle game with the tanks replaced by hedgehogs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257941 Summary: Review Request: hedgewars - 2D tankbattle game with the tanks replaced by hedgehogs Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/hedgewars.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/hedgewars-0.9.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Hedgewars is a turn based strategy game but the real buzz is from watching the devastation caused by those pesky hedgehogs with those fantastic weapons. Each player controls a team of several hedgehogs. During the course of the game, players take turns with one of their hedgehogs. They then use whatever tools and weapons are available to attack and kill the opponents' hedgehogs, thereby winning the game. Hedgehogs may move around the terrain in a variety of ways, normally by walking and jumping but also by using particular tools such as the "Rope" or "Parachute", to move to otherwise inaccessible areas. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 20:21:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:21:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708272021.l7RKLMaD016064@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-27 16:21 EST ------- Jon, any news on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 20:28:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:28:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 258001] New: pyevent package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=258001 Summary: pyevent package Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: johnp at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com pyevent is the python bindings for libevent Spec: http://dev.laptop.org/pub/sugar/srpms/pyevent.spec SRPM: http://dev.laptop.org/pub/sugar/srpms/pyevent-0.3-1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 20:43:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:43:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202334] Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708272043.l7RKhssP017119@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=202334 ------- Additional Comments From jjohnstn at redhat.com 2007-08-27 16:43 EST ------- All jars are now removed from the zip. What additional license txt files are you referring to with regards to marking them as %doc. Rest of comments addressed in: http://www.vermillionskye.com/downloads/jetty5.spec http://www.vermillionskye.com/downloads/jetty5-5.1.12-1jpp.3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 20:48:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:48:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251826] Review Request: maniadrive-music - Replacement soundtrack for the non free ManiaDrive soundtrack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708272048.l7RKmTMK019868@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maniadrive-music - Replacement soundtrack for the non free ManiaDrive soundtrack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251826 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-08-27 16:48 EST ------- * rpmlint: No Problems * Package named correctly: Yes * Patches named correctly: N/A * Spec file named correctly: Yes * Licence(s) acceptable: Yes * Licence field matches: No (!!! - See below) * Licence file installed: Yes (!!! - See below) * Spec file in American English: Yes * Source matches upstream: N/A * Locales use %find_lang: N/A * Contains %clean: Yes * %install contain rm -rf %{buildroot} or similar: Yes * Specfile legible: Yes * Compiles and builds ok: Yes (mock/i386 devel) * Calls ldconfig in %post/%postun for shlibs: N/A * Owns directories it creates: Yes * Duplicate files: No * Permissions set correctly: Yes * Consistent macro use: Yes * Separate -doc needed (for large docs): N/A * %doc affects runtime: N/A * Headers and static libs in -devel: N/A * .pc files in -devel: N/A * .so in -devel: N/A * -devel requires base: N/A * Contains .la files: N/A * Owns files it didn't create: No * .desktop files included and installed correctly: N/A * Filenames valid UTF8: Yes 1. I think the license field should be: CC-BY and Free Art and GPL+ I couldn't find anything that refers to a specific GPL version and according to the licensing page, GPL is not a valid short form. 2. According to the guidelines: "MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc." So I have doubts that the text of the licenses should be included in the README. Apart from that I see no problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 20:50:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:50:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708272050.l7RKo6vq018352@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 axel.thimm at atrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |258041 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 20:58:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:58:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 255361] Review Request: cbios - A third party BIOS compatible with the MSX BIOS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708272058.l7RKwHMj019698@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cbios - A third party BIOS compatible with the MSX BIOS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=255361 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-08-27 16:58 EST ------- Thanks I'll correct that before import: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cbios Short Description: A third party BIOS compatible with the MSX BIOS Owners: packages at amiga-hardware.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 21:04:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:04:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 255561] Review Request: d3lphin - A file manager for KDE focusing on usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708272104.l7RL48Tt020734@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: d3lphin - A file manager for KDE focusing on usability https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=255561 johan at x-tnd.be changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |johan at x-tnd.be ------- Additional Comments From johan at x-tnd.be 2007-08-27 17:03 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (x86_64). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM. + rpmlint is silent for RPMS : the dangling symlink warning is normal (provided by kdebase). + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code Not contents. + no static libraries present. + no .pc files present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + translations are available, and proprely installed. + Dose owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + icon cache scriptlets used. + Desktop file handled correctly. + file permissions are appropriate. + GUI app, desktop file installed properly APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 21:06:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:06:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 255381] Review Request: openmsx - An emulator for the MSX home computer system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708272106.l7RL6aGB023029@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openmsx - An emulator for the MSX home computer system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=255381 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-08-27 17:06 EST ------- This should fix those issues: Spec URL: http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/openmsx.spec SRPM URL: http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/openmsx-0.6.2-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 21:09:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:09:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708272109.l7RL9XHJ021860@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2007-08-27 17:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #55) > Axel, it's been 2 months with no changes. I've asked you to apply a simple > workaround for the lapack issue, which you ignored. I didn't ignore it, we were talking about this issue on bugzilla and list. The workaround you suggest is looking more like papering over an issue that will revenge itself later. You suggest to force the choice on BR, but we have no sane way to do so for the run-time dependencies, too. Starting to work around that, too, is the wrong angle to attack this. The issue is a generic problem between lapack and atlas and needs to be resolved and not looked away from. I opened bug #258041 for this issue and made it a blocker. > You offered to clean up the patch from freefem, but nothing has happened > since. If nothing changes within a few days, I'm going to close this review > and submit my own request. This has been holding up my freefem++ package > for too long now. OK, I suggest if you have the time that you clean up the patch and submit it to this bugzilla. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 21:17:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:17:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202334] Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708272117.l7RLHCZv024742@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=202334 ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2007-08-27 17:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #23) > Tom: I can't figure out what you mean by the licenses. I just meant that whatever code is licensed under those two BCLA license files must be removed from the tarball. It's hard to know exactly which jars are problematic because there could be some re-namespacing going on. I wondered about classes in the org.mortbay namespace, for example. But I didn't do in-depth forensics. Here are two specific examples of jars that need to be removed from the zip: ./ext/activation.jar ./ext/mail.jar activation.jar: http://java.sun.com/products/javabeans/jaf/downloads/index.html Look at META-INF/MANIFEST.MF: ... Implementation-Vendor: Sun Microsystems, Inc. Specification-Vendor: Sun Microsystems, Inc. ... mail.jar: http://java.sun.com/products/javamail/downloads/index.html Likewise, META-INF/MANIFEST.MF: ... Implementation-Vendor: Sun Microsystems, Inc. Specification-Vendor: Sun Microsystems, Inc. ... There may be more. It may be safest to just remove all jars to create a modified source zip. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 21:21:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:21:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202334] Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708272121.l7RLLeJl025874@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=202334 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-08-27 17:21 EST ------- Jeff actually did remove all jars: # Following source zip was originally taken from the following location: # http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven/jetty/jetty-5.1.12.zip # The zip file was modified by removing all jars and BCLA licenses. # unzip jetty-5.1.12.zip # pushd jetty-5.1.12 # find . -name *.jar -exec rm {} \; # rm ./etc/LICENSE.javax.xml.html ./etc/LICENSE.jsse.txt # popd # zip jetty-5.1.12.fedora.zip jetty-5.1.12/* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 21:24:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:24:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 255561] Review Request: d3lphin - A file manager for KDE focusing on usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708272124.l7RLOGUS026341@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: d3lphin - A file manager for KDE focusing on usability https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=255561 johan at x-tnd.be changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |johan at x-tnd.be Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 21:26:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:26:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254048] Review Request: biosdevname - udev helper for naming devices per BIOS names In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708272126.l7RLQIcE027038@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: biosdevname - udev helper for naming devices per BIOS names https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254048 ------- Additional Comments From matt_domsch at dell.com 2007-08-27 17:26 EST ------- I decided to nuke the libbiosdevname.* stuff in upstream, it isn't really needed and only causes confusion. Updated SRPM and spec posted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 21:27:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:27:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202334] Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708272127.l7RLRlnm025723@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=202334 ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2007-08-27 17:27 EST ------- Yes, I see that now. My response to your comments collided with Jeff's new-URL comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 21:29:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:29:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 255561] Review Request: d3lphin - A file manager for KDE focusing on usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708272129.l7RLTa2A025997@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: d3lphin - A file manager for KDE focusing on usability https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=255561 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-27 17:29 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: d3lphin Short Description: A file manager for KDE focusing on usability Owners: chitlesh Branches: FC-6 F-7 devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 21:34:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:34:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254016] Review Request: rubygem-gem_plugin - plugin system based on rubygems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708272134.l7RLY7kg028004@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-gem_plugin - plugin system based on rubygems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254016 sseago at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From sseago at redhat.com 2007-08-27 17:33 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-gem_plugin Short Description: A plugin system based only on rubygems that uses dependencies only Owners: sseago Branches: F-7, EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 21:35:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:35:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254018] Review Request: rubygem-fastthread - optimized thread.rb replacement In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708272135.l7RLZCim028517@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-fastthread - optimized thread.rb replacement https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254018 sseago at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From sseago at redhat.com 2007-08-27 17:34 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-fastthread Short Description: Optimized replacement for thread.rb primitives Owners: sseago Branches: F-7, EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: No -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 21:36:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:36:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254019] Review Request: rubygem-daemons - A toolkit to create and control ruby daemons In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708272136.l7RLaVR7028720@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-daemons - A toolkit to create and control ruby daemons https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254019 sseago at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From sseago at redhat.com 2007-08-27 17:36 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-daemons Short Description: A toolkit to create and control ruby daemons Owners: sseago Branches: F-7, EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: No -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 21:38:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:38:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254015] Review Request: rubygem-mongrel - A small fast HTTP library and server for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708272138.l7RLcBMx027807@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-mongrel - A small fast HTTP library and server for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254015 sseago at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From sseago at redhat.com 2007-08-27 17:37 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-mongrel Short Description: A small fast HTTP library and server for Ruby Owners: sseago Branches: F-7, EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: No -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 21:44:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:44:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251545] Review Request: setroubleshoot-plugins - analysis plugins for setroubleshoot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708272144.l7RLi5FQ029853@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setroubleshoot-plugins - analysis plugins for setroubleshoot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251545 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-08-27 17:43 EST ------- setroubleshoot-1.10.1-1.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 21:48:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:48:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202334] Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708272148.l7RLmgXK029668@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=202334 ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2007-08-27 17:48 EST ------- Looks good. Just a few more points: - jetty.conf: by "comment header" I meant adding a comment to jetty.conf itself (rather than in the spec file, explaining its creation), e.g. indicating the purpose and maybe the format of the file, as well as a reference to documentation describing the use of the file. That would eliminate rpmlint's complaint about it being an empty file and it would be helpful to the would-be jetty administrator. - you added the jsp requirement rather than replacing the jsse requirement. Is jsse needed? (jsse is a virtual provide provided by the JDK packages, and represents a Java <= 1.4 concept, so it shouldn't be necessary if you're requiring Java >= 1.5). - I missed this the first time, but can %{demodir}/webapps just belong to the manual subpackage? If not, can you add a comment to the spec file explaining manual's post section? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 21:54:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:54:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253874] Review Request: lsdvd - Small application for displaying the contents of a DVD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708272154.l7RLsYUm031955@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lsdvd - Small application for displaying the contents of a DVD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253874 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-08-27 17:54 EST ------- lsdvd-0.16-5.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 21:55:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:55:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253874] Review Request: lsdvd - Small application for displaying the contents of a DVD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708272155.l7RLt0VK032025@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lsdvd - Small application for displaying the contents of a DVD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253874 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |0.16-5.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 22:07:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 18:07:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254135] Review Request: libpanelappletmm - C++ interface for Gnome panel applets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708272207.l7RM7v7j000596@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpanelappletmm - C++ interface for Gnome panel applets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254135 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2007-08-27 18:07 EST ------- - Yup, I missed the graphviz dependency (and only graphviz) - Stray mkdir line removed (leftover from previous version) - Used the timestamp-preserving INSTALL line - Added the dist tag. I always use them. http://www.poolshark.org/src/libpanelappletmm.spec http://www.poolshark.org/src/libpanelappletmm-2.6.0-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 22:22:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 18:22:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254211] Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708272222.l7RMMR1b003970@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254211 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-08-27 18:22 EST ------- Fixed, same files: Spec : http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/guile-gnome-platform/guile-gnome-platform.spec SRPM : http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/guile-gnome-platform/guile-gnome-platform-2.15.93-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 22:24:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 18:24:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202334] Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708272224.l7RMO0MW002696@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=202334 ------- Additional Comments From jjohnstn at redhat.com 2007-08-27 18:23 EST ------- Added a comment to jetty.conf with a # character to start the line. I could not find the format of the file as the references I found online pointed a non-existent web-site (see earlier comment regarding the URL in the spec file). I removed the jsse requirement and removed the manual post step. Updates can be found here: http://www.vermillionskye.com/downloads/jetty5.spec http://www.vermillionskye.com/downloads/jetty5-5.1.12-1jpp.4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 22:32:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 18:32:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254209] Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708272232.l7RMW4On004087@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254209 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-08-27 18:31 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: g-wrap Short Description: A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries Owners: lxtnow at gmail.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 Devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 22:34:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 18:34:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256481] Review Request: gwave - Analog Waveform Viewing Environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708272234.l7RMY20q005825@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwave - Analog Waveform Viewing Environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256481 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lxtnow at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 22:39:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 18:39:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202334] Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708272239.l7RMdsDU004953@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=202334 ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2007-08-27 18:39 EST ------- Right, the URL comment brings up an interesting point: that Eclipse 3.3 will be depending on a project with a dead upstream. Longer term, I suppose either you will have to become the upstream (it would be nice if the URL field were made valid again) or Eclipse will have to be convinced to use some replacement for jetty5. For now though, jetty5 fills a need and it has been carefully packaged. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 22:44:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 18:44:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708272244.l7RMiBe6007341@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From kaigai at kaigai.gr.jp 2007-08-27 18:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #48) > For example, the PL and -test subpackages Require: postgresql-server, which > would mean you'd have to duplicate those as se-specific versions. Indeed, you are correct. It's a demerit of using Conflict: tag. > I don't see the reason why you can't make it install parallel files with > different names (sepostgres etc). > The argument that some error messages include the program name seems a bit > silly, and it's been awhile since there were any hard dependencies on the > executable name. I don't say it is not possible, but I was anxious about this change may invoke unexpected problems. pg_ctl and initdb invoke the hardcoded "postgres", so we have to patch them in the sepostgresql package at least. Just I confirmed the /usr/bin/postgres source. Several codes seems invoke the hardcoded "postgres", but most of them are enclosed by "#ifdef EXEC_BACKEND", so it seems to me the binary name does not give us any significant affect. OK, I try to rename the binary, and confirm its works. > Rather than Conflicts: postgresql-server, I wonder whether you shouldn't be > trying to Require: postgresql-server = %{version} so that you can share > whichever files are in common, instead of shipping duplicates. Maybe, we can omit any libraries (like utf8_and_euc_jp.so) and timezone data. Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 01:04:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 21:04:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 258681] New: Review Request: bluez-firmware - Bluetooth firmware distributed by the BlueZ project Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=258681 Summary: Review Request: bluez-firmware - Bluetooth firmware distributed by the BlueZ project Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wwoods at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ecoldcuts.com/~wwoods/fedora/bluez-firmware.spec SRPM URL: http://ecoldcuts.com/~wwoods/fedora/bluez-firmware-1.2-1.src.rpm Description: This package contains the firmware distributed by the BlueZ project as bluez-firmware. Debian (and Ubuntu) distribute this package; see http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/non-free/b/bluez-firmware/bluez-firmware_1.2-1/bluez-firmware.copyright for info. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 01:36:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 21:36:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708280136.l7S1aVI9028430@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-27 21:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #60) > > Re: designer plugin issue(s) > > My builds mention: > The Designer plugin will be installed in /usr/lib64/qt4/plugins/designer > near the beginning, This is the same for i386 (with /usr/lib64 changed to /usr/lib) > but then doesn't actually ever does anything with it. ?? The real issue is that, rebuild tries to install some files under %_libdir/qt4/plugins/designer _directly_, not under $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%_libdir/qt4/plugins/designer. > > > Re: the newest seems 4.3. > > Which requires a newer version of sip than we have in fedora/rawhide atm (per > comment #43 ) Okay. > -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 01:52:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 21:52:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708280152.l7S1q5Yp030313@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-27 21:51 EST ------- This time rebuild fails at a different point? http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=132360 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 03:20:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 23:20:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708280320.l7S3KQ0B009881@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From kaigai at kaigai.gr.jp 2007-08-27 23:20 EST ------- [SpecURL] http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/files/sepostgresql.spec [SrpmURL] http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/files/sepostgresql-8.2.4-0.432.beta.fc8.src.rpm I updated the sepostgresql package as follows: - several binary files are renamed * /usr/bin/initdb -> /usr/bin/initdb.sepgsql * /usr/bin/pg_ctl -> /usr/bin/sepg_ctl * /usr/bin/postgres -> /usr/bin/sepostgres * /usr/bin/postmaster -> /usr/bin/postmaster * /usr/bin/pg_dump -> /usr/bin/sepg_dump * /usr/bin/pg_dumpall -> /usr/bin/sepg_dumpall (pg_dump and pg_dumpall also have "se" prefix in older version) - add Requires: postgresql-server, instead of Conflicts: postgresql-server - several duplicate files with postgresql-server are removed, such as /usr/bin/ipcclean, /usr/lib/sepgsql/*.so and manpages in section 1. - shared loadable modules are deployed on /usr/lib/pgsql to share them. - "%define _unpackaged_files_terminate_build 0" is removed In my simple test, it seems to work fine. Could you review and check the specfile again? I modified it a bit drastically. Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 03:23:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 23:23:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708280323.l7S3NmSa009050@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From kaigai at kaigai.gr.jp 2007-08-27 23:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #50) > - several binary files are renamed > * /usr/bin/postmaster -> /usr/bin/postmaster ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ /usr/bin/sepostmaster Sorry, it's a typo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 03:49:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 23:49:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216734] Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708280349.l7S3nhMM012634@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216734 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-27 23:49 EST ------- Looks like this was built in both devel and f7, but not pushed out in f7 via the updates system ( http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ ) Please do so when you get a chance. Since it's imported and built, I will go ahead and close this now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 03:54:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 23:54:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708280354.l7S3sU2o013249@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From tgl at redhat.com 2007-08-27 23:54 EST ------- FWIW, you could probably drop sepostmaster altogether --- that symlink is only kept around for compatibilty with pre-8.2 startup scripts. If you're going to teach a launch script to start sepostmaster, you might as well teach it to start sepostgres, and not bother with the extra symlink. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 04:00:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 00:00:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257341] Review Request: obexfs - FUSE based filesystem using ObexFTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708280400.l7S40Pps014403@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: obexfs - FUSE based filesystem using ObexFTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257341 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora_requires_release_note | |? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-28 00:00 EST ------- FYI, on mock build i386 rawhide I saw /builddir/build/BUILD/obexfs-0.11/missing: Unknown `--run' option Try `/builddir/build/BUILD/obexfs-0.11/missing --help' for more information configure: WARNING: `missing' script is too old or missing This is not causing any problem for build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 04:02:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 00:02:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249235] Review Request: pidgin-knotify - KNotify plugin for Pidgin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708280402.l7S42jxj015093@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-knotify - KNotify plugin for Pidgin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249235 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-28 00:02 EST ------- This package appears to have been imported and built. Closing it now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 04:03:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 00:03:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257341] Review Request: obexfs - FUSE based filesystem using ObexFTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708280403.l7S43sgw014578@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: obexfs - FUSE based filesystem using ObexFTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257341 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora_requires_release_note|fedora-review? |? | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-28 00:03 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM. + source files match upstream. e1dd69f43d734f3a3faa67a735ac68d4 obexfs-0.11-rc2.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Requires: libbfb.so.0 libbluetooth.so.2 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libdl.so.2 libfuse.so.2 libfuse.so.2(FUSE_2.5) libmulticobex.so.1 libobexftp.so.0 libopenobex.so.1 libpthread.so.0 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.0) librt.so.1 libusb-0.1.so.4 rtld(GNU_HASH) + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 04:04:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 00:04:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250538] Review Request: pidgin-otr - OTR messaging for pidgin (was gaim-otr) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708280404.l7S4486E015162@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-otr - OTR messaging for pidgin (was gaim-otr) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250538 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-28 00:03 EST ------- This package appears to have been imported and built. Closing this review request now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 04:08:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 00:08:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257341] Review Request: obexfs - FUSE based filesystem using ObexFTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708280408.l7S48WCR015863@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: obexfs - FUSE based filesystem using ObexFTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257341 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 04:16:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 00:16:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 255361] Review Request: cbios - A third party BIOS compatible with the MSX BIOS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708280416.l7S4GV89017043@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cbios - A third party BIOS compatible with the MSX BIOS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=255361 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-28 00:16 EST ------- Please use your Fedora Account system name for the Owner field moving forward. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 04:22:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 00:22:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 255561] Review Request: d3lphin - A file manager for KDE focusing on usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708280422.l7S4M0Oc017711@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: d3lphin - A file manager for KDE focusing on usability https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=255561 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-28 00:21 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 04:28:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 00:28:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254088] Review Request: b43-fwcutter - firmware cutter which outputs new format used by b43 drivers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708280428.l7S4S9dn018028@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: b43-fwcutter - firmware cutter which outputs new format used by b43 drivers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254088 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-28 00:27 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 04:30:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 00:30:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217262] Review Request: tdom - DOM parser for Tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708280430.l7S4U2Ot018393@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tdom - DOM parser for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=217262 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-28 00:29 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 04:34:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 00:34:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254015] Review Request: rubygem-mongrel - A small fast HTTP library and server for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708280434.l7S4Y3fx018693@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-mongrel - A small fast HTTP library and server for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254015 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-28 00:33 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 04:35:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 00:35:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254209] Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708280435.l7S4ZM38019457@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254209 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-28 00:35 EST ------- Well, some comments from me: * Please check which package owns %{_libdir}/%{name}/modules/ (currently no package) * m4 files under %{_datadir}/aclocal/ usually should be in -devel package * I don't know what software calls g-wrap modules, however usually modules are dlopen'ed with the name '*.so', not '*.so.X'. So I guess libgw-guile-*.so under %{_libdir}/%{name}/modules/ should be in main package, not in -devel subpackage. * Well, why should -devel subpackage have "Requires: ORBit2-devel"? * And -devel package should have "Requires: guile-devel" because /usr/include/g-wrap/guile-compatibility.h (and one another header file) requires libguile.h -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 04:37:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 00:37:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254016] Review Request: rubygem-gem_plugin - plugin system based on rubygems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708280437.l7S4b37v019400@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-gem_plugin - plugin system based on rubygems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254016 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-28 00:36 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 04:39:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 00:39:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254018] Review Request: rubygem-fastthread - optimized thread.rb replacement In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708280439.l7S4doFh019550@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-fastthread - optimized thread.rb replacement https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254018 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-28 00:39 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 04:41:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 00:41:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254019] Review Request: rubygem-daemons - A toolkit to create and control ruby daemons In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708280441.l7S4fxBV020325@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-daemons - A toolkit to create and control ruby daemons https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254019 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-28 00:41 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 04:44:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 00:44:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708280444.l7S4ijl1020200@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-28 00:44 EST ------- I'm going to unset the fedora-cvs flag on here. Once everything is hashed out, please reset it for the cvs request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 05:17:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 01:17:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708280517.l7S5HkYu025027@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-28 01:17 EST ------- Also I reset fedora review flag to question. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 05:39:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 01:39:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254091] Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708280539.l7S5dBCT027832@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254091 ------- Additional Comments From dchen at redhat.com 2007-08-28 01:38 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: scim-array Short Description: 3D Game of Foo Owners: dchen Branches: F-7 EL-5 InitialCC: dchen Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 05:57:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 01:57:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253805] Review Request: scim-array - Array 30 input method engine for SCIM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708280557.l7S5vgQ7029607@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-array - Array 30 input method engine for SCIM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253805 ------- Additional Comments From dchen at redhat.com 2007-08-28 01:57 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: scim-array Short Description: Array 30 Input Method Engine for SCIM Owners: dchen Branches: F-7 InitialCC: dchen Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 06:06:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 02:06:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254091] Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708280606.l7S66ISN031171@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254091 ------- Additional Comments From dchen at redhat.com 2007-08-28 02:06 EST ------- New SPEC: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/libsvm.spec New SRPM: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/libsvm-2.84-2.fc7.src.rpm Changed: - Fix mock error - Support Python 2.4 and Python 2.5 Sorry for the Comment #4, one shouldn't make important decision when he has a running nose. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 06:09:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 02:09:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708280609.l7S69LjE031880@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From kaigai at kaigai.gr.jp 2007-08-28 02:09 EST ------- [SpecURL] http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/files/sepostgresql.spec [SrpmURL] http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/files/sepostgresql-8.2.4-0.433.beta.fc8.src.rpm (In reply to comment #52) > FWIW, you could probably drop sepostmaster altogether --- that symlink > is only kept around for compatibilty with pre-8.2 startup scripts. Your pointed out is fair enough. I dropped "/usr/bin/sepostgresql" in the updated package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 06:13:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 02:13:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253469] Review Request: opyum - Offline package installation and update tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708280613.l7S6DUds031876@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opyum - Offline package installation and update tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253469 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-28 02:13 EST ------- Is this issue discussed on fedora-devel? Not understand why we need to patch pirut dependency? Why can't configure successfully detects it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 06:42:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 02:42:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254135] Review Request: libpanelappletmm - C++ interface for Gnome panel applets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708280642.l7S6g0eS004481@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpanelappletmm - C++ interface for Gnome panel applets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254135 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-28 02:41 EST ------- Okay. ------------------------------------------------------ This package (libpanelappletmm) is APPROVED by me ------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 06:48:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 02:48:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkuni-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708280648.l7S6mZTp005177@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: cjkuni-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Package Review: cjkunifonts-|Package Review: cjkuni-fonts |fonts (splitted from fonts- |(splitted from fonts- |chinese). |chinese). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 06:48:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 02:48:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708280648.l7S6mqwq004383@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Package Review: cjkunifonts-|Package Review: cjkuni-fonts |fonts (splitted from fonts- |(splitted from fonts- |chinese). |chinese). cchance at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Package Review: cjkuni-fonts|Package Review: cjkunifonts- |(splitted from fonts- |fonts (splitted from fonts- |chinese). |chinese). ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2007-08-28 02:48 EST ------- http://hiro.brisbane.redhat.com/~cchance/20070828_cjkuni-fonts/cjkuni-fonts.spec http://hiro.brisbane.redhat.com/~cchance/20070828_cjkuni-fonts/cjkunifonts-fonts-0.1.20060928-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 06:50:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 02:50:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkuni-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708280650.l7S6oL4T004907@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: cjkuni-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 cchance at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Package Review: cjkunifonts-|Package Review: cjkuni-fonts |fonts (splitted from fonts- |(splitted from fonts- |chinese). |chinese). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 06:58:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 02:58:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254091] Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708280658.l7S6wkuK006537@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254091 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-28 02:58 EST ------- missing following guidelines - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 07:05:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 03:05:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkuni-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708280705.l7S7505n007622@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: cjkuni-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-28 03:04 EST ------- About the name: I still think I prefer just calling it "cjkunifonts" since that seems the closest to upstream name "CJK Unifonts". [the srpm url is http://hiro.brisbane.redhat.com/~cchance/20070828_cjkuni-fonts/cjkuni-fonts-0.1.20060928-1.fc8.src.rpm] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 07:05:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 03:05:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254135] Review Request: libpanelappletmm - C++ interface for Gnome panel applets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708280705.l7S75mL4008138@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpanelappletmm - C++ interface for Gnome panel applets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254135 denis at poolshark.