[Bug 407031] Review Request: pcapy - A Python interface to libpcap
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Dec 4 05:53:49 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: pcapy - A Python interface to libpcap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=407031
tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-12-04 00:53 EST -------
Not much here; just one non-documentation file.
As far as I can tell, ASL 1.1 is compatible with the current Python license.
As far as I know there is no reason to call ldconfig in this package; the .so
file that's installed isn't in the search path, so the ldconfig call is simply
pointless.
Since that's the only issue I can fine, I'll go ahead and approve this and you
can remove the %post and %postun scriptlets when you check in.
* source files match upstream:
80a763d91814836e0cd1e57b63519dc60213b42ba3c486d4794cabae30fd7a57
pcapy-0.10.5.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly
* debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
pcapy.so()(64bit)
pcapy = 0.10.5-1.fc9
=
/sbin/ldconfig
libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
libpcap.so.0.9()(64bit)
libpython2.5.so.1.0()(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6()(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)
python(abi) = 2.5
* %check is not present; no test suite upstream.
* no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
* owns the directory it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
X ldconfig scriptlets are unneeded.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no static libraries.
* no libtool .la files.
APPROVED, just remove the unneeded scriptlets.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list