[Bug 254091] Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Dec 1 22:34:33 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254091
bugzilla at redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version|devel |rawhide
bugs.michael at gmx.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |bugs.michael at gmx.net
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Keywords| |Reopened
Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |
------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-12-01 17:34 EST -------
This one is mispackaged.
1) Note that %{_datadir}/libsvm/ is not included.
2) Note that %{_libdir}/java/libsvm/ is not included.
3) Note how %_libdir/libsvm/ is included in the -devel
package, while the two DSO files within it are also
included in the main package.
%files
[...]
%{_libdir}/libsvm/libsvm.so
%{_libdir}/libsvm/libsvm.so.2.84
%files devel
[...]
%{_libdir}/libsvm
4) Drop "Requires: glibc".
5) Drop "Requires: python ...", because rpmbuild adds the
python(abi) requirement automatically.
6) What is /usr/share/libsvm/src in the -devel package?
7) Creation of the DSO with non-versioned SONAME libsvm.so but
also a versioned library outside run-time linker's search path
is questionable. Where is this customisation explained?
8) What in the "libsvm-devel" package "Requires: libsvm"?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list