[Bug 227070] Review Request: jflex-1.3.5-2jpp - Fast Scanner Generator
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Feb 13 16:20:37 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: jflex-1.3.5-2jpp - Fast Scanner Generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227070
mwringe at redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|mwringe at redhat.com |pcheung at redhat.com
------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-02-13 11:20 EST -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> ...
> X correct buildroot
> - should be:
> %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
done
> * if %{?dist} is used, it should be in that form (note the ? and %
> locations)
> X license text included in package and marked with %doc
> COPYRIGHT missing from %doc
done
> ...
> X specfile is legible
> - Get rid of Vendor and Distribution tag
done
> - Source0 should be: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/jflex/jflex-1.3.5.tar.gz
done
> - Fix release 2jpp.1%{?dist}
done
> ...
> X make sure lines are <= 80 characters
> line 89 is longer than 80 characters
done
>...
> * run rpmlint on the binary RPMs
> W: jflex non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java
> W: jflex wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/jflex-1.3.5/COPYRIGHT
> W: jflex uncompressed-zip /usr/share/java/jflex-1.3.5.jar
> W: jflex-javadoc non-standard-group Development/Documentation
> W: jflex-javadoc dangerous-command-in-%post rm
> W: jflex-javadoc dangerous-command-in-%postun rm
No warnings or errors other than about groups (which can be safely ignored)
New spec file can be found here:
https://mwringe.108.redhat.com/files/documents/175/209/jflex.spec
New srpm can be found here:
https://mwringe.108.redhat.com/files/documents/175/210/jflex-1.3.5-2jpp.1.fc7.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list