[Bug 226295] Merge Review: php-pear

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Feb 6 23:20:06 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: php-pear
Alias: php-pear

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226295





------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk  2007-02-06 18:20 EST -------
I'm happy to spend the time getting the PLD method working (including splitting
off Archive_Tar, XML_RPC and Console_Getopt) in Fedora style, but only if we can
jointly agree in principle that that's a good thing, and I know Joe was against
it before, which is why we need to discuss that. There is an interesting
circular dependency there too (PEAR <-> Archive_Tar) which could be fun with mock.

I can't readily see how php-pear and php-pear-PEAR could/would be separated, or
what that would mean. Remember too (further to my earlier comments) that the
"PEAR installer" isn't just the CLI frontend: it's also a PHP library backend
for integration with other software - calls direct to the installer's back-end
API *are* used by other packages (for example PEAR_Command_Packaging, or the
not-yet-RPM-packaged s9y).
That said, the current php-pear package does Provide php-pear(PEAR), so if such
a thing did become meaningful in future, we already have the mechanism to do it
in a reasonably BC way.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list