[Bug 226540] Merge Review: wireless-tools

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Dec 21 03:48:58 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: wireless-tools


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226540





------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com  2007-12-20 22:48 EST -------
OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
OK - License (GPL+)
OK - License field in spec matches
See below - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
ae81659767bfe58d2c92a07eb453dc64  wireless_tools.29.pre22.tar.gz
ae81659767bfe58d2c92a07eb453dc64  wireless_tools.29.pre22.tar.gz.1
OK - Package needs ExcludeArch
OK - BuildRequires correct
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Package has correct buildroot
OK - Package is code or permissible content.
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install

OK - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage.
OK - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun
OK - .so files in -devel subpackage.
OK - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}

OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. 
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates.
See below - No rpmlint output.
OK - final provides and requires are sane.

SHOULD Items:

OK - Should build in mock.
OK - Should build on all supported archs
OK - Should function as described.
OK - Should have dist tag
See below - Should package latest version
see below - check for outstanding bugs on package.

Issues:

1. NON BLOCKER: might include the COPYING file as a doc?

2. NON BLOCKER: The 29 version is out... perhaps upgrade to that from this pre22
version?

3. rpmlint says:

wireless-tools.src: E: non-utf8-spec-file
/tmp/wireless-tools-29-0.2.pre22.fc9.src.rpm.16740/wireless-tools.spec
wireless-tools.src: E: tag-not-utf8 %changelog

Suggest: run iconv on the spec file to make it UTF8?

wireless-tools.src:42: W: setup-not-quiet

Suggest: add -q to setup line?

wireless-tools.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1:29.0.2.pre22
1:29-0.2.pre22.fc9

Suggest: don't use dist tags in changelog entries.

wireless-tools-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation

Suggest: ignore

wireless-tools-devel.x86_64: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/lib64/libiw.so
/lib64/libiw.so.29

Suggest: should use a relative link? Perhaps this is something wrong in the
makefile patch?

4. 14 outstanding bugs, none of which seem to be at all packageing related.

All these are very minor issues... very clean package.
Would you be willing to make the minor changes for rpmlint?
Or if you like I would be happy to do so for you...


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list