[Bug 241656] Review Request: ocaml-csv - OCaml library for reading and writing CSV files

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ocaml-csv - OCaml library for reading and writing CSV files


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241656


berrange at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |NEEDINFO
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(rjones at redhat.com)




------- Additional Comments From berrange at redhat.com  2007-08-23 20:48 EST -------

      - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. [WARNING]

$ rpmlint ocaml-csv-1.1.6-2.src.rpm 
W: ocaml-csv invalid-license LGPL

Needs fixing

$ rpmlint ocaml-csv-1.1.6-2.fc8.x86_64.rpm 
W: ocaml-csv devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ocaml/csv/csv.cmi

Bogus warning

W: ocaml-csv invalid-license LGPL

Needs fixing

E: ocaml-csv only-non-binary-in-usr-lib

Bogus Error for OCaml packages


$ rpmlint ocaml-csv-devel-1.1.6-2.fc8.x86_64.rpm 
W: ocaml-csv-devel invalid-license LGPL

Needs fixing

      - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming
Guidelines. [OK]
      - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} [OK]
      - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [OK]
      - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license [OK]
      - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license. [WARNING: tar.gz contains no license info. Website says LGPL + OCaml
Linking Exception & links to LGPLv3. Please clarify specfile & upstream]
      - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [OK]
      - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [OK]
      - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [OK]
      - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream
source, as provided in the spec URL.  [OK]
      - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms
on at least one supported architecture. [OK x86_64 rawhide]
      - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. [N/A]
      - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [OK]
      - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. [N/A]
      - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not
just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig
in %post and %postun. [N/A]
      - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must
state this fact in the request for review. [N/A]
      - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [OK]
      - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files
listing. [OK]
      - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [OK]
      - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section [OK]
      - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros [OK]
      - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [OK]
      - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage.  [N/A]
      - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application. [N/A]
      - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [OK]
      - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [N/A]
      - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires:
pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [N/A]
      - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.
libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a
-devel package. [N/A]
      - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the
base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} =
%{version}-%{release} [OK] 
      - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives [N/A]
      - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a
%{name}.desktop file [N/A]
      - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages. [OK]
      - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf
%{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for
details. [OK]
      - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [OK]

OK, all supplementary guidelines for OCaml at:

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/OCaml


Will approve pending clarification of LGPL version, and addition of OCaml Linker
Exception note to License.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.