[Bug 254091] Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Dec 1 22:34:33 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254091


bugzilla at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Version|devel                       |rawhide

bugs.michael at gmx.net changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |bugs.michael at gmx.net
             Status|CLOSED                      |ASSIGNED
           Keywords|                            |Reopened
         Resolution|NEXTRELEASE                 |




------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net  2007-12-01 17:34 EST -------
This one is mispackaged.

1) Note that %{_datadir}/libsvm/ is not included.

2) Note that %{_libdir}/java/libsvm/ is not included.

3) Note how %_libdir/libsvm/ is included in the -devel
package, while the two DSO files within it are also
included in the main package.

%files
[...]
%{_libdir}/libsvm/libsvm.so
%{_libdir}/libsvm/libsvm.so.2.84

%files devel
[...]
%{_libdir}/libsvm

4) Drop "Requires: glibc".

5) Drop "Requires: python ...", because rpmbuild adds the
python(abi) requirement automatically.

6) What is /usr/share/libsvm/src in the -devel package?

7) Creation of the DSO with non-versioned SONAME libsvm.so but
also a versioned library outside run-time linker's search path
is questionable. Where is this customisation explained?

8) What in the "libsvm-devel" package "Requires: libsvm"?


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list