[Bug 426929] Review Request: tetex-lineno - Add line numbers on paragraphs in LaTeX

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: tetex-lineno - Add line numbers on paragraphs in LaTeX


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426929


tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |tibbs at math.uh.edu
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2007-12-30 01:44 EST -------
This is a really trivial package.  Honestly I don't really like the idea of
using the Fedora review process for a package that will never be used in Fedora,
but I guess after its imported and branched you can just mark the devel branch
as a dead.package so it won't ever make it into a Fedora release.

About the package name: normally I'd say this should be tex-lineno but since
it's EL-4 only I can't see how it really matters.

* source files match upstream:
   95a83f00cbcbf68f7f5f53a6b1675ab45ee7df2d18a273c8a0db8cdaa98cfe5a
   lineno.zip
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text not included upstream.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper (none)
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   tetex-lineno = 4.41-1.fc9
  =
   /usr/bin/texhash
   tetex-latex
* %check is not present, no test suite upstream.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* scriptlets OK (texhash)
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.