[Bug 226513] Merge Review: units

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: units


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226513


kevin at tummy.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|kevin at tummy.com             |harald at redhat.com
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review-




------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com  2007-02-07 23:27 EST -------
OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
OK - License (GPL)
OK - License field in spec matches
See below - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
e27f580474702e9138b332acbafafe5b  units-1.86.tar.gz
e27f580474702e9138b332acbafafe5b  units-1.86.tar.gz.1
See below - BuildRequires correct
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
See below - Package has correct buildroot
OK - Package is code or permissible content.
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.

OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates.
See below - No rpmlint output.
OK - final provides and requires are sane:

SHOULD Items:

OK - Should build in mock.
OK - Should build on all supported archs
OK - Should function as described.
OK - Should have dist tag
OK - Should package latest version
0 outstanding bugs - check for outstanding bugs on package.

Issues:

1. Might include in %doc:
ChangeLog COPYING NEWS README

2. Buildroot should be the default one:
      %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)

3. rpmlint says:
rpmlint on units-1.86-3.fc7.src.rpm
W: units summary-ended-with-dot A utility for converting amounts from one unit
to another.

Suggest: remove . at the end of summary.

W: units no-url-tag

Suggest: add a "URL: http://www.gnu.org/software/units/units.html"

W: units prereq-use /sbin/install-info

Suggest: remove the "Prereq: /sbin/install-info" and replace per
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-47896da5fb2662d75deefeb9ba75145a398515db
with
Requires(post): /sbin/install-info
Requires(preun): /sbin/install-info

4. Don't use %makeinstall, instead use 'make DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT install'
per
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/MakeInstall

5. Possible missing Buildrequires?

checking for sin... no
checking for tparm in -lncurses... no
checking for tgetent in -ltermcap... no
checking for readline in -lreadline... no

Once you have addressed these items (either by making the suggested changes, or
by explaining why they don't make sense), please reassign this review back 
to me, and change the 'fedora-review' flag back to ? for me to take action. 

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.