[Bug 426644] Review Request: perl-Math-BaseCnv - Fast functions to CoNVert between number Bases

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Dec 23 18:23:41 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-BaseCnv - Fast functions to CoNVert between number Bases


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426644


panemade at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com  2007-12-23 13:23 EST -------
Review:
+ package builds in mock (development i386).
+ rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM.
+ source files match upstream url
60d5fb31db63e3d7a9807b0df37c4a80  Math-BaseCnv-1.4.75O6Pbr.tgz
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc is present.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no headers or static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no scriptlets present.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ make test outputs
t/00pod.....ok
t/00podc....ok
t/01base....ok
All tests successful.
Files=3, Tests=33,  0 wallclock secs ( 0.22 cusr +  0.04 csys =  0.26 CPU)

+ Package perl-Math-BaseCnv-1.4.75O6Pbr-2.fc9
  Provides: perl(Math::BaseCnv) = 1.4.75

APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list