[Bug 226295] Merge Review: php-pear

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Feb 5 19:02:03 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: php-pear
Alias: php-pear

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226295





------- Additional Comments From jorton at redhat.com  2007-02-05 14:02 EST -------
Thanks for the review!

Fixed in -4:
- upstream do not provide a permanent archive URL for each version of the .phar
installer, so there is no URL to provide (yes, I know this sucks).  I'll add a 
comment to this effect
- bogus Group
- pear.conf marked noreplace; /etc/rpm/macros.* should never be noreplace (and
that should be documented by standard not per spec file)

Won't fix:
- passing -q to %setup has no effect when -T is also used
- providing an noop %build adds no value
- no idea what the issue with $RPM_SOURCE_DIR is, this has been used in spec
files forever
- the patches are applied using %{PATCHn} syntax
- the license specified in every PEAR class file is indeed v3 not v2.02.  There
is no accepted policy for the License tag in Fedora yet; there is no point
tweaking this on a whim until there is, rpmlint is not definitive on that front

Again, the upgrade to the latest upstream is not relevant to the review of the
current packaging and need not block the review process.  Of course the
packaging may change with each new upstream releases, that is always going to be
true.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list