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2007-08-28 03:05 EST ------- Thanks for the review :-) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libpanelappletmm Short Description: C++ interface for Gnome panel applets Owners: denis Branches: FC-6 F-7 devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 07:13:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 03:13:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226480] Merge Review: tclx In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708280713.l7S7Digk009207@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: tclx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226480 ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2007-08-28 03:13 EST ------- The paths aren't nice. I'll fix all paths in tcl and related packages after the tcl8.5 will be out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 07:21:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 03:21:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254091] Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708280721.l7S7LSI1009160@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254091 ------- Additional Comments From dchen at redhat.com 2007-08-28 03:21 EST ------- New SPEC: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/libsvm.spec New SRPM: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/libsvm-2.84-2.fc7.src.rpm Changed: - Issue raised in Comment #6 fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 07:21:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 03:21:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 255381] Review Request: openmsx - An emulator for the MSX home computer system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708280721.l7S7LWtf010645@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openmsx - An emulator for the MSX home computer system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=255381 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-28 03:21 EST ------- Looks perfect now, approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 07:22:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 03:22:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254091] Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708280722.l7S7MG30009319@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254091 ------- Additional Comments From dchen at redhat.com 2007-08-28 03:22 EST ------- New SPEC: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/libsvm.spec New SRPM: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/libsvm-2.84-3.fc7.src.rpm Changed: - Issue raised in Comment #6 fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 07:37:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 03:37:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkuni-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708280737.l7S7bXv3011644@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: cjkuni-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2007-08-28 03:37 EST ------- http://hiro.brisbane.redhat.com/~cchance/20070828_cjkuni-fonts/cjkuni-fonts.spec http://hiro.brisbane.redhat.com/~cchance/20070828_cjkuni-fonts/cjkunifonts-0.1.20060928-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 08:07:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 04:07:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708280807.l7S87RQg017733@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 ------- Additional Comments From mefoster at gmail.com 2007-08-28 04:07 EST ------- Hmm. That isn't a failure I recognise ... could you try it again? It rebuilds fine for me in mock on my machine. (Not against development when I just tried, but that looks more like yum crapping out rather than a build problem.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 08:29:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 04:29:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708280829.l7S8TVWr019314@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From kaigai at kaigai.gr.jp 2007-08-28 04:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #55) > I dropped "/usr/bin/sepostgresql" in the updated package. Oops, it was "/usr/bin/sepostmaster", no need to say. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 08:54:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 04:54:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254091] Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708280854.l7S8s15f023450@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254091 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-28 04:53 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM. + source files match upstream. a7bd21b21510e9634950715c2b4a4ce9 libsvm-2.84.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + libsvm package Requires: glibc libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) libm.so.6 libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libstdc++.so.6 libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4) rtld(GNU_HASH) + libsvm-devel package Provides: perl(libsvm) Requires: glibc libsvm = 2.84-3.fc8 + libsvm-python package Provides: svmc.so Requires: /usr/bin/env libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) libm.so.6 libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libstdc++.so.6 libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4) libsvm = 2.84-3.fc8 python >= 2.4 python(abi) = 2.5 rtld(GNU_HASH) + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 09:00:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 05:00:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708280900.l7S90Vcr024552@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-28 05:00 EST ------- Well, this time rebuild succeeded on x86_64 and ppc, failed on i386 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=133694 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=133707 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=133696 And the previous time, it failed on x86_64 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=132362 Now I guess this is due to parallel make problem. Would you try to drop parallel make support and re-upload new srpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 09:16:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 05:16:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708280916.l7S9GLLH026708@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 ------- Additional Comments From mefoster at gmail.com 2007-08-28 05:16 EST ------- Parallel make disabled. Weird, wonder why this hasn't shown up before now ... http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/mef/extras/ice-3.2.1-8.fc7.src.rpm http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/mef/extras/ice.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 09:39:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 05:39:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253858] Review Request: system-config-vsftpd - graphical utility for administrating vsftpd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708280939.l7S9dQrF029113@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-vsftpd - graphical utility for administrating vsftpd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253858 mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmaslano at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2007-08-28 05:39 EST ------- You should fix this warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/applications/system-config-vsftpd.desktop, because the file shouldn't be listed twice. rpmlint output: W: system-config-vsftpd no-dependency-on usermode W: system-config-vsftpd dangerous-command-in-%preun rm another spec things: The license could be GPLv2+ ? %defattr(-,root,root) is usually %defattr(-,root,root,-) I'm not sure if vendor couldn't be fedora. You are upstream so you can decide it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 09:44:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 05:44:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253691] Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708280944.l7S9i5Fp031087@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253691 ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2007-08-28 05:43 EST ------- Here are the updated spec file and SRPM: Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~fitzsim/java-1.7.0-icedtea.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~fitzsim/java-1.7.0-icedtea-1.7.0.0-0.14.b18.snapshot.src.rpm Here is the new snapshot: http://icedtea.classpath.org/download/source/icedtea-1.3-a9c9ee1b6479a84f2153be67fce85b0dbf371398.tar.gz The updated SRPM fixes the remaining release-critical items: 1. plugin location on x86_64 2. documentation for -plugin and -src 3. licensing issues 4. s/OpenJDK/IcedTea/ in version output -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 10:11:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 06:11:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225300] Merge Review: automake16 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281011.l7SABg14002739@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: automake16 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225300 karsten at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From karsten at redhat.com 2007-08-28 06:11 EST ------- We don't ship any dvi files and it doesn't really matter. But I've added this for completeness in -13. Please close this bugzilla if everything else looks ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 10:43:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 06:43:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225671] Merge Review: curl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281043.l7SAh2Z8004746@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: curl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225671 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2007-08-28 06:42 EST ------- A couple of comments on the latest changes for building with nss rather than openssl: 1. The package is still configured to use /etc/pki/tls/certs/ca-bundle.crt, which is provided by openssl and hence that's why there was a dependency on openssl. Is there an equivalent cert bundle provided by nss? 2. The curl-devel requirement for libidn-devel is real (or at least it was): see http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2004-November/msg07551.html (the pkgconfig file for curl does reference -lidn too, which would suggest the dependency is still valid) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 10:48:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 06:48:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257181] Review Request: komparator - kompare/sync files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281048.l7SAmXKZ005373@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: komparator - kompare/sync files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257181 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2007-08-28 06:48 EST ------- #002: I don't know what to do with this one #006: Is this needed? I don't get any rpath complaint - and it was configured with --disable-rpath. Please review https://nbecker.dyndns.org/RPM/komparator-0.6-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 11:31:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 07:31:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225300] Merge Review: automake16 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281131.l7SBVi68013195@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: automake16 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225300 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-08-28 07:31 EST ------- Almost. There is still the automake = 1.6.3 obsoletion that annoys me. I sent a mail on -devel, we'll see what people respond. And if nobody responds for some day I'll repost on -packaging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 12:00:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 08:00:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281200.l7SC0xA0017031@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Package Review: cjkuni-fonts|Package Review: cjkunifonts |(splitted from fonts- |(splitted from fonts- |chinese). |chinese). ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-28 08:00 EST ------- Just remembered again: the urls should be on an external site please so that everyone can see them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 12:02:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 08:02:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281202.l7SC2eLf017227@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|cchance at redhat.com |petersen at redhat.com Summary|Package Review: cjkunifonts |Package Review: cjkunifonts |(splitted from fonts- |(split from fonts-chinese) |chinese). | Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 12:07:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 08:07:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257181] Review Request: komparator - kompare/sync files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281207.l7SC7Jah016033@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: komparator - kompare/sync files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257181 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-28 08:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > #002: I don't know what to do with this one Add %{__sed} -i "s|\%u \%u|\%u|" src/%{name}.desktop after %setup -q > #006: Is this needed? I don't get any rpath complaint - and it was configured > with --disable-rpath. no it's not needed. Forget it. > Please review https://nbecker.dyndns.org/RPM/komparator-0.6-2.fc7.src.rpm Next time do post the SPEC file as well together with the SRPM Fix #002 as mentioned above, I'll approve it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 12:14:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 08:14:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226487] Merge Review: texi2html In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281214.l7SCENlN017026@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: texi2html https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226487 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-08-28 08:14 EST ------- I committed the changes I was advocating. You can build if you like them, I can revert the changes you dislike if you want to. I also clarified the licenses. There is currently no tag for the texi2html documentation license, I asked spot to add it to the wiki, in the mean time I used MIT-like. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 12:24:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 08:24:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257181] Review Request: komparator - kompare/sync files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281224.l7SCObaN020521@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: komparator - kompare/sync files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257181 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2007-08-28 08:24 EST ------- Done. See: https://nbecker.dyndns.org/RPM/komparator-0.6-3.fc7.src.rpm https://nbecker.dyndns.org/RPM/komparator.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 12:25:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 08:25:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226487] Merge Review: texi2html In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281225.l7SCPe1a020915@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: texi2html https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226487 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-08-28 08:25 EST ------- Thanks, it's building now. btw. texlive 0.11 will be out in a few minutes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 12:45:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 08:45:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281245.l7SCj2bu023555@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-28 08:44 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=176161) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=176161&action=view) cjkunifonts.spec-2.patch Here are some more changes and some of the changes again from the first patch. Please be consistent with the vertical spacing: either use one or two spaces between each section. In this patch I made all the sections double-spaced but single-spaced is fine too. BTW IMHO it would be easier to do the %install in parallel for uming and ukai like in the initial version - that would make maintenance easier. If you're unclear about any of the changes please feel free to ask questions. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 12:48:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 08:48:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281248.l7SCmsOZ022482@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-28 08:48 EST ------- Please also rename the spec file, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 12:51:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 08:51:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281251.l7SCpwOG023105@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-28 08:51 EST ------- This time rebuild passed. It is unsure if I can check the results today (in Japan = UTC+09h) Meantime please check if the results meets what you expect. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 12:54:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 08:54:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281254.l7SCs8QY024897@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-28 08:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #51) > Meantime please check if the results meets what you expect. Oops.. The results are under: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=133932 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/mtasaka/task_133932/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 12:59:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 08:59:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225655] Merge Review: coreutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281259.l7SCx7HH025676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: coreutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225655 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|twaugh at redhat.com |pertusus at free.fr Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-08-28 08:58 EST ------- Seems to me that everything is right (except the license tag which is still the old GPL one), this is not a blocker for me. I reassign to me and set feodra review to +, Michael or Kevin you can reassign to you if you want to, I didn't do most of the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 12:59:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 08:59:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253858] Review Request: system-config-vsftpd - graphical utility for administrating vsftpd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281259.l7SCxTSc025762@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-vsftpd - graphical utility for administrating vsftpd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253858 ------- Additional Comments From mbarabas at redhat.com 2007-08-28 08:59 EST ------- All done: SPEC: http://vsftpd-config.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/*checkout*/vsftpd-config/trunk/system-config-vsftpd.spec RPM - for download use: www.sf.net/projects/vsftpd-config/download Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 13:01:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 09:01:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226487] Merge Review: texi2html In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281301.l7SD1G08026322@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: texi2html https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226487 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-08-28 09:01 EST ------- APPROVED. I'll take care of the documentation license tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 13:07:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 09:07:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253691] Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281307.l7SD7Oue025738@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253691 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-08-28 09:06 EST ------- BTW any chances to see powerpc-version of IcedTea? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 13:12:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 09:12:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253691] Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281312.l7SDC9G0026657@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253691 overholt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-08-28 09:11 EST ------- Approved Thanks, Tom! I know there's still work to be done, but this is an excellent addition to Fedora and I look forward to its inclusion. Don't forget to do the fedora-cvs flag setting and requesting. I'd also say that a release note is in order, but I'll leave that up to you to set the flag or not (not that I really know what it does ;). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 13:15:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 09:15:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253691] Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281315.l7SDF00j028337@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253691 ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2007-08-28 09:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #29) > BTW any chances to see powerpc-version of IcedTea? We're working on PowerPC support. We're investigating using CACAO's JIT as a short-term solution and longer term we're working on a PPC port of Hotspot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 13:16:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 09:16:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253691] Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281316.l7SDGfEv027517@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253691 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-08-28 09:16 EST ------- I forgot to thank Kostas for his patch and him and everyone else for their interest in this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 13:21:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 09:21:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253469] Review Request: opyum - Offline package installation and update tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281321.l7SDLFHp028257@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opyum - Offline package installation and update tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253469 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-08-28 09:21 EST ------- I was told in #fedora-devel by ivazquez that patching out the check for pirut in configure would be fine since the Requires and BuildRequires are taking care of that. The configure file basically does: $ $PYTHON -c "import pirut" ...to check for the availability of the Pirut modules. However importing the Pirut modules also imports gtk. Importing Gtk needs DISPLAY to be set and a running X. Although one can take care of DISPLAY, I do not think we have X running on the Koji build servers. Hence the error. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 13:27:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 09:27:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253691] Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281327.l7SDR4a0030872@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253691 ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2007-08-28 09:26 EST ------- David Walluck pointed out on IRC that IcedTea should use the system versions of third-party libraries it requires (e.g., libpng). I agree and wanted to mention here that we plan to do this work before Fedora 8. I also wanted to mention another plan to solve a problem brought up in this discussion: I would like a cleaner solution to the lib vs lib64 alternatives naming problem. I'm toying with the idea of proposing $LIB support for the alternatives command. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 13:35:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 09:35:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253691] Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281335.l7SDZrjN032330@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253691 fitzsim at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora_requires_release_note | |?, fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2007-08-28 09:35 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: java-1.7.0-icedtea Short Description: IcedTea Owners: fitzsim at redhat.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 13:52:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 09:52:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281352.l7SDq4dL003059@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 ------- Additional Comments From nadia.derbey at bull.net 2007-08-28 09:51 EST ------- Adel, Fix the issues, but sourceforge (it is the palce I upload my specfile to) is unreacheable via ssh. Will ping you as soon as the spec ans srpm url's are updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 14:04:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 10:04:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281404.l7SE4X64005334@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 ------- Additional Comments From nadia.derbey at bull.net 2007-08-28 10:04 EST ------- oops, I meant "fixed the issues" ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 14:07:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 10:07:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253434] Review Request: eclipse-rpm-editor - RPM Specfile editor for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281407.l7SE7f8f006135@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-rpm-editor - RPM Specfile editor for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253434 overholt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-08-28 10:07 EST ------- I forgot to assign this to myself. What should we do about the rpmlint 0.81 requirement? Lower the required version of rpmlint or block on this package until that gets in? Alphonse? Ville? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 14:27:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 10:27:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253691] Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281427.l7SER8pA010073@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253691 a.badger at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From a.badger at gmail.com 2007-08-28 10:26 EST ------- CVS Done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 14:39:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 10:39:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253469] Review Request: opyum - Offline package installation and update tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281439.l7SEdN2D013079@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opyum - Offline package installation and update tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253469 ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2007-08-28 10:39 EST ------- I've never created a configure script before but from what I understand it's a bash script... this would work: python_sitelib=$(python -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib()") echo -n "Checking for pirut... " if [ -d "$python_sitelib/pirut" ];then echo "Yes, $python_sitelib/pirut" else echo 'No' fi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 14:52:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 10:52:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253858] Review Request: system-config-vsftpd - graphical utility for administrating vsftpd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281452.l7SEqaIY013726@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-vsftpd - graphical utility for administrating vsftpd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253858 mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|mmaslano at redhat.com |mbarabas at redhat.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 15:05:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 11:05:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281505.l7SF5epD021412@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-08-28 11:05 EST ------- The new texlive 0.11 is now uploaded and repodata updated. It newly contains japanese support and fixes/changes proposed by Patrice and others. We should consider this one final IMO. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 15:07:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 11:07:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202334] Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281507.l7SF7ld3021969@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=202334 jjohnstn at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jjohnstn at redhat.com 2007-08-28 11:07 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: jetty5 Short Description: Jetty webserver and servlet container Owners: jjohnstn Branches: F-8 InitialCC: overholt Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 15:11:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 11:11:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254088] Review Request: b43-fwcutter - firmware cutter which outputs new format used by b43 drivers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281511.l7SFBxEU023280@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: b43-fwcutter - firmware cutter which outputs new format used by b43 drivers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254088 linville at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 15:14:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 11:14:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 260441] New: Review Request: pguiman - The PostgreSQL database server managing tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=260441 Summary: Review Request: pguiman - The PostgreSQL database server managing tool Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: odvorace at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://pguiman.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/*checkout*/pguiman/trunk/pguiman.spec SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/pguiman/pguiman-0.0.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: The PostgreSQL Manager is a graphical user interface for administration of a PostgreSQL database server. Users new to PostgreSQL database server can use this tool to quickly set up a working database. This is my first package and I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 15:21:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 11:21:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281521.l7SFLpcB026258@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2007-08-28 11:21 EST ------- http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/20070829_cjkunifonts/cjkunifonts.spec http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/20070829_cjkunifonts/cjkunifonts-0.1.20060928-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 15:22:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 11:22:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253434] Review Request: eclipse-rpm-editor - RPM Specfile editor for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281522.l7SFM1Rw026330@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-rpm-editor - RPM Specfile editor for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253434 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-08-28 11:21 EST ------- I haven't checked how this package works, if it works (even partially) without rpmlint installed, or if it works (even partially) with an older rpmlint. If it actually absolutely requires a version of rpmlint that can be invoked on specfiles, my humble opinion would be to block it until such a rpmlint is available in the target repos. See also comment 3 and 4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 15:24:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 11:24:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202334] Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281524.l7SFO7G6026758@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=202334 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-08-28 11:23 EST ------- If this is approved, please set the fedora-review flag to '+'. (It should be set to '?' while the package is being reviewed and to '+' once approval is given.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 15:27:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 11:27:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257181] Review Request: komparator - kompare/sync files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281527.l7SFRx81020122@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: komparator - kompare/sync files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257181 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-28 11:27 EST ------- =========================================== The package komparator is approved by ME . =========================================== -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 15:29:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 11:29:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 255561] Review Request: d3lphin - A file manager for KDE focusing on usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281529.l7SFT6XM020236@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: d3lphin - A file manager for KDE focusing on usability https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=255561 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 15:29:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 11:29:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202334] Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281529.l7SFTbgT028194@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=202334 fitzsim at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 16:00:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 12:00:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225667] Merge Review: cryptsetup-luks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281600.l7SG0uie025527@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: cryptsetup-luks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225667 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(kevin at tummy.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 16:34:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 12:34:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253361] Review Request: wyrd - A ncurses frontend for the calendar application remind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281634.l7SGYWZD008308@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wyrd - A ncurses frontend for the calendar application remind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253361 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-08-28 12:34 EST ------- Spec URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/wyrd.spec SRPM URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/wyrd-1.4.3-2.fc7.src.rpm This new spec now uses a conditional to BR ocaml-camlp4-devel like it is described in: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag for F8 and beyond. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 17:25:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 13:25:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252010] Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281725.l7SHPuJp006469@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252010 ------- Additional Comments From anderson.silva at redhat.com 2007-08-28 13:25 EST ------- description fixed. http://www.the-silvas.com/rpmrebuild-2.1.1-4.src.rpm http://www.the-silvas.com/rpmrebuild.spec updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 17:35:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 13:35:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254093] Review Request: rubygem-rake - Ruby based make-like utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281735.l7SHZBsD007766@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rake - Ruby based make-like utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254093 dlutter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|WORKSFORME | ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2007-08-28 13:35 EST ------- Bug shouldn't have been closed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 17:35:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 13:35:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254015] Review Request: rubygem-mongrel - A small fast HTTP library and server for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281735.l7SHZY6n007945@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-mongrel - A small fast HTTP library and server for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254015 Bug 254015 depends on bug 254093, which changed state. Bug 254093 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rake - Ruby based make-like utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254093 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WORKSFORME | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 17:35:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 13:35:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254016] Review Request: rubygem-gem_plugin - plugin system based on rubygems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281735.l7SHZuCr008031@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-gem_plugin - plugin system based on rubygems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254016 Bug 254016 depends on bug 254093, which changed state. Bug 254093 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rake - Ruby based make-like utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254093 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WORKSFORME | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 17:39:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 13:39:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254093] Review Request: rubygem-rake - Ruby based make-like utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281739.l7SHdvjj008350@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rake - Ruby based make-like utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254093 dlutter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora_requires_release_note | |-, fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2007-08-28 13:39 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-rake Short Description: Ruby based make-like utility Owners: lutter, sseago Branches: F-7, EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 18:05:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 14:05:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 255381] Review Request: openmsx - An emulator for the MSX home computer system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281805.l7SI5f6k023474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openmsx - An emulator for the MSX home computer system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=255381 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-08-28 14:05 EST ------- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: openmsx Short Description: An emulator for the MSX home computer system Owners: oddsocks Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 18:37:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 14:37:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254209] Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281837.l7SIblC7029375@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254209 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-08-28 14:37 EST ------- Please resubmit your CVS request with your FAS name instead of e-mail. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 18:39:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 14:39:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202334] Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281839.l7SIdVJM029527@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=202334 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 18:42:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 14:42:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254093] Review Request: rubygem-rake - Ruby based make-like utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281842.l7SIg4J2019359@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rake - Ruby based make-like utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254093 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 18:42:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 14:42:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254135] Review Request: libpanelappletmm - C++ interface for Gnome panel applets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281842.l7SIgxMR030266@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpanelappletmm - C++ interface for Gnome panel applets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254135 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 18:48:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 14:48:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 255381] Review Request: openmsx - An emulator for the MSX home computer system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281848.l7SImU7g020261@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openmsx - An emulator for the MSX home computer system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=255381 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 19:06:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 15:06:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202334] Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281906.l7SJ6C9h023162@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=202334 overholt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-08-28 15:05 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: jetty5 Re-name package to jetty. Sorry, I know this was just approved and imported, but I should have brought this up during the review. I was thinking about having parallel-installable jetty's (5, 6, etc.) but we don't care about that. I'm an idiot, sorry :). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 19:18:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 15:18:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225726] Merge Review: emacs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281918.l7SJI7cg005639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: emacs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225726 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Bug 225726 depends on bug 224627, which changed state. Bug 224627 Summary: emacs 22: trademark issue with Tetris https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=224627 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 19:34:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 15:34:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257181] Review Request: komparator - kompare/sync files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281934.l7SJYIJk028353@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: komparator - kompare/sync files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257181 ndbecker2 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2007-08-28 15:34 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: komparator Short Description: kompare/sync files Owners: nbecker Branches: devel F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 19:41:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 15:41:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251825] Review Request: maniadrive-data - Data files for maniadrive, a 3D stunt driving game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281941.l7SJfRi4010782@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maniadrive-data - Data files for maniadrive, a 3D stunt driving game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251825 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-08-28 15:41 EST ------- * rpmlint: Ok W: maniadrive-data dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/maniadrive/rayphp ../raydium/rayphp The relative symbolic link points nowhere. I believe this is OK and points to a file in the main maniadrive package but will check when I review that also. * Package named correctly: Yes * Patches named correctly: Yes * Spec file named correctly: Yes * Licence(s) acceptable: Yes * Licence field matches: No (!!!!) see below * Licence file installed: Yes and included upstream * Spec file in American English: Yes * Source matches upstream: N/A (upstream sources are repackaged by necessity) * Locales use %find_lang: N/A * Contains %clean: Yes * %install contain rm -rf %{buildroot} or similar: Yes * Specfile legible: Yes * Compiles and builds ok: Yes (mock devel/i386) * Calls ldconfig in %post/%postun for shlibs: N/A * Owns directories it creates: Yes * Duplicate files: No * Permissions set correctly: Yes * Consistent macro use: Yes * Separate -doc needed (for large docs): N/A * %doc affects runtime: No * Headers and static libs in -devel: N/A * .pc files in -devel: N/A * .so in -devel: N/A * -devel requires base: N/A * Contains .la files: N/A * Owns files it didn't create: No * .desktop files included and installed correctly: N/A * Filenames valid UTF8: Yes 1. The license field says GPLv2+, but I believe it should be GPL+ The README states GPL and the version (as I understand it) stated in COPYING is not sufficient. Unless the GPL version is specified in the source or accompanying documentation then it is GPL+, I couldn't find a reference to that specific version but if there is one, let me know. 2. Not a blocker but I suggest converting README from iso-8859-1 to UTF8. Otherwise the package seems fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 19:45:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 15:45:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241553] Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281945.l7SJj1Tv029749@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241553 ------- Additional Comments From mricon at gmail.com 2007-08-28 15:44 EST ------- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 19:45:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 15:45:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708281945.l7SJjNix030229@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-08-28 15:45 EST ------- You should use this URL in the Source-Tag: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#head-e27982f18a3bfd26b5b6ecbee113d2d8f3f006f2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 20:10:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 16:10:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 261581] New: Review Request: xmlroff - A XSL-FO processor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261581 Summary: Review Request: xmlroff - A XSL-FO processor Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ivazqueznet at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ivazquez.fedorapeople.org/packages/xmlroff/xmlroff.spec SRPM URL: http://ivazquez.fedorapeople.org/packages/xmlroff/xmlroff-0.5.2-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: xmlroff is a fast, free, high-quality, multi-platform XSL formatter that aims to excel at DocBook formatting and that integrates easily with other programs and with scripting languages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 20:14:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 16:14:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251824] Review Request: maniadrive - 3D stunt driving game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708282014.l7SKENqY001501@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maniadrive - 3D stunt driving game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251824 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-08-28 16:14 EST ------- I'm currently unable to build this mock against i386/devel: a - raydium/compile/myglut.o a - raydium/compile/web.o a - raydium/compile/hdr.o a - raydium/compile/shader.o a - raydium/compile/atexit.o a - raydium/compile/path.o /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lz collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [libraydium.so.0.0] Error 1 make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... File created: libraydium.a.0.0 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.74579 (%build) I guess a missing BR on zlib-devel? