[Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware)

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Aug 29 16:39:12 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware)


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234612





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-08-29 12:39 EST -------
(In reply to comment #55)
 On rereading the Ruby packaging guidelines, I also added Provides: Ruby(Ice) =
> %{version} to the ruby package. (According to those guidelines, the package
> "must" also apparently be called "ruby-ice", not "ice-ruby", but I don't really
> want to do that.)

Well, actually I don't know correctly what this part of Ruby packaging
guidelines tries to say.
IMO we can follow python module naming guideline:
---------------------------------------------------------
Addon Packages (python modules)

Packages of python modules (thus they rely on python as a parent) use a slightly
different naming scheme. They should take into account the upstream name of the
python module. This makes a package name format of python-$NAME. When in doubt,
use the name of the module that you type to import it in a script.
----------------------------------------------------------
For this package, the parent package of ice-ruby is surely
ice, so the name should be ice-ruby, not ruby-ice IMO. Also
I am not sure whether ice-ruby should provide "ruby(Ice) = 1.8"
(although it should be safe that ice-ruby provides it).

Anyway please follow the procedure written on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list