[Bug 225635] Merge Review: cairo

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Feb 5 15:42:21 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: cairo


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225635





------- Additional Comments From besfahbo at redhat.com  2007-02-05 10:42 EST -------
now you are being a bit too picky.  I'm going to remove the Obsoletes, but here
are the answers anyway:

(In reply to comment #5)
> What is the intended user experience here?
> * What should happen if a user has libpixman and old cairo installed and then
>   tries to update his box to a repository that contains the present version of
>   cairo?

libpixman removed, as is apparently what happens.

> * What should happen if he only has libpixman and tries to install cairo from
>   the same repository?

"Don't care".  Removed.

> * What should happen if a user has a new cairo and then tries to install a
>   libpixman RPM (using a .rpm file he found somewhere that was copied from
>   rawhide once)?

"Don't care".  Conflict.

> Having answers for these three cases will help finding the best settings for the
> Obsoletes lines.

I only can think of two settings: keep them or remove them.  Removing  defeats
the purpose of what it was there for: to clean up an unneeded package.  Keeping
them does just that.  There's nothing special here as the only package that
evern depended on libpixman was cairo.

But as I said, I'll remove them anyway.  (the situation is similar to pango
obsoleting pango-gtkbeta and fribidi-gtkbeta).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list