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 20:24:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 16:24:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251824] Review Request: maniadrive - 3D stunt driving game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708282024.l7SKOJOw016642@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maniadrive - 3D stunt driving game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251824 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-28 16:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > I'm currently unable to build this mock against i386/devel: > > a - raydium/compile/myglut.o > a - raydium/compile/web.o > a - raydium/compile/hdr.o > a - raydium/compile/shader.o > a - raydium/compile/atexit.o > a - raydium/compile/path.o > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lz > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > make: *** [libraydium.so.0.0] Error 1 > make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > File created: libraydium.a.0.0 > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.74579 (%build) > > I guess a missing BR on zlib-devel? > Yes, I think so, can you add that please and give it another try? Thanks for all the effort. I'll get back to you on all the reviews as time permits, I'm awfully busy at the moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 20:27:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 16:27:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241553] Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708282027.l7SKRlww017278@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241553 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-08-28 16:27 EST ------- I'm just waiting for a reviewer comment at this point. This isn't assigned to a reviewer currently. I was going to go hunting for a reviewer next week if someone doesn't step up this week. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 21:15:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 17:15:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253691] Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708282115.l7SLFDkZ025052@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253691 fitzsim at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2007-08-28 17:14 EST ------- java-1.7.0-icedtea-1.7.0.0-0.14.b18.snapshot.fc8 built successfully in Rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 21:25:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 17:25:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232358] Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708282125.l7SLPhsd012952@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232358 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-08-28 17:25 EST ------- When I download the Spec or SRPM, they only contain nullbytes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 21:43:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 17:43:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239280] Review Request: medusa - A speedy, massively parallel, modular, login brute-forcer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708282143.l7SLhScH015243@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: medusa - A speedy, massively parallel, modular, login brute-forcer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239280 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-08-28 17:43 EST ------- - The conditional is not correct according to: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag?highlight=%28Packaging%29#head-1c550109af0705ccb71329619b99428af2fd3e25 %if "%fedora" >= "7" has to be %if 0%{?fedora} >= 7 - The license tag needs to be adjusted: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#head-f21ae23bf2f278444e2c385463cfa74a502396b8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 22:05:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 18:05:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 261801] New: Review Request: pixel - CL web image gallery generator with JavaScript viewer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261801 Summary: Review Request: pixel - CL web image gallery generator with JavaScript viewer Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jkubin at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.bx.cz/px.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bx.cz/px-0-8.noarch.rpm Description: "px" started in a folder with images (gained from a digital camera) creates dot prefixed new smaller images, thumbnails, necessary files and index.html page. After processing the content is prepared for display on a web server. Description for images can be easily created by gthumb-2.7.8-3 image viewer (let?s try key c). After description modification don?t forget to re-run px for index.html regeneration. A live working example is here: http://www.bx.cz JavaScript viewer works in: MSIE 6,7 Firefox Opera Konqueror Galeon ... Now I'm fixing several bugs - they are bearable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 22:18:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 18:18:37 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_261881=5D_New=3A_Review_Request=3A_=C3=A9c?= =?iso-8859-1?q?olier-fonts_-_=C3colier_court_fonts?= Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881 Summary: Review Request: ?colier-fonts - ?colier court fonts Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://nim.fedorapeople.org/%c3%a9colier-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://nim.fedorapeople.org/%c3%a9colier-fonts-1.00-0.1.20070628.fc8.src.rpm Description: ?colier are a set of latin fonts created by Jean-Marie Douteau to mimick the traditionnal cursive writing French children are taught in school. He kindly released two of them under the OFL, which are redistributed in this package. The fonts are especially useful used in conjunction with educational software -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 22:20:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 18:20:20 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_261881=5D_Review_Request=3A_=C3=A9colier-f?= =?iso-8859-1?q?onts_-_=C3colier_court_fonts?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708282220.l7SMKK9C001110@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ?colier-fonts - ?colier court fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2007-08-28 18:20 EST ------- The review should be trivial as the spec file is largely inspired from existing fedora font packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 22:20:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 18:20:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708282220.l7SMKW5A001167@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From kaigai at kaigai.gr.jp 2007-08-28 18:20 EST ------- [SpecURL] http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/files/sepostgresql.spec [SrpmURL] http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/files/sepostgresql-8.2.4-0.434.beta.fc8.src.rpm (In reply to comment #48) > For example, the PL and -test subpackages Require: postgresql-server, > which would mean you'd have to duplicate those as se-specific versions. > (Which maybe you have to do anyway, for the PLs ... are they going to > be binary-compatible? What about postgresql-contrib?) The binary-compatibilities strongly depends on the internal implementation. Because SE-PostgreSQL modifies several data structure like HeapTupleHeader to store its security attribute, we cannot share *.so files in binary- compatible. Therefore, these are deployed on "/usr/lib/sepgsql" in the updated version, as the previous one. This manner follows "Library Name Conflicts" in the Conflicts Guidelines. As you mentioned, when we use any other PL- or contrib modules, these also have to be built for SE-PostgreSQL. However, these are not duplicate ones. I want the latest one to be reviewed and be put on the next phase again. Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 22:24:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 18:24:47 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_261881=5D_Review_Request=3A_=C3=A9colier-f?= =?iso-8859-1?q?onts_-_=C3colier_court_fonts?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708282224.l7SMOlFP001681@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ?colier-fonts - ?colier court fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-08-28 18:24 EST ------- Is it acceptable to have accented letters in package names? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 22:34:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 18:34:12 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_261881=5D_Review_Request=3A_=C3=A9colier-f?= =?iso-8859-1?q?onts_-_=C3colier_court_fonts?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708282234.l7SMYCU0003400@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ?colier-fonts - ?colier court fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2007-08-28 18:34 EST ------- I don't know if we have an official policy on this, but the infrastructure should be able to handle this nowadays (after some embarrassing failures when bodhi was first deployed) Since the contents are tied to a locale, I'd hate to mangle the naming -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 22:41:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 18:41:17 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_261881=5D_Review_Request=3A_=C3=A9colier-f?= =?iso-8859-1?q?onts_-_=C3colier_court_fonts?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708282241.l7SMfHBB004904@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ?colier-fonts - ?colier court fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-08-28 18:41 EST ------- The infrastructure maybe (and it would even be a good test...) but what about people scripts and stuff that use the package names? The locale may be use another encoding than utf8, this may call for troubles in that case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 22:51:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 18:51:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 261801] Review Request: pixel - CL web image gallery generator with JavaScript viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708282251.l7SMpFoE006098@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pixel - CL web image gallery generator with JavaScript viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261801 ------- Additional Comments From jkubin at redhat.com 2007-08-28 18:51 EST ------- -it's valuable to mention that dot prefixed images don't disturb viewing of original images with another viewer - for example "gthumb" -for nonsupported/obsolete browsers the script is switched off but the basic functionality of the page is preserved - try to visit offered sample page with MSIE 5 or MSIE 5.5 -description of an image is an attribute of thumbnail tag title="My image description", it is possible to easily change/fix it by hand without necessity to start Perl script "px" again -the index.html contains compressed EXIF data - when the user visits a huge gallery it saves bandwidth - the content of the index.html is decompressed and finished on the client side -users can add their own additional stylesheets into index.html - the css list will be automatically added into relevant drop-down menu -settings of viewer is preserved by cookies -original images are used for magnifier (buggy) - it needs good bandwidth -if user enables "allow multiple instances" in "Viewer settings" the number of images is only limited by available memory on client computer - z-index works flawlessly, it works as stack, last clicked image is on the top of stack -for additional information please read embedded manual page -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 22:54:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 18:54:34 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_261881=5D_Review_Request=3A_=C3=A9colier-f?= =?iso-8859-1?q?onts_-_=C3colier_court_fonts?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708282254.l7SMsYit006236@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ?colier-fonts - ?colier court fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2007-08-28 18:54 EST ------- skvidal & abadger1999 seem to think the technical problems linked to the naming (if any) should be fixed and not ignored. So naming is not a blocker -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 22:59:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 18:59:42 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_261881=5D_Review_Request=3A_=C3=A9colier-f?= =?iso-8859-1?q?onts_-_=C3colier_court_fonts?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708282259.l7SMxgMS025713@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ?colier-fonts - ?colier court fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |261961 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2007-08-28 18:59 EST ------- I'm not too worried about the non-utf8 locale case: 1. utf-8 is the default fedora encoding, so that's what we should optimize for 2. almost every fedora locale migrated to utf-8 long long ago 3. I thoroughly doubt any user of a non-utf8 locale (be it because this locale is some complex obscure asian stuff or be it because the user is an US sysadmin which has not understood i18n needs yet) will be interested in this particular package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 23:24:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 19:24:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254091] Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708282324.l7SNOWjl010049@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254091 ------- Additional Comments From dchen at redhat.com 2007-08-28 19:24 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libsvm, libsvm-devel libsvm-python Short Description: A Library for Support Vector Machines Owners: dchen Branches: F-7 InitialCC: dchen Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 23:25:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 19:25:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225667] Merge Review: cryptsetup-luks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708282325.l7SNPskq029583@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: cryptsetup-luks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225667 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(kevin at tummy.com) | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-28 19:25 EST ------- Sorry for the delay, I've been swamped of late. I promise to try and finish this up this week... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 23:25:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 19:25:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254091] Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708282325.l7SNPuVf010492@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254091 dchen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 23:27:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 19:27:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253805] Review Request: scim-array - Array 30 input method engine for SCIM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708282327.l7SNReis010720@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-array - Array 30 input method engine for SCIM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253805 dchen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 00:03:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 20:03:38 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_261881=5D_Review_Request=3A_=C3=A9colier-f?= =?iso-8859-1?q?onts_-_=C3colier_court_fonts?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708290003.l7T03c78003412@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ?colier-fonts - ?colier court fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-08-28 20:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > I'm not too worried about the non-utf8 locale case: > 1. utf-8 is the default fedora encoding, so that's what we should optimize for I am not sure that it is relevant here. The issue is would it be right to have encoded characters in a package name. > 2. almost every fedora locale migrated to utf-8 long long ago No, the otherwise encoded locales are still there, like fr_FR. > 3. I thoroughly doubt any user of a non-utf8 locale (be it because this locale > is some complex obscure asian stuff or be it because the user is an US sysadmin > which has not understood i18n needs yet) will be interested in this particular > package Even if the user isn't interested in this particular package, the package name may still appears somewhere (in repoquery calls, for example). Or as a dependency. I don't feel strongly about that issue, but I have seen so many trouble with encodings that I think it is better to be cautious. I know some people still using 8 bit locales. That is a situation we shouldn't prevent, and we should leave this choice to the user (even though we are more targetting utf8). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 00:10:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 20:10:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708290010.l7T0AbdP016530@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-08-28 20:10 EST ------- The licenses issues are blockers, and I also think that the projects I list in Comment #20 under Separate projects ----------------- should not be shipped if they weren't part of tetex previously. And for those that were part of tetex, maybe their subpackage name shouldn't be prefixed by texlive if they have their own subpackage (like xdvi). I have other more minor comments I'll post later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 00:12:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 20:12:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257341] Review Request: obexfs - FUSE based filesystem using ObexFTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708290012.l7T0C0DC016785@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: obexfs - FUSE based filesystem using ObexFTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257341 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-08-28 20:11 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: obexfs Short Description: FUSE based filesystem using ObexFTP Owners: rathann Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 00:12:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 20:12:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257341] Review Request: obexfs - FUSE based filesystem using ObexFTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708290012.l7T0CoIf005857@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: obexfs - FUSE based filesystem using ObexFTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257341 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-08-28 20:12 EST ------- Thanks for the quick review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 01:00:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 21:00:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253812] Package Review: taipei-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708290100.l7T10TvW022803@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: taipei-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253812 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-28 21:00 EST ------- It seems taipei-1.2.tar.gz seems to originate from the CLE (Chinese Linux Extension) to Slackware from bitmaps taken from XFree86 perhaps. Anyway I managed to track down a potential new upstream since taipei16 and taipei24 are included in GNU's intlfonts distribution. ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/intlfonts/ The current version is 1.2.1. http://directory.fsf.org/localization/intlfonts.html lists the distribution as GPLv2+, verified by the FSF in 2001. There is no COPYING or license file included in the tarball(s) though. It would be good to ask Handa-san for clarification about that perhaps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 01:04:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 21:04:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253805] Review Request: scim-array - Array 30 input method engine for SCIM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708290104.l7T14utx013294@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-array - Array 30 input method engine for SCIM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253805 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-28 21:04 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 01:09:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 21:09:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257181] Review Request: komparator - kompare/sync files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708290109.l7T19Amt023626@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: komparator - kompare/sync files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257181 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-28 21:08 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 01:10:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 21:10:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202334] Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708290110.l7T1ACp0014729@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=202334 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-28 21:09 EST ------- This appears to already be done. Please reset the flag if you need further cvs work done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 01:25:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 21:25:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253812] Package Review: taipei-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708290125.l7T1PDhN016679@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: taipei-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253812 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-28 21:24 EST ------- So probably the Chinese.tar.gz in ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/intlfonts/intlfonts-1.2.1-split/ is a good candidate to replace taipeifonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 01:25:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 21:25:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254091] Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708290125.l7T1Pd2J016841@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254091 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-28 21:25 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 01:26:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 21:26:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253812] Package Review: taipei-fonts (split from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708290126.l7T1QbT7016940@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: taipei-fonts (split from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253812 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Package Review: taipei-fonts|Package Review: taipei-fonts |(splitted from fonts- |(split from fonts-chinese). |chinese). | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 01:28:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 21:28:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257341] Review Request: obexfs - FUSE based filesystem using ObexFTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708290128.l7T1Sp8v026123@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: obexfs - FUSE based filesystem using ObexFTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257341 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-28 21:28 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 01:40:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 21:40:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253812] Package Review: taipei-fonts (split from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708290140.l7T1e7av018849@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: taipei-fonts (split from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253812 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-28 21:39 EST ------- Oh and I just found: http://ftp2.tnc.edu.tw/pub3/CLE/CLE/devel/wjwu/slackware/slackware-9.1/source/taipeifonts-1.2/re-build.readme which claims the taipei fonts are Public Domain. The taipei fonts are available here: ftp://cle.linux.org.tw/pub2/fonts/bitmap/taipeifont -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 02:52:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 22:52:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708290252.l7T2qpPW029251@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-28 22:52 EST ------- Thanks for the update and unifying %install for uming and ukai - looks much clearer now. :) rpmlint still gives: W: cjkunifonts unversioned-explicit-obsoletes ttfonts-zh_CN W: cjkunifonts unversioned-explicit-obsoletes ttfonts-zh_TW W: cjkunifonts unversioned-explicit-obsoletes ttfonts-zh_CN W: cjkunifonts unversioned-explicit-obsoletes ttfonts-zh_TW These need to be fixed. All the CID map files need to be updated to the new directory paths. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 02:57:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 22:57:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708290257.l7T2vaVs029862@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-28 22:57 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=177821) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=177821&action=view) cjkunifonts.spec-3.patch A few more fixes (I forget to mention "Arphic" was added as a license to the fedora wiki Licenses page). After this still get: W: cjkunifonts-uming non-conffile-in-etc /etc/ghostscript/cidfmap.zh_CN W: cjkunifonts-uming non-conffile-in-etc /etc/ghostscript/FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN W: cjkunifonts-uming non-conffile-in-etc /etc/ghostscript/FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW W: cjkunifonts-uming non-conffile-in-etc /etc/ghostscript/CIDFnmap.zh_TW W: cjkunifonts-uming non-conffile-in-etc /etc/ghostscript/cidfmap.zh_TW W: cjkunifonts-uming symlink-should-be-relative /etc/X11/fontpath.d/cjkunifonts-uming /usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming W: cjkunifonts-uming non-conffile-in-etc /etc/ghostscript/CIDFnmap.zh_CN W: cjkunifonts-uming obsolete-not-provided ttfonts-zh_CN W: cjkunifonts-uming obsolete-not-provided ttfonts-zh_TW and similarly on -ukai. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 03:04:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 23:04:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253781] Review Request: outerspace - client for 4x on-line strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708290304.l7T34cx5007167@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: outerspace - client for 4x on-line strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253781 ------- Additional Comments From nsboyle at gmail.com 2007-08-28 23:04 EST ------- I'm not sponsored, so this isn't official. Some items have been omitted either because I'm not sure how to reliably answer them, or they just absolutely don't apply. Complete list is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines ALSO, please note that this review is based on your original .src.rpm, since you linked the binary package on your last update. If anything I point out was fixed in new package, please disregard :) OK - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review -->No output OK - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the ["Packaging/LicensingGuidelines" Licensing Guidelines]. NOT OK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. --> COPYING says GPLv2, source files says GPLv2 or later. AFAIK, what the source says shows the actual "intent" of the author for licensing. As such, license should be GPLv2+. Please see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#head-4d5634799c488896bc50697288213a0b2d9acbae OK - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). NOT OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. --> Version in src.rpm is 30ca7ba6d3b8e632f4ec611a565fb445, upstream is 3ee9e7890392acd53cd5487f33f84f48 (this may be fixed by newer package, but obviously I can't tell) NOT OK - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. --> Last errors reported by mock (i386 FC7) are: /usr/lib/python2.5/distutils/dist.py:263: UserWarning: Unknown distribution option: 'windows' warnings.warn(msg) running install error: invalid Python installation: unable to open /usr/lib/python2.5/config/Makefile (No such file or directory) OK - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. OK - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK? - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. --> $RPM_BUILD_ROOT could be %{buildroot} OK - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) ? - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. --> Not sure what the PKG-INFO file is (something for Python?), but contents looks suspect. Use your judgement on that. If it's required to run... it shouldn't be in %doc NOT OK - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of Packaging Guidelines. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. --> See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-43fa82f212954e9288ab00a4f250403353c1813d , basically, you're missing the desktop-file-install command OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8 Misc: You incremented the minor version number in your new .spec... whereas you want to leave that number alone (since it corresponds to upstream source) and instead increment the Release: number, which corresponds to the package version. Don't forget to update the package's %changelog! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 03:08:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 23:08:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708290308.l7T38LlB031006@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-28 23:08 EST ------- The CID files should live in /usr/share/ghostscript/conf.d/ not /etc/ghostscript as in fonts-japanese. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 03:54:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 23:54:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708290354.l7T3sG6V003965@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2007-08-28 23:54 EST ------- Please kindly review: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/20070829_cjkunifonts_2/cjkunifonts.spec http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/20070829_cjkunifonts_2/cjkunifonts-0.1.20060928-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 04:09:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 00:09:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 262401] New: Review Request: jcip-annotations - Java 5 thread safety annotations Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=262401 Summary: Review Request: jcip-annotations - Java 5 thread safety annotations Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: loganjerry at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/jcip-annotations/jcip-annotations.spec SRPM URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/jcip-annotations/jcip-annotations-20060626-1.src.rpm Description: This package provides class, field, and method level annotations for describing thread-safety policies. These annotations are relatively unintrusive and are beneficial to both users and maintainers. Users can see immediately whether a class is thread-safe, and maintainers can see immediately whether thread-safety guarantees must be preserved. Annotations are also useful to a third constituency: tools. Static code-analysis tools may be able to verify that the code complies with the contract indicated by the annotation, such as verifying that a class annotated with @Immutable actually is immutable. This package is the last prerequisite needed in Fedora in order for findbugs to be buildable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 04:12:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 00:12:15 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_261881=5D_Review_Request=3A_=C3=A9colier-f?= =?iso-8859-1?q?onts_-_=C3colier_court_fonts?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708290412.l7T4CFKW006281@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ?colier-fonts - ?colier court fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-29 00:12 EST ------- My vote would go for "ecolier-fonts" FWIW. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 04:14:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 00:14:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253134] Review Request: jlint - Java program checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708290414.l7T4EZqg016998@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jlint - Java program checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253134 ------- Additional Comments From loganjerry at gmail.com 2007-08-29 00:14 EST ------- Now I'm concerned about licensing issues. The 1.x code just says that it is "freeware", with no indication of what the author thinks that means. The 3.x code claims to be released under the GPL, but since it is a derivative work of code with no clear license, I'm not sure that's legal. I'm now inclined to drop jlint and work on getting findbugs into Fedora instead. Unless someone really, really wants me to keep pursuing jlint, I'm going to close this review request and leave jlint alone. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 04:23:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 00:23:25 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_261881=5D_Review_Request=3A_=C3=A9colier-f?= =?iso-8859-1?q?onts_-_=C3colier_court_fonts?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708290423.l7T4NPAt007471@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ?colier-fonts - ?colier court fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-29 00:23 EST ------- I also note that the .ttf files are just named "ec*.ttf" and it is hard for many people in the world to type "?" without changing xkb layout, installing a input method, or having to cut and paste the letter (like I just did). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 04:49:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 00:49:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708290449.l7T4ngoj024103@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From tgl at redhat.com 2007-08-29 00:49 EST ------- Hmm ... if you changed HeapTupleHeader then it is pretty much completely unsafe to load *any* standard extension module into sepostgres; we have no way to tell which ones depend on that data structure. But I think all the PLs do, and many contrib modules do, so none of those RPMs are compatible and you need to supply substitutes. I wonder if it'd be feasible to hide the sepostgres add-on data into the t_hoff padding, the way OIDs have been handled the last few releases? It's a bit of a long shot, but otherwise we're going to have a real hard time with binary dependencies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 05:08:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 01:08:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708290508.l7T58Xdo027209@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-29 01:08 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=177961) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=177961&action=view) cjkunifonts.spec-4.patch Fix license and dangling symlink. The symlinks don't need to be forced either. Just for the record too: usual practice is to bump the release field for each new srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 05:26:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 01:26:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229321] Review Request :postgresql-pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708290526.l7T5Qo7F016932@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request :postgresql-pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229321 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2007-08-29 01:26 EST ------- Hi, (In reply to comment #32) > /etc/sysconfig/pgpool is 755, shouldn't it be 644? Otherwise, looks great. Oops, done. (In reply to comment #33) > Although I don't see it in the system services menu in the text mode config > tools. Added: chkconfig --add pgpool I am working on these packages nowadays -- Found some problems while using with the web interface. I will submit it for building ASAP. Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 05:34:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 01:34:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708290534.l7T5YPve018097@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2007-08-29 01:34 EST ------- Patched with comment# 22, overwritten on url in comment# 21. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 05:41:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 01:41:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253469] Review Request: opyum - Offline package installation and update tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708290541.l7T5fjKc001114@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opyum - Offline package installation and update tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253469 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-29 01:41 EST ------- remove python as BR in spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 05:47:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 01:47:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708290547.l7T5lKfS002002@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-29 01:47 EST ------- Please bump the release number in future so that the srpm's don't get overwritten. Then you could also just use one dir (eg http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/cjkunifonts/) for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 05:49:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 01:49:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708290549.l7T5nm3Y020638@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From kaigai at kaigai.gr.jp 2007-08-29 01:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #58) > I wonder if it'd be feasible to hide the sepostgres add-on data into > the t_hoff padding, the way OIDs have been handled the last few releases? > It's a bit of a long shot, but otherwise we're going to have a real hard > time with binary dependencies. In SE-PostgreSQL, all tuples have a its security attribute without any exception, and I made a decision it's not necessary this field with flexible length. It is the reason why I didn't use t_hoff padding to store security attribtue. Your suggestion seems to me fine enough. However, I hesitate to apply it onto the 8.2.x based SE-PostgreSQL now, because this change affects so wide range. I want this change to be queued for 8.3.x based SE-PostgreSQL. In the current version, I believe that installing se- version module into "/usr/lib/sepgsql" is the best way to enhance its functionality. Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 05:54:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 01:54:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708290554.l7T5seLg021489@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-08-29 01:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #45) > The licenses issues are blockers, Yes, they are, but in the current state of TeXLive packages, which are now in functional state, we should focus on F8 inclusion, because feature freeze was yesterday and we can remove stuff with inappropriate licensing during the last testing period. If TeXLive is not included now into Fedora, there will be *no* TeXLive in it, making F8 terribly poor in comparison with other distros, such as Mandriva or SuSE, where texlive is already included. These license problems can really be resolved after inclusion. > and I also think that > the projects I list in Comment #20 under > > Separate projects > ----------------- > > should not be shipped if they weren't part of tetex previously. Why? One of the criteria needed for TeXLive to be accepted is that it should substitute functionality of tetex, what it does, but why to limit the Fedora TeXLive only to a functionality in obsolete teTeX? This makes no sense to me. > > And for those that were part of tetex, maybe their subpackage name > shouldn't be prefixed by texlive if they have their own subpackage > (like xdvi). > I can add a virtual provides for those packages, but I don't think it's a good idea to remove the texlive- prefix as users should know it is not comming from, say xdvi upstream, but from TeXLive distribution so that it could differ from the official upstream of the projects as the problems users could face should be reportrd to TeXLive upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 05:57:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 01:57:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253163] Review Request: sazanami-fonts - Sazanami Japanese TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708290557.l7T5vepV004256@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sazanami-fonts - Sazanami Japanese TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253163 tagoh at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2007-08-29 01:57 EST ------- Thanks for fixing. closing now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 06:20:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 02:20:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708290620.l7T6KBVh026087@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-29 02:19 EST ------- The CID files still need to be updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 06:32:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 02:32:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253134] Review Request: jlint - Java program checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708290632.l7T6W8vZ028230@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jlint - Java program checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253134 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-08-29 02:31 EST ------- I have no objections to that, but as said, the 1.x author at least used to respond pretty quickly to mails so I suppose clarifying the license wouldn't take much more than just asking him. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 06:43:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 02:43:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254209] Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708290643.l7T6h1G7030048@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254209 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-08-29 02:42 EST ------- > * Please check which package owns %{_libdir}/%{name}/modules/ > (currently no package) hm...%{_libdir}/%{?ame} is owned by current main package that imply its subdirectory which's shipped & provided by main package to be owned to same one. > * m4 files under %{_datadir}/aclocal/ usually should be in -devel > package right, thanks for notice me this missing point. > * I don't know what software calls g-wrap modules, however usually > modules are dlopen'ed with the name '*.so', not '*.so.X'. > So I guess libgw-guile-*.so under %{_libdir}/%{name}/modules/ > should be in main package, not in -devel subpackage. do you also check this: $ file libgw-guile-*.so libgw-guile-gw-glib.so: symbolic link to `libgw-guile-gw-glib.so.0.0.0' libgw-guile-standard.so: symbolic link to `libgw-guile-standard.so.0.0.0' > * Well, why should -devel subpackage have "Requires: ORBit2-devel"? it seem that we did some mixed up things between g-wrap & guile-gnome-platform (which requires ORBit2-devel) cause, only guile-gnome-platform ships ORBit2's stuffs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 06:57:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 02:57:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251864] Review Request: kpogre - PostgreSQL graphical frontend for KDE 3.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708290657.l7T6vG1h014263@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kpogre - PostgreSQL graphical frontend for KDE 3.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251864 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2007-08-29 02:57 EST ------- Hi, (In reply to comment #2) > For a start, the source URL should be similar to: > Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz > > Mock build fails with: > checking for KDE... configure: error: > in the prefix, you've chosen, are no KDE headers installed. This will fail. > So, check this please and use another prefix! > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.40521 (%prep) > Adding kdelibs-devel solves this, but rpmlint exposes some more problems: > E: kpogre standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share > W: kpogre dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kpogre/common > /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common > W: kpogre symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kpogre/common > /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common > E: kpogre standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/bin > E: kpogre standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/doc > E: kpogre standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/icons > -> you try to own directories that you should not > > W: kpogre invalid-license GPL > -> The lists with the valid licenses is available at > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#head-489bc5bbf14ecdb808316674e9fc465243cfa4f5 > > E: kpogre binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/kpogre ['/usr/lib64', > '/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/lib'] > You should try to get rid of the rpath. All are done. Thanks for the review. I will post the new SRPM and the new spec file shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 07:04:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 03:04:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251864] Review Request: kpogre - PostgreSQL graphical frontend for KDE 3.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708290704.l7T74w83001518@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kpogre - PostgreSQL graphical frontend for KDE 3.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251864 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2007-08-29 03:04 EST ------- New spec URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/kpogre/kpogre.spec New SRPM URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/kpogre/kpogre-1.5.4-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 07:31:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 03:31:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708290731.l7T7V7QA006635@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2007-08-29 03:30 EST ------- Hi, (In reply to comment #24) > > See configure file for this. > > You mean the PACKAGE_NAME? > The tarball is slony1-1.2.10.tar.bz2, the upstream project is called Slony-I, and the first line of the README file says Slony-I. From > the NamingGuidelines: > When naming a package, the name should match the upstream tarball or project name from which this software came. Ok, I committed a bunch of fixes to Slony-I: http://lists.slony.info/pipermail/slony1-commit/2007-August/001953.html http://lists.slony.info/pipermail/slony1-commit/2007-August/001954.html http://lists.slony.info/pipermail/slony1-commit/2007-August/001955.html http://lists.slony.info/pipermail/slony1-commit/2007-August/001956.html http://lists.slony.info/pipermail/slony1-commit/2007-August/001957.html > > Missing yacc parser.y parser.c > >> ? No idea what this means. > yacc is provided by bison, and seems to be used by Slony-I: http://www.gnu.org/software/bison/ Ok, added as BR. > > - Since postgresql_autodoc is now available, maybe you can add it to the BuildRequires > >> I don't think so. Is there anything that depends on autodoc? > > configure is searching for it, so I assume it is used. It is not a must... But ok, added it. > > Some people may skip doc builds. > But doc is a separate package in Fedora, and people can just choose to not install it. I will make this change, since AFAIR RHEL 5, Fedora 6,7 and 8 does not have the NAMELEN problem. I won't push it to RHEL 4. > > Slony looks for /usr/local/pgsql/bin/pg_config first. If someone has a source installation of PostgreSQL, then the build will break > > This won't be a problem when the package is build on the Fedora buildservers. I understand that you want to maintain one upstream > specfile for all versions of Red Hat and Fedora, but having a clean spec in Fedora makes things more easier in the long run. Yes, I want to maintain 1 spec file. If this is not a blocker, I would like to skip it. > A few other comments: > > - Double BuildRequires for docbook-style-dsssl Good catch :) Removed. > - Is %kerbdir still needed? If not, there's no need to change CFLAGS, CXXFLAGS and CFLAGS and a simple %configure will do. > %kerbdir is broken in RHEL3, that's why we keep it. Yes, one spec file for all platforms :) > rpmlint of postgresql-slony1-engine-docs: > E: postgresql-slony1-engine-docs non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/postgresql-slony1-engine-docs-1.2.10/support 0644 > E: postgresql-slony1-engine-docs non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/postgresql-slony1-engine-docs-1.2.10/adminguide > 0644 > E: postgresql-slony1-engine-docs non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/postgresql-slony1-engine-docs-1.2.10 0644 > E: postgresql-slony1-engine-docs non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/postgresql-slony1-engine-docs-1.2.10/concept 0644 > E: postgresql-slony1-engine-docs non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/postgresql-slony1-engine-docs-1.2.10/howto 0644 > E: postgresql-slony1-engine-docs non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/postgresql-slony1-engine-docs- > 1.2.10/implementation 0644 Some of them are fixed. However... 