[Bug 225635] Merge Review: cairo
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Feb 5 15:42:21 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: cairo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225635
------- Additional Comments From besfahbo at redhat.com 2007-02-05 10:42 EST -------
now you are being a bit too picky. I'm going to remove the Obsoletes, but here
are the answers anyway:
(In reply to comment #5)
> What is the intended user experience here?
> * What should happen if a user has libpixman and old cairo installed and then
> tries to update his box to a repository that contains the present version of
> cairo?
libpixman removed, as is apparently what happens.
> * What should happen if he only has libpixman and tries to install cairo from
> the same repository?
"Don't care". Removed.
> * What should happen if a user has a new cairo and then tries to install a
> libpixman RPM (using a .rpm file he found somewhere that was copied from
> rawhide once)?
"Don't care". Conflict.
> Having answers for these three cases will help finding the best settings for the
> Obsoletes lines.
I only can think of two settings: keep them or remove them. Removing defeats
the purpose of what it was there for: to clean up an unneeded package. Keeping
them does just that. There's nothing special here as the only package that
evern depended on libpixman was cairo.
But as I said, I'll remove them anyway. (the situation is similar to pango
obsoleting pango-gtkbeta and fribidi-gtkbeta).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list