[Bug 226436] Merge Review: statserial

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Feb 9 12:23:21 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: statserial


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226436


wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro    |twaugh at redhat.com
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro  2007-02-09 07:23 EST -------
Formal review for release 39:

MUST
- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- license ( GPL ) OK, text in %doc, matches source
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream, sha1sum 3ace36585c82238003b37f267263f06aad4f0afd 
statserial-1.1.tar.gz
- package compiles on devel (x86_64)
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all files/directories that it creates, does not take ownership of foreign
files/folders
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file 
- no static, .la, .pc files
- rpmlint is silent on src.rpm; for the binary the following warnings are generated:
W: statserial spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/statserial-1.1/phone_log
W: statserial doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/statserial-1.1/phone_log /bin/bash
Since phone_log IS a bash script and bash is supposed to be already installed
anyway, no additional packages are actually pulled so I guess both warnings can
safely be ignored.

SHOULD
- Builds fine in mock for FC6 and devel (x86_64)
- Runs as advertised on FC6/x86_64

Notes:
I have no access to 390 so I can only assume that the hardware being different,
the ExcludeArch is justified.


APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list