[Bug 263121] Review Request: pharosc - VLSI and ASIC Technology Standard Cell Libraries

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pharosc - VLSI and ASIC Technology Standard Cell Libraries


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=263121





------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au  2007-08-29 18:42 EST -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> # Quick comment
> 
> * some files which're installed in subpackage (such as README, templates/)
> should be marked as %doc

Actually it is simple to say but it complicates usage as README and templates 
may come from different folders from the same subpackage.

Each folder entails a particular set of files and images. The latter forms a 
what so called "technology". Moving files from right to left will mix up 
technology descriptions.

I believe it's a bad idea to add it as %doc
 
> * Just add a quick comment in %build stage even if there's no build action.

I thought having marked the package as noarch made it explicit.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.