[Bug 226415] Merge Review: sgml-common

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Dec 19 14:36:22 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: sgml-common


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226415





------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr  2007-12-19 09:36 EST -------
(In reply to comment #16)
> (In reply to comment #15)
> > Anyway looks good now, except that the xml-common url doesn't
> > correspond at all with the xml-common package. This url, however
> > links to some explanations, and ultimately to files in
> > http://www.w3.org/2003/entities/2007/
> 
> Actually I think there is no free completely corresponding url for sgml-common
> and xml-common. Old swiss page with iso 8879 was not 100% correct too, because
> in sgml-common and xml-common is only subset of full set of entities. Anyway - I
> think the best way is to keep it as it is done now - with link to w3.org entities.

For sgml-common, sure, but for xml-common, I think that the best
is not to provide any URL, since there is no url corresponding with
that package. It will inherit the sgml-common url fine in any case.
 
> > Sone of these files are in docbook-dtds. I don't know about others.
> > Should they be shipped somehow?
>
> Which files do you mean? I agree that docbook-dtds corresponds somehow with
> sgml-common/xml-common entities - as both are subsets docbook entities.

All the .ent files at:
http://www.w3.org/2003/entities/2007/


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list