[Bug 226638] Merge Review: xorg-x11-filesystem
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Feb 4 15:38:12 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-filesystem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226638
fedora at leemhuis.info changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|fedora at leemhuis.info |ajackson at redhat.com
CC| |fedora at leemhuis.info
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review-
------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2007-02-04 10:38 EST -------
* I'm a bit unsure about this package in general -- is it really still needed?
FC5 has modular X already, and we don't support from older releases anymore
iirc. RHEL5 should have this package, too, and RHEL6 probably should not need it
anymore, too.
* why doesn't this package simply own some of the other important directorys
like /usr/lib/xorg/modules/
* Stuff like "cat > "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/${UPGRADE_CMD}" <<'EOF'" is disliked; it
should live in a separate file that it included as source
* Quoting the spec
{{{
# NOTE: Do not replace these with _libdir or _includedir macros, they are
# intentionally explicit.
}}}
Nice, the comment helps -- but it would help more if the reason why its
"intentionally explicit" would be mentioned ;-) Ohh, it's explained later in the
spec; Not importatn, but maybe mention in once at the top of the spec file
properly might be the best
* rpmlint:
rpmlint on ./xorg-x11-filesystem-7.1-2.fc7.noarch.rpm
W: xorg-x11-filesystem incoherent-version-in-changelog 7.1-2.fc6 7.1-2.fc7
-> simply avoid mention the disttag in the changelog
W: xorg-x11-filesystem invalid-license MIT/X11
-> Would be MIT, but what actualy is licenced under MIT/X11 ?
W: xorg-x11-filesystem no-documentation
-> acceptable
E: xorg-x11-filesystem standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/lib/X11
-> owned by package "filesystem", so not needed
W: xorg-x11-filesystem dangerous-command-in-%pre rm
rpmlint on ./xorg-x11-filesystem-7.1-2.fc7.src.rpm
W: xorg-x11-filesystem invalid-license MIT/X11
-> see above
E: xorg-x11-filesystem hardcoded-library-path in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/lib/X11"
E: xorg-x11-filesystem hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/X11
E: xorg-x11-filesystem hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/X11
E: xorg-x11-filesystem hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/X11
E: xorg-x11-filesystem hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/X11
E: xorg-x11-filesystem hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/X11
-> accpetable in this case
W: xorg-x11-filesystem no-%build-section
-> accpetable in this case
Stopping reviewing here for now until it becomes clear this is still needed
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list