[Bug 227075] Review Request: jtidy-1.0-0.20000804r7dev.6jpp - HTML syntax checker and pretty printer

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: jtidy-1.0-0.20000804r7dev.6jpp - HTML syntax checker and pretty printer


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227075





------- Additional Comments From fnasser at redhat.com  2007-02-13 11:22 EST -------
I am not sure what is the better course of action w.r.t. the pre-release for
these dated packages that were in the previous format (all others get the right
rpm ordering, but the YYYYMMDD is a really big number, and for some reason
Fedora decided that svn and cvs come _after_ the number).

We have basically two choices:

1) Change the format now to the new one and... raise Epoch!

2) Let it be a little longer with the current date in the hopes a release will
be issued.

Also, I have my doubts about the way the source tar ball is named.  This date
seems to be the indication of a branch creation date, the release being actually
the characters that come after it.  I am sending an e-mail to the authors to get
that straighten up before we have to do two Epoch bumpings.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.