[Bug 254019] Review Request: rubygem-daemons - A toolkit to create and control ruby daemons

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Aug 24 01:27:45 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: rubygem-daemons - A toolkit to create and control ruby daemons


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254019


dlutter at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com  2007-08-23 21:27 EST -------
OK - Package name
OK - Specfile name
OK - Specfile is legible
OK - No prebuilt binaries included
OK - BuildRoot value (one of the recommended values)
OK - PreReq not used
OK - Source md5sum matches upstream
OK - No hardcoded pathnames
OK - Package owns all the files it installs
OK - Package requires create needed unowned directories
OK - Package builds successfully on i386 and x86_64 (mock)
OK - BuildRequires sufficient
OK - File permissions set properly
OK - Macro usage is consistent
OK - rpmlint is silent

OK - Package is named rubygem-%{gemname}
OK - Source points to full URL of gem
OK - Package version identical with gem version
OK - Package Requires and BuildRequires rubygems
OK - Package provides rubygem(%{gemname}) = %version
OK - Package requires gem dependencies correctly
OK - %prep and %build are empty
OK - %gemdir defined properly, and gem installed into it
OK - Package owns its directories under %gemdir
OK - No arch-specific content in %{gemdir}
OK - Package is noarch

FIX - Mark the LICENSE file as %doc

FIX - License info is not accurate
    The license seems to be BSD, but not quite. Needs to be clarified


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list