[Bug 195647] Review Request: redland

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: redland


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195647





------- Additional Comments From thomas at apestaart.org  2007-02-09 07:40 EST -------
Thanks for reviewing!

Wrt. your issues:

1) Any LGPL package is always allowed to be used under the GPL - this is a
standard "feature" of the LGPL.  As such I don't think it's necessary to add it
to the license field, since I don't see any other LGPL package doing that.  What
do you think ?

2) yep, will add that

4) will file that bug now.

5) IMO this is up to upstream if this should be changed.  I don't necessarily
feel it should - the headers seem to be namespaced with rdf_ - but in any case I
don't think packagers should make changes like this if they are not strictly
necessary because it creates problems for developers.  What do you think ?

I will push a new package when we resolve 1) and 5)

Thanks
Thomas


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.