[Bug 225618] Merge Review: bitstream-vera-fonts
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Feb 4 02:58:08 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: bitstream-vera-fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225618
roozbeh at farsiweb.info changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |besfahbo at redhat.com
Flag| |fedora-review-
------- Additional Comments From roozbeh at farsiweb.info 2007-02-03 21:58 EST -------
Generlly fine. Partial review:
* Consider using %{?dist} in Release (mostly useful for upgrades, as different
distro versions tend to need to have different scriptlets always).
* rpmlint output:
E: bitstream-vera-fonts description-line-too-long the licensing FAQ in
/usr/share/doc/bitstream-vera-fonts-1.10/COPYRIGHT.TXT or the
W: bitstream-vera-fonts invalid-license Redistributable, with restrictions
Both should be fixed.
* Use "-p" option to install in %install
* This:
%dir %{fontdir}
%{fontdir}/*.ttf
could be replaced with this:
%{fontdir}
* Uses /usr/share/fonts without owning it or depending on a package that does
(fontconfig).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list