[Bug 197445] Review Request: fuse-convmvfs

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: fuse-convmvfs


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197445


mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-02-12 09:29 EST -------
Well, 
(In reply to comment #10)
> SRPM URL:
> ftp://ftp.fedora.cn/pub/fedora-cn/in-review/fuse-convmvfs-0.2.3-1.fc6.src.rpm

* Documentation
  - Please add more documents
-------------------------------------------
AUTHORS
NEWS
-------------------------------------------
  - "INSTALL" is not needed because this is needed when trying
    to install by themselves.

* URL
  Which URL is preferable, 
  http://sourceforge.net/projects/fuse-convmvfs/
  or http://fuse-convmvfs.sourceforge.net/ ?

Then, for your pre-review of 226795
- Well, this package seems somewhat special. For compiler package,
  the files, which usually should be in -devel package for other
  cases, are allowed to (and quite often, should) be in main
  package.
  But other pre-reviews seems good.


Okay..
----------------------------------------------------
  This package (fuse-convmvfs) is APPROVED by me.
----------------------------------------------------

Please follow the procedure of
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors .
During the procedure, I will receive a mail which tells that
you need a sponsor and the I will sponsor you.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.