1.2.11 was already released, and I committed the changes after that :( That may mean that we will wait another release to test some of the changes. I will post the updated srpm and spec file shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 07:42:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 03:42:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254209] Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708290742.l7T7gC6c008786@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254209 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-29 03:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > > * Please check which package owns %{_libdir}/%{name}/modules/ > > (currently no package) > > hm...%{_libdir}/%{name} is owned by current main package Yes > that imply its > subdirectory which's shipped & provided by main package to be owned > to same one. It may be that I don't understand correctly what you want to say, however if you write "%dir foo/", the subdirectories of foo/ are not _automatically_ owned by any subpackages. > > * I don't know what software calls g-wrap modules, however usually > > modules are dlopen'ed with the name '*.so', not '*.so.X'. > > So I guess libgw-guile-*.so under %{_libdir}/%{name}/modules/ > > should be in main package, not in -devel subpackage. > > do you also check this: > $ file libgw-guile-*.so > libgw-guile-gw-glib.so: symbolic link to `libgw-guile-gw-glib.so.0.0.0' > libgw-guile-standard.so: symbolic link to `libgw-guile-standard.so.0.0.0' Symlinks themselves are no problem, the problem is how these modules are dlopened (with what name). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 07:55:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 03:55:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708290755.l7T7ta68025306@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-29 03:55 EST ------- Here is the review: + rpmlint output: W: cjkunifonts-ukai symlink-should-be-relative /etc/X11/fontpath.d/cjkunifonts-ukai /usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-ukai W: cjkunifonts-ukai obsolete-not-provided ttfonts-zh_CN W: cjkunifonts-ukai obsolete-not-provided ttfonts-zh_TW W: cjkunifonts-uming symlink-should-be-relative /etc/X11/fontpath.d/cjkunifonts-uming /usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming W: cjkunifonts-uming obsolete-not-provided ttfonts-zh_CN W: cjkunifonts-uming obsolete-not-provided ttfonts-zh_TW IMO these can be waived. + package name follows upstream project name + spec filename matches package name + packages two Chinese truetype fonts currently part of fonts-chinese + Arphic Public License is listed on Licensing page + license with translations included + spec files is legible + source files agree with debian upstream: 465b1350911f086a2021c36e039f79c8 ttf-arphic-ukai_0.1.20060928.orig.tar.gz 4f2e5a4ba4cf3ac01518ea211a89fdc1 ttf-arphic-uming_0.1.20060928.orig.tar.gz + package is noarch and builds correctly + build deps listed + owns own dirs + filelist looks correct + consistent macro usage Need attention: - should not own ghostscript/conf.d/ which belongs to ghostscript - /usr/share/fonts/zh_*/TrueType/ seem to be empty in the rpm's - and already mentioned ghostscript conf paths -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 08:43:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 04:43:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708290843.l7T8hJVO032313@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-08-29 04:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #46) > (In reply to comment #45) > > The licenses issues are blockers, > > Yes, they are, but in the current state of TeXLive packages, which are now in > functional state, we should focus on F8 inclusion, because feature freeze was > yesterday and we can remove stuff with inappropriate licensing during the last > testing period. If TeXLive is not included now into Fedora, there will be *no* > TeXLive in it, making F8 terribly poor in comparison with other distros, such as > Mandriva or SuSE, where texlive is already included. These license problems can > really be resolved after inclusion. A package with license issues cannot be approved. Since here we have certainly the same issues in an already included package in Fedora (tetex), it would be acceptable, in my opinion, if you feel that we really are in a hurry. > > and I also think that > > the projects I list in Comment #20 under > > > > Separate projects > > ----------------- > > > > should not be shipped if they weren't part of tetex previously. > > Why? One of the criteria needed for TeXLive to be accepted is that it should > substitute functionality of tetex, what it does, but why to limit the Fedora > TeXLive only to a functionality in obsolete teTeX? This makes no sense to me. The point is not to reduce the functionalities in texlive, but do proper packaging. It is not appropriate to repackage a distribution when it consists of projects that have a clear independence. In general every project with a release distributed and a home page should have its own package. This is evident in the case of texlive because some parts are already out of date. So, to avoid obsoletes and complications, it seems to me that it would be better not to add those to texlive in the first place (and submit those packages separately). There are switches for all the utilities in the texlive configure to avoid building them. As I said above I think that it acceptable to let those that were in tetex slip in, but no more. If there was no tetex in fedora I think that shipping independent projects in texlive would be a blocker. > I can add a virtual provides for those packages, but I don't think it's a good > idea to remove the texlive- prefix as users should know it is not comming from, > say xdvi upstream, but from TeXLive distribution so that it could differ from > the official upstream of the projects as the problems users could face should be > reportrd to TeXLive upstream. My idea was that having those packages from texlive should be only transitory, and to avoid obsoletes/provides and so on and so forth (there are already the tetex related obsoletes) it would be better not to use the texlive prefix in the first place. Especially when the version in texlive is the same than the up-upstream version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 09:36:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 05:36:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708290936.l7T9a0PG007602@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2007-08-29 05:35 EST ------- Personally, I'm against pushing this package to Fedora. SEPostgreSQL is not tested widely yet -- and it is thought as a replacement of original PostgreSQL. If people, who are already running their databases on PostgreSQL, wants to switch to SEPostgreSQL and if it is broken somewhere, it will harm the good reputation of PostgreSQL in terms of stability. If someone calls for a vote, I strongly object to adding this package to Fedora / EPEL. 0.02 cents. Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 09:54:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 05:54:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708290954.l7T9sjkX027641@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-08-29 05:54 EST ------- I have checked what was in tetex, this leads to: Independent projects, not in tetex: detex devnag dvi2tty afm2pl dvipdfmx Independent projects, in tetex: dvipdfm dvipng mendex Independent projects, in tetex, consisting of a whole subpackage: xdvik pxdvik -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 09:57:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 05:57:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239471] Review Request: httptunnel - Tunnels a data stream in HTTP requests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708290957.l7T9vmPk010634@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: httptunnel - Tunnels a data stream in HTTP requests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239471 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-08-29 05:57 EST ------- GPL is not a valid license tag anymore: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#head-f21ae23bf2f278444e2c385463cfa74a502396b8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 10:50:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 06:50:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241553] Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291050.l7TAoI1i017500@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241553 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-08-29 06:50 EST ------- I cannot download the current spec file: $ curl -I http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/safekeep/1.0.1-2/safekeep.spec HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden [...] The srpm works. Here are some first observations: - GPL is not a valid value for the license tag anymore: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#head-f21ae23bf2f278444e2c385463cfa74a502396b8 - Source0 should be: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz not _pr_downloads... - the client subpackage seems to be empty, so imho you should rename the common package to client and let the server package depend on the client. Also it seems to be odd that the client package has a lot of Requires - Afaik there is no need to package "AUTHORS COPYING LICENSE" multiple times, packaging it in the client (common) package should be enough. - does this "Requires: safekeep-common = %{PACKAGE_VERSION}" really work? I cannot see where PACKAGE_VERSION is defined and the guidelines mention %{version}-%{release}" instead. - every %files section has to start with a %defattr(...) line, but only the %files section for common has one -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 10:59:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 06:59:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291059.l7TAx5R2018367@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From kaigai at kaigai.gr.jp 2007-08-29 06:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #60) I can admit that any software contains bugs more or less. However, I cannot understand your opinion. In generally, if people who are already running their database on PostgreSQL, switch to SE-PostgreSQL and if it is broken somewhere, they will switch back it to the original PostgreSQL. No need to say, it will be a reputation of SE-PostgreSQL, not original one. In addition, getting merged into Fedora encourage widely test of SE-PostgreSQL. I think it should be merged to resolve your concern also. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 11:07:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 07:07:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257181] Review Request: komparator - kompare/sync files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291107.l7TB7Fmn004824@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: komparator - kompare/sync files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257181 ndbecker2 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 11:18:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 07:18:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228255] Review Request: grub2 - grub next generation tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291118.l7TBIbu5021102@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: grub2 - grub next generation tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228255 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-08-29 07:18 EST ------- - GPL is not a valid license tag anymore: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#head-f21ae23bf2f278444e2c385463cfa74a502396b8 - instead of /etc you should use %{_sysconfdir} - maybe the file in /etc should be marked with %config, is it intended, that they are not? - Why is this update-grub_lib in %{_libdir}/grub and not in %{_libdir}/grub2? Also in case it is intentional, the directory %{_libdir}/grub/ is not owned by any package afaics. - I guess %{_libdir}/grub2/* should be just %{_libdir}/grub2/ because otherwise the directory %{_libdir}/grub2/ is not owned by any package. - /etc/grub.d/ is also not owned by the package but created - /boot/grub2 should be /boot/grub2/ imho to make it more obvious that it is an directory - the conditionals in %files can be simplified because there is a "ExclusiveArch: i386 x86_64 ppc ppc64" tag and everything in the package for ppc(64), is also in the package for i386 and x86_64, so this should produce the same rpms: /sbin/grub2-emu /sbin/grub2-install /bin/grub2-mkimage /boot/grub2/ %ifarch i386 x86_64 /sbin/grub2-mkdevicemap /sbin/grub2-probe /sbin/grub2-setup %endif - What do you mean with this comment: #All apart of update-grub2 tool? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 11:29:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 07:29:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253858] Review Request: system-config-vsftpd - graphical utility for administrating vsftpd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291129.l7TBTPde007806@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-vsftpd - graphical utility for administrating vsftpd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253858 mbarabas at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mbarabas at redhat.com 2007-08-29 07:29 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: system-config-vsftpd Short Description: graphical utility for administrating VSFTPD Owners: mbarabas Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 11:37:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 07:37:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 258681] Review Request: bluez-firmware - Bluetooth firmware distributed by the BlueZ project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291137.l7TBbh13009217@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluez-firmware - Bluetooth firmware distributed by the BlueZ project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=258681 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-08-29 07:37 EST ------- The source tag should point to a full URL, here it seems that http://downloads.sourceforge.net/bluez/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz would be the correct one. Did you build this package once for a 64bit arch? There %{_lib} expands to lib64, so maybe configure should be invoked wiht --libdir=/lib, because e.g. the ipw2000 firmware is also everytime in /lib. ./configure --libdir=/%{_lib} [...] /lib/firmware/BCM-LEGAL.txt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 11:44:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 07:44:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253434] Review Request: eclipse-rpm-editor - RPM Specfile editor for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291144.l7TBi9eq024460@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-rpm-editor - RPM Specfile editor for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253434 ------- Additional Comments From alcapcom at gmail.com 2007-08-29 07:43 EST ------- I lower the version of rpmlint and backport the needed patch, Ville can you please take a look on because the original patch http://rpmlint.zarb.org/cgi-bin/trac.cgi/changeset/1349?format=diff&new=1349 don't will apply on CheckSpec.py file. I have also patched the specfile so that you have less stuff todo to include it. http://alcapcom.fedorapeople.org/patches/rpmlint-0.80-rpmlint-on-specfiles.patch http://alcapcom.fedorapeople.org/patches/rpmlint.spec-backport-rpmlint-on-specfiles.patch Andrew the package is modify according with the review, FYI the package build on i386 arch and using mock on rawhide. Spec URL: http://alcapcom.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/eclipse-rpm-editor.spec SRPM URL: http://alcapcom.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/eclipse-rpm-editor-0.1.0-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 12:15:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 08:15:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291215.l7TCFEJG029546@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2007-08-29 08:14 EST ------- Hi, (In reply to comment #61) > (In reply to comment #60) > In generally, if people who are already running their database on PostgreSQL, > switch to SE-PostgreSQL and if it is broken somewhere, they will switch back > it to the original PostgreSQL. Ouch! So you don't care about the downtime? :( > In addition, getting merged into Fedora encourage widely test of > SE-PostgreSQL. I think it should be merged to resolve your concern also. Fedora is *not* for testing packages, IMHO. Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 12:17:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 08:17:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 263121] New: Review Request: pharosc - VLSI and ASIC Technology Standard Cell Libraries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=263121 Summary: Review Request: pharosc - VLSI and ASIC Technology Standard Cell Libraries Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/pharosc/pharosc.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/pharosc/pharosc-8.3-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: VLSI and ASIC Technology Standard Cell Libraries. There are five new open source standard cell libraries, the * vsclib, * wsclib, * vxlib, * vgalib and * rgalib. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 12:20:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 08:20:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 263121] Review Request: pharosc - VLSI and ASIC Technology Standard Cell Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291220.l7TCKo6f030325@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pharosc - VLSI and ASIC Technology Standard Cell Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=263121 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lxtnow at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 12:21:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 08:21:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291221.l7TCLx6V015783@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From rob.myers at gtri.gatech.edu 2007-08-29 08:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #60) > Personally, I'm against pushing this package to Fedora. SEPostgreSQL is not > tested widely yet -- and it is thought as a replacement of original PostgreSQL. i disagree that SE-PostgreSQL is thought of as a replacement of PostgreSQL. furthermore, that concern could be addressed with adding sufficient warning to SE-PostgreSQL's %description. > If people, who are already running their databases on PostgreSQL, wants to > switch to SEPostgreSQL and if it is broken somewhere, it will harm the good > reputation of PostgreSQL in terms of stability. i think the reasonable conclusion is that SE-PostgreSQL is broken somewhere and to switch back to PostgreSQL. Fedora is on the leading edge of SELinux development, and thus is a perfect place to test this extension of PostgreSQL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 12:45:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 08:45:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 263181] New: Review Request: php-pecl-Svn - PHP Subversion Wrapper Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=263181 Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-Svn - PHP Subversion Wrapper Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: akahl at iconmobile.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SPECS/php-pecl-Svn.spec SRPM URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SRPMS/php-pecl-Svn-0.2-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: This extension implements PHP bindings for Subversion (SVN), a version control system, allowing PHP scripts to communicate with SVN repositories and working copies without direct command line calls to the svn executable. -- I am still searching for a sponsor but will release all my packages step by step so you can see I'm serious about contributing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 12:46:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 08:46:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 263181] Review Request: php-pecl-Svn - PHP Subversion Wrapper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291246.l7TCkYv1019560@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-Svn - PHP Subversion Wrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=263181 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 13:05:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 09:05:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291305.l7TD526W004646@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From kaigai at kaigai.gr.jp 2007-08-29 09:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #63) Rob, thanks for your comment. I also think your opinions are correct. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 13:24:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 09:24:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253434] Review Request: eclipse-rpm-editor - RPM Specfile editor for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291324.l7TDOPrW025488@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-rpm-editor - RPM Specfile editor for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253434 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-08-29 09:24 EST ------- The plugin will still function without the patched rpmlint, though, right? If so, I'm willing to approve this. Otherwise, we can hold off until Ville gets time to look at the rpmlint situation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 13:29:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 09:29:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291329.l7TDTUk0026491@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From ynakam at hitachisoft.jp 2007-08-29 09:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #63) I agree with rob. People will think postgreSQL and SE-PostgreSQL is different. People who want postgreSQL usally installs usual postgreSQL. People who install SE-PostgreSQL will know SE-PostgreSQL have different feature. >furthermore, that concern could be addressed with adding sufficient warning to >SE-PostgreSQL's %description. I agree this too, to avoid misunderstanding. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 13:38:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 09:38:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291338.l7TDc1BS028323@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-29 09:37 EST ------- ============================================== LICENSE CHECK ============================================== For tar files except for "rpmbuild" Total files number 10434 * ICE_LICENSE 3504 * Binary .class file (not used) 5612 * jpg/png/gif 153 * .depend 166 * .ice 54 * GPL 28 ------------------------------------- Total 9517 Left 917 I checked the left 917 files manually and they are all okay (some of them are demo files or so and are never used...) * However, as Ice accepts some exceptions for linage, please tag the license as "GPLv2 with exceptions". Okay. ============================================== This package (ice) is APPROVED by me ============================================== Please follow the procedure according to: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". At a point a mail should be sent to sponsor members which notifies that you need a sponsor (at the stage, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship) Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 7, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 13:41:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 09:41:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291341.l7TDf6Wv029088@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-29 09:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #53) > * However, as Ice accepts some exceptions for > linage, please tag the license as > "GPLv2 with exceptions". s/linage/linkage/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 13:42:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 09:42:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239936] Review Request: oyranos - The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291342.l7TDgjVQ029369@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: oyranos - The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239936 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(kwizart at gmail.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-29 09:42 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 13:44:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 09:44:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291344.l7TDixdx011140@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Package Review |4Suite ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2007-08-29 09:44 EST ------- Hi, (In reply to comment #63) > i disagree that SE-PostgreSQL is thought of as a replacement of PostgreSQL. > furthermore, that concern could be addressed with adding sufficient warning to > SE-PostgreSQL's %description. How many people read the %description parts, guys? > i think the reasonable conclusion is that SE-PostgreSQL is broken somewhere > and to switch back to PostgreSQL. As I wrote before, this means a downtime , and usually There Is No Time For Downtime. > Fedora is on the leading edge of SELinux development, and thus is a perfect > place to test this extension of PostgreSQL. Fedora is not the place to test a replacement for PostgreSQL. We are talking about a database server guys, not a browser, or text editor, or such. Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 13:48:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 09:48:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291348.l7TDmO9X011866@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|4Suite |Package Review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 14:19:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 10:19:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291419.l7TEJFJR017169@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From kaigai at kaigai.gr.jp 2007-08-29 10:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #66) It is not a generic situation to replace a significant working system by an unknown package, without enough evaluation and verification. Especially, if it is required to minimize its downtime. In addition, we are understanding that Fedora project positively fetch many advanced and experimental features. These experimences are leveraged in Red Hat Enterprise Linux and feedbacked to the later versions of Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 14:39:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 10:39:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291439.l7TEdTLH021539@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-08-29 10:39 EST ------- No production server should be using rawhide. Whoever uses rawhide knows that there is an experimental part over there. Therefore I think that rawhide is a very food test place for SE-PostgreSQL. But the package should not be pushed to stable without performing extensive testing first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 15:02:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 11:02:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254209] Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291502.l7TF214s026227@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254209 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-08-29 11:01 EST ------- Okay, after checked the dlname, modules are dlopen'ed with '*.so.X' dlname='libgw-guile-gw-glib.so.0' dlname='libgw-guile-standard.so.0' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 15:15:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 11:15:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254209] Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291515.l7TFF0Ct028527@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254209 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-29 11:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > Okay, > after checked the dlname, modules are dlopen'ed with '*.so.X' > dlname='libgw-guile-gw-glib.so.0' > dlname='libgw-guile-standard.so.0' Would you tell me where these modules are dlopen'ed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 15:15:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 11:15:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249365] Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291515.l7TFFOoW013826@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249365 ------- Additional Comments From jima at beer.tclug.org 2007-08-29 11:15 EST ------- While this isn't waiting on me, I just thought I'd chime in and say that yes, I'm willing to co-maintain. :-) *moves on to other open bugs* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 15:19:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 11:19:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291519.l7TFJr91029404@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From kaigai at kaigai.gr.jp 2007-08-29 11:19 EST ------- I like to return the topic about package reviewing. At the point of Comment #57, I added Requires: tag with postgresql-server instead of Conflicts: tag, and several binaries are renamed with "se" prefix or ".sepgsql" postfix. "%define _unpackaged_files_terminate_build 0" is removed, and all unnecessary files became to be removed during %install section. These fixes are reflecting to the above comments. Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 15:42:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 11:42:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249059] Review Request: wdaemon - hotplug helper for wacom x.org driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291542.l7TFgDeV002398@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wdaemon - hotplug helper for wacom x.org driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249059 arozansk at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From arozansk at redhat.com 2007-08-29 11:42 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: wdaemon Short Description: x.org hotplug helper for Wacom tablets Owners: arozansk at redhat.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 15:58:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 11:58:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253858] Review Request: system-config-vsftpd - graphical utility for administrating vsftpd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291558.l7TFwCvp025280@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-vsftpd - graphical utility for administrating vsftpd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253858 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-08-29 11:58 EST ------- Random comments: - it crashes when you don't have vsftpd installed - any line of the sort: syslog = commands.getoutput( 'cat /var/log/messages''* | grep vsftpd' ) seems *very wrong* - help->about doesn't do anything -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 16:04:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 12:04:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249059] Review Request: wdaemon - hotplug helper for wacom x.org driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291604.l7TG4ZwG006599@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wdaemon - hotplug helper for wacom x.org driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249059 ------- Additional Comments From arozansk at redhat.com 2007-08-29 12:04 EST ------- fixing the 'owners' field and the short description to match the BZ#'s -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 16:03:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 12:03:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249059] Review Request: wdaemon - hotplug helper for wacom x.org driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291603.l7TG3XNa006506@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wdaemon - hotplug helper for wacom x.org driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249059 ------- Additional Comments From arozansk at redhat.com 2007-08-29 12:03 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: wdaemon Short Description: hotplug helper for wacom x.org driver Owners: arozansk Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 16:13:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 12:13:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291613.l7TGDrTO008380@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 ------- Additional Comments From mefoster at gmail.com 2007-08-29 12:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #53) > I checked the left 917 files manually and they > are all okay (some of them are demo files or so > and are never used...) Wow! I'm impressed ... thanks for that, and for accepting the package. I made the license change. Meanwhile, I only just now noticed that I'd been putting the Ruby stuff into a subdirectory where it didn't actually work, so I fixed that. On rereading the Ruby packaging guidelines, I also added Provides: Ruby(Ice) = %{version} to the ruby package. (According to those guidelines, the package "must" also apparently be called "ruby-ice", not "ice-ruby", but I don't really want to do that.) Don't know if you want to look over these changes too ... http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/mef/extras/ice-3.2.1-9.fc7.src.rpm http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/mef/extras/ice.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 16:39:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 12:39:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291639.l7TGdCkb032622@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-29 12:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #55) On rereading the Ruby packaging guidelines, I also added Provides: Ruby(Ice) = > %{version} to the ruby package. (According to those guidelines, the package > "must" also apparently be called "ruby-ice", not "ice-ruby", but I don't really > want to do that.) Well, actually I don't know correctly what this part of Ruby packaging guidelines tries to say. IMO we can follow python module naming guideline: --------------------------------------------------------- Addon Packages (python modules) Packages of python modules (thus they rely on python as a parent) use a slightly different naming scheme. They should take into account the upstream name of the python module. This makes a package name format of python-$NAME. When in doubt, use the name of the module that you type to import it in a script. ---------------------------------------------------------- For this package, the parent package of ice-ruby is surely ice, so the name should be ice-ruby, not ruby-ice IMO. Also I am not sure whether ice-ruby should provide "ruby(Ice) = 1.8" (although it should be safe that ice-ruby provides it). Anyway please follow the procedure written on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 16:53:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 12:53:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291653.l7TGrnl4015610@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-08-29 12:53 EST ------- Nothing on the forum, and no new releases. Last I checked, they had some cars ready but no real progress, at least that I could see, on tracks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 17:01:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 13:01:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291701.l7TH1uZg004620@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-29 13:01 EST ------- Bummer. Have you tried pinging them? Can you get those cars from CVS? If we were to use whats available now, how many tracks would we have? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 17:09:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 13:09:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291709.l7TH9PRV019012@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-08-29 13:09 EST ------- I'll ping, and ask the cvs question. I'd do it now, but my forum account got locked out due to a fat-fingered password. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 17:26:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 13:26:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254088] Review Request: b43-fwcutter - firmware cutter which outputs new format used by b43 drivers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291726.l7THQKnK022662@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: b43-fwcutter - firmware cutter which outputs new format used by b43 drivers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254088 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-08-29 13:26 EST ------- b43-fwcutter-008-1.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 17:26:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 13:26:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 258681] Review Request: bluez-firmware - Bluetooth firmware distributed by the BlueZ project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291726.l7THQGe5022621@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluez-firmware - Bluetooth firmware distributed by the BlueZ project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=258681 ------- Additional Comments From wwoods at redhat.com 2007-08-29 13:26 EST ------- Changed the spec to match your suggestions, thanks. New files: Spec URL: http://wwoods.fedorapeople.org/review/bluez-firmware.spec SRPM URL: http://wwoods.fedorapeople.org/review/bluez-firmware-1.2-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 17:26:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 13:26:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251545] Review Request: setroubleshoot-plugins - analysis plugins for setroubleshoot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291726.l7THQlUr009815@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setroubleshoot-plugins - analysis plugins for setroubleshoot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251545 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-08-29 13:26 EST ------- setroubleshoot-plugins-1.10.1-1.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 17:49:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 13:49:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248692] Review Request: R-rlecuyer - R interface to RNG with multiple streams In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291749.l7THnQC9014677@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-rlecuyer - R interface to RNG with multiple streams https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248692 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-08-29 13:49 EST ------- There is the newest version with the correct license tag : SPEC http://www.pingoured.fr/public/RPM/R-rlecuyer/R-rlecuyer.spec SRPM http://www.pingoured.fr/public/RPM/R-rlecuyer/R-rlecuyer-0.1-2.fc6.src.rpm ++ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 18:00:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 14:00:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248681] Review Request: R-affyio -Tools for parsing Affymetrix data files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291800.l7TI0aR4017405@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-affyio -Tools for parsing Affymetrix data files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248681 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-08-29 14:00 EST ------- Changed the license tag SPEC http://www.pingoured.fr/public/RPM/R-affyio/R-affyio.spec SRPM http://www.pingoured.fr/public/RPM/R-affyio/R-affyio-1.4.1-2.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 18:08:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 14:08:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248679] Review Request: R-hgu95av2probe - Probe sequence data for microarrays of type hgu95av2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291808.l7TI8pG9031758@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-hgu95av2probe - Probe sequence data for microarrays of type hgu95av2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248679 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-08-29 14:08 EST ------- Changed the license tag SPEC http://www.pingoured.fr/public/RPM/R-hgu95av2probe/R-hgu95av2probe.spec SRPM http://www.pingoured.fr/public/RPM/R-hgu95av2probe/R-hgu95av2probe-1.16.3-2.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 18:26:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 14:26:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248678] Review Request: R-BSgenome.Dmelanogaster.FlyBase.r51 - osophila melanogaster genome (FlyBase r5.1) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291826.l7TIQpFM022695@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-BSgenome.Dmelanogaster.FlyBase.r51 - osophila melanogaster genome (FlyBase r5.1) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248678 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-08-29 14:26 EST ------- Changed in the license tag SPEC http://www.pingoured.fr/public/RPM/R-BSgenome.Dmelanogaster.FlyBase.r51/R-BSgenome.Dmelanogaster.FlyBase.r51.spec SRPM http://www.pingoured.fr/public/RPM/R-BSgenome.Dmelanogaster.FlyBase.r51/R-BSgenome.Dmelanogaster.FlyBase.r51-1.2.0-2.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 18:26:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 14:26:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247699] Review Request: R-BufferedMatrixMethods - Microarray Data related methods that utlize BufferedMatrix In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291826.l7TIQYlC022632@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-BufferedMatrixMethods - Microarray Data related methods that utlize BufferedMatrix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247699 Bug 247699 depends on bug 246539, which changed state. Bug 246539 Summary: Review Request: R-BufferedMatrix - A matrix data storage object held in temporary files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246539 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-08-29 14:26 EST ------- Changed in the license tag SPEC http://www.pingoured.fr/public/RPM/R-BufferedMatrixMethods/R-BufferedMatrixMethods.spec SRPM http://www.pingoured.fr/public/RPM/R-BufferedMatrixMethods/R-BufferedMatrixMethods-1.0.0-5.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 18:31:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 14:31:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244237] Review Request: R-pls - Multivariate regression by PLSR and PCR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291831.l7TIVxVf023863@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-pls - Multivariate regression by PLSR and PCR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244237 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-08-29 14:31 EST ------- Changed in the license tag SPEC http://www.pingoured.fr/public/RPM/R-pls/R-pls.spec SRPM http://www.pingoured.fr/public/RPM/R-pls/R-pls-2.0-4.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 18:31:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 14:31:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 264641] New: Review Request: libconfig - simple library for manipulating structured configuration files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=264641 Summary: Review Request: libconfig - simple library for manipulating structured configuration files Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ianburrell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://znark.com/fedora/libconfig.spec SRPM URL: http://znark.com/fedora/libconfig-1.1.3-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: libconfig is a simple library for manipulating structured configuration files. This file format is more compact and more readable than XML. And unlike XML, it is type-aware, so it is not necessary to do string parsing in application code. Libconfig is very compact ? just 25K for the stripped C shared library (one-fifth the size of the expat XML parser library) and 39K for the stripped C++ shared library. This makes it well-suited for memory-constrained systems like handheld devices. The library includes bindings for both the C and C++ languages. It works on POSIX-compliant UNIX systems (GNU/Linux, Mac OS X, Solaris, FreeBSD) and Windows (2000, XP and later). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 18:45:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 14:45:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248677] Review Request: R-BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2 - BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291845.l7TIjfxK027062@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2 - BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248677 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-08-29 14:45 EST ------- Changed the license tag SPEC http://www.pingoured.fr/public/RPM/R-BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2/R-BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2.spec SRPM http://www.pingoured.fr/public/RPM/R-BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2/R-BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2-1.2.0-2.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 18:53:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 14:53:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225365] Review Request: perl-File-Next - File-finding iterator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291853.l7TIrYFZ028320@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Next - File-finding iterator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225365 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ianburrell at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ianburrell at gmail.com 2007-08-29 14:53 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-File-Next New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 18:53:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 14:53:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225368] Review Request: ack - Grep-like text finder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291853.l7TIrt86008750@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ack - Grep-like text finder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225368 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ianburrell at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ianburrell at gmail.com 2007-08-29 14:53 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: ack New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 18:54:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 14:54:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241079] Review Request: R-DynDoc-1.14.0 - Functions for dynamic documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291854.l7TIs9aC028453@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-DynDoc-1.14.0 - Functions for dynamic documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241079 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-08-29 14:54 EST ------- Changed the license tag SPEC http://www.pingoured.fr/public/RPM/R-Dyndoc/R-DynDoc.spec SRPM http://www.pingoured.fr/public/RPM/R-Dyndoc/R-DynDoc-1.14.0-5.