[Bug 413321] Review Request: inotail - An inotify-enabled tail replacement

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: inotail - An inotify-enabled tail replacement
Alias: inotail

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=413321


panemade at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com  2007-12-06 07:52 EST -------

(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > do we need to care about CFLAGS here?
> 
> Oops, forgot that.
> 
> > man page is not following upstream timestamp.
> > 
> 
> Not sure what you mean by this.  The man page is part of the archive, rpmbuild
> gzips it during install.
> 
 I guess its not needed( only for copying commands in SPEC)  as per said in
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-0239576e441f9ef53d175c4aec8c12868dffb5ab

I see no issues with new SPEC.
rpmlint is clean
source matched upstream
82d4d05f86d6069e95c4b73e4004f15f  inotail-0.5.tar.bz2
Packaging look good.
APPORVED.

Also,
You may like to add disttag.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.