[Bug 411471] New: Review Request: WebKitGtk - GTK+ Web Content Engine

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=411471

           Summary: Review Request: WebKitGtk - GTK+ Web Content Engine
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: peter at thecodergeek.com
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com


Spec URL: http://pgordon.fedorapeople.org/for-review/WebKitGtk.spec
SRPM URL: http://pgordon.fedorapeople.org/for-review/WebKitGtk-1.0.0-0.1.svn28383.src.rpm

Description: WebKit is an open source web browser engine. This package contains the GTK+ port.

Note that even though both the Qt and GTK+ ports come from the same source tarball, upstream has advised me that they are not intended to be built together. (Indeed, attempting to do so causes quite catastrophic linking errs due to multiple symbol definitions, etc.)

rpmlint also has some small complaints:

> WebKitGtk-devel.x86_64: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
This is ignorable, as the devel subpackage contains only the DSO symlink, header files, and some other build data (such as a pkgconfig file). 

> WebKitGtk.x86_64: W: no-documentation
> WebKitGtk-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
This is also ignorable. Currently, upstream does not ship anything which would be appropriate documentation. I've filed upstream bug #16300 to inquire about shipping a LICENSE file or similar.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.