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 19:45:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 15:45:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291945.l7TJjwpf006018@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-08-29 15:45 EST ------- >From upstream: ----------- No new release yet, and no new GPL cars/tracks yet. We're working on something though. It will probably be a while yet before another release. ----------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 19:59:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 15:59:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249059] Review Request: wdaemon - hotplug helper for wacom x.org driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708291959.l7TJxa1a020437@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wdaemon - hotplug helper for wacom x.org driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249059 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-29 15:59 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 20:12:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:12:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225368] Review Request: ack - Grep-like text finder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708292012.l7TKCIt6022900@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ack - Grep-like text finder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225368 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 20:11:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:11:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225365] Review Request: perl-File-Next - File-finding iterator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708292011.l7TKBwmq022865@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Next - File-finding iterator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225365 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 20:11:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:11:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253858] Review Request: system-config-vsftpd - graphical utility for administrating vsftpd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708292011.l7TKBIvk010678@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-vsftpd - graphical utility for administrating vsftpd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253858 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 20:18:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:18:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251824] Review Request: maniadrive - 3D stunt driving game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708292018.l7TKI2XB011942@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maniadrive - 3D stunt driving game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251824 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-08-29 16:18 EST ------- * rpmlint: W: maniadrive no-documentation W: maniadrive-track-editor no-documentation W: raydium no-documentation W: raydium-devel no-documentation Acceptable as docs are in the data package. See additional rpmlint warnings below. * Package named correctly: Yes * Patches named correctly: Yes * Spec file named correctly: Yes * Licence(s) acceptable: Yes * Licence field matches: Yes * Licence file installed: No * Spec file in American English: Yes * Source matches upstream: Yes * Locales use %find_lang: N/A * Contains %clean: Yes * %install contain rm -rf %{buildroot} or similar: Yes * Specfile legible: Yes * Compiles and builds ok: NO (!!!!) See below * Calls ldconfig in %post/%postun for shlibs: Yes * Owns directories it creates: Yes * Duplicate files: No * Permissions set correctly: Yes * Consistent macro use: Yes * Separate -doc needed (for large docs): No * %doc affects runtime: No * Headers and libs in -devel: Yes * .pc files in -devel: N/A * .so in -devel: Yes * -devel requires base: Yes * Contains .la files: No * Owns files it didn't create: No * .desktop files included and installed correctly: Yes * Filenames valid UTF8: Yes 1. The following BRs were added in order to get it to compile: zlib-devel curl-devel libxml2-devel They might not be strictly needed though, if you see point 4. 2. The description for Raydium reads poorly and has several spelling mistakes. A suggested corrected version is below. "Raydium is a game engine. It provides a set of functions which allow quick and flexible games creation. There are a lot of other 3D/game engines (and some are very complete, such as Ogre, Crystal Space, etc). Raydium does not try to be as complex as these engines, but on the contrary is aiming at quick and simple development." 3. Is this file useful to the end user? If so, would it be better placed in the doc directory? It could give the rayphp location at the top for context. I'm not familiar enough with the software to say either way. /usr/share/raydium/rayphp/README 4. Additional rpmlint warnings. W: raydium undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libraydium-1.2.so sapi_globals ... ... W: raydium unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libraydium-1.2.so libphp5-5.2.3.so W: raydium unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libraydium-1.2.so /usr/lib/libvorbis.so.0 W: raydium unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libraydium-1.2.so /usr/lib/libogg.so.0 W: raydium unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libraydium-1.2.so /lib/libresolv.so.2 W: raydium unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libraydium-1.2.so /lib/libcrypt.so.1 W: raydium unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libraydium-1.2.so /lib/libz.so.1 W: raydium unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libraydium-1.2.so /usr/lib/libcurl.so.4 W: raydium unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libraydium-1.2.so /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2 Obviously not a blocker, but you might want to check if these can be cleaned up easily enough. 5. I read a packaging doc on the wiki that recommended against using macros in patch names, but of course I can't find it now. :) 6. I think raydium-devel may need dependencies on freealut-devel libvorbis-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 20:22:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:22:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 255361] Review Request: cbios - A third party BIOS compatible with the MSX BIOS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708292022.l7TKMR9T024711@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cbios - A third party BIOS compatible with the MSX BIOS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=255361 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 20:22:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:22:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 255381] Review Request: openmsx - An emulator for the MSX home computer system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708292022.l7TKMRXs024739@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openmsx - An emulator for the MSX home computer system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=255381 Bug 255381 depends on bug 255361, which changed state. Bug 255361 Summary: Review Request: cbios - A third party BIOS compatible with the MSX BIOS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=255361 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 21:02:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:02:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 265381] New: Review Request: python-GnuPGInterface - A Python module to interface with GnuPG Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=265381 Summary: Review Request: python-GnuPGInterface - A Python module to interface with GnuPG Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/python-GnuPGInterface.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/python-GnuPGInterface-0.3.2-1.src.rpm Description: GnuPGInterface is a Python module to interface with GnuPG. It concentrates on interacting with GnuPG via filehandles, providing access to control GnuPG via versatile and extensible means. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 20:59:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:59:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251826] Review Request: maniadrive-music - Replacement soundtrack for the non free ManiaDrive soundtrack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708292059.l7TKxTfW019580@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maniadrive-music - Replacement soundtrack for the non free ManiaDrive soundtrack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251826 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-29 16:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > 1. I think the license field should be: > > CC-BY and Free Art and GPL+ > > I couldn't find anything that refers to a specific GPL version and according to > the licensing page, GPL is not a valid short form. > Agreed. > 2. According to the guidelines: > > "MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) > in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the > package must be included in %doc." > > So I have doubts that the text of the licenses should be included in the README. > I see, well for the CC licenses, atleast a link to the webpage with the shortform must be included, as the CC licenses have this clause: "* For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. The best way to do this is with a link to this web page." I thought it would be better to just include the shortform, for offline reference. More in general I think the guideline you quote doesn't apply here, as that is meant for packages where upstream distributes the sources in bundled form, like tar or zip file. In this case there is a direct link on the music site webpage to the .ogg file and on this same page a link to the license, so in a sense the license and music files are bundled too, just like when they are in a zip file, but now one needs to do some more work to get both parts of the bundle. In the end either way is fine with me though, so if you think its better to rip out the license texts and only provide links to the relevant CC license short forms, then I'll do that. So please let me know which one it will be and then I'll prepare a new release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 21:04:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:04:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 265381] Review Request: python-GnuPGInterface - A Python module to interface with GnuPG In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708292104.l7TL4bCM032345@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-GnuPGInterface - A Python module to interface with GnuPG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=265381 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmcgrath at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-08-29 17:04 EST ------- This package is required to update duplicity to 0.4.3, because it's a new run-time dependency. As Mike is interested in duplicity 0.4.3, he is maybe interested in reviewing this requirement, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 21:18:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:18:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251826] Review Request: maniadrive-music - Replacement soundtrack for the non free ManiaDrive soundtrack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708292118.l7TLIstX023759@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maniadrive-music - Replacement soundtrack for the non free ManiaDrive soundtrack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251826 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-08-29 17:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > I thought it would be better to just include the shortform, for offline reference. It actually occurred to me after the posting, that inclusion of the license might be a clause so I read it and noticed the recommendation to link to the license but that only served to muddy things further :-) > In the end either way is fine with me though, so if you think its better to rip > out the license texts and only provide links to the relevant CC license short > forms, then I'll do that. So please let me know which one it will be and then > I'll prepare a new release. Well I think you made a valid point regarding the "bundling" of the license, ie the content and the license are available as direct links and coupled with the fact I didn't have strong convictions either way, only doubts, I think it's fine to leave as-is. Assuming the license field is fixed before import, the package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 21:22:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:22:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251825] Review Request: maniadrive-data - Data files for maniadrive, a 3D stunt driving game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708292122.l7TLMudr024637@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maniadrive-data - Data files for maniadrive, a 3D stunt driving game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251825 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 21:22:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:22:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251824] Review Request: maniadrive - 3D stunt driving game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708292122.l7TLMYhO024589@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maniadrive - 3D stunt driving game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251824 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 21:24:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:24:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 255381] Review Request: openmsx - An emulator for the MSX home computer system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708292124.l7TLOCIS003354@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openmsx - An emulator for the MSX home computer system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=255381 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 21:31:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:31:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225667] Merge Review: cryptsetup-luks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708292131.l7TLVLGB004778@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: cryptsetup-luks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225667 ------- Additional Comments From mgarski at post.pl 2007-08-29 17:31 EST ------- FYI: 1. URL has changed to http://luks.endorphin.org/ 2. License is GPLv2 3. ChangeLog needs to be recoded to UTF-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 21:51:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:51:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 265661] New: Review Request: python-boto - A simple lightweight interface to Amazon Web Services Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=265661 Summary: Review Request: python-boto - A simple lightweight interface to Amazon Web Services Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/python-boto.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/python-boto-0.9b-1.src.rpm Description: Boto is a Python package that provides interfaces to Amazon Web Services. It supports S3 (Simple Storage Service), SQS (Simple Queue Service) via the REST API's provided by those services and EC2 (Elastic Compute Cloud) via the Query API. The goal of boto is to provide a very simple, easy to use, lightweight wrapper around the Amazon services. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 21:57:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:57:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225667] Merge Review: cryptsetup-luks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708292157.l7TLvCPR030847@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: cryptsetup-luks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225667 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-08-29 17:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > 1. URL has changed to http://luks.endorphin.org/ > 2. License is GPLv2 > 3. ChangeLog needs to be recoded to UTF-8 changed in cvs for devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 21:53:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:53:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 265661] Review Request: python-boto - A simple lightweight interface to Amazon Web Services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708292153.l7TLrvZO030100@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-boto - A simple lightweight interface to Amazon Web Services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=265661 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmcgrath at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-08-29 17:53 EST ------- This package is required to update duplicity to 0.4.3, because it's a new run-time dependency. As Mike is interested in duplicity 0.4.3, he is maybe interested in reviewing this requirement, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 21:58:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:58:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 265661] Review Request: python-boto - A simple lightweight interface to Amazon Web Services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708292158.l7TLwwiV009744@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-boto - A simple lightweight interface to Amazon Web Services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=265661 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |265701 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 21:58:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:58:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 265381] Review Request: python-GnuPGInterface - A Python module to interface with GnuPG In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708292158.l7TLwwqd009769@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-GnuPGInterface - A Python module to interface with GnuPG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=265381 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |265701 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 22:04:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 18:04:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 263121] Review Request: pharosc - VLSI and ASIC Technology Standard Cell Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708292204.l7TM4Xxo010652@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pharosc - VLSI and ASIC Technology Standard Cell Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=263121 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-08-29 18:04 EST ------- [ OK ] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [ OK ] Spec file name must match the base package. [ OK ] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [ OK ] Package successfully to build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [ CHECK ] Tested on: Mock [FC-devel] [ OK ] Package is not relocatable. [ OK ] Buildroot is correct [ OK ] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license. [ OK ] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [ OK ] License type: LGPL [ OK ] The source package includes the text of the license(s). [ OK ] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [ SKIP ] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [ OK ] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. [ OK ] The spec file handles locales properly. [ SKIP ] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [ Ok ] Package must own all directories that it creates. [ OK ] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [ OK ] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [ OK ] Permissions on files are set properly. [ OK ] Package has a %clean section. [ OK ] Package consistently uses macros. [ OK ] Package contains code, or permissable content. [ OK ] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [ CHECK ] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [ SKIP] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [ SKIP ] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [ SKIP ] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [ SKIP ] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [ CHECK ] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [ OK ] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [ SKIP ] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file. [ OK ] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. # Quick comment * some files which're installed in subpackage (such as README, templates/) should be marked as %doc * Just add a quick comment in %build stage even if there's no build action. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 22:26:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 18:26:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708292226.l7TMQgCn014446@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-08-29 18:26 EST ------- I think that the descriptions could be ameliorated. They are too detailed in my opinion, and at the same time they don't cover what is really in the package. Moreover some packages that are to be installed as dependencies don't need to have such a verbose description. I propose the following, mainly taken from the existing descriptions of course, these are just suggestions: %description TeX Live is an easy way to get up and running with TeX. It provides a comprehensive TeX system. The texlive package contains many binaries and scripts, including tex. Usually, TeX is used in conjunction with a higher level formatting package like LaTeX or PlainTeX, since TeX by itself is not very user-friendly. Install texlive if you want to use the TeX text formatting system. Consider to install texlive-latex (a higher level formatting package which provides an easier-to-use interface for TeX). The TeX documentation is located in the texlive-doc package. %description afm texlive-afm provides afm2tfm, a converter for PostScript font metric files. %description dvips Dvips converts .dvi files to PostScript(TM) format. %description fonts This package contains programs required to generate font files for the TeX system. The kpathsea related programs are also in this package, they are needed in order to find out a file in the TeX file tree. %description latex LaTeX is a front end for the TeX text formatting system. Easier to use than TeX. LaTeX is essentially a set of TeX macros which provide convenient, predefined document formats for users. It also allows to compile LaTeX files directly to PDF format. The TeX documentation is located in the texlive-doc package. %description xdvi Xdvi allows you to preview .dvi files on an X Window System. It seems to me that not removing t1lib is wrong, since reautoconf has already been done: # t1lib: use t1lib.ac and withenable.ac if reautoconf Why not use the external autoconf-2.13? Most the Requires should certainly be %{version}-%{release} That way, if there is a fix that needs to be in 2 dependent subpackages and if the user updates only one of the 2, the other will be dragged in. Obviously not true for the *-errata subpackages, but at least for all the subpackages from the same source package. There is an Obsoletes for tetex-tex4ht remaining. There are BuildRequires within subpackages. This is not wrong, but in my opinion it is easier to follow if all the BuildRequires are in the beginning. You should remove --add-category Application \ disdvi should certainly be in dviutils (if at all in texlive) and I guess it is the same for dvipng. maybe xelatex would better be in texlive-latex? files/directories installed in usr/share/texmf/texconfig are not usefull (except for tcfmgr*), they are only useful when using the dialog from texlive. usr/share/texmf/web2c/*.pool are also in texlive-texmf. and mf.pool is in 2 packages. mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_texmf_var} is redundant Maybe xetex and context related binaries (and similar in texmf) could be in separate packages, but it is not completely obvious either. What could be interesting, however, would be to group the utilities that are context related and those that are xetex related. Maybe you could use my patch from Comment #28? The timestamps are not kept during install. In general doing make INSTALL='install -p' is sufficient but in that case it may need some testing. Also in the explicit install call of noarch files, you could add -p, like in install -p -m 644 COPYRIGHT ChangeLog %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/texmf/doc/mendexk after the iconv you can use touch -r COPYRIGHT.jis %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/texmf/doc/mendexk/COPYRIGHT.jis I don't think keeping the timestamps that are not easily kept would be a blocker for the review. Maybe %dir %{_texmf_var} could be added too? I haven't checked texlive-texmf*, but I think that there should be something like %dir %{_sysconfdir}/texmf %dir %{_sysconfdir}/texmf/web2c and maybe, if you feel like going through %verify(not md5 size mtime) %config(missingok,noreplace) for the config files that also are in /usr/share/texmf It also seems to me that mktex.opt should be in %{_sysconfdir}/texmf/web2c %config(noreplace). Same for mktexdir.opt vfontmap.sample should certainly be in a doc directory. You could add a proper shebang to texmfstart, or add a Requires: ruby The split between texlive-fonts and texlive is not very obvious to me. For example kpsewhere is in texlive while most of the kpe* programs are in -fonts. Also programs like pfb2pfa tftopl mptopdf and omega related font programs are in texlive while other font related commands are in -fonts. More generally what is the criter to decide that something goes in the font package or the main package? Where should encoding related stuff go? I can implement and test some of my proposals above with a spec file diff if you give me the permission for some of the proposals. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 22:38:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 18:38:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708292238.l7TMcOtD016458@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-08-29 18:38 EST ------- Also i think that it would be better to install the file xdvi48x48.png in %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/xdvi.png use in the .desktop file Icon=xdvi And run the appropriate pre/post scripts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 22:35:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 18:35:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240497] Review Request: R-multtest 1.14.0 - Resampling-based multiple hypothesis testing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708292235.l7TMZRec004773@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-multtest 1.14.0 - Resampling-based multiple hypothesis testing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240497 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-08-29 18:35 EST ------- Changed the license tag SPEC http://www.pingoured.fr/public/RPM/R-multtest/R-multtest.spec SRPM http://www.pingoured.fr/public/RPM/R-multtest/R-multtest-1.14.0-6.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 22:39:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 18:39:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708292239.l7TMdtUt016707@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From a.badger at gmail.com 2007-08-29 18:39 EST ------- Looks pretty good. What about the port? Is that still the same as postgresql server? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 22:42:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 18:42:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 263121] Review Request: pharosc - VLSI and ASIC Technology Standard Cell Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708292242.l7TMg7q2006077@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pharosc - VLSI and ASIC Technology Standard Cell Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=263121 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-29 18:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > # Quick comment > > * some files which're installed in subpackage (such as README, templates/) > should be marked as %doc Actually it is simple to say but it complicates usage as README and templates may come from different folders from the same subpackage. Each folder entails a particular set of files and images. The latter forms a what so called "technology". Moving files from right to left will mix up technology descriptions. I believe it's a bad idea to add it as %doc > * Just add a quick comment in %build stage even if there's no build action. I thought having marked the package as noarch made it explicit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 23:00:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 19:00:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 265841] New: Review Request: blcr - Berkeley Lab Checkpoint/Restart for Linux Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=265841 Summary: Review Request: blcr - Berkeley Lab Checkpoint/Restart for Linux Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ndbecker2 at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: https://nbecker.dyndns.org/RPM/blcr-0.6.0_b7-2.spec SRPM URL: https://nbecker.dyndns.org/RPM/blcr-0.6.0_b7-2.src.rpm Description: Berkeley Lab Checkpoint/Restart for Linux (BLCR) This package implements system-level checkpointing of scientific applications in a manner suitable for implementing preemption, migration and fault recovery by a batch scheduler. BLCR includes documented interfaces for a cooperating applications or libraries to implement extensions to the checkpoint system, such as consistent checkpointing of distributed MPI applications. Using this package with an appropriate MPI implementation, the vast majority of scientific applications which use MPI for communucation on Linux clusters are checkpointable without any modifications to the application source code. You must also install the %{name}-libs package and a %{name}-modules_* package matching your kernel version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 23:26:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 19:26:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254091] Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708292326.l7TNQH8u024360@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254091 dchen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 23:44:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 19:44:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708292344.l7TNi4YM015569@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From kaigai at kaigai.gr.jp 2007-08-29 19:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #70) > Looks pretty good. What about the port? > Is that still the same as postgresql server? Yes. We have to stop postgresql server before running sepostgresql, and vice versa. I think it should be same in default, because we have to update widespread database applications to connect sepostgresql if it use an alternative port. In addition, it can be overwritten with "/etc/sysconfig/sepostgresql", if necessary. Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 29 23:59:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 19:59:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708292359.l7TNxfpG029080@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2007-08-29 19:59 EST ------- CID files had been updated. The symlinks shouldn't with 'ghost' to be loaded to system from temp dir. http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/20070829_cjkunifonts/cjkunifonts.spec http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/20070829_cjkunifonts/cjkunifonts-0.1.20060928-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 01:37:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 21:37:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266001] New: Review Request: webunit - Python web testing framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266001 Summary: Review Request: webunit - Python web testing framework Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mike at flyn.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/webunit.spec SRPM URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/webunit-0.4-1.src.rpm Description: A framework for performing client-side tests of web applications, based on PyUnit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 01:39:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 21:39:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266001] Review Request: webunit - Python web testing framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708300139.l7U1d4sX011751@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: webunit - Python web testing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266001 mike at flyn.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 02:11:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 22:11:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225667] Merge Review: cryptsetup-luks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708300211.l7U2BmY2006223@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: cryptsetup-luks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225667 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-29 22:11 EST ------- Sorry again for the delay. Minor nitpick: any reason for not using %{?_smp_mflags} on your make ? Do you plan to rename this over to cryptsetup? I see no further blockers, so this package is APPROVED. Feel free to close this rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 02:56:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 22:56:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708300256.l7U2u9nY024682@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-29 22:56 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=180241) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=180241&action=view) cjkunifonts.spec-5.patch The changelog entries for each revision should document the changes too: - drop requires for scriptlets - %{cidmapdir} is owned by ghostscript (The package is looking good now. I think we're nearly there.:) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 03:57:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 23:57:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253469] Review Request: opyum - Offline package installation and update tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708300357.l7U3v5eJ002645@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opyum - Offline package installation and update tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253469 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-29 23:57 EST ------- ok let it be as it is BR: python Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPMs. + source files match upstream. 299873e5d0b4d762a261edb6b9bc62e6 opyum-0.0.2.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + no -doc subpackage. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no static libraries. + no .pc files are present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + gtk-update-icon-cache scriptlets are used. + Desktop files handled correctly. + Requires: /bin/bash /usr/bin/python hicolor-icon-theme pirut >= 1.3.11 + GUI APP. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 04:10:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 00:10:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 265661] Review Request: python-boto - A simple lightweight interface to Amazon Web Services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708300410.l7U4AqYC004563@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-boto - A simple lightweight interface to Amazon Web Services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=265661 ------- Additional Comments From skvidal at linux.duke.edu 2007-08-30 00:10 EST ------- I see python egg errors when I try to build this page locally: error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/boto-0.9b-py2.5.egg-info/PKG-INFO /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/boto-0.9b-py2.5.egg-info/SOURCES.txt /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/boto-0.9b-py2.5.egg-info/dependency_links.txt /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/boto-0.9b-py2.5.egg-info/top_level.txt I was trying it w/rpmbuild - I'll give it a whirl with mock in a second, too. I take it you didn't see this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 04:24:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 00:24:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 265661] Review Request: python-boto - A simple lightweight interface to Amazon Web Services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708300424.l7U4OGpu027728@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-boto - A simple lightweight interface to Amazon Web Services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=265661 ------- Additional Comments From skvidal at linux.duke.edu 2007-08-30 00:24 EST ------- Ah, looks like it is something hosed locally for me. It builds in mock just fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 04:34:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 00:34:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 265661] Review Request: python-boto - A simple lightweight interface to Amazon Web Services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708300434.l7U4Ymtn029234@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-boto - A simple lightweight interface to Amazon Web Services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=265661 skvidal at linux.duke.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |skvidal at linux.duke.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From skvidal at linux.duke.edu 2007-08-30 00:34 EST ------- okay - I've checked md5sums, the spec file, the build, now properly under mock and rpmlint. Everything that should check out appears to check out. all the MUSTS that apply to this pkg check out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 04:50:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 00:50:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708300450.l7U4otok031922@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2007-08-30 00:50 EST ------- http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/20070829_cjkunifonts/cjkunifonts.spec http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/20070829_cjkunifonts/cjkunifonts-0.1.20060928-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 05:37:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 01:37:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708300537.l7U5bJPW006144@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-30 01:37 EST ------- Thanks, Caius! Looks good to me now. :) Package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 05:52:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 01:52:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266261] Review Request: knm_new-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708300552.l7U5ql7L016517@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: knm_new-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266261 tagoh at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |eng-i18n-bugs at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2007-08-30 01:52 EST ------- This package is split up from fonts-japanese. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 05:51:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 01:51:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266261] New: Review Request: knm_new-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap font Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266261 Summary: Review Request: knm_new-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap font Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tagoh at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/knm_new-fonts/knm_new-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/knm_new-fonts/knm_new-fonts-1.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This package provides 12x12 Japanese bitmap font for JIS X 0208. JIS X 0208 is a character set that contains Kanji characters mostly often used. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 06:23:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 02:23:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708300623.l7U6NQH8012891@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From a.badger at gmail.com 2007-08-30 02:23 EST ------- Well, there's precedent for having two packages with the same port in things like httpd/lighttpd packages I suppose. All of the issues I raised have been addressed. Thanks! I'm not running rawhide so I don't have a machine to test that the packages still function after these changes. mtasaka, would you like to make sure the packages still run and do the honors of finishing off the review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 06:35:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 02:35:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708300635.l7U6Z7B7014885@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 cchance at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2007-08-30 02:35 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cjkunifonts Short Description: Chinese TrueType Fonts. Owners: cchance Branches: devel InitialCC: cchance Cvsextras Commits: cchance -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 07:13:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 03:13:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251826] Review Request: maniadrive-music - Replacement soundtrack for the non free ManiaDrive soundtrack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708300713.l7U7D18Y026314@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maniadrive-music - Replacement soundtrack for the non free ManiaDrive soundtrack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251826 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-30 03:13 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: maniadrive-music Short Description: Replacement soundtrack for the non free ManiaDrive soundtrack Owners: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Branches: devel only! InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes Note, this _really_ is devel only, as mania drive needs a new php sub-package which is only in Rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 07:30:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 03:30:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708300730.l7U7Uot5028530@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 mefoster at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mefoster at gmail.com 2007-08-30 03:30 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ice Short Description: Object middleware Owners: mef Branches: F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 07:42:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 03:42:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 263121] Review Request: pharosc - VLSI and ASIC Technology Standard Cell Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708300742.l7U7gmNi029999@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pharosc - VLSI and ASIC Technology Standard Cell Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=263121 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-08-30 03:42 EST ------- Okay, thanks for clarify those points. However, for %build stage, i think add a comment (such as #nothing to build) is more explicit than just noarch as buildarch. well, This package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 07:58:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 03:58:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253469] Review Request: opyum - Offline package installation and update tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708300758.l7U7wHf1032281@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opyum - Offline package installation and update tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253469 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-08-30 03:58 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: opyum Short Description: Offline package installation and update tools. Owners: debarshi.ray at gmail.com Branches: FC-6, F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 07:55:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 03:55:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708300755.l7U7tJmb027175@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-30 03:55 EST ------- better: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cjkunifonts Short Description: Chinese TrueType Fonts Owners: cchance Branches: devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 08:31:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 04:31:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708300831.l7U8VGxc004927@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-30 04:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #72) > Well, there's precedent for having two packages with the same port in things > like httpd/lighttpd packages I suppose. All of the issues I raised have been > addressed. Thanks! Okay, thank you, Kuratomi-san. I will then recheck the recent srpm, mainly for packaging issue (if any). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 08:36:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 04:36:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 263121] Review Request: pharosc - VLSI and ASIC Technology Standard Cell Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708300836.l7U8aXg5005637@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pharosc - VLSI and ASIC Technology Standard Cell Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=263121 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-30 04:36 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pharosc Short Description: VLSI and ASIC Technology Standard Cell Libraries Owners: chitlesh Branches: FC-6 F-7 Devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 08:50:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 04:50:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708300850.l7U8o47E003912@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-08-30 04:50 EST ------- I thought a bit more about the independent packages issue and I think that * packages not in tetex should not be packaged in texlive. detex devnag dvi2tty afm2pl dvipdfmx * packages that are in tetex should be put in their own subpackages (with obsolete for the tetex package they were split off): dvipdfm dvipng mendex * And the subpackages that correspond with independent packages should not have texlive- prependended dvipdfm dvipng mendex xdvik/pdvik Then you can add requires in texlive or texlive-latex for the new subpackages if you think that these subpackages are really needed. That way the packages may be independently submitted to fedora very easily without any renaming/obsolete. Once again I can do patches to the texlive spec file to implement the split. