[Bug 253163] Review Request: sazanami-fonts - Sazanami Japanese TrueType fonts

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Aug 23 08:05:53 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: sazanami-fonts - Sazanami Japanese TrueType fonts


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253163





------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com  2007-08-23 04:05 EST -------
For reference the sazanami fonts are currently part of the fonts-japanese
package in Fedora, so this not new content for Fedora per se, but will
allow those fonts to be housed in their own package.

Here is the review:

Good
- package follows upstream project name
- spec filename matches package name
- meets Packaging Guidelines
- upstream license is BSD and included
- spec file is well written
- source tarball is identical to the current one included in fonts-japanese
b312f77829011547b19fc16956dc6f12  sazanami-20061016.tar.bz2
(which fixes a bug in the last upstream release - see above bug)
- noarch package and builds correctly
- lists build dependencies
- rest of filelist looks good (see below)
- permissions correct
- has %clean
- consistent macro usage
- tarball contains two free truetype fonts which is acceptable content
- filenames are all ascii

Needs attention:
- rpmlint output is above (might be better to use a relative symlink)
- good to add a reference to bug 196433
- the package should require the new fonts-japanese package rather
than conflict with the old one
(see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Conflicts)
- it should not own %{catalogue}/ since this is now owned by filesystem

Suggestions:
- might be nice to have a summary and description in ja too

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list