[Bug 416761] Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416761





------- Additional Comments From bradbell at seanet.com  2007-12-30 08:40 EST -------
I have gone back over the cppad rpm with the review check list, just to be as
careful as possible before starting the process above. 

Using the techniques I used to check geoqo.spec, I and found a problem.
There are three (special case) files in
    http://www.coin-or.org/CppAD/download/cppad-20071225.gpl.tgz
that had the wrong copyright message (CPL instead of GPL); namely
    makefile.am
    mainfile.in
    omh/license.omh
This problem was only in the short copyright message at the top and does not
affect the output of the license in the documentation.

I can patch the source, but this does not seem like proper procedure to me. I
think it is better to fixed this in the upstream version. Would fixing this in
the upstream source be OK with you ?



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.