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 09:34:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 05:34:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708300934.l7U9YwpA012919@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From tmraz at redhat.com 2007-08-30 05:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #51) > I thought a bit more about the independent packages issue and I think > that > > * packages not in tetex should not be packaged in texlive. > detex devnag dvi2tty afm2pl dvipdfmx I do not agree. For packages which are not currently part of Fedora it would mean extra work to remove them from texlive and add them as separate packages. Of course when someone steps up and submits these packages as separate they can later be removed from texlive. I don't see any problem with that. > * packages that are in tetex should be put in their own subpackages > (with obsolete for the tetex package they were split off): > dvipdfm dvipng mendex You cannot obsolete a package containing N features with a package containing only a single feature from these N features. > * And the subpackages that correspond with independent packages should > not have texlive- prependended > dvipdfm dvipng mendex xdvik/pdvik That's really a matter of personal preference I think. > Then you can add requires in texlive or texlive-latex for the new > subpackages if you think that these subpackages are really needed. > > -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 10:05:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 06:05:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254209] Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708301005.l7UA56Cn015414@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254209 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-30 06:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > Would you tell me where these modules are dlopen'ed? Mamoru, what do you mean? Is there something in your mind that you are trying to point to us that I can't see ? Please shed more light on this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 10:27:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 06:27:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254209] Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708301027.l7UARaTv018789@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254209 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-30 06:27 EST ------- What I meant in the comment 12 is that I want to check where Xavier found the actual code noted in comment 11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 10:44:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 06:44:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708301044.l7UAiOCi021611@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-08-30 06:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #52) > (In reply to comment #51) > > I thought a bit more about the independent packages issue and I think > > that > > > > * packages not in tetex should not be packaged in texlive. > > detex devnag dvi2tty afm2pl dvipdfmx > I do not agree. For packages which are not currently part of Fedora it would > mean extra work to remove them from texlive and add them as separate packages. > Of course when someone steps up and submits these packages as separate they can > later be removed from texlive. I don't see any problem with that. What extra work? Some of those files have --without, others can simply be removed, and I volunteered to do and test patches. If this is not done now, there will be some extra work when separate packages are submitted with obsoletes and complications. > > * packages that are in tetex should be put in their own subpackages > > (with obsolete for the tetex package they were split off): > > dvipdfm dvipng mendex > You cannot obsolete a package containing N features with a package containing > only a single feature from these N features. That's not the idea. The idea is when foo is split in fooA and fooB, both fooA and fooB obsolete foo, such that on update fooA and fooB get installed. This is what is done, for example in mesa-libGLw: # libGLw used to be in Mesa package in RHL 6.x, 7.[0-2], RHEL 2.1 Obsoletes: Mesa # libGLw moved to XFree86-libs for RHL 7.3, 8, 9, FC1, RHEL 3 Obsoletes: XFree86-libs # libGLw moved to xorg-x11-libs FC[2-4], RHEL4 Obsoletes: xorg-x11-libs > > * And the subpackages that correspond with independent packages should > > not have texlive- prependended > > dvipdfm dvipng mendex xdvik/pdvik > That's really a matter of personal preference I think. Not only it is also a matter of changing more than needed package names and having to add Obsoletes/Provides or not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 10:52:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 06:52:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197609] Review Request: poster In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708301052.l7UAqHnU023073@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poster Alias: poster-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197609 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at redhat.com Alias| |poster-review Flag| |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-08-30 06:52 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: poster New Branches: F-7 Updated Fedora Owners: lkundrak at redhat.com # Not sure if this is needed anymore I have taken this package -- it was orphaned. It did not have a branch for Fedora 7, so please create one for me. Also, I am not sure whether the Owners update is needed, since I believe this to be cared about by pkgdb now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 10:50:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 06:50:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708301050.l7UAoku1022942@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-08-30 06:50 EST ------- Patrice, feel free to post patches to spec to speed things up, I can review, test and apply them quite quickly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 10:49:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 06:49:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266261] Review Request: knm_new-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708301049.l7UAniGE022429@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: knm_new-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266261 tagoh at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |253149 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 10:55:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 06:55:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708301055.l7UAtpmh023648@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-08-30 06:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #54) > Patrice, feel free to post patches to spec to speed things up, I can review, > test and apply them quite quickly. Before I make patch I would like to have your agreement on a specific item. If you dislike one of my proposal it doesn't make sense to make a patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 10:55:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 06:55:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 166567] Review Request: perl-Date-Simple (Simple date object for perl) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708301055.l7UAt8U1023639@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Date-Simple (Simple date object for perl) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=166567 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2007-08-30 06:55 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Date-Simple New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 10:59:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 06:59:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 265661] Review Request: python-boto - A simple lightweight interface to Amazon Web Services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708301059.l7UAx07b024029@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-boto - A simple lightweight interface to Amazon Web Services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=265661 redhat at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From redhat at linuxnetz.de 2007-08-30 06:58 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-boto Short Description: A simple lightweight interface to Amazon Web Services Owners: robert Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: No -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 11:00:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 07:00:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197609] Review Request: poster In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708301100.l7UB0Ywt024566@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poster Alias: poster-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197609 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 11:11:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 07:11:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225667] Merge Review: cryptsetup-luks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708301111.l7UBBQtl025837@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: cryptsetup-luks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225667 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-08-30 07:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Sorry again for the delay. No problem, thank you for your review. > Minor nitpick: any reason for not using %{?_smp_mflags} on your make ? I added it to cvs for devel and a scratch build worked fine, so I will keep it. > Do you plan to rename this over to cryptsetup? Yes, I already asked how to do this but got no satisfactory reply: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2007-August/msg00419.html The main issues are that there is already a cryptsetup Bugzilla component and that I do not know, whether someone will really take care, that the cryptsetup-luks and cryptsetup component in Bugzilla are merged. Also there seems no way to move the acls in the package db yet. For me it is no a high priority task to rename the package, therefore I want to wait until Fedora's infrastructure really support renaming packages. > I see no further blockers, so this package is APPROVED. > Feel free to close this rawhide. Thank you again. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 11:26:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 07:26:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708301126.l7UBQWkq028633@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-30 07:26 EST ------- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR, I am now sponsoring) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 12:17:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 08:17:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266801] Review Request: php-pear-Propel_generator - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708301217.l7UCHNeB004462@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Propel_generator - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266801 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 12:16:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 08:16:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266801] New: Review Request: php-pear-Propel_generator - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266801 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Propel_generator - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: akahl at iconmobile.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SPECS/php-pear-Propel_generator.spec SRPM URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SRPMS/php-pear-Propel_generator-1.2.1-3.fc7.src.rpm Description: Propel is an Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5. It allows you to access your database using a set of objects, providing a simple API for storing and retrieving data. Propel allows you, the web application developer, to work with databases in the same way you work with other classes and objects in PHP. -- This package relies on php-channel-phpdb, available in the same repository. I'm still searching for a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 12:22:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 08:22:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266821] Review Request: php-pear-Propel_runtime - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708301222.l7UCM2RD002915@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Propel_runtime - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266821 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 12:20:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 08:20:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266821] New: Review Request: php-pear-Propel_runtime - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266821 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Propel_runtime - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: akahl at iconmobile.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SPECS/php-pear-Propel_runtime.spec SRPM URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SRPMS/php-pear-Propel_runtime-1.2.1-3.fc7.src.rpm Description: Propel is an Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5. It allows you to access your database using a set of objects, providing a simple API for storing and retrieving data. Propel allows you, the web application developer, to work with databases in the same way you work with other classes and objects in PHP. -- This is the runtime component of Propel. I'm still searching for a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 12:23:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 08:23:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266841] New: Review Request: php-pear-Propel - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266841 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Propel - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: akahl at iconmobile.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SPECS/php-pear-Propel.spec SRPM URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SRPMS/php-pear-Propel-1.2.1-2.fc7.src.rpm Description: This is a metapackage that installs both Propel's runtime and generator components. Propel is an Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5. It allows you to access your database using a set of objects, providing a simple API for storing and retrieving data. Propel allows you, the web application developer, to work with databases in the same way you work with other classes and objects in PHP. -- I'm still searching for a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 12:24:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 08:24:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266841] Review Request: php-pear-Propel - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708301224.l7UCO0ZD005421@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Propel - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266841 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 12:33:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 08:33:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266941] New: Review Request: php-pear-Phing - A project build system based on Apache Ant Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266941 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Phing - A project build system based on Apache Ant Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: akahl at iconmobile.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SPECS/php-pear-Phing.spec SRPM URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SRPMS/php-pear-Phing-2.3.0-0.5.beta1.fc7.src.rpm Description: PHing Is Not GNU make; it's a project build system based on Apache Ant. You can do anything with it that you could do with a traditional build system like GNU make, and its use of simple XML build files and extensible PHP "task" classes make it an easy-to-use and highly flexible build framework. Features include file transformations (e.g. token replacement, XSLT transformation, Smarty template transformations), file system operations, interactive build support, SQL execution, CVS operations, tools for creating PEAR packages, and much more. -- This package relies on php-channel-phing, available in the same repository. This is a beta version containing many new important features like PHPUnit3 support and works well, i.e. stable for me. I'm still searching for a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 12:33:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 08:33:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266941] Review Request: php-pear-Phing - A project build system based on Apache Ant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708301233.l7UCXtpC004667@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Phing - A project build system based on Apache Ant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266941 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 12:50:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 08:50:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234326] Review Request: bandsaw - A syslog monitoring program for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708301250.l7UCoN3C007160@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bandsaw - A syslog monitoring program for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234326 ------- Additional Comments From dtimms at iinet.net.au 2007-08-30 08:50 EST ------- Damien: Do you think you will get time to continue working on this package to bring it up to par, or would you rather someone else proceed from here ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 12:54:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 08:54:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708301254.l7UCsm3O007479@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-08-30 08:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #49) > I think that the descriptions could be ameliorated. > They are too detailed in my opinion, and at the same time > they don't cover what is really in the package. Moreover > some packages that are to be installed as dependencies > don't need to have such a verbose description. I propose > the following, mainly taken from the existing descriptions > of course, these are just suggestions: > > %description > TeX Live is an easy way to get up and running with TeX. > It provides a comprehensive TeX system. The texlive package > contains many binaries and scripts, including tex. > Usually, TeX is used in conjunction with a higher level formatting > package like LaTeX or PlainTeX, since TeX by itself is not very > user-friendly. > > Install texlive if you want to use the TeX text formatting system. Consider > to install texlive-latex (a higher level formatting package which provides > an easier-to-use interface for TeX). > > The TeX documentation is located in the texlive-doc package. Ok, I updated the desription. > > %description afm > texlive-afm provides afm2tfm, a converter for PostScript font metric > files. I let this one more verbose. > %description dvips > Dvips converts .dvi files to PostScript(TM) format. I reduced the description to: "Dvips converts .dvi files produced by the TeX text formatting system to PostScript(TM) format." and let the remaining paragraph intact since it describes useful instalation information. We can tidy it up again as soon as the subpackaging structure of texlive will be clear. > %description fonts > This package contains programs required to generate font files > for the TeX system. The kpathsea related programs are also > in this package, they are needed in order to find out a file > in the TeX file tree. I substituted the original description by yours. > %description latex > LaTeX is a front end for the TeX text formatting system. Easier to > use than TeX. LaTeX is essentially a set of TeX macros which provide > convenient, predefined document formats for users. It also allows to > compile LaTeX files directly to PDF format. > > The TeX documentation is located in the texlive-doc package. Updated. > %description xdvi > Xdvi allows you to preview .dvi files on an X Window System. > > > > > It seems to me that not removing t1lib is wrong, since > reautoconf has already been done: > # t1lib: use t1lib.ac and withenable.ac if reautoconf Fixed. > Why not use the external autoconf-2.13? Why we should? > Most the Requires should certainly be %{version}-%{release} > That way, if there is a fix that needs to be in 2 dependent > subpackages and if the user updates only one of the 2, > the other will be dragged in. Obviously not true for the > *-errata subpackages, but at least for all the subpackages from > the same source package. > > There is an Obsoletes for tetex-tex4ht remaining. Removed. > There are BuildRequires within subpackages. This is not > wrong, but in my opinion it is easier to follow if all > the BuildRequires are in the beginning. I'd let it as is IMO. > You should remove > --add-category Application Removed. > disdvi should certainly be in dviutils (if at all in texlive) > and I guess it is the same for dvipng. > Same probably applies for: %{_bindir}/dvicopy %{_bindir}/dvihp %{_bindir}/dvipdfm %{_bindir}/dvipdft %{_bindir}/dvipng %{_bindir}/dvitomp %{_bindir}/dvitype %{_bindir}/odvicopy %{_bindir}/odvitype %{_bindir}/dvipos I moved them to -dvi and added new %post scriptlet for dvipng.info installation. > maybe xelatex would better be in texlive-latex? Moved. > > files/directories installed in usr/share/texmf/texconfig > are not usefull (except for tcfmgr*), they are only > useful when using the dialog from texlive. Removed. > usr/share/texmf/web2c/*.pool are also in texlive-texmf. > > and mf.pool is in 2 packages. Fixed. > mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_texmf_var} > is redundant Fixed. > Maybe xetex and context related binaries (and similar in texmf) > could be in separate packages, but it is not completely obvious > either. What could be interesting, however, would be to group > the utilities that are context related and those that are > xetex related. This would need a bit more effort, but seems reasonable. > Maybe you could use my patch from Comment #28? Applied. > The timestamps are not kept during install. In general doing > make INSTALL='install -p' is sufficient but in that case it > may need some testing. I add -p to all install calls. > Also in the explicit install call of noarch files, you could > add -p, like in > install -p -m 644 COPYRIGHT ChangeLog %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/texmf/doc/mendexk > > after the iconv you can use > touch -r COPYRIGHT.jis %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/texmf/doc/mendexk/COPYRIGHT.jis To preserve timestamps? I wouldn't care for these. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 13:01:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 09:01:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708301301.l7UD19Yh012299@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-08-30 09:01 EST ------- The patch in comment #28 was already applied before among the Mandriva patches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 13:35:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 09:35:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708301335.l7UDZkbR014294@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-08-30 09:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #57) > The patch in comment #28 was already applied before among the Mandriva patches. Indeed, but in comment #28 it is modified (I removed the parts that weren't relevant anymore). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 13:34:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 09:34:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708301334.l7UDYkb3013821@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-08-30 09:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #56) > > disdvi should certainly be in dviutils (if at all in texlive) > > and I guess it is the same for dvipng. > > > > Same probably applies for: > %{_bindir}/dvicopy > %{_bindir}/dvihp > %{_bindir}/dvipdfm > %{_bindir}/dvipdft > %{_bindir}/dvipng > %{_bindir}/dvitomp > %{_bindir}/dvitype > %{_bindir}/odvicopy > %{_bindir}/odvitype > %{_bindir}/dvipos makempx uses dvitomp, the other seems indeed to better be in dviutils. > I moved them to -dvi and added new %post scriptlet for dvipng.info installation. > > Maybe xetex and context related binaries (and similar in texmf) > > could be in separate packages, but it is not completely obvious > > either. What could be interesting, however, would be to group > > the utilities that are context related and those that are > > xetex related. > > This would need a bit more effort, but seems reasonable. I have just noticed that xetex and xelatex uses dvipdfmx. So taking dvipdfmx from texlive makes sense. Still I think that it would be better to have it in a subpackage, to be able to easily replace it if needed. For the name (with or without texlive-) it isn't an obvious choice: * with texlive it marks that it is not the upstream dvipdfmx * without texlive- it is easier to split and unsplit. I checked that the other utilities I propose to split off are not needed by other scripts or binaries. > To preserve timestamps? I wouldn't care for these. Right. Would be better, in my opinion, but definitively after the import. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 13:40:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 09:40:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708301340.l7UDegI9019903@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 ------- Additional Comments From nadia.derbey at bull.net 2007-08-30 09:40 EST ------- I finally found another location for my files, since sourceforge is still unreachable via ssh: SPEC URL: http://www.bullopensource.org/libtune/libtune.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bullopensource.org/libtune/libtune-0.12-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 13:43:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 09:43:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243211] Review Request: chestnut-dialer - PPP (Point to Point Protocol) dialing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708301343.l7UDhGLQ020158@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chestnut-dialer - PPP (Point to Point Protocol) dialing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243211 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-08-30 09:43 EST ------- GPL is not a valid value for the license tag anymore: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#head-f21ae23bf2f278444e2c385463cfa74a502396b8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 13:50:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 09:50:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251020] Review Request: libflaim - Flaim Database Engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708301350.l7UDo97v016678@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libflaim - Flaim Database Engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251020 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-08-30 09:50 EST ------- - static libraries should be in a -static package or not packaged at all: %{_libdir}/libflaim.a - see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-2302ec1e1f44202c9cc4bcce24cb711266557ad7 - - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). -> Add Reuires: pkgconfig to %package devel - you should use $RPM_OPT_FLAGS instead of %optflags: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-f3d77b27a5d29dfc1f5600ef3fc836f2e317badf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 14:00:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 10:00:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708301400.l7UE0qFU018401@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-08-30 10:00 EST ------- Ok, some other issues with the spec file: >%define base_kernel %(rpm -q --queryformat='%{VERSION}' --whatprovides >kernel-headers) >%define family FC >%define frelease %(rpm -q --queryformat='%{VERSION}' fedora-release) >%define distro_string %{family}%{frelease} seems like the only one used from them is the "base_kernel" drop the other ones and use uname -r instead of rpm to get the kernel version; this also means you have to require the extact kernel version it is build against or isn't this needed? ---------------- >License: GPL/LGPL the license guidlines changed please see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing ----------------- Remove the dot from the end of the description ----------------- use %{dist} for distro_string ----------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 14:03:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 10:03:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254209] Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708301403.l7UE3jts023656@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254209 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-08-30 10:03 EST ------- re, sorry for the delay on this post. well, from lib-gw-*.La (where those libtool archives have been removed from the package as well) COuld you tell me if there something wrong with this ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 14:13:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 10:13:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254209] Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708301413.l7UEDY0u025476@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254209 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-30 10:13 EST ------- Well, now I assume that the dlopen'ed name is *.so.0.. Then would you fix the left issues I noted on the comment 7? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 14:25:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 10:25:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249548] Review Request: fedora-ds-admin - Administration server used by Fedora Directory Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708301425.l7UEPZ0A027958@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds-admin - Administration server used by Fedora Directory Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249548 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dennis at ausil.us Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 14:51:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 10:51:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251020] Review Request: libflaim - Flaim Database Engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708301451.l7UEp8Kq026529@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libflaim - Flaim Database Engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251020 ------- Additional Comments From snecklifter at gmail.com 2007-08-30 10:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) Thanks for the review Till. > - static libraries should be in a -static package or not packaged at all: > %{_libdir}/libflaim.a - see: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-2302ec1e1f44202c9cc4bcce24cb711266557ad7 Done. > - - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' > (for directory ownership and usability). > -> Add Reuires: pkgconfig to %package devel Done. > - you should use $RPM_OPT_FLAGS instead of %optflags: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-f3d77b27a5d29dfc1f5600ef3fc836f2e317badf Done. Updated pkgs at: http://snecker.fedorapeople.org/libflaim/ I am still working on iFolder and simias which are the other two packages that form the reqs necessary to get iFolder working on Fedora. Regards Chris -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 15:25:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:25:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253579] Review Request: php-pecl-memcache - Extension to work with the Memcached caching daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708301525.l7UFPsLd007612@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-memcache - Extension to work with the Memcached caching daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253579 fedora at famillecollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2007-08-30 11:25 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pecl-memcache Short Description: Extension to work with the Memcached caching daemon Owners: remi Branches: F-7, FC-6, EL-5, EL-4 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 15:33:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:33:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708301533.l7UFXcn2000977@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-08-30 11:33 EST ------- What about the proposal here, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/TeXNaming that is add virtual Provides to texlive related packages? This is more for post-import, but may be discussed before. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 15:37:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:37:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254048] Review Request: biosdevname - udev helper for naming devices per BIOS names In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708301537.l7UFbBa0001812@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: biosdevname - udev helper for naming devices per BIOS names https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254048 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-08-30 11:37 EST ------- Spec and resulting package look good to go. I'll just need to runtime test the actual binary package. The %description could maybe be changed from : "takes an kernel name" to "takes a device kernel name" (or "takes a kernel device name"?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 15:54:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:54:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226302] Merge Review: pm-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708301554.l7UFsK8E004286@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pm-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226302 Bug 226302 depends on bug 233906, which changed state. Bug 233906 Summary: pm-utils: unowned directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233906 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 15:59:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:59:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253434] Review Request: eclipse-rpm-editor - RPM Specfile editor for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708301559.l7UFxZtU013522@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-rpm-editor - RPM Specfile editor for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253434 ------- Additional Comments From alcapcom at gmail.com 2007-08-30 11:59 EST ------- Right, the plugins should work without rpmlint but it that case rpmlint warnings should not be showed in the editor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 16:05:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 12:05:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253434] Review Request: eclipse-rpm-editor - RPM Specfile editor for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708301605.l7UG50xw014814@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-rpm-editor - RPM Specfile editor for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253434 ------- Additional Comments From alcapcom at gmail.com 2007-08-30 12:05 EST ------- Oups, without the patch I expect the same result. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 16:05:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 12:05:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254048] Review Request: biosdevname - udev helper for naming devices per BIOS names In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708301605.l7UG5aCt015334@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: biosdevname - udev helper for naming devices per BIOS names https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254048 ------- Additional Comments From matt_domsch at dell.com 2007-08-30 12:05 EST ------- Spec %description changed to say "takes a kernel device name". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 16:23:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 12:23:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226602] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-joystick In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708301623.l7UGN2rd009020@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-joystick https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226602 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matthias at rpmforge.net, xgl- | |maint at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-08-30 12:23 EST ------- ...but nothing obsoletes it, so I have a bunch of Fedora 7 systems updated from previous releases which still have this package installed. If another package now provides the joystick driver, it should have : Obsoletes: xorg-x11-drv-joystick <= 1.1.0 or something similar, to ensure its removal on upgraded systems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 16:24:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 12:24:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226590] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-elo2300 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708301624.l7UGOhBE018658@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-elo2300 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226590 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matthias at rpmforge.net, xgl- | |maint at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-08-30 12:24 EST ------- ...but nothing obsoletes it, so I have a bunch of Fedora 7 systems updated from previous releases which still have this package installed. If another package now provides the elo2300 driver, it should have : Obsoletes: xorg-x11-drv-elo2300 <= 1.1.0 or something similar, to ensure its removal on upgraded systems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 16:29:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 12:29:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226302] Merge Review: pm-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708301629.l7UGTJvL019522@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pm-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226302 Bug 226302 depends on bug 233906, which changed state. Bug 233906 Summary: pm-utils: unowned directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233906 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 16:40:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 12:40:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254209] Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708301640.l7UGe6Ol022010@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254209 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-08-30 12:40 EST ------- okay, Spec : http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/g-wrap/g-wrap.spec SRPM : http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/g-wrap/g-wrap-1.9.9-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 16:39:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 12:39:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254048] Review Request: biosdevname - udev helper for naming devices per BIOS names In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708301639.l7UGdApg021557@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: biosdevname - udev helper for naming devices per BIOS names https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254048 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-08-30 12:39 EST ------- Okay, package approved! Seems like my workstation's BIOS doesn't override much, though (Precision 490), but the package didn't break anything either ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 16:53:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 12:53:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226302] Merge Review: pm-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708301653.l7UGrRo0024137@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pm-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226302 Bug 226302 depends on bug 233906, which changed state. Bug 233906 Summary: pm-utils: unowned directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233906 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 16:59:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 12:59:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225667] Merge Review: cryptsetup-luks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708301659.l7UGxkxE014192@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: cryptsetup-luks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225667 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-30 12:59 EST ------- Well, at least for now, we have decided to do package renames as follows: - Create the new package name. - Follow the end of life package guidelines on the old package in the branches where it is being replaced. - Maintainer imports the package into the new name (with Obsoletes/Provides if needed). The cvs history is maintained in the old package's cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 17:18:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 13:18:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225667] Merge Review: cryptsetup-luks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708301718.l7UHIx6w017254@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: cryptsetup-luks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225667 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-08-30 13:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Well, at least for now, we have decided to do package renames as follows: > > - Create the new package name. How is this done? Just rebuild cryptsetup-luks with name cryptsetup and a cryptsetup.spec? And are you sure that this will not break anything because there is already a cryptsetup component in Bugzilla? (There was a cryptsetup packege in FC 2 and 3) according to http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/rpms/cryptsetup/?root=core And do I have to manually copy the acls from PackageDB into a fedora-cvs request template? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 17:30:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 13:30:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226302] Merge Review: pm-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708301730.l7UHUF3p030794@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pm-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226302 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(pknirsch at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-08-30 13:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > 1. Is there no upstream repo for this package? > Perhaps you could add it to 'hosted.fedoraproject.org' so it has some upstream > presense? There is http://webcvs.freedesktop.org/pm-utils/pm-utils/ but I did not yet find any source for tarballs. > Also upstream for radeontool and vbetool links would be nice. I guess for vbetool there is only the directory where the source comes from, for radeontoll I added something to the spec. > rpmlint on pm-utils-0.19.1-6.fc7.src.rpm > W: pm-utils no-url-tag > > Would be nice to have upstream. I added http://pm-utils.freedesktop.org/, where it is planned to add some information according to the pm-utils mailinglist. > W: pm-utils unversioned-explicit-obsoletes vbetool > W: pm-utils unversioned-explicit-provides vbetool > W: pm-utils unversioned-explicit-obsoletes radeontool > > Would be very nice to provides versions on these if they are split out later. Would this be better? Obsoletes: vbetool < 0.7-0 Provides: vbetool = 0.7-0 Obsoletes: radeontool < 1.5-0 Provides: radeontool = 1.5-0 I will look into the other issues later, but it may need some time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 19:05:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:05:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253434] Review Request: eclipse-rpm-editor - RPM Specfile editor for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708301905.l7UJ5RqB001273@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-rpm-editor - RPM Specfile editor for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253434 overholt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-08-30 15:05 EST ------- Alright, then let's get this in there and we can work out any kinks with the rpmlint version later (including removing that functionality temporarily if necessary). Approved Thanks, Alphonse. Don't forget to do the fedora-cvs ? and template thing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 19:13:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:13:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 265841] Review Request: blcr - Berkeley Lab Checkpoint/Restart for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708301913.l7UJD7Fu002276@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blcr - Berkeley Lab Checkpoint/Restart for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=265841 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2007-08-30 15:13 EST ------- Updated spec to fix rpmlint complaints https://nbecker.dyndns.org/RPM/blcr-0.6.0_b7-3.spec https://nbecker.dyndns.org/RPM/blcr-0.6.0_b7-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 19:20:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:20:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708301920.l7UJKSnQ003578@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208034 paul_kunz at slac.stanford.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(paul_kunz at slac.sta| |nford.edu) | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-25 11:31 EST ------- ping again? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-25 11:31 EST ------- ping again? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-25 22:38 EST ------- (In case my comment is not delivered due to yesterday's bugzilla maintenance, I write one more ping...) ------- Additional Comments From paul_kunz at slac.stanford.edu 2007-08-30 15:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #75) > (In case my comment is not delivered due to yesterday's bugzilla > maintenance, I write one more ping...) commetn #71 and onward was not received by e-mail. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 19:23:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:23:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708301923.l7UJNjfU017235@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208034 paul_kunz at slac.stanford.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From paul_kunz at slac.stanford.edu 2007-08-30 15:23 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: HippoDraw Short Description: nteractive and Python scriptable data analysis application Owners: pfkeb Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: pfkeb Cvsextras Commits:yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 19:53:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:53:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244894] Review Request: yum-cron - get yum updates via a cron job In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708301953.l7UJriaZ023325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yum-cron - get yum updates via a cron job https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244894 ------- Additional Comments From bill+redhat at bfccomputing.com 2007-08-30 15:53 EST ------- For those impatient to wait for this to hit the updates repo, this worked for me on F7 to pull it from testing: yum --enablerepo=updates-testing install yum-cron and accept the testing key,. Probably obvious to many, but I had to look it up. I have no idea why, but the first run on the first F7 machine I tried it on took 5.5 hours on a 2.5GHz P4 server (to install 41 updates). That was completely surprising, as yum never takes that long to do anything but 'yum upgrade' a distro. Subsequent runs take a normal amount of time, but this is likely a yum problem anyway, not a yum-cron problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 20:07:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:07:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226478] Merge Review: tar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708302007.l7UK7tau027388@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: tar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226478 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 21:19:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 17:19:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 269421] New: Review Request: eclipse-egit - Eclipse Git plugin Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=269421 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-egit - Eclipse Git plugin Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bkonrath at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://bagu.org/eclipse/eclipse-egit.spec SRPM URL: http://bagu.org/eclipse/eclipse-egit-0.2.2-0.git20070826.fc8.src.rpm Description: The eclipse-egit package contains Eclipse plugins for interacting with Git repositories. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 21:19:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 17:19:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 269441] New: Review Request: dvgrab - A program to copy Digital Video data from a DV camcorder Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=269441 Summary: Review Request: dvgrab - A program to copy Digital Video data from a DV camcorder Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rpm at greysector.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/dvgrab.spec SRPM URL: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/dvgrab-3.0-1.src.rpm Description: dvgrab copies digital video data from a DV camcorder. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 21:29:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 17:29:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250463] Review Request: python-pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708302129.l7ULTxBJ028811@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250463 michael at laptop.