[Bug 222248] Review Request: alsa-plugins - backend plugins for alsa sound system
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Aug 6 23:59:36 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: alsa-plugins - backend plugins for alsa sound system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222248
------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-08-06 19:59 EST -------
Initial comments:
- I second Lennarts comment about maemo - is it useful to package that plugin
without any other part of maemo in fedora ?
- OSSO DSP SW <--> ALSA DSP plugin
========================
Don't put ascii formatting into the %description, please.
- BuildRequires are per source package, there is no reason to put them
into the subpackage sections (of course, it doesn't hurt either)
- Requires: alsa-lib
is unnecessary, since library dependencies pull it in anyway
- The license tag needs some work; GPL is no longer a valid value for
that field, it should probably be GPLv2+. But some of the plugins
appear to be LGPLv2+, so maybe it would be better to put license
tags in the subpackages according to their actual licenses. In fact,
all but the samplerate plugin appear to be LGPL, not GPL.
- What is the touching in %prep about ?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list