[Bug 227079] Review Request: maven2-common-poms-1.0-3jpp - Common poms for maven2
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Feb 13 20:10:45 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: maven2-common-poms-1.0-3jpp - Common poms for maven2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227079
overholt at redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|overholt at redhat.com |dbhole at redhat.com
------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-02-13 15:10 EST -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> X verify source and patches
> . we really need to host the source tarball somewhere other than just in the
> SRPM. Even just on your people page is fine. The XML file as well.
The md5sums now match.
X Please change the Source0 line to the full URL
> X skim the summary and description for typos, etc.
> . "maven2 dependent" -> "maven2-dependent"
Verified, thanks.
> X license text included in package and marked with %doc
> . since you're maintaining the source, can you include the ASL text?
Can we do this?
> X BuildRequires are proper
> . why the Requires(postun) on jpackage-utils? There's no %postun.
Verified.
> X package should include license text in the package and mark it with %doc
This is the only thing remaining.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list