[Bug 226038] Merge Review: libpng

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Feb 3 20:48:31 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: libpng


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226038


bdpepple at ameritech.net changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|bdpepple at ameritech.net      |tgl at redhat.com
                 CC|                            |bdpepple at ameritech.net
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review-




------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net  2007-02-03 15:48 EST -------
Good:
* Source URL in canonical.
* Group Tag is from official list.
* All paths begin with macros
* All directories are owned by this or other packages

Must Fix:
* rpmlint errors:
 E: libpng useless-explicit-provides libpng.so.3
 E: libpng tag-not-utf8 %changelog

Minor:
* Not preferred build root.
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
* Drop the '.' from the devel summary to quite rpmlint.

Is it still true that some graphical boot packages need the static lib?  And if
so, does it make sense to make a sub-package for the static lib?



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list