[Bug 320421] Review Request: cwrite - console editor
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Dec 4 16:26:13 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: cwrite - console editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=320421
------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-12-04 11:26 EST -------
For 0.1.13-1:
* setuid/gid
- Ah, you wrote "+s" Then:
* You must not change the permission on %post. Instread
you must specify the permission at %files section like:
-------------------------------------------------------
%files
%attr(4755,root,root) %{_bindir}/%{name}
-------------------------------------------------------
* And if you want to use setuid, perhaps I have to ask
RH security responsible team about this as we now consider
that using setuid/gid is generally dangerous. Is this
"really" needed?
* License
- Still the tag "GPL" is invalid.
! Note
The COPYING file is GPLv3, however apart from this
file there are no files in the tarball which limits
the version of GPL applied to only 3.
Then we regard the license of this software as
"GPL+" (i.e. "any version" of GPL) due to the section
14 "Revised Versions of this License"
Currently the license tag for this spec file is "GPL+".
* BuildRequires
- Is autoconf needed for BuildRequires?
* %doc
- Generally The file "INSTALL"
is for people who want to build and install the software
by themselves and is not needed for people who use rpm to
install the software.
* Requires(post,postun): /sbin/install-info
- Why is this needed? This file does not contain any info
files and actually post/postun scriptlets don't use install-info.
- Also is "rm -f %{buildroot}%{_infodir}/dir" in %install
really needed?
* Empty %preun
- Please remove this.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list