[Bug 307891] Review Request: libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307891





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-12-18 12:05 EST -------
(In reply to comment #20)
> libtool is in BuildRequires because the build process uses it to build the
> libraries.
  - Really? Your spec file actually does not call libtoolize
    and currently I cannot find where actually libtool is needed.

> This package provides a C++ library and a C library (libvpd_cxx and libvpd
> respectively).  On my system, rpmbuild does not fill out the Provides section so
> when I would install something that depended on either of these I would get
> unsatisfied dependency errors.
  rpmbuild automatically adds
  "Provides: libvpd_cxx-1.4.so.1", which should correctly remove
  the need of writing "Provides: libvpd_cxx", for example.
  If unsatisfied dependency error occurs, then I guess the dependency
  is _actually_ not satisfied (you cannot ignore soversion mismatch,
  for example).
 
> I have not been able to get rpmlint to work on my debian or 
> gentoo systems yet.
  ... Please import Fedora system :)



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.