[Bug 426228] Review Request: perl-Class-Inner - A perlish implementation of Java like inner classes
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Dec 20 21:26:03 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Inner - A perlish implementation of Java like inner classes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426228
tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flag| |fedora-review?
------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-12-20 16:26 EST -------
Source URL should probably be http://search.cpan.org/dist/Class-Inner/.
There's usually no reason to put the class name in the summary, since it's
derivable from the package name, but this isn't really a big deal.
I don't see how you came to "GPLv2+ or Artistic 2.0" for the license tag. All
I can see is that the README says "same as Perl", which is GPL+ or Artistic.
This package puts a file in %{perl_vendorlib}/Class but doesn't own it or
depend on anything that owns it.
* source files match upstream:
b4dcb388ac32923adbb9d2a501216a4fe039de4d6a447cc163c110826df81467
Class-Inner-0.1.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
X license field does not match the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text not included upstream.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
perl(Class::Inner) = 0.1
perl-Class-Inner = 0.1-2.fc9
=
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8)
perl(Carp)
perl(strict)
perl(vars)
* %check is present and all tests pass:
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=13, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 cusr + 0.00 csys = 0.01 CPU)
X owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list