[Bug 250747] Review Request: Linux-Complete-Backup-and-Recovery-HOWTO - bare metal recovery scripts & docs

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Linux-Complete-Backup-and-Recovery-HOWTO - bare metal recovery scripts & docs


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250747





------- Additional Comments From nsboyle at gmail.com  2007-08-13 23:35 EST -------
I'm not sponsored, so this isn't official:

? - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
--> Seems more a set of scripts than documentation... although I could be
looking at what it does all wrong :P  Consider renaming after script-suite?
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK? - Spec has consistant macro usage.
--> $RPM_BUILD_ROOT could be macro-ified as %{buildroot}
OK - License field in spec matches
OK - License is GPL
OK - License file is included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
NOT OK - Sources SHOULD match upstream md5sum
--> Source: e44ce87defb0b7f3688dbbded79bedc4 Package:
e44ce87defb0b7f3688dbbded79bedc4
OK - Package has correct buildroot.
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
? - Changelog section is correct. 
--> Not sure if one should put such direct references to the specfile in
%changelog... but it's probably bad form to change the %changelog after the fact... 

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.