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michael at laptop.org ------- Additional Comments From michael at laptop.org 2007-08-30 17:29 EST ------- New spec file: http://dev.laptop.org/~mstone/releases/pyvserver.spec New SRPM: http://dev.laptop.org/~mstone/releases/pyvserver-1.0-0.2.20070830git1e20c7.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 21:34:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 17:34:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254209] Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708302134.l7ULYeut018367@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254209 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-08-30 17:34 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: g-wrap Short Description: A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries Owners: laxathom Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 Devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 23:25:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 19:25:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 269941] New: Review Request: gmyth - MythTV remote access libraries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=269941 Summary: Review Request: gmyth - MythTV remote access libraries Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bnocera at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/bnocera/gmyth/gmyth.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/bnocera/gmyth/gmyth-0.4-1.src.rpm Description: GMyth is a library used by applications to access content provided by the MythTV set-top box framework, such as Live TV broadcasts, TV recordings, or TV listings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 23:33:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 19:33:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708302333.l7UNXs1Y013147@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-30 19:33 EST ------- cvsadmin done. You can import the srpm now with common/cvs-import.sh. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 30 23:54:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 19:54:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253805] Review Request: scim-array - Array 30 input method engine for SCIM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708302354.l7UNsjLJ004553@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-array - Array 30 input method engine for SCIM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253805 dchen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 00:01:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 20:01:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197609] Review Request: poster In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708310001.l7V01lZN016931@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poster Alias: poster-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197609 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-30 20:01 EST ------- Yes it is needed but please make request again with your FAS username not your bz email address - the process has been updated for pkgdb: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 00:42:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 20:42:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251826] Review Request: maniadrive-music - Replacement soundtrack for the non free ManiaDrive soundtrack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708310042.l7V0gGxa031229@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maniadrive-music - Replacement soundtrack for the non free ManiaDrive soundtrack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251826 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-30 20:42 EST ------- Sorry need your FAS username for the Owner field. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 00:48:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 20:48:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253469] Review Request: opyum - Offline package installation and update tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708310048.l7V0mN0t023510@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opyum - Offline package installation and update tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253469 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-30 20:48 EST ------- Please re-request using your FAS username in the Owners field. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 01:38:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 21:38:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 263121] Review Request: pharosc - VLSI and ASIC Technology Standard Cell Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708310138.l7V1crmh005452@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pharosc - VLSI and ASIC Technology Standard Cell Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=263121 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-30 21:38 EST ------- (You could also use %{nil} under %build but a comment is probably better.) request done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 01:38:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 21:38:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254209] Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708310138.l7V1cwgV029556@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254209 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-30 21:38 EST ------- updated -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 01:38:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 21:38:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 265661] Review Request: python-boto - A simple lightweight interface to Amazon Web Services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708310138.l7V1cpne029518@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-boto - A simple lightweight interface to Amazon Web Services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=265661 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-30 21:38 EST ------- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 01:39:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 21:39:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708310139.l7V1d3vF029589@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-30 21:39 EST ------- cvs request done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 01:39:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 21:39:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253579] Review Request: php-pecl-memcache - Extension to work with the Memcached caching daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708310139.l7V1d6pb029618@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-memcache - Extension to work with the Memcached caching daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253579 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-30 21:39 EST ------- request done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 01:39:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 21:39:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708310139.l7V1dE6v005594@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208034 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-30 21:39 EST ------- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 02:13:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 22:13:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252124] Review Request: filezilla - FileZilla is a fast FTP and SFTP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708310213.l7V2Dl3d009679@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filezilla - FileZilla is a fast FTP and SFTP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252124 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-08-30 22:13 EST ------- SRPMS: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/7/testing/filezilla/filezilla-3.0.0-0.2.rc2.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm SPEC: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/7/testing/filezilla/filezilla.spec Description: FileZilla is a fast FTP and SFTP client -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 05:13:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 01:13:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252124] Review Request: filezilla - FileZilla is a fast FTP and SFTP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708310513.l7V5DBoa026885@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filezilla - FileZilla is a fast FTP and SFTP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252124 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-31 01:13 EST ------- rpmlint reports on SRPM W: filezilla mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 76) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. rpmlint reports on RPM E: filezilla invalid-desktopfile /tmp/filezilla-3.0.0-0.2.rc2.fc8.i386.rpm.32204/usr/share/applications/filezilla.desktop .desktop file is not valid, check with desktop-file-validate Encoding field is missing from .desktop file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 05:21:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 01:21:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225909] Merge Review: iputils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708310521.l7V5LXCo028127@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: iputils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225909 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-31 01:21 EST ------- rpmlint on binary rpm gave me W: iputils mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 109, tab: line 70) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. I: iputils checking W: iputils symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/man/man8/ping6.8.gz /usr/share/man/man8/ping.8.gz Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot environments. W: iputils symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/man/man8/tracepath6.8.gz /usr/share/man/man8/tracepath.8.gz Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot environments. E: iputils setuid-binary /bin/ping6 root 04755 The file is setuid, this may be dangerous, especially if this file is setuid root. E: iputils non-standard-executable-perm /bin/ping6 04755 A standard executable should have permission set to 0755. If you get this message, it means that you have a wrong executable permissions in some files included in your package. E: iputils setuid-binary /bin/ping root 04755 The file is setuid, this may be dangerous, especially if this file is setuid root. E: iputils non-standard-executable-perm /bin/ping 04755 A standard executable should have permission set to 0755. If you get this message, it means that you have a wrong executable permissions in some files included in your package. W: iputils symlink-should-be-relative /usr/sbin/tracepath /bin/tracepath Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot environments. W: iputils symlink-should-be-relative /usr/sbin/ping6 /bin/ping6 Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot environments. W: iputils symlink-should-be-relative /usr/sbin/arping /sbin/arping Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot environments. W: iputils symlink-should-be-relative /usr/sbin/tracepath6 /bin/tracepath6 Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot environments. W: iputils incoherent-init-script-name rdisc The init script name should be the same as the package name in lower case, or one with 'd' appended if it invokes a process by that name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 05:22:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 01:22:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225903] Merge Review: iproute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708310522.l7V5MIvD004734@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: iproute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225903 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-31 01:22 EST ------- rpmlint output on SRPM and RPM W: iproute invalid-license GPL The value of the License tag was not recognized. Known values are: "Affero GPL", "AFL", "ASL 1.0", "ASL 1.0+", "ASL 1.1", "ASL 1.1+", "ASL 2.0", "ASL 2.0+", "APSL 2.0", "APSL 2.0+", "Artistic 2.0", "Artistic clarified", "BitTorrent", "Boost", "BSD", "BSD with advertising", "CeCILL", "CDDL", "CPL", "Condor", "Copyright only", "Cryptix", "Crystal Stacker", "EPL", "eCos", "EFL 2.0", "EFL 2.0+", "EU Datagrid", "Giftware", "Glide", "GPL+", "GPL+ or Artistic", "GPLv2", "GPLv2 with exceptions", "GPLv2+", "GPLv3", "GPLv3+", "IBM", "IJG", "iMatix", "Intel ACPI", "Interbase", "ISC", "Jabber", "JasPer", "LGPLv2", "LGPLv2 with exceptions", "LGPLv2+", "LGPLv3", "LGPLv3+", "libtiff", "LPL", "LPPL", "mecab-ipadic", "MIT", "MPLv1.0", "MPLv1.0+", "MPLv1.1", "MPLv1.1+", "NCSA", "NGPL", "NOSL", "Netscape", "Nokia", "OpenLDAP", "OSL 1.0", "OSL 1.0+", "OSL 2.0", "OSL 2.0+", "OSL 3.0", "OSL 3.0+", "OpenSSL", "Phorum", "PHP", "Public Domain", "Python", "QPL", "RPSL", "Ruby", "Sleepycat", "SISSL", "SPL", "TCL", "UCD", "Vim", "VNLSL", "VSL", "W3C", "WTFPL", "wxWindows", "xinetd", "Zend", "ZPLv1.0", "ZPLv1.0+", "ZPLv2.0", "ZPLv2.0+", "zlib", "CDL", "FBSDDL", "GFDL", "Open Publication", "CC-BY", "CC- BY-SA", "DSL", "Free Art", "Arphic", "Bitstream Vera", "mplus", "OFL", "Utopia", "Redistributable, no modification permitted", "Freely redistributable without restriction". W: iproute unversioned-explicit-obsoletes shapecfg The specfile contains an unversioned Obsoletes: token, which will match all older, equal and newer versions of the obsoleted thing. This may cause update problems, restrict future package/provides naming, and may match something it was originally not inteded to match -- make the Obsoletes versioned if possible. W: iproute mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 10, tab: line 44) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. I: iproute checking W: iproute file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/man8/ss.8.gz The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in the specfile for example using iconv(1). W: iproute obsolete-not-provided shapecfg If a package is obsoleted by a compatible replacement, the obsoleted package must also be provided in order to provide clean upgrade paths and not cause unnecessary dependency breakage. If the obsoleting package is not a compatible replacement for the old one, leave out the provides. E: iproute only-non-binary-in-usr-lib There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share. correct above and update SPEC in CVS for further review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 05:25:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 01:25:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225911] Merge Review: ipvsadm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708310525.l7V5PNLG005340@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ipvsadm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225911 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-31 01:25 EST ------- Correct Buildroot. Use macros. check http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros Though dist tag is not mandatory but its good to have it in SPEC. update SPEC for further review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 05:36:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 01:36:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708310536.l7V5aIUm006579@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-31 01:36 EST ------- One note: When rebuild is done, you can close this bug as NEXTRELEASE. Then this review request finishes. After that, as currently Ice does not support ppc64, please * create a new bug report with component "Ice" which tells that currently Ice does not support ppc64. * And make the bug block bug 238953. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 06:13:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 02:13:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253469] Review Request: opyum - Offline package installation and update tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708310613.l7V6DFjE003287@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opyum - Offline package installation and update tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253469 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-08-31 02:13 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: opyum Short Description: Offline package installation and update tools. Owners: rishi Branches: FC-6, F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 06:13:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 02:13:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246525] Review Request: libMini - A high-performance terrain rendering library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708310613.l7V6DCup011859@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libMini - A high-performance terrain rendering library Alias: mini https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246525 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-08-31 02:13 EST ------- Any news ? there is a : libMini 8.3 (stable, with sea rendering) But unfortunately, no autotools added... Do we have a chance to have autotools in libMini ? Also, it would be fine to have sources not melted with binaries... If ever it is not, then you should made a snapshot script that will: - Remove unneeded files (binaries) - patch the autotools. - run autogen (aclocal, autoconf, automake ) - make dist Then, updload the tarball from a place (but ideally, from upstream website) This snapshot script will have to be sourced (Souce10: libMini-snapshot.sh ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 06:18:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 02:18:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708310618.l7V6IkMd012606@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 mefoster at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 06:16:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 02:16:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253469] Review Request: opyum - Offline package installation and update tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708310616.l7V6GrDu012535@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opyum - Offline package installation and update tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253469 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 06:18:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 02:18:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247556] Review Request: ice-java - Java runtime files for Ice In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708310618.l7V6IkPe012626@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ice-java - Java runtime files for Ice https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247556 Bug 247556 depends on bug 234612, which changed state. Bug 234612 Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 06:18:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 02:18:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247557] Review Request: ice-dotnet - .Net runtime files for Ice In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708310618.l7V6IlWm012650@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ice-dotnet - .Net runtime files for Ice https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247557 Bug 247557 depends on bug 234612, which changed state. Bug 234612 Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 06:45:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 02:45:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251826] Review Request: maniadrive-music - Replacement soundtrack for the non free ManiaDrive soundtrack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708310645.l7V6jQ2o021752@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maniadrive-music - Replacement soundtrack for the non free ManiaDrive soundtrack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251826 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-31 02:45 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: maniadrive-music Short Description: Replacement soundtrack for the non free ManiaDrive soundtrack Owners: jwrdegoede Branches: devel only! InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes Note, this _really_ is devel only, as mania drive needs a new php sub-package which is only in Rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 06:50:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 02:50:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251826] Review Request: maniadrive-music - Replacement soundtrack for the non free ManiaDrive soundtrack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708310650.l7V6oCaG022584@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maniadrive-music - Replacement soundtrack for the non free ManiaDrive soundtrack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251826 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 08:28:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 04:28:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197609] Review Request: poster In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708310828.l7V8SPm8027629@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poster Alias: poster-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197609 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-08-31 04:28 EST ------- Jens thanhs for pointing that out. Btw it was quite easy to get the FAS username from my Bugzilla account name ;) Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: poster New Branches: F-7 Updated Fedora Owners: lkundrak -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 08:34:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 04:34:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708310834.l7V8YE8M004555@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-08-31 04:34 EST ------- cjkunifonts-0.1.20060928-4.fc8 imported and built by Caius. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 10:15:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 06:15:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253434] Review Request: eclipse-rpm-editor - RPM Specfile editor for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311015.l7VAFtPu018249@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-rpm-editor - RPM Specfile editor for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253434 alcapcom at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From alcapcom at gmail.com 2007-08-31 06:15 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: eclipse-rpm-editor Short Description: RPM Specfile editor for Eclipse Owners: alcapcom,overholt Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: overholt Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 10:40:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 06:40:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226433] Merge Review: stardict In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311040.l7VAekIL012789@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: stardict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226433 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|majain at redhat.com |zhu at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-31 06:40 EST ------- rpmlint on binary RPM gave -> I: stardict checking W: stardict non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/stardict.schemas A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. W: stardict invalid-license GPL The value of the License tag was not recognized. Known values are: "Affero GPL", "AFL", "ASL 1.0", "ASL 1.0+", "ASL 1.1", "ASL 1.1+", "ASL 2.0", "ASL 2.0+", "APSL 2.0", "APSL 2.0+", "Artistic 2.0", "Artistic clarified", "BitTorrent", "Boost", "BSD", "BSD with advertising", "CeCILL", "CDDL", "CPL", "Condor", "Copyright only", "Cryptix", "Crystal Stacker", "EPL", "eCos", "EFL 2.0", "EFL 2.0+", "EU Datagrid", "Giftware", "Glide", "GPL+", "GPL+ or Artistic", "GPLv2", "GPLv2 with exceptions", "GPLv2+", "GPLv3", "GPLv3+", "IBM", "IJG", "iMatix", "Intel ACPI", "Interbase", "ISC", "Jabber", "JasPer", "LGPLv2", "LGPLv2 with exceptions", "LGPLv2+", "LGPLv3", "LGPLv3+", "libtiff", "LPL", "LPPL", "mecab-ipadic", "MIT", "MPLv1.0", "MPLv1.0+", "MPLv1.1", "MPLv1.1+", "NCSA", "NGPL", "NOSL", "Netscape", "Nokia", "OpenLDAP", "OSL 1.0", "OSL 1.0+", "OSL 2.0", "OSL 2.0+", "OSL 3.0", "OSL 3.0+", "OpenSSL", "Phorum", "PHP", "Public Domain", "Python", "QPL", "RPSL", "Ruby", "Sleepycat", "SISSL", "SPL", "TCL", "UCD", "Vim", "VNLSL", "VSL", "W3C", "WTFPL", "wxWindows", "xinetd", "Zend", "ZPLv1.0", "ZPLv1.0+", "ZPLv2.0", "ZPLv2.0+", "zlib", "CDL", "FBSDDL", "GFDL", "Open Publication", "CC-BY", "CC- BY-SA", "DSL", "Free Art", "Arphic", "Bitstream Vera", "mplus", "OFL", "Utopia", "Redistributable, no modification permitted", "Freely redistributable without restriction". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 10:47:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 06:47:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226428] Merge Review: speex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311047.l7VAlKOQ013518@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: speex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226428 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |matthias at rpmforge.net Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-08-31 06:47 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=183061) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=183061&action=view) Spec file patch I'll start a formal review. Attached is a suggested patch to the current development spec file : - Update to 1.2.0beta2. - Remove rpath. - Exclude static library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 10:47:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 06:47:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226430] Merge Review: squashfs-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311047.l7VAlq6Z022008@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: squashfs-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226430 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-31 06:47 EST ------- NEED:- Use of macros. Change Buildroot to current one. update license tag Can use dist tag. Also, rpmlint on binary rpm reported as W: squashfs-tools summary-not-capitalized squashfs utilities Summary doesn't begin with a capital letter. W: squashfs-tools invalid-license GPL The value of the License tag was not recognized. Known values are: "Affero GPL", "AFL", "ASL 1.0", "ASL 1.0+", "ASL 1.1", "ASL 1.1+", "ASL 2.0", "ASL 2.0+", "APSL 2.0", "APSL 2.0+", "Artistic 2.0", "Artistic clarified", "BitTorrent", "Boost", "BSD", "BSD with advertising", "CeCILL", "CDDL", "CPL", "Condor", "Copyright only", "Cryptix", "Crystal Stacker", "EPL", "eCos", "EFL 2.0", "EFL 2.0+", "EU Datagrid", "Giftware", "Glide", "GPL+", "GPL+ or Artistic", "GPLv2", "GPLv2 with exceptions", "GPLv2+", "GPLv3", "GPLv3+", "IBM", "IJG", "iMatix", "Intel ACPI", "Interbase", "ISC", "Jabber", "JasPer", "LGPLv2", "LGPLv2 with exceptions", "LGPLv2+", "LGPLv3", "LGPLv3+", "libtiff", "LPL", "LPPL", "mecab-ipadic", "MIT", "MPLv1.0", "MPLv1.0+", "MPLv1.1", "MPLv1.1+", "NCSA", "NGPL", "NOSL", "Netscape", "Nokia", "OpenLDAP", "OSL 1.0", "OSL 1.0+", "OSL 2.0", "OSL 2.0+", "OSL 3.0", "OSL 3.0+", "OpenSSL", "Phorum", "PHP", "Public Domain", "Python", "QPL", "RPSL", "Ruby", "Sleepycat", "SISSL", "SPL", "TCL", "UCD", "Vim", "VNLSL", "VSL", "W3C", "WTFPL", "wxWindows", "xinetd", "Zend", "ZPLv1.0", "ZPLv1.0+", "ZPLv2.0", "ZPLv2.0+", "zlib", "CDL", "FBSDDL", "GFDL", "Open Publication", "CC-BY", "CC- BY-SA", "DSL", "Free Art", "Arphic", "Bitstream Vera", "mplus", "OFL", "Utopia", "Redistributable, no modification permitted", "Freely redistributable without restriction". I: squashfs-tools checking W: squashfs-tools spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/squashfs-tools-3.2/ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. W: squashfs-tools spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/squashfs-tools-3.2/CHANGES The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. W: squashfs-tools spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/squashfs-tools-3.2/README The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. W: squashfs-tools spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/squashfs-tools-3.2/COPYING The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. W: squashfs-tools spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/squashfs-tools-3.2/PERFORMANCE.README The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. W: squashfs-tools summary-not-capitalized squashfs utilities Summary doesn't begin with a capital letter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 10:55:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 06:55:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226428] Merge Review: speex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311055.l7VAtXN6014685@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: speex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226428 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-08-31 06:55 EST ------- I've gone through everything, and it all looks okay. Apart from additional minor cleanups to the spec file (ugly mix of spaces and tabs), I only have one more suggestion : Split off a speex-tools package which would contain the two binaries and manual.pdf. That way, only the small library often pulled in as a dependency would be in the main speex package. This is what is often done in Fedora packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 11:11:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 07:11:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226435] Merge Review: startup-notification In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311111.l7VBBUGS025027@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: startup-notification https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226435 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-31 07:11 EST ------- rpmlint reported W: startup-notification invalid-license LGPL The value of the License tag was not recognized. Known values are: "Affero GPL", "AFL", "ASL 1.0", "ASL 1.0+", "ASL 1.1", "ASL 1.1+", "ASL 2.0", "ASL 2.0+", "APSL 2.0", "APSL 2.0+", "Artistic 2.0", "Artistic clarified", "BitTorrent", "Boost", "BSD", "BSD with advertising", "CeCILL", "CDDL", "CPL", "Condor", "Copyright only", "Cryptix", "Crystal Stacker", "EPL", "eCos", "EFL 2.0", "EFL 2.0+", "EU Datagrid", "Giftware", "Glide", "GPL+", "GPL+ or Artistic", "GPLv2", "GPLv2 with exceptions", "GPLv2+", "GPLv3", "GPLv3+", "IBM", "IJG", "iMatix", "Intel ACPI", "Interbase", "ISC", "Jabber", "JasPer", "LGPLv2", "LGPLv2 with exceptions", "LGPLv2+", "LGPLv3", "LGPLv3+", "libtiff", "LPL", "LPPL", "mecab-ipadic", "MIT", "MPLv1.0", "MPLv1.0+", "MPLv1.1", "MPLv1.1+", "NCSA", "NGPL", "NOSL", "Netscape", "Nokia", "OpenLDAP", "OSL 1.0", "OSL 1.0+", "OSL 2.0", "OSL 2.0+", "OSL 3.0", "OSL 3.0+", "OpenSSL", "Phorum", "PHP", "Public Domain", "Python", "QPL", "RPSL", "Ruby", "Sleepycat", "SISSL", "SPL", "TCL", "UCD", "Vim", "VNLSL", "VSL", "W3C", "WTFPL", "wxWindows", "xinetd", "Zend", "ZPLv1.0", "ZPLv1.0+", "ZPLv2.0", "ZPLv2.0+", "zlib", "CDL", "FBSDDL", "GFDL", "Open Publication", "CC-BY", "CC- BY-SA", "DSL", "Free Art", "Arphic", "Bitstream Vera", "mplus", "OFL", "Utopia", "Redistributable, no modification permitted", "Freely redistributable without restriction". W: startup-notification macro-in-%changelog makeinstall Macros are expanded in %changelog too, which can in unfortunate cases lead to the package not building at all, or other subtle unexpected conditions that affect the build. Even when that doesn't happen, the expansion results in possibly "rewriting history" on subsequent package revisions and generally odd entries eg. in source rpms, which is rarely wanted. Avoid use of macros in %changelog altogether, or use two '%'s to escape them, like '%%foo'. update SPEC in cvs for further review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 11:20:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 07:20:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225903] Merge Review: iproute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311120.l7VBK9e1017956@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: iproute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225903 mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmaslano at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2007-08-31 07:20 EST ------- W: iproute unversioned-explicit-obsoletes shapecfg I think obsoletes is only warning. E: iproute only-non-binary-in-usr-lib There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share. Movin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 11:27:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 07:27:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226360] Merge Review: readahead In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311127.l7VBRW4n018747@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: readahead https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226360 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-31 07:27 EST ------- NEEDS work rpmlint said W: readahead invalid-license GPL The value of the License tag was not recognized. Known values are: "Affero GPL", "AFL", "ASL 1.0", "ASL 1.0+", "ASL 1.1", "ASL 1.1+", "ASL 2.0", "ASL 2.0+", "APSL 2.0", "APSL 2.0+", "Artistic 2.0", "Artistic clarified", "BitTorrent", "Boost", "BSD", "BSD with advertising", "CeCILL", "CDDL", "CPL", "Condor", "Copyright only", "Cryptix", "Crystal Stacker", "EPL", "eCos", "EFL 2.0", "EFL 2.0+", "EU Datagrid", "Giftware", "Glide", "GPL+", "GPL+ or Artistic", "GPLv2", "GPLv2 with exceptions", "GPLv2+", "GPLv3", "GPLv3+", "IBM", "IJG", "iMatix", "Intel ACPI", "Interbase", "ISC", "Jabber", "JasPer", "LGPLv2", "LGPLv2 with exceptions", "LGPLv2+", "LGPLv3", "LGPLv3+", "libtiff", "LPL", "LPPL", "mecab-ipadic", "MIT", "MPLv1.0", "MPLv1.0+", "MPLv1.1", "MPLv1.1+", "NCSA", "NGPL", "NOSL", "Netscape", "Nokia", "OpenLDAP", "OSL 1.0", "OSL 1.0+", "OSL 2.0", "OSL 2.0+", "OSL 3.0", "OSL 3.0+", "OpenSSL", "Phorum", "PHP", "Public Domain", "Python", "QPL", "RPSL", "Ruby", "Sleepycat", "SISSL", "SPL", "TCL", "UCD", "Vim", "VNLSL", "VSL", "W3C", "WTFPL", "wxWindows", "xinetd", "Zend", "ZPLv1.0", "ZPLv1.0+", "ZPLv2.0", "ZPLv2.0+", "zlib", "CDL", "FBSDDL", "GFDL", "Open Publication", "CC-BY", "CC- BY-SA", "DSL", "Free Art", "Arphic", "Bitstream Vera", "mplus", "OFL", "Utopia", "Redistributable, no modification permitted", "Freely redistributable without restriction". W: readahead conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/readahead.d/default.early A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here W: readahead conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/readahead.d/default.later A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here W: readahead service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/readahead_later The service is enabled by default after "chkconfig --add"; for security reasons, most services should not be. Use "-" as the default runlevel in the init script's "chkconfig:" line and/or remove the "Default-Start:" LSB keyword to fix this if appropriate for this service. W: readahead service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/readahead_early The service is enabled by default after "chkconfig --add"; for security reasons, most services should not be. Use "-" as the default runlevel in the init script's "chkconfig:" line and/or remove the "Default-Start:" LSB keyword to fix this if appropriate for this service. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 11:28:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 07:28:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226361] Merge Review: readline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311128.l7VBS1tU026752@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: readline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226361 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-31 07:28 EST ------- like to review this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 11:34:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 07:34:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225241] Merge Review: alsa-lib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311134.l7VBY5DZ019381@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: alsa-lib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225241 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |matthias at rpmforge.net Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-08-31 07:34 EST ------- Please find an updated spec file and a patch to the current spec file containing some suggested changes and fixes : http://thias.fedorapeople.org/merge-review/alsa-lib/ - Update License field. - Use configdir instead of sysconfdir hacks (cleaner). - Remove redundant optflags overriding. - Switch to using main "version", and merge "postver" since this is the right way of doing things (see NamingGuidelines#NonNumericRelease). - Remove static library. - Mark all of /etc/alsa as config, but not "noreplace". - Remove useless rpath on 64bit archs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 11:56:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 07:56:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241596] Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311156.l7VBuIlv030624@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241596 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(axel.thimm at atrpms. | |net) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-31 07:56 EST ------- Axel, would you recheck the build log on my comment 6 and upload a new srpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 12:06:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 08:06:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311206.l7VC6ILO023840@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-31 08:06 EST ------- Okay for me. Again I APPROVE this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 12:16:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 08:16:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 265661] Review Request: python-boto - A simple lightweight interface to Amazon Web Services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311216.l7VCGPd2001226@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-boto - A simple lightweight interface to Amazon Web Services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=265661 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-08-31 08:16 EST ------- 36097 (python-boto): Build on target fedora-4-epel succeeded. 36095 (python-boto): Build on target fedora-5-epel succeeded. 36092 (python-boto): Build on target fedora-6-extras succeeded. Package: python-boto-0.9b-1.fc7 Tag: dist-fc7-updates-candidate Status: complete Built by: robert Package: python-boto-0.9b-1.fc8 Tag: dist-f8 Status: complete Built by: robert -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 12:21:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 08:21:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225242] Merge Review: alsa-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311221.l7VCLrWR001952@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: alsa-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225242 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |matthias at rpmforge.net Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-08-31 08:21 EST ------- Please find an updated spec file and a patch to the current spec file containing some suggested changes and fixes : http://thias.fedorapeople.org/merge-review/alsa-utils/ - Update License field. - Mark udev rule as config. - Use find_lang macro again to include translations (why was it removed?). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 12:26:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 08:26:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225903] Merge Review: iproute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311226.l7VCQOEv026906@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: iproute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225903 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-31 08:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > W: iproute unversioned-explicit-obsoletes shapecfg > I think obsoletes is only warning. > > E: iproute only-non-binary-in-usr-lib > There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share. > Movin ??? what is that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 12:35:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 08:35:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 271021] New: Review Request: last.fm - The official Last.fm software Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=271021 Summary: Review Request: last.fm - The official Last.fm software Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: akahl at iconmobile.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SPECS/last.fm.spec SRPM URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SRPMS/last.fm-1.3.1.0-3.fc7.src.rpm Description: With Last.fm on your computer you can scrobble your tracks, share your music taste, listen to personalized radio streams, and discover new music and people. -- I'm still searching for a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 12:41:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 08:41:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 271021] Review Request: last.fm - The official Last.fm software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311241.l7VCfcFh028993@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: last.fm - The official Last.fm software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=271021 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 12:45:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 08:45:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217259] Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311245.l7VCj9mQ029635@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=217259 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2007-08-31 08:45 EST ------- Thanks very much for the review Jason. I will check out the licensing again before importing and make sure that it all ties up with the new License tag etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 12:51:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 08:51:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247515] Review Request: php-pecl-phar - Allows running of complete applications out of .phar files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311251.l7VCpb1j030734@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-phar - Allows running of complete applications out of .phar files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247515 fedora at famillecollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 12:59:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 08:59:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254209] Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311259.l7VCxFvv031938@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254209 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-31 08:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > okay, > > Spec : http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/g-wrap/g-wrap.spec > SRPM : http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/g-wrap/g-wrap-1.9.9-3.fc8.src.rpm > looke okay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 13:00:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 09:00:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 265381] Review Request: python-GnuPGInterface - A Python module to interface with GnuPG In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311300.l7VD0bPN032456@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-GnuPGInterface - A Python module to interface with GnuPG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=265381 nphilipp at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nphilipp at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 13:01:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 09:01:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 265381] Review Request: python-GnuPGInterface - A Python module to interface with GnuPG In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311301.l7VD1Vob007898@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-GnuPGInterface - A Python module to interface with GnuPG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=265381 nphilipp at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 13:13:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 09:13:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 271021] Review Request: last.fm - The official Last.fm software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311313.l7VDDPBZ002037@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: last.fm - The official Last.fm software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=271021 bdpepple at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 |182235 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX Flag| |fedora-review- ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at gmail.com 2007-08-31 09:13 EST ------- This has already been submitted, and rejected since it contains patent infringing code. Refer to #249824 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 13:12:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 09:12:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252133] Review Request: quicksynergy - GTK frontend for synergy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311312.l7VDC3go009662@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quicksynergy - GTK frontend for synergy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252133 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 13:16:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 09:16:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311316.l7VDGFFA002823@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 ------- Additional Comments From nadia.derbey at bull.net 2007-08-31 09:16 EST ------- 1) variables: The %{distro_string} is used too. Since it is built from the %{family} and %{release} variables, we can say they are all used. 2) base_kernel: uname -r would give me something like "2.6.21-1.3194.fc7", while I only need the first 3 fields of it: "2.6.21" 3) kernel required: Don't need to require the exact kernel, since several releases are supported, starting from 2.6.9. Actually, I want to avoid changing my spec file each time the kernel changes. That's why I'm extracting the running kernel release. 4) Licensing: Fixed - But rpmlint should be fixed accordingly: it is now telling me my License string is invalid. May be there was another version released after license guidelines has changed? 5) dot Whish one are you talking about? Couldn't find anything about dots in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-ef67b32cfe3903b0aaab1b3c920940769007da6a 6) distro_string: I actually only changed it in the tunables-distro-data description. The problem is that anyewhere else, the "FC7" string is used instead of f7. So I would have to change things upstream. But if it is really a problem, please tell me and I'll do the changes, since I am the upstream. SPEC URL: http://www.bullopensource.org/libtune/libtune-0.12-4/libtune.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bullopensource.org/libtune/libtune-0.12-4/libtune-0.12-4.