[Bug 411881] Package review: sim
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Dec 5 13:46:21 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Package review: sim
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=411881
mmahut at redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO
Flag| |needinfo?(mmaslano at redhat.co
| |m)
------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2007-12-05 08:46 EST -------
Hi Marcela,
+ Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
+ Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec.
+ Package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
+ Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
+ Rpmline output is sane.
+ Buildroot is correct
(%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n))
+ Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. (GPLv2+)
+ Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in
the spec URL. (4bc30577e619e05252d394d51dc20747)
+ Package must own all directories that it creates.
+ Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
+ Permissions on files are set properly.
+ Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}
+ Latest version is packaged.
- Package does not compile in mock.
You forgot to include autoconf and automake as BuildRequires, but also flex.
w/o autotools:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=275886&name=build.log
w/ autoools:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=275917&name=build.log
Please fix these issues and let me know.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list