[Bug 226351] Merge Review: qt

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Feb 7 17:34:56 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: qt


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226351


rdieter at math.unl.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |NEEDINFO
               Flag|fedora-review?              |needinfo?(than at redhat.com),
                   |                            |fedora-review-




------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu  2007-02-07 12:34 EST -------
Guidelines-wise, looks good, only a few relatively small SHOULD (optional) items
to consider:

* icons.  SHOULD try to follow icon-spec here, and put items in/under
%_datadir/icons/hicolor/ somewhere instead of using %_datadir/pixmaps

* .desktop files: using namespace/vendor of qt-* *and* using '3' appended to
.desktop file names is redundant.  Consider removing the '3' from the .desktop
file names.

* consider changing qtdir from %{_libdir}/qt-3.3 to just %_libdir/qt3.  It would
then be consistent with qt4 packaging.  This is a big change that may induce
pain in other packages that currently hard-code the old location, so it may not
be worth it.

* -devel-docs subpkg SHOULD:
  1. should simply be -doc (corrolary: and have no dependency on -devel)
  2. assistant should be included here.

* SHOULD avoid some of the multilib ickiness, and necessity to use
/etc/ld.so.conf.d/qt*, by simply using
./configure -libdir %{_libdir}
ie, putting qt's libs into %_libdir directly.

qt4 has been using these latter 2 items with success.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list