[Bug 239936] Review Request: oyranos - The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS)

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: oyranos - The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS)


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239936





------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com  2007-12-13 10:29 EST -------
@Kai-Uwe Behrmann thx for joining
I would say, I will probably handle this somehow. the mandatory thing will be to
remove from the source archive of oyranos the icc profiles that cannot be
redistributed from the Fedora point of view.
Then I will probably take the "upstream" site of theses profiles to packages
them on a well know third part repository (if the site allow us to redistribute
them).

This may requires some naming rules from the new package (or I could stay with
 	oyranos-LStarRGB-0.4-16.1.noarch.rpm - what if I choose color-icc-LStarRGB for
example?)

I haven't checked which one could be allowed or not, maybe we could have the
compatibleWithAdobeRGB1998.icc but that's all. I wonder if i will split it to
another package (that will be required by oyranos)
Maybe cineon profiles can be allowed, in this case i may provide another package
with color-icc-Cineon

for LStar case - I wonder if we can allow it for Fedora (but not for EPEL) as:
Permission to use, copy, and distribute this profile and its documentation for
any other than commercial purpose (including bundling with products, enhancing a
product´s performance or value)... 

I don't know the status for HeidelbergLicense probably allowed to redistribute
but not Free (to modify, even if it does not make sense - so it will not be
allowed into Fedora).



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.