[Bug 227041] Review Request: bea-stax-1.2.0-0.rc1.2jpp - Streaming API for XML

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Feb 14 04:34:25 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: bea-stax-1.2.0-0.rc1.2jpp - Streaming API for XML


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227041


vivekl at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|vivekl at redhat.com           |mwringe at redhat.com
               Flag|fedora-review-              |fedora-review?




------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com  2007-02-13 23:34 EST -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> rpmlint bea-stax-1.2.0-0.rc1.2jpp.src.rpm:
> W: bea-stax non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java
Group warnings ignored
Ignore

> W: bea-stax invalid-license Apache Software License 2
Fixed

> W: bea-stax mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 9, tab: line 51)
Fixed

> 
> rpmlint rpms:
> W: bea-stax non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java
Group warnings ignored
> W: bea-stax invalid-license Apache Software License 2
fixed reverted to ASL
> W: bea-stax no-documentation
> W: bea-stax-api summary-ended-with-dot The StAX API.
> W: bea-stax-api non-standard-group Development/Documentation
> W: bea-stax-api no-documentation

> W: bea-stax-javadoc dangerous-command-in-%post rm
> W: bea-stax-javadoc dangerous-command-in-%postun rm
Fixed by removing post postun magic for javadoc handling and adding a proper
owned unversioned directory

>    http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#PackageRelease
> X    - release tag does not follow guidelines
> X    - all jpp packages need to have %{?dist} added at the end
Fixed - 0:1.2.0-0.1.rc1.2jpp.1%{?dist} now
> X not a proper license tag, remove the '2'
Done

> 
> * specfile name matches %{name}
> * verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do)
> 
>  X source md5sums match, but project is no longer on project website
>    should probably change source link to the following, where the package still
>  exists
>    http://dist.codehaus.org/stax/distributions/stax-src-1.2.0_rc1-dev.zip  
Done, thanks for the URL

>  X buildroot does not follow fedora guidelines
>  - should be:
>    %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
Done

> X dist not used, but needs to be added since jpp package
> 
> * license text included in package and marked with %doc
> X license test not included in package
Fixed, added ASF2.0.txt from the source tar ball

> * Packager tag should not be used
> X this should be removed
> 
> * Vendor tag should not be used
> X this should be removed
Fixed
> X too many commented lines
Fixed.
> 
> * package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86
> * BuildRequires are proper
>  X missing build requires. This package is at very least missing ant
Package builds on mock so I assume this is fixed :)

Package available at:
http://tequila-sunrise.ath.cx/rpmreviews/F7/bea-stax/bea-stax-1.2.0-0.1.rc1.2jpp.1.fc7.src.rpm

Spec:
http://tequila-sunrise.ath.cx/rpmreviews/F7/bea-stax/bea-stax.spec


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list