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 13:14:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 09:14:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 271021] Review Request: last.fm - The official Last.fm software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311314.l7VDE891009803@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: last.fm - The official Last.fm software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=271021 bdpepple at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at gmail.com 2007-08-31 09:14 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 249824 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 13:14:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 09:14:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249824] Review Request: last.fm - listen to last.fm radio stations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311314.l7VDE8Ta009832@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: last.fm - listen to last.fm radio stations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249824 bdpepple at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |akahl at iconmobile.com ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at gmail.com 2007-08-31 09:14 EST ------- *** Bug 271021 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 13:17:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 09:17:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225620] Merge Review: bluez-libs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311317.l7VDHkGa010476@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bluez-libs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225620 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |matthias at rpmforge.net Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-08-31 09:17 EST ------- Please find an updated spec file and a patch to the current spec file containing some suggested changes and fixes : http://thias.fedorapeople.org/merge-review/bluez-libs/ - Own "bluetooth" include directory in devel package. - Require pkgconfig and exact main package release in devel package. - Disable static library building. - Don't ship the generic INSTALL file nor the empty NEWS file. - Remove unneeded build-time ldconfig call. - Use last known version for the bluez-sdp-devel obsoletes. - Remove the package's requirement on itself (!?). - Use _smp_mflags. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 13:43:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 09:43:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253579] Review Request: php-pecl-memcache - Extension to work with the Memcached caching daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311343.l7VDhHMC007755@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-memcache - Extension to work with the Memcached caching daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253579 fedora at famillecollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2007-08-31 09:43 EST ------- Push to CVS with typo changes. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 13:54:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 09:54:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311354.l7VDscwc010386@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-08-31 09:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #33) > 1) variables: > The %{distro_string} is used too. > Since it is built from the %{family} and %{release} variables, we can say they > are all used. ok > 2) base_kernel: > uname -r would give me something like "2.6.21-1.3194.fc7", while I only need the > first 3 fields of it: "2.6.21" ok, but you don't need the --whatprovides rpm -q --queryformat='%{VERSION}' kernel-headers should be enough also buildrequire kernel-headers for this > 3) kernel required: > Don't need to require the exact kernel, since several releases are supported, > starting from 2.6.9. Actually, I want to avoid changing my spec file each time > the kernel changes. That's why I'm extracting the running kernel release. ok > 4) Licensing: > Fixed - But rpmlint should be fixed accordingly: it is now telling me my License > string is invalid. May be there was another version released after license > guidelines has changed? yes rpmlint got updated => rpmlint-0.80-3.fc7 should know about the new license tags. > 5) dot > Whish one are you talking about? > Couldn't find anything about dots in > >http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-ef67b32cfe3903b0aaab1b3c920940769007da6a sry confused the summary with the description this is ok. > 6) distro_string: > I actually only changed it in the tunables-distro-data description. > The problem is that anyewhere else, the "FC7" string is used instead of f7. So I > would have to change things upstream. > But if it is really a problem, please tell me and I'll do the changes, since I > am the upstream. %dist should be fc7 (fedora collection 7) so you should be fine there or did I miss anything? btw this is only a cosmetic change. > SPEC URL: http://www.bullopensource.org/libtune/libtune-0.12-4/libtune.spec > SRPM URL: > http://www.bullopensource.org/libtune/libtune-0.12-4/libtune-0.12-4.fc7.src.rpm ----------- The package fails to build here: SYMLINK include/base -> include/basedbs/base-2.6.22.4 Version 2.6.22.4 is not supported is it because of the .4 ? if yes use rpm -q --queryformat='%{VERSION}' kernel-headers | cut -c 0-6 to get the kernel version. I tested this and it complains about kernel 2.6.22 not supported. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 14:03:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 10:03:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226671] Merge Review: zlib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311403.l7VE3scv011770@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: zlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226671 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-08-31 10:03 EST ------- This should go in a -static subpackage: %{_libdir}/*.a -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 14:08:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 10:08:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311408.l7VE80Eb012466@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 kaigai at kaigai.gr.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kaigai at kaigai.gr.jp 2007-08-31 10:08 EST ------- Thanks for your reviewing again. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sepostgresql Short Description: Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL Owners: kaigai Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 14:20:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 10:20:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 261801] Review Request: pixel - CL web image gallery generator with JavaScript viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311420.l7VEKpsD014411@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pixel - CL web image gallery generator with JavaScript viewer Alias: px-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261801 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |px-review AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-08-31 10:20 EST ------- I'll review this on Monday. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 14:35:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 10:35:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 261801] Review Request: pixel - CL web image gallery generator with JavaScript viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311435.l7VEZrQb017013@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pixel - CL web image gallery generator with JavaScript viewer Alias: px-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261801 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-08-31 10:35 EST ------- * http://www.bx.cz/px-0-8.noarch.rpm is a built package, please include the src.rpm. * Release: 8 -- please change this to 8%{?dist}, as described in [1] * Source: %{name}.tar.gz -- it would be great if the source code tarball name contained the version. Even better if it you made it available for download somewhere in Internet (people.redhat.com?) * BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/build-root-%{name} -- The standard build root form is %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) * Packager: Josef Kubin -- This tag is obsolete, as usually multiple people work on a package. The authoritative source where to look for the names of people that worked on a package is the ChangeLog * License: GPL -- This is no longer acceptable. Please use specific version, such as GPLv3 or GPLv2+. See the Licensing FAQ [2] * Prefix: %{_datadir}/px -- please note that making relocatable packages is discouraged. See paragraph "Relocatable packages" in the Guidelines [1] * The changelog time stamp lines should end with complete version-release pair, e.g. 0-1, 0-2, 0-3 in your case. Each changelog entry should correspond to a revision. [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines [2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 14:42:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 10:42:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 263121] Review Request: pharosc - VLSI and ASIC Technology Standard Cell Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311442.l7VEgvex017986@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pharosc - VLSI and ASIC Technology Standard Cell Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=263121 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-31 10:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > (You could also use %{nil} under %build but a comment is probably better.) I've added the comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 14:54:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 10:54:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226380] Merge Review: rsync In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311454.l7VEsfa9020021@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: rsync https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226380 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matthias at rpmforge.net AssignedTo|fenlason at redhat.com |ed at eh3.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-08-31 10:54 EST ------- Assigning to the actual reviewer, and changing to ASSIGNED instead of leaving NEW, since according to the "fedora-review" flag, the formal review has started. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 15:02:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 11:02:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226302] Merge Review: pm-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311502.l7VF2N5A026790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pm-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226302 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |271661 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 15:02:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 11:02:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 271661] Review Request: radeontool - Backlight and video output configuration tool for radeon cards In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311502.l7VF2Opr026816@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: radeontool - Backlight and video output configuration tool for radeon cards https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=271661 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |226302 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 15:01:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 11:01:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 271661] New: Review Request: radeontool - Backlight and video output configuration tool for radeon cards Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=271661 Summary: Review Request: radeontool - Backlight and video output configuration tool for radeon cards Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: opensource at till.name QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/radeontool.spec SRPM URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/radeontool-1.5-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Radeontool may switch the backlight and external video output on and off. Use radeontool at your own risk, it may damage your hardware. radeontool was previously packaged in pm-utils, now it goes its own way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 15:04:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 11:04:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218022] Review Request: clamsmtp - SMTP filter daemon for anti-virus checking using ClamAV In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311504.l7VF4SEA027062@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clamsmtp - SMTP filter daemon for anti-virus checking using ClamAV https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=218022 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-08-31 11:04 EST ------- http://thias.fedorapeople.org/review/clamsmtp/ * Fri Aug 31 2007 Matthias Saou 1.9-1 - Update to 1.9. - Add missing scriplets requirements. - Fix License field, it's a 3 clause BSD. Hint : If someone had this ASSIGNED, I wouldn't forget to look at why it's still not CLOSED ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 15:21:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 11:21:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225632] Merge Review: byacc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311521.l7VFLnAA027815@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: byacc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225632 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |matthias at rpmforge.net Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-08-31 11:21 EST ------- Good work at keeping the package clean! I've started the formal review. I see no blockers, only possible improvements. Find here an updated spec file and a patch to the current development one : http://thias.fedorapeople.org/merge-review/byacc/ - Update to the 20070509 release. - Update URL and summary. - Remove useless doc copying in install section. - Add NOTES and NO_WARRANTY docs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 15:38:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 11:38:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 271861] New: Review Request: vbetool - Run real-mode video BIOS code to alter hardware state Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=271861 Summary: Review Request: vbetool - Run real-mode video BIOS code to alter hardware state Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: opensource at till.name QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/vbetool.spec SRPM URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/vbetool-0.7-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: vbetool uses lrmi in order to run code from the video BIOS. Currently, it is able to alter DPMS states, save/restore video card state and attempt to initialize the video card from scratch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 15:42:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 11:42:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 261801] Review Request: pixel - CL web image gallery generator with JavaScript viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311542.l7VFgIEK007896@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pixel - CL web image gallery generator with JavaScript viewer Alias: px-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261801 ------- Additional Comments From jkubin at redhat.com 2007-08-31 11:42 EST ------- http://www.bx.cz/px-0-0.8.a.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 15:42:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 11:42:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 271861] Review Request: vbetool - Run real-mode video BIOS code to alter hardware state In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311542.l7VFgWoq007936@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vbetool - Run real-mode video BIOS code to alter hardware state Alias: vbetool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=271861 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-08-31 11:42 EST ------- Won't this conflict with the existing vbetool in pm-utils? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 15:39:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 11:39:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226302] Merge Review: pm-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311539.l7VFdXdg000790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pm-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226302 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |271861 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 15:43:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 11:43:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 271861] Review Request: vbetool - Run real-mode video BIOS code to alter hardware state In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311543.l7VFhlm2001601@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vbetool - Run real-mode video BIOS code to alter hardware state Alias: vbetool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=271861 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |244330 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 15:43:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 11:43:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 271661] Review Request: radeontool - Backlight and video output configuration tool for radeon cards In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311543.l7VFhmvM001629@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: radeontool - Backlight and video output configuration tool for radeon cards Alias: radeontool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=271661 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |244330 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 16:03:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 12:03:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225638] Merge Review: cdparanoia In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311603.l7VG3ZkO010556@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: cdparanoia https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225638 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |matthias at rpmforge.net Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-08-31 12:03 EST ------- Please find an updated spec file and a patch to the current spec file containing some suggested changes and fixes : http://thias.fedorapeople.org/merge-review/cdparanoia/ - Move .so symlink to the devel sub-package (#203620). - Reorder and clean up the spec file. - Remove use of "ver" and "realver". - Convert spec file to UTF-8 and escape all macros in changelog. - Add highest known version to the cdparanoia-III obsoletes. - Include install patch to have DESTDIR work and libs +x for correct debuginfo. It's quite a major cosmetic cleanup overall :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 16:02:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 12:02:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 271861] Review Request: vbetool - Run real-mode video BIOS code to alter hardware state In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311602.l7VG2adD004879@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vbetool - Run real-mode video BIOS code to alter hardware state Alias: vbetool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=271861 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-08-31 12:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Won't this conflict with the existing vbetool in pm-utils? oh, I forgot to mention this here. vbetool will be removed from pm-utils, once it is reviewed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 16:06:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 12:06:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225640] Merge Review: cdrtools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311606.l7VG6DYA011200@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: cdrtools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225640 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matthias at rpmforge.net Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-08-31 12:06 EST ------- Closing as NOTABUG since cdrtools is no longer part of the distribution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 16:20:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 12:20:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225712] Merge Review: dvd+rw-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311620.l7VGKTv1013212@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: dvd+rw-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225712 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |matthias at rpmforge.net Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-08-31 12:20 EST ------- Please find an updated spec file and a patch to the current spec file containing some suggested changes and fixes : http://thias.fedorapeople.org/merge-review/dvd+rw-tools/ (note: I had to rename the index.html file to not have it in the way) - Minor spec file cleanups (tabs vs. spaces, etc.). - Use install instead of cp for the html file to avoid umask differences. The spec file was overall already quite clean! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 16:28:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 12:28:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225784] Merge Review: gdbm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311628.l7VGSIZb014259@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gdbm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225784 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matthias at rpmforge.net ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-08-31 12:28 EST ------- If someone decides to give the gdbm package some attention, then I'd really appreciate if bug #162416 was also taken care of. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 16:37:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 12:37:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225891] Merge Review: httpd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311637.l7VGbQ1d010479@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: httpd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225891 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matthias at rpmforge.net ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-08-31 12:37 EST ------- I'm not sure I really want to review the apache package, as it's quite a complex beast ;-) but would you be willing to include a patch to the httpd.conf which isolates inside IfModule sections all configuration which is module specific? I've been doing that to my custom files for a while, and it's quite handy to be able to simply comment out a module and not have to edit anything more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 16:45:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 12:45:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226000] Merge Review: libdv In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311645.l7VGjqFV011831@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libdv https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226000 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |matthias at rpmforge.net Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-08-31 12:45 EST ------- Please find an updated spec file and a patch to the current spec file containing some suggested changes and fixes : http://thias.fedorapeople.org/merge-review/libdv/ - Update License field. - Remove useless zero epoch. - Add pkgconfig devel sub-package requirement. The package was already quite clean overall :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 16:58:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 12:58:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197609] Review Request: poster In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311658.l7VGwuQB018816@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poster Alias: poster-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197609 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-31 12:58 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 17:06:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:06:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253469] Review Request: opyum - Offline package installation and update tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311706.l7VH66Rf020069@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opyum - Offline package installation and update tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253469 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-31 13:06 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 17:12:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:12:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226032] Merge Review: libjpeg In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311712.l7VHCQOn020864@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libjpeg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226032 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |matthias at rpmforge.net Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-08-31 13:12 EST ------- Please find an updated spec file and a patch to the current spec file containing some suggested changes and fixes : http://thias.fedorapeople.org/merge-review/libjpeg/ - Use original IJG source URL and switch to official gz (no bz2 in sight...). - Move "make test" to %%check section. - Include install patch to support DESTDIR and fix man pages location. It could also make sense to split off the binaries and their man pages into a "tools" sub-package, or maybe "-n jpeg-tools" to not contain "lib" in the name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 17:22:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:22:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225304] Merge Review: avahi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311722.l7VHM2Fq022365@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: avahi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225304 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |notting at redhat.com, fedora- | |package-review at redhat.com AssignedTo|ivazqueznet at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org QAContact|fedora-package- |extras-qa at fedoraproject.org |review at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 17:20:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:20:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225635] Merge Review: cairo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311720.l7VHKuTo016869@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: cairo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225635 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-08-31 13:20 EST ------- FWIW, I have started to require gtk-doc in -devel packages now, to get over the directory ownership annoyance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 17:23:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:23:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226032] Merge Review: libjpeg In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311723.l7VHN7Hf017183@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libjpeg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226032 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-08-31 13:23 EST ------- Possibly another detail : Does linking statically also require the headers? Probably, and in which case, we need to either : - Have the static sub-package require the devel sub-package - Also include the headers in the static sub-package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 17:28:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:28:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257061] Review Request: osslsigncode - Tool for Authenticode signing of EXE/CAB files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311728.l7VHSjqX023786@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: osslsigncode - Tool for Authenticode signing of EXE/CAB files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257061 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-08-31 13:28 EST ------- > To this one can only add an even faster non-look that says its infringing > ..someone's.. something... ;) Could you please elaborate? Obviously, if there's any problem, I'd prefer knowing ASAP and close this review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 17:33:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:33:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 272501] New: Review Request: < python-bsddb3> - Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=272501 Summary: Review Request: < python-bsddb3> - Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: 440volt.tux at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: SRPM URL: Description: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 17:38:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:38:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226333] Merge Review: pygtk2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311738.l7VHcJmi025535@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pygtk2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226333 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-08-31 13:38 EST ------- Stalled review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 17:34:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:34:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239279] Review Request: libssh2 - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311734.l7VHY4Wl019320@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libssh2 - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol Alias: libssh2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239279 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matthias at rpmforge.net ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-08-31 13:34 EST ------- Well, at that time, 0.15 wasn't out and the "%define checkoutdate 20070506" from the spec sort of shows it. But now 0.17 is out. Please update the package, then I'd be more than willing to perform a review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 17:44:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:44:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225804] Merge Review: glib2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311744.l7VHifY2026506@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: glib2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225804 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|roozbeh at farsiweb.info |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 17:51:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:51:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225918] Merge Review: iso-codes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311751.l7VHpf9B021809@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: iso-codes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225918 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|dsantani at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-08-31 13:51 EST ------- Stalled review, needs a new reviewer to give the rubber stamp. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 18:26:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 14:26:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225891] Merge Review: httpd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311826.l7VIQXK8026640@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: httpd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225891 ------- Additional Comments From jorton at redhat.com 2007-08-31 14:26 EST ------- I'd prefer to keep issues which are not specifically related to the spec file review out of the review tracker bugs - can you bring this up on fedora-devel? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 18:35:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 14:35:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250463] Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311835.l7VIZJJJ001146@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250463 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lxtnow at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Summary|Review Request: python- |Review Request: pyvserver - |pyvserver - Python interface|Python interface to the |to the Linux-VServer kernel |Linux-VServer kernel |interface |interface Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-08-31 14:35 EST ------- Fixed bug Summary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 18:44:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 14:44:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226430] Merge Review: squashfs-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311844.l7VIiGRw028955@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: squashfs-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226430 ------- Additional Comments From katzj at redhat.com 2007-08-31 14:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > NEED:- > Use of macros. What macros in particular aren't being used that are needed by the guidelines? > Change Buildroot to current one. Buildroot is one of the three acceptable ones > update license tag Updated > Can use dist tag. Given that squashfs-tools depends on kernel version and isn't synchronized across branches, the dist tag doesn't buy anything really > Also, rpmlint on binary rpm reported as > W: squashfs-tools summary-not-capitalized squashfs utilities > Summary doesn't begin with a capital letter. Fixed > W: squashfs-tools invalid-license GPL Fixed > W: squashfs-tools spurious-executable-perm And fixed all of these -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 19:07:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 15:07:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220683] Review Request: rubygems - the Ruby standard for packaging ruby libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311907.l7VJ7s8R005864@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygems - the Ruby standard for packaging ruby libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220683 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora dlutter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2007-08-31 15:07 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: rubygems [New Branches: ] EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 19:14:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 15:14:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 269421] Review Request: eclipse-egit - Eclipse Git plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311914.l7VJEk8t000857@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-egit - Eclipse Git plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=269421 overholt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-08-31 15:14 EST ------- I'll take this. Things are generally pretty good. There are just a few minor things (lines beginning with NEEDS_FIX) and some questions (lines beginning with ?): MUST items: OK package is named appropriately OK is it legal for Fedora to distribute this? ? license field matches the actual license. - it says in the git web repo that some of it is LGPL ... but I can't see what parts - can you? I'm okay with the dual GPLv2 and EPL as that's what I can see. OK license is open source-compatible. OK specfile name matches %{name} ? verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do) - I can't get the same md5sum but the contents are the same. Did you use wget? OK skim the summary and description for typos, etc. OK correct buildroot OK if %{?dist} is used, it should be in that form (note the ? and % locations) OK license text included in package and marked with %doc - license text included in jar so can't mark as %doc OK packages meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) OK rpmlint on .srpm gives no output $ rpmlint eclipse-egit-0.2.2-0.git20070826.fc8.src.rpm W: eclipse-egit invalid-license EPL GPLv2 - this is fine since it's dual-licensed software OK changelog should be in one of these formats: [...] OK Packager tag should not be used OK Vendor tag should not be used OK Distribution tag should not be used OK use License and not Copyright OK Summary tag should not end in a period OK if possible, replace PreReq with Requires(pre) and/or Requires(post) OK specfile is legible OK package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86 OK BuildRequires are proper OK summary should be a short and concise description of the package OK description expands upon summary (don't include installation instructions) OK make sure lines are <= 80 characters - they are, where possible OK specfile written in American English OK make a -doc sub-package if necessary OK packages including libraries should exclude static libraries if possible OK don't use rpath OK config files should usually be marked with %config(noreplace) OK GUI apps should contain .desktop files OK should the package contain a -devel sub-package? OK use macros appropriately and consistently OK don't use %makeinstall OK install section must begin with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot} OK locale data handling correct (find_lang) OK consider using cp -p to preserve timestamps OK split Requires(pre,post) into two separate lines OK package should probably not be relocatable OK package contains code OK package should own all directories and files OK there should be no %files duplicates OK file permissions should be okay; %defattrs should be present NEEDS_FIX %clean should be present - you have ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT elsewhere OK %doc files should not affect runtime OK if it is a web app, it should be in /usr/share/%{name} and *not* /var/www NEEDS_FIX verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs - do we need a Requires on eclipse-platform? $ rpm -qp --requires ../RPMS/x86_64/eclipse-egit-0.2.2-0.git20070826.fc8.x86_64.rpm /usr/bin/rebuild-gcj-db /usr/bin/rebuild-gcj-db java-1.5.0-gcj >= 1.5.0 java-1.5.0-gcj >= 1.5.0 libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgcj_bc.so.1()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) librt.so.1()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) $ rpm -qp --provides ../RPMS/x86_64/eclipse-egit-0.2.2-0.git20070826.fc8.x86_64.rpm org.spearce.egit.core_0.2.2.200708311149.jar.so()(64bit) org.spearce.egit.ui_0.2.2.200708311149.jar.so()(64bit) org.spearce.jgit_0.2.2.200708311149.jar.so()(64bit) eclipse-egit = 0.2.2-0.git20070826.fc8 NEEDS_FIX run rpmlint on the binary RPMs $ rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/eclipse-egit-0.2.2-0.git20070826.fc8.x86_64.rpm W: eclipse-egit no-documentation - okay W: eclipse-egit incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.2.2-1.fc8 0.2.2-0.git20070826.fc8 - please fix W: eclipse-egit invalid-license EPL GPLv2 - this is fine ... unless we discover some LGPL stuff SHOULD items: OK package should include license text in the package and mark it with %doc - fine ? package should build on i386 - it builds on x86_64 :) OK package should build in mock NEEDS_FIX we should probably fill in some of feature.xml such as the licence section ? should there be any user-visible eclipse features other than Team->Share? No checkout? I know you said they were making a new release soon with a whole bunch of new features so should we wait until then? I'm legitimately asking, not trying to be snide. I notice a lot of stuff being spewed to the console as well ... do they have a bug tracker upstream? I guess what I'm trying to say is that we shouldn't have it be installed by default in the Eclipse group of comps.xml just yet. What do you think? ? should we split the package into two: the java git implementation and the eclipse plugin? I guess we can do that in the future if anything else starts using the java git implementation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 19:43:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 15:43:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257061] Review Request: osslsigncode - Tool for Authenticode signing of EXE/CAB files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311943.l7VJhDwL005017@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: osslsigncode - Tool for Authenticode signing of EXE/CAB files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257061 ------- Additional Comments From yaneti at declera.com 2007-08-31 15:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Note: A quick look doesn't show any patent infringement, but this might deserve a double check, just to be sure. > > To this one can only add an even faster non-look that says its infringing > > ..someone's.. something... ;) > > Could you please elaborate? Obviously, if there's any problem, I'd prefer > knowing ASAP and close this review request. I was joking, in attempt to make a point. Please keep meaningless patent related remarks out of supposedly technical forums like bugzilla or fedora-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 19:52:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 15:52:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251824] Review Request: maniadrive - 3D stunt driving game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708311952.l7VJqILP006484@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maniadrive - 3D stunt driving game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251824 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-08-31 15:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > 1. The following BRs were added in order to get it to compile: > > zlib-devel > curl-devel > libxml2-devel > > They might not be strictly needed though, if you see point 4. > You're right, they aren't needed. > > 2. The description for Raydium reads poorly and has several spelling mistakes. > A suggested corrected version is below. > > "Raydium is a game engine. It provides a set of functions which allow quick and > flexible games creation. There are a lot of other 3D/game engines (and some > are very complete, such as Ogre, Crystal Space, etc). Raydium does not try to > be as complex as these engines, but on the contrary is aiming at quick and > simple development." > I've put in your version. > 3. Is this file useful to the end user? If so, would it be better placed in the > doc directory? It could give the rayphp location at the top for context. I'm not > familiar enough with the software to say either way. > > /usr/share/raydium/rayphp/README > It doesn't contain any info usefull to the enduser. > 4. Additional rpmlint warnings. > > W: raydium undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libraydium-1.2.so sapi_globals > ... > ... > W: raydium unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libraydium-1.2.so > libphp5-5.2.3.so I think you used -force or -nodeps when installing, that cause these. > W: raydium unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libraydium-1.2.so > /usr/lib/libvorbis.so.0 > W: raydium unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libraydium-1.2.so > /usr/lib/libogg.so.0 > W: raydium unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libraydium-1.2.so > /lib/libresolv.so.2 > W: raydium unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libraydium-1.2.so > /lib/libcrypt.so.1 > W: raydium unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libraydium-1.2.so /lib/libz.so.1 > W: raydium unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libraydium-1.2.so > /usr/lib/libcurl.so.4 > W: raydium unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libraydium-1.2.so > /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2 > The others are fixed now. > 5. I read a packaging doc on the wiki that recommended against using macros in > patch names, but of course I can't find it now. :) > You shouldn't use %{version}, as you may want to apply the same patch to a newer version, %{name} is no problem. > 6. I think raydium-devel may need dependencies on > freealut-devel > libvorbis-devel Good catch, it also needs glew, libjpeg and ode -devel. Here is a new version with the following changes: * Fri Aug 31 2007 Hans de Goede 1.2-2 - Improved and spell-fixed raydium description - Fix a number of unused direct shlib dependencies in libraydium-1.2.so - Add Requires on various -devel packages to the raydium-devel subpackage so that all headers included by the raydium headers will be present Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/maniadrive.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/maniadrive-1.2-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 20:27:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 16:27:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 261801] Review Request: pixel - CL web image gallery generator with JavaScript viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708312027.l7VKRA1g010885@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pixel - CL web image gallery generator with JavaScript viewer Alias: px-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261801 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-08-31 16:27 EST ------- $ px Use of uninitialized value in substitution (s///) at /usr/bin/px line 161. Use of uninitialized value in substitution (s///) at /usr/bin/px line 162. Use of uninitialized value in string ne at /usr/bin/px line 285. Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/bin/px line 286. Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/bin/px line 286. Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/bin/px line 286. Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/bin/px line 286. create data for index.html ... Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/bin/px line 307. done. $ This is expected behavior? (FC-7 on i386) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 20:53:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 16:53:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 170131] Review Request: php-extras - Additional PHP modules from the standard PHP distribution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708312053.l7VKr2CS013843@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-extras - Additional PHP modules from the standard PHP distribution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=170131 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-08-31 16:53 EST ------- CVS admin for ownership/EPEL branched done in bug 249577: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249577 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 20:57:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 16:57:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254211] Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708312057.l7VKvtw8020620@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254211 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-08-31 16:57 EST ------- #001: Texinfo: missing: Requires(post): /sbin/install-info Requires(preun): /sbin/install-info #002: -devel package Requires: guile-devel, g-wrap-devel g-wrap-devel already requires guile-devel remove guile-devel from requires of -devel #003: The patches (%patch0 -p1) Take as good example : %patch0 -p1 -b .REASON #004:rpmlint /home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/SRPMS/guile-gnome-platform-2.15.93-3.fc7.src.rpm W: guile-gnome-platform strange-permission guile-gnome-platform-2.15.93.tar.gz 0755 W: guile-gnome-platform strange-permission guile-gnome-platform.spec 0755 W: guile-gnome-platform mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 14) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 21:09:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 17:09:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273301] New: Review Request: perl-Class-CSV - Class based CSV parser/writer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273301 Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-CSV - Class based CSV parser/writer Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dmalcolm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dmalcolm/perl/perl-Class-CSV.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dmalcolm/perl/perl-Class-CSV-1.03-1.src.rpm Description: This module can be used to create objects from CSV files, or to create CSV files from objects. Text::CSV_XS is used for parsing and creating CSV file lines, so any limitations in Text::CSV_XS will of course be inherant in this module. I'm seeking a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 21:55:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 17:55:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241596] Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200708312155.l7VLtpNJ023003@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241596 axel.thimm at atrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(axel.thimm at atrpms.| |net) | ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2007-08-31 17:55 EST ------- So the difference in the two builds on rawhide was just the age of rawhide? E.g. something that entered rawhide from the 5th to the 23rd broke maildrop? I'm currently officially afk with Ville looking over my packages - don't know if that includes my review requests. I think this is important to find out why it fails, as it may be a rawhide regression, but I won't be able to look into it during the next 10 days or even more. Could you dig into this? Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.