[Bug 226295] Merge Review: php-pear

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Feb 6 18:06:56 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: php-pear
Alias: php-pear

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226295


jorton at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rpm at timj.co.uk




------- Additional Comments From jorton at redhat.com  2007-02-06 13:06 EST -------
I can't follow most of that.  The PEAR class *is* the PEAR installer: they are
one and the same thing.  All the PHP tarball does to "install PEAR" is to run a
.phar exactly like php-pear.spec does.

The only .phar available is 1.5.0RC2, and the .tgz for PEAR seems to call itself
1.5.0RC3 in the package.xml - CC added for timj; Tim, are you in a position to
fix this upstream?

php-pear.spec seems to work fine with zero lines of packaging changes with that
installer anyway, so what is the big deal with the upgrade?  The non-CLI
Frontends should be packaged separately from php-pear; I don't see how that is
relevant.

I have no philosophical objection to moving the PEAR packages bundled with the
.phar into subpackages, I'm just not convinced it's technically worth it;
XML_RPC at least probably is.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list