[Bug 225882] Merge Review: hdparm

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Feb 10 21:46:24 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: hdparm


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225882


wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro    |karsten at redhat.com
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro  2007-02-10 16:46 EST -------
MUST:
- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- license (BSD) OK, text in %doc, matches source
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream
- package compiles on devel (x86_64)
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all files/directories that it creates, does not take ownership of foreign
files/dirs
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file 
- just a small binary, no static, .la, .pc etc
- no scriptlets

SHOULD
- builds in mock
- runs as advertised

The only caveat I see is that, despite being passed RPM_BUILD_OPT in %build, it
also takes looooots of compile parameters from the Makefile. All seem sane
however, and are not very important since it's not an application from which to
squeeze each ounce of performance.

APPROVED



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list